From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 00:21:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] New: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kairo at kairo.eti.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/procbench/procbench.spec SRPM URL: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/procbench/procbench-0.8.2a-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Procbench is a multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 processors. It tests memory transfer and math capabilities of your x86 processor. It includes programs (pb_g++ and pb_gcc) to get the best GCC optimisation parameters for a CPU. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 00:22:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010022.m710MrQv013902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 kairo at kairo.eti.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: procbench - |Review Request: procbench - |Multiplatform information |Multiplatform information |tool and CPU benchmark for |tool and CPU benchmark for |x86 procs |x86 procs ------- Additional Comments From kairo at kairo.eti.br 2008-07-31 20:22 EST ------- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/procbench.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/kairo/rpmbuild/SRPMS/procbench-0.8.2a-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/kairo/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/procbench-0.8.2a-1.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/kairo/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/procbench-debuginfo-0.8.2a-1.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010146.m711kXQi028175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:46 EST ------- gambit-c-4.2.8-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010146.m711keph028250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:46 EST ------- php-pear-Net-DNS-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010146.m711ka75028215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |4.2.8-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456517] Review Request: fotoxx - Photo editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711lXLR026272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotoxx - Photo editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456517 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:47 EST ------- fotoxx-4.9-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456517] Review Request: fotoxx - Photo editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711liXj026310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotoxx - Photo editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456517 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:47 EST ------- fotoxx-4.9-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711lSOH026237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:47 EST ------- gambit-c-4.2.8-6.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:49:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010149.m711n5MV026502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:49 EST ------- typespeed-0.6.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010149.m711nLsA026593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:49 EST ------- typespeed-0.6.4-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010149.m711nQ5K026627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:49 EST ------- php-pear-Net-IPv4-1.3.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448204] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010146.m711kgBS026007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DNS - Resolver library used to communicate with a DNS server Alias: pear-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448204 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711l8Bo026123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.3.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450054] Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010148.m711mO53026433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:48 EST ------- liblinebreak-0.9.6-0.4.20080421cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update liblinebreak'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711l6Db028521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:47 EST ------- immix-1.3.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711lvdY028769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:47 EST ------- immix-1.3.2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456022] Review Request: fotowall - Photo collection creativity tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711lpdW028702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotowall - Photo collection creativity tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456022 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:47 EST ------- fotowall-0.21-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456517] Review Request: fotoxx - Photo editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711lZds028636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotoxx - Photo editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456517 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |4.9-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448205] Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010149.m711nS7s029205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-IPv4 - IPv4 network calculations and validation Alias: pear-Net-IPv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448205 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:47:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456022] Review Request: fotowall - Photo collection creativity tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010147.m711lruE028737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotowall - Photo collection creativity tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456022 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.21-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447639] Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010149.m711n7kg029130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: typespeed - Test your typing speed and get your fingers' CPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447639 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.6.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448874] Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010148.m711mv9M029037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyroom - PyRoom is a full screen text editor and a clone of Writeroom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448874 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:48 EST ------- pyroom-0.2.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyroom'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 01:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359921] Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010150.m711o4ed027142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-07-31 21:50 EST ------- drupal-cck-6.x.2.0-2.rc4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update drupal-cck'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 04:14:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456972] Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010414.m714Eblx017099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456972 ------- Additional Comments From sflaniga at redhat.com 2008-08-01 00:14 EST ------- I'm beginning to think that this little optimisation/hack in my spec file might be a problem: ---------------------- # Disable repacking of jars, since it takes forever for all the little jars, # and we don't need multilib anyway: %define __jar_repack %{nil} ---------------------- since it looks to me as if eclipse 3.4 is doing away with noarch support (replacing %{_datadir}/eclipse/ with %{_libdir}/eclipse/). I don't really understand why we repack jars, except that it's something to do with multilib support. I was hoping to avoid repacking 8,962 (really!) jars by making eclipse-nls noarch. Do I need to make eclipse-nls multi-arch? And does anyone know if we really need to be repacking jars in that case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 04:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456972] Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010424.m714OjL7020802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456972 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-08-01 00:24 EST ------- > since it looks to me as if eclipse 3.4 is doing away with noarch support > (replacing %{_datadir}/eclipse/ with %{_libdir}/eclipse/). I think we need %{_datadir}/eclipse/. Andrew? > Do I need to make eclipse-nls multi-arch? And does anyone know if we really > need to be repacking jars in that case? It should be noarch, surely, but may still need to repack jar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 05:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010512.m715CAYv027635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-08-01 01:12 EST ------- Mock Build files and logs: SRPMS: FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMS: FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Logs: FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/build-fc7.log FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/build-fc8.log FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/build-fc9.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 06:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457232] Package Change Request : Pem-0.7.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010628.m716SYCd005561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Change Request : Pem-0.7.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457232 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-08-01 02:28 EST ------- Hey thanks Kevin :) How do I checkout this branch? I tried `$ cvs up' in my local pem directory, but didn't get the EL-4 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 06:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 02:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456972] Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010627.m716R4RH005483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456972 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-08-01 02:27 EST ------- Sean pointed out that this is discussed in: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2008-June/msg00031.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 07:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010710.m717Abco008572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-08-01 03:10 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Auth-OpenID Short Description: PHP OpenID Owners: athimm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 07:44:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010744.m717ihRf013222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |giallu at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2008-08-01 03:44 EST ------- Ok, I think it's time to get this into Fedora, let's see if I can carve some time for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 07:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 03:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] New: Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 Summary: Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This module provides the STDOUT, STDERR and exit codes of asynchronously running processes via events. It may be used for long running or blocking processes that provide periodic updates on state via STDOUT. Simple IPC is possible via STDIN. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 08:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456955] Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010817.m718Hj6m022271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at krishnan.cc 2008-08-01 04:17 EST ------- Sure. I will send you an email shortly at the hexago.nl address. -Rajesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 08:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010836.m718aGsu025499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 aage at thaumaturge.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge.o| |rg) | ------- Additional Comments From aage at thaumaturge.org 2008-08-01 04:36 EST ------- I'm sorry, i've been on a short vacation. Will ship a new one out by this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 08:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/scim-thai/scim-thai.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/scim-thai/scim-thai-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Thai Input Method Engine for SCIM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 09:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010900.m7190Krm029387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-08-01 05:00 EST ------- Hi Jess, hi Gianluca, I'd really love to see syck back maintained and supporting YAML 1.1 or even 1.2 (http://code.google.com/p/yaml-cpp/ does it); as far as I can judge from the alternatives' code basis, libyaml seems to be most suitable for extension as it clearly follows formal grammar / parser theory patterns (BNF tokens etc.) but maybe I'm just wrong here and underestimating syck. Fedora's php-syck still seems to come from the original syck tarball instead of php-pecl-syck, thus being utterly obsoleted. I'll file a bug report here right away. Actually the file permissions issue is a classic amongst developers working in heterogeneous environments as soon as the Redmond OS is involved. Btw. you can also use -perm /111 to get u+x,g+x,o+x. Hey, collaboration is what keeps the community alive and Free Software is what makes us able to help our neighbor :) Gianluca: Great! I know we're all busy and really appreciate your commitment here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 09:28:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010928.m719Sq2r030556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-08-01 05:28 EST ------- formal review is here, please read the notes bellow OK source files match upstream: e827ada394aff91f9c539cee35e946e81152426c arpd-0.2.tar.gz 342cc53e8d23c84ecb91c7b66c6e93e7ed2a992a honeyd-1.5c.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. BAD dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. BAD license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. BAD compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. BAD package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). ?? debuginfo package looks complete. ?? rpmlint is silent. ?? final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - you should standardize on using one of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - you should add the %dist tag - arpd is licensed under BSD, so the right license tag is "GPLv2+ and BSD" - missing BR: readline-devel, zlib-devel - aprd doesn't build on 64-bit platforms (it checks for libevent and libpcap only in ${prefix}/lib and checks for static lib only) - CFLAGS are reset to "" in configure.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 09:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454921] Review Request: python-dotconf - Parser for dot.conf file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010939.m719dW9K032193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dotconf - Parser for dot.conf file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454921 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-08-01 05:39 EST ------- Thank you for the CVS creation and the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 09:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] New: Package review: perl-Padre Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Summary: Package review: perl-Padre Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The application maintains its configuration information in a directory called .padre http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 09:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Package review: perl-Padre In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010949.m719nqZV001468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: perl-Padre https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-08-01 05:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=313173) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313173&action=view) Warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 09:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Package review: perl-Padre In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808010948.m719mrFH001409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: perl-Padre https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-08-01 05:48 EST ------- I can't pass test and the same problem appears after installation. The application is running as I can say, but it should be removed before adding into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 10:19:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011019.m71AJkvs006114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-08-01 06:19 EST ------- My patches have been merged upstream (actually a modified version) Please add libtool-ltdl-devel BR on the next sox release (This is the default option on debian for some time already) Pkg-config support will requires to add Requires: pkgconfig on sox-devel The next release will create a play and record symlinks to sox. We will need to take care of them via alternatives and ask on fedora-devel ml for a potential conflict between command line audio player and recorder with suches symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 10:35:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011035.m71AZkbo011088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lkundrak at v3.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at v3.sk 2008-08-01 06:35 EST ------- Thanks for the package -- it seems very well. Filelists, provides and requires are sane; SPEC file is clean and legible. APPROVED Note: The src.rpms linked to above are either outdated or truncated, I tested the the new SPEC file with source from older SRPM. Please ensure that you use the right SPEC file when importing. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 10:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011042.m71Agbsc012127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-08-01 06:42 EST ------- Looks like someone broke rawhide :( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=752263&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 11:09:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:09:00 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_455032=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl5000-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_5000_A/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?/N_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011109.m71B90sq013314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl5000-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-08-01 07:08 EST ------- iwl5000-firmware-5.4.A.11-2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 11:16:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011116.m71BGiQS017072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 ------- Additional Comments From paul.goessinger at gmx.de 2008-08-01 07:16 EST ------- Yes, this an orphaned package, I just took the F8 srpm and patched the spec file to build under F9. I would like to maintain the package (as soon as I get sponsored) Yes the release tag was wrong, since its the first build on F9 its actually 1 so the new package is here: http://goessinger.eu/fedora/aget/aget.spec http://goessinger.eu/fedora/aget/aget-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm any comments are welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 11:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457232] Package Change Request : Pem-0.7.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011144.m71Bi13H019068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Change Request : Pem-0.7.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457232 ------- Additional Comments From pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in 2008-08-01 07:44 EST ------- Hi, don't bother, I did get it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 11:58:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] New: Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 Summary: Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mvaliyav at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/myanmar3-unicode-fonts-2008801-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Myanmar3 unicode font from Myanmar Unicode & NLP Research Center -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 12:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011206.m71C6RAb025735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 ------- Additional Comments From paul.goessinger at gmx.de 2008-08-01 08:06 EST ------- Ok, sry, you are right, release number is 4. http://goessinger.eu/fedora/aget/aget.spec http://goessinger.eu/fedora/aget/aget-0.4-4.fc9.src.rpm Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011303.m71D3wsp000352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |457543 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011303.m71D3x43000372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |457544 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-Net-Ping-External.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-Net-Ping-External-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Net::Ping::External is a module which interfaces with the "ping" command on many systems. It presently provides a single function, ping(), that takes in a hostname and (optionally) a timeout and returns true if the host is alive, and false otherwise. Unless you have the ability (and willingness) to run your scripts as the superuser on your system, this module will probably provide more accurate results than Net::Ping will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] New: Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-IPTables-ChainMgr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-IPTables-ChainMgr-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The IPTables::ChainMgr package provides an interface to manipulate iptables policies on Linux systems through the direct execution of iptables commands. Although making a perl extension of libiptc provided by the iptables project is possible, it is easy to just execute iptables commands directly in order to both parse and change the configuration of the policy. Further, this simplifies installation since the only external requirement is (in the spirit of scripting) to be able to point IPTables::ChainMgr at an installed iptables binary instead of having to compile against a library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:02:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] New: Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-IPTables-Parse.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-IPTables-Parse-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The IPTables::Parse package provides an interface to parse iptables rules on Linux systems through the direct execution of iptables commands, or from parsing a file that contains an iptables policy listing. You can get the current policy applied to a table/chain, look for a specific user-defined chain, check for a default DROP policy, or determing whether or not logging rules exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] New: Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-Net-RawIP.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/perl-Net-RawIP-0.23-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package provides a class object which can be used for creating, manipulating and sending raw ip packets with optional features for manipulating ethernet headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:29:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] New: Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 Summary: Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/mediascrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/mediascrapper-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A script to scrap media files from different sites -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 13:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011357.m71DvKHf009771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 ------- Additional Comments From jesusfreak91 at gmail.com 2008-08-01 09:57 EST ------- Added utf-8 character support. new srpm url: http://jesusfreak91.googlepages.com/transbot-0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 14:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011413.m71EDGgE014403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms at iinet.net.au 2008-08-01 10:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Oops. I noticed that I am ending up placing two desktop items in the Audio Video > submenu, one without an icon. New spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack.spec New .src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack-0.2.0-0.2.fc9.src.rpm - exclude the upstream .desktop file, in favour of fedora one. 2. A request was made from planetccrma users to add two additional categories to the .desktop file: # desktop file categories BASE="X-Fedora Application AudioVideo" XTRA="X-Digital_Processing X-Jack" These put the audio processing tools into a separate single menu. I am happy to do that if the packaging guidelines don't block me from doing so {which my reading suggests not to make new categories}. However, there are a lot of related audio tools that audio experimenters will find useful to be accessible from the same menu. Any thoughts on whether this is allowed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 14:35:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457561] New: Review Request: pthsem - The GNU Portable Threads library extended with semaphore support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457561 Summary: Review Request: pthsem - The GNU Portable Threads library extended with semaphore support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://helena.bawue.de/~ixs/pthsem/pthsem.spec SRPM URL: http://helena.bawue.de/~ixs/pthsem/pthsem-2.0.7-1.src.rpm Description: Pth is a very portable POSIX/ANSI-C based library for Unix platforms which provides non-preemptive priority-based scheduling for multiple threads of execution ("multithreading") inside server applications. All threads run in the same address space of the server application, but each thread has it's own individual program-counter, run-time stack, signal mask and errno variable. pthsem is an extend version, with support for semaphores added. It can be installed parallel to a normal pth. The header file is called pthsem.h, the configuration program pthsem-config and the autoconf macro AC_CHECK_PTHSEM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011505.m71F51iQ021797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-08-01 11:05 EST ------- Note the new upstream release is just done and may take a few minutes to appear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011504.m71F4Tr0023154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-08-01 11:04 EST ------- http://cdn.verbum.org/hotssh.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/hotssh-0.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011512.m71FCimC023659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-08-01 11:12 EST ------- last ping before closing as dead-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011534.m71FYlr2027337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-08-01 11:34 EST ------- OK, sha2sum matches upstream now (b4d9fa4e553dfe95e919c76dd2c1ec9baae796a9). Builds fine in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=752912 rpmlint output: ------ hotssh.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/hotssh.csh hotssh.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/hotssh.sh ------ As already stated safe to ignore. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011542.m71FgaRe029044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |457502 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454166] Review Request: griv - a gtk rivchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011551.m71FpCmk031374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: griv - a gtk rivchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454166 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 11:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 15:57:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011557.m71Fv16f031637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 11:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011603.m71G3MKw001242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 12:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011606.m71G62Eb001857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011606.m71G6iF4001068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:05:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011605.m71G5Njf000882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:08:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011608.m71G8HH3001179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-08-01 12:08 EST ------- Well, for 0.10.13-1: * Explicit library dependency ----------------------------------------------------------- On main package: Requires: fftw, hspell On -gtk subpackage: Requires: gtk2 ----------------------------------------------------------- - Please explain why you want to write these explicit library related dependencies - Generally speaking, rpmbuild automatically detects library related dependencies and adds the dependency to binary rpms, so these explicit requires must be removed. However, if the rpm explicitly depends on the binaries in the required rpm, you can leave the explicit Requires (in that case, write as a comment why you want to leave the explicit requires) ** Requires * Requires for -devel subpackage * Every package which ships pkgconfig .pc files must have "Requires: pkgconfig" * Also please pkgconfig files themselfs to check dependencies for -devel subpackage A. %_libdir/pkgconfig/libhocr-gtk.pc contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- Requires: gtk+-2.0 --------------------------------------------------------------- This means that libhocr-devel subpackage must have "Requires: gtk2-devel" B. %_libdir/pkgconfig/libhocr.pc contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- Libs: -lhocr -lhspell -lz -ltiff -lm --------------------------------------------------------------- This means that libhocr-devel must have "Requires: hspell-devel zlib-devel libtiff-devel" (because of -lhspell -lz -ltiff) However all these 3 linkage seem unneeded, because none of the header files in libhocr-devel needs header files from fftw-devel, hspell-devel, libtiff-devel. I guess "@ld_hspell@ @ld_tiff@" in libhocr.pc.in should be removed. * Requires for -gtk subpackage * Please recheck the dependency for -gtk subpackage. For example, /usr/bin/hocr-gtk contains ---------------------------------------------------------------- 28 import pygtk 29 pygtk.require('2.0') ---------------------------------------------------------------- This means that libhocr-gtk must have "Requires: pygtk2". * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files, please consider to use ---------------------------------------------------------------- make install \ INSTALL="install -p" \ DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ ..... ----------------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for based Makefiles based on recent autotools * Desktop files - Category "X-Fedora" is deprecated and should be removed. * %doc %_mandir - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked under %doc * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories created when installing a rpm are correctly created by the rpm For example, %_datadir/hocr-gtk is not owned by any packages. Note: When you write: ----------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/hocr-gtk ----------------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %_datadir/hocr-gtk and all files/directories/etc under %{_datadir}/gtk, while when you write ----------------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{_datadir}/hocr-gtk ----------------------------------------------------------------- contains the directory %{_datadir}/hocr-gtk only. * %files entry on -python subpackage - On i386/ppc %{python_sitelib} and %{python_sitearch} are the same, so on these archs %files entries are duplicate as: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1131 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_hocr.so 1132 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hocr.py 1133 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hocr.pyc 1134 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hocr.pyo ----------------------------------------------------------------- Writing %files entry a bit more verbosely can resolve this issue. * 64 bits issue - libhocr{-gtk}.pc.in contains: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2 exec_prefix=${prefix} 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib ----------------------------------------------------------------- So libdir is expanded as /usr/lib even on 64 bits archs, but this is wrong as on 64 bits archs libdir must be expanded as /usr/lib64. libdir=@libdir@ is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011609.m71G99kO002284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011624.m71GOFfx005871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rnorwood at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011641.m71GflpP008731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 rakesh.pandit at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:42:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011642.m71GgixF008928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |457590 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011641.m71GfRUq008679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-08-01 12:41 EST ------- APPROVED It shows some warnings while building. -- They are all cosmetic and can be ignored. But for small packages I will rather fixing them quickly;-) May be you can try pushing this patch upstream, it removes all warnings I see. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/misc/bcrypt.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011642.m71Ggjd6008969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |457590 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:42:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011642.m71Gginn008948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |457590 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 16:47:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011647.m71GlUeD010633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-08-01 12:47 EST ------- Review results - the starred items need to be fixed before I can pass the package review: - Source matches upstream - rpmlint passes * Missing BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) * Error generating Makefile: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Error: Unable to initialize gtk, is DISPLAY set properly? Writing Makefile for Wx::Perl::ProcessStream Is this a real error? I suspect not, since the package still builds and works. - Package naming is ok - License is ok - Source matches upstream * Package does *not* build in koji. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=753064 >From build.log: """ Error: Unable to initialize gtk, is DISPLAY set properly? Use of uninitialized value $Wx::_universal in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Wx.pm line 176. Use of uninitialized value $Wx::_static in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Wx.pm line 177. Use of uninitialized value $Wx::wxVERSION_STRING in concatenation (.) or string at /builddir/build/BUILD/Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.11/blib/lib/Wx/Perl/ProcessStream.pm line 346. """ Probably the best solution is to include a patch to disable/comment out the tests that fail. FYI, you can do a koji scratch build easily. Just build an SRPM with your changes, and run: $ koji build --skip-tag --scratch dist-f9 /path/to/SRPM That way you can make sure you've gotten all the failing tests. - File and directory ownership is ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:05:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011805.m71I5Yok023345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-08-01 14:05 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hotssh Short Description: HotSSH is an interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH. Owners: walters at redhat.com Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456364] Review Request: pam_sotp - PAM module that provides support for One Time Passwords (OTP) authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011808.m71I8Vb0024584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_sotp - PAM module that provides support for One Time Passwords (OTP) authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456364 ------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit at gmail.com 2008-08-01 14:08 EST ------- Failed to Build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=753204 -------------------------------------------------------- make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pam_sotp-0.3.3/src' # PAM module install -m 755 src/pam/pam_sotp.so /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/lib/security/ # OTPpasswd utility install -m 2755 src/utils/otppasswd /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/usr/bin # conf. files & directory install -d -m 770 /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/etc/sotp install -m 640 etc/pam.d/otppasswd /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/etc/pam.d/ + /usr/bin/install -m 0644 -p /builddir/build/SOURCES/pam_sotp-pam-config_include /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/etc/pam.d/otppasswd + /usr/bin/install -m 0644 -p /builddir/build/SOURCES/pam_sotp-README.RPM README.RPM + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/pam_sotp-0.3.3 extracting debug info from /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/lib/security/pam_sotp.so *** ERROR: No build ID note found in /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pam_sotp-0.3.3-1.fc10.i386/lib/security/pam_sotp.so error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.OVLMHw (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.OVLMHw (%install) EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/pam_sotp.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 315, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/pam_sotp.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You may like to check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBuildId may be you need --build_id for ld at some place to fix it. It built on my system but failed on koji rpmlint output gives: pam_sotp.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/otppasswd A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. pam_sotp.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/sotp 0770 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. pam_sotp.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/otppasswd root 02755 The file is setgid. Usually this is a packaging bug. If this is a game, then, you should use the proper rpm group, or location. pam_sotp.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/otppasswd 02755 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:27:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011827.m71IRi2g027111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-08-01 14:27 EST ------- just curious, is this a gnome-only app? If not, I'd suggest dropping "for GNOME" from the pkg description, summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:26:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011826.m71IQiQ0027030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:39:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011839.m71IdIAs028876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-08-01 14:39 EST ------- "[-] no duplicates in %files." Should be "[+] no duplicates in %files." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011838.m71IcXso028802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-08-01 14:38 EST ------- Review ======== [+] source files match upstream: 2aaba7be4ecfe81e4349b7a1be7899c300faeaca [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [-] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: Use "ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64" instead of BuildArch [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [-] compiler flags are appropriate: It does not use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS [+] %clean is present. [-] package builds in mock: does not due to the BuildArch vs ExclusiveArch issue, see above. [+] package installs properly. [-] debuginfo package looks complete: no due to wrong CFLAGS usage. [+] rpmlint is silent. [-] owns the directories it creates. please own "%{_datadir}/%{name}/" (just removing the * after it should do it) [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [-] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. ======= Summary: 1) Use ExclusiveArch 2) Use proper CFLAGS 3) Fix the ownership issue And I will approve it (rest looks good). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 18:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011849.m71In2OJ030856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2008-08-01 14:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: md5deep Short Description: A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes Owners: stingray Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 19:22:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011922.m71JMrCP005011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-08-01 15:22 EST ------- Packager seems to be responsive to criticism and has updated packages to meet guidelines. I've sponsored him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 19:31:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011931.m71JVKMu006478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 15:31 EST ------- Sorry for the delay... OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below- License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: cdb23e367fc0d2f18c3717aabdc9ef21 gadmin-squid-0.1.0.tar.gz cdb23e367fc0d2f18c3717aabdc9ef21 gadmin-squid-0.1.0.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Not sure the URL is right here. That site mentions that there is a new site called www.gadmintools.org, which appears to be a dyndns redirect. In any case, can you find a url that will point a user directly to the gadmin-squid page? 2. The license tag here seems to be 'GPLv3+' to me... ie, GPLv3 or later. 3. Might include the TODO and NEWS files as docs. 4. rpmlint says: gadmin-squid.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 14, tab: line 1) Can be ignored. 5. Why put the doc files in %{_docdir}/%{name}/ instead of just marking them %doc and getting them under the standard place: %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 19:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808011938.m71Jcn53007639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 ------- Additional Comments From maxamillion at gmail.com 2008-08-01 15:38 EST ------- The URLs that I posted last time are still valid, but I uploaded another update that resolves all errors from rpmlint. The warnings will still be a work in progress to get taken care of though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 20:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012019.m71KJR0a014195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 20:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012039.m71KdEce016569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-08-01 16:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: thibault-fonts Short Description: A collection of fonts from thibault.org, including Isabella, Essays1743, Rockets, and StayPuft. Owners: lyosnorezel Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lyosnorezel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 20:39:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012039.m71Kd5mW017294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-08-01 16:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: thibault-fonts Short Description: A collection of fonts from thibault.org, including Isabella, Essays1743, Rockets, and StayPuft. Owners: lyosnorezel Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lyosnorezel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 21:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:04:20 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_450527=5D_Review_Request=3A_libkni_-_C++_l?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_f=C3=BCr_the_Katana_robot_arm?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012104.m71L4KRJ020023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkni - C++ library f?r the Katana robot arm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-08-01 17:04 EST ------- Jason, would you mind to have a look again on the new package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 21:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012109.m71L95aA020808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-08-01 17:09 EST ------- OK, I will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 21:12:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012112.m71LCWbR022182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 ------- Additional Comments From hedayat at grad.com 2008-08-01 17:12 EST ------- Thanks a lot. I've fixed my FAS account email address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 21:26:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451120] Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012126.m71LQ5eq023616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-lpeg - Parsing Expression Grammars for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451120 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 22:45:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012245.m71MjHZs002435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-08-01 18:45 EST ------- The newer version of rpm has become pickier, so you'll have to replace %patch -p1 with "%patch0 -p1". Otherwise mock bails out with an error. Also, you must either modify the second patch (recommended method !) or add %define _default_patch_fuzz 2 to the spec file, otherwise the patch does not apply with current koji/mock settings Everything else seems OK at the first glance. Please fix the above and I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 22:49:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012249.m71Mn5Fx002761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-08-01 18:49 EST ------- I also suggest changing "Note: This is no portable code, it will just run on a Linux system." to "Note: This is no portable code, it will run just on a Linux system." Given that the developer is not a native English speaker (neither am I, so I might be wrong here) I think my version express better what he wanted to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 22:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012250.m71MoLjR002577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 1 23:40:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808012340.m71Ne5ht009139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2008-08-01 19:40 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meet packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license (BSD) - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - source match upstream 196aef8904be20c199e536480f92c5c9 ./ZendFramework-1.6.0RC1.tar.gz - successfully builds in mock for rawhide x86_64 - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - rpmlint output not clean php-ZendFramework-Cache-Backend-Apc.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-Cache-Backend-Memcached.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-Cache-Backend-Memcached.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet php-ZendFramework-Cache-Backend-Memcached-1.6.0-0.1.rc1.fc9.noarch.rpm php-ZendFramework-demos.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-demos.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/share/php/Zend/demos/OpenId/mvc_auth/html/.htaccess php-ZendFramework-Feed.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-Gdata.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-Pdf.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-Search-Lucene.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-Services.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Filter/_files/file.1 php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Text/Figlet/GenerateDummies.sh 0644 php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Text/Figlet/InvalidFont.flf php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Auth/Adapter/Digest/_files/.htdigest.1 php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Soap/_files/cert_file php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Http/Client/_files/testHeaders.php php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Translate/_files/test_fileerror.mo php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Translate/_files/testmsg_en.mo php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Translate/_files/testmsg_ru(koi8-r).mo php-ZendFramework-tests.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/php/Zend/tests/Zend/Translate/_files/translate_bigendian.mo 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 15 warnings. I think the "no-documentation" warnings could be ignored on subpackages. You may consider adding the license file to silence it filename-too-long-for-joliet is annoying if this is going to be burned on a CD/DVD. I am not sure if that's a blocker htaccess-file IIRC htaccess files are ignored by the default apache installation. please check if we can remove it without impacting the demo. I think all the -tests W and E can be safely ignored. Please just double check the .htdigest.1 and the zero lenght files are really the test targets. One last remark. If there is some post installation steps the user is supposed to do, please add a README.Fedora file with the appropriate note. So, I can't see any blocker here, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 00:01:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020001.m7201L2x012196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2008-08-01 20:01 EST ------- This thread is relevant to my interests (I will open new bug as soon as I will finish my RPMs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 01:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 21:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020109.m7219Dbu020707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 bretm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bret.mcmillan at gmail.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sahartsu at xs4all.nl | |) ------- Additional Comments From bretm at redhat.com 2008-08-01 21:09 EST ------- Btw, now that the package has been approved, what's the next step? Importing into Fedora CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020221.m722L2GY031643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-08-01 22:21 EST ------- Confirmed. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020221.m722Lrrg000428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-08-01 22:21 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 450409) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020235.m722Z7PU002911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 22:35 EST ------- cvs done. Please reset the fedora-cvs flag if you would like to change the Short Description. Additionally, I added it as: "An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020237.m722b6cK002113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 22:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020240.m722eYG4003864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com 2008-08-01 22:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: darkgarden-fonts Short Description: Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. Owners: lyosnorezel Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lyosnorezel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020242.m722gtDS003162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 22:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 02:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 22:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020240.m722ekG8002932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Thibault- |Review Request: thibault- |fonts - Collection of fonts |fonts - Collection of fonts |from thibault.org |from thibault.org Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 22:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 03:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020308.m72381TS008569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-01 23:08 EST ------- In reply to comment #13: Yes, normally... however your reviewer is not yet in the packaging group, so he can't officially approve this package. :( I am however working with them on another submission, and once that is done, I can sponsor them and this review is valid. ;) If someone else would like to do a quick review/approval we can get this moving sooner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 03:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020324.m723OOxx010526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: why - Why software verification platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 ------- Additional Comments From amdunn at gmail.com 2008-08-01 23:24 EST ------- I made a new version to incorporate your suggested changes: SRPM: http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/why/why-2.14-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/why/why.spec (In reply to comment #10) > Okay, I've looked this over, installed on my own system and tested it, etc. > It's generally quite good, but there are a few issues... but I think they'll be > really easy to fix. > > * rpmls of each binary package looks fine (permissions reasonable) > > - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > review. > Ok. No errors, and the warning is a well-known one > that is the fault of the ocaml compiler. See: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450551 > http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4564 > http://groups.google.com/group/fa.caml/browse_thread/thread/2d247a192eb92826 > > But you could do better; apply "execstack -c" to ELF files in /usr/bin, > and the programs will run without an executable stack. > That's a better idea; OCaml doesn't actually require an executable stack, > and the noexec stack will protect the low-level C routines it calls. > > $ rpmlint SPECS/why.spec SRPMS/why-2.14-1.fc9.src.rpm \ > RPMS/i386/why-2.14-1.fc9.i386.rpm > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/why-stat > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/why2html > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/why-dp > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/caduceus > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/rv_merge > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/why > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/jessie > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/simplify2why > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/why-obfuscator > why.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/krakatoa > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. Fixed - turns out that (as I mentioned to you separately) I was not seeing these warnings due to an old version of rpmlint (oops). I took your suggestion - running execstack -c on all (native code) binaries. > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines > OK. > > - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. > OK > > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > OK (I didn't see any errors) > > - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. > OK (GPLv2) > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > Yes; README, INSTALL, and COPYING all quite explicit that it is GPLv2. > > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc. > > FAIL. At _least_ install file "COPYING" in %doc, and go ahead and include "GPL" > too. Fixed. > - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. > OK > > - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable > to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not > the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). > OK > > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > OK > > - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at > least one supported architecture. > OK > > - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed > in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work > on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to > the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries > during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment > until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the > long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one > (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: > FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 > OK > > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions exceptions > section of Packaging Guidelines] ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is > optional. Apply common sense. > OK (builds in mock) (Still builds in mock.) > - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the > %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. > OK (No locale issue). > > - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just > symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in > %post and %postun.... > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable... > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not > create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does > create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. > OK > > - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > OK > > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. > OK. I checked the permissions on the binary RPMs using rpmls, looks okay. > > - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf > %{buildroot} ([wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT] ). > OK > > - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the > [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#macros macros section of Packaging Guidelines]. > OK > > - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described > in detail in the [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#CodeVsContent code vs. content > section of Packaging Guidelines] . > OK > > - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The > definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not > restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime > of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run > properly if it is not present. > OK > > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for > directory ownership and usability). > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), > then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = > %{version}-%{release} > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be > removed in the spec. > OK (N/A) > > - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the > %install section. > OK (Verified on desktop) > > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package > owns, then please present that at package review time. > OK. I don't know how to check that automatically, but a look using rpmls at the > binary files looks okay. > > - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} > ([wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT] ). > See [wiki:Self:Packaging/Guidelines#PreppingBuildRootForInstall Prepping > BuildRoot For %install] for details. > OK > > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > OK. > > > Serious problems: > * gwhy fails if the .c file isn't in the current directory (home directory if > invoked from the GUI). Fixed (change to gwhy.sh, further correction to my patch). > * In the Zenity patch, use --file-selection not --entry to get the filename. > That way, people can use a GUI to traverse the directory structure and click on > the right file. Changed. > Strongly recommend fixing: > * apply "execstack -c" to ELF files in /usr/bin, as noted above. (But only if > they're ELF, don't do that to bytecode). That will enable the exec-stack > protection, there's no reason it should be disabled. Fixed, see above. > * In the description, change "Furthermore, in theory," to just "Furthermore". > To a lot of people, "in theory" means "not really". Since they've demonstrated > the truth of the claim for 2 rather different languages, I think they've proved > that claim. Changed. > * By default gwhy gives a HUGE list of potential provers, even when they aren't > installed. That's a big pain - you want beginning users to have a reasonable > view when they start!! In the long term, I think upstream should modify gwhy so > that at start-up it detects which provers exist, and only shows the ones that > are installed. For the short term, can you modify the defaults so that by > default, if the user hasn't made any selections, only Zenon, Ergo, and CVC3 are > shown? Changed, patch to config.ml. > Other suggestions: > * Simplify this comment: > # Native ocaml builds do not seem to work on ppc64 (not the first > # package for which this has been true) > to something shorter like this: > # Native ocaml builds don't work on ppc64 (many packages have this problem) Changed. > * I think you should modify the %files list to use wildcards and %exclude, > instead of (for example) listing every file in /usr/bin. It would simplify the > %files list greatly. It would also make updates much easier; if a future > version of the package installs some new files (e.g., in /usr/bin), the spec > file would be more likely to "just work" if it used wildcards. E.G., I suggest > something like this: > %files > %{_bindir}/* > %exclude %{_bindir}/gwhy* > ... > You must _not_ say "%{bindir}/" (that tries to grab /usr/bin itself), but > %{bindir}/* is fine... and in this case, I think it's preferable. > Fixed. Also, re: Most of the SHOULDs don't apply, but I think this one does: - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. The subpackages aren't fully versioned. Is there a reason for that? Fixed this too. Let me know what you think (and if you think any more changes would be good). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 03:47:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 23:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020347.m723lF1u013475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 ------- Additional Comments From kairo at kairo.eti.br 2008-08-01 23:47 EST ------- - Fixed ExclusiveArch, ownership issue and proper CFLAGS SPEC File: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/procbench/procbench.spec SRPM File: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/procbench/procbench-0.8.2a-2.fc9.src.rpm $ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SPECS/procbench.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SRPMS/procbench-0.8.2a-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/procbench-0.8.2a-2.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/procbench-debuginfo-0.8.2a-2.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 04:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020438.m724cjfZ019705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-08-02 00:38 EST ------- Please do increment your release version and add a changelog entry for changes, even in reviews. It lets reviewers see what was changed and when and makes it easier to make sure you have the most recent version for review. Issue 1 is solved. Issue 2 still seems to be there... it doesn't build in mock. You need to add a BuildRequires on the package that has the msgfmt command in it. On rpmlint issues, good progress... most of the rest can be ignored, but there are 2 easy ones you can solve: txt2tags.src:40: W: setup-not-quiet Add -q to %setup macro. txt2tags.src: W: no-%build-section Add a empty %build section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 04:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020446.m724kStQ021007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-08-02 00:46 EST ------- Due to the stricter checking implemented now in rpm, you'll have to replace "%patch -p1" with "%patch0 -p1", otherwise the patch is not applied. Two more serious issues - Neither rpm_opt_flags nor parallel build flags are taken into consideration while actually compiling - the created debuginfo rpm is empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 05:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020540.m725eWmZ026925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ondrejj at salstar.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-08-02 01:40 EST ------- You missed to add src.rpm, but I fount it. :-) http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-tw-forms-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint shows only doc problem, builds well on F8, F9 and devel, I see nothing more to fix. APPROVED. What else we need for TG2 in fedora? Somebody is planning to add it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 07:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 03:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020735.m727ZweP010393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-08-02 03:35 EST ------- Sorry, I was in Africa for 3 weeks with no internet access. I applied all your points except: + Why not include contrib/simple-mtpupload in %doc? reason: It contains perl script that could pull in a perl dependency, which shouldn't be otherwise needed. The questin is whether /usr/share/doc is a good place for scripts anyway. IIRC the s390(x) excluding is because it simply doesn't have USB support. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 08:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 04:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020853.m728rHAa021448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 ------- Additional Comments From sven at lank.es 2008-08-02 04:53 EST ------- New SRPM: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/libacpi-0.2-11.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/libacpi.spec I changed 'just run' to 'only run' and redid the patch to apply without fuzz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 09:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 05:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020935.m729Zrcr028808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-08-02 05:35 EST ------- Very well, package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 09:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 05:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020933.m729XWYn028307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-08-02 05:33 EST ------- The source tarball is a 404, again, and it seems upstream has a new version 1.2 that builds with the same spec and patches RPM Lint: OK, silent Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK, GPLv2+ Actual License: OK, no license file but code says GPLv2+ %doc License: No, license is in the code Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: Upstream tarball disappears when new version is released. Newer version 1.2 builds with the same spec and the same patches, so no problem. Might wanna contact upstream to make them have the tarballs around a little longer though. Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK package approved in principle, but you might want to bump the version and contact upstream about the disappearing tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 09:38:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 05:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020938.m729cOOS028086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-08-02 05:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-attributes Short Description: Attributes for Ruby (Gem) Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-5, F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: kanarip Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 09:48:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 05:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020948.m729mGHY029368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 ------- Additional Comments From sven at lank.es 2008-08-02 05:48 EST ------- forgot the new URLs: Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/yacpi.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/yacpi-3.0.1-10.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 09:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 05:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020947.m729lY1r029324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 ------- Additional Comments From sven at lank.es 2008-08-02 05:47 EST ------- > Due to the stricter checking implemented now in rpm, you'll have to replace > "%patch -p1" with "%patch0 -p1", otherwise the patch is not applied. fixed - Neither rpm_opt_flags Wow - good catch. Fixed. I've also notified upstream. - nor parallel build flags are taken into consideration Fixed - the created debuginfo rpm is empty ... because the makefile was stripping the binary. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 09:47:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 05:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808020947.m729lVYe030255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-08-02 05:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xlog Short Description: Logging program for Hamradio Operators Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:01:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021001.m72A1isg031389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-08-02 06:01 EST ------- > The source tarball is a 404, again, and it seems upstream has a new version 1.2 > that builds with the same spec and patches Verified building with 1.2, I will initial import the newer version and contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:02:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021002.m72A2F0F031450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-08-02 06:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xpsk31 Short Description: GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 for Ham Radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021019.m72AJl1v001053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-08-02 06:19 EST ------- Package looks fine now. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:18:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021018.m72AICMi001762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-08-02 06:18 EST ------- Just "chmod -x simple-mtpupload " and rpm will no longer pull perl as dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021022.m72AM68d002502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 sven at lank.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: maatkit - |Review-Request: maatkit - |Essential command-line |Essential command-line |utilities for MySQL |utilities for MySQL Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From sven at lank.es 2008-08-02 06:22 EST ------- rpmlint doesn't like the license "GPLv2 or Artistic". As this seems to be a missing license in rpmlint / the Fedora license page I have opened bz #457486 against rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021029.m72AToZA002581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-08-02 06:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xpsk31 Short Description: GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 for Ham Radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:41:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021041.m72AfHVO005270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-08-02 06:41 EST ------- "Requires: gecko-libs >= 1.9" for f9+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 10:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021039.m72AdljS004713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-08-02 06:39 EST ------- Review ============= [+] source files match upstream: 2b2b00a179740548035a1145bbae600db9b0a2ce [-] package meets naming and versioning guidelines: please use libproxy-python instead of libproxy-binding-python [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [-] Requires are proper: xulrunner does not use soname's so please add Requires: gecko-libs >= 1.9 to the plugin-mozjs package. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=745038 [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent: It isn't: ----------- libproxy-binding-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-kde.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-mozjs.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-networkmanager.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. ------------ But this warnings can be ignored. [+] ldconfig is used in %post and %postun [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. =============== Summary & Comments: 1) Please use libproxy-python instead of libproxy-binding-python 1.1) Any reason why the java and C# bindings aren't packaged? 2) Fix the gecko-libs requires 3) Consider submitting the patch to upstream (if not done already). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 11:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021123.m72BNVX7010676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-08-02 07:23 EST ------- darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 11:24:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021124.m72BOoPQ010733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-08-02 07:24 EST ------- darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 11:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021127.m72BRmUM010467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-08-02 07:27 EST ------- thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 11:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021128.m72BScBn011400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-08-02 07:28 EST ------- thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 11:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200808021142.m72Bg3Qx012449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-08-02 07:42 EST ------- Juan & Patrice, thanks for picking this up! It already looks quite good (submission and review). Wrt the name: don't change it please, the HEP community is very familiar with the root name. Patrice, if we identify the non-free dependencies, maybe we can contact upstreams and make them adapt their licensing like it happened for ARPACK. It's is very slow (so this review should not wait for them), but it seems to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 2 23:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808022353.m72NrbPx011828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #3 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-02 19:53:36 EDT --- I updated the spec file to reflect the issues raised by Kevin: SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gadmin-squid.spec SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/el5/SRPMS/gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.3.el5.src.rpm point 1: I don't know if the URL I updated to is a good one, but it is better than the previously used one, I'm sure. point 2: although the license included is GPLv3, the src/* indicates indeed GPLv3+, so changed in the spec. point 3: files added point 4: although no problem, changed anyway :) point 5: missed that one, upstream does it that way, changed in a patch and will contact upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 00:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030003.m73031SY010836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 --- Comment #6 from Kairo Francisco de Araujo 2008-08-02 20:02:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: procbench Short Description: Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs Owners: kairo Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 01:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030135.m731ZWhs018299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Customer Facing|NO |--- Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #38 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-02 21:35:21 EDT --- This one has been done for some time now. Setting the review flag to + and closing this bug out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 02:18:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030218.m732IN9f024731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 --- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-02 22:18:12 EDT --- Excellent! I checked and confirmed that you've fixed the blocker (not including the license file). rpmlint is now 100% silent (which is good; that means the buffer overflow protection, etc., will now work properly). I started up the graphical "gwhy" and confirmed that (1) you can now navigate the filesystem using the GUI, and that (2) you can work with files not in the current directory. Looks good. I did a try with binary_search.c, and confirmed that it now works with Zenon (which already has a Fedora package). Zenon doesn't do a _great_ job, but it does prove some verification conditions. Reducing the number of default columns is a big help; new users will be overwhelmed enough. I think it's ready for release. Congrats! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 03:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030359.m733xq17004711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-02 23:59:49 EDT --- Humm... all the issues I saw appear to be solved, but you made an additional change I am unclear on: Why add: BuildRequires: autoconf BuildRequires: automake and change the configure line to use %GNUconfigure ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 04:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030405.m7345VPV005689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-03 00:05:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 04:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030407.m73478sj004526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-03 00:07:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 04:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 00:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808030408.m7348pvx005926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-03 00:08:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 10:08:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 06:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031008.m73A8Q2U011618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #6 from Oron Peled 2008-08-03 06:08:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, for 0.10.13-1: First, thanks for the excellent and detailed comments. Since I'm working with upstream about some other small issues, I'm merging the fixes and hope to upload an updated package within a day or two. A short checklist: > * Explicit library dependency > ----------------------------------------------------------- > On main package: > Requires: fftw, hspell fftw - removed (yes it should be delegated to RPM) hspell - move to hocr-gtk subpackage. This package uses gtktextbuffer (python bindings) which uses gtkspell which test at *runtime* for backend spellcheckers. Added a comment about that in the .spec file > On -gtk subpackage: > Requires: gtk2 fixed. > ** Requires > * Requires for -devel subpackage > * Every package which ships pkgconfig .pc files must have > "Requires: pkgconfig" Fixed. I didn't check .pc files at all. Looks like I should write a small script to test these things (supplement rpmlint...) > * Also please pkgconfig files themselfs to check dependencies for > -devel subpackage > > A. %_libdir/pkgconfig/libhocr-gtk.pc contains: > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Requires: gtk+-2.0 Fixed. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > This means that libhocr-devel subpackage must have "Requires: gtk2-devel" > > B. %_libdir/pkgconfig/libhocr.pc contains: > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Libs: -lhocr -lhspell -lz -ltiff -lm > --------------------------------------------------------------- > This means that libhocr-devel must have > "Requires: hspell-devel zlib-devel libtiff-devel" (because of > -lhspell -lz -ltiff) > However all these 3 linkage seem unneeded, because none of the > header files in libhocr-devel needs header files from > fftw-devel, hspell-devel, libtiff-devel. > I guess "@ld_hspell@ @ld_tiff@" in libhocr.pc.in should be removed. Their inclusion in the .pc file is correct since they are used by the applications, either explicitly (tiffio.h and fftw3.h) or implicitly (hspell via gtkspell). However, I'll have to digg deeper to make sure *which* subpackage requires *what* (TODO) > * Requires for -gtk subpackage > * Please recheck the dependency for -gtk subpackage. > For example, /usr/bin/hocr-gtk contains > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 28 import pygtk > 29 pygtk.require('2.0') > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This means that libhocr-gtk must have "Requires: pygtk2". Fixed. > * Timestamps > - To keep timestamps on installed files, please consider to use > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > make install \ > INSTALL="install -p" \ > DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ > ..... > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > This method usually works for based Makefiles based on recent > autotools Hmmm... first time I see this consideration. It seems logical but are these any guideline about it? If it's a general problem maybe I can use your method as a solution for this package, but it seems better to fix the AC_PROG_INSTALL macro upstream (if they accept the same logic). > * Desktop files > - Category "X-Fedora" is deprecated and should be removed. Done. I must have got its addition from some obsolete guide somewhere but I cannot find any reference to it now, nevermind. > * %doc %_mandir > - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked under %doc Removed the %doc. > * Directory ownership issue > - Please make it sure that all directories created when installing a > rpm are correctly created by the rpm > For example, %_datadir/hocr-gtk is not owned by any packages. Fixed. Will recheck other ownerships as well. > * %files entry on -python subpackage > - On i386/ppc %{python_sitelib} and %{python_sitearch} are the same, > so on these archs %files entries are duplicate as: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 1131 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_hocr.so > 1132 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hocr.py > 1133 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hocr.pyc > 1134 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hocr.pyo > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Writing %files entry a bit more verbosely can resolve this issue. TODO. I need to check it again. > * 64 bits issue > - libhocr{-gtk}.pc.in contains: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 2 exec_prefix=${prefix} > 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > So libdir is expanded as /usr/lib even on 64 bits archs, but this is wrong > as on 64 bits archs libdir must be expanded as /usr/lib64. > libdir=@libdir@ is correct. Fixed (changed all assignments to use @...@ so we won't have wrong assumptions in general and respect ./configure selections even in non-rpm builds -- e.g: ./configure --prefix=/opt/kuku --includedir=/foobar Sent upstream. Updated packages+specs - ASAP (a day or two). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 11:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031109.m73B9h3I019025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 11:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031114.m73BEiCu017625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 --- Comment #30 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-03 07:14:41 EDT --- Approved. You will still need a sponsor before you can request cvs access and commit anything however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 11:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031128.m73BSga6019123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-03 07:28:40 EDT --- You shouldn't be approving NEEDSPONSOR tickets if you're not a sponsor. Approval of the review ticket should include an offer to sponsor the person: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process (You can, of course, do as much pre-review work as you like on such tickets.) Alternately, you could consider requesting that you be made a sponsor: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/SponsorProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 11:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 07:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031154.m73Bsj4K021510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #5 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-03 07:54:44 EDT --- Kevin, the BuildRequires and %GNUconfigure were neccesary to have it build for epel-5. The source tarball contains an Makefile.in that borks the build for epel-5. Including above statements ensures that Makefile.in is regenerated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 12:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 08:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031205.m73C5FKi022942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-03 08:05:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bcrypt Short Description: File encryption utility Owners: sundaram Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 12:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 08:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031239.m73CdVNJ025821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 --- Comment #8 from David Nielsen 2008-08-03 08:39:29 EDT --- Paul do you plan to ever build this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 13:09:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 09:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454166] Review Request: griv - a gtk rivchat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031309.m73D9sXH029390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454166 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 08:57:18 EDT --- Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when you rebuilt this package on devel/F-9/F-8 and request on bodhi is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 12:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 08:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031256.m73CueX3028953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 08:56:02 EDT --- Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when you rebuilt this package on devel/F-9/F-8 and request on bodhi is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 13:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 09:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454166] Review Request: griv - a gtk rivchat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031313.m73DDQI3030121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454166 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 09:13:23 EDT --- Closing as rebuild is done and request on bodhi is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 13:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 09:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031313.m73DDxur030198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 09:13:56 EDT --- Closing as rebuild and request on bodhi is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 14:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031454.m73EsteP008316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #20 from Adam Huffman 2008-08-03 10:54:49 EDT --- Matt, Before I make a package for 0.2.2, I should point out that the emusic format seems to have changed. The file extension is now .emx, which is an XML format, replacing the previous encrypted one. Some details are here: http://code.google.com/p/emusicremote/wiki/EMX_File_Format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 14:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031458.m73Ewjt5008854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 --- Comment #14 from Alan Dunn 2008-08-03 10:58:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: why Short Description: Why software verification platform Owners: amdunn Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031503.m73F35FZ009507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-03 11:03:02 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031509.m73F95ZS011147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031509.m73F9eLp011221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-03 11:09:39 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031524.m73FOj4J011857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 --- Comment #17 from Dave Nomura 2008-08-03 11:24:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313294) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313294) updates for Roland McGraths upgrade to utrace Roland McGrath is upgrading utrace in Fedora10. The attached tar file contains a src rpm, spec file, and patch file to upgrade Dpiperf/src/stap/usr_itrace.stp This is based on a preliminary version of Roland's changes and has only had limited testing due to the need for uprobes (which also must be adapted for the new utrace) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031526.m73FQKfw012380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #30 from leigh scott 2008-08-03 11:26:14 EDT --- Are you still stuck ? ( does this help? ) http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/screenlets.spec http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/screenlets-0.1.2-5.fc9.src.rpm If you have given up perhaps someone could review my attempt ! rpm doesn't seem to find the library dependencies by itself!! rpmlint output screenlets.noarch: I: checking screenlets.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libnotify You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:33:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031533.m73FXpEj013103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Josh Boyer 2008-08-03 11:33:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created an attachment (id=313294) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313294) [details] > updates for Roland McGraths upgrade to utrace > > Roland McGrath is upgrading utrace in Fedora10. The attached tar file contains > a src rpm, spec file, and patch file to upgrade Dpiperf/src/stap/usr_itrace.stp > > This is based on a preliminary version of Roland's changes and has only had > limited testing due to the need for uprobes (which also must be adapted for the > new utrace) Just handle this in CVS at your leisure, or open a different bug for it. The review is done and this bug should be closed out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 15:39:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 11:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031539.m73FdbaH013763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 --- Comment #29 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2008-08-03 11:39:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rcssserver3d Short Description: Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D Owners: hedayat Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:03:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031603.m73G3kYZ017993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 12:03:44 EDT --- For 1.0-3: * License - (As you seem to be the upstream developer) unless you mention in the tarball that this package is licensed under GPLv2+, we regard the license of this package to be GPL+ (from section 9) * Source - The tarball which can be downloaded from the URL differs from the one in the tarball. When you modify the tarball itself, please change the version number and upload the new one. * %defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * General rpmlint issue -------------------------------------------------------------- transbot.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trans/transbot.py 0644 transbot.noarch: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 -------------------------------------------------------------- - If the permission of transbot.py is correct (as 0644), then this script should not have shebang. - This package must not own /usr/share/man/man1 (owned by filesystem) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:14:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031614.m73GEACB019345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-03 12:14:08 EDT --- xlog-1.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031614.m73GEXGi019437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-03 12:14:32 EDT --- xlog-1.7-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:15:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031615.m73GFu0V019836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:25:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031625.m73GP5GB019718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 12:25:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > ** Requires > > * Requires for -devel subpackage > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > This means that libhocr-devel subpackage must have "Requires: gtk2-devel" > > > > B. %_libdir/pkgconfig/libhocr.pc contains: > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Libs: -lhocr -lhspell -lz -ltiff -lm > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > This means that libhocr-devel must have > > "Requires: hspell-devel zlib-devel libtiff-devel" (because of > > -lhspell -lz -ltiff) > > However all these 3 linkage seem unneeded, because none of the > > header files in libhocr-devel needs header files from > > fftw-devel, hspell-devel, libtiff-devel. > > I guess "@ld_hspell@ @ld_tiff@" in libhocr.pc.in should be removed. > > Their inclusion in the .pc file is correct since they are used > by the applications, either explicitly (tiffio.h and fftw3.h) or > implicitly (hspell via gtkspell). I guess currently I don't understand what you want to say correctly. libhocr-devel itself does not need tiffio.h or fftw3.h. > > * Timestamps > > - To keep timestamps on installed files, please consider to use > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > make install \ > > INSTALL="install -p" \ > > DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ > > ..... > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > This method usually works for based Makefiles based on recent > > autotools > > Hmmm... first time I see this consideration. It seems logical > but are these any guideline about it? Although in PackagingDrafts, I usually recommend this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Timestamps > > * Desktop files > > - Category "X-Fedora" is deprecated and should be removed. > > Done. I must have got its addition from some obsolete guide > somewhere but I cannot find any reference to it now, nevermind. Perhaps this is difficult to find: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00725.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031634.m73GY0sH021943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454025] Review Request: libixp - stand-alone client/server 9P library including ixpc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031647.m73GlDHD023739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 12:47:11 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 16:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031659.m73GxXu3025135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 12:59:28 EDT --- To Wolfy: It seems that Mathieu has another review requests, bug 456774 and bug 456783 . To Mathieu: Please post to this bug entry that you have already submitted some other review requests. This is needed for sponsoring process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 17:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 13:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031739.m73HdQtf028561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-03 13:39:24 EDT --- I just tried to rebuild your latest srpm but it failed as below. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=755698 Note: Please make build.log more verbose. The output like: ---------------------------------------------------------- Building CXX object pokemod/CMakeFiles/pokemod.dir/MapTrainerTeamMember.o [ 9%] Building CXX object pokemod/CMakeFiles/pokemod.dir/MapWarp.o ---------------------------------------------------------- is not useful. We want to check if Fedora compiler flags are correcly honored, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 18:40:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031840.m73IedRZ004754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-03 14:40:36 EDT --- I have add some enhancements to the kspliceprep schript which I have renamed to fedora-ksplice-prepare. The ksplace-extras subpackage is renamed into fedora-ksplice to signal that the content is fedora specific. The uploaded stuff may be find at: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ksplice/ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ksplice/ksplice-0.8.7-8.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 19:03:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031903.m73J3DLO007592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.spb.su --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-03 15:03:10 EDT --- http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager.spec is 404 error: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 19:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] New: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/python-flickrapi.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/python-flickrapi-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A python module for flickr api -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 19:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808031952.m73Jqg4l014398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #11 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2008-08-03 15:52:41 EDT --- Updated package: SPEC:http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/dZnKuQtSOr3An4ab7jnrAJ/download/rcssbase.spec SRPM: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/c-GdeKyzqr3yzEab7jnrAJ/download/rcssbase-12.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 20:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808032033.m73KXJQU020701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 --- Comment #40 from Ricky Zhou 2008-08-03 16:33:13 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: supybot New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 20:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808032035.m73KZA86021182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 3 21:31:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 17:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808032131.m73LVGZd027041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #8 from Oron Peled 2008-08-03 17:31:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > ** Requires > > > * Requires for -devel subpackage > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This means that libhocr-devel subpackage must have "Requires: gtk2-devel" > > > > > > B. %_libdir/pkgconfig/libhocr.pc contains: > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Libs: -lhocr -lhspell -lz -ltiff -lm > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This means that libhocr-devel must have > > > "Requires: hspell-devel zlib-devel libtiff-devel" (because of > > > -lhspell -lz -ltiff) > > > However all these 3 linkage seem unneeded, because none of the > > > header files in libhocr-devel needs header files from > > > fftw-devel, hspell-devel, libtiff-devel. > > > I guess "@ld_hspell@ @ld_tiff@" in libhocr.pc.in should be removed. > > > > Their inclusion in the .pc file is correct since they are used > > by the applications, either explicitly (tiffio.h and fftw3.h) or > > implicitly (hspell via gtkspell). > > I guess currently I don't understand what you want to say correctly. > libhocr-devel itself does not need tiffio.h or fftw3.h. Sorry, my previous reply wasn't clear enough: 1. You are correct that fftw-devel and libtiff-devel should not be required by libhocr, since only libhocr *implementation* uses them. (fixed, they are only mentioned in BuildRequires). 2. However, I think that we still need them listed in the .pc files for other (future) applications that may want to link against libhocr. Such applications would probably have in their build something like: libhocr_LIBS=`pkgconfig --libs libhocr` So the linker would add '-lfftw -ltiff' 3. TODO: libz is also mentioned in libhocr.pc, but I want to fix it first with upstream, since the author forgot to check for it in its configure.ac (actually, it's a dependency of hspell which don't come with pkgconfig file of its own). 4. TODO: hspell should be removed from libhocr.pc (IMO) since its not linked explicitly, but rather loaded during runtime by gtkspell. I'll discuss it with upstream as well. 5. I added "Requires: hspell" to the gtk subpackage because rpmbuild would not find this dependency automatically (as mentioned it is detected by gtkspell during runtime). > > > * Timestamps > > > - To keep timestamps on installed files, please consider to use > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > make install \ > > > INSTALL="install -p" \ > > > DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ > > > ..... > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This method usually works for based Makefiles based on recent > > > autotools > > > > Hmmm... first time I see this consideration. It seems logical > > but are these any guideline about it? > > Although in PackagingDrafts, I usually recommend this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Timestamps Fixed. [added the link to my bookmarks, as it does not appear in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts]. > > > * Desktop files > > > - Category "X-Fedora" is deprecated and should be removed. > > > > Done. I must have got its addition from some obsolete guide > > somewhere but I cannot find any reference to it now, nevermind. > > Perhaps this is difficult to find: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00725.html Thanks, I also noticed we are blocked on rawhide by bug 457502 So now libhocr can be used as a debugging tool as well ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 00:46:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: libUnihan-data - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040046.m740kHtC019829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #5 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-03 20:46:15 EDT --- I've changed the name of this package from libUnihan-data to UnihanDb. The reason I change the name is to aviod the end-user confusion. To me, the name "libUnihan-data" implies that it is optional and does not need to be install by default. However, database file of UnihanDb is compulsory for the whole package to work. In addition, it has its own versioning from Unicode upstream, so it should be a separate package. UnihanDd now BuildDepends and Depends on libUnihan, as it is generate by libUnihan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 00:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: libUnihan-data - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040048.m740mZYQ018366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #6 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-03 20:48:34 EDT --- BTW, the new SPEC and SRPM is available at: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/UnihanDb.spec?use_mirror=voxel&filesize=2225 SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/UnihanDb-5.1-2.fc9.src.rpm?use_mirror=voxel&filesize=6207199 Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 00:51:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040051.m740peCS018966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #4 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-03 20:51:38 EDT --- New SPEC and SRPM for libUnihan 0.4.0 are at: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/libUnihan.spec?use_mirror=voxel&filesize=3062 SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/libUnihan-0.4.0-0.fc9.src.rpm?use_mirror=voxel&filesize=72990 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 01:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 21:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040150.m741obur028143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: UnihanDb - |libUnihan-data - The Unihan |The Unihan character |character database in 5NF |database in 5NF Alias| |UnihanDb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 02:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 22:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040217.m742HjBJ032319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #10 from mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-08-03 22:17:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I just tried to rebuild your latest srpm but it failed as below. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=755698 This is due to the new position of the phonon libraries (they are no longer in the KDE packages). I will update with my latest package which should be less dependent on whether the latest Phonon is with Qt or KDE. > Note: > Please make build.log more verbose. The output like: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Building CXX object pokemod/CMakeFiles/pokemod.dir/MapTrainerTeamMember.o > [ 9%] > Building CXX object pokemod/CMakeFiles/pokemod.dir/MapWarp.o > ---------------------------------------------------------- > is not useful. We want to check if Fedora compiler flags are correcly honored, > for example. I'm using the cmake_kde4 macro, which is what the KDE packaging uses. I'd assume that the flags are set correctly there, but I will update it to use CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 03:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 23:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040335.m743ZUHG009091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #11 from mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-08-03 23:35:29 EDT --- Fixed those problems. New specs can be found at: http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen.spec http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen-0.0.2-0.10.20080804svn233.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:37:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] New: Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Summary: Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mvaliyav at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/perizia-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/perizia-fonts-2008803-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: perizia is an asymmetric English font. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perizia_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040436.m744aFZg016638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 00:36:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756354 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f3b365136ccf88c79167ac3b1292e5b3 Net-RawIP-0.23.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=104, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 4.38 cusr 0.08 csys = 4.51 CPU) + Package perl-Net-RawIP-0.23-1.fc10=> Provides: RawIP.so perl(Net::RawIP) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::ethhdr) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::generichdr) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::icmphdr) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::iphdr) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::opt) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::tcphdr) = 0.23 perl(Net::RawIP::udphdr) = 0.23 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpcap.so.0.9 perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Struct) perl(DynaLoader) perl(English) perl(Exporter) perl(Net::RawIP::ethhdr) perl(Net::RawIP::generichdr) perl(Net::RawIP::icmphdr) perl(Net::RawIP::iphdr) perl(Net::RawIP::opt) perl(Net::RawIP::tcphdr) perl(Net::RawIP::udphdr) perl(strict) perl(subs) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions:- You can include examples directory in %doc. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:42:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040442.m744grPx018771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 00:42:52 EDT --- Again just tried to rebuild and this time rebuild failed seemingly by some obvious reason: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040443.m744hADi017353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040440.m744ewiT017240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 00:40:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756359 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 29c6cd74081861f4bffe1f83943f5792 Net-Ping-External-0.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package perl-Net-Ping-External-0.12-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(Net::Ping::External) = 0.12 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Socket) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040447.m744l5tb018088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 00:47:04 EDT --- rpmlint gave me => scim-thai.i386: E: description-line-too-long Currently, it supports 3 keyboard layouts: Ketmanee, TIS-820.2538, and Pattachote. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. scim-thai.i386: E: description-line-too-long In addition to keyboard layout supports, it also validate input sequences in 3 levels of strictness: Passthrough (no check), Basic Check, and Strict Check. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. scim-thai.i386: E: description-line-too-long For applications that support surrounding text retrieval/deleting, it also corrects the invalid input sequences. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040504.m7454KiP021308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 04:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 00:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040459.m744xjAF020653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 00:59:44 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756386 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 03fcd2d010db1b7190f7e257124cb278 IPTables-Parse-0.6.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.01 CPU) + Package perl-IPTables-Parse-0.6-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(IPTables::Parse) = 0.5 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:15:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040515.m745F3WE021582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 Greg DeKoenigsberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gdk at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #26 from Greg DeKoenigsberg 2008-08-04 01:14:57 EDT --- Any chance that the current situation can be clarified here? Are we simply waiting for the draft document here: http://extjs.com/products/floss-exception.php ...to become final? What's the status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040541.m745fxq5025184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-04 01:41:58 EDT --- Thanks - fixed: Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/scim-thai/scim-thai.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/scim-thai/scim-thai-0.1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:48:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040548.m745mEpI027187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #312229|4 to 5 patch |updated spec file description| | Attachment #312229|un-core-fonts.spec-5.1.patc |un-core-fonts.spec-5.1 filename|h | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:46:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040546.m745kAnb025861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 01:46:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756467 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 584912c92d08bf005283fb29a47a6e4d pyevent-0.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package pyevent-0.3-3.fc10 => Provides: event.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libevent-1.4.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:57:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040557.m745vZa8028567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 01:57:34 EDT --- 1)you don't need again {%_docdir} remove it from %files 2) Add BuildRequires: python-setuptools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 05:59:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040559.m745x2hV027346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-04 01:59:00 EDT --- Dennis communicated to me that he is happy with the .spec file in attachment 312229. I am sponsoring Dennis - thank you for the review! This package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora. Please go ahead and follow the process from step 7 on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join also explains the steps in more detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 06:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 02:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040603.m7463VlH029469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-04 02:03:28 EDT --- Dennis is now sponsored - so removing needsponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 06:45:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 02:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040645.m746jHIJ001330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnp at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 02:45:13 EDT --- *** Bug 258001 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 06:45:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 02:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040645.m746jF1d001293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 02:45:13 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 457123 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 06:56:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 02:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040656.m746uYq9002989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #13 from mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-08-04 02:56:33 EDT --- New RPM problem with not creating the buildroot. Fixed in: http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen.spec http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen-0.0.2-0.11.20080804svn234.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 07:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040711.m747Bwtp006626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |franck at collins.fr --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-04 03:11:55 EDT --- *** Bug 457286 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 07:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040721.m747LIV4006650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 03:21:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756505 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url caa84f54fedf4fe1bcf50dfe69ec112d scim-thai-0.1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package scim-thai-0.1.1-2.fc10 => Provides: thai-imengine-setup.so thai.so Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libscim-1.0.so.8 libscim-1.0.so.8(LIBSCIM_1.0) libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so.8 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libthai.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 07:46:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 03:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040746.m747kORc010860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 03:46:21 EDT --- 1)Correct source url to Source0: http://www.myanmarnlp.net.mm/downloads/%{archivename}.zip 2) Version should be 3.00. I used "gnome-font-viewer mm3.ttf" command to find version for font. 3)Correct Changelog entry to * Fri Aug 01 2008 Minto Joseph - 3.00-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 08:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 04:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040814.m748EjBU016637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #2 from _pjp_ 2008-08-04 04:14:44 EDT --- Hello Mamoru, Looks good to me. The build/install from source and rpm did work without any hassles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 08:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 04:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040818.m748IjsE017358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-04 04:18:44 EDT --- I don't know why, but it's still can't be built in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=756612&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 08:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 04:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Package Review: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040814.m748Evhr016685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-04 04:14:55 EDT --- I switched off tests and add BR http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756596 http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream/perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream-0.11-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 08:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 04:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040839.m748dijl020570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 04:39:43 EDT --- Thank you. If you think that this package can be approved, would you set fedora-review flag to + and write on this bug that you approved this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 09:03:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457232] Package Change Request : Pem-0.7.3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040903.m7493bS1025794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457232 _pjp_ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 09:47:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040947.m749l7Kx001909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Minto Joseph 2008-08-04 05:47:05 EDT --- Thank you Parag. Made suggested changes. Please verify. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/myanmar3-unicode-fonts-3.00-1.fc8.src.rpm http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 09:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808040932.m749WJhu029962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2008-08-04 05:31:46 EDT --- If I take out %{_docdir} I am getting RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/doc/flickrapi-1.1/documentation.css /usr/share/doc/flickrapi-1.1/flickrapi.html /usr/share/doc/flickrapi-1.1/html4css1.css Tell me what I should do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 10:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041019.m74AJCQS006991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-04 06:19:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libproxy-0.2.3-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: A library handling all the details of proxy configuration Changelog - Rename binding-python to python - Add Requires: gecko-libs >= %%{gecko_version} - Fix some descriptions - Add plugin-webkit package Patch has been submitted upstream http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/issues/detail?id=5 The java and C# binding aren't present in the source tarball (not ready yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 10:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041031.m74AVfE9004144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mediascrapper - A script to |mediascrapper - A script to |scrap media files from |scrap media files from |different sites |different sites --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 06:31:40 EDT --- will you please tell me how can I test package? any sample movie.txt you would like to provide here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 10:33:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041033.m74AXuDX004246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 06:33:55 EDT --- Your updated SPEC looks old version spec. But, SRPM is now included with Requires: ghostscript APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 10:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041043.m74Ah6nn005944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 06:43:04 EDT --- will you please reupload SRPM with following change in SPEC changelog * Fri Aug 01 2008 Minto Joseph -3.00-1 to * Fri Aug 01 2008 Minto Joseph - 3.00-1 I see rpmlint warning myanmar3-unicode-fonts.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog -3.00-1 3.00-1.fc10 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 10:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041047.m74AlCuF006770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-04 06:47:11 EDT --- I will import the srpm. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdfmerge Short Description: Command line utility program for merging PDF files Owners: sundaram Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 11:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 07:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041108.m74B89rk010445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #4 from Minto Joseph 2008-08-04 07:08:08 EDT --- uploaded with suggested changes. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/myanmar3-unicode-fonts-3.00-1.fc8.src.rpm http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 11:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 07:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041108.m74B8Uqs010479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-04 07:08:28 EDT --- That happened because you tested on your machine where python-docutils is installed. So you need to add BR:python-docutils also you should install doc files in /usr/share/doc/python-flickrapi-1.1 instead to create one more directory /usr/share/doc/flickrapi-1.1 So, 1) Add BR:python-docutils 2) Add following in %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/* 3) your %doc should look like %doc README LICENSE doc/documentation.css doc/flickrapi.html doc/html4css1.css 4) don't include %{_docdir}/* in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 11:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 07:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041128.m74BSYkH014977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2008-08-04 07:28:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > will you please tell me how can I test package? any sample movie.txt you would > like to provide here? Put the following line in a movie.txt in the current folder http://www.apunkabollywood.net/browser/category/view/3949/rock-on-(2008) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 11:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 07:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041133.m74BXUOR014011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2008-08-04 07:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > That happened because you tested on your machine where python-docutils is > installed. So you need to add BR:python-docutils also you should install doc > files in /usr/share/doc/python-flickrapi-1.1 instead to create one more > directory /usr/share/doc/flickrapi-1.1 > > So, > 1) Add BR:python-docutils > 2) Add following in %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/* > 3) your %doc should look like > %doc README LICENSE doc/documentation.css doc/flickrapi.html > doc/html4css1.css > 4) don't include %{_docdir}/* in %files Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/python-flickrapi.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/python-flickrapi-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm The new spec and SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 12:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041219.m74CJ5Xr020790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #4 from _pjp_ 2008-08-04 08:07:33 EDT --- Yes, I approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 13:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041300.m74D0Ioe027907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: |Review Request: |perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream |perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 13:00:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041300.m74D06QD027797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 --- Comment #27 from Jon Stanley 2008-08-04 09:00:04 EDT --- Yep, but as I read that exception, it will only apply to new versions of ExtJS. So here's what we'd need to do: 1) Package the new ExtJS in Fedora (Testopia bundles ExtJS with the tarball, however, we don't allow private copies of libs in packages) 2) Either wait for upstream or help upstream port to the new version of ExtJS that this exception applies to (probably not hard - might not even need porting) After that, we can have Testopia! Spot - you never commented on the legal status of that exception, were it to become final - here's our opportunity to influence it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 13:50:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041350.m74DoxY6003781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-04 09:50:57 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyevent Short Description: Python bindings for libevent Owners: rnorwood at redhat.com Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 13:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041359.m74Dx68m005162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #25 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-04 09:59:04 EDT --- awesome 3.0 is close [1] I'll redo the SPEC file [1] http://awesome.naquadah.org/download/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 13:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041358.m74Dwenh005190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 --- Comment #4 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-04 09:58:39 EDT --- Everything looks good now - approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041400.m74E0CEf005673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #7 from John McLean 2008-08-04 10:00:10 EDT --- -I've fixed the licensing issues. It is now simply GPL+ -The latest source tarball has been uploaded at the same url. I simply forgot to upload it last time I made changes. I'm still forming habits concerning uploading changes and bumping the release numbers. -%defattr is fixed. -The rpmlint issues should be cleared up. The shebang was left over from some testing. The package shouldn't own /usr/share/man/man1 anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041402.m74E2qbx006103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #8 from John McLean 2008-08-04 10:02:51 EDT --- forgot to add this to my last comment: new srpm: http://jesusfreak91.googlepages.com/transbot-0.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:08:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041408.m74E8xx3006921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-04 10:08:56 EDT --- MUST Items: [PASS] - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [PASS] - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [PASS] - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . [PASS] - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [PASS] - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [PASS] - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [PASS] - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) ... [PASS] - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [PASS] - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read [PASS] - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [PASS] - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. * PASS on i386, under mock and koji [PASS] - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, [PASS] - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires * PASS on i386, under mock and koji [ NA ] - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [ NA ] - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files [ NA ] - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state [PASS] - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [PASS] - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [PASS] - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with [PASS] - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [PASS] - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the [PASS] - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ NA ] - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [PASS] - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [ NA ] - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ NA ] - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ NA ]- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files [ NA ] - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix [ NA ] - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require [ NA ] - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [PASS] - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [PASS] - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [PASS] - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} [PASS] - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [ NA ] - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) * includes [ NA ] - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain [mock] - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [koji] - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ NA ] - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. * lack of applicable HW [ NA ] - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [ NA ] - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ NA ] - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) [ NA ] - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, --- REVIEWED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041416.m74EGMb3008410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Comment #18 from Tim Colles 2008-08-04 10:16:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: prover9 Short Description: Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator Owners: tcolles Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: tcolles Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457761] New: Review Request: dt - Generic data test program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dt - Generic data test program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Summary: Review Request: dt - Generic data test program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevinverma at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kevinverma.fedorapeople.org/packages/dt/dt.spec SRPM URL: http://kevinverma.fedorapeople.org/packages/dt/dt-15.14-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: 'dt' is a generic data test program used to verify proper operation of peripherals and for obtaining performance information. Since verification of data is performed, 'dt' can be thought of as a generic diagnostic tool. 'dt' command lines are similar to the 'dd' program, which is popular on most UNIX systems. It contains numerous options to give the user complete control of the test parameters. 'dt' has been used to successfully test disks, tapes, serial lines, parallel lines, pipes, and memory mapped files. In fact, 'dt' can be used for any device which allows the standard open, read, write, & close system calls. Special support is necessary for some devices, such as serial lines, for setting up the speed, parity, data bits, etc. Available documentation is located in /usr/doc/dt-15.14. Sample scripts and config data are installed in /usr/share/dt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:22:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041422.m74EMotQ009698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #4 from Adel Gadllah 2008-08-04 10:22:48 EDT --- OK, looks good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041423.m74ENanm009754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 --- Comment #12 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-04 10:23:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alevt Short Description: Teletext decoder/browser Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457761] Review Request: dt - Generic data test program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041422.m74EMLwF009571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Kevin Verma changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Kevin Verma 2008-08-04 10:22:20 EDT --- I am a new contributor and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041443.m74EhRns013549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 10:43:26 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: monafont Short Description: Japanese font for text arts Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: (nobody) Cvsextras Commits: welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 14:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041447.m74ElG2r014230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvrabec at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pvrabec at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:06:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041506.m74F6Jrf017295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-04 11:06:18 EDT --- There are some rpmlint issues: ksplice.src:93: E: files-attr-not-set ksplice.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 36, tab: line 1) ksplice.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ksplice-prepare 0775 Minor (non-blocking issues) regarding the fedora-ksplice-prepare script: - There are some typos: # fedora-ksplice-prepare fetches the source rpm of the currently installed kernel # from the repository an tries to prepare it for ksplice. ... echo "Kernel rpm will be prepared" - The tmpdir is not removed if something fails (use trap). - Not sure whether deleting the downloaded src.rpm is a good idea, the user might want to rerun the script if something breaks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:04:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajax at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/mach64/xorg-x11-drv-mach64.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/mach64/xorg-x11-drv-mach64.src.rpm X driver for mach64 devices. Split out from the -ati driver package upstream, so splitting it out here as well. spec file is more or less cloned from -ati's spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajax at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/r128/xorg-x11-drv-r128.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/r128/xorg-x11-drv-r128.src.rpm X driver for Rage 128 devices. Split out from the -ati driver package upstream, so splitting it out here as well. spec file is more or less cloned from -ati's spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041532.m74FWKbK021426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-04 11:32:18 EDT --- OK, I fixed this by adding: BuildRequires: python-devel Successful scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=757252 New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tcl-snack-2.2.10-2.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tcl-snack.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041555.m74FtkCE025254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 Lyos Gemini Norezel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457761] Review Request: dt - Generic data test program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041554.m74Fs8Tn024839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-04 11:54:06 EDT --- The package name and the corresponding binary and directory names are too short in my opinion. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Use_of_common_namespace for some reasoning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:57:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226089] Merge Review: libXTrap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041557.m74FvHmG025490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226089 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Customer Facing|NO |--- Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-04 11:57:15 EDT --- This package is dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041559.m74FxlSL024931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 11:59:44 EDT --- Good. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rcssbase) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 16:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 12:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041605.m74G5mxK027041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 Lyos Gemini Norezel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.co | |m Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 15:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041544.m74Firn7022645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-04 11:44:52 EDT --- Should be fixed. The uploaded stuff may be find at: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ksplice/ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ksplice/ksplice-0.8.7-8.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 17:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041732.m74HWixL008919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-08-04 13:32:42 EDT --- Thanks for the review! I'll let lmacken reply with what packages are still needed for TG2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 17:38:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041738.m74HcDKj009863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-08-04 13:38:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tw-forms Short Description: Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets Owners: toshio,lmacken,fschwarz Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041832.m74IWImu022995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:32:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041835.m74IZeuT021209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:35:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041833.m74IXZee023301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:33:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041837.m74IbN81024234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:37:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:41:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041841.m74IfT2i025128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:41:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041838.m74Icqu6024441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:38:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041840.m74Ie0Wa024517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 14:39:59 EDT --- Once setting FE-Legal. spot, how do you think about naming? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041844.m74IiRI7025490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:44:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041845.m74Ijbu1025892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:45:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041851.m74IpmGd023961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:51:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] New: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 Summary: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-chardet.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-chardet-1.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Character encoding auto-detection in Python. As smart as your browser. Open source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041846.m74IkVqZ026120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:46:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041853.m74IrxS7024192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #13 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2008-08-04 14:53:58 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rcssbase Short Description: Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) Owners: hedayat Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457761] Review Request: dt - Generic data test program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041854.m74IsjTS027360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041852.m74IqUgG027135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455558 Jima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at beer.tclug.org --- Comment #4 from Jima 2008-08-04 14:52:29 EDT --- Did anyone happen to notice that this package creates a file conflict with rblcheck? (/usr/bin/rblcheck) This doesn't really feel like much of a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041900.m74J0It7025508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 15:00:17 EDT --- To Kevin: Thanks for CVS procedure. By the way I am seeing that every time you write "cvs done" you add yourself to CC list. Perhaps you want to check bug 457664 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041859.m74IxWkr024984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 14:59:31 EDT --- By the way aside from naming: * SourceURL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control - If you are using svn controlled tarball, you should write in the spec file as comments how you created the tarball using as Source. * Macros - Use macros properly. /usr should be %{_prefix}: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros ** Scriptlets * mimeinfo - Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo * desktop database - As pokemodr.desktop has Mimetype entry, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database * Unused direct dependencies - rpmlint shows (note: rpmlint can be used for installed rpms) -------------------------------------------------------------- pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /usr/lib/libpokescripting.so.0 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /usr/lib/libkdeui.so.5 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /usr/lib/libQtSvg.so.4 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.5 pokegen.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0.0.2 /lib/libpthread.so.0 -------------------------------------------------------------- You can check this by $ ldd -u /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so Usually even with these unused direct dependencies left the program/libraries should work. However this may bring about unneeded dependency for the rpm including the program/library. As you are the upstream, you may want to fix this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 18:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041859.m74IxKm5028299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 14:59:19 EDT --- Looks like the docs are going to require a bit more tinkering... the latest package doesn't build here. I get: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/COPYING /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/README Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/COPYING /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/gadmin-squid/README If GNUconfigure is needed for EL-5, perhaps only use it in that branch, and/or use a conditional on the %dist tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] New: Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 Summary: Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gwibber/0.7-1.61bzr/gwibber.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gwibber/0.7-1.61bzr/gwibber-0.7-1.61bzr.fc9.src.rpm Gwibber is an open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK. It supports Twitter, Jaiku, Identi.ca, Facebook, and Digg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:22:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041922.m74JMmsc032350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Drake 2008-08-04 15:22:47 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback! I changed it to MIT and uploaded v1.2. We already have the appropriate package-specific depends: PolicyKit We additionally depend on the directory because PolicyKit upstream told us the location where these files are stored may change in future. This dependency will make sure that we notice if/when this change happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:27:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041927.m74JRgS9030251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 15:27:41 EDT --- Excellent idea. Thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041930.m74JUbaH001229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-04 15:30:36 EDT --- Updated to 2.2.61 SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/zile-2.2.61-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/zile.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041935.m74JZNQw002109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 --- Comment #31 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2008-08-04 15:35:21 EDT --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 19:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808041955.m74JtraI006090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2008-08-04 15:55:52 EDT --- Has the maven directory issue been resolved? If so, I'd like to move forward with this review. A new findbugs release is supposed to be out within the next couple of weeks, and I'd like to have this package in place by then. Upstream (which is also upstream for findbugs) has been active recently with some changes needed for the new findbugs version. New versions of the spec file and SRPM are here: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jsr-305/jsr-305.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jsr-305/jsr-305-0-0.1.20080721svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 20:01:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042001.m74K1Zas006898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-04 16:01:34 EDT --- I believe that the maven stuff is done, but I am out of the country for another few days so I won't be able to look at this until, most likely, next weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 20:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042022.m74KMdMB010599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 16:22:37 EDT --- Rebuild on devel/F-9/F-8, request to push to reqository on F-9/F-8 done, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 20:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 16:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042038.m74KcL6b013398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-04 16:38:19 EDT --- Oops.. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: monafont Branches: devel F-9 F-8 Updated Fedora CC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 21:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] New: Review Request: rubygem-cobbler Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cobbler Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cobbler Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 22:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042211.m74MBKPW027188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-04 18:11:18 EDT --- rcssserver3d-0.6-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 22:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042213.m74MDuPP024201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-04 18:13:55 EDT --- rcssserver3d-0.6-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 22:37:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042237.m74Mbk4d027457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #7 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-04 18:37:45 EDT --- I cannot reproduce your results Kevin. Even on (fresh) bare metal never before used to build this package (or any other) I cannot reproduce this. What was the command line you used? As a side note I must say that EPEL-5 is not really a target, more a nice to have at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 23:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042304.m74N488t030657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 19:04:07 EDT --- I was building it here using 'mock'. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/MockTricks for more info. I can also submit it as a scratch build in our buildsystem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=758305 which seems to have finished fine. ;( I seem to have used the wrong spec or something is going on with my mock machine. ;( So, provided you conditionalize the GNUconfigure bits or only check in that version on the EL-5 branch, this package is APPROVED. I will go ahead and sponsor you, you can continue the process at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 23:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042318.m74NIR5C003129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-04 19:18:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 4 23:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808042319.m74NJjbc003208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #16 from mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-08-04 19:19:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Fixed in: http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen.spec http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen-0.0.2-0.12.20080804svn236.fc9.src.rpm Thanks for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050422.m754MZ6A024283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 00:22:34 EDT --- rpmlint gave me => python-flickrapi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/flickrapi/__init__.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. ==> Fix by removing shebang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050436.m754acip025988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 00:36:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756862 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 1cae8ab0ea5c5a369b73cb70a24fe9dd Myanmar3_Unicode.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + fc-cache scriptlets are used. * Regarding .conf file I don't see any problem as far as its following conf file writing guidelines from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/Fontconfig * Your SRPM is still old but you updated only SPEC. So before you import package make sure you use correct SRPM. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:39:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050439.m754dHp9026242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:38:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050438.m754cuBb026189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:37:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050437.m754bjaY026099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050438.m754cpOh026158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050439.m754dj1Z029452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 00:39:44 EDT --- APPORVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:37:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050437.m754baZK029289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:38:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050438.m754ccXX029347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050456.m754u0Sk028831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 00:55:59 EDT --- Kushal, You can fix that in %install as sed -i -e "s|#!/usr/bin/env python||" $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}/flickrapi/__init__.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 04:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050456.m754uRmK032081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 05:08:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050508.m7558XpT030223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 01:08:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=758670 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f8c510a6fac300fe0ac9a0c24a76a7ba chardet-1.0.1.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: * Add docs/* directory from source to %doc * As all source files also include License text your license should be LGPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 05:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050512.m755CHco030849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #7 from Kushal Das 2008-08-05 01:12:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Kushal, > You can fix that in %install as > sed -i -e "s|#!/usr/bin/env python||" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}/flickrapi/__init__.py Fixed :) Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-flickrapi.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-flickrapi-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 05:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050519.m755JFo7002321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2008-08-05 01:19:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Suggestions: > * Add docs/* directory from source to %doc > * As all source files also include License text your license should be > LGPLv2+ Changes made :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 05:24:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050524.m755OUws003216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2008-08-05 01:24:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-chardet Short Description: Character encoding auto-detection in Python Owners: kushal Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: kushal Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 05:43:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050543.m755harH002443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 01:43:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=758909 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e51f57430629105dcec26a00eaa5fcae flickrapi-1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 05:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050551.m755piO9003824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #9 from Kushal Das 2008-08-05 01:51:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-flickrapi Short Description: python module for flickr api Owners: kushal Branches: F-9 EL5 InitialCC: kushal Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 06:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 02:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050616.m756GaMM010572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-05 02:16:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scim-thai Short Description: Thai Input Method Engine for SCIM Owners: petersen Branches: devel F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 06:26:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 02:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050626.m756QO1t012305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #5 from _pjp_ 2008-08-05 02:26:22 EDT --- Hey thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 06:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 02:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050646.m756kgAF015354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-05 02:46:40 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 06:52:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 02:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454011] Review Request: tcl-snack - Sound toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050652.m756q6qk012276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011 --- Comment #11 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-05 02:52:05 EDT --- - build in koji OK Everything pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050750.m757oBq8021540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |laroche at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:48:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050748.m757maxL024730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |than at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226225] Merge Review: pam_krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050754.m757srwJ022082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226225 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nalin at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226025] Merge Review: libgtk-java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050752.m757qNRw021886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226025 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050753.m757rUmn022005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225652] Merge Review: comps-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050755.m757tOCF025984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225652 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:59:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050759.m757xQmQ022924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:57:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226493] Merge Review: tix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050757.m757vhhj022733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226493 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mitr at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:58:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050758.m757wKUD022780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050759.m757xx5B023037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |veillard at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:01:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050801.m7581g0u023638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-05 04:01:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Ping-External Short Description: Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities Owners: mitr Branches: F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 07:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 03:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050758.m757wjYj022850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-05 03:58:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-RawIP Short Description: A Perl extension for manipulating raw IP packets using libpcap Owners: mitr Branches: F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050803.m7583C6F024414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-05 04:03:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IPTables-Parse Short Description: Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets Owners: mitr Branches: F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050806.m7586DHf028233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-05 04:06:10 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=758674 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url debf3a59379f67bafc9a01d65562d784 gwibber-61bzr.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed successfully. + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226493] Merge Review: tix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050808.m7588dZw025258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226493 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- AssignedTo|mitr at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-05 04:08:38 EDT --- I don't own tix anymore. If you feel you must assign the bug to anyone, Vitezslav is the current package owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:08:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050808.m7588Zh9025235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #14 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-05 04:08:34 EDT --- I've updated the package to the latest stable release 2.1.1. SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/player/player-2.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm A scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=759170. It still fails for the same component. I'm going to setup a Rawhide VM to investigate this. For now to get going with the package I propose to disable the GEOS support. The GIS features are nice to have, but not essential in the very beginning to get the simulator running. It can be conditionally enabled on F-9 for now, disabled on F-10. Once we have a fix or it's fixed in the Player project we can remove this conditional building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:20:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050820.m758KA9g030311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |seg at haxxed.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:25:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050825.m758PbDv028194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-05 04:25:33 EDT --- Erm, why was this ticket assigned to the person who submitted it? Review tickets should be assigned to the person who is reviewing, or to nobody if they are not being reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226009] Merge Review: libgdiplus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050823.m758Ngn1027581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226009 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:24:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050824.m758OWUK027666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Bug 444760 depends on bug 447921, which changed state. Bug 447921 Summary: perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 not rebuilt for Fedora 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ON_QA Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225303] Merge Review: autorun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050826.m758QWnc031282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225303 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |harald at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226205] Merge Review: nss_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050825.m758PkQd031128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226205 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nalin at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050829.m758TcfO028704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457888 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050829.m758Tagd028663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457888 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050829.m758Tb7n028683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457888 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225861] Merge Review: grub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050828.m758SUe4028524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225861 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:29:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050829.m758TdRs028724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457888 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226469] Merge Review: system-config-securitylevel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050827.m758RfEA028443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226469 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |twoerner at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:30:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050830.m758UNGh029197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] New: Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Summary: Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 457543,457544,457545,457546 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mitr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/fwknop.spec SRPM URL: http://mitr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/fwknop-1.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: fwknop implements an authorization scheme known as Single Packet Authorization (SPA) that requires only a single encrypted packet to communicate various pieces of information including desired access through an iptables policy and/or specific commands to execute on the target system. The main application of this program is to protect services such as SSH with an additional layer of security in order to make the exploitation of vulnerabilities (both 0-day and unpatched code) much more difficult. The authorization server passively monitors authorization packets via libpcap and hence there is no "server" to which to connect in the traditional sense. Any service protected by fwknop is inaccessible (by using iptables to intercept packets within the kernel) before authenticating; anyone scanning for the service will not be able to detect that it is even listening. This authorization scheme offers many advantages over port knocking, include being non-replayable, much more data can be communicated, and the scheme cannot be broken by simply connecting to extraneous ports on the server in an effort to break knock sequences. The authorization packets can easily be spoofed as well, and this makes it possible to make it appear as though, say, www.yahoo.com is trying to authenticate to a target system but in reality the actual connection will come from a seemingly unrelated IP. Although the default data collection method is to use libpcap to sniff packets off the wire, fwknop can also read packets out of a file that is written by the iptables ulogd pcap writer or by a separate sniffer process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050831.m758V0qJ032051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226493] Merge Review: tix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050835.m758Z5tA030037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226493 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Brennan Ashton 2008-08-05 04:35:04 EDT --- Sorry, trying to get these bugs out of new and onto someone who will deal with them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226303] Merge Review: pnm2ppa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050832.m758WjEX032425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226303 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |twaugh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050839.m758d0bo000808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-05 04:38:56 EDT --- Another bogus assignment Please stop this. Unfortunately I do not have the time now to put all of these back the way they were, so I can only ask you, bashton at brennashton.com, to undo all of the bogus assignments you have made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:39:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050839.m758dJFA000901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 --- Comment #32 from Brennan Ashton 2008-08-05 04:39:16 EDT --- Sorry, I figured it was there responsibility to manage the bug as it is there package being reviewed. We are working to move bugs out of New and into there respective categories in order to keep fedora moving along, and allow BugZilla to work properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225824] Merge Review: gnome-mime-data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050843.m758hd9o031150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225824 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226439] Merge Review: stunnel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050843.m758h2BR001725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226439 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mitr at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050856.m758u6U5000800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|seg at haxxed.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050854.m758sGKW032651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455558 --- Comment #5 from Adrian Reber 2008-08-05 04:54:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Did anyone happen to notice that this package creates a file conflict with > rblcheck? (/usr/bin/rblcheck) This doesn't really feel like much of a review. I also received the file conflicts mail. From the changelog it looks like you are the maintainer of the rblcheck rpm. My first thought was to just remove the rblcheck binary from udns, because udns is only needed as a library for jabberd and the rblcheck from udns is not really needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050856.m758uwrE003929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|lxtnow at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:55:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226439] Merge Review: stunnel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050855.m758tBBf003654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226439 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- AssignedTo|mitr at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-05 04:55:10 EDT --- Brennan: please stop doing this. First, I can't review my own package. Second, you're not my manager (nor of most other package owners, I think) and just telling people to do work you want them to do won't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050857.m758vdFT001010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|tcallawa at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226303] Merge Review: pnm2ppa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050857.m758viVa001027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226303 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- AssignedTo|twaugh at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Tim Waugh 2008-08-05 04:57:43 EDT --- Resetting owner. I am not the Reviewer of this Fedora package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050900.m7590PVW004790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 08:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050859.m758xoRF004358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050910.m759AnO0003847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|dwmw2 at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226025] Merge Review: libgtk-java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050911.m759Bv2x003946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226025 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|skasal at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:10:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226009] Merge Review: libgdiplus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050910.m759ACCX003631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226009 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|lxtnow at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226225] Merge Review: pam_krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050911.m759BUNb003915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226225 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|nalin at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225824] Merge Review: gnome-mime-data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050908.m759863g003232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225824 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|rstrode at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226469] Merge Review: system-config-securitylevel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050909.m7599EYh003280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226469 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|twoerner at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226205] Merge Review: nss_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050909.m7599q6Q006304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226205 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|nalin at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:11:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225652] Merge Review: comps-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050911.m759BGKB006871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225652 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|roozbeh at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225861] Merge Review: grub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050908.m7598sF1006212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225861 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|pjones at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050908.m7598UO0006180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|bnocera at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:09:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225303] Merge Review: autorun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050909.m7599VNu006271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225303 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|harald at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050910.m759AXnH006671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|veillard at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226439] Merge Review: stunnel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050913.m759DxgT004197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226439 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225854] Merge Review: gperf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050912.m759CIwf004079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225854 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|laroche at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 09:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808050912.m759CnTx007088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 10:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 06:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226469] Merge Review: system-config-securitylevel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051009.m75A9HRa015296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226469 Thomas Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Customer Facing|NO |--- Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Thomas Woerner 2008-08-05 06:09:16 EDT --- This package has been replaced by system-config-firewall and is therefore part of newer Fedora versions (>=8) anymore. Closing as NOT A BUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 12:13:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051213.m75CDbZ5001785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #6 from _pjp_ 2008-08-05 08:13:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ptrash Short Description: Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory Owners: pjp Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: pjp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 12:29:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051229.m75CTUTh004899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #9 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-05 08:29:28 EDT --- Kevin, how's this? new Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gadmin-squid.spec new SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.4.fc9.src.rpm Changelog: - Made autoconf and automake buildrequires conditional and remove %GNUconfigure from the .spec - Added %{__aclocal} and %{__automake} to %prep stage in the .spec, because of outdated files inside the upstream tarball - replaced another 'bare' make statement with %{__make} in the %install stage in the .spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 12:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051239.m75Cduha006279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #10 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-05 08:39:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gadmin-squid Short Description: graphical configuration tool for squid Owners: baard Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: [none] Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 13:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051304.m75D4MWJ009941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Verma 2008-08-05 09:04:21 EDT --- I am a new contributor and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 13:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457916] New: Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Summary: Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevinverma at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 177841 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kevinverma.fedorapeople.org/packages/lmbench/3.0a7/lmbench.spec SRPM URL: http://kevinverma.fedorapeople.org/packages/lmbench/3.0a7/lmbench-3.0a7-7.fc9.src.rpm Description: lmbench is a series of micro benchmarks intended to measure basic operating system and hardware system metrics. The benchmarks fall into three general classes: bandwidth, latency, and "other". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 13:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457917] Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051310.m75DAwl5006613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Verma 2008-08-05 09:10:57 EDT --- I am a new contributor and I am seeking a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 13:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457917] New: Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 Summary: Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevinverma at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 177841 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kevinverma.fedorapeople.org/packages/stress/0.18.8/stress.spec SRPM URL: http://kevinverma.fedorapeople.org/packages/stress/0.18.8/stress-0.18.8-1.4.fc9.src.rpm Description: Stress is a tool which imposes a configurable amount of CPU, memory, I/O, or disk stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system. Stress is written in highly-portable ANSI C, and uses the GNU Autotools to compile on a great number of UNIX-like operating systems. Stress is not a benchmark, it is rather a tool which puts the system under a repeatable, defined amount of load so that a systems programmer or system administrator can analyze the performance characteristics of the system or specific components thereof. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051418.m75EIuih020987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #15 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-05 10:18:55 EDT --- I've added the conditional BR and it builds fine now for dist-f10 without GEOS support. SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/player/player-2.1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=759295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:22:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051422.m75EMJgf021215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051436.m75EaDSh022577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-05 10:36:12 EDT --- Remove the sitearch macro definition and CFLAGS line. Those are not needed for a noarch package. Include a copy of the license under a file called COPYING. The license of the source should match the tag in the spec file. You might also want to move your project to fedorahosted.org and make the script more generic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051449.m75EnRuk020141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-05 10:49:25 EDT --- Packages built for F-9 and rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6565 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 15:11:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051511.m75FB6Lh022048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 Feng Yu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rainwoodman at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:55:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] New: Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Summary: Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Biniax is an original and unique arcade logic game. It requires just a minute to learn the rules and you will get hours of gameplay. -------- This is the classic biniax version. There is also biniax 2, with more eye-candy and game modes. I will submit biniax 2 as soon as the classic version is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 15:03:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] New: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Summary: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: soumya at dgplug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup.spec SRPM URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup-1.01-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: It is a python module which formats text to Mediawiki (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Editing) syntax. More information on this module available at http://code.google.com/p/wikimarkup/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051454.m75EsmMt024446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2008-08-05 10:54:47 EDT --- Added the empty build section and changed the parameter for the %setup macro. SRPM: http://www.shsu.edu/~ajm023/txt2tags-2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm SPRC: http://www.shsu.edu/~ajm023/txt2tags.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 14:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] New: Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Summary: Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/libmicrohttpd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a library which can be used to embed a webserver in applications. I'm about to use it for one of my applications which is already available in Fedora (NNTPGrab). The package consists of 3 sub-packages: libmicrohttpd: the library itself libmicrohttpd-devel: development files libmicrohttpd-doc: API documentation and example source code During compilation, the testsuite bundled with the library is also run $ rpmlint libmicrohttpd.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint libmicrohttpd-* libmicrohttpd.i386: W: no-documentation libmicrohttpd-devel.i386: W: no-documentation libmicrohttpd-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libmicrohttpd-doc-0.3.1/html/d8/d26/microhttpd_8h__incl.map 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. The 2 no-documentation warnings are false positives, all the docs are bundled in the -doc subpackage. The zero-length file is something which is auto-generated by doxygen..I don't know whether to leave it as is or remove the file manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 15:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051549.m75FnbPw031233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051616.m75GGOcS031107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:16:22 EDT --- Looks ok. Can you ping upstream about including those fixes and/or rebuilding with fixed/newer auto* tools? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051618.m75GIX2M031259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:18:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051620.m75GK6CR031705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:20:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:18:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051618.m75GImWp031318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-05 12:18:47 EDT --- General comments: * On a fresh installation, the program won't start: $ hellanzb Could not find configuration file in the following dirs: ['/home/erik', '/usr/etc', '/home/erik/etc', '/home/erik'] * The program searches for config files in /usr/etc instead of /etc * Can you patch the program so the contents of the README.Fedora file are shown on startup on environments where no config file is available yet ? This way, new users can get this program up-and-running faster $ rpmlint hellanzb.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint hellanzb-0.13-3.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint hellanzb-0.13-3.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ md5sum hellanzb-0.13.tar.gz d3510c6b1b2c7b935332a469fdc8e7e2 hellanzb-0.13.tar.gz $ wget http://www.hellanzb.com/distfiles/hellanzb-0.13.tar.gz --quiet -O - | md5sum d3510c6b1b2c7b935332a469fdc8e7e2 - Compilation in mock fails, probably due to a missing BuildRequires: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73995 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd hellanzb-0.13 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + /usr/bin/python -c 'import setuptools; execfile("setup.py")' build Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError : No module named setuptools RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73995 (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73995 (%build) Review - python eggs: [ OK! ] Must: Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from upstream into the proper directory. [ OK! ] Must: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [ OK! ] Must: If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be included in the package. [ N/A ] Must: When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so it won't conflict with the main package. [ N/A ] Must: When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the packages must contain a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with no prior setup. [ N/A ] Should: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. Review: [ OK! ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ OK! ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [ OK! ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . [ OK! ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [ OK! ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [ OK! ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [ OK! ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [ OK! ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK! ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK! ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [ OK! ] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [FALSE] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [ OK! ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK! ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK! ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [ OK! ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [ OK! ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [ OK! ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [ N/A ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ N/A ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [ OK! ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [ OK! ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [ OK! ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [ N/A ] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ N/A ] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [FALSE] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [ N/A ] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [FALSE] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [ N/A ] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [ N/A ] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ N/A ] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [ N/A ] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. To sum it up: - The program should inform the user how it can be configured when no config file can be found - The program looks in the folder /usr/etc for config files, this should be changed to /etc or removed - Missing BuildRequires which make the package unable to build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:17:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442377] Review Request: python-pysctp - Python binding for the SCTP network protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051617.m75GHltO003311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442377 Neil Horman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Neil Horman 2008-08-05 12:17:46 EDT --- ping, can someoneae please review this? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051622.m75GMEP5004123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:22:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051617.m75GHRZG003291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |457936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051624.m75GOcgW004425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jtulach at netbeans.org --- Comment #2 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-05 12:24:35 EDT --- *** Bug 439265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051624.m75GObrZ004391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Customer Facing| |--- Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #21 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-05 12:24:35 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 456337 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051634.m75GYjOs002093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:34:43 EDT --- cvs done. Just out of curiosity, whats the difference between this package and rrdtool-ruby? Just different bindings? Perhaps the two projects could work together someday? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051637.m75Gb47L007178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:37:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051640.m75Gem7s007794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:40:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051637.m75GbxI1007293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:37:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:39:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051639.m75Gd7N7007354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:39:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457106] Review Request: publican-genome - Genome brand for publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051643.m75GhqOG003660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457106 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:43:51 EDT --- cvs done. (The name in the request was publican-gnome, but I added it as publican-genome). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457034] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Builders for MarkUp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051641.m75GfxmK003549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457034 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:41:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051645.m75Gjjpr008576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 12:45:44 EDT --- alevt-1.6.2-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:46:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051646.m75GkHCg008715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2008-08-05 12:46:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gwibber Short Description: An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK Owners: ianweller Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051648.m75GmRkm004555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 12:48:26 EDT --- alevt-1.6.2-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051649.m75GnF3R008927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051627.m75GRuqs000842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:27:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 16:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051626.m75GQW8r000512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-05 12:26:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 17:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] New: Old Standard Fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Old Standard Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Summary: Old Standard Fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec file URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 17:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051737.m75Hbqig012431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 --- Comment #7 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-05 13:37:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.binaryhelix.net/zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.binaryhelix.net/zypper-0.11.10-1.fc9.src.rpm New upstream release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 17:37:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051737.m75HbEU1012330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-05 13:37:12 EDT --- I have try to suppres the output of the failing test #98. Unfortunately, I have to recorgnise a bug in autotest which is reported at BZ #457936. this issue occurs only on rawhide. New upaloaded files: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/open-cobol/open-cobol/open-cobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/open-cobol/open-cobol/open-cobol-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 17:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455111] Review Request: python-webob - WSGI request and response object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051743.m75HhomM013023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455111 --- Comment #9 from Ricky Zhou 2008-08-05 13:43:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-webob New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 17:43:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453082] Review Request: python-dtopt - Add options to doctest examples while they are running In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051743.m75Hhfsl013002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453082 --- Comment #9 from Ricky Zhou 2008-08-05 13:43:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-dtopt New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 17:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051756.m75HunfH015126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 18:30:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051830.m75IULLO025430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-05 14:30:20 EDT --- Well, * Currently I don't know how to use this, however when I just type $ transbot, I get a traceback as --------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ transbot Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/transbot", line 37, in channel_list = conf_file.readline().split ( ':' ).lower() [ 1 ] AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'lower' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is this expected? (In reply to comment #7) > -The latest source tarball has been uploaded at the same url. I simply forgot > to upload it last time I made changes. I'm still forming habits concerning > uploading changes and bumping the release numbers. * What I asked you is to change the _version_ number when you modify the tarball itself (release number is rpm specific). Changing tarball without changing version may confuse people who are trying to use this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 18:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] New: BonvenoCF font. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: BonvenoCF font. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Summary: BonvenoCF font. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec file URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description : A fun font from the Crude Factory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 19:13:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051913.m75JDFMa028219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #10 from John McLean 2008-08-05 15:13:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Well, > > * Currently I don't know how to use this, however when I just type $ transbot, > I get a traceback as > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > $ transbot > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/transbot", line 37, in > channel_list = conf_file.readline().split ( ':' ).lower() [ 1 ] > AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'lower' > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Is this expected? > The traceback came from a typo. I'll need to go back and fix that. > (In reply to comment #7) > > -The latest source tarball has been uploaded at the same url. I simply forgot > > to upload it last time I made changes. I'm still forming habits concerning > > uploading changes and bumping the release numbers. > > * What I asked you is to change the _version_ number when you modify the > tarball > itself (release number is rpm specific). > > Changing tarball without changing version may confuse people who are trying > to > use this package. Alright. I guess I read your comment too quickly and equated version with release in my mind. My apologies. For future reference, should the version number be changed even for one-line corrections? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 19:29:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051929.m75JTlbb030671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 15:29:46 EDT --- python-tw-forms-0.9.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 19:31:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051931.m75JVLZj003248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 15:31:20 EDT --- python-tw-forms-0.9.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 19:33:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051933.m75JXFKw003474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #8 from _pjp_ 2008-08-05 15:33:13 EDT --- Hey thanks Kevin. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 19:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051948.m75JmOLo001442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #11 from John McLean 2008-08-05 15:48:23 EDT --- uploaded new srpm: http://jesusfreak91.googlepages.com/transbot-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 19:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808051950.m75JonKC006700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 --- Comment #16 from Javier Palacios 2008-08-05 15:50:47 EDT --- I have updated the package. The missing `cp -p` are fixed, and I've also adopted the Users & Groups guidelines. Spec URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge-4.5.19-4.fc9.src.rpm Regarding the way to hardcoding any password in the package, I'm thinking about writing a helper script that must be run by superuser and performs that task after the package has been installed. The point is the proper way to inform about it. Issuing a message on %post might be unnoticed by many users. Mailing to root account sounds better, but might not be correctly redirected. And adding that into a README/ENABLE file on %doc does not appear as a better solution to me. Any ideas ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 20:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457340] Review Request: ROME - Java tools for parsing, generating and publishing RSS and Atom feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052040.m75KeZM2011217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457340 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-08-05 16:40:34 EDT --- Taking on this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 20:56:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457340] Review Request: ROME - Java tools for parsing, generating and publishing RSS and Atom feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052056.m75KuAZw014442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457340 --- Comment #3 from Jesse Keating 2008-08-05 16:56:08 EDT --- The instructions for getting the source need work. I wind up with a file named "rome-0.9-src.tar.gz\?rev\=1.1" Naming looks right javadoc subpackage as expected buildrequires and requires seem correct successfully avoids building against the pre-shipped jar file. Everything looks good here. rpmlint only complains about a lack of documentation, and a non-standard group which is ignorable in my book. I'm passing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 20:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052057.m75KvU4E014682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #1 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-08-05 16:57:29 EDT --- Updated the Group tag in SPEC file Spec URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup.spec SRPM URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup-1.01-2.fc9.src.rpm The new SPEC and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 21:18:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052118.m75LIYMw019340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-05 17:18:33 EDT --- Two issues so far: 1. the backticks in perl(:MODULE_COMPAT... should be replaced by to make it more readable (and compliant to the perl packaging guidelines). 2. the resulting package doesn't install under r9/f10 - the requires needs to be changed to perl(DBD::mysql) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 21:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052123.m75LNY5m024594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 17:23:33 EDT --- why-2.14-2.fc8.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 22:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457340] Review Request: ROME - Java tools for parsing, generating and publishing RSS and Atom feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052230.m75MUJGR032325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457340 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2008-08-05 18:30:18 EDT --- Thanks, Jesse. I'll add an mv after the wget in the source-getting instructions. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rome Short Description: ROME is an set of open source Java tools for parsing, generating and publishing RSS and Atom feeds. Owners: overholt Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 22:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052254.m75MsNJG003094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 18:54:22 EDT --- pdfmerge-1.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 23:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052301.m75N1A76004337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 19:01:09 EDT --- pdfmerge-1.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 23:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052305.m75N5RbQ004963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 19:05:26 EDT --- bcrypt-1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 5 23:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808052314.m75NEipb009930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-05 19:14:43 EDT --- bcrypt-1.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 00:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-users - Adds NOCpulse user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060042.m760gE35017648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Michael Stahnke 2008-08-05 20:42:12 EDT --- I'll go ahead and start a review. Numbers 4 and 5 I need to look into more. A few notes FAIL - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint is not silent. This isn't show stopping, but could be better. rpmlint nocpulse-users-1.17.11-7.fc8.noarch.rpm nocpulse-users.noarch: W: no-documentation nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh nocpulse-users.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/nocpulse/.ssh nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse-users.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided NPusers 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. 1. Could any documentation be provided for this package? 2. Any time you obsolete something, you should provide it also, that way anything depending on what you obsolete doesn't have to be rebuilt. 3. /var/log/nocpulse log should be incorporated into logrotate. System admins will thank you. 4. ??- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . >>This really isn't code, it's a user 5. ?? - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. >>There isn't really source. Not sure how that works. OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . NA - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. NA - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. NA - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. NA - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. NA - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 01:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060110.m761AiLd026092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|456671 | Depends on| |456671 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 01:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457509] Review Request: scim-thai - Thai IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060123.m761NUre023482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-05 21:23:29 EDT --- Package imported and built for devel and F-9. Thanks for the quick review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 01:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060144.m761i63q026183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-08-05 21:44:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/libss7.spec SRPM URL: http://jcollie.fedorapeople.org/libss7-1.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Update to 1.0.1 (Mostly a license clarification). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 02:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060236.m762aCbG006763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 --- Comment #28 from Jon Stanley 2008-08-05 22:36:08 EDT --- Note that ExtJS published a new version of their exception today over at http://extjs.com/products/floss-exception.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 04:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 00:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: 69bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060445.m764jBJ3023353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|BonvenoCF font. |Review Request: | |69bonvenocf-fonts - | |BonvenoCF font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 04:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 00:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060443.m764hYLK023010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Old Standard Fonts |Review Request: | |69oldstandard-fonts - Old | |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 05:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] New: Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 Summary: Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/ms-sys.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/ms-sys-2.1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This program is used to create DOS/MS-compatible boot records. It is able to do the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk. It is also able to do the same as DOS "sys" to a floppy or FAT32 partition except that it does not copy any system files, only the boot record is written. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 05:37:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] New: Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Summary: Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/openwsman/openwsman.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/openwsman/ SRPM: openwsman-2.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Hello, I have finished packaging up openwsman, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it to Fedora Extras. Openwsman is a project intended to provide an open-source implementation of the Web Services Management specification (WS-Management) and to expose system management information on the Linux operating system using the WS-Management protocol. WS-Management is based on a suite of web services specifications and usage requirements that exposes a set of operations focused on and covers all system management aspects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 05:41:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060541.m765fAq0031102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-06 01:41:06 EDT --- There really needs to be a license file added to the top directory. License header in longer source files would be desirable too, specially C code. Some comments on the latest patch: -%define srcrelease 5 +%define srcrelease 4 Please use 3.1.x for future releases -Version: 3.1 +Version: 3.2 Is there a new upstream?? +Release: 1.f9 You must use "1%{?dist}". -License: GPLv2 +License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2 Not sure where this came from earlier... -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root No! # dependency for primary LSB application for v1.3 Provides: lsb = %{version} # dependency for primary LSB application for v2.0 and v3.0 @@ -93,120 +91,290 @@ ExclusiveArch: i386 ia64 x86_64 ppc ppc6 %ifarch %{ix86} # archLSB IA32 Base Libraries -Requires: libz.so.1 -Requires: libutil.so.1 -Requires: libpthread.so.0 -Requires: libncurses.so.5 -Requires: libm.so.6 -Requires: libgcc_s.so.1 -Requires: libdl.so.2 -Requires: libcrypt.so.1 +Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 +Requires: libcrypt.so.1 +Requires: libdl.so.2 +Requires: libgcc_s.so.1 +Requires: libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libglib-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libgmodule-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libgobject-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libgthread-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 +Requires: libm.so.6 +Requires: libncurses.so.5 +Requires: libpango-1.0.so.0 +Requires: libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 +Requires: libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 +Requires: libpthread.so.0 +Requires: libqt-mt.so.3 +Requires: libQtCore.so.4 +Requires: libQtGui.so.4 +Requires: libQtNetwork.so.4 +Requires: libQtOpenGL.so.4 +Requires: libQtSql.so.4 +Requires: libQtSvg.so.4 +Requires: libQtXml.so.4 Requires: libstdc++.so.6 +Requires: libutil.so.1 +Requires: libz.so.1 Lot of changes? -touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-%{archname} -touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch -touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-%{archname} -touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch +touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.2-%{archname} +touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.2-noarch +touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/lsb-release.d/desktop-3.2-%{archname} +touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/lsb-release.d/desktop-3.2-noarch Please use %{_sysconfdir}. - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu} + $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu} Why? +#/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts +#/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt Please drop lines. %defattr(-,root,root) -%doc README Why? -%{_sysconfdir}/redhat-lsb -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d -%{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d/* +/etc/redhat-lsb +#%config /etc/lsb-release +#/etc/redhat-lsb +%dir /etc/lsb-release.d +/etc/lsb-release.d/* No! +#%dir /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver +#/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/* Again -#/bin/mailx +/bin/mailx No! -%{_sbindir}/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu} +/usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu} No +#/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy +#/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts +#/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt Ditto %changelog -* Thu Jul 31 2009 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-21 -- remove symlink for mailx (Bug #457241) - -* Tue Feb 19 2008 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.1-20 -- Autorebuild for GCC 4.3 - -* Wed Oct 3 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-19 -- fix build issue on ppc - (.opd+0x10): multiple definition of `__libc_start_main' It is not considered good to remove old changelog entries - please leave them. +* Wed Apr 16 2008 Mats Wichmann 3.2-1 +- port forward to LSB 3.2 You can put it in your name, I think. -* Fri Sep 21 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-18 -- fix build issue in minimal build root (Bug #265241) - -* Wed Aug 29 2007 Fedora Release Engineering - 3.1-17 -- Rebuild for selinux ppc32 issue. - -* Fri Aug 20 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-16 -- update spec file in accordance to feedback provided through merge review - merge-review.patch - #226363 - -* Wed Jul 18 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-15.f8 +* Wed Jul 18 2007 Lawrence - 3.1-13.f8 - Resolved: #239842 - /lib/lsb/init-functions shall use aliases but not functions -- forward port the patch from 3.1-12.3.EL which fix #217566, #233530, #240916 - -* Wed May 2 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-14.fc7 -- fixed Bug 232918 for new glibc version +- forward port the patch from 3.1-12.3.EL -* Wed Feb 21 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-13 -- fixed Bug 226363 +* Tue Jun 26 2007 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-12.3.EL +- Resolves: #217566 - rewrite /lib/lsb/init-functions file needs to define the commands as true shell functions rather than aliases. +- Resolves: #233530 - LSB pidofproc misspelled as pidofprof. +- Resolves: #240916 - "log_warning_message" replaced with "log_warning_msg" per the LSB 3.1 spec + +* Wed Dec 6 2006 Lawrence Lim - 3.1-12.2.EL +- Resolves: bug 217566 +- revise patch So this is a forward port from RHEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 06:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: - myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060604.m76649JJ001547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #6 from Minto Joseph 2008-08-06 02:04:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: myanmar3-unicode-fonts Short Description: Myanmar3 unicode font Owners: mintojoseph Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 06:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060608.m7668sil002247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #40 from Hao Liu 2008-08-06 02:08:53 EDT --- Upload src rpm and spec for redhat-lsb3.1 to hliu.fedorapeople.org 1. Revise the License info 2. Remove the 2 requires provided by redhat-lsb3.1 3. Add comments explaining why hard-coded lib paths are kept. 4. Resolve some hard-coded path problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 06:30:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060630.m766ULeb005312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #41 from Hao Liu 2008-08-06 02:30:20 EDT --- Update Comment#40: The full urls for the 2 uploaded files are: SPEC: [http://hliu.fedorapeople.org/redhat-lsb.spec] SRPM: [http://hliu.fedorapeople.org/redhat-lsb-3.1-21.fc9.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 06:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] New: Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Summary: Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcc/sfcc.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcc/ SRPM: sblim-sfcc-2.1.0-0.src.rpm Description: Hello! I have finished packaging sblim-sfcc and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. Small Footprint CIM Broker(SFCB) is a lightweight CIM daemon that responds to CIM client requests for system management data and/or performs system management tasks. sfcb supports most of the standard CIM XML over http/https protocol.It is highly modular, allowing functionality to be easily added, removed or customized for different management applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 06:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 02:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] New: Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Summary: Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/wsmancli/wsmancli.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/wsmancli/ SRPM: wsmancli-2.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Hello! I have finished packaging sblim-sfcc and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. wsmancli is a part of openwsman, an Opensource Implementation of WS-Management. This is the command line client of openwsman providing an easy way to access WS-Management service, especially for testing and exploration purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 07:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 03:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060708.m7678elH010659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-06 03:08:39 EDT --- Still rpmlint clean :) This looks good now. I can do a full review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 07:16:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 03:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060716.m767Gx02011935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 03:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > * What I asked you is to change the _version_ number when you modify the > > tarball > > itself (release number is rpm specific). > > > > Changing tarball without changing version may confuse people who are trying > > to > > use this package. > > Alright. I guess I read your comment too quickly and equated version with > release in my mind. My apologies. For future reference, should the version > number be changed even for one-line corrections? If you want to modify the tarball itself and wants to publish a new tarball _formally_, please. (Note: some upstream developer and also Fedora package submitter doesn't publish new tarball formally until the review request he/she submitted is passed) Well, * Now this package itself is okay * You are currently in need of sponsor. In this case you have to either submit another review request or do pre-review of other person's review request as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored You have 2 other review requests, which seem good to some extent (they need fixing on some points... however it is not sure if I have enough time to review your other review requests at the moment) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (transbot) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:05:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060805.m7685e7l014917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #42 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-06 04:05:38 EDT --- Ok. lets start review again with new maintainer. rpmlint on binary gave me redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 ld-linux.so.2 redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig ==> Ok redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch ==> As explained in SPEC needed these LSB Profile files and as they are not having any contents no issue of marking as conffile. redhat-lsb.i386: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 redhat-lsb.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 redhat-lsb.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 ==> Not sure about this for now redhat-lsb.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ==> From LSB documentation page 460 this looks ok. redhat-lsb.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1-22 3.1-21.fc10 ==> Change Release tag in SPEC rpmlint on SRPM gave redhat-lsb.src:361: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb redhat-lsb.src:379: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/install_initd redhat-lsb.src:380: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ===> From spec comment its ok As comment in SPEC said "# LSB uses /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib64 even for 64bit OS" you should revert your changes 437c436 < /lib/lsb --- > /%{_lib}/lsb otherwise there will be problem on 64bit machine as those files will be installed in /usr/lib64 cp command should be used like "cp -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060804.m7684Bbr018767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 04:04:10 EDT --- Some notes before Petersen-san do a full review: * Seemingly redundant version specific (Build)Requires - Please explain why you want version specific (Build)Requires such as glib2-devel > 2.4, splite-devel > 3.0 Even Fedora Core 3 shipped sqlite-3.1.2 and glib2-2.4.7. * Cflags http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=761796 And as a result the debuginfo rpm creation is not correct. By the way why do you call cmake twice? * Unihan.h - %_includedir/Unihan.h contains: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 29 #ifndef UNIHAN_H_ 30 #define UNIHAN_H_ 31 #include "config.h" 32 #include "Unihan_enum.h" 33 #include "str_functions.h" ------------------------------------------------------------------ However I can find these 3 headers nowhere. Also please note that installing autotool-generated "config.h" as system-wide header file must be avoided: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034#c43 * Directory ownership issue - %_datadir/doc/%name is not owned by any packages. By the way, do you really want two document directories: %_datadir/%doc/%name-version and %_datadir/doc/%name ? Please consider to unify document directories. * linkage mistakes - rpmlint shows: ------------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint libUnihan libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 g_free libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 g_free libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 sqlite3_close libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 g_strsplit_set libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 sqlite3_value_int libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 sqlite3_result_text libUnihan.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 g_strdup ...... (and many) -------------------------------------------------------------------- You can check this also by $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libUnihan.so.0.4 >/dev/null For shipping -devel subpackages this is not allowed because leaving undefined non-weak symbols will cause linkage error. This usually means that libUnihan.so is not correctly linked against proper libraries. Please fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060808.m76887Cb019538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-08-06 04:08:06 EDT --- Thanks for your suggestion of dumping README.Fedora if no configuration is found; I believe I've added this and fixed the other issues in these new spec/srpms: Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hellanzb.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hellanzb-0.13-4.fc9.src.rpm Additionally it now builds in mock [0]. [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=761872 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060810.m768AnuD020082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 --- Comment #17 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-08-06 04:10:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Regarding the way to hardcoding any password in the package, I'm thinking about > writing a helper script that must be run by superuser and performs that task > after the package has been installed. The point is the proper way to inform > about it. Issuing a message on %post might be unnoticed by many users. Mailing > to root account sounds better, but might not be correctly redirected. And > adding that into a README/ENABLE file on %doc does not appear as a better > solution to me. > Any ideas ? The Fedora way is a README.Fedora file in %doc. It is used by many packages and that is what an admin should look for after installing if manual intervention is needed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060812.m768Ci0i015921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #43 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-06 04:12:42 EDT --- Ok got statically linked rpmlint messages bug 232918. Because of this bug fix this package got that rpmlint message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] New: Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 Summary: Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Avogadro is an advanced molecular editor designed for cross-platform use in computational chemistry, molecular modeling, bioinformatics, materials science, and related areas. It offers flexible rendering and a powerful plugin architecture. By the way: This is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:21:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060821.m768Lsd1021864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at leemhuis.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060841.m768ffwp024738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-06 04:41:40 EDT --- For the test-suite it is possible to do the review with the one test failing (just comment out the %check section from the spec) and only wait for a solution before building the package. Does the test #98 fail only on rawhide or in F-9/8 too? But there are still unresolved issues from comment #3 - wrong license tag - "-g" is filtered out from the CFLAGS during running configure (should be solvable with appending --enable-debug) - incomplete debuginfo (depends on the CFLAGS issue), will require "chmod a-x" for all *.c and *.h files - excessive --with-readline as an parameter for configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 08:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060854.m768sHoP026963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #44 from Hao Liu 2008-08-06 04:54:16 EDT --- Revise the spec according to the comment #42 and #43, SPEC: [http://hliu.fedorapeople.org/redhat-lsb-3.1-22.spec] SRPM: [http://hliu.fedorapeople.org/redhat-lsb-3.1-22.fc9.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 09:14:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432205] Review Request: exe - eXe eLearning XHTML editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060914.m769EQmw030120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432205 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2008-08-06 05:14:24 EDT --- Okay, all (almost all?) needed info for cleaning up the licensing mess that is eXe is now available here: http://eduforge.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=5768 But I simply don't have the time / motivation to clean this up, so I'm closing this review request as wontfix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 09:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060931.m769VDpL027839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-06 05:31:12 EDT --- prover9-200805a-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 09:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060932.m769W9B1032553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-06 05:32:07 EDT --- I have not forgotten about this. I am trying to identify if these libs work on PPC but for the moment I do not have the hardware at hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 09:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060933.m769X795028012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-06 05:33:06 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153#c17 applies here too, for the moment. will come back once I have news. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 09:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808060942.m769gWw7029360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 --- Comment #24 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-06 05:42:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) Thanks, Mamoru. I've added myself to the CC: list of those bugs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 10:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061016.m76AGYx8005970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.spb.su --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-06 06:16:32 EDT --- If there is no objection may be I can continue maintenance this package? SPEC: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel.spec SRPM: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) All changes made by your comment (see changelog): - Correct BuildRoot - License changed to GPLv2+ - Add patch0 - axel-1.1-fedora-build.patch - Regular file /usr/etc/axelrc changed to %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/axelrc - Disable strip binaries (switch --strip=0 to configure script) - Add internationalisation support: . Switch --i18n=1 to configure script . Add BR gettext . Add files for de and nl locales. rpmlint is quiet. And it is built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=761927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 10:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061018.m76AIwPs001894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 06:18:57 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 10:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 06:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061026.m76AQ9t5007320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-06 06:26:08 EDT --- This is my 4th (in Fedora package review, not in packaging history at all) package and I am looking for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 11:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] New: Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 Summary: Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcarter at entertain-me.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/arm4-0.8-0.1.fc9.beta2.src.rpm Description: An open source implementation of the Open Group's Application Response Measurement standard Version 4.0. This agent and daemon is capable of measuring transaction response times across multiple tiers and correlating them to determine the true source of application response problems. See http://www.arm4.org for more information. As this is my first package submission, I'm in need of a sponsor. I hope to contribute many related packages in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 11:59:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 07:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061159.m76BxLkL014250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 12:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 08:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061206.m76C6bj6015023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #45 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-06 08:06:35 EDT --- with updated SRPM I see that build.log gave me warning: File listed twice: /lib/lsb warning: File listed twice: /lib/lsb/init-functions Your %files should look like this %files %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README %{_sysconfdir}/redhat-lsb %dir %{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d # These files are needed because they shows which LSB we're supporting now, # for example, if core-3.1-noarch exists, it means we are supporting LSB3.1 now %{_sysconfdir}/lsb-release.d/* %{_mandir}/*/* %{_bindir}/* #/bin/mailx /bin/redhat_lsb_init /usr/lib/lsb /%{_lib}/*so* /lib/lsb/init-functions %{_sbindir}/redhat_lsb_trigger.%{_target_cpu} Otherwise with SRPM you submitted rpm failed to build on x86_64. Please, update SPEC and SRPM with no release increment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061349.m76Dnh4w000619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-06 09:49:41 EDT --- Some new comments: * BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel is actually unncessary, python-setuptools should be sufficient enough * Why did you merge the unrar and the configuration patch? They both have different goals so they should be kept seperate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061349.m76Dnnh2000721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:49:47 EDT --- Again ping? I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews#Submitter_not_responding -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:52:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061352.m76DqKYP025519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:52:18 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061351.m76DpToI025439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #47 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:51:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:54:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061354.m76DspIg025755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:54:49 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061352.m76DqoZu025592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-06 09:52:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd-1.5c-4.fc9.src.rpm next turn :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:53:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Email-Find.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Email-Find-0.10-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456723] Review Request: libatasmart - ATA S.M.A.R.T. Disk Health Monitoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061359.m76DxVaB002560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456723 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:59:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456828] Review Request: libasyncns - Asynchronous Name Service Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061359.m76DxEaf002426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456828 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061356.m76DuwOf026503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:56:56 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061357.m76Dvk6Y026596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:57:43 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061359.m76DxcES026852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #48 from Alexander Kahl 2008-08-06 09:59:33 EDT --- Gianluca: I've fixed the "no-documentation" issue by adding the license to all subpackages. The joliet problem should go away with 1.6 stable; for the rest I've verified the files are necessary and correct for the unit tests. Right now there's nothing special required to have Zend Framework run on Fedora, if it ever will, I'll add a README. Thanks again! Jess: Which way do you recommend for staying in contact, do you want to be set CC for Zend Framework related bugs in RedHat Bugzilla or should I open a Zend Jira account and forward bug reports where applicable? Sorry guys for taking so long but whenever I tried posting Bugzilla's update seemed to get into my way.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458085] New: Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Summary: Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dtimms at iinet.net.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/nes_ntsc/nes_ntsc.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/nes_ntsc/nes_ntsc-0.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: NES NTSC video filter library. Pixel artifacts and color mixing play an important role in NES games console graphics. Accepts pixels in native 6-bit NES palette format, or a 9-bit format that includes the three color emphasis bits in PPU register $2001. Can also output an RGB palette for use in a regular blitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 13:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061359.m76Dxjrr002645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 09:59:44 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:05:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061405.m76E5LKl028440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #13 from John McLean 2008-08-06 10:05:20 EDT --- I've requested sponsorship. My FAS name is mcleanj. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] New: Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Summary: Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/LuxRender.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/LuxRender-0.5-1.fc9.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457277] Review Request: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine - Reporting Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061405.m76E5AJ9028304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457277 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walters at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Colin Walters 2008-08-06 10:05:09 EDT --- Took a brief look; need to do the build deps first though. [+] source files match upstream [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper [+] %clean is present. -- TO BE REVIEWED [?] package builds in koji [?] package installs properly [?] rpmlint is silent. please fix. [?] owns the directories it creates. [?] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [?] no duplicates in %files. [?] file permissions are appropriate. [?] code, not content. [?] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [?] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061411.m76EBOte005529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #49 from Alexander Kahl 2008-08-06 10:11:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ZendFramework Short Description: Leading open-source PHP framework Owners: akahl Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:12:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061412.m76EC7W3005694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #2 from David Timms 2008-08-06 10:12:06 EDT --- I plan on up/packaging upstreams other *_ntsc libs. The author mentions the latest release include a source cleanup and refactoring, so that some files are now identical between the 3x *_ntsc sources. Would it be acceptable/worth the effort to create a single libntsc package, that includes all three upstream source packages, with sub packages for -nes, -snes, -sms ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061416.m76EG7PF006581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-06 10:16:05 EDT --- There are the new files http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3.spec http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3-1.1.4-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Aug 06 2008 pingou 1.1.4-2 - Keep the timestamp in the README.txt - Change the CFLAG for the compilation - Remove BR perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061416.m76EGtG1006725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 10:16:54 EDT --- Confirmed. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061420.m76EKjtB031701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #30 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-08-06 10:20:44 EDT --- I'll step in if the reporter is not willing to maintain this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061411.m76EBfhB030110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2008-08-06 10:11:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313566) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313566) diff between original dribble spec0.2.0 and this spec. I request some assistance regarding lib sonames. This library has previously been packaged and used by out of Fedora repo applications as libnes_ntsc.so.0.2.0 Have I gone about the soname change in an effective way ? Should I keep the original 0.2.0 soname instead ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061422.m76EMD8s007688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #50 from Jess Portnoy 2008-08-06 10:22:12 EDT --- Hi Alex, I'd love to be set CC. It can't hurt :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061433.m76EXIJR001005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-06 10:33:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libproxy Short Description: A library handling all the details of proxy configuration Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454199] Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061455.m76EtGeh005877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walters at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Colin Walters 2008-08-06 10:55:15 EDT --- [+] source files match upstream [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines - Can you annotate the patch to say whether it is going to be upstreamed? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged (as far as I can tell) [+] BuildRequires are proper [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji [+] package installs properly [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] code, not content. [+] -javadoc package exists and works [+] %doc exists Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457546] Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061440.m76Eem4e002891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-06 10:40:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061440.m76Een0O002913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Bug 457888 depends on bug 457546, which changed state. Bug 457546 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-RawIP - A Perl extension for manipulating raw ip packets using libpcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457546 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061450.m76EoJW0013134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 --- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-06 10:50:17 EDT --- CVS admins: Can you help, please? $ cvs -d :ext:mitr at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/pkgs co perl-Net-Ping-External cvs server: cannot find module `perl-Net-Ping-External' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules (Checking out perl-Net-RawIP, which was added roughly at the same time, works fine.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 14:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061450.m76EoS9W013189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 10:50:26 EDT --- For -12: * Scriptlets --------------------------------------------------- # env LANG=C rpm -Fvh *i386*rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:pokegen ########################################### [100%] /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `2' used to build cache error: %post(pokegen-0.0.2-0.12.20080804svn236.fc10.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 --------------------------------------------------- - "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig" can be used when only /sbin/ldconfig is called on %post. If other commands are executed like this, don't use "-p /sbin/ldconfig" and simply use: --------------------------------------------------- %post /sbin/ldconfig update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : ............. --------------------------------------------------- ! rpmlint - rpmlint shows there are still some unused direct dependencies on installed libraries. You can check this also by --------------------------------------------------- $ ldd -u /usr/lib/libpokebattle.so.0 Unused direct dependencies: /usr/lib/libpokemod.so.0 /usr/lib/libphonon.so.4 /usr/lib/libkrosscore.so.4 /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4 /usr/lib/libQtXml.so.4 /lib/libm.so.6 --------------------------------------------------- , for example. While this is _not_ a blocker, you may want to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061538.m76FcxIa023902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061539.m76FdDDn023954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-08-06 11:39:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I plan on up/packaging upstreams other *_ntsc libs. The author mentions the > latest release include a source cleanup and refactoring, so that some files are > now identical between the 3x *_ntsc sources. Would it be acceptable/worth the > effort to create a single libntsc package, that includes all three upstream > source packages, with sub packages for -nes, -snes, -sms ? IMHO it is not worth the trouble and you could have a serious drawback. What if upstream update just -sms? You should make a new release for all three - and this is something unneeded by both end users (who would download a release for -nes and -snes for nothing) and for infrastructure (who would build a release for -nes and -snes for nothing). Separate packages is the way to go if upstream have separate independent sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061540.m76Fent8015688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-06 11:40:48 EDT --- Sorry, wrong SRPM URL. http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/r128/xorg-x11-drv-r128-6.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454917] Review Request: figlet - a program to print stdin to stdout as ASCIIart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061530.m76FUCer013372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454917 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks|177841 |182235 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 11:30:10 EDT --- As debian says, currently I think that this is non-free. The license of crc.c (and others): http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/f/figlet/figlet_2.2.2-1/figlet.copyright The issue http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=274950 does not seem to have disappeared. Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061540.m76Fe901024424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-06 11:40:08 EDT --- Sorry, wrong SRPM URL. SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/mach64/xorg-x11-drv-mach64-6.8.0-1.fc9..src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061543.m76FhujQ024991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-06 11:43:55 EDT --- Removed Extra dot ;-) http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/mach64/xorg-x11-drv-mach64-6.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061544.m76Fi5h1016167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #2 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-08-06 11:44:04 EDT --- This is my First package and I am seeking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454667] Review Request: truecrypt - Free open-source disk encryption software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061604.m76G46ZB029881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-06 12:04:04 EDT --- License as-is is non-free. Going to try to talk to upstream to see if they are interested in resolving the issues (plural) with the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:45:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061545.m76FjwUd025618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061617.m76GHjbj000483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:21:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061621.m76GL50M001332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #11 from Adam Tkac 2008-08-06 12:21:01 EDT --- I will take care about this review. - spec looks fine for me - mock build OK - rpmlint doesn't print any error/warning => Reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454199] Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061513.m76FDLOl018392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-06 11:13:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pentaho-libxml Short Description: Namespace aware Java SAX-Parser utility library Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:04:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061504.m76F4sET016180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #304019|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061510.m76FAR0t017803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pingou at pingoured.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:38:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454667] Review Request: truecrypt - Free open-source disk encryption software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061638.m76GcDPx005264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667 --- Comment #4 from Levente Farkas 2008-08-06 12:38:11 EDT --- can you tell me exactly which part of the license should have to change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:41:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454917] Review Request: figlet - a program to print stdin to stdout as ASCIIart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061641.m76Gf2HG027576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454917 --- Comment #11 from John McLean 2008-08-06 12:41:00 EDT --- Figlet has been re-licensed (in 2005) under the Academic Free License, rather than the Artistic license. See comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:01:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] New: seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 Summary: seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/seahorse-plugins.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/seahorse-plugins-2.23.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The plugins and utilities in this package integrate seahorse into the GNOME desktop environment and allow users to perform operations from applications like nautilus or gedit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061653.m76GrG9G029591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-06 12:53:15 EDT --- Seems well. APPROVED You may want to remove an useless comment (# aclocal ; automake -a ; autoconf), and clarify the origin of r128.xinf a bit before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:46:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061646.m76GkqVM028433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061703.m76H3TPh010895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das 2008-08-06 13:03:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Remove the sitearch macro definition and CFLAGS line. Those are not needed for > > a noarch package. Include a copy of the license under a file called COPYING. > > The license of the source should match the tag in the spec file. > > > > You might also want to move your project to fedorahosted.org and make the > > script more generic. > > Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediascrapper.spec > SRPM URL: > http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediascrapper-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm > > I will move the project under fedorahosted. The upcoming release will have > feature to download photos from flickr Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediascrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediascrapper-0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454917] Review Request: figlet - a program to print stdin to stdout as ASCIIart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061651.m76Gp4Sc007762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454917 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 12:51:02 EDT --- No. You are just saying that the license text is changed from ASL to AFL. Yes, actually with this license change figlet.c is relicensed under from ASL to AFL But I am referring to the license used in crc.c, inflate.c, and so on. The license used in these codes are not ASL and not AFL. They are licensed under what debian regards as non-free and I agree with this (i.e. these codes are non-free). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:53:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061653.m76GruSN008289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2008-08-06 12:53:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Remove the sitearch macro definition and CFLAGS line. Those are not needed for > a noarch package. Include a copy of the license under a file called COPYING. > The license of the source should match the tag in the spec file. > > You might also want to move your project to fedorahosted.org and make the > script more generic. Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediascrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediascrapper-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm I will move the project under fedorahosted. The upcoming release will have feature to download photos from flickr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457340] Review Request: rome - Java tools for parsing, generating and publishing RSS and Atom feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061729.m76HTWTW016125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457340 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: ROME - |Review Request: rome - |Java tools for parsing, |Java tools for parsing, |generating and publishing |generating and publishing |RSS and Atom feeds |RSS and Atom feeds --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:29:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:30:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454199] Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061730.m76HUpRm016637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:30:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061733.m76HXMir017013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:33:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455111] Review Request: python-webob - WSGI request and response object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061744.m76Hi1u9019131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455111 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:44:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061741.m76HfIrM018846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:41:16 EDT --- Sorry about that. Can you try again in about 20min or so? I think it's fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:44:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453082] Review Request: python-dtopt - Add options to doctest examples while they are running In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061744.m76HiwRP007570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453082 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:44:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061742.m76HgNJV007285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:42:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061743.m76HhUsu007406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-06 13:43:29 EDT --- Upon first look (and studying the java packaging guidelines for the first time...) it looks mostly ok (detailed review to follow). The one thing that I found so far is: "If the number of provided JAR files exceeds two, you must place them into a sub-directory." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061740.m76HeA2E006714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #51 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-06 13:40:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 17:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 13:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061735.m76HZ4A6005640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-06 13:35:03 EDT --- APPROVED Build on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=762691 rpmlint -i xorg-x11-drv-mach64-6.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm xorg-x11-drv-mach64.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Required: [x] Name [x] License [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully [x] BuildRequires [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] removing .la [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [NA] GUI [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines [x] md5sum Source from site: 6081b8fa50c689d51f85c2fbaf93867e Source from srpm: 6081b8fa50c689d51f85c2fbaf93867e Optional suggestions: a. You may like to add some more info to description b. clean #{_mandir}/man4/mach64.4* c. BuildRequires: automake autoconf libtool pkgconfig may be removed Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061801.m76I11rO012093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-06 14:00:59 EDT --- Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=763547 Remove the note on the specific website. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454199] Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061800.m76I0M7s011870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061800.m76I0Na4011893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 Bug 457263 depends on bug 454199, which changed state. Bug 454199 Summary: Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061813.m76IDXqF015170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-06 14:13:32 EDT --- It's just /usr/share/java/liblayout.jar despite the glob, so only one .jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:11:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061811.m76IBdaw014906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|dell | CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:12:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061812.m76ICBjD014974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|dell | CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061812.m76ICLoa015013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|dell | CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061825.m76IPnZD017912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walters at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Colin Walters 2008-08-06 14:25:48 EDT --- Doesn't build for me; seems to install an epiphany extension that's not in %files? error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/epiphany/2.22/extensions/libseahorseextension.so /usr/lib64/epiphany/2.22/extensions/seahorse.ephy-extension [+] source files match upstream [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged [+] BuildRequires are proper [+] %clean is present. [] package builds in koji [] package installs properly [] rpmlint is silent. [] owns the directories it creates. [] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [] no duplicates in %files. [] file permissions are appropriate. [] code, not content. [+] No doc subpackage needed [+] %doc exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454667] Review Request: truecrypt - Free open-source disk encryption software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061642.m76GgWEc006153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-06 12:42:30 EDT --- It is quite a bit of changes, not a small matter. I emailed this to upstream, if you'd like a copy, I can email it to you as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061851.m76Iplwn002510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-06 14:51:46 EDT --- Oh, sorry. I meant to investigate why it wouldn't build the ephy extension on my system, but forgot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230142] Review Request: SBLIM megapackage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061856.m76Iu5iM023818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230142 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-06 14:56:03 EDT --- Mark is no longer working on this. Last review comment indicated it was a bad idea to merge these. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457543] Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061512.m76FCdsZ009647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-06 11:12:37 EDT --- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061512.m76FCfc9009689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Bug 457888 depends on bug 457543, which changed state. Bug 457543 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 18:43:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061843.m76IhXgc021363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 --- Comment #2 from Colin Walters 2008-08-06 14:43:32 EDT --- Hm, trying to build in koji I get this: checking which gecko to use... ./configure: line 22985: test: : integer expression expected disabling epiphany plugin ./configure: line 22993: test: : integer expression expected ./configure: line 23001: test: : integer expression expected ./configure: line 23009: test: : integer expression expected ./configure: line 23028: test: : integer expression expected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061512.m76FCekw009672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Bug 457544 depends on bug 457543, which changed state. Bug 457543 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-Parse - A Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457543 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 16:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] New: Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Summary: Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.thincrust.net/download/ruby-pam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thincrust.net/download/ruby-pam-1.5.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ruby bindings for pam. This is my first package and I will require sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 15:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 11:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061520.m76FKTdr011513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-06 11:20:28 EDT --- $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/R-nws-1.6.3-1.fc9.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/R-nws-1.6.3-1.fc9.noarch.rpm R-nws.noarch: W: one-line-command-in-%post /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh R-nws.noarch: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. according to the R guidelines these warnings are safe to ignore. * rpmlint OK * Name OK * License OK * Sources: OK -site : bbd48a292826897a7b85d611cbd030f0ba605168 nws_1.6.3.tar.gz -src.rpm: bbd48a292826897a7b85d611cbd030f0ba605168 ../SOURCES/nws_1.6.3.tar.gz * Build on F-9 OK * Build on F-10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=762655 * Requires: OK * Files: OK * Macros: OK * The library loads into R ! The description of the command ?nws mentions: NetWorkSpaces makes it easy to create and experiment with parallel programs without requiring specialized tools or hardware. You must install both the NetWorkSpaces server (on one machine) and the R NetWorkSpaces package (on all machines involved in the computation). Should the server be include as a Require ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 19:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061925.m76JPs3c008881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |soumya at dgplug.org --- Comment #5 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-08-06 15:25:53 EDT --- If there in no interest from the submitter now , I can take over the package as I need it to package ENTERTAINER. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 19:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061940.m76JewF4032239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #1 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-06 15:40:56 EDT --- building on rawhide, rpmlint throws: sblim-sfcc.src: E: no-spec-file sblim-sfcc.src: W: non-standard-group Systems Management/Base sblim-sfcc.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libcimcClientXML.so sblim-sfcc.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/doc sblim-sfcc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Systems Management/Base sblim-sfcc.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.0-0 2.1.0-0 sblim-sfcc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/sblim-sfcc-2.1.0/backend/cimxml/indicationlistener.c sblim-sfcc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/sblim-sfcc-2.1.0/backend/cimxml/nativeCimXml.h sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man3 sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/include sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Systems Management/Base 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 19:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808061942.m76JgNC1032531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski 2008-08-06 15:42:22 EDT --- * Wed Aug 6 2008 Orion Poplawski - 1.2-1 - Update to 1.2 release - Fixup unit test run http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/framewave.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/framewave-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 20:33:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062033.m76KXqns021326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matt_domsch at dell.com --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-06 16:33:50 EDT --- Review: Fix all rpmlint errors/warnings. sblim-sfcc.src: E: no-spec-file sblim-sfcc.src: W: non-standard-group Systems Management/Base sblim-sfcc.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libcimcClientXML.so sblim-sfcc.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/doc sblim-sfcc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Systems Management/Base sblim-sfcc.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.0-0 2.1.0-0 sblim-sfcc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/sblim-sfcc-2.1.0/backend/cimxml/indicationlistener.c sblim-sfcc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/sblim-sfcc-2.1.0/backend/cimxml/nativeCimXml.h sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man3 sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/include sblim-sfcc-devel.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Systems Management/Base 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 7 warnings. Naming: ok spec file name: wrong. Should be sblim-sfcc.spec version: ok release: consider adding %{?dist} tag license: EPL OK Source URL: not ok, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net no prebuild binaries: ok BuildRoot: not ok, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Requires: curl should get picked up automatically by the dependency processor, don't add it here. BuildRequires: don't list gcc-c++. no packager, vendor, copyright, tags: ok summary and description tags: ok %setup shouldn't need those extra args remove the export PATCH_GET and commented #%patch0 %build make doesn't use the macro for invoking -j for parallel make. Please fix. %install missing mandatory initial cleanup. Should be: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} %install doesn't need the extra paranoia checking. %clean doesn't need the extra paranoia checking. no rpaths: ok no config files: ok no initscripts: ok no desktop files: ok consistent use of macros: ok no makeinstall: ok no lang files: ok scriptlets: ok no conditional deps: ok builds with a normal user account: ok not relocatable: ok code, not content: ok directory ownership: not ok. package must not own %{_includedir} or %{_mandir} itself. users and groups: ok not a web app: ok conflicts: ok no kmods: ok no files under /srv: ok license file not in %doc: must fix english: ok legible: ok source matches: ok package builds on x86_64 at least: ok calls ldconfig appropriately: ok no duplicate files: ok file permissions: mostly ok, see rpmlint headers in -devel: ok no pkgconfig file (should it have one??) devel package has fully versioned dependency on lib package: no - pls fix libtool archives removed: ok Please correct these items and re-submit. Thanks, Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 20:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062048.m76KmOgi010953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #3 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-06 16:48:23 EDT --- while you're at it, check out the compiler warnings thrown in build.log. It looks like some header files are missing which would make for a good patch to send upstream. Lots of implicit function definitions for stdlib functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 20:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062053.m76KrgJZ028896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 20:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062059.m76KxOUx029956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-06 16:59:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313642) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313642) build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062121.m76LLtUG001793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 --- Comment #4 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-06 17:21:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 Short Description: X.org X11 mach64 driver Owners: xgl-maint at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:24:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458180] New: Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 Summary: Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, rakesh.pandit at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Mailutils is a GNU implementation of various mail-handling utilities. This package offers basic Mailutils tools including SMTP and local delivery agents. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/mailutils.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/mailutils-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:23:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062123.m76LNFGO017971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 --- Comment #4 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-06 17:23:14 EDT --- gah, useless needinfo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:22:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062122.m76LMnaM017924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 --- Comment #3 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-06 17:22:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-r128 Short Description: X.org X11 r128 driver Owners: xgl-maint at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454917] Review Request: figlet - a program to print stdin to stdout as ASCIIart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062132.m76LWVDj019354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454917 --- Comment #13 from John McLean 2008-08-06 17:32:30 EDT --- Ah. That is a problem. In that case, then I suppose I should mark it as closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:42:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062142.m76LgOWo005156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #57 from Andrea Santilli 2008-08-06 17:42:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313646) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313646) patch for xdg-user-dirs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:33:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457152] Review Request: appliance-tools tools for generating appliance images on Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062133.m76LXKLA003642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 David Huff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from David Huff 2008-08-06 17:33:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: appliance-tools Short Description: tools for building appliance images Owners: huff Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:41:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062141.m76LfaLq021062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #56 from Andrea Santilli 2008-08-06 17:41:28 EDT --- you might want to add this little patch to make it compatible to the xdg user directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062149.m76LnZth006089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #4 from David Timms 2008-08-06 17:49:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) ... > Separate packages is the way to go if upstream have separate independent > sources. Thanks, I thought that might be the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:47:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062147.m76Llw0G005984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #15 from John McLean 2008-08-06 17:47:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: transbot Short Description: IRC translation bot Owners: mcleanj Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mcleanj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 21:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458186] New: Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458186 Summary: Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME. It reads and writes many audio formats such as WAV, MP3 and FLAC through its modular system of file format drivers and can also extract the audio from video formats like MPG, WMV and AVI through the FFmpeg file format driver. It can use either OSS, ALSA or JACK for recording and playback and interfaces with the GLADSPA plugin system to provide a wide range of high-quality audio processing plugins including filters, compressors and delay effects. SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gnusound-0.7.5-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnusound.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 22:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062207.m76M7Hln009269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 --- Comment #3 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-06 18:07:16 EDT --- Hi Arindam. Some comments and questions: - The plugin shouldn't be versioned. Can we prevent that? For now the Player plugin is at /usr/lib64/libstageplugin.so.1, but if you try to load it Player will only try libstageplugin.so (without .1 in the end). So only if the devel sub-package is installed the plugin can actually be loaded. - There is a problem with the Player package with the plugin search path. We need to define a Plugin directory like /usr/lib/player which is used to store plugins. I will work on that for the Player package so that we can use it for Stage. - Have you tried the new 3.0.1? Maybe we want to rename this package to stage2 and package the new version as stage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 22:50:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] New: Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 Summary: Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, rakesh.pandit at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The coredumper library can be compiled into applications to create core dumps of the running program -- without terminating. It supports both single- and multi-threaded core dumps, even if the kernel does not natively support multi-threaded core files. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/coredumper.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/coredumper-1.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 22:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457545] Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062252.m76MqqDn016522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-06 18:52:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 22:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062252.m76MqrKV016543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Bug 457888 depends on bug 457545, which changed state. Bug 457545 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Ping-External - Cross-platform interface to ICMP "ping" utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457545 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 23:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062311.m76NBLWO020262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #29 from Jon Stanley 2008-08-06 19:11:19 EDT --- Had a mini-conversation with spot on IRC today: (edited to show relevant parts, there was another conversation ongoing). 11:26 < jds2001> btw, extjs 2.2 was released on monday 11:26 < jds2001> with the FLOSS exception 11:26 < jds2001> need spot to opine on that :) 11:27 < spot> do not want 11:27 < spot> RH Legal says stay far far far away from ExtJS. Exception, or no exception. As a result of this, closing this review CANTFIX. However, it would be great if we could port this to use some other JavaScript library, since that's really the only problem with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 6 23:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 19:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808062352.m76NqZE5027873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-08-06 19:52:35 EDT --- Fixed. Sorry for merging the two patches, that happened on accident and I've reversed it now. Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hellanzb.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hellanzb-0.13-5.fc9.src.rpm Continues to build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 00:16:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070016.m770GZxW032475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-06 20:16:34 EDT --- I've updated the spec and srpm to include the epiphany extension now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 00:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454917] Review Request: figlet - a program to print stdin to stdout as ASCIIart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070049.m770n61u020960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454917 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-06 20:49:04 EDT --- Okay. Once closing. Thank you anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 02:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070209.m7729khV020323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #18 from Kevin Kofler 2008-08-06 22:09:44 EDT --- The unused direct dependencies might be partly KDE's fault. Upstream knows about it and is working on fixing it for 4.2. (AFAIK some parts of the fix are in 4.1, but disabled by default.) So we'll be working to get this sorted out in the KDE packages. However, some of those are also caused by pokegen's own libraries: preferably, all shared libraries should use: set_target_properties(targetname PROPERTIES LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES "") (CMake defaults to linking in all indirect dependencies directly, and this is unlikely to change for compatibility reasons, unless the Fedora CMake gets patched. While ELF with GNU ld, as currently used in Fedora, lets you use symbols from indirectly-linked dependencies just fine, most platforms don't allow that, and the new "gold" linker might also be stricter, so changing this default behavior is considered an incompatible change.) Note that CMake 2.4 ignores this property, so it will only help for 2.6 (currently only Rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 02:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070239.m772d8JG008608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-06 22:39:07 EDT --- package name: ok spec name: ok packaging guidelines: ok. might want to add a bug ref or explanatory comment about the patch, though license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: ok excludearch: ok locales: n/a shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok still to be checked: buildability rpmlint buildrequires directory ownership duplicate files file ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 03:07:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 23:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] New: Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-json.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-json-1.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PHP support for JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) serialization. I'm not in a very descriptive frame of mind at present, so any input on a better summary/description would be better, but it's a very simple php module that adds two extra functions to convert json<->arrays. Note, this is for EPEL only, as PHP includes these functions as of 5.2 (EL-5 is 5.1 and I'm not sure about EL-4). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 04:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070439.m774dgQR026660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-07 00:39:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) + What is the need for two Source0 lines? The first one should be simply removed. + Unnecessary 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig' still remains. + You could look at Manuel's comment on simple-mtpupload, but its finally upto you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 04:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070444.m774iial011724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-07 00:44:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Fedora tends to prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo), so it would be nice if you could use it instead of %defattr(-,root,root). But this is not a blocker for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 04:55:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070455.m774tuFV029257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-07 00:55:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Please provide URLs to your new Spec/SRPM pair, bump their Release field and update the %changelog, when you make such a series of changes. That helps in tracking the changes and progress made during the course of the review. > + The versioned dependencies on pkgconfig, flex and glib2-devel are not > - fixed The -devel subpackage still has 'Requires: pkgconfig >= 1:0.14'. It should be 'Requires: pkgconfig'. > + The gzipped tarball is no longer available at the given Source location. > - a new version has been released during this package review, should I update to it? Even then the bzipped tarball of 1.0.0 is still available, while the gzipped counterpart is not. That is enough reason to fix the Source0. Whether you want to update to a new upstream release is a different matter and is your decision (I think you should). Also, the 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig' is not needed and should be removed, because those build dependencies which provide *.pc files should themselves bring it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 04:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070455.m774tFK1013446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- --- Comment #9 from Jindrich Novy 2008-08-07 00:55:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Fedora tends to prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Updated. (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > + What is the need for two Source0 lines? The first one should be simply > removed. It was a typo, the older one should just have to go away. > > + Unnecessary 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig' still remains. > Removed. > + You could look at Manuel's comment on simple-mtpupload, but its finally upto > you. Well, putting executable stuff into /usr/share/doc is not a good idea, we should either package it to be actually executable in /usr/bin or not to package it at all. Just removing the executable attribute to fool RPM is not a solution IMO. Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:04:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070504.m7754o1H030364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 01:04:49 EDT --- ptrash-1.0-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070505.m7755n2n015193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 01:05:48 EDT --- ptrash-1.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070507.m7757hZx031018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-07 01:07:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) + You are not removing rssh from /etc/shell on removal of the package. It should be removed in %postun. Here is how bash does it: %post HASBASH="" HASSH="" if [ ! -f /etc/shells ]; then > /etc/shells fi (while read line ; do if [ "$line" = "/bin/bash" ]; then HASBASH=1 elif [ "$line" = "/bin/sh" ]; then HASSH=1 fi done if [ -z "$HASBASH" ]; then echo "/bin/bash" >> /etc/shells fi if [ -z "$HASSH" ]; then echo "/bin/sh" >> /etc/shells fi) < /etc/shells %postun if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then /bin/grep -v '^/bin/bash$' < /etc/shells | \ /bin/grep -v '^/bin/sh$' > /etc/shells.new /bin/mv /etc/shells.new /etc/shells fi Here is how tcsh does it: %post if [ ! -f /etc/shells ]; then echo "%{_bindir}/tcsh" >> /etc/shells echo "%{_bindir}/csh" >> /etc/shells else grep -q '^%{_bindir}/tcsh$' /etc/shells || \ echo "%{_bindir}/tcsh" >> /etc/shells grep -q '^%{_bindir}/csh$' /etc/shells || \ echo "%{_bindir}/csh" >> /etc/shells fi %postun if [ ! -x %{_bindir}/tcsh ]; then grep -v '^%{_bindir}/tcsh$' /etc/shells | \ grep -v '^%{_bindir}/csh$' > /etc/shells.rpm cat /etc/shells.rpm > /etc/shells && rm /etc/shells.rpm fi Use whichever one you like. Personally, I like the latter. Looks more readable. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458232] New: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458232 Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adrian at linux.org.ar QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.proyectofedora.org/repositorio/aircrack-ptw.spec SRPM URL: http://www.proyectofedora.org/repositorio/aircrack-ptw-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: We were able to extend Klein's attack and optimize it for usage against WEP. Using our version, it is possible to recover a 104 bit WEP key with probability 50% using just 40,000 captured packets. For 60,000 available data packets, the success probability is about 80% and for 85,000 data packets about 95%. Using active techniques like deauth and ARP re-injection, 40,000 packets can be captured in less than one minute under good condition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458231] New: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adrian at linux.org.ar QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.proyectofedora.org/repositorio/aircrack-ptw.spec SRPM URL: http://www.proyectofedora.org/repositorio/aircrack-ptw-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: We were able to extend Klein's attack and optimize it for usage against WEP. Using our version, it is possible to recover a 104 bit WEP key with probability 50% using just 40,000 captured packets. For 60,000 available data packets, the success probability is about 80% and for 85,000 data packets about 95%. Using active techniques like deauth and ARP re-injection, 40,000 packets can be captured in less than one minute under good condition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458233] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070526.m775QErW018124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458233 Adrian Alves changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458233] New: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458233 Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adrian at linux.org.ar QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.proyectofedora.org/repositorio/aircrack-ptw.spec SRPM URL: http://www.proyectofedora.org/repositorio/aircrack-ptw-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: We were able to extend Klein's attack and optimize it for usage against WEP. Using our version, it is possible to recover a 104 bit WEP key with probability 50% using just 40,000 captured packets. For 60,000 available data packets, the success probability is about 80% and for 85,000 data packets about 95%. Using active techniques like deauth and ARP re-injection, 40,000 packets can be captured in less than one minute under good condition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070537.m775bWWO019977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-07 01:37:31 EDT --- Assigning after some talk with Petersen-san. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458231] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070537.m775b7vl003192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 01:37:05 EDT --- *** Bug 458232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458231] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070537.m775b1Ci003147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 01:36:59 EDT --- *** Bug 458233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070538.m775cdsc003296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|453520 | Depends on| |453520 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070538.m775cex6003332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |453519 Depends on|453519 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458232] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070537.m775b6Wt003168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458232 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 01:37:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458231 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:37:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458233] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070537.m775b0Lq003123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458233 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 01:36:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458231 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 05:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070549.m775nbZn021387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-07 01:49:35 EDT --- Kevin, thanks for the help. As I am not cmake or KDE expert it is really appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:05:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070605.m7765Zwo007334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-07 02:05:33 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070613.m776DWcY024641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 02:13:31 EDT --- First you should look into http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored You need to do 2 things 1) submit some more packages with enough packaging quality. 2) start doing pre-reviews of packages from queue http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html Note that as you are not sponsored yet, you should only do unoffcial pre-reviews where you only comments review and can not able to accept package. This will ensure that you have got sufficient understanding of rpm packaging and also review process. Don't forget to comment bug numbers here when you do some pre-reviews. Take help of following links while posting reviews. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070616.m776G5Fq025210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #46 from Hao Liu 2008-08-07 02:16:04 EDT --- According to the comment#45, revise the spec file and build the source rpm. SPEC: [http://hliu.fedorapeople.org/redhat-lsb.spec] SRPM: [http://hliu.fedorapeople.org/redhat-lsb-3.1-22.fc9.src.rpm] Description: 1. Replace %{_libdir}/lsb with /usr/lib/lsb 2. Replace /%{_lib}/* with /%{_lib}/*so* 3. replace /lib/lsb with /lib/lsb* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070641.m776f9UW013049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070640.m776exTp028762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070644.m776ivr0013405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-07 02:44:55 EDT --- We will still wait for the reply from Ankur (usually one month is required before switching submitter) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070641.m776fYwC013199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070657.m776viMe030853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 06:58:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070658.m776wKL1030901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:09:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070709.m7779mAH016833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #47 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 03:09:46 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=764240 package build successfully. Suggestions:- Add some more changelog in SPEC from comment #46 change prep section from %setup -q -a 0 %patch0 -p 0 to %setup -q %patch0 -p1 I think you can commit this new SPEC with above suggessted modification in CVS now. Can you commit and build new package? once you done comment here and will see if we have any issues otherwise will APPROVE and CLOSE this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070713.m777DLrJ000766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] New: Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Summary: Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-0.1.0.20080807-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: ibus (Input Bus) is a new input method framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:15:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070715.m777F9Lg017792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-07 03:15:08 EDT --- - README.txt convertion can be simplified. - you need to have export INIT_CFLAGS="%{optflags}" in the %build section - make test remains in the %build section. - non-standard perms for binaries, should be 755 It still seems strange if you don't install the .a or .so when you install some .h for the -devel package. Is it possible or relevant to build a shared onject library instead ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070726.m777QBtC019293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 03:26:11 EDT --- First you should look into http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored You need to do 2 things 1) submit some more packages with enough packaging quality. 2) start doing pre-reviews of packages from queue http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html Note that as you are not sponsored yet, you should only do unoffcial pre-reviews where you only comments review and can not able to accept package. This will ensure that you have got sufficient understanding of rpm packaging and also review process. Don't forget to comment bug numbers here when you do some pre-reviews. Take help of following links while posting reviews. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070734.m777YMYB003424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 03:34:21 EDT --- 1)you don't need following line in SPEC %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} 2) unable to verify source with URL Source0: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 07:50:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070750.m777oFH3006295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2008-08-07 03:50:14 EDT --- Just updated ibus.spec file. 1) %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} has been removed. 2) I will upload the tarball later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 08:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 04:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070804.m7784ErW009282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 04:04:13 EDT --- one more thing, I am not committing here that I am going to SPONSOR you. I just gave directions. So you can search for other sponsors also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 08:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 04:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070835.m778Z8t0015542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 08:36:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 04:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070836.m778alXV000415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-07 04:36:45 EDT --- Ping? What's the status of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 08:39:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 04:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070839.m778drhx000714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-07 04:39:52 EDT --- Adding CC to Tasaka-san, since he has kindly taken on the review of libUnihan, which blocks this package (bug 453520). rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 08:59:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 04:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070859.m778x7f0004593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #48 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 04:59:04 EDT --- Review:- With latest cvs build rpmlint gave redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 ld-linux.so.2 redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 redhat-lsb.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig redhat-lsb.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig redhat-lsb.i386: E: zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch redhat-lsb.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 redhat-lsb.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib redhat-lsb.src:361: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb redhat-lsb.src:382: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/install_initd redhat-lsb.src:383: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd redhat-lsb.src:439: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb redhat-lsb.src:441: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb* ==> all above are accepted for this package redhat-lsb.src:450: W: macro-in-%changelog _libdir redhat-lsb.src:451: W: macro-in-%changelog _lib ==> You should take care of this next time you build new release of redhat-lsb All other looks ok. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070900.m7790OGZ020597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #49 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-07 05:00:22 EDT --- oops new BZ UI is confusing. Correcting RESOLUTION -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:17:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] New: Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 Summary: Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-markdown.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-markdown-1.7-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: This is a Python implementation of John Gruber's Markdown. It is almost completely compliant with the reference implementation, though there are a few known issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:18:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070918.m779IMnO009042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-07 05:18:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem-0.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.2.8-1 - New upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070921.m779L9k5009889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 Jiri Moskovcak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #5 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-08-07 05:21:08 EDT --- Hi, thanks for the tips, I've updated to the latest version and made followong changes to spec: - fixed Source url - removed pkgconfig from BuildRequires - added shared-mime-info to Requires - dropped ppc patch - add the missing changelog Updated files: Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage-1.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:24:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070924.m779OB1u025713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #6 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-08-07 05:24:10 EDT --- sorry, wrong srpm url ^ Updated files: Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:29:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070929.m779TNGO011588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-07 05:29:22 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070927.m779RFFa011294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #39 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-07 05:27:14 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-5639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070939.m779dif8028962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] New: Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 Summary: Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-m17n.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-m17n-0.1.0.20080709-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: m17n engine for IBus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070945.m779jx3R015212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 --- Comment #50 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-07 05:45:58 EDT --- Thank you all - specially to Parag for his long work and effort on getting this package through. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070949.m779nl47030844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 Alexander Kahl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #52 from Alexander Kahl 2008-08-07 05:49:45 EDT --- All builds successful. If anyone wants this into EPEL/RHEL, I'll consider it - but for now, the implicated long-term responsibility is quite daunting. Thank you Jess and Gianluca for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 09:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808070953.m779r6WX016402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Alias| |ibus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071011.m77ABTwn002811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-07 06:11:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem-0.2.8-2.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.2.8-2 - Add missing BR ocaml-camlp4-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:28:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071028.m77ASt6m005779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071028.m77ASsv6005754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071028.m77ASpgG005698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |442714, 447738, 447740 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071028.m77ASrfF005732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:29:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071029.m77ATwaj023218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-07 06:29:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem-0.2.8-3.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.2.8-3 - Add missing BR ocaml-xmlrpc-light-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458254] New: Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lvillani at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.binaryhelix.net/fedora-package-config-zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.binaryhelix.net/fedora-package-config-zypper-9-1.fc9.rpm (it is an SRC rpm. don't worry) This package contains repository configuration for zypper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 10:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 06:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071039.m77AdhgL024862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-07 06:39:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://omploader.org/vbm84/fedora-package-config-zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vbm85/libzypp-4.27.24.0-1.fc9.src.rpm - New upstream release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 11:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071113.m77BDR4H031028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-07 07:13:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem-0.2.9-1.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.2.9-1 - New upstream release 0.2.9: - Fixes 64 bit builds. - Fixes builds on Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 12:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071220.m77CK0cc011483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 John McLean changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 12:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071226.m77CQWuN028838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|--- |Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 12:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 08:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071237.m77Cbm06015562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-07 08:37:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-mem-0.2.9-3.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.2.9-3 - Added missing indirect BRs for ocaml-xmlrpc-light-devel. - Added missing BR ocaml-pcre-devel. Finally I've got a complete list of BRs, and have been able to do a Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=764557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 13:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071326.m77DQtB9024364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 13:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071345.m77DjdEv027054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 Jiri Moskovcak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- --- Comment #8 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-08-07 09:45:38 EDT --- Hi, I updated to version 14.1 and make it modular as you suggested can you please take a look at the spec file? Thanks, Jirka Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/sox.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/sox-14.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 13:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071351.m77Dp0Mt027863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 13:50:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071350.m77DoxPt027840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458054 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 13:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458279] New: Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 Summary: Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcarter at entertain-me.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/python-arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/python-arm4-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Arm4 is a python module that provides for application response measurement across multiple tiers using the Open Group's Application Response Measurement (ARM) standard, Issue 4.0. See http://www.arm4.org/ for more information. This is the second of 3 packages I'm submitting relating to ARM, and is related to the arm4 package I submitted earlier. I'm still seeking sponsorship as I'm a new packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 13:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071354.m77DsaiF028281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 --- Comment #3 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-07 09:54:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/honeyd-1.5c-5.fc9.src.rpm even better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:15:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071415.m77EFarf032481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-07 10:15:35 EDT --- Well, for 0.7-2: * SourceURL - Please use %name, %version macros. With using these macros perhaps you won't have to modify SourceURL when the version is upgraded. * %PATCH0 - I guess there is no needed to rename "COPYING" to "LICENSE". Please use COPYING file as it is. * Requires - Please check if all needed rpms are correctly added to Requires. At least "pygtk2" seems needed for Requires as %_bindir/nxt_python contains: ----------------------------------------------------------- 16 import cStringIO 17 import gtk 18 import os.path ----------------------------------------------------------- ! Note I usually check python module related Requires like below: ----------------------------------------------------------- $ grep -h 'import ' `rpm -ql nxt_python | grep -v /usr/share/doc` | sort | uniq ----------------------------------------------------------- * Udev rule config file - It seems that usually udev rule config files are not marked as (noreplace) (even if rpmlint warns about it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:20:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] New: Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Summary: Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivaxer at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/gitosis/gitosis.spec SRPM URL: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/gitosis/gitosis-0.2-4.20080730git.fc9.src.rpm Description: Gitosis aims to make hosting git repos easier and safer. It manages multiple repositories under one user account, using SSH keys to identify users. End users do not need shell accounts on the server, they will talk to one shared account that will not let them run arbitrary commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:23:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071423.m77ENrLC001122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 John Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071429.m77ETBdO016551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #16 from John Khvatov 2008-08-07 10:29:10 EDT --- I sent another review-request #458288. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071427.m77ERQoR001951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071433.m77EXe7r017484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-07 10:33:39 EDT --- The prelude setup for pads was added as step 13 on http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/prelude.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071444.m77EieM5004579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #22 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-07 10:44:38 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vbm95/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vbm96/sat-solver-0.9.4-2.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.9.4-2 - Removed link to source tarball, it is not needed. Upstream distributes sat-solver, libzypp and zypper using a branched subversion tree, the tarball which comes with the SRPM is just an exported subversion checkout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071447.m77ElWF5020045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #9 from David Timms 2008-08-07 10:47:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=312796) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312796) [details] > .spec for OpenGTL package > > Ok, looks like I'll be trying out the maintainer hat. I don't have an account We can get the review rolling with a pre-review, even before you organize the fedoraproject account. I'm sure you found the packaging guidelines in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers#Packaging And you should be referring to the process in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process , so please post the .spec and .src.rpm somewhere on the web, and explicitly provide the links in this bug, in the requested format, ie with description, and rpmlint status. Failing to perform the elementary stuff might suggest you aren't following these docs, which will make it difficult for both reviewers and yourself to get the package into an acceptable form. In my view there are many reasons for the review: - show that you have read/understood the guidelines - ensure readable, maintainable, quality, integrated fedora packages - that you would plan to babysit the package, rather than dump and run. If you feel that parts of your spec may not meet the guidelines, show this knowledge by pointing those specific areas as you find them. There are many experience packager maintainers who can provide tips and improvements, to someone who shows they have a better Fedora as the goal, so good luck :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:01:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071501.m77F1503022549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #9 from John Anderson 2008-08-07 11:01:03 EDT --- I've done some additional work. The current version builds against fc10 for i386 and x86_64. I've tested the package on the live cd for the alpha and it seems to run correctly. http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/gnome-rdp.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/gnome-rdp-0.2.2.3-5.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=764772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 14:59:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071459.m77Exnks006915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 --- Comment #6 from John McLean 2008-08-07 10:59:48 EDT --- Alright, those should be fixed. new srpm: http://jesusfreak91.googlepages.com/nxt_python-0.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071509.m77F9Chb008633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Comment #10 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-07 11:09:11 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vbnAy/libzypp.spec SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vbnA1/libzypp-4.27.24.1-1.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 4.27.24.1-1 - 4.27.24.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071508.m77F8OhW023592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-07 11:08:23 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vbnAz/zypper.spec SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vbnA0/zypper-0.11.10-2.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Aug 7 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.11.10-2 - Removed link to source tarball, it is not needed. Upstream distributes sat-solver, libzypp and zypper using a branched subversion tree, the tarball which comes with the SRPM is just an exported subversion checkout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071533.m77FXNQm012600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-07 11:33:22 EDT --- There is a problem. As my patch was truncated. And actually, wasn't present in 14.1.0 see the attached untruncated backported patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071532.m77FWSck012528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #13 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-07 11:32:26 EDT --- Update !!! Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop-3.3.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071537.m77Fb882028704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-07 11:37:07 EDT --- For the spec file side, there are some problems I will try to address them soon so we can get rid of the merge review for sox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:35:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071535.m77FZ3Yu028240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-07 11:35:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313708) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313708) Patch to avoid_version of module in sox 14.1.0 This patch was produced in F-8 gendiff command. It can be applyed in Rawhide (F-10) by using %define _default_patch_fuzz 2 On top of the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071543.m77Fh5f9030070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-07 11:43:04 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (nxt_python) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:48:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071548.m77Fm6gJ015745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-07 11:48:04 EDT --- Peter thanks!! It went out of my mind for long now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 15:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458313] New: Review Request: perftools - Tools for developing C++ apps especially multi-threaded or using templates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perftools - Tools for developing C++ apps especially multi-threaded or using templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458313 Summary: Review Request: perftools - Tools for developing C++ apps especially multi-threaded or using templates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: These tools are for use by developers so that they can create more robust applications. Especially of use to those developing multi-threaded applications in C++ with templates. Includes TCMalloc, heap-checker, heap-profiler and cpu-profiler. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/perftools.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/perftools-0.98-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 16:48:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071648.m77GmFPk009496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #16 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-07 12:48:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) I wonder does the newly released player 3.0.1 codebase fix the geos issue? Should we jump to trying to get player/stage 3.0.x into the distro? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 17:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071715.m77HF08V014460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #17 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-07 13:14:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) no sorry that's stage that was released not player -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 17:20:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] New: Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Summary: Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.spb.su QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/DivFix++/DivFix++.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/DivFix++/DivFix++-0.30-0.fc9.src.rpm Description: This program designed to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file. This is very useful when trying to preview movies which has no index part, like some files are currently downloading from ed2k or bittorent networks. DivFix++ has supports CLI tools, this means you can fix, preview and delete movies automatically via script (by using argument parameters...) DivFix++ program code supports lots of operating system, because it's written by cross-platform API, wxWidgets. Rpmlint silent. Koji build successful - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765146 This is my 5th (in Fedora package review, not in packaging history at all) package and I am looking for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 17:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071727.m77HRR3o001494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 --- Comment #8 from John McLean 2008-08-07 13:27:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nxt_python Short Description: Lego Mindstorms NXT Control Package Owners: mcleanj Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mcleanj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 17:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071744.m77HiR7A003825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-07 13:44:25 EDT --- expect a review in few hrs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071808.m77I8teN009317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 --- Comment #5 from Colin Walters 2008-08-07 14:08:54 EDT --- Ok: [+] package builds in koji [+] package installs properly [-] 1 trivial rpmlint warning about mixed spaces and tabs Doesn't matter. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. Looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] New: Review Request: Rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Summary: Review Request: Rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/rabbyt/bugzilla/1/Rabbyt.spec SRPM URL: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/rabbyt/bugzilla/1/Rabbyt-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Rabbyt is a sprite library for Python with game development in mind. It has two goals: * To be fast, without sacrificing ease of use. * To be easy to use, without sacrificing speed. Rabbyt makes it very easy to create lots of sprites very fast that run very fast with little code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] New: Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 Summary: Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The gflags package contains a library that implements commandline flags processing. As such it's a replacement for getopt(). It has increased flexibility, including built-in support for C++ types like string, and the ability to define flags in the source file in which they're used. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gflags.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gflags-0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:39:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071839.m77Id3xv031290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-07 14:39:01 EDT --- Hey Victor, I started to review this, but it fails to build in Mock(1). Here's a link to the build & root logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=765403&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=765403&name=root.log If I get some free time later today, I'll try to look into what is causing it to fail. (1) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071846.m77Ik5UH000356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-07 14:46:04 EDT --- Let me know if this looks good http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rssh.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rssh-2.3.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071851.m77IpC8v018168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 14:51:10 EDT --- rcssbase-12.1.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:47:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071847.m77Ilg0l017315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 Matthew Woehlke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #312796|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Matthew Woehlke 2008-08-07 14:47:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313729) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729) .spec for OpenGTL package fix missing defattr, fixes rpmlint errors against srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071857.m77IvsbE002164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #8 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 14:57:52 EDT --- Hi - any chance you (or someone else) could look over this proposed package? This is now a blocker for this proposed Fedora 10 feature: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Provers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071854.m77Is0Zo001497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Woehlke 2008-08-07 14:53:59 EDT --- > We can get the review rolling with a pre-review, even before you organize the fedoraproject account. I have an account, but the CLA may need to go through my company's legal dept... otherwise so far I haven't done anything but create it. > And you should be referring to the process in: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > so please post the .spec and .src.rpm somewhere on the web, and explicitly provide the links in this bug, The .spec is already here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729 I don't have anywhere to put the SRPM (and/or haven't figured out / set up FAS), but it's easily created: cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES ; wget http://www.opengtl.org/download/OpenGTL-0.9.4.tar.bz2 cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; wget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729 cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; rpmbuild -bs OpenGTL.spec (in appropriate directories, of course) Or, is 163k small enough to just dump the SRPM in here as an attachment, also? > in the requested format, ie with description, and rpmlint status. D'oh! Sorry about that! Trying again... ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ echo * OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-devel-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-libs-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint * OpenGTL-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not sure if the no-documentation warning is interesting? Should I just copy the same doc to -devel, -libs? Or is there a "normal" way to handle this I'm not familiar with? Other than the above warnings, I've tried to follow the specs as close as possible (and as far as I can tell, I'm ok w.r.t. the ReviewGuidelines checklist), but as you know this is still my first package, so I'm still feeling my way around :-). Note: I can't conveniently test with mock right now as I'm on x86_64 (see blocking bug 455502). I'm building locally with a fixed llvm package from Cyrille Berger. When I get time, I'll test it on my other (i686) machine that should build with the current rawhide llvm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 18:53:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071853.m77IrfHO018467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 14:53:40 EDT --- rcssbase-12.1.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071903.m77J3Wpq003343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-07 15:03:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: seahorse-plugins Short Description: Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:12:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071912.m77JCCvq005294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-07 15:12:11 EDT --- I'm back in the country now (although badly jetlagged); I will try to get this finished up this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] New: Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Summary: Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate-1.5.6-1.tillf8.src.rpm Description: Gpscorrelate adds coordinates to the exif data of jpeg pictures based on a gpx track file. The correlation is done by comparing the timestamp of the images with the timestamp of the gps coordinates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071920.m77JKvY8024167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Bug 455555 depends on bug 457502, which changed state. Bug 457502 Summary: gtk.gdk.threads_init() crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457502 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071920.m77JKO0A007203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #18 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-07 15:20:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313732) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313732) rpmlint output See attachment for full list. 3 zero-length Errors in player-docs: Do the zero-length files need to be excluded? 1 non-standard-executable-perm in player-python: Bogus error on a python binding library not in shared library path. 19 warnings: all the no-documentation warnings can be ignored most of the devel-file warnings for header and c files in player-examples can be ignored Do we want to exclude the .a archives from the player-example payloads? player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampledriver/libexampledriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/multidriver/libmultidriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/opaquedriver/libopaquedriver.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/libeginterf.a player-examples.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/player/examples/plugins/exampleinterface/libeginterfdriver.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071922.m77JMlsQ024397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-07 15:22:45 EDT --- MD5Sum: 4d6925a0dc7d95949325bd4d496e51cf svnClientAdapter-nb6.0.1-src.zip Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package includes no pre-built jars * jars files are located in %{_javadir} * Package builds in koji/mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * BR should include java-devel & jpackage-utils. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires * Group Tag is not from the official list. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups * rpmlint produces the following warnings: netbeans-svnclientadapter.noarch: W: no-documentation netbeans-svnclientadapter.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Java I would include the license.txt & readme.txt as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071936.m77Ja5MX026838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-07 15:36:04 EDT --- I am a new contributor and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] New: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/ocamlgraph/ocaml-ocamlgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/ocamlgraph/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ocamlgraph provides several different implementations of graph data structures. It also provides implementations for a number of classical graph algorithms like Kruskal's algorithm for MSTs, topological ordering of DAGs, Dijkstra's shortest paths algorithm, and Ford-Fulkerson's maximal-flow algorithm to name a few. The algorithms and data structures are written functorially for maximal reusability. Also has input and output capability for Graph Modeling Language file format and Dot and Neato graphviz (graph visualization) tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 17:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071700.m77H0HF0012204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: |myanmar3-unicode-fonts - |myanmar3-unicode-fonts - |Myanmar3 unicode font |Myanmar3 unicode font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:58:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071958.m77JwMY6014164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #20 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-07 15:58:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313743) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313743) Patch to spec file with review changes Okay here's the little patch of the last round of review changes license tag correction and removal of the unneeded real-version macro The license tag change is the only one that is blocking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071955.m77JteUa013828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #19 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-07 15:55:39 EDT --- Formal Review Summary: Summary: Only one solid blocker License text is incorrect. License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Reading the source comments they use the "or later version" clause hence the "+" The rpmlint errors concerning the zero-length files in the docs subpackage need to be discussed however before you open up the F9 branch. I'm marking this as approved for rawhide as long as you correct the license text. Full Review: naming: good spec-naming: good license: wrong should be GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ md5sum matches upstream url 74d221bebd7f68a8ef258aadf0ac185b included player-2.1.1.tar.bz2 74d221bebd7f68a8ef258aadf0ac185b http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/playerstage/player-2.1.1.tar.bz2 passes development scratch build on koji builds locally via mock for rawhide and f9 no locale support needed ldconfig called post and postun not relocatable no dupes in files macro usage fine permissible code/content docs package looks good static package looks good devel package looks good, requires pkgconfig as it should docs section in main package looks good no .la files installed install section looks good desktop files look good directory ownership looks good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 19:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458231] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808071956.m77JuKwj030686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-08-07 15:56:18 EDT --- FYI: the code of aircrack-ptw resp. the type of attack has been included in aircrack-ng[1], which is already in Fedora. Aircrack-ptw will not get any updates afaik, because the code is now maintained by aircrack-ng. Btw. I was told that aircrack-ptw is MIT-licensed. [1] http://aircrack-ng.org/doku.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 20:17:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072017.m77KH9SU001710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-08-07 16:17:08 EDT --- - rpmlint: ok (silent) - license: ok (MIT), matches license in COPYING and xsel.c - license included in %doc: ok, in COPYING - spec legigble: ok - url in source: ok - builds in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765463 - source tarball ok: 75983f143ce83dc259796c6eaf85c8f5 xsel-1.2.0-3.fc9/xsel-1.2.0.tar.gz 75983f143ce83dc259796c6eaf85c8f5 xsel-1.2.0.tar.gz - directory ownage: ok - not a library: ok - not much documentation: ok - macro usage: ok - %install with rm: ok - %clean with rm: ok - macro usage: ok - optflags: ok - no locales: ok - buildroot: ok This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 20:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456166] Review Request: mars-sim - Mars Simulation Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072017.m77KHwPm017442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456166 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-07 16:17:57 EDT --- SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/mars-sim-2.84-2.el5.src.rpm SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/mars-sim.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 20:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072037.m77Kbt3T005060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 20:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072048.m77Km9SC006803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-07 16:48:07 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. Approved. Please proceed for cvs admin request. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 20:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457152] Review Request: appliance-tools tools for generating appliance images on Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072054.m77KsAYf023476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457152 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-07 16:54:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 20:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072057.m77Kvjll008416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-07 16:57:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072100.m77L0LA1024681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-07 17:00:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072101.m77L1JOl009159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-07 17:01:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072107.m77L7IK9025691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-07 17:07:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458379] New: Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 Summary: Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/wondershaper/wondershaper.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/wondershaper/wondershaper-1.1a-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Many cablemodem and ADSL users experience horrifying latency while uploading or downloading. They also notice that uploading hampers downloading greatly. The wondershaper neatly addresses these issues, allowing users of a router with a wondershaper to continue using SSH over a loaded link happily. Simple bash script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072126.m77LQsB3028948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072138.m77LcNXx014608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler at dwheeler.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwheeler at dwheeler.com --- Comment #1 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 17:38:22 EDT --- ocaml-ocamlgraph.i386: E: no-binary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072144.m77LiKNG032018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 --- Comment #1 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-07 17:44:18 EDT --- RPM Lint: 1 error, see to the bottom of this comment Package name: php-pecl-json Spec file: php-pecl-json.spec License: PHP Actual License: PHP v3.01 %doc License: not included Spec file language: english Spec file readable: yes Upstream source vs. used tarball: md5sums match Compile and Build: - F-8: n/a - F-9: n/a - rawhide: n/a - EL-5: builds Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: not aplicable Shared libs: ok Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: not ok, see bottom Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: ok %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: ok Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok rpmlint complains about: [shartsuiker at localhost json-1.2.1]$ rpmlint -i -v /var/lib/mock//epel-5-i386/result/php-pecl-json-1.2.1-1.el5.i386.rpm php-pecl-json.i386: I: checking php-pecl-json.i386: E: percent-in-dependency php-zend-abi %{php_zendabiver} This rpm has a dependency whose version part contains the '%' character. It could be an unexpanded macro, please double check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. All I did was a mock build against epel-5-i386 on fedora9 . Looks like the dependencies are not working properly. Does this have to be build on a rhel5 box? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072150.m77LoZD6016823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #2 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 17:50:34 EDT --- Okay, I'll pick this one up. Here are a few quick comments: rpmlint produces an error which you've not justified. When I run: [dwheeler at dwheeler2-pc SPECS]$ rpmlint ocaml-ocamlgraph.spec ../SRPMS/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ocaml-ocamlgraph-* ocaml-ocamlgraph.i386: E: no-binary 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmls ../RPMS/i386/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.i386.rpm drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/META -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cma -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cmi -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c/LICENSE These aren't really architecture-dependent files, correct? Since .cma is bytecode, and .cmi is a compilation signature, these are NOT architecture-dependent, and they should be in /usr/share/WHATEVER... correct? Let me know if I'm wrong about this, but I think rpmlint gets this one right, these AREN'T architecture-dependent, and so the FHS says that they belong in /usr/share and not /usr/lib. (Yes, this is an FHS rule that's frequently violated.) I'm very glad to see a "%check" section. But I think you should NOT do: cp %{SOURCE1} . during %check; I think you should do that during %build. I would expect the result of "%build" to be that "all the files are ready for checking and installing", and that's not really the case here. If I built, and did some hand-testing, the 'expected output' file isn't in the BUILD directory yet in the current approach. It's also odd that a SOURCE file is NOT used in the %build phase, but only afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 21:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072156.m77Luj38001794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #3 from Alan Dunn 2008-08-07 17:56:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Okay, I'll pick this one up. Here are a few quick comments: > > rpmlint produces an error which you've not justified. When I run: > [dwheeler at dwheeler2-pc SPECS]$ rpmlint ocaml-ocamlgraph.spec > ../SRPMS/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ocaml-ocamlgraph-* > ocaml-ocamlgraph.i386: E: no-binary > 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmls ../RPMS/i386/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.i386.rpm > drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph > -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/META > -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cma > -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cmi > -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c/LICENSE > > These aren't really architecture-dependent files, correct? > Since .cma is bytecode, and .cmi is a compilation signature, these > are NOT architecture-dependent, and they should be in /usr/share/WHATEVER... > correct? Let me know if I'm wrong about this, but I think > rpmlint gets this one right, these AREN'T architecture-dependent, > and so the FHS says that they belong in /usr/share and not /usr/lib. > (Yes, this is an FHS rule that's frequently violated.) (In reply to comment #1) > ocaml-ocamlgraph.i386: E: no-binary You just reminded me of the thing I forgot to enter into the original description: I'm aware of this, however, may actually not be considered an error. It is currently standard practice with OCaml library packages to keep them as architecture dependent packages due to the limitations of the RPM format as per the following discussion: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-August/msg00017.html A potential fix is suggested in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-August/msg00020.html However, this is currently not what has been done for previous packages. The question becomes whether now is the time to deviate from prior practice. > I'm very glad to see a "%check" section. But I think you should NOT do: > cp %{SOURCE1} . > during %check; I think you should do that during %build. I would expect the > result of "%build" to be that "all the files are ready for checking and > installing", and that's not really the case here. If I built, and did some > hand-testing, the 'expected output' file isn't in the BUILD directory yet in > the current approach. It's also odd that a SOURCE file is NOT used in the > %build phase, but only afterwards. Okay, I'll change that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 22:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072210.m77MAZjA004624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 --- Comment #2 from Nigel Jones 2008-08-07 18:10:34 EDT --- How silly of me, try: Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-json.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-json-1.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm These appear to be rpmlint clean here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 22:19:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072219.m77MJ28O006359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #39 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-08-07 18:19:00 EDT --- Pong (sorry for the latency, now back from vacation). Unfortunately, I'm still struggling with issues with my host. I have some outstanding patches that I want to check in prior to doing the 0.11 release. Please do whatever you feel is most appropriate. I'm definitely interested into getting a new Synopsis release out and getting a fedora package accepted. Thanks for your patience. Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 22:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072225.m77MPR3u023611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Drake 2008-08-07 18:25:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PolicyKit-olpc Short Description: OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides Owners: dsd Branches: F-9 InitialCC: dsd Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 22:26:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072226.m77MQR16023853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 --- Comment #22 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-07 18:26:26 EDT --- Near as I can tell, after looking at this a bit, is that ruby-rrdtool is based upon work of the original author of rrdtool-ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 22:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072234.m77MYKX9025041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341 --- Comment #7 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-07 18:34:18 EDT --- Probably the Eclipse Java Compiler is used instead of the Java compiler provided by OpenJDK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 22:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072245.m77Mjgnl027075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 --- Comment #15 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-07 18:45:40 EDT --- I am now in the packing group and seeing no one has picked this up further, I am setting this to review-approved. Bretm, once this is in CVS, go here for further instructions: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072305.m77N5nU1029882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:03:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072303.m77N3akp029355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 --- Comment #3 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-07 19:03:35 EDT --- This looks good. I also ran a few test from the tarball and they also appear, at least to my untrained eye, to be working. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] New: Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 Summary: Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dkopecek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/bro/bro.spec SRPM URL: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/bro/bro-1.4-0.1.pre.src.rpm Description: Bro is an open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) that passively monitors network traffic and looks for suspicious activity. Bro detects intrusions by first parsing network traffic to extract is application-level semantics and then executing event-oriented analyzers that compare the activity with patterns deemed troublesome. Its analysis includes detection of specific attacks (including those defined by signatures, but also those defined in terms of events) and unusual activities (e.g., certain hosts connecting to certain services, or patterns of failed connection attempts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] New: Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 Summary: Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rrankin at ihug.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/denemo/fedora/denemo.spec SRPM URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/denemo/fedora/denemo-0.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Denemo is a graphical music notation program written in C with gtk+. As of April 2000, it is an official part of the GNU project (http://www.gnu.org/) It is intended to be used in conjunction with GNU Lilypond (http://www.cs.uu.nl/hanwen/lilypond/), but is adaptable to other computer-music-related purposes as well. This package depends on aubio which is already in rawhide. This is my first package and I will require sponsership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359961] Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072348.m77NmPP6020300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359961 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:48:24 EDT --- drupal-service_links-6.x.1.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] New: Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 Summary: Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-paver.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-paver-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Paver is a Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool along the lines of Make or Rake. What makes Paver unique is its integration with commonly used Python libraries. Common tasks that were easy before remain easy. More importantly, dealing with your applications specific needs and requirements is now much easier. * Build files are just Python * One file with one syntax, pavement.py, knows how to manage your project * File operations are unbelievably easy, thanks to the built-in version of Jason Orendorff?s path.py. * Need to do something that takes 5 lines of code? It?ll only take 5 lines of code.. * Completely encompasses distutils and setuptools so that you can customize behavior as you need to. * Wraps Sphinx for generating documentation, and adds utilities that make it easier to incorporate fully tested sample code. * Wraps Subversion for working with code that is checked out. * Wraps virtualenv to allow you to trivially create a bootstrap script that gets a virtual environment up and running. This is a great way to install packages into a contained environment. * Can use all of these other libraries, but requires none of them * Easily transition from setup.py without making your users learn about or even install Paver! (See the Getting Started Guide for an example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072350.m77NoT4h004243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 Roy Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072350.m77NoLQY021208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:50:20 EDT --- rcssserver3d-0.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072355.m77NtaWS005799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:55:35 EDT --- twinkle-1.2-2.fc8, libzrtpcpp-1.3.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:51:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072351.m77NpUC0004667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:51:29 EDT --- prover9-200805a-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072355.m77Nt74H005614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:55:06 EDT --- bcrypt-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bcrypt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072353.m77NrJI3004957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:53:18 EDT --- pdfmerge-1.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfmerge'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072352.m77Nqu4T004904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:52:55 EDT --- python-tw-forms-0.9.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tw-forms'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448901] Review Request: nled - Simple curses-based text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072359.m77Nxjl5024166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448901 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:59:42 EDT --- nled-2.52-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:56:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072356.m77NuqbN023607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:56:50 EDT --- why-2.14-2.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450409] Review Request: rcssserver3d - Robocup Soccer Simulation Server 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072359.m77NxG8V024008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450409 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:59:14 EDT --- rcssserver3d-0.6-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072358.m77NwSUF023887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:58:25 EDT --- unuran-1.2.4p1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:55:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359921] Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072355.m77NtH5u023055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:55:16 EDT --- drupal-cck-6.x.2.0-2.rc4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:55:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072355.m77NtBPC023016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:55:10 EDT --- python-tw-forms-0.9.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tw-forms'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7074 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072358.m77NwFGO006663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:58:14 EDT --- libzrtpcpp-1.3.0-2.fc9, twinkle-1.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:58:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456303] Review Request: bcrypt - File encryption utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072358.m77NwZq5006724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456303 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:58:34 EDT --- bcrypt-1.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bcrypt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 7 23:58:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456331] Review Request: pdfmerge - Command line utility program for merging PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808072358.m77NwxMY006824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456331 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:58:58 EDT --- pdfmerge-1.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfmerge'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7115 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 00:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455032] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl5000-firmware_-_Firmwa?= =?utf-8?q?re_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080000.m7800Ax8024939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 20:00:08 EDT --- iwl5000-firmware-5.4.A.11-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update iwl5000-firmware'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 00:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080015.m780FQsl010221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 --- Comment #4 from Nigel Jones 2008-08-07 20:15:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-json Short Description: PECL library to implement JSON in PHP Owners: nigelj Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes Please note: This is _not_ required for Fedora, as Fedora ships PHP with php-pecl-json built in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 00:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080023.m780NUdR011079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-07 20:23:29 EDT --- Everything looks fine to me except the -O3 ricing. I have no specific problems with this if you have some results which actually indicate a performance improvement, but if you're just assuming that it must somehow be faster because the number is bigger then you really should just use the default flags. Can you provide some evidence that this makes a difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 00:36:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] New: Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Summary: Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/griffith.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/griffith-0.9.7.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Griffith is a media collection manager application. Adding items to the collection is as quick and easy as typing the film title and selecting a supported source. Griffith will then try to fetch all the related information from the Web. Note: Running it won't work in current rawhide due to pygtk breakage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 00:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080045.m780jxwG014272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #11 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 20:45:56 EDT --- The -O3 option is the _normal_ optimization level for MiniSAT. If you look at their makefile, you'll see that upstream adds -O3 when THEY do a release version ("make release"). So, I'm really just being consistent with upstream, and I think that's a reasonable reason. I could develop some test suites to do timing tests, but is that necessary if it's just being consistent with upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] New: Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 Summary: Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/pisg.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/pisg-0.72-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Pisg is an IRC statistics generator. It takes IRC logfiles and turns them into nice looking stats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080106.m7816KkS001630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.spb.su --- Comment #23 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-07 21:06:19 EDT --- By URL in spec - http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Devel I can't found any reference to sat-solver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:17:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080117.m781HOZw003127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-07 21:17:23 EDT --- Just a quick note that the SAT resolver used by SUSE for their new package management system - zypper is available for review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] New: Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 Summary: Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-anthy.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-anthy-0.1.0.20080808-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: It is a Japanese engine for IBus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080135.m781Zg1n005560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:38:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080138.m781csx1005853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler at dwheeler.com --- Comment #24 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 21:38:53 EDT --- I'm glad to see this! Two quick notes: miniSAT, another SAT solver that's used by several other programs, is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 "sat-solver" is a really generic name; it's quite likely that Fedora will end up with several competing SAT solvers. Shouldn't this SAT solver's package name be something a little more specific, like "libzypp-sat-solver"? That would leave "sat-solver" as a generic name (one that might, in the future, resolve to whatever default SAT solver the user desires, a la Java implementations). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:39:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] New: Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 Summary: Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/vttest.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/vttest-20071216-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: vttest is a program to test the compatibility (or to demonstrate the non-compatibility) of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080145.m781jQSF007007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 21:45:25 EDT --- I went and got some numbers, and -O3 is a waste of time. I'll need to tell upstream that. I created a test sample, and got these: With -O3: real 0m35.714s real 0m35.714s real 0m35.834s With -O2: real 0m35.296s real 0m35.301s So -O3 will be dumped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:50:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080150.m781o9W2023310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080154.m781sR55008003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #14 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 21:54:26 EDT --- Okay, new miniSAT2 uploaded: http://www.dwheeler.com/minisat2.spec http://www.dwheeler.com/minisat2-2.0-6.20070721.fc9.src.rpm This one leaves -O2, as it was. I left in the (tricky) lines that switch optimization level, in case it actually helps in a future version of gcc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:49:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] New: Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 Summary: Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-pinyin.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-pinyin-0.1.0.20080808-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: It's a Chinese PinYin engine for IBus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 01:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080158.m781wwAK024277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #25 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 21:58:57 EDT --- In the "minisat2" package I added a small test case file, which _is_ satisfiable. This would take a trivial amount of space, if you don't want to include a massive test suite. It doesn't stress the solver, but it's a reasonable "smoke test" to see if the solver can run: c c start with comments c c p cnf 5 3 1 -5 4 0 -1 5 3 4 0 -3 -4 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 02:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080208.m7828fXr010482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #15 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 22:08:40 EDT --- I should add that my -O2 vs. -O3 numbers were for 32-bit i386. Your mileage may vary. Indeed, it almost CERTAINLY will vary :-). 2-CPU, where for each: vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 6 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.60GHz stepping : 4 cpu MHz : 3591.136 cache size : 2048 KB ... bogomips : 7187.56 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 02:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458140] seahorse-plugins - Plugins and utilities for encryption in GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080226.m782Q95A029978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458140 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 02:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080233.m782XiJ9015859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #4 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-07 22:33:42 EDT --- Responding to comment #3: > I'm aware of this, however, may actually not be considered an error. Okay, I see the problem. If it's better to make rpmlint whine, at least document in the .spec file that the rpmlint complaint is expected, and why. Perhaps include the URL you just quoted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 02:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 22:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080250.m782o8IM002696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-07 22:50:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xsel Short Description: manipulate the X selection Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 03:39:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080339.m783dk23028772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-07 23:39:45 EDT --- [x] Build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765906 [x] rpmlint -- clean [x] package naming [x] packaging guidlines [x] md5sum srpm source: 6fad0a69ac89440ad4f696dbbbf11497 source: 6fad0a69ac89440ad4f696dbbbf11497 [!] license -- waiting for confirmation from upstream [x] spec file in us-en and legible [x] license text file [x] Buildrequire [x] permissions [x] pkg owns directories created [x] %clean and %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] translation file handled Optional: [!] why using debug option Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 03:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080358.m783wiqP015146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-07 23:58:42 EDT --- I will update package today evening IST -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:08:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080408.m78482cR016900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 --- Comment #3 from Huang Peng 2008-08-08 00:08:00 EDT --- Hi Parag, spec & src.rpm has been updated. Please review it again. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080413.m784DYRi017916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-08 00:13:33 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I've fixed the most issues you raised. Except the double cmake, as the cmake works a little bit like latex: first run generates various configure files, then the second run can build the Makefile successfully. The ChangeLog is shown as follows: ======================== * Fri Aug 08 2008 Ding-Yi Chen - 0.4.1-0 - Header files have moved to {include}/libUnihan - Completed the description of UnihanTable enumeration. - Completed the description of str_functions.h - In str_functions.h: unsignedStr_to_signedStr and signedStr_to_unsignedStr clones the inputs now, while _buffer postfix for the circumstances that the buffer is given. Addressing C#6 [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - rpmlint undefined-non-weak-symbol problems solved. - Moved the include statement of private header files to Unihan_SQL_gen.c files. - Move the doc/{name} files to doc/{name}-{version}. - Uhihan_enum.h and str_functions.h are now in API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080414.m784EkK4002469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-08 00:14:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:16:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080416.m784GIRS018651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-08 00:16:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080418.m784IpWx018890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-08 00:18:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080417.m784HnIl018777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-08 00:17:47 EDT --- cvs done. Please do mark the devel branch with a dead.package file explaining this is only needed in EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080441.m784foRE007515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #9 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-08 00:41:49 EDT --- The NEW SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/libUnihan.spec?use_mirror=internap&filesize=3748 and the NEW SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc9.src.rpm?use_mirror=internap&filesize=75811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 04:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080453.m784rrB7024977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 00:53:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765922 + rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. ibus.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/ibus.conf ==> Ok to accept. + source files match upstream url 48b73b6bfe056fa677ca57361149fa83 ibus-0.1.0.20080807.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + update-gtk-immodules scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files installed correctly. + Package ibus-0.1.0.20080807-1.fc10 => Provides: config(ibus) = 0.1.0.20080807-1.fc10 libibus-gtk.so.0 Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/env libX11.so.6 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libibus-gtk.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package ibus-gtk-0.1.0.20080807-1.fc10 => Provides: im-ibus.so Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libibus-gtk.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package ibus-qt-0.1.0.20080807-1.fc10 => Provides: libibus.so Requires: libQtCore.so.4 libQtDBus.so.4 libQtGui.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 05:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080502.m78520hx026700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2008-08-08 01:01:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus Short Description: the Input Bus for Linux OS Owners: phuang at redhat.com Branches: F-9 InitialCC: phuang at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 05:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080515.m785FMbH029232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 01:15:21 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 05:59:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080559.m785x5eq021125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 01:59:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765917 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5d40778080e012f7fcf25342d0b21966 ibus-m17n-0.1.0.20080709.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package ibus-m17n-0.1.0.20080709-1.fc10 => Provides: _m17n.so Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm17n-core.so.0 libm17n.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080604.m7864cSe022303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080602.m7862A2k022082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |69bonvenocf-fonts - |bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF |BonvenoCF font. |font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080601.m7861cGj022013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |69oldstandard-fonts - Old |oldstandard-fonts - Old |Standard Fonts |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080604.m7864VSI005323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080607.m7867htw006119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2008-08-08 02:07:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-m17n Short Description: M17N engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: F-9 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:12:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080612.m786CNaG006743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2008-08-08 02:12:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec file URL: > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm "I am a new packager and I am looking for a sponsor." Spec file URL:: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-fonts.spec SRPM URL:: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 06:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080616.m786GHG6024272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2008-08-08 02:16:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > spec file > URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts.spec > > SRPM URL: > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm > > Description : A fun font from the Crude Factory. I am a new Packager and I am looking for a Sponsor. spec file URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/bonvenocf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:04:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080704.m7874NnY013410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #48 from Miles Sabin 2008-08-08 03:04:21 EDT --- 2.7.2 will be coming very soon. Geoff if you're too tied up to continue this perhaps I could pick it up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080723.m787NJOM000653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #2 from Edouard Bourguignon 2008-08-08 03:23:18 EDT --- I try to get sponsored but someone told be that my package need to be approved first. Is that correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458429] New: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458429 Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gaburici at cs.umd.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools-2.69-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: LCDF Typetools consists of several command-line programs for inspecting and manipulating OpenType fonts of both CFF (PostScript Type 2) and TrueType flavors, as well as PostScript Type 1, and Type 1 multiple master fonts. The otftotfm utility that creates TeX font metrics and encodings is packaged separately in lcdf-typetools-tex. $ rpmlint lcdf-typetools.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] New: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gaburici at cs.umd.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools-2.69-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: LCDF Typetools consists of several command-line programs for inspecting and manipulating OpenType fonts of both CFF (PostScript Type 2) and TrueType flavors, as well as PostScript Type 1, and Type 1 multiple master fonts. The otftotfm utility that creates TeX font metrics and encodings is packaged separately in lcdf-typetools-tex. $ rpmlint lcdf-typetools.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080749.m787nLMA020319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Vasile Gaburici changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |456582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:49:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080749.m787nMYd020344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Vasile Gaburici changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458430 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080750.m787ove1005552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Vasile Gaburici changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Vasile Gaburici 2008-08-08 03:50:55 EDT --- I (still) need a sponsor... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 07:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080755.m787t4bn006462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #12 from Bart Vanbrabant 2008-08-08 03:55:02 EDT --- Anyone willing to sponsor me? I've added myself to the packager group and I'm awaiting approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080801.m7881DvP007757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 04:01:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=766012 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d4e97fc37198a3916a9ead39433d411c ibus-anthy-0.1.0.20080808.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are correct with unnecessary extra dependencies perl(XML::Parser) + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package ibus-anthy-0.1.0.20080808-1.fc10 => Provides: _anthy.so Requires: /bin/sh libanthy.so.0 libanthydic.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1) Remove extra BR: perl(XML::Parser) 2) Remove unnecessary line from %files %{_datadir}/ibus-anthy/icons/* This makes build.log to show warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/ibus-anthy/icons/ibus-anthy.png APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080814.m788ETgr009559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 04:14:27 EDT --- Now for 0.4.1-0: * Source tarball - in the srpm does not coincide with what I downloaded from the written URL? ---------------------------------------------------------- 70713 2008-08-08 11:28 libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc9/libUnihan-0.4.1-Source.tar.gz 71729 2008-08-08 16:02 libUnihan-0.4.1-Source.tar.gz ---------------------------------------------------------- * Requires ** For main package - Now "Requires: glib2 sqlite" can (and should) be dropped as these libraries' dependency are automatically checked by rpmbuild itself. ** For -devel subpackage: - For example, %_includedir/%name/Unihan_enum.h contains: ---------------------------------------------------------- 31 #ifndef UNIHAN_ENUM_H_ 32 #define UNIHAN_ENUM_H_ 33 #include 34 #include ---------------------------------------------------------- This means libUnihan-devel should have "Requires: glib2-devel, sqlite-devel" Please also check for other header files. * cflags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored yet: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765959 I am not a expert of cmake, however as far as I looked Makefiles, ----------------------------------------------------------- make VERBOSE=1 C_DEFINES="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------------------- seems to work for this issue * Removing document files at %install ----------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/AUTHORS rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/NEWS rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ChangeLog rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING.LESSER ----------------------------------------------------------- - Does this mean that you want to remove these files and _leave_ some other files which are installed under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ? Actually build.log says that many html files and others are installed under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ like: ----------------------------------------------------------- 348 -- Installing: /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1/html/tabs.css 349 -- Installing: /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1/html/doxygen.css 350 -- Installing: /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1/html/index.html 351 -- Installing: /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1/html/str__functions_8h-sou rce.html ----------------------------------------------------------- However these files are removed anyway because you write ----------------------------------------------------------- %doc AUTHORS NEWS ChangeLog README COPYING COPYING.LESSER ----------------------------------------------------------- With this %doc usage (i.e. the case in which %doc list is not given by full path), %doc first removes all files under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} and then (re-)installs files listed in %doc like: ----------------------------------------------------------- 403 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.t2hcK9 404 + umask 022 405 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD 406 + cd libUnihan-0.4.1-Source 407 + DOCDIR=/builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1 408 + export DOCDIR 409 + rm -rf /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1 410 + /bin/mkdir -p /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/libUnihan-0.4.1 411 + cp -pr AUTHORS NEWS ChangeLog README COPYING COPYING.LESSER /builddir/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libUnihan-0.4.1-0.fc10.i386/usr/share /doc/libUnihan-0.4.1 412 + exit 0 ----------------------------------------------------------- So: - If you want to once clean up all installed files under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ and use "%doc AUTHORS NEWS" method, simply use ----------------------------------------------------------- rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ----------------------------------------------------------- in %install. - Or you can leave the installed document files as it is and use: ----------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %_docdir/%name-%version %_docdir/%name-%version/AUTHORS %_docdir/%name-%version/NEWS .... .... %files doc %defattr(-,root,root,-) %_docdir/%name-%version/html/ ----------------------------------------------------------- here all document files are installed %_docdir/%name-%version, while currently 3 directories are used to install document files. Note that all files under %_docdir are marked as %doc, so when writing ----------------------------------------------------------- %files %_docdir/%name-%version/AUTHORS ----------------------------------------------------------- %doc attribute is not needed. ! Duplicate/unneeded files - I don't think that "%doc AUTHORS NEWS ChangeLog README" is needed for -devel subpackage because -devel subpackage always "Requires" main package (but this is not a blocker). ! Here again see the usage of "%_docdir/%name-%version/AUTHORS" above. - By the way why is the file GPL (not LGPL) "COPYING" file needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080814.m788EvNx009644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2008-08-08 04:14:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-anthy Short Description: The Anthy input engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: F-9 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080817.m788H1Za025240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-08-08 04:17:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I try to get sponsored but someone told be that my package need to be approved > first. Is that correct? No. You cannot have a package approved if you are not sponsored. The process is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080824.m788OE40010938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 04:24:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=766028 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 21ddfc9307ac154f0360a36f64dd97f2 ibus-pinyin-0.1.0.20080808.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are correct with unnecessary extra dependencies perl(XML::Parser) gtk2-devel qt-devel + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Suggestions: 1) Remove extra BR: perl(XML::Parser) pygtk2 gtk2-devel qt-devel 2) Remove unneeded lines from SPEC %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080832.m788WSfM012393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #7 from Kushal Das 2008-08-08 04:32:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediascrapper Short Description: A script to scrap media files from different sites Owners: kushal Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: kushal Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:34:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080834.m788YFlg027530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2008-08-08 04:34:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-pinyin Short Description: The Chinese PinYin input engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: F-9 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080842.m788gSnr013889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 04:42:26 EDT --- *** Bug 458429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 08:42:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 04:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458429] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080842.m788gREq013865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458429 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 04:42:26 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458430 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 09:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 05:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080936.m789a8O1022485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-08 05:36:07 EDT --- formal review of the last revision: OK source files match upstream: e827ada394aff91f9c539cee35e946e81152426c arpd-0.2.tar.gz 342cc53e8d23c84ecb91c7b66c6e93e7ed2a992a honeyd-1.5c.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 09:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 05:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808080944.m789ikXY006494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-08 05:44:44 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/sysklogd.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/sysklogd-1.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 10:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081019.m78AJ5Xm027922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 06:19:03 EDT --- - spec file naming: ok - buildroot: ok - summary/description: ok - license: ok (GPLv2) - tag ok - matches license header in: crc32.c and crcimg.c - license included in %doc: COPYING - directory ownage: ok - not a library: ok - not much documentation: ok - rm in %clean: ok - rm in %install: ok - %defattr in %files: ok - rpmlint: ok (silent) - source file matches: 8e8cec7e15dcd3e3b5e35503d74ec636 crcimg-1.1.tar.bz2 8e8cec7e15dcd3e3b5e35503d74ec636 crcimg-1.1-1.fc9/crcimg-1.1.tar.bz2 - source url works: ok - builds in koji: ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=766134 NOT OK: - optflags are not honoured: gcc -O -Wall -c -o crc32.o crc32.c gcc -O -Wall -c -o crcimg.o crcimg.c gcc -o crcimg crc32.o crcimg.o You need to add: CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the make command in %build For reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Please fix the optflags issue and I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 10:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454008] Review Request: iax - Implementation of Inter-Asterisk eXchange protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081033.m78AXItL030237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454008 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 06:33:17 EDT --- There should be a comment about the status of your patch in the spec according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 10:58:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081058.m78AwLiD001143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-08 06:58:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > There's currently no src.rpm for this. Oops. Fixed now. But all the files needed to create it were already there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 10:55:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081055.m78AtEfr000740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-08 06:55:13 EDT --- **************************** * * * This package is APPROVED * * * **************************** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 10:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081058.m78Awk7d016891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-08 06:58:45 EDT --- Update spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/et/entertrack.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/et/entertrack-1.2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm ChangeLog: - update to new upstream version 1.2.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 11:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081112.m78BCQJd004142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-08 07:12:25 EDT --- To reply to the last comment, the "elisa-common" package is a hack to break the circular dependency that exists. Here's the problem : You need to install elisa before you can "build" and install the plugins. Installing from source, this isn't really a problem. But from packages, it is, as normal users will want to install only "elisa" and have it pull in all the plugins it needs to run. So for packages, we need elisa to require the plugins, but we need the plugins to buildrequire elisa. Circular dependency. To break that circular dependency, I've split out most of the "elisa" files into a bogus "elisa-common" package, which doesn't require the plugins. To build the plugins, this is fine. To make it more obvious, I've used a virtual provides/requires of "elisa-devel", but haven't named the package "devel" since it will be installed for normal runtime. I've double checked, and the "elisa-common" package doesn't require the plugins, and it shouldn't as explained above. I don't know how you ran into a problem here. The only drawback I can see here is that after removing "elisa", the plugins will be gone, but not the "elisa-common" package. The only solution I can think of would be to duplicate the files currently in "elisa-common" in "elisa" and rename the "common" to "devel". We'd have two packages nearly identical, with one used only for building the plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 11:15:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081115.m78BFrb4004807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-08-08 07:15:52 EDT --- Many thanks for the careful and thorough review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hellanzb Short Description: Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor Owners: konradm Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 11:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081119.m78BJZMX020977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer 2008-08-08 07:19:33 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-yenc New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 11:16:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081116.m78BGxJM020708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-08 07:16:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > There looks to be a final 0.9.5 release available now. I've just updated the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 11:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081121.m78BLWl3021684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-08 07:21:30 EDT --- I have removed some spaces from the current devel spec file, as tabs are used in most places (this is only a cosmetic change). All the rest looks good, so closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 11:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081140.m78BejHN024673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341 --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-08 07:40:43 EDT --- Hi Brian, Yes, my assumption is right. I can reproduce the error mentioned by you after switching the javac command to the Eclipse Java Compiler on my Fedora 9 platform by means of the commands: ========================== # alternatives --config javac There are 2 programs which provide 'javac'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- *+ 1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk/bin/javac 2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj/bin/javac Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number: 2 # javac -version Eclipse Java Compiler 0.793_R33x, 3.3.2, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2008. All rights reserved. ========================== And vice versa, I see the Ant message "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" after switching back to the reference implementation of the Java Compiler. It seems the Fedora platform uses the Eclipse Java Compiler by default. I guess, platform should use a reference implementation by default if it is accessible on that platform and all other implementations should be considered as alternatives of it, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 12:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456166] Review Request: mars-sim - Mars Simulation Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081202.m78C2QAF028298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456166 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 12:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081209.m78C9YqJ013263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #16 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 08:09:33 EDT --- Hi Rakesh, I think there is no need to package update if package proposed by me pass the review. I hope this tool will be available in F10 so we need to finish the review as soon as possible. Is it OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 12:12:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081212.m78CCZpB013967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Michal Marciniszyn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|pvrabec at redhat.com |mmarcini at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 12:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456166] Review Request: mars-sim - Mars Simulation Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081245.m78CjQwP020142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456166 --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 08:45:24 EDT --- Lubomir, thanks for this submission. All looks good, just please remove the non-english comment from the spec file or translate it to english. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 12:55:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456166] Review Request: mars-sim - Mars Simulation Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081255.m78Ct35B022024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456166 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-08 08:55:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mars-sim Short Description: Mars Simulation Project Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 13:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458440] New: Pakage review : bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pakage review : bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Summary: Pakage review : bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: louizatakk at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC url: http://dl.free.fr/oTfMQ0xp3/bluemindo.spec SRPM url: http://dl.free.fr/mFx8BkQWK/bluemindo-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Bluemindo is a really simple powerful audio player in python/PyGTK, using Gstreamer. It claims to be lightweight. It needs python-tag >= 0.94 (the one actually included in fedora 9 is 0.91, and it doesn't work with it (see http://www.codingteam.net/bluemindo-bugs-affiche-231_fr.html)), so I don't know if it can be included in fedora, but I think that we should update the python-tag fedora package to 0.94 if possible. rpmlint reports 9 errors: "script-without-shebang", should I patch to correct these errors ? (these shebang aren't needed at all) (info: I'm following this package's developpement, and I know the main developper (and I reported some bugs)) This is my first package from-scratch, and I need support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 13:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455474] Review Request: extjs - JavaScript library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081341.m78Dfc6L014025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455474 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Customer Facing| |--- Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm 2008-08-08 09:41:37 EDT --- I'm withdrawing this review request, based on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013#c29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 13:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081353.m78DrFHT001023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 09:53:13 EDT --- No it is not okay. You assigned request to yourself first, so you where supposed to review request. I thought you wanted to review. Review was submitted by me. So, if you really want to help , you are welcome. Best way would have been to submit a patch. But as you have built then it is okay. I would update with proper changelog mentioning your contribution and Jakub's contribution. But, if I am right about process, until and unless I say that I am not interested in this package further or i don't respond quickly as and when needed, you are not supposed to duplicate the package and say "this is my package and review it" I am and will be happy to own and maintain this package. In case you want to co-maintain you are welcome -- there is a procedure for everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:06:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081406.m78E6cfn004082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081406.m78E6bx3004062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-HTML-FromText.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-HTML-FromText-2.05-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Convert plain text to HTML -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081410.m78EAVq2020391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 10:10:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=766523 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c1851a9ca74d47e6edb66e363474e313 IPTables-ChainMgr-0.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.03 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.04 CPU) + Package perl-IPTables-ChainMgr-0.7-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(IPTables::ChainMgr) = 0.5 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(IPTables::Parse) perl(Net::IPv4Addr) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:11:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081411.m78EBnM6005074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081411.m78EBUHm020598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081413.m78EDV2I020828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-08 10:13:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > No it is not okay. > > But, if I am right about process, until and unless I say that I am not > interested in this package further or i don't respond quickly as and when > needed, you are not supposed to duplicate the package and say "this is my > package and review it" > > I am and will be happy to own and maintain this package. In case you want to > co-maintain you are welcome -- there is a procedure for everything. You are right. However, if somebody comes and informally review Peter srpm and approve it it is still an interesting data point, though, in te end it is your package that will have to be formally reviewed and approved. It would even be acceptable if you said, instead of 'not ok' something along, 'reviewer, you can review Peter package as if I had prposed it myself'. But you seem to prefer that you resubmit somethin for the review and it is your choice, and since you are th esubmitter it has to be accepted by the reviewer (but as I said just above anybody can still comment on Peter package). @Peter: a review should never ever be done in a hurry. If the package does'nt make F10 launch, it will be in the updates. In my opinion this is especially true for this review since it was first entered 2 years ago... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458449] Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081419.m78EJcZI006435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458449 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:19:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081419.m78EJdmx006456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456150] Review Request: slapi-nis - NIS Server and Schema Compatibility plugins for Fedora DS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081418.m78EIp0F006341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456150 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #4 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2008-08-08 10:18:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slapi-nis Short Description: NIS Server and Schema Compatibility plugins for Directory Server Owners: nalin Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458449] New: Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458449 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Log-TraceMessages.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Log-TraceMessages-1.4-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:27:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-users - Adds NOCpulse user In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081427.m78ERK4b008201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-08-08 10:27:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313810) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313810) IRC log Based on discussion on this IRC log with stahnma and dgilmore. I'm going to merge nocpulse-config and nocpulse-users to one package nocpulse-common. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081429.m78ETEjX023750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |nocpulse-users - Adds |nocpulse-common - Add |NOCpulse user |NOCpulse users and includes | |common files for NOCpulse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081437.m78EbQtv009968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #19 from Michal Marciniszyn 2008-08-08 10:37:24 EDT --- I looked at the package, everything seems ok, except that -devel package is not build (which was explained by pvrabec to be ok) and there is small error in the init script. There are followin tests in main run of initscript: [ -x $ntop ] || exit 1 [ -r "/etc/ntop.conf" ] || exit 1 [ -r "/var/lib/ntop/ntop_pw.db" ] || exit 1 that should be moved in the start function instead. Also error codes can be more precise, as 2nd and 3rd test failure indicates that the service is not configured. So, correct version is [ -x $ntop ] || exit 1 [ -r "/etc/ntop.conf" ] || exit 6 [ -r "/var/lib/ntop/ntop_pw.db" ] || exit 6 placed at the begining of start() function. Except for this small problem, the package is ready for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081445.m78Ej5lp026412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #20 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 10:45:03 EDT --- hey I'm sorry I didn't want to make a review, so reassigning to me was my fault. I wanted to push this further. What do you suggest to do now? I can provide new package ASAP. Then we(you or me) can import into cvs. I'll appreciate if I can be maintainer or co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081449.m78EnRU2011551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #8 from Kumar Gala 2008-08-08 10:49:26 EDT --- I've updated the BuildRoot and placed a new spec file at the same url: http://gate.crashing.org/~galak/u-boot-tools.spec http://gate.crashing.org/~galak/u-boot-tools-1.3.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081449.m78EnRjc011574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #21 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 10:49:26 EDT --- @patrice Thanks for clarification. I am happy that peter is interested. Actually I was confused, because peter assigned request to himself first and also proposed the package. @peter I am also sorry for creating confusion. I would be very happy if you would rebuild clearing the above thing mentioned by Michal. Lets work on it collectively. Please, you may like to be co-maintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453111] Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081454.m78EsfUd027567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453111 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Customer Facing| |--- Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-08-08 10:54:39 EDT --- I'm goig to merge this package with nocpulse-common. I'm closing this request as it is not needed any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081455.m78EtoCN012822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-08 10:55:48 EDT --- Sorry for being so long, but I am pretty busy right now. I'll try to progress during the week-end. Also I don't have internet at home anymore which is also slowing me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 14:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081456.m78EuvHe028366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-08 10:56:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review - fixed the optflags issue here: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/crcimg.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/crcimg-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081502.m78F2L8S013863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #26 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-08 11:02:19 EDT --- The xmlto issue seems to be fixed. I'll try to review the latest now that I can build it. I have no internet during the week end so hopefully on monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:02:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081502.m78F2bcq029303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #22 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 11:02:36 EDT --- here we go Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop-3.3.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081507.m78F7hqf014813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081515.m78FFnqn031527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 --- Comment #5 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 11:15:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: honeyd Short Description: Honeypot daemon Owners: pvrabec Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081515.m78FFTjL031493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 11:15:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the review - fixed the optflags issue here: > > http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/crcimg.spec > http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/crcimg-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081516.m78FGoZq016312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-08 11:16:49 EDT --- ? rpmlint output + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora - license matches the actual package license The license should be LGPLv2+ + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm c12056decc733d3bae21d32e05b628be - package successfully builds on at least one architecture Build fails on Rawhide, i386: gssdp-device-sniffer.o: In function `init_upnp': /tmp/gssdp-0.6.1/tools/gssdp-device-sniffer.c:599: undefined reference to `g_thread_init' n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed ? BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates ? no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel - -devel must require the fully versioned base -devel subpackage should have: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} as in comment 6. + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock - the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin A few things to fix there, primarily to get it to compile in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081521.m78FLYZp017018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-08 11:21:33 EDT --- I've taken this bug, but I'll wait to see a buildable package from bug 446637 first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081527.m78FRJtI000656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 11:27:19 EDT --- Don't you have any site where you can put the tarball and the srpm you are using now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081527.m78FRGLV000634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 --- Comment #4 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-08 11:27:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: crcimg Short Description: Tool for constructing .crc files from image files. Owners: rnorwood Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:26:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458379] Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081526.m78FQFbZ000546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 11:26:14 EDT --- - Source0: has to be a full URL, e.g. http://lartc.org/wondershaper/wondershaper-%{version}.tar.gz - You should add a comment about the status of the patch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus Hint: Adding -b .parameters makes it easier to modify the patch, if this is ever needed, because you can then use "make rediff SUFFIX=parameters" or something similiar in Fedora's cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448337] Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081533.m78FXDPH018771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 11:33:10 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081534.m78FYwOq019061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #23 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 11:34:56 EDT --- Just updated the changelog mentioning Jakub H's patch update. SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ntop-3.3.6-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ntop.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081537.m78Fb6pH019627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 --- Comment #1 from Dan Kope?ek 2008-08-08 11:37:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) New SRPM url: SRPM URL: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/bro/bro-1.4-0.1.pre.fc8.src.rpm Added disttag and smp flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:38:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] New: Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Summary: Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/grc/grc.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/grc/grc-0.70-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The GNU Radio Companion is a preliminary graphical user interface which allows GNU Radio components to be put together graphically. It is currently under development by Josh Blum. GNU Radio Companion encompasses over 200 blocks from the GNU Radio Project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081536.m78FavBx002113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #41 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-08-08 11:36:54 EDT --- Sure, but that's not an official release. I'd like to base the rpm packages on the 0.11 release that I haven't been able to get out yet. (I guess I only need to commit my local changes and run some final tests once they are in, the usual release procedure...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:42:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081542.m78FgQqG020411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #18 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 11:42:24 EDT --- Can't find any spare time for this at the moment, is anyone interested in fixing this outstanding issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081547.m78Fl0kE021095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081547.m78FlS3E021135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448337] Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081552.m78FqxY5022044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Shevchuk 2008-08-08 11:52:57 EDT --- Will fix on this weekend -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081550.m78FodC4021714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-08 11:50:38 EDT --- If no one beats me to it, I'll try to squeeze this issue somewhere in my schedule. Unfortunately I am in the middle of several projects related to $WORK so I am not sure when will I be able to look again at x11vnc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:53:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457247] Review Request: sugar-terminal -- Terminal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081553.m78FrRYU004433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457247 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rnorwood at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rnorwood at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:52:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458379] Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081552.m78FqAM7004353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 11:52:09 EDT --- Till, SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/wondershaper/wondershaper-1.1a-2.fc8.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 15:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081557.m78Fv7Rg005164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #24 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 11:57:06 EDT --- some more init script tuning Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop-3.3.6-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458379] Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081604.m78G43CJ023458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 12:04:01 EDT --- SRPM URL w/ correct alpha tag: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/wondershaper/wondershaper-1.1-0.1.a.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:05:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081605.m78G5e94006681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 12:05:39 EDT --- By the way, to make it sure, what I am waiting for you first is that you submit another review request or you do a pre-review of other person's review request as I wrote as comment 23. This is not related to your site problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081606.m78G667e023993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-08 12:06:05 EDT --- PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081614.m78GECev007439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-08 12:14:11 EDT --- Hi, The problem with "To break that circular dependency, I've split out most of the "elisa" files into a bogus "elisa-common" package, which doesn't require the plugins." is that the elisa-common rpm is built from the elisa src rpm so even by splitting it out you still end up with the circular dependency. From the quick test I did it seems you can build elisa fine without the plugins installed (and it will even run but it just won't be of any use). So I think to fix the issue you could depend on it for install but not for build or something similar but I'm not sure whether that would word either. Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:14:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081614.m78GEO2S007472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-08 12:14:22 EDT --- Thanks for the package marek. Compiles fine in mock. Have tested basic functionality. Using proper make flags (see 2. for compiler flags) The file list is (mostly, see 0.) sane. Provides are sane (see 3. for a note on requires). The SPEC file seems pretty straightforward, legible and very sane. 0.) RPMLint: eboard.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/eboard-config A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. Actually this is a false positive. eboard-config is not a pkg-config script. You may still consider if it's appropriate to include it in the pacakge, though creating a subpackage just for it is definitely not reasonable. 1.) Please do not use %configure Your ./configure is not autoconf. It doesn't understand the flags you pass to it. 2.) Proper compiler flags are not used Please ensure that you pass %optflags to the C++ compiler. This is closely related to 1.) 3.) Useless requires: Requires: gtk2 Requires: pango Requires: cairo Requires: libpng >= 1.2 These are pulled in by the library dependencies generated by autoreq script. No need to duplicate those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081621.m78GLCO0008728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #49 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 12:21:11 EDT --- For confirmation: What I am waiting from Geoff is what I wrote on the comment 40. i.e. you must submit another review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request as well as updating scala srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081622.m78GMGtW026114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 12:22:14 EDT --- Thanks for doing that. We rarely see any measurable improvement with -O3 so it's always viewed with some skepticism. That doesn't mean that you can't turn it on in the future if you find that it actually makes a difference, but in that case you should docuemnt the performance issues in the specfile and be prepared to re-evaluate as the compiler evolves. Anyway, things look good to me now; sorry that my vacation slowed things down. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081623.m78GNhoh008929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Vasile Gaburici changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081629.m78GTOnn009668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 12:29:23 EDT --- I don't have RHEL around so I'm not sure if the needed provides/obsoletes have been added. There in all of the Fedora branches that I can see. Any possibility of closing this ticket now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081629.m78GT1vL009637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #25 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 12:28:59 EDT --- so "much" tuning that I made small but important typo.(time to go home :) ) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/ntop-3.3.6-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457247] Review Request: sugar-terminal -- Terminal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081630.m78GUFoE010140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457247 --- Comment #1 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-08 12:30:14 EDT --- - rpmlint is very noisy: sugar-terminal.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities * Sugar/Activities should probably be added to the standard groups list. * Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458460 to get this done. sugar-terminal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sugar/activities/Terminal.activity/setup.py 0644 * Probably just patch out the shebang line or make it non-executable since this shouldn't be needed at runtime. sugar-terminal.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/sugar/activities/Terminal.activity/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES/org.laptop.Terminal.mo (...lots more...) * Ongoing discussion as to what to do about this on fedora-olpc-list. No point in blocking the review, we'll just fix it when the proper course of action is decided. - Package naming is fine - License is fine - Source matches upstream (git checkout of a tag) - Spec file is fine - File list is fine (except for translations) APPROVED (Once you fix the rpmlint error) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081634.m78GYSpe027663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 12:34:25 EDT --- I think the issue that was holding this up has been fixed; can this ticket be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081632.m78GWhJZ010589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 12:32:42 EDT --- Are we still waiting for upstream to do something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:31:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081631.m78GVIFn010422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 --- Comment #49 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 12:31:13 EDT --- Is there any reason this ticket is still open? I don't see that CVS was ever done, but the package seems to be in the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081635.m78GZ9Vi028096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 12:35:07 EDT --- Any reason this is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081636.m78GaMo1028307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-08 12:36:21 EDT --- Updated src/spec with some fixes but still awaiting a build fix for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081637.m78GbPAP011285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pvrabec at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081636.m78Gam8M011246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvrabec at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-08 12:36:47 EDT --- $ rpmlint pads-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm pads.src: W: strange-permission pads.init 0755 pads.src: W: strange-permission pads.sysconfig 0640 - pads.init and pads.sysconfig might be 0644 $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pads-1.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm pads.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/pads 0640 pads.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pads-ether-codes pads.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pads-signature-list pads.i386: E: non-readable /etc/pads.conf 0640 pads.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pads $prog pads.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pads $prog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. - is there a reason why not 0644 for /etc/sysconfig/pads and /etc/pads.conf - incoherent-subsys? it doesn't seem to me. prog=pads - non-conffile-in-etc - seems ok to me Everything else is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081639.m78GdL8m011346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-08 12:39:20 EDT --- Marek, thanks for the package. Actual source file matches upstream. Mock rebuild succeeded. Offered functionality was tested. RPMlint is mostly silent, see below Uses macros consistently. Have you thought about renaming the package to gnuradio-companion? That may express the relation to gnuradio, and you'll prevent a potential name clash. It even comes from the same upstream. Probably one day there'll be a lot of grc packages around :) 0.) RPMLint thinks the package should be noarch You do not ship any binaries. I do not know if the precompiled python stuff is arch-independent -- probably worth trying. Also, rpmlint complains about shebangs in nonexecutable files. 1.) Please do not create scripts inline in SPEC That is utterly ugly. You should be ashamed. 2.) Fix your runtime dependencies. You seem to import at least wx, gtk, pango, etc. We do not have autoreqs for python. Please add the necessary Requires. The upstream web [1] recommends the following, which you may want to base your decision upon: * wx-python * numpy * gnuradio with gr-wxgui * python-gtk2(>=2.6) * python-xml and/or pyxml [1] http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/GNURadioCompanion 3.) License tag does not seem correct. At least you include some CC blurb in %doc. Are you sure you don't ship any Creative Commons stuff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 16:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081641.m78Gfu2M011969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 12:41:54 EDT --- Well, as I as checked, * this package has already been rebuilt on devel, F-8, but not on F-9 * No push requests are submitted on bodhi. So would you update the status, Christian? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081700.m78H0Ql7014846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-08 13:00:24 EDT --- Since I got no reply from the submitter in more than 6 months, I am closing this. If anyone wishes to submit this application, please open a new review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:06:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251864] Review Request: kpogre - PostgreSQL graphical frontend for KDE 3.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081706.m78H6vQf016393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251864 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081716.m78HG2fA018372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libkni - |Review Request: libkni - |C++ library f?r the Katana |C++ library for the Katana |robot arm |robot arm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458449] Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081714.m78HEefM017755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458449 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081714.m78HEtRa017806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 13:14:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=766986 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fb8ae4ab0cae0b57101f78b046b3927b HTML-FromText-2.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave + Package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081720.m78HKOK3019395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 13:20:23 EDT --- oops koji build failed. Thought this is base package. Need to review then bug 458080 first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081738.m78Hcelq006338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-08 13:38:39 EDT --- build failed => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=766992 can you add BR: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:41:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] New: Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Summary: Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/grub2.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/grub2-1.98-0.1.20080807svn.el5.src.rpm Description: This is the second version of the GRUB (Grand Unified Bootloader), a highly configurable and customizable bootloader with modular architecture. It support rich scale of kernel formats, file systems, computer architectures and hardware devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458379] Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081750.m78Hom4O025172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 13:50:47 EDT --- The package is missing a: BuildArch: noarch [NOT OK] rpmlint output: wondershaper.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1a-2 1.1-0.1.a.f8 This is obvious imho wondershaper.i386: E: no-binary I guess it is because the package is not noarch [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license: GPL+ [NOT OK] license matches shortname in License: Imho it should be GPL+, I cannot see a statement that says it is v2 or later For reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Upstream says: | Licensed under the GPL [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: {OK} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: bbc5a3a4485ab286e337ce8550e7b990 wondershaper-1.1a.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: it's noarch [OK] BuildRequires are complete: no build (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %build starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} no duplication of system libraries {NOT OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps install in %install should have -p added {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format Fix changelog, architecture and install. Use GPL+ as License or show me why it is GPLv2+. Then I will approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081755.m78HtgVN026166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Miloslav Trmac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Miloslav Trmac 2008-08-08 13:55:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr Short Description: Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies Owners: mitr Branches: F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:58:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081758.m78Hw4ts010255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081757.m78Hvkce010175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 13:57:45 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458472 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 17:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081757.m78HvllS010201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jerone at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 13:57:45 EDT --- *** Bug 228255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081803.m78I370d027647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081811.m78IB0OH029362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 14:10:59 EDT --- For 0.2-4: ! EVR (epoch-version-release) - Would you tell me whether this tarball is the "pre-release" or "post-release" of the formal 0.2 version? * License - Currently I don't see any evicence that this package is licensed under GPLv2 only. Currently I regard this as licensed under GPL+ (I ignore debian/ directory) * SourceURL - As this uses git repository, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control i.e. write as a comment how you created the tarball * Requires - Please make it sure that all rpms needed for this rpm are correctly listed in Requires. It seems at least "python-nose python-setuptools" is needed for Requires. * README.fedora - Please include this file as SOURCE and not create this file by using cat. Using cat changes the timestamp of this time every time you rebuild this srpm unneededly. * %clean * rm -f README.fedora is not needed. * scriptlets -------------------------------------------------------------- useradd -r -g gitosis -d /var/lib/gitosis -s /bin/sh \ -c "git repository hosting" gitosis -------------------------------------------------------------- - Is the directory %_localstatedir/lib/ unneeded (for %files entry)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081819.m78IJWqj030799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #3 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-08 14:19:31 EDT --- The next release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://www.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2054/netbeans-svnclientadapter.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2100/netbeans-svnclientadapter-6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: * BR should include java-devel & jpackage-utils. - java-devel & jpackage-utils are added as the build requirements - jpackage-utils is added as the run-time requirement * Group Tag is not from the official list. + netbeans-svnclientadapter.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Java - An appropriate value of Group Tag is chosen from the official list * netbeans-svnclientadapter.noarch: W: no-documentation - Both license.txt and readme.txt are added as the package documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081822.m78IMACH015289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 14:22:09 EDT --- Please make it sure that the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of rpm has the order devel >= F-9 >= F-8 Currently F-8 transbot has transbot-0.2-3.fc8 so rawhide (F-10) transbot must have higher EVR than 0.2-3.fc8. Please bump the release number of F-10/9 rpms. Note: When you want to fix F-9/8 rpm while you don't have to modify F-10 rpm, you can use "Release: 1%{?dist}.1" for example because 0.2-1.fc10 > 0.2-1.fc8.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081823.m78IN1pk031706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 14:22:59 EDT --- Maybe you need trigger-scriptlets with kernel-PAE, too. Also I guess you need Requires(post): mkinitrd Requires(preun): mkinitrd because you use grubby in preun and post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081830.m78IUVqS000841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-08 14:30:29 EDT --- Please make it sure that the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of rpms has the order F-8 <= F-9 <= F-10 (rawhide). If F-8 rpm has xsel-1.2.0-4.fc8 EVR, F-9/10 rpms must have higher EVR than 1.2.0-4.fc8. Note that 1.2.0-4.fc8 > xsel-1.2.0-3.fc9. Please bump the release number of F-10/9 rpms. ! note From next time if you have to fix only F-8 rpm, you can take the method of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081841.m78IfrrA018765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-08 14:41:52 EDT --- xsel-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081839.m78Idlhs018113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-08 14:39:45 EDT --- xsel-1.2.0-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 18:47:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081847.m78Ilriu019485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 --- Comment #3 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-08 14:47:52 EDT --- >$ rpmlint pads-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm >pads.src: W: strange-permission pads.init 0755 >pads.src: W: strange-permission pads.sysconfig 0640 > >- pads.init and pads.sysconfig might be 0644 These are just the src files. I can change them, but I generally make them what they would be when installed. I do set the permission explicitly on install so I can make these 644 if needed. >$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pads-1.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm >pads.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/pads 0640 > >- is there a reason why not 0644 for /etc/sysconfig/pads and /etc/pads.conf It can give out details that non-root users shouldn't see. You can specify what networks to listen too, what uid to run as, what config file to use. I generally believe this info is not required for someone that is not the admin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 19:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081913.m78JDGc8024275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 --- Comment #1 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2008-08-08 15:13:15 EDT --- just a quick initial review from just looking at the spec file: - > BuildRequires: cmake >= 2.4.5, qt4-devel >= 4.3.0, eigen-devel >= 1.0.5, openbabel-devel >= 2.2.0, python-devel >= 2.5.1 Thats a pretty long line; would look much cleaer if you split it - > Requires: libavogadro = %{version} Are you sure that's needed? RPM will likely add a dep on the libs it needs automatically - the description is quite small (just 55 chars instead off less then 80); no blocker, but looks odd - > %package -n libavogadro I'd say the libs package should be called avogadro-libs -- that's the usual way to name the libs subpackage in Fedora - > # set permissions Please add a comment to the spec file why you do this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 19:14:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081914.m78JE9t0007922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 15:14:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Marek, thanks for the package. > Actual source file matches upstream. > Mock rebuild succeeded. > Offered functionality was tested. > RPMlint is mostly silent, see below > Uses macros consistently. > > Have you thought about renaming the package to gnuradio-companion? That may > express the relation to gnuradio, and you'll prevent a potential name clash. It > even comes from the same upstream. Probably one day there'll be a lot of grc > packages around :) > > 0.) RPMLint thinks the package should be noarch > > You do not ship any binaries. I do not know if the precompiled python stuff is > arch-independent -- probably worth trying. You're right, this package should be noarch, will be fixed in next revision. > Also, rpmlint complains about shebangs in nonexecutable files. > > 1.) Please do not create scripts inline in SPEC > > That is utterly ugly. You should be ashamed. Any guideline against this? I like it. > 2.) Fix your runtime dependencies. > > You seem to import at least wx, gtk, pango, etc. We do not have autoreqs for > python. Please add the necessary Requires. > > The upstream web [1] recommends the following, which you may want to base your > decision upon: > > * wx-python > * numpy > * gnuradio with gr-wxgui > * python-gtk2(>=2.6) > * python-xml and/or pyxml > > [1] http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/GNURadioCompanion All those are fetched with GNURadio itself, this should be fine. > 3.) License tag does not seem correct. > > At least you include some CC blurb in %doc. Are you sure you don't ship any > Creative Commons stuff? Only the icon is under CC, however it's shipped with the package under GPLv2+, should I mention it anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 19:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081919.m78JJRuP025105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 15:19:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Have you thought about renaming the package to gnuradio-companion? That may > express the relation to gnuradio, and you'll prevent a potential name clash. It > even comes from the same upstream. Probably one day there'll be a lot of grc > packages around :) It's not from the same upstream, only the guide is hosted on their wiki. It's a separate utility to create configuration files for GNURadio. Thus I know this is not first grc software that will be in Fedora, it's certainly first software w/ "grc" name :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 19:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081923.m78JNaX7010035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 15:23:34 EDT --- @Mamoru Thanks for pointing out. I will bump for F-10/F-9 and use minor release bumps for old branches in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 19:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454029] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema - DBIx::Class::Schema Model Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808081926.m78JQeKQ026914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454029 Bug 454029 depends on bug 455151, which changed state. Bug 455151 Summary: Conflict over /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Catalyst/Manual.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455151 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-08 15:26:39 EDT --- Whew, looks like all that has been sorted out. Koji scratch builds: dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=767296 dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=767297 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 20:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082004.m78K4VGK018456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2008-08-08 16:04:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > You missed to add src.rpm, but I fount it. :-) > http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-tw-forms-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm > rpmlint shows only doc problem, > builds well on F8, F9 and devel, > I see nothing more to fix. > > APPROVED. > > What else we need for TG2 in fedora? Somebody is planning to add it? The TurboGears2 packaging status can be found here:: http://gobby.fedoraproject.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=sobby;a=blob_plain;f=TurboGears;hb=HEAD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 20:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082023.m78KNT0i021296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-08 16:23:28 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/grc/grc-0.70-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 20:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082031.m78KVRgc023037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 16:31:26 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2+ GPLv2+ license headers in all files: olpc-connections olpc-log olpc-mesh olpc-mpp olpc-netstatus olpc-xos sugar-telepathies sugar-xos [OK] license matches shortname in License-Tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: [OK] Source0 is a working URL [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: eb66bdf93e1eed8ae822a584abbc9082 olpc-netutils-0.4.tar.bz2 [OK] Package builds on all platforms: noarch [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin 28 Requires: /sbin/modprobe 29 Requires: /bin/awk 30 Requires: /bin/grep [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {NOT OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps In Makefile.build install is used without -p for files (line 15). Please create a patch that adds -p and submit it upstream. {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {NOT OK} Changelog in allowed format Afaik, the disttag (.fc9) does not belong in the Changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch In conclusion: - Please add -p to the install in the Makefile as a patch, submit it upstream and mention it in the spec: install -p -D $< $@ - You should not use the disttag in the changelog Once the install issue is resolved, I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 20:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082047.m78KlHIT008770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #17 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-08 16:47:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: minisat2 Short Description: A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver Owners: dwheeler Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: tibbs Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 20:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458186] Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082046.m78Kkmtd025649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458186 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 16:46:46 EDT --- MP3 support cannot go into Fedora, also iirc FFmpeg is not in Fedora. In case there is no support for these forbidden items, please remove them also from the description. Also I guess this is wrong, because stripping has to be done by some debuginfo-generation script afaik, to make the information go into the debuginfo subpackage: ( cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ for i in *.so; do strip $i || true done ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 21:01:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082101.m78L1LHB028774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 17:01:20 EDT --- Instead of the massive amount of %defines at the beginning of the spec, you can afaik use macros like %bcond_with %bcond_without It is documented in /usr/lib/rpm/macros Afaics, every subpackage requires the -libs and the -docs subpackage and the -docs subpackage. The -docs subpackage does not seem to be very big, therefore imho it should be merged into the -libs package. This line should be removed from the spec: #rm %{_datadir}/guile/site/mailutils/guile-procedures.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 21:06:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082106.m78L6kMK030005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 17:06:45 EDT --- Is Requires: automake for the -devel subpackage really needed? I guess not. Does this really work? Normally --disable-static is used: %configure --enable-static=no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 21:28:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252946] Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082128.m78LS1cp016885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252946 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 17:28:00 EDT --- The spec cannot be accessed anymore, maybe this request should be closed soon, unless Patrice replies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 21:31:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082131.m78LVoCJ017809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-08 17:31:49 EDT --- Please do not include me in the InitialCC for this package. I review far too many packages to be CC'd on all of them. Also, one comment I might add is that there's no need to play any games with "newoptflags" because you're not changing anything. You might as well just remove, or at least comment out, that portion of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:03:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082203.m78M3nSQ007800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #17 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 18:03:47 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent under normal conditions [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2 [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag LICENSE.txt indicates GPLv2 [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: [OK] package is code or permissive content: [OK] Source0 is a working URL [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: 7c69feceffdef7e12ca42a479335f2bc views-6.x-2.0-beta4.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: noarch [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [NOT OK] no duplicates in %files The following files are also copied in /usr/share/drupal/modules/views CHANGELOG.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt drupal-views-fedora-README.txt [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {Ok} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {Ok} PreReq not used {Ok} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {NOT OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps The drupal-views-fedora-README.txt file is copied without preserving the timestamp, install -p -m 0644 would be probably the best option {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {Ok} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {Ok} no Conflicts {Ok} nothing installed in /srv {Ok} Changelog in allowed format https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch {NOT OK} Follows Naming Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages The Release is missing and additional integer, it should be: 0.1.beta4%{?dist} ^- this is missing The second number needs to be bumped every time you change something, until it is properly released. Additional: The Copying SOURCE1 should go into %prep, because it is not a build step. You can leave the %build section empty. In conclusion: - The duplicate .txt files should not be copied - The timestamp of SOURCE1 should be preserved - The release should be created according to the Naming Guidelines Iirc, these issues are present in your other drupal review requests. Btw. I also see the 02755 permissions warnings, but I know why they are there! ;-) The BUILD directory of by rpmbuild user has this permissions and therefore every directory that is created there, too. You could run a recursive chmod on everything after copying it, to avoid this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082217.m78MHnTY009705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-08 18:17:48 EDT --- I think that grc is a bit short for a name, too. Lubomir's suggestion to use gnuradio-companion instead would certainly be useful in preventing name clashes. Just because it's the first piece of software claiming a 3 letter name does not mean it really should do it. Especially as it has a desktop file to launch it, so not typing in the console is really needed. Eventually you could create a symlink named grc... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082229.m78MTg5Q011065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-08 18:29:41 EDT --- Thanks, Till, your suggestions have been integrated in the new revision. Marek, this now builds on x86_64. SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/grub2.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/grub2-1.98-0.2.20080807svn.el5.x86_64/grub2-1.98-0.2.20080807svn.el5.src.rpm mock build with build logs: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/mock-results/grub2-1.98-0.2.20080807svn.el5.x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082229.m78MTB5r011019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-08 18:29:10 EDT --- Ok, new spec file and srpm with both of those issues fixed: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/olpc-netutils-0.4-2.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/olpc-netutils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082240.m78Me2O8027815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Pakage review : bluemindo - |Review Request: bluemindo - |Simple audio player in |Simple audio player in |python/GTK |python/GTK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082245.m78MjLTi013443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package review: perl-Padre |Review Request: perl-Padre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225745] Merge Review: fedora-logos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082243.m78Mhn6Y012981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225745 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 18:43:48 EDT --- [NOT OK] rpmlint output: fedora-logos.noarch: W: invalid-license Not licensed. See COPYING file for trademark permission. exception fedora-logos.noarch: W: no-url-tag I guess there this should maybe point to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork or http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo fedora-logos.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib fedora-logos.noarch: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/screensavers/system.desktop need to investigate fedora-logos.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-logos probably ok fedora-logos.src:166: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot/*png fedora-logos.src:167: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*.sh fedora-logos.src:168: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*.jpg At least %{_prefix} for /usr needs to be used. fedora-logos.src:557: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr * Mon Jun 19 2000... - Add %defattr There needs to be an extra percent sign: - Add %%defattr fedora-logos.src: W: invalid-license Not licensed. See COPYING file for trademark permission. fedora-logos.src: W: no-url-tag see above [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [EXCEPTION] license allowed: This is a special package afaics. [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: [EXCEPTION] Source0 is a working URL Afaics CVS is the upstream location for the Sources SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} Source1: background.png Imho this is to generic, fedora-logos-background.png would be better. [EXCEPTION] Source0 matches Upstream: [OK] Package builds on all platforms: noarch [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages [NOT OK] Owns all created directories: e.g.: /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksplash/Themes not sure, whether this is ok. Maybe you should multiown these directories, too. [NOT OK] no duplicates in %files 155 %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/* 156 %{_datadir}/icons/Bluecurve/*/apps/* 162 # we multi-own these directories, so as not to require the packages that 163 # provide them, thereby dragging in excess dependencies. 164 %{_datadir}/icons/Bluecurve 165 %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor Either drop lines 155 and 156 or add a %dir before lines 164 and 165. [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [EXCEPTION] Does not own files or dirs from other packages see comment in spec [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [NOT OK] Consistent macro usage /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot/*png /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*.sh /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*.jpg Use %{_prefix} instead of /usr [OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines Will check later: {} Conflicts https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts {} Scriptlets complete rpmlint output (desktop file) Btw: infinity-grub.xpm.gz is both in cvs and sources file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082244.m78MiqSK028284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|python-wikimarkup - Python |Review Request: |module to format text to |python-wikimarkup - Python |Mediawiki syntax |module to format text to | |Mediawiki syntax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082249.m78MnL1N028824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 18:49:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Ok, new spec file and srpm with both of those issues fixed: > > http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/olpc-netutils-0.4-2.fc9.src.rpm > http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/olpc-netutils.spec {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {OK} Changelog in allowed format APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 22:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082256.m78MuNY1029973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-08-08 18:56:22 EDT --- I just read on Fedoras Planet, that there will a kernel-vanilla package soon, maybe you keep this in mind for the next update of your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 8 23:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808082305.m78N5V4R031217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-08 19:05:30 EDT --- > > 1.) Please do not create scripts inline in SPEC > > > > That is utterly ugly. You should be ashamed. > > Any guideline against this? I like it. Yup: "- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible." > > > 2.) Fix your runtime dependencies. > > > > You seem to import at least wx, gtk, pango, etc. We do not have autoreqs for > > python. Please add the necessary Requires. > > > > The upstream web [1] recommends the following, which you may want to base your > > decision upon: > > > > * wx-python > > * numpy > > * gnuradio with gr-wxgui > > * python-gtk2(>=2.6) > > * python-xml and/or pyxml > > > > [1] http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/GNURadioCompanion > > All those are fetched with GNURadio itself, this should be fine. I do not think so. Fedora 9: [lkundrak at jesus ~]$ grc Missing critical module: "xml.dom.ext" Exiting! [lkundrak at jesus ~]$ > > 3.) License tag does not seem correct. > > > > At least you include some CC blurb in %doc. Are you sure you don't ship any > > Creative Commons stuff? > > Only the icon is under CC, however it's shipped with the package under GPLv2+, > should I mention it anyway? I do not know what does the CC license of the icon say. By including the icon license in License tag can not do any harm, well, I guess... when in doubt please ask on legal m-l. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 00:58:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090058.m790w3j1030029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 20:58:02 EDT --- Thanks Fixed May you look at them again. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gflags.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gflags-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 01:11:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 21:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090111.m791BBdL014668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-08 21:11:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313860) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313860) Patch to handle docs & minor clean-up Looks pretty good, though when we package documentation we use the %doc macro, instead of doing it manually. I've attached a patch for your spec to fix this, and to also remove the Distribution tag since we don't use that. +1 Approved. Go ahead and set-up you account, and send me you account name and I'll sponsor you: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 01:45:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 21:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458186] Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090145.m791j2Ur003346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458186 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 21:45:01 EDT --- It FAILED on koji, I will correct it and update. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=767585 SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnusound.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gnusound-0.7.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Stripping and Description fixed. Yes stripping like this was wrong. The issue was with permissions of *.so I have changed description to this: GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME. It reads and writes many audio formats through its modular system of file format drivers and can also extract the audio from video formats. It can use either OSS, ALSA or JACK for recording and playback and interfaces with the GLADSPA plugin system to provide a wide range of high-quality audio processing plugins including filters, compressors and delay effects. It looks to me acceptable now. May you suggest changes if any still required? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 01:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 21:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090158.m791wAlQ019862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Vasile Gaburici changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gaburici at cs.umd.edu --- Comment #12 from Vasile Gaburici 2008-08-08 21:58:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Ok. Anyway if you want more info Adobe-side, Thomas Phinney seems to be the > contact. He's basically the manager of the their font divison. He does comment on licensing matters on typophile.com. But he's been mum about some shady issues like whether it's okay to produce documents using the Minion and Myriad that come with Adobe Reader; AFAICT nobody from Adobe ever cleared that up. So I wouldn't hold my breath that he'll answer this patent issue either... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 02:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090202.m7922l6t020678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #13 from Vasile Gaburici 2008-08-08 22:02:46 EDT --- There has been an update upstream a couple of days ago. The author added the Bold and BoldItalic variants, so you should probably update the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 02:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090242.m792glmG027126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-08 22:42:46 EDT --- Thanks, Fixed SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/mailutils.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/mailutils-1.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 02:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090243.m792hwAG027242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #3 from Vasile Gaburici 2008-08-08 22:43:57 EDT --- After some patching and complaining about usability upstream, a new version has been released. Please review this instead! http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools-2.70-2.fc9.src.rpm http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 03:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090302.m79322OH015169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 --- Comment #4 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-08 23:02:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: olpc-netutils Short Description: olpc-netutils is a GPL-licensed collection of scripts for logging network status information on OLPC XOs. Owners: rnorwood Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 03:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090344.m793ijKW019908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-08 23:44:44 EDT --- Upstream confirmed it is just GPLv2. I have fixed the license tag and disabled the debugging option. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/ms-sys.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/ms-sys-2.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 06:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 02:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090621.m796LM3r007795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-09 02:21:21 EDT --- [rpmbuild at rocky ~]$ rpmls ms-sys-2.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -rwxr-xr-x ms-sys-2.1.3.tgz -rwxr-xr-x ms-sys.spec It should be 664 Rest things are okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 07:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 03:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090701.m7971Uob012566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-09 03:01:28 EDT --- Till, right, there's also memtest, and probably some more packages, that make sense to be loaded by GRUB. Maybe it would make sense to adjust grubby for grub2's grub.cfg, and not use update-grub at all. But yes, I think I'll just add those triggers for now, not to deviate from upstream at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 07:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 03:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090742.m797gIwL017343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #7 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-09 03:42:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Yup: > "- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible." It is! > I do not think so. Fedora 9: > > [lkundrak at jesus ~]$ grc > > Missing critical module: "xml.dom.ext" > > Exiting! > > [lkundrak at jesus ~]$ As you said it's PyXML. > I do not know what does the CC license of the icon say. By including the icon > license in License tag can not do any harm, well, I guess... when in doubt > please ask on legal m-l. You're right done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 07:47:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 03:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090747.m797l25N032455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #8 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-09 03:47:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think that grc is a bit short for a name, too. Lubomir's suggestion to use > gnuradio-companion instead would certainly be useful in preventing name > clashes. Just because it's the first piece of software claiming a 3 letter name > does not mean it really should do it. Especially as it has a desktop file to > launch it, so not typing in the console is really needed. Everyone knows it as grc, it's upstream official name... first anyone would do is to try it install under this name (I could use Provides: grc to save it). > Eventually you could create a symlink named grc... But if I create the symlink named grc and provides to grc, that's the point to not name the package itself grc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 07:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 03:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808090747.m797lhsH018027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #9 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-09 03:47:41 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/grc/grc-0.70-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 10:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 06:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091028.m79ASIRK022238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-08-09 06:28:17 EDT --- I have uploaded a new version, which should fix your points and renamed the shared library package to avogadro-libs. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogardo-0.8.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 11:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 07:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091107.m79B7ngq026983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #43 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 07:07:46 EDT --- I'm not sure why this ticket is open; I've done the review on emesene and things were closed out. If further things need to happen to this package, a separate ticket should be opened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 11:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 07:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458186] Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091119.m79BJ0Q3013954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458186 --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-08-09 07:18:59 EDT --- The patch probably needs to be send upstream and a comment about the status of the patch needs to be added to the spec: Patch0: gnusound-build.patch Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus Imho this should also apply to the .desktop file, therefore please send it to upstream, too. The %configure script already sets --prefix (you can test it with rpm --eval %configure), therefore I cannot see a reason, why this needs to be added: %configure --prefix=%{_usr} Btw. if you needed to add it, %{_prefix} would be probably a better choice. Is it intentional, that these files are not marked with %doc? %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}/html %{_docdir}/%{name}/html/*.html You do not yet need to rebuild it, I will try to do a complete review later, but I need to refresh my knowledge about some guidelines, first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 11:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 07:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458186] Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091159.m79BxfKO001245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458186 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-09 07:59:37 EDT --- Just commenting for this: (In reply to comment #3) > Is it intentional, that these files are not marked with %doc? > %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}/html > %{_docdir}/%{name}/html/*.html Files/directories under %_docdir are automatically marked as %doc. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch09s05.html#id2972655 >From rpm 4.5.90 source, the current directories which are automatically assumed as %doc are: %__docdir_path %{_datadir}/doc:%{_datadir}/man:%{_datadir}/info:%{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html:%{?_docdir}:%{?_mandir}:%{?_infodir}:%{?_javadocdir}:/usr/doc:/usr/man:/usr/info:/usr/X11R6/man -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 12:58:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 08:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091258.m79Cw3Le029228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 --- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-09 08:58:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Looks like a rpmlint warning has crept in during the review: + [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ rpmlint gphoto2-2.4.2-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm gphoto2.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gphoto2-2.4.2/ChangeLog [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ Could be fixed as shown in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#file-not-utf8 Otherwise it looks fine. +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 13:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091308.m79D8pKp031245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 --- Comment #11 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-09 09:08:50 EDT --- Also replace %{buildroot} with %%{buildroot} in the %changelog stanza to avoid rpmlint warnings on the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 13:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091343.m79DhJSr018559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-09 09:43:18 EDT --- Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 13:46:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091346.m79DkxHF019337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-09 09:46:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Updated files: > Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage.spec > SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Fails to build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=768031 Looks like the new version has a dependency on zlib. Please add 'BuildRequires: zlib-devel'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 13:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091348.m79DmiC6019558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 --- Comment #12 from David Timms 2008-08-09 09:48:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > so please post the .spec and .src.rpm somewhere on the web, and explicitly > provide the links in this bug, > > The .spec is already here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729 > > I don't have anywhere to put the SRPM (and/or haven't figured out / set up > FAS), but it's easily created: You could use a public upload server like: http://filebin.ca/, and post the link back here, please. Note: As I understand this is your first fedora package, the official review needs to be performed by a fedora sponsor; in the meantime I should be able to give some comments to help whip the package into shape if it needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 13:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091355.m79DtFB2020932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-09 09:55:14 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 13:55:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 09:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091355.m79DtVP9020994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 09:55:31 EDT --- The Fedora project can provide hosting if you have an account set up; you just need to ask and someone can flip the switch that will get things set up. However, that can't be done until the CLA is completed. In fact, I'd say this review might be a bit premature until you get past the CLA, because if you can't sign it due to issues with your company then you can't contribute packages to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091403.m79E39Aj022410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091402.m79E2UmH008360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-09 10:02:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) + Since you are installing new mimeinfo, the MIME database needs to be updated. Moreover 'Requires: shared-mime-info' is not needed. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo for details. + You could also consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} ... to preserve timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091407.m79E77LH009262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-09 10:07:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ms-sys Short Description: Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records Owners: sundaram Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091411.m79EBiVc024085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-09 10:11:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Email-Find.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-Email-Find-0.10-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text Changelog - Add BR perl(Test:More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429585] Review Request: lv2dynparam - An LV2 plugin for dynamic parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091427.m79EReDq026833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429585 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 10:27:39 EDT --- Closing because the ticket this depends on was closed due to lack of submitter response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:29:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091429.m79ETKxx012964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 10:29:19 EDT --- I think the cvs flag was set instead of the review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:30:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091430.m79EUkW4013536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 10:30:45 EDT --- Please remember to set the review flag to '?' when you're reviewing a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:30:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091430.m79EU3l3013348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 10:30:02 EDT --- Please remember to set the review flag to '?' when you're reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:26:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232465] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091426.m79EQqoO012691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 10:26:50 EDT --- This has been in needinfo for over a month, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429581] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091426.m79EQs4v012724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429581 Bug 429581 depends on bug 232465, which changed state. Bug 232465 Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429581] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091427.m79ERQQw012804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429581 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 10:27:25 EDT --- Closing because the ticket this depends on was closed due to lack of submitter response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 14:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429585] Review Request: lv2dynparam - An LV2 plugin for dynamic parameters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091426.m79EQtqm012749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429585 Bug 429585 depends on bug 232465, which changed state. Bug 232465 Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 15:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091507.m79F7u6c001200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 11:07:55 EDT --- This was built and is in rawhide currently; any reason not to close this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 15:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091509.m79F9Ef3019759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 11:09:13 EDT --- This was built for rawhide but doesn't ever seem to have been built on the release branches. Did you intend for this package to go into F8 and F9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 15:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091511.m79FBZ5k001953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 11:11:34 EDT --- It seems as if this package is in rawhide and F-9 now; any reason not to close this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 15:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091548.m79FmwG6007109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #21 from Adam Huffman 2008-08-09 11:48:56 EDT --- Have submitted another package for review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458543 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 15:47:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458543] New: Review Request: eg - a wrapper for Git Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eg - a wrapper for Git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458543 Summary: Review Request: eg - a wrapper for Git Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bloch at verdurin.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/eg/eg.spec SRPM URL: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/eg/eg-0.85-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Easy Git (eg) is a wrapper for git, designed to make Git easy to learn and use. rpmlint on the .spec file: eg.spec:61: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I would welcome advice on how to get around this error - there is only a single source file (not an archive), which constitutes the entire package. eg.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. As mentioned above, there are no other files in the source. Is it normal to create something like 'README.Fedora' in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 16:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455941] RFE: Update libical to 0.31 for Fedora 9, 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091602.m79G2HWN009076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455941 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | Component|Package Review |libical Version|rawhide |9 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Summary|Review Request: libical - |RFE: Update libical to 0.31 |Update libical to 0.31 for |for Fedora 9, 10 |Fedora 9, 10 - SPONSOR | |NEEDED | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-09 12:02:16 EDT --- Changing the component to libical. This is a RFE for F-9 (F-10 has 0.31 libical) and not a review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 16:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454025] Review Request: libixp - stand-alone client/server 9P library including ixpc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091605.m79G50rC027652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-09 12:04:59 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 16:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091634.m79GYdvJ014768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #95 from Lee Howard 2008-08-09 12:34:36 EDT --- SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 16:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458543] Review Request: eg - a wrapper for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091647.m79GllRY017193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458543 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 12:47:46 EDT --- > eg.spec:61: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR > You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use > a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. It's kind of rare to see $RPM_SOURCE_DIR used like that; wouldn't it just be easier to install %{SOURCE0} directly? > As mentioned above, there are no other files in the source. Is it normal to > create something like 'README.Fedora' in this case? You don't need to invent documentation where none exists. You could, however, consider writing a manpage and sending it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 16:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091656.m79Gu7QJ018760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 12:56:05 EDT --- OK, I'm back from vacation and have my build infrastructure running again. Things still build. The checkout instructions work fine. The directory ownership issues are resolved on all sides. debuginfo issues are explained. gcj bits are conditionalized properly. Everything looks good to me; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 17:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091733.m79HXWxQ025024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 13:33:31 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 17:31:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091731.m79HVe2g024844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 13:31:38 EDT --- I'm back from vacation; sorry for not being able to take care of this sooner. Everything looks good to me now; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 17:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091754.m79HsRkT014150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-09 13:54:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: node Short Description: Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 18:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091802.m79I2aLr030381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 14:02:35 EDT --- Not much to review, really. * source files match upstream: 34167eefcbf17feafc7a5c53b9c1396f460b18d7030e0a4da9e360df4268e7d0 pisg-0.72.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(pisg) = 0.72-3.fc10 perl(Pisg) perl(Pisg::Common) perl(Pisg::HTMLGenerator) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::DCpp) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::IRCAP) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::RacBot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::Template) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::Trillian) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::Vision) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::axur) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::blootbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::bobot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::bxlog) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::dancer) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::dircproxy) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::eggdrop) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::energymech) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::grufti) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::hydra) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::infobot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::ircII) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::ircle) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::irssi) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::javabot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::konversation) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::kvirc) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::lulubot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::mIRC) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::mIRC6) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::mIRC6hack) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::mbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::miau) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::moobot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::mozbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::muh) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::muh2) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::oer) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::perlbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::pircbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::psybnc) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::rbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::sirc) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::supy) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::virc98) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::weechat) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::winbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::xchat) perl(Pisg::Parser::Format::zcbot) perl(Pisg::Parser::Logfile) pisg = 0.72-3.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl config(pisg) = 0.72-3.fc10 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(POSIX) perl(Pisg) perl(Pisg::HTMLGenerator) perl(Text::Iconv) perl(lib) perl(strict) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I ran the program and it appeared to work, although I didn't feed it a large body of logs for processing. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 18:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091853.m79IrlhC005673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-09 14:53:46 EDT --- In case reviewer doesn't see any issues i think this packages can go through review without doc until other issue is resolved. The package will block libkml library which I will file in a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 18:52:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] New: Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 Summary: Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Uriparser is a strictly RFC 3986 compliant URI parsing library written in C. uriparser is cross-platform, fast, supports Unicode and is licensed under the New BSD license. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/liburiparser.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/liburiparser-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm *Note: I haven't packaged a doc sub package or anything inside doc directory. The build system for that was separate, and I don't have any reason why. I had asked upstream and hope for some action. *I have filed a bug at sourceforge project home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 19:23:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091923.m79JNQcv027441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-08-09 15:23:25 EDT --- Here is a new version, which contains a reorganized spec file and fixes some things concerning the icon implementation. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro-0.8.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 19:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091925.m79JP1OL009787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-09 15:25:00 EDT --- https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2044182&group_id=182840&atid=902834 Confirmed from upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 19:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091953.m79JrTQp031419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 19:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808091952.m79JqaPk031347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 15:52:35 EDT --- Looks clean to me. I note that there seem to be some included tests; "setup.py test" will run them file if python-nose is added as a build dependency: Ran 35 tests in 0.068s OK It's probably worth doing that, unless you can see a reason not to. * source files match upstream: 01112b01f72cb2f71029f4f392405a8bb1f1f6159a91ee2a883e82f888f5864f Paver-0.8.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-paver = 0.8.1-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 X %check should probably be added. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 20:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 16:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092001.m79K1tpf014981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 16:01:54 EDT --- Actually I don't see why a separate build system is a problem. In %build, just add cd doc %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} and you'll need to figure out how to get them installed properly, since make install in the doc directory doesn't seem to do anything for me. It's probably just a matter of putting the doc/html directory somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 20:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 16:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092014.m79KECKp016321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-cobbler Provides |rubygem-cobbler - Provides |Ruby bindings to interact |Ruby bindings to interact |with a Cobbler server. |with a Cobbler server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 20:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 16:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092019.m79KJJAU016990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458025 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 20:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 16:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092019.m79KJHPE016944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Depends on| |458012 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 20:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 16:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092019.m79KJCID002242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 16:19:11 EDT --- Adding NEEDSPONSOR (as the account "srini" in the account system does not have packager access) and fixing up dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 20:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 16:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444019] Review Request: perl-PHP-Serialization - Converts between PHP's serialize() output and the equivalent Perl structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092021.m79KLIpT017594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444019 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 21:14:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092114.m79LE8iA023477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2008-08-09 17:14:07 EDT --- Stay tuned for full review this weekend (most likely tomorrow night). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 21:23:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092123.m79LN9oZ009978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-09 17:23:08 EDT --- I'll sponsor, he's one of my teammates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 22:14:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 18:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092214.m79MEgRp030385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #6 from Ankur Shrivastava 2008-08-09 18:14:40 EDT --- @all i am sorry for not being able to reply, this was my first try at packaging and well it was full of errors!!!! altough i updated my spec there are still some problem with the configure script how do i solve it??? @ Pavel Alexeev Yes i have no problem if you maintain this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 22:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 18:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445708] Review Request: RaptorMenu - Alternate menu for KDE 4.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092232.m79MWq3a032705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445708 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #5 from Steven M. Parrish 2008-08-09 18:32:50 EDT --- Closing this review request until upstream gets some issues resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 9 23:51:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 19:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808092351.m79NpAYp027602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 19:51:08 EDT --- This does indeed build now, but I note that several of the tests seem to fail for me (x86_64, rawhide in mock). Too many to include here, so I did a scratch build. Just search for "failed" at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=768334&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 00:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 20:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100036.m7A0axEE000543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 20:36:58 EDT --- You seem to have posted a built rpm, not a src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 00:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 20:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100050.m7A0oDWe002043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 20:50:12 EDT --- License seems to be MIT, not BSD. It's just the " Old Style with legal disclaimer" from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT with the MIT references removed or replaced. You probably don't want to use %{__mv} and %{__rm} in %prep but instead want the non-macro versions to match the rest of your spec. * source files match upstream: 6c754405c1b9af2a28ba0975058ef8a38da230bc8c8e0874aebcbe2ff24dee7d vttest.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written X macros not used consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field should read "MIT". * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: vttest = 20071216-1.fc10 vttest(x86-64) = 20071216-1.fc10 = vttest-debuginfo-20071216-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm vttest-debuginfo = 20071216-1.fc10 vttest-debuginfo(x86-64) = 20071216-1.fc10 = * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I ran this manually in the mock chroot and it seems to work fine. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100106.m7A16GvL018998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:06:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456150] Review Request: slapi-nis - NIS Server and Schema Compatibility plugins for Fedora DS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100108.m7A18TJ4004314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456150 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:08:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100110.m7A1Ab54004784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:10:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:13:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100113.m7A1Dp6n019679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:13:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456166] Review Request: mars-sim - Mars Simulation Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100112.m7A1CPA4004946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456166 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:12:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100117.m7A1Hfut020250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:17:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:19:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100119.m7A1Jis5020319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:19:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100122.m7A1MlVi020907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:22:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100126.m7A1Q90v021418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:26:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100127.m7A1RA3Y006624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:27:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100129.m7A1Tpj6006691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:29:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100131.m7A1V5ar021979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:31:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100132.m7A1WxaU022138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:32:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100135.m7A1Z6lL022587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:35:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 01:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449667] Review Request: python-yenc - yEnc Module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100139.m7A1dqVb022951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449667 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-09 21:39:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 02:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 22:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100225.m7A2PpMV014580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-09 22:25:49 EDT --- This package needs a license review, I think. You have License: LGPLv2, but the source files all seem to be either LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ (grep for "GNU Lesser" and "GNU General" and note the "any later version" language present in all files). However, I don't know if any of the GPLv2+ stuff ends up on the final binary; it seems to be test-related. You will need to check that; if that's the case, then the final product is GPLv2+; otherwise I think it would be LGPLv2+ unless some other license is involved. rpmlint says: libmicrohttpd.x86_64: W: no-documentation Actually the COPYING file should be in the main package, and this will go away when that's fixed. (Eliminating this complaint isn't the reason for moving the COPYING file; we just want the license information in the package that people will be installing.) libmicrohttpd-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a problem. libmicrohttpd-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libmicrohttpd-doc-0.3.1/html/d8/d26/microhttpd_8h__incl.map Doxygen tends to do this for whatever reason. I don't think it's a big problem. * source files match upstream: c38e3d74c1a97e2bd0442147003d6423acbe791979cb52d5e78b5fcfe95168ff libmicrohttpd-0.3.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text not included in main package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libmicrohttpd.so.4()(64bit) libmicrohttpd = 0.3.1-1.fc10 libmicrohttpd(x86-64) = 0.3.1-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig info libmicrohttpd.so.4()(64bit) libmicrohttpd-devel-0.3.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libmicrohttpd-devel = 0.3.1-1.fc10 libmicrohttpd-devel(x86-64) = 0.3.1-1.fc10 = libmicrohttpd = 0.3.1-1.fc10 libmicrohttpd.so.4()(64bit) libmicrohttpd-doc-0.3.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libmicrohttpd-doc = 0.3.1-1.fc10 libmicrohttpd-doc(x86-64) = 0.3.1-1.fc10 = /bin/sh libmicrohttpd = 0.3.1-1.fc10 * %check is present and all tests pass: All 3 tests passed All 15 tests passed * shared libraries installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (install-info, ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is in a separate package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 03:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 23:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100343.m7A3hJWF006375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-09 23:43:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=768412 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b38339e6c4ef0a13818195d50a193545 Email-Find-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=37, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.25 CPU) + Package perl-Email-Find-0.10-2.fc10 => Provides: perl(Email::Find) = 0.10 perl(Email::Find::addrspec) = 0.09 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Email::Find::addrspec) perl(Email::Valid) perl(Mail::Address) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 06:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100655.m7A6tCXl014154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-10 02:55:11 EDT --- @jason Yes, you are very right. Thanks. I was just concerned why was it like that & never though about a way around. Updated: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/liburiparser.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/liburiparser-0.7.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 07:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100724.m7A7OK8V032520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-10 03:24:20 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-2.61bzr.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 07:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100725.m7A7PJKB017846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-10 03:25:18 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-2.61bzr.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 07:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100746.m7A7kgtP003082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-10 03:46:41 EDT --- node-0.3.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 07:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100745.m7A7jxhr002887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-10 03:45:58 EDT --- node-0.3.2-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 07:47:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452078] Review Request: node - Simple node front end, modelled after the node shells of TheNet and G8BPQ nodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100747.m7A7lP5C020435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452078 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 07:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100750.m7A7o2qp003690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #36 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-10 03:50:00 EDT --- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-fedora.spec http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-1.2.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 08:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100805.m7A85fTX023770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #53 from Jess Portnoy 2008-08-10 04:05:39 EDT --- Hi Alex, I was thinking, it might be a good idea for the RPM %post to run the following: sed 's@\(^include_path\s*=\s*".*\)"@\1:%{_datadir}/php"@' -i /etc/php.ini So that the prefix for ZF is found within PHP's include path. I don't think it's a must and can also think of reasons why not to interfere with the php.ini but still, thought I'd suggest it none the less. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 08:25:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100825.m7A8PgRJ027942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1.1-6 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 08:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100825.m7A8Pi39028012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Bug 455211 depends on bug 227190, which changed state. Bug 227190 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 08:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100825.m7A8PhIT027983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 Bug 218581 depends on bug 227190, which changed state. Bug 227190 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 08:37:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100837.m7A8bp7P029558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-10 04:37:49 EDT --- This need an update. I will wait till these two dependent package reviews are done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 php-oauth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 php-xmpphp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 09:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 05:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100905.m7A95OhM015906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 --- Comment #2 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-08-10 05:05:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pisg Short Description: Perl IRC Statistics Generator owners: sindrepb Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 09:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 05:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100914.m7A9EnAB001962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-10 05:14:48 EDT --- Oops. Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-markdown.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-markdown-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 09:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 05:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100911.m7A9BNTt001758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 --- Comment #2 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-08-10 05:11:22 EDT --- Updated: - License change to MIT - Changed macro usage in %prep Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/vttest.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/vttest-20071216-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 09:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 05:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100939.m7A9dsk4005481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-08-10 05:39:53 EDT --- One detail, better source URL to use is ftp://invisible-island.net/vttest/vttest-%{version}.tgz so we won't have different versions saved in file with the same name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 09:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 05:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: Rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808100949.m7A9nE9l021567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2008-08-10 05:49:14 EDT --- SPEC: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/rabbyt/bugzilla/2/python-rabbyt.spec SRPM: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/rabbyt/bugzilla/2/python-rabbyt-0.8.1-2.fc9.src.rpm renamed from Rabbyt to python-rabbyt to honor the Python Naming Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 10:03:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454025] Review Request: libixp - stand-alone client/server 9P library including ixpc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101003.m7AA3lOG009183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 --- Comment #5 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2008-08-10 06:03:46 EDT --- Thank you for the review! Sorry for not answering all this time and thanks for continuing to ping. I had given up on the package because I got stuck. I managed to add a few of the stuff you proposed, but not others. I uploaded the new spec and src.rpms, though they still have errors: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/libixp-0.4-2.fc9.i386.rpm http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/libixp.spec I'm not sure if the libraries should be in the -devel part or if i should replace that with a -static section(though from what I read in the Packaging Guidelines, that's strongly discouraged) I'm afraid I need more help in order to get this specfile right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 10:24:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101024.m7AAOB2x027461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-10 06:24:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This package needs a license review, I think. > > You have License: LGPLv2, but the source files all seem to be either LGPLv2+ or > GPLv2+ (grep for "GNU Lesser" and "GNU General" and note the "any later > version" language present in all files). However, I don't know if any of the > GPLv2+ stuff ends up on the final binary; it seems to be test-related. You > will need to check that; if that's the case, then the final product is GPLv2+; > otherwise I think it would be LGPLv2+ unless some other license is involved. The website of this project says the license is LGPL. This is confirmed in a mailing list posting ( http://crisp.cs.du.edu/pipermail/libmicrohttpd/2007/000001.html ) and a bugreport ( https://gnunet.org/mantis/view.php?id=1384 ). In the Subversion repository of this project, everything is already changed to LGPLv2+. I'll change the License tag to LGPLv2+ in the spec file > rpmlint says: > libmicrohttpd.x86_64: W: no-documentation > Actually the COPYING file should be in the main package, and this will go away > when that's fixed. (Eliminating this complaint isn't the reason for moving the > COPYING file; we just want the license information in the package that people > will be installing.) Fixed by moving the COPYING file to the main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 10:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101027.m7AAR6vd013244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-10 06:27:05 EDT --- New package @ http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/libmicrohttpd.spec and http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm I also forgot to mention the location of the SVN repository of this project, this is https://gnunet.org/svn/libmicrohttpd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 10:43:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101043.m7AAhfQF015865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #54 from Alexander Kahl 2008-08-10 06:43:39 EDT --- Hi Jess, nice idea but actually useless for Fedora: include_path is not set in php.ini by default, instead it's hard-coded by a patch to .:/usr/share/pear:/usr/share/php (in C: INCLUDE_PATH=.:$EXPANDED_PEAR_INSTALLDIR:${EXPANDED_DATADIR}/php) Our policy is to install PEAR packages into /usr/share/pear and all other PHP packages into /usr/share/php; if anyone wishes to override the path, he or she has to make sure the default still applies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 10:47:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101047.m7AAlAsY031410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 --- Comment #2 from Dan Kope?ek 2008-08-10 06:47:09 EDT --- > Miloslav Trma? wrote: > > This is not a formal review: I didn't go through Packaging/Guidelines, > and I won't be able to reply during the next week. > > rpmlint output: > bro.i386: E: > wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/bro/capture-events.bro "$Id:" > bro.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bro/capture-events.bro > 0644 >> bro.i386: E: > wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/bro/capture-state-updates.bro "$Id:" >> bro.i386: E: > non-executable-script /usr/share/bro/capture-state-updates.bro 0644 > The .bro files are not scripts, so this is not a problem. >> bro.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/bro/ftp-safe-words.bro > Shipped that way, OK. >> bro.i386: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/bro > Have you checked this is OK? I think this is ok because Bro periodically creates new log files (this can be set in /etc/sysconfig/bro). But it ships some archiving script too that are not installed now - I will fix that after I rewrite this scripts as they are not usable in our environment now. > bro.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/bro $prog >> rpmlint can not expand $prog, this is OK. > > * blocker: The Release: field does not follow > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Changed to: 0.1.%{snapshot}svn%{?dist} > * blocker: License: should be "BSD with advertising" > * Why is the "Requires: perl openssl zlib ncurses" line necessary? > - I can't see anything that requires perl > - libssl dependency is discovered automatically; nothing uses the > command-line utility > - libz dependency is discovered automatically > - Only "shtool", which is not shipped at all, uses the command-line > programs from ncurses. Fixed. (removed) > * blocker: bro seems to ship its own copy of libedit. If it's true, bro > needs to be patched to link to the package shipped in the libedit rpm. Yes, it ships its own libedit but it is not installed nor linked with any installed executables, so this should be ok. Thanks for review New SRPM: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/bro/bro-1.4-0.1.20080804svn.fc8.src.rpm New spec: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/bro/bro.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101121.m7ABLBO5004835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #17 from Christian Iseli 2008-08-10 07:21:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I think the issue that was holding this up has been fixed; can this ticket be > closed now? Building still fails on PPC due to the GCC internal error on F-9... Are you sure a new GCC has been pushed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101132.m7ABWxnc006844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-10 07:32:57 EDT --- Hello, I'm taking over this request. I've moved schematics to doc directory, updated README file to specify correct location and added initial configuration file and sysvinit script to startup cwdaemon... ... and finally bumped version. New versions: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cwdaemon.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cwdaemon-0.9.4-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101134.m7ABYaTC024425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 07:34:35 EDT --- I do not know if Jakub intends to fix the issue on F-9; I pinged on bug 450889. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:37:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101137.m7ABboP6007679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 07:37:49 EDT --- Well, we trust the licenses on the actual code in preference to what upstream says on their web site. Upstreams rarely pay as much attention to licensing as we do and their web sites are often woefully inaccurate. The presence of GPL source in the tarball should indicate that. We could either wait until a new release comes out with the licensing cleaned up, or pull a snapshot from SVN, but it would probably be more reasonable to include a copy of that mailing list post as documentation in the package, and include those links as comments in the spec. Otherwise I think this package is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101144.m7ABitjn008797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #19 from Christian Iseli 2008-08-10 07:44:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I do not know if Jakub intends to fix the issue on F-9; I pinged on bug 450889. Thanks tibbs. I requested a push of staden-io_lib for F-8. If GCC won't be fixed in F-9 I'll just close this ticket, but let's wait a bit to see what are Jakub's intentions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101152.m7ABqdhr010500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |450889 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101152.m7ABqFut010423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-10 07:52:14 EDT --- Well, by the time gcc issue is fixed on F-9, I propose a workaround like: %build #%% configure --disable-static %configure --enable-shared %if 0%{?fedora} == 9 # First build source as much as possible # Next downgrade optimization level due to gcc ICE (bug 450889) make -k %{?_smp_mflags} || : make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="`echo %optflags | sed -e 's|-O2|-O|'`" %else make %{?_smp_mflags} %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 11:54:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101154.m7ABsd7j010725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119 Daniel Veillard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Customer Facing| |--- Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Daniel Veillard 2008-08-10 07:54:38 EDT --- Oh, right, forgot to close. thanks for your help Jason ! Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101227.m7ACR6c9002314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 --- Comment #21 from Christian Iseli 2008-08-10 08:27:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Well, by the time gcc issue is fixed on F-9, I propose a workaround like: > ... Oh, ok. I applied your workaround and the build went fine. Good idea, thanks. I'll close this ticket now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:29:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444735] Review Request: staden-io_lib - General purpose library to handle gene sequencing machine trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101229.m7ACT5IK002481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444735 Christian Iseli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101230.m7ACUvxO017965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 08:30:56 EDT --- I would suggest opening your own review ticket and closing this one as a duplicate of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101232.m7ACW5Jr018169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Rabbyt - |Review Request: |sprite library for Python |python-rabbyt - sprite |with game development in |library for Python with |mind |game development in mind -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101239.m7ACd0n0019134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-10 08:38:59 EDT --- Current status of this package: Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-3.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jul 31 2008 Thomas Moschny <...> - 4.3.1-3 - Remove src/include/dsound.h, and src/include/*asio* files from the tarball, for legal reasons. Only used on windows anyway. - Remove src/include/soundcard.h (explicitly forbids modification) and disable OSS support. - Build and pack Md2Skini. - Build and pack the examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:39:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101239.m7ACdIwT004174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] New: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cwdaemon.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cwdaemon-0.9.4-7.fc9.src.rpm Description: Cwdaemon is a small daemon which uses the pc parallel or serial port and a simple transistor switch to output morse code to a transmitter from a text message sent to it via the udp internet protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101240.m7ACeY2M019609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DEFERRED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-10 08:40:33 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458585 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 12:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101240.m7ACeZOO019640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob at fedoraunity.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-10 08:40:33 EDT --- *** Bug 433161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 13:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101327.m7ADROfS027849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk --- Comment #9 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-08-10 09:27:22 EDT --- Does not build in my F8 mock: ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for ocaml-bitstring-devel >= 1.9.7. Also does not work on my F8 xen machine: [root at vs1 ~]# virt-uname Fatal error: exception Failure("Domain-0: use -W to define word size for this image") Is it possible to make it usable for current stable xen distribution (F8)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 13:34:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101334.m7ADYRAj028830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-10 09:34:26 EDT --- After some more investigation of the latest SVN snapshot I've found out there's a license incompatibility involved in this project. The HTTPS part of libmicrohttpd makes use of a (bundled and modified copy of) opencdk and openpgp. Both these projects are licensed under the GPLv2+ (opencdk) and GPLv3+ (openpgp) licenses. If libmicrohttpd really is LGPLv2+ this is a license incompatibility as these licenses don't mix. There are also some other files which are still licensed under the GPLv2+ license, but as these are only testcases they are valid (they aren't bundled in the RPM files anyway). I've reported this issue at upstream's bugtracker: https://gnunet.org/mantis/view.php?id=1404 If upstream doesn't respond in a few days, I'll disable HTTPS support in the package until the issue is really solved, but for now we'll have to wait for more clearance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 13:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] New: Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 Summary: Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qsstv.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qsstv-5.3-0.1.c.fc9.src.rpm Description: Qsstv is a program for receiving slow-scan television and fax. These are modes used by hamradio operators. Qsstv uses a soundcard to send and receive images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101422.m7AEMhtn005251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 10:22:42 EDT --- I'm not sure there's any incompatibility there; the result would simply be GPLv3+. Perhaps the legal folks should look over things; I've added it to the legal blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101423.m7AENmx3005399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-10 10:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Does not build in my F8 mock: > ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for ocaml-bitstring-devel >= 1.9.7. I think it will work if you install ocaml-bitstring 1.9.7 from F8 updates-testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-6564 > Also does not work on my F8 xen machine: > [root at vs1 ~]# virt-uname > Fatal error: exception Failure("Domain-0: use -W to define word size for this > image") Currently it doesn't detect architectures correctly. Very easy to fix, and will be done in a future release, but in the meantime you need to do, for example: virt-uname -A i386 -T i386 > Is it possible to make it usable for current stable xen distribution (F8)? It should build on F8 with the updated ocaml-bitstring. Here is an F8 package for x86-64 that I just built on an F8 machine: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/virt-mem-0.2.9-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm http://www.annexia.org/tmp/virt-mem-0.2.9-3.fc8.src.rpm By the way, for general build/usage questions, you might want to post to this list: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:24:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458543] Review Request: eg - a wrapper for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101424.m7AEOZS6022858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458543 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-08-10 10:24:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > eg.spec:61: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR > > You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use > > a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. > > It's kind of rare to see $RPM_SOURCE_DIR used like that; wouldn't it just be > easier to install %{SOURCE0} directly? Imho it the source should be copied to the build-dir in %setup, therefore instead of cp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/%{name} $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} this would be better in %prep: cp -p %SOURCE0 . I did not test it, but imho it should work. Also note the "-p" to preserve the timestamp. When %SOURCE0 would be directly installed in %install, then it make much more work to create a patch, e.g. I normally run make prep, create the patch and use "make patch SUFFIX=foo" in Fedora CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:25:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101425.m7AEPdSO005907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-10 10:25:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is it possible to make it usable for current stable xen distribution (F8)? Sorry, I also notice that you're using Xen. At the moment libvirt only supports memory peeking for KVM guests. We plan to implement this for Xen too (it is, after all, relatively simple to do under Xen), but there is no support in libvirt right at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:28:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101428.m7AESvTG006298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-10 10:28:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-paver.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-paver-0.8.1-2.fc9.src.rpm %check section added and python-nose is now a BuildRequire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101438.m7AEcjON007896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #12 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-08-10 10:38:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > I think it will work if you install ocaml-bitstring 1.9.7 from F8 > updates-testing: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-6564 I think you should request move to stable for this package. It's harder to install this in my mock environment. > Currently it doesn't detect architectures correctly. Very easy to fix, and > will be done > in a future release, but in the meantime you need to do, for example: > > virt-uname -A i386 -T i386 OK. As I am using xen, this does not help. > By the way, for general build/usage questions, you might want to post > to this list: I can build it, just if package need to be approved, it must build in mock/koji. I think we need this for F8 too. I am interested in this package only if it will work for F8 xen. Although reviewer not must test package functionality, my interests are different. If you patch it to work with xen paravirtualized guests, please let me know and I will make a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 14:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101444.m7AEi0hE025794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-10 10:43:59 EDT --- Xen support needs changes to libvirt. virt-mem itself won't be affected - it just uses the virDomainMemoryPeek[1] call from libvirt and hence just uses whatever libvirt supports. [1] http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainMemoryPeek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 15:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101522.m7AFMBPq013270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #3 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-10 11:22:10 EDT --- Sorry about unsetting assigned and status. The new bugzilla didn't warn me of a Mid-Air Collision with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 16:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101619.m7AGJtVP004805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Comment #55 from Jess Portnoy 2008-08-10 12:19:54 EDT --- OK, I would love to hear to reason for this patch someday but it seems in that case it is indeed useless :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 16:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101634.m7AGYBtK006625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-10 12:34:10 EDT --- Ver. 1.2-2 %changelog * Sun Aug 10 2008 Peter Lemenkov 1.2-2 - Fixed issue with multiarch http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 16:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101648.m7AGmKWC008381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 12:48:19 EDT --- Cool, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 17:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101712.m7AHClg4027216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-10 13:12:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313897) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313897) Patch to incorporate Spec file fixes. (In reply to comment #6) > http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rssh.spec > http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rssh-2.3.2-3.fc10.src.rpm + The example scripts provided as documentation should not have their executable bits set. + https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir suggests that files be put into package-specific subdirectories. Can this be done? + The %pre scriptlet does not follow the guidelines for users and groups (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups). You need to add 'Requires(pre): shadow-utils' and the scriptlet needs to end with an 'exit 0'. I think '|| :' also has the same effect as 'exit 0', but you might want to be pedantic and be safe. + You have mistakenly put fish instead of rssh in the Spec comments. + You might want to split the %doc in multiple lines to achieve the 72/80 character rule. But it is a matter of style and upto you. + As I had mentioned earlier, the rssh(1) manual recommends: # chown root:rsshuser rssh rssh_chroot_helper # chmod 550 rssh # chmod 4550 rssh_chroot_helper Please find attached a patch which incorporates these changes. I have deliberately not bumped the release and added a %changelog. It is your package update them as you deem fit. These changes lead to the following rpmlint issues (which can be ignored): $ rpmlint rssh rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /usr/bin/rssh rsshusers rssh.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/bin/rssh 0750 rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/rssh 0750 rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/rssh_chroot_helper rsshusers rssh.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/libexec/rssh_chroot_helper root 04750 rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/rssh_chroot_helper 04750 rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/rssh_chroot_helper 04750 rssh.x86_64: E: no-binary rssh.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun mv $ However using -i reveals some interesting avenues: + You might want to add /usr/bin/rssh to the list of files which are not readable by everyone in Fedora. rssh.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/bin/rssh 0750 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). + Can we have rssusers as a standard group in Fedora? rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /usr/bin/rssh rsshusers A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users rssh.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/rssh_chroot_helper rsshusers A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 17:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101742.m7AHg1xj015323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 13:42:00 EDT --- Thanks; this looks fine. * source files match upstream: 1d11859f79bcf502572ad9e582dbed827f8fca3b6379173a283bc3080a0578d8 markdown-1.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-markdown = 1.7-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101804.m7AI4fs0018040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 14:04:40 EDT --- I'm not quite sure why you have the alphatag and such in the version. It looks to me as if this is a post-release update, not a prerelease paackage. If so, why not just use an NVR like qsstv-5.23c-1%{?dist} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:08:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101808.m7AI8Ltp018674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Padre |Review Request: perl-Padre | |- Perl Application | |Development and Refactoring | |Environment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101811.m7AIB0qn002142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 14:10:59 EDT --- Is Peter actually reviewing this package? It's assigned to him but he's made no comments and the fedora-review flag is empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101814.m7AIEhLa002759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2008-08-10 14:14:42 EDT --- It has been built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:15:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101815.m7AIF66E020100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:13:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101813.m7AIDdZk019563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2008-08-10 14:13:37 EDT --- It has been built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101814.m7AIEpYG019734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2008-08-10 14:14:50 EDT --- It has been built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:13:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101813.m7AIDcQu019538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bloch at verdurin.com --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-10 14:13:35 EDT --- *** Bug 458543 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:13:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458543] Review Request: eg - a wrapper for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101813.m7AIDbM9019503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458543 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |dan at danny.cz Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-10 14:13:35 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 442914 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:15:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101815.m7AIF4GU003171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Huang Peng 2008-08-10 14:15:03 EDT --- It has been built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101815.m7AIFCqr003225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Matt Good changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt at matt-good.net --- Comment #22 from Matt Good 2008-08-10 14:15:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Before I make a package for 0.2.2, I should point out that the emusic format > seems to have changed. The file extension is now .emx, which is an XML format, > replacing the previous encrypted one. > > Some details are here: > > http://code.google.com/p/emusicremote/wiki/EMX_File_Format Yes, I've seen the EMX format, though by default eMusic still uses the EMP format since this is what's supported by their official clients. The new eMusic Remote client that uses EMX is still pre-release with no releases since Oct. 2007, so I haven't bothered updating this client yet, though the eMusic lib I'm planning would support EMX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:16:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101816.m7AIGLwm020443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101829.m7AIT1Jk005518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-10 14:29:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It looks > to me as if this is a post-release update, not a prerelease paackage. If so, > why not just use an NVR like qsstv-5.23c-1%{?dist} ? Yes this is a post-release, I've corrected the files: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qsstv.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qsstv-5.3c-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101828.m7AISmhB022502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 14:28:47 EDT --- I sure hope Bob's OK. I'll take a look at this. Fist thing I notice is that the tarball in the package doesn't match the tarball at the upstream URL. It seems that the upstream tarball lacks the COPYING file and there are a couple of inconsequential changes in the documentation. Any idea what's happened there? Otherwise the packaging seems fine, but after building this (on x86_64 rawhide), I can't get it to do anything other than segfault. Does it require the config file to be set up first? X source files don't match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: gridloc = 0.6-4.fc10 gridloc(x86-64) = 0.6-4.fc10 = libform.so.5()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) ? %check is not present. I tried to test this manually but all it seems to do is segfault. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101834.m7AIY6TE006130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 14:34:04 EDT --- Last comment from the submitter was over two months ago. Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:49:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101849.m7AInPQX008147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #23 from Adam Huffman 2008-08-10 14:49:24 EDT --- Fair enough. I only mentioned it because the last download I made it defaulted to .emx. Just had a look and it's back to .emp - perhaps they're rolling it out gradually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:45:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 408941] Review Request: Unicornscan - Scalable, Accurate, Flexible, and Efficient Network Probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101845.m7AIj9sI007852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408941 --- Comment #14 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-10 14:45:08 EDT --- ping again? Since the submitter din not reply for 7 months, this is the last appeal before marking the ticket as deadreview. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458598] New: Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 Summary: Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/snowballz/bugzilla/snowballz.spec SRPM URL: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/snowballz/bugzilla/snowballz-0.9.5.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Take command of your army of penguins as you blaze your path to victory! March through snow laden forests to conqueror new frontears and grow your small army. Ambush enemy lines with blasts of freezing snowballs. But don't neglect your home, invaders are just over the next snow drift! Gather fish for your cold penguins to munch on as they warm up in your cozy igloo. It's a snowy world you don't want to miss! Requires Rabbyt Bug #458345 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101858.m7AIwSFJ009856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 14:58:26 EDT --- Any update from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 18:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101859.m7AIxeq2009988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #17 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-10 14:59:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Fist thing I notice is that the tarball in the package doesn't match the > tarball at the upstream URL. It seems that the upstream tarball lacks the > COPYING file and there are a couple of inconsequential changes in the > documentation. Any idea what's happened there? Upstream lacks of storage space .. last time he released new version and removed the previous ones, now I believe he didn't bother to make a new release he just repacked gridloc, he mainly just releases bugfixes. I will contact him once again ... > ? %check is not present. I tried to test this manually but all it seems to do > is segfault. I cannot reproduce this under F9 (i386 or x86_64), it should work fine (if you do not have the config file .gridlocrc (there is a sample in docdir) it should complain about it and exit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 19:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101919.m7AJJTIK012645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 19:19:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101919.m7AJJSiP012618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 19:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101919.m7AJJjoh029275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-10 15:19:44 EDT --- [rpmbuild at rocky ~]$ rp rssh-2.3.2-3.fc10.src.rpm rssh.src: W: strange-permission rssh-2.3.2.tar.gz 0755 rssh.src: W: strange-permission rssh.spec 0755 rssh.src: W: strange-permission rssh-2.3.2-makefile.patch 0755 755 is bad 664 will be okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 19:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101927.m7AJR6Z2013937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 15:27:05 EDT --- I have difficulty believing that an open source project which is so small can lack storage space these days. There are so many places (even Fedora) which will give storage space for free. In any case, certainly see a segfault, but things are quite fine when I run under gdb and I get the complaint about the missing .gridlocrc file. And amazingly, if I run it under zsh, I get the expected complaint while running it under bash gives the segfault. Bizarre. I'm going to assume this is some artifact of the chroot setup I run in for testing things. Let me know when you've sorted out the upstream tarball issue. Or just spin a new package with a fresh tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 19:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808101951.m7AJpltQ001341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 15:51:46 EDT --- This rpmlint complaint: phatch.src:76: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-1.0/python/%{name}_* is an absolute blocker. If you build this noarch package on x86_64, you'll get files in /usr/lib64, which doesn't even exist on a 32-bit machine. I do not know what the proper solution is; if nautilus really has no place to put arch-independent extensions then I suppose this package can't be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454687] Review Request: perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl extension for the clamav virus scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102018.m7AKIqHR005112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454687 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl |perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl |extension for the clamav |extension for the clamav |virus scanner |virus scanner --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 16:18:51 EDT --- This is standard Perl module, but a couple of things bother me. If you visit the upstream URL, you can't see version 0.22, just 0.13. If you search for ClamAV on CPAN you'll see a link to 0.22, but clicking there gets you a page with a big red "UNAUTHORIZED" warning. What's that about? When running the tests, I see the following: (in cleanup) panic: free from wrong pool. which is kind of troubling. I see no problems with the packaging, but I'm reluctant to approve this without some discussion of those two issues. * source files match upstream: 1927671296cd398a1b0ce3102683ed23e78648fc9dd643a8fab92d18e33b010b Mail-ClamAV-0.22.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ClamAV.so()(64bit) perl(Mail::ClamAV) = 0.22 perl(Mail::ClamAV::Status) perl-Mail-ClamAV = 0.22-1.fc10 perl-Mail-ClamAV(x86-64) = 0.22-1.fc10 = libclamav.so.4()(64bit) libclamav.so.4(CLAMAV_PUBLIC)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Struct) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Handle) perl(Inline) perl(Inline) >= 0.44 perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=10, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 1.58 cusr 0.12 csys = 1.71 CPU) (discounting the weird panic at the end) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102025.m7AKPOXX022227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #24 from Adam Huffman 2008-08-10 16:25:22 EDT --- New version available at: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/germanium/germanium.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/germanium/germanium-0.2.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102029.m7AKTE3T022488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 16:29:13 EDT --- I don't know if the issue of the weird license was ever resolved on-list; blocking FE-Legal to hopefully get a clear statement in this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102030.m7AKUm1q023007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-10 16:30:47 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-markdown Short Description: Markdown implementation in Python Owners: thm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102034.m7AKYxtb007350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102036.m7AKaKeH023824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 16:36:19 EDT --- It's been over a month since the last ping with no response; setting NEEDINFO. I'll close ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 20:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102054.m7AKsnkx025995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-10 16:54:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313898) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313898) Patch to fix warnings and deprecated code. MUST Items: xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM + [rishi at freebook x86_64]$ rpmlint afio-2.5-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/restore afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/gnupg_read afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/pgp_read afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/pgp_write afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script4/tapechange afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script3/gnupg_write afio.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/backup afio.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/afio-2.5/script2/backup /bin/bash [rishi at freebook x86_64]$ OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Broken Source tag. Use the URL publised by upstream: http://freshmeat.net/redir/afio/144/url_tgz/afio-2.5.tgz + The description should be slightly more verbose than the summary. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description You can consider using the following paragraph from the README file: "Afio makes cpio-format archives. It deals somewhat gracefully with input data corruption. Supports multi-volume archives during interactive operation. Afio can make compressed archives that are much safer than compressed tar or cpio archives. Afio is best used as an `archive engine' in a backup script." + It might be a good idea to add a check stanza and run 'make regtest' and 'make regtest2gb' in it. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps you should use 'install -p'. + The ANNOUNCE-2.5 file contains useful information. It should be added to %doc in the %files stanza. + The ChangeLog file contains no useful information. It should not be distributed. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation the INSTALLATION file should not be distributed. + The Dist tag (ie. fc9) should not be a part of the %changelog entry. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines ?? - License field meets actual license + The header in afio.c says: "This software package can also be re-distributed under particular conditions that are _weaker_ than the Perl "Artistic License" combined with the GNU Library General Public License. Redistribution need only satisfy all four license notices below." I am not sure how this might affect the License tag. Need to verify. OK - upstream license file included in %doc + The perl.artistic.license file might need to be distributed. OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible + You might want to split the %doc in multiple lines to achieve the 72/80 character rule. But it is a matter of style and upto you. xx - sources match upstream sources + The MD5SUM does not match. Tarball found in SRPM: 70fd825bd8af83473eb52d140df84cc3 Upstream sources from http://freshmeat.net/redir/afio/144/url_tgz/afio-2.5.tgz: 8c6665e0f875dcd8e1bdb18644b59688 OK - package builds successfully + You could consider using the attached patch to fix warnings and deprecated code. Getting the patch upstream should be the final goal. OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file xx - file permissions set properly + The scripts in %doc should not have their executable bits set. + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text OK - translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are not needed OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 21:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102106.m7AL6Z8T012056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-10 17:06:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Is Peter actually reviewing this package? It's assigned to him but he's made > no comments and the fedora-review flag is empty. I swapped Peter for a couple of his bugs, but those are stalled because I couldn't build them in Rawhide. Feel free to take over this review if you feel inclined :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 21:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] New: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Mock Log: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-build.log Description: This is the PostgreSQL MDB2 driver. rpmlint against srpm complains about a patch non apllied, I think it's just because the path is applied once installed (bug #379081). rpmlint against rpm also complains about missing documentation, there is no documentation provided upstream for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 21:28:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102128.m7ALSl1n030468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhollis at davehollis.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 17:28:44 EDT --- *** Bug 438805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 21:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438805] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102128.m7ALSkbU030440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438805 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841 | Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 17:28:44 EDT --- Well, this has been sitting for ages, and there's someone around who wants to get this into the distro, so I'm just going to close this ticket and review the other one. If you really want to maintain this package, consider contacting the other maintainer once you've been sponsored. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458610 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 21:44:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102144.m7ALiXcg016393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 17:44:31 EDT --- Well, if I actually check the bug history, I see that he just took this ticket on Friday, and I certainly shouldn't be complaining about non-response after two days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 22:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102230.m7AMUAdn007605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 18:30:09 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I note that the compiler is called properly everywhere except when compiling nsdejavu.c. However, the plugin isn't actually installed by this package, so I'm not going to worry about it. However, if in the future you decide to turn on the plugin, you'll have several things to look at. (The licensing is different, for one thing.) Your scriptlets seem to be missing the if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi part. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache * source files match upstream: a783c3700f32d31b0a2a8662d5e2abcd1b4ab3cc129543daaa8af9211135e911 djview4-4.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. ? compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: djview4 = 4.3-1.fc10 djview4(x86-64) = 4.3-1.fc10 = /bin/sh libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libdjvulibre.so.15()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have not tested this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets missing icon cache update. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 22:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102234.m7AMYOac024744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 22:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102245.m7AMjQWY010182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 --- Comment #4 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-08-10 18:45:25 EDT --- Updated: - Update source url Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/vttest.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/vttest-20071216-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 22:52:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102252.m7AMqGiW027895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 18:52:15 EDT --- Indeed, rpmlint complains about the two things you've pointed out; I agree that both complaints can be ignored. The only thing I could suggest you add is some statement of why the file has to be patched after installation instead if in %prep as usual. (I understand why but it might not be obvious to whoever might glance at the spec in the future.) * source files match upstream: 7a051e90c63897701a93c9d3b02d79e6c696240c552694cf34cbc7eab6284691 MDB2_Driver_pgsql-1.4.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream (it's in each of the PHP files). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(MDB2_Driver_pgsql) = 1.4.1 php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql = 1.4.1-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(MDB2) >= 2.4.1 php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; there's a test suite, but it would require a running postgres instance and pear tests aren't runnable at build time in any case. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration). * code, not content. * no documentation to worry about. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 22:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102257.m7AMvBQV028747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review-Request: |Review-Request: |perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - |perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - |Generate JUnit compatible |Generate JUnit compatible |output from TAP results |output from TAP results --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 18:57:09 EDT --- I note that upstream has updated this package twice since this ticket was opened, but I guess you know that since you're the upstream. Should we wait for an updated package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 22:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102259.m7AMxpkU012184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-10 18:59:50 EDT --- Thanks tibbs! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-paver Short Description: Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool Owners: toshio lmacken Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:03:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102303.m7AN32Vr012767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 19:03:01 EDT --- Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Bad: * Fails to build in Mock. Your missing a BuildRequires on expat-devel. * rpmlint produces the following: ffado.x86_64: W: no-documentation ffado.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/libffado/tests/test-dbus ffado.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/libffado/tests/test-isorecv-1 ffado.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/libffado/tests/test-isoxmit-1 ffado.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/libffado/tests/teststreaming3 ffado.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/libffado/tests/test-dbus-server ffado.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/libffado/tests/test-ffado libffado.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libffado-2.0/NEWS libffado.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libffado-2.0/TODO libffado.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libffado.so libffado-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings. The documentation warning can be ignored, since you've got the relevant documention in the main package, though I would drop the NEWS & TODO files since they don't contain anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:10:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454997] Review Request: ircii - Popular Unix Irc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102310.m7ANADLA030435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454997 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 19:10:11 EDT --- Do you still wish to submit this package to Fedora? The links you provided are currently dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457196] Review Request: pymetar - METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102314.m7ANEmrF030734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457196 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:19:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457196] Review Request: pymetar - METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102319.m7ANJ2nM031333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457196 --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 19:19:01 EDT --- MD5Sum: 84b6737b101daf5647a60d0d93d7783a pymetar-0.13.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint does not find problems * Builds fine in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=769550 * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102319.m7ANJthd014577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-10 19:19:54 EDT --- Upstream has confirmed the license incompatibility and is looking for a solution -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102324.m7ANO5gi032058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:29:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102329.m7ANTrZI032698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 19:29:52 EDT --- MD5Sum: 2abcd24587b313177c98ca4cc8d41258 puritan-0.4.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint does not find problems * Builds fine in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=769552 * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:32:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457343] Review Request: jquery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use javascript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102332.m7ANWEXa000780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457343 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102338.m7ANcJO7001383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- --- Comment #44 from Caius CHANCE 2008-08-10 19:38:18 EDT --- As instructed by Fedora Project Wiki, the progress of package maintainer candidate is tracked in package review bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 10 23:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808102350.m7ANo5jR003130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 --- Comment #45 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-10 19:50:01 EDT --- Not this review ticket, though. This review ticket was originally opened by you when Wilmer submitted emesene. I reviewed it, it was imported, and the ticket was closed. It should stay closed; both Wilmer and I are done with the package, and for my part I'd prefer not to see any more review traffic relating to it. If for some reason the package needs another review, then a new ticket should be opened. Packages don't need re-review until after they've been orphaned and dropped from the distro for some period of time, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 00:03:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457343] Review Request: jquery - Fast, concise library that simplifies how you use javascript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110003.m7B03Dbx020242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457343 --- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 20:03:12 EDT --- Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified against svn * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * rpmlint produces no errors * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly. * Spec has good comments explaining patches and other building issues. * Package builds fine in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=769554 Looks pretty good, but I'll hold off on giving a final approval until the javascript guidelines are finished for outstanding issues (versioning, etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 00:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110013.m7B0Dub5021653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 20:13:55 EDT --- Package fails to build in koji, due to RPM's new use of --fuzz=0 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=769557&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 00:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110019.m7B0JlxU022261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-10 20:19:46 EDT --- Are you still wishing to submit this package to Fedora? There's been no reply to Till's review 3 months ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 00:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.hutterer at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://whot.fedorapeople.org/synaptics/xorg-x11-drv-synaptics.spec SRPM URL: http://whot.fedorapeople.org/synaptics/xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-0.15.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a driver for the Synaptics TouchPad for X.Org. A Synaptics touchpad by default operates in compatibility mode by emulating a standard mouse. However, by using a dedicated driver, more advanced features of the touchpad becomes available. Features: * Movement with adjustable, non-linear acceleration and speed. * Button events through short touching of the touchpad. * Double-Button events through double short touching of the touchpad. * Dragging through short touching and holding down the finger on the touchpad. * Middle and right button events on the upper and lower corner of the touchpad. * Vertical scrolling (button four and five events) through moving the finger on the right side of the touchpad. * The up/down button sends button four/five events. * Horizontal scrolling (button six and seven events) through moving the finger on the lower side of the touchpad. * The multi-buttons send button four/five events, and six/seven events for horizontal scrolling. * Adjustable finger detection. Multifinger taps: two finger for middle button and three finger for right button events. (Needs hardware support. Not all models implement this feature.) * Run-time configuration using shared memory. This means you can change parameter settings without restarting the X server. Reason for this package: the synaptics package currently in Fedora is discontinued upstream, with the maintainer having agreed to a relicensing the source (from GPL to MIT). The new source is hosted in the X.Org repositories, with a new maintainer. This package is merely a move of the synaptics package to the new xorg-x11-drv-synaptics name to be in-line with other xorg packages. The spec file is a merger of synaptics.spec, and the xorg-x11-drv-evdev.spec (for xorg-related information). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 01:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110149.m7B1nxhE018387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-10 21:49:57 EDT --- Hi, Thanks for point out those for me. I have addressed following concerns you raised: * Requires * cflags * Removing document files at %install However, as http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html states, LGPL software package has to include both COPYING and COPYING.LESSED. The revised SPEC and SRPM are located at: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/libUnihan.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/libUnihan-0.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 02:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110216.m7B2GfN6006379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-10 22:16:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: puritan Short Description: OLPC disk image compiler Owners: rnorwood Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 02:38:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110238.m7B2cGHO025487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-10 22:38:15 EDT --- olpc-netutils-0.4-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 02:43:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110243.m7B2hf8p009975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-10 22:43:40 EDT --- crcimg-1.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 03:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457767] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-mach64 - mach64 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110315.m7B3FDwg030574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457767 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-10 23:15:12 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 03:28:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456972] Review Request: eclipse-nls - Babel translations for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110328.m7B3STLO016088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456972 --- Comment #8 from Sean Flanigan 2008-08-10 23:28:27 EDT --- New Spec/SRPM/fetcher script are all here: http://seanf.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-nls/0.2.0-0.2/ * Mon Aug 11 2008 Sean Flanigan - 0.2.0-0.2.20080807snap - Fixed version in changelog - Updated snapshot of Babel translation plugins - Changed code for Hebrew to he (not iw); changed fetch-babel.sh to compensate - Renamed eclipse_base macro to eclipse_data Updates and notes: Andrew's latest package for Fedora Eclipse eclipse-*-3.4.0-18 has proper dropins support for %{_datadir}/eclipse/. I noticed that eclipse.spec disables jar repacking, so I'm going to assume I can get away with it too, at least for eclipse-nls's very simple needs (no compilation). https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=242327 (mentioned previously) doesn't seem to happen with Fedora Eclipse, for some reason. (The splash screen flashes on and off for about a minute after the update, but then it settles down.) Also, I was having trouble getting Fedora Eclipse to pick up the translations from any directory at all, but then it started happening with old revisions (eg eclipse-*.3.4.0-15) that *used to work*. I spent a lot of time trying to work out what was wrong, but got nowhere. Today I tried the rawhide version of eclipse-*-3.4.0-18.fc10.i386.rpm and everything is working again, so I'd better move things along! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 03:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457768] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-r128 - r128 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110330.m7B3UqrP016497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457768 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-10 23:30:51 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 03:35:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110335.m7B3Ztbp000820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing|NO |--- --- Comment #37 from Jarod Wilson 2008-08-10 23:35:53 EDT --- Hm... CFLAGS look good now, but still no smp_mflags, and -ENOBUILD on rawhide... [...] g++ -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o v4l2-driverids.o v4l2-driverids.cpp g++ -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o v4l2-chipids.o v4l2-chipids.cpp g++ -lm -o v4l2-dbg v4l2-dbg.o v4l2-driverids.o v4l2-chipids.o cc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o ivtvctl.o ivtvctl.c In file included from ivtvctl.c:66: linux/ivtv.h:48: error: expected ':', ',', ';', '}' or '__attribute__' before '*' token make[1]: *** [ivtvctl.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 03:45:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110345.m7B3jWRG018260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Jarod Wilson 2008-08-10 23:45:31 EDT --- Got the BR fixed, dropped the empty doc files. Not quite sure offhand where to put the files that are triggering arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share... Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 04:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110443.m7B4hslm008717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #19 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-11 00:43:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have difficulty believing that an open source project which is so small can > lack storage space these days. There are so many places (even Fedora) which > will give storage space for free. Upstream has a lot more software besides gridloc. (http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/). We have already packaged many of those them. Anyway perhaps this is just bad house keeping. > Let me know when you've sorted out the upstream tarball issue. Or just spin a > new package with a fresh tarball. I've just rolled a new package with the latest tarball. http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/gridloc.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/gridloc-0.6-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 05:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110500.m7B50GNm011140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #3 from Johan Cwiklinski 2008-08-11 01:00:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql Short Description: PostgreSQL MDB2 Driver Owners: trasher Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: trasher Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 05:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110515.m7B5FPb9028931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 --- Comment #15 from Deji Akingunola 2008-08-11 01:15:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Any update from upstream? They are working on it. A couple of the affected source codes have already been properly 're-licensed' to LGPLv2+ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 05:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110526.m7B5QKBL014546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 05:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] New: Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 Summary: Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/translation-filter.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/translation-filter-0.0.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: A l10n file filter to check translations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 05:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110556.m7B5uosO002997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-11 01:56:49 EDT --- Okay. ! Note: - I prefer to remove installed files once explicitly like: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/ However this is not a blocker ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libUnihan) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110605.m7B65dxL021162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-08-11 02:05:38 EDT --- Oops, made mistake in link Correct ones are Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/translation-filter.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/translation-filter-0.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:06:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110606.m7B66kTg004876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110614.m7B6EvJV022360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-11 02:14:57 EDT --- Need some work: 1)Remove unnecessary line from SPEC %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} 2) Remove docs/LICENSE from SPEC 3) build failed with error /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bbjMqY: line 31: desktop-file-install: command not found ==> Add desktop-file-install as BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110619.m7B6JHPJ023108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-11 02:19:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Need some work: > 1)Remove unnecessary line from SPEC > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > > 2) Remove docs/LICENSE from SPEC > > 3) build failed with error > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bbjMqY: line 31: desktop-file-install: command not found > ==> Add desktop-file-install as BR oops. it should be BR: desktop-file-utils 4) also license looks to me GPLv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110621.m7B6LaC8023768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2008-08-11 02:21:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Need some work: > > 1)Remove unnecessary line from SPEC > > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} > > > > 2) Remove docs/LICENSE from SPEC > > > > 3) build failed with error > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bbjMqY: line 31: desktop-file-install: command not found > > ==> Add desktop-file-install as BR > > oops. it should be BR: desktop-file-utils > > 4) also license looks to me GPLv2 Fixed Spec URL:http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/translation-filter.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/translation-filter-0.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110639.m7B6ds1f010079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-11 02:39:52 EDT --- *** Bug 226446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:39:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226446] Merge Review: synaptics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110639.m7B6dr1e010050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226446 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |dan at danny.cz Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-11 02:39:52 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458617 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] New: Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 Summary: Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/teseq.spec SRPM URL: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/teseq-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNU Teseq is a tool for analyzing files that contain control characters and terminal control sequences. It is intended to be useful for diagnosing terminal emulators, and programs that make heavy use of terminal features (such as those based on the Curses library). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 06:59:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110659.m7B6xCNw029825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from vivek shah 2008-08-11 02:59:11 EDT --- This is my first package and I am seeking for a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 07:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110701.m7B713Lu013847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-11 03:01:02 EDT --- For 5.1-2: * Requires - Does this package "itself" require sqlite? * License - First of all would you tell me where I can get the license text of this package? I browsed http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html but the content does not seem to coincide with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/UCD * Versioning - Well * Unihan.txt says the version is 5.1.0. So I guess the correct version is 5.1.0. Also would you release the tarball with the name including correct version or ask the upstream to do so if you are not the upstream? * If you want to use the version of UnihanDb-doc, even in such case the versioning on Fedora is wrong because we regard "%{version}-%{rel_num}" as the "version" of the upstream version. * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by any packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229323] Review Request: postgresql-pgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool-II administration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110817.m7B8HoO3025929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229323 Bug 229323 depends on bug 229321, which changed state. Bug 229321 Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110817.m7B8Hmej025870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 Devrim GUNDUZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110817.m7B8HnB9025905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 Bug 229322 depends on bug 229321, which changed state. Bug 229321 Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:16:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110816.m7B8GIYV010198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #21 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-11 04:16:16 EDT --- Ok updated: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/postgresql-pgbouncer-1.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/postgresql-pgbouncer.spec BTW... Would you object if I change the package name to pgbouncer only? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:19:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110819.m7B8Je8E010527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-11 04:19:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=769876 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. ca6b4bf23f0745e6717905b3d62b32b0 translation-filter-0.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + GUI app. + Package installed correctly. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110828.m7B8SfIw028138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-11 04:28:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream Short Description: proccess output via events Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 08:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110852.m7B8qgH8031785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-11 04:52:41 EDT --- Thank you for replying. Then before checking your latest srpm: (In reply to comment #21) > BTW... Would you object if I change the package name to pgbouncer only? Well, in my recognition when we rename a package "python-foo" "perl-baa" "ruby-XXX" it usually means that the package provides a "module" or an extension function of the main language (python, perl, ...), i.e. usually it is less useful to install the package _only_ and other application uses the package. For this package it installs some binaries under %_bindir and it seems this package is not only a module of postgresql. So I don't object to renaming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 09:04:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110904.m7B94Avi000866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #9 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-08-11 05:04:09 EDT --- Hi, I did a following changes to spec file: - removed shared-mime-info dependency - add script to %post and %postun to update mimeinfo db if s-m-info is installed - added zlib-devel to BuildRequires (now it builds in koji) - added INSTALL="%{__install} -p" to preserve timestamps Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage-1.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 09:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110926.m7B9QUpp021114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-11 05:26:28 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below OK source files match upstream: 41eaa1c77af11166ff5ec4abc013076f545bc676 xf86-input-synaptics-0.15.0.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (MIT). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK* BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK* package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - when libtool is used as BR: then autoconf and automake are redundant - parallel make is not used - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - you should include README as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 09:36:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110936.m7B9aB57022762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #6 from Kushal Das 2008-08-11 05:36:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: translation-filter Short Description: A l10n file filter Owners: kushal Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: kushal Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 09:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808110951.m7B9pub2008284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 --- Comment #3 from Peter Hutterer 2008-08-11 05:51:54 EDT --- Thanks! Updated spec file and srpm available at the URLs above. (In reply to comment #2) > - when libtool is used as BR: then autoconf and automake are redundant the latter two have been removed from BuildRequire > - parallel make is not used - see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make make called with %{_smp_mflags} > - you should include README as %doc added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 10:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111002.m7BA2AHu026483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-11 06:02:08 EDT --- Package is APPROVED, thanks for the update. In the future, please, increase the release for each published package iteration. Don't forget to close this bug after the package is imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 10:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] New: Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Summary: Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bernie at codewiz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/dansguardian.spec SRPM URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/dansguardian-2.9.9.5-1.src.rpm Description: DansGuardian is a web filtering engine that checks the content within the page itself in addition to the more traditional URL filtering. DansGuardian is a content filtering proxy. It filters using multiple methods, including URL and domain filtering, content phrase filtering, PICS filtering, MIME filtering, file extension filtering, POST filtering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 10:25:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111025.m7BAP5c8029534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-11 06:25:04 EDT --- Jason: No need to. The changes did not affect the way this is packaged, so the spec file remains basically the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 10:26:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111026.m7BAQI7X012952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-11 06:26:17 EDT --- Yes, I'll be reviewing it today. I meant to on Friday but ran out of time and was away from computers for the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 10:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111036.m7BAaJsZ014399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Sayamindu Dasgupta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sayamindu at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sayamindu at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 11:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111138.m7BBcJej007020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-11 07:38:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - README.txt convertion can be simplified. I have always done this in that way. Does it really matter ? I would prefer be consistent over my spec file. > - you need to have export INIT_CFLAGS="%{optflags}" in the %build section Done > - make test remains in the %build section. Done > - non-standard perms for binaries, should be 755 Done > It still seems strange if you don't install the .a or .so when you install some > .h for the -devel package. Is it possible or relevant to build a shared onject > library instead ? I have never done such sub-package could you point me to an example or so doc ? SPEC http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3.spec SRPM http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3-1.1.4-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 11:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111146.m7BBk9pv024709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-11 07:46:06 EDT --- I've looked at building this in the past and found it to be in the too hard basket because it builds against its own copy of xulrunner and gstreamer. Having gone through most of the patches that they apply to the xulrunner code base quite a few of them have upstream bugs and most of the patches that apply to the linux build are fairly trivial bug fixes but the SongBird devs aren't pushing them for upstream. They all easily will apply and build against the Fedora XULrunner and don't affect firefox and other apps but Fedora would more than likely want them upstream first. The other issue is that most of the build scripts are hardcoded for the locally included copies of the source code and don't use auto* for locating include files etc so as to be able to build against the OS versions. They have said they'll happily accept patches but haven't the time or expertise to do it themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 11:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458653] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458653 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora PerlySense is a Perl IDE backend that integrates with editor frontends, currently Emacs. Conveniently navigate and browse the code and documentation of your project and Perl installation. Run tests and scripts and syntax check source with easy navigation to errors/warnings/failing tests. Automate common editing tasks related to source code, tests, regular expressions, etc. Highlight syntax errors, warnings, Perl::Critic complaints, and Devel::Cover test coverage in the source while editing. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-PerlySense/perl-Devel-PerlySense-0.0158-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 11:50:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111150.m7BBop5Y025555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-11 07:50:50 EDT --- Please note that there are some who believe this software to be unacceptable for Fedora due to the distribution restrictions of the upstream website http://dansguardian.org/?page=download: " Before downloading, please read the copyright for DansGuardian 2. DansGuardian is not free to download from this website for commercial use. " I happen to not be one of them, but either way this should be commented on by either the legal folks or perhaps the board. Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 11:57:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] New: Review Request: Text::Aligner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Text::Aligner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Summary: Review Request: Text::Aligner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Aligner/per l-Text-Aligner-0.03-1.fc9.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Text::Aligner exports a single function, align(), which is used to justify strings to various alignment styles. The alignment specification is the first argument, followed by any number of scalars which are subject to alignment. The operation depends on context. In list context, a list of the justified scalars is returned. In scalar context, the justified arguments are joined into a single string with newlines appended. The original arguments remain unchanged. In void context, in-place justification is attempted. In this case, all arguments must be lvalues. Align() also does one level of scalar dereferencing. That is, whenever one of the arguments is a scalar reference, the scalar pointed to is aligned instead. Other references are simply stringified. An undefined argument is interpreted as an empty string without complaint. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Aligner/perl-Text-Aligner-0.03-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] New: Review Request: Text::Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Text::Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 Summary: Review Request: Text::Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Organization of data in table form is a time-honored and useful method of data representation. While columns of data are trivially generated by computer through formatted output, even simple tasks like keeping titles aligned with the data columns are not trivial, and the one-shot solutions one comes up with tend to be particularly hard to maintain. Text::Table allows you to create and maintain tables that adapt to alignment requirements as you use them. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Table/perl-Text-Table-1.114-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:07:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] Review Request: Text::Aligner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111207.m7BC71GC029120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458655 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: Text::Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111207.m7BC72Ze029142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458654 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:09:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111209.m7BC9bM8013643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-11 08:09:36 EDT --- It's been another six weeks; has anything happened regarding sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: Text::Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111209.m7BC9H9b013567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458653] Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111209.m7BC9IUt013589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458653 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458655 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111208.m7BC8KnY013381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |Text::Aligner |perl-Text-Aligner - | |Text::Aligner Perl module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:12:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111212.m7BCCWGA030372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Text::Table |Review Request: | |perl-Text-Table - Organize | |Data in Tables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:11:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452691] Review Request: btrfs-progs - supporting programs for btrfs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111211.m7BCBV0Q030204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452691 Josef Bacik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Customer Facing| |--- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111223.m7BCN7Pb016910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #50 from Miles Sabin 2008-08-11 08:23:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > For confirmation: > > What I am waiting from Geoff is what I wrote on the comment 40. > i.e. you must submit another review request or do a pre-review of other > person's > review request as well as updating scala srpm. Understood ... if Geoff is tied up I could update the spec file to 2.7.2 and incorporate your comments from #40. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] New: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Graph::Easy lets you generate graphs consisting of various shaped nodes connected by edges (with optional labels). http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Graph-Easy/perl-Graph-Easy-0.63-1.fc9.src.rpm Could someone double check the licence? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111243.m7BChqaI021026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.spb.su -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111245.m7BCjoT1004520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458653] Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111247.m7BClkjA004890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458653 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:47:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111247.m7BCljQG004868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:45:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111245.m7BCjp0q004546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] New: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Graph::Easy::As_svg contains just the code for converting a Graph::Easy object to a SVG text. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg/perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg-0.23-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111247.m7BClS4U021864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-11 08:47:27 EDT --- gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111249.m7BCn3pX022077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-11 08:49:02 EDT --- gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458653] Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111248.m7BCmiCk022034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458653 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 12:48:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111248.m7BCmhC7022013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458653 Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:33:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111333.m7BDX8Kd030454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-11 09:33:07 EDT --- If you want to rename the srpm, then I will wait for it before checking your srpm again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454025] Review Request: libixp - stand-alone client/server 9P library including ixpc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111337.m7BDb4qb013966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-11 09:37:03 EDT --- Well, for 0.4-2: * Summary/%description - "Libixp is a " part is redundant for Summary - The Summary for -devel subpackage is not proper. Usually this is "Development files for foo". - Main package and -devel subpackage have the same %description. However the purpose of the two packages are different and this is not proper. Please modify the %description. You can refer to the %description in the skeleton spec file created by "$ rpmdev-newspec -t lib foo". * 64 bit arch issue - Well, actually the fix is not easy, as this package uses somewhat unique makefiles which don't seem to be based on recent Makefiles. As a workaround, I propose: ------------------------------------------------------- %setup -q # Make build.log more verbose find . -type f | xargs grep -l '.SILENT' | xargs sed -i.silent -e 's|\.SILENT||' # Umm... fixing 64 bits archtecture directory issue cannot be easy done # by applying a patch, using sed... grep -rl '/lib' . | xargs sed -i.lib \ -e 's|/lib\([ /]\)|/%{_lib}\1|' \ -e 's|/lib$|/%{_lib}|' ------------------------------------------------------- ! The above %setup also contains a fix to make build.log more verbose !!! Please recheck what I do by the script above. * Cflags - As I wrote in the comment 1, Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags For this package the following works (note: the following method is this package specific) -------------------------------------------------------- %build make %{?_smp_mflags} \ CC="%{__cc} -c %optflags" -------------------------------------------------------- * %files entry v.s. debuginfo rpm issue - Currently (after cflags issue is fixed) rpmlint complains: -------------------------------------------------------- libixp-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.build-id libixp-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.build-id libixp-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/52/fcd345977adcc0861159407db91f2bc489d3e2 ../../../../bin/ixpc libixp-devel.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ixpc.debug libixp-devel.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ixpc.debug -------------------------------------------------------- debuginfo rpms installs files under %_libdir/debug so writing %files entry like: -------------------------------------------------------- %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/* -------------------------------------------------------- is wrong because %_libdir/* contains %_libdir/debug, while files under this directory must be owned by -debuginfo rpm and not -devel rpm. Please don't use "%{_libdir}/*" and replace this with "%{_libdir}/libixp*.a", for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454025] Review Request: libixp - stand-alone client/server 9P library including ixpc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111339.m7BDd6ZU031243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:41:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111341.m7BDfV6d014707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |atkac at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac 2008-08-11 09:41:30 EDT --- It would be nice to have this software in Fedora. I'm going to take care about review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111348.m7BDm1lO032767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #5 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-11 09:47:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=313860) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313860) [details] > Patch to handle docs & minor clean-up The patch is applied and third release is published. Spec URL: http://www.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2054/netbeans-svnclientadapter.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2103/netbeans-svnclientadapter-6.1-3.fc10.src.rpm > Go ahead and set-up you account, and send me you account name and I'll sponsor > you: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account My account is: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/victorv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:51:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111351.m7BDp8IG001019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-11 09:51:07 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=770263 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dd329d4e7e0ef200fd1f653ac9e828e0 Text-Aligner-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=504, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.12 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-Text-Aligner-0.03-1.fc10 Provides: perl(Text::Aligner) = 0.03 perl(Text::Aligner::Auto) perl(Text::Aligner::MaxKeeper) Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 13:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111355.m7BDtr1Y016982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #7 from Adam Jackson 2008-08-11 09:55:51 EDT --- Dare I suggest that we really don't need more bootloaders? Particularly when they have such a high maintenance cost in the installer, and (in this particular case) it offers no real features over the grub we've got. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:02:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111402.m7BE2Bb7002806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-11 10:02:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Aligner Short Description: Text::Aligner Perl module Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111408.m7BE836o019031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #6 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-11 10:08:01 EDT --- OK, I've sponsored you, so you should be able to go to the next step: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] New: Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora The intent of File::ShareDir is to provide a companion to Class::Inspector and File::HomeDir, modules that take a process that is well-known by advanced Perl developers but gets a little tricky, and make it more available to the larger Perl community. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir/perl-File-ShareDir-1.00-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:16:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111416.m7BEGuC4005725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111416.m7BEGwoo005746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458669 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111421.m7BELmBw006511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 --- Comment #68 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-11 10:21:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnu-smalltalk New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111421.m7BELRQb006467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac 2008-08-11 10:21:26 EDT --- rpmlint output: unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/unbound unbound unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/unbound unbound unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/unbound/unbound.conf unbound unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/unbound/unbound.conf unbound unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-dir-in-var unbound unbound.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/unbound $prog ^^ OK unbound.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm Why do you have to call rm? I think rpm could handle remove of such directories automatically. build process: you could see something like Depend daemon/daemon.c Depend daemon/acl_list.c Build services/listen_dnsport.c Build services/localzone.c Is it intentional that gcc parameters are not written to output? It doesn't look fine for me. spec file: is it really needed ship static libunbound.a library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111430.m7BEUmTB008143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-11 10:30:46 EDT --- Adam: even though at the time GRUB 2 does not have any killer features over GRUB, GRUB 2 has more active code base, that has potential to be shared across distributions (unlike GRUB whose official upstream had been long dead until very recently, and developed into various vendor-specific forks each carrying a load of custom patches, often resulting in regressions). Some of interesting features GRUB 2 has now is native support for UTF-8, support for variety of graphic modes, RAID and LVM support. Note that including GRUB 2 in distribution does not imply any support in the installer. GRUB 2 kernel can be booted from withing GRUB in in the same way as Linux kernel. This package does not intend to replace GRUB (at least until it is feature-complete), but to serve users and developers that are interested in GRUB 2's features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111439.m7BEd8PX024879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #7 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-11 10:39:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netbeans-svnclientadapter Short Description: High-level Java API for Subversion, NetBeans version. Owners: victorv Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111438.m7BEc6rR009867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2008-08-11 10:38:05 EDT --- Afaik grub2 supports booting directly from iso files, which is feature I would like to have very much to boot live cds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] New: Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 Summary: Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: theinric at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ypsa.pfy.cz/picviz.spec SRPM URL: http://ypsa.pfy.cz/picviz-0.2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Picviz is a parallel coordinates plotter which enables easy scripting from various input (tcpdump, syslog, iptables logs, apache logs, etc..) to visualize your data and discover interesting results quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 14:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111457.m7BEvaOn028245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #21 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-11 10:57:34 EDT --- New SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/player/player-2.1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Contains your patch, Jeff. I modified the changelog date to the date when you posted that patch (was June in the patch). Is that correct/ok? To comment #18: The zero-byte files are autogenerated by doxygen. I'd like to keep them because at some point they might contain useful content and then we might not see it. The examples package could pack all the binaries to /usr/bin/player-example-* and the source as %doc. Would that be what you had in mind? I think we can do this also on an approved package before we push an update... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111506.m7BF6RKH014735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:09:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111509.m7BF9uBK014933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #8 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-11 11:09:55 EDT --- Victor, fyi, when you have a cvs request be sure to set to the fedora-cvs flag to '?', that way the cvs admins will be made aware of your request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:10:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111510.m7BFAknl030438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 --- Comment #12 from Jerry James 2008-08-11 11:10:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jsr-305 Short Description: Java annotations for software defect detection Owners: jjames Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:47:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111547.m7BFldNO004630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-11 11:47:37 EDT --- Applied patch http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rssh.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rssh-2.3.2-4.fc10.src.rpm The permissions and group is as suggested by upstream and inherited from the upstream spec file. Those are retained as it is for security reasons. I think the definition of a "standard" group doesn't include rssh but only the historically core components of a what is a POSIX system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:45:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111545.m7BFjtmk004384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-11 11:45:54 EDT --- I was about to prepare the same perl dist for submission, but you were faster ;) APPROVED. Remarks: 1. I would use "make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1" for more extensive testing, but whether to do so is up to the packager's descretion. [This would unhide some outdated perl-packages in Fedora] 2. Please also branch for FC-9 and FC-8, because this package is required by recently released new versions of rt3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:50:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] New: Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 Summary: Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingou at pingoured.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/browser/R2spec.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/browser/R2spec-2.3-2.fc9.src.rpm?format=raw Description: This is a small python script that generates spec file for R libraries. It can work from a URL or a tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458686] Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111551.m7BFpsNK005566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458686 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2008-08-11 11:51:53 EDT --- As Bill knows the stuff, and we're not in a hurry. Thanks Bill :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458686] New: Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458686 Summary: Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/bluez/bluez.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/bluez/bluez-4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Libraries and utilities for use in Bluetooth applications. The BLUETOOTH trademarks are owned by Bluetooth SIG, Inc., U.S.A. This replaces bluez-libs and bluez-utils as currently available in rawhide. This package will go in at the first opportunity for Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 15:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111558.m7BFwttW006574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2008-08-11 11:58:53 EDT --- Unit Test failures reported upstream: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2046616&group_id=212624&atid=1022481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:19:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111619.m7BGJd0C009600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #26 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-11 12:19:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ntop Short Description: A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Owners: rakesh, pvrabec Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458686] Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111619.m7BGJ1cc025901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458686 --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2008-08-11 12:19:01 EDT --- Marcel mentions that hal-devel and dbus-glib-devel aren't needed anymore. I'll remove those on the next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458686] Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111630.m7BGUSqp028464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458686 Marcel Holtmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcel at holtmann.org --- Comment #3 from Marcel Holtmann 2008-08-11 12:30:27 EDT --- And the location of the source has changed. It should be: Source: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/bluetooth/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:32:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111632.m7BGWTRY012665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #27 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-11 12:32:27 EDT --- Branches where missing: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ntop Short Description: A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Owners: rakesh pvrabec Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC:rakesh pvrabec Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111637.m7BGb9Xx013721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ajax at redhat.com | Customer Facing|NO |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:36:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111636.m7BGaNae013622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #1 from R P Herrold 2008-08-11 12:36:22 EDT --- The website at: https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/ speaks of downloading: ... R2spec-2.3.tar.gz but clearly the content is NOT gzipped. The next part states (correctly): tar cvf R2spec\* There is a 'impedence mismatch' between what is said, and what exists. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111637.m7BGbcUG013771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #22 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-11 12:37:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) Err, I'm not sure I meant for the examples to be dumped into /usr/bin/ I'm not sure that is okay or not, are any of them guis? If they are they'd need desktop files. All the stuff I've done with examples so far have been example scripts.. not executables..so I don't have any personal experience with guidance on the matter. Leave them where they are for now. And I'll try to get some feedback as to whether they should go into /usr/bin/ as normal executables. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 16:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111644.m7BGiIwm031084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #2 from R P Herrold 2008-08-11 12:44:17 EDT --- Further, retrieving the .spec file thus: lynx -dump https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/browser/R2spec.spec?format=raw > R2spec.spec Clening up the line breaks, and gzipping the .tar archive: gzip R2spec-2.3.tar cp R2spec-2.3.tar.gz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ and trying a local build: rpmbuild -ba R2spec.spec This too fails: [herrold at centos-5 r2spec]$ rpmbuild -ba R2spec.spec File "", line 1 from distutils.sys ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File "", line 1 from distutils.sys ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.59142 + umask 022 + cd /home/herrold/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C ... copying R2spec.1 -> /var/tmp/R2spec-2.3-2-root-herrold/usr/share/man/man1 creating /var/tmp/R2spec-2.3-2-root-herrold/etc copying R2spec.conf -> /var/tmp/R2spec-2.3-2-root-herrold/etc/ + chmod +x /var/tmp/R2spec-2.3-2-root-herrold//r2spec/R2spec.py chmod: cannot access `/var/tmp/R2spec-2.3-2-root-herrold//r2spec/R2spec.py': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5028 (%install) Implying a missing BR. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111713.m7BHDGcI004368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:13:14 EDT --- Michal: I can't seem to find you in the packager group. Have you been sponsored? Only folks in the packager group can formally approve package reviews. Is your account under another name/address in that group? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:11:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] New: Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Summary: Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marcel at holtmann.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://holtmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://holtmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgdbus-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgdbus is a helper library for D-Bus integration with GLib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111721.m7BHLwvW022530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:21:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111723.m7BHNJTp022827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:23:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:22:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453781] Review Request: sat4j - A library of SAT solvers written in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111722.m7BHMg7D022640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453781 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Customer Facing| |--- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:25:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111725.m7BHPckI007096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:25:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111725.m7BHPkDS007146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111725.m7BHPXbG007053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111726.m7BHQ4U1007197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111725.m7BHPxjA023524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:26:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456281] Review Request: xerces-j2 - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111726.m7BHQLlo023777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456281 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111726.m7BHQCQO023688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446134] Review Request: jsr-305 - reference implementation of JSR-305 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111728.m7BHSW7b007537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446134 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:28:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111728.m7BHSdYX007577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111728.m7BHSsuR007616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111726.m7BHQxAm007453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:32:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111732.m7BHWded024666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:32:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:31:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111731.m7BHVdQC024581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:31:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111730.m7BHUMfh024366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:30:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:33:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111733.m7BHXrLw008380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:33:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:36:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111736.m7BHanua025393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:36:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111738.m7BHcJp4025478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 --- Comment #69 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:38:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111735.m7BHZWgT025141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 13:35:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 17:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111746.m7BHkPbM026983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-08-11 13:46:24 EDT --- SPEC: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/rabbyt/bugzilla/3/python-rabbyt.spec SRPM: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/rabbyt/bugzilla/3/python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 18:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111810.m7BIAX1h031627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-11 14:10:32 EDT --- I'm really confused as to what the problem you've encountered is, because things should be as follows, thus avoiding any circular dependency : * The "elisa" package DOES NOT "BuildRequires" any of the plugins * The "elisa" package DOES "Requires" the plugins * The "elisa-common" package DOES NOT "Requires" the plugins (and provides "elisa-devel") * The plugins DO NOT "BuildRequire" "elisa" (to avoid the circular dep!) * The plugins DO "BuildRequire" "elisa-devel" (provided by "elisa-common") * The plugins DO "Require" "elisa" So as long as you rebuild "elisa" first, then the plugins (in any order), things should "just work". Obviously, after rebuilding only "elisa", you can install "elisa-common" (aka "elisa-devel") BUT NOT YET "elisa". Would you care to detail what your problem is? Maybe I have something busted in my build environment which is hiding a problem from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 18:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111812.m7BICUw6015965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #24 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-11 14:12:29 EDT --- Here is the new spec and srpm: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.spec http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/pgbouncer-1.2.3-1.f9.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 18:17:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111817.m7BIHui0017051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-11 14:17:54 EDT --- Fixed all but the last chmod comment. I don't see the error you mention, are these in rpmlint? rpmlint -i is clean for me. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-6.x.2.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 18:30:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457247] Review Request: sugar-terminal -- Terminal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111830.m7BIUBPY003097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457247 --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Katz 2008-08-11 14:30:10 EDT --- The setup.py thing needs to be fixed in the sugar BundleBuilder so that we avoid proliferating noise into every spec file. Started a discussion about that also. Since if we're going to be packaging a number of activities, we should be doing it in a way that doesn't involve a lot of cut and paste boiler-plate "work around the system" types of things. Will hold off on cvs request (and filing the other review tickets I've got) until we get a little bit of somewhere on the two issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 18:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111845.m7BIjoVg022087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-11 14:45:49 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 18:44:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111844.m7BIipv1021555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-11 14:44:49 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 19:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111911.m7BJB0kR009733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Steffan 2008-08-11 15:10:58 EDT --- I'll put some more work into this shortly. I sent a patch upstream and never got a response back. I'll try again with upstream, and if that fails, should I carry the patch in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 19:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] New: Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Summary: Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libkate.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libkate-0.1.7-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format rpmlint (on installed packages) libkate-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation Koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=771518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 19:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111949.m7BJnB7u031976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-11 15:49:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-Find Short Description: Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 19:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808111958.m7BJw8Z7017030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #3 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-08-11 15:58:07 EDT --- This package doesn't build on koji for x86_64 from 0.9.2 to 0.9.3. I've contacted upstream. He is actually fixing that and will release 0.9.4 when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 20:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457083] Review Request: puritan - OLPC disk image compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112048.m7BKm3MD011128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457083 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-11 16:48:02 EDT --- puritan-0.4-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 21:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112102.m7BL26pX029178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #8 from Adam Miller 2008-08-11 17:02:05 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.shsu.edu/~ajm023/txt2tags.spec SRPM URL: http://www.shsu.edu/~ajm023/txt2tags-2.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Fixed the gettext (msgfmt) BuildRequirement (thanks nirik for pointing that one out) Incremented the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 21:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112108.m7BL8NKD030420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #23 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-11 17:08:22 EDT --- Ok, we leave it as it is. But let's get this rolling and into Fedora now so that we can get going. The desktop files for the examples do not make much sense, the example demos are meant for programmers who use Player, not for regular users. Most stuff is pretty console centric anyway. The playerv GUI for example can only be connected to a different host on the console and not via the GUI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 21:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252946] Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112107.m7BL7H4t015241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252946 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-11 17:07:15 EDT --- No Response. Closing Ticket. If the original submitter or anyone else is interested, please submit a new review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 21:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] New: Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 Summary: Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hedayat at grad.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/aIZlQGz-Wr3zipab7jnrAJ/download/rcssmonitor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.assembla.com/spaces/hedayat/documents/cOF-O4z-Sr3y0dab7jnrAJ/download/rcssmonitor-12.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The RoboCup Soccer Simulator Monitor is a viewer for moved 2d vector graphics. You can use it to watch 2D soccer games running on rcssserver. However, The architecture of The RoboCup Soccer Simulator Monitor was from the beginning kept as general and modular as possible and not just hacked to fit the needs of the robocup soccer server (rcssserver). So by now The RoboCup Soccer Simulator Monitor is also used to visualize many other two dimensional system. You can use UDP/IP communication sockets to send commands to The RoboCup Soccer Simulator Monitor. A generic communication device is also included. It understands a very easy description language to build and move 2d objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 21:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112153.m7BLr4HC005733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 17:53:02 EDT --- ok, that one solves all the issues I see, so this package is APPROVED. I will sponsor you. You can continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Sorry again for all the delays. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 22:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112231.m7BMVWdK031042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #1 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2008-08-11 18:31:31 EDT --- Built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=772196 I can build the package using mock on my system too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 22:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112237.m7BMbxDv014217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-11 18:37:58 EDT --- + rpmlint output rpmlint -i virt-mem-0.2.9-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 67eeb7bd7bc519a8adadc976e660791c virt-mem-0.2.9.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested on x86_64 using mock + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing using kvm) + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 22:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112252.m7BMqou3002383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #24 from Jef Spaleta 2008-08-11 18:52:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) So build it already! Its marked as a approved. As soon as this is available in rawhide.. I can do the stage review. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 23:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112307.m7BN7sYH019695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 23:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112306.m7BN6gIC019580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-11 19:06:41 EDT --- 1/ There is no need for Requires: python >= 2.3 as package already have Requires: python(abi) = 2.5 2/ gzip -9 -c share/itaka.1 > share/itaka.1.gz at install step. This is usually unneeded, rpm takes care of compression at /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress step. It seems that the compression option can be different. (it will use gzip -9 -n) It shouldn't have any problem unless we choose a different compression method for all man pages later.. */timestamps and md5sum are the same from source files and packages 25c0919219c7e0479ab3f0534eadf25e itaka-0.2.1.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 builder builder 311287 jui 19 2007 itaka-0.2.1.tar.bz2 good 3/ /usr/share/itaka/ is not owned by the package. You need to add: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} 4/ License is GPLv2+, but COPYRIGHT also mention icons to be Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#License_of_Fedora_SPEC_Files It is FSF compatible but need to be mentioned: License: GPLv2+ and CC-BY-SA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 23:48:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112348.m7BNmbJ7016351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|bdpepple at gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-11 19:48:35 EDT --- MD5Sum: 668f3fa1d2189f58f02309d518f1aa14 nb-javaparser-6.1-src.zip Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package includes no pre-built jars * jars files are located in %{_javadir} * Package builds in koji/mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * BR should include java-devel & jpackage-utils. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires * Group Tag is not from the official list. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups * rpmlint produces the following warnings: netbeans-javaparser.noarch: W: no-documentation netbeans-javaparser.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Java 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 11 23:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456086] Review request: hellanzb - Hands-free nzb downloader and post processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808112352.m7BNqQww032414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456086 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-08-11 19:52:25 EDT --- Package has landed in Rawhide, closing ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 00:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120011.m7C0BssD021533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-11 20:11:53 EDT --- Closing, since this has been imported into cvs & built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 00:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120019.m7C0JMb0004189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Resolution|RAWHIDE |WONTFIX --- Comment #18 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-11 20:19:20 EDT --- Make this not show up on reports -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 00:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120023.m7C0NgrZ004908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 --- Comment #5 from Peter Hutterer 2008-08-11 20:23:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics Short Description: Xorg X11 synaptics input driver Owners: whot Branches: F-9 InitialCC: whot Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 00:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120027.m7C0R6cA005579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-11 20:27:05 EDT --- Hey, are you still interested in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 00:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120026.m7C0QZqZ023515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|440231 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 00:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455925] Review Request: htop - interactive process viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120041.m7C0fZE8025826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455925 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 20:41:34 EDT --- Removing needsponsor, as I have offered to sponsor submitter. I see no further issues here, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 01:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454199] Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120108.m7C18n5U011204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |walters at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 01:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226292] Merge Review: perl-XML-Twig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120110.m7C1AcHE029725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226292 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 01:43:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120143.m7C1hlrA001430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 --- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-08-11 21:43:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > http://gobby.fedoraproject.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=sobby;a=blob_plain;f=TurboGears;hb=HEAD I've updated that list (on Friday) with a few things that have been finished -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 02:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120204.m7C24YiS004711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #9 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-11 22:04:32 EDT --- Hi, Addressed Issue in #8: * Directory ownership issue * Versioning * Requires Actually it does require sqlite, but for the same reason you said in the libUnihan review, I remove the Requires. * License I think the UCD in Fedora Licensing is outdated, as the new Unihan Character Database term is at http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html#Exhibit1 The revised spec and srpm are at: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/UnihanDb.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/UnihanDb-5.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 02:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120213.m7C2DkCc006419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Eric Sandeen 2008-08-11 22:13:45 EDT --- I'm glad to see this! I hope lmdd will be part of the package; if so can you make sure that it properly picks up the O_DIRECT #define so that direct IO is possible? I've had trouble with that in the past. Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 02:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] New: Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 Summary: Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeckersb at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/python-netaddr/python-netaddr.spec SRPM URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/python-netaddr/python-netaddr-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: netaddr is a network address manipulation library written in pure Python. It supports the Pythonic manipulation of several common network address notations and standards, including :- - IP version 4 - IP version 6 - CIDR (Classless Inter-Domain Routing) - IEEE EUI-48 and EUI-64 - MAC (Media Access Control) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 03:01:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120301.m7C315rS017533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 03:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454895] Review Request: sitecopy - Tool for easily maintaining remote web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120301.m7C31Wkd032177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454895 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 03:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120318.m7C3IKVo021302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 23:18:18 EDT --- This package has been imported and built for rawhide at least. Please consider F8/F9 builds. In reply to comment #8: Please file a new bug about that issue? Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 03:22:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120322.m7C3Mogl022265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-11 23:22:48 EDT --- This has been imported and built. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120416.m7C4GUuo015568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:16:29 EDT --- I see duplication of document files installed. Remove docs/api/* from %docs update SRPM and SPEC. Also, You should add tests to %doc but this will make rpmlint to complain spurious-executable-perm warning. For that you should add following line to %prep chmod 644 tests/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231588] Review Request: aspell-or - Oriya Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120448.m7C4mxdp022726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231588 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:48:58 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-or New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231586] Review Request: aspell-hi - Hindi Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120448.m7C4mYEY022686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231586 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:48:33 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-hi New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:48:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231587] Review Request: aspell-mr - Marathi Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120448.m7C4mmcQ007421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231587 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:48:47 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-mr New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231589] Review Request: aspell-ta - Tamil Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120451.m7C4pg11008404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231589 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:51:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-ta New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:57:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231590] Review Request: aspell-te - Telugu Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120457.m7C4vLTK024489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231590 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:57:20 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-te New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231583] Review Request: aspell-bn - Bengali Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120456.m7C4uv8c009318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231583 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:56:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-bn New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231441] Review Request: aspell-pa - Aspell Punjabi Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120456.m7C4ulqG009289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231441 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:56:46 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-pa New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 04:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231585] Review Request: aspell-gu - Aspell Gujarati Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120457.m7C4vAxo009353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231585 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 00:57:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-gu New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444113] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120516.m7C5GO7j027698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444113 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-12 01:16:23 EDT --- Expect a review in few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120524.m7C5ONPN028900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:24:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120525.m7C5Phew029453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:25:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231583] Review Request: aspell-bn - Bengali Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120534.m7C5Y3Nd030444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231583 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:34:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:32:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231441] Review Request: aspell-pa - Aspell Punjabi Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120532.m7C5WgA3030396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231441 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:32:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:32:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120532.m7C5WNnV030360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 01:32:22 EDT --- Suggestions 1) remove following from %files %{_libdir}/*.a see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries 2) Your build section should look like this %configure --disable-static make %{?_smp_mflags} 3) Add "Requires: pkgconfig" to devel package >From Review Guidelines you can see - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). 4) rpmlint complain that libgdbus.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libgdbus-0.1/NEWS ==> Remove NEWS from %docs 5) you should drop following line from SPEC /sbin/ldconfig -n $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231586] Review Request: aspell-hi - Hindi Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120535.m7C5Zg1P015502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231586 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:35:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231590] Review Request: aspell-te - Telugu Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120539.m7C5dZ4Y031182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231590 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:39:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231585] Review Request: aspell-gu - Aspell Gujarati Dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120534.m7C5Yxq3030523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231585 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:34:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:38:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231588] Review Request: aspell-or - Oriya Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120538.m7C5c3Dt031105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231588 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:38:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231589] Review Request: aspell-ta - Tamil Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120538.m7C5cqO8015756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231589 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:38:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:36:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231587] Review Request: aspell-mr - Marathi Dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120536.m7C5afDs015663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231587 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 01:36:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120543.m7C5hS6L031929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 --- Comment #37 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 01:43:26 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aspell-ml New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:51:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120551.m7C5pLi0000972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 01:51:20 EDT --- python-paver-0.8.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120552.m7C5qQQB001125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #2 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-08-12 01:52:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > " > Before downloading, please read the copyright for DansGuardian 2. DansGuardian > is not free to download from this website for commercial use. > " Yeah I have seen this notice too. It's such a funny and naive business model :-) I also don't think it affects people obtaining the source and binary from me or from Fedora, but let's wait for legal's opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 05:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458397] Review Request: python-paver - Python-based build/distribution/deployment scripting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120552.m7C5qUMV018111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458397 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 01:52:29 EDT --- python-paver-0.8.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 06:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120606.m7C66RFu020104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Marcel Holtmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Marcel Holtmann 2008-08-12 02:06:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://holtmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://holtmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgdbus-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgdbus is a helper library for D-Bus integration with GLib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 06:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456927] Review Request: python-tw-forms - Web Widgets for building and validating forms in ToscaWidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120614.m7C6E13r004037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456927 --- Comment #11 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-08-12 02:13:59 EDT --- http://gobby.fedoraproject.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=sobby;a=blob_plain;f=tg2_requirements.txt;hb=bba4907c99a79353874e069e53acaaaf8f8ac85e Here is my summary of my TG2 virtualenv content. I tryed to update current gobby document, but gobby client created two new ones. It slightly differs from your data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 06:27:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120627.m7C6Rctb005901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-12 02:27:37 EDT --- Reassigning back to Parag, the "Review request" bug should be assigned to reviewer during its whole life. And one note - you should remove the explicit "Requires: glib2 dbus" as such dependencies are created automagically during the build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 06:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120630.m7C6UjXw023162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-12 02:30:44 EDT --- aah. All I can see about you is that this is your first package submission to Fedora. If not then tell me which packages you are/was maintaining. You should look first http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process You actually removed me from official review process. Have you done enough package reviews before? I see that you are already member of packager group. Thanks danny for your comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120701.m7C71vMB010398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 --- Comment #10 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-12 03:01:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Please consider F8/F9 builds. OK, queued in. > In reply to comment #8: Please file a new bug about that issue? There is already bug #446816 which is about to be resolved (builds submitted as well). But I wonder why neither this bug, nor bug #446816 appear on my frontpage.cgi :( (OK this one is closed now, but the other one is assigned and modified). I'll check this and report to the bugzilla master. Also Ed, sorry for missing your comment until now, maybe bugzilla didn't present it on my frontpage, or I just overlooked it. I'll put you on Cc to bug #446816, so you can follow up the new builds and their propagation through testing etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:04:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120704.m7C74no8027381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-12 03:04:48 EDT --- Ok, extended test added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120706.m7C76oav028040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 03:06:49 EDT --- freenx-client-0.9-7.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120707.m7C77aIi028131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-12 03:07:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-ShareDir Short Description: file sharing dir module Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120711.m7C7B3eO011653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 --- Comment #5 from Marcel Holtmann 2008-08-12 03:11:02 EDT --- Fixed the Requires mistake. Spec URL: http://holtmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://holtmann.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgdbus-0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgdbus is a helper library for D-Bus integration with GLib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458770] New: Review Request: ntop - Network traffic probe that shows the network usage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ntop - Network traffic probe that shows the network usage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458770 Summary: Review Request: ntop - Network traffic probe that shows the network usage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bernie at codewiz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/ntop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/ntop-3.3.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: ntop is a network and traffic analyzer that provides a wealth of information on various networking hosts and protocols. ntop is primarily accessed via a built-in web interface. Optionally, data may be stored into a database for analysis or extracted from the web server in formats suitable for manipulation in perl or php. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458769] New: Geanyprj is alternative project manager for Geany fast light IDE. In order to use it you need Geany 0.14. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Geanyprj is alternative project manager for Geany fast light IDE. In order to use it you need Geany 0.14. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458769 Summary: Geanyprj is alternative project manager for Geany fast light IDE. In order to use it you need Geany 0.14. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://geany-plugins.sourceforge.net/geanyprj/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=314047) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314047) geany-prj-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description of problem: New plugin for geany: geanyprj Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.3 Actual results: 1. Builds fine on Fedora 9 with Rawhide (10). Additional info: 1. Currently I have repackaged the source with renamed base directory for the package. The URL to the source package is shared off my local server. Maybe in the next iteration we could perhaps retain the original name of the source package while keeping the visible name of the package as geany-prj (or geany-geanyprj if we prefer to be too strict). 2. SRPM and SPEC are attached. 3. Once the package is installed, the user can see the new plugin becomes available in Geany (see manage plugins dialog). 4. Built on Fedora 9 + rawhide repositories enabled; on X86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458769] Geanyprj is alternative project manager for Geany fast light IDE. In order to use it you need Geany 0.14. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120719.m7C7JEug029528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458769 --- Comment #1 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-08-12 03:19:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314049) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314049) geany-prj/geany-prj.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:22:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120722.m7C7MaqQ013292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Joe Orton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #311673|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120725.m7C7PS0N030828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #25 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-12 03:25:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > So build it already! Its marked as a approved. Ah, I must have missed it. When did you set that? I couldn't find it in any bugzilla mail... Will do CVS request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:27:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120727.m7C7Ri1f014243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #26 from Tim Niemueller 2008-08-12 03:27:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: player Short Description: Cross-platform robot device interface and server Owners: timn Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: makghosh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120726.m7C7Qe0c014158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-12 03:26:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The website at: > https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/ > > speaks of downloading: > ... R2spec-2.3.tar.gz > > but clearly the content is NOT gzipped. The next part states (correctly): > tar cvf R2spec\* > > There is a 'impedence mismatch' between what is said, and what exists. > I think the error came from the command tar cvf which is actually tar xvf, sorry for the typo. For the build, I think you are doing it wrong. You should: * download the SRPM * rpm -ivh R2spec\*.src.rpm * cd rpmbuild/SPECS/ * rpmbuild -ba R2spec.spec BTW, I see you are running a CentOS, let me know please if you have any dependencies issue. Thanks, Pierre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120727.m7C7RJhb031092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-12 03:27:18 EDT --- For information: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=773131 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:38:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120738.m7C7cGqT032435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:43:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120743.m7C7hcN7016312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-12 03:43:37 EDT --- Peter: Unless I missed something, that's all fine right? If so you need to add a comment saying the package is approved, and set the fedora-review flag to '+'. If not, please let me know what's wrong :-) I'm keeping an eye on your two bugs, and will take them up again once you add a comment saying that they have been fixed to build on Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252946] Review Request: xmms2 - X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120746.m7C7kJs3016894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252946 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:48:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120748.m7C7mCrl001474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2008-08-12 03:48:10 EDT --- Not particularly. I have no need for dealing with the idiocy that is SSH+S/Key any more. I have different idiocy to deal with... I don't mind maintaining the package though -- it should be fairly simple. I wrote opiessh.c, but I can't test it any more. You could, though :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Geanyvc provides uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120754.m7C7sUgt018367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 --- Comment #1 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-08-12 03:54:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314064) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314064) geany-vc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 07:52:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] New: Geanyvc provides uniform access to different version-control systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Geanyvc provides uniform access to different version-control systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 Summary: Geanyvc provides uniform access to different version-control systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://geany-plugins.sourceforge.net/geanyvc/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=314063) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314063) geany-vc-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description of problem: New plugin for geany: geany-vc Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.3 Actual results: 1. Builds fine on Fedora Rawhide (10). Additional info: 1. Currently I have repackaged the source with renamed base directory for the package. The URL to the source package is shared off my local server. Maybe in the next iteration we could perhaps retain the original name of the source package while keeping the visible name of the package as geany-vc (or geany-geanyvc if we prefer to be too strict). 2. SRPM and SPEC are attached. 3. Once the package is installed, the user can see the new plugin becomes available in Geany (see manage plugins dialog). 4. Built on Fedora 9 + rawhide repositories enabled; on X86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120807.m7C876N6006227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 04:07:05 EDT --- Hi Richard, Yes, I know :-) I just wanted to check a couple of things this morning that I wasn't sure about.... which I've now done. So package approved :-) Cheers, Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120824.m7C8OulL024734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-12 04:24:55 EDT --- Excellent, thank you Peter for your hard work. CVS admin request coming up in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120827.m7C8ROWX025313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 --- Comment #22 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-12 04:27:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: virt-mem Short Description: Management tools for virtual machines Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458769] Review Request: geany-prj - Alternative project manager for geany fast light IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120843.m7C8hwqA028224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458769 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Geanyprj is alternative |Review Request: geany-prj - |project manager for Geany |Alternative project manager |fast light IDE. In order to |for geany fast light IDE |use it you need Geany 0.14. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120845.m7C8j4kk013018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 04:45:03 EDT --- pisg-0.72-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120845.m7C8j499028854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 04:45:03 EDT --- pisg-0.72-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 04:45:03 EDT --- pisg-0.72-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458770] Review Request: ntop - Network traffic probe that shows the network usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120847.m7C8l9PT029109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458770 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-12 04:47:08 EDT --- Isn't this a duplicate of Bug #448397 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120852.m7C8q3DK014374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Geanyvc provides uniform |Review Request: geany-vc - |access to different |Provide uniform access to |version-control systems |different version-control | |systems --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-12 04:52:02 EDT --- PLEASE use the template below (as described at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join)for your package review submissions: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review It saves other people having to edit your submissions - the formatting is important because the review tickets are processed by scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120855.m7C8tFm8030686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernie at codewiz.org --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 04:55:11 EDT --- *** Bug 458770 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 08:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458770] Review Request: ntop - Network traffic probe that shows the network usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120855.m7C8tDFX030626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458770 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 04:55:11 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 448397 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 09:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457196] Review Request: pymetar - METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120920.m7C9K1qr019505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457196 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-12 05:20:00 EDT --- Thanks for your quick review, Brian! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pymetar Short Description: METAR weather reports parser for Python Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 09:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] New: Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Summary: Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libev/libev.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libev/libev-3.43-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Libev is modelled (very losely) after libevent and the Event perl module, but is faster, scales better and is more correct, and also more featureful. And also smaller. This is dependency of bug 452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 09:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] New: Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Summary: Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb, the core X protocol library, and some of the extension libraries. These experimental libraries provide convenience functions and interfaces which make the raw X protocol more usable. Some of the libraries also provide client-side code which is not strictly part of the X protocol but which have traditionally been provided by Xlib. This is dependency of bug 452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 09:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120958.m7C9wwp5009479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 09:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120958.m7C9wwIF009463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 09:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808120958.m7C9wuFM009443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458784, 458785 --- Comment #27 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-12 05:58:55 EDT --- Bump to version 3. This is completely new version which triggers two new dependencies not in Fedora libev bug 458785 and xcb-util bug 458784. * Thu Aug 11 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.2.rc2 - bump to RC2 * Thu Aug 04 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.1.rc1 - bump to awesome v3-the new generation * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.2.rc2.fc9.src.rpm Patch0 is in upstream git repo. For xsession file is filled bug upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121004.m7CA4gWo026293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-12 06:04:41 EDT --- There are some sort of legal issues because of source files do not have proper license statements. It's being solved. (However it's in Debian already.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121005.m7CA52ld010600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-12 06:05:02 EDT --- [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/xcb-util-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/xcb-util-0.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/xcb-util-devel-0.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/xcb-util-debuginfo-0.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm xcb-util.spec xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121006.m7CA6PFU026843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|452427 | Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-12 06:06:24 EDT --- [root at dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint libev.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/libev-3.43-1.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/libev-3.43-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/libev-devel-3.43-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/libev-debuginfo-3.43-1.fc9.i386.rpm libev-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121006.m7CA6P2c026864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|458785 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121011.m7CABL9l027549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #28 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-12 06:11:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Patch0 is in upstream git repo. For xsession file is filled bug upstream. Implemented. http://git.naquadah.org/?p=awesome.git;a=commit;h=d2f38d4051b90fd5b2deab3ddbc57e58ab574efd Will do some tuning on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121026.m7CAQBBm013649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 --- Comment #4 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-12 06:26:10 EDT --- Steve, change pads.init and pads.sysconfig permissions please. I don't consider it as a blocker, but it will make rpmlint more happy at least. /etc/sysconfig/pads and /etc/pads.conf $pgrep pads and I know the user. I can also check which interface is in promisc. mode so I can assume, where is pads listening to. Personally, I feel that there are some more files in /etc that are readable by non root users, even thou it is not needful. If you still stand for the 0640 go ahead, but I wouldn't like to do it until it is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121040.m7CAeZgq015662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2008-08-12 06:40:34 EDT --- I will take care about this review. Specfile --- - I think that daemons should be compiled with -fpie/-fPIE, shouldn't them? (especially security related daemons) - if you are going to put package only into rawhide please remove BuildRoot definition (see http://wiki.rpm.org/Releases/4.5.90 - it is ignored) ---------------------------- rpmlint --- src.rpm -> OK binary rpm: fwknop.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/fwknop - would it be possible add logrotate script? It will prevent endless grow of log file. fwknop.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post perl - this doesn't look right for me. I think that part of configuration file should be changed by administrator, not by script (or simply put there "localhost" in %install section of spec) It would be nice to have SELinux policy for this package but if it not exists yet I'm not going to block this review. Otherwise package seems fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 10:52:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121052.m7CAq61H000630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #30 from Michal Marciniszyn 2008-08-12 06:52:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Michal: I can't seem to find you in the packager group. > Have you been sponsored? Only folks in the packager group can formally approve > package reviews. > > Is your account under another name/address in that group? Hi, I've just created fedoraprojec account (my fault, being 2 years with redhat without this account is blame) and have been added to packager group. Thanks for your notice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 11:13:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121113.m7CBDwZN004307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Joe Orton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jorton at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #22 from Joe Orton 2008-08-12 07:13:57 EDT --- non-formal review: 1) remove the Vendor, Packager, Provides and Excludeos tags 2) remove Requires: httpd, libxml2 - only Requires necessary should be: Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing) 3) use an approved BuildRoot tag, see wiki packaging guidelines 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs? 5) using %{_sbindir}/apxs throughout is probably a good idea 6) License: GPL should follow the licensing conventions on the wiki http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing 7) the package should be called simply mod_proxy_html, no httpd- prefix necessary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 11:40:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121140.m7CBeK2q026186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 07:40:18 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 11:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121143.m7CBhSti026539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 07:43:27 EDT --- Please make a CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 11:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121141.m7CBfotG009701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: pgbouncer - |postgresql-pgbouncer - |Lightweight connection |Lightweight connection |pooler for PostgreSQL |pooler for PostgreSQL | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 11:59:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121159.m7CBxkeS029362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 07:59:45 EDT --- Please sumbit a request to push the rebuilt packages into F-9/8 repositories on bodhi then close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121214.m7CCEjWx032695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-08-12 08:14:44 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/nocpulse-common/nocpulse-common.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/nocpulse-common/nocpulse-common-2.0.1-2.src.rpm $ rpmlint /home/msuchy/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/nocpulse-common-2.0.1-2.noarch.rpm nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse ^--- nocpulse need to write here nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse ^--- home dir of nocpulse user nocpulse-common.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided NPusers nocpulse-common.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided np-config ^--- previous versions is not compatible with this version. see irc log for reasoning. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121218.m7CCIKDI016612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-08-12 08:18:19 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/itaka.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog : - licence updated - directories own fix - removed useless Require python >= 2.3 - using brp-compress step instead of gzip for man page rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121216.m7CCGVVw016414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-12 08:16:30 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/PPC [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct ( %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4f2911cb0c737335003c2c13edef76821dee2cd1 /tmp/libacpi-0.2.tar.gz [!] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch See issue 1 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/ppc [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [!] Package functions as described. see issue 1 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. the package builds happily on PPC, but I had no chance yet to test if it actually works on that architecture I'll come back as soon as I can do the test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121232.m7CCWOn2019191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 08:32:23 EDT --- OK. New spec and src.rpm that fixes the points addressed below and builds for me in rawhide/mock. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gssdp.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gssdp-0.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121236.m7CCas1B004384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 --- Comment #5 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-12 08:36:53 EDT --- New package uploaded. The permissions for the source files are fixed. I feel strongly that non-admin users should not be able to look at how IDS software is configured. If there are other packages with loose permissions, we will be fixing those at some point. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:41:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121241.m7CCfV0w005095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-12 08:41:30 EDT --- Well, the argument I saw on IRC (which is not my argument, so please don't ask me to defend it) is that people who obtain this package from Fedora may not be able to obtain the upstream source under the same terms as Fedora. In other words, you may not legally be able to take the spec, run spectool -g and build your own package. It's an interesting argument but I'm not sure it applies since Fedora itself is entitled to all of the usual software freedoms which are required (modification and redistribution are permitted, obviously since the source is GPL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121248.m7CCm1sH005932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 08:48:00 EDT --- translation-filter-0.0.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121252.m7CCqqRB006687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sgrubb at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sgrubb at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-12 08:52:51 EDT --- I'll look at this package. I'll post results shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121258.m7CCwuus007538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 --- Comment #3 from Dan Kope?ek 2008-08-12 08:58:55 EDT --- > * blocker: License: should be "BSD with advertising" See: http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/bro/2008-August/003606.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 12:58:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121258.m7CCw4Pe023022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-12 08:58:03 EDT --- + rpmlint output gssdp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) This should be fixed before committing the package. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm c12056decc733d3bae21d32e05b628be + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock but the packager built it in mock - the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin This all looks good to me, so APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121304.m7CD44Zh008491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #19 from Till Maas 2008-08-12 09:04:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Fixed all but the last chmod comment. I don't see the error you mention, are > these in rpmlint? rpmlint -i is clean for me. You see the error after you run "chmod g+s BUILD" where BUILD is the BUILD directory you use for rpmbuild, afaik the default is ~/rpmbuild/BUILD. I normally build rpms as a differenty user and therefore I set the BUILD directy sgid, to have some permissions as my normal user. But this is not really something that needs to be fixed, because in Fedora the rpms are built within mock. > Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec > SRPM URL: > http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-6.x.2.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.src.rpm Everything you fixed looks good. I was about to approve the package, but then I noticed the 6.x in the version tag. I am not sure, whether it should be there or better be a part of the package name: Name: drupal-views-6.x Version: 2.0 Because there are seveveral releases for several drupal branches listed on http://drupal.org/project/views What is your opinion about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:01:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121301.m7CD1hoj023922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-12 09:01:42 EDT --- Hmm, this seems to be waiting on me. Not sure how that happened; I'll try to get to this today. But I note that someone has submitted libev for review; see bug 458785. Do you think that should have any bearing on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121304.m7CD4u4K008593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-12 09:04:55 EDT --- I'm getting a build error on rawhide which looks like the same problem we had with bug 446637: gcc -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gssdp-1.0 -I/usr/include/libsoup-2.4 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o .libs/light-client light-client.o ../libgupnp/.libs/libgupnp-1.0.so light-client.o: In function `main': /home/rjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/gupnp-0.12.1/examples/light-client.c:79: undefined reference to `g_thread_init' light-server.o: In function `main': /homecollect2: ld returned 1 exit status /rjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/gupnp-0.12.1/examples/light-server.c:96: undefined reference to `g_thread_init' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [light-client] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: *** [light-server] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121306.m7CD6PLe024815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 09:06:24 EDT --- Thanks! Tabs vs space issue fixed on copy I just uploaded as it was introduced with the patch to fix the build issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456678] Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121306.m7CD6qST024880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121310.m7CDA43Z025377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 09:10:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gssdp Short Description: GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: pbrobinson Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:12:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121312.m7CDCGLQ025781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 --- Comment #6 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-12 09:12:15 EDT --- OK, the package is APPROVED now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121317.m7CDH53k010575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-12 09:17:04 EDT --- - starting review - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456955] Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121322.m7CDMIwP027292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456955 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-12 09:22:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Are these review requests going to be more drive-by submissions like the Haskell > ones you recently submitted, or do you plan to respond to bugzilla comments from > potential reviewers this time? (In reply to comment #4) > I don't understand where you guys got the label of "drive-by" submissions. The phrase was used in Bug #451413, one of your original Haskell submissions, when it appeared that you were just dumping spec files into bugzilla and (more importantly) not responding to any of the comments, specifically the requests to stop making further submissions until the systematic issues with the existing ones were addressed, this saving everyone a lot of work. I'm happy to see that you're now responding to bugzilla comments and I've no doubt that you have a lot to offer to Fedora. However, it would be best for everybody concerned (both you and anybody reviewing your packages) if you were to follow the documented procedures (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join), as Yaakov suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454914] Review Request: nxt_python - a package for controlling a LEGO NXT robot using python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121328.m7CDSW9a012255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454914 John McLean changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453465] Review Request: transbot - An irc bot designed to translate between languages on separate channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121329.m7CDTC0w012351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453465 John McLean changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456603] Review Request: oggvideotools - Toolbox for manipulating Ogg video files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121344.m7CDiMiB014747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456603 --- Comment #14 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-12 09:44:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: oggvideotools New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121343.m7CDhb0b014641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 --- Comment #2 from John Eckersberg 2008-08-12 09:43:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I see duplication of document files installed. Remove docs/api/* from %docs > update SRPM and SPEC. > > Also, You should add tests to %doc but this will make rpmlint to complain > spurious-executable-perm warning. For that you should add following line to > %prep > chmod 644 tests/* I have removed the duplicate docs, added the tests and fixed the permissions so rpmlint is clean. Re-uploaded the spec and srpm to the original URLs above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 13:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121359.m7CDxeOa000365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 09:59:37 EDT --- mediascrapper-0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121408.m7CE8sGS018824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-12 10:08:52 EDT --- + License is GPLv2+ or BSD and fit the package Licensed field + The source tarball from the development site and the src.rpm are the same 6dddea9189345f0c8c36c4eb8ecce441 libev-3.43.tar.gz + The spec file is readable + Package build in mock (local: F-8 x86_64) and Rawhide for all arches: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=773760 + Package use our CFLAGS 1/ Please use INSTALL="install -p" at make install step to avoid timstramps changes while installing headers. 2/ Package bundled a static library by default. If really needed, it would be better to move this library to a -devel-static sub-package. If not, just add --disable-static at the configure step. 3/ There is a name clash with event.h from libevent. This suggest that the headers should be removed from the default include directory (ie /usr/include) to be provided in a subdirectory by default (ie /usr/include/libev ). So the name clash doesn't occur anymore. This change would be required for libevent eventually. 4/ Package lack to provide support of pkg-config for libev. It would be fine to have libev.pc for the dependant packages that will use libev. + no .pc file present. + no .la files. + Requires look sane + rpmlint on installed pacakge is quiet + package install/uninstall went fine There is 4 points that can be improved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121418.m7CEIQkF004066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #3 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-12 10:18:25 EDT --- I sponsored him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121425.m7CEPrs2005769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #6 from R P Herrold 2008-08-12 10:25:51 EDT --- Comment #4 points to something broken: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=773131 yields this for me: ----------------------------------------------------- Mod_python error: "PythonHandler mod_python.publisher" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py", line 299, in HandlerDispatch result = object(req) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py", line 213, in handler published = publish_object(req, object) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py", line 412, in publish_object return publish_object(req,util.apply_fs_data(object, req.form, req=req)) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/util.py", line 439, in apply_fs_data return object(**args) TypeError: getfile() takes exactly 3 non-keyword arguments (2 given) ---------------------------------------------------- -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121424.m7CEOu7L021973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #5 from R P Herrold 2008-08-12 10:24:54 EDT --- The .spec file is NOT present in the tarball previously referred to. That is the reason I did not use: rpmbuild -ta ... [herrold at centos-5 r2spec]$ ls R2spec-2.3 R2spec-2.3.tar.gz R2spec.spec README [herrold at centos-5 r2spec]$ find . -name R2spec.spec ./R2spec.spec [herrold at centos-5 r2spec]$ (the one 'fine' finds is the one I creates as previously outlined.) I mentioned a missing BR already; see the last lines of comment #2 -- will there be an update? -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:25:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121425.m7CEPF2c022314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-12 10:25:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > Fixed all but the last chmod comment. I don't see the error you mention, are > > these in rpmlint? rpmlint -i is clean for me. > > You see the error after you run "chmod g+s BUILD" where BUILD is the BUILD > directory you use for rpmbuild, afaik the default is ~/rpmbuild/BUILD. I > normally build rpms as a differenty user and therefore I set the BUILD directy > sgid, to have some permissions as my normal user. But this is not really > something that needs to be fixed, because in Fedora the rpms are built within > mock. I don't see were in the spec or build process this happens. Maybe it's just the time of day and my caffiene level, but. . . > > Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec > > SRPM URL: > > http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-6.x.2.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.src.rpm > > Everything you fixed looks good. I was about to approve the package, but then I > noticed the 6.x in the version tag. I am not sure, whether it should be there > or better be a part of the package name: > > Name: drupal-views-6.x > Version: 2.0 > > Because there are seveveral releases for several drupal branches listed on > http://drupal.org/project/views > > What is your opinion about this? I was thinking it's best left in the version, for easier dependency referencing, and so we don't need a whole new review for each module when Drupal bumps it's major version number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:28:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121428.m7CES8bT006168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #11 from John Anderson 2008-08-12 10:28:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Stay tuned for full review this weekend (most likely tomorrow night). I look forward to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121444.m7CEin4r025303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-12 10:44:48 EDT --- euh... since when the spec file should be in the tarball ?? The spec file is in the src.rpm... The error on the url seems more like a problem in koji than something else. Here is a second: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=773877 Just curiosity, have you ever done a review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457505] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-ProcessStream In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121440.m7CEeJC0024708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:41:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121441.m7CEfhCV025091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #2 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-12 10:41:42 EDT --- This package does not build on 64 bit machine: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libpicviz.so /usr/lib/libpicviz.so.1 /usr/lib/picviz/libpicvizoutdebug.so /usr/lib/picviz/libpicvizoutplplot.so /usr/lib/picviz/libpicvizoutsvg.so /usr/lib/pkgconfig/picviz.pc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/UiPicviz.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/UiPicviz.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/UiPicviz.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/axisgui.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/axisgui.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/axisgui.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/defaults.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/defaults.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/defaults.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/lines.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/lines.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/lines.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/selection.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/selection.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/selection.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/siteconfig.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/siteconfig.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PicvizGui/siteconfig.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/picviz_gui-0.1-py2.5.egg-info /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/Picviz-0.1-py2.5.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121451.m7CEpjA1026914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 Daniel Drake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-1.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Daniel Drake 2008-08-12 10:51:44 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing, we're all done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 14:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121451.m7CEpTJW010237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 --- Comment #24 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-12 10:51:28 EDT --- Yes, it is because I don't want to forget that the F-9 build is waiting for Bug 373861 to be also done on F-9. I can close it and reopen another bug if you want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:01:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121501.m7CF1uu1029065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #21 from Till Maas 2008-08-12 11:01:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > (In reply to comment #18) > > > Fixed all but the last chmod comment. I don't see the error you mention, are > > > these in rpmlint? rpmlint -i is clean for me. > > > > You see the error after you run "chmod g+s BUILD" where BUILD is the BUILD > > directory you use for rpmbuild, afaik the default is ~/rpmbuild/BUILD. I > > normally build rpms as a differenty user and therefore I set the BUILD directy > > sgid, to have some permissions as my normal user. But this is not really > > something that needs to be fixed, because in Fedora the rpms are built within > > mock. > > I don't see were in the spec or build process this happens. Maybe it's just > the time of day and my caffiene level, but. . . It does not happen anywhere. I set the BUILD directory on my build machine to sgid and then I get the 02755 errors from rpmlint for packages that do not set the permissions explicitly. It only meant to explain how one can get the rpmlint error because Benjamin experienced them, too. > > > Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec > > > SRPM URL: > > > http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-6.x.2.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.src.rpm > > > > Everything you fixed looks good. I was about to approve the package, but then I > > noticed the 6.x in the version tag. I am not sure, whether it should be there > > or better be a part of the package name: > > > > Name: drupal-views-6.x > > Version: 2.0 > > > > Because there are seveveral releases for several drupal branches listed on > > http://drupal.org/project/views > > > > What is your opinion about this? > > I was thinking it's best left in the version, for easier dependency > referencing, and so we don't need a whole new review for each module when > Drupal bumps it's major version number. ok. I noticed there is atleast one other packages with this version-scheme in Fedora, so I guess it is not a problem. This packages is hereby APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121506.m7CF6RrA030016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-12 11:06:26 EDT --- It doesn't matter much to me either way, but as long as this ticket is in my bug list I'm going to periodically send pings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:07:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] New: Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 Summary: Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/s390utils.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/s390/s390utils-1.7.0-1.el5.src.rpm Description: This package contains utilities related to Linux for S/390. The most important programs contained in this package are: - The cmstools suite to list, check, copy and cat files from a CMS volume. - chccwdev, a script to generically change attributes of a ccw device. - dasdfmt, which is used to low-level format eckd-dasds with either the classic linux disk layout or the new z/OS compatible disk layout. - dasdview, which displays DASD and VTOC information and dumps the content of a DASD to the console. - fdasd, which is used to create or modify partitions on eckd-dasds formatted with the z/OS compatible disk layout. - osasnmpd, a subagent for net-snmp to access the OSA hardware. - qetharp to query and purge address data in the OSA and HiperSockets hardware - qethconf to configure IBM QETH function IPA, VIPA and Proxy ARP. - src_vipa.sh to start applications using VIPA capabilities - tunedasd, a tool to adjust tunable parameters on DASD devices - vmconvert, a tool to convert vm dumps to lkcd compatible dumps. - vmcp, a tool to send CP commands from a Linux guest to the VM. - zipl, which is used to make either dasds or tapes bootable for system IPL or system dump. - zdump, which is used to retrieve system dumps from either tapes or dasds. scratch build at http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121523.m7CFNVnE000390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-12 11:23:29 EDT --- I had a look last month, and it was not ready, but it looks like there is a new release now. I'll try to update and let you know. (I don't have a lot of time currently, but I should be done in one week at most). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121532.m7CFWxhW018945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-12 11:32:58 EDT --- [root at kwizatz include]# desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/itaka.desktop /usr/share/applications/itaka.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated /usr/share/applications/itaka.desktop: warning: value "GNOME;Application;Network;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" You can fix this by either - patching the .desktop file (this will fix both warnings) - using --remove-category="Application" at the desktop-file-install step The best would be to send the patch upstream along with the modifications needed for an accurate python directory detection. Please add this little fix before import. ------------ This package (itaka) is APPROVED ----------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:21:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121521.m7CFL0mo016314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-12 11:20:58 EDT --- As far as I can tell, it is still not in RHEL. However I remember being told to fill a separate bug, and it looks like I didn't do it. I have filled Bug 458828, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121519.m7CFJFuV015652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-12 11:19:14 EDT --- I corrected the make test to include the conditionnality --with tests does the tests (make test) defaults does not SPEC http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3.spec SRPM http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3-1.1.4-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121550.m7CFo4bp022865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 11:50:03 EDT --- python-markdown-1.7-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121542.m7CFgH2w021302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |poelstra at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121542.m7CFg7cI021262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |poelstra at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121601.m7CG1r6S009189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #23 from Philip Prindeville 2008-08-12 12:01:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > non-formal review: > > 1) remove the Vendor, Packager, Provides and Excludeos tags > 2) remove Requires: httpd, libxml2 - only Requires necessary should be: > > Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing) > > 3) use an approved BuildRoot tag, see wiki packaging guidelines > 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz > is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs? > 5) using %{_sbindir}/apxs throughout is probably a good idea > > 6) License: GPL should follow the licensing conventions on the wiki > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > 7) the package should be called simply mod_proxy_html, no httpd- prefix > necessary The most recent version of the .rpm and .spec files are attached directly to this bug report. I'll make the remaining fixes that you suggest that haven't been made (most already have). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121604.m7CG4Ti2025535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-12 12:04:27 EDT --- export INIT_CFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC -DPIC" make %{?_smp_mflags} liboligotm.so.1.2.0 make %{?_smp_mflags} make %{?_smp_mflags} primer3_core.dyn This will build a shared version of the library along with a binary linked with the shared library. Maybe -fPIC isn't needed on i386 for some little library (you need to test), but on x86_64, it is mandatory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121617.m7CGHbfQ028325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 12:17:34 EDT --- For 1.2.3-1: * Requires(preun) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets - %preun uses /sbin/service and "Requires(preun): initscripts" is needed ! %postun - Would you consider to add %postun section as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets (If there is a reason adding this %postun must be avoided, it is no problem) * cflags/install flags - build.log shows --------------------------------------------------------- 201 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/pgbouncer-1.2.3/doc' 202 gcc -c -o lib/client.o src/client.c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wendif-labels -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wformat -Wnonnull -Wstrict-overflow -fomit-frame-pointer -I./include -I./include 269 mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pgbouncer-1.2.3-1.fc10.i386/usr/share/doc/pgbouncer 270 install -s -m 755 ./pgbouncer /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pgbouncer-1.2.3-1.fc10.i386/usr/bin --------------------------------------------------------- -- -fomit-frame-pointer makes debugging very difficult -- "install -s" removes debugging information and makes failure of debuginfo rpm So both are forbidden on Fedora. For this package the following can fix these issues: --------------------------------------------------------- sed -i.fedora \ -e 's|-fomit-frame-pointer||' \ -e '/BININSTALL/s|-s||' \ configure --------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamps - When installing files by "cp" or "install", add "-p" option to keep timestamps on them. * Permission --------------------------------------------------------- pgbouncer.src: W: strange-permission pgbouncer.init 0775 pgbouncer.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/pgbouncer pgbouncer.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/pgbouncer --------------------------------------------------------- - All files in the srpm must have 0644 permission. - %_sysconfdir/sysconfig/pgbouncer must have 0644 permission. * %config --------------------------------------------------------- pgbouncer.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/pgbouncer --------------------------------------------------------- - Would you explain why you don't want to use %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/%{name}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121620.m7CGKGIF012984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #311672|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #24 from Philip Prindeville 2008-08-12 12:20:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314111) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314111) Replacement .src.rpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121621.m7CGLR4d029267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #311673|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #25 from Philip Prindeville 2008-08-12 12:21:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314112) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314112) Replacement .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121624.m7CGO0gZ029557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #26 from Philip Prindeville 2008-08-12 12:23:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > non-formal review: > > 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz > is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs? Unfortunately, they do not. > 5) using %{_sbindir}/apxs throughout is probably a good idea Ok. I thought that allowing for the potential of testing an alternate version of apxs might be a good thing. All other comments have been addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:37:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121637.m7CGbY6B016321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Heinrich 2008-08-12 12:37:33 EDT --- Updated package: http://ypsa.pfy.cz/picviz.spec http://ypsa.pfy.cz/picviz-0.2.3-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 16:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121645.m7CGj77n017932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121701.m7CH1Wph021619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-12 13:01:31 EDT --- Ah, I see. Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drupal-views Short Description: Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation Owners: limb Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:03:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121703.m7CH3lxb021883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-12 13:03:46 EDT --- For 12.1.0-1: ! Comment -------------------------------------------------- # Source 0 is created by me. -------------------------------------------------- - Perhaps Source1. * Source1 -------------------------------------------------- 977 + desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora --dir=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rcssmonitor-12.1.0-1.fc10.i386//usr/share/applications /builddir/build/SOURCES/rcssmonitor.desktop 978 /builddir/build/SOURCES/rcssmonitor.desktop: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing -------------------------------------------------- - Fix the Category item as: -------------------------------------------------- Categories=Education;Science;Robotics; -------------------------------------------------- Please fix these when importing this into Fedora CVS. Other things are okay + This builds on dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=773561 + Spec/srpm (almost) clean + Can be installed correctly + Seems to work well ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (rcssmonitor) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121551.m7CFpRBZ006953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 11:51:27 EDT --- python-markdown-1.7-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:41:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121541.m7CFfekj004633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |poelstra at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121541.m7CFflOk004668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |poelstra at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 15:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121541.m7CFfwL6004734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |poelstra at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121709.m7CH9Ghg023100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:09:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450713] Review Request: virt-mem - Management tools for virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121710.m7CHAcoN007112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450713 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:10:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448025] Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121713.m7CHDrxr024121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:13:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457196] Review Request: pymetar - METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121712.m7CHCaqb007380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457196 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:12:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121715.m7CHF2IZ024633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:15:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121717.m7CHHjXX025130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:17:43 EDT --- cvs done. Do consider EPEL branches here if this package builds/works there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456603] Review Request: oggvideotools - Toolbox for manipulating Ogg video files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121720.m7CHKG2L009144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456603 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:20:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121719.m7CHJ5gA008601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:19:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121721.m7CHL4lb026190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 --- Comment #38 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-12 13:21:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121724.m7CHOrsl026731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #32 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-12 13:24:52 EDT --- @peter I have started doing initial import now. May you add yourself to page: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ntop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:35:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121735.m7CHZnEH029058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #33 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-12 13:35:47 EDT --- @peter You are automatically added already:-) @Kevin Yes, will consider adding to EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121743.m7CHhEow030502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-08-12 13:43:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: itaka Short Description: On-demand screen capture server Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121741.m7CHfMp1013347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-08-12 13:41:21 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'll update spec file for desktop file using these commands : sed -i -e "s/Icon=%{name}.png/Icon=%{name}/" share/%{name}.desktop sed -i -e "/Encoding=UTF-8/d" share/%{name}.desktop and -remove-category="Application" for desktop file install. I'll also contact upstream to send him the modifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 17:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121754.m7CHsVVc032641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-12 13:54:30 EDT --- I was working up a review for this (which isn't really easy) but I noticed that the rpmlint output from the packages I pulled from koji doesn't seem to match the spec. For example: s390utils.src: W: invalid-license GPL s390utils.src: W: no-url-tag and yet there's a URL tag and "GPLv2 and CPL" in the spec you linked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456309] Review Request: perl-Apache2-SOAP - A replacement for Apache::SOAP designed to work with mod_perl 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121819.m7CIJLQP005771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456309 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:19:20 EDT --- perl-Apache2-SOAP-0.73-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:19:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121819.m7CIJG32005736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:19:14 EDT --- xsel-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xsel'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7141 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121818.m7CIIsje005561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvrabec at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-12 14:18:53 EDT --- SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/fwknop-1.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/fwknop.spec PIE: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/Features I don't think we need to compile it with -fpie/-fPIE I left BuildRoot in spec file, it doesn't hurt and you can create the packege even on older systems. Everything else was fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CILCqf022330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:11 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454329] Review Request: PolicyKit-olpc - OLPC-specific PolicyKit overrides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121819.m7CIJYlC021443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454329 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:19:33 EDT --- PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121820.m7CIKqeU022166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:20:51 EDT --- rcssbase-12.1.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121820.m7CIKjA3022119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:20:44 EDT --- ptrash-1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457142] Review Request: olpc-netutils - OLPC network utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CIL2kM022251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457142 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:01 EDT --- olpc-netutils-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update olpc-netutils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7158 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121820.m7CIKTK3006717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:20:28 EDT --- alevt-1.6.2-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121822.m7CIMCM8007292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:22:11 EDT --- xlog-1.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121823.m7CINxj2007658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:23:58 EDT --- ptrash-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452872] Review Request: bmake - The NetBSD make(1) tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CILPnF007083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452872 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:24 EDT --- bmake-20080515-1.fc9, mk-files-20070430-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456009] Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121824.m7CIOiXQ007762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:24:43 EDT --- python-jinja2-2.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CIL7Ih006995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-12 14:21:06 EDT --- Looks like I forgot to rebuild the latest version in Koji, it is being built right now - http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2256. The differences between the 2 version should be cosmetic only, not functionally and the content of SRPM/Spec URLs is authoritative. few notes: - it is a rebase of the most recent RHEL 5 package to the latest sources - remaining (and relevant) patches will be sent to IBM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450816] Review Request: alevt - Teletext decoder/browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121824.m7CIOueF023567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450816 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:24:54 EDT --- alevt-1.6.2-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454895] Review Request: sitecopy - Tool for easily maintaining remote web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121823.m7CINepD023224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454895 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:23:39 EDT --- sitecopy-0.16.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456009] Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121825.m7CIPXh0024133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:25:32 EDT --- python-jinja2-2.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121825.m7CIPHc0024025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:25:16 EDT --- dnrd-2.20.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445027] Review Request: dnrd - A caching, forwarding DNS proxy server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CILdcS022788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445027 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:38 EDT --- dnrd-2.20.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453821] Review Request: mk-files - Support files for bmake, the NetBSD make(1) tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CILSF3022706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453821 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:28 EDT --- bmake-20080515-1.fc9, mk-files-20070430-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456309] Review Request: perl-Apache2-SOAP - A replacement for Apache::SOAP designed to work with mod_perl 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CILHkE022376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456309 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:16 EDT --- perl-Apache2-SOAP-0.73-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:21:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454940] Review Request: rcssbase - Base libraries for Robocup Soccer Server (2D) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121821.m7CILLwE022521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454940 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:21:20 EDT --- rcssbase-12.1.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457116] Review Request: crcimg - Construct .crc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121824.m7CIO70S023342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457116 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:24:06 EDT --- crcimg-1.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update crcimg'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7201 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:25:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121825.m7CIPtpd024365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:25:54 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121825.m7CIPU1S024100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:25:29 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-2.61bzr.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gwibber'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7213 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:25:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454895] Review Request: sitecopy - Tool for easily maintaining remote web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121825.m7CIPNWB008456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454895 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:25:22 EDT --- sitecopy-0.16.5-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121826.m7CIQeFJ008900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:26:38 EDT --- xsel-1.2.0-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xsel'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:26:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121826.m7CIQiFH008935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:26:43 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-2.61bzr.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gwibber'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458610] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121826.m7CIQ4V3008701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458610 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:26:03 EDT --- php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql-1.4.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7219 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:27:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121827.m7CIR32H025077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:27:02 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:27:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121827.m7CIRNdY025192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 14:27:22 EDT --- xlog-1.7-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 18:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] New: Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Summary: Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.spb.su QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/xls2csv/xls2csv.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/xls2csv/xls2csv-1.06-0.fc9.src.rpm Description: This script will recode a spreadsheet into a different character set and output the recoded data as a csv file. The script came about after many headaches from dealing with Excel spreadsheets from clients that were being received in various character sets. Koji build successfully - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=774226 This is my 6th (in Fedora package review, not in packaging history at all) package and I am looking for sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:02:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121902.m7CJ25V4015872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #4 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-12 15:02:04 EDT --- The new package still has the same problem. The problem is that /lib is hardcoded in the makefiles. See src/libpicviz/picviz.pc.cmake and look for Libs: -L at CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX@/lib -lpicviz. That needs to be changed to a prefix passed in from the spec file. I can confirm changing that to lib64 makes all the /usr/lib/*.so issues go away leaving just python going to the wrong place. It just needs to be done automatically instead of hardcoding it. WRT python, I'd say that there needs to be a passing of %{python_sitearch} into the setup.py files so that it understands what rpm wants it to do. picviz-0.2.3/src/libpicviz/bindings/python/setup.py --help install has some hints. Maybe, something like: python ./setup.py install --root=%{buildroot} --install-lib=%{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} or maybe --install-platlib=%{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} but then some specfile locations need adjusting. You do not need to make a -3 srpm since when its imported it will be a -1 file. Just let me know when you have a new file posted to try out. Also, you need to try this on F9 or rawhide because python there makes egginfo files and you are not packaging them or deleting them as the case may warrant. -Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:14:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121914.m7CJE9uJ017507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-12 15:14:07 EDT --- Marcela -- is someone reviewing this? The fedora-review flag is set to "?", which should indicate a review is in process, but no one is assigned to it... If no one is working it, the flag should be unset so people (like me ;)) know they can review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:15:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121915.m7CJFRKd001432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 15:15:25 EDT --- ntop-3.3.6-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:17:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121917.m7CJHtKI018381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 --- Comment #3 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-08-12 15:17:54 EDT --- OK I will look for the new package submission template. The question is, why doesn't the the Fedora bugzilla automatically display the template when I choose the "Package Review" option at the time of submission? Something like that would be quite useful and much better than the static bug-submission template that gets shown. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121916.m7CJGNmO018186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-12 15:16:22 EDT --- > I note that the compiler is called properly everywhere except when compiling > nsdejavu.c. However, the plugin isn't actually installed by this package, so > I'm not going to worry about it. However, if in the future you decide to turn > on the plugin, you'll have several things to look at. (The licensing is > different, for one thing.) Ok, thanks for heads up. > Your scriptlets seem to be missing the > if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ] ; then > %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : > fi > part. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache Fixed in updated package: spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/djview4/djview4.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/djview4/djview4-4.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:17:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121917.m7CJHFAw001647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 15:17:13 EDT --- ntop-3.3.6-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:29:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121929.m7CJTf5j020624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 Bug 446639 depends on bug 446637, which changed state. Bug 446637 Summary: Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:29:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446637] Review Request: gssdp - GSSDP implements resource discovery and announcement over SSDP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121929.m7CJTein020595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446637 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 15:29:38 EDT --- Committed to CVS, built for rawhide in koji on all platforms. Coming to a rawhide near you soon. Thanks for your help Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:47:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121947.m7CJlVGT024320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2008-08-12 15:47:30 EDT --- rpmlint on the srpm gives liblayout.src:90: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} Don't know if it is ok or not as it can be build with or without gcj -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:53:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121953.m7CJrRbt025401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-08-12 15:53:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314134) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314134) Mock build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121953.m7CJrESd009293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkearney at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bkearney at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 19:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808121954.m7CJsWrs009438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2008-08-12 15:54:31 EDT --- rpmlint on srpm gives tangogps.src: W: summary-not-capitalized tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application Also see the above attached mock build log file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 20:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457263] Review Request: liblayout - positioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122006.m7CK6DYv028212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457263 --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-12 16:06:12 EDT --- rpmlint isn't able to parse the %ifs correctly so it see the "noarch" of one logical branch and at the same time sees the %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} of the other logical branch. i.e. the libdir usage is only used when it not built as noarch, and not used when built as arch-dependent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 20:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122012.m7CKCQXJ029599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 16:12:25 EDT --- For the capitalised description the name is spelt tangoGPS so that's why its not capitalised. I now have a mock env setup so I'm putting it through the paces in my mock now and will update the spec/src with the fixes. Are you going to do the formal review for the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 20:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122020.m7CKKmX2031214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-12 16:20:47 EDT --- Problem build requires fixed. Builds in mock on x86_64 for me. spec/src is the same as originally specified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 20:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122022.m7CKMXuf015260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #10 from Oron Peled 2008-08-12 16:22:32 EDT --- * I fixed all pending issues about a week ago: SRPM URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/libhocr/libhocr-0.10.13-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/libhocr/libhocr.spec * However, these fixes were not merged upstream yet. This is bad since it requires running autoreconf in %prep, which BuildRequires: automake and aclocal. * Yesterday, Kobi (the upstream author) told me he would try pushing a fixed version in the coming weekend. I think it's worth waiting for it. * If it's still delayed, maybe it would be acceptable to push this version anyway? [Ah, almost forgot... pong! ... thanks] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 21:05:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122105.m7CL5jNe006159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 21:11:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122111.m7CLBAgK022617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #10 from Adam Miller 2008-08-12 17:11:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: txt2tags Short Description: Converts text files to HTML, XHTML, LaTeX, and other formats Owners: maxamillion Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: kevin Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 21:07:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122107.m7CL75X5021986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #1 from Bryan Kearney 2008-08-12 17:07:05 EDT --- * General OK - Package name But why a gem? XX - License info is accurate Specify LGPL based on COPYING File OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name XX - Specfile is legible Explicitly list the test files, and their permissions. No Loops. OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories XX - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OUTPUT of "rpmbuild --rebuild rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm " Installing rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412 + umask 022 + cd /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/BUILD /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412: line 23: cd: /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/BUILD: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412 (%prep) OUTPUT of "rpmbuild -bb rubygem-cobbler.spec" Processing files: rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/COPYING warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/NEWS warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/README warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml Provides: config(rubygem-cobbler) = 0.0.1-1.fc9 rubygem(cobbler) = 0.0.1 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires: /usr/bin/ruby config(rubygem-cobbler) = 0.0.1-1.fc9 rubygems Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9-root-bkearney Wrote: /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53996 OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent XX - rpmlint is silent rpmlint rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm rubygem-cobbler.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 8) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rubygem-cobbler.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml rubygem-cobbler.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. * Package a rubygem OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} OK - Source points to full URL of gem OK - Package version identical with gem version OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty XX - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it [bkearney at localhost noarch]$ sudo rpm --install rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm package rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch is already installed [bkearney at localhost noarch]$ irb irb(main):001:0> require "cobbler" LoadError: no such file to load -- cobbler from (irb):1:in `require' from (irb):1 OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir ** noarch rubygem OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Package is noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 22:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455925] Review Request: htop - interactive process viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122201.m7CM1jgN014462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455925 --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2008-08-12 18:01:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: htop New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: maxamillion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 22:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122221.m7CMLwqL032671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-12 18:21:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > OK I will look for the new package submission template. > > The question is, why doesn't the the Fedora bugzilla automatically display the > template when I choose the "Package Review" option at the time of submission? > Something like that would be quite useful and much better than the static > bug-submission template that gets shown. Good point; how about raising that on fedora-infrastructure-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 22:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456603] Review Request: oggvideotools - Toolbox for manipulating Ogg video files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122259.m7CMx4II021839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456603 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 18:59:03 EDT --- oggvideotools-0.5-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 22:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456603] Review Request: oggvideotools - Toolbox for manipulating Ogg video files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122258.m7CMwReH021801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456603 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-12 18:58:26 EDT --- oggvideotools-0.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 12 23:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808122326.m7CNQgDr026048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #10 from Stephen Lau 2008-08-12 19:26:39 EDT --- A bunch of us from various XULRunner projects (representing Songbird, Komodo/ActiveState, Mozilla, Mozdev, and others) are hashing out some XULRunner issues on a xulcentral mailing list @ Mozdev. One common theme that is coming up is the importance of a shared XULRunner to distribution adoption. Would someone from Fedora/Red Hat be interested in participating in these discussions? The list page is here if you'd like to signup: https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/xulcentral -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:45:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130445.m7D4jcX6004500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 00:45:37 EDT --- you can build package as cvs is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130446.m7D4kwxA019742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 00:46:57 EDT --- can you build package as cvs is done already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439163] Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130452.m7D4q5aB005283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439163 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 00:52:03 EDT --- ping. can you build package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130452.m7D4q51c005300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #8 from Huang Peng 2008-08-13 00:52:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus Short Description: the Input Bus for Linux OS Owners: phuang at redhat.com Branches: EPEL-5 InitialCC: phuang at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:53:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130453.m7D4rCS0005370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2008-08-13 00:53:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-anthy Short Description: The Anthy input engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: EPEL-5 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:53:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130453.m7D4rdBG005413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2008-08-13 00:53:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-pinyin Short Description: The Chinese PinYin input engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: EPEL-5 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 04:52:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130452.m7D4qeXr020405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2008-08-13 00:52:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-m17n Short Description: M17N engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: EPEL-5 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:09:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455925] Review Request: htop - interactive process viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130509.m7D59OOc007973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455925 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:09:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130508.m7D58Mv3007877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:08:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:07:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130507.m7D57cfE007763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:07:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:05:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130505.m7D55o3S007288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:05:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130506.m7D56nid007610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:06:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130510.m7D5AcGw023384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:10:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130511.m7D5BjCR008734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 01:11:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:14:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130514.m7D5Esko023689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 01:14:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=774764 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 9f6450c2b868964afea248fa2a2af0f4 netaddr-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions:- Kindly make habit of always updating release in SPEC and adding changelog of what changed from last SRPM upload. This will avoid any confusion for reviewer also. you should now add changelog before importing this package to CVS. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130547.m7D5lQw7013514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 01:47:25 EDT --- did you asked upstream to fix tests that are failing? rpmlint reported perl-HTML-FromText.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/text2html 0555 ==> you need to add following line to %build %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130549.m7D5n2YT028414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 01:49:01 EDT --- did you asked upstream to fix tests that are failing? rpmlint reported perl-HTML-FromText.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/text2html 0555 ==> you need to add following line to %build %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 05:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130549.m7D5nxB3013633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 01:49:58 EDT --- sorry wrong comment above should be supposed to post in bug 458446. These depends and blocks are making me confused :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 06:04:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130604.m7D64CwW015724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das 2008-08-13 02:04:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Problem build requires fixed. Builds in mock on x86_64 for me. spec/src is the > same as originally specified. You are supposed to bump the release if you make any changes to the spec file :) And I am not going to do the formal review (as I never did one). Just trying to write some script which will do some basic review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 06:11:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130611.m7D6Ba6s016896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-13 02:11:35 EDT --- Argh, you're right. I overlooked this in guidelines :( You can take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 06:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130612.m7D6CdZL031768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 06:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130612.m7D6Cffm031788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Bug 457517 depends on bug 458669, which changed state. Bug 458669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 06:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130646.m7D6kcGj003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-13 02:46:36 EDT --- Thank for review, Nicolas. * Mon Aug 12 2008 Michal Nowak - 3.43-2 - removed libev.a - installing with "-p" - event.h is removed intentionaly, because is there only for backward compatibility with libevent Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libev/libev.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libev/libev-3.43-2.fc9.src.rpm Points 1. and 2. fixed. Point 3: fixed by removing event.h because it's, according to upstream, only for bw compatibility with libevent -> N/A for me, IMHO. """ On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:16:40PM -0400, Michal Nowak wrote: > Do you thing it could be possible to avoid such conflict on upstream > basis? Unlikely, the "conflict" is by design. > Giving example, to install event.h, ev.h and ev++.h to /usr/include/libev > by default? That would break applications that expect to find it as event.h (basically all libevent applications). On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Michal Nowak wrote: > ----- "Matt Tolton" wrote: > > Why not just leave out event.h? That's just for libevent > > compatibility. > > Thanks, that was my original decision. Why not do it like other distributions such as debian, where the common header files are installed as alternatives, or optionally? event.h is an alternative to the libevent event.h, it's not an unrelated header file, it serves the same purpose in both libraries. """ (Not yet in mail archive http://lists.schmorp.de/pipermail/libev/) Point 4: No interest from upstream, probably because when it's in /usr/lib/ no special magic is necessary. When it's not upstream -> projects won't use it -> useless to have it in Fedora. What you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 07:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130718.m7D7ILP2007931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 07:18:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130718.m7D7IMnk007951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 Bug 458655 depends on bug 458654, which changed state. Bug 458654 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130803.m7D83AgA031978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 04:03:09 EDT --- looks like you have not put "?" for cvs. Can you please request for cvs by changing fedora-cvs to "?" Actually new bugzilla interface is confusing me a lot. Previously it was easy to just look above and see what happened last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:09:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130809.m7D89omQ000713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-08-13 04:09:49 EDT --- You can ship the package with your own patch, if you do not reach upstream. But please keep trying, maybe upstream is on vacation or lost your previous mails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:08:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458918] New: Review Request: pidgin-facebookchat - Facebook Chat IM Pidgin plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-facebookchat - Facebook Chat IM Pidgin plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458918 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-facebookchat - Facebook Chat IM Pidgin plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/pidgin-facebookchat.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/pidgin-facebookchat-1.33-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a Facebook chat plugin for Pidgin and libpurple messengers. It connects to the new Facebook Chat IM service without the need for an API key. Currently the plugin can log into the Facebook servers, grab the buddy list, send/receive messages, add/remove friends, receive notifications, search for Facebook friends and set your Facebook status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:23:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130823.m7D8N5QF018431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 04:23:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=774918 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ae0d69a743bc52a169dea6a07c301e06 Text-Table-1.114.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=166, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.10 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.14 CPU) + Package perl-Text-Table-1.114-1.fc10 -> Provides: perl(Text::Table) = 1.114 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Text::Aligner) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130825.m7D8PORR003984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-13 04:25:22 EDT --- I would suggest sending an email to the fedora-devel mailing list or to the xulrunner/firefox maintainers directly regarding this. I know the fedora maintainers work closely with the Mozilla guys regarding various bits to do with the linux version of mozilla code so I'm sure they can assist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:33:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458238] Review Request: ibus - An input bus for Linux. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130833.m7D8XqAE019970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458238 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:34:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458407] Review Request: ibus-anthy - anthy engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130834.m7D8YAgi020050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458407 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458409] Review Request: ibus-pinyin - PinYin engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130834.m7D8YHjA020085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458409 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 08:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130833.m7D8XxBk020014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 09:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130914.m7D9El2x011951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-13 05:14:46 EDT --- applied a patch to stop the compile of the examples directory as its not installed/packaged anyway. Maintainers know about the issue and it will be fixed in the next release shortly. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-0.12.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 09:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130939.m7D9dSb1015814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-13 05:39:27 EDT --- - rpmlint output gupnp.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.12-2 0.12.1-2.fc10 The %changelog version numbers are incorrect. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm f8b0c3a759e4bf18380ed49f37e0b207 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock - the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin Just fix those %changelog version numbers and resubmit for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 09:42:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130942.m7D9gUQd031469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 --- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac 2008-08-13 05:42:29 EDT --- Package looks fine, reviewed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 09:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808130948.m7D9m3t4017313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-13 05:48:02 EDT --- 1) I think you should also keep timestamps using following command make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 2) I see there is no documentation/APIs for this library but there are some example files in test directory. you should also add them to %doc of -devel package. Don't include irrelevant files from test/* to %doc 3) Drop INSTALL from %doc as its really of no use. BTW, Is this your first package submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131002.m7DA2YPd002689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-13 06:02:33 EDT --- New spec and srpm fixing the changelog. BTW what rpmlint options did you use to get that reported so I can get more info for next time :) SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-0.12.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131018.m7DAIH7o022903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-13 06:18:15 EDT --- OK, that fixes the rpmlint problem, so ===> APPROVED <=== I'm using rpmlint in Rawhide. No special options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:19:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131019.m7DAJbdp022995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sahartsu at xs4all.nl |kanarip at kanarip.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131019.m7DAJ0oq005354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 --- Comment #6 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-08-13 06:18:59 EDT --- rpmlint is quiet now. F8 builds properly. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131020.m7DAKq8e005869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sahartsu at xs4all.nl |kanarip at kanarip.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:20:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131020.m7DAKUvm023494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sahartsu at xs4all.nl |kanarip at kanarip.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:20:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131020.m7DAKrNn023599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sahartsu at xs4all.nl |kanarip at kanarip.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131021.m7DALwWx006128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sahartsu at xs4all.nl |dev at nigelj.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131021.m7DALd8O006084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sahartsu at xs4all.nl |bretm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131026.m7DAQ9Tg024620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-13 06:26:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gupnp Short Description: GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: pbrobinson Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 10:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131046.m7DAkbJQ027396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:05:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131105.m7DB5Sr1030172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |sahartsu at xs4all.nl --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-13 07:05:27 EDT --- Dear Hartsuiker: Keep the assignee to the reviewer, please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:14:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131114.m7DBEQPK031117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |sahartsu at xs4all.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131113.m7DBDYjM013461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |sahartsu at xs4all.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131113.m7DBDQRJ013428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |sahartsu at xs4all.nl --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-13 07:13:25 EDT --- Please keep the assignee to the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:13:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131113.m7DBDdiV013493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Joe Orton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #314112|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131120.m7DBKiHM032241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dev at nigelj.com |sahartsu at xs4all.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:21:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131121.m7DBLT9a015029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bretm at redhat.com |sahartsu at xs4all.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131123.m7DBNMbx015157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #27 from Joe Orton 2008-08-13 07:23:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #22) > > non-formal review: > > > > 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz > > is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs? > > Unfortunately, they do not. upstream should be educated then ;) You'll need to work around that and version the tarball manually, I think this is covered in the wiki somewhere. > > 5) using %{_sbindir}/apxs throughout is probably a good idea > > Ok. I thought that allowing for the potential of testing an alternate version > of apxs might be a good thing. I'm not sure it really makes a difference, but it reduces predictability if apxs is picked from $PATH. > All other comments have been addressed. more nit-picking^W^Wreview: 1) this stuff is unnecessary obfuscation: %define base proxy_html %define modname mod_%{base} Name: %{modname} the spec file is for building mod_proxy_html, not an abstract httpd module; so use "Name: mod_proxy_html" and hard-code proxy_html as necessary and mod_proxy_html or %{name} otherwise. 2) the with-xml options should go; the module should be linked against -lxml2 and the conf file purged of LoadFile unconditionally. The upstream method of providing a deliberately broken module is totally crazy and not something that should be supported (even as an option) in Fedora. otherwise looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131145.m7DBjdHa018867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220 Nigel Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |php-pecl-json-1.2.1-2.el5 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Nigel Jones 2008-08-13 07:45:38 EDT --- Errr yeah, this is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458939] New: Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 Summary: Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/arora/arora.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/arora/arora-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Arora is a simple cross platform web browser. Currently Arora is a very basic browser whose feature list includes things like "History" and "Bookmarks". It is small, less than 10,000 lines of code, very fast, lean, mean and loads of fun to hack on. Arora and QtWebKit is developed to be cross-platform using the Qt library. It was originally created as a demo for Qt to help test the QtWebKit component and find API issues and bugs before the release. An older version can still be found in Qt's source code in the demo/browser directory. Arora works on Linux, OS X, Windows, and embedded Linux using Qt Embedded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 11:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131157.m7DBviAi005343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpierce at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dpierce at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 12:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458918] Review Request: pidgin-facebookchat - Facebook Chat IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131203.m7DC3EGl006532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458918 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-13 08:03:12 EDT --- I will do this review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 12:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131216.m7DCGAG1024523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 12:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131213.m7DCDk2v023914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 --- Comment #4 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-13 08:13:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fwknop Short Description: A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation Owners: pvrabec,mitr Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 12:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131215.m7DCF2fS008668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-13 08:15:00 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below OK source files match upstream: 3acb6d294489ac0393d090ba5361dfead47668aa gresolver-0.0.5.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. BAD license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. BAD doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file installed - maybe you could skip "make build" and generate the file with sed => no need for BR: perl - you should use "make install prefix=..." instead of %makeinstall (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used) - license is "the same as Perl" (see gresolver.pl) => GPL+ or Artistic - you should split the %{_datadir}/* line into at least %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop and %{_datadir}/%{name} otherwise the package will incorrectly own %{_datadir}/applications (and looks like others dirs are hidden there) - empty directory %{_datadir}/locale/*/... is created and included in package (are the translations missing from source package??) - no need to specify Requires: perl-Gtk2, perl-Gtk2-GladeXML, perl-Net-IPv6Addr, they are found automagically -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 12:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458918] Review Request: pidgin-facebookchat - Facebook Chat IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131235.m7DCZA8J027464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458918 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-13 08:35:09 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - License field in spec matches - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint error/warnings Preliminary check shows package is functional. Suggestion: Might include the icons from http://pidgin-facebookchat.googlecode.com/files/facebook_icons.zip APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 12:54:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131254.m7DCsCJc014628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Heinrich 2008-08-13 08:54:11 EDT --- patched src/libpicviz/picviz.pc.cmake to use -L at LIB_INSTALL_DIR@ added --install-lib=%{python_sitearch} to setup.py included *.egg-info files http://ypsa.pfy.cz/picviz.spec http://ypsa.pfy.cz/picviz-0.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 13:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131300.m7DD0bpH031572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 Jay Turner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jturner at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 13:21:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131321.m7DDLem3019221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-13 09:21:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - you should use "make install prefix=..." instead of %makeinstall > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used) but in this case it is more my preference then a rule to use "make install" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 13:45:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] New: Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Summary: Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.0.0-0.1.svn.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sems (SIP Express Media Server) is very extensible and programmable SIP media server for Ser (SIP Express Media Server, http://www.iptel.org/ser). The plug-in based Sdk enables you to extend Sems and write your own applications and integrate new codec. Voicemail, announcement and echo plug-ins are already included. Sems supports g711u, g711a, GSM06.10 and wav file. Still WiP, though. I'll split this package into subpackages (to avoid additional dependencies) and made some other changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 13:47:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131347.m7DDlx9D023484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #6 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-13 09:47:58 EDT --- Passes rpmlint: [sgrubb at centaur BUILD]$ rpmlint /home/sgrubb/working/SRPMS/picviz-0.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sgrubb at centaur BUILD]$ rpmlint /home/sgrubb/working/RPMS/x86_64/picviz-0.2.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sgrubb at centaur BUILD]$ rpmlint /home/sgrubb/working/RPMS/x86_64/picviz-devel-0.2.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm picviz-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [sgrubb at centaur BUILD]$ rpmlint /home/sgrubb/working/RPMS/x86_64/picviz-gui-0.2.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm picviz-gui.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [sgrubb at centaur BUILD]$ rpmlint /home/sgrubb/working/RPMS/x86_64/picviz-plugin-plplot-0.2.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm picviz-plugin-plplot.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 13:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131356.m7DDudwg009926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #51 from Geoff Reedy 2008-08-13 09:56:37 EDT --- I've finally found why files extracted from the jars in brp-repack-jars had no permission bits set so I now have a package that actually builds. I hope to get the new revision up tonight once I get home from work. Miles, perhaps we could become co-maintainers for the scala package? It'd be really good to have a couple people on it since this package turns out to be very complicated. I'll probably also pull down off the 2.7.2 branch and start building a package for that. If you want to give it a shot too, start with removing the patches backporting the scala implementation of the msil library. Hopefully it will just work (TM) from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131401.m7DE1jmj026750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 --- Comment #4 from John Eckersberg 2008-08-13 10:01:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-netaddr Short Description: Network address manipulation, done Pythonically Owners: jeckersb Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252257] Review Request: perl-mogilefs-server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131408.m7DE8OD3012043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252257 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mogilefs-server - Server |perl-mogilefs-server - |part of the MogileFS |Server part of the MogileFS |distributed filesystem |distributed filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131423.m7DENJDK015012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-08-13 10:23:18 EDT --- 1. Source0 should be the full path for getting the source package, something like: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ruby-pam/%{name}-%{version}.tgz 2. Source0 should use variables for the version (see above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458969] New: Review Request: InetVis - 3-D scatter-plot visualization for network traffic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: InetVis - 3-D scatter-plot visualization for network traffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458969 Summary: Review Request: InetVis - 3-D scatter-plot visualization for network traffic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dkopecek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, lkukline at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/inetvis.spec SRPM URL: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/inetvis-0.9.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: InetVis is a 3-D scatter-plot visualization for network traffic. In way, it's more or less like a media player, but for network traffic. It's quite handy for observing scan activity and other anomolous traffic patterns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131432.m7DEWIMh001045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #7 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-13 10:32:17 EDT --- Review of the packaging looks good. Marking Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131434.m7DEY2wa001199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-13 10:34:01 EDT --- Well, for 5.1.0-3: * License (In reply to comment #9) > * License > I think the UCD in Fedora Licensing is outdated, as the new Unihan Character > Database term is at http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html#Exhibit1 - Okay, then Fedora regards this as MIT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Modern_Style_without_sublicense_.28Unicode.29 * Requires: (In reply to comment #9) > * Requires > Actually it does require sqlite, but for the same reason you said in the > libUnihan review, - If this package itself really requires sqlite, then this package must have "Requires: sqlite" explicitly because this package contains no binary libraries and rpmbuild doesn't try to detect any library-related dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131437.m7DEb6VW001957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 Michal Marciniszyn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131453.m7DErg0s020633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #8 from Tomas Heinrich 2008-08-13 10:53:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: picviz Short Description: Parallel coordinates plotter Owners: theinric Branches: InitialCC: pvrabec Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:57:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458974] New: Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 Summary: Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/OpenCASCADE.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/8/SRPMS/OpenCASCADE-6.2.0-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: The OpenCASCADE framework This package is needeed for FreeCAD (among others). It is reported to build on F-8 (tested x86_64), and fails in F-9 There is some bison generated files to fix (see debuginfo extraction) and see if some files are needed from the original sources at runtime. (from samples tools doc data). This "early" Review Request is primary aimed to bring every packagers interested in maintaining this package (and others for FreeCAD) to coordinate the efforts.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 14:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131458.m7DEwbU7021329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-08-13 10:58:36 EDT --- Package has a GUI application. A desktop file should be provided. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:03:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458975] New: Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Summary: Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/Pivy.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/Pivy-0.5.0-0.1.20080718.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Coin binding for Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458974] Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131512.m7DFCvc3023903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-13 11:12:56 EDT --- I am in contact with the Debian packager - their effort is at http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/opencascade/ Set blocking FE_LEGAL as the status of the license is unclear - after consulting with Spot I have moved it to the legal list https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-July/msg00037.html. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:22:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131522.m7DFMcC1009939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 --- Comment #7 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-13 11:22:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pads Short Description: Passive Asset Detection System Owners: sgrubb Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458974] Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131514.m7DFEMdI007876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-13 11:14:21 EDT --- Another issue could be with the included "triangle" library (ros/src/Trianle). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131521.m7DFLWP2025994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #6 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-13 11:21:30 EDT --- See my previous comments for just "looking at the spec file overall". Below is my review. The big issue is that the license is wrong, it's the _LGPLv2_ not the _GPLv2_. It's actually the LGPLv2 + an additional permission; see below on how I think you should handle that. Using http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. FAIL. As noted above, there's an rpmlint complaint not justified in the .spec file. Justify or fix. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK (other than what I've noted elsewhere) - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK (claimed GPLv2, actually LGPLv2, see beow) - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. FAIL. It's actually the LGPLv2, not the GPLv2. See LICENSE. In _addition_, it's not really the stock LGPLv2 license. It's the LGPLv2, _plus_ an additional permission granting additional privileges (it looks a LOT like the GNAT additional privileges): "As a special exception to the GNU Library General Public License, you may link, statically or dynamically, a "work that uses the Library" with a publicly distributed version of the Library to produce an executable file containing portions of the Library, and distribute that executable file under terms of your choice, without any of the additional requirements listed in clause 6 of the GNU Library General Public License. By "a publicly distributed version of the Library", we mean either the unmodified Library as distributed, or a modified version of the Library that is distributed under the conditions defined in clause 3 of the GNU Library General Public License. This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be covered by the GNU Library General Public License." The LGPLv2 is a free software and open source software license. Since adding _additional_ permissions cannot remove that status, this license is as well. So here's what I suggest: 1. Use "LGPLv2 with exceptions" as the license, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing In this case, it's not really an "exception", it's an "additional privilege", but there's no standard way to denote that; "with exceptions" is the best we can do. 2. Don't bother reporting to fedora-legal-list at redhat.com. Since the license only adds additional privileges it cannot possibly NOT be a FLOSS license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK, /usr/share/doc/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c/LICENSE - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. 3aff22a06afaa105ca40e31a5e15cf21 ocamlgraph-0.99c.tar.gz 3aff22a06afaa105ca40e31a5e15cf21 ../SOURCES/ocamlgraph-0.99c.tar.gz - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 N/A. Tested with koji build --scratch dist-f9 ../SRPMS/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. Tested with koji build --scratch dist-f9 ../SRPMS/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. N/A; see OCaml guidelines for more about OCaml libraries. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. Checked rpmls and .spec file itself, looks good. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A. Doesn't have any translations, but I don't see evidence of translations easily available. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. OK. Builds in koji, thus builds in Mock. - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK. (Tested with Koji, above) - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK. It has a %check section, which does that. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:26:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131526.m7DFQO8M010877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmraz at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Tomas Mraz 2008-08-13 11:26:23 EDT --- I have rereviewed the package and it seems to be OK. I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458975] Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131534.m7DFYQXV011968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-13 11:34:25 EDT --- This package BuildRequires SoQt-qt4-devel which isn't available as a Review Request yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131543.m7DFhDxR013737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-13 11:43:12 EDT --- Thank you for you review. I have uploaded the modified files on: SPEC URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gresolver/gresolver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gresolver/gresolver-0.0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:40:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131540.m7DFedA4013305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 --- Comment #3 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-13 11:40:38 EDT --- The next release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2052/netbeans-javaparser.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2107/netbeans-javaparser-6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: * BR should include java-devel & jpackage-utils. - java-devel & jpackage-utils are added as the build requirements - jpackage-utils is added as the run-time requirement * Group Tag is not from the official list. + netbeans-javaparser.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Java - An appropriate value of Group Tag is chosen from the official list * netbeans-javaparser.noarch: W: no-documentation - The package documentation is added rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131543.m7DFhbfN013784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-13 11:43:35 EDT --- For 0.10.13-2: * pkgconfig file issue - Leaving this line ------------------------------------------------------- Libs: -lhocr -lhspell -lz -ltiff -lm ------------------------------------------------------- in libhocr.pc means that libhocr-devel must have "Requires: hspell-devel zlib-devel libtiff-devel" (among these, zlib-devel is Required by gtk2-devel) ** Requires * For -gtk subpackage - %_bindir/hocr-gtk has: ------------------------------------------------------- 30 31 import gtk, gtk.glade ------------------------------------------------------- and this means that -gtk subpackage Requires pygtk2-libglade (note: pygtk2-libglade Requires pygtk2) - Also the my previous comment (In reply to comment #5) > * Requires for -gtk subpackage > * Please recheck the dependency for -gtk subpackage. > For example, /usr/bin/hocr-gtk contains > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 28 import pygtk > 29 pygtk.require('2.0') > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This means that libhocr-gtk must have "Requires: pygtk2". is for libhocr-gtk, not for libhocr-python. * Desktop issue - The Category "Application" is also deprecated and should be removed. - sane-pygtk.desktop contains: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Icon=xsane ------------------------------------------------------------------ However I can find the icon with the name "xsane." nowhere. (even in xsane rpm) * Directory ownership issue - The directory %_defaultdocdir/%name-%version is not owned by any packges. ! Some notes: - This is not a blocker issue, however would you try to remove "implicit declaration of function" warning (i.e. try to fix codes so that the build succeeds with ------------------------------------------------------------------ %build export CFLAGS="%optflags -Werror-implicit-function-declaration" %configure #--disable-static make # %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------------------------------ or ask the upstream developer to remove this warning? (please refer to: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-March/msg02036.html ) Currently build fails with "-Werror-implicit-function-declaration" as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=775601 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131536.m7DFa8mN029456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #7 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-13 11:36:07 EDT --- By the way, this "linking exception" style text is so common that there's a Wikipedia entry on it (for GPL not LGPL, but same issue): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 15:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131545.m7DFjsCr014389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-13 11:45:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > @all > i am sorry for not being able to reply, this was my first try at packaging and > well it was full of errors!!!! altough i updated my spec there are still some > problem with the configure script how do i solve it??? > > @ Pavel Alexeev > Yes i have no problem if you maintain this package Umm.. would you want to withdraw your submittion or want Pavel to co-maintain this package? If you want to continue this review request, would you upload your newest srpm anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 16:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131623.m7DGNVBD005553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2008-08-13 12:23:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=770931 [cassmodiah at schafwiese 3]$ ls -l insgesamt 2024 -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 151071 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 179474 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc10.ppc64.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 176673 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc10.ppc.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 173699 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 170038 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 278470 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-debuginfo-0.8.1-3.fc10.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 295534 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-debuginfo-0.8.1-3.fc10.ppc64.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 295670 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-debuginfo-0.8.1-3.fc10.ppc.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 cassmodiah cassmodiah 296349 13. Aug 18:18 python-rabbyt-debuginfo-0.8.1-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm [cassmodiah at schafwiese 3]$ rpmlint * 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [cassmodiah at schafwiese 3]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 16:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131628.m7DGScdY021893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 Dan Kope?ek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmarcini at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Dan Kope?ek 2008-08-13 12:28:37 EDT --- New SRPM: http://mildew.pfy.cz/redhat/bro/bro-1.4-0.1.20080804svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 16:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131629.m7DGTB0K006592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-13 12:29:09 EDT --- +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 16:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131648.m7DGml7w025101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #16 from ritz 2008-08-13 12:48:45 EDT --- updated http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.1-rc1.src.rpm is the emacs subpackage really required ? where do i find examples for these, i looked up subversion, libidn from what i could see on my system. and how do i remove the message below librep.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object librep.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/rep ['/usr/lib64'] -- ritz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131723.m7DHNkpb032355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 13:23:45 EDT --- cvs done. Why the cvsextras no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131721.m7DHLvwv017036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 13:21:56 EDT --- cvs done. Please make sure to assign the bug to reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131725.m7DHPjBB000599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 13:25:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:28:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457535] Review Request: myanmar3-unicode-fonts - Myanmar3 unicode font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131728.m7DHSZ6M018493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 13:28:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131730.m7DHUdFJ019137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 13:30:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131727.m7DHRqI3018395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 --- Comment #9 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-13 13:27:51 EDT --- Thanks for taking taking care of cvs. pads is a security program that we've interfaced to IDS software. I was going to add other comitters from the security team to help keep an eye on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] New: Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 Summary: Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, lmacken at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/liveusb-creator.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/liveusb-creator-2.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A liveusb creator from Live Fedora images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131732.m7DHW8us002062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 13:32:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453772] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131744.m7DHiQEx021778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453772 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453772] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131746.m7DHkBLg004980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453772 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-13 13:46:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314227) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314227) local rebuild log of 0.04-3 on rawhide i386 machine For 0.04-3: * License - As far as I checked the whole code, the license tag must be "LGPLv3+". * %SOURCE0 - Please use %version macro. With this you probably won't have to modify %SOURCE9 URL when the version is upgraded. - The tarball in your srpm does not coincide with what I could download from the URL written as %SOURCE0: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 44080 2008-03-18 04:42 Gtk2-ImageView-0.04.tar.gz 43947 2008-03-15 05:24 perl-Gtk2-ImageView-0.04-3.fc9/Gtk2-ImageView-0.04.tar.gz ----------------------------------------------------------------- * BuildRequires - For perl module related Requires, please specify it by the virtual module names the rpms provide, not by using the rpms' name directly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * e.g. Usually "BuildRequires: perl-Glib" should be "BuildRequires: perl(Glib)" or so. * %check - %check fails on local build (log attached) Note that rpmbuild always unset DISPLAY env as: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/INSTROOT/rpm-tmp.54049 + umask 022 + cd /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd Gtk2-ImageView-0.04 + unset DISPLAY + tty -s + make test ------------------------------------------------------------------ For this package this seems to be leading to test failure. * rpmlint issue * Documents - Usually the file "INSTALL" is for the users who want to rebuild the package by themselves and is not needed for rpm users. - The file "MANIFEST" should be removed from %doc (actually rpmlint warns about this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 17:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225255] Merge Review: arptables_jf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131755.m7DHsxfQ024074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225255 Gabriel Somlo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |somlo at cmu.edu --- Comment #3 from Gabriel Somlo 2008-08-13 13:54:58 EDT --- any idea what the difference between this package's source tree and arptables-0.0.3-3 from ebtables.sourceforge.net ? Is this package a fork ? Any pointers to the story behind how we ended up with two different ones would be much appreciated... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131803.m7DI3Y1k008089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #8 from Alan Dunn 2008-08-13 14:03:33 EDT --- Your changes have been made in http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/ocamlgraph/ocaml-ocamlgraph.spec http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/ocamlgraph/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-2.fc9.src.rpm (I was waiting to make the former change until I got a list like this.) (In reply to comment #6) > See my previous comments for just "looking at the spec file overall". > Below is my review. The big issue is that the license is wrong, it's the > _LGPLv2_ not the _GPLv2_. It's actually the LGPLv2 + an additional permission; > see below on how I think you should handle that. > Using http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > the review. > FAIL. As noted above, there's an rpmlint complaint not justified in the .spec > file. Justify or fix. > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines > OK > - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines > OK > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines > OK (other than what I've noted elsewhere) > - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet > the Licensing Guidelines > OK (claimed GPLv2, actually LGPLv2, see beow) > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > FAIL. It's actually the LGPLv2, not the GPLv2. See LICENSE. > In _addition_, it's not really the stock LGPLv2 license. It's the LGPLv2, > _plus_ an additional permission granting additional privileges > (it looks a LOT like the GNAT additional privileges): > "As a special exception to the GNU Library General Public License, you > may link, statically or dynamically, a "work that uses the Library" > with a publicly distributed version of the Library to produce an > executable file containing portions of the Library, and distribute > that executable file under terms of your choice, without any of the > additional requirements listed in clause 6 of the GNU Library General > Public License. By "a publicly distributed version of the Library", we > mean either the unmodified Library as distributed, or a > modified version of the Library that is distributed under the > conditions defined in clause 3 of the GNU Library General Public > License. This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons > why the executable file might be covered by the GNU Library General > Public License." > The LGPLv2 is a free software and open source software license. > Since adding _additional_ permissions cannot remove that status, this > license is as well. So here's what I suggest: > 1. Use "LGPLv2 with exceptions" as the license, per > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing In this case, it's not really an > "exception", it's an "additional privilege", but there's no standard way to > denote that; "with exceptions" is the best we can do. > 2. Don't bother reporting to fedora-legal-list at redhat.com. Since the > license only adds additional privileges it cannot possibly NOT be a FLOSS > license. > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc. > OK, /usr/share/doc/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c/LICENSE > - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. > OK > - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is > unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora > is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest > (http://www.ioccc.org/). > OK > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > OK. > 3aff22a06afaa105ca40e31a5e15cf21 ocamlgraph-0.99c.tar.gz > 3aff22a06afaa105ca40e31a5e15cf21 ../SOURCES/ocamlgraph-0.99c.tar.gz > - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at > least one supported architecture. > OK > - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed > in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work > on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next > to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla > entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the > comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and > replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as > blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: > FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , > FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 > N/A. > Tested with koji build --scratch dist-f9 > ../SRPMS/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > OK. > Tested with koji build --scratch dist-f9 > ../SRPMS/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-1.fc9.src.rpm > - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the > %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. > N/A > - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just > symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in > %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each > subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. > N/A; see OCaml guidelines for more about OCaml libraries. > - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state > this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for > relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is > considered a blocker. > N/A. > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not > create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does > create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. > OK. Checked rpmls and .spec file itself, looks good. > - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > OK. > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. > OK > - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf > %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). > OK > - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros > section of Packaging Guidelines > OK > - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is > described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines > OK > - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The > definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not > restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) > N/A > - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime > of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run > properly if it is not present. > OK > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. > N/A > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. > N/A > - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' > (for directory ownership and usability). > N/A > - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), > then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel > package. > N/A > - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = > %{version}-%{release} > N/A > - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be > removed in the spec. > N/A > - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the > %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of > the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does > not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your > explanation. > N/A > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another > package owns, then please present that at package review time. > OK > - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} > ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. > OK > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > OK > SHOULD Items: > - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > N/A > - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should > contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > N/A. Doesn't have any translations, but I don't see evidence of translations > easily available. > - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See > MockTricks for details on how to do this. > OK. Builds in koji, thus builds in Mock. > - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all > supported architectures. > OK. (Tested with Koji, above) > - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > OK. It has a %check section, which does that. > - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, > and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. > N/A > - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package > using a fully versioned dependency. > N/A > - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and > this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. > A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not > installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. > N/A > - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, > /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file > instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for > further information. > N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458621] Review Request: translation-filter - A l10n file filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131817.m7DIH5Jo010339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458621 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457806] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131818.m7DIIskC010572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457806 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457547] Review Request: mediascrapper - A script to scrap media files from different sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131815.m7DIFWNe010060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131824.m7DIOvDp029348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Bug 447456 depends on bug 446639, which changed state. Bug 446639 Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:24:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131824.m7DIOwKK029365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 Bug 447457 depends on bug 446639, which changed state. Bug 446639 Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131825.m7DIP1OU029460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 Bug 454668 depends on bug 446639, which changed state. Bug 446639 Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446639] Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131824.m7DIOuiv029326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-13 14:24:55 EDT --- Committed to CVS. Coming to a rawhide near you soon. Thanks for your help yet again Richard, feel free to swap any more reviews that you need :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:24:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131824.m7DIOx8T029383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Bug 454664 depends on bug 446639, which changed state. Bug 446639 Summary: Review Request: gupnp - GUPnP is an framework for creating UPnP devices & control points https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446639 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131841.m7DIfoqk000395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Javier Palacios changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |javiplx at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Javier Palacios 2008-08-13 14:41:49 EDT --- The INSTALL file should not be included at %doc section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] New: python-statgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: python-statgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Summary: python-statgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: soumya at dgplug.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-statgrab.spec SRPM URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-statgrab-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for libstatgrab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:46:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] python-statgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131846.m7DIk0WQ016258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] python-statgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131847.m7DIlZvn016609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131850.m7DIoXPq002003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2008-08-13 14:50:32 EDT --- ...and another new version fixing some typos: Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuilds/avogadro-0.8.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 18:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131848.m7DImd0Y001464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2008-08-13 14:48:37 EDT --- There are still a lot of issues with this package so I don't think that a full review makes sense at this state. 1) rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gnome-rdp-* gnome-rdp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gnome-rdp-0.2.2.3/AUTHORS gnome-rdp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gnome-rdp-0.2.2.3/ChangeLog - this is minor and can be fixed with iconv gnome-rdp.i386: E: description-line-too-long gnome-rdp is a Remote Desktop Protocol client for the GNOME desktop environment. - description needs a line wrap after 79 characters gnome-rdp.i386: E: no-binary gnome-rdp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - because it's mono, save to ignore gnome-rdp-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings. - why is there no debuginfo? if there really is none you should disable building the debuginfo package 2) IMO the description could be a little more elaborate, e. g.: "gnome-rdp is a Remote Desktop Protocol client for the GNOME desktop environment. It supports RDP, VNC and SSH. Configured sessions can be saved to the built in list." (Taken from the sf.net website) 3) You are not providing a URL for Source0, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 4) You are using ExcludeArch for PPC and PPC64, but you are not providing any details about the reasons. Please read the corresponding paragraph at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines 5) Looks as if you are missing some (Build)Requires: checking for vncviewer... vncviewer checking for rdesktop... rdesktop checking for ssh... ssh checking for gnome-terminal... gnome-terminal 6) On F9 build fails with configure: error: Package requirements (vte-sharp-0.16 >= 1.9) were not met: No package 'vte-sharp-0.16' found Can you tighten the BuildRequires so that RPM will refuse to install the SRPM if the requirements are not met? 7) There must be one blank line between every changelog entry. This is important because the changelogs get parsed automatically by a couple of scripts. 8) This is not the latest version. 0.2.3 is out since 2008-06-27. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:03:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131903.m7DJ3OAq004755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-08-13 15:03:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Package has a GUI application. A desktop file should be provided. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Uh, thanks. I meant to add it before I submitted the review. Here it is: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate-1.5.6-2.tillf8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131901.m7DJ1m4r004532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Javier Palacios changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |javiplx at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Javier Palacios 2008-08-13 15:01:46 EDT --- The Source should be a full URL pointing to the source. I have seen that the reported URL for the SRPM has changed due to a new version. It might be a good idea to reflect that on bugzilla Also, as I'm able to follow the package, the real source code (and probably for some other globus-* packages) is on a full globus-5.14.tar.gz file. I'm not sure if there is a policy about that, but having many packages sharing a main source tarball might cause problems. It's probably much better (and faster for building) to have a single source package for multiple globus things and handle it as subpackages. Finally, the changelog entry says that the SPEC is automatically created. I'm not sure if people from Fedora might accept a program as packager, but even in that case you will very likely be required to ensure that the program implements all current (and future) policies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131912.m7DJC2cR029299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #4 from Vasile Gaburici 2008-08-13 15:12:00 EDT --- Updated with the preliminary Type 42 auto-generation patch: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools.spec http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/lcdf-typetools-2.71-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] New: Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Summary: Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: A closed loop, high-performance, general purpose protocol-blind fuzzer for C programs. Uses compiler-level integration to seamlessly inject precise and reliable instrumentation hooks into the traced program. These hooks enable the fuzzer to receive real-time feedback on changes to the function call path, call parameters, and return values in response to variations in input data. This architecture makes it possible to significantly improve the coverage of the testing process without a noticeable performance impact usually associated with other attempts to peek into run-time internals. SPEC:http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/bunny.spec SRPM:http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/bunny-0.93-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131928.m7DJSxEX009362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-13 15:28:58 EDT --- ExcludedArch: ppc ppc64 The package dynamically writes x86 code and is specially for x86(uses asm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131926.m7DJQmNF009246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 --- Comment #18 from Javier Palacios 2008-08-13 15:26:47 EDT --- > The Fedora way is a README.Fedora file in %doc. It is used by many packages and > that is what an admin should look for after installing if manual intervention > is needed. New versions at Spec URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freewebs.com/javiplx/Fedora/gforge-4.5.19-5.fc9.src.rpm Now there is a README.Fedora package included, with a script to set interactively the administrator password. It has also been added the svntracker plugin, and the reference to upstream submitted patches (following Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131933.m7DJXmUY010473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-13 15:33:47 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo you you need to have: 'Requires(post): info' 'Requires(preun): info' + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation the INSTALL file should not be distributed. xx - Fedora approved license and meets Licensing Guidelines + Wrong value of License field. xx - License field meets actual license + It should be GPLv3+ instead of GPLv3, since the license notice in the sources say: "GNU Zile is free software; ... under the terms of the GNU General Public License ... ... ; either version 3, or (at your option) any later version." OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present xx - macros used consistently + Apart from one place in the %files stanza you have used %{name} instead of zile. Please remove the inconsistency. OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131947.m7DJlu0q003470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-13 15:47:55 EDT --- You know, I just committed to the existing zile package in the distribution (to fix up the license tag.) Why don't you just add yourself as a comaintainer and then work on the package we have? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 19:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808131958.m7DJwwHU005358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-13 15:58:57 EDT --- Fixed -- all above mentioned issues. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/zile.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/zile-2.2.61-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 20:15:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132015.m7DKF6YA018160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #2 from John Khvatov 2008-08-13 16:15:05 EDT --- This tarball is the "post-release", which I wrote in Release tag as in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages I have a warnings from rpmlint: $ rpmlint gitosis-0.2-5.20080730git.fc9.noarch.rpm gitosis.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/gitosis gitosis gitosis.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/gitosis gitosis gitosis.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/gitosis 0750 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Why? I create gitosis user and homedir by the package with appropriately permissions (0750). May be switch to fedora-mgmt? Incidentally, a similar package monotone has the same warnings. Fixed: SPEC: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/gitosis/gitosis.spec SRPM: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/gitosis/gitosis-0.2-5.20080730git.fc9.src.rpm Sorry for idle. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 20:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132018.m7DKIJxl018579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-13 16:18:18 EDT --- Almost good, but you need to modify the %files section - instead of %{_datadir}/* which means that the package will own also the directories %{_datadir}/applications and %{_datadir}/pixmaps, yum must use %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png %{_datadir}/%{name} so only the files under applications and pixmaps are owned by the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 20:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132020.m7DKKtiQ009470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 John Eckersberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from John Eckersberg 2008-08-13 16:20:54 EDT --- Built in Koji for F-8,9,10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 20:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132033.m7DKX7U3021987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-13 16:33:06 EDT --- +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 20:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132037.m7DKbDte013833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-08-13 16:37:12 EDT --- [NOT OK] rpmlint output: gflags-devel.i386: W: no-documentation There is a html file in the doc/ dir of the tarball that contains documenation, that would fit in the -devel subpackage imho. [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: BSD 3 clause [OK] license matches shortname in License: BSD [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: [OK] Source0 is a working URL [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: bd4871398e9019b241d89cc21fb62def gflags-0.9.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: httsp://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=776073 [OK] BuildRequires are complete (koji builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [OK] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig [OK] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [OK] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage: no static libraries are packaged [OK] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [OK] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] .la files (libtool) are not included [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {NOT OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps You should change the make install to: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines Other stuff: - this line should be removed, because no static libraries are build: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.a" -delete - Can you maybe submit an patch to upstream that changes the installation of the header files within the automake stuff or file a bug? Then you could remove these lines: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name} mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/google/*.h $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name}/ - On my system no rpath is set in the libraries, why did you use chrpath? - Why don't you install the python stuff? - not the NOT OK for rpmlint and timestamps above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 20:41:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132041.m7DKfKAq024212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-08-13 16:41:19 EDT --- There is a unittest running script in the python directory, maybe you can integrate it into the spec somehow (you can use a section named %check). I tried to just run it in %check and it failed, but without using rpmbuild it did not. Not sure, what can be done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 21:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132104.m7DL4HkE018805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #13 from John Anderson 2008-08-13 17:04:16 EDT --- Unfortunately the new version adds gnome-keyring-sharp as a dependency, which is not yet in Fedora. I'll look at that library and see how easy it would be to package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 21:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132129.m7DLTbuw023149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #3 from John Khvatov 2008-08-13 17:29:36 EDT --- Fixed perms /var/lib/gitosis (0755): SPEC: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/gitosis/gitosis.spec SRPM: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/gitosis/gitosis-0.2-5.20080730git.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 22:07:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455654] Review Request: pads - Passive Asset Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132207.m7DM7pnF007704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-13 18:07:49 EDT --- pads was built in rawhide...closing bug. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 22:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132214.m7DME3Cg008763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 Zeeshan Ali changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zeenix at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Zeeshan Ali 2008-08-13 18:14:03 EDT --- Sorry for being a nitpicker but one small correction to the description: AV upnp apps -> UPnP AV applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 22:53:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132253.m7DMr5ki006305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 Nigel Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com --- Comment #1 from Nigel Jones 2008-08-13 18:53:03 EDT --- I'll do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 23:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132318.m7DNIRiG009582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #12 from Oron Peled 2008-08-13 19:18:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314268) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314268) pkg-config files (*.pc) dependency helper A stupid perl script to scan recursively for pkg-config (*.pc or *.pc.in) files and output information related to .spec file dependencies. This would help prevent dependency omissions in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 23:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132325.m7DNP9TZ019700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #14 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-13 19:25:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libUnihan Short Description: C library for 5NF Unihan character database. Owners: Ding-Yi Chen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: dchen Packager Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 13 23:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808132351.m7DNpwvT014117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #13 from Oron Peled 2008-08-13 19:51:57 EDT --- * Updates: SRPM URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/libhocr/libhocr-0.10.13-3.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/libhocr/libhocr.spec * All new patches sent upstream. > pkgconfig file issue Fixed (also attached helper script in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555#c12) > ...and this means that -gtk subpackage Requires pygtk2-libglade Fixed. > This means that libhocr-gtk must have "Requires: pygtk2". > is for libhocr-gtk, not for libhocr-python. Fixed. > * Desktop issue > - The Category "Application" is also deprecated and should be removed. Fixed. Added a desktop-file-validate in %build to verify in the future. > - sane-pygtk.desktop contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Icon=xsane > ------------------------------------------------------------------ Changed from 'xsane' to 'sane', we are now sure we have the icon: * sane.png is included in sane-backends rpm (as well original tarball). * sane-backends is required by sane-backends-libs. * The libsane.so.1 contained in sane-backends-libs is required by python-imaging-sane. * python-imaging-sane is explicitly "Required" by libhocr-gtk * So installing libhocr-gtk would bring the icon as well. QED ;-) > The directory %_defaultdocdir/%name-%version is not owned by > any packges. Fixed. > %build > export CFLAGS="%optflags -Werror-implicit-function-declaration" * Added to .spec and fixed the code. * Also fixed a bunch of 'unused variable' warnings. * While doing this, I noticed the code contains tons of duplication. I offered Kobi (upstream author) some help in refactoring this code and wait for his reply (don't want to step on his feet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 00:36:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140036.m7E0arYe019783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #9 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-13 20:36:51 EDT --- Very good, all the problems have been addressed. Builds fine. Congrats. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 01:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140101.m7E11MF7032350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #10 from Alan Dunn 2008-08-13 21:01:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-ocamlgraph Short Description: OCaml library for arc and node graphs Owners: amdunn Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Packager Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 02:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452921] Review Request: libzrtpcpp - ZRTP support library for the GNU ccRTP stack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140228.m7E2SmeF002699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452921 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 22:28:47 EDT --- Done and pushed. Closing. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 02:30:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140230.m7E2UIW6012136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-13 22:30:17 EDT --- Addressed issues: License, Requires Revised SPEC and SRPM: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/UnihanDb.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libunihan/UnihanDb-5.1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 02:41:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140241.m7E2f26H005106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 22:41:01 EDT --- Hey Jeff. Are you still looking for a sponsor? Do you have other packages you would like to submit? Have you done any pre-reviews of other pending review submissions? Take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored I am happy to look at this package and see about sponsoring you, but it would be good to have some more packages or see some pre-reviews you have done to make sure you understand the guidelines. Look for a full review of this package at some point here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 03:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140305.m7E359gq018965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-13 23:05:08 EDT --- This package doesn't seem to build for me in mock for f10. I get at the end of the build.log: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT dnxTransport.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/dnxTransport.Tpo -c -o dnxTransport.lo dnxTransport.c mv -f .deps/dnxSleep.Tpo .deps/dnxSleep.Plo dnxTcp.c: In function 'dnxTcpNew': dnxTcp.c:369: error: 'HOST_NAME_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) dnxTcp.c:369: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once dnxTcp.c:369: error: for each function it appears in.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 03:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140357.m7E3vTTp018927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johan at x-tnd.be --- Comment #13 from Johan Cwiklinski 2008-08-13 23:57:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: BackupPC New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 04:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453701] Review Request: minisat2 - A minimalistic, open-source SAT solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140455.m7E4taj6005254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453701 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-14 00:55:35 EDT --- minisat2-2.0-7.20070721.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. /updates/minisat2-2.0-7.20070721.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 05:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140513.m7E5DjDV031734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 --- Comment #2 from Nigel Jones 2008-08-14 01:13:44 EDT --- MUST: Y: rpmlint on each package Y: Meeting Package Naming Guidelines Y: Spec file name matches base package name Y: License field is valid Y: Meets Packaging Guidelines Y: License included in package (if included in source) Y: Spec file written in en_US Y: Spec file is legible Y: Sources match upstream source Y: Source URL 'sane' Y: Compiles successfully - [noarch] -: ExcludeArch required? Y: All Build Dependencies Listed -: Handles locales sanely -: Library packages run ldconfig Y: Package is not relocatable Y: Package owns all directories created Y: No duplicate file listings Y: defattr set correctly Y: %clean is used Y: Macro use conisistant Y: ONLY Contains Code/Content that is allowed -: Large Documentation in -doc subpackage Y: %doc must not affect package runtime -: Header files in -devel -: Static libraries in -static -: pkgconfig files require pkgconfig -: Library files are located in correct package -: -devel requires base package w/ fully versioned dependency -: Packages do not contact .la (libtool) archives Y: GUI Apps have .desktop files Y: No duplicate directory ownerships Y: %install cleans buildroot Y: Filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD: -: Description/Summary sections contain translations Y: Builds in mock/koji Y: Builds on all architectures Y: Program works upon testing Y: Scriptlets are sane -: Subpackages require base package -: pkgconfig.pc files in -devel -: File dependencies should only be in /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 05:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140515.m7E5F0n4008552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 Nigel Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 05:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140538.m7E5c96c003802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #15 from Jeff Goldschrafe 2008-08-14 01:38:08 EDT --- I'm absolutely still looking for a sponsor -- this is a really useful piece of software and I hope someone else finds the package handy. I've added a patch that adds a conditional to common/dnxTransport.h defining HOST_NAME_MAX on platforms where it's not defined (e.g. some glibc). The new files are here: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-3.spec I can't find it in Bugzilla at the moment, but I commented a bit on Xavier Bachelot's pnp4nagios package. I haven't really written much else, but I think I've got a pretty good understanding of the packaging guidelines at this point. I've been spending the last couple of months tweaking packages from EPEL for my sysadmin environment, and I've got a very good handle on how the project does things. (I'm completely anal retentive about standards-compliance.) However, if you need more to indicate that I know what I'm doing, I'd be perfectly willing to do something with a few more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 05:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140540.m7E5e0qZ003904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #16 from Jeff Goldschrafe 2008-08-14 01:39:59 EDT --- Sorry; I typo'd the URL on that last SRPM. It should be as follows: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 06:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455032] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl5000-firmware_-_Firmwa?= =?utf-8?q?re_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140601.m7E61VVK016135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 Daniel Malmgren changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dm at mensa.se --- Comment #8 from Daniel Malmgren 2008-08-14 02:01:29 EDT --- And this package is going to be built for F9 and devel as well, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 06:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140624.m7E6O72E009911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 02:24:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I've added a patch that adds a conditional to common/dnxTransport.h defining > HOST_NAME_MAX on platforms where it's not defined (e.g. some glibc). I guess now we shoud use sysconf(_SC_HOST_NAME_MAX) to get HOST_NAME_MAX (please see sysconf(3) man page and https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-June/msg00737.html ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 06:35:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140635.m7E6ZpOk011493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #28 from Philip Prindeville 2008-08-14 02:35:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > non-formal review: > > > > > > 4) Source: http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/mod_proxy_html.tgz > > > is bad - do upstream not provide versioned URLs? > > > > Unfortunately, they do not. > > upstream should be educated then ;) That might be beyond the scope of this bug fix. ;-) In any case, I've tried contacting the owners but not gotten any traction with them. > You'll need to work around that and version the tarball manually, I think this > is covered in the wiki somewhere. I looked at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release but didn't find it there. Nor is it in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Can you point me at the right guidelines? Also, rpmlint doesn't seem to have issue with Source0: not containing %{version}. Is that a shortcoming of rpmlint? > > > 5) using %{_sbindir}/apxs throughout is probably a good idea > > > > Ok. I thought that allowing for the potential of testing an alternate version > > of apxs might be a good thing. > > I'm not sure it really makes a difference, but it reduces predictability if > apxs is picked from $PATH. > > > All other comments have been addressed. > > more nit-picking^W^Wreview: > > 1) this stuff is unnecessary obfuscation: > > %define base proxy_html > %define modname mod_%{base} > > Name: %{modname} > > the spec file is for building mod_proxy_html, not an abstract httpd module; so > use "Name: mod_proxy_html" and hard-code proxy_html as necessary and > mod_proxy_html or %{name} otherwise. > > 2) the with-xml options should go; the module should be linked against -lxml2 > and the conf file purged of LoadFile unconditionally. The upstream method of > providing a deliberately broken module is totally crazy and not something that > should be supported (even as an option) in Fedora. Not sure I follow you. Why does Apache support LoadFile then? Or is it a Fedora policy to discourage using it? (It's not documented in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28httpd.2C_pam.2C_and_SDL.29 so where should I be looking?) > otherwise looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 06:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140637.m7E6bUU0020492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 02:37:29 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 06:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140646.m7E6k2f2012843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2008-08-14 02:46:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: liveusb-creator Short Description: A liveusb creator Owners: kushal, lmacken Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: kushal Packager Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140703.m7E73FF6023760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #14 from Bart Vanbrabant 2008-08-14 03:03:13 EDT --- Thx. I'm not able to request a cvs module. The select box for the fedora-cvs flag is stilled greyed out -> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure What should I do or what am I doing wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:09:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140709.m7E79LnW015881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 03:09:20 EDT --- Okay. * Permission (In reply to comment #2) > I have a warnings from rpmlint: > $ rpmlint gitosis-0.2-5.20080730git.fc9.noarch.rpm > gitosis.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/gitosis gitosis > gitosis.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/gitosis gitosis > gitosis.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/gitosis 0750 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. > > Why? I create gitosis user and homedir by the package with appropriately > permissions (0750). - If you really want 0750 permission, not 0755, then set explicitly the permission as 0750 (by %attr) and _ignore_ the rpmlint error. * Macros ------------------------------------------------------------ 64 %dir %attr(0755,gitosis,gitosis) /var/lib/gitosis ------------------------------------------------------------ - Please change /var to %{_localstatedir} Please fix or modify these issue when importing this package into Fedora. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (gitosis) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:18:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140718.m7E7IvFD025849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 03:18:55 EDT --- Just leaving a comment that I am waiting for spot's license check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:23:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459064] Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140723.m7E7NPqW018093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459064 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-14 03:23:24 EDT --- rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/hyphen-ga-0.20040220-1.fc9.noarch.rpm /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/hyphen-ga-0.20040220-1.fc9.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:22:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459064] New: Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459064 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hyphen-ga.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hyphen-ga-0.20040220-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Irish hyphenation rules as used by libhyphen. Enables optimal hyphenation of Irish in OpenOffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] New: Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Summary: Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: axel.thimm at atrpms.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/italc.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/italc-1.0.9-4.src.rpm Description: iTALC is a use- and powerful didactical tool which lets you view and control computers in your labs and interact with students in a modern way. It supports Linux and Windows NT/2000/XP and it even can be used transparently in mixed environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:30:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140730.m7E7UUZ5027936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #38 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-14 03:30:28 EDT --- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-fedora.spec http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-1.2.0-6.src.rpm Now builds against 2.6.27 headers (w/o __user) as well. Since the package is not that big _smp_mflags just messes up the build output, so I prefer to keep it w/o (it's a soft SHOULD in the Packaging guidelines and not even mentioned in the review guidelines :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 07:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459064] Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140754.m7E7sYLP030995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459064 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-14 03:54:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=777087 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. bd410dd925853de0dc7e5e117ac2555d hyph_ga_IE.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text NOT is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: Ask upstream to include license text file in next upstream release. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 08:07:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459064] Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140807.m7E87QXo001410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459064 --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-14 04:07:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-ga Short Description: Irish Hyphenation Rules Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Packager Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 08:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455032] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl5000-firmware_-_Firmwa?= =?utf-8?q?re_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140812.m7E8CfGt002457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-14 04:12:40 EDT --- No. This package is a nodist and noarch package. The F-8 built will be inherited in the F-9 stable repository once it will hi the F-8 stable repository. Did you tried it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 08:40:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458405] Review Request: pisg - Perl IRC Statistics Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140840.m7E8ePmp007147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458405 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 09:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140904.m7E94EPv002150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr --- Comment #29 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-14 05:04:13 EDT --- New branch CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guake Short Description: Drop-down terminal for GNOME Owners: pingou Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 09:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808140942.m7E9g1e1008683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #15 from Tomas Mraz 2008-08-14 05:42:00 EDT --- Weird, I can set the flag without problems. Perhaps there are some sync problems between bugzilla and Fedora Account System? I think you are member of all the groups you need to be in FAS so that should not be a problem. Can you try to relogin into bugzila and if that doesn't help can you report the problem to the bugzilla-owner at redhat.com ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 10:05:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459073] New: Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 Summary: Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/iok/iok.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/iok/iok-1.0.7-2.svn9.fc9.src.rpm Description: iok is Indic Onscreen Keyboard. This package gives virtual Keyboard functionality. It currently works with Inscript keymaps for Indian languages. iok can even try to parse non-inscript keymaps and show them in iok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 10:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141008.m7EA8qSH020873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-08-14 06:08:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Uh, thanks. I meant to add it before I submitted the review. Here it is: I recommend not use a vendor in desktop-file-install. You really must provide an icon: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files And therefore you need to add hicolor-icon-theme to Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 10:08:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141008.m7EA8GBo020840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-14 06:08:14 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=777244 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 10:25:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141025.m7EAPCdf023288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-08-14 06:25:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Uh, thanks. I meant to add it before I submitted the review. Here it is: > > I recommend not use a vendor in desktop-file-install. The current guidelines still demand a vendor, but I agree that it seems to be better to not use it. > You really must provide an icon: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > > And therefore you need to add hicolor-icon-theme to Requires. I do not see there, that I have to provide an icon, there is only described how the icon should be specified in the desktop file. The Desktop Entry Specification that is linked there also says, that an icon is not required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 10:37:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141037.m7EAbHul016339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-14 06:37:16 EDT --- updated package Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/iok/iok.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/iok/iok-1.0.7-3.svn9.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Aug 14 2008 Parag Nemade - 1.0.7-3.svn9 - fix directory ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141115.m7EBFbkN030938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 --- Comment #29 from David Hollis 2008-08-14 07:15:36 EDT --- Waiting on sponsorship or for someone to take this package and run with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141112.m7EBCo6G030189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #52 from Miles Sabin 2008-08-14 07:12:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Miles, perhaps we could become co-maintainers for the scala package? It'd be > really good to have a couple people on it since this package turns out to be > very complicated. Yes, I think that would be a good plan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141115.m7EBF4jM022329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 --- Comment #6 from David Hollis 2008-08-14 07:15:03 EDT --- Just waiting on sponsorship, or if someone wants to take this package under their wing, that's fine by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141125.m7EBPl7A000451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 Roy Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrankin at ihug.com.au --- Comment #1 from Roy Rankin 2008-08-14 07:25:46 EDT --- I have run the spec file against rpmlint and it gives the following result. whatsup.spec:122: E: files-attr-not-set whatsup.spec:123: E: files-attr-not-set whatsup.spec:124: E: files-attr-not-set whatsup.spec:125: E: files-attr-not-set whatsup.spec:126: E: files-attr-not-set 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings. These errors a result of a missing %defattr(-,root,root,-) The packages compiles OK under Mock. License looks OK The current upstream version of the package is 1.8-1 (which came out after this review was requested), The package should be upgraded to the current version which may eliminate the need for the patches. I did not finish the review as the spec file is fixed and the package update a full review can be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141131.m7EBVC7Y001322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Bug 456337 depends on bug 456316, which changed state. Bug 456316 Summary: Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456316] Review Request: netbeans-svnclientadapter - Subversion Client Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141131.m7EBVAG1001276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456316 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-14 07:31:08 EDT --- The Branch F-9 has been wrongly requested. It was removed from the cvs repository. Koji shows successful build status: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=775851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457888] Review Request: fwknop - A Single Packet Authorization (SPA) implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141135.m7EBZav2002139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457888 Bug 457888 depends on bug 457544, which changed state. Bug 457544 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 11:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457544] Review Request: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr - A Perl extension for manipulating iptables policies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141135.m7EBZZeH002109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457544 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pvrabec at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-14 07:35:33 EDT --- done. (mitr is on vacation) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459081] New: Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459081 Summary: Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pvrabec at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/psad-2.1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/psad.spec Description: Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) is a collection of three lightweight system daemons written in Perl and in C that are designed to work with Linux iptables firewalling code to detect port scans and other suspect traffic. It features a set of highly configurable danger thresholds (with sensible defaults provided), verbose alert messages that include the source, destination, scanned port range, begin and end times, tcp flags and corresponding nmap options, reverse DNS info, email and syslog alerting, automatic blocking of offending ip addresses via dynamic configuration of iptables rulesets, and passive operating system fingerprinting. In addition, psad incorporates many of the tcp, udp, and icmp signatures included in the snort intrusion detection system (http://www.snort.org) to detect highly suspect scans for various backdoor programs (e.g. EvilFTP, GirlFriend, SubSeven), DDoS tools (mstream, shaft), and advanced port scans (syn, fin, xmas) which are easily leveraged against a machine via nmap. psad can also alert on snort signatures that are logged via fwsnort (http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwsnort/), which makes use of the iptables string match module to detect application layer signatures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:14:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459081] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141214.m7ECEHjd000990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459081 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459081] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141219.m7ECJW8p002490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459081 --- Comment #2 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-14 08:19:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: psad Short Description: Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic Owners: pvrabec Branches: InitialCC: Packager Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:15:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459081] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141215.m7ECFItD001657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459081 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2008-08-14 08:15:17 EDT --- Package looks fine for me (rpmlint, spec, build process), reviewed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:15:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459084] New: Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459084 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hyphen-sv.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hyphen-sv-0.20030814-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules as used by libhyphen, used by OOo to hyphenate words. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141218.m7ECIkHw010655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-14 08:18:45 EDT --- New revision: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.0.0-0.2.svn.fc9.src.rpm More modularization (to avoid excessive dependencies), more cleanups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:28:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141228.m7ECSLF3004974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-08-14 08:28:19 EDT --- To clarify, anything with an XX should be resolved. Also, the output of OUTPUT of "rpmbuild --rebuild rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm " Does build, but gives me the following warnings: [bkearney at localhost pierce]$ rpmbuild --rebuild rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Installing rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20548 + umask 022 If you resolve and reload the rpms I will re-verify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141238.m7ECcAke007183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #53 from Geoff Reedy 2008-08-14 08:38:09 EDT --- Ok, here we go: http://www.programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala.spec http://www.programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala-2.7.1-2.srpm I just also noticed that I forgot to set the release back down to -1 so there's no entry in the changelog for -2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:44:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141244.m7ECiJYP016474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-14 08:44:17 EDT --- The sync between FAS and bugzilla is currently being done manually, about once per day. Reporting this to the bugzilla people is not productive as it is not their fault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141244.m7ECi1JH016396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #5 from srinivas 2008-08-14 08:43:59 EDT --- Hello Matt, I have incorporated the changes as per your suggestion. Please find the updated spec file and the SRPM at the following location: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcc/sblim-sfcc.spec http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcc/ SRPM: sblim-sfcc-2.1.0-0.src.rpm Thanks Srinivas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:47:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141247.m7EClnCu008839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-08-14 08:47:48 EDT --- UPDATED: Specfile: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler.spec SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm RPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-3.fc9.noarch.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > * General > > OK - Package name > But why a gem? It makes it easier for developers to consume it as a dependency, along the lines of Maven. > XX - License info is accurate > > Specify LGPL based on COPYING File Fixed. It is now LGPLv2+, same as Cobbler. > XX - Specfile is legible > > Explicitly list the test files, and their permissions. No Loops. Done. > XX - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) > > OUTPUT of "rpmbuild --rebuild rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm " > Installing rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm > warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root > warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root > warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root > warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root > Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412 > + umask 022 > + cd /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/BUILD > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412: line 23: cd: /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/BUILD: No such > file or directory > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412 (%prep) This error's not due to the RPM. > XX - rpmlint is silent > > rpmlint rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm > rubygem-cobbler.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: > line 8) > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > rpmlint rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm > rubygem-cobbler.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml > rubygem-cobbler.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Fixed. > XX - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it > > [bkearney at localhost noarch]$ sudo rpm --install > rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm > package rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch is already installed > [bkearney at localhost noarch]$ irb > irb(main):001:0> require "cobbler" > LoadError: no such file to load -- cobbler > from (irb):1:in `require' > from (irb):1 Fixed. In the GemSpec, require_path was misconfigured as "." rather than "lib". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458678] Review Request: picviz - Parallel coordinates plotter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141248.m7ECm3L2017216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458678 Tomas Heinrich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141252.m7ECqkdH017975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Lev Shamardin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:56:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141256.m7ECu9QH018649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-08-14 08:56:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The current guidelines still demand a vendor, but I agree that it seems to be > better to not use it. Guidelines say that using this form is acceptable: desktop-file-install --vendor="" \ [...] As you noted it is a suggestion :) > I do not see there, that I have to provide an icon, there is only described how > the icon should be specified in the desktop file. The Desktop Entry > Specification that is linked there also says, that an icon is not required. I think that this will be the first GUI package in Fedora not to use an icon... not a nice thing to see. You can ask to the Art Team for one. I just noticed that you missed the use of the %{name} macro here: Source0: http://freefoote.dview.net/linux/gpscorrelate-%{version}.tar.gz The Debian package has a man page. You might want to include it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 12:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] New: Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Summary: Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shamardin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec SRPM URL: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.0-0.1.beta.fc8.src.rpm Description: Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data in an efficient yet extensible format. Google uses Protocol Buffers for almost all of its internal RPC protocols and file formats. Protocol buffers are a flexible, efficient, automated mechanism for serializing structured data ? think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler. You define how you want your data to be structured once, then you can use special generated source code to easily write and read your structured data to and from a variety of data streams and using a variety of languages. You can even update your data structure without breaking deployed programs that are compiled against the "old" format. Project homepage: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ This is my first package for Fedora and I am seeking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141304.m7ED4UqF011632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #17 from Tomas Mraz 2008-08-14 09:04:28 EDT --- I have added this information to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141307.m7ED7hxw012731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-14 09:07:41 EDT --- The next release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://www.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2042/beansbinding.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2108/beansbinding-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - java-devel & jpackage-utils are added as the build requirements - jpackage-utils is added as the run-time requirement - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - Redundant run-time requirements for /bin/* utilities are removed - A ghost symlink for javadoc directory is removed - Documentation added rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141314.m7EDEnHR013870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 09:14:48 EDT --- For -3: ! desktop-file-validate ------------------------------------------------------ find . -name '*.desktop' | while read file; do /usr/bin/desktop-file-validate "$file" done ------------------------------------------------------ - These lines are redundant because desktop-file-install fails is desktop file to be installed is invalid (some warning are suppressed with desktop-file-install, though) * Document entry ------------------------------------------------------ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc %{hocrdocdir} ------------------------------------------------------ - This contains the directory %hocrdocdir and all files/directories under %hocrdocdir, i.e. including %hocrdorcdir/examples, while this is also included in -doc subpackage. By the way: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141319.m7EDJHaH014892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 09:19:15 EDT --- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (UnihanDb) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141320.m7EDKn9T015550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dnovotny at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-14 09:20:47 EDT --- Two interesting things: There is nobody CC'd on this ticket. Amanda has just changed ownership. I've CC'd the new maintainer; maybe this can get cleaned up and closed out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:36:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141336.m7EDa18I025686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #54 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 09:36:00 EDT --- Again I leave a note that as written in comment 40 I am still waiting for _another_ review request or a _pre-review_ of a review request by other person from Geoff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141345.m7EDj528027286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 09:45:03 EDT --- Closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file another review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:51:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141351.m7EDpBsa021385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225669 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-14 09:51:09 EDT --- Terje: Did you intend to approve this ticket? It's closed but fedora-review is still set to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 13:50:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141350.m7EDo9mL021118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #55 from Miles Sabin 2008-08-14 09:50:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > Again I leave a note that as written in comment 40 I am still waiting > for _another_ review request or a _pre-review_ of a review request by other > person from Geoff. Does it help if I "officially" become a prospective co-maintainer of this package? I'm upstream for Scala (I work full-time on the Scala Eclipse plugin, and I have commit rights for the Scala compiler, libraries and tools source trees, write access to the web-site, wiki etc.). At some point I expect to sumbit a review request of a packaging of the Scala Eclipse plugin. In the very near future I will be submitting review requests for a number of Haskell packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455032] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl5000-firmware_-_Firmwa?= =?utf-8?q?re_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 5000 A/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141402.m7EE2eV6023595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455032 --- Comment #10 from Jarod Wilson 2008-08-14 10:02:39 EDT --- Nicolas, I don't think the process is automatic, you probably have to prod someone in rel-eng to manually inherit this up to F9 and devel. I had to do so for another firmware package just a few weeks ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141407.m7EE7l7p031686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:07:46 EDT --- Now regarding the initial reporter as not responding. To Chitlesh: If you want to take over the maintainership of this package please resubmit CVS request (note that this package is already in Fedora CVS) with including maintainer change request. If no progress happens with two weeks, I _really_ close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:09:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448337] Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141409.m7EE9t1X024984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:09:54 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141413.m7EED31O025900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:13:02 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141413.m7EEDoif000608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:13:49 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141414.m7EEEtqe026238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:14:54 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141429.m7EETWij028890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:29:31 EDT --- Claudio, would you still interested in importing this package into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141425.m7EEPEd6028312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #56 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:25:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #55) > (In reply to comment #54) > > Again I leave a note that as written in comment 40 I am still waiting > > for _another_ review request or a _pre-review_ of a review request by other > > person from Geoff. > > Does it help if I "officially" become a prospective co-maintainer of this > package? No. I am waiting from Geoff as this is requested for a new contributor to be sponsored. Of course co-maintaining is always welcome :) (however if you want to co-maintain this package you also have to get sponsored beforehand) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:32:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141432.m7EEWb3F004462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #18 from Jeff Goldschrafe 2008-08-14 10:32:35 EDT --- It's tricky, because the standard isn't as transparent as that -- sysconf(_SC_HOST_NAME_MAX) can return -1, indicating that there _is_ no maximum host name size, and the application should handle that value accordingly. This one doesn't, and until this is changed upstream, I think it's a better idea to mangle the code as little as possible and just provide a sensible default instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459110] New: Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459110 Summary: Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/protobuf.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/protobuf-2.0.0-0.1.beta.fc9.src.rpm Description: Protocol buffers are a flexible, efficient, automated mechanism for serializing structured data ? think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler. You define how you want your data to be structured once, then you can use special generated source code to easily write and read your structured data to and from a variety of data streams and using a variety of languages. You can even update your data structure without breaking deployed programs that are compiled against the "old" format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459110] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers are a way of encoding structured data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141439.m7EEd4ai030986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459110 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-14 10:39:03 EDT --- This was already submitted today; perhaps you could work with the submitter of the other ticket. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 459088 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141439.m7EEd6Au031019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-14 10:39:03 EDT --- *** Bug 459110 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:36:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141436.m7EEaUO4030848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #57 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 10:36:29 EDT --- By the way: Rebuild failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=777548 Note: Now on rawhide patches are applied with --fuzz=0 by default and build.log says applying a patch fails with this option. So: - Please re-generate the patch in issue so that it can be applied with --fuzz=0 - or add "%define _default_patch_fuzz 2" if you want to use the default fuzz by patch. Ref: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg00477.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:56:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141456.m7EEufCO001720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-14 10:56:40 EDT --- Should be fixed. SPEC URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gresolver/gresolver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gresolver/gresolver-0.0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 14:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141449.m7EEn2fh007013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #58 from Geoff Reedy 2008-08-14 10:49:01 EDT --- I have made some pre-reviews on #446097 and #428549 I'll re-generate the patch and re-upload tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141525.m7EFPhJ2013703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 --- Comment #5 from Michal Marciniszyn 2008-08-14 11:25:42 EDT --- Latest bro package looks good. Problems reported by rpmlint are more caused due to the presence of #! sequence in the begining of some bro conf files. Bro successfully builds on i386/x86_64 and runs on both of those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141528.m7EFSNuB006943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-14 11:28:22 EDT --- All issues were fixed, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141529.m7EFTBiF006996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-14 11:29:09 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2040/appframework.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2109/appframework-1.03-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - java-devel & jpackage-utils are added as the build requirements - jpackage-utils is added as the run-time requirement - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - Redundant run-time requirements for /bin/* utilities are removed - A ghost symlink for javadoc package is removed - Documentation added - Both build-time and run-time requirements for the swing-layout package are added - Redundant dependency on swing-worker is removed, because it is included as a part of JRE since version 6. rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:37:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141537.m7EFbffD008850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-14 11:37:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name:gresoler Short Description:Graphical DNS query tool Owners:s4504kr Branches:F-9, F-8 InitialCC: Packager Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: Bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141536.m7EFaLOF008634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 --- Comment #6 from Dan Kope?ek 2008-08-14 11:36:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bro Short Description: Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System Owners: dkopecek Branches: InitialCC: pvrabec Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:31:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141531.m7EFVGpu007723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-14 11:31:15 EDT --- The upstream have created a new prerelease of the upcomming version 1.1 of opencobol which should solve the knewn issues. I have created packages based on this prerelease. New upaloaded files: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/open-cobol/open-cobol/open-cobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/open-cobol/open-cobol/open-cobol-1.0.90-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:43:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] New: Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Summary: Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/FreeCAD.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/FreeCAD-0.7.1514-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 This package isn't yet ready for import, but This Review is aimed to track the needed work and others remaining TODO items. This package itself depend on WildMagic4 (I will submit soon) There is a need to remove it from FreeCAD and build a shared version of WildMagic4 Known to work only on F-8 (OpenCASCADE fails on F-9) and x86_64 (for some reason SoQt-qt4 Conflict only on x86 when trying to run mock) Maybe someone could take a look at http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mount/ANN and http://www.xdp.it/cximage.htm for packaging... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141546.m7EFk76T017203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458975] Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141546.m7EFkoSw017407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459125 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:46:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458974] Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141546.m7EFknbC017390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459125 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 15:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141546.m7EFkmub017362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458974, 458975 Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:03:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141603.m7EG3gFp020594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #29 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-08-14 12:03:40 EDT --- I think either way would end up functionally the same; however, if we link against libxml2, we then get an implicit requires against libxml2 although I suppose you could just manually add an explicit Requires as well. I'm not a technical expert on the subject at all however, so I'd be interested in hearing why LoadFile would be a better alternative than linking? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141605.m7EG5nXT014025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #19 from Jeff Goldschrafe 2008-08-14 12:05:48 EDT --- Submitted a better patch upstream to use sysconf(_SC_HOST_NAME_MAX) as recommended. Included patch in new 0.18-4: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:13:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141613.m7EGDwZ9015674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #59 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-14 12:13:56 EDT --- Well: * bug 428549 is already closed, so I cannot verify if your pre-review is proper * bug 446097 is open, however based on my criterion your pre-review is not satisfactory. Would you re-prereview bug 446097 ? General packaging guidelines are written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Some points for pre-review of bug 446097: - Please check the item "MUST: In the vast majority of cases...." of ReviewGuidelines wiki. This is usually also applied to any subpackages. - Please check the %files list. Are there any duplicate files (between subpackages)? - Also check the "ScriptletSnippets" wiki. Some files are under %_datadir/icons/hicolor/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141618.m7EGI6E1016542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #30 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-14 12:18:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > I think either way would end up functionally the same; however, if we link > against libxml2, we then get an implicit requires against libxml2 although I > suppose you could just manually add an explicit Requires as well. > > I'm not a technical expert on the subject at all however, so I'd be interested > in hearing why LoadFile would be a better alternative than linking? Using a loadfile is certainly not the way to go in fedora. Linking against libxml2 doesn't only add an automatic requires, this is a mere side effect of adding the soname dependency on the right libxml2 version in the binary (something along libxml2.so.2). The binary will refuse to run if the libxml2 shared object with the right version isn't found. There are ways to use another library at runtime (certainly by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH), using LoadFile (which certainly does a dlopen) is not right. Ther are cases where using LoadFile or similar are right (like plugins for example), but here it doesn't seems to be the case at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141623.m7EGN4WH018006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-14 12:23:03 EDT --- open-cobol-1.0.90-1.fc9.src.rpm looks broken to me (size 966401 bytes), I can't rebuild it or open in midnight commander. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459084] Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141624.m7EGONeR018203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459084 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-14 12:24:22 EDT --- picking this for review. koji scratch build is giving timed out. will do review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:31:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141631.m7EGVEJ9019925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-14 12:31:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Maybe someone could take a look at http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mount/ANN and > http://www.xdp.it/cximage.htm for packaging... I will look at them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141649.m7EGn4Ul023357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 Justin Zygmont changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |solarflow99 at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Justin Zygmont 2008-08-14 12:49:02 EDT --- i'm getting stuck, this whole process seems less than straight forward to me. I have followed the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and I don't know what else to do, this is my first package, do you know where I am on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 16:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141648.m7EGmniB029921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-14 12:48:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I've fixed the rpmlint errors, and updated the package to the new upstream version. Spec: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/whatsup.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/whatsup-1.8-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 17:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141703.m7EH3QQe026247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-14 13:03:25 EDT --- You need patience. We have 800+ packages waiting on review. I would suggest that you either submit more packages or review existing packages. The details are given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 17:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] New: Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 Summary: Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: CTemplate is a simple but powerful template language for C++. It emphasizes separating logic from presentation: it is impossible to embed application logic in this template language. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ctemplate.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ctemplate-0.90-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 18:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] New: Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 Summary: Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: txt2rss is a shell script that parses a simple txt file (in a simple format) and convert it to RSS feed file. Simple to use and intuitive, you need to set up a config file with parameter like webmaster's name, link of the site and others, after you just call the script with options like and a . SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/txt2rss.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/txt2rss-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 18:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141826.m7EIQPIu017914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-14 14:26:24 EDT --- Sorry for this mistake, I have uploaded the source rpm again and have double checked the upload -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 18:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141833.m7EIXxW7012806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-14 14:33:58 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2044/freemarker.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2110/freemarker-2.3.13-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - Versions of java-devel & jpackage-utils are corrected - Name of dir for javadoc is changed - Manual is removed due to http://freemarker.org/docs/index.html rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 18:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141846.m7EIksKV015271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459153 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 18:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141846.m7EIkrjt015242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459125 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 18:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] New: Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Summary: Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ann.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ann-1.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ANN is a library written in the C++ programming language to support both exact and approximate nearest neighbor searching in spaces of various dimensions. It was implemented by David M. Mount of the University of Maryland, and Sunil Arya of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. ANN (pronounced like the name ``Ann'') stands for Approximate Nearest Neighbors. ANN is also a testbed containing programs and procedures for generating data sets, collecting and analyzing statistics on the performance of nearest neighbor algorithms and data structures, and visualizing the geometric structure of these data structures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 19:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459161] New: Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459161 Summary: Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/wraplinux.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/wraplinux-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm A tool to wrap an x86 Linux kernel and one or more initrd files into a single file in ELF or NBI format, as required by some booting protocols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 19:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141945.m7EJj7WU001077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-14 15:45:06 EDT --- I have reported upstream, about header files not going to proper place and an extra folder being created which doesn't make sense. I assume it as a cosmetic issue and non-blocking one. Other all issues are taken care. 1. rpmlint & timestamp 2. python module & unittest 3. removed useless stuff SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gflags.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gflags-0.9-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 19:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808141955.m7EJtIPL003304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #2 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-08-14 15:55:16 EDT --- I didn't realize someone else was working on this. Feel free to take any pieces from this version that you need: Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/protobuf.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/protobuf-2.0.0-0.1.beta.fc9.src.rpm I didn't include the python stuff, but I did include a vim package and a pkgconfig file, which is isn't in the protocol buffers release, but probably should be. You might want to contact upstream (Google) about adding it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 19:59:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] New: Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-assembler.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: peak.util.assembler is a simple bytecode assembler module that handles most low-level bytecode generation details like jump offsets, stack size tracking, line number table generation, constant and variable name index tracking, etc. That way, you can focus your attention on the desired semantics of your bytecode instead of on these mechanical issues. In addition to a low-level opcode-oriented API for directly generating specific Python bytecodes, this module also offers an extensible mini-AST framework for generating code from high-level specifications. This framework does most of the work needed to transform tree-like structures into linear bytecode instructions, and includes the ability to do compile-time constant folding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 19:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459173] New: Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-extremes.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The peak.util.extremes module provides a production-quality implementation of the Min and Max objects from PEP 326. While PEP 326 was rejected for inclusion in the language or standard library, the objects described in it are useful in a variety of applications. In PEAK, they have been used to implement generic functions (in RuleDispatch and PEAK-Rules), as well as to handle scheduling and time operations in the Trellis. Because this has led to each project copying the same code, we've now split the module out so it can be used independently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 19:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] New: Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-symbols.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SymbolType gives you access to the peak.util.symbols module, previously available only by installing the full PEAK toolkit. peak.util.symbols provides a Symbol type and two built-in symbols that are used by PEAK: NOT_FOUND and NOT_GIVEN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3KCm031074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459175 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3Jfg031049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459172 Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] New: Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9.src.rpm Description: SymbolType gives you access to the peak.util.symbols module, previously available only by installing the full PEAK toolkit. peak.util.symbols provides a Symbol type and two built-in symbols that are used by PEAK: NOT_FOUND and NOT_GIVEN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] New: Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: In any sufficiently-sized application or framework, it's common to end up lumping a lot of different concerns into the same class. For example, you may have business logic, persistence code, and UI all jammed into a single class. Attribute and method names for all sorts of different operations get shoved into a single namespace -- even when using mixin classes. Separating concerns into different objects, however, makes it easier to write reusable and separately-testable components. The AddOns package (``peak.util.addons``) lets you manage concerns using ``AddOn`` classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459173] Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3sh2005277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3r0D005256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3uWh005317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3tqS005297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:03:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142003.m7EK3q0x005232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459176, 459175, 459173, | |459172 Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142006.m7EK6oLU031970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142006.m7EK6lQK031929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142006.m7EK6q8x032013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142006.m7EK6pqd031992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459173] Review Request: python-peak-util-extremes - Production-quality 'Min' and 'Max' objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142006.m7EK6nHm031950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459173 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142015.m7EKFAck007507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-14 16:15:09 EDT --- New rev.: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.0.0-0.3.svn.fc9.src.rpm Since iLBC isn\t acceptable for Fedora, I decided to use conditional switch "with_ilbc". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142021.m7EKLDF4008611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Oron Peled changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oron at actcom.co.il --- Comment #1 from Oron Peled 2008-08-14 16:21:12 EDT --- This is not an official review, but some preliminary observations: 1. There is no ownership info in %files. You should add something like: %defattr(-,root,root,-) Or alternatively specify %attr(-,owner,group) before files that have specific ownership/groupship. 2. Release tag should be: Release: 1%{dist} 3. License should be clarified. Pick the correct string from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing More info in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Your LICENSE file looks like GPLv2 4. This is a web application and it would fail to run with SELinux activated. You should fix the context of the cgi script. For a quick howto, look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux And probably create a subpackage fedora-ds-graph-selinux 5. No docs whatsoever. As a minimum you can add the COPYING and CHANGELOG files. Also... 6. Since you are the upstream author: * Adding a README would be even nicer. * The common name is ChangeLog and not CHANGELOG. * Exclude the .svn from the tarball, either via tar command line flags, or by using 'svn export' for the tarball. 7. Dependencies: * The cgi is in perl and uses some modules in other packages, so: Requires: perl, rrdtool-perl * Time::Local and Symbol are part of perl package itself. OK. 8. The init script (ds-graph) does not follow Fedora common behaviour: * Should use daemon function. * Should touch and rm /var/lock/subsys/ds-graph * Should observe exit status and return appropriate values. Hope it helps and thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142023.m7EKN4bY008873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-14 16:23:03 EDT --- Hmmmm, something weird with fedorapeople.org (I could achieve only 2-3 kbytes/s using sshfs), so srpm still doesn't uploaded. Nevertheless, only spec-file changed since last revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 20:30:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459161] Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142030.m7EKUf18010132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459161 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Warren Togami 2008-08-14 16:30:40 EDT --- As requested by drago01: - Builds in mock (yes it really doesn't have any build reqs) - wraplinux.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/wraplinux This is the only rpmlint warning. Asking hpa upstream if this was intended or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 21:14:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142114.m7ELEsOI016523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #21 from mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-08-14 17:14:52 EDT --- I thought we were waiting on Legal for the name. I have the fix with the ldconfig, but I have other changes that would horribly break if I committed everything (my SVN policy isn't really The Right Way with me being the only developer). If needed, I'll update the SRPM and SPEC there, but it won't match upstream for a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 21:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] New: Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 Summary: Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgrubb at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/prelude-notify.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/prelude-notify-0.9-0.1.svn10860.fc9.src.rpm Description: Prelude-notify is a desktop oriented application that works as a monitoring tool that capture events from prelude manager using the prelude connection pool event checker. Its purpose is to help security managers and/or administrators to see in real time what's going on in their network. This is a svn snapshot with the final release occurring in the next day or two. I'm using svn snapshot just to get through packaging review and will switch over to release at the first opportunity. In order to run it, you need to be using libprelude from rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 22:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142205.m7EM5OVD023728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 22:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142205.m7EM5IwF017484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 22:39:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142239.m7EMdnIU022553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Rob Crittenden changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rcritten at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Rob Crittenden 2008-08-14 18:39:48 EDT --- rpmlint complains that the license is unknown. The spec defines it as PSF or ZPL. The possiblilities for ZPL are: ZPLv1.0, ZPLv1.0+, ZPLv2.0, ZPLv2.0+, ZPLv2.1, or ZPLv2.1+ Is PSF the Python license? The %doc files all have executable permissions!? (e.g. /usr/share/doc/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev/Indexing.txt) The changelog version doesn't match the RPM version: 1.0-1 vs 0.5a1.dev-0.2569 The Source0 URL is incorrect. I found it at http://peak.telecommunity.com/snapshots/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 23:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142313.m7ENDxPN028559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2008-08-14 19:13:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint complains that the license is unknown. The spec defines it as PSF or > ZPL. > > The possiblilities for ZPL are: ZPLv1.0, ZPLv1.0+, ZPLv2.0, ZPLv2.0+, ZPLv2.1, > or ZPLv2.1+ > Is PSF the Python license? I believe so, yes. I'm not quite sure about what to do with the License tag, as it says "PSF or ZPL" in the docs... > The %doc files all have executable permissions!? (e.g. > /usr/share/doc/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev/Indexing.txt) Fixed. > The changelog version doesn't match the RPM version: 1.0-1 vs 0.5a1.dev-0.2569 Fixed. > The Source0 URL is incorrect. I found it at > http://peak.telecommunity.com/snapshots/ Fixed. http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules.spec http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 23:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142315.m7ENFCLh002711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |victor.vasilyev at sun.com Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 14 23:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808142325.m7ENPGXD030691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #13 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-08-14 19:25:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: UnihanDb Short Description: The Unihan Character database in 5NF Owners: dchen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: dchen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 00:01:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150001.m7F01RSr004850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-14 20:01:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314363) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314363) Updated spec fixing absolute symlinks The symlinks program is failing to convert your absolute symlink to a relative one because, although your absolute symlink is correctly formed in the package, it's dangling within the buildroot. If you're intending to use the symlinks program, you need to generate your absolute symlink such that the target is also within the buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:22:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459210] New: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/gnustep-base.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/gnustep-base-1.16.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: The GNUstep Base Library is a powerful fast library of general-purpose, non-graphical Objective C classes, inspired by the superb OpenStep API but implementing Apple and GNU additions to the API as well. It includes for example classes for unicode strings, arrays, dictionaries, sets, byte streams, typed coders, invocations, notifications, notification dispatchers, scanners, tasks, files, networking, threading, remote object messaging support (distributed objects), event loops, loadable bundles, attributed unicode strings, xml, mime, user defaults. This package includes development headers too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:27:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459212] Review Request: oolite-data - Data files for Oolite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150127.m7F1RaSA016504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459212 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:27:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150127.m7F1RbKI016528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459212 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] New: Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Summary: Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite-1.65-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Oolite is a space sim game, inspired by Elite, powered by Objective-C and OpenGL, and designed as a small game that is easy for users to pick up, modify and expand upon. Almost every aspect of the game can be changed by using simple, free graphics packages and text editors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150126.m7F1QU9m022943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150126.m7F1QSHD022918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 01:27:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459212] New: Review Request: oolite-data - Data files for Oolite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: oolite-data - Data files for Oolite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459212 Summary: Review Request: oolite-data - Data files for Oolite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite-data.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite-data-1.65-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Data files for Oolite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459161] Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150211.m7F2Blme022039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459161 --- Comment #2 from Warren Togami 2008-08-14 22:11:46 EDT --- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/wraplinux.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/wraplinux-1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm No remaining rpmlint warnings, builds cleanly in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:18:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] New: Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 Summary: Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at gohanman.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/freetds-devel/freetds-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/freetds-devel/freetds-devel-0.64-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Provides headers not included in the current freetds package. Useful for compiling programs that rely on freetds (e.g., perl & python Sybase modules; custom build of php w/ mssql support). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150219.m7F2JTqv029607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 --- Comment #1 from andy at gohanman.com 2008-08-14 22:19:28 EDT --- Forgot to mention, first submission. In need of sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459161] Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150218.m7F2Ifeh029556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459161 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-14 22:18:40 EDT --- Looks clean. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459084] Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150239.m7F2d9mE025840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459084 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-14 22:39:08 EDT --- Koji still giving problem. This is simple package so I will directly review this. Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. a1c31b48cbf570bb05f22e98dacb9e17 hyph_sv_SE.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:43:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150243.m7F2heCc000636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-14 22:43:38 EDT --- Can't the lame related items be run-time detected? Would you ask upstream if they are interested in something like this or gstreamer? If it can't be done, might be worth it to patch the man page or add a README.dist file explaining what has been changed or maybe provide a macro to rebuild it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 02:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459218] New: Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459218 Summary: Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-morph.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-morph-0.89-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The image morphology toolbox implements the basic binary and grayscale morphology operations, working with numpy arrays to hold image data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 03:15:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150315.m7F3F956031279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #3 from Rob Crittenden 2008-08-14 23:15:08 EDT --- >From what I can tell from http://www.python.org/psf/license/ PSF is Python Software Foundation so using "Python" seems the right thing for PSF. ZPL is defined at http://www.zope.org/Resources/ZPL but you'd need to ask the author which version he wants to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 03:17:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150317.m7F3HlwL005491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #3 from Roy Rankin 2008-08-14 23:17:46 EDT --- OK rpmlint is silent. OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile named properly OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). OK license field matches the actual license. OK license file included in %doc OK Specfile in english and readable OK source files match upstream and latest version(md5sum matches) OK package builds in mock (rawhide/i386). N/A specfile handles locales properly OK Package owns directories it creates OK Requires packages owning non-core directories it uses OK No duplicte files in %files OK %defattr(...) in every %files section OK valid %clean section OK consistent use of macros OK package includes code N/A Large documentation in -doc subpackage OK %doc files not required for running OK .h files in -devel subpackage N/A static libraries must be in -static subpackage N/A Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) must require pkgconfig OK If package contains lib files with suffix .so files in -devel OK -devel subpackage requires base package with versions OK no .la libtool not included in packages N/A GUI applications handle %{name}.desktop file properly OK %install runs rm -rf %{buildroot} OK filenames in packages use valid UTF-8 OK dist tag is present. rpmlint output: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 03:48:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150348.m7F3mGHh002226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 --- Comment #5 from Clint Savage 2008-08-14 23:48:15 EDT --- Rahul, What do you mean 'lame related items be run-time detected'? The application can be built without the lame libraries altogether, no patch needed. Why would we want to include them? Cheers, Clint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 04:01:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150401.m7F41YrY010367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-15 00:01:33 EDT --- I didn't say we would want to include them. I was thinking of a xine-lib like solution to the problem where third repos can add what is being removed here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 04:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150413.m7F4DDaZ011510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 --- Comment #7 from Clint Savage 2008-08-15 00:13:12 EDT --- Rahul, Oh, if a thirdparty repo wants to build darkice-nonfree or something, its a simple matter of requiring the right libraries. The configure script would take care of that already. I have simply omitted those libraries in my build. Make more sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 04:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150425.m7F4P0QX012791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 04:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] New: Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 Summary: Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-chewing.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-chewing-0.1.1.20080815-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Chewing engine for IBus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 05:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffc - Computer version of the board game Rush Hou In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150514.m7F5EcKu011912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 --- Comment #3 from Geoff Reedy 2008-08-15 01:14:36 EDT --- Some additional items have been brought to my attention, so I'm redoing this pre-review. MUST Items: ok - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ok - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. ok - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ok - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. ?? - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. The SWIG generated source file contains a BSD licensing clause. I'm not certain if it is just advising that SWIG is under BSD or declaring that it's output file is under BSD. This might mean that the proper License tag is GPLv2+ and BSD. ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ok - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. I suggest changing the puzzle count to 19,000 as that is the American convention ok - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ok - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. ?? - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. koji is down at the moment so I can't attempt build on the other architectures - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the [[Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions |exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines]] ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. na - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. na - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. ok - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. ok - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. XX - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. The base package includes the extra theme files intended to be in the themes subpackage. The files section for the base package needs to have something like: %dir %{_datadir}/pytraffic %{_datadir}/pytraffic/*.py %{_datadir}/pytraffic/*.pyo %{_datadir}/pytraffic/*.pyc %{_datadir}/pytraffic/config.db %{_datadir}/pytraffic/doc %{_datadir}/pytraffic/libglade %{_datadir}/pytraffic/music %{_datadir}/pytraffic/*.egg-info %{_datadir}/pytraffic/*.desktop %{_datadir}/pytraffic/sound_test %{_datadir}/pytraffic/themes %{_datadir}/pytraffic/ttraffic.levels ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ok - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. ok - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. na - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. na - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. na - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). na - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. na - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ok - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives ok - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed ok - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: na - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. ?? - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. ok - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Builds with fedora-8-i386 fedora-9-i386 and fedora-rawhide-i386 ?? - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ok - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. XX - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. This package installs icons so it should include the gtk-icon-cache scriptlets on Packaging/ScriptletSnippets XX - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. The dependency in the themes package should be fully versioned na - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase ok - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. The following items need to be addressed: * The licensing issue should be clarified. I'm not aware of nor have found any precedent for this situation. Probably a quick message on fedora-legal can clear it up. * The duplicated files need to be fixed. Use caution when including a directory in the files list * Koji needs to be back up so that the package can be tested for building on other architectures Consider doing the following * Follow the recommendation in Package/ScriptletSnippets regarding icons * Fully version the base package dependency in the themes subpackage So, IMO we're at NEEDSWORK here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 05:38:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150538.m7F5cDwk021311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-15 01:38:12 EDT --- If there is something wrong with the existing freetds-devel (look at http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/fedora.redhat.com/linux/development/i386/os/Packages/ for the whole package collection or run "yum install freetds-devel" on your workstation if you need it) package, then you should file a bug against freetds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 08:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150818.m7F8IKjM003467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #10 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-15 04:18:18 EDT --- Only 2 small issues remaining: open-cobol package should have Requires: libcob = %{version} instead of Requires: libcob-devel = %{version} and from rpmlint output: open-cobol.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 3) => please fix open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/common.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/intrinsic.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/fileio.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/call.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/termio.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/move.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/cob-config open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/strings.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/codegen.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libcob.so open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/byteswap.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/numeric.h open-cobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libcob/screenio.h open-cobol.x86_64: E: devel-dependency glibc-devel => these are OK, open-cobol is in fact a "devel" package If I understand it correctly then compiled COBOL programs will be linked with the libcob.so.1 library and thus depend only on the libcob subpackage (= runtime environment for Open-COBOL compiled programs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 09:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808150946.m7F9krtn023424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #3 from Lev Shamardin 2008-08-15 05:46:52 EDT --- I've added pkgconfig to -devel and vim subpackage to my version of the package and updated the spec & srpm on the web. Will be waiting for any comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 10:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151022.m7FAMhar021248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-15 06:22:41 EDT --- koji is down currently. will review this later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 10:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151025.m7FAPLed021610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvrabec at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pvrabec at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 10:41:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151041.m7FAfO6e029968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-15 06:41:24 EDT --- Hi Roy, A few initial comments: - are the defines on the top of the spec needed? You can just set the Name, Version and Release tags and refer to them in the rest of the spec as %{name}, %{version} and %{release} - You're using RPM_BUILD_ROOT everywhere, except on line 43, there it's %{buildroot} - You can use %{_includedir} instead of %{prefix}/include on line 40 - The defattr on line 50 should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Could you pick one of the BuildRoots from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 11:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151108.m7FB8nwf026814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 --- Comment #1 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-15 07:08:48 EDT --- OK: rpmlint prelude-notify-0.9-0.1.svn10860.fc9.src.rpm NOT OK: rpmlint /home/pvrabec/RPM/RPMS/i386/prelude-notify- 0.9-0.1.svn10860.fc9.i386.rpm prelude-notify.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.svn10860 0.9-0.1.svn10860.fc9 prelude-notify.i386: E: no-binary - shouldn't it be marked as noarch? NOT OK: Package Naming Guidelines - add COPYING and AUTHORS file - install desktop file by desktop-file-install OK: Licensing Guidelines OK: License field in the package spec file OK: American English OK: spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources match the upstream source OK: successfully compile OK: ExcludeArch OK: BuildRequires OK: locales OK: shared library files OK: Prefix: /usr OK: own all directories OK: duplicate files in the %files OK: Permissions on files OK: clean section OK: macros OK: documentation files OK: %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package OK: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK: library files with a suffix OK: fully versioned dependency OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK: GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop OK: not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK: valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 11:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151157.m7FBvTLU007453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-15 07:57:27 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2050/netbeans-resolver.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2124/netbeans-resolver-6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Docummentaion is added - Appropriate value of the Group Tag are chosen from the official list rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 12:10:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151210.m7FCA6Lt009736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Bostrom 2008-08-15 08:10:04 EDT --- Some stuff from rpmlint: heimdal-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/windc.so windc.so.0.0.0 Maybe it would be best to remove the windc.so symlink from -devel if the library is not supposed to be used outside of the -server package? (I guess that's why the library is in -server instead of in -libs.) heimdal-libs.i386: E: info-files-without-install-info-post{in,un} /usr/share/info/{heimdal,hx509}.info.gz Does this matter? Lots of unstripped-binary-or-object for /usr/{lib,bin,sbin}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 13:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151320.m7FDK8gj020179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 --- Comment #2 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-15 09:20:07 EDT --- Ok, new packages uploaded. The srpm changed names. You can find it here: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/prelude-notify-0.9-0.1.20080814svn10860.fc9.src.rpm I think this addresses everything above. Note that the svn stuff is only until there is a release which is due today or next week. After that I won't be taking svn snaps. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 13:56:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151356.m7FDuqua025725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #29 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-15 09:56:51 EDT --- Bump to RC3 * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.3.rc3.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Aug 15 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.3.rc3 - bump to RC3 - xsession desktop file is now provided by upstream - dumped patches awesome-3.0-rc1-fedora-doc-path.patch awesome-3.0-rc2-fedora-xsession-path.patch both are now in upstream - cmake is now need >2.6 (present in rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 14:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151415.m7FEF7Ls028922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 14:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151415.m7FEFnqN029167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 --- Comment #3 from andy at gohanman.com 2008-08-15 10:15:48 EDT --- yum install freetds-devel doesn't work. It's not in the non-dev repos. In fact, the freetds package in the regular repos is a 3-year old version of the library. How do I see the history or status of this package - find out why it isn't available? A bugzilla search of 'freetds' doesn't turn up anything useful. The fedora package db (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/) is currently down w/ a 500 error, but when I looked yesterday freetds-devel wasn't in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 14:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151415.m7FEFhS3022470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 14:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151427.m7FERYbb024232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 --- Comment #3 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-15 10:27:33 EDT --- package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 14:44:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151444.m7FEi48f026277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 --- Comment #4 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-15 10:44:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: prelude-notify Short Description: Prelude Notification Applet Owners: sgrubb Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no I suppose uberpackagers would be OK for cvsextras commits. This is a security package. TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151607.m7FG7PLG004861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459161] Review Request: wraplinux - Utility to wrap a Linux kernel and initrd into an ELF or NBI file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151608.m7FG86Vm012355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459161 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151612.m7FGC1wd012960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-15 12:12:00 EDT --- Erm, sorry, I must have errantly clicked something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151627.m7FGRlw4014899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-15 12:27:46 EDT --- freetds-devel exists in all recent versions = F-8, F-9 and Rawhide, what system are running? But I agree that there is an old version (0.64) in F-8 and F-9. Just file a bug asking the maintainer to update to the latest version. The whole package history is available via CVS and browseable at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/freetds/ The "binary" freetds-devel package is not a standalone package, it is created along with "binary" freetds from one source freetds package, so it cannot be found in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:36:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151636.m7FGaqIN008554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 --- Comment #5 from andy at gohanman.com 2008-08-15 12:36:52 EDT --- Hmmm. I'm running F9 and installing from yum gives me the old version (0.64). yum search freetds doesn't show -devel or -doc packages, but I guess that could be an artifact of them not being standalone packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] New: Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 Summary: Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdake at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downlodas/review/corosync-0.91.src.rpm Description: The Corosync Cluster Engine is a "user space kernel" for clustering services. It provides the basis of communication, membership, and other services used in clustering environments. This project was created as a division of the openais project (currently in Fedora) to better align communities and developers around each of the separate projects. The openais package also now depends on corosync. Also, the remaining Fedora 10 cluster infrastructure depends upon corosync being merged into Fedora 10. With this merging, the latest cluster3 trees including gfs/gfs2 can be merged into Fedora 10. If you would like more details of corosync, an Ottawa Linux Symposium 2008 Paper is available: http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/dake-reprint.pdf Thank you for spending the time to review this package for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 16:55:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151655.m7FGt38m018114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 Steven Dake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Steven Dake 2008-08-15 12:55:02 EDT --- The actual SRPM URL is: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync-0.91-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 17:07:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151707.m7FH7DZt012172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #9 from R P Herrold 2008-08-15 13:07:12 EDT --- As to having done reviews, I have reviewed and packaged code for many, many years, but am not able to assent to the Fedora CLA, which I suppose is what you are really interested in. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 17:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151705.m7FH5Il9011981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #8 from R P Herrold 2008-08-15 13:05:17 EDT --- > euh... since when the spec file should be in the tarball ?? ummm --- since forever? rpmbuild -ta tarball.tar.gz with works just fine when the .spec file is there. This is a feature of rpmbuild and has been for a very long time. This rpmbuild feature exists and a .spec file can live in a distributed tarball, because it permits a 'single point of truth' ("SPOT"). See: The Practice of Programming, Brian W. Kernighan, Rob Pike, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1999 at p. 239 Cited at, eg: http://press.samedi-studios.com/publications/2004/jones2004pl4li/jones2004pl4li.pdf > Single Point of Truth[30] If a single application has more than one description of the same information, then keeping these different descriptions from con?icting is di?cult. The reason why such con?icts exist comes from the lack of ability to express the information in a single place. This may oc- cur either because two or more implementation languages are used and are not easily cross-callable or the one language is not powerful enough to state the same truth only once. This is an example of the lack of a language (or languages) ability to capture the information of a domain. > For example, in the Press Pot Java annotation system[23], a single ?le main- tains information describing bytecodes. By generating code from this descrip- tion language to both C and Java, Press Pot is able to keep the semantic description always in sync in both the Java front-end and the C back-end. As another example, in C programs, it is di?cult to express a data ?le format in a single declaration and from that description drive both serialization and deserialization without using some sort of description language. From a description language, serializers and deserializers can be generated and consistency insured. ======================================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 17:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151710.m7FHAhhV020193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-15 13:10:42 EDT --- Hmm, I can see the -devel and -doc packages when doing "yum search freetds" on my F-8. Just try it later, there are some troubles now with some of the Fedora servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 17:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151722.m7FHMlVE013993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-15 13:22:46 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2046/ini4j.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2125/ini4j-0.3.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Documentation added - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - The /etc/maven/fragments/ini4j file is attributed as a config(noreplace) rpmlint shows no errors and no warnings against both SRPM and RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 17:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151758.m7FHwB6S018303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-15 13:58:10 EDT --- BTW, I confirmed with spot that we can't assume a ZPL version and need to ask upstream to clarify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 19:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151905.m7FJ5bH3028098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com, | |rnorwood at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Christopher Stone 2008-08-15 15:05:35 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pygame Updated Fedora Owners: xulchris rnorwood -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 19:41:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151941.m7FJf4iO008546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #19 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-15 15:41:01 EDT --- Bart I don't want to be maintainer of this package I just want it to be available in F10, therefore I filed this CVS request. We can switch as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 19:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151937.m7FJbIAe007772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-15 15:37:16 EDT --- Sorry if I misunderstood the question raised by comment #5, but I guess that the reply from comment #7 should be read "since when is it mandatory for the spec file bundled in the src.rpm to be included in the bundled sources ?" And the answer is "it is not". It's a "nice to have" but very few projects do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 19:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808151940.m7FJeiM6000667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvrabec at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-15 15:40:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-suhosin Short Description: Suhosin extension for the php language Owners: pvrabec Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 20:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808152026.m7FKQNWH016900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-15 16:26:22 EDT --- You don't have to make a CVS request to change ownership; the new owner just needs to drop by the pkgdb and click "Add myself to this package", and the existing owner can accept. When Fedora comes back up, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 20:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808152052.m7FKqlVk021208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #11 from R P Herrold 2008-08-15 16:52:44 EDT --- Hello, Michael, The problem (as I noted it in #2) is that the .spec file as downloaded from the URL posted, is that it DOES NOT WORK, even after minor cleanup and repair. SOMETHING is causing the error: File "", line 1 from distutils.sys But I decline to try to read the coder's mind. There is no indication that it has been fixed in this ticket. Lots of other things in that .spec file are broken as well, and I have seen no update here to indicate that they have been fixed. -- Russ herrold irc: orc_orc on freenode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 21:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808152125.m7FLPXoW018900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #4 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-08-15 17:25:32 EDT --- I haven't done a formal review, but is there any API exposed from libprotoc... perhaps even run-time compiling? If so, libprotoc.so.* might need to be in the main package. Otherwise, from a cursory glance it looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 15 22:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808152240.m7FMeAvi031211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-15 18:40:09 EDT --- There is absolutely no mention of anything license-related in the source code. All we have is the upstream web site, but it's been long enough since this has come up that I don't recall if that's sufficient. While I ask the right people, could you ask upstream to at least mention "GPLv3" somewhere in their code, and if possible to actually follow the suggestions in the GPL and put a copy of it in the tarball/zip and the proper license block in the code? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 00:38:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160038.m7G0c4di017027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-15 20:38:03 EDT --- Any particular reason this requires a fixed uid? Why call %{_initrddir}/corosync directly instead of using /sbin/service corosync? Also note that if you're targeting F10 and later, you can use _initddir. I'm not sure anyone knows where that extra 'r' came from. What is a ".lcrso" file, and why do they need to be under %{_libexecdir}? Have you investigated how this works with multilib? You shouldn't need to explicitly mark anything under %{_docdir} as %doc. In fact, you don't usually install doc files in %doc, but just list them as %doc in the %files list and they'll be copied there. I.e. you can just do %doc LICENSE SECURITY Are you sure the libraries should be in the -devel package? The unversioned .so files should go there, definitely, but the actual libraries should generally be in the main package. Otherwise, in order to run something built against them you have to install the -devel package, which is rarely correct. Why is corosync-objctl installed in the main package while its manpage is in the -devel package? I didn't read the other manpages, but if you're sure that they're of use only to developers then they're fine in the -devel package. You could probably make your %files lists very much smaller if you didn't list each file separately. The manpages, though, I guess you can't do much about. You could have %files lists like these, but maybe you just prefer to list everything out: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc LICENSE SECURITY %{_sbindir}/corosync* %config(noreplace) /etc/corosync.conf %config(noreplace) /etc/ld.so.conf.d/corosync-*.conf %{_initrddir}/corosync %{_libexecdir}/lcrso %dir %{_libdir}/corosync/ %{_libdir}/corosync/*.so.* %{_mandir}/man8/corosync-objctl.8* %{_mandir}/man8/corosync_overview.8* %{_mandir}/man8/logsys_overview.8* %{_mandir}/man5/corosync.conf.5* %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README.devmap %{_includedir}/corosync %{_libdir}/corosync/*.so %{_mandir}/man3/* %{_mandir}/man8/cpg_overview.8* %{_mandir}/man8/evs_overview.8* %{_mandir}/man8/confdb_overview.8* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 00:43:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160043.m7G0h7iW025691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Bartlett 2008-08-15 20:43:04 EDT --- I suppose we could move windc back to the library package, as Samba4 will use that. (but otherwise, like libkdc, it is useless on a client, so hence why I put it in the server package). Adding a server-libs seemed overkill. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 00:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459312] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459312 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-DateManip/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip.spec Description: DateTime::Format::DateManip is a class that knows how to convert between Date::Manip dates and durations and DateTime and DateTime::Duration objects. Recurrences are note yet supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 02:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459215] Review Request: freetds-devel - provides freetds header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160202.m7G22tcm005843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459215 --- Comment #7 from andy at gohanman.com 2008-08-15 22:02:54 EDT --- Weird. It's there today (albeit still 0.64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 03:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160325.m7G3PjXa016723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #12 from David Timms 2008-08-15 23:25:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Created an attachment (id=314363) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314363) [details] > Updated spec fixing absolute symlinks Thanks Paul. I wondered if there is a simpler way to implement this so that rpmlint is happy, and spot gave another suggestion. In fact, it was what I originally implemented, and caused the lint error that I thought meant the method should not be used. Changing to cd to the link destination dir, then ln to the source{target} {although I understand would make the same link}, means that rpmlint has no qualms with the method, without the need to use symlinks. Updated: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.src.rpm - fix rpmlint W: symlink-should-be-relative - mod to use file exclude for the recordwin scripts rpmlint --info /home/davidt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.src.rpm /home/davidt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.noarch.rpm pyvnc2swf.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 04:14:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160414.m7G4Esf8013314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 --- Comment #2 from Roy Rankin 2008-08-16 00:14:53 EDT --- Ruben, Thanks you the comments. I had already fixed all these issues in the rework I did this morning before I saw your comments. Here is the rework URLs Spec URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/denemo/fedora/denemo.spec SRPM URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/denemo/fedora/denemo-0.7.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 04:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160457.m7G4vfs4018003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 00:57:41 EDT --- http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/issues/detail?id=2 Informed upstream. Waiting for response. http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/issues/detail?id=1 I have confirmed about version here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 06:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160630.m7G6UHm5028546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-16 02:30:16 EDT --- We're having a problem: perl-Graph-Easy and perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg have circular build- and run-time dependencies. AFAIS, at least the circular build-dependency can be resolved by removing BuildRequires: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg from perl-Graph-Easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 07:19:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160719.m7G7JIjN009310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2008-08-16 03:19:17 EDT --- > altough i updated my spec there are still some > problem with the configure script how do i solve it??? Run the script directly instead of using the %configure macro. As I pointed out, for this package, the custom configure script is incompatible with the %configure macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 07:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160721.m7G7Lh85009860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-16 03:21:41 EDT --- This package applies auto_install. Please change %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor into %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor --skipdeps to prevent this package from accessing CPAN when it trips missing dependencies. [Try building this package on FC9 to see the effect.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 08:08:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160808.m7G88YG5015805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #5 from Lev Shamardin 2008-08-16 04:08:33 EDT --- To my best knowledge, libprotoc is used only by the protoc compiler. I'm using this library from python, but all sample C++ code is linked only against libprotobuf, so I conclude that libprotoc is required only by the compiler. According to the documentation on the project site, all sources included in libprotoc are parts of the compiler. If you think that someone can try to extend the compiler, or to use the compiler at run time, I can move the libprotoc to the main package, but I doubt that because libprotoc exposes only C++ API and compiler generates source code in C++ which cannot be used at run time without recompiling. I wonder if it is possible to generate noarch subpackages from the same spec as the main arch package? Strictly speaking, -vim and -python subpackages should be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 09:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160926.m7G9QAQX026379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 09:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160936.m7G9as3w018841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet 2008-08-16 05:36:53 EDT --- * source files match upstream: 68e0a84fb3aca46e6e0a6ccfe25c2d6b HTTP_Header-1.2.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (BSD) * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged (1.2.0) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(HTTP_Header) = 1.2.0 php-pear-HTTP-Header = 1.2.0-2.fc8 * %check is not present; test suite cannot run in rpmbuild * owns the directories it creates (HTTP already owned but by non-dependant rpm) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Please remove the TODO comment as file list is ok. Remove php-common from Requires as already required by pear (only need if you want to set a minimal version, which is not the case) This 2 lines are redundant. %dir %{pear_phpdir}/HTTP %{pear_phpdir}/HTTP Missing BR on dos2unix, so doesn't build in mock. Add it or switch to sed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 09:50:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160950.m7G9oPiM029074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2008-08-16 05:50:25 EDT --- Please fix the %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 09:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808160950.m7G9ojGp020242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2008-08-16 05:50:44 EDT --- Please fix the %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 11:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161133.m7GBXjUX031362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 07:33:43 EDT --- This is an unofficial review (As I am not a sponsor) Just to help this package move on. There are few warnings are cosmetic but if reported upstream, will be good(as code base is too small & warnings are two trivial). They are very easy to fix also: First set: ---------- tables -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o Signal.o Signal.c In function 'snprintf', inlined from 'resume_get' at Aget.c:179: /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:65: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer In function 'snprintf', inlined from 'get' at Aget.c:101: /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:65: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will always overflow destination buffer Both of these can be fixed with snprintf(, size .... size greater then or equal to size actually allocated to . Second set: ----------- tables -D_GNU_SOURCE -c -o Resume.o Resume.c Resume.c: In function 'save_log': Resume.c:45: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result Resume.c: In function 'read_log': Resume.c:77: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc -o aget main.o Aget.o Misc.o Head.o Signal.o Download.o Resume.o -pthread Handling the return value of fwrite and fread. In case these calls face, printing an error message to stderr. Your patch for including error.h places include directive at not so good place. May you move it along with standard header files included in source files. Between have you reported the already attached patch upstream? Note: These are cosmetic issues and don't block. But it would be great if they are resolved. [x] name [x] md5sum 1d32390f5ea2ddd82dfbb1794cdfa92f upstream source 1d32390f5ea2ddd82dfbb1794cdfa92f package source [x] license -- except COPYING file there is no mention of license in code files. Have you confirmed about BSD license? [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully [x] BuildRequires [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [NA] GUI [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines Optional suggestions: [x] A small patch to correct warnings and Makefile. Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 11:59:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161159.m7GBxYlM002084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 07:59:31 EDT --- Though SRPM has spec file but you have pasted wrong SPEC URL here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 12:02:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161202.m7GC2rJB002870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2008-08-16 08:02:52 EDT --- http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/debhelper.spec(In reply to comment #4) > Though SRPM has spec file but you have pasted wrong SPEC URL here. http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/debhelper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 13:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161324.m7GDOPmQ021522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 09:24:24 EDT --- GPLv2+ looks to me correct license. [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp dpkg-1.14.20-4.fc9.i386.rpm dpkg.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp dpkg-dev-1.14.20-4.fc9.i386.rpm dpkg-dev.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp dselect-1.14.20-4.fc9.i386.rpm dselect.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. package does not own some directories 1. /etc/dpkg/ 2. /usr/lib/dpkg/ 3. /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/ 4. /usr/share/dpkg/ It looks like SPEC file length can be reduced by using regular exp or some constructs which prevent similar patterns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 13:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455544] Review Request: cx18-firmware - Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161355.m7GDtDcq016174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455544 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20080628-1 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-16 09:55:12 EDT --- Packages are up since a while, closing on behalf of Jarod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 14:04:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161404.m7GE4RtP017181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-16 10:04:25 EDT --- Ah, okay. Then we will wait for spot's reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 14:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161426.m7GEQHHU020066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 10:26:16 EDT --- rpmlint output: [rpmbuild at rocky dosemu]$ rpmlint -i dosemu-1.4.0-1868svn.src.rpm dosemu.src:14: W: buildprereq-use bison flex The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required before a package can be built. Use plain BuildRequires instead. dosemu.src:21: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. dosemu.src:24: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. dosemu.src:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. dosemu.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". dosemu.src: W: non-standard-group System/Emulators The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", ------------- dosemu.src: E: no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. dosemu.src: W: invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", ------------ dosemu.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. rpmlint after building for i386: [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp -i dosemu-1.4.0-1868svn.i386.rpm dosemu.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/dosemu/drives/d /usr/share/dosemu/drive_z Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. dosemu.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru/man1/dosemu.1.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dosemu.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/dosemu/drives/c /usr/share/dosemu/drive_z Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. dosemu.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/dosemu 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. dosemu.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru/man1/mkfatimage16.1.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dosemu.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dosemu/COPYING.DOSEMU The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dosemu.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/dosemu/drive_z/doc/exe2bin 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. dosemu.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/dosemu/drive_z 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. dosemu.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/dosemu/drive_z/tmp /tmp The symbolic link points nowhere. dosemu.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/dosemu/drive_z/tmp /tmp Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. dosemu.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru/man1/dosemu.bin.1.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dosemu.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. dosemu.i386: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. dosemu.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_term.so dosemu.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_X.so dosemu.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_sdl.so dosemu.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_gpm.so dosemu.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_sndfile.so dosemu.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_alsa.so dosemu.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 18 warnings. * SPEC file will look sane if different sections have space between. * repetitive patterns are reduced with regular exp or loop constructs -- optional * Changelog present * URL & source url present. * Correct License tag * rpmlint output needs to be clean. removing 'E' are MUST. rpmlint -i shows necessary diagnosing messages. * may be you can consult few example specs from other packages. * And skim Packaging Guideline must items. * use relative sym links -- move to folder and create 'ln -s /path/to/ * chmod +x /path/to/*so will remove unstripped-binary-or-object warning Note: Wiki and packageDB are down for the moment but hopefully will be soon up. waiting for update.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 14:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459218] Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161433.m7GEXscI020665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 10:33:53 EDT --- This package is clean, but I believe it is improperly named. I can't get to the wiki to look at the guidelines right now, so I'll just skip the bits about naming in the review. I'm thinking that either "pymorph" or "python-pymorph" would be proper names under the guidelines, but since you don't "import morph", I don't believe it should be named just "python-morph". It looks like 0.90 was released at about the same time you submitted this ticket. I don't see anything in the new version that would affect this review, but if you'd like for me to look over an updated package then I will. I tried to test this by running "python morphdemo.py" with the package installed, but I only get: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pymorph/compat.py:489: Warning: 'with' will become a reserved keyword in Python 2.6 Traceback (most recent call last): File "../../morphdemo.py", line 39, in from pymorph.compat import * File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pymorph/compat.py", line 507 def mmcwatershed(f,Bc=None,linereg='LINES'): ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax I'm not sufficiently familiar with python to understand what's happening. * source files match upstream: 2bcd2d061fc539af983bfec221a99cff2a9c9389a1615a6fab471b40864cd935 pymorph-0.89.tar.gz * specfile is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package (in README file). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-morph = 0.89-1.fc10 = numpy python(abi) = 2.5 ? Manual tests seem to fail. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 14:40:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161440.m7GEeuqb021591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 10:40:54 EDT --- @Chris Any updates here ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 14:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459312] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161442.m7GEgFee021752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459312 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 10:42:13 EDT --- Not much to say, really. * source files match upstream: 2077c9a420e3c0659b61298bff4ede1269120cf690bfeb35f49f6e6c6be8ee43 DateTime-Format-DateManip-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Format::DateManip) = 0.04 perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip = 0.04-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Date::Manip) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Duration) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=7, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.35 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.39 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 14:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161457.m7GEv0PM032056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #6 from leigh scott 2008-08-16 10:56:59 EDT --- How do I make the package own the directory ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 15:08:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161508.m7GF8RcC000862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 11:08:26 EDT --- I believe the license is LGPLv2+; where do you see that it is restricted to v2 only? There is really no need to duplicate those three documentation files between the main and -libs packages. You can duplicate the actual license text if you really feel the need to (even though the lawyers have indicated that it is not necessary) but there's really no point in duplicating things like ReadMe.txt. * source files match upstream: b21d7992bb69d56be2cec0e57c3bfb2ce3497570827edccf3cf403e2c2143898 ann_1.1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ann-1.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ann = 1.1.1-1.fc10 ann(x86-64) = 1.1.1-1.fc10 = libANN.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) ann-devel-1.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ann-devel = 1.1.1-1.fc10 ann-devel(x86-64) = 1.1.1-1.fc10 = ann-libs = 1.1.1-1.fc10 libANN.so.1()(64bit) ann-libs-1.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libANN.so.1()(64bit) ann-libs = 1.1.1-1.fc10 ann-libs(x86-64) = 1.1.1-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libANN.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no idea how to test this package. I can at least run the ann2fig binary but I don't know what to pass to it. Maybe there's something in the sample directory, but it doesn't seem to be installed anywhere. * shared libraries installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X documentation is duplicated between packages. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 15:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161515.m7GFFsir025477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 11:15:53 EDT --- e.g for /etc/dpkg/ in %files section use: %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 15:27:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161527.m7GFRg3K026809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 11:27:41 EDT --- A couple of rpmlint issues you'll want to take a look at: ctemplate.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libctemplate.so.0.0.0 pthread_rwlock_rdlock ctemplate.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libctemplate.so.0.0.0 pthread_rwlock_wrlock ctemplate.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libctemplate.so.0.0.0 pthread_rwlock_destroy ctemplate.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libctemplate.so.0.0.0 pthread_rwlock_init ctemplate.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libctemplate.so.0.0.0 pthread_rwlock_unlock Looks like this library uses those pthread functions without linking to a library which provides them. ctemplate.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/diff_tpl_auto_escape ['/usr/lib64'] ctemplate.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/make_tpl_varnames_h ['/usr/lib64'] Usual rpath stuff. It looks like you already have some chrpath calls in your spec; you should looking at fixing up the above two complaints as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 15:41:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161541.m7GFfmdf028369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 11:41:47 EDT --- rpmlint output on srpm: [rpmbuild at rocky clipper]$ rp -i clipper-2.0-13.f8.src.rpm clipper.src:40: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. clipper.src: W: summary-not-capitalized clipper C++ crystallographic library Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. clipper.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. After using libmmdb-devel libgpp4-devel packages, clipper failed to built on my i386 make[3]: Entering directory `/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/clipper-2.0/clipper/mmdb' /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../clipper -I../../clipper -I/usr/include/gpp4 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o clipper_mmdb.lo clipper_mmdb.cpp mkdir .libs g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../clipper -I../../clipper -I/usr/include/gpp4 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -c clipper_mmdb.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/clipper_mmdb.o clipper_mmdb.cpp: In member function 'void clipper::MMDBResidue::set_inscode(const clipper::String&)': clipper_mmdb.cpp:228: error: 'strncpy' was not declared in this scope make[3]: *** [clipper_mmdb.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/clipper-2.0/clipper/mmdb' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/clipper-2.0/clipper' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/clipper-2.0/clipper' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /home/rpmbuild/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54706 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /home/rpmbuild/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54706 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 15:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161543.m7GFhgab004656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-16 11:43:41 EDT --- Just for the record, I've built sucessfully in mock the src.rpm from #2, both for fedora-devel/x86_64 and for centos5/i386, without any intervention over the spec. As of errors, the only one that I spot at a quick glance is a minor one: python is a useless BR because python-devel brings it in. The only problem, but this has nothing to do with the packaging, is that upstream distributes the source as a file ending its name with ".tar.gz" despite the fact that it is a plain tar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 15:48:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161548.m7GFmjiw028936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-16 11:48:44 EDT --- You should be right with the license - the sources specify "Lesser GNU Public License" without version and there is no "or any later version" clause. So LGPLv2+ should be right. The *.txt docs are now included only in the -lib subpackage, because it will be always installed. You can run the tests manually after building the package eg. in mock. There is even an expected output, but it differs due the newer version (1.0 vs. 1.1.1) and the package doesn't have performance statistics enabled. So it cannot be easily automated. Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ann.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ann-1.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 16:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161625.m7GGPoYI000786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #8 from leigh scott 2008-08-16 12:25:49 EDT --- Thanks for the info ( I will submit updated SPEC & SRPM later ) _______________________________________________________________ Is there anything I can do for these errors ( these are the correct file locations ) dpkg.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib dpkg-dev.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib dselect.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 16:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458826] Review Request: s390utils - Linux/390 specific utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161629.m7GGTaI3009726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 12:29:34 EDT --- I haven't a hope of testing this, but of course I can review for form and rpmlint still provides some useful information. I guess the first thing I notice, though, is that the packages in your koji instance have an .fc8 dist tag even though they were build on dist-f9. Any idea what's happened there? s390utils.src:134: W: configure-without-libdir-spec This is OK; it's not an autoconf-generated configure script. s390utils.src: E: description-line-too-long - qetharp to query and purge address data in the OSA and HiperSockets hardware This goes to exactly 80 characters. I'm not sure if rpmlint is off by one or if the limit is really 79 or less, but it might be better to wrap it. s390utils.s390x: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/s390.csh 0755 s390utils.s390x: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/s390.sh 0755 Generally there's no reason for these to be executable, although this wouldn't be the only package to make this error. s390utils.s390x: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/dumpconf s390utils.s390x: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_procd s390utils.s390x: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_statd s390utils.s390x: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/dumpconf s390utils.s390x: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_procd s390utils.s390x: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_statd Seems like the scriptlets to add these services are missing completely. s390utils.s390x: E: non-readable /etc/udev/rules.d/56-dasd.rules 0700 s390utils.s390x: E: non-readable /etc/udev/rules.d/56-zfcp.rules 0700 s390utils.s390x: E: script-without-shebang /etc/udev/rules.d/56-dasd.rules s390utils.s390x: E: script-without-shebang /etc/udev/rules.d/56-zfcp.rules Any reason for the udev rules to not be 644 like the rest of them? There are several "non-readable" and "non-standard-executable-perm" complaints form the main package. I believe these are OK. s390utils.s390x: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/dumpconf s390utils.s390x: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_procd s390utils.s390x: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_statd Not sure what's up here. None of these drop locks in /var/lib/subsys, which is generally expected of daemons. I'm not sure what to make of these, and the wiki is offline so I can't get to the initscript guidelines. s390utils.s390x: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/s390utils-1.7.0/README Should be converted. s390utils.s390x: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/src_vipa.so I'm not sure what this is about; it could even be an artifact of running rpmlint on an i386 machine. Also, I think some would complain about this being in _libdir when nothing will ever link against it. s390utils.s390x: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/dumpconf s390utils.s390x: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_procd s390utils.s390x: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mon_statd Services shouldn't be enabled by default without a good reason. Is there one? We chatted about the LD_PRELOAD bit on IRC; I just don't understand why LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to be modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 16:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161654.m7GGsRq1012292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 16:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459312] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161658.m7GGwsQv013081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459312 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-16 12:58:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip Short Description: Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 17:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161716.m7GHG51B016062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 13:16:04 EDT --- Fails to build for me in rawhide: checking for gperf... no configure: error: Can't find gperf, please install it and try again fixing that with a build dep on gperf, I get to: checking for XCB... configure: error: Package requirements (xcb >= 1.0) were not met: No package 'xcb' found Adding libxcb-devel gets up to: Making all in atom make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xcb-util-0.2.1/atom' I. atoms.gperf.m4 >atoms.gperf /bin/sh: I.: command not found make[1]: [atoms.gperf] Error 127 (ignored) gperf --output-file atoms.c atoms.gperf atoms.gperf: The input file is empty! make[1]: *** [atoms.c] Error 1 and at that point I don't know what to do. Please make sure your packages build in mock or koji before submitting them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 17:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161720.m7GHKGjf016758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 13:20:16 EDT --- Unfortunately this doesn't build because the documentation has additional build dependencies. I think you need doxygen and graphviz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 17:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161724.m7GHOcll017191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 13:24:37 EDT --- This fails to build for me: error: syntax error in expression error: /builddir/build/SPECS/LuxRender.spec:79: parseExpressionBoolean returns -1 I've starred line 79: %cmake \ -CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE:BOOL=TRUE \ -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON \ * %if %{?_lib} == "lib64" -DLIBDIR=%{_lib} \ %endif .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 17:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161730.m7GHUC7g009454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 13:30:11 EDT --- Snippet from output of: [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rpmfile dpkg-1.14.20-4.fc9.i386.rpm ----------------- /usr/lib/dpkg/mksplit 100755 perl script text executable /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg.pm 100644 ASCII English text /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Gettext.pm 100644 perl script text executable ----------------- It looks to me you can see Dpkg.pm is ASCII English txt. It looks it has a missing sh-bang line: #!/usr/bin/perl -w if it works inform upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 18:20:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161820.m7GIKsws017597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 14:20:53 EDT --- [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp -i dpkg-1.14.20-4.fc9.i386.rpm dpkg.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. --- .pm files are are not intended to be run directly rather .pl files are and they don't generally don't need she-bang. So, most probably I am wrong. But you will need to investigate why that one of these files most probably mksplit has an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 18:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161830.m7GIURRH028029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 14:30:26 EDT --- @Matthias Any update ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 18:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161848.m7GImdQk021075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 14:48:38 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: snobol.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/snobol4/snotypes.h and the same for several other headers. The point of this package is to produce C code so this makes sense, although I then wonder if it shouldn't have a dependency on gcc. snobol.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Is there anything arch-specific in /usr/lib? Would /usr/share be a better place for those files? There's also a README file in /usr/lib/ which is a duplicate of what's in the docdir. I note that the compiler is called like "gcc -O3 -O2 -g -pipe..." which looks a bit odd, although I've confirmed that at least current gcc will ignore the -O3 in this case, but you might consider patching out the -O3 entirely. Can you comment on why the debuginfo generation is broken. I know it is turned off because the package would be empty, but it would be better to know why it is empty as that may be a bug that needs fixing. * source files match upstream: 53503e412953ddf31149cd36aa3cd7ce164c2a149e33309fe7c583be54c791ae snobol4-1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. o compiler flags are appropriate (well, there's an extra -O3 which is currently ignored). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. ? debuginfo package is disabled for unknown reasons. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. ? final provides and requires are sane: snobol = 4.1.1-1.fc10 snobol(x86-64) = 4.1.1-1.fc10 = libgdbm.so.2()(64bit) Would a gcc dependency be in order? * %check is not present, but there are some tests run as part of the build process which seem to succeed (see timing.out). * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X README file is duplicated. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are present in the main package because this is a compiler. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 19:10:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161910.m7GJAaek000664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 15:10:35 EDT --- this review is stalled and response is required from reporter ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 19:26:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161926.m7GJQjM8026289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2008-08-16 15:26:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp -i dpkg-1.14.20-4.fc9.i386.rpm > dpkg.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. > > > --- > .pm files are are not intended to be run directly rather .pl files are and they > don't generally don't need she-bang. So, most probably I am wrong. > > But you will need to investigate why that one of these files most probably > mksplit has an issue. I have extracted the stable dpkg_1.13.25_i386.deb package and looked at mksplit and it appear to be the same ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 19:38:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161938.m7GJcsV4003699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-16 15:38:53 EDT --- No, Jon and I lost interest in this, after we found that matchbox fits our needs better... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 19:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161955.m7GJttO6006050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 15:55:54 EDT --- CLOSING with NOTABUG -- If anyone interested should open a new review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 19:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447367] Review Request: onboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808161956.m7GJuZIH029975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447367 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - llgal generates static web-pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162022.m7GKMq8W000561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 16:22:51 EDT --- License field should be GPLv2+ rpmlint -i output [rpmbuild at rocky llgal]$ rp -i llgal-0.13.15-1.fc9.i386.rpm llgal.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/llgal.css A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/indextemplate.html A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: W: siteperl-in-perl-module /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Llgal/Utils.pm This perl module package installs files under the subdirectory site_perl, while they must appear under vendor_perl. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Llgal/.packlist The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. llgal.i386: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Llgal/.packlist You have a perl temporary file in your package. Usually, this file is beginning with a dot (.) and contain "perl" in its name. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: W: siteperl-in-perl-module /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Llgal/Config.pm This perl module package installs files under the subdirectory site_perl, while they must appear under vendor_perl. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/slidetemplate.html A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod You have a perl temporary file in your package. Usually, this file is beginning with a dot (.) and contain "perl" in its name. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/tile.png A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/index.png A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: W: siteperl-in-perl-module /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Llgal/Messages.pm This perl module package installs files under the subdirectory site_perl, while they must appear under vendor_perl. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/next.png A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/captions.header A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/bin/llgal A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: E: dir-or-file-in-usr-local /usr/local/share/llgal/prev.png A file in the package is located in /usr/local. It's not permitted for packages to install files in this directory. llgal.i386: W: siteperl-in-perl-module /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Llgal/Templates.pm This perl module package installs files under the subdirectory site_perl, while they must appear under vendor_perl. llgal.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized llgal generates static web-pages. Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. llgal.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot llgal generates static web-pages. Summary ends with a dot. llgal.i386: W: non-standard-group Graphismes The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", ------------- llgal.i386: W: invalid-license GNU General Public License V2 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", --------- llgal.i386: W: invalid-license later The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", "ADSL", "AFL", "AGPLv1", "AGPLv3", "AMPAS BSD", "ARL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", ------------ llgal.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. llgal.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/local/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo llgal.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/local/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo llgal.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/local/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo llgal.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/local/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/llgal.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 17 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:30:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162030.m7GKUUAD010036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 16:30:29 EDT --- @Jon Any updates regarding flags ? This request is stalled for long and needs an update soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:39:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458975] Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162039.m7GKdUca002155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 16:39:29 EDT --- I don't really understand the point of opening a review ticket for something that nobody can build. Marking this as not being ready for review; please clear the whiteboard when the situation changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162036.m7GKaDjE002069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 16:36:12 EDT --- I find that I can't fetch the upstream source from the Source0 URL in the spec; http://users.telenet.be/on4qz/qsstv/download/qsstv-5.3c.tar.gz seems to be the proper location. The "snapshots" directory holds version 6.0a. That, of course, begs the question of whether you would prefer to package 6.0a instead. I can go ahead and review this version, however. The only other issue I see is that there is no desktop file. As this is a GUI application, Fedora requires that a desktop file be provided by the package. * source files match upstream (using corrected URL): 26094e95eb7e2a6728b8d3bde7aee91cb1ce2f6167dd58a8e47c778f405099ad qsstv-5.3c.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: qsstv = 5.3c-1.fc10 qsstv(x86-64) = 5.3c-1.fc10 = libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I honestly haven't a clue as to how I could test this, but I ran the program and it opened windows and suck without crashing. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. X A GUI application with no desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:44:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162044.m7GKiOak011226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 16:44:23 EDT --- Expect a full review in few days: rpmlint output: [rpmbuild at rocky noarch]$ rp -i cerebro-2.9.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm cerebro.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cerebro.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here cerebro.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/cerebro The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Am waiting for koji to get up -- have too low bandwidth to set up mock or local mirror. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458969] Review Request: InetVis - 3-D scatter-plot visualization for network traffic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162058.m7GKwRCc004298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458969 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 16:58:26 EDT --- This failed to build for me in mock on rawhide: + qmake 'QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE += -DINETVIS_DOCDIR=\"/usr/share/doc/inetvis-0.9.3.1/\"' /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dNOhMU: line 31: qmake: command not found I think qmake-qt4 is what you want, but I'm not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 20:58:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458939] Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162058.m7GKwm0f012799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 16:58:47 EDT --- rpmlint on srpm: arora.src: W: non-coherent-filename arora-0.3-1.src.rpm arora-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm The file which contains the package should be named --..rpm. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. srpm name wrong it misses fc8 or fc9?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 21:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162107.m7GL7ALl005507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-16 17:07:08 EDT --- [rpmbuild at rocky italc]$ rp -i italc-1.0.9-4.src.rpm italc.src: W: summary-not-capitalized intelligent teaching and learning with computers Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. italc.src: E: unknown-key GPG#66534c2b The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option for more information. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. if I remember, will update as soon as koji is up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 21:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162157.m7GLvoee010692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Summary|Review Request: pmpu - GUI |Review Request: pmpu - GUI |for distributed VCS's |for distributed VCS's --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 17:57:49 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The only statement of a license I can find anywhere within the package is in the "About" dialog, which says GPLv2. You should ask upstream to provide proper licensing information, and in the interim you should make a note in your spec indicating where you discovered that this package is GPLv2 licensed (which would have saved me the time searching for it). There is no need to explicitly disable the debuginfo package if you have BuildArch: noarch. It would be good to package the KNOWNBUGS, RELEASE_TESTS and TODO files as %doc, especially given how this software is in an early state. There is no reason to explicitly require python (although it doesn't really hurt anything). * source files match upstream: 53aca186c7225aacb4fb724ac4ba6835129496937e126f15bddfece3ddd04aa0 pmpu-0.2.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license (as far as I can tell). * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pmpu = 0.2-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/python PyQt4 ? python python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed the program and it seems to run OK, although I don't have any repositories handy. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 22:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162205.m7GM5mWF011843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 18:05:47 EDT --- This failed to build for me in a manner which I completely fail to comprehend. I know you did a koji build, but koji is down at the moment so I can't check it. I'm building in rawhide on x86_64. The failure isn't that long, so I'll just paste it in. I suspect mock has destroyed any formatting. make check-local make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libkate-0.1.7' Checking Kate namespace /usr/bin/nm: 'lib/.libs/*.a': No such file Checking memory allocation routines Checking forgotten debug traces Checking Kate stream bspline /builddir/build/BUILD/libkate-0.1.7/tools/.libs/lt-kateenc: error while loading shared libraries: liboggkate.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory == 4448== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line == 4448== at 0x32E: ??? == 4448== by 0x400E947: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x400D97D: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x40036E9: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x401610B: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x4001443: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x4000AF7: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x7: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000B7E: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000BB9: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000BBC: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000BBE: ??? == 4448== Address 0x32e is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd == 4448== == 4448== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) == 4448== Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x32E == 4448== at 0x32E: ??? == 4448== by 0x400E947: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x400D97D: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x40036E9: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x401610B: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x4001443: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x4000AF7: (within /lib64/ld-2.8.90.so) == 4448== by 0x7: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000B7E: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000BB9: ??? == 4448== by 0x7FF000BBC: ??? ==4448== by 0x7FF000BBE: ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 22:07:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162207.m7GM7vC5020721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-16 18:07:56 EDT --- Were you going to do the package review as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 16 22:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808162245.m7GMjgPI016178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-16 18:45:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > You should be right with the license - the sources specify "Lesser GNU Public > License" without version and there is no "or any later version" clause. So > LGPLv2+ should be right. ?!? Copying.txt explicitly says: "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." => This is the "later version" clause. License.txt says: "GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2.1, February 1999..." => This is a copy of LGPLv2.1. => This package is LGPLv2+'ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 02:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170239.m7H2dSDT017470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-08-16 22:39:27 EDT --- I have forgot to say "I need a sponsor" :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 06:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170639.m7H6dWOg001632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 07:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170702.m7H72cU9004384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #2 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-17 03:02:37 EDT --- Thanks for spotting this. I'll fix the capitalization, but since it's minor I won't be repackaging yet, just consider it done :) On the GPG key: Since it is not yet reviewed it canot carry any official Fedora GPG key. Please ignore this warning, it will automagically go away once the package goes through bodhi etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 08:28:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170828.m7H8SoHD016274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #10 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-17 04:28:48 EDT --- I agree with Till, we have to include this in distribution at least for QA purpose. It may become once the official boot loader and replace dead grub. The final version of package looks sane, Lubomir please include patch comments in the spec file as we agreed on IRC. This package is approved, please include a note about grub2 availability in release notes for Fedora 9. (I'll help with testing once I'm back from my vacation.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 08:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170840.m7H8ex7w026725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-17 04:40:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > You should be right with the license - the sources specify "Lesser GNU Public > > License" without version and there is no "or any later version" clause. So > > LGPLv2+ should be right. > ?!? > > Copying.txt explicitly says: > "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the terms of the GNU Lesser Public License as published by the > Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your > option) any later version." > > => This is the "later version" clause. > > License.txt says: > "GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > > Version 2.1, February 1999..." > > => This is a copy of LGPLv2.1. > > > => This package is LGPLv2+'ed OK, thanks for explanation. I am really not a licensing expert, so I thought that license text in the source files (*.cpp, *h)) is prioritized against the included *.txt files and it leads into LGPLv2+ too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 09:10:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170910.m7H9Api1021658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2008-08-17 05:10:50 EDT --- zorba.review.txt: Hi, you don't seem to be sponsored, so I can't perform an official review. Instead, I can get the review process started with a pre-review. Have you requested a fedoraproject account ? === [OK] OK [NA] not applicable [??] unsure, more info needed. [ x] must fix [OK] naming meets guidelines [same as upstream source], doesn't conflict [OK] .spec is named as the package %{name} [OK] generally meets packaging guidelines [OK] upstream source md5sum matches. dc4ffe43b191700b93c4802b8baeec38 zorba-0.9.21.tar.gz [within source rpm] dc4ffe43b191700b93c4802b8baeec38 ../zorba-0.9.21.tar.gz [upstream] [OK] buildroot is the second most preferred option [OK] doesn't use %{locale} to handle locales. [NA] doesn't use Prefix: tag. [OK] header files are in the -devel sub package. [OK] contains code not content [OK] no static libs, no .pc files, no .la files [OK] -devel package requires the base package [OK] file names are UTF-8 [NA] .desktop: not a gui app. [??] -devel include shows %name/%name/* . Is this what was intended, why ? [??] are the .TAGFILEs needed by an end user of devel-docs ? Perhaps they are a side result of the compile process ? [??] license is Apache license v2 from web site. extracted upstream source mentions "the Apache License" more than 700 times. The short name "APL 2.0" is the correct fedora reference. [??] NOTICE.txt also provides some license information / history. I haven't analysed whether the license would be considered free for Fedora purposes. Have each of the authors mentioned [??] devel-doc is created as a separate package. It isn't overly large, and could potentially be part of the -devel package ? What reasoning caused you to split the devel-docs out ? [??] spec legible: - could be improved by sticking to a certain coding style within the spec with relation to eg 2x blank lines between sections, rather than 0 or 1. - the files section has one layout for some subpackages, and different spacing for the last ones. [ ?] might as well fix the spelling of grammer and headerss ! [ ?] while individually specifying each %files to include can be done, would it be simpler to glob the folders instead (or have you already factored this in) ? [??] python guidelines suggest placing python_sitelib determination at the top of the spec. Any reason to do it elsewhere ? [??] places files directly in the %{python_sitelib}, rather than a module named subfolder. Not sure if that is allowed ? [??] -python doesn't require the base package. Is there a reason why ? [??] why put the *.py*, *.gif, *.rb examples in the python/ruby sub packages. Would these be more appropriate for the devel-doc package ? [??] %build turns on debug output. I don't know whether that is allowed in the final package ? [ x] rpmlint problems: rpmlint zorba-0.9.21-2.fc9.src.rpm zorba.src:116: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:117: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:120: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:121: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:122: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:123: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:124: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:125: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:126: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:127: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:128: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:129: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:130: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:131: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:132: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:133: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:134: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:135: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:136: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:137: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:138: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:139: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:140: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:141: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:142: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:143: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:144: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:145: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:146: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:147: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:148: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:149: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:150: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:151: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:152: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:153: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:154: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:155: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:160: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:161: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:162: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:163: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:164: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:165: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:169: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:170: E: files-attr-not-set zorba.src:171: E: files-attr-not-set 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 47 errors, 0 warnings. use --info more abit more info about the errors. [ x] doesn't build on i386. Is a build require missing ? Perhaps need to try one of the methods to help determine build requires at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires --------------- -- look for component program_options -- found ? Boost_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_LIBRARY_RELEASE-NOTFOUND -- Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS: Boost_INCLUDE_DIR-NOTFOUND -- Boost_LIBRARIES: -- Boost Version required: . Found: .. CMake Error: Error in cmake code at /home/davidt/rpmbuild/BUILD/zorba-0.9.21/cmake_modules/FindBoost.cmake:575: MESSAGE Couldn't find the Boost libraries and/or include directory, or the version found is too old. Please install the Boost libraries AND development packages. You can set BOOST_ROOT, BOOST_INCLUDEDIR and BOOST_LIBRARYDIR to help find Boost. Current CMake stack: [2] /home/davidt/rpmbuild/BUILD/zorba-0.9.21/cmake_modules/FindBoost.cmake [1] /home/davidt/rpmbuild/BUILD/zorba-0.9.21/CMakeLists.txt -- Configuring done error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46222 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46222 (%build) --------------- [ x] doesn't own all the dirs it creates: %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} is the dir only the subfolders c, cxx, zorba, python ruby aren't owned {I could be wrong here, since it won't build}. [ x] unversioned .so must be in the -devel package [ x] no excludearch yet does not build on i386 [ x] package provides .sos in normal lib dir, but doesn't use the guideline must %post/un -p /sbin/ldconfig [ x] clean rm -rf is commented out. Why has this been done ? I don't think it could make it into Fedora like this. [ x] not all %files sections include the %defattr() [ x] main package doc files are not marked as %doc. I assume they aren't required for the executable to run. [ x] LICENSE.txt is included in source, and hence must be included in package, but is not marked %doc [ x] -python summary line is repeated under description [ x] -ruby package must indicate the required Ruby ABI version [ x] -ruby library must indicate what it provides with a Provides: ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION [ x] must bump release with each adjustment of the package. This provides tracability, and ensures an update path. You don't appear to have begun the fedoraproject account creation process. Note the email you use there should be the one used in the changlelog as well. I also notice that you are an upstream contributor. What applications are using zorba so far ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 09:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170926.m7H9QmN1023694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #2 from David Timms 2008-08-17 05:26:47 EDT --- Forgot to include: [ x] Source0 for a sourceforge file needs to be writtent in a specific way, so that the main sf download server is used. It can't be a file:// -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 09:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170950.m7H9os1d026479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-17 05:50:53 EDT --- Review for release 2.fc9: * RPM name is OK * Source denemo-0.7.9.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock rpmlint is not silent: [ruben at slice denemo]$ rpmlint denemo-0.7.9-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm denemo.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 denemo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog You can probably drop all Requires except bug-buddy because you've listed them in the BuildRequires and rpm will pick them up by itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 09:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458975] Review Request: Pivy - Coin binding for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808170952.m7H9qDI5026634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-17 05:52:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This package BuildRequires SoQt-qt4-devel which isn't available as a Review > Request yet. FYI: I (SoQt, Coin, SIMvoleon maintainer) do not plan to ship an SoQt-qt4 package for Fedora, but intend to build and ship SoQt only against "nominal version of qt". Unfortunately, due to all the problems qt4/KDE4 had on FC9, this plan had failed for FC9, so SoQt is built against qt3 on FC9. I.e. I plan to switch SoQt for FC10 to qt4 soon, but plan to stay with qt3 for older Fedoras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 12:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171214.m7HCE1CP019297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-17 08:13:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grub2 Short Description: Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 13:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171312.m7HDC24S017566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-17 09:12:00 EDT --- Dan, I am not an expert either, but (quoting from IRC): " wolfy: what's in the individual source files wins." However, in this case the source files reference the license file (via ReadMe.txt) so probably that the author wanted his source to be LGPv2+ but failed to properly mention that in the source files. I'd say it's one of those cases where one should send a mail to the author politely asking for clarifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 13:48:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171348.m7HDm5La031003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 09:48:04 EDT --- I believe that the license should be GPLv2+; I know the upstream website says GPLv2, but the code itself has the "or (at your option) any later version" language. I'm not sure the summary is terribly useful. It tells me that this module replaces another, but it doesn't tell me at all what it actually does. The README file says "XMPPHP is an elegant PHP library for XMPP (aka Jabber, Google Talk, etc)" which seems to be a more reasonable summary. It seems that the current release is beta-r50; it came out about a month ago. Did you want to update to it? It seems to be somewhat different, including more examples and tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 14:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171403.m7HE3Lku024534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-17 10:03:20 EDT --- Thanks, I will update in few days. Will check whether dependent laconica has moved to latest one or not. Will check as soon as koji & mirrors get up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 14:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171422.m7HEMAiE027611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 10:22:09 EDT --- I don't think there's any real ambiguity here. Sure, it would be nice if upstream just used the license block specified by the LGPL in their source files instead of having folks make a trip through three files to find the info, but I don't think the currently situation leaves any real doubt as to what the license is. Maybe you could ask them, but since the last update to this software was two years ago, I doubt you'll see much of a response. In any case, the issues I had are fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 14:42:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171442.m7HEgK29007313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 10:42:19 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 15:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171500.m7HF0GOf000956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|steved at redhat.com |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 11:00:14 EDT --- Looks like Steve no longer owns this package. CC'ing the current maintainer; perhaps there's a changce that this could move forward after over a year without receiving any response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 15:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171501.m7HF1N1Z010341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 11:01:22 EDT --- Looks good to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 16:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171615.m7HGFNaZ021780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 12:15:21 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED By the way, the segfault happens whenever $HOME is unset. When I set it everything is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 16:24:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171624.m7HGOLTL013650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #21 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-17 12:24:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gridloc Short Description: A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 16:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171638.m7HGctgm025068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 --- Comment #6 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-08-17 12:38:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vttest Short Description: Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals Owners: sindrepb Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 16:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171647.m7HGlpME026526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-17 12:47:49 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 18:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171812.m7HICEvd030978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-17 14:12:13 EDT --- The COBOL programm will first translated into a C programm. Then this C programm will be compiled into an executable. The library libcob.so contains the runtine environment for the COBOL programm. New upaloaded files: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/open-cobol/open-cobol/open-cobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/open-cobol/open-cobol/open-cobol-1.0.90-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 18:56:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171856.m7HIuhJq012633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-17 14:56:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I find that I can't fetch the upstream source from the Source0 URL in the spec; > http://users.telenet.be/on4qz/qsstv/download/qsstv-5.3c.tar.gz seems to be the > proper location. Corrected Source0 > The "snapshots" directory holds version 6.0a. > That, of course, begs the question of whether you would prefer to package 6.0a > instead. I can go ahead and review this version, however. I would prefer 5.3c. > The only other issue I see is that there is no desktop file. As this is a GUI > application, Fedora requires that a desktop file be provided by the package. Added png and desktop file and bounced version: http://gnome.eu.org/qsstv.spec http://gnome.eu.org/qsstv-5.3c-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 19:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808171959.m7HJxpT9019798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 --- Comment #9 from Paul Cochrane 2008-08-17 15:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > this review is stalled and response is required from reporter ASAP. I have unfortunately had no tuits since the last time I sent an update to this review. I can attempt to get an updated spec file and rpms ready hopefully by the end of this week. Is this ok? Thanks, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 20:18:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808172018.m7HKI5C3022048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-17 16:18:03 EDT --- This now fails to build because of a missing dependency on desktop-file-utils. I added it and the package builds OK. The desktop file installs fine. Since you can't build anyway without that missing dependency, I'll just approve this and you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 20:46:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808172046.m7HKk3Eg025696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-17 16:46:02 EDT --- I have investigate some works in the packages ant have uploaded the most recent releases. I have some monor issue if I'm trying to set the soname because the test suite fails, if I do it. Perhaps someone have a idea for the readon of the failure. Uploaded stuff: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol-4.1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 17 21:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808172141.m7HLfbch022305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-17 17:41:35 EDT --- sure, I'll do the review, but he's got 3 packages in queue, and I'm working with him on the first one; once he's got that one nailed (and it's pretty close now), we'll work through the other two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 01:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180130.m7I1U50M015193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 --- Comment #4 from Roy Rankin 2008-08-17 21:30:04 EDT --- Requires simplified pec URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/denemo/fedora/denemo.spec SRPM URL: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/denemo/fedora/denemo-0.7.9-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 01:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180138.m7I1cC3G025317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #3 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2008-08-17 21:38:11 EDT --- Thanks for your comments. Could you please propose how the spec file should be affected to incorporate your comments? I would very much appreciate this, thanks! (In reply to comment #2) > Expect a full review in few days: > > rpmlint output: > [rpmbuild at rocky noarch]$ rp -i cerebro-2.9.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm > cerebro.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cerebro.conf > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here > > cerebro.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/cerebro > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > Am waiting for koji to get up -- have too low bandwidth to set up mock or local > mirror. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 03:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180313.m7I3DvF2028030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #3 from Paul F. Kunz 2008-08-17 23:13:56 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review. It wa very helpful. I fixed most of the problems but ran out of time today to get to them all, so I have nothing new to show. I do already have a Fedora project account but changed my primary e-mail address since getting it. Will continue working on it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 04:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180434.m7I4YGTb007936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-18 00:34:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qsstv Short Description: Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 07:44:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180744.m7I7iSl1008147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-18 03:44:27 EDT --- I'd rather remove auto_install. With --skipdeps looks the build log same as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 07:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180746.m7I7kgwa031617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-18 03:46:41 EDT --- I know we use in some packages cyclic dependencies. But here should be ok to remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 07:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180757.m7I7vjNd001048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-18 03:57:44 EDT --- (And un-core-fonts is approved though still pending cvs.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 07:56:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180756.m7I7u319000711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-18 03:56:02 EDT --- Dennis, ping :) Can you please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure so we can get this package added to Fedora soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180805.m7I85pTN014201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-18 04:05:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'd rather remove auto_install. You prefer hacking instead of properly using a package's configuration options? > I'd rather remove auto_install. With --skipdeps looks the build log same as > before. Without --skipdeps, building the rpm accesses CPAN and tries to sync perl's setup to meet the package's requirements when it finds insufficient deps. - This doesn't work in a chroot (no network available). - If building as "root", this trashes rpm-based perl installations. - If building as "non-root", this cause various build-breakdowns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180811.m7I8BjqU006030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-18 04:11:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I know we use in some packages cyclic dependencies. > But here should be ok to remove them. Resolving the cyclic build-dep is a MUSTFIX, otherwise you won't be able to bootstrap this package. Afterwards, once this package in Fedora, and when it's being built incrementally, cyclic deps are tolerable. (The normal way to circumvent such issues is add build-conditionals (use %_with_*/%_without_* inside of the *.spec to support rpmbuild --with/--without) In any case you should file a bug upstream. It's an upstream design flaw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:21:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180821.m7I8LEBC017407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-18 04:21:13 EDT --- Ok, that's persuade me. We should write it into Perl guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180816.m7I8GeJB016556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-18 04:16:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I don't think there's any real ambiguity here. Agreed. An author's intention is what matters at court. IMO, they did express their intention very clearly (LGPLv2+), in this case. The only critical situation would be if their sources were containing inlined license terms/clauses which would be contradicting their "global detached license". I haven't checked if this this applies in this particular case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180822.m7I8MZlx017587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-08-18 04:22:35 EDT --- Thanks for comments. - License information - I have sent an email to upstream about this issue, now there is a comment in SPEC file - explicit debuginfo statement deleted - another doc files added (KNOWNBUGS, RELEASE_TESTS and TODO) - python requirement deleted Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/pmpu/pmpu.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/pmpu/pmpu-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458939] Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180826.m7I8Q4kI008647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-08-18 04:26:02 EDT --- Sorry, my fault. Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/arora/arora.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/arora/arora-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 08:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180833.m7I8XMCv019474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-18 04:33:20 EDT --- > Resolving the cyclic build-dep is a MUSTFIX, otherwise you won't be able to > bootstrap this package. Yeah, that's obvious. > In any case you should file a bug upstream. It's an upstream design flaw. In Makefile.PL is Graph::Easy::As_svg only _recommend_, so there's no need to file a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 09:16:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808180916.m7I9Gujk017492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #20 from Bart Vanbrabant 2008-08-18 05:16:54 EDT --- Thanks. At least for the next I won't be able to do much because I can only access the internet from my work. After that I should have a connection at home again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 11:04:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] New: Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Summary: Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karsten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/karsten/libtool2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/karsten/libtool-2.2.4-1.src.rpm Description: GNU Libtool is a set of shell scripts which automatically configure UNIX and UNIX-like systems to generically build shared libraries. Libtool provides a consistent, portable interface which simplifies the process of using shared libraries. Note to the reviewer: Quite a few packages which build with libtool won't build with libtool2 anymore as libtool2 has some incompatible changes. We can't make a complete switch at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 12:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181213.m7ICDXAP019120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-18 08:13:31 EDT --- Licence is ok. Let's wait for koji build... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 12:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 368401] Review Request: freeipmi - Free IPMI userland implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181233.m7ICXMKt022779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368401 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 12:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 368401] Review Request: freeipmi - Free IPMI userland implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181237.m7ICb1wL023524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=368401 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 12:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181246.m7ICkQf3025274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-18 08:46:25 EDT --- - rpmlint checks return: tcl-tile-devel.i386: W: no-documentation but that's ok. Devel don't have to own some documentation. - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license: Please check the license: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/TCL The source code is from tcl developers and it looks more tclish to me than MIT. - spec file legible, in am. english - probably OK - source matches upstream OK - package compiles on devel (x86) - check this latter - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales OK - not relocatable OK - owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - %clean OK - macro use consistent OK - docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - devel package OK - no .la files OK - post/postun ldconfig no, OK - devel requires base package n-v-r OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 13:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181305.m7ID5DaS028711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Radek Vokal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rvokal at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 13:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450013] Review Request: testopia - bugzilla extended to add test case management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181354.m7IDshcs027816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450013 --- Comment #30 from Dave Malcolm 2008-08-18 09:54:41 EDT --- Unfortunately, there are about 15kloc of JavaScript in there, which are heavily dependent on ExtJS. A port of Testopia to a different js lib would be a major engineering effort, and a fork from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 14:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456281] Review Request: xerces-j2 - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181436.m7IEacC7003279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456281 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-18 10:36:36 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2048/xerces-j2.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2126/xerces-j2-2.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - Remove Epoch tag - Remove Obsoletes tag - Clean up versionless javadoc dir symlinking - Add LICENSE to both demo and scripts packages - Avoid use of macros in %%changelog - Remove dangerous command in %%pre: rm -f %%{_javadir}/xerces.jar - Change priority for alternatives - The archive.apache.org is used to obtain sources rpmlint shows no error and no warnings against all binary RPMs, but it shows 3 warnings against SRPM: ------------------- xerces-j2.src:226: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} xerces-j2.src:227: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* xerces-j2.src:251: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-samples.jar.* ------------------ All warnings listed above are not issues, because all of them have relation to the gcj support, but the gcj support is turned off by default in the package specification. Note, all the libdir macros are enclosed within the macro %if %{gcj_support} ... %endif and there is the %define gcj_support 0 at the start of the specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:07:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181507.m7IF7vjo009504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #30 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-18 11:07:56 EDT --- I can't download the srpm (that being said I am still too busy to review it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181506.m7IF6oWK009423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #4 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-18 11:06:48 EDT --- Hi Polychronis, Don't worry, I'll take care of the issues with the spec file, and let you know if I have any questions or need help. I just Cc'ed you on the bug in case we run into trouble. Rakesh, Comments about your comments - conffile-without-noreplace-flag: dbus configs aren't really something that a normal user is going to edit - it doesn't make much sense to me to have (noreplace) on them, especially since, if the app changes the way it uses DBUS, having the configs not be updated on upgrade will break upgrades. Do we have a standard for this already? service-default-enabled: I don't mind to disable it by default, but since it's a network service, I would think it would be enabled by default, like NetworkManager. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:06:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181506.m7IF6vlj018440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-18 11:06:55 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:21:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181521.m7IFLE9I020532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-08-18 11:21:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pmpu Short Description: GUI for distributed VCS's Owners: jreznik Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181520.m7IFKQNe020423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #13 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-18 11:20:25 EDT --- Ok, Sorry for the delay I have been away for few days. > comment #8 Let me explain my though, this is my first project that I package, I have almost never seen the spec file in the sources that I packaged and did not know about the rpmbuild -ta. I have always been working with src.rpm also because it is supposed to be the base of the review and what is available with yumdownload --source. But I understand that some people could be interested on having the specfile with the source. Thanks for the information. > Comment #9 That was indeed my question I could not find you on the FAS. > Comment #10 Thanks for the light, that was actually my question, I never faced a project with the spec file furnished (especially because I assume that the spec file can be rather different in OS like SuSE compare to Fedora -- just my guess I do not know enough SuSE). Anyway there is a new version which include the spec file into the sources for the people who do not like src.rpm :) http://pingoured.fr/public/R2spec/R2spec.spec http://pingoured.fr/public/R2spec/R2spec-2.4.0.tar.gz http://pingoured.fr/public/R2spec/R2spec-2.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm I corrected the python-devel and I think the tar.gz instead of tar Fedorahosted server seems to be down at the moment but I will upload the new version as soon as I get an access back. Regards, Pierre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459084] Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181531.m7IFV2AC022137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459084 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-18 11:31:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-sv Short Description: Swedish hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:30:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181530.m7IFUo32013084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-18 11:30:49 EDT --- So I guess you know that fails to build. It's odd; the regression test passes, the timing test includes this in its output: timing run of genc.sno: ERROR: genc.sno output is bad; compare timdir.22167/stdout with snobol4.c and the build log has: ./timing > timing.out ./xsnobol4: error while loading shared libraries: libsnobol-4.1.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Maybe the problem is that LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to be set when "timing" is called as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181549.m7IFnFXm024390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-18 11:49:13 EDT --- Ping? * http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/libev/libev.spec * http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/libev/libev-3.43-3.fc9.src.rpm (temporarily here due to Fedora infrastructure problems) * Mon Aug 18 2008 Michal Nowak - 3.43-3 - renamed $$RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %%{buildroot} - commenting .pc file & related - installing back to /usr/include from /usr/include/%%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 15:56:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181556.m7IFu24w025492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-18 11:56:01 EDT --- I was able to fix the outstanding issues. Uploaded stuff: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol-4.1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm ------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 16:15:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] New: Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 Summary: Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwheeler at dwheeler.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/E.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/E-0.999.006-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: E is a purely equational theorem prover for full first-order logic. That means it is a program that you can stuff a mathematical specification (in first-order format) and a hypothesis into, and which will then run forever, using up all of your machines' resources. Very occasionally it will find a proof for the hypothesis and tell you so. E's inference core is based on a modified version of the superposition calculus for equational clausal logic. Both clausification and reasoning on the clausal form can be documented in checkable proof objects. E was the best-performing open source software prover in the 2008 CADE ATP System Competition (CASC) in the FOF, CNF, and UEQ divisions. NOTE: Normally I would use mock and koji to test the package, to make sure that the BuildRequires: is correct and that it compiled in other circumstances. Unfortunately, due to the Fedora infrastructure problems, I cannot do that right now. It compiles for me, and I intend to test this with mock and koji as soon as I can do so. In the meantime, I'd love to hear other comments about this package. That way, when the Fedora infrastructure comes back up, this will be ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 16:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181628.m7IGS6lH020769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #14 from R P Herrold 2008-08-18 12:28:05 EDT --- looks great to me so far ... with the files retrieved from your personal site, per comment #13, the tarball method of rebuilding, AND a simple rebuild of the SRPM work fine now. The next step I will take is to package some R modules. thanks -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 16:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181625.m7IGPHCt020477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #5 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2008-08-18 12:25:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > service-default-enabled: I don't mind to disable it by default, but since it's > a network service, I would think it would be enabled by default, like > NetworkManager. What do you think? In the network that Cerebro creates, every node can not only communicate with others, but also update its own profile and receive updates for everyone else. While you are not running Cerebro, the user will miss those updates. If necessary, the user can go into "silent mode" and have Cerebro never transmit a single byte, while still receiving as much of the information that is being broadcasted anyway and would otherwise be dropped by the kernel (because there is no process listening for this type of data). In conclusion, the user _might_ lose some potentially interesting information while not running Cerebro, but probably nothing to lose while running it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 17:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181714.m7IHEp6H026313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-18 13:14:50 EDT --- @Polychronis & @Robin I am having some tough time with my system & will only be able to review as soon as infrastructure problems are solved. (koji or need to set up mock) as said above hopefully in few days. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 17:48:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181748.m7IHmIVJ007278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 17:51:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181751.m7IHpkXj031342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-18 13:51:44 EDT --- Not so far. Life intervened a bit, I'll keep playing with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 17:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181750.m7IHodLM031158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-18 13:50:39 EDT --- Thanks Roy, This package is approved. I've just sponsored you in the Fedora Account System. You now can proceed with the rest of the process starting from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 Please fix the last rpmlint warning before importing your package: denemo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog Let me know if you have any questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 18:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181832.m7IIWOma005074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #31 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-18 14:32:23 EDT --- :) That's because of that ongoing Fedora infrastructure problems. Anyway, I have updated package with fixed build deps and other enhancements. * http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec * http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.5.rc3.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Aug 18 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.5.rc3 - buildepend on readline-devel, glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, luadoc - install via "install -p" - %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/themes/default is not a config file no more, having config file in /usr is kinda weird - added sub-package awesome-doc to handle API doc files * Sat Aug 16 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.4.rc3 - awesome-3.0-rc3-enhance-wallpaper-cmd.patch: enhance setting of wallpaper - new dep: xsri - %%{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default is now handled configfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 18:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181841.m7IIfxiv006953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 --- Comment #3 from Steven Dake 2008-08-18 14:41:58 EDT --- Jason, Thanks for your review. To ansewr your questions: 1) the user id is needed for IPC security. That user id was previously part of openais and has been moved into this package instead. IPC authenticates all users using a UID equal to ais (or root of course). 2) i will change the initrddir issue you mentioned. This spec file was taken from the original openais spec file from fedora 6 ages ago. 3) A lcrso file is a plugin with a specific binary format. It will only be loaded by the corosync binary for which the architecture is built. Therefore multilib is not an issue, since we wont have a 64 bit corosync and 32 bit plugins. The plugins are required to match the binary bit size of the corosync binary. 4) Thanks for the tips on doc I will fix that. 5) The corosync main package doesn't use any library in the -devel package. The devel package shared objects are libraries for use by third party developers writing software. Just so we are clear, here is an example, and you can correct me if I misunderstand the packaging guidelines. User wants to write an application using the cpg service. They install corosync and corosync-devel. corosync-devel provides the API header files and library objects for usage by the application's cpg utilization. At no time does anything in the main corosync package reference any shared object in the devel package. The -devel libraries are only for third party developers. 6) man page in wrong location - thanks for the catch. 7) I really like to list everything out so that rpmbuild catches maintainer (my) errors in packaging by telling me about a missing file or unpackaged files. If this will be an issue for review I can trim the list however. --- I will make a new RPM with the following changes: a) fix the initrdir b) fix the service start c) move the corosync-ctl man page to the proper package If you feel more actions are required please let me know. And thank you for your time reviewing the package. Regards -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 18:43:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456341] Review Request: netbeans-platform8 - NetBeans 6.1 Platform 8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181843.m7IIhG72016138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456341 --- Comment #9 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-18 14:43:14 EDT --- The second release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2059/netbeans-platform8.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2127/netbeans-platform8-6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Suppress rpmlint warnings about hidden .noautoupdate files - Appropriate values of Group Tags are chosen from the official list - Avoid dangling symlinks after %%install rpmlint shows no errors against both SRPM and RPMs. It also shows no warnings against SRPM, but it shows some warnings against RPMs: === netbeans-platform8-6.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm ======================== netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-libs-jna.jar netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-libs-jsr223.jar netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-modules-javahelp.jar netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-netbeans-modules-autoupdate-services.jar netbeans-platform8.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/netbeans/platform8/modules/org-jdesktop-layout.jar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. === netbeans-platform8-harness-6.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm ================ netbeans-platform8-harness.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln netbeans-platform8-harness.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ===================================================================== All 9 warnings listed above are not issues, because: * All dangerous ln and rm commands are used to establish symlinks between the system and external JARs. There are guarantees that the symlinks won't be dangling, because all JARs are provided by the packages listed under the "Requires" tags. All ln and complementary rm commands have relations to files located only inside of /usr/share/netbeans/platform8 and /usr/share/netbeans/harness directories. * All warnings class-path-in-manifest don't have any sense for the package due to OpenJDK 6, i.e minimal used Java version is 6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 18:47:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181847.m7IIlxlk016936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-18 14:47:58 EDT --- Thanks for noting that, Jason. I completely forgot on BuildRequires. * Sun Aug 17 2008 Michal Nowak - 0.2.1-2 - new build deps: gperf, pkgconfig, libxcb, m4, xorg-x11-proto-devel - not installing *.a files anymore - configure with --with-pic * Spec URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec * SRPM URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 18:59:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181859.m7IIxPnY018221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-18 14:59:20 EDT --- SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg-2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm This seems better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 19:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808181958.m7IJwnMO017940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #23 from mathstuf at gmail.com 2008-08-18 15:58:48 EDT --- With less unused links (only libm left) and the ldconfig mistake is fixed now. http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen.spec http://benboeckel.net/pokegen/pokegen-0.0.2-0.14.20080818svn240.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 20:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808182049.m7IKnICu001566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #15 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-18 16:49:17 EDT --- Just for the record, did it work on the first SRPM or did it give the same error ? If you are willing to put R package into Fedora repository, please drop me a line for the review and thanks for the testing :) Regards, Pierre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 20:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808182059.m7IKxlL5003555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #16 from R P Herrold 2008-08-18 16:59:45 EDT --- I did not test the first SRPM, as I was confused at the .tar v .tgz issue. The 2.4.0 SRPM was what succeeded for me. Perhaps Michael can do a Fedora review for you; I am involved with that project as a CLA signer. Thanks. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 23:20:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] New: Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Summary: Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: ctdb is the clustered database used by samba This is my first package and I'm seeking a sponsor. I also need webspace to host my specfile and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 23:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808182326.m7INQdq0025296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Abhijith Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 18 23:49:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808182349.m7INnatD028926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschmidt at redhat.com --- Comment #26 from Michal Schmidt 2008-08-18 19:49:35 EDT --- Do you really need to specify 'Requires: expat rpm zlib'? RPM is able to pick dependencies on shared libraries automatically. I'm not a native speaker, but I'm pretty sure the word is spelled 'satisfiability', not 'satisfyability' (Wikipedia and Googlefight confirm it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 00:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190051.m7J0pH6J006845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 --- Comment #18 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-08-18 20:51:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Time-Duration New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 00:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190051.m7J0pHqE031723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 --- Comment #17 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-08-18 20:51:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: moreutils New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 01:19:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190119.m7J1JdDU003997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-18 21:19:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > .pm files are are not intended to be run directly rather .pl files are and they > > don't generally don't need she-bang. These are perl-modules, which must NOT be executable nor do they need a she-bang. > > But you will need to investigate why that one of these files most probably > > mksplit has an issue. No, it doesn't have one. mksplit is a script. But there are other issues with your package: 1) It is wrong to rename install-info/cleanup-info. These are different tools than the ones in Fedora and must be installed to /usr/sbin, otherwise dpkg will not work. 2) Installing dpkg's (dpkg-)update-alternatives daemon doesn't make any sense on Fedora, because these are provided by other packages in Fedora. 3) Packaging (dpkg-)start-stop-daemon also hardly makes sense. I recommend to not building nor installing it. (%configure --without-start-stop-daemon) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 01:42:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190142.m7J1g5gu007896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #13 from leigh scott 2008-08-18 21:42:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > (In reply to comment #10) > > > > .pm files are are not intended to be run directly rather .pl files are and they > > > don't generally don't need she-bang. > These are perl-modules, which must NOT be executable nor do they need a > she-bang. > > > > But you will need to investigate why that one of these files most probably > > > mksplit has an issue. > > No, it doesn't have one. mksplit is a script. > > > But there are other issues with your package: > > 1) It is wrong to rename install-info/cleanup-info. These are different tools > than the ones in Fedora and must be installed to /usr/sbin, otherwise dpkg will > not work. > > 2) Installing dpkg's (dpkg-)update-alternatives daemon doesn't make any sense > on Fedora, because these are provided by other packages in Fedora. > > 3) Packaging (dpkg-)start-stop-daemon also hardly makes sense. I recommend to > not building nor installing it. (%configure --without-start-stop-daemon) 1) I didn't rename install-info/cleanup-info intentionally and dpkg-install-info/dpkg-cleanup-info are installed to /usr/sbin and appear to work properly. 2) should I just add "rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/dpkg-update-alternatives" to the SPEC file to remove it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 02:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190229.m7J2T3Yu016230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-18 22:29:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > 1) I didn't rename install-info/cleanup-info intentionally and > dpkg-install-info/dpkg-cleanup-info are installed to /usr/sbin and appear to > work properly. They can not work properly, because a) Many *.debs have /usr/sbin/install-info hard-coded, because this is the location Debian has used ever since they exist. It does not conflict with Fedora, because Fedora rpms use a hard-coded /sbin/install-info. A dpkg-cleanup|install-info won't ever be used by any package. b) Debian's install-info is something very different than Fedora's install-info (They are incompatible). > 2) should I just add "rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/dpkg-update-alternatives" > to the SPEC file to remove it ? That's what I am doing in my older (dkg-1.13.25) package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 04:57:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] New: Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Summary: Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: moe at blagblagblag.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is my first Fedora package so I need a sponsor. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/fmit.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/fmit-0.97.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Free Music Instrument Tuner! :) Free Music Instrument Tuner features error history, volume history, wave shape harmonic ratios, microtonal tuning (with Scala file support), and a discrete Fourier transform view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 05:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190519.m7J5J4WQ013246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 08:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190806.m7J86FMI028491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 04:06:14 EDT --- Version: 2.3 Release: 2%{?dist} is the one that worked for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 08:31:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190831.m7J8VLR5032238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 08:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244314] Review Request: matchbox-window-manager - Matchbox window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190848.m7J8mt2N002088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244314 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-19 04:48:53 EDT --- I see this is in the distro, is there a reason the review request is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 09:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190946.m7J9k70m021004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mschmidt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschmidt at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michal Schmidt 2008-08-19 05:46:05 EDT --- I'm interested in python-twisted-web2 because a new version of Jabbim will need it. I'll do the review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 09:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808190956.m7J9uuff014743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-19 05:56:55 EDT --- Great. Note though that I've had a report that seemed to indicate that some parts of web2 8 don't work with the version of Twisted currently in Fedora, so it might be required to update all other Twisted components to version 8 too first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 12:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191218.m7JCIxSL005250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt 2008-08-19 08:18:58 EDT --- If there really are known bugs when used with old Twisted core, consider adding a versioned dependency on python-twisted-core in Requires and BuildRequires and make BZ450227 'Updated Twisted packages please' block this bug. You can use '--install-purelib %{python_sitearch}' like python-twisted-web does it instead of moving the files. Then you won't need to define python_sitelib. python-twisted-web calls %{_libexecdir}/twisted-dropin-cache in %post and %postun. Are they needed in this package too? Checking ReviewGuidelines MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. The package built successfully in mock. $ rpmlint -vi *.rpm python-twisted-web2.src: I: checking python-twisted-web2.x86_64: I: checking python-twisted-web2.x86_64: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. There is a valid reason why the package is arch-specific. This rpmlint error should be ignored. OK. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . The name is consistent with the names of other Twisted components in Fedora. OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . The Guidelines specify that any relevant documentation should be included in the package. The upstream tarball contains a doc/ directory which is not included in the package. PLEASE FIX. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . MIT license. OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. I see just one little error in Description: s/it's APIs/its APIs/ - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sha1sum matches: 4a03e62453037b009ee5f0e1396be792249b9e2f OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. N/A - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. N/A - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file N/A - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 12:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191245.m7JCj8SR017253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-08-19 08:45:07 EDT --- I have made the changes per your suggestions. Please re-verify: pec URL: http://www.thincrust.net/download/rubygem-pam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thincrust.net/download/rubygem-pam-1.5.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ruby bindings for pam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 12:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191254.m7JCsbcE009620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney 2008-08-19 08:54:36 EDT --- I verified. all changes look good. APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191308.m7JD80dX020667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-19 09:07:59 EDT --- Thanks! About the Twisted compatibility, the parts that I have looked at do seem to work (with "elisa"), so I'd be interested in knowing if this package, with the older other Twisted packages currently found in Fedora, work for the application that you need it for. Find updated files in the same location : * Tue Aug 19 2008 Matthias Saou 8.1.0-3 - Use --install-purelib option instead of manually moving the installed files. - Fix description. - Include doc/ directory, although it would fit best in a "devel" package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:15:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191315.m7JDFVc0021996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #40 from Dennis Jang 2008-08-19 09:15:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > Dennis, ping :) Can you please follow > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure > so we can get this package added to Fedora soon. Jens, sorry for slow response ok I'll follow cvsadmin procdeure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191311.m7JDBb5e021374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 09:11:36 EDT --- With the invaluable help of David Woodhouse who spared some cycles and his personal time it was proved that this application does not work on ppc because the code is "far too dependent on ACPI nonsense, and not using the proper generic interfaces to stuff." Therefore the spec file must exclude the ppc/ppc64 architecture. Sven, add the required bits and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191319.m7JDJEH6013489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #21 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 09:19:13 EDT --- Sorry, please ignore comment #20, it was meant for bug 445152 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191318.m7JDILsF013440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #20 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 09:18:20 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/PPC [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct ( %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4f2911cb0c737335003c2c13edef76821dee2cd1 /tmp/libacpi-0.2.tar.gz [!] Package is known to not work on ppc/ppc64 See issue 1 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/ppc [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [!] Package functions as described. See isssue 1 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153#c19 Short version: the code is dependent on x86 specific architecture and cannot be used on ppc Therefore the ppc architecture must be excluded Sven, add the required excludearch line in the spec and I'll approve the package. Wishful thinking: it would be nice of you could persuade the upstream author to rewrite the code in a more portable way. Or ar least tell him about the problems . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191318.m7JDIAAO022267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |450227 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-19 09:18:09 EDT --- Oh, about the call to twisted-dropin-cache. It might be needed, but having tried it now, I can see that web2 definitely needs some newer Twisted components, as it gives the following error on the current Fedora 9 : exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name ServiceMaker So I'm adding a dependency on bug #450227 and will add the proper runtime requirements to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:19:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191319.m7JDJuV8013587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 09:19:55 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/PPC [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct ( %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4f2911cb0c737335003c2c13edef76821dee2cd1 /tmp/libacpi-0.2.tar.gz [!] Package is known to not work on ppc/ppc64 See issue 1 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, devel/ppc [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [!] Package functions as described. See isssue 1 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153#c19 Short version: the code is dependent on x86 specific architecture and cannot be used on ppc Therefore the ppc architecture must be excluded Sven, please add the required excludearch line in the spec and I'll approve the package. Wishful thinking: it would be nice of you could persuade the upstream author to rewrite the code in a more portable way. Or ar least tell him about the problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191321.m7JDLac0022852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #22 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 09:21:35 EDT --- One last suggestion: change "Note: This is no portable code, it will only run on a Linux system." to "Note: This is no portable code, it will only run on a Linux system with an x86 architecture." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:32:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191332.m7JDW3rS024220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-19 09:32:02 EDT --- * Tue Aug 19 2008 Matthias Saou 0.9.5.1-1 - Update to 0.9.5.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235111] Review Request: mina - A Multipurpose Infrastructure for Network Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191331.m7JDVukW024187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235111 marco crosio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |marco.crosio at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 13:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191345.m7JDjmYv026337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas 2008-08-19 09:45:47 EDT --- I think that it would be better to leave dpkg-cleanup|install-info in if somebody wants to use them. As long as the name is clear and that it will only be called on purpose I think it is better to leave it in, no problem if nobody uses it, and if somebody wants to he can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 14:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191409.m7JE99d8030157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #16 from leigh scott 2008-08-19 10:09:07 EDT --- Here's the new SPEC + SRPM with the suggested changes ! http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg.spec http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg-1.14.20-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 14:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191411.m7JEB1IN021038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #17 from leigh scott 2008-08-19 10:11:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I think that it would be better to leave dpkg-cleanup|install-info in > if somebody wants to use them. As long as the name is clear and that > it will only be called on purpose I think it is better to leave it > in, no problem if nobody uses it, and if somebody wants to he can. I have left them in but I have renamed them to there original names as suggested ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 14:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191418.m7JEIAS7031496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #18 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-19 10:18:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > I think that it would be better to leave dpkg-cleanup|install-info in > > if somebody wants to use them. Nobody will want to use them - They are useless, because Debian doesn't have them! On the other hand /usr/sbin/cleanup-info and /usr/bin/install-info are mandatory for dpkg to work, because Debian has them. > I have left them in but I have renamed them to there original names as > suggested ! MUSTFIX: - Remove dpkg-cleanup-info, dpkg-install-info - Add /usr/sbin/cleanup-info , /use/sbin/install-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 14:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191441.m7JEfMX0025627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #19 from leigh scott 2008-08-19 10:41:20 EDT --- > MUSTFIX: > > - Remove dpkg-cleanup-info, dpkg-install-info > - Add /usr/sbin/cleanup-info , /use/sbin/install-info I have already done it ! [leigh05 at localhost Alien_project]$ cd dpkg-1.14.20-5.fc9.x86_64/usr/sbin/ [leigh05 at localhost sbin]$ ls cleanup-info dpkg-divert dpkg-statoverride install-info [leigh05 at localhost sbin]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 14:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191452.m7JEqQmK005153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #20 from leigh scott 2008-08-19 10:52:24 EDT --- > > MUSTFIX: > > - Remove dpkg-cleanup-info, dpkg-install-info > - Add /usr/sbin/cleanup-info , /use/sbin/install-info Here's a link to my server ( on from 09.00GMT - 00.00GMT ) if you want to check the built RPM packages. http://leigh123.homelinux.com/dpkg/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 17:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191737.m7JHb7Lm032333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-19 13:37:06 EDT --- If you wish, I agree to co-maintain package. But I do not insist. In any case (In reply to comment #6) > altough i updated my spec there are still some > problem with the configure script how do i solve it??? you may see how I resolve this trouble and get my patch if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 17:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191754.m7JHs2D1002830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-19 13:54:01 EDT --- Thanks tibbs! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: djview4 Short Description: DjVu viewer Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 18:10:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191810.m7JIAqLc029047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-19 14:10:50 EDT --- Thanks to all for their opinions. I should be more educated in the licensing area now. I will continue in the process during next week after my return from vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 19:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191944.m7JJig3U012060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-19 15:44:41 EDT --- o Source0 is almost correct, just change from prdownloads to downloads: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-{version}.tar.gz Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net o Your are using % style macros for everything, that's good, however then you should replace install with %{__install} too. o I would prefer %defattr in this form: %defattr(-, root, root, -) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 19:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808191953.m7JJrrje013983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-19 15:53:52 EDT --- Pedantic: %install %{__rm} -fr %{buildroot} vs %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} Change to %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 20:03:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459535] New: Review Request: backup-manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: backup-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Summary: Review Request: backup-manager Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://www.backup-manager.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guillaume.kulakowski at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Backup Manager is a command line backup tool for GNU/Linux, designed to help you make daily archives of your file system. Written in bash and perl, it can make archives in lots of open formats (tar, gzip, bzip2, lzma, dar, zip) and provides lots of interesting features (such as network exports or CD/DVD automated-burning). The program is designed to be as easy to use as possible and is popular with desktop users and sysadmins. The whole backup process is defined in one full-documented configuration file which needs no more than 5 minutes to tune for your needs. It just works. spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc9/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-1.fc9.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc9/backup-manager-0.7.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Other RPMS : - http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc6/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-1.fc6.noarch.rpm - http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc8/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-1.fc8.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 20:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192001.m7JK1cil015757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-19 16:01:36 EDT --- Special Comment: I think you should contact FESCo for sheduling this for F-11. Good: + Rpmlint guite for source rpm. + Package has a proper open source license + Local build works fine. + Consitent use of rpm macros + All installed files are owned by the package and doesN't conflict with files of other packages + Package contains verbatin test of the license + Mock build works fine Bad: - Messages from rpmlint libtool-2... rpmlint libtool-2.2.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__strl.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/ltdl.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/argz_.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt__private.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/dyld.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/lt_error.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt_error.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/dld_link.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt_system.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt__glibc.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/slist.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__dirent.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt_dlloader.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/preopen.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/shl_load.c libtool.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt__strl.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__alloc.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/ltdl.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/slist.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/load_add_on.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt__alloc.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/lt_dlloader.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/argz.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/libltdl/lt__dirent.h libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/loadlibrary.c libtool.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/libtool/libltdl/loaders/dlopen.c libtool.x86_64: E: no-binary $ rpmlint libtool-ltdl-2.2.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm libtool-ltdl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long system-installed ltdl libraries; they are not needed by software built using the libtool-ltdl.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL rpmlint libtool-ltdl-devel-2.2.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm libtool-ltdl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libtool-ltdl-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - Why do you not _smp_mflags - Package should not contains *.a and *.la files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 20:26:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192026.m7JKQoce030770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Karsten Hopp 2008-08-19 16:26:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review ! In addition to the above there are lots of conflicts with libtool-1.5 which I need to solve. I'm not sure yet which way ist the best, maybe rename binaries/scripts with suffix '2', use /usr/share/libtool2 and move the header files to their own directory under /usr/include -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 21:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] New: Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Proposal of a MediaWiki extension: Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/mediawiki-imagemap.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/xhtml2fo-style-xsl-20050106-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-rev39658-1.src.rpm RPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-rev39658-1.noarch.rpm Description: This extension lets to use image maps inside Mediawiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 21:41:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192141.m7JLf6wr011492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 21:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192149.m7JLn6DO002960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #23 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-19 17:49:05 EDT --- ExcludeArch added New SRPM: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/libacpi-0.2-12.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/libacpi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 21:48:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192148.m7JLmXZT002906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Comment #14 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-19 17:48:32 EDT --- ExcludeArch added. libacpi/yacpi can hopefully be replaced by something based on DeviceKitPower in the future but until that happens the tools are still very useful. Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/yacpi.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/yacpi-3.0.1-11.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 21:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192152.m7JLqfB2003737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #2 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-19 17:52:40 EDT --- Sorry!! I've cut and pasted badly!! Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/mediawiki-imagemap.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-rev39658-1.src.rpm RPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-rev39658-1.noarch.rpm The other package got its own bug report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793). It's not related with MediaWiki at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 21:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192141.m7JLfucQ011669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-19 17:41:55 EDT --- What is the xhtml2fo-style-xsl srpm for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 22:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] New: Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Summary: Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: metal3d at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.metal3d.org/repo/fedora/9/SPECS/php-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.metal3d.org/repo/fedora/9/SRPMS/php-gtk-2.0.1-1.fc9.metal3d.src.rpm Description: PHP-GTK is an extension for the PHP programming language that implements language bindings for GTK+. It provides an object-oriented interface to GTK+ classes and functions and greatly simplifies writing client-side cross-platform GUI applications RPMlint output: [builder at localhost ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/php-gtk-2.0.1-1.fc9.metal3d.i386.rpm php-gtk.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.1-1.fc9 2.0.1-1.fc9.metal3d 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. That's because I used my repotag "metal3d" Examples are in /usr/share/ php-gtk documentation after install. It works great :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 22:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192214.m7JMEtct007215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Comment #15 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 18:14:53 EDT --- package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 22:15:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192215.m7JMFLMK007569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #24 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-19 18:15:20 EDT --- package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 22:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459549] New: Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459549 Summary: Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acme at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/fedora/python-ethtool.spec SRPM URL: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/fedora/python-ethtool-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface, comes with a test case, pethtool, that uses the bindings already implemented, producing output that mimics the ethool command. Required by another package that will be submitted for review, tuna. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 22:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192225.m7JMPA0h009405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #25 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-19 18:25:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libacpi Short Description: General purpose library for ACPI Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 22:27:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192227.m7JMRMfP019273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Comment #16 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-19 18:27:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yacpi Short Description: Yet Another Configuration and Power Interface Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 19 23:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808192304.m7JN43HW025447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-19 19:04:02 EDT --- This does build, but rpmlint complains about many undefined-non-weak-symbols (for things that should be in libm and such). I don't know if this is a real issue or not. It also complains: snobol-devel.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so and indeed libsnobol.so seems to be just a file instead of the expected symlink. There's also this near the end of the build: *** WARNING: identical binaries are copied, not linked: /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so.4 and /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so Seems that the install command doesn't seem to preserve symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 01:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200123.m7K1NfR0014149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Patrice FERLET changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |metal3d at gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Patrice FERLET 2008-08-19 21:23:39 EDT --- I did another spec file wich create 3 packages: - google-gadgets - google-gadget-gtk - google-gadget-qt My troubles appears with mock to compile on i386 (works great in x86-64). I will give you my src.rpm tomorrow. Maybe a merge between our 2 specs cool be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 02:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200231.m7K2V2md023612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-19 22:31:01 EDT --- This looks OK; rpmlint has one complaint: cwdaemon.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/cwdaemon-0.9.4/cwsetup.sh Normally documentation shouldn't be executable, but it's not really a problem as long as it doesn't cause additional dependencies. I think in this case it causes a /bin/sh dependency which I don't really see as a problem. You seem to be missing the %postun scriptlet; without it, the daemon will not restart itself after a package update. * source files match upstream: 0b26304333a1933d45814be23788295dd22fa6d80fc651a32fb12bd042b9e84e cwdaemon-0.9.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(cwdaemon) = 0.9.4-7.fc10 cwdaemon = 0.9.4-7.fc10 cwdaemon(x86-64) = 0.9.4-7.fc10 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service config(cwdaemon) = 0.9.4-7.fc10 libcw.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no way to test this without the proper hardware. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets present look OK, but %postun is missing. * initscript looks OK. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 03:14:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459549] Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200314.m7K3E5Kb021414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459549 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-19 23:14:04 EDT --- A few comments: python-ethtool.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ethtool.so 0775 This should probably not be group-writable. python-ethtool.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized ethtool python bindings Kind of self-explanatory. python-ethtool.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-3 0.2-1.fc10 You should have a changelog entry matching every version you release. python-ethtool.x86_64: W: no-url-tag Is there really no upstream for this package? It is very strongly suggested that there be an independent upstream source for everything in Fedora. Is the license really GPLv2+? The source would seem to indicate GPLv2 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 04:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200411.m7K4Bbcw028546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 --- Comment #6 from Roy Rankin 2008-08-20 00:11:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name:denemo Short Description:Graphical music notation program Owners:rrankin Branches:F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 05:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200534.m7K5Ym95005573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-20 01:34:46 EDT --- IMO, you can't avoid packaging libtool to allow parallel installation of libtool1 and libtool2, until thing have settled (probably for the next decade :)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 05:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200549.m7K5n8Pw007555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-20 01:49:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > You seem to be missing the %postun scriptlet; without it, the daemon will not > restart itself after a package update. Added %postun and bumped version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cwdaemon.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 07:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200738.m7K7c6xo020992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #18 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-20 03:38:05 EDT --- I found a bug there are the updates Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/browser/R2spec-2.4.1/R2spec.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/browser/R2spec-2.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm?format=raw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 09:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808200951.m7K9pXH9008639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-20 05:51:32 EDT --- TODO items: * Version field should be 0 instead of 0.0.0 * Instead of using "svn co" and later removing svn files, you should use "svn export" * You should add verbatim commands used to produce tarball, not only one (svn co) - see this spec, for example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flashrom/devel/flashrom.spec?view=markup * There is rev. 691 in svn. Would you mind to update your package? * Using only checkout date in versionin is insufficient at all. You should use svn revision (and date, if you wish) instead. * Main package should contain doc/short-desc as well. * To avoid building empty debuginfo-subpackage you should add %define debug_package %{nil} at top of your spec-file. See this spec as an example: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip.spec * I'm in doubts of naming scheme for devel-subpackage. Actually we can use erlang modules in development w/o sources :). Maybe it would be better to name it src instead of devel? Just my thoughts, anyway... * You should use -p switch for "install" command, in order to preserve timestamps. Frankly speaking in this case (checkout from VCS) there is not so much sense, but lately, when official tarball may be introduced, it would have more meaning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 10:06:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201006.m7KA6QYV010794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-20 06:06:24 EDT --- Again, ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 10:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201021.m7KALvvM012940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-20 06:21:54 EDT --- Does this package superceded by php-pear-Auth-OpenID? I quickly looked inside and found that directories PHP-yadis-1.0.2/Services/Yadis and php-openid-2.1.1/Auth/Yadis looks quite similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 10:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201029.m7KAT6PH013623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-20 06:29:04 EDT --- Ping on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 12:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201223.m7KCNBhT004512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 Tim Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #50 from Tim Jackson 2008-08-20 08:23:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > Is there any reason this ticket is still open? I don't see that CVS was ever > done, but the package seems to be in the distro. No, closed. CVS didn't need to be done because there was already a module in CVS from legacy Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 12:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459579] New: Review Request: pike - Interpreted, high-level, object oriented language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pike - Interpreted, high-level, object oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459579 Summary: Review Request: pike - Interpreted, high-level, object oriented language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheese at nosuchhost.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/devel/pike.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/devel/pike-7.6.112-23.src.rpm Description: Pike is easily learned, and just as easily used programming language to develop powerful applications. Pike is designed to be useful and powerful. As the syntax of Pike is similar to that of C, most programmers will find it easy to use. As Pike is a high-level, interpreted and modular object-oriented language, powerful applications can be rapidly developed. Pike has evolved rather than been designed. The changes to Pike that have been made have been guided by its users' needs. In general, the better you get to know Pike, the more you will appreciate it, from a users perspective. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 12:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201239.m7KCd163030809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org --- Comment #26 from David Woodhouse 2008-08-20 08:38:59 EDT --- For the record, I really don't think we should be shipping this as a library in its current form. It's not generically useful -- it's ACPI-specific and broken. It should be using _generic_ interfaces -- such as /sys/class/power_supply for battery information, for example -- rather than the ACPI-specific ones which are going to be going away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 13:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201340.m7KDe6D2005976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #27 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-20 09:40:04 EDT --- @Pavel Alexeev I'm sorry, the real URL is: http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Sat_Solver @David A. Wheeler sat-solver is the upstream name. I just packaged it with it's original name. But I'm willing to change its name. Regarding the smoke test, I'll add that ASAP, it's more convenient than the huge test suite. @Michal Schmidt I'll remove that dependencies in 'Requires' and fix the spelling issues I am on vacation, it'll require some time to get the issues fixed. Please be patient and thanks for the interest :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 13:41:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201341.m7KDfKI9006108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 --- Comment #4 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-20 09:41:18 EDT --- The third release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2044/freemarker.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2134/freemarker-2.3.13-3.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - The downloads.sourceforge.net host is used in the source URL - %%{__install} and %%{__cp} are used everywhere - %%defattr(-,root,root,-) is used everywhere -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 13:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201346.m7KDkJ0p006654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 Michal Marciniszyn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 13:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201346.m7KDkUTv006716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-20 09:46:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > IMO, you can't avoid packaging libtool to allow parallel installation of > libtool1 and libtool2, until thing have settled (probably for the next > decade :)). This was the reason why the packager should contact FESCo. So we can make a clear introdcution of libtool-2 on F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 13:46:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459549] Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201346.m7KDkxoH015590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459549 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2008-08-20 09:46:58 EDT --- Thanks for the comments, answers: 1. will check how python setup.py mechanism sets permissions, trying to find the proper way instead of resorting to chmod in the %install section 2. fixed, now the Summary reads: "Summary: Ethernet settings python bindings" And the description: %description Python bindings for the ethtool kernel interface, that allows querying and changing of ethernet card settings, such as speed, port, autonegotiation, and PCI locations. 3. Fixed the version in changelog 4. I'm the upstream, made a tarball available at: http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-ethtool/ And list the git repo in the URL, good enough? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/python-ethtool.git 5. Fixed the version, its GPLv2 Was this with rpmlint? /me grumbles, I used it: [acme at doppio python-ethtool]$ rpmlint rpm/SPECS/python-ethtool.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [acme at doppio python-ethtool]$ I'll try increasing verbosity, etc. New specfile and srpm uploaded to the same place as before. Please let me know of any other problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 13:50:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201350.m7KDoOKd007486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #39 from Jarod Wilson 2008-08-20 09:50:21 EDT --- Yep, that builds on rawhide now. Two things: 1) for the benefit of others looking in the future, you might want to add a brief comment to the spec about why no _smp_mflags. 2) the changelog needs to be fixed up, its missing entries for 1.2.0-5 and 1.2.0-6 (which makes rpmlint cranky). Consider #1, fix #2, and package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 14:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201429.m7KETJgs020624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-20 10:29:19 EDT --- Thank you for your feedback. A new release of the package can find at: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol-4.1.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 14:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201456.m7KEuNVN014110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 --- Comment #4 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-20 10:56:21 EDT --- The third release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2042/beansbinding.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2135/beansbinding-1.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - Canonical using of %%{__rm} - The %%{ant} macro is used instead of the ant command - Redundant export of the $JAVA_HOME environment variable is removed in the %%build script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 15:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201533.m7KFXbeX017061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 11:33:36 EDT --- This fails to build in mock: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.C7rluz: line 29: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory I added a build-dependency on python-devel and it built. I don't know if that's what's really needed, so you should investigate. Once built, rpmlint says: pymssql.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_mssql.so 0775 pymssql.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pymssql-0.8.0/ChangeLog pymssql.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pymssql-0.8.0/TODO All of these need fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 16:13:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201613.m7KGDNaD022524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 12:13:22 EDT --- Yes, looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 16:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201617.m7KGHUwn023312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-20 12:17:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cwdaemon Short Description: Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 16:30:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201630.m7KGUkpi001592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 12:30:44 EDT --- This builds but fails to install. I think I just fixed this myself last time and forgot to comment on it: Requires: snobol=${version} You really want a '%' there, and spaces around the '='. This causes some missing dependency issues when you try to install the -devel package. The undefined-non-weak symbol complaints are still there, but otherwise there are no rpmlint issues. Please fix the above typo when you check in (unless you like receiving those broken dependency reports, I guess). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 16:29:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459549] Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201629.m7KGTrAi001103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459549 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 12:29:52 EDT --- Could you post a link to the updated package? Please be sure to bump the release when you change the package; otherwise browser caching leads to all sorts of confusion. If there's really no web site for the project, then a git repo is as good as anything else. What's really important is that the Source: lines are URLs wherever possible, so that we can have some external location to compare against. As for rpmlint, you should run it against the src.rpm, the build binary (or noarch) rpms, and then install the package and run "rpmlint packagename" to get the full set of complaints. My build scripts do this all in the mock chroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 16:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201633.m7KGXRwr001884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2008-08-20 12:33:26 EDT --- I will be away for the next few days, so only small comments. 1/ I don't know if using same file for input/ouput in iconv is a good idea. 2/ Keeping the original date/time of documentation file is probably a good idea (no guidelines about this, I think, but some reviewer ask for it) A simple solution (1+2) : # Convert to utf-8 for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog THANKS; do mv $file timestamp iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o $file timestamp touch -r timestamp $file done 3/ Should provides a working config. Especialy, the BM_REPOSITORY_ROOT (should be configured, created and owned by the RPM). 4/ Cron integration It could be useful to provided a cron.daily script with the RPM, with log stored in the usual folder (and of course a logrotate config) => Yum install and forget it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 17:07:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201707.m7KH7DME030648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |backup-manager |backup-manager - A command | |line backup tool for | |GNU/Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 18:22:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201822.m7KIMMLN008860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-20 14:22:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > This builds but fails to install. I think I just fixed this myself last time > and forgot to comment on it: Can you tell me any error message. I have try to install on my system without any error message. > Requires: snobol=${version} > You really want a '%' there, and spaces around the '='. This causes some > missing dependency issues when you try to install the -devel package. This issue should be fixed. > The undefined-non-weak symbol complaints are still there, but otherwise there > are no rpmlint issues. Please fix the above typo when you check in (unless you > like receiving those broken dependency reports, I guess). How do you generate this messages about the undef. non-weak symbols? New stuff: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol-4.1.1-5.fc9.src.rpm ------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 18:28:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] New: Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Summary: Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec SRPM URL: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Insight is the well known GDB GUI from cygnus/redhat. It is a tight graphical user interface to GDB written in Tcl/Tk. It provides a comprehensive interface that enables users to harness most of GDB's power. It's also probably the only up-to-date UI for GDB version 6.x. I've mocked it successfully on rawhide i386. rpmlint on spec, srpm and rpms: no errors, no warnings. This is not my first package, but I still need a sponsor for review request no 452901. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 18:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201828.m7KISYgZ018317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 14:28:33 EDT --- The error was simply a broken dependency; the -devel package depended on a package named "snobol=${version}" (i.e. nothing was expanded). I no longer have the -4 rpm to test but I could re-introduce the typo if needed. To get the undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints, install the package and run "rpmlint snobol". You should see 30 of them, at least on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 18:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201856.m7KIugDj015092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 14:56:40 EDT --- Wow, this one builds with -O6! Without performance data, this is pointless; the package should use the standard set of compile flags. rpmlint says: E.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/eground 0775 E.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/epclextract 0775 E.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/eprover 0775 These shouldn't be group writable. I note that the debuginfo package is devoid of source. I suspect this is because it doesn't use the proper compilation flags (mainly -g). The package did build and install OK. (I built it locally in mock.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:15:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201915.m7KJFZMC026938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 Steven Dake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |urgent --- Comment #4 from Steven Dake 2008-08-20 15:15:34 EDT --- New package available for review (corosync-0.91-2): http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync-0.91-1.src.rpm http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync.spec The changelog is: * Wed Aug 20 2008 Steven Dake - 0.91-2 - use /sbin/service instead of calling init script directly. - put corosync-objctl man page in the main package. - change all initrddir to initddir for fedora 10 guidelines. Thank you for taking the time to review this package. Regards -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201916.m7KJGFA7027004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2008-08-20 15:16:14 EDT --- Thx REmi, 1/, 2/, 3/ => OK (0.7.7-2) 4/ -> A backup policy is an important administration task. The backup's schedule is an important choice and I don't prefer providing a cron.daily. Notice : rpmlint is quiet -------------------------------------- spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc9/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-2.fc9.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc9/backup-manager-0.7.7-2.fc9.src.rpm -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- Other RPMS : FC6: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc6/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-2.fc6.noarch.rpm FC8: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc8/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-2.fc8.noarch.rpm -------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201918.m7KJIhMj018899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:16:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201916.m7KJG9aW018697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 --- Comment #5 from Steven Dake 2008-08-20 15:16:08 EDT --- New package available for review (corosync-0.91-2): http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync-0.91-2.src.rpm http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync.spec The changelog is: * Wed Aug 20 2008 Steven Dake - 0.91-2 - use /sbin/service instead of calling init script directly. - put corosync-objctl man page in the main package. - change all initrddir to initddir for fedora 10 guidelines. Thank you for taking the time to review this package. Regards -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:17:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459637] New: Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Summary: Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The SvxLink project is a multi purpose voice services system for ham radio use. For example, EchoLink connections are supported. Also, the SvxLink server can act as a repeater controller. A few notes: - not entirely sure about the versioning - Patch1 might be required (initially commented) as it seems mock spandsp version (0.0.4) differs from the one in koji (0.0.5) ?!, not able to test it recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201917.m7KJH2uY027130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #27 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-20 15:17:00 EDT --- David, /sys/class/power_supply is used. See libacpi-0.2-sysfs.patch - while this all isn't perfect yet (and quite hackish) and I agree that having something based on e.g. devicekit/power would be much nicer it is something that works now and gets the job done. It will either improve or be replaced by something better over time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:21:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201921.m7KJLAFD027771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-08-20 15:21:09 EDT --- FYI, "Insight" is not a very good name because there already exists a biomolecular modelling software from Accelrys called "Insight II". Also, "Insight" and "Insight II" are registered trademarks: http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=ib0gn2.4.25 http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=ib0gn2.4.18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459639] New: Review Request: binclock - ncurses binary clock Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: binclock - ncurses binary clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459639 Summary: Review Request: binclock - ncurses binary clock Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/binclock.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/binclock-0.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: Fullscreen console binary clock. Features: * Written in Python (needs version 2 or later) * Uses ncurses * In color * Proper SIGWINCH handling -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 19:47:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808201947.m7KJlJYu031653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-08-20 15:47:18 EDT --- Good links... I did not know this chemical software ! However this is the cygwin's program name for years (it used to be called "gdbtk"), and is now owned (under this name) by... RedHat :) It is part of the cygwin's "gdb" package. Debian has kept the name: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/insight I'm not against renaming it, but how ? gdbtk ? gdb-insight ? rhinsight ? ... ? And do we rename the /usr/bin/insight command too ? Wouldn't it confuse the user ? Is it a potential RH legal problem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:04:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202004.m7KK40Mk024358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 16:03:58 EDT --- Now to remember all of that ocaml knowledge I've flushed over the past couple of months.... * source files match upstream: daa5dcb1344979b9e08ac33a61e28d8beb998bcddc247df67b6f3f8b7d7290a5 mikmatch-1.0.0.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane (listed in the original report). * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no idea at all about testing this. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files (besides unnecessarily duplicated LICENSE file, not a blocker). * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. * .cmo, .ml files not included * This is a parser extension, so .o files are OK in the main package. * .so files have no rpath APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202027.m7KKRBpv028130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459639] Review Request: binclock - ncurses binary clock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202033.m7KKXcHd029219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459639 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-20 16:33:36 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: binclock.src:58: E: files-attr-not-set binclock.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: line 1) binclock.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Fullscreen console binary clock. --> please fix the 2 warnings as it is trivial binary RPM: binclock.noarch: W: no-documentation --> it's OK, no doc from upstream binclock.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Fullscreen console binary clock. --> will be solved once the spec has it's cosmetic lifting done [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [!] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: there is no license specified in the source, so the actual license cannot be GPLv1. The copyright file in the debian folder mentions GPLv2, but since it's just an addon not related to the source, we cannot rely on it [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4f4978479ebd9efe459bcc94ceac41d4d4fb4d45 binclock_0.3.2-1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64, centos5/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. License is not correct. There is NO license at all specified in the source. The only indication I have found is the copyright file in the debian folder 2. The source URL needs a bit of sanitizing, the preferred Source0 format is based on http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 3. Small cosmetic fixes needed: - No dot at the end of summary - you should add a %defattr line in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:31:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202031.m7KKVkwe005192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #19 from R P Herrold 2008-08-20 16:31:44 EDT --- As a matter of good programming style, it would be helpful to maintain a CHANGELOG file, or to complete %changelog stanza entries outlining what was done coming into a new tarball -- a version control system (something as simple and lightweight as RCS, or something more formal) will do this for you. As near as I can make out, there was a path issue (which you cured with a swap), and an addition of a temporary file naming convention (which does NOT check for a collision, and so is potentially unsafe -- I would add a check there). -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202040.m7KKexNO030561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-20 16:40:57 EDT --- Jason thanks for your hard work, as always. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:41:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202041.m7KKf4Eq030596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #20 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-20 16:41:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > As a matter of good programming style, it would be helpful to maintain a > CHANGELOG file, or to complete %changelog stanza entries outlining what was > done coming into a new tarball -- a version control system (something as simple > and lightweight as RCS, or something more formal) will do this for you. Isn't there one ? https://fedorahosted.org/r2spec/browser/R2spec-2.4.1/CHANGELOG for the spec: %doc README LICENSE CHANGELOG > As near as I can make out, there was a path issue (which you cured with a > swap), and an addition of a temporary file naming convention (which does NOT > check for a collision, and so is potentially unsafe -- I would add a check > there). Your are referring to when it writes the spec file ? Indeed it should check for the existence of the spec file before writing it, I'll patch that. If no, I am not sure to see what you are referring to. Thanks for the feed back -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202042.m7KKgDv6006901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-20 16:42:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-mikmatch Short Description: OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps Owners: rjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 20:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202057.m7KKvfRJ000727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 16:57:40 EDT --- Since I note that you're around currently, I thought I'd ask what was happening with this package since it's been a couple of months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 21:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456009] Review Request: python-jinja2 - General purpose template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202101.m7KL18sZ001423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456009 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-20 17:01:07 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 21:10:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202110.m7KLAAUO002766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-08-20 17:10:09 EDT --- One more link: http://accelrys.com/products/additional-products.html (Scroll down to "Rational and Structure-Based Drug Design") While Insight II is being phased out in favour of Discovery Studio, it is still widely used (for example at my workplace, which is why this review request caught my eye). (In reply to comment #2) > Good links... I did not know this chemical software ! > However this is the cygwin's program name for years (it used to be called > "gdbtk"), and is now owned (under this name) by... RedHat :) It is part of the > cygwin's "gdb" package. Yes, I know and I'm surprised this hasn't come up even on their own mailing lists. > Debian has kept the name: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/insight > > I'm not against renaming it, but how ? I'm not saying it has to be renamed. I'm just pointing to a potential issue. :) > gdbtk ? gdb-insight ? rhinsight ? ... ? > And do we rename the /usr/bin/insight command too ? > Wouldn't it confuse the user ? > Is it a potential RH legal problem ? That's what I'd like to know. I've blocked FE-Legal here and mentioned this to spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 21:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202136.m7KLasAQ007377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 17:36:53 EDT --- I'm having trouble understanding why this package uses alternatives at all. What good is switching out one jar? If there's an application that needs an older version of the jar, then that older version could be packaged as a compat package and the consuming application could reference that specific version. I have to say, the amount of macro use in this spec is... well... let's just say it makes things pretty hard to read. So hard, in fact, that I don't think I can properly review this. But if you really want to macro-ize things to that degree, you need to be be consistent and use %{__install} as well. You do not need to have explicit scriptlet dependencies for /bin/sh (although it doesn't hurt). You shouldn't own /etc/maven/fragments or /usr/share/maven2/poms; they are owned by jpackage-utils. Is it not possible to run the tests at build time in a %check section? I see a bunch of commented out dependencies which suggest runtime dependencies for the unit tests, which confuses me since generally tests have no impact on the final packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 22:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202205.m7KM5nBT013201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2008-08-20 18:05:48 EDT --- #patch1 -p1 #patch2 -p1 #make check VERBOSE=yes > make_check.log 2>&1 || (cat make_check.log && false) I'd reduce this commented-out boilerplate # dumb redhat-rpm-config replaces config.{sub,guess} with ancient ones in %%configure, use ./configure instead: It would seem more prudent to file a bug against redhat-rpm-config, instead of adding a comment like that. %{_libdir}/libltdl.a %{_libdir}/libltdl.la libtool archives should not be packaged at all (though that has a certain irony in this particular review...), static libraries need to be shipped in a -static subpackage if there is a reason to package them. I still have doubts that going for parallel installation is really the best move. Other distros manage to build the entire universe with libtool 2, no ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 22:28:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202228.m7KMSwVZ017618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 18:28:56 EDT --- Just a few comments: Builds OK; rpmlint just says: tqsllib-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 which indicates that the library is linked against libm without actually calling any functions in it. This isn't a significant issue, but if it concerns you then there's a workaround at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency The source URL seems to be wrong; sourceforge just endlessly redirects me. /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1 and /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1.0.0 are duplicated between the main and -devel packages. There shouldn't be any reason to run ldconfig on the -devel package. If you really want to package the static library you can, but it needs to be in a separate -static subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 22:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202251.m7KMpCdg030016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 18:51:10 EDT --- This is a trivial package; I'm sorry it sat in the queue for so long. * source files match upstream: 7018daea9158919c2b2c5117d4b6d54abbd438f4f39530436ab0be331433e171 Event_Dispatcher-1.0.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream (it's in the actual php files, though). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Event_Dispatcher) = 1.0.0 php-pear-Event-Dispatcher = 1.0.0-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear * %check is not present; pear module tests can't be run at build time. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 22:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202251.m7KMp1O7022213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #1 from Patrice FERLET 2008-08-20 18:51:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.metal3d.org/repo/fedora/9/SPECS/php-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.metal3d.org/repo/fedora/9/SRPMS/php-gtk-2.0.1-2.fc9.metal3d.src.rpm New release, this is some ideas taken on: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/files/php-gtk.spec for PHP 5.3 I need to be sponsored, if someone can help me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 23:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202301.m7KN1JH6031913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 19:01:18 EDT --- Drat, I missed the fact that this package has no runtime dependency on php-pear(PEAR); it doesn't even have a runtime dependency on PHP. Could you add; Requires: php-pear(PEAR) as mandated by the guidelines (and common sense) before importing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 23:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202303.m7KN3QHT024465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 19:03:25 EDT --- The only issue I see is that this is missing Requires: php-pear(PEAR) * source files match upstream: a8b6ed1b927d24cd9339b52f165382e76ef86a39a3e3b0bb23af1707f87a72f9 Console_ProgressBar-0.5.2beta.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream (it's in the PHP source, though). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. X Missing php-pear(PEAR) dependency: php-pear(Console_ProgressBar) = 0.5.2 php-pear-Console-ProgressBar = 0.5.2-0.1.beta.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 20 23:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808202309.m7KN9lGV000805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-20 19:09:46 EDT --- * source files match upstream: d73b985d46a118a65d11dc1e93d6e0e7f0919237f090920478d2ab3250d17826 Var_Dump-1.0.3.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. X missing php-pear(PEAR) dependency: php-pear(Var_Dump) = 1.0.3 php-pear-Var-Dump = 1.0.3-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear * %check is not present; pear module tests can't be run at build time. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 00:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210000.m7L00VWo012425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #12 from Bill Nottingham 2008-08-20 20:00:30 EDT --- I think release notes for a bootloader that won't be the default, won't work on some machines that the normal one does, won't be supported by any of the tools... would be rather silly. (Much like including the package, but... eh.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 00:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458686] Review Request: bluez - Bluetooth libraries and utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210003.m7L03vmO005407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458686 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2008-08-20 20:03:56 EDT --- Haha. If someone else wants to take it, go ahead. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 00:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210031.m7L0VgZq020116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #2 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-20 20:31:40 EDT --- Excellent, thanks for the feedback. I've resolved everything you mentioned, here's the new pair (any other comments?): Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/E.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/E-0.999.006-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint reports no warnings or errors on i386. I got mock to build this on an i386, and you reported on x86_64, so that's good news. koji build --scratch isn't running, so I don't know about ppc or ppc64, though I have no reason to believe it _won't_ work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 02:00:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] New: Review Request: python-sybase - new package request Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sybase - new package request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Summary: Review Request: python-sybase - new package request Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at gohanman.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase.spec SRPM URL: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase-0.39-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Module for python providing interface to Sybase DBs using FreeTDS library. License is BSD-style rather than GPL. First package/need sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 03:48:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210348.m7L3mb8e024672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-20 23:48:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > # dumb redhat-rpm-config replaces config.{sub,guess} with ancient ones in > %%configure, use ./configure instead: > > It would seem more prudent to file a bug against redhat-rpm-config, instead of > adding a comment like that. On rawhide redhat-rpm-config >= 9.0.3-1 this behavior of replacing config.{sub,guess} is removed (see %changelog) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 05:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210555.m7L5t4qd015388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2008-08-21 01:55:03 EDT --- Thank's for the review Missing Br fixed Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Event-Dispatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Event-Dispatcher-1.0.0-2.fc8.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher Short Description: Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks Owners: remi Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 05:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210557.m7L5vsQ6009059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2008-08-21 01:57:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Var-Dump.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc8.src.rpm - Add missing Requires: php-pear(PEAR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 05:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210556.m7L5uoeY015772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2008-08-21 01:56:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Console-ProgressBar.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc8.src.rpm - Add missing Requires: php-pear(PEAR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 06:02:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210602.m7L62V1A016808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #41 from Dennis Jang 2008-08-21 02:02:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: un-core-fonts Short Description: Un Core families Korean TrueType fonts Owners: smallvil Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: petersen,fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 06:43:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210643.m7L6hcS3015654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-21 02:43:37 EDT --- Thanks for the submission. :) I did some testing. And here are some comments and thoughts: - really like the compact size now - it seems to segfault when loading some maps, which is not nice (would be nice if it only displayed the dialog for those cases) - would be nice to have a toggle button between English and native input - I think it would be better to hide the menu bar (at least the Save and modify entries by default) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 07:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459073] Review Request: iok - Indic onscreen virtual keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210736.m7L7amY4023626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459073 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-21 03:36:47 EDT --- (BTW how about using "make dist" to generate the tarballs?) Otherwise the package looks pretty fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 08:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808210835.m7L8ZJ27010489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-21 04:35:18 EDT --- new rev.: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.0.0-0.5.svn.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Aug 21 2008 Peter Lemenkov 1.0.0-0.5.svn - Dropped upstreamed sems--initscript_fix.diff - Installation of some audiofiles was fixed upstream * Tue Aug 19 2008 Peter Lemenkov 1.0.0-0.4.svn - Splitted ivr module - Fixed some rpmlint errors * Thu Aug 14 2008 Peter Lemenkov 1.0.0-0.3.svn - Conditional switch "with_ilbc" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 10:51:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211051.m7LApxUU031349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-21 06:51:58 EDT --- This seems to have the same issue with duplicate packaged %doc-Files as the other two drupal-modules I have reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 10:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211051.m7LApml1005998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-21 06:51:47 EDT --- This seems to have the same issue with duplicate packaged %doc-Files as the other two drupal-modules I have reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 11:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211134.m7LBY6sZ007089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2008-08-21 07:34:04 EDT --- I see gnome-keyring-sharp is not easy to remove, so we have two options: 1. stick with the previous version but fix the issues I mentioned. In this case please ask upstream if they can make gnome-keyring-sharp optional. 2. submit a review request for gnome-keyring-sharp and wait until it is finished. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211201.m7LC13E0012840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 08:01:02 EDT --- Thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211201.m7LC1UER020027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 08:01:28 EDT --- Thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211210.m7LCA40R021961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:11:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211211.m7LCBXtI015242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-21 08:11:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date-6.x.2.0-1.beta3.fc9.src.rpm Corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211211.m7LCBlQ5022429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-21 08:11:46 EDT --- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar-6.x.2.0-1.beta3.fc9.src.rpm Corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251947] Review Request: libkarma - Library to manage the Rio Karma via TCP/IP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211218.m7LCIw2l024234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251947 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 08:18:55 EDT --- Ping? I'll close this soon if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211216.m7LCGnPl023896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-21 08:16:47 EDT --- Note: Currently Fedora build server (koji) is down and I will postpone this review request until build server gets up again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:20:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211220.m7LCKUeY024881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 08:20:29 EDT --- Did anything ever happen with this package? I think bluez itself was submitted recently; doesn't it need this firmware? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:20:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211220.m7LCKxiS017620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-21 08:20:58 EDT --- What happened is I stupidly forgot about it. Thanks (yet again!) for your work. I'll file a CVS request now, although I don't expect anything to happen for quite a while because of the continuing Fedora infrastructure problems ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211228.m7LCS4pw019232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-21 08:28:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-cmigrep Short Description: Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files Owners: rjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211239.m7LCdSdG028521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 08:39:26 EDT --- > Builds OK; rpmlint just says: > tqsllib-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 > which indicates that the library is linked against libm without actually > calling any functions in it. This isn't a significant issue, but if it > concerns you then there's a workaround at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency I've fixed this. But I did not get this complain from rpmlint. What rpmlint version do you use ? > The source URL seems to be wrong; sourceforge just endlessly redirects me. Fixed. > /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1 and /usr/lib64/libtqsllib.so.1.0.0 are duplicated > between the main and -devel packages. Fixed. > There shouldn't be any reason to run ldconfig on the -devel package. Fixed. ... and finally bump ... http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tqsllib.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tqsllib-2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 12:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211248.m7LCm1t6023000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 08:47:59 EDT --- I build and test everything in current rawhide, although I don't think you need a particularly new rpmlint to show this complaint. To get full rpmlint output, you must: Run rpmlint on the src.rpm Build the packages and run rpmlint on the resulting binary rpms. Install the built package and run "rpmlint packagename". Building the -2 package, I see that rpmlint is indeed silent now, the Source: URL is correct (source sha256sum is: 083c4405455c5b5a711e82275fe2b7106266bfc1edbd1a78ef542244e25909dc tqsllib-2.0.tar.gz which matches what's in the package), duplicated library issues and ldconfig are indeed fixed. The only remaining issue is the static library. As I wrote earlier, you can package this if you really want to (although packages in Fedora can't make use of it without FESCo approval) but it must be in a separate -static package. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries and the following couple of sections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 13:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458313] Review Request: perftools - Tools for developing C++ apps especially multi-threaded or using templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211309.m7LD93UR027305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458313 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Adel Gadllah 2008-08-21 09:09:02 EDT --- The package is already in fedora under a different name. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/google-perftools/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 13:15:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458313] Review Request: perftools - Tools for developing C++ apps especially multi-threaded or using templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211315.m7LDFtLZ028966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458313 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2008-08-21 09:15:53 EDT --- If you want to work on this package ask to become a co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 13:21:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211321.m7LDLetu030323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-21 09:21:38 EDT --- *** Bug 458313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 13:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458313] Review Request: perftools - Tools for developing C++ apps especially multi-threaded or using templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211321.m7LDLdOa030288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458313 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-21 09:21:38 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 170303 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 13:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211324.m7LDO02v005234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 09:23:59 EDT --- > Install the built package and run "rpmlint packagename". I think I've missed this step. Thanks. > The only remaining issue is the static library. As I wrote earlier, you can > package this if you really want to (although packages in Fedora can't make use > of it without FESCo approval) but it must be in a separate -static package. > See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries > and the following couple of sections. dropped static ... http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tqsllib.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tqsllib-2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 14:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211427.m7LER5TK012305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 10:27:04 EDT --- - cleaned up -devel packages - tweaked server config file to include the correct libdir. ... and bumped version http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 14:26:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] New: Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 Summary: Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/eigen2/eigen2.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/eigen2/eigen2-2.0-0.1.alpha7.fc10.src.rpm Description: A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math Needed for koffice2 (in rawhide). Parallel-installable with eigen(1), which is (still) needed by kdeedu-4.x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 14:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211436.m7LEaFiV021089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 --- Comment #7 from Tim Fenn 2008-08-21 10:36:13 EDT --- Sorry for the late reply, I've been away. (In reply to comment #6) > > rpmlint output on srpm: > [rpmbuild at rocky clipper]$ rp -i clipper-2.0-13.f8.src.rpm > clipper.src:40: W: setup-not-quiet > Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from > unpacking the sources. > > clipper.src: W: summary-not-capitalized clipper C++ crystallographic library > Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. > > clipper.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version > that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. > done. > > make[3]: Entering directory > clipper_mmdb.cpp: In member function 'void > clipper::MMDBResidue::set_inscode(const clipper::String&)': > clipper_mmdb.cpp:228: error: 'strncpy' was not declared in this scope > make[3]: *** [clipper_mmdb.lo] Error 1 > error: Bad exit status from /home/rpmbuild/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.54706 (%build) > I've included a patch to #include in the appropriate files. new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-14.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 14:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211447.m7LElC9p016440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 --- Comment #9 from Will Woods 2008-08-21 10:47:11 EDT --- Re comment #7 - I *did* ask the BlueZ maintainer, and he told me that he believed that the license granted to Debian covered redistribution for any party. But he's not a lawyer. Re comment #8 - This package is only needed for certain bluetooth chipsets, primarily those using the bcm203x driver. It also includes firmware for some ST Microsystems bluetooth devices, but we don't appear to ship a driver that requires that firmware - at least not in F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 15:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211517.m7LFHIIv021093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #2 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-08-21 11:17:17 EDT --- Alright, new spec and SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/pymssql/pymssql.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/pymssql/pymssql-0.8.0-2.src.rpm Note that I did not get the non-standard-exec-perm error message, and when I install the package the _mssql.so file ends up with 0755 permissions. Any thoughts why yours is ending up 0775? umask of the build user? I could of course change the permission manually on the file before installing it "just to be sure". Thanks much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 15:26:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211526.m7LFQMTr029005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-21 11:26:21 EDT --- Well, as koji (Fedora build server) is currently down I cannot do a full review, however: this package seems almost good except that: * For SourceURL, consider to use %{name}, %{version} (especially %{version}). With this you probably don't have to modify SourceURL when version is upgraded. And as this is NEEDSPONSOR blocker, there is some notes. ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 15:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211538.m7LFcXkC031032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-21 11:38:32 EDT --- One more notes: * As this package contains tests/ subdirectory, please consider add %check section and execute some test program in the section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 16:38:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211638.m7LGcEFM005128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 12:38:12 EDT --- Thanks. For some reason I thought I had run through my checklist already, but I hadn't. It usually helps to uncover some additional issues: I note that the compiler flags are a litle weird; the makefile supplies "-g3 -O -Wall" and then the spec provides the usual Fedora set. I've verified that gcc will use the ones specified later on the command line, so there's no real problem but you might consider patching the extra ones out. This package should own /usr/share/tqsl, I think. Since that's the only real issue, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. * source files match upstream: 083c4405455c5b5a711e82275fe2b7106266bfc1edbd1a78ef542244e25909dc tqsllib-2.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: tqsllib-2.0-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm libtqsllib.so.1()(64bit) tqsllib = 2.0-3.fc10 tqsllib(x86-64) = 2.0-3.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libcrypto.so.7()(64bit) libexpat.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libtqsllib.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) tqsllib-devel-2.0-3.fc10.x86_64.rpm tqsllib-devel = 2.0-3.fc10 tqsllib-devel(x86-64) = 2.0-3.fc10 = libtqsllib.so.1()(64bit) tqsllib = 2.0-3.fc10 * %check is not present; no test suite included. I have no idea how to test this software. * a shared library is installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. X fails to own /usr/share/tqsl. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 17:10:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211710.m7LHAmKW012330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-08-21 13:10:47 EDT --- Thank you for your hint. I have tried to minimize the count of undef. non-weak symbols. Unfortunately, It's not possible to remove all, but afaik this is not a blocker to approve a package. New stuff: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/snobol/snobol-4.1.1-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 17:17:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211717.m7LHH83Z013964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 17:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211717.m7LHHMWQ014030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 13:17:20 EDT --- > This package should own /usr/share/tqsl, I think. I do not think it is necessary as config.xml won't be modified. > > * %check is not present; no test suite included. I have no idea how to test > this software. This bring me to another question: shouldn't the reporter submit a minimum test scenario when %check is missing ? this usualy helps undercover additional issues. tqsllib is the library required to run TrustedQSL application. A more appropriate test can only be done when running TrustedQSL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 17:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211720.m7LHKE8i020345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 13:20:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tqsllib Short Description: The TrustedQSL library Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 17:02:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211702.m7LH23c0015728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-21 13:02:01 EDT --- As it seems that the current latest version is 1.3.5, would you update srpm first? Some notes: - The name of spec file must be "ferm.spec" - "ferm -" is redundant for Summary. - "system/firewalls" is not a standard Group (please refer to $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group - Please remove some meaningless release number suffix. - The license tag "GPL" is not allowed on current Fedora packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - Source must be given by full URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - "Requires: perl" is redundant. Usually perl (module) related dependencies are automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild. - Move the lines: ----------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i 's/PREFIX = /#PREFIX = /' config.mk sed -i 's/MANDIR = /#MANDIR = /' config.mk sed -i 's/DOCDIR = /#DOCDIR = /' config.mk ----------------------------------------------------------------- to %build or %prep (%prep is preferred for --short-circuit option) - Please use macros. /usr should be %{_prefix}, for example: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros - Now %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 17:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211731.m7LHVYSH018047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 13:31:31 EDT --- APPROVAL REVOKED (In reply to comment #6) > > This package should own /usr/share/tqsl, I think. > I do not think it is necessary as config.xml won't be modified. Then I have no choice but to revoke my approval. Modification isn't the issue; if this package doesn't own /usr/share/tqsl, then no package will own it and that is a blocker. Unless you can convince me I'm wrong, I can't approve this package. It is of course a good idea to test all software, but automated test suites are not always possible. I am trusting that you have either tested this software or tested the software which depends on it, and that you will respond to bug reports related to this software in an appropriate manner. The reviewer isn't really the QA agent; when I know how, I will try to run software when possible to make sure that it at least does something but when a ticket sits around in the queue for over a month I figure that nobody with the necessary expertise is going to turn up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 18:09:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211809.m7LI9OZa027654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-21 14:09:22 EDT --- Quick look: o please remove or explain the distribution tag. o I don't see the need for the %nb_ and %nb_ver macros o add the -k option to dos2unix to preserve timestamps o switch from $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} everywhere. o why define orig_jar, ijardir br_jardir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 18:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211807.m7LI7I7S000679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #5 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-08-21 14:07:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-cobbler Short Description: Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. Owners: mcpierce Branches: F-9 InitialCC: mcpierce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 18:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211800.m7LI0jLZ031440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 14:00:44 EDT --- > > Then I have no choice but to revoke my approval. Modification isn't the issue; > if this package doesn't own /usr/share/tqsl, then no package will own it and > that is a blocker. Unless you can convince me I'm wrong, I can't approve this > package. I'm sorry, here's the updated version ... http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tqsllib.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tqsllib-2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211900.m7LJ0M2m004604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 15:00:21 EDT --- I guess the only real question is if it's worth enabling the tests. Unfortunately I know so little of cmake that I can't figure out the proper makefile target for actually running the tests. * source files match upstream: 167eb73ae79a55c957188e4c80659c03ef786773ddb7286abfca637bda3e8c73 eigen-2.0-alpha7.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: eigen2 = 2.0-0.1.alpha7.fc10 eigen2-devel = 2.0-0.1.alpha7.fc10 = (nothing) ? %check is not present, but a test suite exists. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package (since that's all there is). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211925.m7LJPHdc014837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 15:25:16 EDT --- Since the perl-RPC-XML review ticket has been closed after ages of no response, perhaps you'd like to submit it so that this review can move forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:29:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211929.m7LJTP5r015373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 15:29:24 EDT --- Any response to comment #3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:37:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211937.m7LJbOEx017424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-08-21 15:37:23 EDT --- * General XX - Package name The secondary package delivering the binary library should be delivered in a package named "ruby-pam-lib". XX - License info is accurate XX - License tag is correct and licenses are approved The website says LGPL without version. The spec says LGPLv2+. The COPYING file in the GEM lists the original authors name with no mention of LGPL. OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent OK - rpmlint is silent * Package a rubygem OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} XX - Source points to full URL of gem Source0 is just the filename, not the full URL for downloading the source. OK - Package version identical with gem version XX - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems No "Requires: rubygems" in the spec. OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir ** noarch rubygem OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Package is noarch ** arch rubygem OK - No arch specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Defines ruby_sitearch from rbconfig OK - arch specific content moved to %{ruby_sitearch} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:48:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211948.m7LJmcM2014608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 15:48:37 EDT --- Looks good now; thanks. APPROVED (for real this time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211924.m7LJONGq009775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Bug 454102 depends on bug 435835, which changed state. Bug 435835 Summary: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 19:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808211924.m7LJOMC5009743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 15:24:19 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 20:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808212026.m7LKQbBu021286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-21 16:26:36 EDT --- I'm not sure about this but maybe the date_php4-Module (for php < 5.2) should not be installed - F8 and F9 have php 5.2.x and so this is submodule not neccessary and confusing. (While you're touching the package you might also want to update to the latest release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 21:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808212105.m7LL5Ph8032763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-21 17:05:24 EDT --- Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 21:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459751] New: Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 Summary: Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/osgGtk.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/osgGtk-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: osgGtk provides widgets that can be used to integrate OpenSceneGraph (OSG) into Gtk+/gtkmm applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 21:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808212143.m7LLhYWR007323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2008-08-21 17:43:33 EDT --- Yes, I sent it upstream; but the author will unlikely integrate this, as he is also the author toc. I tried half a day to get toc working, without success. Even if I got it to work, it would unlikely have worked and picked the correct compiler flags etc. for any architecture I don't own (i.e. everything but x86). So it seemed far less work to just drop in autotools scripts. And autotool is working and maintained for pretty much all architectures fedora supports, so it seems to me that with autotools build scripts, I will have a better chance of getting the packages to compile and run on other architectures as well. Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 22:22:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808212222.m7LMMTFd010361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2008-08-21 18:22:28 EDT --- This is a headers-only library, it can't get miscompiled, so I don't see what we'd really gain from running tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 23:03:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808212303.m7LN3ba7022482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 19:03:35 EDT --- Pretty obvious to me: it can uncover issues relating to our compiler's interpretation of the headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 21 23:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808212334.m7LNYHGi024639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-21 19:34:16 EDT --- I agree with tibbs mostly (as discussed a bit on irc). At best, the additional checks will uncover breakage, at worst (should) be harmless. Tibbs, are there any other remaining issues you see? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 00:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220035.m7M0Z9GC000443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 20:35:08 EDT --- I don't see anything else. Do you think it difficult to enable the tests? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 01:26:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220126.m7M1QRSP014869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-21 21:26:26 EDT --- Nope, it's just enabling a single define in the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 01:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220135.m7M1ZZ7Q013069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 21:35:34 EDT --- I had originally done the naive thing and enabled that define but I didn't see any output that indicated that any of the tests was actually being run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 01:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220146.m7M1koeK019498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-21 21:46:49 EDT --- I have one I've been using; I'll post it for review once the infrastructure comes back online. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 01:53:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220153.m7M1rVL7017056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-21 21:53:30 EDT --- There's no need to wait for my sake; I can review packages fine with the parts of the infrastructure that are currently running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 07:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220732.m7M7WieL014390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #39 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-22 03:32:40 EDT --- Tasaka, Is Tom Callaway aviable to review that data license ? /Cristian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 07:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220746.m7M7kinn012625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Bostrom 2008-08-22 03:46:42 EDT --- I guess that'd be better. The system-sqlite patch needs rebasing to make it build with --fuzz=0. I'll attach an updated version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 07:48:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452212] Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220748.m7M7mCod017094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 --- Comment #14 from Alexander Bostrom 2008-08-22 03:48:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314783) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314783) rebased patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 08:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220813.m7M8DBkx018645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2008-08-22 04:13:10 EDT --- Thank's for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar Short Description: Eeasy-to-use interface to progress bars Owners: remi Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 08:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220814.m7M8EUxT018857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2008-08-22 04:14:29 EDT --- Thank's for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Var-Dump Short Description: Methods for dumping structured information about a variable Owners: remi Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 08:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220813.m7M8DUHu022607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-22 04:13:28 EDT --- Can you add a URL field and a url for the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 09:09:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220909.m7M99SOu030814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-22 05:09:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314784) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314784) ghc-X11.spec.patch-1 Patch to cleanup and simplify spec file. Unfortunately the filelist generation does not work yet for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 09:13:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220913.m7M9DslH031821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-22 05:13:53 EDT --- Fist, Mamoru Tasaka very thanks for review. (In reply to comment #2) > As it seems that the current latest version is 1.3.5, would you update srpm > first? Of course! Moreover now last version 2.0.2. I upgrade to it. > Some notes: > - The name of spec file must be "ferm.spec" Ok. > - "ferm -" is redundant for Summary. Ok. > - "system/firewalls" is not a standard Group (please refer to > $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group Thanks. I'm change it to "Applications/System". But another question is why rpmlint was silent?? > - Please remove some meaningless release number suffix. Off course. But it is not meaningless for me :) > - The license tag "GPL" is not allowed on current Fedora packaging guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Ok, set it into GPLv2. > - Source must be given by full URL: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Set to http://ferm.foo-projects.org/download/2.0/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > - "Requires: perl" is redundant. Usually perl (module) related dependencies are > automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild. I suppose that do not requires external perl modules. Requires: perl removed. But I can't understand how it will be detected? It is based on standard Makefile, nor perl buildsystem. > - Move the lines: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > sed -i 's/PREFIX = /#PREFIX = /' config.mk > sed -i 's/MANDIR = /#MANDIR = /' config.mk > sed -i 's/DOCDIR = /#DOCDIR = /' config.mk > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > to %build or %prep (%prep is preferred for --short-circuit option) Ok. Moved to %prep section. > - Please use macros. /usr should be %{_prefix}, for example: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Done. > - Now %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. Instead of %defattr(-,root,root)? Why? Done. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm.spec http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm-2.0.2-0.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 09:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220939.m7M9ds1O009400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-22 05:39:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314788) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314788) xmonad.spec.patch-1 cleanup and simplification -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 09:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220936.m7M9amEd009046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-22 05:36:46 EDT --- Well, I thought (and perhaps this is correct) that spot is watching all FE-Legal blockers, however for now I explicitly add spot to CC list. Spot, would you review the license in the comment 24 (which is the same as http://geogratis.cgdi.gc.ca/geogratis/en/licence.jsp )? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 09:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808220944.m7M9iaUa010429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-22 05:44:34 EDT --- I am tempted to drop hsc_name too, it just seems to make everything more verbose. I suggest just changing %{hsc_name} to ghc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 11:56:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221156.m7MBumki005127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 --- Comment #4 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-22 07:56:46 EDT --- The third release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://www.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2046/ini4j.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2145/ini4j-0.3.2-3.fc10.src.rpm FYI a page with all resources related to the NetBeans here: http://nbi.netbeans.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=267 (In reply to comment #3) > I'm having trouble understanding why this package uses alternatives at all. - Ability to switch on the alternative implementations is removed. I agree. Probability to have an alternative implementation of the ini4j on the Fedora platform is very low if only somebody won't recompile the project sources via GCJ. > I have to say, the amount of macro use in this spec is... well... let's just > say it makes things pretty hard to read. - All macroses reflecting a folders layout of the project are removed. I agree it was noise in this case. Now, there are no user-defined macroses in the spec. I hope the spec is readable now. > ... you need to be be consistent and use %{__install} as well. - The %%{__install} macro is used everywhere instead of the install command. > You do not need to have explicit scriptlet dependencies for /bin/sh. - Explicit scriptlet dependencies for /bin/sh are removed. > You shouldn't own /etc/maven/fragments or /usr/share/maven2/poms; they are > owned by jpackage-utils. - Owning of /etc/maven/fragments/ini4j is removed. But, now the rpmlint shows a warning: ------------ $ rpmlint ini4j-0.3.2-3.fc10.noarch.rpm ini4j.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/ini4j 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ------------ And, I can't remove owning of /usr/share/maven2/poms due to RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/maven2/poms/JPP-ini4j.pom BTW, the example http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2 recommends to have this owning. > Is it not possible to run the tests at build time in a %check section? Yeah, it will be better to have the tests, but it requires a set of extra packages. I guess, it will be serious overhead if the these packages will only provided to test the ini4j package. Please note, only the junit package in fc10 is meet with the project requirements. Also, please note, that the ini4j package doesn't have any patches against the original Java code. Therefore, there is no need to have the tests for investigating any regressions. Nevertheless, to be sure that all is OK I've done a test to proofing of assumption that content of the target JAR generated in the scope of the package is byte-to-byte the same as content of original JAR - http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ini4j/ini4j-0.3.2-bin.zip The test has shown only expected differences in the following files: * META-INF/MANIFEST.MF - some informational values are changed * META-INF/maven/org.ini4j/ini4j/pom.properties - the build date is different * META-INF/maven/org.ini4j/ini4j/pom.xml - some lines are commented out according to the specified patch * org/ini4j/PreferencesBean$1.class and org/ini4j/PreferencesBean.class - the JDK 1.6.0_03 has been used in the original project, but it has a bug http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6520152 On the other hand, the OpenJDK 1.6.0 will be used to compile the classes in the scope of the package and the OpenJDK is free from this bug. So, I can say that the JAR files are the same, and, moreover, from viewpoint of the Java specifications the JAR file for Fedora is better than original one. :-) Also, I think, we can rely on the unit test results obtained in the scope of the project. > I see a bunch of commented out dependencies which suggest runtime dependencies > for the unit tests, which confuses me since generally tests have no impact on > the final packages. There are several solutions to provide the tests, including a separate subpackage that will have these dependencies at the run time. Such solution lets to test an implementation after installation into the real run-time environment. I've provided the info about dependencies only to show what will be need if somebody decide to turn on the tests, but if you feel that it is redundant or misleading info then I can remove it at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 12:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221252.m7MCqHTt013025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 --- Comment #5 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-22 08:52:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314799) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314799) Diff between contents of original JAR file and newly generated one Attached ini4j-0.3.2.jar_content.diff file is the report of the test intended to check that the original JAR file is the same as a generated one from the package. Note, to investigate content of both binary files org/ini4j/PreferencesBean$1.class and org/ini4j/PreferencesBean.class the additional textual files was generated via respective commands: javap -c -private -s -verbose ${fileName}.class > ${fileName}.javap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 12:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221255.m7MCtCaj013922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #314799|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 13:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221310.m7MDAo3n017099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-22 09:10:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date-6.x.2.0-2.rc2.fc9.src.rpm Updated. I don't think having it in would hurt, but I excluded it anyway. It doesn't seem to break anything, but can always be put back if it turns out to be needed later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 13:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459800] New: Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 Summary: Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The py lib aims at supporting a decent development process addressing deployment, versioning, testing and documentation perspectives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 14:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221455.m7MEtq4K005622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #7 from Michal Marciniszyn 2008-08-22 10:55:50 EDT --- >From my point of view, the package is good to go to fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 15:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221500.m7MF0GxG006615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-22 11:00:15 EDT --- Good spot, previously we only built the tests, but didn't actually run them (which required using ctest). I'll upload a new pkg that enables these properly. Turns out that I'm seeing 1 failed test, but I'm hoping that's ok for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 15:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221503.m7MF3uTj011414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #8 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-22 11:03:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > From my point of view, the package is good to go to fedora. Thanks. What should be the next step? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 15:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221510.m7MFAiuR013120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-22 11:10:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/eigen2/eigen2.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/eigen2/eigen2-2.0-0.2.alpha7.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Aug 22 2008 Rex Dieter 2.0-0.2.alpha7 - add working %check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 15:17:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221517.m7MFHA18014556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-22 11:17:08 EDT --- Well, the next step would be for a sponsor to do a complete review of this package and sponsor you. But most sponsors will want to see some additional work. Perhaps you could consult http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored and the master document at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 16:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221620.m7MGKLER028582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #7 from Justin Zygmont 2008-08-22 12:20:19 EDT --- thanks for this, I have been learning a lot already. ok, I have fixed as many errors as I could with the src.rpm, there are 2 more than I cannot understand easily: # rpmlint -i dosemu-1.4.0-1868svn.src.rpm dosemu.src:27: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. dosemu.src:28: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. dosemu.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. I think the first Error just needs to have the freedos tar file in the BUILD directory, Do you have any idea how I can copy the freedos tar file from $RPM_SOURCE_DIR to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %prep section? Also, I cant seem to get rid of the last error no matter what I do: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install. I have uploaded the new src.rpm and spec file to: http://fedorapeople.org/~jzygmont/ Any suggestions will go a long ways, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 15:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221556.m7MFueS2018399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-22 11:56:39 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=778101 rpmlint is clean will review on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 16:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221626.m7MGQZn1024675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-22 12:26:33 EDT --- txt2tags-2.5-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. /updates/txt2tags-2.5-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 16:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221626.m7MGQcTY024715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-22 12:26:37 EDT --- txt2tags-2.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. /updates/txt2tags-2.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 16:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221635.m7MGZ6F1026770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 --- Comment #4 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-22 12:35:04 EDT --- The third release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2050/netbeans-resolver.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2146/netbeans-resolver-6.1-3.fc10.src.rpm FYI a page with all resources related to the NetBeans here: http://nbi.netbeans.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=267 (In reply to comment #3) > o please remove or explain the distribution tag. - Redundant distribution tag is removed > o I don't see the need for the %nb_ and %nb_ver macros > o why define orig_jar, ijardir br_jardir - Redundant user-defined macros are removed > o add the -k option to dos2unix to preserve timestamps - The -k option is used for the dos2unix commands > o switch from $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} everywhere. - The %%{buildroot} is used everywhere instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Also, it is additionally fixed: - java-devel is specified in BuildRequires insead of java-1.6.0-openjdk - An epoch of 1 is included in the requirements for the Java versions - The canonical RPM macros are used instead of the commands ant and rm - More correct source URL is used, i.e not a mirror -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 16:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221658.m7MGwRvt004306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-22 12:58:26 EDT --- Thanks, looks much better now. BTW: you can make it more easy for the reviewer if you could add a reference to a successful koji build. Create a koji build from a srpm with: $ koji build --scratch dist-f10 netbeans-resolver-6.1-3.fc10.src.rpm I just did for the netbeans-resolver package: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=778455 and found a problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=778455&name=build.log dos2unix is not listed as a BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 17:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221756.m7MHu7wm016937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2008-08-22 13:56:05 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 48c215e3bac6350f74f19d752775a8bc50a8db7e date-6.x-2.0-rc2.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f9/i386 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 18:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221804.m7MI4fON018766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-08-22 14:04:40 EDT --- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drupal-date Short Description: This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module Owners: limb Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 18:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221808.m7MI8eEb013354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney 2008-08-22 14:08:40 EDT --- Synced up license into. Changed the package name to be in line with the Ruby gem packaging stanhdards, added the requires. New Spec file is here: http://ruby-pam.rubyforge.org/git?p=ruby-pam.git;a=blob;f=rubygem-pam.spec; New Source RPM: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/41730/rubygem-pam-1.5.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 18:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459828] New: Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459828 Summary: Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2500-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2500-firmware-4.04.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 18:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221853.m7MIrtM6027913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-22 14:53:53 EDT --- Without some word from Broadcom, I don't think we can safely move forward here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 19:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221909.m7MJ9Inf024394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 --- Comment #10 from Guidolin Francesco 2008-08-22 15:09:17 EDT --- Now I don't use Linux anymore so I'm not interested on this RPM. If you want you can close this request. Bye. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 19:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808221941.m7MJf83F030956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #41 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-22 15:41:06 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. The GeoGratis License Agreement For Unrestricted Use Of Digital Data is Free, and has been added to the list of acceptable content licenses. Please use: License: GeoGratis Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 20:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808222006.m7MK6CCE008787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-22 16:06:10 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=778975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 21:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808222110.m7MLAbva015982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Bug 455555 depends on bug 457502, which changed state. Bug 457502 Summary: gtk.gdk.threads_init() crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457502 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 22 21:12:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808222112.m7MLCWBU021709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 00:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230008.m7N08MSl022327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-22 20:08:17 EDT --- Thanks, spot!! Now I can approve this package. Please fix the license tag to "GPLv2+ and GeoGratis" on -demo when you import this package into Fedora CVS. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (mapnik) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 02:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] New: Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Summary: Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/ncid/ncid.spec SRPM URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/ncid/ncid-0.71-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: NCID is Caller ID (CID) distributed over a network to a variety of devices and computers. NCID consists of a server called ncidd, a universal client called ncid, various client output modules, two SIP gateways, and a YAC gateway. The server, ncidd, monitors either a modem, device or gateway for the CID data. The data is collected and sent, via TCP, to one or more connected clients. The client, ncid, normally displays the Caller ID data and the ServerCaller ID log in a GUI window. The client output can be changed with output modules. One module can speak the CID, another can send the CID to a pager or cell phone. There are other output modules, including ones that display the CID on a TiVo or MythTV. The SIP gateways obtain the Caller ID information from a VOIP system, using SIP Invite. The YAC gateway obtains the Caller ID information from a YAC server. --------------- I've broken up the sub-packages quite a lot, because they depend on things like kde, samba, festival... things which are rather large and not everyone will want to pull in. Hope it looks ok :) Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=779926 Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 02:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230218.m7N2IwDS014951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 Bojan Smojver changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bojan at rexursive.com --- Comment #15 from Bojan Smojver 2008-08-22 22:18:55 EDT --- CVS admins, please remove tag apr-1_3_3-2_fc10. It was created by mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 02:19:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230219.m7N2Jsw5020461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 Bojan Smojver changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bojan at rexursive.com --- Comment #10 from Bojan Smojver 2008-08-22 22:19:52 EDT --- CVS admins, please remove tag apr-util-1_3_4-8_fc10. It was created by mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 02:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459856] New: Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 Summary: Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-hangul.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-hangul-0.1.1.20080823-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Korean hangul engine for IBus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 03:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459856] Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230300.m7N30jHM026006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 03:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459858] Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230321.m7N3LtcO031240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 03:21:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459858] New: Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-table.spec SRPM URL: http://ibus.googlecode.com/files/ibus-table-0.1.1.20080823-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The general table engine for IBus platform -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 03:32:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230332.m7N3WXKZ006530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-08-22 23:32:31 EDT --- RPM doesn't yet allow noarch sub packages when the main package is arch specific but refer http://wiki.rpm.org/Problems_of_Building -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 03:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199573] Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230334.m7N3Y05O006732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-08-22 23:33:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 03:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230342.m7N3gBk4008675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-08-22 23:42:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 04:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458391] Review Request: bro - Open-source, Unix-based Network Intrusion Detection System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230424.m7N4O1k7012582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458391 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: Bro - |Review Request: bro - |Open-source, Unix-based |Open-source, Unix-based |Network Intrusion Detection |Network Intrusion Detection |System |System --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 00:23:59 EDT --- When reviewing, please remember to assign the bug to the reviewer, and set it to ASSIGNED. Please use your FAS name for Owners. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 04:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230426.m7N4QAqi018454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 00:26:09 EDT --- We don't remove tags from cvs. Just bump the release and retag, or use 'make force-tag'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 04:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230426.m7N4QQxg013358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 00:26:24 EDT --- We don't remove tags from cvs. Just bump the release and retag, or use 'make force-tag'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 04:29:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230429.m7N4TvX9013870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 00:29:55 EDT --- Bart / Peter: I see Bart in the packager group... would you like me to process the request with him as owner? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 04:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230439.m7N4dRDb015849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Bug 455555 depends on bug 457502, which changed state. Bug 457502 Summary: gtk.gdk.threads_init() crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457502 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 07:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230747.m7N7lNHb023024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 03:47:22 EDT --- New revision: %changelog * Sat Aug 23 2008 Peter Lemenkov 1.2-3 - Cleanups http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 08:06:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230806.m7N86k47028379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 04:06:45 EDT --- 404 whil trying to dl spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 08:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230810.m7N8AnVC029323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 04:10:47 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 08:16:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230816.m7N8GBLd003309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 04:16:09 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 08:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808230818.m7N8IBTM031209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 04:18:10 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 10:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231000.m7NA0K1u028651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 06:00:18 EDT --- I have reported missing headers patch as well as build system craziness to upstream. The library is never checked for linking in ac_rwlock.m4 macro written for it. Upstream is already working it. I have applied a quick fix for now. sed -i 's|^PTHREAD_LIBS = |PTHREAD_LIBS = -lpthread|g' Makefile rpath Erros are fixed. SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ctemplate-0.90-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ctemplate.spec I don't have a 86_64 m/c where I can check these error warning. May you verify? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 10:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459871] New: Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 Summary: Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/samefile.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/samefile-2.12-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The samefile utility finds files with identical contents, independent of file name. This program is for you if you are notoriously low on disk space, keep exceeding your disk quota, pay for your storage by the megabyte, run any kind of file server, need to reduce the size of your backups, or just want to get a feeling for how much redundant files are there on your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 10:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231043.m7NAhdXS003687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #4 from vivek shah 2008-08-23 06:43:38 EDT --- I have updated the SOURCEURL and added the %check section with corresponding entries to %changelog SPEC URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/teseq.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/teseq-1.0.0-2.fc8.src.rpm I have also submitted another review request whose URL is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 When I put up more review requests should I check the FE:NEEDSPONSOR BLOCK and put in I am looking for a sponsor or should I just add them in the Comment field for this package to bring them to your notice ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 10:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459872] New: Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459872 Summary: Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/asn1c.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/asn1c-0.9.21-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code. It supports a range of ASN.1 syntaxes, including ISO/IEC/ITU ASN.1 1988, '94, '97, 2002 and later amendments. The supported sets of encoding rules are * BER: ITU-T Rec. X.690 | ISO/IEC 8825-1 (2002) (BER/DER/CER) * PER: X.691|8825-2 (2002) (PER). * XER: X.693|8825-3 (2001) (BASIC-XER/CXER). The compiler was written specifically to address security concerns while providing streaming decoding capabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 11:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459873] New: Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459873 Summary: Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/pdfresurrect.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/pdfresurrect-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PDFResurrect is a tool aimed at analyzing PDF documents. The PDF format allows for previous document changes to be retained in a more recent version of the document, thereby creating a running history of changes for the document. This tool attempts to extract all previous versions while also producing a summary of changes between versions. This tool can also "scrub" or write data over the original instances of PDF objects that have been modified or deleted, in an effort to disguise information from previous versions that might not be intended for anyone else to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 11:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] New: Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 Summary: Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Fast messaging system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 11:22:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231122.m7NBMo2j004116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #8 from David Timms 2008-08-23 07:22:48 EDT --- Trying to review a package relying on this I found that local build [f9] fails due to the %check: cd Email-Find-0.10 + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t Can't locate Test/Harness.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 .) at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/ExtUtils/Command/MM.pm line 49. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.50361 (%check) This occurs both for the .src in this review and the .src built in koji. Yet: $ yum-builddep perl-Email-Find-0.10-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.36-31.fc9.i386 perl-Email-Valid-0.179-4.fc9.noarch perl-Test-Simple-0.72-31.fc9.i386 No uninstalled build requires $ rpm -Va perl\* .......T /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Tk/pTk/extralibs.ld Note that kwizart has built the packages on koji for F8,9,rawhide OK, so I'm not sure whether a BR might have been missed, or just a local issue on my machine ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 11:31:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231131.m7NBVw28005590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 07:31:57 EDT --- Notes: * Please, provide full path to the source tarball. E.g. Source: http://ftp.robert-scheck.de/linux/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz instead of Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz * Please, add empty %build section to make rpmlint happy :) * Use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d BTW useful list of rpm-macros: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Other things seems sane. Consider applying changes according to these advices, and I'll made formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 11:44:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231144.m7NBi7AR007229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 07:44:06 EDT --- Quite easy to review and to package item. I agree with Jason - you'd better to update package to r50, which is more interesting to deal with. I've got only one personal (cosmetic) wish - you shouldn't use macros in URL-field, because it's more easy not to substitute them manually just for visiting project's webpage :). E.g. instead of URL: http://code.google.com/p/%{realname}/ I prefer to see something like URL: http://code.google.com/p/xmpphp/ Just my opinion, anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 11:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231157.m7NBvFOG013958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 07:57:14 EDT --- Notes: * You should describe exact steps how to obtain source code and create tarball. E.g. something like # cvs -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.sippy.berlios.de:/cvsroot/sippy export -D 2008-06-27 sippy # tar -cjvf sippy-20080627.tar.bz2 sippy Source0: sippy-20080627.tar.bz2 * Versioning scheme is ugly. If (then) project will release officialtraball, say ver. 1.0.0, then you will be forced to add %epoch to your spec, because 1.0.0 is earlier than rev[0-9].* . I suggest you to consider using the following versioning scheme Version: 0 Release: 0.1.svn39658%{?dist} Note leading zero. E.g. Release == 0.RPMREV.svnSVNREV%{?dist} With this naming scheme you won't have any troubles then upstream will release official tarball. Other things looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231203.m7NC3NT2010736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 08:03:22 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458449] Review Request: perl-Log-TraceMessages - Perl extension for trace messages used in debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231211.m7NCBKLo016726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458449 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2008-08-23 08:11:18 EDT --- Starting review: {it's my first perl review, so the queries may not make sense, if you can, provide explanation} [OK] = fine. [ x] issue needs fixing [ ?] I'm unsure, unclear why this is happening. [ !] suggestion [OK] name: conforms to fedora naming guidelines. [OK] version: is the most recent release. Upstream development seems to be static. [OK] release field in correct format [OK] summary is <80 chars and punctuation free, matches head1 NAME. [OK] group makes sense [OK] license correct for perl CPAN module. [OK] source0 is correct. [OK] buildroot matches the second most preferred. [OK] buildarch is correct for perl package [OK] br makemaker is correct since Build.pl not present, but Makefile.pl is. [OK] br HTML-FromText is a require from the script. [OK] prep duplicates method used in other perl package. [OK] build duplicated method used in other perl package. [OK] install starts with erasing buildroot [OK] install follows method used in other perl package. [OK] check is included, follows form, and doesn't require exclusion due to buildsys gui or network requirements. [OK] clean buildroot is included in the correct format. [OK] files - defattr is set [OK] both doc files are included [OK] owning of %{perl_vendorlib} parent folder is correct according to guidelines. [OK] source0 md5sum matches upstream download from cpan and uwinnipeg mentioned above: 77687c9858a476628f0299cf4f29c727 Log-TraceMessages-1.4.tar.gz 77687c9858a476628f0299cf4f29c727 Log-TraceMessages-1.4.tar.gz.upst 77687c9858a476628f0299cf4f29c727 perl-Log-TraceMessages-1.4-1.fc8.kwizart.src/Log-TraceMessages-1.4.tar.gz [ !] guidelines suggest adding cc: to perl sig https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Set_inital-cc_to_.27perl-sig.27 [ ?] Data::Dumper is a listed require in the script. Does a perl package automatically add this as br ? [ ?] requires: value is added, but differs from the perl guidelines. I think the guidelines may have been confused when translated between wiki formats. Included value matches other fedora .specs {eg perl-Net-IP} [ x] url gives a search error: The distribution 'Log-TraceMessages' cannot be found, did you mean one of these Not sure why this is. Can be found at: http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/dist/Log-TraceMessages However, the format in the spec file is as required by f guidelines/perl: For CPAN-based packages the URL tag should use a non-versioned search.cpan.org URL. E.g., if one were packaging the module Net::XMPP, the URL would be: URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-XMPP/ [ x] a buildrequire is not yet available: yum-builddep perl-Log-TraceMessages-1.4-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.36-31.fc9.i386 Error: No Package found for perl(HTML::FromText) >= 1.004 - awaiting progress on 458446 for that package. - reviewer has requested update and upstream communication. - sub br package has been reviewed and approved, but does not seem to be built / released yet {infra problems ?} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:13:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231213.m7NCDmDE017043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 08:13:47 EDT --- One note before review: * You should post *exact* instructions on how to build exact copy of your tarball. in order to do so, you need to indicate exact svn revision *in* your instructions, not only in Version field. And one more - you should use "svn export" instead of "svn co" and further removing svn-related files. E.g. # svn export -r 592 http://oauth.googlecode.com/svn/code/php/ oauth # tar -czf php-oauth-1.0.tar.gz oauth Apply this change and I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231220.m7NCK4e3018519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 08:20:03 EDT --- I'll review it, but I don't understand what this command for: ln -s libss7.so.1.0 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libss7.so.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457106] Review Request: publican-genome - Genome brand for publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231232.m7NCWvN9016363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457106 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:32:56 EDT --- publican-genome-1.0-0.t3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-genome-1.0-0.t3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457106] Review Request: publican-genome - Genome brand for publican In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231232.m7NCWx5q016391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457106 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:32:59 EDT --- publican-genome-1.0-0.t3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-genome-1.0-0.t3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231255.m7NCtw3E025365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:55:56 EDT --- rubygem-arrayfields-4.5.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-arrayfields-4.5.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231256.m7NCu0T1025408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:56:00 EDT --- rubygem-arrayfields-4.5.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-arrayfields-4.5.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:58:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457034] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Builders for MarkUp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231258.m7NCwoh8025852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457034 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:58:49 EDT --- rubygem-builder-2.1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-builder-2.1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457034] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Builders for MarkUp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231258.m7NCwqZE025884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457034 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:58:52 EDT --- rubygem-builder-2.1.2-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-builder-2.1.2-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231257.m7NCvdhR025660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:57:38 EDT --- rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 12:57:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231257.m7NCvgbC025692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 08:57:41 EDT --- rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-attributes-5.0.1-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231307.m7ND72xr022833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-23 09:07:01 EDT --- You seems to have used a locally built version of perl (installed in /usr/local) /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 Did it worked using mock on your system (I expect it will). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231314.m7NDE3Vc024005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 Marcin Zajaczkowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mszpak at wp.pl --- Comment #12 from Marcin Zajaczkowski 2008-08-23 09:14:02 EDT --- Any plans to make it available in F-8 and F-9 as "updates"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231312.m7NDC0V6023752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 keith at karsites.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |keith at karsites.net --- Comment #2 from keith at karsites.net 2008-08-23 09:11:58 EDT --- Will this work on Fedora 8 please? I have compiled php-gtk-2.0.0 on Fedora 8, but when I load it as a PHP extension it breaks my connections to localhost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231320.m7NDK5KU030281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #3 from keith at karsites.net 2008-08-23 09:20:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314865) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314865) php-gtk-2.0.0 compiled against Fedora's PHP 5.2.6 [root at karsites modules]# php -v PHP 5.2.6 (cli) (built: May 8 2008 08:53:44) Copyright (c) 1997-2008 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2008 Zend Technologies with Xdebug v2.0.3, Copyright (c) 2002-2007, by Derick Rethans When I tell php.ini to load the php_gtk2.so extension, I cannot access a file with phpinfo() function from my browser. I get 'connection to localhost is broken'. I get that with *anything* I try to load into my browser with this extension loaded. As soon as I remove the extension and restart httpd, the error goes away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:23:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231323.m7NDNDA4025973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 09:23:12 EDT --- Feel free to host necessary files at fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231326.m7NDQAb5026753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 09:26:09 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-xmpphp.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-xmpphp-0.1-0.1.beta_r50.fc9.src.rpm Updated to r50 + fixed license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231342.m7NDgH8c029536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 09:42:16 EDT --- Should examples be placed in %doc? For example, in your package php-oauth you did place them there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:41:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231341.m7NDfTrX029431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 09:41:28 EDT --- SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-oauth-1.0-4.svn592.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-oauth.spec Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 13:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231357.m7NDvAIP032277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 09:57:09 EDT --- Strange, but I've got different tarball: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ ls -l php-oauth-1.0.tar.gz* -rw-rw-r-- 1 petro petro 10708 2008-08-23 17:52 php-oauth-1.0.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 petro petro 10800 2008-08-23 17:23 php-oauth-1.0.tar.gz.orig [petro at Sulaco SOURCES] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:00:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231400.m7NE051s005347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 10:00:04 EDT --- In any case, I just unpacked them and compared with diff - they looks identical. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:11:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231411.m7NEBAqd002686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 10:11:09 EDT --- yes, you are right doc is correct place: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-xmpphp.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] New: Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Summary: Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/genome.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/genome-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Genome Framework scratch builds: - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781055 (f8) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781057 (f9) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781059 (f10) RPMlint says: [jmeeuwen at ghandalf tools]$ rpmlint -i /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/genome-*-1.1.0-1* genome-autostarter.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cron.d/genome-autostarter A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. genome-firstboot.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genome-firstboot The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. genome-firstboot.noarch: E: no-status-entry /etc/init.d/genome-firstboot In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'status' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. genome-firstboot.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/genome-firstboot In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. genome-release.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/yum.repos.d/genome.repo genome-release.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-genome A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here genome-repo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/lib/puppet/modules/genomerepo/files/puppetca.cgi 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. genome-repo.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/genome/bootstrap.pp A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. genome-repo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/lib/puppet/modules/genomerepo/files/puppet_node.sh 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. genome-repo.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cobbler/Genome.ks A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. genome-repo.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cobbler/Cloud.ks A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. genome-repo.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cobbler/Guest.ks A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. genome-repo.noarch: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap The package contains an init script but doesn't contain a %post with a call to chkconfig. genome-repo.noarch: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap The package contains an init script but doesn't contain a %preun with a call to chkconfig. genome-repo.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. genome-repo.noarch: E: no-status-entry /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'status' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. genome-repo.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. genome-repo.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap While your daemon is running, you have to put a lock file in /var/lock/subsys/. To see an example, look at this directory on your machine and examine the corresponding init scripts. genome-repo.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name genome-repo-bootstrap The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. genome-respin.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/revisor/conf.d/cloud-ks.cfg A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here genome-respin.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/revisor/conf.d/combo-ks.cfg A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here genome-respin.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/revisor/conf.d/genome-f9-i386.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here genome-respin.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/revisor/conf.d/genome-ks.cfg A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here genome-respin.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/revisor/genome.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here 12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 16 warnings. Each of which has now a ticket logged upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:18:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231418.m7NEIM0P009001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 10:18:21 EDT --- Review: MUST Items: + rpmlint silent. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The spec file written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. +/- The sources used to build the package were taken from svn. No official tarball. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + A package must owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + All, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. There is only one thing remain. Since we using a svn snapshot, we need to change versioning scheme. I advice you to change Release field to 0.4.%{svnrevision}%{?dist} - note leading zero. That allows us to upgrade package from our svn snapshot to official 1.0 tarball (when it will be out). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231426.m7NEQZZO005818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 10:26:35 EDT --- Thanks Updated SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-oauth.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:35:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231435.m7NEZlrD011615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 10:35:46 EDT --- Till if free sometime ... you may like to help with an unofficial detailed review(if not official) to get this going. Just a request :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231437.m7NEbWUt006974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 10:37:31 EDT --- APPROVED. p.s. don't forget to raise fedora-cvs flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459828] Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231449.m7NEnigo008298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459828 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 10:49:43 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231447.m7NEl1N9012813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 10:46:59 EDT --- REVIEW: MUST Items: + rpmlint is silent. + The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + The text of the license(s) is included in %doc. + The spec file must be written in American English. + The spec file for the package MUST be legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/xmpphp-0.1beta-r50.tar.gz* ab0fd09f9508f99bbfbf08850695de96 ../SOURCES/xmpphp-0.1beta-r50.tar.gz ab0fd09f9508f99bbfbf08850695de96 ../SOURCES/xmpphp-0.1beta-r50.tar.gz.orig [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, a package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:49:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459856] Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231449.m7NEn1r8012891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-23 10:49:00 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781109 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6286e7de3232eb878b03ae3be448b904 ibus-hangul-0.1.1.20080823.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package ibus-hangul-0.1.1.20080823-1.fc10 => Provides: _hangul.so Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libhangul.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions:- Use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install to preserve timestamps for files(like .py and .svg) copied from tarball to rpm APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459828] Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231450.m7NEo8cv008642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459828 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231453.m7NErWRI008905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 10:53:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-xmpphp Short Description: PHP XMPP Library Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231451.m7NEp1t5008703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 10:51:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-oauth Short Description: PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231455.m7NEtZIn013943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|low |medium --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 10:55:34 EDT --- Will update shortly. This needs some more work. Both php-oauth and php-xmpphp are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 14:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459858] Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231456.m7NEukdJ014048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-23 10:56:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781102 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1cfc4d7492b276aae3c5bb685182af75 ibus-table-0.1.1.20080823.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Suggestions:- you should correct license file COPYING to GPLv2 text. Use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install to preserve timestamps. APPROVED. are you going to submit ibus-table-zhengma, ibus-table-wubi these packages also or will be adding in future releases? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231500.m7NF0Ofq010024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-23 11:00:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=778101 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7a9351ff7a9cb4bfa533ea657aec648c ibus-chewing-0.1.1.20080815.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package ibus-chewing-0.1.1.20080815-1.fc10 Provides: _chewing.so Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8) libchewing.so.3 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions:- Use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install to preserve timestamps for files(like .py and .png) copied from tarball to rpm APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459828] Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231509.m7NF9iWZ010873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459828 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 11:09:43 EDT --- REVIEW: MUST Items: + rpmlint is silent. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The text of the license(s) is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum LICENSE* ql2500_fw.bin* 4005328a134054f0fa077bdc37aa64f2 LICENSE 4005328a134054f0fa077bdc37aa64f2 LICENSE.orig e0eee74a60109539f1ea39c89ef05a92 ql2500_fw.bin da9804a0f6c216ea79355ee18fbd3d95 ql2500_fw.bin_mid da9804a0f6c216ea79355ee18fbd3d95 ql2500_fw.bin_mid.orig e0eee74a60109539f1ea39c89ef05a92 ql2500_fw.bin.orig [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. There is something, that I can't understand - this package requires /lib/firmware, and "rpm -qf /lib/firmware" shows that that's a udev's "Provides:". I don't know whethet this firmware should require udev, so I dont know whether this is a blocker.On the other hand there atre the following two rules: - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains permissable content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. And some remarks: * You should use %{_lib} instead of /lib * You should invoke 'install' command with -p key in order to preserve timestamp. Please resolve (or explain me, if I misunderstood something) these issues, and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: liburiparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231514.m7NFESIO011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 11:14:27 EDT --- Updated: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/liburiparser.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/liburiparser-0.7.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231523.m7NFNjgG013026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 11:23:42 EDT --- Why was status ASSIGNED? @Oded My review was unofficial as I am not a sponsor. Are you still interested in package? if yes, you will need to look at this then: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:21:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459828] Review Request: ql2500-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2500 devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231521.m7NFLsgl017318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459828 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 11:21:53 EDT --- Hmm. Seems that I did misunderstood someting - according tho this http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/bluez-firmware.spec use /lib instead of the _lib macro (which could expand to /lib64 on some arches, which would be the wrong place) Are there any Firmware Packaging Guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231528.m7NFSDfs018092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 --- Comment #10 from David Timms 2008-08-23 11:28:12 EDT --- Confirmed success in mock. Thanks kwizart, no thanks to vmware ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 15:33:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449879] Review Request: Zile - Zile Is Lossy Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231533.m7NFX9mZ018848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449879 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 11:33:08 EDT --- I have added myself as a co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459880] New: Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459880 Summary: Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anyremote at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: WEB interface for anyRemote - http://anyremote.sourceforge.net/ - remote control software through bluetooth, IR or TCP/IP connection. anyRemote2html acts as HTTP server and translates anyRemote commands to HTML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:16:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231616.m7NGGsQO025735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 --- Comment #30 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 12:16:53 EDT --- Are you interested in continuing with review? If yes, then you need to follow suggestions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored But, in case you don't want to continue with review and it is okay-- I am interested in taking it from here onwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231635.m7NGZ8lU024251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-23 12:35:07 EDT --- I will restart checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:37:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231637.m7NGbr3Z024558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-23 12:37:51 EDT --- To Spot: Sorry again, however would you review the license of this package (as written in my comment 11)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] New: Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SQLite3/Ruby is a module to allow Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database. rpmlint silent koji scratch builds: - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781287 (f8) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781292 (f9) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781314 (f10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231654.m7NGsrqF027559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-23 12:54:52 EDT --- License is OK, Free but GPL incompatible. I've added it to the license list in 1.03, use: License: CNRI Lifting FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] New: Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-git.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-git-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A package for using Git in Ruby code rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781340 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781342 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781344 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 16:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231655.m7NGtt10028086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231700.m7NH0C1O029173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-23 13:00:11 EDT --- To spot: Thanks!! To John: Now would you change the license tag and modify anything which you think is needed and re-upload the srpm? Then I will recheck your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231708.m7NH8gDO030792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231709.m7NH9MeE030908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-23 13:09:20 EDT --- Now as koji is up, would you follow "Join" wiki? (CVS request is needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231711.m7NHBtBS031706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:11:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:16:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231716.m7NHGXBv032728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:16:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231718.m7NHIwxg004299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:18:57 EDT --- Hey Bryan. I don't seem to see you in the packager group... have you been sponsored yet there? You do need to be in that group to approve packages... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459081] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231722.m7NHMj9t001527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459081 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:22:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:25:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454330] Review Request: gresolver - Graphical DNS query tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231725.m7NHP5TK005775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454330 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:25:04 EDT --- I assume the package name was gresolver, not gresoler. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:30:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231730.m7NHUQj3006462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:30:24 EDT --- I'm a bit worried here about user confusion... what happens if someone removes grub and tries to just use grub2? (I would assume it would fail due at least to lack of selinux support). Have you tested how it would fail in that case... many users assume higher versions are better and will update to them even in the absense of any problems with the older version. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] New: Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-highline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-highline-1.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A high-level IO library that provides validation, type conversion, and more for command-line interfaces. HighLine also includes a complete menu system that can crank out anything from simple list selection to complete shells with just minutes of work. rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781393 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781395 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781399 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231733.m7NHXNni006638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:33:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453520] Review Request: libUnihan - C library for Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231737.m7NHb3f5003364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453520 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:37:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459064] Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231737.m7NHbuc6007216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459064 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:37:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459084] Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231738.m7NHcqf9007289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459084 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:38:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231741.m7NHf1QF003835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:41:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231742.m7NHgtvR007880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:42:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:46:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231746.m7NHkAaH004524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:46:09 EDT --- The description seems odd here, let me know if you would like to change it. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:49:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231749.m7NHn1jf008548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:49:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:51:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231751.m7NHpB2u005156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:51:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:52:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231752.m7NHqeAi005236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:52:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231754.m7NHs2vk005291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:54:01 EDT --- cvs done. (I fixed the "Ee" typo in the short description) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231759.m7NHx6S2005947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:59:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231756.m7NHu89J005840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:56:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] New: Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-main.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-main-2.8.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781425 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781427 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781429 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231757.m7NHvmgG009648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:57:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 17:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231759.m7NHxux9009926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 13:59:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:01:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458408] Review Request: vttest - Test the compatibility of so-called "VT100-compatible" terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231801.m7NI1LWi006841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458408 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 14:01:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231805.m7NI51B8010919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 14:04:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231803.m7NI3JH3010757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 14:03:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459312] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231806.m7NI6GQg011455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459312 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 14:06:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231809.m7NI9roS007930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #42 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 14:09:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231812.m7NICoti012425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 14:12:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231829.m7NITncW010805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 14:29:48 EDT --- This is an unofficial quick review(as I am not a sponsor) to help this package: 1. You should add %check make test to use test cases provided. 2. Confirm from upstream about license. From project page it looks to be BSD. But it is always good to verify. 3. Optional Suggestion: You may like to remove macros from URL. +rpmlint clean +Build on mock -- successfully +summary -- okay +description -- okay +build root -- okay I give priority to this: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +md5sum source from package: 5e51411512f693897f9cfd59c45071f7 from project resource: 5e51411512f693897f9cfd59c45071f7 - license tag correct, few source files (i confirm 1+)src files have license txt included but most of them don't have. So, you may like to confirm it from upstream. +package naming +spec file & base package name match +macros used consistently, sane spec file +compiler flags are appropriate -you may like to request including a license file to upstream, though this is optional here -- moreover only few src files have license block. +You may also like to contact upstream about you being packaging for fedora and they may -- once passed update there project page. Right now they have point to different RPMs (third party may be) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231827.m7NIR96E014662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 14:27:08 EDT --- ruby-RRDtool-0.6.0-6.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ruby-RRDtool-0.6.0-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231827.m7NIR6fU014627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 14:27:05 EDT --- ruby-RRDtool-0.6.0-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ruby-RRDtool-0.6.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231836.m7NIabGv015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 14:36:36 EDT --- You should add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to 'Blocks' field, so that sponsors will notice your ticket and do read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 18:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459064] Review Request: hyphen-ga - Irish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231859.m7NIxGqF018340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459064 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-23 14:59:15 EDT --- thanks guys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459084] Review Request: hyphen-sv : Swedish Hyphenation Rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231901.m7NJ1oQd014827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459084 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2008-08-23 15:01:49 EDT --- thanks guys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189301] Review Request: pygame - Python modules for writing games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231908.m7NJ8tXq015499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189301 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-23 15:08:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231909.m7NJ98f3015544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-23 15:09:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231910.m7NJA9Qt019978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-23 15:10:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:10:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231910.m7NJALDh015954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com --- Comment #30 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-08-23 15:10:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:24:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447954] Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231924.m7NJODOk017792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447954 --- Comment #11 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-23 15:24:12 EDT --- New Spec: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/perl-Math-Cephes.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/perl-Math-Cephes-0.45-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231922.m7NJMdWg017734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #40 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-23 15:22:36 EDT --- Thanks! I'll add a changelog for the latest entry, but there is another issue up: Upstream has released a version for F10 upwards (or 2.6.27 kernel upwards to be more precise, e.g. if/when F9 goes 2.6.27 it will be for F9 as well), which by itself is not an issue, but by doing so the package was renamed from ivtv to ivtv-utils. So for the review/cvs I need approval for o ivtv 1.2.x version as submitted for F8/F9, *but not devel (!)*, and o ivtv-utils 1.3.x *only for devel* Or we could just named this ivtv-utils from the start (e.g. for F8/F9 as well) cheating a bit on the "old" 1.2.x software. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231927.m7NJR9mk022344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-23 15:27:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sysklogd Short Description: System logging and kernel message trapping daemons Owners: kanarip Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447954] Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231939.m7NJdgCw019508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447954 --- Comment #12 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-23 15:39:41 EDT --- Did a few scratch builds just for kicks: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781647 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781652 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781657 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231945.m7NJjmTd020470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 15:45:47 EDT --- md5deep-3.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-3.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 19:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808231945.m7NJjjx3020430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 15:45:44 EDT --- md5deep-3.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-3.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:10:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] New: Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-markaby.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-markaby-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781713 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781715 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781717 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232008.m7NK8W2Y027204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 16:08:30 EDT --- Review Point is I could not start server for me at least on my machine. The init.d script seems to be very bad: [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ sudo /etc/init.d/cerebro start Starting Cerebro: [ OK ] [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ cat: /sys/class/net/msh0/address: No such file or directory I tried with : [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ cerebroui --help master True Error in sys.excepthook: TypeError: print_exc() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given) Original exception was: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/cerebroui", line 1038, in gui = GUI() File "/usr/bin/cerebroui", line 291, in __init__ CerebroInterface.__init__(self, ATYPE) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cerebro/interface.py", line 58, in __init__ self.signup() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cerebro/interface.py", line 62, in signup iface = bus.get_object('org.laptop.cerebro', '/org/laptop/cerebro') File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 244, in get_object follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py", line 241, in __init__ self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 183, in activate_name_owner self.start_service_by_name(bus_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 281, in start_service_by_name 'su', (bus_name, flags))) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 607, in call_blocking message, timeout) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.laptop.cerebro was not provided by any .service files [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ /etc/init.d/cerebro start touch: cannot touch `/var/lock/subsys/cerebro': Permission denied ] [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ Error in sys.excepthook: TypeError: print_exc() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given) Original exception was: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/cerebro", line 1077, in if __name__ == "__main__": main() File "/usr/sbin/cerebro", line 1054, in main sys.stdout = open("/var/log/cerebro", 'a') IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/cerebro' Does not look sane!! Regarding 1) conf file i agree 2) keep it on by default will be okay. rpmlint(rp => rpmlint): [rpmbuild at rocky noarch]$ rp -i cerebro-2.9.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm cerebro.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cerebro.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here *I agree with you here. It does not seem to be logical for putting a noreplace on it.* cerebro.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/cerebro The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. *you can ignore it* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Build successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781524 Required: [x] Name -- [!] License -- License seems to be GPLv2+ as I can check from COPYING & src [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully [x] BuildRequires [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [x] gui [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines [x] md5sum Source from site: 4402c421790fcb13a942f01815145413 Source from srpm: 4402c421790fcb13a942f01815145413 [x] np .pyc files in %{_bindir} [x] .egg taken care Optional suggestions: a. if you are still to report upstream about the missing shebang -- then may be you would like to inform. Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated In short: may be you need to work on making application get to usable level in sane way first, then there is license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232014.m7NKEMlV023920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-23 16:14:20 EDT --- I decided to review it. BTW Parrot 0.7.0 released - will you update it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:11:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232011.m7NKBVP2023775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #3 from R P Herrold 2008-08-23 16:11:30 EDT --- Is this code mature enough to use? I see a LOT of warnings on comparisons between differing types such as: src/tests/template_unittest.cc:770: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions The project is 2.5 years old, and in reading the changelog at the upstream URL, seems not to have ever addresses such issues. This to one side, I get a clean non-root rebuild from your SRPM on x86_64 Wrote: /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ctemplate-0.90-2.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ctemplate-devel-0.90-2.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ctemplate-debuginfo-0.90-2.x86_64.rpm No idea if it works. :) -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:32:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232032.m7NKWw0V026206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #8 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2008-08-23 16:32:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Review > > Point is I could not start server for me at least on my machine. The init.d > script seems to be very bad: Yes it is. I 'll get back with a better one. > I tried with : > > [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ cerebroui --help cerebroui is intended to be used as a sample application for cerebro, but should be executed while cerebro is running. > master True > Error in sys.excepthook: > TypeError: print_exc() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given) > > Original exception was: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/cerebroui", line 1038, in > gui = GUI() > File "/usr/bin/cerebroui", line 291, in __init__ > CerebroInterface.__init__(self, ATYPE) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cerebro/interface.py", line 58, in > __init__ > self.signup() > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cerebro/interface.py", line 62, in > signup > iface = bus.get_object('org.laptop.cerebro', '/org/laptop/cerebro') > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 244, in get_object > follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py", line 241, in > __init__ > self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 183, in > activate_name_owner > self.start_service_by_name(bus_name) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 281, in > start_service_by_name > 'su', (bus_name, flags))) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 607, in > call_blocking > message, timeout) > dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The > name org.laptop.cerebro was not provided by any .service files > [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ > > [rpmbuild at rocky cerebro]$ /etc/init.d/cerebro start > touch: cannot touch `/var/lock/subsys/cerebro': Permission denied ] cerebro is a service, not an application and as such it requires root privileges to execute. Chief among the reasons for elevated privileges is the use of raw sockets and the attachment to org.laptop.cerebro dbus interface. > [!] License -- License seems to be GPLv2+ as I can check from COPYING & src Huh? what is wrong with GPLv2+ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232038.m7NKcpcL026799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 16:38:50 EDT --- Very nice templates. I had been using it for some time on with one my friends site. Documentation: http://google-ctemplate.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/index.html ChangeLog: http://google-ctemplate.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ChangeLog It is very much active. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232043.m7NKhg3T027397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 16:43:41 EDT --- >cerebro is a service, not an application and as such it requires root >privileges to execute. Chief among the reasons for elevated privileges is the >use of raw sockets and the attachment to org.laptop.cerebro dbus interface. Yes, I know -- my point is, it should respond in a sane way for whatever user does. >> [!] License -- License seems to be GPLv2+ as I can check from COPYING & src >Huh? what is wrong with GPLv2+ ? Spec says: GPLv3+ which is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] New: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-mocha.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-mocha-0.9.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Mocking and stubbing library with JMock/SchMock syntax, which allows mocking and stubbing of methods on real (non-mock) classes. rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781771 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781773 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:45:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232045.m7NKjU2L027791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #14 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-23 16:45:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I'm a bit worried here about user confusion... what happens if someone removes > grub and tries to just use grub2? If anyone removes grub, he should be aware that he needs to install another bootloader (with grub-install). That's also true for lilo, or possibly even newer version of grub. > (I would assume it would fail due at least to > lack of selinux support). Good point; as far as I know, grub2 needs an executable stack, due to use of nested functions. I'll need to eventually verify this and open a ticket against selinux-policy. > Have you tested how it would fail in that case... > > many users assume higher versions are better and will update to them even in > the absense of any problems with the older version. ;( Apart from version number, grub and grub2 also differ in package name, and that's generally enough to distinguish that you are dealing with two different pieces of software. An ordinary desktop user won't even notice the presence of the grub2 package unless he wants to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232053.m7NKroNN032190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pjones at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 16:53:49 EDT --- Adding the grub maintainer here for comment. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 20:58:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444113] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232058.m7NKwil8032745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444113 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 16:58:43 EDT --- APPROVED Looks sane to me. rpmlint output: clean Build successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781728 Required: [x] Name [x] License -- Public Domain [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully [x] BuildRequires [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [x] gui [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines [x] md5sum Source from site: 4988af57dc895509ce01e2742883f47b Source from srpm: 4988af57dc895509ce01e2742883f47b [x] package owns all directories it created -- 1 [x] description & summary -- okay [x] %install & %clean section have rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Optional suggestions: a. optional: check .desktop file [rpmbuild at rocky gnome-valgrind-session-1.1]$ desktop-file-validate gnome-valgrind-errors.desktop gnome-valgrind-errors.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated gnome-valgrind-errors.desktop: error: value "XSession" for key "Type" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a registered type value ("Application", "Link" and "Directory") [rpmbuild at rocky gnome-valgrind-session-1.1]$ desktop-file-validate gnome-valgrind-leaks.desktop gnome-valgrind-leaks.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated gnome-valgrind-leaks.desktop: error: value "XSession" for key "Type" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a registered type value ("Application", "Link" and "Directory") *You can ignore them* Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 21:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232101.m7NL1tRd000979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-23 17:01:55 EDT --- First missing include headers is applied by Maintainer upstream and new 0.91 has been release. Will update in a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 21:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232130.m7NLUnhq004241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 Roy Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrankin at ihug.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 21:30:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232130.m7NLU8QL000397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 Roy Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 21:44:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232144.m7NLimC2001650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #4 from Roy Rankin 2008-08-23 17:44:47 EDT --- Specfile changelog entry added for upstream version release. rpmlint still silent This package is approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 21:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] New: Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-pervasives.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Access to pristine object state. If you don't metaprogram or write debuggers you probably don't need it. rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781881 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781887 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781889 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 22:38:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] New: Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 Summary: Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libasyncns.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libasyncns-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libasyncns is a C library for Linux/Unix for executing name service queries asynchronously. It is an asynchronous wrapper around getaddrinfo(3), getnameinfo(3), res_query(3) and res_search(3) from libc and libresolv. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:08:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232308.m7NN8ajL011300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #15 from Oron Peled 2008-08-23 19:08:35 EDT --- Fedora services back to normal, so... First, libhocr: * New upstream version (with most of our patches): SRPM: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/libhocr/libhocr-0.10.17-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/libhocr/libhocr.spec * desktop-file-validate: - I tested the previous, wrong desktop files and found that desktop-file-install did not issue any warning about them while desktop-file-validate caught the problems. - I therefore left my desktop-file-validate calls. * Document entry: - Fixed so both %{hocrdocdir} directory and files are listed explicitly. - The examples subdir is in the -devel package. - No more duplicates. A first pre-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 More to follow (both pre-reviews and other packages review-requests...) Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232315.m7NNFbb0012653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-23 19:15:35 EDT --- Hey Jeff. Sorry for the long delay here... lets get this moving again with a formal review: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: b8e262dd148f22d000015e638ab75b7e dnx-0.18.tar.gz b8e262dd148f22d000015e638ab75b7e dnx-0.18.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. see below - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. See below - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. There shouldn't be any need for rm -rf %{buildroot} >/dev/null 2>&1 at the top of %install... should just be rm -rf %{buildroot} (there shouldn't be any output from that ever. 2. rpmlint says: dnx.src:142: E: files-attr-not-set dnx.src:143: E: files-attr-not-set I think this is due to the doc subpackage missing a: %defattr(-,root,root,-) line dnx.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/dnx nagios dnx.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/dnx nagios dnx.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/dnx nagios dnx.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/dnx nagios dnx-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/dnx nagios dnx-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/dnx nagios Ignore. dnx.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dnx dnx-server.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dnx Need to make a logrotate file and add a Requires: logrotate? dnx.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/dnx Would be nice to have if it makes sense. Not sure if this can be reloaded though. Can it? dnx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dnx-0.18/README dnx-server.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/dnx-server-0.18/README Would be nice to fix with a sed. Check the wiki for recipe. dnx-doc.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dnx-doc-0.18/dnx-doxy-0.18.tar.gz This could be unpacked and shipped unpacked? 3. Some of the directories here are owned in the base package and the subpackages as well. Could you describe why or rethink this? What are the use cases? doc - used by itself, shouldn't need any others? server - could be used by itself? or does it need the base package? base - by itself or not? This ties in with the users setup... the nagios package (currently required by this server subpackage) already makes a nagios user, why do that here? I also see things like the base package having files owned by nagios, but it has no dependency there or user creation. It's best to try and make only one package own dirs/files and use dependencies for subpackages that need those directories or files. Ie, if the server needs the base package we can remove some of the dual listed dirs in the server subpackage. Does that make sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:20:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459873] Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232320.m7NNK2ol013412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459873 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232326.m7NNQenc014341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-23 19:26:39 EDT --- I got a stupid question? How can I test that these libs actually to what they are supposed to do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:26:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232326.m7NNQv8H017925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2008-08-23 19:26:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-chewing Short Description: The Chewing input engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459858] Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232329.m7NNTbwx018054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2008-08-23 19:29:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-table Short Description: The general table engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:28:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459856] Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232328.m7NNSOeX017988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2008-08-23 19:28:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-hangul Short Description: The Hangul input engine for IBus platform Owners: phuang Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: phuang Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:41:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458367] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlgraph - OCaml library for arc and node graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232341.m7NNf4ho019928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458367 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-23 19:41:03 EDT --- ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:44:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232344.m7NNiobG016415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-23 19:44:49 EDT --- There's not an easy way for you to test it. I'm adding this to Fedora (Rawhide-only), so we can build telepathy-salut with libasyncns support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 23 23:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808232350.m7NNofHT017379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-23 19:50:40 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7d44d6476dbf9df17922fa744dc426fedc41c29e libasyncns-0.5.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 + koji scratch build [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/ all archs (koji scratch build) [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === I suggest adding INSTALL="install -p" to the make line (I have tested locally - this will preserve the timestamp of the header file[s] included in the -devel package) ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ /me hoping for telepathy in EPEL ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 00:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240034.m7O0YoYK025446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-23 20:34:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libasyncns Short Description: Library for querying name services asynchronously Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 00:56:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459873] Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240056.m7O0uhFc024554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459873 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-23 20:56:42 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 64d3180d3e9d4b149033357bd4a6341c12fa1271 pdfresurrect-v0_04.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 01:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240117.m7O1HeGi026961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #10 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-23 21:17:39 EDT --- Hi Rakesh, Sounds like Poly is going to work on the initscript issues. I used the GPLv3+ license tag because demjson.py says GPLv3 or later (everything else says GPLv2+, as you say). My understanding is that the package as a whole therefore must be GPLv3 or later. If you want to block the review on the initscript, that's ok...I'll work with upstream to get it fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 01:21:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240121.m7O1LjOh027618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #16 from Peter Jones 2008-08-23 21:21:44 EDT --- Adding another bootloader for x86 that we're not supporting in grubby and booty is just a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 03:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454025] Review Request: libixp - stand-alone client/server 9P library including ixpc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240313.m7O3DK1v007974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454025 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-23 23:13:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 03:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240311.m7O3Bs95007788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-23 23:11:53 EDT --- Well: * This package itself is now good * As to your pre-review for bug 435724, you seem to have chosen some not-so-good review request :) Your pre-remark seems good for initial comments, however there are still some other issues which needs fixing and some of them are rather critical. However for this package I will approve now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libhocr) is APROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 03:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240321.m7O3LwKp012076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #11 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2008-08-23 23:21:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > >cerebro is a service, not an application and as such it requires root > >privileges to execute. Chief among the reasons for elevated privileges is the > >use of raw sockets and the attachment to org.laptop.cerebro dbus interface. > > Yes, I know -- my point is, it should respond in a sane way for whatever user > does. I completely agree. Cerebro has received extensive network testing but this is a good exercise to make it usable also. I do not claim to be an expert in packaging or addressing a large user audience, so any suggestions are greatly appreciated. > > > >> [!] License -- License seems to be GPLv2+ as I can check from COPYING & src > > > >Huh? what is wrong with GPLv2+ ? > > Spec says: GPLv3+ which is wrong. I see. Is it a problem if while demjson.py is GPLv3+ while the rest is GPLv2+ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 04:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459880] Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240421.m7O4LUOI019203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459880 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 00:21:29 EDT --- Is this your first package? Are you sponsored? [rpmbuild at rocky anyremote2html]$ rpmlint -i anyremote2html-0.5.2-1.src.rpm anyremote2html.src:19: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. + rm -rf anyremote2html-0.5.2 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/rpmbuild/rpm/SOURCES/anyremote2html-0.5.2.tar.gz + tar -xvvf - drwxr-xr-x fedotov/fedotov 0 2008-08-20 21:52 anyremote2html-0.5.2/ drwxr-xr-x fedotov/fedotov 0 2007-09-12 08:32 anyremote2html-0.5.2/data/ drwxr-xr-x fedotov/fedotov 0 2007-09-12 07:45 anyremote2html-0.5.2/data/16/ use -q with setup. anyremote2html.src:32: E: files-attr-not-set A file or a directory entry in a %files section does not have attributes set which may result in security issues in the resulting binary package depending on the system where the package is built. Add default attributes using %defattr before it in the %files section, or use per line %attr's. anyremote2html.src:33: E: files-attr-not-set A file or a directory entry in a %files section does not have attributes set which may result in security issues in the resulting binary package depending on the system where the package is built. Add default attributes using %defattr before it in the %files section, or use per line %attr's. anyremote2html.src: E: description-line-too-long WEB interface for anyRemote - http://anyremote.sourceforge.net/ - remote control Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. anyremote2html.src: E: description-line-too-long software through bluetooth, IR or TCP/IP connection. anyRemote2html acts as HTTP Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. anyremote2html.src: E: no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. For every build %changelog needs to be updated. anyremote2html.src: W: strange-permission anyremote2html-0.5.2.tar.gz 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. [rpmbuild at rocky anyremote2html]$ rpmls anyremote2html-0.5.2-1.src.rpm -rwxr-xr-x anyremote2html-0.5.2.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- anyremote2html.spec 755 is bad 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings. [rpmbuild at rocky noarch]$ rpmlint -i anyremote2html-0.5.2-1.noarch.rpm anyremote2html.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. If there is any documentation e.g README doc you need to include it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 04:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240440.m7O4e1N6020851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #17 from Oron Peled 2008-08-24 00:40:00 EDT --- * Requested sponsorship * FAS account: oron -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 04:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240444.m7O4iMmq018327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-24 00:44:21 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 04:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240443.m7O4hwHx018293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 00:43:57 EDT --- To help this review: Yes, add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to 'Blocks' field(necessary) & leave a comment are both okay You may like to keep old changelog entries. %changelog * Thu Aug 21 2008 Vivek Shah 2.12-1 - Initial Package I did a successful build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782273 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 04:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240453.m7O4rXt4019470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 04:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459873] Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240452.m7O4qZ58019415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459873 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-24 00:52:34 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdfresurrect Short Description: PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility Owners: peter Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 06:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455539] Review Request: yui - JavaScript library for building dynamic web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240601.m7O61JOm030675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455539 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 02:01:18 EDT --- @Dave Are you willing to continue ? Any updates? The ticket is stalled. It has been 1 month +, I am putting it 'need info'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 06:02:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240602.m7O62k8Q030754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 02:02:45 EDT --- +1 month now, Any updates here? needinfo ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 06:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240620.m7O6KOou029595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-24 02:20:23 EDT --- For 2.0.2-0: * Release number - The minimum number which can be used for Release number is 1. 0 is used only for pre-release tarballs: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release (Of course, please change the Release number every time you modify your spec file) * License - As far as I verified the source code, the license tag should be "GPLv2+". * rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------ ferm.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.2 2.0.2-0.fc10 ------------------------------------------------------ - The last entry of %changelog should contain full EVR (epoch-version-release) information like: ------------------------------------------------------ * Fri Aug 22 2008 Pavel Alexeev - 2.0.2-1 ------------------------------------------------------ * Macros usage consistency - When using { on macros, please use { for all macros (except for some cases) consistently. You use %{_mandir} and %_sbindir , for example. * Documents - Please also add the following files to %doc. ------------------------------------------------------ NEWS ------------------------------------------------------ (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - "system/firewalls" is not a standard Group (please refer to > > $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group > Thanks. I'm change it to "Applications/System". > But another question is why rpmlint was silent?? - On my system rpmlint warned about this.s > > - "Requires: perl" is redundant. Usually perl (module) related dependencies are > > automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild. > I suppose that do not requires external perl modules. Requires: perl removed. > But I can't understand how it will be detected? It is based on standard > Makefile, nor perl buildsystem. - This is detected by /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req. Try ------------------------------------------------------ $ rpm -ql ferm | /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req ------------------------------------------------------ For example when perl.req finds the line like: ------------------------------------------------------ use Data::Dumper; ------------------------------------------------------ (in /usr/sbin/import-ferm), rpmlint adds "Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) to binary rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 06:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240622.m7O6MRWX000536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 02:22:26 EDT --- @robin & @Polychronis You may like to inform upstream that if there intention is to move to GPLv3+ & if yes then update whole source (LICENSE file, source code blocks)? That would be nice if you folks work upstream to get initscript fixed. It would be equally *cool* if user interaction is sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 06:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240621.m7O6LhLE000476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-24 02:21:42 EDT --- By the way: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 07:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] New: Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bisect is a code coverage tool for the Objective Caml language. It is a camlp4-based tool that allows to instrument your application before running tests. After application execution, it is possible to generate a report in HTML format that is the replica of the application source code annotated with code coverage information. On i386 this package is rpmlint clean. On x86-64 it gives a warning about executable stacks (see bug 450551). $ rpm -q --requires -p /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10.i386.rpm rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) ocaml(Arg) = 03e86a4154064ea900dc32c05f53e364 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(CamlinternalOO) = 6d0d5b328d6db88f403ca4393b4abd38 ocaml(Camlp4) = 1e46a133b8062d1571640f7fa36f32c4 ocaml(Camlp4_config) = cb716b4361f43326c6ad695c7a1bb5c0 ocaml(Camlp4_import) = 0134ca95282ef6821081c0c11802cea0 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Digest) = a5dd2d89492338578de12105e88c803f ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Parsing) = 62cca107e4e88af303516459a87c3e9a ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Queue) = caa3a209bfc63d23a30f573541a88fec ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.2 $ rpm -q --provides -p /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10.i386.rpm ocaml(Bisect) = 9f7bc6aea60758edb6f97e3a0a529077 ocaml(Instrument) = 4f693f068faf19423105eecb1d71ff12 ocaml-bisect = 1.0_alpha-1.fc10 ocaml-bisect(x86-32) = 1.0_alpha-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 08:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240817.m7O8H2nu014873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #21 from John Khvatov 2008-08-24 04:17:01 EDT --- Fixed license tag: Spec URL: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/python-tftpy/python-tftpy.spec SRPM URL: http://stingr.net/~ivaxer/python-tftpy/python-tftpy-0.4.5-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 08:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240827.m7O8RmNr014224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 04:27:47 EDT --- acceptable Fedora format for naming is %{name}-%{version}-%{release} so I suppose ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.1.alpha%{?dist} would be okay ? Build successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782339 Package looks sane to me, except this issue. May you update and it and in the meantime I run my checklist ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 08:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240846.m7O8kZYj016680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-24 04:46:34 EDT --- Wow, that was quick! I'm not sure I understood the naming issue entirely correctly. Is the following name better? Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect-1.0-1.alpha.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 08:47:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240847.m7O8lFm1016738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Moschny 2008-08-24 04:47:13 EDT --- First of all, sorry for the delay. Second, I guess you meant http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ksplice/ksplice-0.8.7-11.fc9.src.rpm, used that for the following review. [x] = ok, [~] = ok - see note, [!] = not ok, [-] = not applicable [x] package meets naming guidelines [x] specfile is encoded in ascii or utf-8 [x] specfile matches base package name [x] specfile uses macros consistently [x] specfile is written cleanly [x] specfile is written in AE [x] changelog is present and has correct format [x] license matches actual license [x] license is open source-compatible [x] license text is included in package [x] source tag has correct url [x] source files match upstream md5sum: 4e42c5a72f4734256db8b50290f1b7a1 [x] latest version is packaged [x] summary is concise [x] dist tag is present [x] buildroot is correct [x] buildroot is prepped [x] %clean is present [x] proper build requirements [x] proper requirements [x] uses %{?_smp_mflags} [x] uses %{optflags} [x] doesn't use %makeinstall [x] package builds at least on one architecture tested on: f9/x86_64 [!] packages installs and runs at least on one architecture - Upon installation: error: Failed dependencies: rpmbuild is needed by fedora-ksplice-0.8.7-11.fc9.x86_64 - More problems running fedora-ksplice-prepare, see later. [!] rpmlint is quiet ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/helper.h ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/helper.c ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/primary.c ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/modcommon.h ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/jumps.h ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/modcommon.c ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/primary.h ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/nops.h ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/allcommon.h ksplice.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/ksplice/kmodsrc/allcommon.c -> This has been discussed before. ksplice.src:95: E: files-attr-not-set ksplice.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 37, tab: line 1) ksplice.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ksplice-create 0775 ksplice.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ksplice-prepare 0775 -> Please fix these. [!] final provides/requires look sane - ksplice misses a dependency on util-linux-ng (for /bin/dmesg) - for fedora-ksplice, 'rpmbuild' cannot be satisfied [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] code, not content [x] file permissions are appropriate [x] debuginfo package looks usable [-] config files marked as %config(noreplace) [x] owns all the directories it creates [-] static libraries in -devel subpackage [-] header files in -devel subpackage [-] development .so files in -devel subpackage [-] pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage, requires pkgconfig [x] no .la files [x] doesn't need a -docs subpackage [x] relevant docs are included [x] doc files are not needed at runtime [-] provides a .desktop file, build-requires desktop-file-utils [-] uses %find_lang, build-requires gettext Problems running fedora-ksplice-prepare: - /usr/bin/fedora-ksplice-prepare: line 73: trap: -: invalid signal specification - fedora-ksplice-prepare tries to cd into BUILD/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.x86_64 here, correct dir would be BUILD/kernel-2.6.25/linux-2.6.25.x86_64. - fedora-ksplice-prepare always re-downloads the (40MB) kernel.src.rpm, should probably be cached. In my opinion, these (and probably more) problems of the scripts can unnecessarily block approval of the ksplice package. One solution would be to move them to another package (maybe creating a tiny fedorhosted project) instead of a subpackage and adding a small README instead, that describes how ksplice can be used in fedora. This way (after fixing the minor problems shown in the review) ksplice itself could be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 09:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240901.m7O91WSr018744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 05:01:30 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease for release field Release: 0.1.%{subversion}%{?dist} will be okay. 1.e ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.1.alpha.fc10.src.rpm for each bump you can increment in ocaml-bisect-1.0-0..alpha.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 09:14:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240914.m7O9EbmP023107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-24 05:14:37 EDT --- OK, I think I've got it now. Try this one: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bisect-1.0-0.1.alpha.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 09:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808240938.m7O9cQ6o023316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 05:38:25 EDT --- APPROVED rpmlint is clean except the warning message I have i686 m/c [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-bisect.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/bisect-report 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings warning is being taken care: #450551 You may like to update this bug now!! [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rp ocaml-bisect-devel-1.0_alpha-1.fc9.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [rpmbuild at rocky SRPMS]$ rp ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Required: [x] Name (in accordance with ocaml guidelines) [x] License -- okay src files have (or later) so GPLv3+ is correct [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782339 [x] BuildRequires [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [x] gui [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines [x] md5sum [rpmbuild at rocky ocaml]$ md5sum bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz 2285c0af8d0e7503fbd0283a48cba944 bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz [rpmbuild at rocky ocaml]$ md5sum ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10/bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz 2285c0af8d0e7503fbd0283a48cba944 ocaml-bisect-1.0_alpha-1.fc10/bisect-1.0-alpha.tar.gz [x] unnecessary files excluded [x] native compiler test [x] devel package contains right files [x] ocaml guidelines Optional suggestions: -Nil- Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 09:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] New: Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Summary: Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beuc at beuc.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora (This is my first package and I need a sponsor.) GNU FreeDink is composed of 3 packages: - game engine - game data - front-end Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink-1.08.20080823-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Adventure and role-playing game (engine) Dink Smallwood is an adventure/role-playing game, similar to Zelda, made by RTsoft. Besides twisted humour, it includes the actual game editor, allowing players to create hundreds of new adventures called Dink Modules or D-Mods for short. GNU FreeDink is a new and portable version of the game engine, which runs the original game as well as its D-Mods, with close compatibility, under multiple platforms. Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data-1.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Adventure and role-playing game (game data) Dink Smallwood is an adventure/role-playing game, similar to Zelda, made by RTsoft. Besides twisted humour, it includes the actual game editor, allowing players to create hundreds of new adventures called Dink Modules or D-Mods for short. This package contains architecture-independent data for the original game (except for non-free sounds). Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc-2.99.20080823-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink DFArc2 makes it easy to play and manage the Dink Smallwood game and it's numerous Dink Modules (or D-Mods). I'd like to get feedback about the packaging and eventally upload them! Legal: the Contribution is the following files: - freedink.spec - dfarc.spec - dink-data.spec - dink-data_README.Fedora Any other file is not part of the Contribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456953] Review Request: ocaml-mikmatch - OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241005.m7OA5bWH026484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456953 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-24 06:05:36 EDT --- F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782459 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241010.m7OAA5Fk029969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-24 06:10:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-bisect Short Description: OCaml code coverage tool Owners: rjones Branches: F-9 InitialCC: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241012.m7OACf2O027193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-24 06:12:40 EDT --- Thanks Roy, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: whatsup Short Description: Node up/down detection utility Owners: ruben Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241019.m7OAJMTl027870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-24 06:19:20 EDT --- Devrim, can you have a look at Jason's comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241016.m7OAGSKS027790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-08-24 06:16:26 EDT --- Changelog format seems a bit off to me, see [0]. Builds in Koji [1]. Spec looks good to me but I havn't done a formal review. [0]: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241020.m7OAKNkK028244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 06:20:21 EDT --- tqsllib-2.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tqsllib-2.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241021.m7OALi9U028477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241021.m7OALUYT031264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 06:21:29 EDT --- tqsllib-2.0-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tqsllib-2.0-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455380] Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241028.m7OASiqj029069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:28:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241028.m7OASje2029101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Bug 455396 depends on bug 455380, which changed state. Bug 455380 Summary: Review Request: tqsllib - The TrustedQSL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455380 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241043.m7OAhkHn000908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-24 06:43:45 EDT --- Hi: Please create new review requests for each srpm and add proper "Depends on/Blocks" dependency checker on the bug. Also, as you need sponsors, please make the submitted review requests block FE-NEEDSPONSOR blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241054.m7OAskTx031752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Comment #16 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-24 06:54:45 EDT --- Hi Odel, Now that 0.11 is distributed in a normal zip file, is it possible to just use %setup -q to extract it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241051.m7OAppwb031676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #7 from John Khvatov 2008-08-24 06:51:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gitosis Short Description: Git repository hosting application Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:52:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241052.m7OAqBbA001976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #43 from Christopher Brown 2008-08-24 06:52:08 EDT --- Thanks for this Mamoru. As Balint Cristian has done the heavy lifting on this one, what is the best way to import this? As owner of this bug do I have to do the import then pass it on to him or can he do the initial import? I am away for one week so won't be able to do much until then anyway however I am happy for whoever to take ownership to get the ball rolling sooner. Cheers Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 10:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241058.m7OAwfRd032331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241112.m7OBCeC0004339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 --- Comment #8 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-08-24 07:12:38 EDT --- Hi Dave, A few comments: - You could probably remove the conditional %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 since older versions are not supported anymore - Permissions on SPARQLParserc.so are 0775 but should be 0755. - Rpm adds SPARQLParserc.so to its provides list, but that library is not in a standard library location, and never meant to be used by other software. It probably can't do much harm, but it might be nice to override rpm's provide script for that, to avoid issues when another package decides to name a library SPARQLParserc.so - For the other rpmlint warnings, you could either make those files executable or strip out the shebang line during install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241128.m7OBSQ45003473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #44 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-24 07:28:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mapnik Short Description: a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications Owners: rezso Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: snecklifter at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241134.m7OBYlew004128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #45 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-24 07:34:45 EDT --- I would add Chris Brown too as Owner, but we must know his fedoraid, so far i added him as watcher CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241135.m7OBZRnG007069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #5 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-24 07:35:26 EDT --- I've follow your recomendations. I remade the package using the supposed last stable version for MediaWiki 1.13. Updated info http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-MW1.13-0.1.r37906.olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/mediawiki-imagemap-MW1.13-0.1.r37906.olea.noarch.rpm Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/mediawiki-imagemap.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241141.m7OBf19c007668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 07:41:00 EDT --- Updated to 0.91 SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/ctemplate.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/ctemplate-0.91-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:47:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241147.m7OBlRM5005898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #46 from Christopher Brown 2008-08-24 07:47:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > I would add Chris Brown too as Owner, but we must know his fedoraid, so > far i added him as watcher CC. Fedoraid is snecker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 11:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241153.m7OBrhl4009031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-24 07:53:42 EDT --- The libmirage.spec that you posted and the one in the SRPM are not the same. The difference is trivial, but still: [rishi at ginger SRPMS]$ diff -uNp libmirage.spec ../SPECS/libmirage.spec --- libmirage.spec 2008-08-11 14:33:55.000000000 +0530 +++ ../SPECS/libmirage.spec 2008-08-11 14:18:21.000000000 +0530 @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> %changelog * Mon Aug 11 2008 Jiri Moskovcak - 1.1.0-2 - more spec file fixes: - - added INSTALL="%{__install} -p" to preserve timestamps + - added INSTALL="%{__install} -p" to preserve timestamp - removed shared-mime-info from Requires since it's not needed - - added zlib-devel do BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 12:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241204.m7OC4cMV008185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-24 08:04:37 EDT --- Built and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 12:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241208.m7OC8gqq008885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-24 08:08:41 EDT --- > I remade the package using the supposed last stable version for MediaWiki 1.13. OK. BTW Axel Thimm right now rebuilding MediaWiki 1.13 for F-8 and F-9. REVIEW: MUST Items: - rpmlint warns aboun incoherent version in changelog. Easy to fix - just add notes about latest changes under actual version (MW1.13-0.1.r37906). + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/ImageMap-MW1.13-r37906.tar.gz* 39e7f7fceb125cf6a707d4c057b15f57 ../SOURCES/ImageMap-MW1.13-r37906.tar.gz 39e7f7fceb125cf6a707d4c057b15f57 ../SOURCES/ImageMap-MW1.13-r37906.tar.gz.orig [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. So, finally * please add entry to %changelog to make rpmlint happy * consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to download latest version (we should provide such support) * find a minute to drop email to ustream about LICENSE inclusion and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 12:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241213.m7OCDKGD009616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #11 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-24 08:13:19 EDT --- Rpmlint errors: [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ rpmlint -i libmirage-1.1.0-2.fc8.x86_64.rpm libmirage.x86_64: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.1.0.0 This package contains a library and its %post scriptlet doesn't call ldconfig. libmirage.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.1.0.0 This package contains a library and its %postun doesn't call ldconfig. libmirage.x86_64: E: non-empty-%post /sbin/ldconfig libmirage.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig [rishi at ginger x86_64]$ Since your %post and %postun stanzas contain more than one command, you need to change them to: %post /sbin/ldconfig update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : %postun /sbin/ldconfig update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241303.m7OD3vec018168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-24 09:03:56 EDT --- I'd say it's a mistake to add support for a bootloader that's not packaged into grubby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241308.m7OD8p1H016363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:08:50 EDT --- qsstv-5.3c-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qsstv-5.3c-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241310.m7ODAUnM019243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458588] Review Request: qsstv - Qt-based slow-scan TV and fax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241309.m7OD9ctn018800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458588 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:09:37 EDT --- qsstv-5.3c-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qsstv-5.3c-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241334.m7ODY29O021526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:34:01 EDT --- php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241331.m7ODVjEj021480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:31:44 EDT --- php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-oauth-1.0-0.5.svn592.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241335.m7ODZoTi022015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:35:48 EDT --- gridloc-0.6-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridloc-0.6-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241338.m7ODc5bm019566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:38:04 EDT --- gridloc-0.6-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gridloc-0.6-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241343.m7ODhJcG020135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:49:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241349.m7ODnc11020808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:49:37 EDT --- php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241349.m7ODnZAd020764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241349.m7ODnvJP023299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 09:49:56 EDT --- php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-xmpphp-0.1-0.2.beta_r50.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:51:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] New: Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Summary: Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beuc at beuc.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dfarc-2.99.20080823-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink DFArc2 makes it easy to play and manage the Dink Smallwood game and it's numerous Dink Modules (or D-Mods). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] New: Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Summary: Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beuc at beuc.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/dink-data-1.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Adventure and role-playing game (game data) Dink Smallwood is an adventure/role-playing game, similar to Zelda, made by RTsoft. Besides twisted humour, it includes the actual game editor, allowing players to create hundreds of new adventures called Dink Modules or D-Mods for short. This package contains architecture-independent data for the original game (except for non-free sounds). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: dink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241350.m7ODo6jM021181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241351.m7ODpT63021355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:53:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241353.m7ODrZLl021445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #2 from Sylvain Beucler 2008-08-24 09:53:34 EDT --- > Please create new review requests for each srpm and add proper > "Depends on/Blocks" dependency checker on the bug. > > Also, as you need sponsors, please make the submitted review > requests block FE-NEEDSPONSOR blockers. All done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241350.m7ODo5fh021160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459915 Summary|Review Request: freedink - |Review Request: freedink - |Adventure and role-playing |Adventure and role-playing |game |game (engine) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241351.m7ODpsik023855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 13:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241351.m7ODprIo023834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459916 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:04:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241404.m7OE4mUf025227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-24 10:04:47 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Why does the -devel subpackage have 'Requires: automake'? The sample Spec included in the upstream tarball (packages/rpm/rpm.spec) does not have it too. + Please add a %check stanza as: %check make check According to the README, a 'BuildRequires: binutils gdb' will be needed to run the tests. + Moving the library headers from %{_includedir}/google to %{_includedir}/%{name} will break the builds of programs which contain '#include '. If similar Google projects are also using %{_includedir}/google, then you might not need to move the files. Otherwise, if you want to move them there are a few options: - Provide a README.Fedora in %doc as mentioned in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description to document this. - Provide a pkgconfig file which has 'Cflags: -I${includedir}/coredumper' - Initiate a discussion on fedora-packaging at redhat.com - It is better to pass --includedir=DIR to %configure instead of using the mkdir & mv dance to change the location of the headers. + No need to 'find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.a" -delete' in %install since --enable-static=no was passed to %configure. + You could consider shipping ChangeLog under %doc, and putting README in the -devel subpackage since it talks about the examples and manual pages. README also mentions 'src/coredump_unittest.c' so it might be a good idea to ship this single file under %doc in the -devel subpackage. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully xx - ExcludeArch is needed This library has been tested only on %{ix86} x86_64 and arm (see README), and it has been specifically mentioned that it does not work on ppc (see ChangeLog). You MUST ExcludeArch atleast ia64, ppc and ppc64. Work is on to port Fedora to arm and sparc, so you might want to exclude them as well. Once the package is approved please file a bug each for ia64, ppc and ppc64, and make them block the following trackers respectively: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ia64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ppc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Also add a comment in the Spec above the ExcludeArch line mentioning the bug numbers for ia64, ppc and ppc64. OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - %post and %postun invoke ldconfig OK - package is not relocatable xx - file and directory ownership + The %files stanza for the -devel subpackage is broken. It should be fixed to have '%dir %{_includedir}/%{name}'. Otherwise the %{_includedir}/coredumper directory will not be owned by the package: [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/coredumper file /usr/include/coredumper is not owned by any package [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ + It might be better not to mention the compression suffix (ie. .gz) for the manual pages. OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - library files without suffix in -devel OK - -devel requires base package OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures xx - package functions as expected + Only works on %{ix86}, x86_64 and arm. Other architectures should be, especially ia64, ppc and ppc64, should be excluded. OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241409.m7OE9341023381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:10:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241410.m7OEAv8m023824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457026] Review Request: rubygem-arrayfields - Arrayfields RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241410.m7OEAUEN023771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457026 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241419.m7OEJNub024694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 --- Comment #18 from Claudio Tomasoni 2008-08-24 10:19:21 EDT --- I am very sorry for the long absence, but I just stepped out from a very annoying health problem. The old package didn't build for ppc and ppc64, so here is a new revision: New SPEC URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/octaviz.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/octaviz-0.4.7-5.fc9.src.rpm If the package is still approved, I will build and submit it as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:19:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241419.m7OEJSr0027130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #32 from Claudio Tomasoni 2008-08-24 10:19:27 EDT --- I am very sorry for the long absence, but I just stepped out from a very annoying health problem. If I can still contribute to the project, here is a new version of SPEC and SRPM file that builds in f10 too (the previous versions didn't build): Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.5-1.svn20080823.fc9.src.rpm This package builds in koji for dist-f8, dist-f9 and dist-f10. Please, let me know if I can still work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:23:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241423.m7OENwRK025282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 10:23:57 EDT --- cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241425.m7OEPElL028131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 10:25:13 EDT --- cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cwdaemon-0.9.4-8.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241426.m7OEQElx028231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:24:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241424.m7OEOmor027721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-24 10:24:47 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:32:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241432.m7OEWZ3A026412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-24 10:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > + current rpmlint output: > E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1/NEWS > --> harmless. Remove the empty file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445094] Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241451.m7OEp4Ok030913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445094 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-24 10:51:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Probably should, but I have no idea how to do that... I'm not sure if it has > anything to do with HAL, but I know it has it's own policy and dbus > configuration. HAL does take care of the volume up/down/mute keys on my Macbook out of the box on Fedora. I don't use the other keys too much so I am not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 14:59:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241459.m7OExdko029253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 15:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241507.m7OF78rk000325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #32 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-24 11:07:07 EDT --- Bump to RC4: ------------ dhcp-lab-192 newman # rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/awesome.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-doc-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Builds OK in mock with xcb-util, libev and enhanced cairo. * Sun Aug 24 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.6.rc4 - bump to RC4 - rejecting awesome-3.0-rc3-enhance-wallpaper-cmd.patch -- solved upstream via awsetbg script - using imlib2 instead of GTK+ pixbuf http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 15:11:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241511.m7OFBGJo030917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 --- Comment #7 from Claudio Tomasoni 2008-08-24 11:11:15 EDT --- Hello, I'm still interested in importing this package into Fedora. As already written I had some health trouble in the last months, that was the reason of my absence. Anyway, the package doesn't build in koji for dist-f10 with "make %{?_smp_mflags}" in the build section (see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=782837). In the new SPEC and SRPM the only correction is the name of the desktop file: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/tennix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/tennix-0.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 15:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241547.m7OFlPrJ004596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-24 11:47:24 EDT --- For 1.0.0-2 * %changelog - As Rakesh says, please keep previous changelog entries. - Other things are okay for this package. - Your another review request (bug 459871) seems good to some extent. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (teseq) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 15:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459925] New: Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Summary: Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libowfat-0.27-1/libowfat.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libowfat-0.27-1/libowfat-0.27-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: his library is a reimplementation of libdjb, which means that it provides Daniel Bernstein's interfaces (with some extensions). It contains wrappers around memory allocation, buffered I/O, routines for formatting and scanning, a full DNS resolver, several socket routines, wrappers for socket functions, mkfifo, opendir, wait, and an abstraction around errno. It also includes wrappers for Unix signal functions and a layer of mmap and sendfile. The library is available for use with the diet libc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 15:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] New: Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Summary: Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.81-1/homestead.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.81-1/homestead-0.81-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Homestead is a 3D real-time network visualizer, displaying hosts and packet traffic. Features include support for multiple sensors, analysis of packets to gather hostnames and services, configurable layout of subnetworks, recording/replaying of packet traffic, and the ability to filter packets by host, protocol or port. hsen (Homestead Sensor) is a packet capture daemon which reads and sends packet header information to Homestead, locally or remotely. hsen also equates hostname to IP by reading DNS packets (UDP type A class IN standard query response). The relationship between hsen to Homestead can be one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one or many-to-many (many Homesteads would be on multiple computers on the same subnet, receiving packet header information from hsen via broadcast). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 16:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459926] New: Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459926 Summary: Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/swing-worker-1.2-1/swing-worker.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/swing-worker-1.2-1/swing-worker-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: When writing a multi-threaded application using Swing, there are two constraints to keep in mind: (refer to How to Use Threads for more details): * Time-consuming tasks should not be run on the Event Dispatch Thread. Otherwise the application becomes unresponsive. * Swing components should be accessed on the Event Dispatch Thread only. These constraints mean that a GUI application with time intensive computing needs at least two threads: 1) a thread to perform the lengthy task and 2) the Event Dispatch Thread (EDT) for all GUI-related activities. This involves inter-thread communication which can be tricky to implement. SwingWorker is designed for situations where you need to have a long running task run in a background thread and provide updates to the UI either when done, or while processing. This project is a backport of SwingWorker included into 1.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 16:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241611.m7OGBUte005040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-24 12:11:29 EDT --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (python-tftpy) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 16:39:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241639.m7OGdc4h010395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 12:39:37 EDT --- itaka-0.2.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 16:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450621] Review Request: itaka - On-demand screen capture server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241640.m7OGeZjv010846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450621 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-24 12:40:34 EDT --- itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/itaka-0.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 17:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241702.m7OH2jDd010534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #5 from keith at karsites.net 2008-08-24 13:02:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314885) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314885) Screen shot of PHP5 running a php-gtk enabled script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 17:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241700.m7OH04jn010309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #4 from keith at karsites.net 2008-08-24 13:00:03 EDT --- My problem appears I was trying to use the same /etc/php.ini for my apache web server as well as for the CLI version of PHP. I made another php.ini file, and used that for loading and running the php_gtk2.so extension. Then used the following C/L to run a php-gtk test script: [root at karsites demos]# php -c /etc/php-cli/php.ini -f phpgtk2-demo.php This works OK now, as you can see by the enclosed attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 17:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241710.m7OHAKIm014259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #23 from John Khvatov 2008-08-24 13:10:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tftpy Short Description: A Pure-Python library for TFTP Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 17:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459880] Review Request: anyremote2html - WEB interface for anyRemote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241738.m7OHcXPw014419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459880 --- Comment #2 from anyremote 2008-08-24 13:38:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is this your first package? Are you sponsored? This is my 4th package. Yes, i'm sponsored. > anyremote2html.src:19: W: setup-not-quiet Fixed. > anyremote2html.src:32: E: files-attr-not-set Fixed. > anyremote2html.src: E: description-line-too-long WEB interface for anyRemote - Fixed > anyremote2html.src: E: no-changelogname-tag Umm... Fixed. > anyremote2html.src: W: strange-permission anyremote2html-0.5.2.tar.gz 0755 Fixed > anyremote2html.noarch: W: no-documentation Fixed Soory for inconvinience. Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote2html-0.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 17:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241746.m7OHk2X9018174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #7 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-24 13:46:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > MUST Items: > > - rpmlint warns aboun incoherent version in changelog. Easy to fix - just add > notes about latest changes under actual version (MW1.13-0.1.r37906). Strange: I'm rpmlinting my packages and get zero comments :-m I'm using this: [olea at lisergia SPECS]$ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.84-2.fc9.noarch [olea at lisergia SPECS]$ rpmlint -ivv mediawiki-imagemap.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > SHOULD Items: > > - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. aha. > So, finally > > * please add entry to %changelog to make rpmlint happy done. > * consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to > download latest version (we should provide such support) Well, I'm confused here since you suggested to explain the way to get the sources (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540#c4). You mean to write it in comments inside the spec file or to remove it since the sources are created through an upstream service? > * find a minute to drop email to ustream about LICENSE inclusion done Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 17:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241756.m7OHuKJC016719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-24 13:56:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > * consider shortening %description - no need to add notes, describing how to > > download latest version (we should provide such support) > > Well, I'm confused here since you suggested to explain the way to get the > sources (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540#c4). > > You mean to write it in comments inside the spec file or to remove it since the > sources are created through an upstream service? I thought that you use custom made svn snapshot. In such cases instructions how to build such snapshot should be supplied in spec-file. See this one, as a reference: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flashrom/devel/flashrom.spec?view=markup > Thanks :-) And one lastminute fix - please change versioning scheme again! I don't think that using MW1.13 as "Version" is a good idea. As its just a svn-snapshot and no official release was made so far, you should use 0, e.g. Version: 0 Release: 0.1.%{revision}%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241808.m7OI81ea018014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #3 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2008-08-24 14:08:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rcssmonitor Short Description: RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor Owners: hedayat Branches: F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241814.m7OIEluw018648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 14:14:46 EDT --- The file %{_includedir}/linux/dirent.h was dropped from kernel-headers on rawhide. So, package fails on koji. So, this package wouldn't build on rawhide. I have fixed other issues. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/coredumper.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/coredumper-1.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm For linux/dirent.h I will contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459873] Review Request: pdfresurrect - PDF Analysis and Scrubbing Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241848.m7OImgtK023142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459873 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:48:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:49:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241849.m7OIntWW023208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:49:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241855.m7OItplm026831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:55:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:53:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241853.m7OIrQHv026341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #47 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:53:23 EDT --- cvs done. I added snecker as co-maintainer. Feel free to adjust via the pkgdb web interface or reset the fedora-cvs flag if you need further changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241857.m7OIve1Z024357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:57:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459856] Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241858.m7OIwSih024423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:58:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:56:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241856.m7OIuhDw024308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:56:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 18:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459858] Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241859.m7OIxq1w027176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 14:59:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241902.m7OJ29gA025175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 15:02:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241903.m7OJ3TS0027788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 15:03:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458396] Review Request: denemo - Graphical music notation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241905.m7OJ5HQ4025660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458396 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 15:05:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241907.m7OJ77rc026046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 15:07:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241910.m7OJA4Z3029136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 15:10:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:12:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241912.m7OJC8NK026838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 15:12:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 19:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808241920.m7OJK46M030403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #28 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-24 15:20:03 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vcDdi/sat-solver-0.9.4-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vcDdj/sat-solver.spec * Sat Aug 23 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.9.4-3 - removed useless requires - Added a rpm database corruption patch - Use correct URI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242000.m7OK0ew4003605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Comment #17 from Oded Arbel 2008-08-24 16:00:38 EDT --- Yes, thanks for catching that. I'll fix this as soon as I have the time. Unfortunately I'll be out of the office in the next 4 weeks, so I probably won't have time to fix this before then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242006.m7OK6Ul1004575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-24 16:06:29 EDT --- I guess you know that scratch build failed. I can't really approve a package that doesn't actually build, but I went ahead and tested it out myself. Oddly enough, it builds on x86_64 but not on i386 (even though the result is, of course, a noarch package). I believe the buildsys will build noarch packages in a 32-bit chroot even if it builds on an x86_64 (or ppc64) machine. In any case, it's kind of a stretch to approve a package that won't actually build. Failing tests aren't inherently a problem as long as you know about them, understand the failure and are convinced that it won't cause a problem for the distro if the test is disabled until upstream can fix the issue. However, failing builds probably should block the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242015.m7OKFJ17006114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-24 16:15:18 EDT --- Was there any response from upstream regarding exactly which of the three ZPL versions they're using? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242022.m7OKMQkI004626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|perl-RPC-XML | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459312] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateManip - Convert Date::Manip to DateTime and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242023.m7OKNsXB007291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459312 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-24 16:23:52 EDT --- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:24:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] New: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling Alias: perl-RPC-XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 Summary: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPC-XML/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-RPC-XML-0.60-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-RPC-XML.spec Description: The RPC::XML package is an implementation of XML-RPC. The module provides classes for sample client and server implementations, a server designed as an Apache location-handler, and a suite of data-manipulation classes that are used by them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242025.m7OKPweg005225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |454102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242025.m7OKPvOO005204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459933 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-24 16:25:56 EDT --- Submitted bug 459933 for RPC::XML review; updating as blocking this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242030.m7OKUdRO008652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-24 16:30:39 EDT --- Koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=781962 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242030.m7OKUSFE008620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-24 16:30:27 EDT --- Heh, /builddir/build/BUILD/eigen2/Eigen/src/Core/Functors.h:274: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:371 NOTOURBUG. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242028.m7OKSr38008102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-24 16:28:52 EDT --- Joy, no, I didn't notice the failure (scratch builds don't send email notification I guess, and all my local builds succeeded). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:43:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242043.m7OKhiNx010444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2008-08-24 16:43:43 EDT --- Not building the testsuite will get the package built, however client programs building against it may run into it. It's a g++ bug, it will have to be filed against GCC. I'll look into it to see if it can be worked around, maybe I can even figure out what is going wrong in GCC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:48:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242048.m7OKmGmv011198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-24 16:48:16 EDT --- I can at least confirm that koffice2 builds fine against eigen2 on F-9/i386 and F-9/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459934] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459934 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Pg/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.16002-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec Description: This module understands the formats used by PostgreSQL for its DATE, TIME, TIMESTAMP, and INTERVAL data types. It can be used to parse these formats in order to create DateTime or DateTime::Duration objects, and it can take a DateTime or DateTime::Duration object and produce a string representing it in a format accepted by PostgreSQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 20:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459934] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242055.m7OKtcpg009920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459934 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-24 16:55:37 EDT --- Koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=783247 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 21:08:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242108.m7OL8kIp014406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-24 17:08:45 EDT --- Hey Jeff. I'll take a look at this package and see about sponsoring you... Do you have another package or two to submit? Or would you be willing to go do some "pre-reviews" of waiting packages in the review queue to show you know the guidelines? Look for a full review of this package in the next few days... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 21:24:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242124.m7OLOCPB014231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler 2008-08-24 17:24:11 EDT --- Looks pretty clearly like a GCC bug. The offending line in Eigen looks reasonable: inline ei_scalar_quotient1_impl(const Scalar& other) : m_other(static_cast(1) / other) {} No inline assembly or anything suspicious. GCC crashes in void convert_move (rtx to, rtx from, int unsignedp). The function is documented as: /* Copy data from FROM to TO, where the machine modes are not the same. Both modes may be integer, or both may be floating, or both may be fixed-point. UNSIGNEDP should be nonzero if FROM is an unsigned type. This causes zero-extension instead of sign-extension. */ The assertion which fails is gcc_assert (to_real == from_real);. This checks for the constraint that "Both modes may be integer, or both may be floating", here we have a mix, so GCC is calling convert_move with invalid arguments. A backtrace might help, as might GCC internal representation dumps (both tree and RTL dumps), but in any case a bug needs to be filed against GCC. I'd suggest disabling building the testsuite for now if that gets the package to build, but filing a bug against GCC to get GCC fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 21:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242133.m7OLXOF7018332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #9 from John Khvatov 2008-08-24 17:33:23 EDT --- Done. I build gitosis for f9 and submit request for push to updates via bodhi. I inadvertently orphaned package, then revert it (in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gitosis). But status is "Orphaned". What must I do to change it? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 21:37:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459896] Review Request: libasyncns - Library for querying name services asynchronously In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242137.m7OLb0d4018996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459896 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-24 17:36:59 EDT --- Closing as a duplicate, since my bugzilla skillz must suck. contacted nirik to correct the owner of this package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 456828 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 21:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456828] Review Request: libasyncns - Asynchronous Name Service Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242137.m7OLb1xR019026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456828 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-24 17:36:59 EDT --- *** Bug 459896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 22:47:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242247.m7OMlUCf029896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moe at blagblagblag.org --- Comment #1 from jebba 2008-08-24 18:47:29 EDT --- BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 22:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459219] Review Request: ibus-chewing - Chewing engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242252.m7OMqoeh027949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459219 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Huang Peng 2008-08-24 18:52:49 EDT --- built it. Thanks for Kevin & Parag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 22:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459856] Review Request: ibus-hangul - The Korean hangul engine for IBus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242252.m7OMqHpT027885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459856 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2008-08-24 18:52:16 EDT --- built it. Thanks for Kevin & Parag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 22:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445094] Review Request: pommed - Apple laptop hotkey event handler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242252.m7OMq70h027828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445094 Stewart Adam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Stewart Adam 2008-08-24 18:52:06 EDT --- The media keys work fine now with HAL, the only thing that pommed does do that HAL doesn't at the moment is backlight control. I heard that was coming in 2.6.27, but I'm not sure if that holds true or not. Either way, I guess I'll close this since the package isn't of much use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 24 22:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459858] Review Request: ibus-table - The general table engine for IBus platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808242253.m7OMr3Tp030753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459858 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2008-08-24 18:53:01 EDT --- built it. Thanks for Kevin & Parag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 00:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250013.m7P0DtMq011589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #2 from jebba 2008-08-24 20:13:54 EDT --- I'm going to take a look at #454008 (iax), #454010 (iaxclient), #454022 (Coccinella) since I'm interested in them and once took a look at packaging Coccinella and was thwarted. haha. I have packaged synfig (#428568) in the past so I'll look at that and whatever else looks interesting. I have packaged a number of things which may be of interest to fedora. All of the .specs would need to be cleaned up (some significantly...). Partial list: freej, jamin, daemontools, ffmpeg2theora, flumotion, freeeee-encyclopedia-en, freeeee-encyclopedia-reader, ihu, indywiki, libclaw, mlt, mlt++, kdenlive, oggfwd, palantir, plee-the-bear, qdvdauthor, ucspi-tcp, gastman, kiax, hasciicam, jabbin, jahshaka, kiax, lives, MuSE, netjack, thoggen, wengophone, xoo, qtnx, pocketphinux, PenguinTV, openlibraries, openmovieeditor, sphinxbase plus a variety multimedia applications which are often found on freeworld servers (mplayer, vlc, etc). If there's anything in particular there that you'd like to see, I'll prepare it. I'll start the process of cleaning them up... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 00:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250026.m7P0QgtH011004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-24 20:26:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > For 2.0.2-0: > > * Release number > - The minimum number which can be used for Release number is 1. > 0 is used only for pre-release tarballs: Hmmm, I'm lose sight of. I assume now release shoud be 2 (1 should have been previous). > * License > - As far as I verified the source code, the license tag should > be "GPLv2+". Official site ( http://ferm.foo-projects.org/) says: "Licensed under the GPLv2" > > * rpmlint issue > ------------------------------------------------------ > ferm.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.2 2.0.2-0.fc10 > ------------------------------------------------------ Ok, done. > * Macros usage consistency > - When using { on macros, please use { for all macros (except for some cases) > consistently. You use %{_mandir} and %_sbindir , for example. %_sbindir replaced by %{_sbindir} Is there any guidelines about it or is it only by the aesthetic considerations? > * Documents > - Please also add the following files to %doc. > ------------------------------------------------------ > NEWS > ------------------------------------------------------ Done. > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > - "system/firewalls" is not a standard Group (please refer to > > > $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group > > Thanks. I'm change it to "Applications/System". > > But another question is why rpmlint was silent?? > - On my system rpmlint warned about this.s You are using stable version of the rpmlint or rawhide? May be I can tune warning level somewhere? $ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.84-2.fc9.noarch > > > > - "Requires: perl" is redundant. Usually perl (module) related dependencies are > > > automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild. > > I suppose that do not requires external perl modules. Requires: perl removed. > > But I can't understand how it will be detected? It is based on standard > > Makefile, nor perl buildsystem. > > - This is detected by /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req. Try > ... Thank you very much for the explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 00:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250034.m7P0YaSP012057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-24 20:34:35 EDT --- Oh, excuse me, I forgot links: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm.spec http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm-2.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 00:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 20:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250031.m7P0VWNK011811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-24 20:31:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > By the way: > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. It would be grateful if you become my sponsor. > the person who want to be sponsored (like you) > are required to "show that you have an understanding > of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described > on : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > > Usually there are two ways to show this. > A. submit other review requests with enough quality. > B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request > (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do > a formal review) I like more the first way. I'm have submitted several packages for review at this time (all waiting review): php-pecl-runkit - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 php-pecl-parsekit - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 DivFix++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 xls2csv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Additionally, dependency from decision of Ankur Shrivastava in I may co-maintain axel - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 or not. By the way you may see my spec in the request. Additionally, it is not formal review request (I'm not first submitter), but request of package sim - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 also created from my src.rpm and thus packages long time distributed from main website of sim (http://sim-im.org/wiki/Download) Furthermore, I'm own small rpm-repository for Fedora: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/ and planing submit more few package review requests shortly. I do not have pre-review, but for that aim may also provide this bug-report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459124 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 01:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250133.m7P1XifZ024739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moe at blagblagblag.org --- Comment #1 from jebba 2008-08-24 21:33:43 EDT --- rpmlint iaxclient-2.1-0.1.beta3.fc10.src.rpm iaxclient.src: W: strange-permission run-tkiaxphone.sh 0775 The .desktop Exec= files have absolute paths (e.g. /usr/bin/wxiax). This doesn't seem common, but is ok? It needs libvidcap & libvidcap-devel, but I can't find that anywhere within Fedora (including bugzilla and your review web dirs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 02:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459944] New: Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Summary: Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: drepper at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: pfstools is a set of command line and GUI programs for reading, writing, manipulating and viewing high-dynamic range (HDR) images and video frames. All programs in the package exchange data using unix pipes and a simple generic HDR image format (pfs). The concept of the pfstools is similar to netpbm package for low-dynamic range images. The RPM is split into a number of subpackages to avoid pulling in dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 02:56:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459945] New: Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 Summary: Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: drepper at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstmo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstmo-1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The pfstmo package contains the implementation of state-of-the-art tone mapping operators. The motivation here is to provide an implementation of tone mapping operators suitable for convenient processing of both static images and animations. The package is used together with the PFS high dynamic range image tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 02:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459946] New: Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Summary: Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: drepper at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PFScalibration package provides an implementation of the Robertson et al. 2003 method for the photometric calibration of cameras and for the recovery of high dynamic range (HDR) images from the set of low dynamic range (LDR) exposures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 03:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459948] New: Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Summary: Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/maemo/libhildon.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/maemo/libhildon-2.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Hildon application framework introduces a new desktop for handheld devices. It comprises a lightweight desktop, a set of widgets optimized for handheld devices, a set of theming tools and other complementary libraries and applications. This package contains the shared libraries needed to run Hildon applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 04:12:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250412.m7P4C8Vm012357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 00:12:07 EDT --- As package db says the owner on devel branch is still you, I don't guess I can change the status. If it doesn't seem you can change the status, add CVS request on this bug to revert the status and set fedora-cvs flag again. Perhaps CVS admins can treat this properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 04:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250429.m7P4Ti3Q013384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #7 from vivek shah 2008-08-25 00:29:43 EDT --- Thanks for the reviews and the advices. I have sent a request to be included in the Fedora Packager CVS commit group. my FAS name is bonii Thanks for the pointers and all the help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 04:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250441.m7P4fEJa015786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #2 from Abhijith Das 2008-08-25 00:41:13 EDT --- This is my first package. I was told that I would get fedorapeople.org space only after submitting my first package. Anyhow, I should be able borrow some webspace and upload the package. Will post a link here. Thanks! --Abhi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 05:13:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250513.m7P5Dmqv018903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 01:13:47 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 05:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250515.m7P5FFiQ019282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 01:15:14 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 458624) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 06:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250615.m7P6FbYp027130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #9 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-25 02:15:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I thought that you use custom made svn snapshot. It was at the first version, before discovering the WikiMedia tgz service :-) > And one lastminute fix - please change versioning scheme again! I don't think > that using MW1.13 as "Version" is a good idea. As its just a svn-snapshot and > no official release was made so far, you should use 0, e.g. > > Version: 0 > Release: 0.1.%{revision}%{?dist} done: http://olea.org/tmp/mediawiki-imagemap.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 06:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250629.m7P6ThW9027630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-25 02:29:41 EDT --- Everything looks clear here; approving. Sorry for the delay! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 06:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250648.m7P6mZHY030657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-25 02:48:34 EDT --- OK. All issues now resolved. Don't forget to raise fedora-cvs flag to "?" :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250702.m7P72Gc6032615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:02:15 EDT --- For 0.7.5-1.svn: * Versioning/Using svn - When using svn based tarball, please write as comments how you created the tarball: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Would you tell me whether the tarball you are using is post- or pre- release of version 0.7.5? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release - For svn based tarball, I prefer to use revision number rather than the date you checked out. * build log verboseness - Build log output like: -------------------------------------------------------------- 200 [ 41%] 201 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/basewidget.o 202 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/codeedit.o 203 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/variables_list.o 204 Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/command_list.o 205 [ 43%] -------------------------------------------------------------- is not useful. For example, we cannot check if Fedora specific compiler flags are honored correctly. Please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage * Icon caching -------------------------------------------------------------- 47 # desktop file can't find icon 48 mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps 49 mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/%{name}.png \ 50 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png 51 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons -------------------------------------------------------------- - Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache Resetting fedora-review flag to question mark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250742.m7P7gv2S005113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:42:56 EDT --- For 2.0.2-2: (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > * License > > - As far as I verified the source code, the license tag should > > be "GPLv2+". > Official site ( http://ferm.foo-projects.org/) says: "Licensed under the GPLv2" - Well I assume the site you quoted is using wrong license tag, because - We guess under what license the package is released by checking the whole codes in the tarball - Some files in the tarball declares explicitly the license is under GPLv2+ (see files under doc/). (I guess the upstream are using "GPLv2" on the site with the meaning of "GPL version 2 and any later" :) ) However as "GPLv2" is more strict than "GPLv2+", for now I accept "GPLv2" license tag. However please ask the upsteam which is correct. > > * Macros usage consistency > > - When using { on macros, please use { for all macros (except for some cases) > > consistently. You use %{_mandir} and %_sbindir , for example. > > %_sbindir replaced by %{_sbindir} > Is there any guidelines about it or is it only by the aesthetic considerations? - Only cosmetic issue > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > - "system/firewalls" is not a standard Group (please refer to > > > > $ rpmlint -I non-standard-group > > > Thanks. I'm change it to "Applications/System". > > > But another question is why rpmlint was silent?? > > - On my system rpmlint warned about this.s > You are using stable version of the rpmlint or rawhide? May be I can tune > warning level somewhere? > > $ rpm -q rpmlint > rpmlint-0.84-2.fc9.noarch - rpmlint-0.84-2.fc10.noarch. Maybe the dependent packages are related. Now: - This package itself is okay - Your other review requests seem good to some extent. (There are some apparent issues which need fixing, however I don't guess I can have a time to review other review requests of yours as I am already reviewing 20 requests... I hope someone else will review other requests of yours.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (ferm) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". As I found your name in FAS I am sponsoring you now. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250745.m7P7jI0x004630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-25 03:45:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > ping again? Hopefully I'll spent some time in this in the next days. Please don't despair :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250746.m7P7kK7F004816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:46:19 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 455067) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250748.m7P7mLH9004997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:48:20 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 455067) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250747.m7P7lDV0005782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:47:13 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 455067) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250749.m7P7n9Sb005913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:49:08 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 455067) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250751.m7P7ppnS005791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 03:51:50 EDT --- Okay, thank you for response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250752.m7P7qNBr006648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-25 03:52:22 EDT --- Strange thing: t/40_server..........NOK 9/54 # Failed test 'RPC::XML::Server::url method (set)' # at t/40_server.t line 58. # got: 'http://localhost.localdomain:9000/' # expected: 'http://localhost:9000/' t/40_server..........ok 24/54# Looks like you failed 1 test of 54. t/40_server..........dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 9 Failed 1/54 tests, 98.15% okay Is there any reason why this build fail on my computer and run ok in koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 07:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250759.m7P7xuXQ006820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #22 from Bart Vanbrabant 2008-08-25 03:59:53 EDT --- For me this is ok, but I don't have any problem whatsoever if someone else is the owner. I've got the time to maintain it so I would at least want co-maintainership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 08:04:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454120] Review Request: vdr-streamdev - Streaming client/server package for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250804.m7P84rtw008787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454120 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Ville Skytt? 2008-08-25 04:04:52 EDT --- License (GPLv2) does not look correct to me. The streamdev sources just refer to COPYING without specifying a GPL version which makes them GPL+, and libdvbmpeg is GPLv2+. I suppose "License: GPL+ and GPLv2+" would be correct. Upstream probably meant the whole shebang to be GPLv2+, I'm sure they would appreciate being notified. The iconv stuff in %prep appears unnecessary, all those files are US-ASCII. "Requires: vdr(abi) ..." should be moved to the -server and -client packages as the "main" package does not produce a binary rpm and -server and -client currently do not have a dependency on vdr. vdr-streamdev-server.conf says "vdr-streamdev" and "streamdev", should probably be changed to "vdr-streamdev-server" and "streamdev-server". Other than that, looks good, I'll complete the review when I have the chance to try the binaries - I've just built the package and looked at the sources for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 08:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250816.m7P8GvVb009659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 08:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250816.m7P8GTbY010591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-25 04:16:28 EDT --- - rpmlint checks return: OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license, text in %doc, matches source OK - spec file legible, in am. english - possibly yes - source matches upstream OK - package compiles on devel (x86) - comment#1 OK - no missing BR OK - no unnecessary BR OK - no locales OK - not relocatable OK - owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - %clean ok OK - macro use consistent OK - code, not content OK - no need for -docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - no need for .desktop file OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 08:30:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250830.m7P8Ui2P012417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2008-08-25 04:30:43 EDT --- Hi Tom, i am not an official sponsor, but the spec file looks good to me. corosync is now a major (Build)Require for cluster. Is there any way we can speed this up? Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 08:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250843.m7P8huk5012855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 --- Comment #31 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-25 04:43:53 EDT --- Still no branch for F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 08:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457261] Review Request: open-cobol - OpenCOBOL - COBOL compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250843.m7P8hwIE013768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457261 --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-25 04:43:57 EDT --- all issues are fixed now, so this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 09:02:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250902.m7P92XhT015147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-25 05:02:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ann Short Description: Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors Owners: sharkcz Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 09:04:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250904.m7P94s7t016389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 --- Comment #7 from Steven Dake 2008-08-25 05:04:53 EDT --- Based on Fabio's feedback: New package available for review (corosync-0.91-3): http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync-0.91-3.src.rpm http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/downloads/review/corosync.spec * Sun Aug 24 2008 Steven Dake - 0.91-3 - move logsys_overview.8.* to devel package. - move shared libs to main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 09:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808250916.m7P9Gw3l018266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #23 from Peter Vrabec 2008-08-25 05:16:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Bart / Peter: I see Bart in the packager group... would you like me to process > the request with him as owner? Bart: owner me: co-maintainer thnx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:04:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251204.m7PC4Ahb006833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 --- Comment #32 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-25 08:04:06 EDT --- See https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/768 for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251216.m7PCG0IY009004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] New: Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 Summary: Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/libgxim/libgxim.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/libgxim/libgxim-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgxim is a X Input Method protocol library that is implemented by GObject. this library helps you to implement XIM servers or client applications to communicate through XIM protocol without using Xlib API directly, particularly if your application uses GObject-based main loop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251211.m7PCBjYK008240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-25 08:11:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > However as "GPLv2" is more strict than "GPLv2+", for now I accept "GPLv2" > license tag. However please ask the upsteam which is correct. I have sent mail to one of main developer with this question. > - rpmlint-0.84-2.fc10.noarch. Maybe the dependent packages are related. Maybe, maybe. I using most packages form F9 stable repository at this time. > > > Now: > - This package itself is okay > - Your other review requests seem good to some extent. > (There are some apparent issues which need fixing, however I don't guess I > can have a time > to review other review requests of yours as I am already reviewing 20 > requests... > I hope someone else will review other requests of yours.) I hope too. Thank you once more for this review. > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". > As I found your name in FAS I am sponsoring you now. I have done this steps several times ago. Even in this present reviews I check it builds in koji. My name in FAS is "hubbitus". > If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT Ok, thanks, this document I have not read yet. > If you have questions, please ask me. Thanks. I think the questions yet to be. What is preferred way to contact with you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:39:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251239.m7PCd202011048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-25 08:39:01 EDT --- drupal-date-6.x.2.0-2.rc2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal-date-6.x.2.0-2.rc2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459902] Review Request: ocaml-bisect - OCaml code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251239.m7PCd1CF011023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459902 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-25 08:38:59 EDT --- F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=784441 F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=784440 Thanks to everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456298] Review Request: netbeans-resolver - Resolver subproject of xml-commons patched for NetBeans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251242.m7PCgbwd011661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456298 --- Comment #6 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-25 08:42:35 EDT --- The fourth release is prepared for review. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2050/netbeans-resolver.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2148/netbeans-resolver-6.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - The dos2unix package is added as the build requirements Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=784438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251244.m7PCiDN4012565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 08:44:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > Please follow the procedure written on: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". > > As I found your name in FAS I am sponsoring you now. > I have done this steps several times ago. Even in this present reviews I check > it builds in koji. > > My name in FAS is "hubbitus". I am already sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. >From what you say, I guess next step of yours is "Add Package to CVS and Set Owner" (i.e. write CVS request on this bug) > > If you have questions, please ask me. > Thanks. I think the questions yet to be. What is preferred way to contact with > you? If the question is related to this review request, you can write it on this bug. Otherwise feel free to mail to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251250.m7PCos6j013688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-25 08:50:53 EDT --- Might I add that "For Easy Rule Making" as a Summary really doesn't say anything about what this package does. I would suggest including "firewall rule manager" or at least something about firewalls in the Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 12:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251252.m7PCqRGa013845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 --- Comment #11 from John Khvatov 2008-08-25 08:52:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gitosis I inadvertently orphaned package in devel content. The status remained "orphaned" after reversion. Is it possible to change the status to "Approved"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251300.m7PD0c0T014432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-25 09:00:36 EDT --- fyi, keep in mind most/all of those "freeworld" items are done so for good reason, in that they contain encumbered (ie patented) content, and cannot be in fedora (at least not without surgery to remove the offending bits). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:01:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251301.m7PD1uWZ015456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #12 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-08-25 09:01:54 EDT --- Fixed post and postun, it builds in koji and rpmlint is quiet. Spec: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage.spec SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libmirage-1.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251335.m7PDZj09018922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 --- Comment #4 from vivek shah 2008-08-25 09:35:44 EDT --- Thanks for the reviews, I have updated the %check section and also added the ChangeLog file SPEC URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/samefile.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/samefile-2.12-2.fc8.src.rpm The license is BSD since this is the license specified in the spec file for creating the rpm for OpenSUSE distribution by the upstream author which is also included in the source tar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251337.m7PDb610020035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #41 from Jarod Wilson 2008-08-25 09:37:02 EDT --- I'd say just call it ivtv-utils everywhere, and Obsoletes/Provides ivtv. Hey, that way, you can even drop the epoch... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:58:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251358.m7PDwQkS021924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459081] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251355.m7PDtOq5021564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459081 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 13:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] New: Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Summary: Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: moe at blagblagblag.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt-0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MLT is an open source multimedia framework, designed and developed for television broadcasting. It provides a toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders, web streamers and many more types of applications. The functionality of the system is provided via an assortment of ready to use tools, xml authoring components, and an extendible plug-in based API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459982] New: Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459982 Summary: Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/moe.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/moe-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: NU Moe is a powerful, 8-bit clean, text editor for ISO-8859 and ASCII character encodings. It has a modeless, user-friendly interface, online help, multiple windows, unlimited undo/redo capability, unlimited line length, global search/replace (on all buffers at once), block operations, automatic indentation, word wrapping, filename completion, directory browser, duplicate removal from prompt histories, delimiter matching, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251402.m7PE2JIf023040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #4 from jebba 2008-08-25 10:02:17 EDT --- I did a package for mlt "Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders" #459979. I believe it meets Fedora's guidelines--I didn't drag in ffmpeg and such, for example. It is needed for mlt++ which is needed for kdenlive which rocks. It doesn't compile on x86_64 (some assembly optimization compile fail), but uploaded it anyway to get input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459983] New: Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459983 Summary: Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/moe.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/moe-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNU Moe is a powerful, 8-bit clean, text editor for ISO-8859 and ASCII character encodings. It has a modeless, user-friendly interface, online help, multiple windows, unlimited undo/redo capability, unlimited line length, global search/replace (on all buffers at once), block operations, automatic indentation, word wrapping, filename completion, directory browser, duplicate removal from prompt histories, delimiter matching, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:07:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459983] Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251407.m7PE73id023700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459983 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-25 10:07:01 EDT --- *** Bug 459982 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459982] Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251407.m7PE72CX023676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459982 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-25 10:07:01 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 459983 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] New: Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Summary: Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnurobots.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnurobots-1.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNU Robots is a game/diversion where you construct a program for a little robot, then set him loose and watch him explore a world on his own. The robot program is written in Scheme, and is implemented using GNU Guile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251435.m7PEZ7Cp028695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #9 from vivek shah 2008-08-25 10:35:06 EDT --- Thanks I am going through the detailed procedures on the links mentioned above. Meanwhile I have updated (bug 459871) and also created 2 more review requests (bug 459989) and (bug 459983) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251449.m7PEnQwb030459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 --- Comment #6 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-25 10:49:25 EDT --- Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=784687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251458.m7PEwVVY031825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #60 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-25 10:58:27 EDT --- Any progress with this package? I can take it, if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 14:56:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251456.m7PEurU1031753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 --- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter 2008-08-25 10:56:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/eigen2/eigen2.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/eigen2/eigen2-2.0-0.3.alpha7.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Aug 25 2008 Rex Dieter 2.0-0.3.alpha7 - disable buildtime tests, which tickle gcc bugs scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=784715 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251500.m7PF0LQC031744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-25 11:00:19 EDT --- Any progress with this review? I can take it, if it's ok for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251504.m7PF48hd000305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #29 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-25 11:04:05 EDT --- If anyone wants to try the latest package with the included patch... It *should* fix a bug where yum, when used after zypper (or vice-versa) corrupt the RPM database. In particular it seems to not initialize the db cursor correctly. Please note that you should recompile libzypp and zypper against this version of the package. I'm testing it too, if no corruption happens in 2 days I'll assume that the issue has been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251515.m7PFFQew002605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #30 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-08-25 11:15:25 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://omploader.org/vcDk3/sat-solver-0.9.4-4.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://omploader.org/vcDk4/sat-solver.spec Nothing exceptional, only fixed the mispelled word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] New: Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Summary: Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lfarkas at lfarkas.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/redhat/5/SPECS/rxtx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/redhat/5/SRPMS/rxtx-2.1-7r2.1.src.rpm Description: rxtx is an full implementation of java commapi which aims to support RS232 IEEE 1284, RS485, I2C and RawIO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459871] Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251535.m7PFZMP9005179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-25 11:35:21 EDT --- I will do a detailed review today or at least tomorrow ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:41:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:41:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251541.m7PFfquv006102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251552.m7PFqR2f007390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-25 11:52:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Strange thing: > t/40_server..........NOK 9/54 > # Failed test 'RPC::XML::Server::url method (set)' > # at t/40_server.t line 58. > # got: 'http://localhost.localdomain:9000/' > # expected: 'http://localhost:9000/' > t/40_server..........ok 24/54# Looks like you failed 1 test of 54. > t/40_server..........dubious > Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > DIED. FAILED test 9 > Failed 1/54 tests, 98.15% okay > > Is there any reason why this build fail on my computer and run ok in koji? Oddly, I found that that particular test is highly sensitive to the order of hostnames on the loopback line in /etc/hosts. e.g. it failed on my laptop when the line was: 127.0.0.1 athena localhost localhost.localdomain But passed just fine when I moved 'athena' to the end of the line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251559.m7PFxWAK008645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 15:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251558.m7PFwf05009532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Comment #48 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-25 11:58:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > Thanks, spot!! > > Now I can approve this package. Please fix the license tag to "GPLv2+ and > GeoGratis" > on -demo when you import this package into Fedora CVS. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (mapnik) is APPROVED by mtasaka > --------------------------------------------------------------------- License: GPLv2+ GeoGratis [done] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251603.m7PG3hGu009725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 12:03:39 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251602.m7PG2cIu010664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #60 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 12:02:36 EDT --- As koji is up again I will wait for your new srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448337] Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251607.m7PG7Ini010360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 12:07:16 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251609.m7PG9NSV011682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 12:09:22 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251613.m7PGDVnt011276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 12:13:30 EDT --- Michel, I will once close this bug if no response is received from you within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453772] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-ImageView - Perl bindings to the GtkImageView image viewer widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251615.m7PGFv9q011816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453772 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 12:15:55 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460035] New: EPEL branch for fop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: EPEL branch for fop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460035 Summary: EPEL branch for fop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Package Change Request ====================== Package name: fop New Branches: EL-5 New Branch owners: lkundrak lillian, the Fedora owner agreed to the change, and did not want to maintain it himself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251636.m7PGaJqk015869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #43 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-25 12:36:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-RPM2 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: rnorwood -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 16:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251654.m7PGsbMc019690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-25 12:54:36 EDT --- I got answer from Max Kellerman, one of upstream ferm developer: > What is more true GPLv2 or "GPLv2 or any later version" (GPLv2+ in > > Fedora terminology)?? ... The home page is only 99.9% accurate, to keep it as short as possible and readable - you know, nobody reads text in a web browser, especially if it's longer than really needed ;-) The only "real" licensing statement is the one in the source code, which should be "GPLv2+" for you. So, I'm change Licence to GPLv2+ http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm.spec http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/ferm/ferm-2.0.2-3.fc9.src.rpm Now I reading and working on importing this package into Fedora 8/9. @Jason Tibbitts I have follow guidelines and got summary from upstream. May be "For Easy firewall Rule Making"? Furthermore it is abbrivation as I understood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251701.m7PH1QDc021036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #4 from Paul F. Kunz 2008-08-25 13:01:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > zorba.review.txt: > Hi, you don't seem to be sponsored, so I can't perform an official review. > Instead, I can get the review process started with a pre-review. Have you > requested a fedoraproject account ? I have an account. It is pfkeb. I recently changed my e-mail contact from paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu to paulfkunz at gmail.com. > [??] -devel include shows %name/%name/* . Is this what was intended, why ? This is the way the upstream installs itself. I agree it is a little strange. > > [??] are the .TAGFILEs needed by an end user of devel-docs ? Perhaps they are a > side result of the compile process ? They come from Doxygen. If the end user wants to link his Doxygen generated documentation to Zorba's locally then he needs them. > > [??] license is Apache license v2 from web site. extracted upstream source > mentions "the Apache License" more than 700 times. The short name "APL 2.0" is > the correct fedora reference. > I put the correct Fedora reference in the spec file. > [??] NOTICE.txt also provides some license information / history. I haven't > analysed whether the license would be considered free for Fedora purposes. Have > each of the authors mentioned > I'm not sure what you are suggesting here. > [??] devel-doc is created as a separate package. It isn't overly large, and > could potentially be part of the -devel package ? What reasoning caused you to > split the devel-docs out ? > I've removed devel-docs subpackage. > [??] spec legible: > - could be improved by sticking to a certain coding style within the spec with > relation to eg 2x blank lines between sections, rather than 0 or 1. > - the files section has one layout for some subpackages, and different spacing > for the last ones. > I've taken you suggestions. Thanks, it does look better. > [ ?] might as well fix the spelling of grammer and headerss ! > Ran the spell checker on the spec file and fixed the errors. > [ ?] while individually specifying each %files to include can be done, would it > be simpler to glob the folders instead (or have you already factored this in) ? > Good suggestion and done. > [??] python guidelines suggest placing python_sitelib determination at the top > of the spec. Any reason to do it elsewhere ? > its been moved. > [??] places files directly in the %{python_sitelib}, rather than a module named > subfolder. Not sure if that is allowed ? > I've seen it done both ways. Generally, when the package contains multiiple files and subdirectory is used. However, zorba has only two files. > [??] -python doesn't require the base package. Is there a reason why ? > Was oversigth. Now fixed. > [??] why put the *.py*, *.gif, *.rb examples in the python/ruby sub packages. > Would these be more appropriate for the devel-doc package ? > Fixed. > [??] %build turns on debug output. I don't know whether that is allowed in the > final package ? > Yes this is allowed. The debugging symbols are stripped and put in zorba-debuginfo rpm. > [ x] rpmlint problems: rpmlint zorba-0.9.21-2.fc9.src.rpm I added the attr tag. > [ x] doesn't build on i386. Is a build require missing ? Perhaps need to try > one of the methods to help determine build requires at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequire I tried that procedure but it didn't work for me. Nevertheless I found additional requires that needed to be added. > > [ x] doesn't own all the dirs it creates: > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} is the dir only > the subfolders c, cxx, zorba, python ruby aren't owned {I could be wrong here, > since it won't build}. Fixed. > > [ x] unversioned .so must be in the -devel package > moved it. > > [ x] package provides .sos in normal lib dir, but doesn't use the guideline > must %post/un -p /sbin/ldconfig > Added it. > [ x] clean rm -rf is commented out. Why has this been done ? I don't think it > could make it into Fedora like this. > Was commented out for debugging, now put back in. > [ x] not all %files sections include the %defattr() > Fixed. > [ x] main package doc files are not marked as %doc. I assume they aren't > required for the executable to run. > Correct. > [ x] LICENSE.txt is included in source, and hence must be included in package, > but is not marked %doc > Fixed. > [ x] -python summary line is repeated under description > fixed. > [ x] -ruby package must indicate the required Ruby ABI version > Done. > [ x] -ruby library must indicate what it provides with a Provides: > ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION > Isn't this done automatically because of the .so file > [ x] must bump release with each adjustment of the package. This provides > tracability, and ensures an update path. > Done. > You don't appear to have begun the fedoraproject account creation process. My account if pfkeb >Note > the email you use there should be the one used in the changlelog as well. I > also notice that you are an upstream contributor. What applications are using > zorba so far ? Fixed for recent change log entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460041] New: Review Request: libvidcap - Cross-platform video capture library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libvidcap - Cross-platform video capture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460041 Summary: Review Request: libvidcap - Cross-platform video capture library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libvidcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libvidcap-0.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A cross-platform library for capturing video from webcams and other video capture devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460041] Review Request: libvidcap - Cross-platform video capture library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251710.m7PHA7RE021477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460041 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |454010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:10:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251710.m7PHA6Oj021456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251713.m7PHDuXD023047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #19 from Oron Peled 2008-08-25 13:13:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhocr Short Description: A Hebrew optical character recognition library Owners: oron Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: oron -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:12:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454010] Review Request: iaxclient - Library for creating telephony solutions that interoperate with Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251712.m7PHCmEH022947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454010 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-25 13:12:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint iaxclient-2.1-0.1.beta3.fc10.src.rpm > iaxclient.src: W: strange-permission run-tkiaxphone.sh 0775 > > The .desktop Exec= files have absolute paths (e.g. /usr/bin/wxiax). This > doesn't seem common, but is ok? Should be fine. > It needs libvidcap & libvidcap-devel, but I can't find that anywhere within > Fedora (including bugzilla and your review web dirs). Whoops. It is up for review now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:26:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460041] Review Request: libvidcap - Cross-platform video capture library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251726.m7PHQR2a025336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460041 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:31:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460041] Review Request: libvidcap - Cross-platform video capture library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251731.m7PHVkmA025726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460041 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-25 13:31:44 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: rpmlint of libvidcap: empty rpmlint of libvidcap-devel: libvidcap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation -> ignorable [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 2956d860981eb947bbb174b3f94bccc9de3d85ed libvidcap-0.2.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Would be nice to preserve timestaps of header files in the -devel package. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251735.m7PHZj5k026232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-08-25 13:35:44 EDT --- You're right, license should be TCL. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tcl-tile-0.8.2-2.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tcl-tile.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:38:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251738.m7PHcMph026952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-25 13:38:21 EDT --- I have reported upstream with a patch. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/coredumper.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/coredumper-1.2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm Build successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=785059 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251742.m7PHgjvA027688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 --- Comment #16 from Bret McMillan 2008-08-25 13:42:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordpress-mu Short Description: multi-user variant of wordpress blogging package Owners: bretm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: jonrob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 17:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] New: Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 Summary: Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/pssh/pssh.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/pssh/pssh-1.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package provides various parallel tools based on ssh and scp. Parallell version includes: o ssh : pssh o scp : pscp o nuke : pnuke o rsync : prsync o slurp : pslurp koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=785113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 18:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251824.m7PIOHJ4001646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-25 14:24:16 EDT --- You seem to miss a couple of BRs: - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=785132&name=build.log (missing python) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=785172&name=build.log (missing module named setuptools) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 18:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251829.m7PITEAF002487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-25 14:29:13 EDT --- Sorry, I forgot to update the files on fp.org, fixed now. Please retry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 18:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251831.m7PIVvbR003126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #3 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-25 14:31:56 EDT --- Good news, I now have evidence that this package works on all architectures! Koji is back up, and a scratch build with dist-f9 works on all supported architectures (i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64). Since this spec includes a %check script, this is evidence that the package really does work on all architectures. Here's what I used: $ koji build --scratch dist-f9 E-0.999.006-2.fc9.src.rpm ... 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:02:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251902.m7PJ2VKk009075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-25 15:02:30 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: pssh.src: E: unknown-key GPG#7666df64 (ignorable) binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 68dfefcf442eebe38ba23303ed4015fd4c5fab0e pssh-1.4.0.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251910.m7PJAoE3009984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-25 15:10:49 EDT --- Thanks wolfy, that was very quick! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pssh Short Description: Parallel SSH tools Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:17:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251917.m7PJHh4h011368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2008-08-25 15:17:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Version field should be 0 instead of 0.0.0 > * Instead of using "svn co" and later removing svn files, you should use "svn > export" > * You should add verbatim commands used to produce tarball, not only one (svn > co) - see this spec, for example: Uh, it must have been late. Of course, I'll change this, thanks for pointing. > * There is rev. 691 in svn. Would you mind to update your package? I can do that, it's just a minor bugfix. > * Using only checkout date in versionin is insufficient at all. You should use > svn revision (and date, if you wish) instead. Sorry, but the MUST is the other way round DATEsvn is a must, while your DATEsvnREVISION suggestion is optional. So I will stay with the current one. Keep in mind, that the upstream development is more than slow, I can cound the commits over the last year on one hand or so; see also: [20:59:35] < rsc> hrm. My reviewer dislikes the skipping of the revision in %release, so I'm currently only doing DATEsvn rather DATEsvnREV as he expects. [21:00:04] < tibbs> Your reviewer is entitled to their opinion, I suppose. [21:00:49] < tibbs> But the guidelines just say "followed by up to 16 (ASCII) alphanumeric characters of your choosing". [21:01:08] < tibbs> If you choose to put nothing or just "svn", that is quite up to you. [21:02:33] < tibbs> Our intent was not to legislate anything beyond the presence of the date. > * Main package should contain doc/short-desc as well. The content of doc/short-desc seems useless to me. As far as I read, HOWTO file contains this content as well, so I didn't add the file and will keep this. > * To avoid building empty debuginfo-subpackage you should add > %define debug_package %{nil} > at top of your spec-file. See this spec as an example: Accepted. > * I'm in doubts of naming scheme for devel-subpackage. Actually we can use > erlang modules in development w/o sources :). Maybe it would be better to name > it src instead of devel? Just my thoughts, anyway... I'm currently only using what the current packages are doing. AFAIK there is no scheme for erlang until now. If I'm switching, the other packages also have to do so before. > * You should use -p switch for "install" command, in order to preserve > timestamps. Frankly speaking in this case (checkout from VCS) there is not so > much sense, but lately, when official tarball may be introduced, it would have > more meaning. I won't use -p once we've something official, currently seems useless to me. Are you able to life with the "no"s I've stated above? Please give me a short note if so. As you maybe understand, I'm not happy with flipping some bits or lines all the time during a review while it is still discussed or similar. Of course this only referes to the current points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251927.m7PJRhXK012760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-25 15:27:42 EDT --- Updated to 2.4.2, urls fixed. spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping-2.4.2-1.fc9.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=785262 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251926.m7PJQPsd012853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-25 15:26:24 EDT --- I honestly have no idea about the permissions; I did a scratch build and it came out OK on the builder, so I really don't know what the issue is. I know I'm not the only person who sees this, however. Still, since this comes out OK thorugh the buildsys, I'm going to have to assume that there's something peculiar about my mock setup which causes this issue. I'll take a further look at this later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460035] EPEL branch for fop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251945.m7PJjeiB015772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460035 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:45:39 EDT --- cvs done. Why file this against Package Review? You can file against the package (fop) or the review for it if you can find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251945.m7PJjvJE015838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2008-08-25 15:45:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > * Please, provide full path to the source tarball. E.g. > Source: http://ftp.robert-scheck.de/linux/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > instead of > Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Really? See comment #1 again and AFAIK nirik complained at others about such things. > * Please, add empty %build section to make rpmlint happy :) I will do so, yes. > * Use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d > BTW useful list of rpm-macros: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros AFAIK %{_initrddir} is obsolete since RPM 4.5.90 and %{_initrdir} is only available since RPM 4.5.90 (or the other way round). To avoid nasty if/else hackings, I'm always and everywhere using the less macrofied way in that single case (yes, I've e.g. EPEL packages). > Other things seems sane. Consider applying changes according to these advices, > and I'll made formal review. Before putting a new package there, can we clarify the points above and have a short talk regarding comment #3? Current situation is, that the sip-redirect needs to have a writeable log file, which I only can get with touching, as a %config isn't the right deal and %ghost doesn't create the file. Am I missing something or do you have a better idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:47:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251947.m7PJlj4f016101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:47:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251950.m7PJoQZv016707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:50:24 EDT --- ok, so where do we stand here? Shall I process the cvs request? Or do we think this package is not a good idea to add right now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251953.m7PJrhDk016973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:53:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251959.m7PJxOBB018087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:59:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251955.m7PJtkff017539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:55:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251956.m7PJugoL017653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:56:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 19:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808251957.m7PJvtTR018077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 15:57:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:00:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252000.m7PK0w3i019079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Abhijith Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fdinitto at redhat.com, | |ronniesahlberg at gmail.com, | |ssorce at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Abhijith Das 2008-08-25 16:00:56 EDT --- http://people.redhat.com/rpeterso/Experimental/RHEL5.x/samba/ Please find the srpm and ctdb.spec at the above location. This package currently builds in F9; we're still working out a couple of errors building with rawhide. Please review and offer your comments. Thanks much! --Abhi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:06:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252006.m7PK6vid019816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-25 16:06:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > * Using only checkout date in versionin is insufficient at all. You should use > > svn revision (and date, if you wish) instead. > > Sorry, but the MUST is the other way round DATEsvn is a must, while your > DATEsvnREVISION suggestion is optional. So I will stay with the current one. > Keep in mind, that the upstream development is more than slow, I can cound > the commits over the last year on one hand or so; see also: Ok. > > * Main package should contain doc/short-desc as well. > > The content of doc/short-desc seems useless to me. As far as I read, HOWTO file > contains this content as well, so I didn't add the file and will keep this. Likewise. > > * I'm in doubts of naming scheme for devel-subpackage. Actually we can use > > erlang modules in development w/o sources :). Maybe it would be better to name > > it src instead of devel? Just my thoughts, anyway... > > I'm currently only using what the current packages are doing. AFAIK there is > no scheme for erlang until now. If I'm switching, the other packages also have > to do so before. I think we should, probably, discuss it via fedora-devel maillist. There are more libraries for interpreted languages coming, there similar issues would arise. > > * You should use -p switch for "install" command, in order to preserve > > timestamps. Frankly speaking in this case (checkout from VCS) there is not so > > much sense, but lately, when official tarball may be introduced, it would have > > more meaning. > > I won't use -p once we've something official, currently seems useless to me. Ok. > As you maybe understand, I'm not happy with flipping some bits or > lines all the time during a review while it is still discussed or similar. Of > course this only referes to the current points. Erlang packaging guidelines are still missing. Are you interested in creating ones? There is a dedicated SIG for erlang: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Erlang but still no guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252011.m7PKBHtO021002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-25 16:11:15 EDT --- If your source package has a upstream full URL, you should use it so people can find your upstream version. If that URL requires some kind of registration or the like there is nothing prohibiting that in the guidelines that I know of. You may get an email from my source checker about it being unable to check your source, but it can be blacklisted from checking in the cases like this. Personally I would rather see the full URL, even if it can't be downloaded from there without some clicking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252011.m7PKBxxH020559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #45 from Robin Norwood 2008-08-25 16:11:58 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252025.m7PKP28c023401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #19 from Jerone Young 2008-08-25 16:25:00 EDT --- The consencous is that before grub2 is to go in, support needs to be added for tools (ex grubby). Then it should easily be able to go in. But fedora userspace tools need to support grub2 config files before going into fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] New: Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Summary: Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rezso at rdsor.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers-2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OpenLayers is a pure JavaScript library for displaying map data in most modern web browsers, with no server-side dependencies. OpenLayers implements a JavaScript API for building rich web-based geographic applications, similar to the Google Maps and MSN Virtual Earth APIs, with one important difference -- OpenLayers is Free Software, developed for and by the Open Source software community. Furthermore, OpenLayers implements industry-standard methods for geographic data access, such as the OpenGIS Consortium's Web Mapping Service (WMS) and Web Feature Service (WFS) protocols. Under the hood, OpenLayers is written in object-oriented JavaScript, using components from Prototype.js and the Rico library. The OpenLayers code base already has hundreds of unit tests, via the Test.AnotherWay framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252033.m7PKXBqH024682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #1 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-25 16:33:10 EDT --- This package is very similar to squirrelmail. Package pass rpmlint checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 20:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252055.m7PKtA6I027413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-25 16:55:09 EDT --- I am not sure how did you manage to build in koji, but for me it failed because the new rpm is picky (needs %Patch0 even where before %Patch was enough : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=785303&name=build.log ) Now I am going to be picky, too: README.Fedora includes the following sentence "Fix you want to access from a remote host [...]". I can swear this is not proper English, even if all the words are in English :) I'll try to give it a spin one of these days and come back with a review, unless someone beats me to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:00:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252100.m7PL0ra8029336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rezso at rdsor.ro --- Comment #5 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-25 17:00:51 EDT --- >The old PROJ.4 system is still available at some web sites such > as Remote Sensing Organization site. The web sites associated with PROJ.4 > may have performed their own modification to the PROJ.4 library so there is > no guarantee of the same collection of projections nor functional equivalence. Hold on a bit, lets clarify first please. First, proj.4 passed incubation at osgeo.org and ATM is the main library for whole osgeo.org suite. Libproj4 is a bit too early, proj4 _is_ alive and getting love but at this time with joint efforts of osgeo.org: http://trac.osgeo.org/proj/ Second, ask osgeo.org chairman opinion (Frank Warmerdam): cbalint> folks, what is the diff btwn: http://members.verizon.net/~vze2hc4d/proj4/ and http://trac.osgeo.org/proj/ ?! FrankW> libproj4 is Geralds version of proj.4 that focuses on only projections. FrankW> The long term plan is to refactor proj.4 to use it, withproj.4 providing initialization files, datums, and other high level coordinate system services but for the time being, you are generally best off using proj.4 unless you really want to try one of Gerald's new bits of work. cbalint> FrankW, is it sure that osgeo will rebase on that libproj ? Might be matacrs related ? It is not sure. It is just my intention (and Geralds). But I've intended to do it for some time and it hasn't happened yet. FrankW, thanks for quick response. Certainly it will be within the metacrs project if it occurs. Clearly its too early. If import this to fedora will create more schizo' for following packages: - ogdi - gdal - grass - mapserver - qgis A bounch of other real struggling issues, a bit dataset related, let me introduce: Its enough that we/I have problem with projections database (EPSG) (i am unsatisfied, but I might wait metacrs instead) since there are 2 variants of .csv sets one for proj.4 and one for gdal in .csv format as geodetic datas, best should be to emmit a new 'epsg-dataset' fedora one called package to unify and be able respin any time any fresh epsg sets for fedora purpose and share it commonly to any package that use it it (grass/gdal/proj), its doable, and this mini=project might go metacrs upstream, unless metacrs have far way better solution and decide to rewrite all api's handling these issues of datasets. I dont really like how epsg datas are derived now into .csv, I was talking with EPSG in particular how to choose best TransformationParams for a projection to avoid duplicates, a problem where gdal choosed to drop and avoid to threat the problem (one main issue). I work on this within elegand solution using EPSG-pgsl->sqlite->.csv with a fancy logic to generate our epsg-dataset A third one problem, related to this libproj4 especialy one that induce confusion in lower functional layers (i mean here not database but how math libraries (I mean libroj4 itself) will probaly induce more problems, i even dont want to think it. Please see if interested what metacrs is related: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/MetaCRS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227933] Review Request: libproj4 - Cartographic projection library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252104.m7PL4uhU028687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227933 --- Comment #6 from Balint Cristian 2008-08-25 17:04:55 EDT --- My statements are really functionality related. Again i personaly would't like this package just for sake of its existence in fedora. However lets debate this issue. //cristian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252120.m7PLKT98032498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-25 17:20:27 EDT --- Great! Picky fixes: spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping-2.4.2-2.fc9.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=785424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252126.m7PLQWso001547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #34 from Claudio Tomasoni 2008-08-25 17:26:29 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. Before pointing to a new SRPM and SPEC file, I've got a couple of questions. - Would you tell me whether the tarball you are using is post- or pre- release of version 0.7.5? According to the news.txt file this seems to be a post-release of 0.7.5, while according to http://qtoctave.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/qtoctave-081-testing/, and to the help file this version seems to be a pre-release of 0.8.1. Which adopt? - For svn based tarball, I prefer to use revision number rather than the date you checked out. So the package should be named 0.8.1-1.svn165 (revision is 165)? Thanks in advance for your attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252145.m7PLjxoG004834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2008-08-25 17:45:58 EDT --- Wow! Just some hours from review request submitted to packages pending in bodhi. Never seen that before. Thanks guys! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252146.m7PLksYh003284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #4 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-25 17:46:53 EDT --- Anyone willing to do a review? Clean rpmlint, builds on all architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:47:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252147.m7PLlaWj003329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #5 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-25 17:47:35 EDT --- (I'm hoping to get this in before the Fedora 10 "no more stuff" deadline arrives.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 21:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252152.m7PLq8pt005675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-25 17:52:07 EDT --- The Fedora 10 "no more stuff" deadline happens around the release of Fedora 12. You have on the order of 15 months before that happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 22:02:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252202.m7PM2Kvi005534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #7 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-25 18:02:19 EDT --- Regarding comment #6: Fair enough; I meant I was hoping to beat the "Fedora 10 Beta freeze". http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Schedule says that has already passed, but I suspect the infrastructure outage will mean some sort of extension. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 22:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252212.m7PMC1Hq009395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-08-25 18:11:59 EDT --- The specific problem for this package has been fixed but the underlying issue has one remaining problem. * All packages with status Orphaned and an actual owner have been changed to status "Approved" * The backend has been changed to properly set the status to "Approved" when the package is un-orphaned. * The webUI doesn't yet update the status immediatel,y (A page refresh will show the change, though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 22:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252222.m7PMMLp1008465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-25 18:22:19 EDT --- I can probably pick this up tomorrow morning, but feel free to review it before then if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 22:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459198] Review Request: prelude-notify - Prelude Notification Applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252221.m7PMLR2x010701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459198 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Steve Grubb 2008-08-25 18:21:26 EDT --- Package was imported and built. Closing. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 22:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252229.m7PMT6Kt009231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-25 18:29:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > The consencous is that before grub2 is to go in, support needs to be added for > tools (ex grubby). Then it should easily be able to go in. But fedora userspace > tools need to support grub2 config files before going into fedora. No. It's just your opinion. Please understand that the new grub2 package just adds some optional features. Noone forces you to do so, so if you disagree with the presence of a package, the nice thing about it is that you do not have to install it. In case you feel grubby support is important at this point, you, or anyone, can add it whenever you want to provided your patch is accepted by the grubby maintainer, but please do not use it as argument, unless it is a packaging-comitee approved guideline. I find it highly odd to add support for a nonexistent package, and am not going to do so. In case you question the quality of the review, please point out where does it violate the guidelines. I value comments with valuable opinions, but unsupported assertion presented as "consensus" is of hardly any use. So, to summarize: 1.) grub2 is usable without grubby support - see distribution-agnostic grub2-update 2.) There actually are userspace tools to support grub2 - see grub2-update and $EDITOR 3.) grub2 package does not interfere with anything already in base - none of its provides overlays any existing package, including grub - it does not replace grub2 4.) grub2 was properly reviewed and approved Kevin: given the above explanation, please process the CVS request (unless a package guidelines violation is found, which I believe to be unlikely after a relatively long this request is open) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 23:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252300.m7PN0hoJ017802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #21 from Jerone Young 2008-08-25 19:00:41 EDT --- @Lubomir You have to rembmer I was the first to bring grub2 to fedora last year (as I am a grub2 maintainer .. though not very active as of late ... see bug 228255). While yes you can use grub2 with it's own tools manually, what happens when a new fedora kernel is installed? It doesn't run those tools to update the grub2 config. My point is this issue is integration into the distribution. The grub2 tools are not apart of the distribution process and so this is where the issues are. Making these tools or updating the process to use the tools is what will allow grub2 to go into fedora. You have to stop just thinking about the project, and understand that it is not just a standalone tool. But must be integrated into the processes that fedora uses. Which is why there are comments about grubby & booty support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 25 23:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457288] Review Request: snobol - Macro Implementation of SNOBOL4 in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808252326.m7PNQcuM028059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457288 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-25 19:26:37 EDT --- This is still approved; you are welcome to make your CVS request at any time. I did build the -5 package and there are indeed fewer undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints which, as you noted, are not blockers. There's also this: snobol.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libsnobol.so.4.1.1 /lib64/libdl.so.2 which is odd but also not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 01:41:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260141.m7Q1fFZ1008827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #14 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-25 21:41:14 EDT --- Sorry about that. Didn't have a chance to look at the problems with 0.10.0, which is still present in 0.10.1 but, as it turns out, just requires using LD_LIBRARY_PATH during the build process. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.10.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec UI split into -gtk and -qt subpackages, both providing -frontend which the base package depends on. The GTK interface is more mature at this point -- the Qt interface does not seem to provide a working dock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 01:45:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260145.m7Q1jFU0011566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 John Ellson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |john.ellson at comcast.net --- Comment #3 from John Ellson 2008-08-25 21:45:13 EDT --- $ rpmbuild --rebuild italc-1.0.9-4.src.rpm ... checking QTDIR... configure: error: *** QTDIR must be defined, or --with-qtdir option given error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uuZdGM (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uuZdGM (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 02:02:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260202.m7Q22CMO013818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-25 22:02:10 EDT --- According to your comments I guess the current svn should regarded as the pre-version of 0.8.1 (so EVR must be 0.8.1-0.X.svn165, for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 02:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260201.m7Q21SAA013727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #4 from John Ellson 2008-08-25 22:01:27 EDT --- I've no idea what I'm doing, so likely this is unfair, but I installed italc and italc-master rpms then: $ italc Loading socket Config module ... Creating backend ... Loading x11 FrontEnd module ... Failed to load x11 FrontEnd module. Loading simple Config module ... Creating backend ... desc table has been created. Loading socket FrontEnd module ... Starting SCIM as daemon ... desc table has been created. QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::addPaths: inotify_add_watch failed: No such file or directory Mon Aug 25 21:56:53 2008: [warning] QFileSystemWatcher: failed to add paths: /tmp/ibus-ellson/ The splash screen was up, but the application was hung and had to be aborted with C Shouldn't it provide a configuration screen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 02:57:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260257.m7Q2vZDB020128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-25 22:57:32 EDT --- gnome-keyring-sharp has been in Rawhide for a couple of months; I was not aware that it is being used by anything other than gnome-do (which has some dependencies not in Fedora-9, thus it is currently Rawhide only). I have just built gnome-keyring-sharp for F-8 and F-9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.0-0.2.87622svn.fc8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.0-0.2.87622svn.fc9 Feel free to use it for gnome-rdp, and report any bugs (or vote it up if it works for you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 03:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260348.m7Q3mux4026702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-25 23:48:55 EDT --- I will simply review what comes out of the buildsys and ignore the permissions issue. * source files match upstream: 7743db3c3c59c872396c9ceed809afb082d742844ed6e99bd94d0cd2127fee01 pymssql-0.8.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent (ignoring the permission error as described above). * final provides and requires are sane: _mssql.so()(64bit) pymssql = 0.8.0-2.fc10 pymssql(x86-64) = 0.8.0-2.fc10 = freetds >= 0.63 libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit) libsybdb.so.5()(64bit) python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; test suite needs a running mssql server. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate (ignoring the weird permission issue). * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 03:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260350.m7Q3oAMD027183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-25 23:50:09 EDT --- I would disable the test since it's pretty broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 04:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458669] Review Request: perl-File-ShareDir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260407.m7Q47nM7032065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458669 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 04:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260441.m7Q4flOP001775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Oron Peled changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 05:40:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260540.m7Q5eb6F009518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Bug 459125 depends on bug 459153, which changed state. Bug 459153 Summary: Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 05:40:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459153] Review Request: ann - Library for searching Approximate Nearest Neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260540.m7Q5eaea009484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459153 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-26 01:40:34 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 07:24:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260724.m7Q7OC8H024081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-26 03:24:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > @Lubomir > > You have to rembmer I was the first to bring grub2 to fedora last year (as I > am a grub2 maintainer .. though not very active as of late ... see bug 228255). Right. Your package did not pass the review. > While yes you can use grub2 with it's own tools manually, what happens when a > new fedora kernel is installed? It doesn't run those tools to update the grub2 > config. Are you sure? > My point is this issue is integration into the distribution. You can not integrate nonexistent parts. > The grub2 tools > are not apart of the distribution process and so this is where the issues are. > Making these tools or updating the process to use the tools is what will allow > grub2 to go into fedora. I'd say we developed the review process to judge which parts do we allow into fedora. > You have to stop just thinking about the project, and understand that it is > not just a standalone tool. It can be. > But must be integrated into the processes that > fedora uses. Which is why there are comments about grubby & booty support. To reiterate: You can not integrate nonexistent parts. The guidelines don't require you to do so. Furthermore, currently it integrates at the level which is sufficient for most use cases, and having the package in distribution encourages more integration. And at last; You obviously haven't even bothered looking at the package or reading the spec file, so I do not consider you a discussion peer here anymore. Please don't put useless and uninformed comments here anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 07:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260728.m7Q7SbWA024904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-26 03:28:36 EDT --- Taking bug for review ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 07:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260739.m7Q7dXRc028715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 07:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: HTML::RewriteAttributes is designed for simple yet powerful HTML attribute rewriting. This package is a new prerequisite of rt >= 3.8.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 07:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260741.m7Q7fxVV026882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-26 03:41:58 EDT --- + rpmlint output (no warnings or errors) + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines I'm a little dubious about calling the package 'E' rather than something like 'E-theorem-prover', but it doesn't seem to be specifically against any guideline. + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora GPLv2 + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 5a2168d44e8b3f23f84ccc5ef66aadee 1324629 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386, plus there is a Koji build n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock - the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures ? review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ===>>> APPROVED <<<=== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260803.m7Q836YH030910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora_requires_release_not |e? |e- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260801.m7Q81PfS030471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #23 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-26 04:01:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) [...] > My point is this issue is integration into the distribution. The grub2 tools > are not apart of the distribution process and so this is where the issues are. > Making these tools or updating the process to use the tools is what will allow > grub2 to go into fedora.. I don't agree with you, this is not a part of default core system, it's an additional package that will be primary used for hacking and over-time to adjust our tools (which are closed to community commits, btw). I confirm that I'm approving this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:02:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260802.m7Q82DGx000742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:35:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260835.m7Q8Z1TL007086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-26 04:35:00 EDT --- pmpu-0.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pmpu-0.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] New: Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Text-vFile-asData-0.05-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Text::vFile::asData reads vFile format files, such as vCard (RFC 2426) and vCalendar (RFC 2445). This package is a new prerequisite of rt >= 3.8.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456549] Review Request: pmpu - GUI for distributed VCS's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260836.m7Q8aTwk005132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456549 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-26 04:36:28 EDT --- pmpu-0.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pmpu-0.2-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260849.m7Q8nAdI010062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460111 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] New: Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Data-ICal.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Data-ICal-0.13-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: A Data::ICal object represents a VCALENDAR object as defined in the iCalendar protocol (RFC 2445, MIME type "text/calendar"), as implemented in many popular calendaring programs such as Apple's iCal. This package is a new prerequisite of rt >= 3.8.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260849.m7Q8n8BX010015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459536 Depends on| |460107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260855.m7Q8t1FX011272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #5 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-26 04:54:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > $ rpmbuild --rebuild italc-1.0.9-4.src.rpm > ... > checking QTDIR... configure: error: *** QTDIR must be defined, or --with-qtdir > option given > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.uuZdGM (%build) This is due to presence of qt3-devel. Please uninstall qt3-devel or use a chroot builder like mock to build w/o qt3-devel. This should probably be addressed with a BuildConflicts: qt3-devel or patching the sources to properly use pkg-config. For the latter there is an upstream bug report here: ([ 2040452 ] should use pkg-config to locate qt4) https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2040452&group_id=132465&atid=724375 But in Fedora's build concept this is not surfacing as it will install only the packages mentioned as BuildRequires: and not qt3-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:31:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260831.m7Q8VF1V006602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-26 04:31:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ferm Short Description: For Easy Rule Making Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 08:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260859.m7Q8xpBI009656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 09:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450275] Review Request: sysklogd - System logging and kernel message trapping daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260901.m7Q91EH7010329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 09:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260908.m7Q98O12014175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #6 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-26 05:08:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I've no idea what I'm doing, so likely this is unfair, but > I installed italc and italc-master rpms then: > > $ italc > Loading socket Config module ... > Creating backend ... > Loading x11 FrontEnd module ... > Failed to load x11 FrontEnd module. > Loading simple Config module ... > Creating backend ... > desc table has been created. > Loading socket FrontEnd module ... > Starting SCIM as daemon ... > desc table has been created. > QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::addPaths: inotify_add_watch failed: No > such file or directory > Mon Aug 25 21:56:53 2008: [warning] QFileSystemWatcher: failed to add > paths: /tmp/ibus-ellson/ > > > The splash screen was up, but the application was hung and had to be aborted > with C > > Shouldn't it provide a configuration screen? Yes, that's what it does. What did you test it under, rawhide? I tested this on F9 and it worked OK. Note that ica must be running for italc (the master app) to be able to work. But usually you get a note after the splash screen that this needs to happen and the program bails out. Also I've never seen this verbose output even if ica is not running, usually there is no output on the console at all. Maybe it is firing up some QT components for the first time and you see a QT issue? If you didn't try this under F9, could you please do so? And we can dig into any rawhide problems in the next step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 09:12:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260912.m7Q9CwHa012613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-26 05:12:57 EDT --- I see you were faster! Thanks^2 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 09:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260911.m7Q9BtJ2015171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-26 05:11:53 EDT --- Seems mostly fine, thanks! Please add "$@" to the launch script and remove .png extension of the Icon in desktop files before commiting. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 09:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260925.m7Q9PuWI018320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 09:25:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808260925.m7Q9PeEK018262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #12 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-26 05:25:39 EDT --- Thank you Lubomir! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grc Short Description: GUI for GNURadio Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261000.m7QA0bOJ022923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #7 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 06:00:35 EDT --- Re #3: I removed qt3-devel, and a bunch of stuff that depended on it. I notice that even after a fresh login I still have QTDIR=/usr/lib64/qt-3.3 in my environment. Not sure where this is getting set? Its not getting set in my .bash* scripts. Anyway, same problem. I would have tried removing qt3, but this would have resulted in the removal of most of KDE. I tried a subshell and "unset QTDIR" before running rpmbuild, but this resulted in: checking QTDIR... /usr checking Qt includes... /usr/include checking for moc-qt4... no checking for moc... no configure: error: *** not found! Make sure you have Qt-devel-tools installed! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TQpaPw (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.TQpaPw (%build) I can't find any "moc-qt4" rpms. I tried on a reasonably vanilla fedora-9 system, same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261011.m7QABZdH027515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #8 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-26 06:11:33 EDT --- /usr/bin/moc-qt4 is part of qt-devel, which is a build requirement. Does it exist on your system (ls /usr/bin/moc-qt4)? Is the qt-devel package damaged (rpm -V qt-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261021.m7QALXPf026717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-26 06:21:32 EDT --- > Can you maybe submit an patch to upstream that changes the installation of the > header files within the automake stuff or file a bug? Then you could remove > these lines: >mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name} >mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/google/*.h >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/%{name}/ I had a discussion with upstream and had a look at some other packages. It seems to me that it is wrong to move header files to some other place as it may break some other useful stuff. Few other packages have similar structure and they don't move header files. I will like to keep them in place. Will update ASAP. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261022.m7QAMeql026835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #9 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-26 06:22:38 EDT --- QTDIR is being set by qt3, not qt3-devel (as I assumed), so indeed removing it for test building outside of chroots is not going to work. I patched up the specfile a bit to allow building even if qt3 bits are around, please use the following patch: @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -Summary: intelligent teaching and learning with computers +Summary: Intelligent teaching and learning with computers Name: italc Version: 1.0.9 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} License: GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Daemons URL: http://italc.sourceforge.net/ @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ %patch3 -p1 %build +# QTDIR may be set by a qt3 instance, remove it +# (italc shouldn't be checking for QTDIR in the first place, it's +# obsoleted in QT4) +unset QTDIR # docdir handling is broken in configure.in, but for good measure, # let's keep it where it should be %configure --docdir=%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261025.m7QAPnIY027556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #13 from Marc Wiriadisastra 2008-08-26 06:25:47 EDT --- Take it over if you want -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:28:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458186] Review Request: gnusound - GNUsound is a multitrack sound editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261028.m7QASTZa030423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458186 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-26 06:28:28 EDT --- I tried to communicate with upstream regarding BUILD patch which fixs DESTDIR this but no proper response. I feel it should not be a blocker. Maintainer + moderator of dev mails seems to be on holidays. This package has other issues also like -- few dependencies are in third party repo. As they cannot be here due to license issues with audio formats. I will discuss this package with some more folks at DEV (IRC or ML) and check what is best way to move forward. Anybody having comments is welcome. Will update ASAP. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261046.m7QAk1fl031251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #10 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 06:46:00 EDT --- Re #8: on rawhide, a fresh install of qt-devel installs a broken link: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2008-08-26 06:44 /usr/bin/moc-qt4 -> ../../../bin/moc-qt4 I'll report this against qt... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:59:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261059.m7QAxdEq001557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-26 06:59:32 EDT --- F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=786405 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=786424 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-2.fc9.2 Done, thanks everyone for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 10:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261059.m7QAxxcF001681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 11:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261118.m7QBIQ2Q007892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-26 07:18:25 EDT --- Updated to the latest version. Build tested in mock SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/tangogps.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/tangogps-0.9.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 12:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261221.m7QCLm54021610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #24 from Jerone Young 2008-08-26 08:21:46 EDT --- @Marek Haha. No just just showing where I was coming from. Not to stroke my ego. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 12:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261247.m7QClp13024683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #11 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 08:47:49 EDT --- Re #9: Tested that the patch worked, and that builds failed without it, on fc9.i386 and fc9.x86_64. Thanks. Re #6: OK, on fc9.i386 and fc9.x86_64 running italc from the command line immediately after a fresh install produces much more reasonable set of warning popups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 13:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460035] EPEL branch for fop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261301.m7QD1W4q030645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460035 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-26 09:01:31 EDT --- Closing as this is not a package review ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 13:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261347.m7QDlLrP004461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #16 from John Anderson 2008-08-26 09:47:19 EDT --- Michel thanks for the info on gonme-keyring-sharp. I'll work on getting gnome-rdp-0.2.3 to build against this and post shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 14:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261403.m7QE3wfZ010830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney 2008-08-26 10:03:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hey Bryan. I don't seem to see you in the packager group... > have you been sponsored yet there? You do need to be in that group to approve > packages... Ok.. misread the guidelines. Since I did an initial review, but not in the packager group what does darryl need to do next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 14:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261426.m7QEQ4c6012711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-26 10:26:03 EDT --- I was hoping to knock out some of the other ruby package reviews today; one more shouldn't take long, so I'll try to look at this in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459705] Review Request: eigen2 - A lightweight C++ template library for vector and matrix math In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261505.m7QF5swi023399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459705 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-26 11:05:52 EDT --- OK, this builds fine. If you think it reasonable to skip the test suite then I'll go along, although I hope that the compiler issue can be fixed soon and the tests turned back on. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450371] Review Request: pokegen - Strategy/RPG game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261515.m7QFFhvW025544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450371 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-26 11:15:41 EDT --- Okay, I can say the packaging of the latest srpm is good, so I will wait for spot's reply of how he think about naming (and summary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:21:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261521.m7QFL7Js026839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matt_domsch at dell.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261519.m7QFJ8ES025976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-26 11:19:07 EDT --- Srinivas and I have gone back and forth a few times privately, and he's getting the hang of it. :-) Trivial changes yet which can be made at checkin time. Note the preferred value of BuildRoot I use, and since you are using the standard %setup macro now, you don't need to pass it %{name}-%{version}. With these changes, I approve. -Matt --- sblim-sfcc.spec Tue Aug 19 09:50:30 2008 +++ /home/mdomsch/sblim-sfcc.spec Tue Aug 26 10:13:44 2008 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # Package spec for sblim-sfcc # -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud +%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Summary: Small Footprint CIM Client Library Name: sblim-sfcc @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Small Footprint CIM Client Library Heade %prep -%setup -q %{name}-%{version} +%setup -q %build chmod a-x backend/cimxml/*.[ch] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:20:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261520.m7QFKJMn023179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matt_domsch at dell.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261523.m7QFNL1I027352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458012 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261523.m7QFNNIB027385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:33:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261533.m7QFXpmg029343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-26 11:33:49 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gflags.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gflags-0.9-4.fc9.src.rpm Updated. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 15:44:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261544.m7QFiL90027839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 16:00:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261600.m7QG0Xnv031209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-26 12:00:32 EDT --- Well, for 0.6.1-3: * Summary - Usually the part like "Tennix! is a" is redundant for Summary * SourceURL - I recommend to use %{name}, %{version} macros (especially %{version}). With using these you probably don't have to modify SourceURL when the version is upgraded. * Macros - Use macros. /usr must be %{_prefix}. ! Timestamp - Would you consider to add ---------------------------------------------------------- sed -i -e 's|install -m|install -p -m|' makefile ---------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible? * Icon caching - Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 16:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261616.m7QGGvVg005546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bkearney at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-26 12:16:56 EDT --- I'm going to assign this to myself; I don't mean to steal the ticket, but I fear losing track of it since I see some things that need fixing. OK. First problem: The upstream source does not match what is in this package. I downloaded the src.rpm from comment #3, unpacked it, and used spectool -g to download the Source URLs and compared them. This either points to a naughty upstream which modified the tarball without changing the version (which should never be done) or the tarball was modified before the src.rpm was built (which should only be done in rare circumstances where legalities require it). Wow, unpacking the data.tar.gz file inside the gem gives lots of complaints from tar: tar: examples/has_distro.rb: implausibly old time stamp 1969-12-31 18:00:00 What on earth is going on there? The license of cobbler.rb and all files in lib/cobbler is GPLv2 only. The specfile says LGPLv2+. I see this was discussed earlier but I don't understand why the sources in the tarball contradict the COPYING file in the tarball. In any case, the COPYING file takes second seat here, but I still wouldn't approve this package until the upstream licensing issue is clarified. There seems to be a test suite included; is there any reason for not running it? X source files do not match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. ? latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: rubygem(cobbler) = 0.0.1 rubygem-cobbler = 0.0.1-3.fc10 = /usr/bin/ruby rubygems ? %check is not present, but a test suite seems to exist. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * rubygem(%{gemname}) provided. * gems installed properly. * gems installed to proper directory. * gems, cache, and specifications subdirectories owned properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 16:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261630.m7QGURat008323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-26 12:30:26 EDT --- Umm... doesn't build on dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=785923 By the way you can check if your srpm can be rebuilt correctly using koji like: $ koji build --scratch where can be dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate or dist-f8-updates-candidate (and some olpc related target). When the rebuild succeeds, the result binary rpms and some logs are put under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 16:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] New: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 Summary: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smilner at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: virtualenv is a tool to create isolated Python environments. virtualenv is a successor to workingenv, and an extension of virtual-python. It is written by Ian Bicking, and sponsored by the Open Planning Project. It is licensed under an MIT-style permissive license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 17:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261706.m7QH6n1W011668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 17:20:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261720.m7QHKaHT014523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #10 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-08-26 13:20:34 EDT --- I've fixed the licensing to state that it is released under LGPLv2.1, and added a call to the tests in the %check section. Specfile: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler.spec SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Upstream: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/cobbler-0.0.2.gem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 17:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261722.m7QHMDE4014839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 13:22:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The only drawback I can see here is that after removing "elisa", the plugins > will be gone, but not the "elisa-common" package. The only solution I can think > of would be to duplicate the files currently in "elisa-common" in "elisa" and > rename the "common" to "devel". We'd have two packages nearly identical, with > one used only for building the plugins. I was about to suggest combining elisa with elisa-plugins-good, but if the GUI itself is in elisa-plugins-bad... How about making the %postun of elisa be 'rpm -e elisa-common' ? Not that it is that big of a deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 17:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261736.m7QHa8kp021346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-26 13:36:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > How about making the %postun of elisa be 'rpm -e elisa-common' ? Not that it is > that big of a deal. Eek, that's waaaay too ugly :-) If the current way is to be changed, it would be to have the two nearly identical packages, wasting a little bit of mirror server space (less than 1MB). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 18:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261844.m7QIijAd003126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 14:44:43 EDT --- Do you have an updated python-twisted-core package one can test this with? I need it to review elisa-plugins-bad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 18:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261848.m7QImHx0001648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 14:48:16 EDT --- That might be a good idea -- 1 MB is nothing, really nowadays. So elisa-common can be called elisa-devel, and should only be used for building plugins. Will proceed with the review (reviewing -bad as well) once I could actually install the whole thing. I commented on the twisted-web2 review asking if you could upload the twisted-core package you used for building -web2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 19:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808261937.m7QJb9VM015427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #16 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 15:37:08 EDT --- There were some missing build requirements, sorry. Should have tried a scratch build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787490 http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.10.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459549] Review Request: python-ethtool - bindings for the ethtool kernel interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262001.m7QK1r6v018619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459549 --- Comment #4 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2008-08-26 16:01:52 EDT --- http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-ethtool/python-ethtool-0.3.tar.bz2 http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-ethtool/python-ethtool.spec [root at doppio python-ethtool]# rpmlint rpm/SPECS/python-ethtool.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at doppio python-ethtool]# rpmlint rpm/SRPMS/python-ethtool-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at doppio python-ethtool]# rpmlint rpm/RPMS/x86_64/python-ethtool-0.3-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at doppio python-ethtool]# rpm -Uvh rpm/RPMS/x86_64/python-ethtool-0.3-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:python-ethtool ########################################### [100%] [root at doppio python-ethtool]# rpmlint python-ethtool 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at doppio python-ethtool]# rpm -q --qf "%{url}\n" python-ethtool http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/python-ethtool.git [root at doppio python-ethtool]# grep ^Source rpm/SPECS/python-ethtool.spec Source: http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-ethtool/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 [root at doppio python-ethtool]# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262001.m7QK1Txh022066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #12 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 16:01:28 EDT --- Re #10: The Rawhide bug was cause by bad qt,qt-devel rpms sometime in the past. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262005.m7QK5s77019579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #13 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 16:05:53 EDT --- ... oops hit enter too soon... The issue was solved in bug #460123 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262005.m7QK5uNB019606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2008-08-26 16:05:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I think we should, probably, discuss it via fedora-devel maillist. There are > more libraries for interpreted languages coming, there similar issues would > arise. I don't care whether -devel or -src or whatelse, but we should be consistent for all packages. I'll rename to whatever gets defined or discussed, I'm lacking a bit time to drive such a discussion the next time. > Erlang packaging guidelines are still missing. Are you interested in creating > ones? There is a dedicated SIG for erlang: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Erlang > > but still no guidelines. Sorry, I just need PostgreSQL-Support for ejabberd at work - not more and not less, so I'm maintaining the package, but I'm clueless regarding Erlang and all what has to do with. Updated files are here now (should include everything from yesterday): Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/erlang-pgsql.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262011.m7QKBOcR024403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #14 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 16:11:23 EDT --- Re #6: But the problem with the italc executable from the freshly built rpms is still there on Rawhide: $ italc Loading socket Config module ... Creating backend ... Loading x11 FrontEnd module ... Failed to load x11 FrontEnd module. Loading simple Config module ... Creating backend ... desc table has been created. Loading socket FrontEnd module ... Starting SCIM as daemon ... desc table has been created. QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::addPaths: inotify_add_watch failed: No such file or directory Tue Aug 26 16:08:00 2008: [warning] QFileSystemWatcher: failed to add paths: /tmp/ibus-ellson/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:22:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262022.m7QKMWDs027013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #15 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-26 16:22:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Re #6: But the problem with the italc executable from the freshly built rpms is > still there on Rawhide: What about F9, does it work as advertised? One needs to have ica on all systems running, which is probably the largest issue on F9 and not completely solved (if you need remote access during gdm, kdm, ldm, ..., one needs to add several different autostart mechanisms for ica). If it works on F9, I'd suggest to to allow for rawhide to kickstart again. Since the infrastructure incident two weeks ago there was no update and rawhide was in the middle of going alpha to beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262031.m7QKV4kZ025085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #11 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-26 16:31:03 EDT --- Wow! Thanks for the quick turnaround! > I'm a little dubious about calling the package 'E' rather > than something like 'E-theorem-prover', but it doesn't > seem to be specifically against any guideline. I wondered about that too, but they're consistent in their use of this unusual one-capital-letter name ("E"). There's even precedence for this - "R" is one of the most popular statistical packages, and the Fedora package name is, unsurprisingly, "R". So, since they consistently use the name, there's no guideline against it, and we have precedent, I just went along with the flow. Only 24 to go in U.S. ASCII :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:32:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262032.m7QKWoge029034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #16 from John Ellson 2008-08-26 16:32:49 EDT --- Yes, fc9 is fine, as far as I've progressed with it. See #11. Ok with allowing rawhide to catch up. I was just trying to record that the issue is still open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:37:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262037.m7QKbKt4029984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #12 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-26 16:37:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: E Short Description: Equational Theorem Prover Owners: dwheeler Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 20:44:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262044.m7QKiY8N031293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 21:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262115.m7QLF0bI005491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #16 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-26 17:14:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Currently I found 4 jar files in OmegaT source tarball: > ./nbproject/org-netbeans-modules-java-j2seproject-copylibstask.jar This seems not to be needed. > ./lib/vldocking_2.0.6d.jar > - Seemingly from > http://www.vlsolutions.com/en/products/docking/licensing.php pending > ./lib/htmlparser.jar > - Seemingly from > http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/ first version done: http://olea.org/tmp/htmlparser.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-1olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-1olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-javadoc-1.6-1olea.noarch.rpm Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787616 lib-mnemonics.jar is pending too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 21:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262141.m7QLffKD011616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 17:41:40 EDT --- What if the spec that Fedora ships does *not* contain the full URL to the source tarball? Put the full URL under a comment, noting that access to that URL is restricted to non-commercial use. Since Fedora is a non-commercial project, the Fedora maintainer's downloading of the source from upstream is legit. But let's wait and see what -legal says about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 22:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262258.m7QMwAEW021813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #3 from Sylvain Beucler 2008-08-26 18:58:09 EDT --- Hello, Do you need anything else? I also uploaded an updated version (remove a dependency and amd64 fixes) Spec URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink.spec SRPM URL: http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/fedora/freedink-1.08.20080826-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 23:04:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262304.m7QN4oIr026885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #17 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-26 19:04:49 EDT --- First version of vldocking: http://olea.org/tmp/vldocking.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-2.0.6e-1olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-2.0.6e-1olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-javadoc-2.0.6e-1olea.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 23:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262320.m7QNK9aN029999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-26 19:20:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 23:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262325.m7QNPOvi031025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-26 19:25:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 23:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262328.m7QNSRAU031417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-26 19:28:25 EDT --- ok, cvs done. I still think this could well confuse users, but I don't have any hard objections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 23:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262330.m7QNUWqu027780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-26 19:30:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 26 23:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808262336.m7QNaoDi000642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-26 19:36:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:09:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270009.m7R09J4c004869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-08-26 20:09:18 EDT --- I've redone the guidelines completely to use macros. I'll be going over this in the coming weeks to make some badly needed updates to everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460244] New: Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 Summary: Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/alt-ergo/alt-ergo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/alt-ergo/alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Alt-Ergo is an automated theorem prover implemented in OCaml. It is based on CC(X) - a congruence closure algorithm parameterized by an equational theory X. This algorithm is reminiscent of the Shostak algorithm. Currently CC(X) is instantiated by the theory of linear arithmetics. Alt-Ergo also contains a home made SAT-solver and an instantiation mechanism by which it fully supports quantifiers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270015.m7R0FGn1007597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 --- Comment #1 from Alan Dunn 2008-08-26 20:15:14 EDT --- Bugzilla was inoperative at the time that I originally produced this package, so I solicited a review by email (from David Wheeler, who will vouch for this). He wrote: * I could NOT rebuild on i386; it seems to fail on ocaml-ocamlgraph. Perhaps the ocaml-ocamlgraph I'm using is not the latest version, but in any case, I got this error: "Cannot find file graph.cmxa". I rebuilt http://www.duke.edu/~amd34/ocamlgraph/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-2.fc9.src.rpm to create ocaml-ocamlgraph, and it's true, there's no .cmxa file: $ rpm -qil ocaml-ocamlgraph ... /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/META /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/ocamlgraph/graph.cmi /usr/share/doc/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c/LICENSE ... which I fixed in version 2 by adding ocaml-ocamlgraph-devel to BuildRequires (it is not yet in the repositories, which implies that I can't really use mock) * In "cp %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} .", say "cp -p" instead. You should try to keep the timestamps where you can. Indeed, if you got these files from elsewhere, try to preserve THEIR timestamps. which I also changed, and the following two comments * The spec file says this, and I couldn't figure out what "->" meant; can you make it clearer by replacing "->" with the word(s) you mean? # Avoid a Makefile patch by just adding this empty file -> autoconf # doesn't complain (better than ignoring all status from configure) * I think the "iconv" should be run during _build_, not _install_. Also, you have 3 semicolon-separated commands on one line to invoke it, which kindof hides the "iconv". I'd prefer to have that as a sequence of 3 commands on 3 lines. I'm not big on cuddling multiple commands on a line anyway, but this sequence hides the important command: "mv CeCILL-C CeCILL-C.iso8859; iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 < CeCILL-C.iso8859 > CeCILL-C; rm CeCILL-C.iso8859" which I also changed. He then gave a "more formal review": + rpmlint output It outputs: alt-ergo.i386: W: invalid-license CeCILL-C But this is an error in rpmlint (CeCILL-C is a recent addition), already explained in the spec file + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora Yes. CeCILL-C was just added to the acceptable list. + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file Yes, /usr/share/doc/alt-ergo-0.8/CeCILL-C + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm Yes, sha1sum: 6a073b88d799e3dfcc7e13dfc1386c6422ce9ab8 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386. Can't try koji until ocamlgraph is in. ??? ExcludeArch bugs filed ??? BuildRequires list all build dependencies (Not yet) n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ??? reviewer should build the package in mock Don't know how to do that yet; ocamlgraph not available in yum ??? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures Don't know how to do that yet; ocamlgraph not available in yum + review should test the package functions as described Tried using gwhy; looks great! n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270021.m7R0LDO0009829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #5 from Luke Macken 2008-08-26 20:21:12 EDT --- To quote upstream author, Phillip J. Eby: "ZPL 2.1; see http://www.zope.org/Resources/ZPL" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270020.m7R0KmH8009622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #14 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-26 20:20:47 EDT --- Help! Can't build; is the build env still down? I got the cvs directories okay, but can't seem to build for F-8, F-9, _OR_ devel. I just get these errors: "FAILED: BuildError: package E not in list for tag dist-f8-updates-candidate" I ran this: cd ~/cvs fedora-cvs E cd E ./common/cvs-import.sh ~/dwheeler.com/E-0.999.006-2.fc9.src.rpm ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-9 ~/dwheeler.com/E-0.999.006-2.fc9.src.rpm ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-8 ~/dwheeler.com/E-0.999.006-2.fc9.src.rpm cd F-8 cvs up cd ../F-9 cvs up cd ../devel/ cvs up cd .. cd F-8 make build cd ../F-9/ make build cd ../devel/ make build Here's what I get (skipping to the "make build" stuff): $ cd F-8 $ make build /usr/bin/koji build dist-f8-updates-candidate 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/E/F-8#E-0_999_006-2_fc8' Created task: 787924 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787924 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 787924 build (dist-f8-updates-candidate, F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8): free 787924 build (dist-f8-updates-candidate, F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8): free -> open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 787925 buildSRPMFromSCM (F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8): free 787925 buildSRPMFromSCM (F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8): free -> open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 787925 buildSRPMFromSCM (F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8): open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 787924 build (dist-f8-updates-candidate, F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package E not in list for tag dist-f8-updates-candidate 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed 787924 build (dist-f8-updates-candidate, F-8:E-0_999_006-2_fc8) failed make: *** [koji] Error 1 $ cd ../F-9/ $ make build /usr/bin/koji build dist-f9-updates-candidate 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/E/F-9#E-0_999_006-2_fc9' Created task: 787926 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787926 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 787926 build (dist-f9-updates-candidate, F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9): free 787926 build (dist-f9-updates-candidate, F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9): free -> open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 787927 buildSRPMFromSCM (F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9): free 787927 buildSRPMFromSCM (F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9): free -> open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) 787927 buildSRPMFromSCM (F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 787926 build (dist-f9-updates-candidate, F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package E not in list for tag dist-f9-updates-candidate 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed 787926 build (dist-f9-updates-candidate, F-9:E-0_999_006-2_fc9) failed make: *** [koji] Error 1 $ cd ../devel/ $ make build /usr/bin/koji build dist-f10 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/E/devel#E-0_999_006-2_fc10' Created task: 787928 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787928 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 787928 build (dist-f10, devel:E-0_999_006-2_fc10): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 787929 buildSRPMFromSCM (devel:E-0_999_006-2_fc10): free 787929 buildSRPMFromSCM (devel:E-0_999_006-2_fc10): free -> open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 787929 buildSRPMFromSCM (devel:E-0_999_006-2_fc10): open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 787928 build (dist-f10, devel:E-0_999_006-2_fc10): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package E not in list for tag dist-f10 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed 787928 build (dist-f10, devel:E-0_999_006-2_fc10) failed make: *** [koji] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270029.m7R0TRRE013364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler at dwheeler.com --- Comment #2 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-26 20:29:26 EDT --- For completeness, I'll vouch that comment #1 is an accurate copy of the emails I sent Alan Dunn while Bugzilla was down. I'm looking forward to seeing the updated alt-ergo. I'll make myself the reviewer; thanks for packaging alt-ergo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270030.m7R0US8p014506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwheeler at dwheeler.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:31:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270031.m7R0Vbm8019489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 20:31:36 EDT --- Can't actually remember what package I needed openssl098b for, so I'll just close the bug. Someone else can pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 00:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270047.m7R0l9Cv022325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-26 20:47:08 EDT --- Somehow missed the bugzilla notification, sorry. Yes, all issues are resolved. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 01:21:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270121.m7R1LJWm023645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 01:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270151.m7R1pZXl028936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-08-26 21:51:34 EDT --- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. mlt-devel.i386: W: no-documentation mlt-devel.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so Not sure about the first one, no clue what the second one means, but it is probably a problem in the compilation process of the package itself. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . CHECK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . CHECK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . BuildRoot needs to follow the guidelines. The following value is recommended. %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . CHECK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. CHECK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. CHECK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. CHECK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). CHECK - for some values of legible ;) (next time use better handwriting) - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. No url provided. MD5 matches with the source package from sourceforge, nonetheless. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on i386, works. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Not tested on any other architectures. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. CHECK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Not applicable (?) - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig CHECK - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Not Applicable - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. CHECK (but someone who does the actual review, please double check) - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. CHECK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. CHECK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). CHECK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . CHECK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . CHECK (code) - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Not Applicable - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. CHECK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. CHECK - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Not applicable - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Missing (belongs in the %package section for the devel package. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. CHECK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Missing the %{release} - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. CHECK - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Not applicable - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. CHECK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. CHECK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. CHECK SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Missing (how do you do this actually?) - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. Not tested. - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. It's a library, not going to compile other packages just to test right now. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. CHECK - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. CHECK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 01:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270151.m7R1pFqs028878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-26 21:51:14 EDT --- Confirmed upstream, that it is GPLv3. A license block will shortly be on scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 02:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270204.m7R24fOA003568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #12 from David Halik 2008-08-26 22:04:39 EDT --- In keeping with the Songbird release of 0.7, I've bumped the package version and spec file. Both can be found here along with stable builds from koji: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-0.7.0-1.fc9.src.rpm http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 02:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270227.m7R2R0ar008404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #2 from jebba 2008-08-26 22:26:59 EDT --- *** mlt-devel.i386: W: no-documentation Does the -devel package need a LICENSE or something? I'd think not since it Requires: the main package. *** mlt-devel.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so I have no clue here. *** %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) I changed my BuildRoot: to that. I had a more commonly used one before. *** No url provided. Now using full URL to source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mlt/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz *** Not tested on any other architectures. This package does *not* compile on x86_64, croaking on some assembly... Untested on ppc. I added ExcludeArch: x86_64. *** To -devel section, added: Requires: pkgconfig *** -devel section, fixed: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Revised packages here (0.3.0-2): ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 02:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270238.m7R2cApY005775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-26 22:38:08 EDT --- Thanks for your work. Then would you submit seperate review requests for each srpms and add proper "Depends on/Blocks" markers? (and please make the newly created review requests block NEEDSPONSOR as well as this bug) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 02:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270253.m7R2rt7I008724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #17 from John Anderson 2008-08-26 22:53:52 EDT --- Here is the new version, plus many fixes: http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/gnome-rdp.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/gnome-rdp-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm It will only build against fc10 due to the gnome-desktop-sharp dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 03:01:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270301.m7R31bwg010600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-08-26 23:01:36 EDT --- Wrapped it in a TODO. Not ideal, but then, we don't really expect it to consistently work, so... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787971 SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-RPC-XML-0.60-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-RPC-XML.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 05:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460253] New: Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 Summary: Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qle.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qle-0.0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The qle-package is a graphic QSO log viewer, log editor and QSO logger for amateur radio operators. 'qle' stands for QSO Logger and Editor. It is a Perl/Tk script that logs (or modifies) QSOs directly in a fast and light-weight SQLite database. Intended use: casual logging of rag-chew and contest QSOs. The logger caters for CW operators. Table headings, fonts, colours and other attributes are set in a user-editable configuration file. The SQLite log schema supplied may be altered to suit your taste, provided the configuration file is updated accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 05:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270532.m7R5W1k7003751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-27 01:32:00 EDT --- formal review: OK source files match upstream: de1a91417cef97727f6201f7d986ed07df71bae5 HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 05:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270543.m7R5hBtU005180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 05:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270543.m7R5htnc010998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270700.m7R70JdF015753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-27 03:00:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes- Short Description: Concise attribute rewriting Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270716.m7R7G75v023462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-27 03:16:05 EDT --- The templates should be made self-contained by including the necessary macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:15:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] New: Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 Summary: Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/pangomm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/pangomm-2.13.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Pangomm is a C++ wrapper library for pango: a system for layout and rendering of internationalized text. Pangomm is part of the gtkmm project, the C++ interface for GTK+ and GNOME. Note to reviewer: Pangomm used to be part of the gtkmm package itself but now lives in its own tarball (and becomes a build dependency for gtkmm). There are still issues in the way the documentation is split between gtkmm and pangomm. The spec file sets up the documentation similarly to what is done with gtkmm, but the links are known to be broken. This should be resolved by upstream before pangomm hits 2.14 stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270724.m7R7ONUL018842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-27 03:24:22 EDT --- rcssmonitor-12.1.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rcssmonitor-12.1.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270721.m7R7Ltvm018682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |438943 --- Comment #1 from Denis Leroy 2008-08-27 03:21:54 EDT --- This is a F-10 blocker, since gtkmm needs to follow the gtk2 2.14 track. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:25:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270725.m7R7Pgp1024840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-27 03:25:41 EDT --- I would suggest leaving it for a few hours. Just because Kevin posts his 'cvs done' message doesn't mean that all databases have been updated and all cron jobs have run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270724.m7R7OK3i024392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-27 03:24:19 EDT --- rcssmonitor-12.1.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rcssmonitor-12.1.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270733.m7R7Xe5V026029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-27 03:33:38 EDT --- formal review: OK source files match upstream: e214d3f22b9d261f0a587d68314d76d68739ef0e Text-vFile-asData-0.05.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270734.m7R7Y7xF026070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-27 03:34:06 EDT --- formal review: OK source files match upstream: 7c9c01a3aa26eaa76eb6224d84349ffe66068f21 Data-ICal-0.13.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:44:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270744.m7R7iVsF021420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-27 03:44:30 EDT --- Grumble, nasty typo in #2 - This package's name is supposed to be "perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes" (without -) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes Short Description: Concise attribute rewriting Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 07:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458723] Review Request: rcssmonitor - RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulator Monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270750.m7R7oqaq022704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458723 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 03:50:51 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270809.m7R89rZH000504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-27 04:09:53 EDT --- Thanks for the reviews, Dan. Your help is very much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270808.m7R88l8Y000380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-27 04:08:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-ICal Short Description: Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:06:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270806.m7R86x6Y032626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-08-27 04:06:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-vFile-asData Short Description: Parse vFile formatted files into data structures Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:15:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270815.m7R8Fjb1002139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #19 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-27 04:15:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Then would you submit seperate review requests for each srpms and add proper > "Depends on/Blocks" markers? (and please make the newly created review requests > block NEEDSPONSOR as well as this bug) I'll do as soon I finish the OmegaT package (let it compile using its dependencies). I'd put it here for making easy your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270823.m7R8Nfw7029513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Devrim GUNDUZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) | --- Comment #7 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-27 04:23:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Devrim, can you have a look at Jason's comments? I cannot do mock build at home (bw issues). Let me check other options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270821.m7R8LXKi003541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-08-27 04:21:31 EDT --- Hopefully I have reviewed all the prerequisites for the new RT :-) Could you take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 08:55:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458472] Review Request: grub2 - Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270855.m7R8tHIj002803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458472 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-27 04:55:15 EDT --- Thanks, imported and built. Description was extended and a README file was added to avoid the confusion as much as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 09:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270923.m7R9N7X6014616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #7 from srinivas 2008-08-27 05:23:06 EDT --- The suggested changes have been implemented. The updated spec and SRPM could be found at the following location: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcc/ Thanks Srinivas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 09:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808270959.m7R9xsOI021667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-27 05:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Do you have an updated python-twisted-core package one can test this with? I > need it to review elisa-plugins-bad I don't, but I was planning on working on it if ThomasVS (the twisted package maintainer) didn't have time for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 10:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271030.m7RAUAHu020268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-27 06:30:09 EDT --- Guake 0.3.1 released will you update it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 10:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271056.m7RAuwdT024790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-27 06:56:57 EDT --- Sorry, last post was erroneous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 10:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271057.m7RAvQbJ024856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 --- Comment #31 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-27 06:57:24 EDT --- Guake 0.3.1 released will you update it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 11:07:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271107.m7RB7DwW000895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 --- Comment #32 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-08-27 07:07:12 EDT --- It is already built and waiting to be pushed in updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 11:56:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271156.m7RBu9Uj010234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #20 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-27 07:56:07 EDT --- Updated: http://olea.org/tmp/OmegaT.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/OmegaT-1.7.3_03-2olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/OmegaT-1.7.3_03-2olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/OmegaT-javadoc-1.7.3_03-2olea.noarch.rpm There are some internal paths to be fixed but the apps seem to work. The netbeans jar is only used to compile OmegaT-lib-mnemonics-1.7.3_03.jar. Dunno if it's removable or not, but seems to annoy to package only for this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 11:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271156.m7RBuer8010361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-27 07:56:38 EDT --- I have some twisted packages you could use for testing here: http://mirror.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/bittorrent/Twisted/ They're fairly close to the Fedora packages but updated to 8.x versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271205.m7RC52VF012221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |428798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271205.m7RC53vU012250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] New: Review Request: htmlparser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: htmlparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Summary: Review Request: htmlparser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I need a sponsor. http://olea.org/tmp/htmlparser.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-1olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-1olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-javadoc-1.6-1olea.noarch.rpm Koji info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787616 Description: HTML Parser is a Java library used to parse HTML in either a linear or nested fashion. Primarily used for transformation or extraction, it features filters, visitors, custom tags and easy to use JavaBeans. It is a fast, robust and well tested package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] New: Review Request: vldocking Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vldocking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Summary: Review Request: vldocking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I need a sponsor. http://olea.org/tmp/vldocking.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-2.0.6e-1olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-2.0.6e-1olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-javadoc-2.0.6e-1olea.noarch.rpm Description: Docking windows allow the user to reorganize the application's workspace according to his needs: * Drag and Drop parts of the application ("Dockables") * Hide the dockables not often used to save screen space * Detach some dockables and have them floating outside the window * Easily switch between different workspaces * And much more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271208.m7RC8biW012887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |428798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271208.m7RC8bXI012915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460289 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271206.m7RC6S0u012585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:12:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271212.m7RCCWTl006765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 12:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271213.m7RCDlxu006959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 13:15:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460297] New: Review Request: apricots - 2D air combat game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apricots - 2D air combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460297 Summary: Review Request: apricots - 2D air combat game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora It's a game where you fly a little plane around the screen and shoot things and drop bombs on enemy targets, and it's meant to be quick and fun. SPEC URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/apricots/apricots.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/apricots/apricots-0.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 13:45:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271345.m7RDjUpH029452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #8 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-08-27 09:45:28 EDT --- Theoretically yeah, but these macros are going to go in the GHC package, based on advice from the Packaging Committee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271403.m7RE35QP025822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #8 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-27 10:03:04 EDT --- One more: the -devel package needs to use a fully versioned requires, not a >=. Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271405.m7RE5Qwh000842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-27 10:05:25 EDT --- The guidelines were approved (and hopefully will be accepted by FESCo today) but of course we need to see a ghc package rev with those macros included before reviews can really move forward. I guess this package (and perhaps others) will also need an update to conform to the new prettified specfule template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460306] New: Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 Summary: Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flickrfs/flickrfs.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flickrfs/flickrfs-1.3.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=788713 Description: Flickrfs is a virtual filesystem which mounts on your linux machine like any other partition. Once mounted, it retrieves information about your photos hosted on your flickr account, and shows them as files. You can now easily copy photos from your local machine to this mount, and it will automatically upload them to your flickr account. Similary, you can copy the files from your mount to your local machine, and it will download your images from flickr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:13:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271413.m7REDiVs027787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-27 10:13:42 EDT --- Just a few minor issues. Ownership of dirs created with the %dir macro and the Requires for the devel package. + rpmlint output rpmlint pangomm-2.13.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 148578fbfa7286de2141f3291d64d1e3 pangomm-2.13.7.tar.bz2 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested on x86_64 using mock + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr - package owns all directories it creates doesn't own the following dirs that it creates: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pangomm-1.4 %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4 %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4/pangomm n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static - packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing using kvm) + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin I think also the devel package needs to have a "Requires: gtk-doc" as well as the pkgconfig requires as it uses gtk-doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271413.m7REDD82002207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #9 from srinivas 2008-08-27 10:13:11 EDT --- Done. Please let me know if there are any other changes required. Thanks Srinivas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460306] Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271420.m7REK9WG029740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 Michal Fabry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfabry at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mfabry at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michal Fabry 2008-08-27 10:20:08 EDT --- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271430.m7REU9lm005516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch 2008-08-27 10:30:08 EDT --- Pretty close: formal review below, noting a few minor changes to make. Do these then do the CVS requests. rpmlint: 100% clean, ok naming: ok spec file name matches: ok packaging guidelines: ok license = EPL: ok license tag: ok - COPYING file not included in %doc for main package, only in -devel. Must fix. spec in english: ok spec legible: ok - Source0 URL incorrect, use http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 complies on i386 and x86_64: ok all BRs correct: ok spec doesn't use locales: ok properly uses ldconfig in scriptlets: ok not relocatable: ok dir ownership: ok no duplicate files: ok file perms correct: ok %clean section: ok consistent use of macros: ok code, not content: ok no large docs, no need for -doc subpackage: ok %doc usage ok (except see above) headers in -devel: ok no static libs: ok no pkgconfig files: ok .so in -devel: ok - -devel needs to include fully versioned dependency. Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} all libtool .la files removed: ok no GUI, no .desktop files: ok dir ownership correct: ok %install does rm: ok filenames UTF8: ok shoulds: source includes license: ok not translated .spec: ok builds in mock: ok builds on i386 and x86_64: ok package installs fine, is a library. will be tested when dependent apps use it (also under review). scriptlets sane: ok no other subpackages: ok no pkgconfig: ok no extra deps: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456281] Review Request: xerces-j2 - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271436.m7REaQrl006821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456281 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com, | |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-27 10:36:25 EDT --- xerces-j2 is already available in Fedora. If you need a version upgrade, you will have to request it from the xerces-j2 maintainer: Tom "spot" Callaway. $ sudo yum --enablerepo=rawhide info xerces-j2 Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit rawhide | 2.4 kB 00:00 Available Packages Name : xerces-j2 Arch : i386 Version : 2.7.1 Release : 10.2.fc10 Size : 7.9 M Repo : rawhide Summary : Java XML parser URL : http://xerces.apache.org/ License : ASL 2.0 Description: Welcome to the future! Xerces2 is the next generation of high : performance, fully compliant XML parsers in the Apache Xerces : family. This new version of Xerces introduces the Xerces Native : Interface (XNI), a complete framework for building parser : components and configurations that is extremely modular and easy to : program. The Apache Xerces2 parser is the reference implementation : of XNI but other parser components, configurations, and parsers can : be written using the Xerces Native Interface. For complete design : and implementation documents, refer to the XNI Manual. Xerces 2 is : a fully conforming XML Schema processor. For more information, : refer to the XML Schema page. Xerces 2 also provides a partial : implementation of Document Object Model Level 3 Core, Load and Save : and Abstract Schemas [deprecated] Working Drafts. For more : information, refer to the DOM Level 3 Implementation page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271448.m7REmgRJ001851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 10:48:41 EDT --- Well, (In reply to comment #2) > - package owns all directories it creates > doesn't own the following dirs that it creates: > %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pangomm-1.4 > %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4 > %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4/pangomm - -devel subpackage actually owns these directories. When written as --------------------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_includedir}/pangomm-%{apiver} --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %{_includedir}/pangomm-%{apiver} and all directories/files/etc under this directory. Some notes: - "BuildRequires: pango-devel" is listed twice. - The %description of -devel subpackage is not right. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package contains the static libraries and header files needed for ^^^^^^ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Would you consider to use --------------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on as many files as possible? This method usually works for recent autotool based Makefiles. - Would you explain why you want to remove files under %_libdir/pangomm-%apiver ? - %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ is already marked as docDirs (see Changelog in "rpm" package: from 2007-06-29) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271453.m7RErIrY009574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226555] Merge Review: xerces-j2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271459.m7RExqWJ004040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226555 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |victor.vasilyev at sun.com --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-27 10:59:49 EDT --- *** Bug 456281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271459.m7RExsfo004079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Bug 456337 depends on bug 456281, which changed state. Bug 456281 Summary: Review Request: xerces-j2 - Java XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456281 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456281] Review Request: xerces-j2 - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271459.m7RExpWk004018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456281 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-27 10:59:49 EDT --- This package has been in Fedora for many years now. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226555 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 14:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271456.m7REude0010349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |langel at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271504.m7RF4wem005262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|langel at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460306] Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271505.m7RF5RXT012735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|mfabry at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271505.m7RF58Qb005661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |langel at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:15:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271515.m7RFFrSc014339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 11:15:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) Hello, again: > Updated: > The netbeans jar is only used to compile OmegaT-lib-mnemonics-1.7.3_03.jar. > Dunno if it's removable or not, but seems to annoy to package only for this... Well, I am not Java expert and know nothing about netbeans, however the jar file needed to rebuild OmegaT is available when bug 456341 or bug 456337 gets passed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271517.m7RFHwqm014534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 11:17:57 EDT --- or maybe bug 456273? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271539.m7RFdRF2011196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 11:39:26 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271548.m7RFmL9M012937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 --- Comment #6 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-27 11:48:20 EDT --- No issues. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:47:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271547.m7RFlsid019525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 --- Comment #5 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-27 11:47:52 EDT --- - No rpmlint errors: $ rpmlint -i /notnfs/langel/rpm/RPMS/noarch/beansbinding-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Using http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines to do the review. Those marked with an "X" need attention. * 1 Packaging Guidelines o 1.1 Naming ok o 1.2 Legal ok o 1.3 No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries none. o 1.4 Writing a package from scratch ok o 1.5 Modifying an existing package n/a o 1.6 Filesystem Layout ok o 1.7 Use rpmlint no errors. o 1.8 Changelogs oke o 1.9 Tags ok o 1.10 BuildRoot tag ok o 1.11 Requires ok o 1.12 BuildRequires ok o 1.13 Summary and description ok o 1.14 Encoding ok o 1.15 Documentation ok o 1.16 Compiler flags ok o 1.17 Debuginfo packages n/a o 1.18 Exclusion of Static Libraries n/a o 1.19 Duplication of system libraries n/a o 1.20 Beware of Rpath n/a o 1.21 Configuration files n/a o 1.22 Initscripts n/a o 1.23 Desktop files n/a o 1.24 Macros ok o 1.25 Handling Locale Files n/a o 1.26 Timestamps n/a o 1.27 Parallel make n/a o 1.28 Scriptlets requirements n/a o 1.29 Running scriptlets only in certain situations n/a o 1.30 Scriplets are only allowed to write in certain directories n/a o 1.31 Conditional dependencies n/a o 1.32 Build packages with separate user accounts n/a o 1.33 Relocatable packages n/a o 1.34 Code Vs Content ok o 1.35 File and Directory Ownership ok o 1.36 Users and Groups ok o 1.37 Web Applications ok o 1.38 Conflicts ok o 1.39 No External Kernel Modules n/a o 1.40 No Files or Directories under /srv n/a o 1.41 Application Specific Guidelines n/a Using http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. done - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . done - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . done - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . done - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . done - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. done - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. done - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. done - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. done - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. done - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. done on i386. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. done - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. n/a - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. n/a - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. n/a - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. ok - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . ok - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. n/a - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. n/a - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. n/a - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. n/a - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ok - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ok - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. n/a - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. T ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ok SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. it is there. - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. n/a - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. done - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. n/a - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. n/a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460306] Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271554.m7RFs01Y020516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-27 11:53:59 EDT --- Note that all the other fuse packages are named 'fuse-whatever'... so it might be better to name this 'fuse-flickerfs' (with a Provides: flickerfs perhaps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 15:53:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271553.m7RFrQd3020464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |langel at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 16:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271640.m7RGeL3e028192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-27 12:40:20 EDT --- Thanks for that. Has the topic of Twisted been brought up in -devel? From Paul's page it looks like almost nothing depend on the old version anymore, so we can even avoid having to do a compatibility package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 16:38:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271638.m7RGcKDB027647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #7 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-27 12:38:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beansbinding Short Description: Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation Owners: victorv Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 17:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271717.m7RHH2Gg001834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 13:17:00 EDT --- Will review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 17:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460306] Review Request: flickrfs - Virtual filesystem for flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271718.m7RHIkbq001909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460306 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mfabry at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 17:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271748.m7RHmA28007834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #4 from Denis Leroy 2008-08-27 13:48:09 EDT --- > - package owns all directories it creates Hmm, looks good to me over here. I think Mamoru-san addressed this in his comment. # rpm -qf /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pangomm-1.4 pangomm-devel-2.13.7-1.fc10.i386 # rpm -qf /usr/include/pangomm-1.4 pangomm-devel-2.13.7-1.fc10.i386 > - packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' Fixed. > I think also the devel package needs to have a "Requires: gtk-doc" > as well as the pkgconfig requires as it uses gtk-doc Fixed. > "BuildRequires: pango-devel" is listed twice. Oops. Fixed. > The %description of -devel subpackage is not right. Yes, odd, I can't remember where that's coming from. Fixed. > Would you consider to use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" Sure. Fixed. > %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ is already marked as docDirs Fixed. > Would you explain why you want to remove files under > %_libdir/pangomm-%apiver ? In all gtkmm project tarballs, %{libdir}/%{name} always contains files that are related to the code generation scripts use by the C++ wrapper (the actual C++ interface code is generated dynamically by m4 scripts when the tarball is created, i.e before build time). So these files are not particularly useful even to a gtkmm-based project developer. I removed them mainly to reduce polution of the libdir directory. I've asked upstream before about this, the answer iirc was "in case someone is interested"... Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/pangomm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/pangomm-2.13.7-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 17:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271757.m7RHv4NJ009591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #4 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-27 13:57:02 EDT --- Only one minor issue. Marked with XXXX rpmlint: $ rpmlint -i /notnfs/langel/rpm/RPMS/noarch/appframework-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * 1 Packaging Guidelines o 1.1 Naming ok o 1.2 Legal ok o 1.3 No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries n/a o 1.4 Writing a package from scratch ok o 1.5 Modifying an existing package n/a o 1.6 Filesystem Layout ok + 1.6.1 Libexecdir n/a o 1.7 Use rpmlint no errors o 1.8 Changelogs good o 1.9 Tags ok o 1.10 BuildRoot tag ok o 1.11 Requires ok o 1.12 BuildRequires ok o 1.13 Summary and description ok o 1.14 Encoding ok o 1.15 Documentation ok o 1.16 Compiler flags ok o 1.17 Debuginfo packages n/a o 1.18 Exclusion of Static Libraries n/a o 1.19 Duplication of system libraries n/a o 1.20 Beware of Rpath n/a o 1.21 Configuration files n/a o 1.22 Initscripts n/a o 1.23 Desktop files n/a o 1.24 Macros ok. consistent. o 1.25 Handling Locale Files n/a o 1.26 Timestamps n/a o 1.27 Parallel make n/a o 1.28 Scriptlets requirements n/a o 1.29 Running scriptlets only in certain situations n/a o 1.30 Scriplets are only allowed to write in certain directories n/a o 1.31 Conditional dependencies n/a o 1.32 Build packages with separate user accounts n/a o 1.33 Relocatable packages n/a o 1.34 Code Vs Content ok o 1.35 File and Directory Ownership ok o 1.36 Users and Groups ok o 1.37 Web Applications n/a o 1.38 Conflicts n/a o 1.39 No External Kernel Modules n/a o 1.40 No Files or Directories under /srv n/a o 1.41 Application Specific Guidelines n/a http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. no errors - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . done - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . done - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . done - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . done - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. done - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. done - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. done - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). done - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. done - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. on i386 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. done - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. n/a - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. n/a - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. n/a - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. ok - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok XXXX MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. I think the defattr lines should be fixed to %defattr(-,root,root,-). - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). done - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . done - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . done - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) done - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. done - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. n/a - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. n/a - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). n/a - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. n/a - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n/a - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ok - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. ok - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. done - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ok SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. done - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. done - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. done, works. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. n/a - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. ok - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456276] Review Request: freemarker - FreeMarker template engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271800.m7RI0NpR002223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456276 --- Comment #5 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-27 14:00:22 EDT --- The review for this will have to wait until xerces-j2 2.8 is in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271808.m7RI8WoV003937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-27 14:08:31 EDT --- Spec file seems to be broken and hence I'm seeing buld failure in mock. pm-ad%files %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README %{_libdir}/*.so.* >From mock build.log Processing files: pangomm-debuginfo-2.13.7-2.fc10 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pangomm-2.13.7-2.fc10.x86_64 RPM build errors: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libpangomm-1.4.so.1 /usr/lib64/libpangomm-1.4.so.1.0.30 Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/libpangomm-1.4.so.1 /usr/lib64/libpangomm-1.4.so.1.0.30 Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/pangomm.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 316, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/pangomm.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:13:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271813.m7RIDiFZ013363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #6 from Denis Leroy 2008-08-27 14:13:43 EDT --- Oops, bad case of emacs-itis. Try again, I've fixed the uploads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460352] New: Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 Summary: Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xwota.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xwota-0.4-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Xwota is intended for amateur radio operators who want to make use of the WOTA database. It can be used to find out who is on the air, the band and frequency they are operating on, and their location by country, state, county, grid, and latitude/longitude It's very similar to a DX Cluster client, but it works with the WOTA database and contains more informations. If you don't known what is the WOTA database, please read some infos at http://www.wotadb.org. It's written in C and GTK, and it works on the latests Linux/BSD distributions and MAC OS X (with X11 package installed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271823.m7RINlfU014996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 14:23:45 EDT --- Now I leave this review request to how Peter-san judges. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:30:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271830.m7RIUEtk008044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-27 14:30:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Now I leave this review request to how Peter-san judges. Mamoru are you happy with the explanation for your "Would you explain why you want to remove files under %_libdir/pangomm-%apiver ?" question? Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:42:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271842.m7RIg6GR010087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-27 14:42:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > Mamoru are you happy with the explanation for your "Would you explain why you > want to remove files under %_libdir/pangomm-%apiver ?" question? > > Peter Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271846.m7RIkbaH018941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-27 14:46:35 EDT --- Looks good to me now. Approved. + rpmlint output rpmlint pangomm-2.13.7-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 148578fbfa7286de2141f3291d64d1e3 pangomm-2.13.7.tar.bz2 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested on x86_64 using mock + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing using kvm) + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin + I think also the devel package needs to have a "Requires: gtk-doc" as well as the pkgconfig requires as it uses gtk-doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271857.m7RIvDUS012538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-27 14:57:12 EDT --- Hi Debarshi, Are you planning on reviewing this package? Regards, Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 18:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271857.m7RIv5Za012515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 --- Comment #5 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-27 14:57:04 EDT --- The forth revision is prepared. The minor issue is fixed. Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2040/appframework.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2153/appframework-1.03-4.fc10.src.rpm Changes: - The %%defattr(-,root,root,-) is used everywhere - Use the %%{ant} instead of the ant command - Use the %%{version} in the "-n" option of the %%setup Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=789109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 19:01:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271901.m7RJ1huh021603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 --- Comment #6 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-27 15:01:42 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 19:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271914.m7RJEKtU023500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 --- Comment #7 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-27 15:14:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: appframework Short Description: Swing Application Framework Owners: victorv Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 19:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452486] Review Request: stage - 2D multiple-robot simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808271939.m7RJdXxt019801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452486 --- Comment #4 from Arindam Ghosh 2008-08-27 15:39:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - The plugin shouldn't be versioned. Can we prevent that? For now the Player > plugin is at /usr/lib64/libstageplugin.so.1, but if you try to load it Player > will only try libstageplugin.so (without .1 in the end). So only if the devel > sub-package is installed the plugin can actually be loaded. Well, this may call for merging of -devel branch with the main package. thoughts? > - There is a problem with the Player package with the plugin search path. We > need to define a Plugin directory like /usr/lib/player which is used to store > plugins. I will work on that for the Player package so that we can use it for > Stage. yeah, i noticed the search path problems earlier while packaging stage...so what is its' status now? player cvs is up now...haven't got time to check these things..../me badly busy at the final leg of the GSoC project > - Have you tried the new 3.0.1? Maybe we want to rename this package to stage2 > and package the new version as stage? the last time i tried to build it failed miserably. they have lot of pending things to put in stage3, so as things become little stable with the upstream, i will update the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 20:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808272053.m7RKrA11000833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #36 from Claudio Tomasoni 2008-08-27 16:53:07 EDT --- Ok. The new SPEC and SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc9.src.rpm About https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage Should I insert %check ctest even if the result is "No tests were found!!!" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 21:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: Tennix! - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808272126.m7RLQ7cb006891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 --- Comment #9 from Claudio Tomasoni 2008-08-27 17:26:06 EDT --- All fixes suggested done in: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/tennix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/tennix-0.6.1-4.fc9.src.rpm About "! Timestamp": ok, I'll take care of this from now on. About "* Icon caching": lesson learned (it's the second time with the same error). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 22:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460386] New: Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460386 Summary: Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-netaddr.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-netaddr-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: netaddr is a Python library for the manipulation of various common network address notations and representations. It takes the hassle out of fiddling with enumerable variations of network addresses presenting a consistent, extensible, easy-to-use and (above all) Pythonic API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 22:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808272213.m7RMDOgB013537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 --- Comment #88 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-27 18:13:23 EDT --- themonospot-0.7.1.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/themonospot-0.7.1.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 22:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808272213.m7RMDD0C013506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 --- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-27 18:13:11 EDT --- themonospot-0.7.1.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/themonospot-0.7.1.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 22:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808272221.m7RMLIpt024062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #11 from Denis Leroy 2008-08-27 18:21:17 EDT --- Peter, Mamoru-san, many thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pangomm Short Description: C++ wrapper for pango Owners: denis Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 22:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808272224.m7RMOJnf014854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 27 23:16:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460387] New: Review Request: python-schedutils - bindings for the scheduler settings interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-schedutils - bindings for the scheduler settings interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460387 Summary: Review Request: python-schedutils - bindings for the scheduler settings interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acme at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-schedutils/python-schedutils.spec SRPM URL: http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-schedutils/python-schedutils-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for the kernel scheduler settings (sched_getparam, etc) comes with two test cases, reimplementations of util-linux tools chrt and taskset. Required by another package that will be submitted for review, tuna. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 00:13:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280013.m7S0DIJW007001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-27 20:13:16 EDT --- I asked Thomas about his upgrade plans for Twisted when he bumped it from 2.4 to 2.5 in May when 8.0 was already out. He said: I'm doing it staged - apparently for some code mixing python 2.5 and twisted-core 2.4 is not a good idea, so I wanted to fix this upgrade path first. Then next I will check the new twisted release and verify it works with current twisted-using projects. So I think Thomas is aware of some pitfalls that we don't know about. The twisted-using packages I see in Fedora currently (apart from the python-twisted-* packages themselves) are: buildbot-0:0.7.7-2.fc9.noarch elisa-0:0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch flumotion-0:0.4.2-5.fc9.x86_64 londonlaw-0:0.2.1-3.fc9.noarch postr-0:0.10-2.fc9.noarch pyicq-t-0:0.8-5.b.fc9.noarch python-nevow-0:0.9.29-2.fc9.noarch python-Coherence-0:0.5.0-1.fc9.noarch supybot-0:0.83.3-7.fc9.noarch (this is from "repoquery --enablerepo=development --whatrequires python-twisted-core --alldeps") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 01:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280115.m7S1Fq9C016938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 02:01:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280201.m7S21HRQ025336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-27 22:01:15 EDT --- *** Bug 460386 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 02:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 22:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460386] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280201.m7S21Gi5025304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460386 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-27 22:01:15 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458746 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 03:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280325.m7S3P0df030587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-27 23:24:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315171) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315171) ghc-X11.spec.patch-2 Patch to fix the filelist generation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 05:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280515.m7S5FWZn023497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-28 01:15:31 EDT --- .. added missing desktop file and bumped version http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qle-0.0.10-2.fc9.src.rpm http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/qle.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 05:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280526.m7S5Qc5e024909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-08-28 01:26:38 EDT --- added missing desktop/icon file and bumped version http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xwota.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xwota-0.4-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 05:48:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280548.m7S5mfDv027632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 05:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280550.m7S5o55Q027995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-28 01:50:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=784476 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e0a74b61f39a5e39d6e7f645e2f67be7 libgxim-0.1.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + libgxim.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libgxim-0.1.0-1.fc10 -> Provides: libgxim.so.0 Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgxim.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libgxim-devel-0.1.0-1.fc10 -> Provides: pkgconfig(libgxim) = 0.1.0 Requires: libgxim.so.0 Suggestions:- 1) make install should be used like make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 2) drop %doc from -devel as same you included in main package. 3) group name for main package should be Group: System Environment/Libraries 4) you can also think of adding tests directory to %doc of -devel in future APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 06:55:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280655.m7S6tSdr004999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-28 02:55:26 EDT --- For 0.10.1-2: * About rpath/linking issue --------------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool # Set LD_LIBRARY_PATH: desktop file creation requires access to the libraries # which have not been installed export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/ggadget/.libs --------------------------------------------------------------------- - Well, actually the reason you have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH temporarily is that you killed rpath completely even on build stage under builddir by the two lines above. Usually removing rpath by this way just "breaks" libtool and especially when the package has its own library path (like %_libdir/%name or so) linking fails like this way. The reason this package adds standard rpath is - When linking libtool tries to find out standard libraries only from /usr/lib and /lib, so on 64 bits architectures the unsearched /usr/lib64 or so is added as rpath. (Fedora libtool on 64 bits actually searches libraries also from /usr/lib64 and so on. You can check this by the diff of %_bindir/libtool (this is bash script) on i386 and x86_64 archs) Note that libtool is created from configure - hosts/*/Makefile.in has unneeded -R$(libdir) :( So I recommend: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-for-linux-%{version} # Permission fixes chmod -x ggadget/qt/utilities.h # Rpath issue # Add library search path sed -i.libdir_syssearch -e \ '/sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec/s|/usr/lib |/usr/lib /usr/lib64 /lib /lib64 |' \ configure # No!! No!! sed -i.extra_R -e \ 's|-R\$(libdir)||' \ hosts/*/Makefile.in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamp issue - As said above, would you consider to use the following? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ INSTALL="install -p" CPPROG="cp -p" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 07:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445604] Review Request: tennix - A funny 2D tennis game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280728.m7S7SGIE031381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445604 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Tennix! - A |Review Request: tennix - A |funny 2D tennis game |funny 2D tennis game --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-28 03:28:15 EDT --- Good. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tennix) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 08:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280834.m7S8YsOb010873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #36 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-28 04:34:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ntop New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 08:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280834.m7S8Yu5P020874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-28 04:34:55 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=789671 koji build failed suggestions: 1) remove inclusion of virtualenv.py twice warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtualenv.py remove following line from spec %attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitelib}/virtualenv.py 2) Use BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel to build egginfo from source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 08:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452842] Review Request: monotorrent - a bit torrent client for mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808280854.m7S8s55I024251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452842 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |monotorrent-0.4-2.fc10 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from David Nielsen 2008-08-28 04:54:04 EDT --- Okay spot built it on one of his license tag sprees -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 11:07:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460465] New: Review Request: x11vnc - A VNC server for real X displays Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - A VNC server for real X displays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460465 Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - A VNC server for real X displays Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: axel.thimm at atrpms.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/x11vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/x11vnc-0.9.3-1.src.rpm Description: x11vnc allows one to view remotely and interact with real X displays (i.e. a display corresponding to a physical monitor, keyboard, and mouse) with any VNC viewer. In this way it plays the role for Unix/X11 that WinVNC plays for Windows. Note: two %doc files (AUTHORS, README) are not in utf-8 and I missed fixing this, consider this done in -2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 11:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460465] Review Request: x11vnc - A VNC server for real X displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281113.m7SBDGq5018831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460465 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-28 07:13:15 EDT --- Axel, there is a review going on in bug 439772, can you take a look at this and maybe propose a patch for that we are waiting? I'm still busy and w/ less time I thought. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 11:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281123.m7SBNiMT021590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2008-08-28 07:23:43 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgxim Short Description: GObject-based XIM protocol library Owners: tagoh Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 11:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281135.m7SBZGQr013578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-28 07:35:14 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=790075 oukej, your package pass the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 11:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281155.m7SBtet0028795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-08-28 07:55:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Set-Crontab Short Description: Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 12:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460387] Review Request: python-schedutils - bindings for the scheduler settings interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281214.m7SCEXbs022592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460387 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-28 08:14:32 EDT --- Suggestions:- 1)Where is upstream? I don't see URL tag in spec file. Add URL. 2) your build and install section for python package should look like this %build %{__python} setup.py build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_using_Setuptools 4) preserve timestamps while using cp and install commands with -p option 5) conditional if is not needed F9>= releases %if "%{python_ver}" >= "2.5" %{python_sitearch}/*.egg-info %endif remove it and add only egginfo file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 13:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281333.m7SDXbkN007610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 09:33:36 EDT --- ferm-2.0.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ferm-2.0.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 13:33:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281333.m7SDXfaj007659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 09:33:41 EDT --- ferm-2.0.2-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ferm-2.0.2-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 13:58:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281358.m7SDw4rg012988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-28 09:58:03 EDT --- Lubomir, please take a look in your free time at this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 13:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] New: Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 Summary: Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ircd-ratbox/ircd-ratbox.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ircd-ratbox/ircd-ratbox-2.2.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=790314 Description: ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable, fast ircd. It is an evolution where ircd-hybrid left off around version 7-rc1. It supports the TS3 and TS5 protocols, and is used on EFnet and other IRC networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 14:59:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455067] Review Request: ferm - For Easy Rule Making In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281459.m7SExLlx024080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455067 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-28 10:59:18 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 14:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281455.m7SEtOfv023627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-28 10:55:22 EDT --- Well, * making build.log output verbose ----------------------------------------------------------------- make iVERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------------------------- - should be: ----------------------------------------------------------------- make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------------------------- * %check (In reply to comment #36) > Should I insert > %check > ctest > even if the result is "No tests were found!!!" ? - I don't think this is needed. Please fix "VERBOSE=1" issue above. As this package is already registered in Fedora CVS you can import this package without waiting for CVS process. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package is re-approved ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:05:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281505.m7SF5LPJ001584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net --- Comment #20 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-28 11:05:18 EDT --- *** Bug 460465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460465] Review Request: x11vnc - A VNC server for real X displays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281505.m7SF5K0Z001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460465 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-28 11:05:18 EDT --- Sorry, I thought I had searched bugzilla before wasting time on redoing the same work :( *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 439772 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:21:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281521.m7SFLEMp004235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 11:21:13 EDT --- E-0.999.006-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/E-0.999.006-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459409] Review Request: E - Equational Theorem Prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281521.m7SFLBOB004206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459409 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 11:21:10 EDT --- E-0.999.006-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/E-0.999.006-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460387] Review Request: python-schedutils - bindings for the scheduler settings interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281520.m7SFKSGT028298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460387 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2008-08-28 11:20:27 EDT --- I'm upstream, and I haven't setup a webpage for this package. I don't think it is required, but I'll probably will create a page at fedorahosted. Fixed #2 and #4 (where is #3? :) ) Is #5 strictly required? I'd love to have just one specfile to use in Fedora and older releases, for such a small specfile I guess the "ifdef hell" is not so painful? New specfile and .src.rpm at: http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-schedutils/python-schedutils.spec http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/python-schedutils/python-schedutils-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281528.m7SFS3Gu029494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Roth 2008-08-28 11:28:02 EDT --- Is there anyone on CC who can help us with reviewing this package? We still need someone who volunteers to review it. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281535.m7SFZ74Y031224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 Bug 433199 depends on bug 437675, which changed state. Bug 437675 Summary: ppc64 pangox.pc contains unneeded rpath linkage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 15:43:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281543.m7SFhaC2032585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 16:04:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281604.m7SG4X2Q011613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 --- Comment #3 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-28 12:04:32 EDT --- Okay, here's a re-review of your all-new, ever-wonderful revision 2 :-). Good news: I tried calling it from "gwhy" on the "binary_search.c" test file, and alt-ergo does REMARKABLY well. It solved 30/31 (~97%) of the verification conditions automatically! Since I was hoping for a COMBINED score of 90% or more, that is GREAT. Bad news: It fails to build on some architectures, nor does it exclude them. See koji report below. All my original top-level comments have been addressed: * Rebuild now works (ocaml-ocamlgraph became ocaml-ocamlgraph-devel) * "cp %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} ." had "-p" added, good. * Clarified comment * iconv on own line Formal review: + rpmlint output It outputs: alt-ergo.i386: W: invalid-license CeCILL-C But this is an error in rpmlint (CeCILL-C is a recent addition), already explained in the spec file. I confirmed that CeCILL-C is an approved Fedora license as noted here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing NOTE: CeCILL-C is _NOT_ the same as CeCILL. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora Yes. CeCILL-C was just added to the acceptable list. + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file Yes, /usr/share/doc/alt-ergo-0.8/CeCILL-C + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm Yes, sha1sum: 6a073b88d799e3dfcc7e13dfc1386c6422ce9ab8 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture Confirmed i386 works. Previously, couldn't easily test koji until ocamlgraph is in the repository (and Fedora infrastructure had lots of problems too). I also tried: koji build --scratch alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm -FAIL ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies Does now (that was a fix from revision 1. Alan Dunn could not easily test for this when he created revision 1, because of Fedora's infrastructure problems combined with the lack of ocamlgraph.) n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock Used koji, which uses mock. -FAIL the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described Tried using gwhy; looks great! n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin $ koji build --scratch dist-f9 alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm Uploading srpm: alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:02 114.05 KiB 46.40 KiB/sec Created task: 790529 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=790529 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 790529 build (dist-f9, alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm): free 790529 build (dist-f9, alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 790532 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, ppc): free 790533 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, x86_64): free 790534 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, i386): free 790535 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 790532 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, ppc): free -> open (ppc10.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 790533 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, x86_64): free -> open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 790534 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, i386): free -> open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 790534 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: error building package (arch i386), mock exited with status 10 0 free 4 open 0 done 1 failed 790533 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: error building package (arch x86_64), mock exited with status 10 0 free 3 open 0 done 2 failed 790535 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> canceled 0 free 2 open 1 done 2 failed 790529 build (dist-f9, alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: error building package (arch i386), mock exited with status 10 0 free 1 open 1 done 3 failed 790532 buildArch (alt-ergo-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc10.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> canceled 0 free 0 open 2 done 3 failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 16:11:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281611.m7SGB2th005359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(victor.vasilyev at s | |un.com) --- Comment #7 from Lillian Angel 2008-08-28 12:10:59 EDT --- A few things to look at. See items marked with an X. X rpmlint: $ rpmlint /notnfs/langel/rpm/RPMS/noarch/ini4j-* ini4j.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/ini4j 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Can you explain this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout 1 Packaging Guidelines * 1.1 Naming ok * 1.2 Legal ok. * 1.3 No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries all removed. ok * 1.4 Writing a package from scratch ok * 1.5 Modifying an existing package ok * 1.6 Filesystem Layout ok * 1.7 Use rpmlint see above * 1.8 Changelogs ok * 1.9 Tags ok * 1.10 BuildRoot tag ok * 1.11 Requires ok * 1.12 BuildRequires ok X 1.13 Summary and description Can you take out the line break from the description? Otherwise, ok. * 1.14 Encoding ok X 1.15 Documentation Is there a license file somewhere? I do not see one in the zip. * 1.16 Compiler flags ok * 1.17 Debuginfo packages n/a * 1.18 Exclusion of Static Libraries n/a * 1.19 Duplication of system libraries n/a * 1.20 Beware of Rpath n/a * 1.21 Configuration files n/a * 1.22 Initscripts n/a * 1.23 Desktop files n/a * 1.24 Macros ok * 1.25 Handling Locale Files n/a * 1.26 Timestamps n/a * 1.27 Parallel make n/a * 1.28 Scriptlets requirements n/a * 1.29 Running scriptlets only in certain situations n/a * 1.30 Scriplets are only allowed to write in certain directories n/a * 1.31 Conditional dependencies n/a * 1.32 Build packages with separate user accounts n/a * 1.33 Relocatable packages n/a * 1.34 Code Vs Content ok * 1.35 File and Directory Ownership ok * 1.36 Users and Groups ok * 1.37 Web Applications ok * 1.38 Conflicts ok * 1.39 No External Kernel Modules ok * 1.40 No Files or Directories under /srv ok * 1.41 Application Specific Guidelines ok http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. See above. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines ok - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . ok - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . I see it is ASL 2.0 http://ini4j.sourceforge.net/license.html. This is fine. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ok X MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Is there one? - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ok - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ok - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. ok - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. ok - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. n/a - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: ok - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. n/a - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. ok - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . ok - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. ok - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. ok - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. n/a - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. n/a - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). n/a - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. n/a - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n/a - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. ok - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. ok - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ok SHOULD Items: X SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Please do this and add it to the docs. - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. n/a - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. ok - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ok - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. ok - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. n/a - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. n/a - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. ok - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. n/a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 16:14:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281614.m7SGEDPU014108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |langel at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 16:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281613.m7SGD3fP013898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-28 12:13:02 EDT --- For 2.0.6e-1: * SourceURL - Please write how you can download the tarball you use. ! Well, usually SOURCEx must be given by full URL, however for this package I cannot find the proper URL (php script perhaps redirects to somewhere we cannot see...). So please write how to get the source tarball. * The place of %description - On the current spec file: --------------------------------------------------------------- %package javadoc Summary: Javadocs for %{name} Group: Documentation %description javadoc <======= Description begins here !!! ======== Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: jpackage-utils This package contains the API documentation for %{name}. --------------------------------------------------------------- The current place of %description hides Requires. Please fix this. ? Symlinking - Would you explain why you want to name the created jar file as %{name}-%{version}.jar and to create a symlink, not just naming the jar file itself as %{name}.jar? ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming ! Duplicate documents - %doc License....pdf for -javadoc subpackage is redundant (and usually removing these is recommended) as -javadoc subpackage always Requires: main package (but please fix %description issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 16:27:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281627.m7SGRkh6017277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #11 from srinivas 2008-08-28 12:27:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-sfcc Short Description:Small Footprint CIM Client Library Runtime Libraries Owners: srini Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2 OLPC-3 InitialCC:mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 17:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281745.m7SHjDf4031563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-28 13:45:12 EDT --- The elisa update requires python-twisted-web2 which requires python-twisted-core 8, so we can remove that from the list. Elisa requires python-nevow and python-Coherence as well, so presumably they work with the new Twisted. londonlaw is more or less dead upstream; Flumotion comes from the same people as Elisa so is probably safe too. So the list is narrowed down to buildbot, postr, pyicq and supybot. Yay. Should we Cc: Thomas on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 17:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460244] Review Request: alt-ergo - Alt-Ergo automatic theorem prover In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281755.m7SHt6iG000856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460244 --- Comment #4 from David A. Wheeler 2008-08-28 13:55:05 EDT --- Oops! I misunderstood the koji error messages. I thought that ocaml-ocamlgraph had been pushed out, but it appears that it has _NOT_ been pushed out. So, unsurprisingly, those builds fail. On my system, once ocaml-ocamlgraph is installed, it works just fine. So the builds on the other architectures _should_ work, but I cannot confirm that. I see that ocaml-ocamlgraph has been built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=59965 and that it's pending at bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-ocamlgraph-0.99c-2.fc9 ocaml-ocamlgraph was submitted on 08-23 (5 days ago). The easy solution is to wait for Bodhi to post it, so that the other tests will be easy to do. I don't want to wait forever, though; if this package is ready (and I suspect it is), I'd like to see this in the repository before the F10 freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 18:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281843.m7SIhAle002142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bdpepple at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2008-08-28 14:43:08 EDT --- Victory, sorry for the late approval on this, but I've been swamped at work. Anyway, the issues from comment #2 have been resolved. +1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 18:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281848.m7SIm77m002963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 --- Comment #17 from Aleksey Kontsevich 2008-08-28 14:48:05 EDT --- May be it is better to just reopen it? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 18:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454461] Review Request: php-pear-Event-Dispatcher - Dispatch notifications using PHP callbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281831.m7SIVMWV032038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454461 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 14:31:21 EDT --- php-pear-Event-Dispatcher-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Event-Dispatcher-1.0.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 18:59:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281859.m7SIxmdm005982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 --- Comment #5 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-28 14:59:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netbeans-javaparser Short Description: NetBeans Java Parser Owners: victorv Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281909.m7SJ9NmL007899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 15:09:22 EDT --- php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454466] Review Request: php-pear-Console-ProgressBar - This class provides you with an easy-to-use interface to progress bars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281908.m7SJ8S1G016177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454466 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 15:08:27 EDT --- php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Console-ProgressBar-0.5.2-0.2.beta.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281937.m7SJbR6N013620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 15:37:26 EDT --- php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281937.m7SJbWNj013647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |up-imapproxy.spec - |up-imapproxy - University |University of Pittsburgh |of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy |IMAP Proxy | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] New: Review Request: up-imap - Zile Is Lossy Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: up-imap - Zile Is Lossy Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Summary: Review Request: up-imap - Zile Is Lossy Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Imapproxy was written to compensate for webmail clients that are unable to maintain persistent connections to an IMAP server. Most webmail clients need to log in to an IMAP server for nearly every single transaction. This behaviour can cause tragic performance problems on the IMAP server. imapproxy tries to deal with this problem by leaving server connections open for a short time after a webmail client logs out. When the webmail client connects again, imapproxy will determine if there's a cached connection available and reuse it if possible. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/up-imapproxy.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/up-imapproxy-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Makefile.in does not have DESTDIR - patch sent to upstream There are some simple to remove warnings (while building) -- patch sent But I don't consider them as blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:37:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281937.m7SJbwWt022293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-28 15:37:57 EDT --- php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Var-Dump-1.0.3-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy.spec - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281937.m7SJbAcd022248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: up-imap - |Review Request: |Zile Is Lossy Emacs |up-imapproxy.spec - | |University of Pittsburgh | |IMAP Proxy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:43:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460586] New: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab - Set-Crontab module for perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab - Set-Crontab module for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460586 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab - Set-Crontab module for perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-Set-Crontab.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-Set-Crontab-1.02-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Set-Crontab module for perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:47:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281947.m7SJlrcu015491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |247084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281948.m7SJm213024068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |427659 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:48:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281948.m7SJmEw3024109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |456964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460588] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Crypt-RIPEMD160 module for perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Crypt-RIPEMD160 module for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460588 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Crypt-RIPEMD160 module for perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160-0.04-14.fc9.src.rpm Description: Crypt-RIPEMD160 module for perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281940.m7SJeL89014147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth 2008-08-28 15:40:20 EDT --- Yes, I think Thomas certainly needs to be Cc:-ed, especially since it'll be up to him to update Twisted Core. I think he's upstream for flumotion too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281955.m7SJtMaH017151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #19 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-28 15:55:21 EDT --- Thanks! And yes, I forgot about timestamps; fixed in latest build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=790922 http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.10.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 20:00:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282000.m7SK066O026599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-28 16:00:05 EDT --- Dude this just plainly sucks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 19:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460588] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Crypt-RIPEMD160 module for perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808281957.m7SJvrDf025989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460588 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-28 15:57:52 EDT --- There's a review of this in bug 452453, but it's been stalled for a while. I'll happily review either package, but you might want to look at the licensing issue brought up in that other ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 20:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282000.m7SK0pZf026829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-28 16:00:50 EDT --- No, seriously: 1.) You use Patch tag with an index and %patch macro without one: Patch0: ircd-ratbox-2.2.8-offbyone.patch ... %patch -p1 -b .offbyone Either replace "Patch9" with "Patch" or "%patch" with "%patch0" 2.) sysconfig/ircd has a redundant setting: PIDFILE=/var/run/ircd.pid The init script assigns a default value. You may want to remove this from sysconfid/ircd 3.) Useless comment in init script: # Note: pidfile is assumed to be created # by ircd (config: server.pid-file). # If not, uncomment 'pidof' line. Really, there's no "'pidof' line" 4.) Patch status You added a fairly long and sophisticated patch. You should send it upstream accompany it with status comment. 5.) Useless comment in SPEC file: #make %{?_smp_mflags} -C contrib Get rid of that. Or build contrib stuff and eventually make a subpackage? 6.) Hardcoded path --with-logdir=/var/log/ircd ... mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/log ... Replace with %{_localstatedir} (or %{_var}?) 7.) Own directories you create Add %dir %{_sysconfdir}/ircd 8.) Add explaining comments to non-obvious commands: mkdir -p ... $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/local/ircd/ Why do you create a directory in /usr/local? mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ircd-old/modules $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ircd/modules rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ircd-old Why do you shuffle ircd-old around? What does it contain? sed 's/-Werror//g' -i configure Why do you strip this utterly useful compiler flag away? What's the status of upstreaming this fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 20:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282034.m7SKYBnq000991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-28 16:34:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Dude this just plainly sucks. I told you it's not really ready yet ;) (In reply to comment #3) > No, seriously: > > 1.) You use Patch tag with an index and %patch macro without one: > > Patch0: ircd-ratbox-2.2.8-offbyone.patch > ... > %patch -p1 -b .offbyone > > Either replace "Patch9" with "Patch" or "%patch" with "%patch0" Typo - interesting that it works :) > 2.) sysconfig/ircd has a redundant setting: > > PIDFILE=/var/run/ircd.pid > > The init script assigns a default value. > You may want to remove this from sysconfid/ircd Right, done. > 3.) Useless comment in init script: > > # Note: pidfile is assumed to be created > # by ircd (config: server.pid-file). > # If not, uncomment 'pidof' line. > > Really, there's no "'pidof' line" I agree, I think the author meant "remove" by "uncomment". > 4.) Patch status > > You added a fairly long and sophisticated patch. You should send it upstream > accompany it with status comment. The patch will be send upstream if it's approved :) > 5.) Useless comment in SPEC file: > > #make %{?_smp_mflags} -C contrib > > Get rid of that. Or build contrib stuff and eventually make a subpackage? No need for contrib. > 6.) Hardcoded path > > --with-logdir=/var/log/ircd > ... > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/log ... > > Replace with %{_localstatedir} (or %{_var}?) %{_localstatedir} is /usr/var, but I can make it _var :) > 7.) Own directories you create > > Add %dir %{_sysconfdir}/ircd Done. > 8.) Add explaining comments to non-obvious commands: > > mkdir -p ... $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/local/ircd/ > > Why do you create a directory in /usr/local? Left that from debugging, latest SRPM uploaded. > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ircd-old/modules > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ircd/modules > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ircd-old > > Why do you shuffle ircd-old around? What does it contain? Nothing, upstream Makefile just create this directory to take a backup of previous data in ircd, which is useless if you're building it in mock. > sed 's/-Werror//g' -i configure > > Why do you strip this utterly useful compiler flag away? > What's the status of upstreaming this fix? We don't really need to stop at every warning, causes unwanted things, you know :) However, as I've already told you, other distributions with older compiler are using it frequently (openSUSE). I'll mention it in my mail to upstream once this package will be approved. New SRPM is available, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 20:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282058.m7SKwwmr005008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #5 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-08-28 16:58:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pymssql Short Description: A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python Owners: rayvd Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 21:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282127.m7SLRY7F001612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 --- Comment #25 from Mathieu BONIFACE 2008-08-28 17:27:32 EDT --- Spec URL : http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/terminator.spec SRPM URL : http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/terminator-0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm - update to 0.10 rpmlint and mock are silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 21:59:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282159.m7SLxvWt014681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Tim Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at timj.co.uk --- Comment #1 from Tim Jackson 2008-08-28 17:59:56 EDT --- I don't think you need a whole new review request for this since there are no major changes - you just want to take ownership, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 22:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808282215.m7SMFfej018316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Robert Spanton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 28 22:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460600] New: Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Summary: Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rspanton at zepler.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds204/rpms/mspgcc/msp430-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds204/rpms/mspgcc/msp430-binutils-2.18-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A cross compiling version of binutils configured to assemble and link binaries for the MSP430 microcontrollers. Patches from the mspgcc project (http://mspgcc.sf.net). I based the specfile on the avr-binutils specfile (reviewed in #234750). rpmlint gives one warning complaining that the package creates /usr/msp430 ("W: non-standard-dir-in-usr msp430"), but I believe that this isn't a problem, as the avr-libc package has a similar warning associated with it about /usr/avr. Also, I have included the '--disable-nls' configure flag (see the discussion about this in the avr-binutils bug mentioned above) since the native binutils provides the translation files. This is my first package, and so I need a sponsor :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 01:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290118.m7T1IEYN003080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #2 from Steve Milner 2008-08-28 21:18:13 EDT --- Updated: http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv.spec rpmlint output: [steve at tachikoman SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-virtualenv-1.1-2.fc9.noarch.rpm python-virtualenv.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtualenv.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at tachikoman SPECS]$ Verifying /usr/bin/virtualenv is there: [steve at tachikoman SPECS]$ rpm -qpl /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-virtualenv-1.1-2.fc9.noarch.rpm | grep bin /usr/bin/virtualenv [steve at tachikoman SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 02:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] New: Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 Summary: Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/cli/bti.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/cli/bti-005-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Allows you to pipe your bash input to twitter in an easy and fast manner to annoy the whole world. Thanks to dmarti (http://lwn.net/Articles/296098/) for mentioning this nifty client! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 03:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290304.m7T34IPk027056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-28 23:04:17 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 03:31:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290331.m7T3VFKM030543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-28 23:31:14 EDT --- I am not sure. Looking on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages it looks like I need a review as package was last updated long back. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:29:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290429.m7T4TD9V029173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:29:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290433.m7T4X0c3029914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:32:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:33:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453569] Review Request: libmirage - library to provide access to different image formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290433.m7T4XX1r029943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453569 --- Comment #13 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-29 00:33:32 EDT --- Rpmlint warnings: [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ rpmlint libmirage libmirage.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libsndfile.so.1 libmirage.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ As shown in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency you can modify your %build stanza as follows: %build %configure --enable-gtk-doc --disable-static # Omit unused direct shared library dependencies. sed --in-place --expression 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool make %{?_smp_mflags} Everything else looks fine. +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290434.m7T4YVWg005756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:34:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290436.m7T4aLoN006257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:36:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290439.m7T4dfEN030778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:39:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290435.m7T4ZZJV030472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Bartlett 2008-08-29 00:35:34 EDT --- Updated packages are now on my web page, which should address most of these issues, and others that actual use by kdepim raised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290437.m7T4bRbo030700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Bartlett 2008-08-29 00:37:26 EDT --- Updated packages addressing the above (and incorporating a name change to openchange, on the request of upstream) is now on my website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290442.m7T4g1a3031567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:41:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290440.m7T4egEI031292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:40:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290444.m7T4iKdZ031724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:44:19 EDT --- Do you really want OLPC-2 and OLPC-3 branches here? Note that OLPC-3 is using F9 as a base, so unless you package has OLPC specific changes the F9 package can be used there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290445.m7T4jopu007615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:45:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290449.m7T4n6SZ007802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:49:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290451.m7T4p4EB008338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:51:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290452.m7T4qOES000710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:52:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 04:53:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290453.m7T4rDvO000789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-29 00:53:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:10:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290610.m7T6ALHd020315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-29 02:10:20 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290619.m7T6JtP4013771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 02:19:54 EDT --- Please submit a request on bodhi to push F-9 package to the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:17:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290617.m7T6HqVN013571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-29 02:17:51 EDT --- I'll revew it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290616.m7T6GrHl021404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 02:16:50 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452449] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab Expand crontab(5)-style integer lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290627.m7T6RTnv015449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452449 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-29 02:27:27 EDT --- *** Bug 460586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:27:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460586] Review Request: perl-Set-Crontab - Set-Crontab module for perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290627.m7T6RSmY015412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460586 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-29 02:27:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452449 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:28:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290628.m7T6S9ND023426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-29 02:28:08 EDT --- Thanks, Well done! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290634.m7T6YV4F024489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-29 02:34:29 EDT --- Thanks, Please hold on for some time. Thanks -- it needs an update badly -- I will post update ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290636.m7T6aC5S025082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 --- Comment #6 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-29 02:36:11 EDT --- Thanks to you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ircd-ratbox Short Description: Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd Owners: mmahut Branches: F-9, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290643.m7T6hDlf018291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 02:43:12 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (google-gadgets) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 06:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290645.m7T6jIpu018843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 Devrim GUNDUZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) | --- Comment #27 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-29 02:45:16 EDT --- Here is the new spec and srpm: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.spec http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/pgbouncer-1.2.3-2.f9.src.rpm rpmlint is clean, and I believe I applied all changes you suggested. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290710.m7T7A9EA031473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290709.m7T7990R031058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Comment #7 from Anthony Green 2008-08-29 03:09:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: common-lisp-controller Short Description: Common Lisp source and compiler manager Owners: green Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:13:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290713.m7T7Dboo024199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #13 from srinivas 2008-08-29 03:13:36 EDT --- You can remove the OLPC-2 and OLPC-3 branches. The package does not have anything specific to OLPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290717.m7T7HZps025032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290718.m7T7IjEn025241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290717.m7T7Hb4C025069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:17:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290717.m7T7HGDR032737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290723.m7T7N7nT026442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-29 03:23:06 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290720.m7T7K49S025898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-29 03:20:02 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290740.m7T7emmP029963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-29 03:40:47 EDT --- Sorry, I was busy. Thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290742.m7T7gxHk005106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-29 03:42:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Table Short Description: Organize Data in Tables Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457109] Review-Request: perl-TAP-Harness-JUnit - Generate JUnit compatible output from TAP results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290747.m7T7leik006165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457109 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:46:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460387] Review Request: python-schedutils - bindings for the scheduler settings interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290746.m7T7kkrG006025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460387 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-29 03:46:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792532 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - source file md5 checksum from SRPM is 2e94101218ac254974d836b82a476b64 python-schedutils-0.2.tar.bz2 from upstream is de268b04b767df4214f61c72fac51007 python-schedutils-0.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package python-schedutils-0.2-2.fc10 => Provides: schedutils.so Requires: /usr/bin/python libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1)from review guidelines - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ==> Resubmit SRPM with same tarball inside SRPM and upstream source URL in SPEC. 2) Not mandatory but you can use defattr as %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 07:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459966] Review Request: libgxim - GObject-based XIM protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290754.m7T7s8I6007421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459966 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2008-08-29 03:54:06 EDT --- Package has been built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 08:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290802.m7T82Yp9001893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2008-08-29 04:02:32 EDT --- The following spec is something like what I would expect for this package. http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 08:28:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290828.m7T8Sjbd013885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-29 04:28:44 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792541 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM. python-virtualenv.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtualenv.py 0644 + source files match upstream. 8931b66dbb799120583dd107aab2fa89 virtualenv-1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Upstream_Eggs drop file /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/support-files/setuptools-0.6c8-py2.5.egg from installing by adding line to %files %exclude %{python_sitelib}/support-files 2) remove rpmlint warning using following command in %prep sed -i -e "s|#!/usr/bin/env python||" virtualenv.py 3) you really don't need "ls" in %build. Remove that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 08:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.09-2.el5.src.rpm Description: The Pod::Simple::Wiki module is used for converting Pod text to Wiki text. It currently contains the following output filters: Confluence, Kwiki, Mediawiki, Moinmoin, Template, Tiddlywiki, Twiki and Usemod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 08:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290836.m7T8a3PR007606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-29 04:36:02 EDT --- Built in el5 mock; rpmlint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 08:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290846.m7T8kiRq009484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-29 04:46:43 EDT --- looks like missing BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 08:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290858.m7T8wCdl011348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com Customer Facing| |--- --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-29 04:58:11 EDT --- Lubomir, Please fix BR and this cosmetic issue: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki.src: E: description-line-too-long It currently contains the following output filters: Confluence, Kwiki, Mediawiki, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 09:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290919.m7T9JMZR022749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #38 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-08-29 05:19:20 EDT --- OK, this is now built in the EL-5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 09:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290929.m7T9TuSm024206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-29 05:29:55 EDT --- You both have broken build roots and broken rpmlint! :) SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.09-3.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 09:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290935.m7T9ZGwm025535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-29 05:35:14 EDT --- python-tftpy-0.4.5-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tftpy-0.4.5-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 09:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290949.m7T9nuHK019612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-29 05:49:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792829 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9029379c5106b4d96a53ea1d83b68485 Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful Files=25, Tests=184, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr 0.05 sys + 2.20 cusr 0.22 csys = 2.64 CPU) + Package perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.09-3.fc10 => Provides: perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki) = 0.09 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Confluence) = 0.09 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Kwiki) = 0.08 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Mediawiki) = 0.08 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Moinmoin) = 0.08 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Template) = 0.08 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Tiddlywiki) = 0.08 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Twiki) = 0.08 perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki::Usemod) = 0.08 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Pod::Simple) perl(Pod::Simple::Wiki) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestions:- 1) I think you should remove /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pod/Simple/Wiki/Confluence.pm.escape from installing in %files APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 09:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808290952.m7T9qLAB027739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 05:52:20 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:00:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291000.m7TA0Dw6021225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-29 06:00:12 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792855 koji build pass. The license has been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454015] Review Request: tcl-tile - Modified Tk styling engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291003.m7TA3NCE021505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:06:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291006.m7TA6wBV029927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 --- Comment #39 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-29 06:06:57 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ntop @Richard Thanks Richard May you add yourself as owner of that branch. I will release ownership for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] New: Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 Summary: Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ratbox-services/ratbox-services.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ratbox-services/ratbox-services-1.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792880 Description: ratbox-services is a services package written mostly from scratch for use with ircd-ratbox. It is highly configurable, with nearly all options being set in a config that can be rehashed rather than set at compile time. It also uses the SQLite database backend, which works as a database interface to a normal file, meaning no seperate database software must be running. It builds againts el5 too. rpmlint party that need explanation: non-standard-gid - group ircd needs to operate w/ files unversioned-explicit-provides - do not need versioning strange-permission ratbox-services.conf 0640 - this is ok, it contains a password strange-permission ratbox-services.init 0755 - ok too non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/ratbox-services/* - only ircd group should access these script-without-shebang /usr/share/ratbox-services/schemas/schema-*.txt - not a script non-standard-uid /var/log/ratbox-services ircd - logging is done by service running under ircd non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dbupgrade.pl - sames applies, only for ircd... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:12:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291012.m7TACVHK030703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291012.m7TACUJS030674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://mmahut.fedorapeople. | |org/reviews/ratbox-services | |/ratbox-services.spec Depends on| |460538 Customer Facing| |--- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:18:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459933] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291018.m7TAIZ9j031579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459933 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-29 06:18:33 EDT --- I had similar problem with hosts test in perl packages. I thought that's problem of lazy network. Switch off this one test isn't problem for review, but it should be fixed in upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291022.m7TAM869032414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:27:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291027.m7TARaZW025700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-29 06:27:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456750] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291029.m7TAT8jZ026003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456750 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454395] Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291027.m7TARjBd025738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291028.m7TASgkH025936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455039] Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291028.m7TASAwv025826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291028.m7TASBjZ025856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Bug 455211 depends on bug 455039, which changed state. Bug 455039 Summary: Review Request: php-oauth - PHP Authentication library for desktop to web applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455039 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:27:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291027.m7TARkk2025766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Bug 455211 depends on bug 454395, which changed state. Bug 454395 Summary: Review Request: php-xmpphp - PHP XMPP Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454395 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:30:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291030.m7TAUGoG026537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291049.m7TAnvJi029888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #23 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-29 06:49:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) (In reply to comment #22) > Well, I am not Java expert and know nothing about netbeans, however the jar > file > needed to rebuild OmegaT is available when bug 456341 or bug 456337 gets > passed? > or maybe bug 456273? Neither of the three. I strongly suspects of being needed only by the Neatbeans' build xml scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 10:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291053.m7TArGYn005280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas at apestaart.org --- Comment #13 from Matthias Saou 2008-08-29 06:53:14 EDT --- Note that Elisa seems to be tested primarily on Ubuntu, where the web2 version is a 0.2.x snapshot IIRC. The compatibility of Elisa with twisted 8 is something that seems to be worked on. See : https://bugs.launchpad.net/elisa/+bug/214227 CC'ing Thomas from now on too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 11:04:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291104.m7TB4Ddf032443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-08-29 07:04:13 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg/perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg-0.23-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 11:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291103.m7TB33Wp007090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-29 07:03:01 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The text of the license(s) is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum bti-005.tar.bz2* 65466367d82bae9b470bcf6591bdf37f bti-005.tar.bz2 65466367d82bae9b470bcf6591bdf37f bti-005.tar.bz2.orig [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 11:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291142.m7TBgsS3014458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-29 07:42:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libkate.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libkate-0.1.8-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format Changelog: - Update to 0.1.8 Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=793036 About the previous error; I thought i have disabled make test. I have probably missed to update the src.rpm. Previously the package failed at make test when libkate wasn't already installed. (was : /builddir/build/BUILD/libkate-0.1.7/tools/.libs/lt-kateenc: error while loading shared libraries: liboggkate.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file ) I've just had time to report this problem upstream which this release is aimed to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 11:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291150.m7TBo8J8009267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-08-29 07:50:07 EDT --- So it fails on Rawhide ppc/ppc64 (problem reported upstream) same failure for F-9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=793059 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458080] Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291201.m7TC1mBi018310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291204.m7TC4Z9m018719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Bug 456337 depends on bug 456266, which changed state. Bug 456266 Summary: Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458446] Review Request: perl-HTML-FromText - Convert plain text to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291201.m7TC1ok7018344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458446 Bug 458446 depends on bug 458080, which changed state. Bug 458080 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Find - Find RFC 822 email addresses in plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458080 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456266] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291204.m7TC4YK4018677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456266 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-29 08:04:31 EDT --- Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=792982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:10:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291210.m7TCA0fK013115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Bug 456337 depends on bug 456312, which changed state. Bug 456312 Summary: Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456337] Review Request: NetBeans 6.1 - Integrated Development Environment (IDE) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291207.m7TC7nqu012848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456337 Bug 456337 depends on bug 456273, which changed state. Bug 456273 Summary: Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:09:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456312] Review Request: netbeans-javaparser - NetBeans Java Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291209.m7TC9w5m013073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456312 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-29 08:09:57 EDT --- Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=793056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456273] Review Request: beansbinding - Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291207.m7TC7lhW012807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456273 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-29 08:07:45 EDT --- Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=793007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291209.m7TC9AJ1019757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 --- Comment #31 from David Hollis 2008-08-29 08:09:08 EDT --- Feel free to take ownership on this. It's more important to me that it be packaged and available. If it means less work on my end, I can't complain! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:09:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291209.m7TC9X5w019836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-29 08:09:30 EDT --- REVIEW: +/- rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-pgsql-* erlang-pgsql.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-pgsql.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib erlang-pgsql-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation erlang-pgsql-devel.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ However these messages should be safely ignored. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + File, containing the text of the license, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ svn export -r 691 https://svn.process-one.net/ejabberd-modules/pgsql/trunk erlang-pgsql-0.new A erlang-pgsql-0.new A erlang-pgsql-0.new/Emakefile A erlang-pgsql-0.new/build.bat A erlang-pgsql-0.new/doc A erlang-pgsql-0.new/doc/HOWTO A erlang-pgsql-0.new/doc/short-desc A erlang-pgsql-0.new/INSTALL A erlang-pgsql-0.new/src A erlang-pgsql-0.new/src/pgsql_util.erl A erlang-pgsql-0.new/src/pgsql.erl A erlang-pgsql-0.new/src/pgsql_proto.erl A erlang-pgsql-0.new/src/pgsql_tcp.erl A erlang-pgsql-0.new/EPLICENSE A erlang-pgsql-0.new/build.sh A erlang-pgsql-0.new/ebin Exported revision 691. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ tar xfz erlang-pgsql-0.tar.gz [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ diff -ru erlang-pgsql-0 erlang-pgsql-0.new/ [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. - The package must own all directories that it creates. You should add %dir %{_libdir}/erlang/lib/pgsql-%{version}/{ebin,src} also + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. -/+ Header files are in a -devel package. However they're not a header, actually. Not a blocker, anyway. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Consider adding missing directories to %dir (btw, huge amount of already packaged apps does not list every created directory as %dir, so seems that this is not a critical blocker) and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291254.m7TCs0K1027700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-29 08:53:59 EDT --- You may want to rename this: /usr/bin/dbupgrade.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 12:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291252.m7TCqPpb027396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-29 08:52:24 EDT --- 0.) You may want to rename it I'm not sure if it is usable only with ircd-ratbox, or other ircds. In case it cannot be used with other ircds, name ircd-ratbox-services is much more appropriate. 1.) Do not depend on sendmail Requires: sendmail Replace with /usr/bin/sendmail or MTA or smtpdaemon, depending on ho do you use sendmail. 2.) Explain non-obvious commands sed 's/-Werror//g' -i configure What's this? Comment it. Provides: perl(definetolength.pl) And this? 3.) Fix owners/groups %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ratbox-services At least this is not to be owned by ircd. Change %defattr to use root by default and override in %attr-s. Furthermore, files that contain password should not be world-readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 13:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291301.m7TD1WSa023512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-29 09:01:31 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestion; I'll definitely remove that. Also much thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki Short Description: Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 13:15:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291315.m7TDFV1b032739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 13:27:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291327.m7TDRKbM029278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 --- Comment #4 from Denis Leroy 2008-08-29 09:27:19 EDT --- Some items before the format review: - URL source link is incorrect (s/gupnp/gupnp-av/) - Same mistake in devel package summary - %doc statement not necessary for gtk-doc dir (as with pangomm) - Redundant entries in the %files section. The %dir entries are not strictly necessary, you could simply specify: %{_includedir}/gupnp-av-1.0 %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/gupnp-av this is pretty minor, almost a matter of style or preference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 13:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291344.m7TDiFs6032098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-29 09:44:14 EDT --- Fixed. New spec at same spot, new srpm here http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-av-0.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 14:07:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291407.m7TE7giK004079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-29 10:07:41 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, contain ing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package:75f497e3fda44ff1526c46ac93e5c863bf6e0963 up-imapproxy-1.2.6.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English langua ges, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. Notes ===== The package itself seems fine and functional. However the init script needs a bit of rework, it still returns error code 0 both for normal start and as an error if one tries to do "service imapproxy stop" when the service is already stopped (according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts in this last case return code should be 7 - program is not running ). Hence the blocker bug 247084 should remain open. The other 2 blockers can be closed once this newer version is built. APPROVED but please fix the init script as soon as you can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 14:42:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291442.m7TEgiX8009699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-29 10:42:44 EDT --- Thank you for initial review, (In reply to comment #1) > 0.) You may want to rename it > > I'm not sure if it is usable only with ircd-ratbox, or other ircds. In case it > cannot be used with other ircds, name ircd-ratbox-services is much more > appropriate. Would it make confusion? I'm not very big fun of delaying the original upstream name, if people find on the upstream page the product is called ratbox-services, it should be the same in Fedora (imo). It can be also used with hybrid ircd. > 1.) Do not depend on sendmail > > Requires: sendmail > > Replace with /usr/bin/sendmail or MTA or smtpdaemon, depending on ho do you use > sendmail. Done. > 2.) Explain non-obvious commands > > sed 's/-Werror//g' -i configure We remove usage of -Werror from flags. Once we have all ratbox packages in, I'll inform upstream including patches about it. Comment made in spec file > What's this? Comment it. > > Provides: perl(definetolength.pl) > > And this? Removed. > 3.) Fix owners/groups > > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ratbox-services > > At least this is not to be owned by ircd. Change %defattr to use root by > default and override in %attr-s. You're right, done. > Furthermore, files that contain password should not be world-readable. Done. New SRPM is uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 14:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291448.m7TEmi1O010682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhollis at davehollis.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-29 10:48:41 EDT --- *** Bug 438804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 14:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] New: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description The PEAR::Auth package provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP. Currently it supports the following storage containers to read/write the login data: * All databases supported by the PEAR database layer * All databases supported by the MDB database layer * All databases supported by the MDB2 database layer * Plaintext files * LDAP servers * POP3 servers * IMAP servers * vpopmail accounts * RADIUS * SAMBA password files * SOAP (Using either PEAR SOAP package or PHP5 SOAP extension) * PEAR website * Kerberos V servers * SAP servers SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-pear-Auth.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 14:48:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291448.m7TEmhaW010654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #32 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-29 10:48:41 EDT --- I had no intention to hijack ;-) In case you are sponsored later feel free to take it back if interested. @Christopher It has been long pending. So, I will start a new ticket so that it is open to other folks for review. In case you are interested in REVIEW may you switch to new ticket. #460660 -- Thanks *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 460660 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 14:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291457.m7TEvJoj012393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 --- Comment #4 from Steve Milner 2008-08-29 10:57:19 EDT --- 1. Done 2. Done 3. Done http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv-1.1-3.fc8.src.rpm http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 15:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291503.m7TF37A6013305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-29 11:03:06 EDT --- Thanks for reminding. I will do it ASAP -- I have some more initscripts to fix also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 15:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291515.m7TFFh0R015718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #10 from vivek shah 2008-08-29 11:15:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teseq Short Description: An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable Owners: bonii Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 15:25:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291525.m7TFPbLb022719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-29 11:25:36 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bti Short Description: Bash Twitter Idiocy Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 15:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291526.m7TFQZHQ017802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 11:26:34 EDT --- Well, I don't need myself to be added as InitialCC member. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 15:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291535.m7TFZ8W0018988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #21 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-29 11:35:07 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: google-gadgets Short Description: Google Gadgets for Linux Owners: salimma Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 16:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291626.m7TGQ8qk027740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at linuxnetz.de --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2008-08-29 12:26:07 EDT --- Peter, I'll check that the missing directories are owned before importing. Thanks for your review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: erlang-pgsql Short Description: Erlang PostgreSQL interface Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 16:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291629.m7TGTTcf000735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 12:29:27 EDT --- For 1.6-1: * License - As far as I checked the codes, the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * The place of %description - Similar to bug 460289, please fix the place of %description * %prep stage ------------------------------------------------------ %__unzip src.zip ------------------------------------------------------ - Move this to %prep (to make happy with --short-circuit) ? Symlinking - Similar to bug 460289, would you explain why you want to add version to jar files' names? * Duplicate files - "license.txt" for -javadoc subpackge is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 17:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291700.m7TH08w1005689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com, | |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #2 from Christopher Stone 2008-08-29 13:00:06 EDT --- I think %doc should be: %doc %{pear_name}-%{version}/docdir/%{pear_name}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 17:16:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291716.m7THGZBl003365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-29 13:16:35 EDT --- libhocr-0.10.17-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libhocr-0.10.17-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 17:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291716.m7THGWfY008033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-29 13:16:30 EDT --- libhocr-0.10.17-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libhocr-0.10.17-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 17:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291756.m7THuP2q015101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 13:56:23 EDT --- For 1.2.3-2: * %postun scriptlet - Now Requires(postun) is needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * rpmlint issue --------------------------------------------------- pgbouncer.i386: E: init-script-non-executable /etc/rc.d/init.d/pgbouncer --------------------------------------------------- - /etc/rc.d/init.d/pgbouncer must have 0755 permission. Fix these 2 issues and I guess I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455555] Review Request: libhocr - A Hebrew optical character recognition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291810.m7TIAPLA013352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455555 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-29 14:10:24 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291810.m7TIAoQ9013415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-29 14:10:49 EDT --- Please note, that this library is shipped with iLBC codec, which legal status is questionable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:12:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291812.m7TICxmG018036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-08-29 14:12:58 EDT --- I'll try to review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460690] New: Review Request: echo-artist - Automation tools for echo-icon-theme artists Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: echo-artist - Automation tools for echo-icon-theme artists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460690 Summary: Review Request: echo-artist - Automation tools for echo-icon-theme artists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/echo-artist.spec SRPM URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/echo-artist-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Set of scripts for echo-icon-theme artists useful for setting up and maitaining their local git repository and creating and adding new icon sets to it. Note: I am also upstream for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:32:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456280] Review Request: ini4j - Java API for handling files in Windows .ini format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291832.m7TIWML7021677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456280 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(victor.vasilyev at s | |un.com) | --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-08-29 14:32:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > X rpmlint: > $ rpmlint /notnfs/langel/rpm/RPMS/noarch/ini4j-* > ini4j.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/ini4j > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > Can you explain this? It was explained in the comment #4 above (See the answer for "> You shouldn't own /etc/maven/fragments or /usr/share/maven2/poms; ..."). Note, the spec meets with the example http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2 > X 1.13 Summary and description > Can you take out the line break from the description? Otherwise, ok. - Description is formatted > X 1.15 Documentation > Is there a license file somewhere? I do not see one in the zip. The software is protected by the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004. The text of the license is accessible on a project page - http://www.ini4j.org/license.html The license is also referenced from the text of the legal notices that are placed at the top of each source of the project. Note, such solution is completely meet with conditions of this license (See "APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work." in the license text) > X MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s)in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. > Is there one? The original upstream of the project doesn't include a license file. Therefore, this item - N/A > X SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > Please do this and add it to the docs. - The http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt is added as a separate source, i.e. under tag "Source1:" and it is installed via the %doc script. Additionally it is also changed: - Versionless symbolic link to the jar is added - Redundant user-defined macro for the poms directory is removed Spec URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2046/ini4j.spec SRPM URL: http://nbi.netbeans.org/files/documents/210/2154/ini4j-0.3.2-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:53:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291853.m7TIrmiN020775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-29 14:53:47 EDT --- This package ships locale files. It manages to build on Koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=793776) since gettext was not mentioned as a BuildRequires. When gettext is present the build fails: [...] Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/tangogps-0.9.3-1.fc8-root-rishi error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tangogps.mo Consult https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291855.m7TItoQY025413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-29 14:55:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hi Debarshi, > > Are you planning on reviewing this package? > > Regards, > Peter Please fix these issues and I will do a complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 18:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291855.m7TItLs1021238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #9 from Debarshi Ray 2008-08-29 14:55:20 EDT --- On Fedora 8, which is still supported, libcurl-devel does not exist. So if you want this to be available on Fedora 8, you would need to do something like this: %if 0%{?fc8} BuildRequires: curl-devel %else BuildRequires: libcurl-devel %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 19:45:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808291945.m7TJjHRm001514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #24 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-29 15:45:16 EDT --- Netbeans dependency has been apparently removed with a brand new build.xml scriplet: http://olea.org/tmp/OmegaT.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/OmegaT-1.7.3_03-3olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/OmegaT-1.7.3_03-3olea.noarch.rpm :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 20:03:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459934] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808292003.m7TK3gg7032620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459934 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 21:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808292115.m7TLFShM016737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #2 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-29 17:15:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * License > - As far as I checked the codes, the license tag should > be "LGPLv2+". done > * The place of %description > - Similar to bug 460289, please fix the place of %description ups! > * %prep stage > ------------------------------------------------------ > %__unzip src.zip > ------------------------------------------------------ > - Move this to %prep (to make happy with --short-circuit) done > ? Symlinking > - Similar to bug 460289, would you explain why you want to > add version to jar files' names? I try to mimmic the same practice than binary libraries (*.so). Seens reasonable for me. > * Duplicate files > - "license.txt" for -javadoc subpackge is redundant. done http://olea.org/tmp/htmlparser.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-2olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-2olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-javadoc-1.6-2olea.noarch.rpm (I'm syncing them to the website, if find any trouble try later, please). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 21:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808292129.m7TLTQsh018914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #33 from Michal Nowak 2008-08-29 17:29:24 EDT --- * Fri Aug 29 2008 Michal Nowak 3.0-0.7.rc5 - bump to RC5 http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.7.rc5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 21:32:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808292132.m7TLWZdQ015649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 --- Comment #2 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-29 17:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > For 2.0.6e-1: > > * SourceURL > - Please write how you can download the tarball you use. > ! Well, usually SOURCEx must be given by full URL, however > for this package I cannot find the proper URL (php script perhaps > redirects to somewhere we cannot see...). So please write > how to get the source tarball. I've tried the url too but it's clear there is some magic in the website to not let that. > * The place of %description > - On the current spec file: > --------------------------------------------------------------- > %package javadoc > Summary: Javadocs for %{name} > Group: Documentation > %description javadoc <======= Description begins here !!! ======== OMG! fixed. > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > Requires: jpackage-utils > This package contains the API documentation for %{name}. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > The current place of %description hides Requires. Please > fix this. > > ? Symlinking > - Would you explain why you want to name the created jar file > as %{name}-%{version}.jar and to create a symlink, not just > naming the jar file itself as %{name}.jar? > ref: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming I try to mimmic the same practice than binary libraries (*.so). Seems reasonable for me and I don't see it's agains guidelines. > > ! Duplicate documents > - %doc License....pdf for -javadoc subpackage is redundant (and > usually removing these is recommended) as -javadoc subpackage always > Requires: main package (but please fix %description issue). fixed! http://olea.org/tmp/vldocking.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-2.0.6e-2olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-2.0.6e-2olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/vldocking-javadoc-2.0.6e-2olea.noarch.rpm I'm trying to sync to my website. I'm finding troubles with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 21:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454250] Review Request: tangoGPS - tangoGPS is a lightweight and fast mapping application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808292155.m7TLtZeU019880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454250 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-29 17:55:34 EDT --- There's a new version with the gettext fixes in place. New spec in same location, srpm here http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/tangogps-0.9.3-2.fc9.src.rpm I wasn't planning on supporting Fedora 8 as it will be retired shortly after Fedora 10 is released which isn't far off. If there is demand I may add it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 29 22:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] New: Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 Summary: Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/httperf.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/httperf-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Httperf is a tool for measuring web server performance. It provides a flexible facility for generating various HTTP workloads and for measuring server performance. The focus of httperf is not on implementing one particular benchmark but on providing a robust, high-performance tool that facilitates the construction of both micro- and macro-level benchmarks. The three distinguishing characteristics of httperf are its robustness, which includes the ability to generate and sustain server overload, support for the HTTP/1.1 and SSL protocols, and its extensibility to new workload generators and performance measurements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 02:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459934] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300214.m7U2EPlt026514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459934 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-29 22:14:24 EDT --- * source files match upstream: 85d78d6732102fc917e345308b5b38b190cd4cde662adc0bafb589970d45af8c DateTime-Format-Pg-0.16002.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DateTime::Format::Pg) = 0.16002 perl-DateTime-Format-Pg = 0.16002-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) >= 0.13 perl(DateTime::Duration) perl(DateTime::Format::Builder) >= 0.72 perl(DateTime::TimeZone) >= 0.06 perl(DateTime::TimeZone::Floating) perl(DateTime::TimeZone::UTC) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=17, Tests=124, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.03 sys + 2.04 cusr 0.18 csys = 2.29 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 02:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300213.m7U2DVNf030517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-29 22:13:31 EDT --- perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 02:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460101] Review Request: perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes - Concise attribute rewriting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300215.m7U2F1PN026616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460101 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-29 22:15:00 EDT --- perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-RewriteAttributes-0.03-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 04:15:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300415.m7U4Fmui016418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-08-30 00:15:47 EDT --- A couple of comments: Please use the macro forms consistently; either "rm" or "%{__rm}" but not both. I'd recommend just not using them. What's the 'pwd' for? This appears at the end of the build: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sqlite3-ruby-1.2.2/README.rdoc The ABI dependency is missing: Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 Technically the guidelines say that BuildRequires: ruby is mandatory. I don't really see the point, but I'm not sure if there's some possibility that the dependencies you have already would fail to pull it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 04:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300455.m7U4tT0K023273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-08-30 00:55:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-storm Short Description: An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 05:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300515.m7U5Fp1U030822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #12 from vivek shah 2008-08-30 01:15:50 EDT --- Since this is my first package which I will be adding to cvs I felt adding you to the InitialCC list was required so that you could track the progress of the package. If that is not required do tell me and I will update it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 05:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300558.m7U5wYLC005664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-30 01:58:33 EDT --- Well, adding the reviewer (or sponsor) to InitialCC member is not required. Anyway you can feel free to ask me on this bug (for this review request) or by mailing to me if you have some questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 06:17:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300617.m7U6Hlj5005193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #14 from vivek shah 2008-08-30 02:17:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teseq Short Description: An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable Owners: bonii Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 06:58:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460724] Review Request: vhdl-mode - VHDL Mode in Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300658.m7U6wH4n011748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460724 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: vhdl-mode - |Review Request: vhdl-mode - |VHDL Mode is Emacs |VHDL Mode in Emacs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 06:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460724] New: Review Request: vhdl-mode - VHDL Mode is Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vhdl-mode - VHDL Mode is Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460724 Summary: Review Request: vhdl-mode - VHDL Mode is Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: VHDL Mode is an Emacs major mode for editing VHDL code. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/vhdl-mode.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/vhdl-mode-3.33.26-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 09:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300929.m7U9Tgm2004104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #5 from Aidan Delaney 2008-08-30 05:29:41 EDT --- I should have said "Internationalisation is disabled because otherwise spu-binutils would overwrite the .mo files provided by binutils." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 09:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808300926.m7U9QEAo003910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #4 from Aidan Delaney 2008-08-30 05:26:12 EDT --- This is my first package review. I've read both the maintainers guide and the reviewers guide. Following the reviewer guide verbatim I find the following issues ? rpmlint reports the creation of non-standard /usr/spu directory ? BuildRequires should include gcc ? internationalisation is disabled ? ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} used instead of %{buildroot} I also proffer the opinion that ? ExclusiveArch may be a little restrictive, it /should/ work on x86_64 I think I can argue against some of my strict reading of the reviewers guidelines. A non-standard /usr/spu directory is created as this is what was agreed for Fedora cross compilers. Furthermore, internationalisation is disabled because otherwise spu-binutils would overwrite the .mo files. I believe that BuildRequires must include gcc and I suspect that the ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and ExclusiveArch issues are because of the style employed by the packager, something I'm unqualified to critique. I find the spec file easy to read and have been using binaries built from this spec file on my own systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 10:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460727] New: Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Summary: Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnujump.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnujump-1.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: GNUjump is a clone of the simple yet addictive game Xjump, adding new features like multiplaying, unlimited FPS, smooth floor falling, themable graphics, sounds,replays, etc. The goal in this game is to jump to the next floor trying not to fall down. As you go upper in the Falling Tower the floors will fall faster. Try to survive longer get upper than anyone. It might seem too simple but once you've tried you'll realize how addictive this is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 12:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301254.m7UCsjkS008110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #29 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-30 08:54:44 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/pgbouncer.spec http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/pgbouncer-1.2.3-3.f9.src.rpm Applied the two changes you suggested. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 13:19:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447457] Review Request: gupnp-av - UPnP-AV is a collection of helpers for building AV upnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301319.m7UDJxvH007811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447457 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-30 09:19:58 EDT --- gupnp that this depends on is now built and should hit rawhide tomorrow. Along with the srpm above all should be good to go now. I tested a scratch build in koji just now http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=795141 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 13:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301344.m7UDiQlw011039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2008-08-30 09:44:24 EDT --- Songbird now has a tracking bug in upstream Mozilla BZ to track their xulrunner issues. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 14:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460732] New: Review Request: ocaml-reins - Library of OCaml persistent data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-reins - Library of OCaml persistent data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460732 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-reins - Library of OCaml persistent data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-reins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-reins-0.1-0.1.a.fc10.src.rpm Description: Library of OCaml persistent data structures This is a very simple package -- just a library containing a very big collection of purely functional data structures. rpmlint has this to say about the package: ocaml-reins.src:89: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build export OCAMLFIND_DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/ocaml $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. I can't see a way to build this package without setting OCAMLFIND_DESTDIR in the %build stage. The package seems to stash this somewhere, and just setting it later during %install doesn't work. I don't know what "short circuiting" is and whether it's a problem that we break it. ocaml-reins.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. This is a well-known problem with OCaml packages and can be ignored (for now). RPM are promising to add a feature which will allow us to build this as noarch, but it's not there yet. Files in the main package: /usr/lib/ocaml/reins /usr/lib/ocaml/reins/META /usr/lib/ocaml/reins/reins.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/reins/reins.cmi /usr/share/doc/ocaml-reins-0.1 /usr/share/doc/ocaml-reins-0.1/COPYING /usr/share/doc/ocaml-reins-0.1/LGPL-2.1 Requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 ocaml(Big_int) = 992d682669507b99e689b5a2188c0b9a ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Complex) = bb333e8e4cda78107ccf27048ca40492 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lazy) = 8a4b5e7f0bdc6316df9264fd73cde981 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Map) = dedde7683d54ae7db1eb97cc868dd047 ocaml(Nat) = 0ea20dd1cc4533fd519b5542a89feb87 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printexc) = 82717999a586ede6925c0aa18d6562ac ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Random) = 9936935480b36bcbc716ee513f37876c ocaml(Ratio) = 7067125cce206dd2bbe93918ba7bdfe9 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.2 Provides: ocaml(Reins) = 80e0049b95f5867ce642993dddbe7e76 ocaml-reins = 0.1-0.1.a.fc10 ocaml-reins(x86-32) = 0.1-0.1.a.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 16:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301633.m7UGXdce005862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-30 12:33:38 EDT --- For -2 (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > For 2.0.6e-1: > > > > * SourceURL > > - Please write how you can download the tarball you use. > I've tried the url too but it's clear there is some magic in the website to not > let that. - Well, my comment was unclear. What I meant is that you should write as comments how we can download the tarball. So * The URL tag can be http://www.vlsolutions.com/en/download/ * And please write as a comment that the tarball you are using can be downloaded from the redirect from http://www.vlsolutions.com/en/download/downloader2_0.php One cosmetic issue: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) - You are using both tabs and spaces for indentation. Please choose one and not using both (for cosmetic issue) Please fix the issues above when importing to Fedora CVS. Well, * This package itself is okay * Usually a new contributor who needs to get sponsored has to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored One of the way to show this is to submit another review request with enough quality. For your case I already know your other works which I can admit is enough for sponsoring process. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (vldocking) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 16:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301645.m7UGjgPO012021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-30 12:45:41 EDT --- Well, * I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this software can be licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration? * I forgot to say in my previous comment, howver for "unzip" command would you use "unzip -qq foo.zip" to suppress output? (for tar archive, rpmbuild uses "tar xf" and does not show the file list in the archive by default). * Also I forgot to say in my previous comment, however for cosmetic issue please unify macro usage like %{__unzip} (not %__unzip) if you use %{_javadir} (not %_javadir) and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 16:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301656.m7UGu0pE013714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ivtv - |Review Request: ivtv-utils |userspace tools for |- userspace tools for |iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 |iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 |driven devices |driven devices --- Comment #42 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-30 12:55:56 EDT --- Dropping epochs is sexy! :) http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-utils.spec http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-utils-1.2.0-6.src.rpm This is what will be committed for F-8/F-9, F10 is similar, e.g. dropping a fix and upping the Version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 17:23:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301723.m7UHN6lU014690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-30 13:23:04 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pgbouncer) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 17:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301741.m7UHfGkA021590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #31 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-30 13:41:16 EDT --- BTW, I just added >= 1.3b to libevent-devel dependency -- this version explicitly asks for that (which is available in F-8 + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 17:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301743.m7UHhwnC018290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #32 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-30 13:43:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pgbouncer Short Description: Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL Owners: devrim Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 18:13:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454120] Review Request: vdr-streamdev - Streaming client/server package for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301813.m7UIDwmT023566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454120 --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2008-08-30 14:13:57 EDT --- I've incorporated the suggestions. See: Spec URL: http://felix.fetzig.org/rpms/review/vdr-streamdev.spec SRPM URL: http://felix.fetzig.org/rpms/review/vdr-streamdev-0.3.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 18:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808301853.m7UIr9k5028986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226813 Daniel Qarras changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dqarras at yahoo.com --- Comment #12 from Daniel Qarras 2008-08-30 14:53:07 EDT --- I still see the offending "tetris" function with latest zsh available for F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 20:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302047.m7UKlIZE012069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 16:47:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 20:46:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302046.m7UKkFJN011983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 16:46:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 20:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302049.m7UKn6OR015383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 16:49:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 20:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302054.m7UKsUQb016091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 16:54:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 20:51:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302051.m7UKpdsd015970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 16:51:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 20:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302058.m7UKwbqN016685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 16:58:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 21:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302100.m7UL0QwP017293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 17:00:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 21:02:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302102.m7UL2xMl014166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 17:02:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 21:04:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458624] Review Request: teseq - An utility for rendering terminal typescripts human readable In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302104.m7UL4R7E014233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458624 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 17:04:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 21:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458655] Review Request: perl-Text-Table - Organize Data in Tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302106.m7UL65JZ014790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458655 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 17:06:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 21:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302107.m7UL7aCR014896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-30 17:07:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 23:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302323.m7UNNiqq006738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-30 19:23:42 EDT --- What's the reasoning behind using %attr(2775, root, apache) %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name}/images and not %attr(755, apache, root) %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name}/images ? This will allow apache to write in the images directory (as required by the cgi) and avoid using any suid. Look for a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 23:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302348.m7UNmBg8010993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-30 19:48:11 EDT --- bti-005-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-005-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 23:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460615] Review Request: bti - Bash Twitter Idiocy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302349.m7UNnCNN011093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460615 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-30 19:49:11 EDT --- bti-005-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-005-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 30 23:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808302354.m7UNsVqC009148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-30 19:54:29 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM:E: unknown-key GPG#7666df64 --> ignoreable binary RPM: smokeping.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/smokeping/images apache -> needed, the cgi provided by smokeping must be able to create apache readable images smokeping.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/smokeping/images 02775 --> needed, in order to have the provided CGI create images, but avoidable by changing the owner/group settings smokeping.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/smokeping/smokeping_secrets 0640 --> needed, the file contains passwords [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [!] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. --> see issue 1 [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: see issue 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 055d65c7e3c49cd0d6e8f96242131fe69dc3110e /tmp/smokeping-2.4.2.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [!] Permissions on files are set properly. --> see issue 2 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: all archs suported by koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: all archs suported by koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Smokeping itself is GPLv2+ but it relies and includes several modules which either have no license specified (/usr/share/smokeping/lib/Smokeping/probes/FPing.pm, /usr/share/smokeping/lib/Smokeping/probes/EchoPingSmtp.pm and many many others) or claim to be under the artistic license (/usr/share/smokeping/lib/BER.pm, /usr/share/smokeping/lib/SNMP_Session.pm, /usr/share/smokeping/lib/SNMP_util.pm). Unfortunately, despite the fact the sources claim that the ""Artistic License" is included, the tar file does not really included it. AFAIK the original Artistic license is not acceptable in Fedora, so I must ask you to verify that all the included modules do have an acceptable license. 2. The permissions/ownership as proposed are functional and acceptable, but I see no reason to use 2775 for the folder where smokeping writes the images. I think that using apache.root as owner/group and 755 as modes will work just fine. Please correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 00:16:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310016.m7V0G1ZE013049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #11 from Yanko Kaneti 2008-08-30 20:16:00 EDT --- The original tarball includes a private copy/version of files from at least perl-CGI-Session, perl-SNMP_Session, perl-JSON. And it seems the rpm produced with this spec does too. This should not be allowed without a really good reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 00:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310020.m7V0KlPV013869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 --- Comment #5 from Steve Milner 2008-08-30 20:20:46 EDT --- Updated for upstream release. http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/python-virtualenv.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 01:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310140.m7V1eggr029751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-30 21:40:41 EDT --- google-gadgets-0.10.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-gadgets-0.10.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 01:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310150.m7V1oGaQ031398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-30 21:50:15 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 03:11:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310311.m7V3BCj8012495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-30 23:11:10 EDT --- Good catch, Yanko! I've re-analyzed the perl modules that are included and the following ones are private copies of CPAN modules and should no be included: - CGI::Session - Digest:HMAC,Digest:HMAC_MD5, Digest::HMAC_SHA1 - JSON + submodules (note that the latest version available in CPAN is 2.12, while smokeping includes 1.14; according to it's documentation, 2.12 includes incompatibilities towards the older version) - qooxdoo is included in the binary rpm, but qooxdoo/README.txt from the source files claims it is only needed for development, not for runtime SNMP_Session and SNMP_Util seem to be own implementations, not the CPAN versions. I could not find their author, Simon Leinen, in http://search.cpan.org/search?m=author&q=+Simon+Leinen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 04:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310440.m7V4ehF1027252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-31 00:40:42 EDT --- python-storm-0.13-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-storm-0.13-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 04:39:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430429] Review Request: python-storm - An object-relational mapper (ORM) for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310439.m7V4dt8E026752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430429 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-31 00:39:54 EDT --- python-storm-0.13-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-storm-0.13-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 05:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310548.m7V5mBdn002709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 01:48:10 EDT --- @Till ping Waiting impatiently ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 06:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310636.m7V6aQC7008595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 02:36:24 EDT --- Thanks, %changelog * Fri Aug 29 2008 Rakesh Pandit 1.6.1-7 - fixed %%doc (Christopher Stone) SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-pear-Auth.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 07:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310747.m7V7l9ig021727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 --- Comment #21 from Axel Thimm 2008-08-31 03:47:08 EDT --- I think the choice to make minilzo a shared lib is probably not really what the authors of lzo or the consumer software intended. The idea was to have a one file statically swallowed in build procedures w/o any further ties to the lzo project. Now if the API/ABI of minilzo changes the other software is dependent on being patched up to work with it. Just looking at how this issue is holding up a useful package for 6 months (!) and the amount of patching one needs to remove the internal minilzo. I hardly think that upstream will accept any of this patching (did anyone try to send them upstream). Next updates of libvncserver/x11vnc will probably need to adjust/extend the minilzo patching again. And all that for blindly adhering to guidelines? I'm sure if presented to the FPC they would probably ack the use of minilzo as is. Fedora is currently even more upstream closer than 6 months before, so chances are that upstream proximity will win over other guidelines. And yes, I did have a check on how to remove minilzo in x11vnc and just see the work involved. Trivial OTOH, but not a small workload to maintain on the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 08:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310847.m7V8l35O030301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-08-31 04:47:02 EDT --- koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=796292 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 09:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808310922.m7V9MVgP006270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2008-08-31 05:22:30 EDT --- > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel.spec Don't use %configure but ./configure with proper arguments, because this configure script is a custom one. > %lang(de) %{_datadir}/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}.mo > %lang(nl) %{_datadir}/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}.mo The proper way to include these files is the %find_lang macro: %find_lang %{name} somewhere at end of %install plus a change in the %files section, %files -f %{name}.lang and then don't include the .mo files manually. > %{_mandir}/man1/axel.1.gz Currently, it really is automatic .gz compression. Better use a wildcard, so the package keeps building whenever the underlying compression method changes: %{_mandir}/man1/axel.1* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:11:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311011.m7VABYPL010929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-31 06:11:33 EDT --- Thanks; Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:13:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460629] Review Request: perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki - Utility and perl classes for converting POD to Wiki text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311013.m7VADEia013745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460629 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460690] Review Request: echo-artist - Automation tools for echo-icon-theme artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311020.m7VAKTBb015000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460690 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luya at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |luya at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:21:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460690] Review Request: echo-artist - Automation tools for echo-icon-theme artists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311021.m7VALjPP012422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460690 --- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2008-08-31 06:21:44 EDT --- Taking over that package for review that will come soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:27:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311027.m7VARvht013243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea 2008-08-31 06:27:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Well, > * I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this software > can be > licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration? Yes, it's in their website: http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/license.html I've just investigated into the sources of the 2.0 snapshot and it includes only the CPL. Seems they have changed for the new version. I'll remove the reference of CPL on 1.6. > > * I forgot to say in my previous comment, howver for "unzip" command would you > use > "unzip -qq foo.zip" to suppress output? (for tar archive, rpmbuild uses "tar > xf" and > does not show the file list in the archive by default). > > * Also I forgot to say in my previous comment, however for cosmetic issue > please unify macro usage like %{__unzip} (not %__unzip) if you use > %{_javadir} (not %_javadir) and so on. done http://olea.org/tmp/htmlparser.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-3olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-3olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-javadoc-1.6-3olea.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:36:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311036.m7VAa1f3017362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-31 06:36:00 EDT --- erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:35:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311035.m7VAZt16017318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-31 06:35:54 EDT --- erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 10:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311035.m7VAZ9Yp014404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-1.20080825svn Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck 2008-08-31 06:35:08 EDT --- Thanks for CVS. Peter, I can't see any missing/orphaned directories, even after installing the package and looking twice. Package: erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc8 Tag: dist-f8-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc9 Tag: dist-f9-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: erlang-pgsql-0-1.20080825svn.fc10 Tag: dist-f10 Status: complete 81 (erlang-pgsql): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 11:18:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311118.m7VBIewN022055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-31 07:18:39 EDT --- erlang-pgsql-0-2.20080825svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-pgsql-0-2.20080825svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 11:18:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455187] Review Request: erlang-pgsql - Erlang PostgreSQL interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311118.m7VBIDWQ024750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-08-31 07:18:13 EDT --- erlang-pgsql-0-2.20080825svn.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-pgsql-0-2.20080825svn.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 11:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311123.m7VBNSX8025800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 07:23:27 EDT --- My patch for license block has been applied upstream: http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/source/detail?r=6 http://code.google.com/p/txt2rss/source/browse/trunk/txt2rss Updated SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/txt2rss.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/txt2rss-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 11:25:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311125.m7VBPYWV023578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-31 07:25:32 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 13:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311357.m7VDvCKg018572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-31 09:57:11 EDT --- All errors are eliminated, 6 warnings remain. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/genome.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/genome-1.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 13:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311356.m7VDusYv018521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 09:56:53 EDT --- SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/up-imapproxy-1.2.6-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/up-imapproxy.spec Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 14:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460583] Review Request: up-imapproxy - University of Pittsburgh IMAP Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311413.m7VEDVh2024571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460583 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 10:13:30 EDT --- Build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 15:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311505.m7VF50bT030310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-31 11:04:59 EDT --- I could not find -3?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 15:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311533.m7VFXJF9003039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-08-31 11:33:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Well, > > * I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this software > > can be > > licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration? > > Yes, it's in their website: http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/license.html > > I've just investigated into the sources of the 2.0 snapshot and it includes > only the CPL. Seems they have changed for the new version. > > I'll remove the reference of CPL on 1.6. Well, this will cause problem as OmegaT is licensed under GPLv2+ while CPL is incompatible with GPL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Currently htmlparser 1.6 is licensed under GPLv2+ so there is no problem, however for OmegaT you cannot use svn snapshot of htmlparser. Would you ask the upstream to change the license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 15:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460538] Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311539.m7VFd8og006894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-31 11:39:07 EDT --- Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 15:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458457] Review Request: grc - GUI for GNURadio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311538.m7VFctA9006839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458457 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Marek Mahut 2008-08-31 11:38:54 EDT --- Thank you both! Built and waiting in bodhi! \o/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 15:39:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 11:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311539.m7VFd9KA006923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 Bug 460632 depends on bug 460538, which changed state. Bug 460538 Summary: Review Request: ircd-ratbox - Ircd-ratbox is an advanced, stable and fast ircd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460538 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 16:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311647.m7VGlQFb018853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #1 from Florent le Coz 2008-08-31 12:47:25 EDT --- bump, nobody for a review ? ... note that python-tag problem is not a problem anymore for version 0.94 is now included in fedora repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 16:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460632] Review Request: ratbox-services - Service package for ircd-ratbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311657.m7VGvFmQ020241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460632 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-08-31 12:57:14 EDT --- Seems well, marek; Thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 18:25:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311825.m7VIPeUR000301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 Devrim GUNDUZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #34 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-08-31 14:25:38 EDT --- Thanks. Pushed package to repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 18:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460724] Review Request: vhdl-mode - VHDL Mode in Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311829.m7VIToBK000534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460724 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 14:29:49 EDT --- It is already available. Wishlist had a wrong entry and without investigating I packaged it. :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 18:41:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311841.m7VIfsnP002454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-08-31 14:41:53 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here... OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: d8ec5246602b8933839fa8ec0d37df05 fmit-0.97.7.tar.bz2 d8ec5246602b8933839fa8ec0d37df05 fmit-0.97.7.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. See below - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The files here are all LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ (they all have the 'or later' clause). So, the entire package as a whole would be 'GPLv2+' I think. Do you agree? 2. You need a rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the top of your %install section. 3. Any reason you are shipping your own desktop file instead of using the one provided by upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 18:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311853.m7VIrpNx000417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-31 14:53:49 EDT --- http://code.google.com/p/google-coredumper/source/detail?r=31 <-- Fixed upstream I have applied the same upstream patch to package(removing old patch). As soon as next version is released patch will be removed. Build successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=797003 SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/coredumper.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/coredumper-1.2.1-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 19:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460779] New: Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Summary: Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/nekovm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/nekovm-1.7.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine (This isn't really an OCaml package .. It's pure C, but used by another OCaml package called haXe which is coming along in a minute). rpmlint says: nekovm.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libneko.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 19:10:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460780] New: Review Request: haxe - Web programming language targeting Flash, Javascript, PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: haxe - Web programming language targeting Flash, Javascript, PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460780 Summary: Review Request: haxe - Web programming language targeting Flash, Javascript, PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/haxe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/haxe-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Web programming language targeting Flash, Javascript, PHP rpmlint says: haxe.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/haxe haxe.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/haxe Yes indeed, we cannot strip the binaries because strip damages them. The upstream "build system" (I use the term advisedly) is crazy. It consists of a lengthy script which downloads the sources from several CVS repositories and then issues a series of commands to compile it. So this spec file has to build by hand (mostly copied from what Debian is doing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 19:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808311928.m7VJSW3Y005479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-08-31 15:28:31 EDT --- Ankur Shrivastava, do you make any decision accordingly this package? Do you want continue working on this package? Or do you want co-maintain it? (In reply to comment #10) > Don't use %configure but ./configure with proper arguments, > because this configure script is a custom one. Custom? Koji build successfully on any architectures, so, this macros expanded. What is a reason why I should provide manually all this parameters like PREFIX and others standard? > The proper way to include these files is the %find_lang macro: Yes. I'm known it now. Well, let them be so. > > > %{_mandir}/man1/axel.1.gz > > Currently, it really is automatic .gz compression. Better use a > wildcard, so the package keeps building whenever the underlying > compression method changes: Ok. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 21:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808312117.m7VLHQLx022199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2008-08-31 17:17:25 EDT --- > ./configure See comment 1. One can argue that non-fatal errors like that are acceptable, but they can be avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 22:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448337] Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808312226.m7VMQC0e001448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 Pavel Shevchuk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(stlwrt at gmail.com) | --- Comment #12 from Pavel Shevchuk 2008-08-31 18:26:10 EDT --- Sorry for huge delay =( * Sat Aug 30 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.16.999.043-3 - One more directory ownership fix - Backported enlightenment.pc.in from trunk - Strip unneeded config.h include from e.h Spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/9/i386/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3/enlightenment.spec SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/9/i386/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3.fc9.src.rpm YUM repository for f9, i386 and x86_64: [scwlab-f-e17] name=Stalwart Fedora - E17 baseurl=http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/$releasever/$basearch gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 ------- I hacked up patch for config.h just to realize that config.h isn't actually needed to build stuff that depends on e17. =( So i just strip config.h out of e.h now. I'm not sure deriving from upstream enlightenment-config is really needed, so i didn't in -3. If you insist, i could do -4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 31 23:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200808312346.m7VNkrJK014935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant 2008-08-31 19:46:52 EDT --- The qooxdoo/README.txt seems to be misleading. SmokeTrace contains the following lines: use Qooxdoo::JSONRPC; Qooxdoo::JSONRPC::handle_request ($cgi, $session); So it seems that /usr/share/smokeping/lib/Qooxdoo /usr/share/smokeping/lib/Qooxdoo/JSONRPC.pm /usr/share/smokeping/lib/Qooxdoo/Services /usr/share/smokeping/lib/Qooxdoo/Services/Tr.pm should be made available, but I think that is should exist as a separate package. Fortunately it is licensed as LGPL so it is compatible with the GPLv2+ of smokeping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.