[Bug 459387] Review Request: libtool2 - The GNU Portable Library Tool v2

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459387


Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mclasen at redhat.com




--- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com>  2008-08-20 18:05:48 EDT ---
#patch1 -p1 
#patch2 -p1

#make check VERBOSE=yes > make_check.log 2>&1 || (cat make_check.log && false)

I'd reduce this commented-out boilerplate


# dumb redhat-rpm-config replaces config.{sub,guess} with ancient ones in
%%configure, use ./configure instead:

It would seem more prudent to file a bug against redhat-rpm-config, instead of
adding a comment like that.


%{_libdir}/libltdl.a
%{_libdir}/libltdl.la

libtool archives should not be packaged at all (though that has a certain irony
in this particular review...), static libraries need to be shipped in a -static
subpackage if there is a reason to package them.


I still have doubts that going for parallel installation is really the best
move. Other distros manage to build the entire universe with libtool 2, no ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.