From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100wHO020997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100NZL020882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100MFi020853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:00:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010000.mB100vVo020967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010005.mB105pK4021775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/pac | |kage/X11-xft --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-30 19:05:50 EDT --- Yaakov, do you still have a copy of your .spec file? (Above links are broken.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:10:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473835] New: Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Summary: Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/autoarchive.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/autoarchive-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://autoarchive.sourceforge.net/ Description: AutoArchive is a simple utility for making backups more easily. It uses tar for creating archives. The idea of the program is that every information needed for making a backup is in one file - the archive spec file. Path to this file is passed as a parameter to 'aa' command which reads informations from it and creates desired backup. Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=964944 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint auto* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint auto* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:37:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473822] Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010037.mB10baTG020353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473822 --- Comment #3 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-11-30 19:37:35 EDT --- You might want to review the following links to learn more about the "Fedora Process." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:51:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010051.mB10pdBq022535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Robert 'Bob' Jensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sharms at ubuntu.com --- Comment #11 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-11-30 19:51:36 EDT --- *** Bug 473822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 00:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473822] Review Request: terminator - easily allows multiple terminals in 1 window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010051.mB10pbvF022470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473822 Robert 'Bob' Jensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-11-30 19:51:36 EDT --- Please work with the people involved in Bug 462173 to get this package through review and in to Fedora. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 462173 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 01:17:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472673] Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010117.mB11HddU032014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |promac at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-11-30 20:17:38 EDT --- This is a duplicate of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 01:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010156.mB11uSHO031862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #12 from Steven Harms 2008-11-30 20:56:26 EDT --- I have created an update specfile which builds on FC10. Please review this as I believe it is the most correct, it is based off of the spec file distributed with upstream, and I have submitted it in their bug tracker also. http://www.sharms.org/files/terminator.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 03:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010357.mB13vtf8023466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-30 22:57:54 EDT --- OK, I worked-around the issue. I sed'ed the contents of the ghost list and replaced each non-alphanumeric character in the filenames with ?. Here are the new files: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-5.fc10.src.rpm The package builds and runs as desired. But I'm open to suggestions for the improvement of the code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 04:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472673] Review Request: pyglet - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010408.mB1483xs025254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472673 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-11-30 23:08:02 EDT --- As is explained on the link of the previous comment, pyglet depends heavily on a patent encumbered algorithm and hence cannot be included in Fedora. Submitting to rpmfusion. Closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 05:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 00:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010514.mB15Eu97029574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-01 00:14:54 EDT --- Pretty simple, really; a reviewer needs to do a proper review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 07:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 02:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010700.mB170I0c024955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #23 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-01 02:00:17 EDT --- Ok the rendering issue is fixed in F10, so it looks like soon as commons-cli is updated I will be able to roll out a srpm that has the .desktop javadocs and wrappers done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 06:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 01:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010657.mB16vKtI024318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Bug 472848 depends on bug 473734, which changed state. Bug 473734 Summary: openjdk renders incorrectly for jeuclid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473734 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 07:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 02:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010701.mB171w8J019418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #5 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-01 02:01:57 EDT --- I have emailed upstream and am waiting for a response. Fixed those couple of issues, all I need to do is write the wrapper script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 08:35:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 03:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010835.mB18Z3is007361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state. Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 08:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 03:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010842.mB18g0XY002280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-01 03:41:59 EDT --- It appears that rpm in F-10+ is "finding" more provides/requires than any previous version of rpm. I've filed bug 473874 to address this; if it isn't resolved quickly I'll update the spec to filter these errant deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 10:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011014.mB1AEMbu025041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 --- Comment #11 from Philipp Baum 2008-12-01 05:13:44 EDT --- Fixed. Thanks http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy.spec http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy-1.0.51-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 10:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011029.mB1ATZ5u022089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-01 05:29:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I have emailed upstream and am waiting for a response. You don't have to wait too long. Lack of licence file is not a blocker, especially if the sources contain licence headers. > Fixed those couple of > issues, all I need to do is write the wrapper script. Great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 10:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011056.mB1AuWEm027651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com Bug 438609 depends on bug 457207, which changed state. Bug 457207 Summary: Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Valent Turkovic 2008-12-01 05:56:30 EDT --- any update? will there be a new elisa for F9 and F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 11:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 06:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469548] Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011152.mB1BqNnh012929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469548 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-01 06:52:22 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will fix the open issues in the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 11:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 06:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011154.mB1Bs5g3006800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-01 06:54:04 EDT --- I'm working on this but it will take some more days because I'm not able to fix the .desktop file at the moment. Anyway, thanks for your inputs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 12:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 07:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011201.mB1C1Nqr008507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-01 07:01:22 EDT --- Unfortunately there is no progress with the review of libgarmin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 12:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 07:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011225.mB1CPJwo019900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-01 07:25:18 EDT --- '--vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 12:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 07:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011240.mB1CeiqY016409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-01 07:40:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gpicview New Branches: EL-5 Owners: pertusus Marc agreed by mail that I could be the EL-5 maintainer. He should be able to confirm here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 12:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 07:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011259.mB1Cxenw026864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 --- Comment #9 from Marc Wiriadisastra 2008-12-01 07:59:39 EDT --- I have agreed for Patrice to be the EL-5 maintainer I'm in the process of adding him in pkgdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011307.mB1D7nf7029517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-01 08:07:48 EDT --- So, package should now owns kopete_cryptography directory, uses %{buildroot} macro consistently and builds with VERBOSE=1. Last thing is rpmlint output, see my previous comment, I hope Kevin can approve this output. Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kopete-cryptography/kopete-cryptography.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kopete-cryptography/kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011323.mB1DNsAk001034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dodji at redhat.com) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-01 08:23:52 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011329.mB1DTaB5027534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-01 08:29:35 EDT --- IIRC, chmod -x on doc files is enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:36:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011336.mB1Da1oU004450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #13 from Sven Lankes 2008-12-01 08:35:59 EDT --- @Max - please state if you're still interested in packaging terminator. It seems that there is quite a bit of interest in the package and it would be a shame to not have it in fedora soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011338.mB1DcCmX004767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-01 08:38:10 EDT --- Unfortunately the build logs show one big problem: your spec does not enforce usage of Fedora's mandatory compiler flags, but uses make target CFLAGS='-O2 -ffast-math `pkg-config --static --cflags "gtk+-2.0 >= 2.7.2 cairo >= 1.0.0 freetype2"` ' instead. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags for details -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:43:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011343.mB1DhrKo030634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #15 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-01 08:43:52 EDT --- One can use koji scratch builds. As a sidenote, I fail to understand why do you keep trying to workaround instead of simply fixing the Makefile. And.. what's with that "DNDEBUG" flag ? What's wrong with Fedora's defaults ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:51:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011351.mB1Dp9g4007369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-01 08:51:08 EDT --- I would suggest that you first check with Fedora Legal ( https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list ) about the license. This will avoid that a reviewer will invest time and then Legal drop the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473926] New: Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Summary: Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/mod_limitipconn/mod_limitipconn.spec SRPM URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/mod_limitipconn/mod_limitipconn-0.23-1.src.rpm Description: Apache module which allows web server administrators to limit the number of simultaneous downloads permitted from a single IP address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011359.mB1DxDnj009060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 Bug 469969 depends on bug 469972, which changed state. Bug 469972 Summary: Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 13:59:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:59:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011359.mB1DxCCH009032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #11 from Ville Skytt? 2008-12-01 08:59:11 EDT --- Looks like there's still some work here to do, reopening: What's the rationale for the empty main package? Shouldn't the *.so be included in it instead of -devel? The ldconfig calls are useless in the now empty main package. I suppose they'd be useless even if the *.so would be in the main one because there's no soname in the *.so. Specfile should be named libglfw.spec, not glfw.spec. Empty debuginfo package and unstripped objects remain unfixed. Fix for both would probably be a matter of installing the *.so with 755 permissions instead of 644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 14:02:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011402.mB1E286h001955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #13 from Tim Niemueller 2008-12-01 09:02:06 EDT --- - Patch applies now cleanly, though I don't see the reasoning behind this fuzz stuff. Now I have to create the patch between two patched versions (as I want to keep the patches separate)... - Added another patch which removes the calls to exit() and replaces them with an exception which is more sane. New version at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni-3.9.2-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 14:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011411.mB1EBONq012452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #16 from Avi Alkalay 2008-12-01 09:11:22 EDT --- Workaround is less intrusive, simpler, more readable, less patches, and provides exactly the same results. DNDEBUG is needed by the source. It fails to compile if removed (a needed function declaration is enclosed inside an #ifdef). I tried without it at the first time but had to put it back. Who can use koji? Is it mandatory for the acceptance of this package to have it built on ia32 AND x86_64? Which other platforms are mandatory ? I think a x86_64 user can also use the ia32 binary package. Please provide advice on what else can I do to have this simple package accepted ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 14:12:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011412.mB1ECmEJ004464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-01 09:12:47 EDT --- - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: NO Distribution configure flags --sysconfdir and --libdir are overriden. It doesn't look right for me. What is the reason? Why you can't put configuration file directly into /etc? Libdir flag is unusable at all, package contains no libraries. -------------------------- - package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): NO Source is distributed with config.{guess,sub} as symlinks. It is pretty bad because rawhide has new libtool and those symlinks are no longer valid. I recommend to add config.{guess,sub} to package and use it and run "autoreconf -fiv" before build to get ltmain.sh fixed -------------------------- - rpmlint is silent: NO $ rpmlint autotrust-0.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm autotrust.src: W: strange-permission autotrust.cron 0755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I recommend to use 644 and then install autotrust.cron with 755 perms. -------------------------- - final provides and requires look sane: NO I think package should Requires: anacron -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 14:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225912] Merge Review: irda-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011418.mB1EIBe3013797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225912 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-01 09:18:10 EDT --- - Source0 should come from upstream Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - '/usr/sbin/' and '/usr/bin/' should be replaced with macros. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 14:54:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011454.mB1EsMI3020897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #46 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-01 09:54:18 EDT --- Was someone going to actually build this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011501.mB1F1s8G022711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2008-12-01 10:01:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325238) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325238) Simplify specfile Here's a patch that simplifies the specfile somewhat, works for me on F-9. I don't think it's necessary to change anything else but [ and \ to ?. Regarding the default dependencies: I can see the point for gzipped tarballs and friends, the nested logic would indeed be ugly and possibly fragile. But I'd still trim at least gzip and bzip2 from the list (ditto maybe cpio; I suppose deco has no support for compressed cpio files) - the logic for handling those is already there in for example 7zip and lzma cases as long as we can assume tar is around. But I won't consider this a blocker if you don't agree. But if you decide to keep the defaults, I suppose there's no need to do the symlinking for the defaults - their dirs could be simply directly installed to /var/lib/deco instead, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011538.mB1FcWMp030288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:46:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011546.mB1FkT2d023482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-12-01 10:46:28 EDT --- Follow up to the request. It's been over a week without any response to my review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:50:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:50:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011550.mB1Foxwc000973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-01 10:50:57 EDT --- For -3: * License - Please include the reply from the upstream as %doc to show that this package is surely licensed under LGPLv2+. * build error - dist-f11 (rawhide) now uses libtool 2.2.6 and without ----------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p1 -b .test-shared %patch1 -p1 -b .fix-Judy1-mans %if 0%{?fedora} >= 11 libtoolize --force %endif autoreconf ------------------------------------------------------ build fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=966046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225912] Merge Review: irda-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011556.mB1FuxlD025624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225912 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Karsten Hopp 2008-12-01 10:56:58 EDT --- fixed in irda-utils-0.9.18-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:10:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011610.mB1GA6WS005174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2008-12-01 11:10:04 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pear-Net-DIME New Branches: EL-5 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:11:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011611.mB1GB4YR028878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011608.mB1G8dun028137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-01 11:08:38 EDT --- Use: License: MIT I've added this as another MIT variant here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#WordNet_Variant Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011612.mB1GCvgC029558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2008-12-01 11:12:57 EDT --- Fix typo in previous request : Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Net-DIME New Branches: EL-5 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011612.mB1GCA95029090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2008-12-01 11:12:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-SOAP New Branches: EL-5 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:22:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011622.mB1GM5lW007740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #3 from steve 2008-12-01 11:22:04 EDT --- > I've added this as another MIT variant here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#WordNet_Variant Thanks Tom ! I've changed the License string, rebuilt the package and uploaded it to the location mentioned in the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011625.mB1GPw9K008552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-01 11:25:57 EDT --- Well, - Now the directory %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ is not owned by any packages, which must be owned by log4cxx package. ! By the way, instead of moving files to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}, the following method is simpler. ------------------------------------------------------------------ %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/html . %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/liblog4cxx.so.10.0.0 %{_libdir}/liblog4cxx.so.10 %doc NOTICE %doc LICENSE %doc KEYS .... %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) .... .... %doc html/ ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011624.mB1GO5iG032192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-01 11:24:04 EDT --- The package naming is not illegal, it is not infringing on any relevant trademarks that I can find in the USTO. However, I can see how it would be misleading, and would suggest that the package be renamed to "tinycc". There should be no need to rename the libraries or executable. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:27:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011627.mB1GRgdd008876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-01 11:27:41 EDT --- Yep. This should be GPLv2+. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:32:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011632.mB1GWlBl010042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-01 11:32:46 EDT --- Either find the gsm source tree that contains both the COPYRIGHT file and that version of the header or replace it with a header that we know the licensing for (either via the COPYRIGHT file in the gsm package or in the file itself). Until one of those occurs, I'm leaving FE-Legal in place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011645.mB1GjkAq013037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #14 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-12-01 11:45:45 EDT --- Sven, I talked to Max at about 1600 UTC today, He has been very busy and would not object to someone picking this up to get the task finished. Would you be willing to keep reviewing the package if someone else takes over the maintainer role? Looks like Ian is the next in line to take over the package if he is still interested. I have pinged Ian about it. Robert 'Bob' Jensen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011646.mB1GkoTO005382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Robert 'Bob' Jensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 16:57:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011657.mB1GvnEo015628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Chris St. Pierre changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #6 from Chris St. Pierre 2008-12-01 11:57:48 EDT --- Ready for review. New SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fedora-ds-graph/fedora-ds-graph-1.1.0-1.src.rpm?use_mirror= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 17:03:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] New: Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Summary: Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: saispo at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://saispo.free.fr/fedora/nufw.spec SRPM URL: http://saispo.free.fr/fedora/nufw-2.2.19-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: NuFW is a firewall able to filter connection according to user uid or user software, meaning you can allows port 80 for only one user, whatever ip he uses, or only for konqueror. NuFW performs an authentication of every single connection passing through the IP filter, by transparently requesting user's credentials before any filtering decision is taken. Practically, this means security policies can integrate with the users directory, and bring the notion of user ID down to the IP layers. -- Hi ! I have just finished packaging nufw, can you review it and upload it please ? Just a little information, i package nufw for an another rpm based distro and i maintain it too. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 17:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011709.mB1H99A6018340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 Dan Winship changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwinship at redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Dan Winship 2008-12-01 12:09:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > That's what I don't understand whith the current libproxy scheme: > In the vlc case, the code to support libproxy has been added (it mean, reviewed > by the VideoLan team) to the vlc source code. So I cannot understand why it is > not the same with NetworkManager Gnome mozilla and etc ? You're misunderstanding what the plugins do: libproxy-gnome is not "code to make GNOME applications use libproxy", it's "code to make libproxy-using apps have access to the GNOME Control Center proxy settings". That is, if libproxy-gnome is installed, then when vlc calls px_proxy_factory_get_proxies(), libproxy will check GConf to see if the user has configured a proxy in the GNOME Control Center, and if so, it will return that proxy info to vlc. If libproxy-gnome is NOT installed, then libproxy won't return GNOME Control Center proxy info to *any* applications, even GNOME-based ones, because it no longer knows how to look that information up. Likewise, libproxy-mozjs is not "libproxy support for mozilla-based apps", it's "PAC/WPAD support for *all* libproxy-using applications, by using mozjs to run the PAC file". So making firefox depend on libproxy-mozjs would be completely backwards, and also useless, since firefox doesn't use libproxy. So, the way the packaging should work is IMHO something like: - The mozjs plugin should *always* be installed if libproxy is installed, to provide PAC and WPAD support to libproxy-using apps. (Maybe some weird environments would rather use the webkit plugin rather than the mozjs plugin... perhaps the two plugins could each virtually provide "libproxy-pac", and the base libproxy package would require libproxy-pac. Or maybe suggests/recommends or whatever it's called, to allow people to uninstall it if they really don't need it) - libproxy-gnome should be part of the GNOME Desktop package set, and perhaps also be an explicit dep of any GNOME packages that use libproxy (to ensure that they don't end up regressing in behavior by losing gconf proxy support). - likewise with s/gnome/kde/g - Not totally sure about how to organize the deps on the NM plugin... since NM is basically a requirement these days, maybe it could just be left in the base libproxy package and libproxy would have a hard requirement on NM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 17:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011711.mB1HBQ17011258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #15 from Steven Harms 2008-12-01 12:11:24 EDT --- I also have an SRPM at http://www.sharms.org/files/terminator-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm for whoever wants to test it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 17:39:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011739.mB1HddQa024596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-01 12:39:38 EDT --- In F-9 and previous, yes, but not in F-10+ levels of rpm. They are marked w/o exec: drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Data -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Data/TreeDumper.pm drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/Changes -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/Todo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/colors.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/filters.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/scalar_and_origine.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/test.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/tie_bless.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/try_it.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35/usage.pl -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man3/Data::TreeDumper.3pm.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 17:41:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011741.mB1HfsOq017351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #24 from Nathaniel McCallum 2008-12-01 12:41:53 EDT --- Dan's packaging proposal looks good to me. Particularly the libproxy-pac virtual dep. In non-embedded usage, libproxy should always have one of the pac-runner plugins installed (mozjs, webkit, etc). +1 One thing to point out is that while the NM plugin requires NM for functionality, it doesn't require NM for linkage (it links against dbus). Not sure if that helps at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011800.mB1I0esM028787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-01 13:00:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=325238) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325238) [details] > Simplify specfile > > Here's a patch that simplifies the specfile somewhat, works for me on F-9. I > don't think it's necessary to change anything else but [ and \ to ?. > Thanks a lot for the patch! > Regarding the default dependencies: I can see the point for gzipped tarballs > and friends, the nested logic would indeed be ugly and possibly fragile. But > I'd still trim at least gzip and bzip2 from the list (ditto maybe cpio; I > suppose deco has no support for compressed cpio files) - the logic for handling > those is already there in for example 7zip and lzma cases as long as we can > assume tar is around. But I won't consider this a blocker if you don't agree. > > But if you decide to keep the defaults, I suppose there's no need to do the > symlinking for the defaults - their dirs could be simply directly installed to > /var/lib/deco instead, no? The thing is; the rpm extractor, for instance, requires the presence of dd (coreutils), gunzip, bzip2, tar, cpio and rpm. The current list of default archivers is minimal. If we reduce the number of default archivers, we will need to go to nested logic. The only exception is rpm, but that is installed in probably 100-10^{-5} % of the Fedora systems. I can still take it out if you change your mind. And yes, we can install the default archivers directly in /var/lib/deco/ . But the makefile script installs everything in one location and I would need to move them around manually. No biggie... But I think what I did is neat because, right now, one can see all the possible extraction scripts in one directory, and the symlinks don't occupy much of a harddrive space. Here are the latest files: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 17:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011759.mB1HxOiM020138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #10 from Hayden James 2008-12-01 12:59:23 EDT --- Ok that should be fixed now: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx.spec http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:10:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011810.mB1IA2sg030735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-01 13:10:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325271) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325271) mock build log About HelloWorld.cap - This file seems to be a zip file, containing some binaries (named *.cap), not a image file or so and currently I don't know how to create this file itself. Is this file needed to build gpshell or to use gpshell? - If not, please simply remove this files (and so on) and repackage tarball: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code I think this Sun license is non-free. - If this file (and so on) is needed, anyway Fedora has a policy that all binaries (except for some cases) must be built from sources, so this file itself must be built from FOSS sources. By the way rebuilt itself fails (build log attached) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011819.mB1IJa5N000488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-01 13:19:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > hmm, I don't get it. Why is matio.h shipped by -devel ? Please, give me a test > case, A USER can write and read .mat files without matio.h in %name. I believe > matio is an exception to the rule and matio.h should be shipped by %name. discard this comment #14. Any update from your side ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011830.mB1IUj3J003895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-01 13:30:44 EDT --- -------------------------------------------------------- This package (log4cxx) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:35:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011835.mB1IZLJE004972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-01 13:35:19 EDT --- #001: missing ant-commons-logging as Build Requires #002: add -verbose to ant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011835.mB1IZ2Q9004787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Hayden James 2008-12-01 13:35:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: log4cxx Short Description: A port to C++ of the Log4j project (logging library) Owners: hjames Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011839.mB1IdRi1005668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #16 from Ian Weller 2008-12-01 13:39:24 EDT --- I'll be taking over for Max. Standby for duplication messages. Sven, I'd be delighted if you could take the new review request, when that appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011845.mB1IjPCS007519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #24 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-01 13:45:22 EDT --- BUILD FAILED Target "gluegen.cpptasks.detect.os" does not exist in the project "JOGL". It is used from target "base.init". with gluegen rpms built from gluegen-1.1.1-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 18:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011844.mB1Iirlx030517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #17 from Max Spevack 2008-12-01 13:44:52 EDT --- /me hangs his head in shame, but is glad that someone is able to finish what he started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 19:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux - FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011918.mB1JIGB0014858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: nufw - |Review Request: nufw - |Authentication Firewall |Authentication Firewall |Suite for Linux |Suite for Linux - | |FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 19:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] New: Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 Summary: Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ncjeffgus at zimage.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://marlene.zimage.com/packages/qodem.spec SRPM URL: http://marlene.zimage.com/packages/qodem-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Qodem is an open-source re-implementation of the once-popular Qmodem(tm) shareware communications package. Qodem (pronounced 'kodem', rhymes with 'modem') is now in beta. Its main features are: * Terminal interface: scrollback buffer, capture file, screen dump * Convenience: dialing directory, command-line invocation * Connection methods: serial, local shell, telnet, ssh, rlogin, rsh * Emulations: ANSI (with "ANSI music"), Avatar, VT52, VT100/102, VT220, Linux * Transfer protocols: X/Y/Zmodem, Kermit * Programmability: keyboard macros, full scripting --------------- I recently discovered this program and have found it to be useful for talking to some types of communications equipment via the serial port. Most of the time I just use 'cu -l /dev/ttyS0', but sometimes I need terminal emulation. I find that qodem loads faster than minicom. It is a small program that was easy to make into a package, so I decided to see if it would be useful to others. I think it would be a small, but very useful contribution to Fedora's package repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 19:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011926.mB1JQYPJ007615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 --- Comment #18 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-12-01 14:26:32 EDT --- Don't worry Max, we all get busy at times so we understand where you are coming from. Robert 'Bob' Jensen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 19:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011935.mB1JZibw018766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-01 14:35:41 EDT --- Yeah, I wouldn't exactly categorize Max as a slacker. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 19:51:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011951.mB1JpeKo023432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-01 14:51:38 EDT --- Sounds to me like just using local pam auth would be the best, simplest and safest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:07:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] New: Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Summary: Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/terminator/0.11-1/terminator.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/terminator/0.11-1/terminator-0.11-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: Multiple GNOME terminals in one window. This is a project to produce an efficient way of filling a large area of screen space with terminals. This is done by splitting the window into a resizeable grid of terminals. As such, you can produce a very flexible arrangements of terminals for different tasks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012008.mB1K867c017911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mspevack at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2008-12-01 15:08:04 EDT --- *** Bug 462173 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012008.mB1K86gr017890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #20 from Ian Weller 2008-12-01 15:08:04 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 474036 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012021.mB1KLCVh029471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-01 15:21:11 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: * Mon Dec 1 2008 Dan Hor?k 1.0.1-1 - update to upstream version 1.0.1 * Fri Nov 28 2008 Dan Hor?k 1.0.0-2 - keep modules in %%python_sitelib after a discussion with upstream, user written and non packaged modules will be symlinked there Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=967947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:19:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012019.mB1KJh4J020029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-01 15:19:42 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/tryton.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/tryton-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: * Mon Dec 1 2008 Dan Hor?k 1.0.1-1 - update to upstream version 1.0.1 Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=968014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012031.mB1KV4uX031361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #5 from Jens Liebchen 2008-12-01 15:31:03 EDT --- Together with Till, I have tested some builds of kopete-cryptography. Unfortunately there seems to be an issue with the new package: Encrypting and signing seems to work fine. But if I receive any encrypted (and/or signed) messages, no message is shown in kopete. To be sure this is not a personal issue, we used the Fedora-KDE Live CD, updated to KDE 4.1.3, installed the fresh built kopete-cryptography, and set up a fresh gpg setup. Unfortunately the problem shows up again: You cannot receive any encrypted messages. You do not even notice you got a message if that one is encrypted and/or signed :-( As this is a show stopper for kopete-cryptography, does anybody have a clue about this or can reproduce this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] New: Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Summary: Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb-2.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Zild C Database Library implements a small, fast, and easy to use database API with thread-safe connection pooling. The library can connect transparently to multiple database systems, has zero configuration and connections are specified via a standard URL scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:35:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012035.mB1KZCdW023746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-12-01 15:35:10 EDT --- These items are now ok: [OK] Owns all created directories: [OK] Consistent macro usage {OK} follows special guidelines (In reply to comment #3) > [NEEDSWORK] rpmlint output: > According to other KDE packages reviews it's safe to ignore rpmlint warnings. The "dangling-symlink" warnings can imho be ignored, but not the "symlink-should-be-relative" warnings. In the F8 kdenetwork package, most of the symlinks named common are relative, therefore it smells like something that could be done for all symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:42:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012042.mB1Kg90G000811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #43 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 15:42:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:45:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012045.mB1Kj84h001496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 15:45:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012043.mB1Kht5S001052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 15:43:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:42:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012042.mB1KgZZs000893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at krishnan.cc --- Comment #1 from Bernard Johnson 2008-12-01 15:42:33 EDT --- *** Bug 456955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:42:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456955] Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012042.mB1KgYmE000865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456955 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(fedora at krishnan.c | |c) | --- Comment #9 from Bernard Johnson 2008-12-01 15:42:33 EDT --- No response from submitter - marking as duplicate of the package I'm submitting. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 474044 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012043.mB1KhDnP000977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-01 15:43:12 EDT --- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - *** Summary should probably drop the leading 'A'. You appear to be packaging a git snapshot. (In fact, you're including the entire .git directory in the tarball, which isn't really needed.) Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for how to handle this, and how to version the package. - License - LGPLv2+ - OK - License field in spec matches - *** "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" I don't actually see any GPLv2+ code in the tarball. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - *** See above re: snapshot packaging. - Package needs ExcludeArch - Possibly pointless on s390, but don't really need to exclude it - OK - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. - OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK - .la files are removed. - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - Tested x86_64 (w/mock) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. libiphone-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Barring building the docs with doxygen, nothing to add here. - final provides and requires are sane: Looks good. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK - Should function as described. - No hardware, can't test - Should have sane scriptlets. - OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - OK - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - *** See above re: source control pulls. So, for approval: - fix %{version} and source control URL to specify what revision you're pulling - fix License: tag - maybe tweak summary If this is going to change ABI frequently without changing soname, a warning in the -devel package might be nice. Then again, if nothing other than the FUSE client is going to use the library, it may not be relevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:51:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012051.mB1Kp84n002749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 15:51:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 20:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012053.mB1KreBJ027073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 15:53:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012108.mB1L8otr006171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:08:48 EDT --- cvs done. No need to add yourself to InitialCC, the owner gets all bugs anyway as they are assigned them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012109.mB1L9iwx030252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #16 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-01 16:09:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Sounds to me like just using local pam auth would be the best, simplest and > safest. No problem. I changed the default to login and pam enabled. Even if one (like myself) wants to use partimage from SistemRescuedCD, which comes with login disabled, it is just a question of adding --nologin to the server configuration file and restart partimaged. Really easy ... I also added s short explanation about the use of partimaged-passwd to our README.partimage.html. Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-4.fc8.src.rpm If you can try it, it would be really good. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012112.mB1LCDgk007103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #6 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-01 16:12:11 EDT --- Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/gpshell.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gpshell-1.4.2-4.fc10.src.rpm - fix mock build by including zlib-devel in BuildReq - regenerate tarball without Sun sample code and use that No binaries in the tarball left (except for the windows .ico file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:11:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012111.mB1LBYgZ007022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-12-01 16:11:33 EDT --- Additionally to changing the state to ASSGINED and assigned to the bug to onself, fedora?review should be set to "?" if a reviewer wants to review a request. I do this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012123.mB1LNVPD009328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:23:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012124.mB1LOMUX000918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:24:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012134.mB1LYd4s011534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:34:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:40:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012140.mB1Leckb013264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-01 16:40:37 EDT --- I have downloaded the binaries from upstream and tested. Scicos has black background on F-10 and it is not possible to use it. Can you confirm whether you have it with your rpms ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012140.mB1LeWdx013154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:40:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012139.mB1LdmWI004073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:39:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012142.mB1LgF4u014035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:42:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012142.mB1LgfnY014109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-01 16:42:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - *** > > Summary should probably drop the leading 'A'. Will do > You appear to be packaging a git snapshot. (In fact, you're including the > entire .git directory in the tarball, which isn't really needed.) > > Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for how to handle > this, and how to version the package. I missed that. Will update it. > - License - LGPLv2+ - OK > - License field in spec matches - *** > > "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" > > I don't actually see any GPLv2+ code in the tarball. There was a COPYING and COPYING.LESSER file included which is why I marked it as such. If you think the COPYING file is irrelevant. > - License file included in package - OK > - Spec in American English - OK > - Spec is legible. - OK > - Sources match upstream md5sum: - *** > > See above re: snapshot packaging. ACK. > - Should package latest version - *** > > See above re: source control pulls. ACK. > So, for approval: > - fix %{version} and source control URL to specify what revision you're pulling > - fix License: tag > - maybe tweak summary > > If this is going to change ABI frequently without changing soname, a warning in > the -devel package might be nice. Then again, if nothing other than the FUSE > client is going to use the library, it may not be relevant. Would the warning be contained in an included text file or in the description or somewhere else? I'm not sure whether the library would be used by conduit or rhythmbox or whether they'd use the ifuse client. I'll update the file with the suggestions at update the ticket once complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:45:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012145.mB1LjVqE006013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:45:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:49:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012149.mB1LnJQa006538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:49:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012151.mB1LpMfG016363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2008-12-01 16:51:21 EDT --- (Heads up -- we're missing a few BuildRequires. Fixing.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012155.mB1LttkD017366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:55:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012154.mB1Ls8vr016772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 16:54:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012155.mB1Ltces017332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-01 16:55:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > - License - LGPLv2+ - OK > > - License field in spec matches - *** > > > > "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" > > > > I don't actually see any GPLv2+ code in the tarball. > > There was a COPYING and COPYING.LESSER file included which is why I marked it > as such. If you think the COPYING file is irrelevant. What's listed in the headers of the code trumps whatever COPYING files are in the package itself. > > If this is going to change ABI frequently without changing soname, a warning in > > the -devel package might be nice. Then again, if nothing other than the FUSE > > client is going to use the library, it may not be relevant. > > Would the warning be contained in an included text file or in the description > or somewhere else? I'm not sure whether the library would be used by conduit or > rhythmbox or whether they'd use the ifuse client. Maybe just in the README, if it's not already there. If you don't know of any other users of the library, it's not really a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 21:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012159.mB1Lxbqi017801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:03:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012203.mB1M3aQw018844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 17:03:35 EDT --- cvs done. (you likely need the EL-5 branch before pkgdb will show it to add him. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012203.mB1M3suQ009816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:02:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012202.mB1M2P4B009646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-01 17:02:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012204.mB1M4I6g009865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-01 17:04:17 EDT --- > %{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}.so* Without doing a test-build, I just hope they don't put %version into the SONAME, since that would break the ABI with every bump of %version. Does anything use this lib yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012210.mB1MAwFK011515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Ville Skytt? 2008-12-01 17:10:57 EDT --- I don't quite see the neatness/usefulness in that but the package works as is and disagreement on some details as tiny as this is not a blocker, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012222.mB1MMqEh013573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-01 17:22:51 EDT --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libiphone.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libiphone-0.1.0-2.git8c3a01e.fc10.src.rpm Updated based on review. I think I've done the details on pulling the specific git version (its currently based on HEAD). Removed the GPLv2+ tag and the COPYING file that specifies it as well, and the other listed bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012236.mB1MaesH016226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |deco-archive Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-01 17:36:39 EDT --- Thank you Ville. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: deco-archive Short Description: Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012238.mB1McLxb025820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |deco Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-01 17:38:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: deco Short Description: Extractor for various archive file formats Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012250.mB1MoLQr028215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #20 from David Carter 2008-12-01 17:50:19 EDT --- The legal opinion is in. Looks like I'll have to some modification. >From Tom Callaway: "Unfortunately, it isn't okay. This is non-free, because there is no permission to redistribute modified versions of code under this license, only to "Make copies of the original file you download and distribute it". That, combined with: "Except as expressly stated above, HP and tang-IT grant no other licenses, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any intellectual property rights." means that we cannot assume permission to distribute modified/derived works is implied. HP usually does a better job of this, perhaps they'd be willing to fix this license, or re-license this work under an established free license?" Stefan, any comments on the last paragraph? I know licensing held up the initial SDK release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:55:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012255.mB1MtENT029168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #13 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-01 17:55:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325313) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325313) licensecheck.pl report There are some licencing issues with the sources detected by licensecheck.pl script (from Debian). Please notify upstream about them. I've looked at the problematic files (with UNKNOWN licences) and found two notable issues: /src/utils/lib/md5.{c,h} are under Zlib licence, so you need to add "Zlib" to the License: tag. ./src/utils/lib/md4.h is under a licence I wasn't able to identify which doesn't explicitly give permission to distribute modified versions which seems to make it non-free. I'm blocking FE-Legal pending legal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:55:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012255.mB1MtShM019709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 22:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012257.mB1Mvl9Y029511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #3 from Bernard Johnson 2008-12-01 17:57:46 EDT --- Not yet, but I do need it to update a package in rawhide that will use it. Would this be as simple a changing the name to %{_libdir}/%{name}.so* ? If not, can you elaborate a bit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 23:15:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012315.mB1NFIuV000446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-12-01 18:15:17 EDT --- This seems to be the case: [OK] %doc does not affect runtime [UNCLEAR SITUATION] The provides may not be considered sane afaics: rpm --provides -qp kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm kcm_kopete_cryptography.so()(64bit) kopete_cryptography.so()(64bit) /usr/lib64/kde4/kcm_kopete_cryptography.so /usr/lib64/kde4/kopete_cryptography.so It is not clear, whether the fault is at rpm, i.e. it should not make rpms provide .so files that are not in a directory that is used by ld, but others seem to think, that this is the right beheaviour. I doubt, that there is a high potential for problems with these provides, therefore I do not consider this to be a problem. The rpmlint warnings about absolute symlinks are now considered to be a bug in meinproc, therefore they do not block this review: bug #474057 About the VERBOSE=1 in %build: This will probably not be necessary in the future, for reference: bug #474053 Also since this package seems to use default cmake installation procedures, this is considered to be not an issue: {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install If there is a problem with timestamps, then it is a bug in cmake or %cmake imho. Btw. if this package will be only in F10 and beyond, you can remove the "mkdir %{buildroot}" line from %install. Currently afaik it makes only sence to make a racing condition fail, but with the rpm in F10, the buildroot is located in a user controlled directory by default instead of /var/tmp. Therefore there is no such racing condition anymore. Therefore I see no really blocker to finish the review. This package is now APPROVED. The only left problem is, that the plugin is not able to decrypt encrypted messages. Imho this should be fixed before this package is pushed to F10 updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 23:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012317.mB1NHjcc000888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-01 18:17:43 EDT --- Some further comments. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result mldonkey-server.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/mldonkey Please fix: install -D -p -m 755 packages/rpm/mldonkey.sysconfig $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mldonkey Change 755 to 644. mldonkey-server.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/mldonkey mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/mldonkey mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mldonkey 0750 mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/mldonkey/incoming mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/mldonkey/incoming mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mldonkey/incoming 0770 mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/mldonkey mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/cache/mldonkey mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/mldonkey 0750 mldonkey-server.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/mldonkey mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/mldonkey mldonkey mldonkey-server.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/mldonkey 0750 mldonkey-server.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name mldonkey mldonkey.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 41, tab: line 1) 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 10 warnings. The rest can be ignored. mldonkey.spec: BuildRequires: m4 BuildRequires: autoconf Why does it need these two? Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function independently? sed -i 's|\r||g' distrib/ed2k_submit/README.MLdonkeySubmit sed -i 's|\r||g' docs/slavanap.txt iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 docs/gnutella.txt > docs/gnutella.utf8 && mv docs/gnutella.{utf8,txt} iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 distrib/Authors.txt > distrib/Authors.utf8 && mv distrib/Authors.{utf8,txt} This doesn't preserve original file timestamps. Please use touch -r to do that. [...] # menu and pixmaps install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-16.png -D -m 644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/mldonkey.png install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-32.png -D -m 644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/mldonkey.png install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-48.png -D -m 644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/mldonkey.png I suggest a loop: for sz in 16 32 48 ; do install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-${sz}.png -D -m 644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/${sz}x${sz}/apps/mldonkey.png done %files ... %{_bindir}/copysources %{_bindir}/get_range %{_bindir}/make_torrent ... %{_bindir}/subconv %{_bindir}/svg_converter These filenames seem a little too generic. Are they supposed to be run by the user? Could you add a "ml" prefix to them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 23:31:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012331.mB1NVNjK027024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-01 18:31:22 EDT --- Updated spec for git packaging guidelines SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse-0.1.0-2.d159256.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 23:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012332.mB1NWWbh004220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-01 18:32:31 EDT --- log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 23:33:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012333.mB1NXKR1004311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-01 18:33:19 EDT --- log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 23:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812012339.mB1Ndppn028191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2008-12-01 18:39:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/terminator/0.11-2/terminator.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/terminator/0.11-2/terminator-0.11-2.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Dec 01 2008 Ian Weller 0.11-2 - Add BuildRequires: gettext - Fix installation of .desktop file - terminator-0.11-desktop.patch: Remove useless things Move to same category as gnome-terminal - Uses spaces instead of tabs in the specfile because I can't stand tabs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470976] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope - Execute code after scope compilation finishes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020005.mB205JYL032517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470976 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020014.mB20E6g2010910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Chris Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Ubuntu Launchpad 249617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 01:10:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472335] Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020110.mB21ADlX010756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 01:48:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020148.mB21mJRK026422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 02:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020210.mB22AlJD030370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-01 21:10:45 EDT --- Sorry for the delay; the US holiday season is upon us. Unfortunately this still doesn't build, because you don't pull in automake, leading to the completely cryptic: + autoreconf -f Can't exec "aclocal": Permission denied at /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 326. Adding automake gets me to: + autoreconf -f configure.in:15: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. So I added libtool and it gets down to: ./configure: line 16530: syntax error near unexpected token `SDL,' ./configure: line 16530: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(SDL, sdl)' Now, I have no idea why sdl might be required to build this, but I suspect that your comment "# Needed for camera example" might be related, since you're rebuilding the autoconf stuff for that example even if you're not actually building it. I added SDL-devel and it gets further: checking for jni.h in a /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk/include dir... configure: error: Could not find jni.h in /usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk/include directory. So --with-java needs java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel in order to build, but mock pulls in java-1.5.0-gcj-devel because both provide java-devel. I don't know quite enough about java to understand this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 03:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020308.mB238txW007331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Steven Harms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sharms at ubuntu.com --- Comment #4 from Steven Harms 2008-12-01 22:08:54 EDT --- Shouldn't this spec include gettext? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 03:40:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020340.mB23eD2d013693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-01 22:40:09 EDT --- Thanks; I think we're done here, so I'll close this out. Do you also maintain ypserv and yp-tools? I can take a look at them as well if you like. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226665 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 03:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020358.mB23wkTB007415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-01 22:58:45 EDT --- You've got two git-clone lines in the spec. For making the tarball, you may want to do something like: git-archive --format=tar --prefix libiphone-%{version}/ | gzip > libiphone-%{version}.tar.gz For the version, you need to prefix it with a date, otherwise it won't sort right when the ref changes. xorg-x11-drv-nouveau has an example of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 04:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250282] Package request/suggestion: kidled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020411.mB24BboW010146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250282 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|notting at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 05:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020516.mB25G01l032496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 00:15:59 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 05:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020515.mB25FvfB022163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 00:15:56 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 05:40:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020540.mB25eKaO027019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 05:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020549.mB25nq6I028350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #17 from Simon Wesp 2008-12-02 00:49:51 EDT --- Ping. Is there any progress on this? Do you need any help with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020612.mB26C0H0000458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 01:12:00 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020611.mB26Bweh000421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 01:11:57 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020612.mB26Cg1e000606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020617.mB26HWPl001522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020636.mB26a3ln005201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-02 01:36:02 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream: b1a0e0dda99bb26623682e62f0e59051 robodoc-4.99.36.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: robodoc = 4.99.36-1.fc10 robodoc(x86-64) = 4.99.36-1.fc10 = libc.so.6()(64bit) OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I was able to run program from the command line and generate a doc file. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. Suggestion: Please consider preserving the timestamp of the modified file (ChangeLog). A simple call to 'touch -r' will do. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 07:11:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 02:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020711.mB27B25Z012327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2008-12-02 02:11:01 EDT --- Steven, the newest one does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 07:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 02:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020723.mB27NqHT014595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 02:23:48 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 08:03:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020803.mB283ejn022366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #21 from Stefan Ruppert 2008-12-02 03:03:39 EDT --- I'm the author of some parts of the ARM4SDK but I'm not the copyright owner. Also it seems that the ARM4SDK development is dead since 2003 or 2004. In the meanwhile I have founded my own company MyARM. And we at MyARM would also prefer to see the ARM4SDK license changed to a free license. I can write an email regarding ARM4SDK license change to the people how were involved in the development of the ARM4SDK at that time! David, you are right release delay of the ARM4SDK was about licensing issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 08:28:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020828.mB28Sl3N027391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-02 03:28:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Together with Till, I have tested some builds of kopete-cryptography. > Unfortunately there seems to be an issue with the new package: > > Encrypting and signing seems to work fine. But if I receive any encrypted > (and/or signed) messages, no message is shown in kopete. To be sure this is not > a personal issue, we used the Fedora-KDE Live CD, updated to KDE 4.1.3, > installed the fresh built kopete-cryptography, and set up a fresh gpg setup. > Unfortunately the problem shows up again: You cannot receive any encrypted > messages. You do not even notice you got a message if that one is encrypted > and/or signed :-( > > As this is a show stopper for kopete-cryptography, does anybody have a clue > about this or can reproduce this issue? Ok, this is show stopper for me, thanks for testing. I should set up environment to test it myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 09:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 04:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020905.mB295Ox7012687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-02 04:05:22 EDT --- Till thank you for this great review! - libs - ok - rpmlint warnings - ok but we (KDE SIG) should look to bug #474057 - "mkdir %{buildroot}" removed So now the last problem is receiving encrypted messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 09:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 04:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020956.mB29uvc0024049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 --- Comment #11 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2008-12-02 04:56:54 EDT --- I think so. I removed all auto-tools related things form spec file finally, they were not needed. Yes, I do own them too - and I'll be glad if you take a look, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 09:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 04:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020959.mB29xlbT015919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-02 04:59:46 EDT --- Thanks, they were the commands I couldn't find late last night. Third time lucky I think. Spec in same location. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libiphone-0.1.0-3.20081201git8c3a01e.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 10:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 05:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021009.mB2A9Exw018112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-02 05:09:13 EDT --- Improved and simplified the git package creation. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse-0.1.0-3.20081201gitd159256.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 11:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 06:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux - FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021109.mB2B9GNL007169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |saispo at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-02 06:09:15 EDT --- Hi, I fixed some mistakes on my spec file and update it ! Thanks akurtakov ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 11:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 06:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021143.mB2Bhm12013966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225668 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ajax at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 12:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021247.mB2ClL1f026498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #12 from Gratien D'haese 2008-12-02 07:47:19 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm sorry for the long delay, but in the meantime most items are fixed. After the build checked using a non-privilege user makerpm the quality of the rpm using rpmlint (and as root used mock too). There are 2 items I'm apparently not able to fix (most likely I do not know how to fix these). 1/ during the rpmbuild the warnings about file listed twice 2/ rear.spec not in correct permission mode Both errors pop up with root, under my account and with the special makerpm account, but none of these users have an impact with this (build/install is ok). [makerpm at localhost SRPMS]$ ls rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm [makerpm at localhost SRPMS]$ rpm -ivh rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1:rear ########################################### [100%] [makerpm at localhost SRPMS]$ cd .. [makerpm at localhost rpmbuild]$ ls SOURCES/ rear-1.7.9.tar.gz [makerpm at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/rear.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23801 ... + cp -pr CHANGES README doc/readme.txt contrib /var/tmp/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.9 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf ... $ rpmlint -i SPECS/rear.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i SRPMS/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.9 ==> only "warning: file listed twice" notices as with the rpmbuild phase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 13:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021306.mB2D6Gmd022515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2008-12-02 08:06:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Thank you for your review, I will comment on your objections below. > The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license... > - NOK, see below Well, GPLv2+ is a Fedora approved license, so I see no violation on this point. I guess your objection is not about that the the tag I used is not approved, but that it is the wrong one. Which is really your next point. So I will comment further below. > The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > - The License tag is set to GPLv2+, but the actual source license > is GPLv2. This is true both for the LICENSE file and at least > some copyright notices. I based the tag I used on the text in the included LICENSE.txt file which says: "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." I.e. this is GPLv2+. But as you pointed out all the copyright notices in the source file comments say: "Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (June, 1991)" So there is an inconsistency between the LICENSE.txt file and the source file comments. Since the source file comments are more restrictive (GPLv2) than the LICENSE.txt file (GPLv2+) I have changed the label in the spec file to GPLv2. New versions are available here: Spec URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl.spec SRPM URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl-1.09-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 13:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021341.mB2Dfb8j030757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 08:41:35 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 13:42:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021342.mB2DgRrH006907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 08:42:26 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 13:59:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021359.mB2Dxmhk011172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-02 08:59:47 EDT --- While I appreciate the "functioning" part of the review, it would be of great value to at least get this into rawhide, so that some wider testing could occur. (it's a part of upstream kde.org extragear releases, if there is a bug, I'm sure it could be fixed... provided we could get ample testing/investigation). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021419.mB2EJ14k015860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 09:18:59 EDT --- For -4: * Timestamp - For this package "CPPROG='cp -p'" is not useful (so this can simply be removed) because this package does not use install-sh (anyway keeping timestamps is not useful because all files to be installed (except for %doc files) are created at %build stage) Other things is okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (gpshell) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021417.mB2EHcYO006852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 09:17:36 EDT --- Okay, now gpshell is in good shape, I will approve this package ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (globalplatform) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021424.mB2EOOHA017236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-02 09:24:23 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. partimage.src: W: strange-permission create_certificates.sh 0775 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. partimage.src: W: strange-permission partimaged-passwd 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Why are these runnable by non-root users? RPMS: addressed above. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Generally OK, but drop the image location macro, and remove the user created in the preun conditional. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Source URL still uses shortened SourceForge name, fix. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. Needs to own %{_datadir}/partimaged. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. See above. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . See above. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Summary: Script perms, macro, Source URL, remove generated user, own %{_datadir}/partimaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021430.mB2EUeWp010079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #8 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-02 09:30:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/gpshell.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gpshell-1.4.2-5.fc10.src.rpm - remove keep timestamps on make install as install-sh is not used anyway Thanks for your time! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:37:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021437.mB2EboQV011702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-02 09:37:47 EDT --- Still not imported ! Is there a problem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474149] New: Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Summary: Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: * Designed for 2D video games. * Circle, convex polygon, and line segment collision primitives. * Multiple collision primitives can be attached to the same rigid body. * Fast collision detection by using a spatial hash for the broad phase. * Extremely fast impulse solving by utilizing Erin Catto?s contact persistence algorithm. * Support for collision callbacks based on object types. * Impulses applied to contact points can be retrieved after the impulse solver has finished. * Several kinds of joints available. * C99 implementation, no external dependencies. * Ruby extension available. * Simple, read the documentation. * Unrestrictive MIT license. SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk-4.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021500.mB2F0255026013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #5 from vivek shah 2008-12-02 10:00:00 EDT --- A new upstream version is available which I have packaged keeping in mind the above suggestions Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/sovix.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/sovix-0.0.1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 14:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021458.mB2EwPhV025606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #20 from vivek shah 2008-12-02 09:58:22 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I have updated the package with the suggested changes and the patch. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnurobots.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021501.mB2F1mbe018175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Moschny 2008-12-02 10:01:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Still not imported ! Is there a problem ? Yes: See the fixme at the top of the spec file. While the complete package is GPLv2+, some of the included demo and tutorial projects might not. Some of them are taken from the LSP (http://lmms.sourceforge.net/lsp.php), with various licenses, and those that are not, are under a CC license (according to upstream, but upstream couldn't tell me (yet) which one). I didn't find enough time to sort that out, that's why I delayed the import. If that issue can be postponed, I can do the import real soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021503.mB2F39mj018530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-02 10:03:08 EDT --- Ok, so I ask for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021502.mB2F2Ykl018412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney 2008-12-02 10:02:32 EDT --- I attempted to install it on the latest sugar build, and I am getting the following error: Fatal Python error: (pygame parachute) Segmentation Fault Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sugar-activity", line 21, in main.main() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sugar/activity/main.py", line 103, in main module = __import__(module_name) File "/usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/activity.py", line 1, in import olpcgames File "/usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/__init__.py", line 37, in from olpcgames import camera File "/usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/camera.py", line 12, in import gst File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gst-0.10/gst/__init__.py", line 170, in from _gst import * RuntimeError: can't initialize module gst: Error re-scanning registry , child terminated by signal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:19:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021519.mB2FJIYJ022744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-02 10:19:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kopete-cryptography Short Description: Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP Owners: jreznik kkofler than rdieter ltinkl Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021525.mB2FPrvq024562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-02 10:25:51 EDT --- for info,last version is here: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/10/SRPMS/libkate-0.2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm It still seems in development stage. But ABI seems stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021534.mB2FYkj1002003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 10:34:44 EDT --- I don't know; I'm not going to pretend that I've understood what comment #14 means, and I haven't seen an explicit comment from the submitter of this ticket directly answering the issue I raised in the initial review regarding whether or not the -devel package ends up being required at runtime. All I got was "Beats me" and then several comments regarding DT_SONAME which I might research more deeply if I didn't have 30 other review tickets in flight at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:42:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021542.mB2FgZno028758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:50:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021550.mB2FoF8Y006084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021548.mB2FmlSM005429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sven at lank.es -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021549.mB2FnfQ7005601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 10:49:39 EDT --- This looks good to me. It would be good to ask upstream directly about the license issue, but this software seems to be pretty old so I don't know if you would get much of a response. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021549.mB2FnBUM030158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 15:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021556.mB2Fupul007640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 10:56:49 EDT --- Good. ! Note: Currently on dist-f11 (rawhide) this package won't build due to bug in "rpm" (bug 473814). ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (gnurobots) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021604.mB2G4VKE009199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney 2008-12-02 11:04:30 EDT --- The above was from a rawhids build of sugar. Using a pure F10 build (f10, f10updates and f10-testing) I get 1228251405.415884 WARNING root: Activity directory lacks a MANIFEST file. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sugar-activity", line 21, in main.main() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sugar/activity/main.py", line 100, in main module = __import__(module_name) File "/usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/activity.py", line 1, in import olpcgames File "/usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/__init__.py", line 38, in from olpcgames import pangofont File "/usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/pangofont.py", line 18, in from olpcgames import _cairoimage ImportError: cannot import name _cairoimage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021602.mB2G2QDR001695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-12-02 11:02:25 EDT --- Many thanks for the review, Lucian. Will apply your suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021606.mB2G6RRO002682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-12-02 11:06:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: robodoc Short Description: Extract documentation from source code Owners: monnerat Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021615.mB2GFNdS004833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #18 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-02 11:15:21 EDT --- > Summary: Script perms, macro, Source URL, remove generated user, own > %{_datadir}/partimaged. 1) I changed the script perms in the .src.rpm to 644 and in the rpm to 744. 2) Removed home macro. 3) Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 4) Deleted created user in the postun section. 5) %dir %{_datadir}/partimaged Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-5.fc8.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021616.mB2GGalW012371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 11:16:34 EDT --- Ugh, this package fails in %install: + install -m 0644 -p lib/linux/libKNIBase.a lib/linux/libKNI_InvKin.a lib/linux/libKNI_LM.a /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libkni-3.9.2-7.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64 + install -p 'lib/linux/*.so.*' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libkni-3.9.2-7.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64 install: cannot stat `lib/linux/*.so.*': No such file or directory I checked the buid directory and only see .a files in there. Also, I still see several incidences of "[failed]" in the build log: Compiling: cdlSocket.o [failed] cdlSocket.cpp: In constructor 'CCdlSocket::CCdlSocket(char*, int)': cdlSocket.cpp:99: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' cdlSocket.cpp:110: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' cdlSocket.cpp:116: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' Compiling: kmlExt.o [failed] kmlExt.cpp: In member function 'void CKatana::create(KNI::kmlFactory*, CCplBase*)': kmlExt.cpp:149: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' mock.Root.build: Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNIBase.a [failed] a - cdlCOM.o a - cplSerial.o libKNIBase.a ar: cdlSocket.o: No such file or directory Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNIBase.so.3.9.0 [failed] g++: cdlSocket.o: No such file or directory g++: kmlExt.o: No such file or directory Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 [failed] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lKNIBase collect2: ld returned 1 exit status And many others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:31:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021631.mB2GV6Vd008761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-02 11:31:05 EDT --- The -devel package does not end up being required at runtime. The .so required at runtime is the one in %{_libdir} and the above comments agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:46:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021646.mB2GkNdI018997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-02 11:46:22 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ssbd Short Description: Voice keyer for use in hamradio Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021651.mB2GpqsE020017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #17 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-02 11:51:50 EDT --- FAS name: fkooman I requested sponsoring. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:53:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:53:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021653.mB2Grda9020328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021653.mB2GrMi0020265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 11:53:21 EDT --- * Licensing - I guess src/examples/Clock.java is non-free. So if this file is not needed, please remove this file (and also .jar/.dll files) and repackage the zip source: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code * Then the license tag must be "ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and zlib". --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LICENSE: ASL 1.1 LICENSE_nanoxml: zlib src/com/l2fprod/gui/plaf/skin/LafPluginSupport.java ASL 2.0 src/com/l2fprod/util/WeakImageIcon.java ASL 2.0 src/examples/Clock.java ??? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Also, add "LICENSE_nanoxml" to %doc. - If src/examples/Clock.java is needed, I wil ask spot whether the license is free or not. * BuildRequires, Requires - For java depedency, please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires If this package needs Java openjdk, the BuildRequires should have "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 16:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021658.mB2GwApQ021682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-02 11:58:09 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 17:38:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021738.mB2HcsD2030629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-02 12:38:53 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 17:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021752.mB2HqPgr001388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474188 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 17:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021752.mB2HqOxB001366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 17:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474188] New: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Summary: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/python-openoffice.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/python-openoffice-0.1-0.1.20080929svn33.fc11.src.rpm Description: The library is designed to supports both writing Macros called by OOo) and interacting with OOo from an external Python program (using the UNO bridge). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 17:58:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:58:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021758.mB2Hwv9Y028331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-02 12:58:56 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: * Tue Dec 2 2008 Dan Hor?k 1.0.1-2 - add dependency on python-openoffice Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:11:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:11:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021811.mB2IBRJw031467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-02 13:11:24 EDT --- Oh, might also want to add partimage- to the man.tar.gz and create_certificates.sh and rename at install, to avoid SRPM clobber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021807.mB2I7u4b030678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-02 13:07:53 EDT --- Excellent. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021809.mB2I9PvK030828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-02 13:09:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: afuse Short Description: An automounter implemented with FUSE Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:14:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] New: Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Summary: Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivaxer at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog-0.1.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: Google glog is a library that implements application-level logging. This library provides logging APIs based on C++-style streams and various helper macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021841.mB2IfQve014443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #21 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-02 13:41:24 EDT --- You mean, putting Source1, Source3, Source4, Source5, in, say, scripts.tar.gz and uncompressing them in the source tree? I was intending to do that, but during the review, it would have complicated the access to the scripts. I also have this small text with the guidelines I use for cloning my installations. Even for laptops, I always use a pre-created image. Maybe you would like to read it (of course, this text cannot be included in the rpm). http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/roma/LCG_partimage.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:44:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021844.mB2IiSFc006105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Summary|Review Request: nufw - |Review Request: nufw - |Authentication Firewall |Authentication Firewall |Suite for Linux - |Suite for Linux |FE-NEEDSPONSOR | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021851.mB2IpTNr008023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 13:51:28 EDT --- lzip-1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lzip-1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021853.mB2IrGXm017243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 13:53:15 EDT --- afuse-0.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afuse-0.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:53:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021853.mB2IrDTi017214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 13:53:12 EDT --- afuse-0.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afuse-0.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021851.mB2IpWLE016871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 13:51:32 EDT --- lzip-1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lzip-1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 19:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021904.mB2J4axQ011266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-02 14:04:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libiphone Short Description: Library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 19:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021908.mB2J8Knw012259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-02 14:08:19 EDT --- No, simply rename man.tar.gz partimage-man.tar.gz and rename create_certificates.sh partimage-create_certificates.sh, and rename them when they are installed in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 19:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021935.mB2JZrI5027236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #23 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-02 14:35:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > No, simply rename man.tar.gz partimage-man.tar.gz and rename > create_certificates.sh partimage-create_certificates.sh, and rename them when > they are installed in the spec. I did what you asked, but I also compressed the scripts in partimage-scripts.tar.gz Same links. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 19:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021944.mB2JiiH1020400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-02 14:44:43 EDT --- No need, but no harm either. Looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 19:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021950.mB2JoXM5021909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #47 from Jarod Wilson 2008-12-02 14:50:29 EDT --- I've committed and built ivtv-utils 1.3.0 for rawhide, working on F10 and F9 now (going to leave out F8, not worth it at this point, I think, and not sure if the kernel is sufficiently new for the latest ivtv-utils or not). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 20:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022007.mB2K72vN002101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 15:07:01 EDT --- I hope you realize that there are over 700 review requests in the queue, and that while they will all receive attention eventually, one week including a major US holiday is a bit of an ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 20:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022020.mB2KKnj1005592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 15:20:47 EDT --- ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 20:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022021.mB2KLV4h030147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 15:21:30 EDT --- ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 20:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022021.mB2KLYm6005982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #19 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-02 15:21:33 EDT --- I used Koji scratch build, which runs perfectly on all platforms for F10, but on Rawhide it breaks (because of libtool-2.2). I don't run rawhide here yet. I'll try to fix this libtool issue if I can find what needs changing... dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971571 dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 20:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022037.mB2KbdMe001723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-02 15:37:37 EDT --- Thanks a lot, Jon. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: partimage Short Description: Partition imaging utility, much like Ghost Owners: roma Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 21:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022124.mB2LOfsX022256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-02 16:24:40 EDT --- As guessed: $ grep soname build.libzdb.10.log gcc -shared [...] -Wl,-soname -Wl,libzdb-2.2.3.so.4 -o .libs/libzdb-2.2.3.so.4.1.2 $ objdump -x libzdb-2.2.3.so.4.1.2 |grep -i son SONAME libzdb-2.2.3.so.4 This is the internal library name an application will link with. The dynamic loader/linker will use this name when searching for the library file. And rpmbuild constructs automatic dependencies on these names. Including the full software 2.2.3 version in it (instead of just the library versioning scheme at the very right) implies that every time the 2.2.3 version will change, the dependencies of all packages that require this library will be broken and will need a rebuild. [...] libzdb-devel stores its header files directly in /usr/include. Due to file names like URL.h, Connection.h and Exception.h, this is typical pollution of the global namespace and must be avoided. Please install into /usr/include/libzdb/ instead. [...] Package "Summary" can start with "Small, fast, ..." instead of "A ...". [...] You can build with --disable-static to skip building the static lib. [...] The licencing stuff covered in file "EXCEPTIONS" seems okay. I'm not a lawyer, though, so Fedora Legal and/or a second pair of eyes would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 21:36:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:36:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022136.mB2LaqSq025350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2008-12-02 16:36:50 EDT --- replace %{crazy_version} with `echo %{version}|tr . -` it's much easier to see in place and don't have to change when the version change (although it's not changed for years) in the build section put the clean after the first build: make CROSS=%{_mingw32_host}- GC-inlined make clean make CROSS=%{_mingw32_host}- GCE-inlined afais GCE-inlined has different defines so probably a clean would be useful before the next target. add -mms-bitfields or even better %_mingw32_cflags to OPT probably only way to do this is a patch for the makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 21:38:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022138.mB2Lc4eX025530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2008-12-02 16:38:03 EDT --- imho this is one of the most complicated mingw32 spec file. is this really that bad or it was just written too long ago? a few comments: do we build and run the tests or not? it seems to me not, but the BR wine is still there. ie not %if %{with_tests} is there any reason for this line?: %{SOURCE1} > /dev/null neither mingw32-openssl-0.9.8g-configure.patch nor the inline gcc script has the -mms-bitfields set. anyway it'd be better to everywhere use the %_mingw32_cflags not the hard coded ones. anyway is it a good trick to use the inline gcc script? wouldn't be better to use everywhere the %_mingw32_make macro (but i don't see whether is has any effect? this comment in the sepc: "Disable this thread test, because we don't have pthread on Windows" still valid when we have mingw32-pthreads? unfortunately it's makefiles and configure scripts are very hard coded so we can't easily fix ar, ranlib etc. just patch the makefiles:-( imho the best way in this case to run a successful build and look trough the buildlog to find where and which commands are used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 22:24:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:24:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022224.mB2MOVFn003709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 22:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] New: Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values Alias: mysqlreport https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 Summary: Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackmysql.com/mysqlreport OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/mysqlreport.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/mysqlreport-3.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: mysqlreport makes a friendly report of important MySQL status values. It transforms the values from SHOW STATUS into an easy-to-read report that provides an in-depth understanding of how well MySQL is running, and is a better alternative (and practically the only alternative) to manually interpreting SHOW STATUS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 22:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022243.mB2MhtuU000841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-02 17:43:54 EDT --- dist-f11 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=972151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 22:44:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022244.mB2MiXE8000911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #22 from David Carter 2008-12-02 17:44:31 EDT --- Updated versions: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8.1-0.6/arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8.1-0.6/arm4-0.8.1-0.6.fc9.src.rpm Based on the 0.8.1 release which removed all code related to the SDK. Unfortunately this includes the test programs, so those packages have been removed as well. Also, as per Stefan's suggestion, all static libraries have been removed. Passed all the usual build tests with the same rpmlint warnings as before. 6th time's the charm? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022320.mB2NKYwg007791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:20:33 EDT --- OK, in that case I think this is fine. It would still be good to include that email from upstream with the license information as documentation, but you can do that at your leisure. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:25:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022325.mB2NPFVC015750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:25:14 EDT --- Any reason this ticket is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:24:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022324.mB2NOSvF008435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:24:27 EDT --- Is there any reason this hasn't been pushed out yet? I only see it in rawhide, with an update for f9 in testing (and nothing for f10). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:26:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022326.mB2NQDEc009056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:26:12 EDT --- Any reason this hasn't been built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022330.mB2NUeEF016722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:30:39 EDT --- Is there any chance of closing this now, nine months after the review has been completed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:29:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022329.mB2NTPnD016208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:29:24 EDT --- Any reason for this to still be open? Usually bodhi closes the tickets automatically when it pushes the new packages to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:31:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:31:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022331.mB2NVeK5010091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:31:37 EDT --- Any reason this ticket is stil open, given that the package is already in the relevant stable Fedora branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022328.mB2NSVjo009389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:28:28 EDT --- *** Bug 469833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022328.mB2NSU74009353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:28:28 EDT --- I guess this should have been closed DUPLICATE initially, so I'll do that now. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447191 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022333.mB2NXWL0010374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 18:33:31 EDT --- I guess a new package is needed now that we have functional guidelines. The above links seem to be broken in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022332.mB2NWJTd010262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-02 18:32:18 EDT --- I'll include the email before import. Thanks very much for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: m4ri Short Description: Linear Algebra over F_2 Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022337.mB2NbFV6017980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-02 18:37:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Steve, can you do a build of perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for F-9 as I need it for > perl-Crypt-DSA perl-Crypt-DH? I haven't seen any activity from Steve since mid-August or so; if you have superwizbangpackager membership (unsure of the exact name right now ) I'd suggest filing a bug against it, then just submitting an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022337.mB2Nb9Vt017951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth 2008-12-02 18:37:08 EDT --- Perhaps I unchecked the "close bug" box when I created the updates. No need to keep this open any longer now as you say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 23:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812022338.mB2NciNV018128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #4 from Paul Wouters 2008-12-02 18:38:43 EDT --- * Tue Dec 2 2008 Paul Wouters - 0.2.0-3 - Use upstream svn patch for multiple resolvers and defaults - Don't override unused libdir - Cleanup and run autoreconf - Added missing dependancies (anacron, automake, libtool) - Fix permission on cron job. I Added a require for anacron (but is that right? shouldnt it be any cron daemon?) Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 00:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030043.mB30hC0M021878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 19:43:10 EDT --- The shared-lib-calls-exit bits are just pointing out an oddity in the API of the library; generally the caller would want to handle errors itself instead of simply having the library exit, but I suspect that most of these libraries are for internal use anyway. If anything, they'd be something to report upstream; they're not blockers. The unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints are valid, but not really significant. I don't see any libraries there that wouldn't be pulled in by qt itself, so there's not really any inefficiency. The static libraries will need to go in their own -static packages; they are not permitted in the -devel packages alongside shared libraries. Preferably they aren't included at all, but that's up to you. Many (all?) of the *so files are duplicated between the base and -devel packages. It looks like you used the usual pattern for capturing just the versioned .so files, but this package uses some odd library versioning so for some reason the library version appears before the ".so" as well as after it on some files. I don't pretend to understand why, but I guess you'll need to change the patterns used for capturing the versioned and unversioned .so files. The COPYRIGHT file mentions a gsm directory with a different copyright, but I don't see it in the package. I guess the package now just uses an external library. I don't see any licensing information on the sounds. Can you verify the license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:10:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030110.mB31AufK000438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:10:55 EDT --- projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030110.mB31AR7o026719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:10:26 EDT --- projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:09:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030109.mB319ow5026303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:09:49 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030109.mB319rx8026338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030113.mB31DTod000950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030113.mB31DtaC027594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:13:54 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030112.mB31CSch027345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:12:27 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030113.mB31DPPR027456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:13:24 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030118.mB31IRjV029085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:18:26 EDT --- log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030120.mB31KhFU029667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:20:42 EDT --- sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-memorize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030123.mB31NdmU003765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:23:38 EDT --- sugar-jukebox-5-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030124.mB31Obnk003950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:24:36 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030123.mB31NOZo003700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:23:23 EDT --- log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030123.mB31Ng3l003808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030124.mB31OPRv030613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:24:24 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030126.mB31QXLE031567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:26:32 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030124.mB31OTa8030661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:28:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030128.mB31SMIY005720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:28:21 EDT --- unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030129.mB31T3Ie005918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:29:03 EDT --- pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030130.mB31USTd006795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:30:27 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:27:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030127.mB31RoFV032115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-02 20:27:49 EDT --- otl-4.0.176-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030129.mB31T67H032397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030153.mB31rlGi005033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 20:53:45 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The documentation files are duplicated between the main and -devel package. Unfortunately, modem.h and simd.h are far too generic to place in /usr/include. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e7a42c413a180b873ae76b2c252904a3e34c9807c2604f2315426443d9e28627 soundmodem-0.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: soundmodem-0.10-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm soundmodem = 0.10-3.fc11 soundmodem(x86-64) = 0.10-3.fc11 = /bin/sh chkconfig initscripts libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libasound.so.2()(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit) libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit) libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) libutil.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libxml.so.1()(64bit) soundmodem-devel-0.10-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm soundmodem-devel = 0.10-3.fc11 soundmodem-devel(x86-64) = 0.10-3.fc11 = soundmodem = 0.10-3.fc11 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X generically named files * scriptlets present OK (service management). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 02:09:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:09:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030209.mB329sb2007668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Alias| |hachoir-core Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 02:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030219.mB32JHqN014832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-02 21:19:16 EDT --- I cannot seem to fetch Source0; I think you need http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cqinet/%{name}-%{version}.tgz. You are missing the dependencies for the calls you make in the scriptlets: Requires(post): chkconfig Requires(preun): chkconfig Requires(preun): initscripts Requires(postun): initscripts * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 401646f336b052555abc776e40e94b3990b7c198f2a9ec65bf45ee45acbab6a2 thebridge-1.06.tgz (after fixing Source0: URL so that it downloads) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires: config(thebridge) = 1.06-2.fc11 thebridge = 1.06-2.fc11 thebridge(x86-64) = 1.06-2.fc11 = /bin/bash /bin/sh config(thebridge) = 1.06-2.fc11 libz.so.1()(64bit) Missing scriptlet dependencies. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (service management). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 03:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030347.mB33lepP031675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com, | |tibbs at math.uh.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-02 22:47:39 EDT --- Here is the long awaited review for this package: * Description: The description is insufficient. The term "root window" does not mean much to most people. What does "displays images on the root window" mean? I think it should be replaced by modern day terms such as "sets the wallpaper". * rpmlint says: xsri.spec:20: W: setup-not-quiet Use a -q flag on %setup macro xsri.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install buildroot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install xsri.src: W: no-url-tag I guess this package does not have an URL at all, so this is fine. xsri.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xsri-2.1.0/NEWS The file NEWS is empty, doesn't need to be packaged. xsri.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.0-15 ['1:2.1.0-15.fc10', '1:2.1.0-15'] Typo? Can be fixed easily. * Group: System Environment/Base Is this the best one to pick? * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * BuildRequires: gtk2-devel >= 1.3.13 From the guidelines: "if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all." gtk2-1.3 is ancient, so no need to use the specific version here. * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. I added Jason Tibbitts to the CC since he's the last known maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 03:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030357.mB33veYY027770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 --- Comment #2 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-12-02 22:57:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-core.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-core-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm - Update to new release - Rename the package to match naming guidelines for python modules - Add some files to the doc - Run test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 03:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: python-hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030359.mB33xeic027963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |hachoir-core - Hachoir core |python-hachoir-core - |parser |Hachoir core parser Alias|hachoir-core |python-hachoir-core -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 04:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: python-hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030401.mB341WcA001927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 --- Comment #3 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-12-02 23:01:32 EDT --- Sorry, give a wrong URL for the SRPM. SRPM URL : http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-core-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 05:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030512.mB35CDCf007720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from vivek shah 2008-12-03 00:12:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnurobots Short Description: A robot programming game Owners: bonii Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 05:18:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030518.mB35IIKf008533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-03 00:18:16 EDT --- The review arrived finally. Nothing serious, just few small things: * First you should close bug #444511 * This package is only for F-10+, right? * To simplify the code, you can use %define install_loc %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/eclemma and update everything accordingly. This is a suggestion, not a requirement. * You are now not owning the directory %{install_loc}/eclemma With the above suggestion you can just use %{install_loc} in the files section. * rpmlint says: eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: no-documentation Please add those about.html files (rename them), and at least the license.html and faq.html files to %doc eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/emma.jar /usr/share/java/emma.jar This can be ignored. eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/emma.jar /usr/share/java/emma.jar This should be fixed. eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/.options Is this file required? eclipse-eclemma.src: W: strange-permission get-eclemma.sh 0775 Please use 644 for source files. * The file ./com.mountainminds.eclemma.core/emma.jar needs to be removed in the %prep * The license file says: "The user documentation contains example code taken from the Apache Jakarta Commons project, provided under the terms and conditions of the Apache License Version 2.0. " Shall we include ASL 2.0 in the license tag? * Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . You are using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at certain points and %{buildroot} on others. You should stay consistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 05:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030550.mB35ot26020138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-03 00:50:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cqinet/%{name}-%{version}.tgz. > You are missing the dependencies for the calls you make in the scriptlets: Updated: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/thebridge.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/thebridge-1.06-3.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 06:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: python-hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030614.mB36EMG4023612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-03 01:14:21 EDT --- Thanks for the update. We need to have one thing corrected and I also have a suggestion: * I guess I should have been a little clearer. The python guidelines are slightly different for non-setuptools packages. You are using the guidelines as if the building is done by setuptools. Please check the setup.py file. In order to use the setuptools you have to pass the --setuptools flag to setup.py (in both %build and %install). OR alternatively, you can follow the non-setuptools guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs but this will require a somewhat larger modification. ? Having a closer look, I think you should include all of doc/* in %doc. Those are files for use of graphviz and dia, and they might be useful for some people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 06:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465649] Review Request: python-hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030636.mB36aIMn027185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465649 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |hachoir-parser - Package of |python-hachoir-parser - |Hachoir parsers used to |Package of Hachoir parsers |open binary files |used to open binary files Alias| |python-hachoir-parse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 06:37:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465649] Review Request: python-hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030637.mB36bebX021610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465649 --- Comment #1 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-12-03 01:37:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-parser.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-parser-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm - Update to new release - Rename the package to match naming guidelines for python modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 06:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465650] Review Request: python-hachoir-metadata - Program to extract metadata using Hachoir library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030638.mB36cCm9021674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465650 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |hachoir-metadata - Program |python-hachoir-metadata - |to extract metadata using |Program to extract metadata |Hachoir library |using Hachoir library Alias| |python-hachoir-metad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 06:53:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 01:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465650] Review Request: python-hachoir-metadata - Program to extract metadata using Hachoir library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030653.mB36rVr4029800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465650 --- Comment #1 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-12-03 01:53:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-metadata.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/python-hachoir-metadata-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm - Update to new release - Rename the package to match naming guidelines for python modules - Run test - Add ChangeLog to the doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 08:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 03:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030814.mB38EtAf010867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 09:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030953.mB39rrla029034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|461050 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 09:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030953.mB39rqZn029000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|461003 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 09:56:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030956.mB39uLDS023642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-03 04:56:20 EDT --- Update bug dependency, Tucnak2 does not depend on ssbd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 09:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 04:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030953.mB39rM9K022886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-03 04:53:21 EDT --- new upstream 2.19: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2-2.19-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 10:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031020.mB3AK8Pt028179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-03 05:20:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325510) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325510) suggest to add doc files to -devel package modified spec to add docs to -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 10:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031020.mB3AKc9i028285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 10:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031034.mB3AYqeX004170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-03 05:34:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The static libraries will need to go in their own -static packages; they are > not permitted in the -devel packages alongside shared libraries. Preferably > they aren't included at all, but that's up to you. Removed. > Many (all?) of the *so files are duplicated between the base and -devel > packages. It looks like you used the usual pattern for capturing just the > versioned .so files, but this package uses some odd library versioning so for > some reason the library version appears before the ".so" as well as after it on > some files. I don't pretend to understand why, but I guess you'll need to > change the patterns used for capturing the versioned and unversioned .so files. Fixed (I think...) > The COPYRIGHT file mentions a gsm directory with a different copyright, but I > don't see it in the package. I guess the package now just uses an external > library. I've asked upstream to update the file. > I don't see any licensing information on the sounds. Can you verify the > license? Asked upstream. new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 10:59:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 05:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031059.mB3AxAUb003371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-03 05:59:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The documentation files are duplicated between the main and -devel package. Updated, there's no doc files for devel package. > Unfortunately, modem.h and simd.h are far too generic to place in /usr/include. Moved'em to /usr/include/soundmodem. http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/soundmodem-0.10-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 11:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031126.mB3BQ45G009176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-03 06:26:03 EDT --- you need to use autotools because you have modified configure. I tried but end up with many errors from libtool. when asked same on #fedora-devel I got link http://bugs.gentoo.org/236758 and bug 474330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 11:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031133.mB3BXgLD015783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-12-03 06:33:41 EDT --- Hmm, there is one problem. We both missed that is package is already included: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 But it now bring the situation that I'm owner of F-10, F-9, EL-4 and EL-5 branch. And nigelj is owner of devel and F-8. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 11:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 06:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031137.mB3Bb6dH016500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-03 06:37:05 EDT --- grib_api-1.6.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grib_api-1.6.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:09:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031209.mB3C9pPr017800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-12-03 07:09:49 EDT --- Okay, here goes $ rpmlint mingw32-sqlite.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-sqlite-3.5.9-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-sqlite-3.5.9-3.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/sqlite3.pc mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sqlite3.h mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sqlite3ext.h mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a mingw32-sqlite.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.la mingw32-sqlite.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-sqlite rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem >= 39 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libsqlite3-0.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) $ md5sum sqlite-3.5.9.tar.gz b58412904b42fe49e5a281e99da0fd72 sqlite-3.5.9.tar.gz $ curl http://sqlite.org/sqlite-3.5.9.tar.gz | md5sum % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 2149k 100 2149k 0 0 692k 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 --:--:-- 776k b58412904b42fe49e5a281e99da0fd72 - + OK - Needs to be looked into / Not applicable ? Unsure * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= xx is in the .spec file [+] Requires are OK [+] BuildArch: noarch [+] No man pages or info files [+] No static libs [+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific ones [-] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [?] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [/] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [-] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [?] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [/] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [/] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [?] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [*] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. --- Still to do: rpmlint gives mostly false positives. There's one thing I think needs to be fixed: W: spurious-executable-perm: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a The MinGW Guidelines don't mention anything about -devel subpackage, so I don't know if these rpmlint messages can be ignored: mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/sqlite3.pc mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sqlite3.h mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sqlite3ext.h mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a Finally, packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (according to the regular package guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031216.mB3CGAR9024563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #22 from Victor Bogado 2008-12-03 07:16:07 EDT --- The reason is probably my "newbieness", I thought I already made a build for testing on the F10 branch. I will check again, now. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:17:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031217.mB3CHC9R024807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #23 from Victor Bogado 2008-12-03 07:17:11 EDT --- I don't have access to the build system right now, I will do it as soon as I can build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452458] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031219.mB3CJ0oM019812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452458 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-12-03 07:18:57 EDT --- *** Bug 466879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031218.mB3CIxJc019779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-12-03 07:18:57 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452458 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:41:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031241.mB3CfODE024794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-03 07:41:23 EDT --- I'm testing it and I don't have any problems with sending and receiving of encrypted message and signing messages is working too. So I think it can go to updates-testing after CVS is done. Do you have correctly set it up? So valid private/public key, set up your own private key in plugin configuration and public key for contact? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 12:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 07:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031259.mB3CxcUE000645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #21 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-12-03 07:59:37 EDT --- None that I'm aware. It can be closed AFAIAC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 13:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031301.mB3D1lr2001616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-12-03 08:01:46 EDT --- Packages are built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 13:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031311.mB3DBD7I004153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #11 from D Haley 2008-12-03 08:11:12 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-5.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-5.fc9.srpm RPMLint on SRPM, SPEC and RPM are empty >* Also, add "LICENSE_nanoxml" to %doc. Done. > If src/examples/Clock.java is needed, I will ask spot whether the > license is free or not. Done. Removed by deletion in %prep -- the examples are only compressed into the jar and are not required at compile. Q: How do I provide the srpm? With Clock.java or without -- if I make it with, it still contains it (just not the RPM). If I make it without then it will require me to recompress the source tarball, making the Source0 line invalid. > (and also any .jar.dll files) Not needed/implicit. The output of find ./ -name blah, where blah is *.jar, *so and *dll, is empty. This was the case for the prior revision. The prior revision included the standard check for java files from the packaging guidelines to ensure that the package will not build if any file *.jar is located within the build tree. This check is performed at %prep time. > BuildRequires, Requires Done. Imported any missing java deps from previous package "laf-plugin". Specifically jpackage-utils and updated java lines for req & buildreq. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 13:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031326.mB3DQSKf002646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-12-03 08:26:27 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Utils/perl-NOCpulse-Utils.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Utils/perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.10-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 13:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031332.mB3DW8W5003903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-03 08:32:07 EDT --- "Formal" review: source files match upstream: YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: NO dist tag is present: YES build root is correct: YES license field matches the actual license: YES license is open source-compatible: YES latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: YES compiler flags are appropriate: YES %clean is present: YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): NO debuginfo package looks complete: YES rpmlint is silent: YES final provides and requires look sane: YES owns the directories it creates: YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: YES no duplicates in %files: YES file permissions are appropriate: YES code, not content: YES ------------- Problems: - no configure flags are needed on rawhide, especially overriding --sysconfdir (see configure.ac, DEFAULT_CONFIGFILE macro definition) - package is not buildable on rawhide. New libtool no longer copies config.{guess,sub}. You have to copy it manually (for example "cp /usr/share/automake-1.10/config.{guess,sub} ." after you remove them) - as you wrote above you can "Requires: /etc/cron.daily" instead of "Requires: anacron". But AFAIK it is not needed because only anacron provides that directory, no other cron daemon. Otherwise no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 13:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031341.mB3Dfbqv005737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth 2008-12-03 08:41:35 EDT --- Please build the F-9 version of this package; it's needed by perl-Crypt-DH and perl-Crypt-DSA. Only the devel branch (which was inherited by F-10) has been buit so far. I would be happy to co-maintain this package if that would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] New: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Summary: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/trilead-ssh2/trilead-ssh2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/trilead-ssh2/trilead-ssh2-213-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Trilead SSH-2 for Java is a library which implements the SSH-2 protocol in pure Java (tested on J2SE 1.4.2 and 5.0). It allows one to connect to SSH servers from within Java programs. It supports SSH sessions (remote command execution and shell access), local and remote port forwarding, local stream forwarding, X11 forwarding and SCP. There are no dependencies on any JCE provider, as all crypto functionality is included. This package is the newest version of ganymed-ssh2 that is not maintained anymore and is required for newer versions of eclipse-subclipse that I am updating. There is no direct source download link, the page http://www.trilead.com/Download/Trilead_SSH_for_Java/ requires to check to options Is this kind of requests legal for Fedora "By downloading a Trilead software product you are certifying that you are not a national of Iraq; Liberia; Myanmar (Burma); Sierra Leone; C?te d'Ivoire; Sudan; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Usbekistan; Belarus; Lebanon or any country (or an explicit mentioned individual or group) to which the SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, http://www.seco.admin.ch) has decided to impose sanctions against. Please confirm by checking the above checkbox." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031445.mB3Ejbvd026226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2008-12-03 09:45:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I'm testing it and I don't have any problems with sending and receiving of > encrypted message and signing messages is working too. So I think it can go to > updates-testing after CVS is done. Do you have correctly set it up? So valid > private/public key, set up your own private key in plugin configuration and > public key for contact? We were able to send signed, encrypted and encrypted signed messages without any problems, but no encrypted messages were received. I used a F10 Live image with a persistent overlay where I updated KDE and installed the plugin. I do not see any obvious way to do something wrong here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031450.mB3EoB9t022987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-03 09:50:09 EDT --- OK source files match upstream OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. ? license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. ? %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Shouldn't you install %{vimfiles}/doc/perlsupport.txt into %doc? I didn't find license anywhere in the package. Where could I check it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031452.mB3Eq4ef028098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #15 from Tim Niemueller 2008-12-03 09:52:03 EDT --- Sorry for the noise. Didn't look enough and strangely the package (local) building did not fail. My bad. SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni-3.9.2-8.fc10.src.rpm (Successful) Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=973409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:56:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031456.mB3Eu9nN029113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #20 from D Haley 2008-12-03 09:56:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-6.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-6.fc9.src.rpm >Hmm isn't this a blocker for review ? There should be no other >copyright/license on any fedora spec file except fedora's. Gone. I thought this was part of the package licence's requirements -- but its not. >#001: Missing BuildRequires: ant-commons-logging Fixed. >#002: Rpmlint issues; rpmlint for SRPM,spec and RPM are empty. >#001: missing ant-commons-logging as Build Requires Fixed. >#002: add -verbose to ant Added, but this produces an extremely long output -- significantly greater than the scrollback on my terminal. Not good for building unless you (1) log or (2) redirect or both. Known issues: *I am not actually removing the skinlf jar, as the code to do this is commented out. I discussed this with akurtakov previously & will revisit this soon. * Thu Dec 04 2008 0.5.1-6 - Use ant to build jar, rather than straight from bash. - Fix build patch to correct native .so building - Thanks goes to akurtakov for assitance. - Fixed dos->unix line ending for doc files - Added dos2unix buildrequires - Fix arch flag - Added libX11 dep for native so - Added symlink for so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 14:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031457.mB3EvsqD029457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-03 09:57:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > We were able to send signed, encrypted and encrypted signed messages without > any problems, but no encrypted messages were received. I used a F10 Live image > with a persistent overlay where I updated KDE and installed the plugin. I do > not see any obvious way to do something wrong here. Ops, sorry I can see it now, it's not working now for me. I'll take a deeper look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 15:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031519.mB3FJCu3001398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #2 from John A. Khvatov 2008-12-03 10:19:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > you need to use autotools because you have modified configure. Why not use pregenerated configure? It's works fine for me. So, i fix spec file to using autoconf: SPEC: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog.spec SRPM: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog-0.1.2-5.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=973485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 15:22:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031522.mB3FMKnB030469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-03 10:22:17 EDT --- Looks good. And we thus have Mr. Callaway's legal blessing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 15:38:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031538.mB3FclTX006185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-03 10:38:46 EDT --- The release I mentionned in Comment #9 has still tests failing, but the latest release builds and tests fine! Thanks for your patience and remainders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 15:49:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031549.mB3FngvR004732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-03 10:49:41 EDT --- %{vimfiles}/doc/perlsupport.txt needs to be where it is so that vim can make it available as part of its online help (just as vim itself has a bunch of documentation in /usr/share/vim/vim72/doc directory). The license is in the header of plugin/perl-support.vim file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 15:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031555.mB3FtiBM010401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-03 10:55:43 EDT --- Ok. The review was accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 16:15:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031615.mB3GFgEV014872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-03 11:15:40 EDT --- Well, I tried to add "libtoolize --force" before calling aclocal, however for this package this does not work because with it only static archive is created and shared library is not created. The created ./libtool file contains "build_libtool_libs=no". I will try to debug what is causing this.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 16:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444511] Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031617.mB3GHwwv015389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444511 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 16:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031617.mB3GHx62015434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Bug 444512 depends on bug 444511, which changed state. Bug 444511 Summary: Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444511 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 16:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031625.mB3GP3ck017203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2008-12-03 11:25:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The review arrived finally. Nothing serious, just few small things: Thanks! > * First you should close bug #444511 Done. > * This package is only for F-10+, right? Yes. I updated the BRs/Rs on eclipse stuff to make it F-10+. > * To simplify the code, you can use > %define install_loc %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/eclemma > and update everything accordingly. This is a suggestion, not a requirement. Thanks, done. > * You are now not owning the directory > %{install_loc}/eclemma > With the above suggestion you can just use > %{install_loc} > in the files section. Yup, done. > * rpmlint says: > eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: no-documentation > Please add those about.html files (rename them), and at least the > license.html and faq.html files to %doc Done. > eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: dangling-symlink > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/emma.jar > /usr/share/java/emma.jar > This can be ignored. > eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/emma.jar > /usr/share/java/emma.jar > This should be fixed. I think we'd be better off fixing build-jar-repository. If you want, I'll make it a big long ln -s ../../../java/emma.jar instead, but build-jar-repository seems cleaner. > eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/.options > Is this file required? It may be just a build-time requirement but it doesn't harm anything to keep it. > eclipse-eclemma.src: W: strange-permission get-eclemma.sh 0775 > Please use 644 for source files. This is a shell script to fetch the source. Do you still want it changed? > * The file > ./com.mountainminds.eclemma.core/emma.jar > needs to be removed in the %prep Since I was symlinking over it I didn't think it was a big deal but I've added an explicit removal before the ln line now. > * The license file says: > "The user documentation contains example code taken from the Apache Jakarta > Commons project, provided under the terms and conditions of the Apache License > Version 2.0. " > Shall we include ASL 2.0 in the license tag? I don't know. I guess it can't hurt :) I've added it. > * Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section > of Packaging Guidelines . > You are using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at certain points and %{buildroot} on others. You > should stay consistent. Fixed. Updated spec and SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma-1.3.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 16:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031627.mB3GRjet013287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-03 11:27:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vim-perl-support Short Description: Perl-IDE for VIM Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 16:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474391] New: Review Request: libbase - JFree Base Services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libbase - JFree Base Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474391 Summary: Review Request: libbase - JFree Base Services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/libbase.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/libbase-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libbase - JFree Base Services libbase is a new dependency of the jfreereport family of packages, e.g. jcommon, jcommon-serializer etc which themselves are a dependency of openoffice.org's openoffice.org-report-designer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:19:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431186] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031719.mB3HJlYp028144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail 2008-12-03 12:19:45 EDT --- theres some problem with the app itself and upstream aint responding .. closing this review request as i lost interest with it. The Minbar GUI (which already in the repos) pretty much provide what I need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470792] Review Request: eclipse-shelled - Shell script editor plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031735.mB3HZ4BS031590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470792 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031750.mB3HoI9I031365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-03 12:50:16 EDT --- I'm happy to help you through the process if you need it; just contact me via email or find me on IRC in #fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031747.mB3HlkV9030780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-03 12:47:44 EDT --- For the record, it is acceptable for specfiles to be explicitly licensed as long as that license is accepted for software in Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#License_of_Fedora_SPEC_Files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:56:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:56:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031756.mB3HurVQ032567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-03 12:56:52 EDT --- I don't understand why you didn't just close it, but OK, I'll do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031758.mB3HwnHj003416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-03 12:58:48 EDT --- You ask a legal question, so blocking FE-Legal. It would be very much preferable to be able to download a tarball directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431186] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031759.mB3HxcPC000414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 17:57:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031757.mB3HvbB0032749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-03 12:57:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325567) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325567) Patch to build shared library with libtool 2.2 Okay, with this patch added as %Patch1, %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p1 -b add_pkgconfig.patch %patch1 -p1 -b .order %if 0%{?fedora} >= 11 libtoolize --force --copy %endif aclocal autoconf automake touch -r Makefile.in configure aclocal.m4 will make build succeed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=973859 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=973864 By the way, please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031802.mB3I2aT2001411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #24 from David Carter 2008-12-03 13:02:35 EDT --- All that remains is Eclipse licensed, so we're good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031811.mB3IBMYh003345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-03 13:11:21 EDT --- Then without further ado. . . APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:21:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031821.mB3ILQNH005102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-03 13:21:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: dangling-symlink > > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/emma.jar > > /usr/share/java/emma.jar > > This can be ignored. > > eclipse-eclemma.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative > > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/eclemma/eclipse/plugins/com.mountainminds.eclemma.core_1.3.2/emma.jar > > /usr/share/java/emma.jar > > This should be fixed. > > I think we'd be better off fixing build-jar-repository. If you want, I'll make > it a big long ln -s ../../../java/emma.jar instead, but build-jar-repository > seems cleaner. > I never saw a usage of build-jar-repository in the %install section before. Well, the guidelines state that the symlink must be relative. I know it's ugly but that's the way it should be. > > > eclipse-eclemma.src: W: strange-permission get-eclemma.sh 0775 > > Please use 644 for source files. > > This is a shell script to fetch the source. Do you still want it changed? > I don't think this is a MUST. But I recommend this in reviews. You can always call the fetch script via sh get-eclemma.sh > > * The license file says: > > "The user documentation contains example code taken from the Apache Jakarta > > Commons project, provided under the terms and conditions of the Apache License > > Version 2.0. " > > Shall we include ASL 2.0 in the license tag? > > I don't know. I guess it can't hurt :) I've added it. > So this is my biggest concern. The ASL 2.0 license clearly states that (clause 4.1): "You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License" This package does not include the ASL 2.0 license. I think you should EITHER download it and put it as a source in the SPEC file and then include it in the %doc[1] OR just remove com.mountainminds.eclemma.doc/pages/images/annotations.png and the relevant bits from com.mountainminds.eclemma.doc/pages/annotations.html But in either case, upstream should be notified about this issue. [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] New: Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 Summary: Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/giver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/giver-0.1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Giver is a simple file sharing desktop application. Other people running Giver on your network are automatically discovered and you can send files to them by simply dragging the files to their photo or icon shown in Giver. There is no knowledge or set up needed beyond what the person looks like or their name to use Giver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031836.mB3IabNX008079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2008-12-03 13:36:36 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma-1.3.2-3.fc10.src.rpm All issues fixed and I included a copy of the ASL 2.0 license text. I'll send an email upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:53:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031853.mB3Irj5E015005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 18:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031858.mB3IwbUO012720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-03 13:58:35 EDT --- Fine package. Burnt a CD-RW as a test without any problems. In GNOME. Only adjustments I could think of: * Requiring "hicolor-icon-theme" for the icon hierarchy. * Removing the Xfce reference in the summary. * Be careful with the --enable-debug option as not to enable anything you may not like. Currently it's okay, though. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031905.mB3J5Jio017781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |eclipse-eclemma Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-03 14:05:17 EDT --- Thanks for the update! Review done. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (eclipse-eclemma) has been APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031922.mB3JMXta021145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-03 14:22:32 EDT --- > g++ -O0 -g3 --pipe -Wall -lncurses procinfo.cpp -o procinfo It ignores our global %{optflags}, also influenced by switching on --enable-maintainer-mode. You want to make it accept $CFLAGS (as it doesn't use $CXXFLAGS for C++) and make sure that $LDFLAGS does not include -s (to avoid stripping the binaries as that would make the debuginfo pkg useless). > /usr/bin/procinfo-ng It builds just this executable (renamed from "procinfo") and therefore is not suitable as a direct replacement of the procinfo package, which includes "lsdev" and "socklist". It is NOT options-compatible with the "procinfo" pkg either. It conflicts with package "procinfo" in the manual page file, which you forgot to rename to procinfo-ng.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031927.mB3JR5t6022088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-03 14:27:04 EDT --- > Summary: System monitoring application It's text-based (ncurses), which is special enough to mention that. Else a summary like this is misleading, since most users will expect a modern desktop GUI application that adds a menu entry, too. Summary: Console-based system monitoring utility Summary: Console-based system monitoring tool ...or something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031934.mB3JYXpc023769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:34:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031934.mB3JYAjK023668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #22 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-03 14:34:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globalplatform Short Description: Library for access to OP 2.0.1 and GP 2.1.1 conforming smart cards Owners: fkooman Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031936.mB3Ja83C020928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031935.mB3JZwFJ020769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #9 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-03 14:35:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpshell Short Description: Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards Owners: fkooman Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] New: Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Summary: Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid.spec SRPM URL: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid-1.30-1.el5.src.rpm Description: This module provides immutable UUID objects (class UUID) and the functions uuid1(), uuid3(), uuid4(), uuid5() for generating version 1, 3, 4, and 5 UUIDs as specified in RFC 4122. This should be the same module included with Python 2.5 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031942.mB3JglKS022247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #1 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-12-03 14:42:46 EDT --- This is intended solely for EPEL 4 and 5 as the uuid module is included in Fedora already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 19:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031954.mB3JslbP024477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #23 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-03 14:54:46 EDT --- Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/globalplatform.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/globalplatform-5.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm - make it build with libtool 2.2 (rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 20:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812032006.mB3K6l6u027208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2008-12-03 15:06:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-eclemma Short Description: Java code coverage tool plugin for Eclipse Owners: overholt Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 20:24:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812032024.mB3KOpXU030733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-03 15:24:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > Fine package. Burnt a CD-RW as a test without any problems. In GNOME. > > Only adjustments I could think of: > * Requiring "hicolor-icon-theme" for the icon hierarchy. Xfburn already requires hicolor-icon theme trough gtk2, but I can add it explicitly. > * Removing the Xfce reference in the summary. > * Be careful with the --enable-debug option as not to enable anything you may > not like. Currently it's okay, though. This is actually a relict of debuging a reproducable crash in 3.2. Good catch. > APPROVED @Denis: I'd like you to be able to do a rebuild of this package when necessary (soname bump of libburn or libisofs), so I add you as owner. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfburn Short Description: Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia Owners: cwickert denis Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 22:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812032247.mB3MlGkx030745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters 2008-12-03 17:47:15 EDT --- I checked anacron and cronie with rpm -qi and now understand how they work together (and not like I thought before were a replacement). So Requires: anacron is fine with me. with my last patch, it also fixed the default conf file from usptream to /etc/autotrust/autotrust.conf, so indeed, override is no longer needed. I've removed it. I am still not sure how to deal with libtool. How am I supposed to know the latest version of libtool. Lookig in /usr/shake/automake-1.XX/ looks like an awful ugly hack. there must be a better way of doing this properly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040040.mB40e6GW017905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:40:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040043.mB40hUmJ018338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:43:29 EDT --- Consider also using the standard sourceforge url in Source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040048.mB40mw1q019157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:48:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:50:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040050.mB40oF1m019627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:50:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040046.mB40kaJH018991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:46:35 EDT --- We are no longer doing F-8 branches. cvs done without F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040055.mB40tAta020532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:55:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040052.mB40qrnV020002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:52:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040053.mB40rrQA020130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:53:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040056.mB40uZv2014813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:56:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040057.mB40vaeU021047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:57:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 00:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040059.mB40x9lT015103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 19:59:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 01:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040100.mB410T6I015579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 20:00:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 01:04:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040104.mB414NSR016228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 20:04:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 01:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040105.mB415Cg3016674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 20:05:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 01:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040109.mB419Mf1023121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(herlo1 at gmail.com) --- Comment #11 from Brian Pepple 2008-12-03 20:09:20 EDT --- Hey Clint, if this has been built you can close the bug. Step #13: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 01:31:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040131.mB41Vd7w020976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 01:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040132.mB41WihZ021129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(herlo1 at gmail.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 02:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 21:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040235.mB42ZdLS031551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-03 21:35:38 EDT --- deco-archive-1.2-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/deco-archive-1.2-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 03:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040331.mB43VjuB009546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-03 22:31:44 EDT --- I have decided not to push this for F10, because the program is still to crashy for the stable release. F-9 does not even meet the buildrequires, so only Rawhide build is available. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 04:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040409.mB4497xR016124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 23:09:06 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review this... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 04:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040416.mB44GSCg017654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-03 23:16:27 EDT --- deco-archive-1.2-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/deco-archive-1.2-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 04:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040417.mB44HmTE024270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-03 23:17:47 EDT --- deco-1.5.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/deco-1.5.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 04:20:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040420.mB44KkL7025176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-03 23:20:45 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 36be022bb59545df51b537f0e423d2d6 beanstalkd-1.1.tar.gz 36be022bb59545df51b537f0e423d2d6 beanstalkd-1.1.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: None. I don't see any issues here, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 04:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040443.mB44hDjE023324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-03 23:43:13 EDT --- deco-1.5.7-2.fc9.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/deco-1.5.7-2.fc9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 06:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040612.mB46CHY5012311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #28 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-04 01:12:15 EDT --- It looks like the upstream (Dan) made a new release. Who's going to build this package? Dan, is this ready to package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 06:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040627.mB46Ru3C008113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Jeremy Hinegardner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Hinegardner 2008-12-04 01:27:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beanstalkd Short Description: A fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service Owners: jjh Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 06:59:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040659.mB46xQQs012797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-04 01:59:25 EDT --- Here are the results of my review on this package: * rpmlint says: nwsclient.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/PythonNWSSleighWorker.pyc 0644 nwsclient.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/PythonNWSSleighWorker.pyo 0644 These files should be excluded. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Unnecessary_Byte_compilation * Since this package is a python module, we have to obey the python module naming guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 ? Shall we package the README* files? ? Why is only a subset of the scripts in the scripts directory installed? ? It would be nice if you make a %check section and run as many possible tests as possible from the test directory. * Source0 gives 404 * Providing Eggs for non-setuptools packages is slightly different than for setuptools packages. Please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 07:41:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040741.mB47fkmN019756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #46 from Lev Shamardin 2008-12-04 02:41:44 EDT --- Dear all, If you were interested in this package, can you please test it from updates-testing in Fedora 8 and/or Fedora 9 and provide feedback in bodhi here at these urls? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-10531 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10527 I would really like to have someone except me to check that the package works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 08:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 03:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040827.mB48RqRR001555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 08:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 03:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040834.mB48YuY7027799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-04 03:34:55 EDT --- Sent a new message to upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 09:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040932.mB49Wr3B008135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-04 04:32:51 EDT --- no issues left, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041100.mB4B0p8M027574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-04 06:00:50 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gmp-ecm Short Description: Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:06:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041106.mB4B6cYJ029258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Jerome Soyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041106.mB4B6Wds029230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 06:06:31 EDT --- robodoc-4.99.36-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/robodoc-4.99.36-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] New: Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Summary: Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: saispo at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ClamTk is a GUI front-end for ClamAV using Gtk2-perl. It is designed to be an easy-to-use, point and click virus scanner for Linux systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:07:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041107.mB4B7wge029487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 06:07:58 EDT --- robodoc-4.99.36-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/robodoc-4.99.36-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041118.mB4BI6er007211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-12-04 06:18:05 EDT --- Thanks for CVS Kevin. Source URL was a typo :-( Applied your suggestion. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:25:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041125.mB4BPbDL000729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 06:25:35 EDT --- perl-Crypt-DSA-0.14-7.fc9,perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-9.fc9,perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-DSA-0.14-7.fc9,perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-9.fc9,perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041135.mB4BZ7xY002985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 06:35:05 EDT --- Where do we stand here? I am ready to sponsor you, and the package is near from being acceptable, with (if you coordonate with dvips) or without your patch. Are we waiting for Spot on the legal issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041132.mB4BWCWg002108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rakesh.pandit at gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041132.mB4BWIeZ002213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth 2008-12-04 06:32:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Steve, can you do a build of perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for F-9 as I need it for > > perl-Crypt-DSA perl-Crypt-DH? > > I haven't seen any activity from Steve since mid-August or so; if you have > superwizbangpackager membership (unsure of the exact name right now ) I'd > suggest filing a bug against it, then just submitting an update. Fortunately I'm a member of the superwizbangpackager group and perl-sig too so I've now built F-9 versions of perl-Math-BigInt-GMP and perl-Crypt-DSA/perl-Crypt-DH with a dependency on perl-Math-BigInt-GMP. See Bug #447191. Steve's last blog post was in early October, and is titled "I'm not dead (yet)". Seems he's quite busy at work. http://blog.stevecoinc.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:36:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041136.mB4BaPTG010813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rakesh.pandit at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-04 06:36:23 EDT --- Aah! It slipped out of my mind. I will get back to it this weekend, Patrice thanks for reminding, this was important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:44:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:44:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041144.mB4BiUF9012087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-04 06:44:29 EDT --- Import to CVS done - devel branch only for the moment. Encrypted messages are transmitted correctly, I can even manually decrypt them with gpg. So I'm going to take a look to source code, hopefully it is small bug in decrypted message output to chat window :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 11:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 06:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041149.mB4BnVR0005614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 06:49:29 EDT --- You didn't picked the summaries from Comment #6? Otherwise rpmlint is right, given that known problem is fixed upstream: xcb-util.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation * follow guidelines * free software, license corrected, not included, but not included upstream either * library rightly packaged * match upstream 4b06006e438c3926d077439b31d290d6 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 * %files section right * sane provides 2 issues: URL should be http://xcb.freedesktop.org/ source tarball timestamp not kept: -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 24 00:33 ../SOURCES/xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 20 15:36 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 APPROVED if you fix the 2 issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 257781] Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041204.mB4C4KS1008636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257781 Bug 257781 depends on bug 257701, which changed state. Bug 257701 Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041204.mB4C4Ij3008607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 07:04:15 EDT --- Looks like F-9 will be EOL before _ffmoddir is introduced, so I give up on having this package in F-9. Thanks for th ereview, Tibbs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:09:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041209.mB4C9X8k017280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #25 from Victor Bogado 2008-12-04 07:09:30 EDT --- I had already built it, but I think the process of publishing the update had failed then, I thought then that this was because F10 was in a freeze then and that it would "automagicaly" be published afterward. I was, obviously mistaken, but now I already pushed the update into testing for F10. I guess that from now on all is automatic, isn't? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448497] Review Request: ca-certificates - Mozilla CA root bundle package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041213.mB4CDge5011165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448497 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-04 07:13:38 EDT --- This package seems to be included in Fedora 10. I'm assuming this ticket can and should be closed, so I'm doing that, but please reopen if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] New: Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 Summary: Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/ca-cacert.org/ca-cacert.org.spec SRPM URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/ca-cacert.org/ca-cacert.org-2008-1.src.rpm Description: Class 1 and Class 3 PKI keys from CAcert.org, to trust SSL certificates signed by either key of the CAcert Certificate Authority (CA). Notes : Now that the main ca-bundle.crt is shipped in its own "ca-certificates" packages, I thought it might be a good idea to be able to easily trust additional well known CAs by installing optional packages. The case of CAcert.org comes up frequently, so answering "just run yum install ca-cacert.org" from now on might be useful. If some day the CAcert.org certificates get included in the main ca-certificates packages, then it'll just be a matter of retiring this package and adding a few "Obsoletes:" to ca-certificates. For people who only want to trust the Class 3 certificate, it is possible to only install the "ca-cacert.org-class3" sub-package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041223.mB4CNq8J013314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:23:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453111] Review Request: np-config - NOCpulse global configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041223.mB4CNtrB013400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453111 Bug 453111 depends on bug 453109, which changed state. Bug 453109 Summary: Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 12:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041231.mB4CVAnb022183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-04 07:31:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > You didn't picked the summaries from Comment #6? Now I do. Thx for them. > Otherwise rpmlint is right, given that known problem is fixed upstream: > xcb-util.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxcb-aux.so.0.0.0 > exit at GLIBC_2.0 > xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation In -2 I have a patch for this from upstream git. > * follow guidelines > * free software, license corrected, not included, but not included upstream > either It is included. (The copyright patch.) > * library rightly packaged > * match upstream > 4b06006e438c3926d077439b31d290d6 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 > * %files section right > * sane provides > > 2 issues: > URL should be http://xcb.freedesktop.org/ Fixed. > source tarball timestamp not kept: > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 24 00:33 ../SOURCES/xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 265979 nov. 20 15:36 xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 Should be in -2. > APPROVED if you fix the 2 issues. Please, do so. -- http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 13:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041348.mB4DmkeP032704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #7 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-04 08:48:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I am still not sure how to deal with libtool. How am I supposed to know the > latest version of libtool. Lookig in /usr/shake/automake-1.XX/ looks like an > awful ugly hack. there must be a better way of doing this properly? Well, the best way is to report bug in upstream that they should not ship config.{sub,guess} as symlinks. Before new upstream release/tarball there are only two ways how deal with config.* problem: - copy them from automake - git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/config.git and then add them as SourceX to srpm You can choose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 14:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041435.mB4EZOKl018614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 09:35:23 EDT --- Everything is alrigth, I confirm my approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 14:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041450.mB4EoB5G022142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-04 09:50:10 EDT --- Patrice, thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 14:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041450.mB4EoBfO014992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474573 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 14:55:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041455.mB4Et2tw016200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #16 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 09:55:00 EDT --- you should use xdg-open in the .desktop instead of firefox. There is a Requires on bluecurve-icon-theme missing for the icons. You should do a proper package of this documentation, with a proper home page and download. My comments stating that this package is not that much ltsp specific are, in my opinion, still valid, but anyway, I won't block on that. There are license informations missing for the html, there should be a license notice at the beginning of the file (images are screen capture, I don't know what license cover them, but it is not an issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 15:09:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041509.mB4F9pnv026666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|474573 | --- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera 2008-12-04 10:09:49 EDT --- Fixed Require: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Changed summary for devel files Added README for pam (In reply to comment #7) > two more informal comments on the spec before I run down the checklist: > - I don't think the explicit Requires: PolicyKit is needed, library deps > should take care of that Removed > - The Conflicts: pam_fprint should probably have a comment explaining your > rationale from comment #2 I removed the Conflicts. The configuration is different, so I'll add some release notes. > rpmlint run: see above > > package name: ok > spec file name: ok > packaging guidelines: ok > license: ok > license field: not ok > the license field says GPLv2+, and the source files say so too, > but the license file is GPL3. What gives ? Fixed, it's supposed to be a GPLv2 COPYING file. > license file: ok > spec file language: ok > spec file legible: ok > upstream sources: ok > buildable: ok > ExcludeArch: ok > BuildRequires: ok > locale handling: ok > shared libs: ok > relocatable: ok > directory ownership: not ok > -devel should require gtk-doc, for /usr/share/gtk-doc/html Added. > -pam should require pam, for /lib/security Already dragged in through library deps (PAM libs are in the pam package) > duplicate files: ok > permissions: not ok > the %files sections for pam and devel need %defattr Done. > %clean: ok > macro use: ok > permissible content: ok > large docs: ok > %doc content: ok > headers: ok > static libs: ok > pc files: ok > shared libs: ok > devel deps: ok > libtool archives: ok > gui apps: ok > file ownership: ok > %install: ok > utf8 filenames: ok > > summary: some small fixes left All done! http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd.spec http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/fprintd/fprintd-0.1-3.git43fe72a2aa.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=976118 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 15:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041531.mB4FVRCK031829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #3 from John A. Khvatov 2008-12-04 10:31:26 EDT --- - fix %%{_includedir} - fixed documentation SPEC: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog.spec SRPM: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog-0.1.2-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 15:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041546.mB4Fka3Y028825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474573 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041622.mB4GMR24011958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #17 from Warren Togami 2008-12-04 11:22:26 EDT --- Hmm xdg-open failed in earlier testing on F9, but it seems to work for local HTML files now on F10. In the past xdg-open couldn't handle local files because it depended on prefixes like "http://". I would prefer to stick with "firefox" for now to ensure that it actually works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:42:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041642.mB4Ggeax016237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 11:42:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Hmm xdg-open failed in earlier testing on F9, but it seems to work for local > HTML files now on F10. In the past xdg-open couldn't handle local files > because it depended on prefixes like "http://". Which past? xdg-open is a simple script, and it will fallback to firefox anyway. Now, maybe one of the framework xdg-open may use didn't worked (gnome-open, kfmclient, exo-open or mimeopen), without clearly erroring such that the BROWSERS list wasn't used, but this is not, in my opinion, a reason not to use xdg-open. > I would prefer to stick with > "firefox" for now to ensure that it actually works. I don't think it is wise to workaround xdg-open bugs that way; If xdg-open doesn't work it should be investigated, but using firefox, is, in my opinion, an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041649.mB4GnDtX017380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041649.mB4GnEMH017402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474606 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] New: Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Summary: Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/irrlicht.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Irrlicht Engine is an open source high performance realtime 3D engine written and usable in C++ and also available for .NET languages. It is completely cross-platform, using D3D, OpenGL and its own software renderer, and has all of the state-of-the-art features which can be found in commercial 3d engines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] New: Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Summary: Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/SolarModel.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/SolarModel-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solar Model provides realtime modeling of the solar system. It allows the user to navigate in space, to control time counting (speed-up time flow) and estimate real movement of space bodies like planets, dwarf planets and moons; estimate its nowadays positions in space. You may select two possible views: Solar System view or Milky Way galaxy view. It also allows the user to bind the camera to space objects (for example, you can look from the Moon onto Earth in real time flow). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041653.mB4Greof018271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #19 from Warren Togami 2008-12-04 11:53:39 EDT --- That is an unproductive hard-line stance. I will not risk this particular launcher not working when it is crucial to the entire point of this spin. A future version will switch to xdg-open only after we've made 100% sure that it is reliable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 16:56:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] New: Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 Summary: Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xloadimage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xloadimage-4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xloadimage is a utility which will view many different types of images under X11, load images onto the root window, or dump processed images into one of several image file formats. The current version can read many different image file types. A variety of options are available to modify images prior to viewing. These options include clipping, dithering, depth reduction, zoom (either X or Y axis independently or both at once), brightening or darkening, and image merging. When applicable, these options are done automatically (eg a color image to be displayed on a monochrome screen will be dithered automatically). Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=976418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041718.mB4HIua8016853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-04 12:18:55 EDT --- Looks fine now. Approved. Might be nice to add /usr/share/dbus/interfaces/net.reactivated.Fprint.xml at some point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:30:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:30:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041730.mB4HUflS025970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:31:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041731.mB4HVkHs019598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 12:31:45 EDT --- vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041731.mB4HVhgD019569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 12:31:42 EDT --- vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041736.mB4HaeLJ020500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-04 12:36:39 EDT --- Hey Tom, its trying to run ldconfig during build. + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut + cd source/Irrlicht + mkdir -p /var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut/usr/lib + mkdir -p /var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut/usr/include/irrlicht + make INSTALL_DIR=/var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut/usr/lib install cp ../../lib/Linux/libIrrlicht.so.1.5.beta /var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut/usr/lib cd /var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut/usr/lib && ln -s libIrrlicht.so.1.5.beta libIrrlicht.so ldconfig -n /var/tmp/irrlicht-1.5-0.1.beta.fc8-root-mmahut/usr/lib make: ldconfig: Command not found make: *** [install] Error 127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:38:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:38:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041738.mB4HcSw7027195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Bastien Nocera 2008-12-04 12:38:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fprintd Short Description: D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access Owners: hadess Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041744.mB4Hiem5028195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-04 12:44:39 EDT --- Weird, dunno how I missed that, I ran it through koji to completion. Let me fix that. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:49:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041749.mB4Hna8n028952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 17:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041756.mB4Hu77k030414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-04 12:56:06 EDT --- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/irrlicht-1.5-0.2.beta.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/irrlicht.spec I'm not sure how you got a build going without glibc, but I digress. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 18:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041851.mB4IpDTu008354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #29 from Dan Dennedy 2008-12-04 13:51:11 EDT --- There are still some things in Nicolas' comments #18 and #21 that are not addressed because I do not fully understand them. To be honest, I hardly understand anything he writes. - I do not understand why the existing --disable-mmx is not satisfactory; maybe he meant "--disable-sse2" instead of "--disable-sse". But it seems to me all of MLT's usage of MMX is not acceptable to Fedora i386 policy, and I know some of it is not yet compatible with x86-64. So, it seems to me --disable-mmx should be fine as a global option regardless of architecture of the build. - I know nothing about multilibs. - Re: "- Have runtime tests to be done." What exactly does that mean? MLT already attempts to dlopen all so in lib/mlt. Another release is planned before end-of-year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 18:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041854.mB4IsP0a008666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #25 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-04 13:54:23 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=977087 Built for rawhide. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041934.mB4JY2gH017965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:34:00 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041933.mB4JXUqU017902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:33:29 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041936.mB4JaDQv012293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:36:10 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:33:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041933.mB4JX5cV011537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:33:03 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226416] Merge Review: shadow-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041936.mB4JabZX012326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226416 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:36:36 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041935.mB4JZagd012087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:35:34 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226157] Merge Review: module-init-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041934.mB4JYXxa011659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226157 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-04 14:34:31 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041937.mB4Jbtvn018894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-04 14:37:54 EDT --- This package isn't a python module, its a python application that includes its own module, thus, it doesn't need to be renamed. The tests can't be run without an nwsserver, so they're not overly useful in %check. The README files are packaged, look closely. :) The PySleighService.py isn't installed on Linux because it is windows specific. All the other scripts are installed. I fixed the Source0 URL, used setuptools-devel, and got rid of the byte compiled files. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/nwsclient.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:48:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041948.mB4JmQQD021607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-04 14:48:24 EDT --- Did anything ever happen with this? I see the basesystem package is still around in F10 and rawhide. I can't imagine there are any packaging-related issues left since the package is essentially empty, so there can't be much reason why this review would still be open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:47:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041947.mB4JlWtP021510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-04 14:47:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'm not sure how you got a build going without glibc, but I digress. :) I guess he uses Fedora 8, and therefore does not have sbin in his path. I'm wondering how could that ldconfig succeed for you -- you don't build packages as root, do you? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 19:57:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225659] Merge Review: cracklib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041957.mB4Jv3YX017137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225659 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-04 14:57:01 EDT --- Wow, this one hasn't been touched for a while. Jef, did you want to continue this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:04:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042004.mB4K4XTA025116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-04 15:04:32 EDT --- Nope, not as root. ldconfig seems to succeed with -n as a normal user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042007.mB4K72oh019308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-04 15:07:01 EDT --- All good, except I have an issue with the naming. I know that the package contains a python application, but the doc files, especially /usr/share/doc/nwsclient-1.6.3/nws.client.html gave me the impression that this package's main purpose is usage as a python module. Am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042009.mB4K99tP026035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-04 15:09:08 EDT --- The main purpose of this package is to provide a python client to communicate with the nwsserver. The module enables you to write python scripts to send jobs to the nwsserver, but it is primarily the python client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042020.mB4KKhTv028508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 15:20:43 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042020.mB4KKeap028473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 15:20:39 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042017.mB4KHJ2v027750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-04 15:17:17 EDT --- ok, convinced :) -------------------------------------------- This package (nwsclient) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042019.mB4KJ6aG021709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 --- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-04 15:19:05 EDT --- I already approved it, but reverted since it seemed pointless to me to close a review if th epackages is meant to be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:20:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042020.mB4KKaiB022183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-04 15:20:34 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 20:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042028.mB4KS6RL023673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 --- Comment #23 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-04 15:28:04 EDT --- IMHO the package still should die... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 22:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042252.mB4Mq7A6020198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-04 17:52:06 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 0a8ee9b185702750706f68e4a34e086873f17690 xloadimage.4.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. --> see note #1 [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. See issue #1 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane: === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, EL-5/x86_64 + koji scratch builds for all archs [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: all archs supported by koji scratch builds [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Being an X application, the package should include a desktop file. However the power of the tool comes from command line options so a desktop file would not be really useful. I guess we can accept an exception here. === Final Notes === 1. Duplicate BuildRequires: zlib-devel (by libpng-devel) 2. Please consider an EL-5 branch. I have just tested and it builds / works without any modifications of the spec.If you cannot maintain it, I'll be glad to do it. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 22:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042258.mB4MwlBD028557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-04 17:58:46 EDT --- Well done! * SPEC file is clean, legible. RPMlint produces no errors and warnings. (I think "Realtime" (in Summary) is correctly spelled "Real-time" in American English, but I'm not sure since I'm not a native speaker.) * Built in fedora-5-i386-epel mock (irrlicht packages pulled in manually) successfully with after a tiny 32bit-specific fix applied (I assume x86_64 builds fine). Anyways, BRs are connect. To build this on i386 a small change is needed, since the length of a light year won't fit in a 32bit doubleword (sorry about the light breaks, but it's trivial to apply this by hand anyways): diff -up SolarModel_src/GameMeasurer.cpp.int SolarModel_src/GameMeasurer.cpp --- SolarModel_src/GameMeasurer.cpp.int 2008-12-04 21:03:05.000000000 +0100 +++ SolarModel_src/GameMeasurer.cpp 2008-12-04 21:11:32.000000000 +0100 @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ core::stringw GameMeasurer::GetDistanceA distanceKM/9460730472581.0f); swprintf(s, (sizeof(s)/sizeof(s[0])), L"%.0lf km%s%s", - distanceKM, distanceKM>149598?au:L"", distanceKM>9460730473?ly:L""); + distanceKM, distanceKM>149598?au:L"", distanceKM>9460730473LL?ly:L""); } return core::stringw(s); It won't block the approval, since at the packages are required to build on at least one architecture, and I don't see why won't this build on x86_64. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 23:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042330.mB4NUw54003037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-04 18:30:56 EDT --- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 03:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffc - Computer version of the board game Rush Hou In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050318.mB53I1P7009783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 --- Comment #5 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-12-04 22:18:01 EDT --- Oh, and updated files: Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/pytraffic.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/pytraffic-2.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 03:17:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffc - Computer version of the board game Rush Hou In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050317.mB53HORL009703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 --- Comment #4 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-12-04 22:17:21 EDT --- Updated package: - Fixed issue where main and sub-package included the same files. - Added gtk-icon-cache scriplet Also did a koji build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=980089 As for the licensing information, I'm not sure I understand which file is in violation or how. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 03:57:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:57:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050357.mB53vuN9017489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2008-12-04 22:57:55 EDT --- oooooooooooooops. Actual SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/irclog2html/2.7-1.svn67/irclog2html-2.7-1.svn67.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 03:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] New: Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Summary: Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/irclog2html/2.7-1.svn67/irclog2html.spec SRPM URL: Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats Description: irclog2html is a nice IRC log parser and colorizer that will do the most common things necessary to make an IRC log readable in a web browser. It can export to many different HTML formats, and can export MediaWiki pipe-table syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050412.mB54CPaa020782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-04 23:12:24 EDT --- Well, I guess bug 473874 isn't going to be resolved anytime soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:15:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:15:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050415.mB54Fuis015173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-04 23:15:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper-0.35-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=980199 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050443.mB54hUSw025749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matt_domsch at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] New: Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Summary: Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/supybot-fedora-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/supybot-fedora.spec Description: A Supybot plugin which provides access to Fedora information. Implements a variety of commands, such as: * fas * fasinfo * ext * bug * whoowns These provide various information from the Fedora Package Database and Account System and provide it via IRC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050443.mB54hEL6019792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2008-12-04 23:43:14 EDT --- Easy review, as this is a small package with a clean script. BuildRoot line could be one of the more preferred items, but matters little with newer rpm 4.6. Also s/CVS/SCM/ in the comments. Both are trivial and can be fixed on CVS import. naming: ok legal: ok tags: ok rpmlint: no warnings or errors Comment in spec about license, site points to latest copy of GPL, so presumably they mean to do so. Therefore v3+ is appropriate. nothing else special about the package. clean file list, permissions. Byte-compiled python stuff is just for testing, and is in %{_datadir}. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:49:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050449.mB54n0OI026737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2008-12-04 23:48:59 EDT --- thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: irclog2html Short Description: Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats Owners: ianweller Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: (none) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:48:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] New: Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Summary: Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/supybot-koji-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/supybot-koji.spec Description: A Supybot plugin which provides access to the status of a Koji buildsystem and makes it available via IRC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:47:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050447.mB54lF8o020547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |miniupnpc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:47:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050447.mB54lwQO020619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2008-12-04 23:47:57 EDT --- I would approve this because it seems perfectly fine, but since I *am* upstream I think another set of eyes would be the proper way to do things here. Sorry, Jon ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050459.mB54x8Hu028588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-04 23:59:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-FormFu Short Description: HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050510.mB55Ah7k030839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-05 00:10:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050511.mB55Bk9O025045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-05 00:11:45 EDT --- cvs done. Do consider supporting EPEL if this package builds/works on EL hosts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:15:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050515.mB55F8Eh031649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-05 00:15:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050512.mB55ChXO025187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-05 00:12:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050513.mB55DXhw025287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-05 00:13:32 EDT --- Please add a cvs template here for what you want and reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050525.mB55PRjx027604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-05 00:25:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050636.mB56aCiU013144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #7 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-05 01:36:11 EDT --- Ok this should be the final packing, it passes rpmlint only warning about lack of documentation, which I have requested upstream include, but have not gotten a response about. There is now a java wrapper script so it can be executed from the command line. SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse.spec SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/xjparse-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 07:02:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050702.mB572xTv011349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #5 from Bernard Johnson 2008-12-05 02:02:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb-2.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks Michael, you comments were very valuable. $ objdump -x usr/lib/libzdb.so.4.1.2 | grep SO SONAME libzdb.so.4 $ rpm -qpl libzdb-2.2.3-2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep libzdb.so /usr/lib/libzdb.so.4 /usr/lib/libzdb.so.4.1.2 $ rpm -qpl libzdb-devel-2.2.3-2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep include /usr/include/libzdb /usr/include/libzdb/Connection.h /usr/include/libzdb/ConnectionPool.h /usr/include/libzdb/Exception.h /usr/include/libzdb/PreparedStatement.h /usr/include/libzdb/ResultSet.h /usr/include/libzdb/SQLException.h /usr/include/libzdb/URL.h $ grep Summary: libzdb.spec | head -1 Summary: Small, fast, and easy to use database API $ grep disable libzdb.spec | head -1 %configure --disable-static --enable-protected The package is licensed under GPLv3+ OR GPLv3 + exceptions. Since the exceptions have not been evaluated for being Fedora compatible, wouldn't we just take the OR clause and distribute it under the GPLv3? Also, if you read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ, 3rd question, it says "look at the source" and the source is licensed GPLv3+. It also says "COPYING [or in this case EXCEPTIONS] does not signal licensing intent (it might not seem intuitive, but this is what Red Hat legal told us, and we're going by that)." And, then there is also this under "Multiple licensing situations": The source code in my package is dual licensed, but one of the licenses is a proprietary license (the other is GPLv2+). You do not need to list the proprietary license in the License tag, so it should read: License: GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 07:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:47:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050747.mB57lf7M024458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #24 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-05 02:47:39 EDT --- Ok I think I am done, I have left out the javadocs for now, they are only partially done upstream, and are going to take a while to format in the build script. I will add them in as an update when they are ready as they are not a requirement for packaging. This SRPM will not compile until Bug 453018 is fixed, you can use the SRPM I posted there and it will work. So far that maintainer has not responded to emails or the bug. He is in Europe so it is hard to find him on IRC during my time. This will run on F9, but render correctly only F10, there was no response to a question asking if the openjdk fix will be applied to F9 in the future. And the files: SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-3.1.3-8.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 08:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 03:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050850.mB58oG6C002962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #17 from Avi Alkalay 2008-12-05 03:50:14 EDT --- So what is missing to get this done ? What else can I do ? Why the process stopped ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 09:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050959.mB59xJai016276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-05 04:59:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xcb-util Short Description: Convenience libraries sitting on top of libxcb Owners: mnowak Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 10:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 05:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051003.mB5A3wMi011379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #20 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-05 05:03:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > That is an unproductive hard-line stance. I will not risk this particular > launcher not working when it is crucial to the entire point of this spin. A > future version will switch to xdg-open only after we've made 100% sure that it > is reliable. xdg-open is reliable, it is a plain shell script. In gnome it does [ x"$GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID" != x"" ] && gnome-open "$1" So if it doesn't work, it means that this doesn't work, and if it doesn't work, the desktop is certainly screwed. Now I can accept that you prefer using a plain firefox instead of gnome-open but this has nothing to do with xdg-open. It is admitedly possible that there is a bug in the xdg-open script itself, but I doubt it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 10:09:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 05:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051009.mB5A9oJe012827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera 2008-12-05 05:09:45 EDT --- Build in rawhide, thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 10:31:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 05:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] New: Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Summary: Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pcfe at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/jpilot-backup.spec SRPM URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/jpilot-backup-0.53-3.src.rpm Description: Hello, this is my first package submitted for review. The spec file is built on the one included in the tarball. Notable changes to the spec are in the %changelog (basically cleanups), patch to the package added so that it compiles on x86_64. I'd definitely like feedback on that patch as it feels botched to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 10:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 05:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051041.mB5AftpP018969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at leemhuis.info Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 10:48:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 05:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051048.mB5AmW6n020207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 05:48:31 EDT --- there are several tiny problems: - the correct Source0 is https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/%name/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 - the spec file name as included in the src.rpm should be supybot-fedora, not supybot-koji - %install lacks rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Otherwise things seem pretty much OK, please come back with a correct src.rpm and I'll do a full review PS: is BR python-devel really needed? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python claims BR: python is enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 11:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051127.mB5BRPaZ027927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 06:27:24 EDT --- No further blockers, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 11:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051134.mB5BY29q002256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 06:34:01 EDT --- obviously correct Source0 should have read https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/%name/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 11:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051142.mB5Bgvva030653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 06:42:56 EDT --- Source0 should be https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/%name/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2-0.1.tar.bz2474746 %install lacks rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Everyhing else seems fine, please fix the above and we are good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 11:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051153.mB5Br6j7032546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 06:53:04 EDT --- Access to do koji scratch builds is open to anyone with a FAS account, if I am not mistaken. As of what is missing: you miss a proper fix of the package. Despite having being told several times to patch the makefile, you keep coming with incorrect workarounds. gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -DNDEBUG -o upnpc-sta tic upnpc.o libminiupnpc.a /usr/bin/ld: miniwget.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC miniwget.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [libminiupnpc.so] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lhMd1F (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lhMd1F (%build) EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/miniupnpc.spec' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 286, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), ret) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/miniupnpc.spec' LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 12:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] New: Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Summary: Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.seflip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint: SPEC: empty SRPM: empty RPM: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libstxxl.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. Why is a ".a" library considered to be devel? Something I don't understand properly most likely. Its kinda the key file in all of this. Scratch build: $ koji build --scratch dist-f9 ../SRPMS/stxxl-1.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/stxxl-1.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:35 667.63 KiB 18.62 KiB/sec Created task: 980984 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=980984 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... ... 980988 buildArch (stxxl-1.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> canceled 0 free 0 open 3 done 2 failed Comments: *The install section is a bit of a mess as the project rolls its own makefiles. I had to write the install section myself. *PPC arch build fails, as latex cannot be run (permissions problem?). I can simply drop PDF/DVI user manual generation for this arch if this is a problem. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=980985&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 12:15:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051215.mB5CFYF2005085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 07:15:33 EDT --- http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.spec is not a valid URL and under http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/ I see nothing relevant. Usually .a are statically build libs and they require special packaging. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries According to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=980986&name=build.log, your package does not respect the mandatory Fedora compiler flags, as described by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags. And not only the ppc build fails, all of them do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 12:21:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051221.mB5CLso6006416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2008-12-05 07:21:53 EDT --- Disabling the latex generation causes all arches to build successfully. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=981048 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] New: Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Summary: Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.bubeck at reinform.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Vacation is the automatic mail answering program found on many Unix systems. This version works with the sendmail restricted shell. This is my first package for fedora. I'm seeking for a sponsor. In the past I worked with Than Ngo . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:30:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469052] Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051330.mB5DU2Y0026293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-12-05 08:30:01 EDT --- Fixed some other issues with the package: New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/ris-linux.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/ris-linux-0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051331.mB5DVfH6026699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051334.mB5DYoKK027110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) --- Comment #7 from Jindrich Novy 2008-12-05 08:34:49 EDT --- Jon, I'm unsure what comments to put to which place. db4 contains unversioned obsoletes in subpackages as well. So pasting comments before the Obsoletes in each subpackage seems a bit messy to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051342.mB5Dgg8j023333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-05 08:42:40 EDT --- Now it works. rpmlint on SRPM: nss.src:131: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nss.src:138: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/nss.pc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nss.src:148: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nss.src:156: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nss.src:158: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. Fix if possible. nss.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". Definitely fix. rpmlint on RPMS: nss.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. nss.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/prelink.conf.d/nss-prelink.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. nss.i386: E: invalid-soname /lib/libnsspem.so libnsspem.so The soname of the library is neither of the form lib.so. or lib-.so. nss.i386: E: invalid-soname /lib/libnssckbi.so libnssckbi.so The soname of the library is neither of the form lib.so. or lib-.so. nss-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/nss-3.12.2.0/mozilla/security/nss/lib/libpkix/pkix/checker/pkix_policychecker.h ... and many others. FIX. nss-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix if possible. nss-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/libsoftokn3.chk ../../lib/libsoftokn3.chk The relative symbolic link points nowhere. nss-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/libfreebl3.chk ../../lib/libfreebl3.chk The relative symbolic link points nowhere. Fix if possible. nss-pkcs11-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. nss-tools.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix if possible. nss-tools.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. Can't this be dropped? Source0 must include a URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL %clean starts with %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %install must also. Doing mock build to double-check BRs, but this is probably fine. Summary of full review: buildroot issues, documentation issues, explicit zlib dep, SourceURL issues. Otherwise OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051350.mB5Do6ta030407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-05 08:50:04 EDT --- Agreed, I'd put them before the Obsoletes for the utils subpackage, and explain that it applies to all the rest as well. Comments for the -static (lack of)docs can go in the %files static right before %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474812] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-Unload/perl-Class-Unload.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-Unload/perl-Class-Unload-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unloads the given class by clearing out its symbol table and removing it from %INC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051353.mB5DrULf025447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-05 08:53:29 EDT --- Quick comments: 1. (minor) use prefered/standard Group: and BuildRoot: (see Packaging guidelines for details). 2. %build: use make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" 3. install usage: use -p flag (preserve timestamps), do *not* use -s (strip) 4. imo, the %post, %postun scriptlets are unwise/broken. My home-brewed vacation pkgs always included the /etc/smrsh/vacation symlink in the package. But that means vacation Requires: sendmail , I'm unware if it works with other mailers. If so, then perhaps a %trigger sendmail would work better. 5. %files: use %defattr(-,root,root,-) then you don't need to manually use %attr everwhere -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] New: Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-AutoXS-Header/perl-AutoXS-Header.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-AutoXS-Header/perl-AutoXS-Header-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module is a simple container for the newest version of the AutoXS header file AutoXS.h. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051405.mB5E5xDW001944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #19 from Avi Alkalay 2008-12-05 09:05:57 EDT --- I can look for it, but do you have any fast link to how to use Koji ? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474816] New: Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474816 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-FindIndent/perl-Text-FindIndent.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-FindIndent/perl-Text-FindIndent-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an experimental distribution that attempts to intuit the underlying indent "policy" for a text file (most likely a source code file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051417.mB5EHn5h004418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #20 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 09:17:47 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] New: Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor/perl-Class-XSAccessor-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Class::XSAccessor implements fast read, write and read/write accessors in XS. Additionally, it can provide predicates such as has_foo() for testing whether the attribute foo is defined in the object. It only works with objects that are implemented as ordinary hashes. Class::XSAccessor::Array implements the same interface for objects that use arrays for their internal representation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:26:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051426.mB5EQD1F032649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474818 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051426.mB5EQCm2032628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474815 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051446.mB5EkfTX004591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 09:46:39 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type in specfile: GPLv2+ License type referenced in the source (perl) file: GPLv3 License file bundled with the source (inside the tar.gz) file: GPLv3 --> See Issue 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 00d2790a9b76422a936f96a622567aa03437b9a3 mysqlreport-3.5.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [!] Package consistently uses macros. See Issue 2 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: rawhide/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: all archs via koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. will test soon in Centos env (EL-4 and 5) [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. Issues ========= 1. license as claimed by the spec does not seem to correspond to the one in the source 2. %clean uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; the rest of the spec uses the lowercase variant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051449.mB5EnQmd005094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-05 09:49:25 EDT --- Also -- now I realize this doesn't create a Desktop Entry. Please install a .desktop file with this package. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] New: Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Summary: Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xteddy.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xteddy-2.0.1-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Xteddy is your virtual comfort when things get rough. It can do everything a real teddy bear can do. That is, I can sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 14:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051458.mB5EwFpl007837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 09:58:14 EDT --- Good: works fine in EL-4 and EL-5. Chris, please consider EPEL branches too. I volunteer for [co-]maintainership if you need a monkey hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 15:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051510.mB5FAJlb010860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-12-05 10:10:18 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Changelog * Sat Dec 06 2008 1.2.1-2 - Removed latex build & buildrequires - Patched makefiles to provide shared instead of static libs - made doxygen log to file, due to excessively verbose output Rpmlint: SRPM:empty SPEC:empty RPM: $ rpmlint -iv RPMS/i386/stxxl-1.2.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm stxxl.i386: I: checking stxxl.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libstxxl-0.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. Now this is causing problems, If i put the link in the devel package it says it must be part of the package proper and emits an error. If I put it in the main, as I have done now, it emits this warning. The libstxxl-0.so is simply a symlink to libstxxl.so.0. Running ldconfig -n during %install instead of hand-cranking the symlink makes no difference, as the net result is the same. It simply makes the symlink using the soname of the so. This soname is the same value that I have set in the build patch (patch0). Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=981419 All succeeded. Issues: I don't build the user manual. This however can be grabbed from their sf page by users, so unless someone knows the solution off the top of their head to the latex problem, I will probably leave it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 15:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051512.mB5FCQQV017243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-05 10:12:24 EDT --- Seems very well done. Just two issues: 1.) Please depend on httpd ABI you built against: This is best done by thepending on the Module Magic Number. This comes from mod_perl: Requires: httpd-mmn = %(cat %{_includedir}/httpd/.mmn || echo missing) 2.) RPMlint warnings: mod_scgi.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/scgi/scgi_server.py 0644 mod_scgi.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/scgi/quixote_handler.py 0644 What about these? Are they run by the module? If yes, move them to libexec. No? Move them to bin. Change the mode appropriately. mod_scgi.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/scgi/test_passfd.py 0644 You should probably not bundle this. If you mind completely removing this, mark it as %doc-umentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 15:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051530.mB5FU9tG020491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-05 10:30:07 EDT --- Mock build was fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 15:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051537.mB5FbIKD021779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-05 10:37:17 EDT --- perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03005-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03005-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 15:37:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051537.mB5FboMY016026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 15:43:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196057] Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051543.mB5FhXqx017085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196057 Eric Munson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ebmunson at us.ibm.com --- Comment #25 from Eric Munson 2008-12-05 10:43:26 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libhugetlbfs New Branches: F-10 Owners: Eric Munson ebmunson at us.ibm.com I would like to be able to update Fedora 10 with the libhugetlbfs release that just went out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 16:01:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051601.mB5G1hP8021293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-05 11:01:42 EDT --- %{_datadir}/xteddy is unowned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 16:01:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] New: Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Summary: Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook-0-1.20070930.fc10.src.rpm Description: Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures and (optionally) rescale to fit 2 original pages on 1 physical one. Allows one to easily convert pdf documents to booklet format, e.g. transform from A4 paper to A5 pages on A4 paper, such that one can fold the pages and obtains a small booklet. NB: I'm not sure about the version to give this thing -- it comes from http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/support/pdfbook/ and doesn't seem to have any sort of version number. I gave it a version derived from the guidelines on CVS snapshots ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 16:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051603.mB5G3wDn021810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #2 from Till Bubeck 2008-12-05 11:03:57 EDT --- Thanks for your comments. Here are my answers according to your numbers: 1. What do you mean? I do use a standard group and also a BuildRoot... 2. The Makefile of vacation already prepends $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to CFLAGS. Defining CFLAGS as argument to "make" undefined some additional defines (e.g. -DMAIN) which is otherwise done in the Makefile. Therefore I suggest to keep a simple "make". 3. done 4. I inserted triggers so that sendmail could now be installed after vacation and still installs/removes the link. 5. done I uploaded a new release to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 16:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051616.mB5GGmDb024661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-05 11:16:47 EDT --- If anyone was *very* fast, I've actually just updated the above spec file and srpm. Another thing I don't know about: somehow this package ends up not building a debuginfo package and then complaining that the binary isn't stripped. I can't see through the flames on bug 192422 to see if this is an instance of the problem presented there -- I do have %build and %install sections (albeit trivial ones) ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 16:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250282] Package request/suggestion: kidled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051624.mB5GOq4r031870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250282 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-05 11:24:49 EDT --- This just showed up in the new package review queue; I guess the component was not set properly previous to this. So: Is the original submitter of this ticket still around and interested in maintaining this package in Fedora? Are you already sponsored as a Fedora packager? Is there an actual package submission here? Please post links to an src.rpm and a spec. (It is vastly preferable if you put them on a web server somewhere instead of attaching them, if that is at all possible.) Please make sure that it builds and functions on a current Fedora release, F10 if possible, or rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 16:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051633.mB5GXAYF001660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Comment #16 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-12-05 11:33:07 EDT --- The current /usr/bin/gnome-wm has the following comment: # # NOTE: DON'T USE THIS. Please have your window manager install # a desktop file and change the gconf key # /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager At least with the current rawhide providing the following /usr/share/applications/sawfish.desktop: [Desktop Entry] Type=Application Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Sawfish Exec=sawfish NoDisplay=true # name of loadable control center module X-GNOME-WMSettingsModule=sawfish # name we put on the WM spec check window X-GNOME-WMName=Sawfish # back compat only X-GnomeWMSettingsLibrary=sawfish X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Bugzilla=GNOME X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Product=sawfish X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Component=general X-GNOME-Autostart-Phase=WindowManager X-GNOME-Provides=windowmanager X-GNOME-Autostart-Notify=true which was modified from a copy of metacity.desktop, and setting /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager key to sawfish does switch a window manager as expected. Most likely everything after "# back compat only" is not needed, or maybe even first 6 lines are enough, but I did not see that documented anywhere so this is all guesswork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Signature.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Signature-1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Module::Signature allows you to verify that a distribution has not been tampered with. Test::Signature lets that be tested as part of the distribution's test suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:01:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051701.mB5H1iBB008636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel-list at redh | |at.com Alias| |perl-Test-Signature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:09:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051709.mB5H9uxf010008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel-list at redh | |at.com Alias| |perl-B-Utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:09:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] New: Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Summary: Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-B-Utils.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-B-Utils-0.07-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Helper functions for op tree manipulation Note that rpmlint warns, but we ignore headers in perl packages. perl-B-Utils.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/B/Utils/Install/BUtils.h Also note that perl-Module-Info incorrectly claims to provide B::Utils (reported in bug 474859). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051717.mB5HHQiS011499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 Bug 473591 depends on bug 473590, which changed state. Bug 473590 Summary: Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051717.mB5HHPjR011475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-05 12:17:24 EDT --- Built and in rawhide. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:44:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473330] Review Request: gmp-ecm - Elliptic Curve Method for Integer Factorization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051744.mB5HiXpJ009953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473330 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-05 12:44:32 EDT --- Built in rawhide -- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=981766 . Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 17:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051752.mB5Hq7nt011644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 --- Comment #5 from Jeremy Hinegardner 2008-12-05 12:52:06 EDT --- Thanks, that is the plan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 18:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051802.mB5I2SFL019591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-05 13:02:27 EDT --- Hmmm... Licensing. The COPYING file included is the GPLv3, but the source clearly states that: # mysqlreport makes an easy-to-read report of important MySQL status values. # Copyright 2006-2008 Daniel Nichter # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or # modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License # as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 # of the License, or (at your option) any later version. We could certainly choose to redistribute this under the terms of the GPLv3+, as the plain text of the license grant inside the source permit this. I don't have a problem with this if you're thinking the spec license tag should match the included COPYING file. And, EPEL packages of this would be extremely useful, I agree. No problem with co-maintaintership either :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 19:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051958.mB5JwEtw004789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 14:58:13 EDT --- Oh well, this will teach me to read more carefully. You are right, GPLv2+ is correct. However, I guess pinging the author and asking for clarifications would not hurt. Anyway, package is APPROVED. Do not forget please to replace the uppercase BUILDROOT macro with the lowercase version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 20:03:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:03:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226599] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i810 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052003.mB5K3nwt005855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226599 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2008-12-05 15:03:48 EDT --- The XvMC libraries are just weird like that. It's a dlopen-only lib, and it's loaded from libXvMC which provides all those undefined syms. They're like DRI drivers. Also, therefore, it's okay to not do ldconfig. And it uses %configure now. Has for some time, in fact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 20:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052025.mB5KPZC0015305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 15:25:34 EDT --- Your choice for buildroot does not respect https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=982143&name=build.log says you have a missing BR: + make gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -g -Wall -DMAIN -Xlinker -warn-common -D_PATH_VACATION=\"/usr/bin/vacation\" -o vacation vacation.c strlcpy.c strlcat.c rfc822.c -lgdbm vacation.c:81:18: error: gdbm.h: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 20:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473679] Review Request: xfburn - Simple CD/DVD burning tool based on libburnia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052050.mB5KoAwj015044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473679 --- Comment #5 from Denis Leroy 2008-12-05 15:50:09 EDT --- > @Denis: I'd like you to be able to do a rebuild of this package when necessary > (soname bump of libburn or libisofs), so I add you as owner. Christoph, good idea. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 20:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196057] Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052051.mB5Kp0h0015158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196057 --- Comment #26 from Josh Boyer 2008-12-05 15:50:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Package Change Request > ====================== > Package Name: libhugetlbfs > New Branches: F-10 > Owners: Eric Munson ebmunson at us.ibm.com > > I would like to be able to update Fedora 10 with the libhugetlbfs release that > just went out. So update it. There is already an F-10 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052115.mB5LFkXa025087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-05 16:15:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysqlreport Short Description: A friendly report of important MySQL status values Owners: cweyl wolfy Branches: F-9 F-10 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:15:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052115.mB5LFlV4020553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052123.mB5LNCFF026407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474910 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474910] Review Request: esperanza - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052123.mB5LNBBH026387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474910 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474910] New: Review Request: esperanza - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: esperanza - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474910 Summary: Review Request: esperanza - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/esperanza.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/esperanza-0.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Esperanza is an audio player for the XMMS2 framework written with C++ and QT4. It has a sleek, uncomplicated UI, and supports album art in the playlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052123.mB5LN4fw022396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:23:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052123.mB5LN5OH022416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474909 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] New: Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Summary: Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmms2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmms2-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: XMMS2 is an audio framework, but it is not a general multimedia player - it will not play videos. It has a modular framework and plugin architecture for audio processing, visualisation and output, but this framework has not been designed to support video. Also the client-server design of XMMS2 (and the daemon being independent of any graphics output) practically prevents direct video output being implemented. It has support for a wide range of audio formats, which is expandable via plugins. It includes a basic CLI interface to the XMMS2 framework, but most users will want to install a graphical XMMS2 client (such as gxmms2 or esperanza). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:22:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] New: Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Summary: Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gxmms2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gxmms2-0.7.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: (this package makes two subpackages) gxmms2 is a GTK2 based XMMS2 client, written in C. Its main window is small and simple. It includes a playlist editor and a file details dialog. gkrellxmms2 is a gkrellm2 plugin for XMMS2. It has a title scroller with a position marker and five buttons for playback control. The position marker can be moved with the mouse to seek in the current track. The M button opens a menu with two items for opening a trackinfo dialog and the media library window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052130.mB5LUde5027992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226599] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-i810 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052144.mB5Li3O8026556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226599 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-05 16:44:02 EDT --- Agreed. And I hadn't noticed the change to configure; it has been a while since my original comments. Summarizing other stuff we chatted about on IRC: The autotools calls before %configure aren't currently necessary and cause build problems on rawhide, but then again they don't cause problems for the release branches. Even without the autotools calls, things fail to build in rawhide, but that is due to new kernel stuff. At this point I don't see any packaging-related that would hold up this ticket. It is probably a good idea to comment out the autotools calls if they aren't necessary, but I don't see this as a blocker. APPROVED You might as well go ahead and do a regular CVS request to get the new package name imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 22:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 17:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052255.mB5MthAo010980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 17:55:41 EDT --- I have a small suggestion: since the " program " is actually a perl script which works with all versions of perl available in Fedora land, how about removing the line Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) ? I fail to see anything useful in depending on a specific version of perl, just for the sake of it. rpmbuild already adds /usr/bin/perl as a dependency and AFAICS this is enough. Benefit: the same noarch package can be used in all versions of the distribution, EPEL included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 23:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 18:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812052317.mB5NHwD7011410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |red at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-05 18:17:56 EDT --- just two things I noticed (I'm about to create a package that will depend on skinlf): 1) there jar should be named %{name}-%{version}.jar with a symlink %{name}.jar to it. Right now, only %{name}.jar is installed to the %{_javadir}. ls -al /usr/share/java will show you, that (most?) packages do it like that. 2) the jar should contain the class files, not the source files ;) instead of: pushd . cd build/src jar cf %{name}-%{version}.jar . popd do: pushd build/classes jar cf %{name}-%{version}.jar . popd of course, you'll need to change the path in the install cmd after that, too. I've tested that change and it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:35:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060035.mB60ZDAo028280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 19:35:11 EDT --- There seems to be a missing BR for some ssl-devel: checking openssl/ssl.h usability... no checking openssl/ssl.h presence... no checking for openssl/ssl.h... no configure: WARNING: SSL bundle will not be built: Could not find openssl libraries Is this intentional? Because if it builds with it, it should be included. Ref: devel 1. Why is "/usr/include/gnu-gnu-gnu" used as directory for include files (in -devel) ? I'd say that /usr/include/gnustep would look more "normal". After a quick glance over http://www.gnustep.org/experience/documentation.html I have not found any reference for "gnu-gnu-gnu". 2. %{_libdir}/GNUstep/Makefiles/ and /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Makefiles/Additional/ are unowned Ref: base I have built the package in mock on an x86_64 and I think that there are some issues: 3. Why is /usr/lib/x86_64/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu/ used and not /usr/lib64/gnustep ? 4. The name "pl" (/usr/bin/pl) is not really acceptable, under the terms of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace 5. docs should be built by default unless there is a very compelling reason to not do it. rpmlint has also a complaint about mixed use of spaces and tabs, please be as kind as to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:10:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060010.mB60A22T021684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 19:10:01 EDT --- taking for review, I want to see oolite in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060005.mB6055fq020819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 19:05:04 EDT --- I mean "does not exist yet"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060000.mB600giS019848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 19:00:40 EDT --- The correct link seems to be http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/oolite-1.65-1.fc10.src.rpm Anyway, the package does not build because it build requires gnustep-base-devel which does not seem to exist in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:03:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060003.mB6032uj020368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:02:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459212] Review Request: oolite-data - Data files for Oolite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060002.mB602f1X020305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459212 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-05 19:02:40 EDT --- Nothing much to review here, as it's just a bunch of data... GOOD: ==== SHA1sum corresponds with upstream c322fa81a57d39e150806917cb052bb370efa725 oolite-1.65-data.tar.gz license is OK ( GPLv2+ ) builds fine in mock Potential problems ================== rpmlint output: Source RPM: oolite-data.src:32: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents oolite-data.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents/ oolite-data.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/Contents/Resources/* --> What is the are these required by the game or oolite-data.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. --> esthetic bug, please fix before commit rpmlint of oolite-data: oolite-data.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib --> normal, as we have just data MUSTFIX ======= the folders below /usr/lib/GNUstep/Applications/oolite.app/ seem to be left unowned and at the first glance oolite does not own them either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 00:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060051.mB60pWhZ031032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #25 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-05 19:51:31 EDT --- I just got an email back from the jakarta-commons-cli maintainer, and he will be updating to 1.1 on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 01:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal - generates static web-pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060113.mB61Dnfb002106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(richard at nerux.org | |) --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-05 20:13:47 EDT --- It's been a month since my last comment; I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 01:53:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060153.mB61rvNE008098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-05 20:53:55 EDT --- Yeah, I think just python works fine. python-devel was in the template that rpmdev-newspec gave me, so I just kept it. Why would %install clean out the buildroot, %clean is for that, no? :) I was packaging both plugins at the same time and might have had directory confusion, accounting for the wrong spec in the SRPM :( All fixed now, same spec, http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/supybot-fedora-0.2-3.fc9.src.rpm for the SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 02:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060207.mB6276cx008052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-05 21:07:05 EDT --- Oops, sorry about the %install comment, was thinking about the wrong end of the build process there :) Fixed in the SRPM above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 02:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060206.mB6262iA007848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-05 21:06:01 EDT --- Oh, never mind about the %install in the other bug, I was thinking about the wrong end of %install :) More caffeine required. All fixed, new one for this is at http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/supybot-koji-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 02:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060218.mB62IbhH009669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2008-12-05 21:18:35 EDT --- I'm actually away for the better part of a week, however I have access to my webserver, but not my build machine (aka my desktop). As such I have uploaded a modified "tentative" spec file. Be warned that I cannot even test for approximate correctness. URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6-tentative.spec >1) there jar should be named %{name}-%{version}.jar with a symlink %{name}.jar >to it. Right now, only %{name}.jar is installed to the %{_javadir}. ls -al >/usr/share/java will show you, that (most?) packages do it like that. Changed name & linked. I did look at this and in my java dir, IIRC, it was split between %{name}-%{version} and %{name} for the primary file. >2) the jar should contain the class files, not the source files ;) Fixed. Well that was stupid. I hope this package is almost there. My packages seem to have a nasty tendency of being a mess at the start -- something I need to attend to in the future. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 03:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 22:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] New: Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA.spec SRPM URL: http://xulchris.fedorapeople.org/packages/php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Date_Holidays helps you calculate the dates and titles of holidays and other special celebrations. This is the driver for calculating holidays in USA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 05:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 00:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060531.mB65VhkG007861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 00:31:42 EDT --- Source URL and the dependencies are fixed; everything looks fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 08:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 03:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060844.mB68i66n003744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-06 03:44:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: thebridge Short Description: ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 10:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061036.mB6AaMqb026075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-06 05:36:20 EDT --- #001: Summary: Verilator is a fast simulator for synthesizable Verilog Summary should not include the %{name} Instead it should be "A fast synthesizable Verilog simulator" #002: For rpmfusion, I'm packaging systemc, however the "libsystemc-devel" is simply systemc. #003: Verilator 3.681 has been released . Lane are you still interested with verilator ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 10:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] New: Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Summary: Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ovm.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ovm-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The OVM is based on the IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard and supports design and verification engineers developing advanced verification environments that offer higher levels of integration and portability of Verification IP. The methodology is non-vendor specific and is interoperable with multiple languages and simulators. The OVM is fully open, and includes a robust class library and source code that is available for download. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 10:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061048.mB6AmVq3028118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #10 from Lane 2008-12-06 05:48:30 EDT --- I am swamped right now with a tape out. I will try to get some time over the next two weeks to incorporate your comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 10:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061050.mB6AoTmm028742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-06 05:50:28 EDT --- Current, ovm can only be used with proprietary software. I am still searching a way to find an opensource systemverilog simulator that supports ovm. One short note: Cadence and Mentor Graphics, the whole EDA leaders have developed and released this ovm under the apache 2 license. http://edageek.com/2008/12/04/systemverilog-synopsys/ http://edageek.com/2008/12/04/vmm-ovm-verification/ http://www.cadence.com/Community/blogs/fv/archive/2008/12/04/vmm-users-welcome-to-the-ovm.aspx So, my only concern is whether fedora allows its inclusion or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 10:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:47:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061047.mB6AlfDV026028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-06 05:47:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > %{_datadir}/xteddy is unowned. Thanks. Updated package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xteddy.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xteddy-2.0.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 10:58:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 05:58:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061058.mB6AwULx027879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-06 05:58:28 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specidied by spec:BSD with advertising License type from source: New BSD (no advertising, 3 clause) ==> I might be wrong here but http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD seems closer to the license in the source file [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package do not match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM : 526dd710f7c130808798474873b1621b6bd29ff9 supybot-fedora-0.2.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:package is noarch, should work on any arch with a proper python [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Note === Please recheck the license before doing the commit. I think that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD is the correct one to be used in the spec and not http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#BSDwithAdvertising APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] New: Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Summary: Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jcalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jcalendar-1.3.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date. JCalendar is composed of several other Java beans, a JDayChooser, a JMonthChooser and a JYearChooser. All these beans have a locale property, provide several icons (Color 16x16, Color 32x32, Mono 16x16 and Mono 32x32) and their own locale property editor. So they can easily be used in GUI builders. Also part of the package is a JDateChooser, a bean composed of an IDateEditor (for direct date editing) and a button for opening a JCalendar for selecting the date. This is a dependency for l2fprod-common, which I'm packaging too (no review request yet, but coming soon). l2fprod-common is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061106.mB6B6ZGU029654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-06 06:06:33 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specidied by spec:BSD with advertising License type from source: New BSD (no advertising, 3 clause) ==> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD seems closer to the license in the source file [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package do not match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM : 1914235584a8f004b283a0ffbaab7923b04fc2a0 supybot-koji-0.1.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:package is noarch, should work on any arch with a proper python [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Note === As for supybot-fedora, please recheck the license. I think that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD is the correct one to be used in the spec and not http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#BSDwithAdvertising APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:11:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:11:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061111.mB6BBgIX030628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #26 from vivek shah 2008-12-06 06:11:40 EDT --- Waiting for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473814 to be resolved before building for devel branch and pushing it into Bodhi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061109.mB6B97a4029971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 06:09:06 EDT --- gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061109.mB6B92q4029933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 06:09:01 EDT --- gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:07:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:07:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] New: Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Summary: Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nachocalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nachocalendar-0.23-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Provide a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform. Currently is under early development but can be used safely. It comes with conventient factory classes, providing a fast and easy way to start using them. This is a dependency for l2fprod-common, which I'm packaging too (no review request yet, but coming soon). l2fprod-common is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061112.mB6BChXT032699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] New: Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Summary: Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata. TV-Anytime is an open standard for metadata describing TV and radio programmes that is designed to support Personal Video Recoders (PVRs), programme guides and related technologies. This is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:19:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061119.mB6BJZX2001323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061119.mB6BJYqo001299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:18:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061118.mB6BIMmn031659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:21:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061121.mB6BL0FG032240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:20:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061120.mB6BKWme032165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] New: Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Summary: Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ondrejj at salstar.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/bandwidthd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/bandwidthd-2.0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bandwidthd is a UNIX daemon/Windows service for graphing the traffic generated by each machine on several configurable subnets. It is much easier to configure than MRTG, and provides significantly more useful information. MRTG only tells you how much bandwidth you are using, Bandwidthd tells you that, and who is using it. Each IP address that has moved any significant volume of traffic has its own graph. The graphs are color coded to help you figure out at a glance if your user is surfing the web, or surfing Kazaa. Bandwidthd is targeted to run on my routing platforms. It is very low overhead. Easily graphing small business traffic on a 133Mhz Elan 486 every 2.5 minutes. My entire ISP (2000-3000 IP addresses across 4 states) is graphed on a Celeron 450 every 10 minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061123.mB6BNAFQ032605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tvbrowser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061143.mB6BhRnY003724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061143.mB6BhQ9I003700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 11:42:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] New: Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jakarta-commons-compress.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jakarta-commons-compress-20081205-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The code in this component came from Avalon's Excalibur, but originally from Ant, as far as life in Apache goes. The tar package is originally Tim Endres' public domain package. The bzip2 package is based on the work done by Keiron Liddle. It has migrated via: Ant -> Avalon-Excalibur -> Commons-IO -> Commons-Compress. This is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. A SVN-checkout/-tarball is necessary because commons-compress is still in its 'sandbox', where upstream does not create tarballs of any sort. This will only change once it becomes mature. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 12:45:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 07:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061245.mB6CjNq1014908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-06 07:45:22 EDT --- Thanks Manuel for your review. (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Please get in touch with upstream, clarify the license and ask for inclusion > of license info in all the source files fixed. The developer released a new version with licensing information in the source. The license is GPLv2+. > 2. The desktop file has an ending space on the first line which makes my > desktop-file-validate choke. Could you please fix it? fixed. The developer added the .desktop file to the new version. > 3. There are some duplicate BuildRequires:gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel), > glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel) fixed Here are the new files. But the tools is still not working on my F9 machine (see Comment #1 for the detail about the error). I will retest it soon on a F10 system. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gdnet.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gdnet-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=983716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:04:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469548] Review Request: ap-utils - Configure and monitor Wireless Access Points In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061304.mB6D4PDQ018696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469548 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-06 08:04:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms. > - OK, on my Fedora 9/X86_64 box. Lots of compiler warnings " warning: > pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness" while building." > for constructs with a short and a literal #define int. > Seems acceptable to me. (Upstream report?) I have seen those warning but I don't know to fix them. I sent a message to their mailing list. Waiting for an answer. > A package must own all directories that it creates > - NOK. The %doc section lists Documentation/*.html Documentation/FAQ > but these are not present at all in the generated RPM. [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmls ap-utils-1.5-1.fc9.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ap-auth -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ap-config -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ap-gl -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ap-mrtg -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ap-rrd -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ap-tftp -rwxr-xr-x /usr/sbin/ap-trapd drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/ABOUT-NLS -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/AUTHORS -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/COPYING -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/FAQ <--- -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/NEWS -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/Ovislink-HOWTO.html <--- -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/THANKS -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/ap-utils-1.5/TODO -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/ap-utils.mo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/ap-utils.mo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/ap-utils.mo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/ap-utils.mo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/ap-utils.mo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/ap-utils.mo -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man8/ap-auth.8.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man8/ap-config.8.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man8/ap-gl.8.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man8/ap-mrtg.8.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man8/ap-tftp.8.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man8/ap-trapd.8.gz > Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage > - TBD (Havn't seen those HTML files yet). see above. It's only one html file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:13:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061313.mB6DD0em022945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 --- Comment #11 from Terje R??sten 2008-12-06 08:12:58 EDT --- Now you can eg push to stable, eg has been in testing in over 4 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:14:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] New: Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Summary: Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ondrejj at salstar.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: A library for accessing the IRMAN hardware from Linux and other Unix systems. This package contains only a static library. It's not suggested to use static libraries in Fedora, but it's not forbidden. If somebody can help me to patch this to build as shared (libirman.so), please send me or attach patch here. This library is required to update lirc to use IRMAN hardware. I can make required changes in lirc.spec after this package will be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:15:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061315.mB6DFE3I021493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-06 08:15:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This code seems to be confused about how it is licensed. Note that the LICENSE > file contains the LGPL (v2) but the code itself says: > * This code may be freely redistributed under the terms of the > * GNU General Public License. > and this agrees with the README: > This software may be freely distributed under the terms of > the GNU General Public License (GPL). > > No version is specified anywhere, so GPL+ would seem to apply. Can you clarify > with upstream? For the moment I changed the license to GPL+ while I'm waiting for an answer from upstream. > This also suffers from the compiler flags problem; easily fixed by changing the > make line to: > make CCFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} fixed Here are the new files. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping-1.3.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=983765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:24:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061324.mB6DOI1B023082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #12 from Sergio Pascual 2008-12-06 08:24:17 EDT --- Hi, I think this version fixes all the issues. Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py-1.8-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061327.mB6DRFtV026112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-06 08:27:14 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/unhide.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/unhide-1.0-1.fc10.20080519.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061340.mB6DeEYg026387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-06 08:40:13 EDT --- Thanks Parag Here are the new files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgdbus-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=983783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:44:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061344.mB6DiwwI029023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-06 08:44:56 EDT --- Peter Lemenkov - interested now ? F10 is already out. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061347.mB6Dl1DS027620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-06 08:47:00 EDT --- May you import it? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469997] Review Request: ratproxy - A passive web application security assessment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061343.mB6Dh4sH026847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469997 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-06 08:43:03 EDT --- Would it be okay without them? I wouldn't like to .. may be later on in case administrators bug me. I selected it from security spin wish list. What you suggest ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061354.mB6DsJsx030799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-06 08:54:19 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file - 'Release: 3%{?dist}' should be 'Release: 1%{?dist}' and your changelog entry doesn't match the release. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libirman* libirman.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.4-2 ['0.4.4-3.fc9', '0.4.4-3'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - URL should point to the website of the upstream project. Why not http://www.lirc.org/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 14:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061414.mB6EESJK032553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-06 09:14:27 EDT --- APPROVED fix the missing buildrequire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 14:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061435.mB6EZJj3004062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-06 09:35:18 EDT --- what the eta of this review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 14:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061436.mB6EaCMj004267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #4 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-12-06 09:36:11 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=libs/wt/wt.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/wt-2.1.5-2.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Nov 23 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 2.1.5-2 - shorter description - own _includedir/Wt _sysconfdir/wt and _datadir/Wt directory (fix) - do not duplicate documentation files across packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 14:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061456.mB6EuQEC007582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-06 09:56:25 EDT --- At the first glance, the license should be LGPL v2. This is specified both in [most of ] the source files and in the README file. What is the reasoning behind using GPLv3+ in the spec ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061512.mB6FC1bu012396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-06 10:11:59 EDT --- I guess bug 473814 issue should be okay now, so please try for dist-f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061513.mB6FDlsk010668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Thibault North changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thibault.north at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thibault.north at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061521.mB6FL1fG014056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #4 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-06 10:21:00 EDT --- Fabian -> thanks for the review. I disappeared on holiday just before. My comments below. (In reply to comment #3) > Just some quick comments on your spec file. > > - 'BuildRequires: python-devel' should be 'BuildRequires: python' > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires python-devel is still required, otherwise building fails. I added python as a build requires, although this is already pulled in by python-devel. > - %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be mixed. Fixed > - '--vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. > see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor Fixed > - remove '.fc9' in your %changelog section Fixed New SPEC: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/virtaal-0.2-2.spec New SRPM: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/virtaal-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061521.mB6FLHQO012174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474999 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061521.mB6FLGfn012133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841, 472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:20:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] New: Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Summary: Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java-1.26.0-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The client library provides tools and an abstraction layer, letting you easily construct queries and use response data without having to create HTTP requests or process HTTP responses by hand. Each client library provides classes that correspond to the elements and data types used by the Google Data APIs. Each client library also provides extensions for specific Google services that have Data APIs. This is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061524.mB6FOFUn012534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Patrick C. F. Ernzer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |converter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pcfe at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/cmconvert.spec SRPM URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/cmconvert-1.9.5-2.src.rpm Description: a second package for review, aybe better to finish the reiew and me fixinf any problems in Bug 474768 first cmconvert is a small command line tool to convert EasyGPS XML file formats (LOC and GPX) to a format that can be installed onto a Palm OS device and imported into CacheMate. One needs this when using geocaching.com and wanting tu use their downloads with CacheMate on a PalmOS device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 16:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061603.mB6G3Xn8020836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 16:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061603.mB6G3WvE020797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 16:14:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061614.mB6GEZmG020675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-06 11:14:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > I don't see any licensing information on the sounds. Can you verify the > > license? License of sounds is GPLv2 new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 16:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061656.mB6GugUF027390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-06 11:56:41 EDT --- Till around ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 17:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061728.mB6HSJo4002286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 --- Comment #7 from Alan Crosswell 2008-12-06 12:28:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326008) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326008) remove spurious printf's I've removed two spurious printfs that were resulting in the syslog buffers getting filled up when soundmodem runs as daemon. I've been running soundmodem in two production aprsdigi's for several years with this patch. Without it, soundmodem would randomly exit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 17:31:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061731.mB6HVL7P002993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 --- Comment #8 from Alan Crosswell 2008-12-06 12:31:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326009) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326009) SPEC to apply spurious printf patch This is the SPEC to apply the spurious printf's patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 17:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061739.mB6Hd8g2002194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Alan Crosswell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #326009|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #9 from Alan Crosswell 2008-12-06 12:39:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326010) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326010) applies soundmodem-spurious-printf.patch Sorry, I patched against what is in the fedora SRPM. Here's the update against the 10.4 spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 17:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061748.mB6HmoNR003923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 12:48:49 EDT --- The issues I had with this review have been fixed. It would be nice to address the above mentioned code quality issue, which I have no way to test, but I'm going to leave that up to Lucian. Alan, if your issue is not addressed when this package is imported, please consider filing a bug against it. Unfortunately you can't do that now because the review isn't finished and so the bugzilla component doesn't exist yet. It should be available soon after the CVS request has been processed. Anyway, I'm going to approve this and leave it to Lucian to decide what to do with the above patch. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:07:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061807.mB6I70gu009232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #2 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-06 13:06:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just some quick comments on your spec file > > - 'Release: 3%{?dist}' should be 'Release: 1%{?dist}' and your changelog entry > doesn't match the release. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs ChangeLog entry fixed. This release 3 is because there is libirman of this release in my repository and I need updates from this version. > [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libirman* > libirman.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.4-2 ['0.4.4-3.fc9', > '0.4.4-3'] > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Thanks. For info. > - URL should point to the website of the upstream project. Why not > http://www.lirc.org/ ? I think lirc is not upstream for this, it's just required by this package. But if you stand that this URL is better, I can change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061813.mB6IDDdr008328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 13:13:10 EDT --- This package does build now, but I still see a few failures in the log. These failures are also present in your scratch build; just search for "failed" at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=973415&name=build.log Packaging wise, macro usage is consistent, the license tag is fixed and the URL looks good. I still can't tell about the debuginfo package. I guess it comes down to the question of which shared libraries are actually supposed to be in the package. The -static package has three: libKNIBase.a, libKNI_InvKin.a, and libKNI_LM.a. The base package has only libKNIBase.so.3.9.0. What happens to the other two? I don't think it's a coincidence that these two failures appear in the build log: Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 [failed] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lKNIBase Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNI_LM.so.3.9.0 [failed] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lKNIBase -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061827.mB6IRPub012701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-06 13:27:24 EDT --- Thanks. All good --------------------------------------------- This package (gnuplot-py) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:45:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061845.mB6IjN4x013986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-06 13:45:22 EDT --- I'll review it ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:49:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061849.mB6Ink3M014683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475017 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061849.mB6Inlt7014707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:49:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] New: Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Summary: Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Swing has lot of components built-in but still some are missing. This provides the developer community with these missing components, components inspired from modern user interfaces. This is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061853.mB6IrxER017364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] New: Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Summary: Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd-2.0.1-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description(lib): A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org. Description(gui): This client is only a small demonstration for the usage of the library. It's an enhanced verison of the old XTVD WEBSERVICE CLIENT by Tribune Media Services, Inc. This is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:54:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061854.mB6Isuns015735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |475017 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061854.mB6IstZU015714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |475017 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061854.mB6IsscZ015688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474981, 474982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061858.mB6IwlFa018433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-06 13:58:46 EDT --- Please have a close look at the license text. I didn't really know what to make of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:57:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061857.mB6Iv33b018228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 18:57:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 13:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061857.mB6Iv2rK018191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841, 472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 19:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061909.mB6J9D98018736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475019 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 19:09:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061909.mB6J9BrR018700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841, 472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 19:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] New: Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Summary: Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Support for all the basic csv-type things you're likely to want to do: * Arbitrary numbers of values per line * Ignoring commas in quoted elements * Handling quoted entries with embedded carriage returns (i.e. entries that span multiple lines) * Configurable separator and quote characters (or use sensible defaults) * Read all the entries at once, or use an Iterator style model * Creating csv files from String[] (i.e. automatic escaping of embedded quote chars) This is a dependency needed for tvbrowser, for which a review request exists already. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors - except for a "W: no-documentation" because there's no license text in the source. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062018.mB6KI7Z9031045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |474859 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] New: Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Summary: Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Gnaural is a multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator, implementing the principles described in the October 1973 Scientific American article "Auditory Beats in the Brain" (Gerald Oster). There has been considerable research done on the subject since that publication, and Gnaural's Windows-based predecessor, WinAural, has been used as the audio stimulus in at least one published study, "The Induced Rhythmic Oscillations of Neural Activity in the Human Brain", D. Cvetkovic, D. Djuwari, I. Cosic (Australia), from Proceeding (417) Biomedical Engineering - 2004. The central finding of Oster's article: brain activity can be entrained to the auditory beat frequencies created when each ear is presented simultaneously with tones of slightly different frequency. SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/gnaural-1.0-1.fc10.20080808.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnaural.spec HOME PAGE: http://gnaural.sourceforge.net/ Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=984433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:41:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062041.mB6KfAac004437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 15:41:07 EDT --- Thanks for doing that. It would be good to add a quick comment to the spec near the License: tag indicating which parts are GPLv2 and which are GPLv2+ so you don't have to look for the COPYRIGHT files. I can't quite tell if the svxlink-server package needs a dependency on udev (for /etc/udev/rules.d) or whether the dependency chain includes it. I note that the .so files aren't executable. I was under the impression that they needed to be executable for things to work, and my systems don't seem to have any non-executable so files in _libdir. Any reason for not using the standard user management scriptlet? As it is now, your system fails badly if the svxlink user is defined somewhere other than /etc/passwd (such as on my LDAP server). Check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for more info; it's basically just calling getent. Also, you will need Requries(pre): shadow-utils for that scriptlet. * source files match upstream. sha256sums: 77d14a788ba1a9c5a2027f875790ec3eaeb5074ba48d0bb382c2b6992249a7d1 sounds-080730.tar.gz 68039508fa77ac3daf648bc26b99029c867068a03b43aab6650101c2fc2ef107 svxlink-080730.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summaries are OK. * descriptions are OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license texts included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: echolib-0.13.0-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm libecholib.so.0.13()(64bit) echolib = 0.13.0-5.fc11 echolib(x86-64) = 0.13.0-5.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libasyncaudio.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccore.so.0.16()(64bit) libecholib.so.0.13()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgsm.so.1()(64bit) echolib-devel-0.13.0-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm echolib-devel = 0.13.0-5.fc11 echolib-devel(x86-64) = 0.13.0-5.fc11 = echolib = 0.13.0 libecholib.so.0.13()(64bit) libasync-0.16.1-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm libasyncaudio.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccore.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccpp.so.0.16()(64bit) libasyncqt.so.0.16()(64bit) libasync = 0.16.1-5.fc11 libasync(x86-64) = 0.16.1-5.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXcursor.so.1()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXft.so.2()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) libXrender.so.1()(64bit) libasyncaudio.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccore.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccpp.so.0.16()(64bit) libasyncqt.so.0.16()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) libmng.so.1()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libsigc-1.2.so.5()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libasync-devel-0.16.1-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm libasync-devel = 0.16.1-5.fc11 libasync-devel(x86-64) = 0.16.1-5.fc11 = libasync = 0.16.1 libasyncaudio.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccore.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccpp.so.0.16()(64bit) libasyncqt.so.0.16()(64bit) qtel-0.11.1-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm qtel = 0.11.1-5.fc11 qtel(x86-64) = 0.11.1-5.fc11 = libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXcursor.so.1()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXft.so.2()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) libXrender.so.1()(64bit) libasyncaudio.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccore.so.0.16()(64bit) libasyncqt.so.0.16()(64bit) libecholib.so.0.13()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) libmng.so.1()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libsigc-1.2.so.5()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) ? svxlink-server-0.10.1-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm ModuleDtmfRepeater.so()(64bit) ModuleEchoLink.so()(64bit) ModuleHelp.so()(64bit) ModuleParrot.so()(64bit) ModuleTcl.so()(64bit) config(svxlink-server) = 0.10.1-5.fc11 svxlink-server = 0.10.1-5.fc11 svxlink-server(x86-64) = 0.10.1-5.fc11 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/tclsh config(svxlink-server) = 0.10.1-5.fc11 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXcursor.so.1()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXft.so.2()(64bit) libXi.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) libXrender.so.1()(64bit) libasyncaudio.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccore.so.0.16()(64bit) libasynccpp.so.0.16()(64bit) libasyncqt.so.0.16()(64bit) libecholib.so.0.13()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgsm.so.1()(64bit) libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) libmng.so.1()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0)(64bit) libqt-mt.so.3()(64bit) libsigc-1.2.so.5()(64bit) libspandsp.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libtcl8.5.so()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) ? Needs udev? svxlink-server-devel-0.10.1-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm svxlink-server-devel = 0.10.1-5.fc11 svxlink-server-devel(x86-64) = 0.10.1-5.fc11 = * shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. ? file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files X issues with scriptlets * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackages. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062042.mB6KgTu6002870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-06 15:42:28 EDT --- OK, I finished the review. There are a few minor issues (*) and I also have some questions (?): - rpmlint says xmms2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation xmms2-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation xmms2-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation xmms2-ruby.x86_64: W: no-documentation but I couldn't find anything relevant in the available docs to put into these packages (except maybe the license files?), so these warnings can be ignored. ? I didn't find any occurrences of the clauses "GPL" or "Artistic" or "licensed under the same terms as perl itself." among the perl files. Is there a rule that any perl program has to be released under "GPL+ or Artistic"? I would also like to remind you that there is a .so file in the perl package that links against the libraries in the main package. - TODO file can be included in %doc ? Is the doxygen documentation useless? ? What package(s) own the %{perl_archlib}/Audio/ %{perl_archlib}/auto/Audio/ directories? Are they among the dependencies? ? Some files in the wafadmin directory have /usr/local/ /usr/lib/ directories hardcoded. Will these have any effect on the application? ? There are no .desktop files but why are there pixmaps? * The devel package has .pc files, hence we must require pkgconfig. * Please add the -v flag to the waf script so we can see what it is actually doing. When I did this, I found that the fedora specific compiler flag -O2 is being overwritten. This needs fixed. ? The following provides seemed weird to me: $ rpm -qp --provides xmms2-devel-0.5-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm (git DrLecter b63ec5a270cfde0ae3d59c9b89d860b8650e430f-dirty) commit: pkgconfig(xmms2-client) = 0.5 pkgconfig(xmms2-client-cpp) = 0.5 pkgconfig(xmms2-client-cpp-glib) = 0.5 pkgconfig(xmms2-client-ecore) = 0.5 pkgconfig(xmms2-client-glib) = 0.5 pkgconfig(xmms2-plugin) = 0.5 xmms2-devel = 0.5-1.fc10 xmms2-devel(x86-64) = 0.5-1.fc10 What is that git parenthesis about? Is that normal? * The devel package must require glib2-devel, qt-devel, boost-devel at the least (but I think this is all). * Double BR: libmodplug-devel * Unnecessary BRs: libcurl-devel (picked up by ecore-devel), glib2-devel (picked up by avahi-glib-devel, pulseaudio-libs-devel...), libogg-devel, libvorbis-devel (both picked up by libshout-devel), python-devel (picked up by Pyrex) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062056.mB6KupEE005311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Bug 471754 depends on bug 466608, which changed state. Bug 466608 Summary: Update translate-toolkit to the latest release 1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:52:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] New: Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Summary: Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/metapost-metauml/metapost-metauml.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/metapost-metauml/metapost-metauml-0.2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MetaUML is a MetaPost library for typesetting UML diagrams. Class, activity, use case, state machine, and package diagrams are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:08:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062108.mB6L8REO007728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 16:08:26 EDT --- I noticed that /usr/bin/soundwrapper seemed a bit generic and did a search. I note that nspluginwrapper will automatically try to call a program of that name if it exists. I think it would be a pretty bad idea to package a program of that name. DO you know what it is used for in this program? Can it be removed or renamed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062118.mB6LIFDf009386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-06 16:18:15 EDT --- rpmlint outputs lots of errors about the mp files not having a shebang line. Should I ignore them since (afaik) MetaPost doesn't use shebang lines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062120.mB6LKlmr009948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-06 16:20:46 EDT --- Thank you, Jason. Alan, thank you for the patch, I'm going to handle this after I check this in. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: soundmodem Short Description: Soundcard Packet Radio Modem Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] New: Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Hindi Dictionary for stardict. SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/stardict-dic-hi-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/stardict-dic-hi.spec Original work is by Sriram Chaudhry. He has converted original shabdanjali dictionary to what it is at http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/misc/shabdanjali-fedora.tar.gz I had been in touch with him, and he will be requesting to keep this tarball at http://ltrc.iiit.net/showfile.php?filename=downloads/shabdanjali-stardict/index.html But that would be a long process. To cut short I would host his work to start this review process quickly and will update later on in case he gets hosting on iiit site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:53:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062153.mB6Lruse017278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 16:53:55 EDT --- I had intended to get to this earlier, but better late than never. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: a47ad01575d14ecf9d953a62ead043bb715afc0eed1c34549a65f925ca180be9 MooseX-Types-URI-0.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(MooseX::Types::URI) = 0.01 perl-MooseX-Types-URI = 0.01-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Types) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(URI) perl(URI::FromHash) perl(URI::WithBase) perl(URI::data) perl(URI::file) perl(namespace::clean) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=51, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.21 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:55:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062155.mB6LtjOv016133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(benny+bugzilla at am | |orsen.dk) --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 16:55:44 EDT --- It has been well over a month since comment #5 with no response. This ticket will be closed soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062202.mB6M2G7a019017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 17:02:15 EDT --- Is there some reason why the included unit tests are not run? I don't see any particular reason why building like any other Perl module would be a requirement, although it would certainly be useful. Is there some reason %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse/ isn't owned by this package? It is normal for Perl modules to do this, and the situation is explicitly described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062211.mB6MBccg019264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-06 17:11:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Types-URI Short Description: URI related types and coercions for Moose Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062211.mB6MBeEs019286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] New: Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Summary: Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wol.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wol-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/wake-on-lan/ Description: wol implements Wake On LAN functionality in a small program. It wakes up hardware that is Magic Packet compliant. SecureON is supported by wol too. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=984511 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint wol* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint wol* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062235.mB6MZoSG025193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 17:35:48 EDT --- FE-Legal is still there, but it seems that you've done what spot asked so I'll go ahead and review this. I'll just pass over the license bits and let spot indicate whether things are done properly. It's a bit odd to see a perl specfile that wasn't autogenerated with cpanspec like almost all of the other perl packages in the distro. Not a problem, of course; I just have to check everything a bit closer. rpmlint complains: perl-Set-Object.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.26-2.fc9 ['1.26-2.fc11', '1.26-2'] We don't generally include the dist tag in changelog entries, as they are generally not correct. Is there some reason you do not run the included test suite? It needs to be run in a %check section if possible. (The specfile generators do this for you.) It seems to run fine for me as long as I add build dependencies on Test::More, Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage. Your %files section could be a whole lot simpler: %files %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) %doc Changes.pod META.yml README license.txt %{_mandir}/man3/*.3* %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Set/ %{perl_vendorarch}/Set/ I guess you can obsfucate if you really want to, but I'm not sure why as it just makes things tougher on the next person who looks at th epackage. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: b2c2b5c2a5af1dae37b241c50a553a6044070db2fe23c6d47b6acf8e78e6a3c3 Set-Object-1.26.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: Object.so()(64bit) perl(Set::Object) = 1.26 perl(Set::Object::Weak) perl-Set-Object = 1.26-2.fc11 perl-Set-Object(x86-64) = 1.26-2.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Set::Object) perl(Set::Object::Weak) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) X %check is not present, but should be. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472726] Review Request: perl-Test-Dependencies - Ensure that your Makefile.PL specifies all module dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062239.mB6Md9Df024010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472726 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 472726 depends on bug 472335, which changed state. Bug 472335 Summary: Review Request: perl-rpm-build-perl - Perl compiler backend to extract Perl dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472335 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062248.mB6MmZIi027073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 17:48:33 EDT --- rpmlint says: perl-Class-Unload.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized unload given Class Easy to fix. perl-Class-Unload.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Unloads the given class by clearing out its symbol table and removing it from %INC. Just needs one carriage return. Those are really trivial, so I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix them when you check in. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 01807226cd9a6b5b1c6a02cf8408ab09e0e76e7d70f06f6d3fe3af6e41906005 Class-Unload-0.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK (needs capitalization). * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Class::Unload) = 0.05 perl-Class-Unload = 0.05-1.fc11 = perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Class::Inspector) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=21, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.13 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, just fix up Summary: and %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 22:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 17:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062256.mB6MuBnt027155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 17:56:10 EDT --- This fails to build; the tests bomb because you're missing a build dependency on Test::More. Please do mock or koji scratch builds of packages before submitting them. I fixed that so that I can complete this review. Since I didn't find any other issues, I'll go ahead and approve this, but of course you'll have to fix that so you can build in koji. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 59ee972bf0ea3e85fbcb619863e2cd47ad5646a849409c9a65123fffdb77519a AutoXS-Header-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing Test::More. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64) after fixing BuildRequires. * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(AutoXS::Header) = 0.03 perl-AutoXS-Header = 0.03-1.fc11 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.01 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, but of course you'll have to fix the dependencies so it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 23:01:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474816] Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062301.mB6N1O5w029549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474816 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 18:01:23 EDT --- Not much to say about this one. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 89ad4545a3958331e999f54a9a5875271d398a0c4678b849e0d3ecb3c0a2ffa9 Text-FindIndent-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Text::FindIndent) = 0.03 perl-Text-FindIndent = 0.03-1.fc11 = perl >= 0:5.00503 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=35, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.06 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 23:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062314.mB6NEGns031641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 18:14:14 EDT --- Your manual dependency on Test::Builder results in a duplicated dependency in the final package; rpm -qp --requires perl-Test-Signature-1.10-1.fc11.noarch.rpm yields: perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Builder) >= 0.17 which is pointless. Admittedly rpm should not do this, but in the meantime it is worth asking if you really need the manual versioned dependency. Even F8, which is going EOL soon, shipped with Test::Builder 0.32. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 08375ba37c26d3c062e4d54bf0042b51ab20f4f7ef5b9e5cb23cc0829d2befd5 Test-Signature-1.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires: perl(Test::Signature) = 1.10 perl-Test-Signature = 1.10-1.fc11 = perl >= 0:5.004 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) X perl(Test::Builder) X perl(Test::Builder) >= 0.17 perl(Test::More) >= 0.47 perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 23:28:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:28:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062328.mB6NS8Mf001980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 18:28:06 EDT --- Not much to say here. I agree that the rpmlint complaint is OK, as occasionally a single internal header file comes as part of a binary Perl module. One of the tests is skipped due to a lack of Test::Signature, but honestly verifying signatures as part of the test suite isn't useful in all cases. If we need to patch a file, for example, the tests would fail. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: b2609a722def7499952831f4a72fd0bf6786e64414bd74607cd89637bbb2d59a B-Utils-0.07.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: Utils.so()(64bit) perl(B::Utils) = 0.07 perl(B::Utils::Install::Files) perl(B::Utils::OP) = 0.07 perl-B-Utils = 0.07-1.fc11 perl-B-Utils(x86-64) = 0.07-1.fc11 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(B) perl(B::Utils) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(subs) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=22, Tests=136, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.03 sys + 0.54 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.71 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 23:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062347.mB6NlSZW003467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 18:47:27 EDT --- It's been a while since I looked at a PHP module. rpmlint says: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA.noarch: W: no-documentation which is not a problem. Everything else looks fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 5191c518642aaa2b7a8ba52ee69b156668f5570a909cc4e0a228650b7956ff37 Date_Holidays_USA-0.1.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Date_Holidays_USA) = 0.1.1 php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA = 0.1.1-1.fc11 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(Date_Holidays) >= 0.18.0 php-pear(PEAR) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration). * code, not content. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070003.mB703Mc6007346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 19:03:21 EDT --- Your Source0: URL is not correct. You can use spectool -g to make sure that your sources are downloadable. I think you want: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wake-on-lan/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz instead. Your license tag does not seem to be correct. At least the source files I looked at are GPLv2+. Where do you see the restriction to GPLv2 only? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e0086c9b9811df2bdf763ec9016dfb1bcb7dba9fa6d7858725b0929069a12622 wol-0.7.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: wol = 0.7.1-1.fc11 wol(x86-64) = 0.7.1-1.fc11 = /bin/sh /sbin/install-info * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (info page installation). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:11:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070011.mB70BAKl007152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 19:11:09 EDT --- This fails to build for me: RPM build errors: File must begin with "/": %{_texmf_main}/metapost/metauml So the _texmf_main macro is undefined. Did you build this in mock or koji? This could be a rawhide issue, although I'm thinking more along the lines of a missing build dependency. Adding BuildRequires: texlive gets things working for me. The rpmlint complaints come from the fact that you have an executable text file with no #! line to tell what shell they should be run in. Are you sure those files need to be executable? What could possibly execute them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070013.mB70D9bb007303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 19:13:08 EDT --- You do not seem to be in the packager group, so I'm indicating that you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070038.mB70coYC012297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 19:38:49 EDT --- The problem is that things are a little bit too trivial, so you end up rolling your own and the automated debuginfo extraction bits get confused. Try these: %prep %setup -c -T cp %{SOURCE0} . cp %{SOURCE1} . %build gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS pdfbook.c -o pdfbook %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/ install -m 755 %{name} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/ %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README %{_bindir}/* Builds fine for me, with no rpmlint complaints and a proper debuginfo file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:42:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070042.mB70gcL9011527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 19:42:38 EDT --- It's tough to review this as I don't even have the means to build it properly. I only know how to build Fedora packages, and I guess it should come as no surprise that it doesn't even build in rawhide as python isn't in the buildroot. Any way you could provide a built package and perhaps the build log? Or I guess you could wait for someone who knows how to build EPEL-only packages to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070052.mB70qUsP014318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christopher Stone 2008-12-06 19:52:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA Short Description: Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA Owners: xulchris Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 00:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070053.mB70rAlV014392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 19:53:10 EDT --- This builds fine; rpmlint says: ca-cacert.org.noarch: W: no-documentation ca-cacert.org-class1.noarch: W: no-documentation ca-cacert.org-class1.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-cacert-class1.crt ca-cacert.org-class3.noarch: W: no-documentation ca-cacert.org-class3.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-cacert-class3.crt None of which is troubling or all that surprising. How did you determine that the certs are public domain? The files themselves have no information, but the upstream web page does have a license and indicates that it governs the use of the same keys included in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 01:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 20:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070138.mB71cBDh020258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 20:38:10 EDT --- It's been a while since I reviewed a java package. This one seems simple and clean enough. I note, though, that you don't include the gcj aot bits as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines suggests. Frankly I don't know enough about the Java situation to argue either way; on one hand, my understanding is that we still have platforms which benefit from native code generation, but on the other hand this package exists primarily for jruby which doesn't do the aot stuff either. Anyway, it isn't a blocker. rpmlint says: constantine.noarch: W: no-documentation which normally would be OK, except that in this case at least the LICENSE file should be included. Regarding the test suite, it would of course be good to run it, but if it doesn't work without hacks then I certainly can't fault you So the only blocker I see is the inclusion of the license file. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: f12bb1820fdcb30464929e605b5181c8ea95e9eea8294b86c00b15d7a9431c74 constantine-src-0.4.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * final provides and requires are sane: constantine = 0.4-1.fc11 = java jpackage-utils * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Java-specific bits: * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * ant called properly. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 01:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 20:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070149.mB71nFgm021715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-06 20:49:14 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/constantine.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/constantine-0.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:03:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070203.mB723ikk025821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 21:03:43 EDT --- This fails to build: Patch #1 (flint-1.0.17-add-static-lib.diff): + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/flint-1.0.17-add-static-lib.diff + /usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file makefile.rej Also, 1.0.18 was released yesterday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070221.mB72LFC5028943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #3 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-12-06 21:21:15 EDT --- Hmm... sure. I can do that in mock. Hopefully I didn't miss a procedure for EPEL only packages (didn't see one). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070217.mB72HwXH028245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-06 21:17:57 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/flint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/flint-1.0.18-1.fc9.src.rpm (Bumped to 1.0.18; made patches apply with --fuzz=0.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070234.mB72YdxT031012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 21:34:38 EDT --- This builds but won't install for me on either rawhide or F-10. I take it the needed version of system-config-date simply doesn't exist. It might be nice when opening a review ticket to note that the package under review can't actually be installed. The combination of Obsoletes, Conflicts and Requires seems rather odd to me. I gather you're trying to make sure that if the old system-config-date is installed, the new one along with the -docs package are installed at update time, but without having system-config-date require this package. That makes sense, but is the Conflicts actually necessary? I think the scrollkeeper dependencies are backwards. When I build this for F-10 or rawhide, the package comes out with a scrollkeeper dependency, but I thought scrollkeeper was gone. Either that or %{fedora} is 10 but %{rhel} is simply undefined and so 0%{?rhel} < 6 is true. I'm not entirely sure how the logic works out. Also, this package can't go into F-8 as it is closed to new branches, and certainly nothing less than F-8 is supported, so you can probably just drop the 0%{?fedora} < 8 conditional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475050] New: Review Request: pari - A CAS for Fast Computations in Number Theory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pari - A CAS for Fast Computations in Number Theory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475050 Summary: Review Request: pari - A CAS for Fast Computations in Number Theory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/pari.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/pari-2.3.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PARI/GP is a widely used computer algebra system designed for fast computations in number theory (factorizations, algebraic number theory, elliptic curves...), but also contains a large number of other useful functions to compute with mathematical entities such as matrices, polynomials, power series, algebraic numbers etc., and a lot of transcendental functions. PARI is also available as a C library to allow for faster computations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:46:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:46:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475050] Review Request: pari - A CAS for Fast Computations in Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070246.mB72kYmH031527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475050 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-06 21:46:33 EDT --- Rpmlint has two warnings: pari.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpari.so.2.3.4 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 pari-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The first has no obvious fix (it's caused by src/language/init.c, line 601), but is only triggered when invalid code is compiled. The second is ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070250.mB72oTje001652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 21:50:27 EDT --- I'm sorry for not looking at this ticket in so many months. The review queue is just so long.... Unfortunately the package in comment 3 doesn't build for me: Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-sippy.spec'] error: %patch without corresponding "Patch:" tag You have Patch0: but call %patch instead of %patch0. rpm these days doesn't permit that. You can probably drop the BuildRequires conditional for Fedora 8; new branches for that release aren't accepted any longer so you only have to consider F-9 and newer. If I fix the %patch problem, the package builds and rpmlint says: python-sippy.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides sippy You should essentially never use an unversioned Provides: like that, because it makes it impossible to bring back a package with that name. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages for more information on how to rename packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 02:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 21:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475050] Review Request: pari - A CAS for Fast Computations in Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070253.mB72rYO7032528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475050 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 21:53:33 EDT --- Isn't pari already in Fedora? "yum info pari" sure seems to indicate that it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070310.mB73APJJ003163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 22:10:24 EDT --- This one has been sitting for a bit. I'll take a look. It builds fine on rawhide; rpmlint says: python-weberror.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9-3 ['0.9-2.fc11', '0.9-2'] The last changelog entry is for release 3 but the package is still at release 2. I note that 0.9.1 is out. Did you want to update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475050] Review Request: pari - A CAS for Fast Computations in Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070316.mB73GdTn006127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475050 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-06 22:16:38 EDT --- Oh dear. That would have saved me some work... Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:25:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070325.mB73Pbek007617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 22:25:36 EDT --- This unfortunately does not build for me: + /usr/bin/python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-foolscap-0.3.1-3.fc11.x86_64 running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib64/python2.6/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) In the off chance that was an issue with the new python 2.6 in rawhide, I built it for F10 and had the same problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456383] Review Request: python-plotkit - PlotKit Javascript Chart Plotting packed as TurboGears Widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070322.mB73ML6f006962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456383 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 22:22:20 EDT --- I do not see you (user "sonic") in the packager group, so I'm indicating that you need a sponsor. I am sorry that nobody has looked at your package yet, but if you are still interested in submitting it to Fedora then please say so and I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:28:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070328.mB73Sq2Z007894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-06 22:28:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070328.mB73SchI007860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #9 from Ricky Zhou 2008-12-06 22:28:37 EDT --- Strange, I didn't see any weird release when I looked - maybe Luke fixed that. Here's a new release with the updated version: Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-weberror/python-weberror.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-weberror/python-weberror-0.9.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070330.mB73UZV0006302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-06 22:30:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070331.mB73VcoK008585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-06 22:31:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070335.mB73Zj28009370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-06 22:35:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070334.mB73YHOh008824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-06 22:34:16 EDT --- We no longer accept F-8 branch requests. cvs done except for F-8 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070332.mB73WssE006680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-06 22:32:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 03:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070336.mB73a8v5007350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070411.mB74B9Dj015225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:11:06 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070414.mB74E2Cb015964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:14:01 EDT --- vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070414.mB74EIYl016045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:14:16 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:13:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070413.mB74DeQu015866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:13:39 EDT --- deco-archive-1.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update deco-archive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070412.mB74CI5q013544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:12:17 EDT --- deco-archive-1.2-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update deco-archive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070421.mB74LDfx018586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:21:12 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070421.mB74LGmE018614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-06 23:21:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This fails to build for me: > > RPM build errors: > File must begin with "/": %{_texmf_main}/metapost/metauml > > So the _texmf_main macro is undefined. Did you build this in mock or koji? > This could be a rawhide issue, although I'm thinking more along the lines of a > missing build dependency. Adding BuildRequires: texlive gets things working > for me. I guess got a little ahead of myself when I cleaned up the BuildRequires (figured that since it was just copying files, nothing was needed; forgot about the macro) > The rpmlint complaints come from the fact that you have an executable text file > with no #! line to tell what shell they should be run in. Are you sure those > files need to be executable? What could possibly execute them? They shouldn't be. I tried building with chmod -x *.mp on that directory, but rpmlint still came back with errors about shebang lines. Bug in rpmlint perhaps? The project hasn't had development on it for a long time (2006 or so), but the developer did put a note on the site that he plans on working on it again (although this was in August). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070420.mB74KO9t016037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070420.mB74KLRj015994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:20:20 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:18:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070418.mB74IDf7015215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:18:12 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070419.mB74JwmE015551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:19:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070419.mB74JuSe015515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:19:55 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.05-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070418.mB74IdXq015292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:18:36 EDT --- deco-1.5.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update deco'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10788 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070425.mB74P3ZB019849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:25:02 EDT --- afuse-0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:24:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070424.mB74O4g1019383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:24:03 EDT --- robodoc-4.99.36-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070425.mB74P6oJ019882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070423.mB74No2Q019339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070423.mB74N7fh019207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:23:05 EDT --- perl-Crypt-DSA-0.14-7.fc9, perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-9.fc9, perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Crypt-DSA perl-Crypt-DH perl-Math-BigInt-GMP'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10825 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_?= =?utf-8?q?Computing_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gfan - Software for Computing Gr?bner Fans and Tropical Varieties https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Summary: Review Request: gfan - Software for Computing Gr?bner Fans and Tropical Varieties Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gfan.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gfan-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The software computes all marked reduced Gr?bner bases of an ideal. Their union is a universal Gr?bner basis. Gfan contains algorithms for computing this complex for general ideals and specialized algorithms for tropical curves, tropical hypersurfaces and tropical varieties of prime ideals. In addition to the above core functions the package contains many tools which are useful in the study of Gr?bner bases, initial ideals and tropical geometry. Among these are an interactive traversal program for Gr?bner fans and programs for graphical renderings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070423.mB74NljV017253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:23:46 EDT --- lzip-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:23:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070423.mB74NuCF017289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:23:55 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070422.mB74MZpA017027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:22:30 EDT --- ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:26:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070426.mB74Q1nu018188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:26:00 EDT --- ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070422.mB74MdeT017079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070424.mB74O71v017342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070422.mB74MZSL017010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 23:22:32 EDT --- This builds but fails to install for me on rawhide: Error: Missing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.5 is needed by package 1:openoffice.org-pyuno-3.0.1-12.1.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit) is needed by package 1:openoffice.org-pyuno-3.0.1-12.1.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Not this package's fault; the dependencies are still screwed up from the puthon 2.6 upgrade in rawhide. I did an F10 build and it seems to have worked fine. I have no comprehension of how to test this, so I am only reviewing the packaging. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 31eaccab565fe2d7aab79a5a9f8048d6c771af9d897db5d68b2d614946836a38 openoffice-0.1-r33-20080929.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F10, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-openoffice = 0.1-0.1.20080929svn33.fc10 = openoffice.org-pyuno python(abi) = 2.5 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:27:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070427.mB74R38i020671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:27:02 EDT --- afuse-0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070428.mB74SUQO021176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:28:30 EDT --- robodoc-4.99.36-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473447] Review Request: vim-perl-support - Perl-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070430.mB74UerZ021959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473447 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:30:39 EDT --- vim-perl-support-3.9.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070428.mB74S4p5021096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:28:03 EDT --- lzip-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070428.mB74SiNp021264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070428.mB74Sfb0019318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:28:40 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070429.mB74T6WC019485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:29:05 EDT --- deco-1.5.7-2.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update deco'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:31:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070431.mB74VN3T022167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:31:22 EDT --- xmp-2.5.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:32:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471429] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache - Catalyst Apache Engines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070432.mB74WfeY020565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471429 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 23:32:40 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Engine-Apache-1.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:38:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070438.mB74cHnA023992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-06 23:38:15 EDT --- As for the release weirdness, note that the spec in comment 7 and the spec inside the src.rpm from comment 7 are not identical. In any case, let me do a full review. I might suggest that you expand the "WSGI" acronym in the description; I was curious as to what SGI was up to until I looked it up. I don't think it's a big deal, though. I do want to make sure that you're aware that this seems to bundle its own copy of at least part of jquery, which might fall afoul of future javascript packaging guidelines. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 0ab082270ceaf67de2761a521b1307b5869f790542fca8496d5fc029b62b1d0f WebError-0.9.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-weberror = 0.9.1-1.fc11 = python(abi) = 2.6 python-pygments python-simplejson python-tempita python-webob * %check is present and all tests pass: Ran 16 tests in 0.339s OK * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 04:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 23:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070453.mB74rXl5023842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-06 23:53:32 EDT --- Fixed it up using install -m 644 and also using sed to replace \r in line endings. New spec: http://benboeckel.net/metapost-metauml/metapost-metauml.spec New SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/metapost-metauml/metapost-metauml-0.2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 05:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469993] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-URI - URI related types and coercions for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070523.mB75NiRg028722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469993 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 05:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070530.mB75U5Pl032108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 05:32:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070532.mB75WmXC030194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 05:32:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070532.mB75Wkt8030176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-07 00:32:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-TreeDumper Short Description: Improved replacement for Data::Dumper Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 05:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] New: Review Request: netbeans-platform9 - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netbeans-platform9 - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Summary: Review Request: netbeans-platform9 - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: victor.vasilyev at sun.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform9.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform9-6.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The NetBeans Platform is a generic framework for Swing applications. It provides the services common to almost all large desktop applications: window management, menus, settings and storage, update management, file access, etc. Notes: ------ * The NetBeans Platform 9 is used as a platform for the NetBeans IDE 6.5. * The netbeans-platform9.spec is the next development step based on the netbeans-platform8.spec, Release 5.fc10 * Only the netbeans-platform8-harness subpackage is marked as obsolete, but not both the netbeans-platform8 package and netbeans-platform8-javadoc subpackage. It gives a chance to have both versions of the NetBeans Platform in a Fedora box at the same time. However, development of the applications based on the platform will be supported for its latest version only. rpmlint results and disclaimers: -------------------------------- netbeans-platform9-6.5-1.fc11.src.rpm - 0 errors, 1 warning: 1 x W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes netbeans-platform8-harness Any previous versions of the harness MUST BE uninstalled. netbeans-platform9-6.5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm - 0 errors, 69 warnings: 5 x W: dangling-symlink All these symlinks refer to the JARs owned by the packages that are specified as required. 5 x W: symlink-should-be-relative All these symlinks refer to the JARs located in /usr/share/java/ 1 x W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm It is removing a .noautoupdate file created by the %post scriptlet. 52 x W: uncompressed-zip All JARs of the NetBeans Platform aren't compressed to increase performance. 6 x W: class-path-in-manifest (1) It is nature of Java; (2) All these JARs are used only in the scope of the platform and rely on its rules. (3) All these JARs are located in /usr/share/netbeans/platform9/modules/ (not in /usr/share/java/) netbeans-platform9-harness-6.5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm - 0 errors, 11 warnings: 1 x W: dangling-symlink This symlink refers to the JARs owned by the packages that are specified as required. 1 x W: symlink-should-be-relative This symlink refers to the JARs located in /usr/share/java/ 1 x W: obsolete-not-provided netbeans-platform8-harness The obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one 1 x W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm It is removing a .noautoupdate file created by the %post scriptlet. 7 x W: uncompressed-zip All JARs of the NetBeans Platform aren't compressed to increase performance. netbeans-platform9-javadoc-6.5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm - 0 errors, 0 warnings. Successful scratch koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=984717 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 06:04:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070604.mB764DLM004556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #4 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-12-07 01:04:12 EDT --- FYI, here are the mock results for both EPEL-4 and EPEL-5: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/mock-el4/ http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/mock-el5/ I'll check on epel-list to see how EPEL only packages have been handled in the past as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 07:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 02:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070715.mB77FkK5015147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222552 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Bernard Johnson 2008-12-07 02:15:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mailgraph New Branches: EL-5 Owners: bjohnson mfleming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 08:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 03:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070804.mB784aQW021844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 03:04:35 EDT --- electric-8.07-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/electric-8.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 08:04:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 03:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070804.mB784d7j021872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 03:04:38 EDT --- electric-8.07-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/electric-8.07-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 08:28:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 03:28:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070828.mB78S1Aj025462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-07 03:28:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-B-Utils Short Description: Helper functions for op tree manipulation Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 08:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 03:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475065] New: Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Summary: Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/givaro.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.13-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Givaro is a C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations. Its main features are implementations of the basic arithmetic of many mathematical entities: Primes fields, Extensions Fields, Finite Fields, Finite Rings, Polynomials, Algebraic numbers, Arbitrary precision integers and rationals (C++ wrappers over gmp) It also provides data-structures and templated classes for the manipulation of basic algebraic objects, such as vectors, matrices (dense, sparse, structured), univariate polynomials (and therefore recursive multivariate). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 08:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 03:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070853.mB78rPUr029130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-07 03:53:24 EDT --- Ok. And the Test::More requirement was wrong too (automatically picked up by cpanspec from pod, I guess). New SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc11.src.rpm New spec: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Signature.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 09:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 04:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070927.mB79RRrZ002282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-07 04:27:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-openoffice Short Description: Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 09:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 04:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812070958.mB79wjrQ007521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-07 04:58:44 EDT --- Mental note - don't think before drinking coffee. Of course, cpanspec picked up the Test::More requirement from META.YML or Makefile.PL - nothing sinister with pod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 10:17:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 05:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071017.mB7AHdiP011350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Sergio Pascual 2008-12-07 05:17:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnuplot-py Short Description: Python interface to Gnuplot Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 11:02:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 06:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071102.mB7B2XfK022484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-07 06:02:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks for doing that. It would be good to add a quick comment to the spec > near the License: tag indicating which parts are GPLv2 and which are GPLv2+ so > you don't have to look for the COPYRIGHT files. Fixed. > I can't quite tell if the svxlink-server package needs a dependency on udev > (for /etc/udev/rules.d) or whether the dependency chain includes it. Added udev dependency. > I note that the .so files aren't executable. I was under the impression that > they needed to be executable for things to work, and my systems don't seem to > have any non-executable so files in _libdir. Fixed. Though I can find non-executable files in my _libdir. I guess it all depends on the loading method. Anyway this is seamless thing to do. > Any reason for not using the standard user management scriptlet? As it is now, > your system fails badly if the svxlink user is defined somewhere other than > /etc/passwd (such as on my LDAP server). Check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for more info; it's > basically just calling getent. Also, you will need Requries(pre): shadow-utils > for that scriptlet. Fixed. new versions: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 12:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 07:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071217.mB7CH0Uo000457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-07 07:16:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Some further comments. > Please fix: > install -D -p -m 755 packages/rpm/mldonkey.sysconfig > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mldonkey > Change 755 to 644. Done. > BuildRequires: m4 > BuildRequires: autoconf > > Why does it need these two? Removed. Another one leftover. > Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function > independently? Will investigate later. I, personally, don't use gui. > sed -i 's|\r||g' distrib/ed2k_submit/README.MLdonkeySubmit > sed -i 's|\r||g' docs/slavanap.txt > > iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 docs/gnutella.txt > docs/gnutella.utf8 && mv > docs/gnutella.{utf8,txt} > iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 distrib/Authors.txt > distrib/Authors.utf8 && mv > distrib/Authors.{utf8,txt} > > This doesn't preserve original file timestamps. Please use touch -r to do that. There are a lot of similar issues in this spec-file. Actually, I don't think that we need to preserve timestamps in that case, because we do change file contents. > # menu and pixmaps > install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-16.png -D -m 644 > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/mldonkey.png > install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-32.png -D -m 644 > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/mldonkey.png > install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-48.png -D -m 644 > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/mldonkey.png > > I suggest a loop: > for sz in 16 32 48 ; do > install packages/rpm/mldonkey-icon-${sz}.png -D -m 644 > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/${sz}x${sz}/apps/mldonkey.png > done Doesn't save any line (from 3 similar lines to the same 3, but completely different :) > %files > ... > %{_bindir}/copysources > %{_bindir}/get_range > %{_bindir}/make_torrent > ... > %{_bindir}/subconv > %{_bindir}/svg_converter > > These filenames seem a little too generic. Are they supposed to be run by the > user? Could you add a "ml" prefix to them? Yes. Some of them (exept another one leftover - 'copysources' utility) may be used even by user. For example, make_torrent can be used even w/o main mldonkey package. Maybe we should package them in their own sub-packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 13:14:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071314.mB7DERpr011261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 13:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071314.mB7DE1Tk011192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 13:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071323.mB7DNK4t015474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-07 08:23:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Your Source0: URL is not correct. You can use spectool -g to make sure that > your sources are downloadable. I think you want: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wake-on-lan/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > instead. fixed > Your license tag does not seem to be correct. At least the source files I > looked at are GPLv2+. Where do you see the restriction to GPLv2 only? You are right, the license is GPLv2+. The headers in the source point to GPLv2+. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wol.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wol-0.7.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985187 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 14:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:40:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071440.mB7EeOI9030102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jens Liebchen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |K Desktop Environment 16667 --- Comment #18 from Jens Liebchen 2008-12-07 09:40:23 EDT --- The problem may be related to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166673 It is mentioned, that GPG encrypted messages are ignored silently by kopete, if no kopete-cryptography is available. So maybe kopete is not correctly aware of the kopete-cryptography module? That may be a kopete or a kopete-cryptography issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 14:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071444.mB7EiIvZ030436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |K Desktop Environment | |166673 External Bug ID|K Desktop Environment 16667 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 14:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071442.mB7EgtqU027507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 09:42:54 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 14:42:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071442.mB7EgpA6027478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 09:42:50 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 14:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071443.mB7EhBWZ027547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 09:43:11 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:16:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071516.mB7FG8R0000956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 10:16:07 EDT --- Sorry for delay... Seems good, however as I wrote in my comment 10 (and as you wondered) since Clock.java must be removed from source zip file, the zip file must be re-packaged. Please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071529.mB7FToi5002815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-07 10:29:49 EDT --- So first round of issues found during the review - wrong Group tags are used - check /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS for valid group names, I suggest to use System Environment/Daemons (nufw, nuauth) , System Environment/Libraries (client library, pam), Applications/Internet (utils), Development/Libraries (for -devel), Development/Languages (for the python bindings) - drop the %{epoch} from the Provides/Requires/... as it is not defined/used - preserve timestamps on manually installed files - use "cp -p" or "install -p" - license is GPLv2 only, there is no "or any later version" clause in the sources - license text included in the source archive, but not included in any package as %doc - %{_sysconfdir}/nufw/ is owned by multiple packages (nufw, nufw-utils, nuauth), only one should really own it, other packages get it through the dependencies - wrong initscript scriplets and package dependencies - wrong shared library scriptlets (%postun is missing) - %defattr(-,root,root,-) should be used - no need to specify --localstatedir when running %configure, it is set to /var automatically - static library and *.la archive are packaged in -devel (use %exclude in %files or "rm" in %install) - including the whole "doc" directory as %doc is not necessary, grab only the README.* and the non-manpages (acls, cache_system and debug) - the included initscript are not compliant with Fedora - LSB header is missing, service is enabled by default, ... - the auth and log modules are linked as shared libs (including the version info), so they install *.so, *.so.0 and *.so.0.0.0 - they should use "-avoid-version" in the link command - don't use /var/... in %file, use %{_localstatedir} instead - the %description for -utils talks about nutcpc, but it is stored in its own sub-package - split the Provides for nuauth to multiple lines - there is no need for the Obsoletes for nuauth - the Requires for nuauth are wrong, there are no such packages like sasl-plug-*, you want probably cyrus-sasl-* - the pam module contains rpath and the BuildRequire: chrpath is not used - the library subpackage is usually called foo-libs with headers in foo-devel, you can "Provide: libnuclient" for compatibility - why not to rename the nufw-nuauth-* packages only to nuath-* Please read the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and linked pages for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071534.mB7FYkbx006390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #21 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-07 10:34:43 EDT --- xdg-open arguably may be reliable, but then gnome-open is not. gnome-open tries to open the file in abiword, rather than firefox. Abiword balks saying it can't handle the file. The bottom line is that using xdg-open to launch file the file does not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071538.mB7FcdUB007101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-07 10:38:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > You have Patch0: but call %patch instead of %patch0. rpm these days doesn't > permit that. Fixed. > You can probably drop the BuildRequires conditional for Fedora 8; new branches > for that release aren't accepted any longer so you only have to consider F-9 > and newer. Actually, I can't - I plan to submit this package for EPEL as well. > If I fix the %patch problem, the package builds and rpmlint says: > python-sippy.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides sippy > You should essentially never use an unversioned Provides: like that, because it > makes it impossible to bring back a package with that name. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages > for more information on how to rename packages. Fixed. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-3.20081202cvs.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071550.mB7ForOH006434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #47 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 10:50:50 EDT --- Any news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:49:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071549.mB7Fnm08005999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 10:49:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:51:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071551.mB7FpeWJ009220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 10:51:37 EDT --- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071553.mB7FrFKO009405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 10:53:14 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thebridge-1.06-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071555.mB7FtolF009947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:52:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:52:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071552.mB7Fq6kg009288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 10:52:05 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thebridge-1.06-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] New: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Summary: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader-2.12.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/ Description: GuiLoader is a high-performance and compact GuiXml loader library. This library allows GTK+ applications to create GUI widgets and objects at run-time from GuiXml resource files. GuiLoader is written in C language as a GObject subclass and has a trivial language-independent API. GuiLoader was designed to be easily wrapped for any language that has GTK+ bindings. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985300 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint guiloader* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint guiloader* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This Review Request based on an old Review Request. -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206122 As in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 suggested from the original owner of the Review Request of guiloader, this is the new Review Request to bring this into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071557.mB7FvCU9010130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 10:57:11 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ssbd-0.10-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:58:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071558.mB7FwKGb007435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 10:58:18 EDT --- Umm... Sorry for delay... Perhaps I missed the mail from this bug. I will check it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071559.mB7FxrYw007633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 10:59:51 EDT --- Would you rebuilt this package for older branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071558.mB7FwEZn007392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 10:58:14 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ssbd-0.10-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 15:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071558.mB7FwsR1007487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 16:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071604.mB7G4aHD008598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 11:04:34 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 16:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071605.mB7G5Cwu008961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 11:05:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 16:02:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071602.mB7G2pxe008438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cra at wpi.edu) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 11:02:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 16:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071609.mB7G9CKN011905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 11:09:10 EDT --- Any news from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 16:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071608.mB7G8SEK009398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 11:08:27 EDT --- For F-10/9 please submit push requests on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 17:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071700.mB7H0qRn021021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #16 from Oleg Girko 2008-12-07 12:00:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function > > independently? > > Will investigate later. I, personally, don't use gui. No need to investigate. I use mldonkey-gui separately on my laptop. It doesn't require other mldonkey* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 17:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071725.mB7HP3wl022747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-07 12:25:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > Shouldn't the -gui subpackage require the main package? Or can it function > > > independently? > > > > Will investigate later. I, personally, don't use gui. > > No need to investigate. I use mldonkey-gui separately on my laptop. It doesn't > require other mldonkey* packages. Thanks for info! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 17:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071733.mB7HXIrF024042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-07 12:33:16 EDT --- Ver. 2.9.6-2 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mldonkey-2.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 17:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071745.mB7Hjo0V029049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #26 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-07 12:45:49 EDT --- Yes, I'll look at uploading/pushing them to F9/F10 tomorrow (Monday), I wanted to wait for everything to show up in Rawhide, which it did. Thanks for your assistance and patience with everything! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 17:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071748.mB7Hmu53029434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 12:48:52 EDT --- Okay, now for 2.8.1-2: * Duplicate file entry ------------------------------------------------------- 129 %files .... 142 %{_datadir}/%{name}/ 143 %attr(0755, root, root) %{_datadir}/%{name}/tv_grab_ttx.pl ------------------------------------------------------- - This causes the warning like ------------------------------------------------------- 276 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/nxtvepg/tv_grab_ttx.pl ------------------------------------------------------- because the %files entry "%{_datadir}/%{name}" contains the directory %_datadir/%name itself and all files/directores/etc under this directory. For this package it is better that you explicitly modify the permission of this script at %install like ------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make %{?_smp_mflags} \ ..... install ..... ..... chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/*.pl ------------------------------------------------------- and remove "%attr(........ tv_grah_ttx.pl" line. Now - This package itself is okay (but please fix above) - Now I will sponsor you (if you are still seeking for sponsors) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (nxtvepg) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 18:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071810.mB7IARFk030525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-07 13:10:25 EDT --- The latest seems 2.13.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 18:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071827.mB7IR200004141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-07 13:27:01 EDT --- Looks good; thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 18:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071829.mB7ITqaP004501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-07 13:29:51 EDT --- Thanks; the dependencies look good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 18:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461050] Review Request: tucnak2 - VHF contest logging program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071841.mB7IfNvo003732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461050 --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-07 13:41:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > DO you know what it is used for in this program? Can it be removed or renamed? Upstream hasn't decided whether to rename of remove this program. I decided to rename this to tucnak2-soundwrapper meanwhile. Also updated to the latest version. new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/tucnak2-2.21-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 18:58:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071858.mB7IwT8H009900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 18:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] New: Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Summary: Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian.deutsch at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fabiand/fedora/fourier/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A simple plug-in to do fourier transform on you image. The major advantage of this plugin is to be able to work with the transformed image inside GIMP. You can so draw or apply filters in fourier space, and get the modified image with an inverse FFT. This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:16:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] New: Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Summary: Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-Traits.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-Traits-3.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm The traits package developed by Enthought provides a special type definition called a trait. Although they can be used as normal Python object attributes, traits also have several additional characteristics: * Initialization: A trait can be assigned a default value. * Validation: A trait attribute's type can be explicitly declared. * Delegation: The value of a trait attribute can be contained either in another object. * Notification: Setting the value of a trait attribute can trigger notification of other parts of the program. * Visualization: User interfaces that permit the interactive modification of a trait's value can be automatically constructed using the trait's definition. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071916.mB7JGU9A013719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #31 from Torsten Rausche 2008-12-07 14:16:29 EDT --- OK, the last flaw is fixed in Spec URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Dec 07 2008 Torsten Rausche - 2.8.1-3 - The script permissions are better handled in the install section (This removes the "File listed twice" warning during the package build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071919.mB7JJmOd011057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-07 14:19:47 EDT --- Looks good: license note is there, udev dependency is added, so files are executable (and I should check to see if this is really necessary), scriptlets and their dependencies are OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071921.mB7JLnGS014588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #32 from Torsten Rausche 2008-12-07 14:21:48 EDT --- ===> Requested sponsorship ===> FAS account name: trausche -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071922.mB7JMIp4014639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-07 14:22:16 EDT --- Thanks. The license tag is OK now and the Source0: URL is correct. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071929.mB7JTamp012535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-07 14:29:35 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: svxlink Short Description: Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071951.mB7JpPfC019998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-07 14:51:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: constantine Short Description: Platform Constants for Java Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 20:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072000.mB7K0UTH021713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 15:00:29 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 19:58:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:58:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812071958.mB7Jw3GH018100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 14:58:02 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 20:08:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:08:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072008.mB7K8Du4020228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-07 15:08:12 EDT --- I know, but 2.13.0 needs newer libraries than are available for Fedora 9. Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.18' but version of GLib is 2.16.6 Requested 'gtk+-2.0 >= 2.14' but version of GTK+ is 2.12.12 Per example, glib2 in Fedora 10 is 2.19.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 20:10:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072010.mB7KAv22020741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 470179 depends on bug 470178, which changed state. Bug 470178 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 20:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072054.mB7Ks2Zq031079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-07 15:54:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) * I added necessary BR (and SDL-devel as a temporary solution). * Also correct java-related BR were added. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.3.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:04:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072104.mB7L4imu000703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-07 16:04:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: supybot-fedora Short Description: Supybot plugin to interact with Fedora services Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:12:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072112.mB7LCWxG002272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-07 16:12:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Signature Short Description: Automated SIGNATURE testing Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072125.mB7LP0Dw001516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Uwe Kubosch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] New: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Summary: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader-c++.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/guiloader-c++-2.12.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/ Description: GuiLoader/C++ is a C++ binding to GuiLoader library. It is a convenience layer that simplifies development of GuiLoader based applications written in C++ language by introducing exception safety, binding GTK+ objects defined in GuiXml to C++ variables and type-safe dynamic connection to signals. rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint guiloader-c++* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint guiloader-c++* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The old Review Request -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072142.mB7LgCUh007527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |475107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072142.mB7LgBf8007497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072151.mB7LpljC006772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from John Guthrie 2008-12-07 16:51:46 EDT --- I've submitted the builds, and they have all built successfully. Closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:52:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] New: Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Summary: Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.src.rpm Description: MonkeyStudio is a crossplatform Integrated Development Environment ( IDE ) aiming to become a Rapid Application Development ( RAD ) environment. MonkeyStudio runs everywhere Qt 4.4.0 ( minimum required to build it ) is available as a shared library. It is extensible via a great and powerful plugin system which help make it do nearly anything you want and support virtually any kind of project type for which a plugin exists or is created. The primary goal of MonkeyStudio was to manage Qt4 projects as best as possible, it directly uses .pro files and does not create intrusive or unsightly configuration files. MonkyStudio is also a multi language code editor too ( javascript, xml, ... ). This package builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=985783 Rebuild under mock is OK. Rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.src.rpm monkeystudio-debuginfo-1.8.3.0-1.2625svn.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/$Main File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Plugin/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Dll/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Main File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Main/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/C++ Hello World/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Dll/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/XUP Project/$Project Name$.xup monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Solution/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Static Lib/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Dll/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/XML/Qt Form/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Gui/$Project Name$.pro 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 25 errors, 14 warnings. As all of those files are templates used by monkeystudio, I think that all errors and warnings can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:55:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072155.mB7LtvI6007504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-07 16:55:56 EDT --- Thanks Jason for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 21:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072155.mB7LtZ6f007449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-07 16:55:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: supybot-koji Short Description: Supybot plugin to intercat with Koji instances Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 22:15:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072215.mB7MFUAT013511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 17:15:30 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 22:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072216.mB7MGd8R011264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Stone 2008-12-07 17:16:38 EDT --- Successfully built and pushed on all platforms. Thanks for the review! :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 22:12:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072212.mB7MCpex010486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-07 17:12:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wol Short Description: Wake On Lan client Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 22:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072214.mB7MEcJ8010651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 17:14:37 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 22:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072241.mB7Mfbj1017929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-12-07 17:41:36 EDT --- Hmm, not sure what's wrong there. That Makefile is included in python-devel, which is a BR. It builds fine in mock on rawhide for me. I've been trying to do a scratchbuild but Koji seems to be having an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 23:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812072314.mB7NEdR2020627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:14:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:14:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080014.mB80E4F6030443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-07 19:14:04 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/givaro.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.13-2.fc9.src.rpm Fixed a multilibs conflict (%{_includedir}/givaro-config.h). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] New: Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Summary: Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/python-ldaphelper.spec SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/python-ldaphelper-1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A simple library that provides a convenience class around search results from python-ldap. NOTE: I'm aware of the discontinuity in licensing between upstream's website, the actual python file, and the COPYRIGHT file. The first two state MIT, the latter states GPLv2+. I have an email out to the author to clarify this, and consider this package blocked until such clarification is received. But please do review the rest of it since no matter which license it ends up being, it's acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080026.mB80Q9x2000389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:26:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080027.mB80R5fZ000507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:27:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:30:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080030.mB80UtkZ003193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:30:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:29:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080029.mB80TtBZ000880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:29:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080032.mB80W0cN001485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:31:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:35:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080035.mB80Zp1G004078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:35:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080034.mB80YXjJ003579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:34:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080037.mB80b2hF002462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:37:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080038.mB80cBbm004327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:38:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080038.mB80cxG2002672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:38:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 00:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222552] Review Request: mailgraph - A RRDtool frontend for Mail statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080042.mB80gT7K003259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222552 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-07 19:42:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 01:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473716] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080138.mB81cW6r011722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 01:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080151.mB81pbDF015567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 20:51:36 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 01:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080153.mB81reSV014233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 20:53:39 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 02:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 21:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080217.mB82H4Aa017933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 21:17:03 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 02:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 21:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080218.mB82IdMo019595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 21:18:38 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 02:41:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 21:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080241.mB82fnHl021896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - |k12linux-quick-start-guide |Doc describing how to |- Doc describing how to |enable LTSP on Fedora Live |enable LTSP on Fedora Live |LTSP. |LTSP. Alias|ltsp-server-livesetu | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:01:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473530] Review Request: constantine - Platform Constants for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080301.mB8317A0026837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473530 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-07 22:01:06 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=986525 Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] New: Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Summary: Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zaitcev at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/usbmon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/usbmon-5.2-1.src.rpm Description: The usbmon program collects and prints a trace of USB transactions as they occur between the USB core and HCDs. Analyzing the trace helps to debug the kernel USB stack, device firmware, and applications. This is the submitter's first package and a sponsor is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080330.mB83UqM2029618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Pete Zaitcev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080335.mB83Zoug030415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-07 22:35:49 EDT --- Will check with possibilities to resolve authentic source issue and update shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475135] New: Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475135 Summary: Review Request: portmidi - Real-time Midi I/O Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/portmidi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/portmidi-82-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: PortMedia is a set of simple clean APIs and cross-platform library implementations for music and other media. PortMidi subproject provides a real-time MIDI input/output library. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080357.mB83v5Bu001365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 22:57:04 EDT --- irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 03:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080357.mB83v7KR003345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-07 22:57:07 EDT --- irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 05:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080539.mB85dgIW018967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 00:39:41 EDT --- perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 05:39:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080539.mB85ddSs018931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 00:39:38 EDT --- perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 05:48:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080548.mB85m8OR017772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-08 00:48:07 EDT --- I made a full review on this package and it's in very good condition. I have just one question: * Requires: python-setuptools seems unnecessary to me. Am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 06:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080632.mB86W07u024790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-08 01:31:59 EDT --- F-9, F-10 and EL-5 directories are missing from cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 06:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080651.mB86p6u3030002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |allisson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-12-08 01:51:04 EDT --- *** Bug 431154 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 06:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080651.mB86p5Jg029973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sindrepb at fedoraproject.org Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-12-08 01:51:04 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475141 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 06:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] New: Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Summary: Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-imdb.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-imdb-3.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IMDbPY is a Python package useful to retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database about movies, people, characters and companies. IMDbPY is mainly a tool intended for programmers and developers, but some example scripts are included. This is a re-submit. Submitted for review and abandoned at #431154 Upstream name is IMDbPY, choosing python-imdb based on the name used when importing the module. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Upstream installs example scripts in bindir, as in the debian package I've chosen to move these to docdir as examples. rpmlint silent, buillds across arches in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 07:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] New: Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Summary: Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anthonybryan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1279438 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/metalink/metalink-0.3.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Metalink is the main Metalink generation tool. It combines a list of mirrors (from stdin) and a number of files into one Metalink record (stdout). It can also be used to transform a MD5SUMS file into a metalink. Features currently include: - Hashing algorithms: md4 md5 sha1 sha256 sha384 sha512 rmd160 tiger crc32 ed2k gnunet - Generation of Metalink files from MD5SUMS lists Metalinks are XML files listing mirrors and checksums. Currently, Fedora uses MirrorManager to create Metalinks for files like ISOs. This app is a simple command line tool that can create them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 07:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080729.mB87Tpc3000653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Bug 473476 depends on bug 474188, which changed state. Bug 474188 Summary: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 07:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080729.mB87ToTE000631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 02:29:49 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 07:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080748.mB87mA8F006266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #4 from Till Bubeck 2008-12-08 02:48:09 EDT --- Again, thanks for any comments. I do now respect the BuildRoot_tag and I've added the missing BuildReq: gdbm-devel. I've uploaded again an updates SPEC/SRPMs to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 08:49:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080849.mB88ngKs013303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 03:49:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=983783 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f51d19564bdf77af1c132c2a38643fe4 libgdbus-0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + gdbus.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libgdbus-0.2-2.fc10 -> Provides: libgdbus.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdbus-1.so.3 libgdbus.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libgdbus-devel-0.2-2.fc10 -> Provides: pkgconfig(gdbus) = 0.2 Requires: libgdbus.so.0 + Not a GUI application. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080904.mB8941Ba019683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:07:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080907.mB897DqM017383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 04:07:12 EDT --- If you are still seeking a sponsor, refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080904.mB8948Is016603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:00:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080900.mB8901x1015433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-12-08 04:00:00 EDT --- > Is there some reason why the included unit tests are not run? Because the tests are archaic and do not even compile. The only reason why do not delete them completely is because I want to be rewritten later and make them run again. > Is there some reason %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse/ isn't owned by this package? I thought there is automatic dependance on nocpulse-common, but this is one of few packages which do not require it. Will fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080923.mB89Nd6b023945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 04:23:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326105) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326105) modified onboard.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080926.mB89QScY021641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 04:26:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326107) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326107) modified onboard.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080924.mB89OvNl021062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 04:24:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326106) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326106) modified onboard-settings.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:22:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080922.mB89MY4U020669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-08 04:22:33 EDT --- I already figured out what's going on in Kopete with GPG messages - when sending encrypted message, Kopete moves encrypted body to encrypted part and body is replaced with "This message is encrypted". It's OK, message is sent, for example it works well when sent to Pidgin. But when receiving this message, Kopete is trying to restore encrypted part of message to body (if there is encryption) instead of checking if there is cryptography plugin. So "This message is encrypted" message is replaced with encrypted body and the worst thing - this message is left without any further action! So kopete-cryptography can't handle it - it doesn't know about this message even! And nothing is displayed. I have patch to solve this, but another problem remains - it's working, when chat window is already opened but hanging when not. I'll try to figure out what's happening - seems like chat session is closed before message is decrypted. And finally it's regression in Kopete in KDE 4.0 - one new else if :) So I have prepared patch and I'll notify upstream. One thing I don't understand - kopete-cryptography then couldn't work in KDE 4 even it was released for it!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080935.mB89Ze8v026730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #326107|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 04:35:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326108) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326108) modified onboard.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:35:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080935.mB89ZLm9026662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 04:35:19 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file - 'Version: 4.05', the latest version is 4.06 - 'Group: File tools' is not a valid group. -> 'less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS' for a list with valid group entries - 'Requires: perl...' is missing, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires - '%defattr(-,root,root)' is normally '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' - Your Changelog entry is missing the Release. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474816] Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080941.mB89f0Rx027689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474816 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-08 04:40:59 EDT --- Thank you for quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474816] Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080943.mB89h4Rn024662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474816 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-08 04:43:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-FindIndent Short Description: heuristically determine the indent style Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080943.mB89h6Wl024712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #27 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-12-08 04:43:04 EDT --- I ran make build in the globalplatform directories for F9 and F10 and that works great. For gpshell it doesn't because globalplatform is (still) missing. Should I first push globalplatform to stable before I can run gpshell's make build? Or would testing be enough? I guess no one will be able to test globalplatform without gpshell :) Is it appropriate to push immediately to stable for a new package? I also saw that there is a type "newpackage" in Bodhi's new package creation form, is that one used now for new packages as opposed to "enhancement" as it is described in the wiki pages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080947.mB89lvvg028696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-08 04:47:56 EDT --- Summary and description will be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080947.mB89lL8E028639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 04:47:20 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=986777 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMs + source files match upstream url 64b44e0a36b25c4afc77a0f6b2b208ed glog-0.1.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package glog-0.1.2-6.fc11 => Provides: libglog.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libglog.so.0 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package glog-devel-0.1.2-6.fc11 => Requires: libglog.so.0 + Not a GUI application. Note that I saw some messages in build.log like aclocal-1.10: command not found automake-1.10: command not found But still build is successful so if anyone sees this as blocker please comment here or report bug once this gets into Fedora. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080948.mB89mRBX025722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 04:48:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I made a full review on this package and it's in very good condition. I have > just one question: > > * Requires: python-setuptools seems unnecessary to me. Am I wrong? It looks that, but module pkg_resources (part of setuptools) is imported in reporting.py. So unavailability of python-setuptools leads to an runtime error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080951.mB89pvZA026595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 04:51:54 EDT --- Just two remark - Shouldn't 'Build: perl' be 'Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version))' ? -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires) - You are mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080956.mB89uMDD027534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-08 04:56:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Unload Short Description: unload given Class Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080959.mB89xhVV030539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-08 04:59:42 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 09:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080956.mB89ule3030240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 04:56:46 EDT --- Everything seems fine from my point of view. Only recommendation would be to include the AUTHORS file in %doc APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:01:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081001.mB8A1Yj3031379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-08 05:01:33 EDT --- I'm sorry, I forgot on this one. It will be fixed. Thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:18:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081018.mB8AIt57002173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 05:18:54 EDT --- - '/sbin/' should be replaced with a macro -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros - ChangeLog and COPYING needs to be included in %doc - 3.0.1 is out ( http://www.daniel-baumann.ch/software/dosfstools/ ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081026.mB8AQTk5000727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk --- Comment #17 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 05:26:27 EDT --- Why there are still no packages of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform9 - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081031.mB8AVjJn001611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081032.mB8AWvrp004826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #18 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 05:32:55 EDT --- You are probably looking at wrong place. It is in Rawhide. [root at localhost etc]# rpm -q tightvnc tightvnc-1.5.0-0.9.20081120svn3200.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:33:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081033.mB8AXecY001875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-08 05:33:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > For gpshell it doesn't because globalplatform is (still) missing. > Should I first push globalplatform to stable before I can run gpshell's make > build? Or would testing be enough? - If you want to rebuild gpshell before waiting globalplatform to be pushed into stable repositories (testing state is not enough here for rebuilding gpshell), login on https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ and submit a new ticket to make globalplatform tagged as override tag like "To rebuild gpshell, please tag the following packages as dist-f{10,9}-override: globalplatform-5.0.0-5.fc10 globalplatform-5.0.0-5.fc9" > I guess no one will be able to test globalplatform without gpshell :) - When gpshell is rebuild as above, you can request on bodhi to push multiple packages altogether. > Is it appropriate to push immediately to stable for a new package? - It is up to how you judge. > I also saw > that there is a type "newpackage" in Bodhi's new package creation form, is that > one used now for new packages as opposed to "enhancement" as it is described in > the wiki pages? - It seems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081043.mB8AhndU006706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #19 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 05:43:48 EDT --- CVS request was for F-10 and it's not same as rawhide. Why there is no tightvnc for F-10? If you need help with building this package on F-10, just tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:46:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081046.mB8AkNvw004565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 05:46:22 EDT --- one more thing - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081044.mB8Ai09R003854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 05:43:59 EDT --- Just some comments on your spec file - Spec file name should be clamz.spec - License should be GPLv3+. The header in the source says 'or (at your option) any later version.' - 'BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils' is missing and you need to install the .desktop file https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files - Add README to %doc - Remove '.fc10' from your changelog entry https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:49:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081049.mB8AnaNm007764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 05:49:35 EDT --- soundmodem-0.10-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soundmodem-0.10-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081050.mB8AoJu8008269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 05:50:17 EDT --- I will do a full review as soon as my F10 system is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081048.mB8AmP6p004945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 05:48:23 EDT --- soundmodem-0.10-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soundmodem-0.10-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455137] Review Request: soundmodem - Soundcard Packet Radio Modem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081051.mB8ApZE3008509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455137 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081103.mB8B397e010933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 06:03:07 EDT --- - %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT are not fixed in 0.0.1.7-1 - The email address in the changelog should be the same as in Bugzilla (for your Bugzilla account). Otherwise it will be hard to find you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081102.mB8B29Pp010783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #20 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 06:02:07 EDT --- There is little misunderstanding - Adam's intention was to do the move from vnc to tightvnc in F-11, but to achieve that in the time of the CVS request, it was required to ask for F-10 branch whose content will be included in F-10 (but it will remain empty here) and only the content of devel will go into rawhide even when usual devel branch goes into F-to-be-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081103.mB8B3BN6010968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-08 06:03:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > xdg-open arguably may be reliable, but then gnome-open is not. gnome-open > tries to open the file in abiword, rather than firefox. Abiword balks saying it > can't handle the file. The bottom line is that using xdg-open to launch file > the file does not work. That I can agree with. So ok to use firefox, but don't forget filling bugs to the appropriate components to have that fixed. Following comments still apply: There is a Requires on bluecurve-icon-theme missing for the icons. You should do a proper package of this documentation, with a proper home page and download. There are license informations missing for the html, there should be a license notice at the beginning of the file (images are screen capture, I don't know what license cover them, but it is not an issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:22:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081122.mB8BM08A011848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-08 06:21:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-AutoXS-Header Short Description: Container for the AutoXS header files Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081133.mB8BXh2r017318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 06:33:42 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - URL is not the upstream URL. Why not pack the file together and make a proper release which is hosted on fedorahosted.org? - &doc is empty. Is it necessary? Zypper is not available for Fedora at the moment. Does it make sense to add *.repo files without the tool to use them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081157.mB8Bvlvk018906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #22 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-08 06:57:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Is it possible to build this package in F-10 branch without "Obsoletes" > attribute? > Or is there a problem with that? > I think an empty folder is not a good idea. Also there is an problem, that this > package is included in pkgdb: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tightvnc#Fedora10 > > I like tightvnc and real-vnc is not what I want. > Well, I can build tightvnc for F10 but I don't see reason for it. Current trunk tightvnc is forked RealVNC source - it is completely different from "old" tightvnc 1.2.9 & 1.3.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081152.mB8BqL09017848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #21 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 06:52:18 EDT --- Is it possible to build this package in F-10 branch without "Obsoletes" attribute? Or is there a problem with that? I think an empty folder is not a good idea. Also there is an problem, that this package is included in pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tightvnc#Fedora10 I like tightvnc and real-vnc is not what I want. I know, that I can rebuild this for myself, but It's nicer to have this package in distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 11:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081156.mB8BuU4t018685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 06:56:27 EDT --- An other small thing...I would suggest to switch the URL from 'http://0pointer.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=service-discovery-applet' to 'http://avahi.org', the upstream website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081240.mB8CewMN000936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 07:40:57 EDT --- rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:41:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081241.mB8Cfj7v027921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #23 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 07:41:42 EDT --- Hmm, I am sorry. You right. What's happened, that this nice project is where they started? Back on realvnc source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:39:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081239.mB8CdGiO027171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #14 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-12-08 07:39:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Any news from upstream? I'm not sure what I can ask them to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473926] Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081244.mB8CiQ8w001467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081242.mB8CgJt4028075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 07:42:18 EDT --- rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081259.mB8CxtGh005409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 07:59:53 EDT --- php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081301.mB8D1CBl006222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:01:09 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:01:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081301.mB8D1a66032665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:01:35 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 12:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081259.mB8CxwRZ031760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081301.mB8D1Ms5006292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:01:20 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081306.mB8D669E002230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:06:06 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456138] Review Request: edb - Debugger based on the ptrace API and QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081303.mB8D3L80000838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456138 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:03:20 EDT --- edb-0.9.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081305.mB8D58ik001781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:05:07 EDT --- electric-8.07-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:04:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081304.mB8D4JiF001208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:04:17 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081304.mB8D453s001111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:04:03 EDT --- protobuf-2.0.2-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:04:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081304.mB8D4sZc001394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:04:53 EDT --- balance-3.42-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081305.mB8D5CI3001825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470626] Review Request: balance - TCP load-balancing proxy server with round robin and failover mechanisms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081304.mB8D4vYE001430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470626 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:03:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081303.mB8D3w6Q001046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:03:56 EDT --- gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gnurobots'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473926] Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081304.mB8D4aXC001287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 08:04:35 EDT --- formal review is here: OK source files match upstream: 8a7d2d991328fa67fffa617942436049799bfa02 mod_limitipconn-0.23.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081306.mB8D6pog008398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:06:51 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:09:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081309.mB8D9oie009154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:09:49 EDT --- qdevelop-0.26.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:06:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447104] Review Request: qdevelop - development environment for QT4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081306.mB8D6sPn008436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447104 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081306.mB8D6NeF008159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472684] Review Request: electric - Sophisticated Java based VLSI CAD System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081308.mB8D8qAY003437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472684 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:08:52 EDT --- electric-8.07-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:10:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081310.mB8DA1K7003734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:10:00 EDT --- gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnurobots'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10999 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:14:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081314.mB8DEAaW004843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:15:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081315.mB8DFeaH005364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(louizatakk at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 08:15:38 EDT --- Are you still interested to maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081321.mB8DLKk6006848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 08:21:19 EDT --- As soon you have fixed the vendor tag, I will approve this package and then you can start with the cvs procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081331.mB8DVUj2009432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 --- Comment #2 from Pete Zaitcev 2008-12-08 08:31:29 EDT --- The comments above apparently belong to some different package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081354.mB8Dsobq019547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 08:54:48 EDT --- Hi Andy, I will do the review, but the recent spec needs a lot of work to be acceptable for Fedora. Please get comfortable with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and other docs at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers#Packaging - the Source tag has wrong format - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net - "%ifarch x86_pentium3 x86_pentium4" is useless on Fedora - the %ifarch to %define LibDir - use only %{_libdir} in the spec - do not use absolute paths, use macros %{_{bin,sbin,lib,...}dir} - do not check whether %{buildroot} == "/" in %install and %clean - do not gzip man pages, it is done automagically - drop the %pre and %post scripts almost completely, rely on the content that Fedora provides (we have net-snmp, specific location for MIBs, ...), they should contain handling of the install shared library (call ldconfig) and take care of initscript - use only the new names for utils (i_*) to prevent conflicts with other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081402.mB8E29ub016217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 09:02:08 EDT --- Hmmm, yes the comments are for clamtk. Sorry. One for this package: 'Release: 1' should be 'Release: 1%{dist}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081358.mB8DwEhH015170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 08:58:13 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file - 'Version: 4.05', the latest version is 4.06 - 'Group: File tools' is not a valid group. -> 'less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS' for a list with valid group entries - 'Requires: perl...' is missing, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires - '%defattr(-,root,root)' is normally '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' - Your Changelog entry is missing the Release. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081422.mB8EM7Oj021045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 09:22:06 EDT --- - 'Release: 3' should be 'Release: 3%{dist}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081418.mB8EIQH4020167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-08 09:18:25 EDT --- Neat. I'm curious about details around the need for the -spec %{_libdir}/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ workaround on x86_64 (or 64bit in general?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081418.mB8EIpDZ020250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 09:18:50 EDT --- Just some comments on your spec file - '%define version 0.53' is not necessary. The number in the 'Version:' tag can be reused with %{version} - Add %{?_smp_mflags} to make in the %build section - 'BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}_%{version}' don't match the recommandations. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - Remove the *.la files. They should not be included. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries - '%defattr(-,root,root)' should be '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' for the default directory permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081430.mB8EUJ5S022784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 09:30:18 EDT --- Link to the comments : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081429.mB8ET6JV022291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-08 09:29:05 EDT --- I'm sorry I missed that during the review. All good. --------------------------------------------------- This package (python-relatorio) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081429.mB8ETMMt022345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 09:29:21 EDT --- My comments for this spec file are very similar to the comments in #474768 . - 'Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' should point to the upstream, when possible. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:31:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081431.mB8EVoVi028053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #3 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-08 09:31:49 EDT --- Thanks for the review, i will fix this and bring you a better spec file. Go to work on it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:32:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081432.mB8EWoTM028198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 09:32:49 EDT --- If you add the following lines to the spec and drop the versioned requires on libpcap, libpng and gd the result will work perfectly well on Centos-4. I have it in production for quite some time. %if "0%{?dist}" == "0.el4" BuildRequires: libpcap %else BuildRequires: libpcap-devel %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:43:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081443.mB8EhO9a030139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #3 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2008-12-08 09:43:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just some comments on your spec file Agreed to most of them (and thanks for your help), with one note: > - Remove the *.la files. They should not be included. Some apps require *.la files for plugins. Is that maybe the case here? In reply to comment #2) > - 'Release: 3' should be 'Release: 3%{dist}' Not required, but makes things a whole lot easier In addition (just some things from a quick look): - summary should not start with "A" or "An" - I don't like the "enhanced" in the summary much, as that information is not helpful at all for new users - repeating the summary in the %description IMHO is wasting space - just wondering: "make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" doesn't work instead of "make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}"? - would be nice to split the {build,}requires in multiple lines (one per line) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:48:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081448.mB8EmUso026752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 09:48:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-relatorio Short Description: A templating library able to output odt and pdf files Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 14:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081455.mB8EtgNA028655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-08 09:55:41 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081501.mB8F1lg8001934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #2 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 10:01:46 EDT --- Thank you, nice change. Applied. Same spec: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/bandwidthd.spec SRPM: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/bandwidthd-2.0.1-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081525.mB8FPxeh007852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-08 10:25:58 EDT --- Talk to upstream and CNRI about getting permission to use the mod_scgi derived code under different (GPL compatible terms), perhaps MIT? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081530.mB8FUJkN009160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 10:30:18 EDT --- review under way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:33:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081533.mB8FX5xt005730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-08 10:33:04 EDT --- So first round of issues found during the review - wrong Group tags are used - check /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS for valid group names, I suggest to use System Environment/Daemons (nufw, nuauth) , System Environment/Libraries (client library, pam), Applications/Internet (utils), Development/Libraries (for -devel), Development/Languages (for the python bindings) -> *FIXED* - drop the %{epoch} from the Provides/Requires/... as it is not defined/used -> *FIXED* - preserve timestamps on manually installed files - use "cp -p" or "install -p" -> *FIXED* - license is GPLv2 only, there is no "or any later version" clause in the sources -> *FIXED* - license text included in the source archive, but not included in any package as %doc -> *FIXED* - %{_sysconfdir}/nufw/ is owned by multiple packages (nufw, nufw-utils, nuauth), only one should really own it, other packages get it through the dependencies -> it depends... you may have nuauth and nufw on different server, i think multiple packages need %{_sysconfdir}/nufw/ - wrong initscript scriplets and package dependencies -> *FIXED* - wrong shared library scriptlets (%postun is missing) -> *FIXED* - %defattr(-,root,root,-) should be used -> *FIXED* - no need to specify --localstatedir when running %configure, it is set to /var automatically -> *FIXED* - static library and *.la archive are packaged in -devel (use %exclude in %files or "rm" in %install) -> *FIXED* - including the whole "doc" directory as %doc is not necessary, grab only the README.* and the non-manpages (acls, cache_system and debug) -> *FIXED* - the included initscript are not compliant with Fedora - LSB header is missing, service is enabled by default, ... -> *FIXED* - the auth and log modules are linked as shared libs (including the version info), so they install *.so, *.so.0 and *.so.0.0.0 - they should use "-avoid-version" in the link command -> *FIXED* - don't use /var/... in %file, use %{_localstatedir} instead -> *FIXED* - the %description for -utils talks about nutcpc, but it is stored in its own sub-package -> *FIXED* - split the Provides for nuauth to multiple lines -> *FIXED* - there is no need for the Obsoletes for nuauth -> *FIXED* - the Requires for nuauth are wrong, there are no such packages like sasl-plug-*, you want probably cyrus-sasl-* -> *FIXED* - the pam module contains rpath and the BuildRequire: chrpath is not used -> *FIXED* - the library subpackage is usually called foo-libs with headers in foo-devel, you can "Provide: libnuclient" for compatibility -> *FIXED* - why not to rename the nufw-nuauth-* packages only to nuath-* -> i prefer, it's same as Mandriva, Debian, Ubuntu, etc... module is more flexible than a monolithic package, no ? You will find all the new file at : http://saispo.free.fr/fedora/nufw.spec http://saispo.free.fr/fedora/nuauth.init http://saispo.free.fr/fedora/nufw.init I have no fedora under my hand for building a SRPM :-/ I can give you one tomorrow. Thanks in advance for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081545.mB8Fjdkf008574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 10:45:39 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by source: GPLv2+? License file as specified by spec: GPLv3+ => the README file says "any version", two of the source files say GPLv2+, most of the files do not say anything. I am not an expert, but I see no reason to restrict to GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 81e920830239a6769164946e6466ff7386e7ce8e lzip-1.1.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [!] Package consistently uses macros. => please stick with either uppercase or lowercase macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64, EL-4/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: i386, x86_64; no reason to believe it would not work on other archs [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ===ISSUES === 1. please fix the license tag 2. please choose one kind of macros and use it everywhere. The current version of your spec makes use of both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:46:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081546.mB8FknqU013369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 --- Comment #4 from Pete Zaitcev 2008-12-08 10:46:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > One for this package: 'Release: 1' should be 'Release: 1%{dist}' Fixed N.B. This changes the SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/tmp/usbmon-5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081559.mB8Fxaa3015755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 10:59:35 EDT --- s/allow/along/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081557.mB8Fvrmk015470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 10:57:52 EDT --- Another issue comes from the fact that Fedora requires to have as much functionality as possible enabled by default. In this case, adding postgresql-devel as BR would enable building with the database bits in. Personally I think this would bring in cruft which would be useless for a small router, so I suggest one of the following two approaches - either add a build conditional, which by default would compile the postgresql deps but would allow to rebuild with them off (something allow rpmbuild --define "db off"), or - build a second package (say bandwithd-postgresql) with postgresql enabled -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 16:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081622.mB8GMtdx020847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #7 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 11:22:54 EDT --- Where do you see in README, that I can use any version? I see this in README: You may use this software under any version of the GPL that is current as of your download. Current today is GPLv3+. I don't remember, when I downloaded this package first time, maybe when there was no GPLv3. Even if I am most familiar with GPLv2, I think I can't ignore this line. Or is my understanding of english in this file wrong? - buildroot macro fixed - trying to build bandwithd-postgresql package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 16:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081644.mB8GiF81021830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #14 from David Halik 2008-12-08 11:44:13 EDT --- In keeping with the Songbird release of 1.0, I've bumped the package version and spec file. Both can be found here along with stable builds from koji: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 16:49:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081649.mB8GnJ39022932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-08 11:49:18 EDT --- What is the status of being about to build it with the distro gstreamer/xulrunner? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 16:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Data-Dump-Streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Given a list of scalars or reference variables, writes out their contents in perl syntax. The references can also be objects. The contents of each variable is output using the least number of Perl statements as convenient, usually only one. Self-referential structures, closures, and objects are output correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 16:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081659.mB8Gxqhq029663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #16 from Stephen Lau 2008-12-08 11:59:49 EDT --- It should build fine with a distribution GStreamer as long as it's up to date enough. It still has local XULRunner patches that haven't yet made it upstream though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 17:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081725.mB8HPsKU003513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #3 from Jim Radford 2008-12-08 12:25:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just some comments on your spec file Thanks. > - Spec file name should be clamz.spec Why? Then I can't keep all the previous links valid. FWIW, I've done this before without complaint. > - License should be GPLv3+. The header in the source says 'or (at your option) > any later version.' Done. > - 'BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils' is missing and you need to install the > .desktop file Done. > - Add README to %doc Hmm, already there; I'm going to guess you meant COPYING. > - Remove '.fc10' from your changelog entry Done. > - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} Done. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-0.2-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 17:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081727.mB8HRGLY031966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-08 12:27:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I know, but 2.13.0 needs newer libraries than are available for Fedora 9. Ah, okay (but I recommand that for F-10+ you upgrade guiloader to 2.13.0) By the way: * Redundant (Build)Requires - Although configure.ac or .pc.in explicitly mention, glib2-devel is Required by gtk2-devel and "(Build)Requires: glib2-devel" is redundant. I don't see other issues on this package. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (guiloader) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 17:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081734.mB8HYXKG000783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-08 12:34:32 EDT --- Okay. If you think this package can be moved from testing to stable, please revisit bodhi interface and edit your requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 17:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081744.mB8HiKVO007389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 17:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081750.mB8HofVC008956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-08 12:50:40 EDT --- pong? Sorry, I need to look at this. Set to NEEDINFO of me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081805.mB8I50MK007761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #17 from David Halik 2008-12-08 13:04:58 EDT --- Exactly. In Fedora, the only packages that I need to build against locally are taglib and xulrunner. System gstreamer works just fine. The localized xulrunner though is a blocker until its either accepted as is or the patches are fully upstreamed. I think the larger issue is whether or not all the patches can be upstreamed without changing core mozilla functionality. Stevel would know better, but I'm guessing that all the patches that could easily be implemented have been and the rest are sensitive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:15:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081815.mB8IFaNi014977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #8 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 13:15:35 EDT --- * Mon Dec 8 2008 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 2.0.1-6 - buildroot macro replaced by RPM_BUILD_ROOT variable - added autoconf into build-requires - by default compiled with postgresql support - conditional build without postgresql (--without pgsql) - libpng removed from requires SRPM: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/bandwidthd-2.0.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Something else? Are you sure, license have to be GPLv2+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081834.mB8IYsF0019427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 --- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-08 13:34:53 EDT --- As you suspected, the package can only installed with the related tool (with the same documentation stripped) which I plan to release together with this package (once the review is finished). Sorry for not having mentioned this. I've uploaded new files to: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-date-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-date-docs-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm As discussed on IRC, the unnecessary Conflicts line is gone and the scrollkeeper/rarian_compat thing fixed. I think I'll keep the fedora < 8 as I don't want to unnecessarily make it complicated if people would rebuild the package on old Fedora versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081838.mB8Ic90t020622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 --- Comment #1 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-08 13:38:08 EDT --- NB: The package can only be installed with the related tool (with the same documentation stripped) which I plan to release together with this package (once the review is finished). I've uploaded new files with some fixes at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081837.mB8IbtRJ020578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 --- Comment #1 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-08 13:37:54 EDT --- NB: The package can only be installed with the related tool (with the same documentation stripped) which I plan to release together with this package (once the review is finished). I've uploaded new files with some fixes at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-users-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-users-docs-1.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081837.mB8IbhnV016515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 --- Comment #1 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-08 13:37:42 EDT --- NB: The package can only be installed with the related tool (with the same documentation stripped) which I plan to release together with this package (once the review is finished). I've uploaded new files with some fixes at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081838.mB8IcLih016618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #1 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-08 13:38:20 EDT --- NB: The package can only be installed with the related tool (with the same documentation stripped) which I plan to release together with this package (once the review is finished). I've uploaded new files with some fixes at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081850.mB8Iobac024536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #8 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2008-12-08 13:50:34 EDT --- Build for FEdora 10 : spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc10/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc10.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc10/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 18:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081859.mB8IxMZ2026775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-08 13:59:19 EDT --- The upstream songbird tracking bug is 357052. I'm not sure how many of them are Linux dependant or even Fedora dependant bugs but the last time I tried I couldn't even build Songbird against out of tree libraries, it seems that it has improved on the gstreamer front. What's the issues with taglib. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 19:03:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081903.mB8J3o8J028039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #19 from Stephen Lau 2008-12-08 14:03:48 EDT --- We have patches to taglib for writing back metadata, as well as out-of-order reading of tags from remote files. Additionally, we've applied the community patches for m4a/m4p tag parsing. Scott is working on taglib 2.0 which will (hopefully) contain all these patches, but he isn't merging them into the stable taglib release tree... so until taglib 2.0 is released, we need a private taglib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 19:37:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465159] Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081937.mB8JbX68032538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 --- Comment #1 from Oron Peled 2008-12-08 14:37:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam.spec SRPM URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam-7.0.006-1.fc10.src.rpm * Bumped to upstream version 7.0.006 * Better configuration via included tcexam-setdef script (used both during build and in post-install). * Included Hebrew support patch + translation (sent and accepted by upstream, patch should be removed on next release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 19:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081945.mB8JjxsM006300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-08 14:45:58 EDT --- Use: License: GPL+. No version is specified, and technically, all versions of the GPL are "current". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 19:58:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081958.mB8JwZ3r009797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-08 14:58:34 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=987861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 19:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081957.mB8JvmmU009640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 14:57:46 EDT --- looking at the code, I see that unhide.c does: #define COMMAND "ps -eLf | awk '{ print $2 }' | grep -v PID" followed by fich_tmp=popen (COMMAND, "r") ; Now, my C is quite rusty, but - AFAIR, you must be root to see some of the info this program requires - anything named "ps" and found in root's PATH will be launched by the above code To be honest, I would not run this "security application" on my system. I am afraid of something along cat >> /usr/local/bin/ps << EOF #! /bin/bash echo "eviluser:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash" >> /etc/passwd echo "eviluser:$1$FvAHRp.t$nuD9eJQjgdgE7aXBNfBM/1:13805:0:99999:7:::" >> /etc/shadow /bin/ps $* EOF -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082010.mB8KAFDE012979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #10 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-08 15:10:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Use: License: GPL+. No version is specified, and technically, all versions of > the GPL are "current". Done. * Mon Dec 8 2008 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 2.0.1-7 - changed License to GPL+ SRPM: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/bandwidthd-2.0.1-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:12:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082012.mB8KC6DN009240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-08 15:12:05 EDT --- I'll review this package. But first, can you update to the latest version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082016.mB8KGAng014911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-08 15:16:09 EDT --- Sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082021.mB8KLtk4011824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-12-08 15:21:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > To be honest, I would not run this "security application" on my system. I am > afraid of something along > cat >> /usr/local/bin/ps << EOF > #! /bin/bash > echo "eviluser:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash" >> /etc/passwd > echo "eviluser:$1$FvAHRp.t$nuD9eJQjgdgE7aXBNfBM/1:13805:0:99999:7:::" >> > /etc/shadow > /bin/ps $* > EOF /usr/local/bin is only writable by root and how does not packaging unhide prevent you from this attack? Or do you never use ps without an absolute path as root? Nevertheless, the attacker could also do this for any binary on the system, not only ps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082034.mB8KYql1019574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082031.mB8KVl84019179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-08 15:31:46 EDT --- Isn't /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread- multi/Data/Dump/Streamer/_ a bit odd as directory name ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082033.mB8KXHKx019331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-08 15:33:16 EDT --- This package needs xorg-x11-fonts-misc as requirement, otherwise it won't even start: XmuttFontGrid: can't load the "6x10" font. xmbdfed.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated xmbdfed.desktop: warning: value "Application;Graphics;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" In the %files section, please to use: %defattr(-, root, root, -) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082034.mB8KYG45019442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-12-08 15:34:14 EDT --- Hi Jon, Review for release 1.fc10: * RPM name is OK * Source ldaphelper-1.tgz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * Package has sane Provides and Requires: * I did a quick test with importing it into IPython and retrieved some results from openldap. It works fine. Package is approved, pending the license clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082039.mB8Kdu10015693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-08 15:39:55 EDT --- I think, I fixed all issues. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.0.0-0.9.svn1160.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=987891 rpmlint still not silent: [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint sems-* sems-conf_auth.ppc: E: zero-length /etc/sems/etc/conf_auth.conf sems-conf_auth.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-gsm.ppc: W: no-documentation sems-mailbox.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-pin_collect.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-speex.ppc: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ I think that these messages may be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 20:44:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:44:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082044.mB8KiE43021746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-08 15:44:13 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-cvxopt.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-cvxopt-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082113.mB8LDL5D023381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-08 16:13:19 EDT --- BTW this one may be a better option for packaging (didn't actually try any of them) http://www.math.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/Software/gbdfed/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] New: Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 Summary: Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/genus2reduction.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/genus2reduction-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Determines the reduction of a proper smooth curve of genus 2 at any prime number p. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082126.mB8LQXfc027701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-08 16:26:33 EDT --- It seems like you forgot to upload the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082127.mB8LRUoI032505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #20 from Till Maas 2008-12-08 16:27:29 EDT --- I noticed that you addeed ldconfig in %post(un), but why? Afaik it is not needed here, because ldconfig does not work on the directory, where kopete-cryptogryphy stores the .so file, i.e. this does not return anything: ldconfig -v | grep kopete_cryptography I tested this on F10, but I doubt, that this is different for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082126.mB8LQQOG032160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-08 16:26:25 EDT --- Yep! That was (almost) my first thought - what on earth is Data::Dump::Streamer::_::Printers for a module? But it's really there. Data/Dump/Streamer.pm line 13 use Data::Dump::Streamer::_::Printers; Looks to be the author's way of indicating seriously-private-module-don't-ever-think-about-using-this. Which is why I've excluded the requires and provides that result from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082127.mB8LRjWk027980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 16:27:44 EDT --- Parag, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:30:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082130.mB8LUivA028924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-08 16:30:43 EDT --- Hrm, my uploader script is slightly broken -- should be up now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:29:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082129.mB8LTACd028286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 16:29:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgdbus Short Description: Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082149.mB8LnC9H005966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2008-12-08 16:49:11 EDT --- Sorry to take so long replying. Fallout at work from the Thanksgiving holiday has kept me pretty busy recently. I'm not entirely convinced this package should exist either. In fact, I carried an unofficial RPM of findbugs on my fedorapeople web site for about a year that included a patch to make it use standard BCEL. However, the patch broke with every single new release of findbugs. That's why I finally gave up and packaged the modified BCEL for submission to Fedora. Note also that jpackage recently released this package as well (their SPEC file was developed independently from mine). They are calling it BCEL version 5.3, which I think is a bad idea. This should be marked as a modified version of BCEL, not a later version. As for the groups, in the first place, Fedora leaders are on record as saying that the Group tags no longer have any relevance. The comps.xml files are now the deciding factor for categorizing packages. In the second place, try these two queries: rpm -q -g Development/Libraries/Java rpm -q -g Development/Documentation There are quite a few packages using those groups already. For these two reasons, I believe the Group tags are fine. Thanks for looking at this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 22:06:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:06:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082206.mB8M6kw1010799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller 2008-12-08 17:06:44 EDT --- Spoke with reviewer on IRC... Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/terminator/0.11-3/terminator.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/terminator/0.11-3/terminator-0.11-3.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Dec 08 2008 Ian Weller 0.11-3 - Patch version in terminatorlib/verison.py to the one we think it is - Fix License tag - Update post and postun scripts with one line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 22:24:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082224.mB8MOZGu014752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 17:24:34 EDT --- wol-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wol-0.7.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 22:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082224.mB8MObmK014783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 17:24:37 EDT --- wol-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wol-0.7.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 22:31:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082231.mB8MVoDr016920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2008-12-08 17:31:49 EDT --- Updated for findbugs 1.3.6: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel-5.2-1.3.6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 23:03:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082303.mB8N3qRg018392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-08 18:03:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This package needs xorg-x11-fonts-misc as requirement, otherwise it won't even > start: > XmuttFontGrid: can't load the "6x10" font. > > > xmbdfed.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated > xmbdfed.desktop: warning: value "Application;Graphics;" for key "Categories" in > group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" > > > In the %files section, please to use: > %defattr(-, root, root, -) Thanks! All of these are fixed in -2: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmbdfed-4.7-2.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmbdfed.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 23:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082321.mB8NL1WX022112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 Karsten Wade changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 23:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082349.mB8Nnl3T001444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-08 18:49:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - Spec file name should be clamz.spec > > Why? Then I can't keep all the previous links valid. FWIW, I've done this > before without complaint. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name You haven't to keep the links valid, just add a proper entry in the %changelog section. The number in the 'Release:' tag is 4 but there is only one entry in the changelog. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs > > - Add README to %doc > > Hmm, already there; I'm going to guess you meant COPYING. I can't remember, but it's possible that I took the wrong file. About the .desktop file. The guidelines says that it should be include as 'SourceX:' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files I think with the .xml file the procedure will be similar. Send these files to upstream and ask them to include those files in a future release of clamz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 23:54:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082354.mB8NsTwr002822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 18:54:28 EDT --- remoot-0.9-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/remoot-0.9-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 23:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082354.mB8NsWGq028849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 18:54:32 EDT --- remoot-0.9-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/remoot-0.9-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 00:39:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090039.mB90d33u011577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Gustafson 2008-12-08 19:39:02 EDT --- Is there anything else I need to do to this package/spec to spur further consideration on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 02:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090224.mB92OTQa024967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-08 21:24:28 EDT --- OK, there are a few things that need attention. Otherwise everything seems good. * There is a bunch of compiled C code in the package (under src/C/SuiteSparse). Some are released under GPLv2+, others under LGPLv2+. So I think the correct license tag should be "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+". Also there are lots of doc files inside subdirectories of this directory. They need to be packaged. * There is also a doc directory right on the root of the tarball that contains a Makefile. I think that these docs should be built and included in the package. You'll probably need to BR some latex package(s) for this. * rpmlint gives a huge amount of warnings and errors. There are basically two types of these: W: doc-file-dependency W: spurious-executable-perm There are two ways to fix these. Either, change the permissions of these files to 644, OR (the way I'd prefer) put the examples directory inside %{_datadir}/%{name}. ! This package softly depends on pymosek which is proprietary software. But since it is not a direct requirement, this can't be a blocker. * Python eggs are handled a little differently for non-setuptools packages. In order to create the python egg the proper way, please follow the example in this guideline: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 02:55:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090255.mB92tV5v007594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 473727 depends on bug 473716, which changed state. Bug 473716 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-08 21:55:29 EDT --- build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988405 failed with Can't locate Term/Size.pm in @INC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 03:40:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090340.mB93ebnR009256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-08 22:40:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > * Also there are lots of doc files > inside subdirectories of this directory. They need to be packaged. Hm, which subdirectories? > * There is also a doc directory right on the root of the tarball that contains > a Makefile. I think that these docs should be built and included in the > package. You'll probably need to BR some latex package(s) for this. OK. > * rpmlint gives a huge amount of warnings and errors. There are basically two > types of these: > W: doc-file-dependency > W: spurious-executable-perm > There are two ways to fix these. Either, change the permissions of these files > to 644, OR (the way I'd prefer) put the examples directory inside > %{_datadir}/%{name}. OK. > * Python eggs are handled a little differently for non-setuptools packages. In > order to create the python egg the proper way, please follow the example in > this guideline: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages Oh, oops. I've done this correctly before, it just slipped my mind. Thanks for pointing this out. New URLs to address the criticisms mentioned in the previous comment (I'm still unsure what you mean by commented quoted first above): http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-cvxopt.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-cvxopt-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 04:24:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] New: Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Summary: Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/symmetrica.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/symmetrica-2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Symmetrica is a collection of routines, written in the programming language C, through which the user can readily write his/her own programs. Routines which manipulate many types of mathematical objects are available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 05:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090522.mB95MuYT003741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-09 00:22:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0.02-2.fc9.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988533 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 05:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090550.mB95ooAv000892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-09 00:50:49 EDT --- I've hacked out the included copy of the system library suitesparse. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-cvxopt.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-cvxopt-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 05:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This base controller merges the functionality of HTML::FormFu with Catalyst. Upstream dropped the need for Test::Aggregate again, so all dependencies are available now in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 06:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090600.mB960qEN002770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #8 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-09 01:00:51 EDT --- no response from Upstream about including the license, so this packages is ready for a final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 06:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090605.mB96585Y003772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 07:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 02:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090733.mB97XxAJ020251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475411 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-09 02:33:58 EDT --- Thanks. But since there's a binary incompatibility between the versions of suitesparse, we need to block the suitesparse update request bug. * The directory /usr/share/doc/python-cvxopt-1.1/html is empty. Those latex files are not built properly. * You need to put an explicit Requires on python-matplotlib since some of the examples will need this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 07:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 02:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090756.mB97uW4H030275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-09 02:56:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks. But since there's a binary incompatibility between the versions of > suitesparse, we need to block the suitesparse update request bug. Right. Thanks for filing that bug on suitesparse and adding it as blocking this bug. > * The directory /usr/share/doc/python-cvxopt-1.1/html is empty. Those latex > files are not built properly. I'm fixing this now by forcing the rebuild (make -B). > * You need to put an explicit Requires on python-matplotlib since some of the > examples will need this library. I created an examples subpackage and had the -examples package require python-matplotlib. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-cvxopt.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-cvxopt-1.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 09:07:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090907.mB997NrK011662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #16 from Mattias Ellert 2008-12-09 04:07:20 EDT --- I have updated the package due to a compatibility issue with older versions of automake. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/gpt-3.2-12.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/gpt.spec The new additional patch is reported to upstream bugzilla: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 09:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090932.mB99WhcU016431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-09 04:32:41 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: b66764af72e14918367207b70d3097a868da74d8 Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-40.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ Note: leaving as only comment in %changelog the bits left by an automatic script, even after you review and modify the spec is a tiny bit misleading... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 09:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090947.mB99lld9019811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-09 04:47:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer Short Description: Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 10:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 05:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091008.mB9A8Aad023865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #5 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-09 05:08:09 EDT --- Hi, you can find the new spec and srpms file on : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 10:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 05:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091025.mB9APJQh020968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #2 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-09 05:25:18 EDT --- Hi, Thanks for the review, i have fixed all that you said. You can find new version at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.06-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 10:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 05:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225836] Merge Review: gnome-speech In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091050.mB9AoT5C026296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225836 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-09 05:50:27 EDT --- Ping? Are these issues I pointed out addressed? There have been 9 releases of gnome-speech after I submitted my notes, but all the problems are still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091131.mB9BVC95009281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:31:11 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:31:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091131.mB9BVE4W001700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091132.mB9BWKaG009710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:32:18 EDT --- sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091133.mB9BXcC5009996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:33:37 EDT --- irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091131.mB9BVpRl009522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:31:50 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:32:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091132.mB9BWNFg009747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091136.mB9BaDtB010943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:36:12 EDT --- rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091131.mB9BVsPn009564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:33:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091133.mB9BXeF1002217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091136.mB9BaFoY003352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091138.mB9BcpxP011871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:38:50 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:39:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:39:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091139.mB9BdCos012013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:39:11 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:37:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091137.mB9Bbk1T011682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:37:45 EDT --- rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:38:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091138.mB9BcZLs004540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:38:35 EDT --- irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091139.mB9BdLlS004666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:39:20 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:38:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091138.mB9Bc3Me004406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 06:38:02 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091139.mB9BdN5d004701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 11:57:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 06:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091157.mB9BvnQO015988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-09 06:57:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > How did you determine that the certs are public domain? By looking at the "ca-certificates" package, in which cacert.org would like to ultimately include their root certificate. But indeed, I was wrong. I've updated the package to include a NRP-DaL.txt file where I copied the content of the website's "Disclaimer and Licence" page. I don't know if this is suitable for Fedora or not, so I've sent an email to the legal-list to ask about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 12:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473926] Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091202.mB9C2tHu017267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-09 07:02:54 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review, Dan! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_limitipconn Short Description: Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 12:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091221.mB9CLDYc021054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 12:20:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] New: Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Summary: Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The POI project is the master project for developing pure Java ports of file formats based on Microsoft's OLE 2 Compound Document Format. OLE 2 Compound Document Format is used by Microsoft Office Documents, as well as by programs using MFC property sets to serialize their document objects. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 12:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091222.mB9CMitW013850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #21 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-09 07:22:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > I noticed that you addeed ldconfig in %post(un), but why? Afaik it is not > needed here, because ldconfig does not work on the directory, where > kopete-cryptogryphy stores the .so file, i.e. this does not return anything: > > ldconfig -v | grep kopete_cryptography > > I tested this on F10, but I doubt, that this is different for Rawhide. Ok, sorry I didn't realize what I'm doing, shortage :) Finally I have patches for both Kopete and Kopete Cryptography plugin, only need some more polishing and upstream attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 12:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091227.mB9CRGEG021979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 13:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091322.mB9DMQqA003955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |K Desktop Environment | |177302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 13:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091335.mB9DZfqM031432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-09 08:35:40 EDT --- Ver. 0.4 is out! http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Dropped all workarounds, mentioned above. Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 14:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091422.mB9EMllE009955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-09 09:22:44 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 14:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091430.mB9EUxRb020202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-09 09:30:57 EDT --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 14:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091434.mB9EYM4x020644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-09 09:34:21 EDT --- Why this package still not imported and built? Seems that someone forget about something :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 14:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091439.mB9EdSot013500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #21 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-12-09 09:39:26 EDT --- New version uploaded: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object.spec http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object-1.26-3.fc10.src.rpm I didn't start from scratch but took an existing package, thats why I didn't generate a specfile. To me it looks like it was created by an older cpanspec version. Picked up some stuff from a fresh generated file version, so it is closer now. Seems rpmlint got smarter wrt. dist tag, a while back it used to complain about changelog entries without dist tag. Fixed it up. Also added a %check section (+buildrequires needed for that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 15:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091535.mB9FZWIO004665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 10:35:31 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestions -- I've incorporated them into a new version of the package: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook-0-2.20070930.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 15:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] New: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Summary: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: red at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Javassist enables Java programs to define a new class at runtime and to modify a class file when the JVM loads it. Unlike other similar bytecode editors, Javassist provides two levels of API: source level and bytecode level. If the users use the source-level API, they can edit a class file without knowledge of the specifications of the Java bytecode. The whole API is designed with only the vocabulary of the Java language. You can even specify inserted bytecode in the form of source text; Javassist compiles it on the fly. On the other hand, the bytecode-level API allows the users to directly edit a class file as other editors. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 15:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091543.mB9FhAPi006919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091625.mB9GPi5O019069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:25:43 EDT --- Small update to include the dist in the version http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-4.20081104cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091625.mB9GPAPn018822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:25:09 EDT --- Small update to include the dist in the version http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091624.mB9GOlUV008877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:24:46 EDT --- Small update to include the dist in the version http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091636.mB9GaG6i021976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:36:15 EDT --- Updated to use the latest greatest BuildRoot and to include dist in the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/fontbox.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/fontbox-0.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:35:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:35:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091635.mB9GZhLG021899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:35:42 EDT --- Fixed (hopefully!) -- I also added the dist to the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091636.mB9GavCb012680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:36:56 EDT --- Updated with a better BuildRoot and with dist in the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jempbox.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jempbox-0.2.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:41:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091641.mB9GfKbv023286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:41:20 EDT --- NB: I just replaced the above spec and SRPM with one that uses the latest greatest BuildRoot specification too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472793] Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091637.mB9GbqE7022306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472793 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:37:51 EDT --- Changed buildroot, added dist to version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph-5.12.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:39:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091639.mB9GdkPp022656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:39:45 EDT --- Oops, the URL was wrong above. Note that I've also changed to use the latest greatest BuildRoot: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472794] Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091637.mB9GbRJp012913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472794 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:37:26 EDT --- Changed buildroot, added dist to version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/onemind-commons-java.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/onemind-commons-java-1.5.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:38:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091638.mB9GckMR013154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:38:45 EDT --- Oops, the URL was wrong in the previous message. Note that I've also changed to used the latest greatest BuildRoot. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-4.20081104cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091639.mB9GdLxi013305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:39:20 EDT --- Oops, the URL was wrong above. Note that I've also changed to use the latest greatest BuildRoot: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091647.mB9GlQRt024835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 --- Comment #4 from Balint Cristian 2008-12-09 11:47:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapbender.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapbender-2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Re-Updated to latest upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091647.mB9GlqvY015779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Felix Kaechele 2008-12-09 11:47:51 EDT --- APPROVED. You can now go ahead and request a CVS module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091654.mB9GsavZ026611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-09 11:54:34 EDT --- Everything seems good. Now we'll have to wait for suitesparse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 17:00:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091700.mB9H0DJw028330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Bug 454414 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 17:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091700.mB9H0A0Q028246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-09 12:00:07 EDT --- Built in F-10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-binutils-2.18.50_20080109_2-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 17:00:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091700.mB9H0B3f028266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Bug 454410 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 17:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091700.mB9H0CfU028292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Bug 454412 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 17:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091700.mB9H0E3L028423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Bug 454416 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 16:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091657.mB9GvJZT018103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-09 11:57:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swingx Short Description: A collection of Swing components Owners: mef Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226229] Merge Review: pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091816.mB9IGTWp015924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226229 --- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 13:16:27 EDT --- This has happened by the way. We've gone with the Old MIT license which doesn't have any advertising requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] New: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to create font packages. This package will serve as base for fonts packaging starting with Fedora 11 It has been approved by FPC today (2008-12-09). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_%282008-11-18%29 (18:51:15) Rathann: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation (18:51:17) ubertibbs: It makes the packages reasonable instead of having 50 lines of identical shell code pasted into them. (18:51:21) spot: +1 from me (18:51:24) hansg: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation (18:51:28) ubertibbs: +1 from me. (18:51:37) racor: -1 from me (18:51:52) rdieter: +1 (there's good and bad uses of macros, this is an example of the good kind, imo) (18:52:00) ubertibbs: racor: If you want the reference where we asked the Java folks to add the macros, I will dig it out for you. (18:52:02) spot: abadger1999: would you like to vote? (18:52:10) abadger1999: +1 (18:52:21) spot: okay, thats 6 for and 1 against, it passes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081209 (minutes not posted yet) There is currently no hosting source for this project, a demand will be made fedorahosted side but that's no reason not to push the package in rawhide now so packagers can start adapting their packages to the new template(s) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:30:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091830.mB9IUgrr019704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-09 13:30:41 EDT --- FedoraHosted request http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:33:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091833.mB9IXLAq010153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #5 from John A. Khvatov 2008-12-09 13:33:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glog Short Description: A C++ application logging library Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471108] Review Request: wholeslide - a library for decoding virtual slide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091840.mB9IeqMT022207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471108 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Adam Goode 2008-12-09 13:40:51 EDT --- Withdrawing this package for now, as there are some changes upstream, and the project is being renamed to OpenSlide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091840.mB9IeCbB022012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Torsten Rausche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |torsten at rausche.net Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Torsten Rausche 2008-12-09 13:40:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nxtvepg Short Description: A nexTView EPG decoder and browser Owners: trausche Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475603] New: Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475603 Summary: Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jFormatString/jFormatString.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jFormatString/jFormatString-0-0.1.20081016svn.src.rpm Description: This project is derived from Sun's implementation of java.util.Formatter. It is designed to allow compile time checks as to whether or not a use of a format string will be erroneous when executed at runtime. This package is required by findbugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464014] Review Request: findbugs - Find bugs in Java code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091848.mB9ImL24013977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464014 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 18:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475603] Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091848.mB9ImKxx013953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475603 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 19:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091918.mB9JIAnX022721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-09 14:18:09 EDT --- FYI - got this mail from upstream, will wait for new release. I assume there are no problems with a dual license? I think I originally wrote it under GPL and then had to change it to MIT when I published a few articles about it. So in good conscience, I suppose I should dual license it. I think I will create a new Google Code project and load the files up there, and then generate a 1.1 version of the software. I'll notify you as soon as I have done that. Will that work alright? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 19:26:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091926.mB9JQ5Ex024671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #7 from John Anderson 2008-12-09 14:26:04 EDT --- Adjusted the configure and removed autoconf, automake http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 19:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091955.mB9Jtssr010639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 14:55:53 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 19:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225619] Merge Review: bluez-hcidump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091953.mB9JrslS009586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 14:53:53 EDT --- Any objection to my committing fixes to CVS and closing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:06:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:06:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092006.mB9K686m013476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 15:06:05 EDT --- Any objection to my committing fixes to CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:13:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092013.mB9KDI05014994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 ?ge Olai Johnsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) | --- Comment #28 from ?ge Olai Johnsen 2008-12-09 15:13:16 EDT --- Hi! Thank you for your feedback on this package and approving it! I'm about to start on the process of rebuilding it for import. I've just requested sponsorship and my FAS-name is "aageolai". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226229] Merge Review: pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092012.mB9KCvXq004819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226229 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 15:12:56 EDT --- The license and the license field have long been fixed. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092019.mB9KJcAT006334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-09 15:19:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I just got an email back from the jakarta-commons-cli maintainer, and he will > be updating to 1.1 on Monday. Shouldn't BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-cli be amended to require >= 1.1, too? Or is it OK to build with 1.0 as long as 1.1 is present at runtime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092021.mB9KLSNR017562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #14 from R P Herrold 2008-12-09 15:21:26 EDT --- I see you have noted the license change in the .spec file. Is any other review, occasioned by a relicensing, required? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:30:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092030.mB9KUN1g019950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-09 15:30:22 EDT --- %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/xjparse The %attr is redundant here, you're already installing this script with install -pm755. You can fix it while importing the package, which is now APPROVED. Please apply for sponsorship into packager group in the Fedora Accounts System so that I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225626] Merge Review: brltty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092029.mB9KTYqA019349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225626 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 15:29:32 EDT --- Adding current maintainer. Local build of 3-10.1 on F-10 fails: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/brltty-3.10-1.fc10.i386 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/META /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/libbrlapi_stubs.a /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so.owner RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/META /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/libbrlapi_stubs.a /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so.owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:32:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:32:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092032.mB9KWEDH009668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 15:32:12 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225950] Merge Review: jpackage-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092031.mB9KVj0P020296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225950 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 15:31:44 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092045.mB9KjlIM024012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 15:45:45 EDT --- Reviewed current version. In addition to the above: mgetty.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.36-1 ['1.1.36-2.fc10', '1.1.36-2'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. Sounds link fuzz has been fixed, doing a mock build to test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226161] Merge Review: mrtg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092051.mB9KpuiR014034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226161 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 15:51:55 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 20:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092057.mB9Kvm6P015502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-09 15:57:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I see you have noted the license change in the .spec file. Is any other > review, occasioned by a relicensing, required? Actually, I forgot to note in my previous comment, that upstream relicensed project under LGPLv3 or any later version. Thanks for pointing on this. I don't think that some extra review required in that case. Ver. 0.4-2 %changelog * Tue Dec 9 2008 Peter Lemenkov 0.4-2 - Changed summary. - Fixed license field. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092109.mB9L92UC031211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 16:09:01 EDT --- Mock build, and thus fuzz and BuildRequires, are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092105.mB9L5AuO018139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 16:05:07 EDT --- The license was already fixed. * Tue Dec 09 2008 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.7-3 - Add full source URL to Source lines. - Add docs to main and devel package. - rpmlint is happy now. - Resolves: #225770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092116.mB9LGNHt001015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-09 16:16:22 EDT --- Reviewed 0.14.3-7, same as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:24:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092124.mB9LOZ6t002728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-09 16:24:35 EDT --- package is not approved, and cant be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092124.mB9LOF9L023670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-12-09 16:24:14 EDT --- Ok, just post it here and I'll do another review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226229] Merge Review: pango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092126.mB9LQBN8024211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226229 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-09 16:26:10 EDT --- package has not been reviewed and approved. you cant close it until review is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092131.mB9LVja2025541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 --- Comment #17 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 16:31:42 EDT --- How should we proceed. rpmlint is happy about cairo. Someone can send a patch for the minor issues left? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092128.mB9LSYwn024711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-09 16:28:33 EDT --- $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result jeuclid-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation jeuclid-mathviewer.noarch: W: no-documentation jeuclid-fop.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. jeuclid-mathviewer.desktop ... Icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/jeuclid_48x48.png Icon tag with just plain filename without extension is preferred, but the above is perfectly acceptable as well. ... Categories=Graphics;Math;Science Categories should be semicolon-terminated (;). License: ASL 2.0 and SPL Where did "SPL" come from? %package mathviewer Summary: Viewer for MathML files Group: Applications/Publishing Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} This is missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme, because you're putting the icon in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* . cp src/icons/jeuclid_48x48.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ Please use cp -p to preserve the timestamp. %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/jeuclid-mathviewer and %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/jeuclid-cli %attr is redundant, you're already installing these scripts with install -pm755. You are missing %post/%postun scripts for updating GTK icon cache, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYchm026480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Bug 467395 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYZs0026426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Bug 467389 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYRsa026220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Bug 454416 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYR4h026203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Bug 454414 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYnNw026781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Bug 467409 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYlUg026721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Bug 467407 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYYsR026395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Bug 467388 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYvcE027042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYPRL026170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Bug 454412 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYirV026637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Bug 467402 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYWiH026348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Bug 467376 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYsvh026922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYu4W027013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Bug 467419 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYeA2026529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Bug 467397 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467408] Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYmf5026747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 Bug 467408 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYVgT026324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Bug 467329 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYhJG026609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Bug 467401 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYb2x026451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Bug 467391 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYpMB026833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Bug 467413 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYXhj026370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Bug 467384 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYj1P026663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Bug 467403 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYdgf026504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Bug 467396 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYokq026807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Bug 467410 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYSs7026246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Bug 467322 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYkCu026692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Bug 467405 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYqoB026858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Bug 467414 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYTCa026271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Bug 467324 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYwxl027069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Bug 467421 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYUPY026296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Bug 467325 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYtiS026987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Bug 467418 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYx9L027094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Bug 468376 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYf6m026558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Bug 467398 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYg1k026584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Bug 467399 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092134.mB9LYOXw026142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-09 16:34:22 EDT --- Now built in all branches. Thanks to Dennis Gilmore and Jesse Keating in particular for helping to get this bootstrapped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:36:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226534] Merge Review: vte In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092136.mB9LaPZT005532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226534 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-09 16:36:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * Source url points to wrong directory. Correct is: > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/vte/0.15/vte-0.15.2.tar.bz2 Fixed in devel. > * %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} is included in both packages. Has already been fixed. > * %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/vte.pc lists more "Requires" than found in > the vte-devel package. Incomplete pkgconfig dependency chains break > all sorts of pkg-config queries. Plus: it links -lfreetype by default > (-> Requires: freetype-devel). We don't require freetype anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092150.mB9Lo8mr008065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #2 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-09 16:50:07 EDT --- hi, If I don't use this line for x86_64, it build correctly, but at runtime, plugins can't be loaded. It seems that without this line, plugins are not builded for the good arch. I could't test it for ppc64 (build is ok, but can't test runtime). It also seems that this problem only appears with fedora ((x)buntu, opensuse at least don't have to use this). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092154.mB9LsYTR009598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 21:53:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092153.mB9LrFLN032416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-09 16:53:13 EDT --- The package is OK now. All the issues were addressed. I also compared it with the freetype-freeworld package which passed review at Livna. Merge review APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:06:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464014] Review Request: findbugs - Find bugs in Java code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092206.mB9M6eAf013033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464014 --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2008-12-09 17:06:39 EDT --- Updated to version 1.3.6: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs/findbugs.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs/findbugs-1.3.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092209.mB9M9gxr013280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-12-09 17:09:41 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output: silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPL+ [NEEDSWORK] license matches shortname in License: tag https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing >From the GPLv2 license text that is included in the tarball: | If the Program does not specify a version number of | this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software | Foundation. There is no specific version mentioned in the examiner file, therefore GPL+ has to be used. [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING [OK] package is code or permissive content: code {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: b4c93a092c95ce9cc4e6012130ddc456 examiner-0.5.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: noarch [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [N/A] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) {OK} PreReq not used {N/A} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {N/A} Useful debuginfo generated {N/A} no duplication of system libraries {N/A} no rpath {OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install {N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and %{buildroot} on %install and %clean) {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {OK} Follows Naming Guidelines Conclusion: This package is APPROVED, but change the license tag to GPL+ before importing it to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092214.mB9MEnVY005327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Sven Lankes 2008-12-09 17:14:47 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f78024065afb9a30041a693a40387e68771cec01 terminator_0.11.tar.gz [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f10/x86_64 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch-package [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092229.mB9MTicD017294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-09 17:29:42 EDT --- Thanks for taking a look at this. I'm going to come back to this when I've finished getting the base packages bootstrapped in F-10 and F-11 (https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1103). In the meantime, setting NEEDINFO of me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:55:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092255.mB9MtN5X022531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 --- Comment #10 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-09 17:55:23 EDT --- Ok I have the change made, and I have requested the sponsorship. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] New: Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Summary: Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/google-droid-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender?s Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort on a mobile handset when rendered in application menus, web browsers and for other screen text. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Google_Droid_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:58:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092258.mB9MwxZB023058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |475661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092258.mB9MwuVY022943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451 Depends on| |472635, 475593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 22:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092259.mB9MxVhL023142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 23:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092303.mB9N3dFo024347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-09 18:03:38 EDT --- Infra did its bit, so here is a new version with the fedorahosted references fixed http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.10-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 23:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092302.mB9N2JKV015211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Bug 475661 depends on bug 472635, which changed state. Bug 472635 Summary: Google Droid fonts licensing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED Resolution| |UPSTREAM Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 23:07:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092307.mB9N7rB6016433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #4 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2008-12-09 18:07:52 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. (In reply to comment #1) > - '%define version 0.53' is not necessary. The number in the 'Version:' tag > can be reused with %{version} fixed > - Add %{?_smp_mflags} to make in the %build section done > - 'BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}_%{version}' don't match the recommandations. fixed > - Remove the *.la files. They should not be included. as you can see in the -4 spec, I manually remove it but have provisions in place to build a -static subpackage. I think just removing is better in this case but would like comments. > - '%defattr(-,root,root)' should be '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' for the default > directory permissions. fixed (In reply to comment #2) > - 'Release: 3' should be 'Release: 3%{dist}' fixed (In reply to comment #3) > Some apps require *.la files for plugins. Is that maybe the case here? Does not seem so, the plugin still backs up just fine when libbackup.la is not present on my system. OTOH, the main jpilot RPM does drop .la files in addition to the .so files [...] > - summary should not start with "A" or "An" fixed > - I don't like the "enhanced" in the summary much, as that information is not > helpful at all for new users jpilot itself includes backup functionality. The included version requires the user to explicitly click a 'backup' button whereas the jpilot-backup package allows setting up rules like 'backup every sync' or 'backup daily'. Hence the 'enhanced'. Would you still like me to drop the word? > - repeating the summary in the %description IMHO is wasting space true, fixed. > - just wondering: "make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" doesn't work instead > of "make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}"? does not seem to work (make install tried to write under / instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT), so I left it as it was. > - would be nice to split the {build,}requires in multiple lines (one per line) done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 23:29:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092329.mB9NTv62030239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-12-09 18:29:55 EDT --- [OK] rpmlint output:silent [OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format [OK] license allowed: GPLv2+ [OK] license matches shortname in License: tag [OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: [OK] package is code or permissive content: code {N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented [OK] Source0 is a working URL {N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name} [OK] Source0 matches Upstream: dbda80ef580e1a0975ef50b9aaa5210e vbindiff-3.0_beta4.tar.gz [OK] Package builds on all platforms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=989950 [N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented: [OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds) (OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin [N/A] %find_lang used for locales [N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage [N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig (N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage [N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel [N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included [N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop [N/A] Follows desktop entry spec [N/A] Valid .desktop Name [N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName [N/A] Valid .desktop Categories [N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install [OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable) [OK] Owns all created directories [OK] no duplicates in %files [OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages [OK] included filenames are in UTF-8 [OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [OK] Consistent macro usage [N/A] large documentation is -doc subpackage [OK] %doc does not affect runtime {OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) {OK} well known BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) {OK} PreReq not used {OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured {OK} Useful debuginfo generated {OK} no duplication of system libraries {OK} no rpath {NEEDSWORK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Consider using this to keep the timestamp of the manpage: %configure INSTALL="install -p" But imho this should be done directly in %configure, I have sent a mail about this to fedora-packaging. {OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) {OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used {OK} no Conflicts {OK} nothing installed in /srv {OK} Changelog in allowed format {OK} does not use Scriptlets Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch Sane Provides: and Requires: {GOOD ENOUGH} Follows Naming Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages According to the changelog/Review ticket, this is the second prelease package with the same version. Therefore the release should be '0.2.beta4' and not '0.1.beta4'. The digit needs to be always increased to avoid possible problems with rpms version-release compare algorithm. This package is APPROVED. Please consider the extra argument to %configure before you import this package into cvs and do not forget to increase the release properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 23:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092338.mB9NcIvo032417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 23:38:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812092338.mB9Ncu5A032509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jorton at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:19:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100019.mBA0Jli1007978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #28 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-09 19:19:46 EDT --- I've just sponsored Brennan, lifting NEEDSPONSOR block. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:18:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:18:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100018.mBA0IYhx007782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-09 19:18:33 EDT --- Well done, you are now sponsored. Welcome aboard. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions regarding Fedora processes. Please follow up with a CVS request and close this review request when the package is built and submitted to all relevant Fedora branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100031.mBA0V1q9002627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-09 19:31:00 EDT --- How recently did you test that on fedora? (and why didn't we get any bug reports about it? :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100033.mBA0XvPS003056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-09 19:33:56 EDT --- Full disclosure: we did have a qmake-config issue related to that in the past, but afaik, it should be resolved now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100040.mBA0evBS012345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #29 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-09 19:40:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result > jeuclid-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation > jeuclid-mathviewer.noarch: W: no-documentation > jeuclid-fop.noarch: W: no-documentation > 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > jeuclid-mathviewer.desktop > ... > Icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/jeuclid_48x48.png > > Icon tag with just plain filename without extension is preferred, but the above > is perfectly acceptable as well. That is what I thought, but I could not seem to get it to find it, might have been related to the cache that you were talking about > ... > Categories=Graphics;Math;Science > > Categories should be semicolon-terminated (;). > > > License: ASL 2.0 and SPL > > Where did "SPL" come from? There is code in Patch 1 that fixes some Apple requirements that is SPL licensed > > %package mathviewer > Summary: Viewer for MathML files > Group: Applications/Publishing > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > This is missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme, because you're putting the icon > in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* . Added > > cp src/icons/jeuclid_48x48.png > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ > > Please use cp -p to preserve the timestamp. > Fixed > %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/jeuclid-mathviewer > and > %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/jeuclid-cli > > %attr is redundant, you're already installing these scripts with install > -pm755. Fixed > > You are missing %post/%postun scripts for updating GTK icon cache, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache Added Also added the => 1.1 on jakara-commons-cli in build. This will only build for F10 there are two other packages that are not fixing bugs in F9 that this depends on. SRPM: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid-3.1.3-9.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/jeuclid.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100046.mBA0kRUa013237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #5 from Jim Radford 2008-12-09 19:46:26 EDT --- I separated the desktop and mime xml files off into their own files. I'm not sure why, it just makes them harder to review. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-0.2-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 00:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100057.mBA0vvPQ015165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-09 19:57:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xjparse Short Description: Wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator Owners: bashton Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 01:06:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100106.mBA16MwS009446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #12 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-09 20:06:21 EDT --- jeuclid is only going to be available for F10+ due to jakarta-commons-cli 1.1 only being in F10+ and the new openjdk only F10+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 01:06:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100106.mBA163Av009253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Florent le Coz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(louizatakk at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #6 from Florent le Coz 2008-12-09 20:06:02 EDT --- First of all : Really sorry for the delay... I was quite busy, and a bit lazy too... And thank you for the review :) So, here is a new version: SRPM: http://louizatakk.no-ip.org/fedora/bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://louizatakk.no-ip.org/fedora/bluemindo.spec (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > rpmlint reports 9 errors: "script-without-shebang", should I patch to correct > > these errors ? (these shebang aren't needed at all) > > You can remove the shebang in the spec file or make a patch whatever you like. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files Done, but it's a little "hackish" for this sort of thing, is it really necessary ? Now rpmlint only complains about the __init__.py missing the shebang, but the software simply can NOT work when the __init__.py files aren't empty. > > Just some quick comments on your spec file. > > Macros > - You are using a lot of macros. IMHO, you should consider to drop them. > Your spec file will be more readable. Even you miss one ( > %{appdir}/locale/bluemindo.pot -> podir?) ;-) Ok, I removed them > > BuildRequires: > - Python packages should be sure to have: BuildRequires: python > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > Thanks, done > %build section > - What is %{nil}? > Like None or NULL, it does nothing... But now I use the %build section, I removed it > Source0: http://www.codingteam.net/upload/77133a-bluemindo-0.2.1.tar.gz > - You can switch to 'Source0: > http://www.codingteam.net/upload/77133a-%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' this way you > haven't to take care of this after a new release of the source. Yeah, I usually do it, but I forgot... fixed. > > %files > - You can add all %doc entries on one line %doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG... but that > only cosmetical Yeah, pretty neat, now :) > > %changelog > - for correct changelog entries, take a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs Yes, there was a little mistake. Oh, and I added the handling of the language, I find my way to do it very "hackish" (once again), I don't know if it's the way to do it, but it actually works. New review welcome :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 01:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 20:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100112.mBA1C3Qp010550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-09 20:12:02 EDT --- Now that I am sponsored, I will go through this again for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473926] Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100317.mBA3Hemr009685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:17:39 EDT --- please use FAS name in the Owners field, not email address. cvs done. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100319.mBA3J8u5002434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:19:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100321.mBA3LlPv010814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:21:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:23:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100323.mBA3NWKP011050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:23:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:25:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100325.mBA3PSuU004089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:25:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100324.mBA3OOSV003653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:24:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100330.mBA3UKwo012795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:30:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100329.mBA3T73o004745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:29:06 EDT --- Odd. Sorry about that. Should be fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100331.mBA3VQuF013231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:31:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:32:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474816] Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100332.mBA3WQoR005709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474816 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:32:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:33:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100333.mBA3Xfnm005946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-09 22:33:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 03:56:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 22:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100356.mBA3uEIL010710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-09 22:56:13 EDT --- Thanks, will change license tag while importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: examiner Short Description: Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100407.mBA47aR6020587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100408.mBA48cZJ020692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-09 23:08:36 EDT --- Thanks for this package. The font packaging guidelines always seemed like a maze to me. I hope this will make things a lot easier. I have a few comments and questions: * rpmlint says: fontpackages-devel.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-devel fontpackages-filesystem.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-filesystem Is there a particular reason why you don't provide the obsoletes? I also can't seem to find these packages in our db. Do we really need these obsoletes? fontpackages-filesystem.noarch: W: no-documentation This can be ignored. * The license tag should be: LGPLv3+ * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The directories: /usr/share/fonts. /etc/fonts/conf.d are already owned by filesystem and fontconfig. Why share the ownership? - Suggestion: Since you are the upstream, you can provide a Makefile in the source so that you don't have to do those tricks in the SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:07:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100407.mBA47NYu012748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-12-09 23:07:22 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100435.mBA4ZUAs025624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 23:35:29 EDT --- wol-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update wol'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:37:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475040] Review Request: wol - Wake On Lan client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100437.mBA4brA1026255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475040 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-09 23:37:52 EDT --- wol-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wol'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11106 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225918] Merge Review: iso-codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100453.mBA4rlU5022763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caillon at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Parag 2008-12-09 23:53:45 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: iso-codes New Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel Owners: caillon pnemade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 05:31:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100531.mBA5VTM7003790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Silas Sewell 2008-12-10 00:31:28 EDT --- If someone would like to sponsor this package I will be happy to maintain it, otherwise I won't clog up the ticketing system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 05:33:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225918] Merge Review: iso-codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100533.mBA5XKff004039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-10 00:33:18 EDT --- cvs admin done (Chris said he would like to be recognised as the formal package owner and have Parag as comaintainer. BTW there are already a lot of comaintainers in the desktop group - dunno if it is really necessary to list them all...?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 05:33:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225918] Merge Review: iso-codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100533.mBA5XYJK029771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225918 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:14:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100714.mBA7EsVN015999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-10 02:14:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for this package. The font packaging guidelines always seemed like a > maze to me. I hope this will make things a lot easier. I have a few comments > and questions: > > * rpmlint says: > fontpackages-devel.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-devel > fontpackages-filesystem.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided > rpm-fonts-filesystem > Is there a particular reason why you don't provide the obsoletes? rpm-fonts does not exist in the repo and should not exist. These obsoletes are only there for the people who have played with early versions of this package. I've always intended to remove them shortly, and did so now. > * The license tag should be: LGPLv3+ > > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Those are the correct permission and there is no drawback, and lots of advantages, in not specifying them. > * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > The directories: > /usr/share/fonts. > /etc/fonts/conf.d > are already owned by filesystem and fontconfig. Why share the ownership? As posted on the guideline change plan they will be removed from those other packages after this one is available to keep font policy in a single place. > - Suggestion: Since you are the upstream, you can provide a Makefile in the > source so that you don't have to do those tricks in the SPEC file. You'll find out that to keep directory info in a single place, the macro file, you'd need to play rpm tricks in this Makefile, and at this point it's stupid to do it out of rpm spec space New packages http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474816] Review Request: perl-Text-FindIndent - heuristically determine the indent style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100721.mBA7LGBe023269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474816 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100720.mBA7KvxV017435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474815] Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100721.mBA7L8Dk017552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100721.mBA7L9Fs017573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Bug 474818 depends on bug 474815, which changed state. Bug 474815 Summary: Review Request: perl-AutoXS-Header - Container for the AutoXS header files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474815 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100736.mBA7aCbX026291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Bug 473476 depends on bug 473475, which changed state. Bug 473475 Summary: Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:36:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473475] Review Request: python-relatorio - A templating library able to output odt and pdf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100736.mBA7aBpH026267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473475 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-10 02:36:10 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:53:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100753.mBA7rc5l023512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 02:53:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > > The directories: > > /usr/share/fonts. > > /etc/fonts/conf.d > > are already owned by filesystem and fontconfig. Why share the ownership? > > As posted on the guideline change plan they will be removed from those other > packages after this one is available to keep font policy in a single place. > Sorry, I missed that part. > > - Suggestion: Since you are the upstream, you can provide a Makefile in the > > source so that you don't have to do those tricks in the SPEC file. > > You'll find out that to keep directory info in a single place, the macro file, > you'd need to play rpm tricks in this Makefile, and at this point it's stupid > to do it out of rpm spec space > It was just my suggestion and I respect your decision. I'll approve the package as soon as I see the official FPC announcement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 08:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100859.mBA8xNPh010855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-10 03:59:21 EDT --- unable to verify upstream source wget http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Catalyst/Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz --2008-12-10 14:26:41-- http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Catalyst/Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz Resolving www.cpan.org... 66.39.76.93 Connecting to www.cpan.org|66.39.76.93|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2008-12-10 14:26:42 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 09:06:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100906.mBA96rl9006710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-10 04:06:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988533 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a8ed69115c89247270b1210239a04f03 Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave nothing. + Package perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0.02-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(Data::TreeDumper::Renderer::GTK) = 0.02 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(AutoLoader) perl(Data::TreeDumper) perl(Exporter) perl(Glib) perl(Gtk2) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 09:13:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100913.mBA9D1rb008267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-10 04:13:00 EDT --- %changelog again - Every time you make changes in your spec file, you should bump the release and create a new entry in your changelog. Now it should be '2' ;-) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 09:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100943.mBA9hh5m021837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #19 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-10 04:43:41 EDT --- For the record, I've built this on a F9 box and it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 09:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100944.mBA9i0dO014612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #15 from D Haley 2008-12-10 04:43:59 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-6.fc9.src.rpm >Seems good, however as I wrote in my comment 10 (and as you wondered) >since Clock.java must be removed from source zip file, the zip file >must be re-packaged. Done. rpmlint output is empty for spec, SRPM and RPM. I set the permissions on the tarball generator to 644, so if you wish to use it, you have to set execute permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 09:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100953.mBA9rNfJ023943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 04:53:22 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 09:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100956.mBA9uS31024629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 04:56:27 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 10:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101018.mBAAIiPV028923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #10 from Rahul Bhalerao 2008-12-10 05:18:43 EDT --- Hi, Sorry for the delay. Here are the updated spec and source rpms. Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 10:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] New: Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Summary: Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bernie at codewiz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo.spec SRPM URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo-0.1.20-1.src.rpm Description: Todo is a program to display and manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding work, or just reminders. The program itself is assisted by a few shell scripts that override default builtins. Specifically, cd, pushd and popd are overridden so that when using one of these commands to enter a directory, the todo will display any outstanding items in that directory. For much more complete information please refer to the man page (devtodo(1)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:12:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:12:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101112.mBABCOO7000914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 06:12:22 EDT --- The links to the spec/SRPM are not working, therefore nothing can be done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:18:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101118.mBABIlx1008595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #25 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 06:18:44 EDT --- 1.4.5 is out now. Jens, do you also need to be sponsored? Otherwise you should remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR from the blocked bugs list. If you do not need to be sponsored, I will try to review this, soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101152.mBABqxKK008824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 06:52:58 EDT --- Petersen-san is actually one of the sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101208.mBAC8K5s018373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #6 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-10 07:08:18 EDT --- Hi, * I update to the latest version * Add a patch to -avoid-version * Reintroduce python bindings You can find the new spec ans srpms file on : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-1.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101235.mBACZQwl017688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #7 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-10 07:35:25 EDT --- Hi, * I update to the latest version * Add a patch to -avoid-version * Reintroduce python bindings You can find the new spec ans srpms file on : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-1.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101233.mBACX2Qn017000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |needinfo?(enrico.scholz at inf | |ormatik.tu-chemnitz.de) --- Comment #15 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 07:32:59 EDT --- Issues at first sight: - GPL is not a valid License shortname anymore - SourceX files are not prefixed with %{name}: README.fedora, tconn - The comment before the Version-tag does not apply anymore - The patch should be commented with the explanation, that upstream is dead - The correct SF.net Source0 URL is: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-Beta.tar.gz - It looks to me, that it contains libraries in %libdir, therefore these scriptlets need to be run: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig If this is not needed, please explain why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101240.mBACenUq025822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 07:40:48 EDT --- Looks like a GUI application to me, therefore a .desktop file is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101244.mBACiZ5t026308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Torsten Rausche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #36 from Torsten Rausche 2008-12-10 07:44:31 EDT --- - Package builds done - Closing this ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101245.mBACjenO026818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |needinfo?(thomas at apestaart. | |org) --- Comment #11 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 07:45:37 EDT --- There is a newer version of the package available, please update and notice comment:10 to get this reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:47:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101247.mBAClxeN027219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #5 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-10 07:47:58 EDT --- I have tested it a few month ago (difficult for me as I only have a i386). I'll try to find someone to test it again soon :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475775] New: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent-BDB.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-BDB-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Truly asynchronous berkeley db access rpmlint is clean built using mock in rawhide-i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 12:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] New: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent-AIO.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-AIO-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O rpmlint is clean built using mock on rawhide-i386 This package needs an updated perl(IO::AIO) (>= 3 ) currently in updates-testing for F-10 (whereas it should works for F-9) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101300.mBAD0QYn023339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #27 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 08:00:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Petersen-san is actually one of the sponsors. Ok, it seems to be safe to remove the FE_NEEDSPONSOR, then. I also noticed that Michel is already assigned to this, are you planning to review this, soon? Are there any plans to get this also into F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:09:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101309.mBAD9nSb032404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #5 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-10 08:09:48 EDT --- You can find new version at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.06-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246349] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101310.mBADAo8n000554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246349 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag| |needinfo?(steve at silug.org) --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 08:10:49 EDT --- see comment:3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101309.mBAD9Y0R032307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Blocks| |177841 Flag| |needinfo?(thedangercobra at ya | |hoo.com) --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 08:09:33 EDT --- According to the description, FE-NEEDSPONSOR neeeds to be blocked, which I just did. I mark this as NEEDINFO to show, that the review cannot proceed without action from the reporter (removing the mplayer dependency). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101308.mBAD8qWV025352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-10 08:08:51 EDT --- Hi, Done =) I update the changelog and bump to Release 2 Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101320.mBADKdbm003022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 08:20:37 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101323.mBADNdwA029027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 08:23:39 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101342.mBADgvII001085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 08:42:56 EDT --- Imho the Source0: line is too obfuscated. I have filed a ticket at Fedora's Infrastructure trac instance to make simpler URLs with macro usage possible: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1043 But this huge macro also makes spectool fail to download the Source0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101348.mBADmdhu002466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-10 08:48:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) ... > - I do not understand why the existing --disable-mmx is not satisfactory; maybe > he meant "--disable-sse2" instead of "--disable-sse". But it seems to me all of > MLT's usage of MMX is not acceptable to Fedora i386 policy, and I know some of > it is not yet compatible with x86-64. So, it seems to me --disable-mmx should > be fine as a global option regardless of architecture of the build. We can build the library twice within one mlt.i386 package for i386. (that's done with the "atlas" package for an example) - one time with mmx sse sse2 disabled. - one other time with mmx sse sse2 enabled. The resulting optimized library will be moved in /usr/lib/sse2 and activated at runtime if the dynamic library loader has detected the running cpu is sse2 capable. For this feature to be enabled, we need to be sure nothing will hardcode the libraries pathes, and that it will be correctly linked (not dlopened for example). > - I know nothing about multilibs. That's a packaging level problem. > - Re: "- Have runtime tests to be done." What exactly does that mean? MLT > already attempts to dlopen all so in lib/mlt. That's really bad. We are in $prefix/lib64/mlt on x86_64 ppc64 sparc64 (aka multilibs systems, so not ia64). It would be easier to use libtool-ltdl, but i don't know how to add support for it easily with you current buildsys. Anyway, you should be able to tweak the dlopening path to be correct. Once that said, I'm not sure I can support one more split between mlt non-ffmpeg enabled and mlt-freeworld ffmpeg enabled. Is there any package using mlt that can be in Fedora once mlt is in ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101402.mBAE24iT005969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caolanm at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-10 09:02:02 EDT --- Re-adding planner maintainer. Caolan, please do not remove yourself from this review again without adding a planner co-maintainer that has agreed to work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:07:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101407.mBAE7tZl014259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-10 09:07:54 EDT --- The package needs a maintainer and you need a sponsor to maintain the package. Did you close the bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:07:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101407.mBAE75NK014139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-10 09:07:04 EDT --- SRPM and SPEC links seem incorrect. Could you please update them? I will take care about review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101410.mBAEAZlF008035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-10 09:10:34 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101411.mBAEBEx5008216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-10 09:11:13 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:08:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101408.mBAE82ER007385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-10 09:08:01 EDT --- SRPM and SPEC links seem incorrect. Could you please update them? I will take care about review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101432.mBAEWF49013114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 09:32:13 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/svxlink-080730-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:32:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101432.mBAEWuY3019887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 09:32:56 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/svxlink-080730-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101434.mBAEYM3m020163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:41:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101441.mBAEfkFB015928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 --- Comment #4 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-12-10 09:41:45 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=system/fedora-package-config-zypper/fedora-package-config-zypper.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/fedora-package-config-zypper-10-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > Just some quick comments on your spec file > > - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS Done > > - URL is not the upstream URL. Why not pack the file together and make a > proper release which is hosted on fedorahosted.org? I put ZYpp url instead of fedoraproject.org, is that ok? > > - &doc is empty. Is it necessary? > Removed %doc > Zypper is not available for Fedora at the moment. Does it make sense to add > *.repo files without the tool to use them? This review depends on the core zypp components, due to our recent move to rpm 4.6 upstream has to port it to that specific version before we can include it in Fedora. It makes sense to me to have the review sitting around until they fix the build issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101450.mBAEoDtJ018216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 09:50:12 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101455.mBAEta0O019570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fnasser at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser 2008-12-10 09:55:34 EDT --- Can you use cglib 2.1.3 instead? The 2.2 will conflict with things like Hibernate, JBoss AS etc. In the meanwhile, I am contacting the communities mentioned above to check if they could certify their software with a cglib 2.2 as well. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101505.mBAF5QvM028489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:05:25 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101505.mBAF52X9022649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:05:00 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:05:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101505.mBAF54J2022692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Bug 473775 depends on bug 463266, which changed state. Bug 463266 Summary: Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101511.mBAFB9R5029927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-10 10:11:07 EDT --- Legal seems to think that the license is not appropriate for inclusion in Fedora. I'll ask on the CAcert support list now in case anyone there can give a clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101529.mBAFT6we001975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:29:04 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101528.mBAFSdoA001877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:28:36 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? Currently can we regard that Pavel is the submitter? By the way: To Pavel Usually koji scratch build is deleted within about one week. If you are the current submitter would you upload your srpm on the different URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101534.mBAFY61Y003519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:34:03 EDT --- Henrique, any news from the upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101535.mBAFZAYe003969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:35:08 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101533.mBAFXBuo003321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 10:33:10 EDT --- This appears to be built in F10 and rawhide, closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:37:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101537.mBAFb5E5032073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 10:37:04 EDT --- Again, ping, anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101534.mBAFYM53031115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(henriquecsj at gmail | |.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475806] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475806 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:38:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101538.mBAFcZpg032597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-10 10:38:34 EDT --- Oops, I now notice that cglib 2.1.3 is already in jpackage: http://www.jpackage.org/browser/rpm.php?jppversion=5.0&id=5420 What's the procedure for importing that into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246349] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101539.mBAFdPA0032763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246349 Steven Pritchard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(steve at silug.org) | --- Comment #5 from Steven Pritchard 2008-12-10 10:39:24 EDT --- There's been new pugs development recently. I'll try to update my package ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 15:50:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101550.mBAFoOVu009130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-10 10:50:22 EDT --- I'm reviewing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 and had offered to sponsor. And he's unresponsive there too since October. I say we close both. Mamoru, thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101601.mBAG1ERI011671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 11:01:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xloadimage Short Description: Image viewer and processor Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:02:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101602.mBAG2onN012048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell 2008-12-10 11:02:49 EDT --- Yes, I did close the request. I briefer contributing code and I don't have the time/desire to woo a sponsor. I'm just going to maintain the package externally. http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/wiki/Packages Sorry for wasting your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:17:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101617.mBAGHdpL015341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:17:39 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. Here are the correct URLs for this package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/zlib/mingw32-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-10.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101618.mBAGId75010741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:18:38 EDT --- Here are the correct URLs for this package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libjpeg/mingw32-libjpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libjpeg-6b-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101625.mBAGPKxt017717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:25:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pixman/mingw32-pixman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pixman-0.12.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101623.mBAGNBKU017039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:23:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/portablexdr/mingw32-portablexdr.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-portablexdr-4.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101624.mBAGOj6n012541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:24:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/termcap/mingw32-termcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101627.mBAGR29D013401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:27:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pdcurses/mingw32-pdcurses.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101622.mBAGMZjP012197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:22:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/bzip2/mingw32-bzip2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101623.mBAGNxEK012426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:23:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/iconv/mingw32-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-iconv-1.12-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101629.mBAGTTnA018508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:29:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gdbm/mingw32-gdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:28:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101628.mBAGSqnI018449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:28:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pthreads/mingw32-pthreads.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101630.mBAGURUm019016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:30:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/openssl/mingw32-openssl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-openssl-0.9.8g-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101628.mBAGSJZm013735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:28:18 EDT --- In reply to comment 1, see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2008-December/000211.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:30:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101630.mBAGU383014394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:30:02 EDT --- In reply to comment 1 please see: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2008-December/000210.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101631.mBAGV5NZ014599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:31:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/freetype/mingw32-freetype.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-freetype-2.3.7-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:31:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101631.mBAGVa3c019325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:31:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libpng/mingw32-libpng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libpng-1.2.31-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101635.mBAGZZPL020329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:35:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libgpg-error/mingw32-libgpg-error.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101633.mBAGXvll019684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:33:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/readline/mingw32-readline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10.src.rpm * Sat Nov 22 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 5.2-4 - Rename *.dll.a to lib*.dll.a so that libtool can use these libraries. * Wed Nov 19 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 5.2-3 - Fix paths to mandir, infodir. * Fri Oct 31 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 5.2-2 - Rebuild against latest termcap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:35:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101635.mBAGZSKq020297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 11:35:25 EDT --- - The tools execves to gpg, therefore a Requires: gpg should be added - The package contains a testsuite, please add this to the spec to run it: %check make tests - Then you probably also need "BuildRequires: gpg" - The package does not build on ppc(64): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991182 The problem is, that you have to run make without a target on ppc(64). You can do this by defining a helper macro, e.g. %define make_target %{nil} %ifarch x86_64 %define make_target amd64 %endif %ifarch %{ix86} %define make_target x86 %endif make %{?_smp_mflags} %{make_target} - Also note the added "%{?_smp_mflags}", which seem to work fine here. - Have you thought about patching Makefile.in at upstream to use your install commands instead of cp? Then you can use "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" beginning with next upstreams release. I can probably help you with this, if you need help. - Maybe you should use Source0: instead of Source:, but it seems not to cause any trouble. I believe I have read some changes about Patch:/Patch0: with the new rpm, but I have to check this. - The guidelines recommend a %defattr(-, root, root, -) instead of %defattr(-, root, root, 0755), but I guess the latter is a better %defattr, but I have to check this, too I will try to make a complete review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101634.mBAGYuM4015505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:34:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/glib2/mingw32-glib2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-glib2-2.18.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101632.mBAGWcY5015116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:32:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gettext/mingw32-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gettext-0.17-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101636.mBAGaoN0016283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 11:36:48 EDT --- No need to wait more. I got confirmation from an FPC member. ----------------------------------------------- This package (fontpackages) is approved by oget ----------------------------------------------- Other than this, is there any draft yet for the new guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101637.mBAGbbFi020924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:37:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/atk/mingw32-atk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-atk-1.24.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101639.mBAGdsiX021584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:39:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467408] Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101637.mBAGb2Wf020820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:37:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/jasper/mingw32-jasper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-jasper-1.900.1-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101638.mBAGcr2g021410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:38:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/fontconfig/mingw32-fontconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:36:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101636.mBAGaSDR020643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:36:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libxml2/mingw32-libxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:39:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101639.mBAGdOe9021489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:39:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gnutls/mingw32-gnutls.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gnutls-2.4.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101638.mBAGcLsC021025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:38:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libgcrypt/mingw32-libgcrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgcrypt-1.4.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:45:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101645.mBAGjWrx018905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 11:45:31 EDT --- CPAN problem. http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CF/CFRANKS/Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz works latest version below http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Catalyst/ is 0.03006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101643.mBAGhob1018382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 11:43:49 EDT --- I set NEEDINFO to indicate, that this package is not ready for review, yet. Please provide working links to Spec and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:49:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101649.mBAGnM1i024564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:49:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/SDL/mingw32-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:47:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:47:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101647.mBAGlJ34024312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:47:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pango/mingw32-pango.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101648.mBAGmoi8024494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:48:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gtk-vnc/mingw32-gtk-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.3.8-0.2.20081030hg.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:48:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101648.mBAGm0eM019404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 11:47:59 EDT --- Yes, this ticket is coming around to being closed, again, due to submitter inaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:49:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101649.mBAGnsVH019656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 11:49:53 EDT --- xloadimage-4.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xloadimage-4.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101649.mBAGnqJZ019627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 11:49:51 EDT --- xloadimage-4.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xloadimage-4.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:48:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101648.mBAGm6Hb019447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-10 11:48:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gtk2/mingw32-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk2-2.14.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101654.mBAGsUYY025631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-10 11:54:29 EDT --- There is already an open review request for pidgin-musictracker. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 But it seems that the original reporter is no longer interested to maintain this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101655.mBAGtnqb021415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 11:55:47 EDT --- *** Bug 475806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101656.mBAGuvnH021761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475806] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101655.mBAGtmuI021385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475806 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 11:55:47 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475799 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:56:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101656.mBAGuFic021595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jon.hermansen at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-10 11:56:13 EDT --- It seems that you are no longer interested to bring this package into Fedora. Is that right? I'm asking because there is a new review request for this package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:59:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101659.mBAGxgnu027032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 11:59:40 EDT --- examiner-0.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/examiner-0.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101658.mBAGwY8k022270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 11:58:33 EDT --- examiner-0.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/examiner-0.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:04:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101704.mBAH4LlV028321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 12:04:20 EDT --- kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:05:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:05:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101705.mBAH5kuU028897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 12:05:45 EDT --- Hosting on rapidshare.com is not really the best idea. I'd say (based on the COPYING file, which is referenced by the README file, source files do not include any license info ) that license should be GPLv2+ You should not build and package the static libraries and libtool archives. IF they are needed, separate packages should be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101706.mBAH6jVj029096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 12:06:44 EDT --- And note that this program has already been submitted as #469080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:19:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475822] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475822 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101730.mBAHUZgj028806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101736.mBAHavnt030161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(henriquecsj at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #17 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-10 12:36:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Henrique, any news from the upstream? Hello, Mamoru, unfortunately I don't have any feedback from the upstream yet. How should I proceed in the case of not receive any response? In any case, I will send another email and see what happens. I'm not giving up yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:37:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] New: Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Summary: Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/menu-cache.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/menu-cache-0.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Menu-cache is a caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compatible menus to speed up parsing of the menu entries. It is currently used by some of components of the LXDE desktop environment such as LXPanel or LXLauncher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101737.mBAHbWnG002809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 --- Comment #8 from Eric Sandeen 2008-12-10 12:37:31 EDT --- I'll take lmbench if it looks like this'll get dropped. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101740.mBAHeniQ003577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at deadbabylon.de --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-10 12:40:48 EDT --- Sebastian, I'm CC*ing you because the upcoming 0.4.0 version of your lxpanel package will need this. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/menu-cache-* menu-cache.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/menu-cache-0.2.2/ChangeLog menu-cache-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. PCman promised me to add a proper changelog in the next tarball, that's why I'm to lazy to remove it temporarily. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457917] Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101742.mBAHggRX031329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Eric Sandeen 2008-12-10 12:42:40 EDT --- For future generations (just in case this gets dropped for now), the upstream for this package seems to be at http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:52:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457917] Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101752.mBAHqvm5006310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-10 12:52:56 EDT --- I may pick this up if I don't hear anything soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:52:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101752.mBAHqmI2006272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-10 12:52:46 EDT --- *** Bug 475822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475822] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101752.mBAHqlCN006244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475822 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-12-10 12:52:46 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475799 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101759.mBAHxTuf007405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-10 12:59:27 EDT --- Hi, thank you very much for the review. I'll fix release tag and configure call before I import the package. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vbindiff Short Description: Visual binary diff Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 17:58:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101758.mBAHwoGj001579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-10 12:58:49 EDT --- Is there a policy for cpan sources? Should I wait for it to appear on www.cpan.org or update the spec to use search.cpan.org? My gut feeling is to prefer the former and just wait a while (in which case, will ping here when it's really available). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101809.mBAI9MPA003919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475833] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475833 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475835] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475835 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101820.mBAIKYu3006474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 13:20:33 EDT --- Thanks. Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The test suite passes: All tests successful. Files=40, Tests=453, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.12 usr 0.06 sys + 0.83 cusr 0.17 csys = 1.18 CPU) Everything else looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:26:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101826.mBAIQAtG007721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 13:26:09 EDT --- - currently guiloader is not imported into dist-f11 yet so I tested mockbuild locally, only on i386 and it seems good - spec file good - tarball matches upstream - can be installed (but for dist-f11 needing the following task to be completed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991702 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (guiloader-c++) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101835.mBAIZGSh015046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-10 13:35:15 EDT --- I became a co-maintainer here a while back, and haven't done much since. ;) I guess the least I can do is try and finish off this review. Will take a look soon and get back to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:46:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101846.mBAIkC3K017033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-10 13:46:11 EDT --- Thanks Kevin. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101853.mBAIrH2J018421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-10 13:53:16 EDT --- I've rebuiled this package without using "-spec" option : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991755 Compilation works fine, but at application launch, plugins are not loaded, with those messages : Failed to load plugin ( /usr/lib64/monkeystudio/network/libIrc.so ): Error: QLibrary::load_sys: Cannot load /usr/lib64/monkeystudio/network/libIrc.so (/usr/lib64/monkeystudio/network/libIrc.so: undefined symbol: _ZN11pDockWidget10setVisibleEb) ... If I use de -spec option, plugins are loded correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101900.mBAJ0NGr020435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 14:00:22 EDT --- OK, this does indeed build, even on rawhide. (The package in comment #12 failed there due to a libtool issue, but built fine on F10.) Since the license changed, I have re-checked it. The source in the "examples" directory is GPLv3+, not LGPLv3+, but the examples aren't built and so aren't present in the final package. All of the other source is indeed LGPLv3+, but I note a bug that needs to be reported upstream: In libpyzmq/pyzmq.cpp, you see "static const char* pyZMQ_doc" which has, at the end: "0MQ is distributed under GNU General Public License v3\n"; which seems to conflict with reality. I don't think this is a problem for this pachage, however. It seems to me that the issues I had are fixed; there are two new thing that I need to look at: zeromq-python.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libpyzmq.so zeromq-java.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libjzmq.so Both of these have regular versioned .so* files alongside unversioned ones, and I don't know all of the rules for these so I will ask. Hopefully this will be done soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:05:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101905.mBAJ5463021720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 14:05:03 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:05:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101905.mBAJ5ujE015609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 14:05:55 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225887] Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101905.mBAJ5P3m015535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225887 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 14:05:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:10:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101910.mBAJAGjB022844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101918.mBAJIuit018106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-10 14:18:55 EDT --- wrt renaming? I guess it could be considered (for F-11), Bastien what do you think? (I'll take care of the other items from comment #7) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:20:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101920.mBAJKuq3018768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-10 14:20:55 EDT --- Mamoru, thank you for your review and the hint about the redundant BR. I missed that point. I will update the source for F10 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:25:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101925.mBAJPFiM026088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-10 14:25:14 EDT --- Or maybe we can just libmusicbrainz3 -> libmusicbrainz (and EOL existing libmusicbrainz/libtunepimp). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101928.mBAJSNO3026655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-10 14:28:22 EDT --- Spoke too soon perhaps, seems there's quite a bit of stuff still depending on libmusicbrainz(2): libtunepimp(1) sound-juicer k3b(1) gstreamer-plugins-bad kdemultimedia(1) rhythmbox(2) (1) I do these, and it wouldn't break my heart if libmusicbrainz support went away. (2) Wierd, rhythmbox seems to link to *both* libmusicbrainz/libmusicbrainz3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:31:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101931.mBAJV7au027399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101931.mBAJVUI8027651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:31:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101931.mBAJVSb9027627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-10 14:31:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK Short Description: Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101939.mBAJdKQ3022769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-10 14:39:18 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream: 27872bb7473e5d64d9a24281ae6ad3d9 xmbdfed-4.7.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. NOT OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: xmbdfed = 4.7-2.fc11 xmbdfed(x86-64) = 4.7-2.fc11 = libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXm.so.2()(64bit) libXmu.so.6()(64bit) libXpm.so.4()(64bit) libXt.so.6()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) xorg-x11-fonts-misc OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I was able to run the program fine after adding correct Requires N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. OK desktop file present and correctly installed Must: - Please add desktop-file-utils as dependency (correctly installing desktop files) Suggestions: - Please consider preserving timestamps on installed files - Please also keep the classical order of files for fedora spec files APPROVED. (but please fix BR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474910] Review Request: esperanza - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101944.mBAJi3xQ030818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474910 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: esperanza - |Review Request: esperanza - | |A graphical audio player -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475852] New: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.16.5-1.src.rpm Description: The GNUstep Base Library is a powerful fast library of general-purpose, non-graphical Objective C classes, inspired by the superb OpenStep API but implementing Apple and GNU additions to the API as well. It includes for example classes for unicode strings, arrays, dictionaries, sets, byte streams, typed coders, invocations, notifications, notification dispatchers, scanners, tasks, files, networking, threading, remote object messaging support (distributed objects), event loops, loadable bundles, attributed unicode strings, xml, mime, user defaults. This package includes development headers too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101952.mBAJquvg032640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-10 14:52:54 EDT --- Finally, I found some time to review this package. However, it doesn't build on my F-10: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba parrot.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mBAPeU + umask 022 + cd /home/petro/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/petro/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf parrot-0.6.3 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/petro/rpmbuild/SOURCES/parrot-0.6.3.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd parrot-0.6.3 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + echo 'Patch #0 (parrot-0.6.3-install.patch):' Patch #0 (parrot-0.6.3-install.patch): + /bin/cat /home/petro/rpmbuild/SOURCES/parrot-0.6.3-install.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0 + /usr/bin/perl -pi -e 's,"lib/,"lib/, if (/CONST_STRING\(interp,/)' src/library.c + /usr/bin/perl -pi -e 's,'\''/usr/lib'\'','\''/usr/lib'\'',;s,runtime/lib/,runtime/lib/,' tools/dev/install_files.pl tools/dev/mk_manifests.pl Can't open tools/dev/mk_manifests.pl: No such file or directory, <> line 258. + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rD5tip + umask 022 + cd /home/petro/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd parrot-0.6.3 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + /usr/bin/perl Configure.pl --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --sysconfdir=/etc --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --cc=gcc -std=gnu99 --cxx=g++ --parrot_is_shared --lex=/usr/bin/flex --yacc=/usr/bin/yacc '--libs=-lcurses -lm' Configure.pl - Parrot Configure 2.0 General Options: --help Show this text --version Show version information --verbose Output extra information --verbose=2 Output every setting change --verbose-step=N Set verbose for step N only [skipped large number of lines] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rD5tip (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rD5tip (%build) [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ BTW ver. 0.8.1 is out - are you planning to update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102001.mBAK1moZ002009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:01:46 EDT --- I talked to a Java expert who noted the following: http://www.zeromq.org/code:jzmq indicates that a class file should also be installed, but you have to do it manually. The Java guidelines indicate that JNI libraries should be installed in a subdirectorty under _libdir. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI Honestly the java stuff exposes several issues that I don't fully understand. I would suggest that you talk to a java expert; #fedora-java on IRC should be able to help far better than I can. With regards to the python module, my understanding is the following: It is pointless to version the library. Just install a .so file. It should not be named with the "lib" prefix, as that would mean you use it with "import libpyzmq" instead of "import pyzmq" as documented at http://www.zeromq.org/code:pyzmq. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102004.mBAK4aeK028105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #4 from Andy Cress 2008-12-10 15:04:34 EDT --- Dan, Thanks for the input. I've started on these items, and have committed the changes so far into the project svn. (http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec?view=markup) - the Source tag has wrong format A: fixed in the ipmiutil.spec in svn - "%ifarch x86_pentium3 x86_pentium4" is useless on Fedora A: yes, inert for Fedora, but required for the MontaVista distro - the %ifarch to %define LibDir - use only %{_libdir} in the spec A: fixed in ipmiutil.spec - do not use absolute paths, use macros %{_{bin,sbin,lib,...}dir} A: changed in ipmiutil.spec - do not check whether %{buildroot} == "/" in %install and %clean A: fixed in ipmiutil.spec - do not gzip man pages, it is done automagically A: does this mean that the installed files should be *.8? What process does this (at rpm install time, perhaps)? - drop the %pre and %post scripts almost completely, rely on the content that Fedora provides (we have net-snmp, specific location for MIBs, ...), they should contain handling of the install shared library (call ldconfig) and take care of initscript A: significant changes, and removing some stuff. How should I detect the MIB directory, if present? - use only the new names for utils (i_*) to prevent conflicts with other packages A: I removed the symlinks for commands, there are back-compatibility issues here, this may need further investigation. The rpmlint output with the updated spec file: # rpmlint ipmiutil-2.3.2-1.i386.rpm E: ipmiutil arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/ipmiutil/ipmi_port E: ipmiutil arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/ipmiutil/events W: ipmiutil dangerous-command-in-%post ln W: ipmiutil dangerous-command-in-%postun rm # So where should extra ipmiutil-specific binaries go? They do not need to be in the PATH, IMO. I tried several locations, but rpmlint wasn't happy with my choices. The last warning seems frivilous to me, it seems removing extra stuff should be allowed in %postun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102006.mBAK6PZc003112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-10 15:06:24 EDT --- Ok, finally found free time to review it. BTW, Tom, are you planning to update (at least devel branch) to 2.2.14? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102014.mBAKEnjb004750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:14:48 EDT --- The only policy I know of is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl. If I were the packager, I would temporary use the functional Source0 and replace it in the spec (but I would not build a new rpm just for that) once the search.cpan.org becomes functional. I really see no reason to stall the review because of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102013.mBAKDYrs030225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:13:31 EDT --- *** Bug 475852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102013.mBAKDXXP030184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:13:31 EDT --- I believe this is a duplicate of 459210, which is under active review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 459210 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102020.mBAKKI6B007395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:20:17 EDT --- AutoXS::Header does not seem to be available in rawhide yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102018.mBAKIwGG006894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:18:56 EDT --- *** Bug 475835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:18:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475835] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102018.mBAKIv0E006865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475835 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:18:56 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475799 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102016.mBAKGdIU006196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-10 15:16:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > ----------------------------------------------- > This package (fontpackages) is approved by oget > ----------------------------------------------- Thank you > Other than this, is there any draft yet for the new guidelines? The new templates are in this rpm (FPC approved). I'll turn them in nice wiki pages and hunt all traces of current guidelines once FESCO has approved it. I don't really see the point of doing it before. This is quite a lot of wiki work and if FESCO asks for changes in the templates this work will have to be done twice. Better to keep the proposal in one place for now IMHO. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fontpackages Short Description: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Owners: nim Branches: F10, F9, devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475858] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475858 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475857] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475857 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: watchman7 at bol.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102025.mBAKP0lG008392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102026.mBAKQ79X009004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 --- Comment #12 from Steven Pritchard 2008-12-10 15:26:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Finally, I found some time to review this package. However, it doesn't build on > my F-10: Odd. I wonder what changed since F9. > BTW ver. 0.8.1 is out - are you planning to update your srpm? Yeah, I'm trying to catch up on a lot of Fedora work I've neglected for the last few months... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:24:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evalute perl code in context wraper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102024.mBAKOx6g008366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |473718 Bug 473723 depends on bug 473716, which changed state. Bug 473716 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:24:58 EDT --- This depends on Directory::Scratch::Structured. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] New: Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Summary: Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john5342 at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmsn.spec SRPM URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmsn-4.0-beta1.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libmsn is a reusable, open-source, fully documented library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service. Rpmlint shows no warnings or errors on spec file or source. The following are given on libmsn-4.0-0.1.beta1.fc10.x86_64.rpm: //Not sure what to do about this: libmsn.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.0-0.1-beta1 ['4.0-0.1.beta1.fc10', '4.0-0.1.beta1'] libmsn.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmsn.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 This is my first package and i seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:27:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102027.mBAKRDEH002398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:27:11 EDT --- *** Bug 475857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102027.mBAKRCog002337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475857 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:27:11 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475799 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102022.mBAKMw1J001004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Bug 473718 depends on bug 473716, which changed state. Bug 473716 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper - Improved replacement for Data::Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473716 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:22:57 EDT --- Directory::Scratch does not seem to be available in rawhide yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102031.mBAKVCSc010262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms | |.net) | --- Comment #14 from Axel Thimm 2008-12-10 15:31:10 EDT --- I don't know if it is superseded, but it was just needed (from my part) as part of a dependency chain of which it fell off by now. As I have no direct interest in this package any more I suggest to drop/orphan he review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102027.mBAKRRFA009395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #31 from Dan Dennedy 2008-12-10 15:27:25 EDT --- > we need to be sure nothing will hardcode the libraries pathes ... > > MLT already attempts to dlopen all so in lib/mlt. > That's really bad. We are in $prefix/lib64/mlt on x86_64 ppc64 sparc64 Sorry for my miscommunication. I did not mean literally "lib/mlt." It is actually *defaulted* to $(libdir)/mlt, where there is a ./configure option --libdir. The application can override this via API, and there is an environment variable as well. > Once that said, I'm not sure I can support one more split between mlt > non-ffmpeg enabled and mlt-freeworld ffmpeg enabled. I don't want this project to be a nuisance with too many configurations. First of all, I think I should split up my ffmpeg module because there are some elements for deinterlace and color space conversion that are unencumbered and then encumbered format/codec-oriented elements. That would let you or someone else just make a separate package with the encumbered elements similar to gstreamer-ffmpeg. MLT has libdv and libvorbis modules that still make it usable without the encumbered ffmpeg elements. I do not yet think it is necessary to have good, bad, and ugly packages separate from the framework lib, do you? I think the framework and majority of plugin modules can be in one package. In that case, I need to make it easier/possible to separately build the encumbered ffmpeg module. Feedback welcome. > Is there any package using mlt that can be in Fedora once mlt is in? kdenlive, which was rewritten for KDE4 and proving to be fairly usable and stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:27:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102027.mBAKRKdv002579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:27:18 EDT --- *** Bug 475858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102027.mBAKRe3v002872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475858] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102027.mBAKRJSq002527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475858 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:27:18 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475799 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102034.mBAKYpUD010676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2008-12-10 15:34:50 EDT --- FWIW I use search.cpan.org source URLs in all of my CPAN packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102036.mBAKaKGt011245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-Eval-Context - Evalute |perl-Eval-Context - |perl code in context wraper |Evaluate perl code in | |context wrapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475861] New: Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The GNUstep gui Library is a powerful library of graphical user interface classes written completely in the Objective-C language; the classes are based upon the OpenStep specification, and provide the user with a traditional nextstep-like look and feel. The classes include graphical objects such as windows, menus, buttons, text fields, popup lists, browsers, scrollviews, splitviews, fonts, colors, images, events, pasteboards,... This package includes development headers too. You need the corresponding backend library package (gnustep-back) to use this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:35:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102035.mBAKZupC011202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 15:35:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > ? I didn't find any occurrences of the clauses "GPL" or "Artistic" or "licensed > under the same terms as perl itself." among the perl files. Is there a rule > that any perl program has to be released under "GPL+ or Artistic"? I would also > like to remind you that there is a .so file in the perl package that links > against the libraries in the main package. >From COPYING: src/clients/lib/perl/: Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Florian Ragwitz Licensed under the same terms as Perl itself. License attribution also shows up in the .xs files in src/clients/lib/perl/ > - TODO file can be included in %doc Good point. > ? Is the doxygen documentation useless? Nope. I've added a -docs subpackage for all 6.4 MB of it. > ? What package(s) own the > %{perl_archlib}/Audio/ > %{perl_archlib}/auto/Audio/ > directories? Are they among the dependencies? Multiple ownership for perl directories is acceptable. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership Since nothing in this depends on any other perl module which may own %{perl_archlib}/Audio/ or %{perl_archlib}/auto/Audio/, it is acceptable for this package to own it. > ? Some files in the wafadmin directory have /usr/local/ /usr/lib/ directories > hardcoded. Will these have any effect on the application? Not in my testing on x86_64, no. The /usr/local instances are being overridden, but it can't hurt to sed replace libdir, so I've done that. > ? There are no .desktop files but why are there pixmaps? They're provided in case third party clients want to use "approved" images. > * The devel package has .pc files, hence we must require pkgconfig. Fixed. > * Please add the -v flag to the waf script so we can see what it is actually > doing. When I did this, I found that the fedora specific compiler flag -O2 is > being overwritten. This needs fixed. Good point. Added -v to build, added a patch to disable the extra -O0 that was being appended to CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS. > ? The following provides seemed weird to me: > $ rpm -qp --provides xmms2-devel-0.5-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > (git > DrLecter > b63ec5a270cfde0ae3d59c9b89d860b8650e430f-dirty) > commit: > pkgconfig(xmms2-client) = 0.5 > pkgconfig(xmms2-client-cpp) = 0.5 > pkgconfig(xmms2-client-cpp-glib) = 0.5 > pkgconfig(xmms2-client-ecore) = 0.5 > pkgconfig(xmms2-client-glib) = 0.5 > pkgconfig(xmms2-plugin) = 0.5 > xmms2-devel = 0.5-1.fc10 > xmms2-devel(x86-64) = 0.5-1.fc10 > What is that git parenthesis about? Is that normal? Hmm. It looks like it is getting implanted into one of the .pc files, then rpm is scraping it out as a Provides for some reason. Easy enough to fix the wscript to have a little versioning sanity. > * The devel package must require glib2-devel, qt-devel, boost-devel at the > least (but I think this is all). Added. > * Double BR: libmodplug-devel Fixed. > * Unnecessary BRs: libcurl-devel (picked up by ecore-devel), glib2-devel > (picked up by avahi-glib-devel, pulseaudio-libs-devel...), libogg-devel, > libvorbis-devel (both picked up by libshout-devel), python-devel (picked up by > Pyrex) Fixed. Okay, here is the new SPRM and SPEC: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmms2-0.5-2.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xmms2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102034.mBAKY9KG004973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-10 15:34:08 EDT --- ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102034.mBAKY3HK004934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreznik at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-10 15:34:02 EDT --- Incoherent version - in changelog you have 4.0-0.1-beta1 and version is 4.0-0.1.beta1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102037.mBAKb7pp005668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-12-10 15:37:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ref: devel > 1. Why is "/usr/include/gnu-gnu-gnu" used as directory for include files (in > -devel) ? I'd say that /usr/include/gnustep would look more "normal". After a > quick glance over http://www.gnustep.org/experience/documentation.html I have > not found any reference for "gnu-gnu-gnu". > 2. %{_libdir}/GNUstep/Makefiles/ and /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Makefiles/Additional/ > are unowned I have done some rework with gnustep-make-2.0.6-14 which may effected this review. It may be nice if you can checked it out. The deffences are: 1.) Removing of the gnu-gnu-gnu libcombol stuff 2.) Make sure the *.so files will going into /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102041.mBAKfGt5006846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #9 from Julio Cezar 2008-12-10 15:41:15 EDT --- Fabian, do i must waiting for Jon Hermansen pronounce ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102045.mBAKjaPS013157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-12-10 15:45:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/gnustep-base.spec > SRPM URL: > http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/gnustep/gnustep-base-1.16.3-2.fc10.src.rpm I will notify that 1.16.5 is the current relase now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102044.mBAKiAZ0012622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-12-10 15:44:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > At the first glance, the license should be LGPL v2. This is specified both in > [most of ] the source files and in the README file. What is the reasoning > behind using GPLv3+ in the spec ? The tools should be licensed under the GPL instead of the LGPL for the libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102042.mBAKggrp012456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-10 15:42:41 EDT --- Mentioning "Microsoft" by name, makes me nervous, we probably want to (tm) those in the least, perhaps remove/omit them at most. working SRPM URL: (: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmsn-4.0-0.1.beta1.fc10.src.rpm koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102046.mBAKkpI6007948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-10 15:46:50 EDT --- Why do you think that license should be GPLv3+ ? From what I can see: Source/Additions/GSCompatibility.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN Source/callframe.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/cifframe.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/dld-load.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSeq.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSInvocation.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSNetwork.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSPortPrivate.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSPrivate.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSRunLoopCtxt.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN Source/GSRunLoopWatcher.h: *No copyright* UNKNOWN Source/GSSocketStream.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSStream.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/GSURLPrivate.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/hpux-load.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/inet_ntop.c: ISC Source/inet_pton.c: ISC Source/NSCallBacks.h: LGPL Source/NSCharacterSetData.h: *No copyright* GENERATED FILE Source/NSConcreteNumber.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/nstzfile.h: *No copyright* Public domain Source/null-load.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/objc-load.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/simple-load.h: LGPL (v2 or later) Source/thr-mach.h: GPL Source/win32-load.h: LGPL (v2 or later) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:48:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469485] Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102048.mBAKmoPP008435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102056.mBAKunHD015758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-10 15:56:48 EDT --- Okay. To keep things easy for review, here's a new SRPM. new spec: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.spec new SRPM: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc11.src.rpm and koji logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991954 rpmlint is silent for both src and noarch rpms. and source should be verifiable now ;) (guess who recently discovered the SIGs/Package_Review page) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102056.mBAKuP8o015562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 15:56:24 EDT --- Yep, builds clean and rpmlint is silent. Why do you have the odd "?modtime=*" bits at the end of the URLs? They don't seem to be needed, and if I use: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/metauml/metauml_lib_0.2.5.tgz Source1: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/metauml/metauml_manual_0.2.5.pdf then everything downloads and compares properly. I note that the URL: tag leads to an error page. Is there any other web page which could be referenced? We don't really want to direct interested people to a page which doesn't exist. We have no specific naming guidelines for metapost packages, but prefixing with "metapost-" seems reasonable to me. So my only concerns relate to the URLs. I guess if there's no live upstream then it would be better not to include a URL: tag at all; you can always include one later if upstream does come back up. And it would really be good to use regular SourceN: URLs if at all possible. (If for no other reason than to let the automated tests run over them checking for mismatches or download problems.) * source files match upstream. sha256sum: ae43c06977dbd9ae579bdc04cdc809af4cd81a733f3f7282145ca34a4da04052 metauml_lib_0.2.5.tgz 6e3b197c229563ada8370063944f885def5beeea1600b8bf4891554f88343ca8 metauml_manual_0.2.5.pdf * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: metapost-metauml = 0.2.5-2.fc11 = texlive * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464016] Review Request: eclipse-findbugs - Eclipse plugin for FindBugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102059.mBAKxKfx010848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464016 --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2008-12-10 15:59:19 EDT --- Updated to version 1.3.6: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-findbugs/eclipse-findbugs.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-findbugs/eclipse-findbugs-1.3.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469485] Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102100.mBAL0KtK011395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 16:00:19 EDT --- Uh, I thought this would be a fast review, but I noticed that there is a missing dependency. fakeap.pl uses /usr/local/bin/hostap_crypt_conf which seems not to exist in Fedora. It seems you need to package at least this first: http://hostap.epitest.fi/releases/hostap-utils-0.4.7.tar.gz How did you use this package without this? Btw. the devel release of aircrack-ng also allows to create fake accesspoints which works pretty well. There is also some integration into metasploit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102111.mBALBMff014137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 16:11:21 EDT --- Basically, every package must have a devel branch; you should immediately dead.package it upon import to ensure that the package is never branched for any Fedora releases. I don't know of any EPEL-specific procedure other than that. I'll note for posterity that the code carries no license, but the README.txt file which comes from the same upstream site specifies one. rpmlint says: python-uuid.i386: E: no-binary python-uuid-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package The debuginfo package is empty, and I see no calls to the compiler in the build log. Are you sure this package needs to be arch-specific? I'm not sure it would even build properly on x86_64; did you try? (On that platform, python_sitearch and python_sitelib aren't the same, while on i386 they are.) * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 1f87cc004ac5120466f36c5beae48b4c48cc411968eed0eaecd3da82aa96193f uuid-1.30.tar.gz 2b50f69a57f89054027ff1ab495aca9b65664edb6e76d1b6e4064584cfac948f uuid.README.txt * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (EPEL5, i386). X debuginfo package is empty. X rpmlint has valid complaints. final provides and requires are sane: python-uuid = 1.30-1.el5 = python >= 2.3 python(abi) = 2.4 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102113.mBALD4Iw020196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady Flag| |needinfo?(paul at xelerance.co | |m) --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 16:13:02 EDT --- - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not honoured: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags E.g.: cc -g -Wall -DTUNTAP -c -o ethertap.o ethertap.c - It does not build here, the Makefile of humsify contains: install -o 0755 $(BIN) $(DESTDIR)$(BIN_DIR) The "-o 0755" should probably be "-m 0755", which then can be omitted, because it is the default mode used by install. Please make sure that the package builds before submitting it for review. You can use: koji build --scratch dist-f11 *.src.rpm To create a scratch build of the package on koji to verify that it builds. Please remove the "NotReady" from the Whiteboard once you submitted a SRPM that does at least build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:19:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102119.mBALJ9uc021588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 16:19:08 EDT --- - Please also keep the classical order of files for fedora spec files What do you mean by that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:30:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102130.mBALU3Qs018247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from John A. Khvatov 2008-12-10 16:30:02 EDT --- To mtasaka: fedora-cvs flag is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:32:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102132.mBALWN8I024663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 16:32:22 EDT --- guiloader-2.12.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guiloader-2.12.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102132.mBALWC05024615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 16:32:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmbdfed Short Description: Bitmap Font Editor Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102132.mBALWsFl024762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-10 16:32:53 EDT --- Hi Rahul, At this point, since FPC approved the new packaging templates yesterday, and FESCO will review them next week, it's probably more productive if you target the new templates directly (that will probably also make my next request easier). Otherwise you'll just spend time on the old template and I'll ask you to change it all next week. So just install the fontpackages* rpm from http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/ check /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec and use it as a template to make an rpm with two subpackages (one for gentium basic and one for gentium book basic) Then you can look at /usr/share/doc/fontpackages-devel-1.11/fontconfig-templates/substitution-font-template.conf for the substitution rules (but your current rules do not seem too bad) However, your xml is broken. Please always check your xml files with xmllint --format before submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to Microsoft's MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102145.mBALjlxg021207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #3 from John5342 2008-12-10 16:45:46 EDT --- >Incoherent version - in changelog you have 4.0-0.1-beta1 and version is >4.0-0.1.beta1 Fixed. Saw the fc10 and had no idea how to make that scale but completely missed the full-stop/hyphen mixup in there. >Mentioning "Microsoft" by name, makes me nervous, we probably want to (tm) >those in the least, perhaps remove/omit them at most. Fixed. Replaced with "the MSN protocol" as opposed to "Microsoft's MSN protocol". The _correct_ SRPM url this time (sorry about that): http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmsn-4.0-0.2.beta1.fc10.src.rpm The spec file is the same url: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmsn.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102152.mBALqNZo029130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 16:52:21 EDT --- Note that you are guaranteed that %{fedora} >= 9 at this point, since you cannot branch for F-8. No harm in keeping the conditional if you really want it, though. I'm a bit confused about the versioning. One one hand, you could say that the version is simply 20070930 and use that as Version:; on the other hand, you could say that upstream has never released any version and so this is a prerelease. In the latter case, we don't use Release: 1 or greater for prereleases, so you would have: Version: 0 Release: 0.2.20070930%{?dist} according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages That's really the only issue I see. * source files match upstream. 242eb0943c5574a6a1ac7d1e40354d3e2be74e838e82241c0f6b5d1d06f913fe pdfbook.c 266a40b44aec5f182328054dd2ed301fb4c7d60414423a9bb4e2c27c7cffe1d4 README X package does not meet versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pdfbook = 0-2.20070930.fc11 pdfbook(x86-64) = 0-2.20070930.fc11 = poppler-utils texlive-texmf-latex * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:54:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:54:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102154.mBALsw7e022782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 16:54:56 EDT --- *** Bug 475833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475833] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102154.mBALsv2R022750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475833 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 16:54:56 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475799 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454997] Review Request: ircii - Popular Unix Irc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102154.mBALs0Yj022684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454997 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |opensource at till.name Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Status Whiteboard| |NotReady Flag|needinfo?(kurzawax at gmail.co |fedora-review- |m) | --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-12-10 16:53:59 EDT --- I close this ticket for now, since there is nothing to review. Please reopen or create a new review request, if you still want to get this package into Fedora. Do not forget to add working links to the Spec/SRPM then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 21:58:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475775] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102158.mBALwOmk023560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:02:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102202.mBAM2wjS031072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 17:02:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > BTW this one may be a better option for packaging (didn't actually try any of > them) > > http://www.math.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/Software/gbdfed/ Looks like the GTK version of this package. I'm willing to maintain them both: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] New: Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 Summary: Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gbdfed.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gbdfed-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: gbdfed lets you interactively create new bitmap font files or modify existing ones. It allows editing multiple fonts and multiple glyphs, it allows cut and paste operations between fonts and glyphs and editing font properties. The editor works natively with BDF fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:06:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102206.mBAM6hUY025652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 17:06:42 EDT --- xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102206.mBAM6lOJ025688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 17:06:46 EDT --- xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:17:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102217.mBAMHORw002306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net --- Comment #32 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-10 17:17:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I have built mlt Fedora 8 x86_64 with --disable-qimage --disable-mmx and it > worked also for rawhide.(0) But in this last case, i also need to disable see > in %prep section: > ---------- > #disable sse unless x86_64 > %ifnarch x86_64 > sed -i.checksse -e 's|ifndef __DARWIN__|ifdef __DARWIN__|' > src/modules/motion_est/filter_motion_est.c > #Note that this conditional is wrong > %endif SSE detection should be moved to ./configure and the code containing SSE instructions should be wrapped in #ifdef HAVE_SSE ... #endif. Please ask upstream to do that. > -------------- > I haven't checked that, but if mmx is used on ppc, then is will certainly > fails. > What i expect is mmx should be disabled in all cases unless i686: > %configure \ > ... > %ifnarch i686 > --disable-mmx \ > %endif > So anyone that want to rebuild mlt with theses options can do so with using > --target=i686 for the package. Actually, there are i686 class CPUs without MMX, for example Pentium Pro and there are i586 class CPUs with MMX (Pentium MMX, AMD K6 and K6-2/3). I'd suggest a --with mmx conditional instead. You cannot rely on --target here. Of course, it'd be best handled upstream in a fashion similar to what I've suggested for SSE above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102219.mBAMJF88028252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-10 17:19:14 EDT --- Oups, I forgot EPEL 5 branche : New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vbindiff Short Description: Visual binary diff Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102224.mBAMOEjE029378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera 2008-12-10 17:24:13 EDT --- I don't see the point of renaming the library: - it's not user-facing - libmusicbrainz (2.x) will soon be useless when MB turn off their old servers - libmusicbrainz3 is what it's called upstream Sound-juicer and rhythmbox are already ported to libmusicbrainz3 and use both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:28:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102228.mBAMS0oq004370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 17:27:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nwsclient Short Description: NetWorkSpaces Client for Python Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102231.mBAMVWBL031045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 17:31:30 EDT --- Thanks for the update. The package is good to go now. Btw, the following issues may need to be re-addressed by your friend for the freeworld package ;) > ? Some files in the wafadmin directory have /usr/local/ /usr/lib/ directories > hardcoded. Will these have any effect on the application? > * Please add the -v flag to the waf script so we can see what it is actually > doing. When I did this, I found that the fedora specific compiler flag -O2 is > being overwritten. This needs fixed. > * Double BR: libmodplug-devel > * Unnecessary BRs: libcurl-devel (picked up by ecore-devel), glib2-devel > (picked up by avahi-glib-devel, pulseaudio-libs-devel...), libogg-devel, > libvorbis-devel (both picked up by libshout-devel), python-devel (picked up by > Pyrex) ---------------------------------------- This package (xmms2) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:43:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475775] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102243.mBAMhjmP007156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 17:43:44 EDT --- You might want to capitalize "Berkeley DB" in your Summary: and %description. That's really the only thing I can see to complain about. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d2728acb0e75624100ba41fe0a0464ef92a2c90469599fec14332f3a17e59179 AnyEvent-BDB-1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK (perhaps capitalize Berkeley DB). * description is OK (capitalization). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(AnyEvent::BDB) = 1.0 perl-AnyEvent-BDB = 1.0-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AnyEvent) perl(BDB) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.01 CPU) (not much of a test suite, but...) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102246.mBAMkQQ6001275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 --- Comment #4 from Tom Lane 2008-12-10 17:46:25 EDT --- I would like to push 2.2.14 into rawhide, but the immediate problem is that upstream decided to remove the "text" driver, which leaves us with a functionality gap. I haven't decided whether it's worth trying to get that driver packaged separately or not. I have gotten bugs indicating that people have used it in the past ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102257.mBAMv9C5003363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 17:57:08 EDT --- nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102257.mBAMvBqk003396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-10 17:57:11 EDT --- nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102255.mBAMtkPh003089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-10 17:55:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmms2 Short Description: A modular audio framework and plugin architecture Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 22:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102256.mBAMuZJl009924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102306.mBAN6qDm011859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-10 18:06:51 EDT --- "directrory" should be spelled "directory" in Summary: and %description. Not a big deal; just fix it up when you check in. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 88788b422f9f0d6664d97ec876631309726d803abf758b903a9530746b66c8ed AnyEvent-AIO-1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. O summary is OK (spelling). O description is OK (spelling). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(AnyEvent::AIO) = 1.0 perl-AnyEvent-AIO = 1.0-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(AnyEvent) perl(IO::AIO) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:08:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] New: Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Summary: Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp-0.2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ncmpcpp is almost exact clone of ncmpc but it contains some new features ncmpc doesn't have. It's been also rewritten from scratch in C++. New features include: tag editor, playlists editor, easy to use search screen, media library screen, lyrics screen and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:18:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:18:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102318.mBANIY1X014067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102318.mBANILDs014025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:17:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102317.mBANHumc013949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:17:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102317.mBANHkLu007385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102318.mBANI98k007433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 23:29:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102329.mBANTIU3009429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #4 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2008-12-10 18:29:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - 'Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' should point to the upstream, when > possible. fixed > - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} fixed (In reply to comment #3) > Link to the comments : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 - Release now includes %{dist} - Added %{?_smp_mflags} to make in the %build section - BuildRoot fixed - %defattr fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 00:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110021.mBB0LiSk024818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-10 19:21:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp-0.2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Dec 11 2008 Michal Nowak 0.2.5-2 - added ncurses-devel as BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 00:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110028.mBB0SguG025808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pertusus at free.fr | Bug 452427 depends on bug 458785, which changed state. Bug 458785 Summary: Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110120.mBB1KNvb001883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-10 20:20:22 EDT --- Whoops. The URL should be metauml.sourceforge.net. Too much meta ;) . Here's a spec/sRPM with those fixes: Spec: http://benboeckel.net/metapost-metauml/metapost-metauml.spec SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/metapost-metauml/metapost-metauml-0.2.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 02:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110223.mBB2NN51004947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-10 21:23:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > - libmusicbrainz3 is what it's called upstream I don't think that is the case anymore: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/libmusicbrainzDownload But if it is going to cause lots of trouble we can leave things as are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 03:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110336.mBB3a6fE024368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-10 22:36:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The only policy I know of is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl. > If I were the packager, I would temporary use the functional Source0 and > replace it in the spec (but I would not build a new rpm just for that) once the > search.cpan.org becomes functional. > I really see no reason to stall the review because of this. So does that mean following review guideline is of no importance? - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 03:58:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110358.mBB3wghh021927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #7 from Tim Fenn 2008-12-10 22:58:41 EDT --- update to 5.04: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.04-1.f10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 04:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110401.mBB41SKc029226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-10 23:01:27 EDT --- Ok. Just now got link in SPEC working. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991954 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9e510b1106b8dac95f1f09ed1edb48ea Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=38, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 7.08 cusr 0.47 csys = 7.60 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu) = 0.03007 perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu::Action::Form) perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu::Action::FormConfig) perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu::Action::FormMethod) perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu::Action::MultiForm) perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu::Action::MultiFormConfig) perl(Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu::Action::MultiFormMethod) perl(Catalyst::Helper::HTML::FormFu) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Config::Any) perl(File::Spec) perl(HTML::FormFu) perl(HTML::FormFu::Deploy) perl(Moose) perl(NEXT) perl(Regexp::Assemble) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 04:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110448.mBB4m1GB003614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-10 23:48:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu Short Description: HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 04:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110452.mBB4qjgN004388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-10 23:52:43 EDT --- Should all be taken care of in the current build, I think -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110538.mBB5cv2U012307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #10 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-11 00:38:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - Please also keep the classical order of files for fedora spec files > > What do you mean by that? what i meant was the usual order of fields in spec file e.g. Name: Version: Release: Summary: Group: License: URL: Source0: BuildRoot: BuildRequires: Requires: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110550.mBB5oVQj007865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-11 00:50:30 EDT --- Thank you everyone for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] New: Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 Summary: Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bashton at brennanashton.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/m6812-elf-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/m6812-elf-binutils-2.15-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU binutils, which can be used to assemble and link binaries for the m68hc12 platform, instead of for the native platform. Patch 1 will not be submitted upstream as upstream already fixes it in later versions. The later version is not being used as the cross compiler patch set may not be compatible. rpmlint is clean except for: m6812-elf-binutils.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr m6812-elf which is ok for cross compilers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:16:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110616.mBB6GKNP018330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-11 01:16:19 EDT --- koji built fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=992757 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:35:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110635.mBB6ZpBb015433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com --- Comment #7 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-11 01:35:50 EDT --- I had marked as assigned but forgot to add my self as the assignee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:33:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110633.mBB6X5jY014948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-11 01:33:04 EDT --- I took another look at this, and it still looks fine, so I am going to: APPROVE It. Go ahead and place your CVS Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:39:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:39:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110639.mBB6d26m015839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-11 01:39:01 EDT --- Rpmlint is not silent: tvtime.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: tvtime-0.9.13-pie.patch tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man1/tvtime-scanner.1.gz tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/tvtime 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man5/stationlist.xml.5.gz tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man1/tvtime.1.gz tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man1/tvtime-configure.1.gz tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/es/man5/tvtime.xml.5.gz tvtime.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/tvtime-1.0.2/AUTHORS tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 tvtime.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/tvtime.mo 0775 Consider also using the standard sourceforge url in Source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Please use default %defattr in %files %defattr(-, root, root, -) Please see desktop file install: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage desktop file needs some work net-tvtime.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated net-tvtime.desktop: warning: value "tvtime.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path net-tvtime.desktop: warning: value "Application;AudioVideo;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110700.mBB70k6s025263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 02:00:45 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110725.mBB7PRuW023438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-11 02:25:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=992670 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 328d87642e89629db351a9c00aa6a8c7 gbdfed-1.4-patch1 97dd44876f83caa5c3ae2c2479d7bff2 gbdfed-1.4.tbz2 28625f0878e83687b4c3a293467fc926 gbdfed16x16.png + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:51:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110751.mBB7paEe027976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-11 02:51:35 EDT --- Julio, let's wait some days for an answer from Jon, OK? This is your first package and you are seeking a sponsor. In the meantime you can submit other review requests for packages or even better make some informal review of other packages by yourself. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110755.mBB7tFPw028816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 02:55:14 EDT --- xloadimage-4.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110757.mBB7vCdb029249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 02:57:11 EDT --- nebula-0.2.2-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110755.mBB7tIjl028850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:57:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110757.mBB7vgKD002860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 02:57:41 EDT --- xloadimage-4.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110801.mBB81FCA003874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:01:14 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update swingx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110758.mBB7w0u3029572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 02:57:59 EDT --- pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110757.mBB7vpbk029519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 02:57:50 EDT --- nebula-0.2.2-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110800.mBB80SuF030684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:00:26 EDT --- libsqlite3x-20071018-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110801.mBB81SCn004027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:01:27 EDT --- lynis-1.2.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110805.mBB85WHP005244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:05:31 EDT --- pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110803.mBB83VxR004516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:03:31 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update swingx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469317] Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110804.mBB84VmM032094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:04:30 EDT --- lynis-1.2.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110804.mBB84fXR032150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:04:40 EDT --- pstreams-devel-0.6.0-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110803.mBB833JJ031864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:03:02 EDT --- kopete-cryptography-1.3.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kopete-cryptography'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110806.mBB86j10005634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 03:06:44 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110826.mBB8QaPb009072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-11 03:26:35 EDT --- Thank you Brennan. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pytagger Short Description: ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474910] Review Request: esperanza - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110839.mBB8dsmT004589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474910 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-11 03:39:50 EDT --- Let's make xmms2 a little more useful. Here's my notes: - rpmlint says: esperanza.src:28: W: configure-without-libdir-spec but I guess this can be safely ignored. * There are binary translation files (.qm) in the tarball which need to be removed and rebuilt (via lrelease). ? Where are these translations going? Are they getting compiled into the final binary? ? I think the files data/text/*.html need to go to %doc (if they are not getting compiled into the binary but I couldn't find them within the application) * Fedora specific flag "-fexceptions" is not passed to the compiler. The other flags are ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110845.mBB8jeVx005701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-11 03:45:39 EDT --- Thanks for your comments! I guess I misread the version specifications ... anyway, I switched to the following because I think it's simpler and neater than the other alternative: Version: 20070930 Release: 3%{?dist} http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook-20070930-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 08:53:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110853.mBB8raxB006959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ankur at ankurs.com) | --- Comment #26 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-12-11 03:53:34 EDT --- Hello, Mamoru. Sorry, off course I can provide other link - http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110921.mBB9LnL7013530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #24 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-11 04:21:48 EDT --- Note: until kdenetwork update this plugin will not correctly work with Jabber protocol! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468604] Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110954.mBB9s0VP026530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-11 04:53:59 EDT --- Removed gsm.h and libgsm.a from the tarball. new version: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/echolinux.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/echolinux-0.17a-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110959.mBB9xoJh021048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #8 from ronny.fischer at taunusstein.net 2008-12-11 04:59:49 EDT --- Meanwhile this entry is a year old, but the latest attached spec file has only changed in minor things (for my personal use). This includes an update to the latest development release 0.6.6 (it works) and an update of the madwifi headers to the latest subversion trunk. I'd like to make the suggestion to ask the developer for support for the ath5k and ath9k driver, since it seems to me that those drivers don't work directly with the wpa_supplicant but only in connection with NetworkManager. Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 10:53:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] New: Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Summary: Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shamardin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://abbot.fedorapeople.org/mitter.spec SRPM URL: http://abbot.fedorapeople.org/mitter-0.4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Mitter is a client for Twitter. Currently, you can use it on Linux, Windows and OS X (running PyGTK) and on a console/terminal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111110.mBBBAJNV011706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-11 06:10:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326603) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326603) fedora-cvs flag is here Do you still have a trouble in setting fedora-cvs flag? If so, would you ask Toshio Kuratomi with telling him your FAS name (ivaxer)? By the way, the place to set fedora-cvs flag on this bug is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111122.mBBBMD1J007549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #27 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-11 06:22:12 EDT --- I have no reason to believe that the author is interested in avoiding buffer overflow problems. My problem report (Sep 1st) and the forwarded copy (Oct 21st) are unanswered, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111132.mBBBW8IJ009710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #28 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-12-11 06:32:07 EDT --- Meanwhile mentioned above bug http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=413085&aid=311178&group_id=100070 of buffer owerflow in http.c was resolved and closed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475971] New: Review Request: gadget - MPP server component for tracking presence Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gadget - MPP server component for tracking presence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475971 Summary: Review Request: gadget - MPP server component for tracking presence Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mpg at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/gadget.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sugarlabs.org/~marco/gadget-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Gadget is an XMPP server component written to scale Jabber server based collaborative activities via Telepathy Gabble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111141.mBBBffeg018098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-11 06:41:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Imho the Source0: line is too obfuscated. I have filed a ticket at Fedora's > Infrastructure trac instance to make simpler URLs with macro usage possible: > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1043 I agree that it's ugly ... > But this huge macro also makes spectool fail to download the Source0. but at least here it works: nils at gibraltar:~/src/docs/system-config-services-docs> grep Source0 system-config-services-docs.spec Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/$(echo %{name} | %{__sed} 's@\(\(.\)\(.\).*\)@\2/\3/\1@')/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 nils at gibraltar:~/src/docs/system-config-services-docs> spectool -l system-config-services-docs.spec Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-services-docs/system-config-services-docs-1.1.2.tar.bz2 nils at gibraltar:~/src/docs/system-config-services-docs> rpm -qf `which spectool` rpmdevtools-6.7-1.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475972] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111144.mBBBi5jn012134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475972 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-11 06:44:04 EDT --- Builds fine in fedora-5-i386-epel (el5) and fedora-devel-i386 (f11), rpmlint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:43:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475972] New: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475972 Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Apache-DBI-Cache-0.08-1.el5.src.rpm SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Apache-DBI-Cache.spec Description: This module is an alternative to Apache::DBI module. As a drop-in Apache::DBI replacement it provides persistent DBI connections while overcoming certain limitations. It is compatible with mod_perl, though it does not require it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475972] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111152.mBBBq9Jj014102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475972 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-11 06:52:08 EDT --- This package is good to go. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111159.mBBBx9AM021524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 06:59:08 EDT --- I used 6.4-1.fc8, which seems to be the lastest update for F8, which is what my review machine is running. But I have to say, that I do not really comfortable with spectool running abitrary commands only to get the Source0-Url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:18:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111218.mBBCI5gC026046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-11 07:18:04 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kopete-cryptography New Branches: F-9 Owners: jreznik kkofler than rdieter ltinkl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111220.mBBCKq2S019941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #26 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-11 07:20:49 EDT --- Nevermind, ignore the above, this BRs kdepim-devel >= 4 which is not available on F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111223.mBBCNVYC027289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #29 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-11 07:23:29 EDT --- That's the other one I pointed to in comment 22 already -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:33:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111233.mBBCXkGo029450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #27 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-11 07:33:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Nevermind, ignore the above, this BRs kdepim-devel >= 4 which is not available > on F-9. I'll check why it needs kdepim-devel >= 4. So for now F-10 branch is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475972] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111237.mBBCbPwO030970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475972 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-11 07:37:24 EDT --- Danke schon, Marku. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache Short Description: Perl DBI connection cache Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 13:03:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111303.mBBD3ePp004364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 08:03:39 EDT --- xmms2-0.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmms2-0.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 13:01:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475971] Review Request: gadget - MPP server component for tracking presence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111301.mBBD1cQh003887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475971 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-11 08:01:37 EDT --- Just two comments after a quick look at your spec file - COPYING is missing in %doc - in spec file is 'License: LGPLv2', COPYING says GPLv2, no licensing information in all the source files. This can become a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 13:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111303.mBBD3h51028907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 08:03:43 EDT --- xmms2-0.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmms2-0.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 13:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111313.mBBDDt3d031979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #30 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-12-11 08:13:54 EDT --- Off course this is bug pointed by you. I only what it was resolved and closed. May be you can recheck other? And if it was gone, we can continue review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 13:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111329.mBBDTaA3003171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 --- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-11 08:29:35 EDT --- Sorry for the late reply. I've fixed the following in CVS, gimp-2.4.2-2 is building with these changes for Rawhide right now. (In reply to comment #1) > I reviewed this package. The following issues need to be addressed for > compilance with the guidelines: > > * The files AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, HACKING, NEWS, README, TERMINOLOGY > need to be listed under %doc These files get shipped except HACKING which is documentation about how to change the documentation for which you need the source anyway. > * The package owns > %dir %{_datadir}/gimp > %dir %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver} > which are also owned by gimp. Note that the package Requires: gimp. The above > ownerships need to be dropped. Not owned anymore. > * %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. Fixed. > * BuildRequires: libxml2 > is not required since > BuildRequires: libxslt > will pull that up > > * Similarly > BuildRequires: docbook-style-xsl > is not required. It will be pulled up by other dependencies. Am I wrong? The configure script of gimp-help checks directly for e.g. xmllint (included in libxml2) and .../xhtml/docbook.xsl which is included in docbook-style-xsl. I.e. both packages are required directly, therefore I keep listing them as build requirements. It doesn't matter that they in turn are required by other build requirements, I don't want to rely on that this fact doesn't change in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111412.mBBECuoe012517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-11 09:12:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Looks like a GUI application to me, therefore a .desktop file is needed. That's what I initially thought too. Problem is that it can't be easilly configured from GUI: 1.) The package comes with a dozen of toy pictures that can be selected only via command-line argument (like "xteddy -Fxbrummie"). (As far as I know Debian used to have a submenu "Teddies" of "Games" menu just for selection of xteddy pictures though.) 2.) The application can't be terminated using the desktop environment easily. Correct way to terminate it is to point cursor at it and press q, which is a bit unintuitive and may confuse a casual dekstop user, which would expect it to terminate with xkill, or clicking at the task bar entry or window decoration, which xteddy doesn't have. Given the target group of people of this is the same as of xwud or xev (which don't have desktop entries as well) -- people that tend to be familiar with use of text terminal, I don't think this should have a desktop entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111418.mBBEI6dC013366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-11 09:18:06 EDT --- Neither do I ;-). As soon as fedorahosted.org has sanitized URLs, I'll incorporate them in the various spec files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:41:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111441.mBBEfIZ5026434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly |perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly |asynchronous file and |asynchronous file and |directrory I/O |directory I/O -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111440.mBBEeqk2018070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-11 09:40:51 EDT --- Thx for the reviews tibbs. I will fix the typo before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111443.mBBEhVUl026718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Michal Marciniszyn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111443.mBBEhtle026772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-11 09:43:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-AnyEvent-AIO Short Description: Truly asynchronous file and directory I/O Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475775] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous Berkeley DB access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111445.mBBEjQiN027411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly |perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly |asynchronous berkeley db |asynchronous Berkeley DB |access |access Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-11 09:45:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-AnyEvent-BDB Short Description: Truly asynchronous Berkeley DB access Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:43:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111443.mBBEhO9C018527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Michal Marciniszyn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarcini at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmarcini at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 14:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:57:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111457.mBBEv4AD021757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-11 09:57:02 EDT --- Kumar, can you please change your changelog entries according the examples in the package guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs Some other small things... - Please extent the summary a little bit because for users is not very helpful at the moment - for '/usr/sbin' exists a macro %{_sbindir} - Why are README, COPYING, etc. not added to %doc in %files? - And it would be nice if you update to 1.3.4 before you add it to the cvs ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111501.mBBF1C48030686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Bug 454416 depends on bug 454412, which changed state. Bug 454412 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111501.mBBF1Awx030626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-11 10:01:09 EDT --- All built, bootstrapped and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:01:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111501.mBBF1BDf030664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Bug 454414 depends on bug 454412, which changed state. Bug 454412 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111501.mBBF13c3022802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-11 10:01:01 EDT --- All built, bootstrapped and pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:01:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111501.mBBF14iU022903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Bug 454416 depends on bug 454414, which changed state. Bug 454414 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111504.mBBF4qsP031189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Stefan Seefeld changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico | |.ca) | --- Comment #13 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-11 10:04:51 EDT --- I uploaded a new spec file and a new source rpm: http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest-2.4-4.fc9.src.rpm http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest.spec The spec file now indicates "GPLv2+ and Open Publication", and the code contains some fixes to be compatible with Python 2.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111512.mBBFCI3i000400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libmsn - |Review Request: libmsn - |Library for connecting to |Library for connecting to |Microsoft's MSN Messenger |the MSN Messenger service |service | --- Comment #4 from John5342 2008-12-11 10:12:16 EDT --- Updated bug title to reflect new package summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:13:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111513.mBBFDHEU025380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-11 10:13:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gbdfed Short Description: Bitmap Font Editor Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111517.mBBFHQZ4026366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #9 from Dan Williams 2008-12-11 10:17:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Meanwhile this entry is a year old, but the latest attached spec file has only > changed in minor things (for my personal use). This includes an update to the > latest development release 0.6.6 (it works) and an update of the madwifi > headers to the latest subversion trunk. The madwifi headers are no longer required as the ath5k and ath9k drivers cover that hardware, and are in the upstream kernel already. > I'd like to make the suggestion to ask the developer for support for the ath5k > and ath9k driver, since it seems to me that those drivers don't work directly > with the wpa_supplicant but only in connection with NetworkManager. NetworkManager uses wpa_supplicant for all connections, so if it works in NM, it works in plain wpa_supplicant too. I've successfully used wpa_supplicant with ath5k hardware just fine... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:25:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111525.mBBFPYnG003523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-11 10:25:32 EDT --- At least would you would you submit a seperate review request for orsa and make BkChem depend on (use) seperated orsa? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434583] Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111521.mBBFLh5K002570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434583 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-11 10:21:40 EDT --- Package change Request ======================= Package Name: tunctl Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:37:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:37:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111537.mBBFbjad006408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #28 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 10:37:43 EDT --- Thanks to Kevin I found the new kdenetwork package now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=74325 I did not expect this to happen this fast, therefore ihmo the kopete-cryptography package should be updated with a: Requires: kdenetwork >= 4.1.3-2 And both updates should be put together in one update request at Bodhi to make sure, that they are pushed at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 15:55:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111555.mBBFtu20002042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #19 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-11 10:55:54 EDT --- Good news! I just received a reply from Beda. There follows: -------------------- > - This package uses some files from Python powerwidgets > "Pmw", which is actually in Fedora as "python-pmw" > (bug 462250: I reviewed...). > Is it possible to make this package use system-wide > python-pmw? > (simply creating symlinks will be easier?) I am packaging Pmw together with BKChem because I had to fix a bug or two there and there was no upstream maintenance of Pmw going on. However, it is quite possible that the Pmw package in Fedora also has these fixes, so it might be possible to use the Fedora package. You can try it by simply deleting all files named Pmw*.py in bkchem and see if it would work when the Fedora package is installed. If yes, I could prepare a special package without Pmw. > > - I guess packaging oasa seperately will be better. (and packaging it separetely will pe necessari some code changes?) > I have started to release OASA just this year because of some interest in it. It would of course be able to have two separate packages, but then more effort would have to be put into keeping them in sync - when I release BKChem I always expect that it is used with the version of OASA that is current at the time. Failing to match versions of OASA and BKChem could lead to subtle and hard to find errors. On the other hand, it is not much of a problem for me to create a package of BKChem without OASA. > I know you must be very busy and although I am not an experienced programmer, if you guide me to do the necessary changes, I'll be happy to help. > All these things would not require that much time. Just let me know what I should remove from the package (as I do now with Piddle) and I will do it. ----------- So, I'll start the tests with python-pmw, reporting to Beda if some changes are necessary. Also, I will start the process of packaging OASA, and as is customary, I will request a review of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476025] New: Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476025 Summary: Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ga.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ga-0.20071001-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Irish thesaurus as usable by OpenOffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111612.mBBGCnf0006794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 11:12:48 EDT --- gbdfed-1.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gbdfed-1.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111612.mBBGCrkV006823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-11 11:12:52 EDT --- gbdfed-1.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gbdfed-1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:17:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111617.mBBGHDaT007628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-11 11:17:12 EDT --- Well, again would you tell me where it is indicated that this package is licensed under GPLv2+, not GPL+ (GPL at any version)? Note that just putting GPLv2 license text in the tarball does not mean that the software is licensed under GPLv2 (because of section 9 of GPLv2 license text). If there is GPLv2 license text, but no other files specifies the version of GPL, then it is regarded that it is licensed under GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111622.mBBGMBGX008630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2008-12-11 11:22:10 EDT --- I'll take this. I'll do a full review shortly, but here are some preliminary notes. First, I sent email to upstream asking them to clarify the license issue. I'll let you know how they respond. Second, I'm not comfortable with the way this package is compiled. Ideally it would be built as a shared library in a main package, with the header files in a -devel subpackage. Is there some reason why this cannot be done? That would also let you turn debuginfo generation back on, another issue that bothers me. Also, the spec file as currently written is compiling the example/test code into the library, too. That should not be done. The example/test code could be included as documentation or, if there is enough of it, made into a separate -examples subpackage. I'm also concerned about the .doc extension on the documentation files. That is usually used for Microsoft Word documents, but these are plain text. Worse, they contain information that should be in man pages. Do you have any kind of relationship with upstream? Can you talk them into making real man pages? If they have not got the expertise but will accept contributions, I can generate the man pages for them. Note that I will not block the review on this issue, as it is an upstream problem. Another upstream issue: if they want help building a proper Makefile that generates a shared library, I can help with that, too. Compiling produces a really alarming list of GCC warnings. I see warnings about uninitialized variables, control reaching the end of non-void functions, ambiguous else clauses, unused static functions and variables, incorrect pointer types being passed to functions, incorrect printf format directives, etc. Does this code work reliably for you? This looks like a very interesting package! Thanks for submitting it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:31:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226161] Merge Review: mrtg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111631.mBBGVGmC018928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226161 --- Comment #4 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2008-12-11 11:31:15 EDT --- Hi, (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint on SRPM: > > mrtg.src:22: E: prereq-use vixie-cron > The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is > enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), > Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. Fixed. Changed to plain Requires. > > mrtg.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 44) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic > annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. > Fixed. > > mrtg.src: W: strange-permission filter-requires-mrtg.sh 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > mrtg.src: W: strange-permission filter-provides-mrtg.sh 0755 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > What are these about? If they're good this way, please document what they do > in the spec. These files are used to filter perl provides/requires. I think it's not necessary to document them in spec, because it's often used and well known technique. These files are also NOT listed to be included in final package. For more info see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packagin/Perl#External_filtering > > rpmlint on RPMS: > > mrtg.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/whodo/GIFgraph/GIFgraph/samples/sample54.dat > mrtg.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/CHANGES > > Tons of this all over the docs. Fix. I fixed only this one: mrtg.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/CHANGES Because CHANGES is real documentation file. The rest is in /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/* - just ideas for mrtg users over different operating systems. I feel it's right to make it available but untouched. > > mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/TCH/dualpri.pl "c:\perl\bin" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. > mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/TCH/hiperdsp.pl "c:\perl\bin" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. > mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/TCH/dualt1.pl "c:\perl\bin" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. > mrtg.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/doc/mrtg-2.16.2/contrib/cfgmaker_cisco/cfgmaker.cisco > "/pkg/gnu/bin/perl" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. I have same reason as above to don't touch these files (often examples from other operating systems). > > mrtg.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. There are only perl modules in /usr/lib{64}/* and this it's AFAIK standard place for them and mrtg will search them here. > > mrtg.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > > Fix. This trigger is used when very old mrtg (2.9.17) is uninstalled. This warning isn't real problem... But it was added in Feb 2003, so I think it's time to remove it completely. > > License tag should by GPLv2+. License changed to GPLv2+. > > Otherwise, full review looks good, no other blockers. Changes are commited to the devel branch. Let me know if you have any comments or anything else, otherwise feel free to close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226161] Merge Review: mrtg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111643.mBBGhERD013031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226161 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-11 11:43:12 EDT --- Very good, thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226412] Merge Review: setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111643.mBBGhSVA013230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226412 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-11 11:43:27 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM clean. rpmlint on RPMS: setup.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/securetty 0600 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). setup.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/environment setup.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/motd setup.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/shadow 0400 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). setup.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/gshadow 0400 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). setup.noarch: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /etc/profile.d This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to something non-standard. setup.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/exports setup.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/lastlog This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate configuration for them. These should all be filed as rpmlint exceptions. Page in URL is default Trac page. Might want to look into that. :) Source tag needs to include a URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Should also be Source0, not simply Source. I don't see any license information in the source or the website, just the spec. Add something to the upstream documenting the licensing, then include it in %doc. Otherwise, very simple package, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111643.mBBGhdqU013375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-12-11 11:43:38 EDT --- Are you trying to set the flag while logged in as ivaxer fedoraproject.org? That won't work because the ivaxer at fp.o address doesn't have the extra bugzilla permissions to set it. The email address you have registered in FAS (ivaxer stingr net) will work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111700.mBBH0EDb026697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-11 12:00:13 EDT --- Seems good, approved. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (skinlf) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111658.mBBGwn2v017037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #15 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-11 11:58:47 EDT --- I think you are wrong here. The file 'COPYING' that is referenced throughout the code clearly states that this is version 2. Please note that the license text itself starts somewhat below, with GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION So, the condition of section 9 is met by the very beginning of the COPYING file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 16:57:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111657.mBBGvW8k016868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-12-11 11:57:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Actually, there are i686 class CPUs without MMX, for example Pentium Pro and I'm against to worry about something lower than a PIII specially on a library dedicated for multimedia features. The current workaround would be to allow a i686 target that can have mmx sse and sse2 enabled on x86_32 arch. CPU that aren't capable of theses optimization should remains with the plain i386 package which is the only package that will be provided within the Fedora repositories. Once that said, if the i686 target_cpu doesn't fit well for our needs, then we might want to introduce another ix86 varriant as a rpm macro. But in any cases, Please note that the mmx miss on some ix86 CPU are more important in some Via C3 cases than in pentium pro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111706.mBBH6FYW028176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Vahl 2008-12-11 12:06:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Sebastian, I'm CC*ing you because the upcoming 0.4.0 version of your lxpanel > package will need this. Yeah, I've already seen this in the cvs commits of lxpanel but haven't expected an update so soon. Thanks for the CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:02:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226420] Merge Review: slang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111702.mBBH2RGN018037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226420 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-11 12:02:26 EDT --- On current version: rpmlint on SRPM is clean. rpmlint on RPMS: slang.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/slang-2.1.4/changes.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). Easily fixable. slang-static.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix if static-only docs exist. Source tag should be Source0. Comment in spec on patch upstream status. Otherwise, looks good on full review, no other blockers. Also noticed that this review had been flagged + but never assigned or closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450442] Review Request: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp - Copy tiddlers to files and vice versa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111707.mBBH7RIi028504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450442 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 12:07:25 EDT --- It is easier to understand what you are writing about the rpmlint output, if you also attach it: rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/scripts/txt2html 0644 Don't you get this error? rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/ignored# rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/a rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/d/CVS rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/b rubygem-tiddlywiki_cp.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/tiddlywiki_cp-0.5.3/test/content/a.div My rpmbuild also complains, that some files are mentioned multiple times in %files: %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ %doc %{geminstdir}/README.txt The first path already includes the second one, because at the beginning of the spec, %geminstdir is defined as follows: %define geminstdir %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version} Or in other words: %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ can be directly written as %{geminstdir}/ in %files. >From the Review Guidelines: | - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - Btw. the e-mail address in %changelog is probably only valid on your local machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111713.mBBHDXvP029541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivaxer at stingr.net Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:15:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111715.mBBHFttq030125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-11 12:15:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I think you are wrong here. The file 'COPYING' that is referenced throughout > the code clearly states that this is version 2. > > Please note that the license text itself starts somewhat below, with > > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION > > So, the condition of section 9 is met by the very beginning of the COPYING > file. So actually no. See this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ Putting GPLv2 text only does not mean that the software is licensed under GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111721.mBBHLu9h031026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111722.mBBHMRwU022163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #9 from John A. Khvatov 2008-12-11 12:22:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Are you trying to set the flag while logged in as ivaxer fedoraproject.org? Yes. > That won't work because the ivaxer at fp.o address doesn't have the extra bugzilla > permissions to set it. The email address you have registered in FAS (ivaxer > stingr net) will work. Thanks. (Previously, I changed email to fp.o via bugzilla web interface and started to use ivaxer fp.o login) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:40:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111740.mBBHeMIk001955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 12:40:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can it be possible to ask "fedora-cvs?" without formal review? This is possible for packages that are under "Merge Review", because they are already included in Fedora. About the package: - Why is xsltproc required via a path instead of using libxslt? If libxslt cannot be used, please explain with a comment in the spec. - It is recommended not to use %makeinstall, is there a reason to use it? It builds fine here with: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT - parallel make is not used: make %{?_smp_mflags} - Is the touch command still needed? If it is, please explain why in the spec file or fix it upstream: touch doc/xmlto.xml doc/xmlif.xml - License Tag should be GPLv2+ according to the header in xmlto.in - License is in the tarball, but not in %doc: COPYING - There is more documentation missing: README ChangeLog AUTHORS NEWS, maybe FAQ if it is planned to add more to this file in the future - Btw. fedorahosted provides a way to distribute releases without using the scm, but I do not know how to upload something there: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ If you want and permissions are open in cvs, I can fix at least the issues that do not need a comment from you. I will then perform a full review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111741.mBBHfEGx025489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 --- Comment #5 from Tejas Dinkar 2008-12-11 12:41:12 EDT --- Hey, the new spec file and SRPM are here: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/kopete-bonjour.spec http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/kopete-bonjour-1.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm I've built this exact RPM using koji also: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=993713 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=993700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111741.mBBHffd6002097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(ovasik at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 12:41:40 EDT --- Please note comment: 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111750.mBBHoJdk003741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 12:50:18 EDT --- $ rpmlint *.rpm kopete-bonjour.x86_64: W: no-documentation kopete-bonjour.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. 1. (cosmetic) drop needless %post/%postun scriptlets (no shlibs here), can do post review, before doing any official builds. Looks clean, follows kde4 template, uses macros correctly. I'll take your word for it wrt functionality (ie, it works), I can't test this myself right now. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:52:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:52:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111752.mBBHqCNj004181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #17 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-11 12:52:11 EDT --- The sources explicitly say "for license terms please see the file COPYING". And even if you disregard that (to me clear) statement, the FAQ you cite mentions this (point 4.): "Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll guess COPYING is accurate." Finally, as I'm the maintainer, and my employer the copyright holder, it is not a matter of discussion what license QMTest is released under, but rather, where to put the licensing terms to make our users aware of them. FWIW, the qmtest.com website (http://www.codesourcery.com/qmtest) clearly states that QMTest is available under GPL version 2. Is that what you are asking for ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 17:57:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111757.mBBHvw0i028333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-11 12:57:57 EDT --- Please update release for every published iteration of the spec file (assuming the upstream version is still the same, new version starts with release 1) and put the description changes made into the ChangeLog section. It makes easier for the reviewer to track the changes. The submitter should run rpmlint on its packages. The output of rpmlint run on all rpms (source + binary) is here: libnuclient.x86_64: W: no-documentation - can be ignored libnuclient.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libnuclient.so.3.0.0 libnuclient.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libnuclient.so.3.0.0 - the ldconfig calls are now attached to the main package, but they must exist for the libnuclient subpackage libnuclient.x86_64: E: useless-provides libnuclient - no need to manually provide "libnuclient" libnuclient.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnuclient.so.3.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 - should not be an issue, but a statement or explanation (e.g. from upstream) would be nice rpmlint has a hint: "This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation." libnuclient-devel.x86_64: E: useless-provides libnuclient-devel - no need to manually provide "libnuclient-devel" nufw.src: W: strange-permission setup-python_nufw.py 0755 - can be ignored nufw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/nufw-2.2.20/acls - non-ASCII content must re-encoded in UTF-8 - see http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ultimatestunts/devel/ultimatestunts.spec?revision=1.5&view=markup for an example nufw.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/nufw - initscript must not be marked as %config nufw.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/nufw - only the most important system service can be enabled by default - you can find all about initscripts at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript nufw.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nufw $prog - no problem nufw.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/nufw - see above nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/nuauth/modules/libxml_defs.so nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/nuauth/modules/libsession_expire.so nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/nuauth/modules/libsession_authtype.so - there are still 3 modules that are not using -avoid-version - all patched should be sent to upstream and a notice should be present in the the spec (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment) nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel - it is not allowed to delete the user (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups) nufw-nuauth.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/nuauth nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/nuauth nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nuauth $prog nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/nuauth nufw-nuauth.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name nuauth - see above (nufw) nufw-nuauth-log-prelude.x86_64: W: no-documentation - can be ignored nufw-nutcpc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Networking/Other - perhaps forgotten from previous update, I suggest Applications/Internet nufw-nutcpc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/nutcpc ['/usr/lib64'] pam_nufw.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /lib64/security/pam_nufw.so ['/usr/lib64'] - there are few tricks, how to block rpath - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath - but because rpath affect only these 2 files, it can be a little bug in the makefiles (explicit using of -rpath), so it could be patched nufw-utils.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/bin/nutop - can be fixed with "dos2unix --keepdate $the_file", do not forget to add dos2unix as BuildRequires - see above in the non-utf-content python-nufw.x86_64: W: no-documentation - can be ignored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111803.mBBI3dbW006656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 Tejas Dinkar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Tejas Dinkar 2008-12-11 13:03:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kopete-bonjour Short Description: Bonjour Plugin For Kopete in KDE 4.0 and 4.1 Owners: rdieter tejas Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Note: No devel branch needed, as this becomes a part of kopete in 4.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111812.mBBICgRe008854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111813.mBBIDLdL009033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-11 13:13:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > The sources explicitly say "for license terms please see the file COPYING". > And even if you disregard that (to me clear) statement, the FAQ you cite > mentions this (point 4.): > > "Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is > COPYING, we'll guess COPYING is accurate." In this case we don't do any _guess_ (if possible) but check the license in the technical point of view. > Finally, as I'm the maintainer, and my employer the copyright holder, it is not > a matter of discussion what license QMTest is released under, but rather, where > to put the licensing terms to make our users aware of them. > > FWIW, the qmtest.com website (http://www.codesourcery.com/qmtest) clearly > states that QMTest is available under GPL version 2. Is that what you are > asking for ? I no longer trust website license information because I have seen many cases in which the website license information is wrong due to various reasons. By the way, if you are upstream all I want is that you put the explicit declaration in the COPYING or README that this software is licensed under GPL version 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111814.mBBIE6wG032135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 13:14:05 EDT --- I'll pretend I didn't just think about MSN(tm) either, and just start reviewing. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111829.mBBITqSu003096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #19 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-11 13:29:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > By the way, if you are upstream all I want is that you put the explicit > declaration in the COPYING or README that this software is licensed under > GPL version 2. I'm sorry if I don't follow what you are saying. The COPYING file already starts with GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 So how could I be more explicit than that ? (And, in the same spirit: What do you exactly mean by "check the license in the technical point of view" ? The cited paragraph clearly says that in case nothing else is available the information (which includes the license version header right on top of COPYING) will be used.) So, right now there are two references: the website, as well as the top of the COPYING file; both agree on the license being GPLv2. What else does it take to convince you ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476056] New: Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476056 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-back/gnustep-back.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-back/gnustep-back-0.14.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a backend for the GNUstep gui Library which allows you to use the GNUstep gui Library on an X Windows System (other backends will be added later to allow you to use the GNUstep gui Library in other windowing environments). This package includes development headers too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 18:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111833.mBBIXdlm004055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-12-11 13:33:38 EDT --- I have done some rework related to the BuildRequires: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.14-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111910.mBBJAl7N022065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #11 from Victor Bogado 2008-12-11 14:10:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111912.mBBJCvGc022568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 14:12:56 EDT --- Clean, simple package. Use of macros correct, consistent. Confirmed need for patch (eew). My only minor suggestions would be to not include README, COPYING in -devel (it's already in main pkg), and to add %doc THANKS (can be done post review). APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111923.mBBJN7f0024918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-11 14:23:06 EDT --- I think there is something that needs to fixed in the spec: > Patch0: %{name}-%{version}-gfx.patch > Patch1: %{name}-%{version}-snd.patch > Patch2: %{name}-%{version}-save.patch > Patch3: %{name}-%{version}-optflags.patch This does not work, because during an update you will have to rename all the patches. This also means removing and re-adding them from/to cvs. If the names of the patches are changed one does not get the diff in the commit. So it needs to be: Patch0: %{name}-1.2-gfx.patch ... The version in the patch name is always the version where the patch was added but not the version of the package itself. > Requires: hicolor-icon-theme This should IMO be removed. Without the icon-theme there is no icon in the desktop file, but this does no real harm. hicolor-icon-theme is installed as soon as gtk2 gets installed. In the very unlikely case that somebody really does not have gtk2, he most likely doesn't have a menu ether or at least not menu that shows icons (think of openbox or fluxbox for example). Nevertheless none of these issues is really important enough to justify an update, fixing in CVS is sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111941.mBBJfYcc028690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-11 14:41:34 EDT --- Sorry that this package seems like such spaghetti. As far as I know upstream developed this, and then dumped it on the internet. I don't know if it has any intentions of even taking patches. I would certainly appreciate help making a shared library (I don't expect upstream to change at all, so we don't have to worry too much about a soname other than .0). The documentation is all plain text with a .doc extension. I can rename them all to not have the .doc extension (or replace it with .txt or something) if you like. I don't believe upstream has any interest in their code any more, but it is still useful for SAGE ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/SAGE ) which is why we would like to get it into Fedora. The SAGE project seems to be happy with the code working reliably. I should probably take a look at how they build it ( http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage/spkg/standard/symmetrica-2.0.p2.spkg ) but as far as I know they just build a libsymmetrica.a too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111951.mBBJppSP031291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-11 14:51:50 EDT --- I think the issue is actually rpm, not spectool, as 6.7 running on F9 doesn't find any URLs to extract (-l returns nothing) but the same executable running on F10 works OK. Honestly I don't see why there's any issue to begin with. In the case of these package, I suppose you could just hardcode the "s/y/" bit as they should all be the same. In general we don't really want to deter packagers from making use of macros in Source: URLs, and it would be pointless to try and make some list of macros which are acceptable there. Anyway, I'm reviewing all of these together, and hope to have them finished up later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111955.mBBJtAKe022778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 14:55:10 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=993866 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111956.mBBJueUg023083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 14:56:38 EDT --- Scratch build: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=993876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111955.mBBJtkuQ022859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 14:55:45 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=993871 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 19:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470702] Review Request: L-function - L-function calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111957.mBBJvJCZ023310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470702 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-11 14:57:18 EDT --- Scratch build: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=993881 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112013.mBBKDgWd003781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 15:13:42 EDT --- http://peter.fedorapeople.org/wpa_supplicant.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112015.mBBKFNJw004329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-11 15:15:22 EDT --- Stefan, would you mind reading the rest of the COPYING file? Down where in term 9 it says: If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. This is where the whole issue comes from. You cannot just say "Look at the COPYING file". Well, you can, but that file is rather explicit in saying that then someone who wishes to distribute the software can choose GPLv1 if they want. The FSF is really clear that every source file needs to contain a specific block of text indicating, among other things, the license version in use. Now, there's a whole procedure to go through in determining the intent of the author if they have chosen for some reason to leave off those blocks of text. Upstream web sites can be used assuming that we can establish that they are authoried by the same entity which authored the software. But that's really a case-by-case thing that the legal folks need to look at. Isn't it just simpler to include an actual statement of the license version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112011.mBBKBftB003397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 15:11:39 EDT --- Remarks: * Latest development version is 0.6.6 - consider upgrading. * %install section needs some cleanups: ** installation should preserve timestamps (e.g. %install should be invoked with -p key) ** no need to explicitly create directories - you should use key -D ** I don't see the need to cleanup something in $BUILD/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}/doc/ E.g. I propose you to shorten install section up to ======================================== %install rm -rf %{buildroot} # init scripts install -D -p -m 0755 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/%{name} install -D -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/%{name} install -D -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/%{name} # config install -D -p -m 0600 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/%{name}.conf # binary install -d %{buildroot}/%{_sbindir} install -m 0755 %{name}/wpa_passphrase %{buildroot}/%{_sbindir} install -m 0755 %{name}/wpa_cli %{buildroot}/%{_sbindir} install -m 0755 %{name}/wpa_supplicant %{buildroot}/%{_sbindir} install -D -p -m 0644 %{name}/dbus-wpa_supplicant.conf %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/wpa_supplicant.conf install -D -p -m 0644 %{name}/dbus-wpa_supplicant.service %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/dbus-1/system-services/fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.service # gui install -D -p -m 0755 %{name}/wpa_gui/wpa_gui %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/wpa_gui # running mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_localstatedir}/run/%{name} # man pages install -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man{5,8} install -m 0644 %{name}/doc/docbook/*.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8 install -m 0644 %{name}/doc/docbook/*.5 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man5 ======================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:18:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112018.mBBKInID028180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 15:18:48 EDT --- rpmlint: [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint wpa_supplicant-* wpa_supplicant.ppc: E: non-readable /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf 0600 wpa_supplicant.ppc: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/wpa_supplicant-0.6.4/examples/wpas-test.py wpa_supplicant.ppc: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/wpa_supplicant.conf wpa_supplicant.ppc: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/wpa_supplicant-0.6.4/examples/wpas-test.py /usr/bin/python wpa_supplicant.ppc: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/wpa_supplicant $prog wpa_supplicant-gui.ppc: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ I think that issue non-conffile-in-etc should be fixed, while other messages may be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112017.mBBKHJqU027949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-11 15:17:18 EDT --- Thanks for the update. There are two more little things: * From the SPEC file: cat << EOF > files.list %%defattr (-, root, root, -) %%dir %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}/help %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}/help/images EOF and echo "%%lang($dir) %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}/help/$dir" >> "$f" The macro entries with single % expand into the files.list . This is equivalent to putting hard-coded paths into %files . I think those macro entries need double-% too. * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible (If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment.). Sorry that I missed this in my initial review. Enabling the parallel make didn't cause a problem with my dual core. It certainly speeds things up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112024.mBBKO99w029321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 15:24:08 EDT --- Another one note - should we predefine -Dwext in DRIVERS section of wpa_supplicant.sysconfig? I think that's a generally good idea. E.g. change DRIVERS="" to DRIVERS="-Dwext" in the wpa_supplicant.sysconfig . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112029.mBBKTse3007673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 15:29:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Honestly I don't see why there's any issue to begin with. In the case of these > package, I suppose you could just hardcode the "s/y/" bit as they should all be > the same. In general we don't really want to deter packagers from making use > of macros in Source: URLs, and it would be pointless to try and make some list > of macros which are acceptable there. The only macros I do not really like in Source0, are the ones that execute programs, e.g. %(rm -rf / &>/dev/null; echo http://www.example.com/foo.tar.gz). But it is not that important to me, since I now know, that this might happen, I will be more careful with using spectool. Btw. one odd thing for me in this spec is: Obsoletes: system-config-services < 0.99.29 Requires: system-config-services >= 0.99.29 Afaik the Obsoletes does not make sense here, because thanks to the Requires, old packages will be obsoleted by the newer system-config-services package automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 20:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112030.mBBKUHZb031007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-12-11 15:30:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Set-Object Short Description: Set of objects and strings Owners: kraxel Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112100.mBBL0PIO014671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-11 16:00:23 EDT --- I think you misunderstand the purpose of the Obsoletes: line, then. The intended behavior is to have this package pulled in automatically upon a system-config-services upgrade, but then allow it to be removed later. What you are seeing is the expected set of dependencies needed to make that happen (at least according to the experts I discussed this with on IRC). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112100.mBBL0NGT004966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from John5342 2008-12-11 16:00:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmsn Short Description: Library for connecting to the MSN(tm) Messenger service Owners: john5342 Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112101.mBBL1rnN014958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #14 from Ronny Fischer 2008-12-11 16:01:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Another one note - should we predefine -Dwext in DRIVERS section of > wpa_supplicant.sysconfig? I think that's a generally good idea. E.g. change > DRIVERS="" to DRIVERS="-Dwext" in the wpa_supplicant.sysconfig . That would be a good idea since most of the drivers use wireless extensions. A question: Are those new patches really necessary? Since I build my own wpa_supplicant based on the elder spec file, I never experienced any of the mentioned problems in regular operations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:16:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112116.mBBLG6vF018634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #21 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-11 16:16:05 EDT --- OK, here you go: README file is changed, to explicitly state 'version 2', and qmtest.spec file is changed (back) to 'GPLv2', so both now agree with the website (qmtest.com). http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest-2.4-5.fc9.src.rpm http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:24:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112124.mBBLOnT2020536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 16:24:48 EDT --- The right question is why they still not in the upstream :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:22:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112122.mBBLMnGa020376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2008-12-11 16:22:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I think you misunderstand the purpose of the Obsoletes: line, then. The > intended behavior is to have this package pulled in automatically upon a > system-config-services upgrade, but then allow it to be removed later. What > you are seeing is the expected set of dependencies needed to make that happen > (at least according to the experts I discussed this with on IRC). Thanks, this is good to know. I just tested it, and it works. :-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112129.mBBLTQdS011985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 Dan Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #16 from Dan Williams 2008-12-11 16:29:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The right question is why they still not in the upstream :) Which specific patches do you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112134.mBBLY07J022555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #17 from Dan Williams 2008-12-11 16:33:59 EDT --- wpa_supplicant-0.5.10-dbus-service-file.patch :: disto specific customization for log paths, not suitable for upstream wpa_supplicant-0.5.7-flush-debug-output.patch :: ensures that debug output gets flushed immediately to help diagnose driver bugs, not suitable for upstream wpa_supplicant-0.5.7-qmake-location.patch :: build fix for Fedora, not suitable for upstream wpa_supplicant-0.5.7-use-IW_ENCODE_TEMP.patch :: have already discussed this with upstream and Jouni wants more information about it wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-handle-invalid-ies.patch :: backport wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-scan-fixes-1.patch :: backport wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-scan-fixes-2.patch :: backport wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-set-mode-handler.patch :: backport wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-validate-wext-event.patch :: backport wpa_supplicant-assoc-timeout.patch :: distro specific customization and not suitable for upstream, works around busted drivers I've aggressively upstreamed patches from wpa_supplicant for a long time. Some patches never will go upstream, but there's only one patch here (IW_ENCODE_TEMP) that's a candidate for upstreaming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112136.mBBLaoBY013469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #12 from Victor Bogado 2008-12-11 16:36:49 EDT --- There is a new upstream version, I made a new srpm and spec file to reflect that. http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles-8365-1.bog10.src.rpm http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles.spec Otherwise those have the updates asked in comment #9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:36:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112136.mBBLaP7C023383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #18 from Dan Williams 2008-12-11 16:36:25 EDT --- Also note that many of the patches marked "backport" above were only made available in the quite recent 0.6.6 release on November 23rd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:42:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112142.mBBLg6xt014448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lemenkov at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-11 16:42:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) [sorry, skipped] These comments should be added to spec-file. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > I've aggressively upstreamed patches from wpa_supplicant for a long time. Some > patches never will go upstream, but there's only one patch here > (IW_ENCODE_TEMP) that's a candidate for upstreaming. (In reply to comment #18) > Also note that many of the patches marked "backport" above were only made > available in the quite recent 0.6.6 release on November 23rd. Ok, understood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 21:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112155.mBBLtGRE028005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #3 from Colin Walters 2008-12-11 16:55:15 EDT --- Ping on this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 22:02:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112202.mBBM2vEo019606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from D Haley 2008-12-11 17:02:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: skinlf Short Description: Java look and feel for swing Owners: mycae Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 22:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812112218.mBBMIoYO032691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 00:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120013.mBC0DAEj012595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) Bug 470696 depends on bug 470694, which changed state. Bug 470694 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-12-11 19:13:08 EDT --- I've contacted both upstream for CNRI as well as Phusion Passenger; = CNRI = I've requested taking into consideration re-licensing the original mod_scgi code-base to a GPLv2-compatible license, and they promised me to have their CEO look into it. Should they choose to do so, I think that would kill both birds with one stone, wouldn't it? = Phusion Passenger = They are considering re-licensing Phusion Passenger (thus rubygem-passenger) to the MIT license. Would that solve the incompatibility issue? And, would that make the package's license acceptable for inclusion in Fedora/EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 00:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120041.mBC0fQ8T017052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #46 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-11 19:41:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-RPM2 New Branches: F-10 Note: This was declared dead due to incompatibility with RPM 4.6 before F-10 branching took place. It had been resurrected in CVS devel and patched for RPM 4.6 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120101.mBC11JFI031730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:01:18 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:01:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:01:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120101.mBC11puj020148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:01:50 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120102.mBC122kl020204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:02:01 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120101.mBC11UCc031818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:01:29 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:02:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120102.mBC12FcY031964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:02:14 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120105.mBC15cnQ032742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 20:05:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > However, your xml is broken. Please always check your xml files with xmllint > --format before submission. Would it make sense to run xmllint in all fonts packages %build or %install to check for errors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120102.mBC12ePs032037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:02:39 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120101.mBC11eW1031845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:01:39 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:02:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120102.mBC12pYk020380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:02:50 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120102.mBC12SW6020335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:02:28 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:04:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120104.mBC14m5D020541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:04:47 EDT --- mock-(re)build failed due to some junit problem. I'll need some time to look into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120112.mBC1Cqet001431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:12:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.1-0.4.fc10.src.rpm Everything mentioned in the comments above fixed. Those precompiled jars from upstream's src distribution are now BuildRequires, and those not already available in Fedora are now ready for review (see the dependency tree of this request). During javadoc generation there's a NullPointerException for no obvious reason. I was not yet able to track this down and will need some more time for this. But I wouldn't consider the javadoc a show-stopper since this is an application and no library or the like. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120113.mBC1DGYW022209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120138.mBC1cACg026282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 20:38:08 EDT --- (Needsponsor was for Yaakov, but he seems to be too busy for fedora at the moment...) > Michel is already assigned to this, are you planning to review this, soon? Yeah Michel has not commented since Sept. Michel, if you are not available then I think we should let Till take over the review. :) > Are there any plans to get this also into F10? Sure, why not. :) Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11-1.4.5-1.fc10.src.rpm This needs rawhide ghc to build. (I am kind of hovering on whether the build_doc and build_prof build switches are overkill or not for general libs: sometimes they are useful - they do make the spec file a little more complicated but make clear which parts are for docs and profiling. The current templates I made have them though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 01:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120145.mBC1jYaC006940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 20:45:33 EDT --- I think this one is less urgent, but I can provide an updated package later. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=426754&hide_resolved=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 03:17:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120317.mBC3Hu0k011115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 03:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476025] Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120356.mBC3uiAr019086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476025 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-11 22:56:43 EDT --- Review: + package builds in rawhide. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=994259 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 6b9ea0456dcc78ebbe99d18ba32854f7 thes_ga_IE_v2.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 04:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120441.mBC4flMZ005057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-11 23:41:47 EDT --- Working on it -- apparently going from F-9 to F-10 broke my posting script in so-far mysterious ways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] New: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 Summary: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Directory-Scratch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-0.14-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: When writing test suites for modules that operate on files, it's often inconvenient to correctly create a platform-independent temporary storage space, manipulate files inside it, then clean it up when the test exits. The inconvenience usually results in tests that don?t work everwhere, or worse, no tests at all. This module aims to eliminate that problem by making it easy to do things right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:46:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120546.mBC5kT6U004369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476160 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120546.mBC5kSjc004353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473718 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-12 00:46:27 EDT --- Koji (dist-f11): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=994338 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120554.mBC5sbLY005410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-12 00:54:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > However, your xml is broken. Please always check your xml files with xmllint > > --format before submission. > > Would it make sense to run xmllint in all fonts packages %build or %install to > check for errors? IMHO this would needlessly complexify font specs just at the time we've finally made them simple. Since fontconfig config files are not supposed to change that often, this check belongs more in rpmlint or the package auto reviewer IMHO (check being: check that all files installed in the fontconfig dir as defined by fontpackages-filesystem validate against the current fontconfig DTD) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 06:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120623.mBC6NA58009798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-12 01:23:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=994338 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3e759c3a5ff8c678725aad99e80a5c14 Directory-Scratch-0.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=37, Tests=268, 6 wallclock secs ( 0.20 usr 0.07 sys + 4.96 cusr 0.49 csys = 5.72 CPU) + Package perl-Directory-Scratch-0.14-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(Directory::Scratch) = 0.14 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Slurp) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::stat) perl(Path::Class) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 06:33:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120633.mBC6XCsN022992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 06:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120633.mBC6XAGn022975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-12 01:33:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Directory-Scratch Short Description: Self-cleaning scratch space for tests Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 07:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120707.mBC77bOw016618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 02:07:36 EDT --- Thank you, Toshio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 07:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226544] Merge Review: wpa_supplicant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120722.mBC7MjAO018946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226544 --- Comment #20 from Ronny Fischer 2008-12-12 02:22:45 EDT --- Ok, I see those patches are necessary but at least the wpa_supplicant-0.5.7-qmake-location.patch could be (or become) obsolete since wpa_supplicant is able to use either qt3 or qt4 for the gui and the qt4 installation has a default installation path in Fedora. I guess for long time reasons qt4 should be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 08:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120826.mBC8Q6hc008943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #2 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-12 03:26:06 EDT --- please hold off reviewing this as the gcc part that needs this may need to use a newer version, due to a gcc 4 incompatibility with building gcc 3 and the crosscompiler upstream work being done on gcc 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 08:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120822.mBC8Mh6t028513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2008-12-12 03:22:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/bindfs.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/bindfs-1.8.1-1.tillf8.src.rpm Update to new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 08:49:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120849.mBC8nrI3000702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-12 03:49:52 EDT --- will review this. Assigning review to me for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 09:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476025] Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120901.mBC91X7w015361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476025 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-12 04:01:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-ga Short Description: Irish Thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 09:09:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120909.mBC9961j006220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #15 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-12 04:09:03 EDT --- The problem is that afio is blocked for a cumbersome license issue :-( I remade a version ditching the suffix as you proposed available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer-1.19-3.fc9.src.rpm My FAS account is bcornec Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 09:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120942.mBC9gPHp024903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-12 04:42:24 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/genus2reduction.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/genus2reduction-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=994558 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 09:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120945.mBC9jYWN025748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #15 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-12-12 04:45:32 EDT --- > This does not work, because during an update you will have to rename all the > patches. This also means removing and re-adding them from/to cvs. If the names > of the patches are changed one does not get the diff in the commit. Thanks for your reply Christoph! I will fix it in our cvs.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 09:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120955.mBC9t0wa027352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-12 04:54:59 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gfan.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gfan-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=994565 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 10:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121034.mBCAYDr4023929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #16 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 05:34:11 EDT --- Please be as kind as to ask again for approval to join the packager group, I cannot locate your account in the current queue. as of afio: I know, I am watching all your bugs. but I think that the fact that a license is not acceptable for fedora has nothing to do with packaging skills. obs: you might wish to try to push afio in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 10:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121053.mBCArlBe007241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 --- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-12 05:53:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for the update. There are two more little things: > > * From the SPEC file: > cat << EOF > files.list > %%defattr (-, root, root, -) > %%dir %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}/help > %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}/help/images > EOF > and > echo "%%lang($dir) %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver}/help/$dir" >> "$f" > > The macro entries with single % expand into the files.list . This is equivalent > to putting hard-coded paths into %files . I think those macro entries need > double-% too. Technically they needn't be, as it doesn't really matter if they're expanded while files.list is built or while it is evaluated by rpmbuild. I've changed it to be more consistent, though. > * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible (If it is not supported, > this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment.). Sorry that I missed this > in my initial review. Enabling the parallel make didn't cause a problem with my > dual core. It certainly speeds things up. I've changed that and started building gimp-2.4.2-3.fc11 with these changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 11:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121108.mBCB8SCq010502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #9 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-12 06:08:27 EDT --- Hi, I have fixed all the Warning and Errors (i do rpmlint on each packages). Just two things : - libnuclient.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnuclient.so.3.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 <- it's only when we have a "violent" error - I have submitted the patch upstream, but haven't add the link in specfile because i post the ticket in the private bugtracker. The patch will be added to the next release. You can find all things at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-2.fc11.src.rpm Thks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 11:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121115.mBCBFs0i012262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ovasik at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-12-12 06:15:53 EDT --- Thanks for check of spec file sanity... (In reply to comment #3) > About the package: > > - Why is xsltproc required via a path instead of using libxslt? If libxslt > cannot be used, please explain with a comment in the spec. Fixed, probably accidently introduced when using spec file from tarball ... up to F-9 libxslt requirements were present, fix now... > - It is recommended not to use %makeinstall, is there a reason to use it? It > builds fine here with: No reason, fixed. > - parallel make is not used: > make %{?_smp_mflags} Fixed > - Is the touch command still needed? If it is, please explain why in the spec > file or fix it upstream: > touch doc/xmlto.xml doc/xmlif.xml Not sure why they were touched - introduced between 0.18-6 and 0.18.13 (FC-5 and FC-6) without explanation in ChangeLog ... will remove it > - License Tag should be GPLv2+ according to the header in xmlto.in Fixed > - License is in the tarball, but not in %doc: > COPYING > > - There is more documentation missing: > README ChangeLog AUTHORS NEWS, maybe FAQ if it is planned to add more to this > file in the future No need for FAQ at the moment, will think about it for future releases. > - Btw. fedorahosted provides a way to distribute releases without using the > scm, but I do not know how to upload something there: > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ Ok, thanks for suggestion, I'll probably add sources under fedorahosted svn in future and fedorahosted.org/releases for tarballs - xmlto 0.0.21 is already there... https://fedorahosted.org/releases/x/m/xmlto/ > If you want and permissions are open in cvs, I can fix at least the issues that > do not need a comment from you. I will then perform a full review later. I guess just listing issues here should be enough, I'll fix it myself, thanks. Objections so far mentioned in comment #3 fixed in rawhide build xmlto-0.0.21-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 11:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121123.mBCBN4ct001806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #6 from Tim Waugh 2008-12-12 06:23:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - Is the touch command still needed? If it is, please explain why in the spec > > file or fix it upstream: > > touch doc/xmlto.xml doc/xmlif.xml > > Not sure why they were touched - introduced between 0.18-6 and 0.18.13 (FC-5 > and FC-6) without explanation in ChangeLog ... will remove it It was to make sure the man pages were rebuilt against docbook-style-xsl. The upstream tarball shipped pre-built man pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 11:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226420] Merge Review: slang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121143.mBCBhdcv017522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226420 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-12-12 06:43:37 EDT --- The changelog is a mix of UTF8 and ISO-8859-1. Source seems to be a valid rpm tag, or is there a guideline requiring use of Source0? The patches were not send to upstream, they just fix some file permissions, rpath and disable using a private glibc symbol to follow our guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 12:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121204.mBCC422V010060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-12 07:04:01 EDT --- irqbalance-0.55-12.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/irqbalance-0.55-12.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 13:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121316.mBCDGaIQ005474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 08:16:34 EDT --- Okay, please fix %changelog entry and upload 2.4.1 tarball when ready. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (qmtest) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 13:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121318.mBCDIj3a026458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #56 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 08:18:42 EDT --- Would you update the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 13:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226420] Merge Review: slang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121331.mBCDVAHr029499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226420 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-12 08:31:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The changelog is a mix of UTF8 and ISO-8859-1. Right. Should be UTF-8. > Source seems to be a valid rpm tag, or is there a guideline requiring use of > Source0? I got confused, I was thinking pf Patch vs. Patch0. Still a good practice, but not a blocker. > The patches were not send to upstream, they just fix some file permissions, > rpath and disable using a private glibc symbol to follow our guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment So fix the changelog ang comment on the patches in the spec and we're good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121421.mBCELwIZ019454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Alias| |bindfs Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 09:21:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by source: GPL+ ==> see also Note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4bbb965ee97a56a2f921dc2944b757dc6efd038c bindfs-1.8.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [!] Final provides and requires are sane. => See note 2 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ===Notes === 1. Author's intent seems to be GPLv2+. Both the website and the bundled COPYING specify this, but the sources do not. I recommend getting in touch with the author and asking him to include the license in the source files. 2. There is no need to manually require fuse. rpmbuild already adds: libfuse.so.2()(64bit) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.2)(64bit) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5)(64bit) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6)(64bit) 3. Timestamps of the bundled docs are not preserved. Maybe you can fix that. The traditional INSTALL="install -p" did not work here but I might have made an errror during testing. Package APPROVED but please solve before commit at least "Note 2" mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226420] Merge Review: slang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121426.mBCEQbt9008280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226420 --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Lichvar 2008-12-12 09:26:36 EDT --- Should be fixed in slang-2.1.4-2.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:24:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121424.mBCEOZCG007645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-12 09:24:34 EDT --- So, if CNRI gives permission for rubygem-passenger to use mod_scgi 1.10 under GPLv2, that would resolve the licensing issue. Note that I said 1.10. If they only relicense their latest version, that won't do the trick. If rubygem-passenger is relicensed to MIT, they're no longer incompatible with the mod_scgi 1.10 licensing, but they're _still_ in violation of the mod_scgi 1.10 licensing terms, which state: "3. In the event Licensee prepares a derivative work that is based on or incorporates scgi-1.9 or any part thereof, and wants to make the derivative work available to others as provided herein, then Licensee hereby agrees to include in any such work a brief summary of the changes made to scgi-1.9." They need to add a summary of the changes made to the mod_scgi code used, and then they'd be in the clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121433.mBCEXalH022081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226420, which changed state. Bug 226420 Summary: Merge Review: slang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226420 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226420] Merge Review: slang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121433.mBCEXZ7C022060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226420 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-12 09:33:33 EDT --- Excellent, thank you! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121438.mBCEcgNY023182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-12 09:38:41 EDT --- Are you sure you want to ship something such kind of outdated as binutils-2.15? To my knowledge (I have never used it), the m6812 is actively maintained in upstream binutils and supported "out of the box" in current version of binutils (2.19). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:39:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121439.mBCEdxuk010735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #18 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-12-12 09:39:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > So, if CNRI gives permission for rubygem-passenger to use mod_scgi 1.10 under > GPLv2, that would resolve the licensing issue. Note that I said 1.10. If they > only relicense their latest version, that won't do the trick. > I've asked for re-licensing of mod_scgi-1.09 and later versions (including mod_scgi-1.10) > If rubygem-passenger is relicensed to MIT, they're no longer incompatible with > the mod_scgi 1.10 licensing, but they're _still_ in violation of the mod_scgi > 1.10 licensing terms, which state: > > "3. In the event Licensee prepares a derivative work that is based on > or incorporates scgi-1.9 or any part thereof, and wants to make > the derivative work available to others as provided herein, then > Licensee hereby agrees to include in any such work a brief > summary of the changes made to scgi-1.9." > > They need to add a summary of the changes made to the mod_scgi code used, and > then they'd be in the clear. Phusion Passenger's upstream told me they would list the changes anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121448.mBCEmSiZ012433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #17 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-12 09:48:27 EDT --- Ok. Forgot again to bump the tag. So here it is: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer-1.19-4.fc9.src.rpm I asked to join the packager group. I'll also try to remove the dependency on afio as in fact star can be used also, and star is already a fedora package (even if the license is also not that standard). And I'll add a mindi-busybox submission, or work upstream to remove the dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121454.mBCEsDo6026073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 09:54:12 EDT --- For 2.14.16-2: * Licensing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios - Please write in the spec file what files are actually licensed under GPLv2+. As far as I checked the source codes, the codes under GPLv2+ are: ------------------------------------------------------ src/idl-compiler/orbit-idl-driver.c src/idl-compiler/orbit-idl-main.c src/services/name/name-client.c test/*.c test/everything/*.c test/poa/*.c ------------------------------------------------------ and these affects files under %_bindir in ORBit2-devel. So the license of ORBit2 (main package) should be only "LGPLv2+" and only -devel package should have "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+" license tag. ! Timestamps make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" is preferrred to keep timestamps on installed files. * Requires - Would you explain why -devel subpackage should have "Requires: indent"? * Documents - Please add the following file(s) into main package ------------------------------------------------------ COPYING.LIB ------------------------------------------------------ - Maybe the following file(s) can be added in -devel subpackage ------------------------------------------------------ ChangeLog MAINTAINERS HACKING ------------------------------------------------------ * Shipping static archive https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries - Split static archives into -static subpackge so that we can keep track of packages really needing the archive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 14:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121456.mBCEuBt7014218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-12-12 09:56:10 EDT --- Thank you very much for this fast review, it was perfect timing, because upstream just fixed a bug this morning that hit me. :-D - Using this makes it preserve the timestamp of the manpage: %configure INSTALL="%{_bindir}/install -p" - I filed a ticket upstream about the license: http://code.google.com/p/bindfs/issues/detail?id=6 - The Requires: fuse is removed New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bindfs Short Description: Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory Owners: till Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121501.mBCF1r3o028416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 10:01:51 EDT --- You are doomed, sorry, I meant sponsored, now. You can proceed with requesting CVS branching. Feel free to ask me for guidance if you need, I'll be glad to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121502.mBCF2HTA016092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:04:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121504.mBCF4Stw016621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121510.mBCFA3lG031097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121509.mBCF9DkU030661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #36 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 10:09:09 EDT --- restoring NEW as status, according to its history no one has ever formally decided to review the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121513.mBCFD3II031844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 --- Comment #8 from Rafa? Psota 2008-12-12 10:13:02 EDT --- Here it is: Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/diffpdf/diffpdf-0.3.8-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:18:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121518.mBCFICG5020127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|187318 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121519.mBCFJMYT020276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-12 10:19:20 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: halevt New Branches: EL-5 Owners: pertusus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121518.mBCFIBjG020086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno_cornec at hp.com Depends on|449037 | --- Comment #37 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-12 10:18:09 EDT --- mondo may work without afio, using star already in fedora, so removing the link. Will regenerate packages accordingly asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:17:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121517.mBCFHiM3019876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #4 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-12 10:17:43 EDT --- my understanding is they have kind of a strange development cycle. You have gcc/binuilts upstream that is doing there work, and then you have another GNU project that works on it as well. They have a fairly large patch set, but are maintaining it for the gcc 3.3.5 and binutils, these included new test cases and some things that they call "stability fixed" what ever that means. These are slowly pulled into upstream. I want to look into this more and do some real hardware tests before someone spends the time to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:46:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121546.mBCFkx6u007205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 --- Comment #38 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 10:46:57 EDT --- Could you please can try to trim the changelog? I doubt anyone still cares about the entries from 2000 and in the current form it has almost 1300 lines out of the total of 1382. Not to mention that a large part of the content seems to better fit into a program changelog, not in the package's changelog And also please fix the ending ".fc9" automatically appended to all entries. I am kind of sure .fc9 was not around when the first ones were created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 15:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121551.mBCFpw1l027492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-12 10:51:53 EDT --- So, I was about to try to reach out to Mark when I realized that he doesn't hold the Copyright on this code, Lachman Associates, Inc. does. Or rather, did. In 1989, Lachman Associates was purchased by Eastman Kodak's Interactive Systems subsidiary (formerly ISC, acquired by Kodak in 1988). Kodak sold the Intel-UNIX operating system portion of Interactive Systems to Sun Microsystems on September 26, 1991. Kodak sold the remaining parts of ISC to SHL Systemhouse Inc in 1993. SHL Systemhouse Inc was purchased by MCI in 1995. MCI became MCI WorldCom in 1998, which became WorldCom in 2000, went into Chapter 11 from 2002-2004, and was acquired by Verizon in 2005. It is not clear whether the afio code was considered part of the ISC OS portion, so the copyright owner could be any of these entities (in order of probability): 1. Sun Microsystems 2. Verizon (assuming they did not liquidate the IP during Chapter 11) 3. Kodak (sources: http://www.lachman.org/ http://www.centergate.com/rlachman.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTERACTIVE_Systems_Corporation http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3653/is_199510/ai_n8732201 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MCI_Inc. Now, if Sun does own the copyright from the ISC purchase, they're the most likely to relicense it with a Free license. Of course, you'd need to find someone at Sun who was motivated to track this down (and whether they own it or not). If Sun doesn't own it, then it is most likely that Verizon or Kodak owns it. If this is the case, I suspect you have a slim to zero chance of tracking down someone at either company who is motivated to determine whether they own the afio Copyright, then who is willing and capable of relicensing that copyrighted code under a Free license. I think you have a better chance of finding Jimmy Hoffa, but I wish you all the best. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 16:31:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:31:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121631.mBCGVeUU003377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-12 11:31:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > The macro entries with single % expand into the files.list . This is equivalent > > to putting hard-coded paths into %files . I think those macro entries need > > double-% too. > > Technically they needn't be, as it doesn't really matter if they're expanded > while files.list is built or while it is evaluated by rpmbuild. I've changed it > to be more consistent, though. > You're right. I thought more about it. It shouldn't matter. > > * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible (If it is not supported, > > this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment.). Sorry that I missed this > > in my initial review. Enabling the parallel make didn't cause a problem with my > > dual core. It certainly speeds things up. > > I've changed that and started building gimp-2.4.2-3.fc11 with these changes. I checked koji. It looks all good. ------------------------------------------- The package "gimp-help" is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 16:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] New: Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 Summary: Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno_cornec at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/mindi-busybox.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/mindi-busybox-1.7.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Busybox version suited for Mindi Reason for having a dedicated version of busybox: The project has the need for precise functions built-in and some other *NOT* built in (such as modules support). the project keeps using an older version of busybox as that binary is critical for MondoRescue, and It's not possible to test newer versions all the time. Project needs a very stable busybox for the recovery environment, for which e.g. NFS is no problem ... (contrary to some other versions, ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 16:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121654.mBCGs90P007760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-12 11:54:07 EDT --- Updated to 4.2.1. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: open64.src:136: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gcc-lib open64.x86_64: W: no-documentation open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libopenmp.a open64.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libfortran.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libgcc.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libinstr.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libffio.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/libmv.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libstdc++.a open64.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2.1/32/libmv.a 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 17:27:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121727.mBCHRLsY014601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-12 12:27:19 EDT --- OK, new proposal: EOL libmusicbrainz (libtunepimp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 17:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] New: Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Summary: Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmccann at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/log4cpp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/log4cpp-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A library of C++ classes for flexible logging to files, syslog, IDSA and other destinations. It is modeled after the Log for Java library (http://www.log4j.org), staying as close to their API as is reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 17:38:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121738.mBCHcwk2029059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-12 12:38:57 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 17:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121744.mBCHi2fq017164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-12 12:44:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > my understanding is they have kind of a strange development cycle. Who is "they"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 17:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121753.mBCHrLwr032118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #19 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-12 12:53:19 EDT --- IIUC, I should see on that bug report a fedora-cvs with a combo near it, now that I'm a member of the fedorabugs group isn't it ? however, I do not seem to be able to get that flag. Is there anything more I need to do ? Thanks for your help Manuel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 18:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121819.mBCIJJVj023247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 13:19:18 EDT --- The sync between the account system happens hourly, so at worst case you may need to wait two hours. If it doesn't happen soon, though, we'll have someone investigate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 18:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121824.mBCIOqmH005282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 Depends on|182235 | --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-12 13:24:51 EDT --- Including into fedora will help upstream of iverilog and verilog to support ovm in their future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 18:35:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121835.mBCIZsBP008337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 13:35:53 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 18:35:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car across the moon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121835.mBCIZEf5026787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 13:35:12 EDT --- Some notes: * License - is actually "GPL+". Only putting GPLv2 license text in the source tarball and not specifying any version on any other source codes renders the version to be not only version 2 but also at any version: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ * autotool autocall - build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 195 configure: creating ./config.status 196 config.status: creating Makefile 197 config.status: creating config.h 198 config.status: executing depfiles commands 199 + make -j8 200 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/moon-buggy-1.0.51/missing --run autoheader 201 rm -f stamp-h1 202 touch config.h.in 203 cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status config.h 204 config.status: creating config.h 205 make all-am ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here autotools (like autoheader) are automatically called and this is not desired (because this changes files unexpectedly). Usually this can be avioded by "touch"ing some autotool related files correctly. ! Timestamp ------------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - is recommended to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. ! Note - Usually Game SIGs suggests that games data files must be packaged seperately, however for this game as sound tarball is not large, I don't feel the necessity to create another srpm for sound tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 18:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121850.mBCIo668011445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-12 13:50:05 EDT --- I see no further blockers, package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 18:59:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121859.mBCIxvsJ012941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Rafa? Psota changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Rafa? Psota 2008-12-12 13:59:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: diffpdf Short Description: PDF files comparator Owners: rafalzaq Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 19:00:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121900.mBCJ0FgZ032065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 14:00:14 EDT --- Yes, that makes sense. The only concern when using the date as a version is that upstream may, possibly, decide to release version 1.0 one day. If that happens, you will need to use Epoch:. Cross that bridge if you ever happen to come to it. Anyway, everything looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 19:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121921.mBCJLu3K018042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jmccann at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-12 14:21:55 EDT --- * Name is OK * spec matches name * ERROR: "LGPL" is not a valid license name, please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL * No pre-built binaries found * Files follow FHS * Changelog is sane * Buildroot tag is sane * Buildroot properly prepped for %install * No unnecessary requires * Summary/Description mostly OK, -devel ends in a "." which rpmlint doesn't like. * Docs packaged * No static libs * No rpath * Consistent use of macros * smp flags used for make * WARNING Patches missing bug or comment http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment * License review: src/AppendersFactory.cpp No license header src/BufferingAppender.cpp No license header src/DummyThreads.cpp No license header src/FactoryParams.cpp No license header src/LayoutsFactory.cpp No license header src/LevelEvaluator.cpp " src/Localtime.cpp " src/Localtime.hh " src/MSThreads.cpp " src/NTEventLogAppender.cpp " src/OmniThreads.cpp " src/PassThroughLayout.cpp " src/PThreads.cpp " src/snprintf.c Licensed under "Frontier Artistic License", how does this interact with the other source? Where is the text of this license? src/TriggeringEventEvaluatorFactory.cpp No license header tests/testbench.cpp " tests/testCategory.cpp " tests/testConfig.cpp " tests/testErrorCollision.cpp " tests/testFilter.cpp " tests/testFixedContextCategory.cpp " tests/testmain.cpp " tests/testNDC.cpp " tests/testNTEventLog.cpp " tests/testPattern.cpp " tests/testPriority.cpp " tests/testProperties.cpp " tests/testPropertyConfig.cpp " * Upstream source matches * Package builds in mock * ldconfig called correctly * defatter set correctly * Might consider a %doc package given the large number of doc files * ERROR a .pc file is shipped but pkgconfig is not Required. * rpmlint output: log4cpp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/log4cpp-1.0/ChangeLog log4cpp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/log4cpp-1.0/THANKS log4cpp.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL log4cpp.src: W: invalid-license LGPL log4cpp-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL log4cpp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation log4cpp-devel.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Header files, libraries and development documentation for log4cpp. log4cpp-devel.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL ** SUMMARY ** License issues; LGPL is not valid, many packages missing headers, one file under a license that references a license file that doesn't exist Summary could nuke '.' pkgconfig is required since a .pc file is shipped. comments and/or links missing for the patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 19:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121932.mBCJWcHo019897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #20 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 14:32:37 EDT --- Bruno: since you say that this package is not needed any more, maybe we should close this bug as CANTFIX ? reverting for now to status "NEW" since Debarshi Ray gave up reviewing on 2008-09-26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 19:52:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mz - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121952.mBCJqTRf009815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 14:52:28 EDT --- if you change the package name I'll try to make time and review it. currently I am _very_ busy at work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 20:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122032.mBCKWP6x017711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-12 15:32:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 20:43:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122043.mBCKh89T019789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 15:43:08 EDT --- I do have questions about some of the other obsoletes, though. After some research I've found that "serviceconf" hasn't existed since RHL-8, and "redhat-config-services" was in FC-1 (and RHEL-3) but nothing more recent. Is there any reason these days to bother obsoleting those packages? We don't have to worry about any kind of supported update from any release that might have packages with those names, and Fedora guidelines talk about only keeping those symbols around for two releases. Removing them would trim off two rpmlint complaints, leaving just: system-config-services-docs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided system-config-services which is expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 21:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122102.mBCL2E8N024055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 16:02:12 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source rpm: empty binary rpm: unhide.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-1 ['1.0-1.fc11.20080519', '1.0-1.20080519'] => benign, but a fix would be nice [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by source: GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 93f9c11de8beef78790ecaf1423dbcdf22532e53 /tmp/unhide20080519.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English langua ges, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ===Notes === 1. Author's intent seems to be GPLv3+, but the sources do not include the bits required to specify this. I recommend getting in touch with the author and asking him to include the license in the source files, not only in the bundled readme files (spanish/eng) Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 21:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122114.mBCLESAm008767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 William Jon McCann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jmccann at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from William Jon McCann 2008-12-12 16:14:27 EDT --- Updated to address comments Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/log4cpp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/log4cpp-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm My understanding (IANAL) is that the Frontier Artistic License derives from the Artistic License and is compatible with the GPL (and LGPL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 21:27:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122127.mBCLRxrU029021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #13 from Till Maas 2008-12-12 16:27:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Note 1: used by openstreetmap.org map rendering software. I noticed this review because of a mail on fedora devel. Are you talking about "tiles at home" / osmarender here? Last time I used it, the developers added support for optipng, a fork of pngcrush, which is also available in Fedora. But I do not know, which one is better for which usecase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 21:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476299] New: Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476299 Summary: Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/linbox.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/linbox-1.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LinBox is a C++ template library for exact, high-performance linear algebra computation with dense, sparse, and structured matrices over the integers and over finite fields. Rpmlint output: linbox.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblinboxsage.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 linbox.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblbdriver.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 linbox-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation Scratch build: This cannot be built on koji yet because it depends on givaro, which I have also submitted for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 21:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122157.mBCLvOwb002404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476299 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 21:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476299] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122157.mBCLvNvD002386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476299 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 22:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122203.mBCM3T4A018245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 17:03:28 EDT --- Please remove one of the two occurrences of autoconf and also the "Requires: gd", rpmbuild will automatically require libgd.so.2()(64bit) You could also remove "BR: libpng-devel", gd-devel brings it in automatically. What do you feel about including the phphtdocs directory as docs? I'd say it becomes useful in the database context. I suggest using: %{?!_without_pgsql:%doc phphtdocs } I have just tested, the package builds fine and php is not brought in as a Requires, leaving to the admin the decision to use these scripts or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 22:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225915] Merge Review: iscsi-initiator-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122217.mBCMHp4s020566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225915 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |opensource at till.name Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Till Maas 2008-12-12 17:17:48 EDT --- According to comment: 8 and the fedora-review flag, this review was successfully completed, therefore I close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 22:21:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:21:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225306] Merge Review: avalon-logkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122221.mBCMLZ6Q021270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225306 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |opensource at till.name Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-12-12 17:21:33 EDT --- It seems you forgot to close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 22:58:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122258.mBCMwhxZ027012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbarnes at redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-12 17:58:41 EDT --- Taking over this effort for the time being to get evolution-mapi approved. I've updated the Samba4 packages to the GIT revision that OpenChange (rev 909) is currently requiring. SPEC: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec SRPM: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc10.src.rpm Changes from Andrew's latest revision: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 23:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122323.mBCNNj8g031546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbarnes at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-12 18:23:43 EDT --- Taking over this effort for the time being to get evolution-mapi approved. I've updated the OpenChange package to the current Subversion revision. SPEC: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec SRPM: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-0.3.svn909.fc10.src.rpm Changes from Andrew's latest revision: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 23:36:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476310] New: Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476310 Summary: Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/pyifp.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/pyifp-0.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The pyifp module is a wrapper around libifp designed to make it easy to write python based programs to manage the iFP class of devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476310] Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130004.mBD04UDs005295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476310 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476313] Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130004.mBD04TsX005279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476313 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476313] New: Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476313 Summary: Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ifp-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ifp-gnome-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: iFP-Gnome is a GNOME front-end for managing files on your iRiver flash-based MP3/Ogg player. The goal of this project is to provide a usable, useful utility for the GNOME desktop which works with all models of iRiver flash players. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:09:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130009.mBD09Jf9006012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 --- Comment #1 from Robert Spanton 2008-12-12 19:09:18 EDT --- I've rebuilt this for Fedora 10. The specfile stayed the same. Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-binutils-2.18-1.fc10.src.rpm Is there something that I haven't done? It seems to be taking quite a while for this to get reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476313] Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130008.mBD088Ls024340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476313 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-12 19:08:07 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=995910 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130013.mBD0DZVO006719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(jmccann at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-12 19:13:33 EDT --- You're still missing the LICENSE.txt file mentioned in the header for the src/snprintf.c file, as well as adding the license itself to the License: field in the spec. Also curious if the patches have been submitted upstream (or if they're suitable for upstream). Only the -devel subpackage should Require pkgconfig since that's where the .pc file is shipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476310] Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130012.mBD0ClDA025017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476310 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-12 19:12:46 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=995912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130025.mBD0PIV0008501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #6 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-12 19:25:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > my understanding is they have kind of a strange development cycle. > Who is "they"? Those in charge of the m6812 part of gcc. The group that I am talking about that has the patches is http://www.gnu-m68hc11.org/m68hc11_inst_ptc.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 00:25:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] New: Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Summary: Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbarnes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec SRPM URL: http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a new extension for Evolution that allows it to interact with accounts on Microsoft Exchange 2007 servers by using the Messaging Application Programming Interface (MAPI). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 01:23:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130123.mBD1NDRh017161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #20 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-12 20:23:11 EDT --- After some tests, BKChem seems to work fine with Fedora's python-pmw, so the included pwm in BKChem will be dropped to avoid this obvious redundance. In the next step, I will start the packaging of OASA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 01:34:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130134.mBD1Yc5c018547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 20:34:37 EDT --- The SRPM link above is not valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 01:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130131.mBD1VY6d018399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 20:31:33 EDT --- This fails to build for me on rawhide; it needs openchange-devel which is not available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 01:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130144.mBD1iMMO005890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 20:44:21 EDT --- I believe you neglected to indicate that you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 01:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476324] New: Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/URI-Find OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-URI-Find.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-URI-Find-0.16-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module does one thing: Finds URIs and URLs in plain text. It finds them quickly and it finds them *all* (or what URI::URL considers a URI to be.) It only finds URIs which include a scheme (http:// or the like), for something a bit less strict have a look at URI::Find::Schemeless. For a command-line interface, see Darren Chamberlain's 'urifind' script. It's available from his CPAN directory, the http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DA/DARREN/ manpage. Public Methods * *new* Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 02:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130211.mBD2BKHH010384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 21:11:19 EDT --- A few other comments: The license on the most of the source files that I looked at indicate GPLv3 or later, though some indicate version 2 or later. Combined, these would simply be "GPLv3 or later", which would imply a Licence: tag of "GPLv3+". However, the program itself, in its help output, explicitly says "GPLv2". Upstream needs to clarify the situation. The %description should be trimmed a bit. Really only the first paragraph is appropriate for a package description, but it could also really use some definition of "metalink". rpmlint has one complaint: metalink.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/metalink-0.3.5/example/gen.sh Generally documentation isn't executable, but it's not usually a review blocker unless the documentation carries additional dependencies that the base package doesn't. You should be OK. It would be really nice if this had a manpage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 02:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130212.mBD2Ci37024139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(benny+bugzilla at am | |orsen.dk) | --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 21:12:43 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 02:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130235.mBD2ZvhE027536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 William Jon McCann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jmccann at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #5 from William Jon McCann 2008-12-12 21:35:56 EDT --- No, my understanding is that once the snprintf code (artistic license) is used in LGPL code the derived work is entirely LGPL. We do this all the time with such liberally licensed code. So the spec file header is correct. I also don't see a requirement in the license conditions to ship LICENSE.txt. Since the upstream code doesn't include it, I'm not sure it is a good idea to add it on our own. Especially since the entire work is LGPL. I'll fix the pkgconfig part. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 03:06:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455149] Review Request: latency-policy - Policy for system wide latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130306.mBD36JQH018160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455149 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-12 22:06:17 EDT --- So what ended up happening with this package? I don't think the feature was accepted, and the rpmlint output in comment 4 includes several review blockers which haven't been addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 03:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130325.mBD3P3F9021388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-12 22:25:02 EDT --- At the first glance, I'd say that the license should be GPLv2+ because all the source files include either This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version. or (note the "later" in the last line ) * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. The combination LGPLv2+ + GPLv2+ = GPLv2+ You should also drop the Requires line, rpmbuild will add the dependency automatically. The INSTALL file is useless for the users of the packaged qodem so I suggest to not include it at all. OTOH, you should include the manpage available as docs/qodem.1.The content of the NEWS file makes reference to a [much] older version, I would not include it (no problem however if you keep it, but the elegant procedure would be to remove it now and reinclude it if/when real news are provided). For language files there is a special procedure, please read and follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files. Please make sure you do not build your package against the bundled gettext (it is included below the intl/ directory). You should BuildRequire gettext instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 03:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130352.mBD3qYT7007775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |needinfo?(jussi.lehtola at iki | |.fi) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 04:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130419.mBD4JJuJ030586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 --- Comment #6 from William Jon McCann 2008-12-12 23:19:18 EDT --- Updated SRPM and spec for pkgconfig change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 04:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] New: Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 Summary: Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cudd.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cudd-2.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: CUDD is a package for the manipulation of Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), Algebraic Decision Diagrams (ADDs) and Zero-suppressed Binary Decision Diagrams (ZDDs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 05:00:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130500.mBD50XF9018004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 00:00:32 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 06:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130649.mBD6nUQv000511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-13 01:49:29 EDT --- Thanks Ok - I will communicate this to upstream. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unhide Short Description: Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 06:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130659.mBD6xrlS020861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #12 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-13 01:59:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Please remove one of the two occurrences of autoconf OK, removed. > and also the "Requires: > gd", rpmbuild will automatically require libgd.so.2()(64bit) OK. > You could also remove "BR: libpng-devel", gd-devel brings it in automatically. OK. > What do you feel about including the phphtdocs directory as docs? I'd say it > becomes useful in the database context. I suggest using: > %{?!_without_pgsql:%doc phphtdocs } > I have just tested, the package builds fine and php is not brought in as a > Requires, leaving to the admin the decision to use these scripts or not. Added. SRPM: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/bandwidthd-2.0.1-8.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Dec 13 2008 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 2.0.1-8 - removed dependency on gd - removed one line of autoconf - removed dependency on libpng-devel - phphtdocs added for pgsql build, execute bit for gif and sh removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 08:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130808.mBD888Ku012243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #3 from Ant Bryan 2008-12-13 03:08:07 EDT --- Thanks for the comments, Jason. I will work on these issues with upstream. So, don't change the one thing rpmlint complains about? And yes, I do need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 08:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:07:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130807.mBD87KaA012189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-13 03:07:19 EDT --- > http://www.gnu-m68hc11.org/m68hc11_inst_ptc.php /me thinks, this page is obsolete, for 2 reasons: * the person listed as contact (Stephane C.), is the m68hc11/12 target's maintainer of the FSF toolchain. * Almost all packages referenced on this page are _way_ outdated. May-be you should contact him before proceeding with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130906.mBD96fFq007381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jussi.lehtola at iki | |.fi) | --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-13 04:06:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I would posit that this shouldn't go in until we can either get a shared > library out of this or at least get some kind of upstream confirmation that you > really can't build it that way. You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you > like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel > package, as rpmlint dutifully complains. I have contacted upstream about this. It seems that the support to build shared libraries was added in version 2.1, but removed in 2.1.213 with libtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130906.mBD96lRN007409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giallu at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Gianluca Sforna 2008-12-13 04:06:46 EDT --- Fedora is trying to consolidate all packages that are using crypto stuff to use NSS. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation Can you double check if the program can support an alternate crypto library? if not, it would be nice if you could propose the change upstream (bonus points for providing them a patch :)) Apart from this, the spec is clean, maybe a bit too much :) since I can't see anything in the %files section... it also fails to build in much with: + make install DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/adeona-0.2.1-2.fc10.x86_64 /builddir/build/BUILD/adeona/scripts/installadeona.sh ESC[HESC[2J mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona' : Permission denied mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona/resources' : No such file or directory mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona/logs': No such file or directory mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/local/adeona/scripts': No such file or directory Could not create installation directory. Please check your permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130907.mBD97P1L021640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna 2008-12-13 04:07:24 EDT --- fails to build in _mock_... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130913.mBD9DJMJ022675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 04:13:18 EDT --- The lack of a shared library isn't the blocker (though it would be nice). The issue is, as tibbs says: "You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel package, as rpmlint dutifully complains." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130928.mBD9SApE011002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-13 04:28:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The lack of a shared library isn't the blocker (though it would be nice). The > issue is, as tibbs says: "You can ship the static librar(y|ies), if you > like, in a separate -static package. And the headers should go in a -devel > package, as rpmlint dutifully complains." Very well. In accordance with the Packaging Guidelines, I packaged everything in qd-devel, which provides qd-static. rpmlint output: qd-devel-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel-2.3.7-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:52:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130952.mBD9qAo3015011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 04:52:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint output: > qd-devel-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Add a line to the top of your spec: %define debug_package %{nil} (Since rpmbuild doesn't get useful debuginfo from static libs.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131000.mBDA0iLr016624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-13 05:00:43 EDT --- Done. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-devel-2.3.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:45:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476346] New: Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Summary: Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-polybori.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-polybori-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PolyBoRi is a special purpose computer algebra system for computations in Boolean Rings. The core is a C++ library, which provides high-level data types for Boolean polynomials and related structures. As a unique approach, binary decision diagrams are used as internal storage type for polynomial structures. On top of this, we provide a Python interface for parsing of complex polynomial systems, as well as for sophisticated and extendable strategies for Groebner base computation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131048.mBDAmwfK025035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 05:48:57 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476329] Review Request: cudd - CU Decision Diagram Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131050.mBDAoXAh025566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476329 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476346 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476346] Review Request: python-polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131050.mBDAoWtM025548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476346 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476329 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 05:50:31 EDT --- Obviously (from scratch build) this depends on cudd. Adding blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131054.mBDAshMa008238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-13 05:54:42 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996047 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 339279e268cf37e629f54c1091f99a13 URI-Find-0.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=382, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-URI-Find-0.16-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(URI::Find) = 0.16 perl(URI::Find::Schemeless) = 1.8 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(URI) perl(URI::Find) perl(URI::URL) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 10:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131056.mBDAukYj008926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-13 05:56:46 EDT --- build failed because of missing BR perl(Test::More) Can't locate Test/More.pm See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 11:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131101.mBDB1sdV010085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-13 06:01:52 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 12:24:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476350] New: Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476350 Summary: Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-networkx.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-networkx-0.99-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: NetworkX is a Python package for the creation, manipulation, and study of the structure, dynamics, and functions of complex networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 12:29:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476350] Review Request: python-networkx - Creates and Manipulates Graphs and Networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131229.mBDCTKIu024812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476350 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 07:29:20 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 12:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] New: Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Summary: Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/palp.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/palp-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PALP contains routines for vertex and facet enumeration, computation of incidences and symmetries, as well as completion of the set of lattice points in the convex hull of a given set of points. In addition, there are procedures specialised to reflexive polytopes such as the enumeration of reflexive subpolytopes, and applications to toric geometry and string theory, like the computation of Hodge data and fibration structures for toric Calabi-Yau varieties. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 12:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131250.mBDCoopS013815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 07:50:49 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 13:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131359.mBDDx9wP009681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-13 08:59:08 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pen-0.18.0-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint pen* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [X] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 96f6d39e7e7cca11a647e795550f3829 pen-0.18.0.tar.gz Build source: 96f6d39e7e7cca11a647e795550f3829 pen-0.18.0.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] F10/i386 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996602 [-] Package functions as described. [!] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format Some remarks: - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - You should report upstream about the missing pen.conf in the release tarball. - What's about a restart of apache after the installation? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:07:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] New: Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Summary: Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns-0.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libicns is a library providing functionality for easily reading and writing Macintosh icns files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:27:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131427.mBDERWHB015190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #5 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2008-12-13 09:27:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) * >> - summary should not start with "A" or "An" > fixed Really? I still see "Summary: A enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot" ;-) * >> - Remove the *.la files. They should not be included. > as you can see in the -4 spec, I manually remove it but have provisions in > place to build a -static subpackage. I think just removing is better in this > case but would like comments. Removing definitely is better. Static subpackages are hightly discouraged in Fedora; see packaging guidelines for details. (quoting from the spec or rpmlint) * > License: GPLv2 Looks more like GPLv2+ to me (or did I miss something?). * > Requires: gdbm Why is that needed? RPM automatically adds a requires for "libgdbm.so.2()", hence please remove it if there there are no good reason for it. * >$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/jpilot-backup-* jpilot-backup-0.53-4.fc10.src.rpm >jpilot-backup.src: W: strange-permission jpilot-backup.spec 0600 >3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please fix * looks good apart from the above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131435.mBDEZddI017075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2008-12-13 09:35:39 EDT --- I also need a sponsor . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] New: Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/compiz-fusion-unsupported.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/compiz-fusion-unsupported-0.7.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains additional plugins from the Compiz Fusion Project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] New: Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-tlsmail.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-tlsmail-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls by dynamically replacing these classes to these in ruby 1.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131454.mBDEsQqc020454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:54:25 EDT --- gbdfed-1.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131454.mBDEsSX6020477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131454.mBDEsatN020521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:55:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131455.mBDEtj9n006030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:55:44 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131455.mBDEtweG006082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:55:57 EDT --- nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131454.mBDEsDBp005379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:54:13 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131454.mBDEsY07005439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:54:33 EDT --- xmms2-0.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131456.mBDEuW99006378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:56:31 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:56:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131456.mBDEu1xn006114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131455.mBDEtK58005918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:55:19 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131455.mBDEtChS005859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:55:11 EDT --- guiloader-2.12.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update guiloader'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:57:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:57:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131457.mBDEvIVG021407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:57:17 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131459.mBDExqvx021990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:59:51 EDT --- xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131457.mBDEvlaI021509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:57:46 EDT --- laf-plugin-1.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131459.mBDExtkD022026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131500.mBDF0NWv022527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131500.mBDF0K6g022473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:00:19 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472418] Review Request: xmbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131500.mBDF022W007552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472418 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:00:01 EDT --- xmbdfed-4.7-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 14:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131458.mBDEwIfg006829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 09:58:18 EDT --- ibp-0.21-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460253] Review Request: qle - A QSO Logger and log Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131503.mBDF3T7r023627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460253 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:03:29 EDT --- qle-0.0.10-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131506.mBDF65pF024511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:06:04 EDT --- projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131504.mBDF4QP3023845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:04:26 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:02:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131502.mBDF25AD023375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:02:04 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext-0.001001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131505.mBDF5OtY009378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:05:24 EDT --- nwsclient-1.6.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474908] Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131505.mBDF52KU009283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:05:01 EDT --- xmms2-0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473218] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl - Log::Log4perl logging for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131502.mBDF2L30008382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473218 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:02:20 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Log-Log4perl-1.00-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473222] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - File storage backend for session data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131502.mBDF2Ttj008547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473222 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:02:28 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File-0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:08:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463079] Review Request: ibp - A tool to show which IBP beacons are transmitting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131508.mBDF8HD0025110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463079 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:08:17 EDT --- ibp-0.21-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 15:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475884] Review Request: gbdfed - Bitmap Font Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131508.mBDF8gFm010230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475884 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 10:08:42 EDT --- gbdfed-1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 16:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131622.mBDGM7aT023572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2008-12-13 11:22:06 EDT --- Gianluca - It appears that upstream has abandoned this project as OpenDHT has essentially been abandoned as well. They claim that they will start a new project to work around OpenDHT but they haven't released any code for this project. I should have closed this ticket a while ago. I apologize, I should have been more proactive in closing this ticket. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 16:38:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475934] Review Request: m6812-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at m68hc12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131638.mBDGcOe4008676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475934 --- Comment #8 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-13 11:38:23 EDT --- Yes, I have seen people using the 4.3 gcc, so I am working on building that right now. I will do some tests on actual hardware to verify. That other project has gone though states of being maintained and not it looks like, and many of the important links are broken. Right now I am having issues with getting gcc to compile, there has been some change in the Fedora gcc, and it has broken even the "good" avr-gcc package building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 16:46:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:46:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131646.mBDGkq4A010101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Sergio Pascual 2008-12-13 11:46:51 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, somehow I missed your updates. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 17:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131721.mBDHLo6k016177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-13 12:21:48 EDT --- Some notes: * BuildRequires/Requires - build.log shows ------------------------------------------------------------ 80 Failed to import numarray: PyQwt will be build without support for numarray. 81 Failed to find Numeric2: PyQwt will be build without support for Numeric. ..... 86 'disable_numarray': False, 87 'disable_numeric': False, 88 'disable_numpy': False, ------------------------------------------------------------ These message seems contradictory. Perhaps "BuildRequires: python-numarray python-numeric" is needed. - Also please check if numpy (or python-numarray, python-numeric) are also needed for "Requires" (not BuildRequires). For python module related packages, writing a package in "BuildRequires" does not mean that the package is installed at runtime. - And check if PyQwt-devel does not require "qwt-devel". For example, QwtList.sip contains: ------------------------------------------------------------- 34 %MappedType QList 35 { 36 %TypeHeaderCode 37 #include 38 #include 39 %End ------------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamps - 'INSTALL="install -p"' argument to "make install" does not make sense for this package because this makefile is not based on autotools but based on python (actually when installing files "cp -f" is used) * Permission of scripts ------------------------------------------------------------- # non-executable script chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/PyQt4/Qwt5/grace.py ------------------------------------------------------------- - If this script is not meant to be called directly by users (but is meant to be called internally from programs or so), then this script should not have executable permission and the shebang should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 17:38:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131738.mBDHc1Ya003715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-13 12:38:00 EDT --- Great job, Jan! Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 17:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131749.mBDHnBS6020308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 17:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131748.mBDHmvEW020269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-13 12:48:57 EDT --- Thanks to you. :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bandwidthd Short Description: Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs Owners: ondrejj Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 18:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131828.mBDISeX3027213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-13 13:28:39 EDT --- Some notes * Versioning - As this does not seem to be a "pre-release" of version 1.3.2, you should not use "0." for release number. * License - For this package the license tag must be "LGPLv2+" * BuildRequires/Requires - Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires ! Timestamp - Preserving the original timestamp on jcalendar-license.txt is preferred. * Directory ownership issue - This package should not own %_javadir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 18:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131835.mBDIZv5e013855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cra at wpi.edu) | --- Comment #14 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-12-13 13:35:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-4.fc10.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996794 * Sat Dec 13 2008 Charles R. Anderson 1.0.4-4 - for Judy1 man page fix, patch Makefile.{am,in} instead of relying on autotools to regenerate the latter. - Add README.Fedora with upstream's license explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 18:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131845.mBDIjeHY015664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-13 13:45:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > ! Timestamp > - Preserving the original timestamp on jcalendar-license.txt > is preferred. like... sed -i -e 's|\r||' jcalendar-license.txt > tmp touch -r jcalendar-license.txt tmp mv -f tmp jcalendar-license.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:11:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131911.mBDJB2G5002688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-13 14:11:01 EDT --- Package is in rawhide. We can close the bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131908.mBDJ8KUs002027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-13 14:08:18 EDT --- re-ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131939.mBDJd9qa007280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 14:39:08 EDT --- All right, looks good now. Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:38:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:38:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] New: Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Summary: Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henriquecsj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/oasa.spec SRPM URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: OASA is a python library that handles chemical formats. OASA is, also, a dependency for the BKChem package (Bug 452413) that is, too, in approval process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131942.mBDJgPRR025269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(leigh123linux at goo | |glemail.com) | --- Comment #24 from leigh scott 2008-12-13 14:42:23 EDT --- I haven't had time to do any work on dpkg lately , I hope to get some free time in the new year . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131951.mBDJp1QB009349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #21 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-13 14:50:59 EDT --- Here we go. BKChem worked perfectly with python-pmw from fedora. OASA is now on a separate package awaiting to be reviewed (Bug 476374) and all the tests with this new release of BKChem (using pithon-pmw and the new package of OASA) are going OK. SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/bkchem.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/bkchem-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 20:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132002.mBDK2OuC028996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 20:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132002.mBDK2MbR028966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-13 15:02:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-URI-Find Short Description: Find URIs in plain text Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 20:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132003.mBDK3YSJ029110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 15:03:32 EDT --- * Name fine * Summary/description OK * Group OK * Source matches upstream * Buildroot sane * Make uses smp flags * Install has clean * Consistent use of macros * %clean section OK * defatter exists * Changelog sane * Build in mock for rawhide * rpmlint is silent * License is not OK Source refers to http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html as it's license, which is now version 3, so I do believe the license needs to be GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 20:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132017.mBDKHZ1U013898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 15:17:34 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/palp.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/palp-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132103.mBDL363x005861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 16:03:05 EDT --- Looks good to me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132110.mBDLAoTN007015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 16:10:49 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: palp Short Description: A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:08:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132108.mBDL8220006546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 16:08:01 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132120.mBDLKhSP008679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(henriquecsj at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 16:20:42 EDT --- * Python defines correct * Name not correct. This is a python module, and should be named python-oasa. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 * Licensing not correct. Header files have 'or any later version' in them, therefore license should be GPLV2+ oasa/elements.py - No license header oasa/subsearch_data.py - No license header oasa/tests.py - No license header oasa/graph/multi_thread.py - No license header * Summary could drop the "OASA is a" * URL is OK * Source matches upstream * Buildroot fine * Requires on python is redundant, don't put that in. * Description is OKish. * Consistent macro usage * Correct cleaning at %install * Good %clean section * defatters in %files * %files is a bit broad. I'd rather see something more like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Byte_Compiled_Files * changelog should have a revision listed. * rpmlint output: oasa.noarch: W: no-documentation oasa.noarch: E: description-line-too-long OASA is a free python library for manipulating and analyzing chemical structures. oasa.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.12.5 ['0.12.5-1.fc11', '0.12.5-1'] oasa.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 3) ** SUMMARY ** Fix license, report unlicensed files to upstream Fix name Fix summary Fix Requires Potentially fix %files Fix rpmlint output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132128.mBDLS2Mf009687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 16:28:01 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461619] Review Request: system-switch-displaymanager - A display manager switcher for GDM, KDM, XDM and WDM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132136.mBDLaQG3011094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461619 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #13 from Ngo Than 2008-12-13 16:36:25 EDT --- it's build in f9/f10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:49:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132149.mBDLnska012650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(rakesh.pandit at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 16:49:53 EDT --- * python define correct * Name/Summary/Group/URL all correct * Buildroot def is fine * Builds Ok in mock * License is wrong, there are multiple licenses in this package, due to various image files. BSD 3-clause, Eclipse Public License, LGPL, GPLv2 Many files in enthought/traits/protocols/ have no license headers, and are in fact from a different project, PyProtocols Many files in enthought/traits/tests/ have no license headers enthought/traits/ui/editors_gen.py is licensed under GPLv2(thus +) MANY things in examples/ have no license information Most things in integrationtests/ have no license information * buildroot is sane * %prep,%build,%files,%clean all seem fine * %files OK * changelog OK * rpmlint output: python-Traits.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/traits/ctraits.so 0775 python-Traits.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/traits/protocols/_speedups.so 0775 ** SUMMARY ** This needs a close examination of the licenses of the files and a correct License field. Permissions need to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 21:59:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132159.mBDLxnjf014184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 16:59:48 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 22:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132200.mBDM0UuP014574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-13 17:00:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > 1/ during the rpmbuild the warnings about file listed twice http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html > 2/ rear.spec not in correct permission mode Use chmod to switch the permission before you use rpmbuild locally, then the warning will go away. One remark... - leave contrib in %doc away. On a RPM based system it's not interesting how to build stuff for a gentoo system. Did you find a sponsor in the meantime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 22:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132207.mBDM7lLp015605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-13 17:07:46 EDT --- * Python define good * Source0 is a 404 * Commented out %doc isn't likely commented out. You need %%doc * MANY files lack license header info * PKG-INFO lists the license as UNKNOWN, there is no fallback for unlicensed files. * Some files are licensed under MIT /and/ GPL * rpmlint output: python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: no-documentation python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/images/._fhbg.gif python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._ie.css python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._images python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/images/._wbg.gif python-tw-jquery.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/javascript/validate/demo/captcha/images/.htaccess python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._flexigrid.css 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. ** SUMMARY ** Needs a license audit. Needs an updates Source rpmlint issues need accounting for or fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 22:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132224.mBDMO1q8001134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny 2008-12-13 17:24:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py-0.9.2-5.fc10.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Dec 12 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.9.2-5 - Add patch from trunk fixing a subversion 1.5 problem (pylib issue66). - Don't replace doctest compat module (pylib issue67). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 22:30:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476385] New: Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476385 Summary: Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/pycrypto.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/pycrypto-2.0.1-1.20081213git510428c.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a collection of both secure hash functions (such as MD5 and SHA), and various encryption algorithms (AES, DES, IDEA, RSA, ElGamal, etc.). The package is structured to make adding new modules easy. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=996990 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 22:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] New: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-verilog.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-verilog-3.044-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides functions to support writing utilities that use the Verilog language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 23:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132308.mBDN8h6p023982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(henriquecsj at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #3 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-13 18:08:42 EDT --- Hello, Jesse, thanks for reviewing the package. * Fix license, report unlicensed files to upstream - DONE and I already warned Beda about the files without license. * Fix name - DONE * Fix summary - DONE * Fix Requires - DONE * Potentially fix %files - I still have little experience in packaging, I hope I have done correctly this time. * Fix rpmlint output - rpmlint is no longer showing any errors. SPEC - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/python-oasa.spec SRPM - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 23:22:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] New: Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 Summary: Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: vhd2vl is a VHDL to Verilog translation program. It targets the translation of synthetisable RTL. While far from complete it supports a useful subset of VHDL, sufficient for complex designs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 23:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812132353.mBDNr7JG031283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 18:53:06 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this and sponsor you... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 00:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140013.mBE0DPWc017932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 19:13:25 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: cbba81a5b47b811dafd897cd7bd72dee usbmon-5.2.tar.gz cbba81a5b47b811dafd897cd7bd72dee usbmon-5.2.tar.gz.orig See below - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: A few general comments, unrelated to the packaging and thus moot for the review, but I thought I would mention them: - You have your upstream url as your people.redhat.com page. Perhaps it would be good to use a fedorahosted.org site for this? That way you get bug tracking/mailing lists/vcs repo, etc. See: https://fedorahosted.org/web/new - You might add a note about the license version to the .c file. No big deal since it's mentioned other places and is clearly your intent, but just to be paranoid. ;) Now, on to issues about the package: 1. I have no idea on the ExcludeArch. Does s390 have usb? In any case it's not a blocker here as Fedora doesn't have s390 as a primary arch. You might ask the s390 list? I don't see any other blockers here, this is a very simple package, and is APPROVED. Go ahead and continue the process from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account If you have any questions don't hesitate to contact me via bugzilla, email, or on irc (nirik on freenode). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 01:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140129.mBE1Ths2012725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 01:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140129.mBE1TgZU012674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks| |177841, 452413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 02:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476385] Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140208.mBE28Sb3018199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476385 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mads at kiilerich.com --- Comment #1 from Mads Kiilerich 2008-12-13 21:08:27 EDT --- This is already packaged in the python-crypto package. The upstream project has just moved from amk.ca to dlitz.net. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 02:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476385] Review Request: pycrypto - The Python Cryptography Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140225.mBE2Pr3R004935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476385 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-13 21:25:52 EDT --- Ah, thanks. Closing then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 02:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140252.mBE2q34J024505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #17 from Jerry Amundson 2008-12-13 21:52:01 EDT --- [root at walnut ~]# rpm -Uvh --test ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-common-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-client-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-libs-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm ~jerry/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/samba4-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 file /usr/bin/ntlm_auth from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 file /usr/bin/wbinfo from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 file /usr/lib/libnss_winbind.so from install of samba4-winbind-4.0.0-0.6.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386 conflicts with file from package samba-winbind-0:3.2.5-0.23.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 03:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140303.mBE33EO4026314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-13 22:03:13 EDT --- There are some missing BR: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'CP=/bin/cp -p' PREFIX=/usr %Error: 'flex' must be installed to build %Error: 'bison' must be installed to build %Error: Exiting due to above missing dependencies. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pdWnhE (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pdWnhE (%build) And according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the license tag should be either Artistic(clarified) or Artistic 2.0, just "Artistic" is not valid. At the first glance, you should use Artistic(clarified) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 03:26:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140326.mBE3QVUH013818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 03:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140342.mBE3gt8p015771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-13 22:42:54 EDT --- please either use parallel build or make a note about it being non-functional in the spec. Anyway, mock build fails: + /usr/bin/make -C src make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/vhd2vl/src' flex -i vhd2vl.l bison -d -v -t vhd2vl.y gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -m tune=generic -O -g -o vhd2vl lex.yy.c vhd2vl.tab.c -lfl lex.yy.c: In function 'yylex': vhd2vl.l:144: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result vhd2vl.l: At top level: lex.yy.c:1670: warning: 'yyunput' defined but not used lex.yy.c:1713: warning: 'input' defined but not used vhd2vl.y: In function 'yyparse': vhd2vl.y:850: error: expected ';' before '}' token vhd2vl.y:851: error: expected ';' before '}' token vhd2vl.y:1389: error: expected ';' before '}' token make: *** [vhd2vl] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/vhd2vl/src' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14SfcI (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14SfcI (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:14:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140414.mBE4EbCf020171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-13 23:14:35 EDT --- Yeah, not sure what to do about the library. File conflicts in other samba4 subpackages were all binaries, which I resolved by simply appending a '4' to the name. Ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:16:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140416.mBE4G8C8004764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #19 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-13 23:16:06 EDT --- Note, the samba4-winbind subpackage isn't needed by OpenChange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:33:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476398] New: Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Summary: Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/eclib.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/eclib-20080310-1.p7.fc9.src.rpm Description: John Cremona's programs for enumerating and computating with elliptic curves defined over the rational numbers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140445.mBE4jLw6008870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 23:45:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140447.mBE4lNRS024984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 23:47:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140454.mBE4ssbe025907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 23:54:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140451.mBE4pQSq025667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 23:51:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140501.mBE51wTb011441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:01:57 EDT --- Does this really need to go into F9/F10? Thats going to be a lot of churn to change all the fonts packages in stable reases. Or do you see new fonts using them going into those releases? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 04:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140457.mBE4vjLb010613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-13 23:57:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:05:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140505.mBE55eTq012127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:05:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140503.mBE53Vr1011651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:03:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:07:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:07:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476025] Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140507.mBE57EAO028182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476025 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:07:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140510.mBE5A56Q012804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:10:03 EDT --- Sorry, a devel branch is always created. Please follow the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife procedure for that branch. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:15:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475775] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous Berkeley DB access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140515.mBE5Flo2029543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:15:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140513.mBE5DtP1013229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:13:54 EDT --- Spot: care to make sure FE-Legal should be ok to remove here? I will process cvs once thats done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140518.mBE5IVAV029813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:18:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140516.mBE5Gt9e029674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:16:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:18:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140518.mBE5IWGB013966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 --- Comment #7 from Pete Zaitcev 2008-12-14 00:18:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > - You have your upstream url as your people.redhat.com page. > Perhaps it would be good to use a fedorahosted.org site for this? > That way you get bug tracking/mailing lists/vcs repo, etc. > See: https://fedorahosted.org/web/new I hoped to get by, because thus far usbmon only received 3 patches from external contributors. It's a very simple, even trivial tool. But I'll keep this in mind, especially if they come out once they see it packaged. > - You might add a note about the license version to the .c file. > No big deal since it's mentioned other places and is clearly your intent, > but just to be paranoid. ;) How about I do it in 5.3, so as not to invalidate the approval of 5.2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:25:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140525.mBE5P4f4015140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:25:02 EDT --- Humm... the README.txt contains: " // License GPL V.3 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html)" Which sure sounds like the license tag should be GPLv3 here, not GPLv3+ In any case it might be good to clarify that before importing and building? cvs done, but please clarify before importing. (F-8 branches are no longer accepted, so this was left out). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140528.mBE5SIWs031340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:28:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140535.mBE5ZUx9032637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:35:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140536.mBE5aoiw016856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:36:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140535.mBE5Z5K4016634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-14 00:35:04 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475972] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140533.mBE5XZ7Z016255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475972 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:33:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:40:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:40:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140540.mBE5eVCE000895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #47 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:40:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:38:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140538.mBE5cKrL016988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:38:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434583] Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140539.mBE5d1Cs017046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434583 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:39:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 05:42:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:42:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140542.mBE5gifp001042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 00:42:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 06:04:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451302] Review Request: kopete-bonjour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140604.mBE64J5j004019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451302 Tejas Dinkar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 06:06:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140606.mBE66urV021063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 06:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476351] Review Request: palp - A Package for Analyzing Lattice Polytopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140606.mBE66C47021014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476351 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-14 01:06:11 EDT --- Built in rawhide. Closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997464 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 06:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:40:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140640.mBE6ej4l026018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 01:40:44 EDT --- >I hoped to get by, because thus far usbmon only received 3 patches >from external contributors. It's a very simple, even trivial tool. >But I'll keep this in mind, especially if they come out once they >see it packaged. Yeah, may be more overhead than needed now, but something to consider. > How about I do it in 5.3, so as not to invalidate the approval of 5.2? If you want to post a updated spec/src.rpm, I would be happy to look it over. Or you can just import it with that change... thats fine as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 06:45:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140645.mBE6jA9O009861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #11 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-14 01:45:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > What is actual state of packaging this? > > I really want it in F10 and I can help if it is needed. I think we're waiting for the reviewer to approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 06:55:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140655.mBE6t53e011329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Pete Zaitcev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Pete Zaitcev 2008-12-14 01:55:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: usbmon Short Description: The front-end for usbmon Owners: zaitcev Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: zaitcev -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 07:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140700.mBE70kvr012343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 02:00:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 08:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] New: Review Request: bullet - 3D Game Multiphysics Library provides collision detection, soft body and rigid body dynamics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bullet - 3D Game Multiphysics Library provides collision detection, soft body and rigid body dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Summary: Review Request: bullet - 3D Game Multiphysics Library provides collision detection, soft body and rigid body dynamics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno.mahe at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hi, This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. Spec URL: http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet/bullet.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet/bullet-2.73-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bullet 3D Game Multiphysics Library provides state of the art collision detection, soft body and rigid body dynamics. Thanks, Bruno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 08:30:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140830.mBE8U6VD009191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-14 03:30:05 EDT --- Er, the spec/%{name} should be qd.spec, not qd-devel.spec. You should however omit the %files section for the main package and only have one for the devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 08:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Game Multiphysics Library provides collision detection, soft body and rigid body dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140828.mBE8SkA3008770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Bruno Mahe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 08:40:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:40:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140840.mBE8e4R3010545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #20 from Alex Lancaster 2008-12-14 03:40:02 EDT --- Has this review stalled? elisa 0.5.20 is now in rawhide but has broken deps because it requires elisa-plugins-good, see bug #429590 comment #43. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 09:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812140938.mBE9cp8X022214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #12 from Felix Kaechele 2008-12-14 04:38:49 EDT --- Funny that the reviewer itself has never commented on this bug. I'd be willing to take over the review if the original reviewer doesn't want to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141001.mBEA13SV009217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-14 05:01:02 EDT --- Must I open a specific bug for that ? It's quite difficult as I don't know the real reason for that (trick with -spec was given by upstream), and I don't have a x86_64 to ealily reproduce it :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476406] New: Review Request: sympow - Special Values of Symmetric Power Elliptic Curve L-Functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sympow - Special Values of Symmetric Power Elliptic Curve L-Functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476406 Summary: Review Request: sympow - Special Values of Symmetric Power Elliptic Curve L-Functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/sympow.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/sympow-1.019-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SYMPOW is a program for computing special values of symmetric power elliptic curve L-functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476406] Review Request: sympow - Special Values of Symmetric Power Elliptic Curve L-Functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141002.mBEA2e2F009456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476406 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-14 05:02:39 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141036.mBEAaErV015360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 05:36:13 EDT --- skinlf-6.7-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/skinlf-6.7-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141035.mBEAZVDc032492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 05:35:29 EDT --- skinlf-6.7-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/skinlf-6.7-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469843] Review Request: unhide - Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141041.mBEAfr6A001151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469843 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-14 05:41:52 EDT --- Yes, I have already dropped a mail. Which check before importing or building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 10:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141043.mBEAhDtC001340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #13 from Sayamindu Dasgupta 2008-12-14 05:43:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Funny that the reviewer itself has never commented on this bug. I'd be willing > to take over the review if the original reviewer doesn't want to do so. Sorry for the delay, I have been swamped with a lot of work for the past few months. I did raise the issue regarding this package in the fedora-legal mailing list, and it looks like it is legal to redistribute the software. If you want to review the package, feel free to assign it to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 11:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141117.mBEBHMvh007663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-14 06:17:21 EDT --- Updated package: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse-0.1.0-4.20081214gitb0412bf.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 11:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475972] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI-Cache - Perl DBI connection cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141128.mBEBSUYI024706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475972 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-14 06:28:29 EDT --- Thanks. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 11:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141134.mBEBYBXD010312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 06:34:10 EDT --- bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 11:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141144.mBEBi0nK027287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 06:43:59 EDT --- bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:08:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141208.mBEC85hj031567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-14 07:08:04 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl-2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Scratch Build F-10 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141208.mBEC8VZB031604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-14 07:08:30 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-verilog.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-verilog-3.044-2.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build F-10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:19:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141219.mBECJGA6018317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 07:19:15 EDT --- libgdbus-0.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgdbus-0.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141219.mBECJD6X018290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 07:19:12 EDT --- libgdbus-0.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgdbus-0.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141256.mBECunCa024942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 07:56:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Suggestion:- > 1) Good to modify onboard.desktop file line from > Categories=GNOME;GTK;Accessibility;X-GNOME-PersonalSettings; > to > Categories=GNOME;GTK;Utility;Accessibility; > > This will make sure we have all onboard/onscreen virtual keyboards in same > category fixed. For now I'm OK with the usage of your modified files. In the trunk of onBoard are already .desktop files which will be shipped with the next release, I guess. > 2) This package built successfully by removing > BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel This is needed for the generation of the egg. It's mentioned in the guidelines > BuildRequires: gettext I will leave it in place because as soon I'm able to integrate the translations it's needed. > 3) I think you don't need Requires: gnome-python2 not sure about that > though. removed Here are the new files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/onboard.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/onboard-0.91.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] New: Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Summary: Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/assogiate.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/assogiate-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.kdau.com/projects/assogiate/ Description: assoGiate allows users to modify the detection and display of file types. It is compliant with the freedesktop.org Shared MIME Info and Icon Theme specifications. The standard file types can be modified, and additional file types can be added and removed. The file type detection based on filenames, file contents, and XML root elements can be specified. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997883 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint assogiate* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint assogiate-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 12:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192164] Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141257.mBECvOe7025046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192164 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-14 07:57:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Socket6 Owners: robert wtogami jpo Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 13:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141311.mBEDB3Ht028015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 08:11:02 EDT --- The license is LGPLv3+. Upstream updated the license. Here are the new files. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping-1.3.4-3.fc9.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=997919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 14:32:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141432.mBEEWLsB025214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #25 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-14 09:32:19 EDT --- Lifted FE-Legal, sorry. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 14:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471041] Review Request: diffpdf - PDF files comparator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141449.mBEEneqS027841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471041 Rafa? Psota changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Rafa? Psota 2008-12-14 09:49:39 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 15:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141508.mBEF8cXv031267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Schlomo Schapiro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at schlomo.schapiro.org --- Comment #14 from Schlomo Schapiro 2008-12-14 10:08:36 EDT --- Hi, I am - together with Gratien - the main developer of Relax and Recover. I am currently trying to find a sponsor, is there anything else missing so far? A few notes about the issues mentioned above from a ReaR design point of view: 1) ReaR brings along the empty filesystem of a mini linux distribution (no binaries) which is the reason for the empty files and symlinks pointing nowhere. As part of the ReaR process to create the rescue media this empty filesystem is filled in with components from the current linux system to create a functioning mini linux rescue system. Is there a way to get along with the empty files and dead symlinks? 2) ReaR does not have a -devel package and - by design - always contains the entire distribution. That is why you will also find .deb and gentoo files as part of every ReaR installation so that any user can package his/her (modified) version of ReaR without installing any additional tools. Since ReaR is written entirely in Bash there is no platform or distribution dependency beyond what ReaR is already doing internally. Of course we could leave these under /usr/share/rear and not copy them to %doc. Kind regards, Schlomo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 15:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476025] Review Request: mythes-ga - Irish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141521.mBEFLvkx018615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476025 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 16:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141651.mBEGpRlT031677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-14 11:51:26 EDT --- I think this package better should not own following directories /usr/share/icons/hicolor /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ instead you can add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme so yours %files will then list icon files as %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 16:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141651.mBEGpsP6013891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 11:51:52 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 16:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141653.mBEGrOIh031843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 11:53:24 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 16:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141658.mBEGweR2014763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 11:58:39 EDT --- Thanks Bryan Here are the new files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak-9-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 17:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141729.mBEHTOgc018968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 12:29:22 EDT --- Sill no action for upstream about the open issues. I still hope that the upstream of this sugar activity is not as dead as 80% of the all activities. Last action in the repo is two months ago. Bug report is open for 5 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 17:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141729.mBEHTudK004418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-14 12:29:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ldtp Short Description: Desktop testing framework Owners: rishi Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 18:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476435] New: Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Summary: Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-60-1.fc10.src.rpm Project website: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Record Description: Record is the basic rich-media capture activity for the laptop. It lets you capture still images, video, and/or audio. It has a simple interface and works in both laptop and ebook mode. An interface for sharing pictures among multi XOs during a picture-taking session is a hallmark of the Record activity. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998124 [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint sugar-record-60* sugar-record.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/_camera.c sugar-record.i386: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-record.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/_camera.o sugar-record.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/_camera.so sugar-record.i386: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/_camera.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-record-60-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-record.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I guess that there will be more to do on this package because it is not noarch and the camera stuff will not work on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 18:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] New: Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Summary: Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: danken at cs.technion.ac.il QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff-0.20071020-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Latexdiff is a Perl script for visual mark up and revision of significant differences between two latex files. Various options are available for visual markup using standard latex packages such as color. Changes not directly affecting visible text, for example in formatting commands, are still marked in the latex source. A rudimentary revision facility is provided by another Perl script, latexrevise, which accepts or rejects all changes. Manual editing of the difference file can be used to override this default behaviour and accept or reject selected changes only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476324] Review Request: perl-URI-Find - Find URIs in plain text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141909.mBEJ9fPK019344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476324 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476160] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141909.mBEJ9c58019302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:09:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] New: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module defines the complete grammar needed to parse any VHDL code. By overloading this grammar, it is possible to easily create perl scripts which run through VHDL code and perform specific functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141912.mBEJCaLN020011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-12-14 14:12:36 EDT --- I have uploaded the SRPM again. I hope, it's works fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:19:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141919.mBEJJqa4002854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141916.mBEJGrcj002621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #21 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-14 14:16:52 EDT --- When trying to edit flags, I now see the fedora-cvs one. However, the combobox s grey, and I can't put the question mark in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:19:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141919.mBEJJpxX002813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |187317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:23:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141923.mBEJN6SL003641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 --- Comment #39 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-14 14:23:01 EDT --- I have made available a mindi-busybox package (Cf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141935.mBEJZrqv023506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Victor Bogado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 19:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812141939.mBEJdsrO023826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #14 from Victor Bogado 2008-12-14 14:39:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: puzzles Short Description: A collection of one-player puzzle games Owners: bogado Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142014.mBEKEcKt029089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Comment #25 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-14 15:14:37 EDT --- Boo! SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/kBuild.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/kBuild-0.1.4-1.el5.src.rpm * Builds in fedora-devel-i386 * RPMlint silent * If you type "google" into google, you'll break the internets! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142022.mBEKMwcX030408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 15:22:57 EDT --- * Sun Dec 14 2008 Fabian Affolter - 0-0.4.20081214svn - Updated from revision 307 to revision 315 SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.4.20081214svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142028.mBEKSJII013011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller 2008-12-14 15:28:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: terminator Short Description: Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window Owners: ianweller Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142038.mBEKcglA032725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-14 15:38:41 EDT --- [x]source files match upstream: 95aab98d316ce5289e80840301da7dea8f7fffc4931506afaf092aec1c063fe3 Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12.tar.gz [x]package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [x]specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [x]dist tag is present. [x]build root is correct. [x]license field matches the actual license. [x]license is open source-compatible. [x]latest version is being packaged. [x]BuildRequires are proper. [x]compiler flags are appropriate. [x]%clean is present. [x]package builds in mock. package installs properly. NO, you need to add find . -type f | xargs %{__perl} -pi -e 's|#! /bin/perl|#! /usr/bin/perl|' to your spec file, the script are looking for perl in /bin/perl and it will not install because rpm want a package that provides /bin/perl. When I added this to the spec file after %setup it is happy. [x]rpmlint is silent. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x]%check is present and all tests pass: Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nopDDm + umask 022 + cd /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12 + unset DISPLAY + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..2 ok 1 Test 2 OK [x]no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [x]no duplicates in %files. [x]file permissions are appropriate. [x]no scriptlets present. [x]documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [x]%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Once you have made that change I will approve the package. I made it locally and it passes tests on a vhd file I made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142045.mBEKjbS9015725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-14 15:45:36 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142049.mBEKn892001514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-14 15:49:08 EDT --- Ok it installs clean now I, APPROVE. Feel free to submit your CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142057.mBEKv9qK002836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-14 15:57:09 EDT --- Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 20:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142056.mBEKuTLw002781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-14 15:56:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser Short Description: Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 21:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142101.mBEL182k003548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 16:01:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this package better should not own following directories > /usr/share/icons/hicolor > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ > instead you can add > Requires: hicolor-icon-theme > > so yours %files will then list icon files as > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/* Thanks, changed and 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme' added Updated files are here: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/assogiate.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 21:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142110.mBELAKYn005107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 21:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142122.mBELMdpc021190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 21:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142122.mBELMdXr021210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 21:22:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] New: Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Summary: Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A Vregs object contains a documentation "package" containing enumerations, definitions, classes, and registers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 22:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142259.mBEMxfoA002136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-14 17:59:40 EDT --- [x]source files match upstream: ea8145aa33a10874007187e628cc90805b4c29d8cd57bbed024abb1dc4a0a308 SystemC-Vregs-1.460.tar.gz [x]package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [x]specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [x]dist tag is present. build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) [FAIL]license field matches the actual license. It is GPL+ not LGPL according to the webpage and README this also results in rpmlint errors [x]license is open source-compatible. [x]latest version is being packaged. [x]BuildRequires are proper. [x]compiler flags are appropriate. [x]%clean is present. package builds in mock. I would have to set my own repo up to do this because of a require still being under review. [FAIL]package installs properly. You will need to include the SystemC-Vregs-1.460/t/ folder for the examples that you include to run. [x]debuginfo package looks complete. [FAIL]rpmlint is silent. perl-SystemC-Vregs.src: W: invalid-license LGPL+ perl-SystemC-Vregs.src: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/03_spaces.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/25_vregshdrs.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/30_cbitfields.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/20_vregsparse.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/10_language.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/50_gcc_hdr.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/55_gcc_info.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/60_gcc_vderegs.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/00_pod.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/05_number.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/01_manifest.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/02_help.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/51_gcc_str.t perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL+ perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/25_vregshdrs.t perl(Config) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/00_pod.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/01_manifest.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/02_help.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/03_spaces.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/05_number.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/10_language.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/20_vregsparse.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/25_vregshdrs.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/30_cbitfields.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/50_gcc_hdr.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/51_gcc_str.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/55_gcc_info.t perl(Test) perl-SystemC-Vregs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460/examples/60_gcc_vderegs.t perl(Test) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 31 warnings. do you really need these in there? It is OK, but discouraged, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 as an example. [x]final provides and requires are sane: [makerpm at laptop SPECS]$ rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(SystemC::Vregs) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Bit) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Define) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Define::Value) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Enum) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Enum::Value) perl(SystemC::Vregs::File) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::Assembler) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::C) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::CPP) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::Gas) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::Lisp) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::Perl) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::Tcl) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::Verilog) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language::XML) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Number) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::CBitFields) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Class) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Defines) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Hash) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Info) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Latex) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Layout) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Param) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Register) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Rules) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Subclass) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::TableExtract) = 1.460 perl(SystemC::Vregs::Type) = 1.460 perl(Vregs) perl-SystemC-Vregs = 1.460-1.fc10 [makerpm at laptop SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/noarch/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460-1.fc10.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Bit::Vector) perl(Bit::Vector::Overload) perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Basename) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(HTML::TableExtract) perl(HTML::TableExtract) perl(IO::File) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(SystemC::Vregs) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Bit) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Define) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Enum) perl(SystemC::Vregs::File) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Language) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Number) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::CBitFields) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Class) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Defines) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Hash) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Info) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Latex) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Layout) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Output::Param) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Register) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Rules) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Subclass) perl(SystemC::Vregs::TableExtract) perl(SystemC::Vregs::Type) perl(Test) perl(Verilog::Language) perl(Verilog::Language) >= 2.1 perl(base) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 [x]%check is present and all tests pass: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00_cleanhtml......ok t/00_pod............ok t/01_manifest.......ok t/02_help...........ok t/03_spaces.........ok t/05_number.........ok t/10_language.......ok t/20_vregsparse.....ok t/25_vregshdrs......ok t/30_cbitfields.....ok t/50_gcc_hdr........ok t/51_gcc_str........ok t/55_gcc_info.......ok t/60_gcc_vderegs....1/3 In file included from 60_gcc_vderegs.cpp:14: ../examples/include/vderegs.cpp:30:31: error: readline/readline.h: No such file or directory ../examples/include/vderegs.cpp:31:30: error: readline/history.h: No such file or directory In file included from 60_gcc_vderegs.cpp:14: ../examples/include/vderegs.cpp: In member function ?std::string VDeregs::getLine(const char*)?: ../examples/include/vderegs.cpp:151: error: ?readline? was not declared in this scope t/60_gcc_vderegs....ok All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=148, 9 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr 0.04 sys + 6.01 cusr 0.63 csys = 6.84 CPU) Result: PASS The little hickup in the middle is ok, as it does not keep it from passing and is do to a two files that are example files no longer included. [x]owns the directories it creates. [x]doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [x]no duplicates in %files. [x]file permissions are appropriate. see rpmlint section [x]no scriptlets present. [x]code, not content. [x]documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [x]%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [x]no headers. [x]no pkgconfig files. [x]no libtool .la droppings. Once these are fixed I will do another review for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 23:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476406] Review Request: sympow - Special Values of Symmetric Power Elliptic Curve L-Functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142345.mBENjj2J009503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476406 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-14 18:45:45 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/sympow.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/sympow-1.019-2.fc9.src.rpm I just fixed the launcher script to be multilibs-safe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 23:58:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812142358.mBENwm6d028795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 18:58:47 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pytagger-0.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150000.mBF00Taf029240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-14 19:00:29 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pytagger-0.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150009.mBF09iex012732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-14 19:09:43 EDT --- Koji scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:12:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150012.mBF0CL4q013283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #21 from Bruno Cornec 2008-12-14 19:12:19 EDT --- I'll try to contact someone I know at Sun to see if he can help me with this. Will let you know how it progresses. I'd like to wait a bit before closing it here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:22:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:22:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150022.mBF0M4F5032112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-14 19:22:04 EDT --- This is due to Patch0: mumbles-sitedir.patch ... %prep %setup -q -n mumbles-%{version} %patch -p1 needs to be %patch0 -p1 ^ or even better: %patch0 -p1 -b .sitedir Backing up patched files is useful for debugging patch problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:30:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150030.mBF0UQl2016259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #20 from David Robinson 2008-12-14 19:30:24 EDT --- Doesn't this need a "BuildRequires: python-devel"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150032.mBF0WpsP016495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #8 from David Robinson 2008-12-14 19:32:49 EDT --- Doesn't this also need a "BuildRequires: autoconf sysconftool automake libtool flex zlib-devel bison"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 00:39:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] New: Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Summary: Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stuart at gathman.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter.spec SRPM URL: http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a python extension module to enable python scripts to attach to sendmail's libmilter functionality. Additional python modules provide for navigating and modifying MIME parts (adds to email package), and sending DSNs or doing CBVs. This is the first Fedora package I am submitting myself. Other packages of mine have been submitted by jafo at tummy.com (Sean Reifschneider). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 01:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150105.mBF15bqu021410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Stuart D Gathman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 01:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150110.mBF1AiDc022238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-14 20:10:43 EDT --- Right, SAGE just puts the headers into /usr/include/symmetrica and builds the sources into a libsymmetrica.a. We want to do the same so we can link SAGE against it (and that's what the specfile does). The lack of a Makefile sucks, but I don't see it as a blocker, as the instructions to build it are fairly simple. The license mentioned in the specfile is actually MIT, not BSD. That's pretty close to public domain. Either way, the license is definitely acceptable for Fedora, it matters only for the text to write into the License tag. I'd suggest just going with License: MIT. Making something truely public domain isn't allowed under German copyright law (Urheberrechtsgesetz), which I assume is why the MIT X11 license was used instead. But of course clarification can't hurt if we can get it. As for the warnings, I can try to fix them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 02:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150207.mBF27epC014974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-14 21:07:39 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jcalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for the comments! Everything has been addressed in the new version. The given script for preserving the timestamp while remove all \r didn't work but I got the idea and was able to come up with this: %{__sed} -i.tmp 's/\r//' jcalendar-license.txt touch -r jcalendar-license.txt.tmp jcalendar-license.txt This does what was intended I think...and is even a little bit shorter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 02:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150233.mBF2XOTX019148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-14 21:33:20 EDT --- >rpmlint on SRPM: > >spamassassin.src:37: W: redundant-prefix-tag >The Prefix tag is uselessly defined as %{_prefix} in your spec file. It should >be removed, as it is redundant with rpm defaults. Removed. >spamassassin.src:72: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes perl-Mail-SpamAssassin >The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all >older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update >problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it >was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if >possible. > >Fix. Well, the problem here is that upsteam uses that package name. So, if someone installs the upstream rpms, then decides to upgrade to the fedora one, without this they will get a confusing mix. ;( >spamassassin.src:101: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL >DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/ SYSCONFDIR=%{_sysconfdir} INSTALLDIRS=vendor >ENABLE_SSL=yes < /dev/null >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will >break short circuiting. > >There may be a good reason for this. Is there? It's not clear to me where it is using the build root. It's setting DESTDIR to it, but it shouldn't be using it. Will dig more, but ideas welcome. >spamassassin.src:542: W: macro-in-%changelog postun >Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to >the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that >affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in >possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd >entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in >%changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Fixed. >spamassassin.src:580: W: macro-in-%changelog post >Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to >the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that >affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in >possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd >entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in >%changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Fixed. >spamassassin.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 135, tab: line >108) >The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic >annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. At least that instance fixed up. ;) >spamassassin.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Spam filter for email which can be >invoked from mail delivery agents. >Summary ends with a dot. > >Fix. Fixed. >spamassassin.src: W: strange-permission spamassassin-helper.sh 0755 >A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. >Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > >Fix, or document in spec. It's a shell script that runs and shows the exit code (spam/notspam). I guess I can add a comment that it's expected to be executable. >rpmlint on RPMS: > >spamassassin.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update >Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/. > >Fix, if it won't be too catastrophic. Well, it's not spamassassin itself that logs anything, it's the daily sa-update job that pulls updates to rules. I think it makes more sense to leave it as sa-update since thats the command that generates the logs. >spamassassin.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update >A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a >configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration >files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. > >Fix. Good catch. Fixed. >spamassassin.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file >/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin-helper.sh >Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent >upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an >executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. > >???? Humm. Not sure why thats marked as config. No one should ever change it. Sadly, thats generated the file that the make process generates. It might need a patch or getting upstream to fix it. >spamassassin.i386: E: non-readable /etc/cron.d/sa-update 0600 >The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security >reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of >exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you >installed rpmlint from the source tarball). > >Probably OK. This makes little sense to me. I would expect 644 here. Perhaps Warren can chime in with a reason for 600 ? >spamassassin.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm >/usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 0744 >A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this >message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files >included in your package. > >Fix or document. I suppose this is due to it not making much sense to run as non root but yet, it's fine it anyone looks at it. Will document. >spamassassin.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file >/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin >Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent >upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an >executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. > >Fix. Fixed. >spamassassin.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Spam filter for email which can be >invoked from mail delivery agents. >Summary ends with a dot. Fixed. >spamassassin.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided perl-Mail-SpamAssassin >If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package >must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause >unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a >compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. See above. >spamassassin.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag >/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin >A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A >way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: >%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here Fixed above by making it not a config file. >spamassassin.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post cp This is so that updates with old config file options that are no longer supported will get updated. I don't see any easy way around it. >spamassassin.i386: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin >In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' >entry, which is necessary for good functionality. spamd doesn't have any functionality to do a reload without just restarting as far as I know. >Otherwise, full review looks good, no other blockers. Ok. new spec: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/spamassassin.spec diff against old: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/spamassassin.diff scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998690 Warren is going to look it over as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 02:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150241.mBF2fNsJ003247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |red at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-14 21:41:22 EDT --- rpmlint output when run on the resulting RPMs: evolution-mapi.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libexchangemapi-1.0.so.0.0.0 evolution-mapi.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libexchangemapi-1.0.so.0.0.0 evolution-mapi.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/evolution-mapi-0.1/NEWS evolution-mapi.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag evolution-mapi-debuginfo.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag evolution-mapi-devel.i386: W: no-documentation evolution-mapi-devel.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 1 warnings. the no-changelogname-tag errors seem to be fixed in the spec file linked above, but not in the spec file that is included in the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 02:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150254.mBF2saEq022516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |red at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-14 21:54:34 EDT --- rpmlint output for the SRPM: openchange.src:132: W: macro-in-%changelog post openchange.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 8) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint output for the resulting RPMs: openchange.i386: W: no-documentation openchange.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libmapi.so.0.8 openchange.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libmapi.so.0.8 openchange.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libocpf.so.0.8 openchange.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libocpf.so.0.8 openchange.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libmapiadmin.so.0.8 openchange.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libmapiadmin.so.0.8 openchange.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:0.8-0.3.svn960.fc9 ['0.8-0.3.svn909.fc10', '0.8-0.3.svn909'] openchange.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmapi.so.0.8 exit at GLIBC_2.0 openchange.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libocpf.so.0.8 exit at GLIBC_2.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 03:32:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] New: Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Summary: Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: This is a guide, written in Publican, describing Linux Security implementation. This is my first package and I will need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 03:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150335.mBF3Z5YR029218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 03:57:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] New: Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 Summary: Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john5342 at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ebook-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ebook-tools-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats. scratch-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998726 This package besides a couple of utilities includes libepub which provides support for the epub document format for okular. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 04:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150415.mBF4F780003731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |belegdol at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-14 23:15:07 EDT --- Added Bastien and Julian to CC since they are the last known maintainers. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 04:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150412.mBF4Ck1W003284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com, | |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-14 23:12:45 EDT --- I reviewed this package. It surely needs some work: * Can bug #459365 be closed now? * gawk is among the default package set and hence doesn't need to be BR'd. * The BR perl-XML-Parser >= 2.31-16 is not used at all and can be removed. Am I wrong? * rpmlint says: shared-mime-info.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/shared-mime-info.pc Is there a valid reason why this file is not in a -devel package? Also, from the guidelines: "Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability)." shared-mime-info.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2 shared-mime-info.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 I believe that these explicit R's can be dropped since rpmbuild itself picks up these dependencies. * Group tag is "System Environment/Libraries" but I don't see a library in this package. * What is wrong with the locale files in the tarball? (A more detailed explanation as a comment within the SPEC file please.) Also, assuming you have a legitimate reason to remove these files, why are you BR'ing gettext? * The files ChangeLog, HACKING and most importantly COPYING need to be listed under %doc. * Macros should be used consistently. If you want to use %{__rm} notation, use macros for the other commands as well (%{__cat}, %{__make}, etc.). OR do it the other way around. But please stay consistent. * Buildroot should be one of these: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root * According to the COPYING and test-tree-magic.c files, the license tag should be GPLv2+ * The main source file (Source0) should be given in full URL. * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. * About the defaults.list: Can't we provide a separate list for KDE users? This may need some hacking on the source code. * See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo for correct usage of the snippet. It's interesting to see that the very package that this guideline is based on doesn't obey the guideline itself (at least, partially). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 04:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] New: Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-filesystem.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-filesystem-1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the base filesystem layout for all Fedora python-zope-* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 04:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150441.mBF4fxjm008297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.e | |u --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-14 23:41:58 EDT --- Note: this must be non-noarch because python_sitearch's location varies depending on the arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:10:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150510.mBF5A6x3028328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #15 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-15 00:10:05 EDT --- The problems issued by rpmbuild /var/tmp/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.9 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf means that in your %files section, the above mentioned two files are specified twice. I did not look over the spec, but may times this warning is caused by including once the directory and a second time a specific file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:11:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150511.mBF5BpjD028681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #10 from Jerry Amundson 2008-12-15 00:11:50 EDT --- On rawhide, I see this: $ rpmlint Download/openchange-0.8-0.3.svn909.fc10.src.rpm /usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:16: DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess module. import popen2 openchange.src:132: W: macro-in-%changelog post openchange.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 8) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150519.mBF5Jwgn029936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Bartlett 2008-12-15 00:19:56 EDT --- I will note that while it might not help with packaging, it is the intention of the Samba Team to only have one wbinfo and one nss_winbind, which will talk to either Samba3 or Samba4's winbindd (ie, share a protocol). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:25:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150525.mBF5Pmvu015896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 00:25:46 EDT --- + is OK - Needs work Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998757 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 30cc5c89f9bfeffaf50e366ee309c7fc assogiate-0.2.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + scrollkeeper and gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150525.mBF5Prdr015921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 00:25:52 EDT --- + is OK - Needs work Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998755 - rpmlint is silent for RPM. But Not for SRPM. onboard.src: W: strange-permission onboard.spec 0666 ==> easy to fix. + source files match upstream. 6e0dde122c50dcdfc27fe32b714edf3f onboard-0.91.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop files installed correctly. + Followed python guidelines. + GUI app. Suggestions:- You can ask upstream to include/modify .desktop files as used in this package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150529.mBF5TEc6016329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-15 00:29:13 EDT --- I'd say that the version number is not correct. Nowhere in the scripts or on the website do I see any reference to 20071020. OTOH there are references as "Version 0.42 November 06 Bug fixes only" (in the script) and "Version 0.5" (on the main web page of the project) License is not correct. The website claims GPLv2+ but the scripts themselves include: # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License Version 2 as published by # the Free Software Foundation. This clearly makes them GPLv2 (not GPLv2+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:41:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150541.mBF5f7LR018443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-15 00:41:06 EDT --- Source0 should follow the guidelines described at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150538.mBF5cWZf017834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 00:38:31 EDT --- 1) Buildroot should be from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag 2) defattr usage should be %defattr(-,root,root, -) 3) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install 4) Also, in Changelog use %%post instead of %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150547.mBF5lK3Y001926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 00:47:19 EDT --- Please also submit updates request for F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150548.mBF5mOFH019530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-15 00:48:23 EDT --- before I start a review, would you mind updating to the latest release (1.3.5) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150601.mBF61Nlf021974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #22 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-15 01:01:21 EDT --- What about libnss_winbind.so, is that also compatible with Samba3? If so, perhaps we should just disable the samba4-winbind subpackage until we move to Samba4 officially? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150612.mBF6C2om006027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 473718 depends on bug 476160, which changed state. Bug 476160 Summary: Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch - Self-cleaning scratch space for tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476160 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 01:12:01 EDT --- Result: FAIL Failed 1/10 test programs. 1/32 subtests failed. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150632.mBF6WBsk027025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] New: Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Summary: Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-paths/ghc-paths.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-paths/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Knowledge of GHC's installation directories. Needed by recent haddock to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:32:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150632.mBF6WTBJ027075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/pac | |kage/ghc-paths -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 07:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150719.mBF7JtUC001222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Bartlett 2008-12-15 02:19:53 EDT --- So, I should clarify: Samba4 and Samba 3.4 are being developed in the samba git repository - under a branch of 'master'. In that branch, there will be soon (I hope) a common libnss_winbind and a common wbinfo, along with many other shared things. But because this is not a stable protocol, the protocol used will be different to what Samba3 in current Fedora uses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 07:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150719.mBF7JHS6001120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 02:19:15 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (Judy) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 07:40:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150740.mBF7eo33019384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #24 from Jerry Amundson 2008-12-15 02:40:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > So, I should clarify: > > Samba4 and Samba 3.4 are being developed in the samba git repository - under a > branch of 'master'. > > In that branch, there will be soon (I hope) a common libnss_winbind and a > common wbinfo, along with many other shared things. > > But because this is not a stable protocol, the protocol used will be different > to what Samba3 in current Fedora uses. Then, logically, libnss_winbind and wbinfo, et. al, will not be "common", ergo they need to be packaged separately, or not at all, right? Put another way, do the Samba developers consider the 4.x and 3.4 as environments that can exist in parallel, or not? Either it is or it isn't. Otherwise, wouldn't the direction of this package be faulty? If one or more "shared things" are in the forecast then, it would seem, disabling it until v. 4 is "official" is the way to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 07:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150751.mBF7pMsE006188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-15 02:51:21 EDT --- Are you targeting only F10 ? Because the src.rpm from #2 still does not build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998879 Note that according to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=997866&name=build.log, "'CP' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name." and therefore your little trick to preserve timestamps when using cp is ignored. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=997866&name=perl-verilog-3.044-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm gives no less than 53 warnings in rpmlint, all of them being either "spurious-executable-perm" or "doc-file-dependency". Could you please fix that ? I do not think that bringing in perl(Test) or perl(Data::Dumper) is a good idea: people wanting to run the tests could install the dependencies manually. A more delicate problem are the scripts named vpm and vppp. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace , commands whose names are shorter than 5 letters should be avoided. Fortunately vpm does not seem to conflict with anything, but vppp is also the name of the Virtual PPP project by packagestorm and is also used by http://www.linux-kheops.com/pub/vppp/vpppGB.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 08:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226277] Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150829.mBF8Tgbr012688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226277 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 03:29:41 EDT --- This package is needed in EPEL-{4,5} for perl-Satcon. I can maintain it for EPEL, if you don't want it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 08:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150835.mBF8ZQMh028927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-15 03:35:25 EDT --- Are you targeting only F10 ? rawhide build still fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998903 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 08:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226277] Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150844.mBF8iPhk030354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226277 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 03:44:23 EDT --- Hm false alarm. This package have branches for RHEL, but it wasn't included into comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 08:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150849.mBF8neLo016085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 03:49:39 EDT --- guiloader-2.13.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guiloader-2.13.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 08:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150852.mBF8qJCg031858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 03:52:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: assogiate Short Description: Editor for the file types database Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150903.mBF935kj019400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150911.mBF9BK3K004040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150906.mBF96U66003092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 04:06:29 EDT --- Thank you. BR was added. Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor/perl-Class-XSAccessor-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998951 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:17:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150917.mBF9Ha50005724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 04:17:35 EDT --- Many thanks for the review. The .desktop files are already present in the trunk of the upstream VCS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150918.mBF9IrMu005978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 04:18:53 EDT --- oops s/now/not -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150918.mBF9IwP4006007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 04:18:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: onboard Short Description: Simple on-screen Keyboard Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150918.mBF9IQEB022681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 04:18:25 EDT --- Just saw that upstream source is now downloadable and new sources are already in releases. Can you resubmit this SRPM with new source http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Class-XSAccessor-0.14.tar.gz ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150917.mBF9Hjc3022616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Fabrice Bellet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fabrice Bellet 2008-12-15 04:17:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: FlightGear-data Short Description: FlightGear base scenery and data files Owners: fabrice at bellet.info Branches: InitialCC: I'll rename this package, because upstream name changed, since version 1.99.5: ftp://ftp.de.flightgear.org/pub/fgfs/Shared/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150923.mBF9NndJ023648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #14 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-12-15 04:23:47 EDT --- Yes, this referes to osmarender / tiles-at-home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150931.mBF9VlEP025385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 04:31:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Many thanks for the review. The .desktop files are already present in the > trunk of the upstream VCS. you welcome. Here I mean upstream .desktop files are different than Fedora .desktop files now. So if you drop these .desktop files in next update for new upstream release in spec file then existing .desktop files in fedora will get overwritten. see comment#2 suggestion 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150939.mBF9dMwN026676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 04:39:21 EDT --- Now, I get the point. I will get in touch with upstream to see if they are kind enough to change the .desktop files to our needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150940.mBF9eAQ3027064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-15 04:40:09 EDT --- This is for new fonts. A lot of packagers will only work on new packages if they can import in stable release without waiting F11 time. I will actively discourage anyone who suggests converting existing F9 and F10 packages to the new templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234835] Review Request: fgfs-Atlas - Flightgear map tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150941.mBF9f1Sj027177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234835 Fabrice Bellet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Fabrice Bellet 2008-12-15 04:40:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: FlightGear-Atlas Short Description: Flightgear map tools Owners: fabrice at bellet.info Branches: InitialCC: I'd like to rename this package. The data tarball for FlightGear has been renamed to FlightGear-data recently. So I'll take this opportunity to unify the name of this other package too. With this renaming, all FlightGear related packages will have the same prefix. The upstream name of this package is 'Atlas' (http://atlas.sourceforge.net/), and another unrelated package with this name already exists in the packagedb (atlas for http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/). So this is why this move doesn't reflect an upstream project modification in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 09:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150943.mBF9h9RN011399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 04:43:09 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 10:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151000.mBFA0ViU015588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 10:11:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151011.mBFABCVw032765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 05:11:11 EDT --- Just some comments... - X-CD-Roast 0.98alpha16 released http://www.xcdroast.org/#download - Summary ends with a dot - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) - Use parallel make (make %{?_smp_mflags}) - Package doesn't consistently use macros - Please add a note because 'PREFIX=/usr' is used https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 10:14:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:14:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151014.mBFAEOP7017983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pcheung at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-15 05:14:22 EDT --- I asked on fedora-packaging about this package, and got the (grudging) response that it would be okay, *if* the bcel maintainer is also okay with it: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-December/msg00027.html The bcel maintainer seems to be Permaine Cheung -- I've added him to the CC. That aside, here's my review: * source files match upstream. 3b3d451664855b0c9aae15dd05b69bf1063d8a1d bcel-5.2-src.tar.gz patch is modified, but the differences are documented (but see below) * package meets versioning guidelines. X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. I'm not sure about this -- should it be findbugs-bcel or bcel-findbugs? * summary is OK. X description Should probably mention the findbugs aspect in the description somewhere * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license is included as %doc * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper X compiler flags are appropriate. If you're using javac directly, maybe you should use the %{_javac} macro Similarly, you can use %{_jar} instead of jar * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks good * rpmlint is silent (except for Group tags which are apparently okay) * final provides and requires are sane * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * javadoc package looks right * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. Regarding the modified patch -- the original version from findbugs seems to also create a file src/java/org/apache/bcel/classfile/AbstractLocalVariableTable.java but the modified patch in the SRPM doesn't. Is there a reason for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 10:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151039.mBFAd6Qa005671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-15 05:39:05 EDT --- modified as per comments updated spec file http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir.spec updated srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-28.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint on srpm gives ttmkfdir.src: W: no-url-tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 10:44:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151044.mBFAib1D024217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #2 from Dan Kenigsberg 2008-12-15 05:44:36 EDT --- Thanks for the review. As I understand it, "version 0.42" in latexdiff and "version 0.3" in latexrevise relate to the versions of the separate scripts. Since I did not find any version number for the whole package, I chose the latest update date of files within. Do you have a better idea (maybe 0.0.20071020, to let upstream choose 0.43 one day in the future ?) See http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff-0.0.20071020-1.fc10.src.rpm and http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff.spec for updated version and license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151105.mBFB5WD1029149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-15 06:05:31 EDT --- updated spec file http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir.spec updated srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-28.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:02:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151102.mBFB2D4A028234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #22 from Ankur Sinha 2008-12-15 06:02:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > The doc on changelog doesnt tell me which ones dist and which ones version.. :( > > so i havent changed that in this one.. (pablo please help me with this) > It's quite simple to understand, for exemple, your spec: > Version: 1.1 > Release: 1%{?dist} > The number after "Version:" is the version one, it's given by upstream and you > must not change it. So put "1.0" as it's the version of the font. > The "Release:" number is a distro/package specific number, so each time you add > an entry in the changelog, you increment by one this number. So currently, it > should be "3%{?dist}". > > Also your changelog format is not correct, you have to add your email address > as said in the guidelines > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs). > > > > The warnings for the docs is still present.. How do i correct that? > You should add the code proposed by Nicolas in the review request of the > bonveno fonts in the %prep section . > > > You have many font substitution examples in the dejavu font packages. Do not > > forget to declare your font is an acceptable substitute for all the different > > Old Standard variant out there (TTF, OTF, etc) > Ok, so you have to duplicate the XML code I gave you, and just change the first > Old Standard to Old Standard TTF. > For register this font as a serif one, add the following to the fontconfig > file: > > serif > > Old Standard SFD > > hi, sorry for the delay.. Fedora 10 got me stuck up a bit.. Here are packages.. I used the new source the author has uploaded.. Also the FONTLOG in the src zip has version 2.0.2 so i used that in the spec. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:16:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151116.mBFBGpVh013268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 06:16:50 EDT --- package built successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999153 rpmlint only complained ttmkfdir.src: W: no-url-tag But I see that there is already comment as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream Can you build this package in rawhide now? Once its built I will approve review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151114.mBFBE654012581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 06:14:05 EDT --- Just some comments on this spec file - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) - Use parallel make (make %{?_smp_mflags}) - Is there a reason that %makeinstall is used? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:25:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151125.mBFBP4hK014740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 06:25:03 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999048 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151124.mBFBOfcG014408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 06:24:41 EDT --- Updated. Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor/perl-Class-XSAccessor-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:39:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151139.mBFBdw6j002825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-15 06:39:57 EDT --- Done built it for rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999184 Thanks for completing merge review of ttmkfdir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151145.mBFBjgf5018727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2008-12-15 06:45:40 EDT --- hi, new packages..sorry for the delay. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:24:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151224.mBFCOpdW011401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #25 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-15 07:24:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Otherwise, wouldn't the direction of this package be faulty? If one or more > "shared things" are in the forecast then, it would seem, disabling it until v. > 4 is "official" is the way to go. Bearing in mind the primary reason for packaging Samba4 at this time is to support OpenChange, and OpenChange doesn't need the winbind stuff, I'm inclined to just omit the subpackage for now. Will try to post another round of updates later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151224.mBFCOPtt011313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 07:24:25 EDT --- I try to use it on command line, but no luck yet. lit2epub doesn't work, because clit wasn't and maybe can't be in our repo. Anyway it looks like the libepub will be working well with okular (http://okular.kde.org/download.php). OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field MIT matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999213 OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. ebook-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151250.mBFCo2aL016590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151249.mBFCnwEt016285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:50:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151250.mBFCo19f016354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151249.mBFCnxq0016302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] New: Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Summary: Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zdaemon.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zdaemon-2.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Daemon process control library and tools for Unix-bases systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] New: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-testing.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-testing-3.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package provides a number of testing frameworks. It includes a flexible test runner, and supports both doctest and unittest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:47:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476523] New: Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-proxy.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-proxy-3.4.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Proxies are special objects which serve as mostly-transparent wrappers around another object, intervening in the apparent behavior of the wrapped object only when necessary to apply the policy (e.g., access checking, location brokering, etc.) for which the proxy is responsible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:47:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476526] New: Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-event.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-event-3.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The zope.event package provides a simple event system. It provides an event publishing system and a very simple event-dispatching system on which more sophisticated event dispatching systems can be built. (For example, a type-based event dispatching system that builds on zope.event can be found in zope.component.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:47:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:47:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476528] New: Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Summary: Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-ZConfig.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-ZConfig-2.6.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: ZConfig is a configuration library intended for general use. It supports a hierarchical schema-driven configuration model that allows a schema to specify data conversion routines written in Python. ZConfig's model is very different from the model supported by the ConfigParser module found in Python's standard library, and is more suitable to configuration-intensive applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476525] New: Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Summary: Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zc-lockfile.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zc-lockfile-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The zc.lockfile package provides a basic portable implementation of interprocess locks using lock files. The purpose if not specifically to lock files, but to simply provide locks with an implementation based on file-locking primitives. Of course, these locks could be used to mediate access to other files. For example, the ZODB file storage implementation uses file locks to mediate access to file-storage database files. The database files and lock file files are separate files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:49:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151249.mBFCnrtU031006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151249.mBFCnv21031038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151250.mBFCo5NF031367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151249.mBFCnqb0030987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151250.mBFCo4KP031349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151250.mBFCovts031510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151249.mBFCnuBk031021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151250.mBFCowpj031534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151303.mBFD38fA019348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2008-12-15 08:03:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I reviewed this package. It surely needs some work: > > * Can bug #459365 be closed now? Will be when the latest update is stable. > * gawk is among the default package set and hence doesn't need to be BR'd. Fixed. > * The BR perl-XML-Parser >= 2.31-16 is not used at all and can be removed. Am I > wrong? Needed for intltool, I change it to "perl(XML::Parser)" though. > * rpmlint says: > shared-mime-info.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pkgconfig/shared-mime-info.pc > Is there a valid reason why this file is not in a -devel package? > Also, from the guidelines: "Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files > must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability)." It's used for applications to detect where the database is installed. It's not a development file though. > shared-mime-info.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2 > shared-mime-info.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 > I believe that these explicit R's can be dropped since rpmbuild itself picks up > these dependencies. Done > * Group tag is "System Environment/Libraries" but I don't see a library in this > package. Changed to SE/Base > * What is wrong with the locale files in the tarball? (A more detailed > explanation as a comment within the SPEC file please.) Done. > Also, assuming you have a legitimate reason to remove these files, why are you > BR'ing gettext? Because it's needed to put the translations in the .xml file. > * The files ChangeLog, HACKING and most importantly COPYING need to be listed > under %doc. Added HACKING and COPYING, not ChangeLog, as it replicates data from NEWS whilst being much bigger. > * Macros should be used consistently. If you want to use %{__rm} notation, use > macros for the other commands as well (%{__cat}, %{__make}, etc.). > OR do it the other way around. But please stay consistent. Used the commands directly now. > * Buildroot should be one of these: > %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Changed it to the second one. > * According to the COPYING and test-tree-magic.c files, the license tag should > be GPLv2+ Done. > * The main source file (Source0) should be given in full URL. Done. > * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, > this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. Done. > * About the defaults.list: Can't we provide a separate list for KDE users? This > may need some hacking on the source code. Because KDE doesn't use that file, and they never expressed interest. > * See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo > for correct usage of the snippet. It's interesting to see that the very package > that this guideline is based on doesn't obey the guideline itself (at least, > partially). Added a note as to why it shouldn't ignore errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151314.mBFDEYP4022046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 08:14:33 EDT --- Thanks for building package. APPROVED This Merge-Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151315.mBFDF4en005193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 08:15:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999048 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6cc5e214d9873f9205c2c49a1b7f3008 Class-XSAccessor-0.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=65, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-Class-XSAccessor-0.14-1.fc11 => Provides: XSAccessor.so perl(Class::XSAccessor) = 0.14 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151318.mBFDIoVA023201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|belegdol at gmail.com | --- Comment #4 from Julian Sikorski 2008-12-15 08:18:49 EDT --- I'm not a real maintainer, just did a drive-by fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:24:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151324.mBFDOS40024500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 08:24:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-XSAccessor Short Description: Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151330.mBFDU5tm026129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pertusus at free.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476530] New: Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Summary: Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ProjXP is an agile project management system. It enables a development team to maintain a backlog of features, plan and track sprints, and enable project and product owners to view status reports easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151330.mBFDUd22009218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pertusus at free.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:31:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151331.mBFDV7FL009367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pertusus at free.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226415] Merge Review: sgml-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151332.mBFDWiGa009772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226415 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pertusus at free.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151339.mBFDdmIo011031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-15 08:39:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I'll try to contact someone I know at Sun to see if he can help me with this. > Will let you know how it progresses. I'd like to wait a bit before closing it > here. Sure. Keep in mind that we'd need some statement from Sun that they do hold the ownership of the copyright of this code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151415.mBFEFp3H004073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 09:15:50 EDT --- Please write CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:16:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151416.mBFEGDo5019883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 09:16:12 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:16:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151416.mBFEGEew019912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Bug 475107 depends on bug 475082, which changed state. Bug 475082 Summary: Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] New: Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Summary: Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zapplet.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zapplet-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Zapplet is a tray applet for monitoring aspects of your Zenoss installation from the desktop. The intention is to work from all desktops supported by GTK. I need a sponsor Here is the output from rpmlint: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./zapplet.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/zapplet-0.1-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/zapplet-0.1-1.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151430.mBFEUvaT022849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #11 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-15 09:30:56 EDT --- Fixed: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs-1.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151432.mBFEWK1j007489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 --- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-15 09:32:19 EDT --- New files: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs-1.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151433.mBFEXAhp007611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 --- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-15 09:33:09 EDT --- New files: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs-1.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151442.mBFEgTep025735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 09:42:27 EDT --- Please also rebuild for dist-f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:49:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:49:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151449.mBFEnoIF027061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-15 09:49:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > >spamassassin.src:72: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes perl-Mail-SpamAssassin > >The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all > >older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update > >problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it > >was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if > >possible. > > > >Fix. > > Well, the problem here is that upsteam uses that package name. > So, if someone installs the upstream rpms, then decides to upgrade > to the fedora one, without this they will get a confusing mix. ;( Then commenting this in the spec should be sufficient. > > >spamassassin.src:101: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL > >DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/ SYSCONFDIR=%{_sysconfdir} INSTALLDIRS=vendor > >ENABLE_SSL=yes < /dev/null > >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will > >break short circuiting. > > > >There may be a good reason for this. Is there? > > It's not clear to me where it is using the build root. It's setting DESTDIR to > it, but it shouldn't be using it. Will dig more, but ideas welcome. I'll peek at it. > >spamassassin.src: W: strange-permission spamassassin-helper.sh 0755 > >A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > >Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > > >Fix, or document in spec. > > It's a shell script that runs and shows the exit code (spam/notspam). > I guess I can add a comment that it's expected to be executable. That'd be perfect. > > >rpmlint on RPMS: > > > >spamassassin.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update > >Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/. > > > >Fix, if it won't be too catastrophic. > > Well, it's not spamassassin itself that logs anything, it's the daily > sa-update job that pulls updates to rules. I think it makes more sense > to leave it as sa-update since thats the command that generates the logs. Agreed, might want to comment in spec. > > >spamassassin.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file > >/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin-helper.sh > >Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent > >upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an > >executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. > > > >???? > > Humm. Not sure why thats marked as config. No one should ever change it. > Sadly, thats generated the file that the make process generates. > It might need a patch or getting upstream to fix it. Hmm. > >spamassassin.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > >/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin > >A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > >way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > >%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here > > Fixed above by making it not a config file. > > >spamassassin.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post cp > > This is so that updates with old config file options that are no longer > supported will get updated. I don't see any easy way around it. Neither do I. Comment in spec. > >spamassassin.i386: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin > >In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' > >entry, which is necessary for good functionality. > > spamd doesn't have any functionality to do a reload without just restarting > as far as I know. In this instance, just make reload do what restart does. > >Otherwise, full review looks good, no other blockers. > > Ok. > > new spec: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/spamassassin.spec > diff against old: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/spamassassin.diff > scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=998690 > > Warren is going to look it over as well. I'll await his input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:01:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151501.mBFF14Yt014340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:01:03 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:59:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151459.mBFExdF2029489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 09:59:38 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:00:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151500.mBFF0GRp029893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:00:15 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:58:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151458.mBFEwoFk029285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney 2008-12-15 09:58:49 EDT --- APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151457.mBFEvYLF029026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 09:57:33 EDT --- Okay, no problem. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (jcalendar) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). Note that now you are using red_AT_fedoraproject.org as bugzilla account, but using sm_AT_XXXXXX as FAS account mail address. To set fedora-cvs flag (this is needed for review process, which is written in "Join" wiki) or fedora-review flag (if you want to review other person's review request), you have to create bugzilla account with sm_AT_XXXXX mail address (if not exist) and login bugzilla as sm_AT_XXXXX account. If you have some question, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:01:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151501.mBFF1ngO014721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:01:49 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151502.mBFF2UL9014896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:02:29 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151503.mBFF39jC015010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:03:08 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151505.mBFF5KZc031621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:05:19 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151506.mBFF67n3031813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:06:06 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:07:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151507.mBFF751D016000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:07:04 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151508.mBFF83Gg016265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|177841 | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 10:08:02 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151543.mBFFhRaq024095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 10:43:26 EDT --- glog-0.1.2-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glog-0.1.2-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151548.mBFFmuKT025746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 John A. Khvatov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151556.mBFFuZ0g011233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from John5342 2008-12-15 10:56:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ebook-tools Short Description: Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats Owners: john5342 Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151604.mBFG4ub2029462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #25 from Levente Farkas 2008-12-15 11:04:53 EDT --- does it means lwjgl also good for fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226417] Merge Review: shared-mime-info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151603.mBFG33WF012610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226417 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-15 11:03:02 EDT --- Thanks for the update. Everything looks fine. I just have two more comments. > > * The BR perl-XML-Parser >= 2.31-16 is not used at all and can be removed. Am I > > wrong? > > Needed for intltool, I change it to "perl(XML::Parser)" though. > Ah, I noticed that now. Just a side-note: BR'ing "intltool" will then pull up "perl(XML::Parser)", so still, explicitly BR'ing "perl(XML::Parser)" is not required. But if you think this dependency might change in the future, I'm OK with leaving it as it is. > > * The files ChangeLog, HACKING and most importantly COPYING need to be listed > > under %doc. > > Added HACKING and COPYING, not ChangeLog, as it replicates data from NEWS > whilst being much bigger. > Does NEWS contain all the relevant information from ChangeLog (both from a user's and a developer's point of view)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151621.mBFGLuJd016893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-12-15 11:21:56 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:25:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151625.mBFGP5pG001742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2008-12-15 11:25:04 EDT --- If this is truly intended to be consumed by SAGE only, then I can see being a little more lax with it. Are you certain that nobody else will want to consume it? Because if anybody does, I think you really will want to build a shared library and have a separate -devel subpackage. I'll do the review in a moment. I don't know that fixing the warnings is really all that important if they aren't indicative of runtime issues. I've had no response from upstream yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151646.mBFGkerG021622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com --- Comment #3 from R P Herrold 2008-12-15 11:46:39 EDT --- I get a cmake related error: -- Found LibXml2: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so CMake Error at cmake/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:51 (MESSAGE): Could not find REQUIRED package LibZip Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake/FindLibZip.cmake:28 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS) CMakeLists.txt:10 (find_package) CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt: No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of code such as cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6) should be added at the top of the file. The version specified may be lower if you wish to support older CMake versions for this project. For more information run "cmake --help-policy CMP0000". This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.15551 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151651.mBFGp5II022427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 11:51:04 EDT --- Some comments: * Release number - As same as jcalendar, please fix release number. * Requires - Also fix Requires as same as jcalender. * About Patch0 and "-classpath /usr/share/java/javamail.jar" - I guess rather using sed with "build-classpath" (in jpackage-utils) is preferable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#build-classpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151652.mBFGq5BY006549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-15 11:52:04 EDT --- I'm not familiar with cmake, but I was able to build it in koji (mock). So this package is probably all right. Which version of cmake do you have? I think this package will be in F-9, F-10, where would be cmake-2.6.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 17:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151709.mBFH9153025800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #5 from John5342 2008-12-15 12:09:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I get a cmake related error: > > -- Found LibXml2: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so > CMake Error at cmake/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:51 (MESSAGE): > Could not find REQUIRED package LibZip > Call Stack (most recent call first): > cmake/FindLibZip.cmake:28 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS) > CMakeLists.txt:10 (find_package) What arch/release are you building for? Version of cmake and libzip? If build was on koji have you got a link to the build? > CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt: > No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of code such as > > cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6) Warning is known about and will be reported upstream shortly (doesnt stop build) Thanks for the feedback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 17:40:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151740.mBFHeTV9032663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-15 12:40:28 EDT --- Thanks for that, but something's gone wrong. This now has no runtime dependency on rarian-compat, just a build dependency. It will definitely need Requires(pre) and Requires(post), conditionalized for the old releases you want to support. Also, I can't for the life of me figure out what is supposed to own /usr/share/gnome/help. This package leaves it unowned, which isn't a good idea. I'm thinking that the filesystem package should own it (as it does with /usr/share/gnome) and then everything would be OK, but that will need to be acked by the filesystem maintainer first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 17:39:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151739.mBFHdvlX032298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-15 12:39:56 EDT --- Notes: * License - As far as I checked the whole source codes, the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) - Please fix the release number ! %setup - "-n %{name}-%{version}" is the default of %setup and this can be removed. * Documents - Please consider to add the following file(s) to %doc ------------------------------------------------ CHANGELOG.txt ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 17:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151759.mBFHxbjD020257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #8 from Warren Togami 2008-12-15 12:59:35 EDT --- I'm OK with his proposed changes. I also suggested switching it to pidgin.spec style automatic boolean setting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151818.mBFIIHLB023681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-15 13:18:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This fails to build for me on rawhide; it needs openchange-devel which is not > available. Jason, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenChange. OpenChange and Samba4 are also under review to support this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:24:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151824.mBFIOaTt024700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-15 13:24:35 EDT --- Then could you perhaps set the ticket dependencies properly so that something indicates that this isn't actually reviewable now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:24:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:24:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151824.mBFIOVUm009223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #23 from Warren Togami 2008-12-15 13:24:29 EDT --- [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Name=K12Linux Quick Start Guide Type=Application Terminal=false Icon[en_US]=/usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/filesystems/gtk-network.png Name[en_US]=K12Linux Quick Start Guide Exec=firefox /usr/share/ltsp-server-livesetupdocs/k12linux-quick-start-guide.html Icon=/usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/filesystems/gtk-network.png GenericName[en_US]= The pathin the Exec line is wrong. It was renamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151836.mBFIaASD012355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-15 13:36:08 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Scratch Build F-11 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999932 Upstream will be notified about the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151838.mBFIcXt8012881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151838.mBFIcVlR012823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453083, 453395 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151838.mBFIcYu6012945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151837.mBFIbhMp012717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-15 13:37:42 EDT --- evolution-mapi saw its first formal release today: 0.25.3. Think I got the rpmlint issues from comment #2 worked out as well. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151857.mBFIvrwZ016771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 William Jon McCann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from William Jon McCann 2008-12-15 13:57:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: log4cpp Short Description: C++ logging library Owners: mccann Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 19:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151908.mBFJ8pjj018904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |459946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 19:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151908.mBFJ8ooL018879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org Depends on| |459944 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-12-15 14:08:49 EDT --- BuildRequires is missing pfstools-devel and libtool Please use complete URL to the upstream tarball in Source0. There is also a newer upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 19:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151919.mBFJJVZg003408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-15 14:19:29 EDT --- Update. Think I got most of the rpmlint stuff. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-0.5.svn909.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 19:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151920.mBFJKdQf003948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2008-12-15 14:20:38 EDT --- I tried to modify the .spec file to build a shared library. This turned up a code problem. In file nb.c there are multiple unconditional calls to the function insert_zero_into_monopoly. However, that function is defined only if the preprocessor symbol MONOPOLYTRUE is defined. This will lead to undefined symbol errors when linking with the static archive, too, so it looks to me like -DFFTRUE -DMONOPOLYTRUE is the minimal set of preprocessor flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 19:29:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151929.mBFJT942005069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-15 14:29:08 EDT --- > SONAME libzdb.so.4 By doing that, you've created a library that doesn't exist anywhere else. Anything that would be built with it, would be incompatible with the real libzdb as released by upstream. It's similar to packagers who invent a shared library name and version when converting from a static-only package. Upstream really ought to be involved in such a decision. > The package is licensed under GPLv3+ OR GPLv3 + exceptions. So far, you've included the EXCEPTIONS file in the package. That file modifies the licencing by extending/changing the GPLv3. If those special terms and conditions are met, the licencing would no longer be GPLv3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:02:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152002.mBFK2hoT029438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2008-12-15 15:02:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327014) Revised spec file What do you think of the attached spec file? Would building as a shared library adversely affect SAGE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152011.mBFKBF7t012650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:11:14 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152012.mBFKCj5U012845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:12:44 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:14:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152014.mBFKE5Dm012955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:14:04 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152018.mBFKIQpb013831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:18:25 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152024.mBFKOicG000361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Owen Taylor 2008-12-15 15:24:43 EDT --- Doesn't look like: main package should require gobject-introspection for %{libdir}/girepository. was fixed. New Summary/Description: Summary: Introspection for GNOME libraries %description Introspection system for GNOME libraries; see the gobject-introspection package. are a bit weird. (I'd use "information" or "data" in both places.) Generally looks fine though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152027.mBFKROWg015646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152031.mBFKVJ3Q016514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #26 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-15 15:31:17 EDT --- Andrew, something annoying I've been struggling with: If I already have the samba4 packages installed and I go to rebuild them, the configure script wants to link against the libldb.so from samba4-libs instead of building its own. So I have to uninstall all my samba4 packages (along with openchange and evolution-mapi) before building new ones. Any way to force samba to build its own ldb whether it finds one already installed or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152033.mBFKXjoa016968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dodji at redhat.com) | --- Comment #12 from Dodji Seketeli 2008-12-15 15:33:43 EDT --- Sorry for my late reply. The updated spec file is at http://www.seketeli.org/dodji/rpms/cloog/cloog.spec.0.15-0.2.git57a0bc. and the updated srpm is at http://www.seketeli.org/dodji/rpms/cloog/cloog-0.15-0.2.git57a0bc.fc10.src.rpm. Please find below my answers to your review. Thanks. >For -0.2 > >! First of all, you can try to check your package by rpmlint > (in rpmlint package). rpmlint detects some general packaging > issues. Done. I am still getting those two errors, but I am not sure how to fix them: cloog.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcloog.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 cloog-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation I'd appreciate any help there. > >Then: >* Requires >----------------------------------------------------------- >Requires: ppl-devel >= 0.10, gmp-devel >= 4.1.3 >----------------------------------------------------------- > - This should be for cloog-devel package, not for cloog package Fixed. > >* Group > - Group for -devel subpackage should be "Development/Libraries", > not "Development/Library" Fixed. >* %_infodir/dir > - This file must not be installed. Overwriting this file > by this rpm breaks system "info" information. > > * Please remove this file at %install (not %clean) > and remove this file from %files Done. > * And restore the previous %clean Done. >* Shipping static archives > - What I meant is that unless some specific reason static > archive libfoo.a must be removed (as well as libtool .la > file) I guess you meant that for the -devel package. I added an exclude for the .a library as well as for the .la files. > >* calling ldconfig on scriptlet > - When using "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig" (i.e. using /sbin/ldconfig > directly instead of calling bash and executing ldconfig in the > shell script), no other additional scriptlets are allowed. > > i.e. if there is some other scriptlets than /sbin/ldconfig, > you have to write like: >---------------------------------------------------------- >%post >/sbin/ldconfig >/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : >---------------------------------------------------------- Done. > >* %changelog > - git revision differs between %release and %change.log Fixed. > >? Some header files design flaw > - Well, for example the head of %_includedir/cloog/cloog.h > says: >---------------------------------------------------------- > 40 #ifndef CLOOG_H > 41 #define CLOOG_H > 42 > 43 #ifdef CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND > 44 # define GNUMP > 45 # include > 46 #else > 47 # include > 48 # include > 49 #endif >---------------------------------------------------------- > However, where can we tell if CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND is defined > or not (when this package was built) (i.e whether this header > file includes ppl_backend.h or polylib_backend.h)? > build.log shows that when rebuilding this package -DCLOOG_PPL_BACKEND > is used, however installed header files does not save such > information.... How can I fix this ? I mean this is an upstream problem. Do you mean I should append a patch to the package ? I could as well ship the package as is, and submit a patch upstream to fix it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:40:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152040.mBFKeORN003586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:40:23 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152042.mBFKgEnK003830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:42:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152044.mBFKi3e8004031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:44:02 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:46:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152046.mBFKkOoJ004616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:46:23 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152043.mBFKhAlb003950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:43:09 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152049.mBFKnVn4019340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327014|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152050.mBFKowEA019834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2008-12-15 15:50:57 EDT --- If Permaine objects, I suppose I could go back to patching findbugs to use a vanilla BCEL. But as I said in the original description, that approach proved fragile. It would be difficult to maintain and, according to Bill Pugh, has a large adverse effect on findbugs' performance. The problem with the modified patch appears to be a case of PEBKAC. So my transformation of the upstream patch is clearly too manual, and therefore too fragile. Let's try another approach. I'll use the unmodified upstream patch, mask the failure to patch the two files that do not exist in the source distribution, and remove the unnecessary import of the com.sun.* class afterwards. The failure masking part is also fragile; I'll have to be very careful when moving to a new findbugs version. I'll ask upstream if they can change the patch so this isn't necessary. I don't know if findbugs-bcel or bcel-findbugs would be better, either. If someone has a clear rationale for one or the other, I'm all ears. I completely replaced the package description with one that I think is more appropriate. I am now using the suggested Java-related macros. New versions are at the previous URLs, repeated here for convenience: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-bcel/findbugs-bcel-5.2-1.3.6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152050.mBFKoIws005345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:50:17 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:49:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152049.mBFKnMSB004931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:49:21 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:55:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152055.mBFKtWkU020545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #22 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:55:30 EDT --- without the review flag set to + we are unable to process the cvs request. Reveiwer please fix and set the cvs flag back to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152053.mBFKr8Su019969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Bruno Mahe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bullet - 3D |Review Request: 3D |Game Multiphysics Library |Collision Detection and |provides collision |Rigid Body Dynamics Library |detection, soft body and | |rigid body dynamics | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:53:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152053.mBFKrvpd020029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:53:55 EDT --- there is no CVS request here to process. plase set back to ? with a CVS admin request as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 20:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192164] Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152059.mBFKxurQ020942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192164 --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 15:59:55 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152101.mBFL10VH021537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-15 16:00:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdfbook Short Description: Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures Owners: mef Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: (sorry about the previous empty request ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192164] Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152103.mBFL3XhF022081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192164 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:04:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152104.mBFL4pNC022258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-12-15 16:04:50 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152110.mBFLA5Uk023653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-15 16:10:04 EDT --- That would be fine, too. Kevin, looks like once the above are finished, we're good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456941] Review Request: thrift - Multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152148.mBFLmSad015194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456941 Devan Goodwin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Devan Goodwin 2008-12-15 16:48:27 EDT --- Withdrawing review request, no longer looking to use this library and thus probably shouldn't undertake Fedora maintenance of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152153.mBFLrsvO030771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Gustafson 2008-12-15 16:53:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327029) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327029) Patch Makefile so that it ignores the included gettext directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152158.mBFLw8Lm031802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 16:58:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: guiloader Owners: fab Updated Description: GuiXml Loader Library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152157.mBFLvf6Q031748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Gustafson 2008-12-15 16:57:40 EDT --- Thank you for checking out the package. I made the suggested changes. I make some quick changes to force the build to use the system-wide gettext. Let me know if this is either too heavy-handed or not going far enough. I included the patch as an attachment to this bug entry. I updated the .spec file and copied it up to the location initially reported in this entry. One other option would be to use the English-only .tar.gz file for qodem and avoid the gettext issue entirely. That way no .patch file would be needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152200.mBFM0EDv017310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 17:00:13 EDT --- There is no need for a CVS request because the directory already exists. I guess that this was done with #206134. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:11:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152211.mBFMBBbk019374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #11 from Chris Feist 2008-12-15 17:11:10 EDT --- I'll make sure we get upgraded to the latest version of ctdb & fix build issues (if possible) on ppc/ppc64 once we can build this package in the build system. (We don't have access to F-10 ppc/ppc64 systems currently). Thanks, Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152209.mBFM9lRw018791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Chris Feist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chris Feist 2008-12-15 17:09:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ctdb Short Description: Clustered TDB used by Samba Owners: cfeist adas Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: cfeist adas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152223.mBFMNkOm003696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-15 17:23:45 EDT --- Some comments: - What does -DFAST do? - "I don't know that fixing the warnings is really all that important if they aren't indicative of runtime issues." What Kevin meant is often gcc warnings are indicative of run-time issues on non-32-bit arches. - How about generating both dynamic and static libraries instead of one or the other? New spec and srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/symmetrica.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/symmetrica-2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:30:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152230.mBFMUQqv005226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-15 17:30:24 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcping-1.3.5-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152235.mBFMZcmP006302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 17:35:37 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152235.mBFMZZp7023938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 17:35:35 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152243.mBFMh4Wi007525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 17:43:03 EDT --- assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152244.mBFMi8N1025367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 17:44:08 EDT --- onboard-0.91.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/onboard-0.91.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:43:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152243.mBFMh1Kb025254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 17:43:00 EDT --- assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152244.mBFMiCLt025389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 17:44:11 EDT --- onboard-0.91.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/onboard-0.91.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 22:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152258.mBFMwNED027756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-15 17:58:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The bcel maintainer seems to be Permaine Cheung -- I've > added him to the CC. Oh my God, Permaine -- I'm *so* sorry I called you "him" above! :( It's embarrassing to find my own assumptions exposed like that; of *course* there are other women involved in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 23:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152320.mBFNK3DC014178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 18:20:01 EDT --- bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc9.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 23:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152320.mBFNK7fp014231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 18:20:07 EDT --- bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 23:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152327.mBFNRXiS000704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Victor Bogado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 23:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152335.mBFNZNRP002127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #29 from Till Maas 2008-12-15 18:35:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > (I am kind of hovering on whether the build_doc and build_prof build switches > are overkill or not for general libs: sometimes they are useful - they do make > the spec file a little more complicated but make clear which parts are for docs > and profiling. The current templates I made have them though.) Imho the prof packages do not hurt, but in case the documentation is not big, there is no need to add it to a seperate doc subpackage. Nevertheless I would prefer to use %bcond_without or %bcond_with macros to make it possible to easily define whether or not to build the subpackages on the rpmbuild commandline. Here is a patch: http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghx-X11-buildcond.patch Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 23:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152340.mBFNe1sd002544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Victor Bogado changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 00:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160000.mBG00eBQ021744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com --- Comment #30 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-12-15 19:00:38 EDT --- Actually, the prof packages should be seen as mandatory, not optional, so there is no reason that there should be a flag to control whether or not they are built. The reason for this is that if a library is built without profiling, then nothing that depends on it can ever be built *with* profiling enabled. As a result, we require that all libraries be built both in profiling and no-profiling flavours. The issue of whether a -prof RPM is installed on a system is a separate one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 00:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160000.mBG00VwJ006066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #25 from leigh scott 2008-12-15 19:00:29 EDT --- I think I have implemented most of the recommended changes , it hasn't been possible to use glob for the man pages extensions as doing so would pack some man pages in the wrong packages . Spec: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg.spec SRPM: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg-1.14.23-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 00:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160011.mBG0BQAJ023685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #19 from Milos Jakubicek 2008-12-15 19:11:23 EDT --- Hm, is it just me seeing rpaths here? >rpmbuild --rebuild xcb-util-0.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm ... + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot ******************************************************************************* * * WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild' * to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS' * environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values * below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000. * * 0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor * issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without * providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib * environments. * 0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute * nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk * 0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a * SECURITY risk * 0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other * RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted * 0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs * and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries * 0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break * the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink * * * Examples: * - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like * $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm * - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like * $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT= /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths * ******************************************************************************* ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-wm.so.0.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-image.so.0.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-icccm.so.1.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libxcb-property.so.1.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] Please fix them accordingly to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160123.mBG1NX4m002027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160123.mBG1NYD7002045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:23:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] New: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-transaction.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-transaction-1.0-0.1.a1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains a generic transaction implementation for Python. It is mainly used by the ZODB, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160122.mBG1Mqg3019020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-15 20:22:52 EDT --- Looks good now, approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476600] New: Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Summary: Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-ZODB3.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-ZODB3-3.9.0-0.1.a7.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Zope Object Database provides an object-oriented database for Python that provides a high-degree of transparency. Applications can take advantage of object database features with few, if any, changes to application logic. ZODB includes features such as a plugable storage interface, rich transaction support, and undo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SD0b002873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SEFj002885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SCk4002848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SBFI002836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SDBq002861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SEX4002897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SBbX002820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476523, 476524, 476525, | |476526, 476527, 476528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:29:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160129.mBG1TN2r002997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review- |needinfo?(jonathansteffan at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2008-12-15 20:29:21 EDT --- If you want to finish the package, please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458379] Review Request: wondershaper - Simple network shaper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160128.mBG1SY5r019790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458379 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-12-15 20:28:32 EDT --- In case you want to finish this package, please reopen this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 01:45:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160145.mBG1jWUu022923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-15 20:45:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Actually, the prof packages should be seen as mandatory, not optional, so there > is no reason that there should be a flag to control whether or not they are > built. Bryan is probably right, we can probably drop the prof flag - at least I can't think of any cases profiling has blocked building a package: my reason for having it is really more to save time for debugging builds sometimes (either build time or time downloading ghc-prof), but for small libraries it probably doesn't make sense so I think it is safe to remove from the default template and then big libraries (like gtk2hs) might still have a prof build flag but that would be up to the maintainer. bcond looks better though: so I will use that for docs and other places/packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160202.mBG22W2o008892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160243.mBG2hC0n015293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 21:43:11 EDT --- I already had this account...I didn't even remember :D Uhm, do I need to do anything on my review requests with this account now? I think I can't change the 'reporter' or can I? Thanks again for your help. I'll also update my other review requests since pretty every package matches the problems from comment #2. I've actually already fixed that locally but I'll need to update the requests when I find the time to do so....just saying this before you posts the problems from #2 everywhere ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160254.mBG2sYKV017035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 21:54:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jcalendar Short Description: A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:17:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160417.mBG4Hdkx017064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-15 23:17:38 EDT --- > but in case the documentation is not big, > there is no need to add it to a separate doc subpackage. Documentation is not actually being subpackaged here: the flag would just be for whether the docs get build or not: generally no reason not to do that, though occasionally docs building can break with certain versions of haddock say. > Here is a patch: > http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghx-X11-buildcond.patch Thanks - will try to fold that into the templates. > Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making > sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a > Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the > pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the > rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel > installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. Good question. I see what you're saying, but since ghc libraries change ABI with every minor version I think it is useful to document what version a library has been built with - though I suppose one can also look at the binary package metadata for that. Let's think a little more about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160425.mBG4P2m1001243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:25:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.1-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160426.mBG4QYlo018629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:26:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nachocalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nachocalendar-0.23-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. This includes all of the above should have been addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:31:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160431.mBG4VKvl002666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:31:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160428.mBG4SDWF001900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #2 from Stuart D Gathman 2008-12-15 23:28:13 EDT --- Fixed Source0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160430.mBG4UDu5002423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:30:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java-1.26.0-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. This includes that the above has been addressed, except for the classpath thing into which I will look next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:29:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160429.mBG4T5Jv018851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:29:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160430.mBG4UwgO019366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:30:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd-2.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd.spec New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160430.mBG4UbMh019301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:30:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160429.mBG4TgVl018920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:29:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jakarta-commons-compress.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jakarta-commons-compress-20081205-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160431.mBG4VmDX002753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:31:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160432.mBG4WBfo002798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:32:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 05:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160522.mBG5MiCO010959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #12 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2008-12-16 00:22:42 EDT --- Hi Chris, I can provide limited (across the 24h) access to F10 ppc/ppc64. Please let me know if you need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 05:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160552.mBG5qoFX031698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-16 00:52:49 EDT --- ok. Checked in and built in rawhide. Take a look and see if there is anything further that needs addressing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1001301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 06:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160605.mBG65pa5017307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 01:05:50 EDT --- At least this won't build on dist-f11 because F-11 uses python 2.6. I will do further check if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 07:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160736.mBG7aGgJ032066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-16 02:36:15 EDT --- It seems to me, you're lacking a "chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*" for spamassassin as much of the other perl packages do. All files in the directory /usr/lib/perl5 are readonly, but for perl packages I got in the past usually remembered to change that to 644 rather 444. The same applies to the man pages, so command above should fit and solve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 07:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160731.mBG7VvKC031028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #6 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-16 02:31:56 EDT --- Actually I did the test build in a chroot of rawhide (f11). Ahh, it looks like when you changed the package name, you didn't adjust the %files section since the python module name did not change: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/oasa-0.12.5-py2.5.egg-info That should be a simple fix. Unfortunately I just noticed that Henrique is in need of a sponsor. Henrique, have you applied for packager membership yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 07:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160744.mBG7iuYg017734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-16 02:44:55 EDT --- This doesn't build in rawhide currently: DEBUG: This script requires setuptools version 0.6c7 to run (even to display DEBUG: help). I will attempt to download it for you (from DEBUG: http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/s/setuptools/), but DEBUG: you may need to enable firewall access for this script first. DEBUG: I will start the download in 15 seconds. DEBUG: (Note: if this machine does not have network access, please obtain the file DEBUG: http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c7-py2.6.egg DEBUG: and place it in this directory before rerunning this script.) It then tries to download the .egg file which really isn't going to work in the builders. Licenses: tests/test_savepoint.py is under ZPL 2.0 instead of 2.1 like the rest of the files. Might be an oversight by the upstream, should contact them, or otherwise make note in the spec. I'm not sure what the differences are between 2.0 and 2.1 and what happens when you combine both in a work. Docs: the %doc call should include LICENSE.txt since it is shipped with upstream. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Otherwise, looks good. Just a few things to fix there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 07:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160757.mBG7vYvN019991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-16 02:57:34 EDT --- I take that back about building. It builds if you add python-setuptools to your BuildRequires. rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 08:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160808.mBG88vRP005309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 08:17:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160817.mBG8HBrU006975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 03:16:41 EDT --- Oh, oops. I think python-setuptools should be part of the spec template (/etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-python.spec) since it's used for all distutils/setuputils python scripts in Fedora. It would certainly help me remember it. I'm pretty sure tests/test_savepoint.py is supposed to be ZPLv2.1 like everything else, but I will fire off an email to upstream. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-transaction.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 09:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] New: Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 09:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160948.mBG9mrL1009107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org Summary|Review Request: 3D |Review Request: bullet - 3D |Collision Detection and |Collision Detection and |Rigid Body Dynamics Library |Rigid Body Dynamics Library --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 04:48:52 EDT --- Some thoughts: - Summary would be nice if it could be a bit shorter (I'm not sure if there's policy about this, but it makes it nicer on e.g. PackageKit). - Group: I would say Development/Libraries (I think System Environment/Libraries is reserved for pretty core parts of Fedora) - License: Zlib is acceptable in Fedora; I think we like it lowercase, though (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing). - %description: policy is to keep it below 80 characters wide, IIRC. - In general I think it improves legibility to align the sections with spaces but it's certainly not a requirement. - If it builds on koji (could you add a link to that build in a comment, please?) then you probably have the BuildRequires. 'make' is unnecessary as it is part of the default build root. - Same notes as above about Group for -devel subpackage. - Generally for Summary/%description for -devel subpackages we put something like "Development files for %{name}" and "Development headers and libraries for %{name}." - %prep: move cmake to %build - %build: As we talked about on IRC, use %cmake. - %install: NEED 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' as the first thing. - I believe you need ldconfig in %post as well as %postun. rpmlint should warn about not having one of those. - Same doc files between main package and -devel subpackage is redundant. - /usr/lib/*.so should be in -devel, not main package. - Replace literal "/usr/lib" with "%{_libdir}". - /usr/include/ with %{_includedir} - %changelog needs a version per entry. ex: %changelog * Mon Dec 15 2008 Bruno Mahe - 2.73-2 - Some changes. * Sat Dec 13 2008 Bruno Mahe - 2.73-1 - Initial build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 09:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476623] New: Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-NeedsDisplay/perl-Test-NeedsDisplay.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-NeedsDisplay/perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: When testing GUI applications, sometimes applications or modules absolutely insist on a display, even just to load a module without actually showing any objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 10:22:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444792] Review Request: augeas - library for changing configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161022.mBGAM3Zw015797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444792 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from David Lutterkort 2008-12-16 05:21:59 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: augeas New Branches: EL-4 Updated Fedora Owners: lutter, apevec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 10:24:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445601] Review Request: ruby-augeas - Ruby bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161024.mBGAOmv6032351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445601 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from David Lutterkort 2008-12-16 05:24:46 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ruby-augeas New Branches: EL-4, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 10:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161040.mBGAeebn004060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs- |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-16 05:40:39 EDT --- I am sorry, I thought I have set it to "+" back in october. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name:buffer Short Description: General purpose buffer program Owners: bcornec Branches: F9 F10 InitialCC: wolfy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 10:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161044.mBGAiv9x004637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 05:44:56 EDT --- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond-1.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476623] Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161107.mBGB7l3t009320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-16 06:07:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => koji is down currently. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 63967780b12820a668fed932812f9327 Test-NeedsDisplay-1.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=2, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.13 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.18 CPU) + Package perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.05-1.fc11 Provides: perl(Test::NeedsDisplay) = 1.05 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Config) perl(File::Spec) perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestions: Drop unnecessary BR:perl >= 1:5.6.0 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:23:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161123.mBGBNII4012457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #7 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-16 06:23:17 EDT --- No, Mamoru, I haven't applied yet. I'm doing it right now. Coult you explain, me the problem with %files and how I fix it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Compile/perl-Test-Compile.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Compile/perl-Test-Compile-0.08-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Check Perl module files for errors or warnings in a test file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:27:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-CheckOS/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-CheckOS/perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.50-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Devel::CheckOS provides a more friendly interface to $^O, and also lets you check for various OS "families" such as "Unix", which includes things like Linux, Solaris, AIX etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161130.mBGBUadh029778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:27:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:27:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161127.mBGBRiRC029156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161127.mBGBRhYv029138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476633 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:29:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:29:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161129.mBGBTeon029386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 06:29:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327089) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327089) Review. See attached for my initial review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161156.mBGBuIh0018781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2008-12-16 06:56:17 EDT --- Do I need to repeat my CVS req? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451582] Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161155.mBGBt01w018183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |needinfo?(smparrish at shallow | |creek.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161202.mBGC2HG8003396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 11:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458231] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161157.mBGBvrUv002439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |konrad at tylerc.org Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(adrian at linux.org. | |ar) | --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 06:57:51 EDT --- Closing unless the submitter wants to re-open and continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458231] Review Request: aircrack-ptw - A tool for cracking WEP keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161206.mBGC6lWX004448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458231 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Flag| |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161202.mBGC2T3Z003491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161209.mBGC99o5021478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 07:09:08 EDT --- My comments to the BADs and ???s are prefixed with "DH:" - [ BAD ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/trytond.conf tryton trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/trytond.conf tryton trytond.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/trytond.conf 0640 DH: trytond.conf contains login information for the DB server including a password, so the file shouldn't be world-readable trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/trytond tryton trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/trytond tryton trytond.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/trytond 0750 trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/trytond tryton trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/trytond tryton trytond.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/trytond 0750 I think the above are ignorable. DH: yes, these are normal when using an own user trytond.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/trytond DH: it is OK, because the deamon includes its own log rotation mechanism trytond.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/trytond ${prog} DH: it is OK, because the default Fedora initscript template is used and the subsys is set via the $prog variable - [ BAD ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. I think the name should have a python- prefix. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 DH: I must disagree, trytond is a standalone application, it only uses python module in its implementation and the module cannot be used by external applications - [ ??? ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. I think you should Requires: chkconfig which owns /etc/init.d. (But I guess this package isn't really removable on Fedora anyways so I'm not considering this a blocker. DH: /etc/rc.d/init.d (what is the primary location) is owned by "initscripts" and you can't install a system without them and AFAICT it is fully compliant with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript - [ ??? ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Can I have an example of how to test this, please? DH: you need a running PostgreSQL server somewhere, a DB user with the permission to create databases and set the values in /etc/trytond.conf appropriately, you really need to configure it manually - [ ??? ] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. DH: there are no file dependencies in the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161214.mBGCEql5022603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:15:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161215.mBGCF8d5006266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:15:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:15:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161215.mBGCFdLp006337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:20:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161220.mBGCKvJd007338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 07:20:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > My comments to the BADs and ???s are prefixed with "DH:" > > - [ BAD ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should > be posted in the review. > trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/trytond.conf tryton > trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/trytond.conf tryton > trytond.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/trytond.conf 0640 > > DH: trytond.conf contains login information for the DB server including a > password, so the file shouldn't be world-readable > > trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/trytond tryton > trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/trytond tryton > trytond.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/trytond 0750 > trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/trytond tryton > trytond.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/trytond tryton > trytond.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/trytond 0750 > > I think the above are ignorable. > > DH: yes, these are normal when using an own user > > trytond.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/trytond > > DH: it is OK, because the deamon includes its own log rotation mechanism > > trytond.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/trytond ${prog} > > DH: it is OK, because the default Fedora initscript template is used and the > subsys is set via the $prog variable OK. > - [ BAD ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming > Guidelines. > I think the name should have a python- prefix. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 > > DH: I must disagree, trytond is a standalone application, it only uses python > module in its implementation and the module cannot be used by external > applications I agree that it as a standalone application -- maybe the python module can be installed in a subpackage python-%{name}? If you are absolutely sure it cannot be used by external applications I am ok with the current name. > - [ ??? ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If > it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a > package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for > examples. > > I think you should Requires: chkconfig which owns /etc/init.d. (But I > guess this package isn't really removable on Fedora anyways so I'm > not considering this a blocker. > > DH: /etc/rc.d/init.d (what is the primary location) is owned by "initscripts" > and you can't install a system without them and AFAICT it is fully compliant > with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript OK. > - [ ??? ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as > described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > > Can I have an example of how to test this, please? > > DH: you need a running PostgreSQL server somewhere, a DB user with the > permission to create databases and set the values in /etc/trytond.conf > appropriately, you really need to configure it manually > > - [ ??? ] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, > /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which > provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies > in the Guidelines for further information. > > DH: there are no file dependencies in the package Sorry, misread the SHOULD item. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161225.mBGCPBI7024684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161225.mBGCPGXK024788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161235.mBGCZdC3010440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 07:35:38 EDT --- rpmlint report: gupnp-ui.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please fix the minor problem reported by rpmlint above. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora - license matches the actual package license License is actually LGPLv2+ + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 5ca6b3f6740d0295066b0b533289aa4c + package successfully builds on at least one architecture x86-64 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed ? BuildRequires list all build dependencies Was not able to test this yet, as Koji is down. n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ? reviewer should build the package in mock ? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin === A few things to fix there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161239.mBGCdu6A011026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 07:39:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327093) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327093) [Review] See attached for my initial review. Thank you for submitting this package to Fedora, I was considering submitting it myself if no one else did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:45:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161245.mBGCj0PS028394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-16 07:44:59 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type per spec: GPLv2 License type per source: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4df3a2cc531d9fcd4a51d7f8e14aec41d8db0d69 vhd2vl-2.0.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if availabl e. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. License field should be changed to GPLv2+ before commit ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161244.mBGCiQkN012161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 07:44:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trytond Short Description: Server for the Tryton application framework Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:45:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161245.mBGCjtup012604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 07:45:54 EDT --- Missing BuildRequires on vala-tools (for vapigen). After that it fails to build: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/rjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/gupnp-vala-0.2/tests' VALAC test-publisher VALAC server-test VALAC proxy-test VALAC browsing-test VALAC test-browser server-test.vala:80.9-80.41: error: use of possibly unassigned local variable `filter' make[2]: *** [server-test] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /tmp/ccmQDEmL.o: In function `test_browsing_test_main': browsing-test.c:(.text+0xb1): undefined reference to `g_thread_init' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status error: cc exited with status 256 make[2]: *** [browsing-test] Error 1 /tmp/ccA2KrmW.o: In function `test_proxy_test_main': proxy-test.c:(.text+0x6b): undefined reference to `g_thread_init' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status error: cc exited with status 256 make[2]: *** [proxy-test] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/gupnp-vala-0.2/tests' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/gupnp-vala-0.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 ? rpmlint output ? package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines ? specfile name matches the package base name ? package should satisfy packaging guidelines ? license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ? license matches the actual package license ? %doc includes license file ? spec file written in American English ? spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm a7b78c99346ac4dd79847a060ac3cfd8 ? package successfully builds on at least one architecture ? ExcludeArch bugs filed ? BuildRequires list all build dependencies ? %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* ? binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun ? does not use Prefix: /usr ? package owns all directories it creates ? no duplicate files in %files ? %defattr line ? %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ? consistent use of macros ? package must contain code or permissible content ? large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage ? files marked %doc should not affect package ? header files should be in -devel ? static libraries should be in -static ? packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' ? libfoo.so must go in -devel ? -devel must require the fully versioned base ? packages should not contain libtool .la files ? packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file ? packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages ? %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. ? filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: ? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream ? translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ? reviewer should build the package in mock ? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures ? review should test the package functions as described ? scriptlets should be sane ? pkgconfig files should go in -devel ? shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161243.mBGChB7t011956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 07:43:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > - [ BAD ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming > > Guidelines. > > I think the name should have a python- prefix. See: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 > > > > DH: I must disagree, trytond is a standalone application, it only uses python > > module in its implementation and the module cannot be used by external > > applications > > I agree that it as a standalone application -- maybe the python module can be > installed in a subpackage python-%{name}? If you are absolutely sure it cannot > be used by external applications I am ok with the current name. > Yes, I am sure :-) Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161252.mBGCq31L014278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org | |) --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 07:51:59 EDT --- Setting to Needinfo of reporter, to answer comment 13. Otherwise I'll close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161254.mBGCsaW9030813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #7 from Permaine Cheung 2008-12-16 07:54:34 EDT --- I'm okay with this package as long as it doesn't conflict with the original bcel one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161253.mBGCrBmg030658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #8 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-16 07:53:09 EDT --- After a bit of further investigation, it seems that cglib 2.1.3 depends on a very old version of objectweb-asm. Fedora currently has packages for objectweb-asm (=version 3.1, October 2007) and asm2 (=version 2.2.3, April 2006), but cglib 2.1.3 depends on classes last defined in asm version 1.5.3, which was released in November 2004. jpackage has a package for asm version 1.5.3 which could probably be imported quite easily as "asm1" or the like: http://jpackage.org/browser/rpm.php?jppversion=5.0&id=6304 It's not very satisfying to be packaging all of these old libraries, though ... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161256.mBGCuIWW015234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-12-16 07:56:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Judy Short Description: General purpose dynamic array Owners: cra Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161301.mBGD1Fko016415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 08:01:13 EDT --- That corrects all the problems found in the original review, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161301.mBGD1Qsx016470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 12:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161258.mBGCws9P015661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #8 from Permaine Cheung 2008-12-16 07:58:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > The bcel maintainer seems to be Permaine Cheung -- I've > > added him to the CC. > > Oh my God, Permaine -- I'm *so* sorry I called you "him" above! :( It's > embarrassing to find my own assumptions exposed like that; of *course* there > are other women involved in Fedora. Don't worry, that's ok. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:05:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161305.mBGD57Sa001086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 08:05:06 EDT --- Fixed license and tabs vs space issues. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-ui-0.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-ui.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161305.mBGD5Oth001243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-16 08:05:22 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type per spec: LGPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: ecc5fe7fb2f8e86a1fc2d09651310b26fa922c7b tcping-1.3.5.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161303.mBGD39XU016921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 08:03:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327099) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327099) [Review] See attached for my initial review of the package. I need a reason for building the jar manually instead of using maven before approving this (or alternatively, you can switch the spec over to build using maven (pom.xml) as documented at [0] and [1]). [0]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472793] Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161321.mBGDLiNC021114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472793 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-16 08:21:43 EDT --- Oops, I hadn't noticed that this was already in jpackage -- mea culpa. :( I've taken the jpackage spec and modified it slightly and here's the result: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph-5.12.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Here are the differences from the jpackage spec: - Updated to latest upstream 5.1.2.1 - Added maven fragments and additional documentation - Used dos2unix to convert file endings - Removed Epoch -- not sure if that's kosher or not ... - Added gcj stuff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161326.mBGDQ6Po005835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 08:26:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: entertrack Short Description: Artifact tracking/management system Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161332.mBGDWcNs007126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 G Rajesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ganesanrajesh at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from G Rajesh 2008-12-16 08:32:37 EDT --- Yes. This is an excellent utility. Saves much of time, from configuring nfs for simple file sharing. Needs no much complex knowledge. Somebody take this project, please. If possible, port it to Fedora 10 also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 13:52:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161352.mBGDqXsW011273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #6 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2008-12-16 08:52:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) [...] > I still see "Summary: A enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot" ;-) doh! my bad, misread originally. Fixed now. > Removing definitely is better. Static subpackages are hightly discouraged in > Fedora; see packaging guidelines for details. OK, removed the provisions to make static package from spec file completely to keep is clean. > > License: GPLv2 > Looks more like GPLv2+ to me (or did I miss something?). No, you are right, I had missed the 'or later' in my first and second look. Fixed now. > > Requires: gdbm > Why is that needed? RPM automatically adds a requires for "libgdbm.so.2()", > hence please remove it if there there are no good reason for it. Thanks, you're of course right, removed. > >$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/jpilot-backup-* jpilot-backup-0.53-4.fc10.src.rpm > >jpilot-backup.src: W: strange-permission jpilot-backup.spec 0600 > >3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > Please fix Fixed. $ rpmlint jpilot-backup.spec /var/lib/mock//fedora-10-x86_64/result/*rpm jpilot-backup.spec:33: W: configure-without-libdir-spec jpilot-backup.src:33: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I let it nag as '%configure --disable-static' did not help in making no .la, so there is little point in leaving a useless flag in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161412.mBGECHje015347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #22 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-16 09:12:14 EDT --- Untill now, Beda was creating a tarball especially for Fedora, but it could be a substantially large working for him in the future. Following the advice of Terje, I created a patch that works directly on the upstream's "original". I hope I have done it correctly and that it is the best solution. SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/bkchem.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/bkchem-0.12.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161420.mBGEKqTW017621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #7 from John5342 2008-12-16 09:20:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I get a cmake related error: > > > > -- Found LibXml2: /usr/lib64/libxml2.so > > CMake Error at cmake/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:51 (MESSAGE): > > Could not find REQUIRED package LibZip > > Call Stack (most recent call first): > > cmake/FindLibZip.cmake:28 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS) > > CMakeLists.txt:10 (find_package) > > What arch/release are you building for? > Version of cmake and libzip? > If build was on koji have you got a link to the build? I have since imported into cvs and built for F-9, F-10 and devel andall builds went fine. Hopefully this is a one off or a config problem during a local build. >> CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt: >> No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of code such as >> >> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6) > >Warning is known about and will be reported upstream shortly (doesnt stop >build) Fix for this already in upstream svn. Should be included in next upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161429.mBGETcO2019049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 09:29:36 EDT --- Yup, looking good. === APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161438.mBGEcJ7P021081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2008-12-16 09:38:17 EDT --- rpmlint output: xmlto.spec:61: E: files-attr-not-set - The %doc has to be below the %defattr xmlto.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt - OK xmlto-tex.i686: W: no-documentation - OK 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. License is still not ok: xmlto.in contains a GPLv2+ header, butxmlif.l and xmlif.c do not contain any license information Are they really GPLv2+, too? They seem to be individual programs to me. Can you get the original author to verify the license and add license headers then? Here is a howto for GPL licensing: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] New: Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-restr.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Restr is a simple client for RESTful web services, designed as a lightweight alternative to ActiveResource rpmlint clean koji scratch builds: - f9: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1001390 - f10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1001392 - f11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1001396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161455.mBGEtsfJ008628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Colin Walters 2008-12-16 09:55:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gir-repository Short Description: Introspection system for GNOME libraries Owners: walters at verbum.org,otaylor at redhat.com Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 14:57:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161457.mBGEv2Aj025124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #8 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-12-16 09:57:01 EDT --- On the page of xmlif http://www.catb.org/~esr/xmlif/ is mentioned, that the xmlif is shipped as part of Tim Waugh's xmlto as well - and in the tarball is GPLv2 COPYING file. So I guess GPLv2+ should be ok... %doc and attrs will be fixed - of course - just accident ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:01:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161501.mBGF15bG009901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 10:01:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gupnp-ui Short Description: a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161501.mBGF1cxJ026356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 10:01:37 EDT --- Adam are you still reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: OASA - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161511.mBGFBxmE028697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 10:11:58 EDT --- It seems that only fixing %files will be okay. To Henrique: Just replacing egg-info entry with %{python_sitelib}/oasa-%{version}-py*.egg-info or so will make build succeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161514.mBGFEWgU012672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-16 10:14:31 EDT --- pdfbook-20070930-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfbook-20070930-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161513.mBGFDrA6012598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-16 10:13:52 EDT --- pdfbook-20070930-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfbook-20070930-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161522.mBGFMRCV014248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: OASA - |Review Request: python-oasa |python library for |- python library for |manipulation of chemical |manipulation of chemical |formats |formats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161528.mBGFSbCu015419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 10:28:36 EDT --- No. "devel" branch is already created on Fedora CVS and you can already rebuild this package for dist-f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:31:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161531.mBGFVTCX016385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 10:31:28 EDT --- Resetting CVS request as there is already guiloader module on Fedora CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161529.mBGFTQaj015674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #9 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-16 10:29:25 EDT --- Done, Mamoru. SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/python-oasa.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/oasa/0.12.5/python-oasa-0.12.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:28:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:28:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161528.mBGFSjZk015498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 10:28:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > BAD no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. > BAD no scriptlets present. This is fixed now so that the shared library has an SONAME, and we run ldconfig in the %post/%postun scriptlets. > - use --keepdate when running dos2unix to preserve the timestamps for the files Done. > - shared library is added, but ldconfig scriptlets are missing Done. > - rpmlint complains rpmlint now says: nekovm.src:114: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib nekovm.src:121: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib nekovm.src:122: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/* nekovm.src:123: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. But in this case it's just complaining about my install script which is moving the files FROM %{_prefix}/lib to %{_libdir}. I think this is rpmlint getting it wrong. > - I think these will create a multilib issue together with shared libneko.so > in the main package Fixed so now it uses %{_libdir} always. > - what is the purpose of the *.ndll? runtime libs for nekovm based apps? These are some type of runtime shared library containing neko VM code. > nekovm.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libneko.so > - result of not-so-right linking command This is now fixed. > I think you need to split the package to > main - %{_bindir} + /usr/lib/neko > libs - %{_libdir} > devel - %{_includedir} I don't think this split will work. The reason is that the main package will always require the -libs package, because it always needs (at least) std.ndll. This is the updated package: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/nekovm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/nekovm-1.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Dec 16 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.8.0-2 - New upstream release 1.8.0. - Use dos2unix --keepdate. - Use scriptlets to run ldconfig. - Use _libdir instead of _prefix/lib, and modify so it searches /usr/lib64 as well as /usr/lib. - Set the soname correctly and include libneko.so.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161535.mBGFZK7e001033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 10:35:19 EDT --- This package can be approved now. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (nachocalendar) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161539.mBGFditl001818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 Jorge Bras changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org | |) | --- Comment #15 from Jorge Bras 2008-12-16 10:39:42 EDT --- I posted the url with the new packages, for re-review, since I had fixed what you have pointed. I had a problem with the server that was hosting the packages, I will post a new url with the packages for review, give me a day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161542.mBGFgfv7002773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 10:42:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > There is no need for a CVS request because the directory already exists. I > guess that this was done with #206134. Ah, sorry. Then would you rebuild this package? For branches less than F-11 (i.e. F-10 or F-9), if you want to rebuild guiloader-c++ before guiloader is pushed into stable repositories (even if guiloader are in testing repositories you cannot rebuild -c++ aganist guiloader), please - visit https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng - login there - create a new ticket with informing * that to rebuild guiloader-c++ guiloader packages must be tagged as dist-f{10,9}-override * the EVRs (epoch-version-release) of guiloader packages which you have to have tagged as override. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161544.mBGFiqEc019630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2008-12-16 10:44:51 EDT --- If you want to rely only on the COPYING file, then xmlif is licensed under the terms of any GPL license, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ Or read the COPYING file: | If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may | choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. This may not be intended by upstream, therefore it is better to ask. The correct license tag for xmlif is then GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 15:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161552.mBGFqlpF005122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(twaugh at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #10 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-12-16 10:52:45 EDT --- So do you suggest to have License: GPLv2+ and GPL+ ? I'm ok with it, although I guess it is quite obscure ... Tim - as you probably have direct contact to xmlif author - what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161603.mBGG3tnQ007355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 11:03:54 EDT --- rpmlint isn't hugely useful for mingw packages at the moment. Upstream rpmlint refused to make changes to accomodate the packaging guidelines, but hopefully we can add some custom rules at some point in the future. The updated package here now has the following rpmlint warnings: mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/sqlite3.pc mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sqlite3.h mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sqlite3ext.h mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a These are fine. All mingw packages are development packages, so there is no -devel subpackage. mingw32-sqlite.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.la Note that we currently include *.la files in mingw packages, because libtool (probably) requires them for linking. mingw32-sqlite.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsqlite3.dll.a This is OK because the file in question contains Windows binary stubs - ie. arch-independent from the p.o.v. of Fedora. mingw32-sqlite.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 And again, this is OK, mandated by GCC and the packaging guidelines. I've fixed the spurious executable permission, and added 'Requires: pkgconfig' which is needed. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-sqlite.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-sqlite-3.6.6.2-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Dec 16 2008 Richard Jones - 3.6.6.2-1 - New upstream release (to match Fedora native), 3.6.6.2. - Replace patches with ones from native. - Rebase -no-undefined patch. - Remove spurious +x permissions on libsqlite3.dll.a. - Requires pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161604.mBGG4YbE024183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-16 11:04:33 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.3.beta1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmsn-4.0-0.3.beta1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:05:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161605.mBGG57jq024580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-16 11:05:06 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.3.beta1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmsn-4.0-0.3.beta1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161610.mBGGAdfo009142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-16 11:10:38 EDT --- ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161611.mBGGB0vk025971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-16 11:10:59 EDT --- ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161613.mBGGDTNu009543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 11:13:28 EDT --- Well, would you change the release number every time you modify your spec file? (In reply to comment #12) > cloog.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcloog.so.0.0.0 > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 - This library actually calls exit() in the library (e.g. source/names.c). This is unusual situation. Usually when some unexpected behavior happens in a function in a library, the function should return a value which tells the error or so and should call exit() ($ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit shows the explanation). Would you contact upstream? > cloog-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - This warning can be ignored. > I'd appreciate any help there. > >? Some header files design flaw > > - Well, for example the head of %_includedir/cloog/cloog.h > > says: > >---------------------------------------------------------- > > 40 #ifndef CLOOG_H > > 41 #define CLOOG_H > > 42 > > 43 #ifdef CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND > > 44 # define GNUMP > > 45 # include > > 46 #else > > 47 # include > > 48 # include > > 49 #endif > >---------------------------------------------------------- > > However, where can we tell if CLOOG_PPL_BACKEND is defined > > or not (when this package was built) (i.e whether this header > > file includes ppl_backend.h or polylib_backend.h)? > > build.log shows that when rebuilding this package -DCLOOG_PPL_BACKEND > > is used, however installed header files does not save such > > information.... > > How can I fix this ? I mean this is an upstream problem. Do you mean I should > append a patch to the package ? > I could as well ship the package as is, and submit a patch upstream to fix it ? - For this issue, I don't think this issue can be unresolved (I won't approve this package unless this is fixed). At least a patch should be appended or so and also this must be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161617.mBGGHJpB027360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 11:17:18 EDT --- Looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:19:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161619.mBGGJAMa011213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(twaugh at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #11 from Tim Waugh 2008-12-16 11:19:09 EDT --- I haven't really had any contact with Eric since xmlif was included. I'm sure it's fine for you to just add that RPM tag, and send him an email asking what he intended in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161626.mBGGQ0Bt013098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #27 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-16 11:25:57 EDT --- Update. Disabled the winbind subpackage so there shouldn't be any more file conflicts. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-0.7.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161626.mBGGQsQF029344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 11:26:53 EDT --- It unfortunately doesn't compiling using in rawhide using mock. It needs a BuildRequires: libtool and there's a gconf/dbus issue below. Not sure if the issue is fixed in 2.0.6 which has been released. checking for GCONF... configure: error: Package requirements (gconf-2.0 >= 2.6) were not met: Package dbus-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'dbus-1', required by 'gconf', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GCONF_CFLAGS and GCONF_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6XE1ki (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6XE1ki (%build) Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/libhildon.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 317, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/libhildon.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161630.mBGGURkw015381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #11 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-16 11:30:26 EDT --- Thank you. Could you sponsor the package, Mamoru? I signed up in the group of packagers, but it counts as Unapproved rather than pending. Did I something wrong or is this normal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161628.mBGGSWp9013687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2008-12-16 11:28:31 EDT --- In reply to comment #7 (and carefully not exposing my own assumptions), it does provide packages and classes with the same names as those in the BCEL jar. If some script adds every single JAR in /usr/share/java to CLASSPATH (and I have seen scripts that do that), then there very well could be a conflict. Do you know of some way to avoid that? Should I put this JAR in some nonstandard place to avoid that eventuality? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:35:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161635.mBGGZSMI031336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-16 11:35:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nachocalendar Short Description: Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:59:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161659.mBGGxRth003316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 11:59:26 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:04:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161704.mBGH4PJD004310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 12:04:24 EDT --- To use classpath, an example can be: ------------------------------------------------------------------ %prep %setup -q -n gdata pushd java rm -rf lib/* classes doc pro=build-src/build.properties for jars in \ "servlet servletapi5" \ "mail javamail" \ "activation activation" do f=$(echo $jars | gawk '{print $1;}') g=$(echo $jars | gawk '{print $2;}') %{__sed} -i -e "/^${f}/s|=.*$|=$(build-classpath ${g})|" $pro done ...... %build ...... ...... javadoc -classpath $(build-classpath javamail):/etc/alternatives/java_sdk_openjdk/lib/tools.jar -d doc `find src -name '*.java'` ----------------------------------------------------------------- (I have not yet found how to find tools.jar using build-classpath, maybe it is impossible for current Fedora java structure?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161706.mBGH6meD004989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 12:06:47 EDT --- So all issues should be fixed, but there will be multilib/multiarch problems due the existence of the devel subpackage. I tend to agree with you that there is no simple solution, so you should ask rel-eng to add nekovm to the list of multilib incompatible packages. And/or try to discuss the issue on the fedora-devel mailing list. But anyway, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161710.mBGHAKPx023970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 12:10:19 EDT --- Thanks for approving this. Are you sure there are still multilib issues remaining? The new package (1.8.0-2) should only install packages in %{_libdir}. Can this still cause a conflict? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161712.mBGHCQIh024415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-16 12:12:25 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Actually, maven needs artifacts that are not provided in Fedora. And packaging other java software that could be built using maven also shows that maven is Fedora lacks lots of important artifacts and that maven is really outdated. And I really don't understand maven enough to change any of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161711.mBGHBTiC024222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-16 12:11:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nekovm Short Description: Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:20:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161720.mBGHKrRY007498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-16 12:20:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Thanks for approving this. > > Are you sure there are still multilib issues remaining? > The new package (1.8.0-2) should only install packages > in %{_libdir}. Can this still cause a conflict? The binaries from %{_bindir} will differ and thus will block parallel installation of the nekovm packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161722.mBGHMjOj007768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:31:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161731.mBGHV0KG027401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-16 12:30:59 EDT --- Builds in fedora-10-i386 mock, rpmlint silent and happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161730.mBGHU0mf008567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-16 12:29:59 EDT --- python-setuptools isn't needed for distutils. Distutils is part of the python package itself: $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/python2.5/distutils/core.pyc python-2.5.2-1.fc10.x86_64 Might be worth porting stuff still using setuputils over to distutils. http://docs.python.org/distutils/index.html#distutils-index It seems to actually be in the documentation at python.org unlike setuptools/setuputils Everything looks good now, approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] New: Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Summary: Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/lua-rex.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/lua-rex-2.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lrexlib are bindings of three regular expression library APIs (POSIX, PCRE and Oniguruma) to Lua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161752.mBGHq0w3012579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 12:51:58 EDT --- I'm doing the review of this package. Could you review my hydrogen-drumkits? (Bug 468765) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161802.mBGI2OOp014629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org --- Comment #4 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 13:02:23 EDT --- ifuse.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 18) ifuse.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-4 ['0.1.0-4.20081214gitb0412bf.fc11', '0.1.0-4.20081214gitb0412bf'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161816.mBGIGYeu002748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #5 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 13:16:33 EDT --- - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. You should add 'Requires: hal' because you place a file in %{_datadir}/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:17:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161817.mBGIHs6K003015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Bug 466717 depends on bug 475411, which changed state. Bug 475411 Summary: suitesparse needs updated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:20:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161820.mBGIK2NX003342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 13:20:01 EDT --- Looks good to me other than the above. When those are fixed, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161818.mBGIIrgL003100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 13:18:51 EDT --- Here's the full review: * rpmlint complains: opal.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes openh323-devel Will this cause any problem in the future? I would say, let's put a version number just to be safe opal-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation At least the license file can get into this. opal-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openh323-devel Is openh323 compatible with opal? If yes, you should provide it. * Remove the precompiled binaries during prep. So far I found: ./configure.exe ./samples/opalgw/messages.bin ./plugins/LID/TigerJet/TjIpSys.dll ./plugins/LID/CM_HID/CM_HID.dll ./plugins/LID/VPB/libvpb.lib ./plugins/video/H.263-ffmpeg/ffmpeg/libavcodec.dll ./plugins/video/H.263-ffmpeg/ffmpeg/libavcodec.so ./src/win32/vpbapi.lib: current ar archive Actually the ffmpeg stuff is patent encumbered. You should take that stuff off and provide a "clean" tarball for the SRPM. * Please package the docs directory. I think it makes more sense to put it in the -devel package. * Shall we package samples and plugins (possibly in different subpackages)? Note that some plugins have different licenses. * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Please make use of the %{name} macro. * The devel package must require openssl-devel (see iax2/remote.h) * Weird provides: $ rpm -qv --provides opal ()(64bit) <--- This one g726()(64bit ... * Most libraries install into the directory %{_libdir}/%{name} , but not %{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}. Any reason you picked the latter way? * Latest version is not packaged. opal-3.4.3 is available * Fedora specific flag -O2 is overriden at certain instances by -Os. That needs fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161822.mBGIMAn5003969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 13:22:09 EDT --- I'm confused about this whole obsoletes/provides issue opal-devel obsoletes openh323-devel but opal does not obsolete openh323 I don't get it. An explanation in the SPEC file as a comment would be useful if you believe this is the right way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161827.mBGIRQ6p004874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Hans de Goede 2008-12-16 13:27:24 EDT --- *** Bug 476453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:33:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161833.mBGIXL95020213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 13:33:20 EDT --- Are we suppose to put the full build string in the changelog. I've only put the initial rev number, I've seen both done. There's a new version with the rest fixed here http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse-0.1.0-5.20081214gitb0412bf.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161837.mBGIbReF006835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 13:37:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm confused about this whole obsoletes/provides issue > > opal-devel obsoletes openh323-devel > > but opal does not obsolete openh323 > > I don't get it. An explanation in the SPEC file as a comment would be useful if > you believe this is the right way. there's no need for them any more as the docs only require them to be kept for 2 Fedora releases, openh323 was replaced back in Fedora 6 or 7. I thought I'd already dropped them, apparently missed the -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161836.mBGIavWc006782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-16 13:36:56 EDT --- Before I can review this package: - For svn based tarball, please follow * For creating source tarball https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control * For versioning https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages For this package the EVR should be 2.0.1-0.2.svn35%{?dist} (as 2.0.1 does not seem to be released yet) - As far as I checked the codes, the license tag should be "GPL+" (no version specified) - Can this package be built by using maven? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven Note that I am not familiar with maven. - For %setup, would you modify your tarball so that the tarball expands codes under the directory of which the name contains %{name}? - Would you explain why %{name} binary rpm itself is not created? - Please consider to use build-classpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161839.mBGIdmmi021125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:42:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161842.mBGIgebW007710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] New: Beteckna fonts package for review. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Beteckna fonts package for review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Summary: Beteckna fonts package for review. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, sundaram at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Package for review.. Beteckna fonts.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm it gives a "FindMatchinHVEdge didn't" during build but builds successfully.. Am not yet sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:43:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161843.mBGIhfpO021955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #8 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 13:43:40 EDT --- Allegedly rpmlint will let you omit %{dist} from the changelog but nothing else. It's not entirely clear that the packaging guidelines are so strict. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Changelogs doesn't go into detail. Personally, I think it's more readable as you had it before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:51:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161851.mBGIptfc009650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 13:51:54 EDT --- > * rpmlint complains: > opal.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes openh323-devel > Will this cause any problem in the future? I would say, let's put a version > number just to be safe > opal-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > At least the license file can get into this. > opal-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openh323-devel > Is openh323 compatible with opal? If yes, you should provide it. I'll remove it as its long obsolete. > * Remove the precompiled binaries during prep. So far I found: > ./configure.exe > ./samples/opalgw/messages.bin > ./plugins/LID/TigerJet/TjIpSys.dll > ./plugins/LID/CM_HID/CM_HID.dll > ./plugins/LID/VPB/libvpb.lib > ./plugins/video/H.263-ffmpeg/ffmpeg/libavcodec.dll > ./plugins/video/H.263-ffmpeg/ffmpeg/libavcodec.so > ./src/win32/vpbapi.lib: current ar archive > Actually the ffmpeg stuff is patent encumbered. You should take that stuff off > and provide a "clean" tarball for the SRPM. I'll speak to upstream to get this cleaned up. > * Please package the docs directory. I think it makes more sense to put it in > the -devel package. OK > * Shall we package samples and plugins (possibly in different subpackages)? > Note that some plugins have different licenses. The library is little use with out plugins so I don't see the point in splitting it up. > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > * Please make use of the %{name} macro. > > * The devel package must require openssl-devel (see iax2/remote.h) Will fix > * Weird provides: > $ rpm -qv --provides opal > ()(64bit) <--- This one > g726()(64bit > ... See RHBZ 473084 > * Most libraries install into the directory %{_libdir}/%{name} , but not > %{_libdir}/%{name}-%{version}. Any reason you picked the latter way? As per upstream. > * Latest version is not packaged. opal-3.4.3 is available Yes, but the current ekiga release depends on 3.4.2. When the new version of ekiga comes out it will be upgraded too. > * Fedora specific flag -O2 is overriden at certain instances by -Os. That needs > fixed. I'll add it to my upstream list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 18:54:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161854.mBGIsBpT023935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 13:54:10 EDT --- I agree, I've seen ones with just the build like I had, and with the git ammended. I think its more readable and it seems there's a mix. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:08:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161908.mBGJ872Q027553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 14:08:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > * Shall we package samples and plugins (possibly in different subpackages)? > > Note that some plugins have different licenses. > > The library is little use with out plugins so I don't see the point in > splitting it up. Ok, How about the samples? Btw, currently the "MPEG4 Part 2" plugin is disabled for obvious reasons. Shall we include it in a freeworld package at rpmfusion? Is there any benefit in that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:15:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:15:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161915.mBGJFL6m014579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 14:15:19 EDT --- > Ok, How about the samples? I'll have a look > Btw, currently the "MPEG4 Part 2" plugin is disabled for obvious reasons. Shall > we include it in a freeworld package at rpmfusion? Is there any benefit in > that? I think it requires x264 so its a possibility, it provides a video codec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161914.mBGJEFWH013968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 14:14:14 EDT --- OK, it looks like the concensus seems to be that this package should not own /usr/share/gnome/help, so that's OK. There is a question of whether this package should depend on yelp, as without it there's no way to actually look at the contained documentation. But that, again, is up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161913.mBGJDD9Y028657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 14:13:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ifuse Short Description: Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161925.mBGJPlmc031190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-16 14:25:46 EDT --- Not the name, the Description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161924.mBGJOqqu030778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-16 14:24:51 EDT --- It was a change request for the change of the name. Not a CVS Package request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161925.mBGJPVdk031139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-16 14:25:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: metapost-metauml Short Description: UML in LaTeX/MetaPost Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161928.mBGJSs7b017398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:56:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161956.mBGJu4os023591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 14:56:02 EDT --- This currently doesn't build for rawhide in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1001992 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 20:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162006.mBGK6jZd006931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #20 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 15:06:44 EDT --- Oops. looks like I forgot to update the BuildRequires and recheck in mock after I added the NetworkManager bits. Sorry. Testing this for myself now... Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect-0.99-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 20:10:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162010.mBGKASYZ007613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #21 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 15:10:27 EDT --- That worked. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1002066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 20:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162012.mBGKChhk008095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 15:12:42 EDT --- Cool. I saw the NM errors but thought it might have been something to with the other package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 20:20:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162020.mBGKKMSD028378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 Steven Pritchard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Steven Pritchard 2008-12-16 15:20:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 20:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:54:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162054.mBGKsncE002777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #23 from Terje R??sten 2008-12-16 15:54:47 EDT --- Looks good, some minor things: o rpmlint: bkchem.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 3) o use diff -x option or remove setup.py~ to clean up the patch. o use wget -N to get correct timestamp on tarball. o maybe change naming: bkchem.patch -> bkchem-remove-oasa.patch ? I see you are sponsored, congrats! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162102.mBGL2A41018371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162104.mBGL4OpY005100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 16:04:23 EDT --- All looks good. The only issue is that the new tar ball isn't up on the ftp site to verify the md5sum. Other than that its APPROVED. + rpmlint output $ rpmlint -i openconnect-0.99-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible ? upstream sources match sources in the srpm 5dbb4f92b31fc81d8b9a59083eb160f7 openconnect-0.99.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture built fine in koji + BuildRequires list all build dependencies N/A %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* N/A binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing but don't have a Cisco Anyconnect VPN currently available) + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:16:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162116.mBGLG9O6021995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2008-12-16 16:16:08 EDT --- Wasn't -DFAST in your original .spec file? Anyway, there are some macros that expand to error-checking code unless you specify -DFAST, in which case they expand to nothing. So it's your call, really: do you want error-checking code compiled in, or do you want to live dangerously but have the code run faster? As for the warnings, you're absolutely right. Some of the printf format warnings look like they indicate incorrect printing problems on 64-bit platforms. The dynamic + static library approach looks good. Sorry I didn't finish the review yesterday like I said I would. I had a complete network failure before your new SRPM finished downloading, possibly due to a winter storm that just went through here. The network's back up at last, and I have the SRPM, so *now* I will do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162117.mBGLHm8J022320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 16:17:47 EDT --- BTW I noticed a README.secureid in the git repos that wasn't included. Coming from a support point of view in might be useful if it was included as docs in a release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162125.mBGLPJxl009831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #25 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 16:25:18 EDT --- Thanks; I'll include README.SecurID. The tarball should be available: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/openconnect/openconnect-0.99.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:29:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162129.mBGLTdgx010273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #27 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 16:29:38 EDT --- tarball was there. firefox was caching the dir listing. md5sum confirmed to match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162127.mBGLRemt024460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 16:27:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openconnect Short Description: Open client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN Owners: dwmw2 Branches: F-9 F-10 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162145.mBGLj4uU013234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #10 from R P Herrold 2008-12-16 16:45:03 EDT --- actualy I pushed in a updated RawHide (from a while back) libzib and that solved the matter CentOS 5 x86_64 [herrold at centos-5 ebook-tools]$ rpm -q cmake libzip-devel cmake-2.6.2-2orc libzip-devel-0.8-5orc [herrold at centos-5 ebook-tools]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:51:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162151.mBGLpEFC014423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 16:51:13 EDT --- Also has build issues in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1002223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162148.mBGLmLA5013790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 16:48:20 EDT --- A couple of things. Where is the location for the source tarballs? I can't see them on either the openconnect site or NetworkManager site. Also alot of the Requires shouldn't be needed as RPM will automatically work it out from the library versions it that its built against. Explicit requires are only required for things like dbus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162150.mBGLotWF014380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2008-12-16 16:50:53 EDT --- MUST items: - rpmlint output: bad news here. These undefined non-weak symbol warnings probably indicate that we need yet more -DFOO command line options to avoid unresolved symbol problems. It'll take digging through the code to see what must be defined to have these symbols be defined, I guess. symmetrica.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_monomschur symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 length_comp_part symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eq_monomsymfunc symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_monomvector_monomvector symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 maxpart_comp_part symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_koeff symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 monom_speicherindex symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 monom_speicher symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_monommonomial symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mss_hashtable_hashtable_ symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_monompowsym symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_monomelmsym symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_monomhomsym symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 monom_speichersize symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ganzsquareroot symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_scalar_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eval_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 quores_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_skn_po symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_ilih_m symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 append_apply_part symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ganzdiv_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 std_perm symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 matrixp symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_schur_schur symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 select_row symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 hash_list symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_bruch_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 convert_sqrad_scalar symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_ksd_n symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sn_l symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_integermatrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 hash_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 addinvers_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_gk_spa symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_BINTREE_POWSYM symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ordcon symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_tableaux symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sn_h symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 partitionp symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_permutation symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 first_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 convert_sqrad_cyclo symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ggt_field_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ganzdiv_apply_longint_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 make_monopoly_sqrad symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mod_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_BINTREE_SCHUR symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_integer_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_bruch_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ganzdiv_apply_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_l_s symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_us_t symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_pa_l symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ribbon_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 durfee_size_part symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 kostka_number_skewpartition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 dimension_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 skewpartitionp symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 kuerzen symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_permutation symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_bruch_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 gen_mat symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_scalar_sqrad symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 c_ijk_sn symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 dec_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_list symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_lh_nm symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 makevectorofSYT symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eq_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 kostka_tab symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 hook_part symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 convert_cyclo_scalar symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_integermatrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 tex_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_LIST_VECTOR symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 double_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 invers_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mss_ende symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_scalar_sqrad symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 P_symmetrized_bideterminant symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sn_s symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 lehmercode_vector symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_pa_li symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_t_ij symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_longint_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 half_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 an_tafel symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sn_mon symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_bruch_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 consp_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_bruch_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 transformlist symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 zykeltyp symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 dec_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_EXPONENT_VECTOR_apply symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 charvalue symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_BINTREE_MONOMIAL symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_integer_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 objectread_list symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eq_partition_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_polynom_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 invers_apply_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 empty_listp symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 makevectorofpart symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 remove_part_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 numberofpart_i symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 conjugate_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 nullp_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 inc_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 init_bintree symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sn_ps symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_scalar_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 comp_permutation symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 addinvers_apply_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_gl_il symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 part_part_skewschur symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_integer_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_VECTOR_FROBENIUS symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 a_charvalue_co symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mod_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 squareroot symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 numberofvariables symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_longint_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 det_mat_imm symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 operate_perm_vector symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 makevectorofspecht_poly symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 first_subset symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_tableaux_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 generate_standard_tableaux symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_longint_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_bruch_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_bruch_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_part_perm symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sk_mo symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 kuerzen_integral symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mod_apply_integer_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 kronecker_product symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mod_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_cyclo_data symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 addinvers_apply_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 intlog_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 c_l_s symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_iindex_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_ou_b symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 an_rz_perm symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_ioiu_b symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 wert symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ggt_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 nullp_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 filter_apply_list symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_matrix_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mem_size_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mod_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_bruch_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_sk_mo symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_skewpartition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_scalar_cyclo symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 hash_skewpartition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_BINTREE_ELMSYM symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_ilih_nm symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 square_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_integer_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 pfaffian_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 objectread_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_skn_po symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_longint_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_longint_integer symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_BINTREE_HOMSYM symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_m_li symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_scalar_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 make_index_coeff_power_cyclo symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eq_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 inc_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_ou_b symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 make_n_kelmtrans symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_tableaux symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_pa_i symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_po_k symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 operate_perm_spaltenmatrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_il_p symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_l_n symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_v_pa symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_integermatrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 addinvers_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 insert_bintree symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 c_l_n symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 indexofpart symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_bruch_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_mo_ki symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_t_iji symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 signum_permutation symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 ordcen symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_sn_e symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 copy_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_mo_s symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mem_size_matrix symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mod_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_m_hi symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 last_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 kostka_number symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eq_longint_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_pa_ii symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_longint_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_scalar_polynom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 zeilenende symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_int_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_BINTREE_POLYNOM symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 weight_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 next_subset symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_int_pa symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 alle_teiler symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_mo_k symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 s_t_u symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 eq_permutation symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 cast_apply_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_iindex_iexponent_monom symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_integer_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_partition symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 freeself_list symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 bit_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 first_permutation symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_schur_schur symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_bruch symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 t_VECTOR_EXPONENT symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_apply_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_umriss_tableaux symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_i_pa symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 change_row_ij symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 add_longint_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_u_t symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 mult_apply_bruch_longint symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 b_ks_pa symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 which_part symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 bestimme_fixpunkt symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 m_lh_m symmetrica.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libsymmetrica.so.0.0.0 class_mult symmetrica-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 263 warnings. - package name: OK - spec file name: OK - packaging guidelines: OK - license guidelines: OK - license field: OK - text of license in a file: OK - spec file in American English: OK - legible spec file: OK - sources match upstream: OK - package builds successfully: OK, checked on x86_64 - use of ExcludeArch: unknown, as I cannot check other arches, assumed OK - BuildRequires: OK - locale handling: OK - use of ldconfig: OK - relocatable package: OK - package owns all directories it creates: OK - no duplicate files in %files: OK - file permissions: OK - %clean section: OK - consistent use of macros: OK - code or permissible content: OK - large documentation files: OK - %doc files do not affect runtime: OK - header files in -devel: OK - static libraries in -static: OK - pkgconfig files: OK - .so files in -devel: OK - -devel package requires main package: OK - no .la archives: OK - desktop files: OK - don't own files/directories owned by other packages: OK - clean at start of %install: OK - filenames are UTF-8: OK SHOULD items: - no license text file, query upstream: OK (upstream appears to be dead) - translations of description and summary: OK - builds in mock: OK (checked F-10 x86-64 only) - builds on all supported arches: did not check - package works as described: unable to test satisfactorily - sane scriptlets: OK - subpackages require main package: OK - pkgconfig file placement: OK - file dependencies: OK So it looks like the items you need to take care of are: - Decide whether to use -DFAST or not - Decide what (if anything) to do about the undefined non-weak symbols - Possibly patch the sources to get rid of warnings indicating 64-bit problems None of those make the package fail MUST items, so I'll APPROVE this package now and trust you to provide good solutions for those 3 items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162151.mBGLppUJ014665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-16 16:51:50 EDT --- Thanks Manuel for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 21:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162155.mBGLt4PC030058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 16:55:03 EDT --- Yeah, stuff changed in rawhide; I have to build a slightly newer version there. Tarballs will be coming from the same place as the rest of NetworkManager in the future. The code has now been imported into GNOME SVN. Most of the specfile was copied directly from NetworkManager-vpnc. As was the code, for that matter. dcbw, what version number should we use for the first build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:02:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162202.mBGM2XPF016986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #11 from John5342 2008-12-16 17:02:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > actualy I pushed in a updated RawHide (from a while back) libzib and that > solved the matter > > CentOS 5 x86_64 > > [herrold at centos-5 ebook-tools]$ rpm -q cmake libzip-devel > cmake-2.6.2-2orc > libzip-devel-0.8-5orc > [herrold at centos-5 ebook-tools]$ Ok then. That explains it. Tested it with the minimum version in the repos at the time of review (cmake 2.6.2, libzip 0.8-5) and went fine. Am guessing centos had an older version. Never tested in centos because it wasnt a target platform. Treating this build issue as resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:21:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162221.mBGML6AE020342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 17:21:05 EDT --- This is the F-10 version: Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect-0.99-1.fc10.src.rpm Building now as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1002264 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162231.mBGMVfLj022116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #8 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 17:31:40 EDT --- Tarballs uploaded now. At dcbw's request I'll change the version number to 0.7.0-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:43:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162243.mBGMhG1R024560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 17:43:15 EDT --- That is a perfectly legitimate reason not to use maven for me. Please fix the other things in the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162242.mBGMgCfm024498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162243.mBGMh3BQ006974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162249.mBGMnefi007819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 17:49:39 EDT --- I think the date is fine (20080907 style) but I think the version shouldn't be 0. Is the format of the drumkits dependant on particular versions hydrogen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162253.mBGMrEI1026041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #9 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 17:53:13 EDT --- OK, rebuilt as 0.7.0-1, and a bunch of superfluous Requires: dropped. Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.0-1.svn3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 22:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162251.mBGMpuCh025918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 17:51:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-transaction Short Description: Transaction Management for Python Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:01:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162301.mBGN1uts010136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #10 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-16 18:01:55 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1002338 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] New: Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Summary: Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libspiro/libspiro.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libspiro/libspiro-20071029-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library will take an array of spiro control points and convert them into a series of b?zier splines which can then be used in the myriad of ways the world has come to use b?ziers. Notes: - Both fontforge and inkscape can use this library. Testing with either recompiled with this library enabled welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162313.mBGNDuM8029813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pjones at redhat.com |pbrobinson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162326.mBGNQ9Mr000955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-16 18:26:09 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162329.mBGNTZ1x001455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-16 18:29:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcping Short Description: Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:30:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162330.mBGNUt5E015677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(thomas at apestaart. | |org) | --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 18:30:53 EDT --- Looks like nothing's going to happen here. Well, we tried. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:33:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162333.mBGNXFJ6002718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec - |beteckna-sfd-fonts - |Beteckna fonts |Beteckna fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162332.mBGNWqMf002629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Summary|Beteckna fonts package for |Review Request: |review. |beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec - | |Beteckna fonts --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 18:32:51 EDT --- We have scripts which parse these review requests, so it is much better if you follow the submission instructions at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162338.mBGNcW7C004271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) --- Comment #3 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-16 18:38:31 EDT --- Should the .so files go in a -devel subpackage? License seems good Why isn't doc/ packaged in %doc ? Why aren't smp_flags used? What is the purpose of the manual lrexlib Provides? What will be Requiring that, other than the other auto-generated Provides: rex_onig.so.2.4 rex_pcre.so.2.4 rex_posix.so.2.4 lua-rex = 2.4.0-1.fc11 lua-rex(x86-32) = 2.4.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162339.mBGNd67r017778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-16 18:39:06 EDT --- koji build fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1002390 in my local mock (building for rawhide, too), I got: checking for intltool >= 0.35... 0.35.5 found checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tD6hvi (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tD6hvi (%build) EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/giver.spec' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 286, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), ret) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/giver.spec' LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162345.mBGNjnhi006357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 18:45:48 EDT --- Yes, they only work for hydrogen 0.93 and up. They will release a new beta for hydrogen-0.94 very soon, and I will update that for rawhide. The drumkits will work with hydrogen-0.94. Anyhow, should I use 20080907 for version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162356.mBGNuiha021625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 18:56:43 EDT --- If they're dependant on a particular version of hydrogen then I would use the version of hydrogen as the version with a build rev as the date like you currently have. That way its easy for the user to tell what version of hydrogen they need (or at least the minimum) and the date the drumkits were packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170001.mBH01IfG022639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-16 19:01:18 EDT --- I'm about to perform the necessary changes. Is it a problem to have the svn information included? Makes it somewhat easier to maintain as I only need to unpack it, svn up, repack it and do a new build. Including the date when the snapshot was done in the release tag is a problem: jakarta-commons-compress-javadoc.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet jakarta-commons-compress-javadoc-0-0.1.20081205svn.fc11.noarch.rpm ...what should I do about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:07:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170007.mBH07VNf010323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 19:07:30 EDT --- But these drumkits will work for both hydrogen-0.93 and hydrogen-0.94. hydrogen-0.93 is in the stable repo and rawhide right now. hydrogen-0.94 will be in rawhide soon. but hydrogen-0.93 will remain in the stable repo. So should I use 0.93 for the drumkits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:17:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170017.mBH0HVub025097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 19:17:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm about to perform the necessary changes. > > Is it a problem to have the svn information included? Makes it somewhat easier > to maintain as I only need to unpack it, svn up, repack it and do a new build. Sure, if that works for you that's fine. > Including the date when the snapshot was done in the release tag is a problem: > jakarta-commons-compress-javadoc.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet > jakarta-commons-compress-javadoc-0-0.1.20081205svn.fc11.noarch.rpm > > ...what should I do about this? dwmw2 says this is not an issue, I believe him :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170021.mBH0LUu7025750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 19:21:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Wasn't -DFAST in your original .spec file? Anyway, there are some macros that > expand to error-checking code unless you specify -DFAST, in which case they > expand to nothing. So it's your call, really: do you want error-checking code > compiled in, or do you want to live dangerously but have the code run faster? Nope, -DFFTRUE was in my original. I guess Sage is ok with -DFAST, so it's fine for me. > As for the warnings, you're absolutely right. Some of the printf format > warnings look like they indicate incorrect printing problems on 64-bit > platforms. Kevin may get to making some patches if he has time, or may prod me into it :). > The dynamic + static library approach looks good. Great. > Sorry I didn't finish the review yesterday like I said I would. I had a > complete network failure before your new SRPM finished downloading, possibly > due to a winter storm that just went through here. The network's back up at > last, and I have the SRPM, so *now* I will do the full review. It's fine! Bummer that your network went down. Any chance you're in Washington? (We just had a storm.) (I'll reply to anything in the review as needed in my next comment.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170024.mBH0OEiQ025968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 19:24:13 EDT --- I think 0.93 is fine. it specifies the minimum version. and then you have a requires for >= minimum version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170027.mBH0RAkF013334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 19:27:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327192) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327192) #ifdef'd things in symmetrica Generated with: grep '#ifdef' *.c | cut -d':' -f2 | cut -d' ' -f2 | sort | uniq > defines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451582] Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170028.mBH0SnA9013439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(smparrish at shallow | |creek.net) | --- Comment #6 from Steven M. Parrish 2008-12-16 19:28:46 EDT --- Still working on a few issues. Should have a new SPEC and SRPM ready for review later this week. Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:29:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170029.mBH0TGd6026660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 19:29:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: symmetrica Short Description: A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170033.mBH0XR9n027351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-16 19:33:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jakarta-commons-compress.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc11.src.rpm I think every issue was addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170038.mBH0cVu3028059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 19:38:31 EDT --- OK I will use Version: 0.93 Release: 1.20080907 inspired by this guideline: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Anything else that needs fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170040.mBH0errL028482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-16 19:40:52 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170044.mBH0isG9028822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-16 19:44:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jakarta-commons-compress Short Description: Java API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:56:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170056.mBH0uuaq017407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 19:56:55 EDT --- A few fixes required. Also as a side note it doesn't look like libgnome is used in the source files but its included in the configure checks but I'm not sure. + rpmlint output $ rpmlint NetworkManager-openconnect.spec NetworkManager-openconnect.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 70) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora - license matches the actual package license There's no COPYING file included in the source. Some of the source files include the license but some don't include any at all. + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible - upstream sources match sources in the srpm 399dc23f2df67d994770dfdfdaec0ecb NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.0.svn3.tar.gz Package needs to adhere to source requirements, if its using VCS snapshots it needs to be specified as per the Packaging docs. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL + package successfully builds on at least one architecture built fine in koji - BuildRequires list all build dependencies Not sure why libpng is required. It builds fine without it and doesn't seem to check for it in the configure script. + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* Documented that there's no translations yet but its handled + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr - package owns all directories it creates /usr/share/gnome-vpn-properties/openconnect/ is not owned by the package /usr/share/gnome-vpn-properties/ isn't either and should probably be owned by NetworkManager itself as more than one NM vpn package installs things there. n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages - %install must start with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT etc. needs to remove old buildroots + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: - if there is no license file, packager should query upstream mentioned above n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing but don't have a Cisco Anyconnect VPN currently available) + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 01:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170102.mBH12WPG018537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-16 20:02:31 EDT --- It looks mostly OK. You should move from %{buildroot} to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as its the standard now. Other than that once there's an updated package I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 01:42:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170142.mBH1gOSO024430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 20:42:23 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: ghc-paths-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is true, and not a problem. ghc-paths.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/libHSghc-paths-0.1.0.5.a ghc-paths-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/libHSghc-paths-0.1.0.5_p.a which are normal for Haskell packages. The only real complaint I have is that the module description doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I guess it must make sense if you understand Haskell (which I don't); that's not really unheard of when it comes to specialized modules for various languages, so I'm not going to worry about it. Maybe you can think of something more sensible. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: ea9e97425894e3dbd7915e00e107e2e7fc07b6e8293fd2dd66a813f0673cba10 ghc-paths-0.1.0.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-paths-devel = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-paths = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-paths(x86-64) = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.10.1 ghc-paths-prof-0.1.0.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-paths-prof = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-paths-prof(x86-64) = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 = ghc-paths = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11 ghc-prof = 6.10.1 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 01:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170150.mBH1oTHZ006105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 20:50:28 EDT --- This fails to build for me: - build examples comp_diff.opt + ocamlopt.opt -warn-error A -dtypes -inline 3 -I . -I ../src -I +camlp4 -o comp_diff.opt nums.cmxa graphics.cmxa comp_diff.cmx /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 02:12:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:12:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170212.mBH2CZ0v028868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 21:12:34 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The license tag seems incorrect; AssertOS.pm and CheckOS.pm both explicitly say either GPLv2 or Artistic. Why is the test suite disabled? If there's a reason you can't run it, you should at least comment on it in the spec. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 0c4a461f21e895ec4373325a10ea5df1df734ad7ba4c261f5a3edb47e10dac77 Devel-CheckOS-1.50.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Devel::AssertOS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::AIX) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Amiga) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Apple) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::BSDOS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::BeOS) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Cygwin) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::DEC) = 1.3 perl(Devel::AssertOS::DGUX) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::DragonflyBSD) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Dynix) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::FreeBSD) = 1.0 perl(Devel::AssertOS::HPUX) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Haiku) = 1.0 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Interix) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Irix) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Linux) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Linux::v2_6) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MPEiX) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MSDOS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MSWin32) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MacOSX) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MacOSX::v10_4) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MacOSclassic) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MachTen) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MicrosoftWindows) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::MirOSBSD) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::NeXT) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::NetBSD) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Netware) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::OS2) = 1.0 perl(Devel::AssertOS::OS390) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::OS400) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::OSF) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::OSFeatures::POSIXShellRedirection) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::OpenBSD) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::POSIXBC) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::QNX) = 1.0 perl(Devel::AssertOS::QNX::Neutrino) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::QNX::v4) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::RISCOS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Realtime) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::SCO) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Solaris) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Sun) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::SunOS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::SysVr4) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::SysVr5) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Unicos) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::Unix) = 1.2 perl(Devel::AssertOS::VMESA) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::VMS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::AssertOS::VOS) = 1.1 perl(Devel::CheckOS) = 1.50 perl-Devel-CheckOS = 1.50-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Data::Compare) perl(Devel::AssertOS) perl(Devel::AssertOS::Linux) perl(Devel::AssertOS::MacOSX) perl(Devel::CheckOS) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Find::Rule) perl(File::Find::Rule) >= 0.28 perl(File::Spec) perl(Test::More) >= 0.62 perl(strict) perl(vars) ? %check is commented out for some reason. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 02:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] New: Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Summary: Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-shove.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-shove-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Common object storage frontend that supports dictionary-style access, object serialization and compression, and multiple storage and caching backends. Currently supported storage backends are: * Amazon S3 Web Service * Berkeley Source Database * Filesystem * Firebird * FTP * DBM * Durus * Memory * Microsoft SQL Server * MySQL * Oracle * PostgreSQL * SQLite * Subversion * Zope Object Database (ZODB) Currently supported caching backends are: * Filesystem * Firebird * memcached * Memory * Microsoft SQL Server * MySQL * Oracle * PostgreSQL * SQLite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 02:50:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170250.mBH2o9eC015057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-16 21:50:08 EDT --- In reply to comment #11: Strange, so you think the perl files should be 644 instead of 444? Is root likely to need to write them? Or is there something thats broken by them being 444? I suppose if it's needed we could just change the defattr for those files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 02:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170250.mBH2oTYG015128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 21:50:28 EDT --- I note the upstream web site indicates 0.5.0 is out, but I can't find the files anywhere. That's the only weirdness I see; the package looks fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: db5a48d21f562af94a57bf92e44cf7d570b1f8065f4b8e83a995b796b09711a0 restr-0.4.0.gem * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: rubygem(restr) = 0.4.0 rubygem-restr = 0.4.0-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/env ruby(abi) = 1.8 rubygems * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * rubygem(%{gemname}) provided. * gems installed properly. * gems installed to proper directory. * gems, cache, and specifications files/directories owned properly. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 03:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170304.mBH34QaF017379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-16 22:04:24 EDT --- I did the changes you asked. I also found another free drumkit in hydrogen's forums. I added it to the package: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10.src.rpm %changelog: 0.9.3-1.20080907 - Change versioning - Some cosmetics on the SPEC file - Added Asma Davul (GPLv3) to the drumkits -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 03:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170311.mBH3B9Zv006196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 22:11:08 EDT --- This fails to build for me, in a bizarre way: + %cabal_build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CbV8LX: line 32: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CbV8LX (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CbV8LX (%build) This package looks significantly different from the ghc-paths package I just reviewed; I'm guessing this package just needs an update to work with the new set of macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 03:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170313.mBH3DgaU006479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mohakvyas at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-16 22:13:41 EDT --- I note there's been no response to these comments from the submitter in over a month. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 03:57:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:57:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170357.mBH3vu5o014742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #24 from Warren Togami 2008-12-16 22:57:54 EDT --- I am soon ready to spin K12Linux F10 RC1. This package needs to be finished quickly. Action items? 1) Fix the path in the desktop file. 2) Got your fedorapeople.org account straightened out? Upload your versioned tarballs into a permanent location in a directory there and refer to it from your spec file. Source0: http://......./something.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 04:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170424.mBH4OAEj018699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Stefan Seefeld changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #23 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-16 23:24:08 EDT --- I just released QMTest 2.4.1. The source package is available from http://www.codesourcery.com/public/qmtest/qmtest-2.4.1/qmtest-2.4.1.tar.gz It includes the qmtest.spec file. I have created a Fedora account (username=stefan), and added FE_NEEDSPONSOR to the block field of this bug. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] New: Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-1.0-0.1.rc1.r2803.fc10.src.rpm Description: `repoze.what` is an `authorization framework` for WSGI applications, based on `repoze.who` (which deals with `authentication`). On the one hand, it enables an authorization system based on the groups to which the `authenticated or anonymous` user belongs and the permissions granted to such groups by loading these groups and permissions into the request on the way in to the downstream WSGI application. And on the other hand, it enables you to manage your groups and permissions from the application itself or another program, under a backend-independent API. For example, it would be easy for you to switch from one back-end to another, and even use this framework to migrate the data. It's highly extensible, so it's very unlikely that it will get in your way. Among other things, you can extend it to check for many other conditions (such as checking that the user comes from a given country, based on her IP address, for example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170521.mBH5LRIf006987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-17 00:21:25 EDT --- The above srpm URL is invalid, but I poked around in the directory and found it. Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. Note that the leading blank line in your %description makes it into the final output, which probably isn't what you want. That's really minor, and I can find nothing worth complaining about. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 803b7669e09124012db110da71fa8dfdf64ea53c92b4021fbaba3e5638aea00b refmac_dictionary_v5.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: refmac-dictionary = 5.04-1.fc11 = (nothing) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * acceptable content. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:25:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170525.mBH5PebM028327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2008-12-17 00:25:39 EDT --- *** Bug 468805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:25:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468805] Review Request: python-tgext-authorization - Authorization for TurboGears 2 applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170525.mBH5Peut028302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468805 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2008-12-17 00:25:39 EDT --- tgext-authorization has been replaced what repoze.what. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 476789 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170526.mBH5QTd1028437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170526.mBH5QSuW028401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476789 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 05:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170532.mBH5WW4L029264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 00:32:29 EDT --- Thanks Till - I changed ghc-zlib to use bcond and %(ghc --numeric-version) so far and will do same for ghc-gtk2hs. (I think we should move ghc_version into macros.ghc then.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:15:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170615.mBH6FgDR003324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 01:15:41 EDT --- Ah yes - I will update to "%cabal build" and "%cabal haddock" soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170618.mBH6ISMP003591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #34 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-12-17 01:18:27 EDT --- Pong, Sorry for the away-ness. I plan on picking this up in a few days, but... I'm having really really weird problems getting Xmonad to work in Gnome, so i'm going to be trying to resolve that first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170621.mBH6LKWn004303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(opensource at till.n | |ame) --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 01:21:18 EDT --- > Btw. is there any need to require a certain version of ghc except for making > sure that the pkg_libdir exists, i.e. would it be possible to just use a > Requires: ghc, given that one can use some spec-fu to automatically build the > pkg_libdir path and Requires from the ghc version that was used to build the > rpm? Iirc it was only required in previous Fedora releases, to allow parallel > installation of different ghc version, which is not supported anymore. Actually this is breaking in mock/koji for me, but perhaps I am not doing it right. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1002891&name=srpm.log Till, could you have look or do you know another package that does something similar? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170629.mBH6T3EZ005209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-17 01:29:02 EDT --- Well, there is not much to complain about. The package is in very good condition. Just two tiny remarks: * rpmlint says: libspiro-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation At the least the license file can go in the %doc of this subpackage. I also think that the README* files would suit the devel subpackage better. * I suggest you to make use of the %{name} and %{version} macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170635.mBH6ZONf017667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-17 01:35:23 EDT --- Well, you can do these changes before you commit. No need to recycle the review process since these are very minor issues. ------------------------------------------- This package (libspiro) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170642.mBH6gk69007171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 01:42:45 EDT --- Ah, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:54:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170654.mBH6sgGB008871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 08:20:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170820.mBH8Kw3R024169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-17 03:20:56 EDT --- There is no answer from the reporter of the other pidgin-musictracker review request so far. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 I will close the other review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 08:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170822.mBH8MUXr003062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(jon.hermansen at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-17 03:22:28 EDT --- I'm close this Review request because there is an other one and the reporter seems to be not longer interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 08:40:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170840.mBH8e7pf027592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-17 03:40:06 EDT --- Some comments on your spec file - License: GPLv2 What's is about the copyright in the NEWS file? - 'Source0: http://pidgin-musictracker.googlecode.com/files/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4.tar.bz2' can be 'http://pidgin-musictracker.googlecode.com/files/musictracker-%{version}.tar.bz2' no worries about the version in the future to get the source - No 'BuildRequires' ? I think that this didn't work in mock. - This is a pidgin plugin but Pidgin is not a requirement? - 'make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' better use 'make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install' to preserves the files' timestamps. - '%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README' The file THANKS is missing - For your file section, take a lot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros - Your %changelog don't match the guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170912.mBH9CDjj012987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-17 04:12:12 EDT --- Can you please provide an URL to the spec file? It's much easier for possible reviewers to have a look at it. Some quick comments on your spec file: - The name of this package is a bit wired. Upper case, underscore, version, and language. According the other doc stuff (e.g. fedora-release-notes) 'fedora-security-guide' would be nice or 'linux-security-guide'. - 'Source0:' should point to the upstream source location, if possible. - About the .desktop file. The guidelines says that it should be include as 'SourceX:' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files See 'desktop-file-install usage' for details about the installation of this file. Get in touch with upstream and ask them to include the .desktop file. - There is no entry in your %changelog section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:17:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170917.mBH9HNEt003187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|sayamindu at gmail.com |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #14 from Felix Kaechele 2008-12-17 04:17:21 EDT --- Here are some issues that need to be addressed imo (without trying to impose my personal style of writing specs :-) before I can start the "real" review process - why do you %define real_name DansGuardian when it is never used in the spec any further? - why does BuildRequires: gcc-c++, have a ',' at the end when there's nothing following? - you should better include dansguardian.httpd and dansguardian.init into a source file. That would improve readability of the spec. - you seem not to have written a patch as suggested in comment #8 - in %files why do you set %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) instead of %defattr(-, root, root, -)? Is it really necessary to mark all files executeable? - same for %defattr(0700, nobody, nobody, 0755) a few lines after that - don't put www files in /var/www. You should rather put them into /usr/share/dansguardian. Then you would also need to rewrite the apache config that is supplied. See the package phpMyAdmin for an example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170925.mBH9PIkg004943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2008-12-17 04:25:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > It looks mostly OK. You should move from %{buildroot} to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as its > the standard now. Other than that once there's an updated package I'll do a > full review. There is nothing wrong with using %{buildroot} in general: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:45:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170945.mBH9jqBE009550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #25 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-17 04:45:49 EDT --- Also, it seems to me that gtk-network is a link to network-workgroup.png so you'd better use the generic name. Also I don't know if .desktop files for files at the desktop follow the same specification than .desktop in menu, but if it is so, Icon could be Icon=network-workgroup In that case you could avoid the dependency on a precise theme, and either have a dependency on a generic virtual provides, if one exists or no dependency at all since a theme should be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170947.mBH9l3Ee020448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 04:47:02 EDT --- I still think it can be split to be multilib compliant main - %{_bindir} + %{_libdir}/neko/ -libs - %{_libdir}/libneko.so.* -devel - %{_includedir} + %{_libdir}/libneko.so both main and -devel will Require -libs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:45:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469485] Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170945.mBH9jpAJ020126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-17 04:45:49 EDT --- At the moment there is no Prism2/2.5/3 based 802.11b cards in my hardware pool, I tested only if fakeap runs and not if it's really working. So I miss the dependency of hostap_crypt_conf. Thanks for pointing me to that. I didn't know that aircrack-ng provide such functionality. Because of that I think that it would be better to drop this request or postpone it till hostap-utils is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170947.mBH9l5Fd009946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #26 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-17 04:47:04 EDT --- Also is Icon[en_US]=/usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/filesystems/gtk-network.png really useful? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 09:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170949.mBH9nDoF020997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-17 04:49:12 EDT --- Brennan -> Do you want to take this one? No change since we chatted on #fedora-devel. I dropped a message there but you might have missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 10:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171041.mBHAfEg3032548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) --- Comment #14 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-17 05:41:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > OK, it looks like the concensus seems to be that this package should not own > /usr/share/gnome/help, so that's OK. There is a question of whether this > package should depend on yelp, as without it there's no way to actually look at > the contained documentation. But that, again, is up to you. I dropped the yelp dependency a while ago while the documentation was still part of the main package, so that Live media could be created which didn't pull in yelp (to meet space constraints), yet had the tools. Now that the documentation is split off, I can just do the right thing and let this depend on yelp again. Do you want another round of SRPMS/Spec files with that change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 10:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171053.mBHArJOX025346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 05:53:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327225) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327225) create -libs subpackage to be multilib compliant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 10:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171051.mBHApXum025105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #13 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 05:51:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327224) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327224) update set-soname patch - make libneko.so.1 real file and libneko.so symlink - use "cp -d" when copying the libs otherwise (plain "cp") the symlink was dereferenced to the real file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 11:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171123.mBHBNoT9009273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #9 from Lubos Stanek 2008-12-17 06:23:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327228) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327228) the Czech message catalog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 11:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171125.mBHBPKfD009767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #10 from Lubos Stanek 2008-12-17 06:25:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327229) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327229) modify sources to include the new message catalog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 11:22:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171122.mBHBMYDg009141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Lubos Stanek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lubek at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #8 from Lubos Stanek 2008-12-17 06:22:33 EDT --- I created the Czech localization for assoGiate some time ago. It would be great to add it to the package. It was not possible to push it into the upstream. The author has not replied either my mails or his web contact form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 11:32:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171132.mBHBWlss001127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #45 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 06:32:43 EDT --- Can we close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 11:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171134.mBHBYfOE001422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:01:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171201.mBHC1iYb017345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |461234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 11:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] New: Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Summary: Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twaugh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db-3.0.0.20081124-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is the database of printers, printer drivers, and driver options for Foomatic. The site http://www.openprinting.org/ is based on this database. -- Note to reviewer: This package has been split out of the main 'foomatic' package. The reason is that the database itself should be a noarch package as it is architecture-independent, while the engine for accessing it is small but architecture-dependent. Once this package has been approved I will adjust the main foomatic package so that it requires foomatic-db (and does not ship the database itself). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:03:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171203.mBHC34ue017673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 07:03:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327234) [Review] Attached is my initial review for the package. Also: please consider updating from Fedora 8 before it goes End of Line very soon! Two very simple "BAD"s to fix and then I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:04:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171204.mBHC4G2i017845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) | --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-17 07:04:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Should the .so files go in a -devel subpackage? No. They are not meant for use by linker, lua interpreter looks for .so files specifically. I'm thinking whether it makes sense to ship the .2.4 files, but it's that just because upstream does so. The .so files don't have a SONAME and are not used by dynamic linker, just dlopened by lua. > License seems good > > Why isn't doc/ packaged in %doc ? I just forgot. I'll be including it in new package I'll post shortly. > Why aren't smp_flags used? There's a comment. Or should I be more specific than just "doesn't work"? > What is the purpose of the manual lrexlib Provides? What will be Requiring > that, other than the other auto-generated Provides: > > rex_onig.so.2.4 > rex_pcre.so.2.4 > rex_posix.so.2.4 > lua-rex = 2.4.0-1.fc11 > lua-rex(x86-32) = 2.4.0-1.fc11 That's an upstream name. While it is desirable to name this package lua-rex, to denote it's a lua rex module there's a chance people will try to install it by doing "yum install lrexlib". If I remember correctly this is a recommended practice for perl modules, and I assumed it would be the same for lua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171211.mBHCBTGJ019554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-17 07:11:27 EDT --- Something about the .desktop file 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171212.mBHCCrbJ019818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 07:12:52 EDT --- Are you aware that rpmbuild since F-10 can create a noarch subpackage while the main package is "arch"? It was announced as one of the new features in rpm 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171218.mBHCIUlt011089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 07:18:30 EDT --- And it's a very minor thing -- very clean package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171218.mBHCI1TR011022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 07:18:00 EDT --- In that case someone needs to fix http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files . In the mean time, you only have one thing to fix and I'll approve :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171223.mBHCNbZ5012299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 07:23:36 EDT --- Oops, very sorry, but I have already reviewed this one, but submitted by other person... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 474982 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171223.mBHCNcUa012339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 07:23:36 EDT --- *** Bug 469896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:27:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171227.mBHCRLKq013465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171232.mBHCWiTg014534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171233.mBHCXjvw014658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] New: Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Summary: Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: MyDNS is a free DNS server for UNIX. It was implemented from scratch and is designed to serve records directly from an SQL database (currently either MySQL or PostgreSQL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171240.mBHCexdW026305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-17 07:40:57 EDT --- In bug 232465 comment 2 I pointed out that the package is dual-licenced: API header is LGPLv2+, data file is MIT. => License: LGPLv2+ and MIT Authors's COPYING file says "BSD-style", but the licence text matches this: http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php It is not clear to me why neither the LV2 bundledir ( %{_libdir}/lv2 ) nor the bundle name ( lv2core.lv2 ) are defined anywhere in the lv2.h file. That means applications would need to define it themselves. Hopefully they get it right and agree on a standard path. Home page lists a rev3 (2008-11-08) with a comment in the ChangeLog that says "unstable". Can't find any such classification of rev2. > %files > %doc AUTHORS COPYING README > %defattr(-,root,root,-) I suggest moving the %defattr one line up. Actually rpmlint reports this, too. > Summary: An Audio Plugin Standard I would drop the "An ". ;) Starting the %description with the following sentence from the home page would be an improvement: LV2 is a standard for plugins and matching host applications, mainly targeted at audio processing and generation. With those changes, which can be applied in pkg cvs, it's fine packaging-wise: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171246.mBHCkKC6017308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-17 07:46:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-CheckOS/perl-Devel-CheckOS.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-CheckOS/perl-Devel-CheckOS-1.50-2.fc10.src.rpm You're right. The licence should be GPLv2 or Artistic. I've commented tests in previous changelog. In the second release are removed only two wrong tests. One isn't written and second try to check installed package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:48:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171248.mBHCmcUH017599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Alias| |mydns --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-17 07:48:37 EDT --- I need some help packaging mydns. at this moment mydns doesn't have loadable module support, so I need to compile mydns 2 times, one for mysql and another for postgresql support, something like this. mysql: %configure --without-pgsql --with-mysql --with-mysql-lib=%{_libdir}/mysql --with-mysql-include=%{_includedir}/mysql --with-zlib=%{_libdir} postgresql: %configure --with-pgsql --without-mysql --with-pgsql-lib=%{_libdir} --with-pgsql-include=%{_includedir} --with-zlib=%{_libdir} I like to create one base package and 2 subpackages mydns mydns-mysql mydns-postgresql but the problem is the name of the files. /usr/bin/mydns (in mysql subpackage) /usr/bin/mydns (in postgresql subpackage) what's the best way to package this ? renaming files ? /usr/bin/mydns-mysql (in mysql subpackage) /usr/bin/mydns-postgresql (in postgresql subpackage) or there are a way to preserve the mydns name in executable ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:49:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171249.mBHCnKRU017707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #12 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-17 07:49:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > A few fixes required. Also as a side note it doesn't look like libgnome is used > in the source files but its included in the configure checks but I'm not sure. I've added a patch to remove it from configure.in. Well spotted. > + rpmlint output > > $ rpmlint NetworkManager-openconnect.spec > NetworkManager-openconnect.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line > 1, tab: line 70) Fixed. > - license matches the actual package license > > There's no COPYING file included in the source. Some of the source files > include the license but some don't include any at all. Added COPYING file in a patch also. Will push upstream. > - upstream sources match sources in the srpm > 399dc23f2df67d994770dfdfdaec0ecb > NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.0.svn3.tar.gz > > Package needs to adhere to source requirements, if its using VCS snapshots it > needs to be specified as per the Packaging docs. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Added instructions. > - BuildRequires list all build dependencies > > Not sure why libpng is required. It builds fine without it and doesn't seem to > check for it in the configure script. Removed. > - package owns all directories it creates > > /usr/share/gnome-vpn-properties/openconnect/ is not owned by the package Fixed. > /usr/share/gnome-vpn-properties/ isn't either and should probably be owned by > NetworkManager itself as more than one NM vpn package installs things there. Yeah, that's a NetworkManager bug. > - %install must start with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT etc. > needs to remove old buildroots Fixed. Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.0-2.svn3.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1003330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171249.mBHCnvgb027790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 07:49:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327246) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327246) [Review] Attached is my initial review. Thanks for submitting this software to Fedora! General comments: - Why the %update_maven_depmap and friends? It uses ant to build, not maven (note: I don't think this is wrong necessarily, I'm just unfamiliar with maven and would like to understand if this should be part of the java packaging guidelines for ant-built packages as well as maven). Will approve as soon as "BAD" marked thing is either fixed or explained. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 12:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171251.mBHCp0k6028241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #10 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 07:50:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Hi, > > I have fixed all the Warning and Errors (i do rpmlint on each packages). Just > two things : > > - libnuclient.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnuclient.so.3.0.0 > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 <- it's only when we have a "violent" error > OK > - I have submitted the patch upstream, but haven't add the link in specfile > because i post the ticket in the private bugtracker. The patch will be added to > the next release. > OK there are still few little issues - the ldconfig calls in the scriptlets for the main package are useless (the libnuclient package already has them) - I would prefer when the /etc/sysconfig/nufw file is added as new SourceX: instead of online creation in the %install section - mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs in the spec (spaces: line 244, tab: line 3) - BuildRequires: python for the python-nufw package is redundant (this dependency is auto-solved via python-devel) - the DefaultStop line in the initscripts should contain all levels 0 - 6 to complement DefaultStart - multiple packages own the %{_sysconfdir}/nufw/ directory - that depends on the exact interaction between the packages - must be the nuauth service run on the same machine as nufw? - does have sense to have only the nufw-utils or nutcpc packages installed (without nufw)? - are the files in %{_sysconfdir}/nufw/ properly separated between nufw and nuauth? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 13:09:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171309.mBHD96sW000468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-17 08:09:05 EDT --- If Mary wants to, I'm happy to let her be the maintainer of this pkg. I really don't care as long as it's part of Fedora ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 13:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171316.mBHDGwkC024949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 08:16:56 EDT --- Please prepare a new srpm and spec file for download so I can continue in the review (with updated Version and/or Release). Fedora prefers small clean spec files without support for other distros, because the use of miscellaneous conditions lowers the legibility and can lead to errors. The present usage of pre/post scripts is wrong, the MIBs and cron files all have their proper (and stable) place in the system and their installation and removing is done by standard means of the rpm program, it can even react on user modified files (e.g. save copies). Some locations are standardized in LSB or FHS, so they are even stable within multiple distros. All binaries that are supposed to be run directly by a (super-)user must live in "bin" or "sbin". Test or demo scripts not required for proper function of a package can be marked and stored as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 13:20:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171320.mBHDKKkq003445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-17 08:20:18 EDT --- Sorry for late response. Formal review: source files match upstream: YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: YES dist tag is present: YES build root is correct: YES license field matches the actual license: YES latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: YES compiler flags are appropriate: NO %clean is present: YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): YES ------- rpmlint is silent: NO: $ rpmlint mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-10.fc11.src.rpm mingw32-zlib.src:46: W: configure-without-libdir-spec - wouldn't be better to add "--libdir=%{_mingw32_libdir}" configure parameter? $ rpmlint mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-10.fc11.noarch.rpm mingw32-zlib.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-zlib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/zlib.h mingw32-zlib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libz.dll.a mingw32-zlib.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/zconf.h mingw32-zlib.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libz.dll.a mingw32-zlib.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 - OK (there is no reason to separate headers to -devel - noone will use mingw32-zlib-libs package without -devel on Fedora) ------ final provides and requires look sane: YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: YES no duplicates in %files: YES file permissions are appropriate: YES code, not content: YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary: YES ---------------------------------------------------------------- Currently I see two problems: - compiler flags are not correct, it seems you have to add "CFLAGS=%{_mingw32_cflags}" parameter to make - static version of library is packaged: $ file /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libz.dll.a /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libz.dll.a: current ar archive MinGW packaging guidelines says that static libraries should be packaged in -static subpackage (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW, "Static libraries" statement). Yes, it is pedantry but guidelines should be honoured. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 13:28:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171328.mBHDSafm027319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk --- Comment #2 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-17 08:28:35 EDT --- python-devel is a standard requirement of python-setuptools-devel, so you can remove python-devel from BR. Documentation from docs directory is missing in rpm package. Please, consider adding it into package or may be into a doc subpackage. You need this to build docs: BuildRequires: python-sphinx make -C docs html or make -C docs htmlhelp There is no more problems with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 14:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171405.mBHE55UH002512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 09:05:03 EDT --- It seems you forgot to write the URLs of your spec/srpm... Then some guess - If possible, renaming binaries' names (and writing some notes why you renamed the binaries as one document) is the simplest - If you want to keep "mydns" name, I guess for this case we can use alternatives method (still installed binaries themselves should be renamed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 14:09:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171409.mBHE94Nr013880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #27 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-17 09:09:03 EDT --- gtk-network.png is a link to /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/icon-network-systems.png. I specifically chose that icon because it looks a bit like one large computer connected to two smaller computers, somewhat akin to an LTSP server and its clients. I rejected other network icons because they don't convey the idea of thin clients. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 14:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171432.mBHEWHWx018578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #28 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-17 09:32:15 EDT --- Icon[en_US]=/usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/filesystems/gtk-network.png does seem redundant, as does Name[en_US]=K12Linux Quick Start Guide. I think those were automatically added when I just created the icon on the desktop. Will remove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 14:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171437.mBHEb6Tq019517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-17 09:37:05 EDT --- the mydns-mysql can conflict with mydns-postgresql, so only one will installed and the use alternatives will not needed example. configure --with-mysql make mkdir mysql make install DESTDIR=mysql configure --with-postgresql make mkdir mysql make install DESTDIR=postgresql list files mysql/usr/sbin/mydns postgresql/usr/sbin/mydns is possible to package mysql/usr/sbin/mydns into mydns-mysql package and postgresql/usr/sbin/mydns into mydns-postgresql package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 14:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171459.mBHExaVt013349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 15:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171504.mBHF4bDR025260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 10:04:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > the mydns-mysql can conflict with mydns-postgresql, so only one will installed > and the use alternatives will not needed - I guess in this case "Conflict" method should not be used and I guess perhaps other reviewers also complain about using Conflict: See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Conflicting_Files > example. > > configure --with-mysql > make > mkdir mysql > make install DESTDIR=mysql > > > configure --with-postgresql > make > mkdir mysql > make install DESTDIR=postgresql > > list files > > mysql/usr/sbin/mydns > postgresql/usr/sbin/mydns > > is possible to package mysql/usr/sbin/mydns into mydns-mysql package and > postgresql/usr/sbin/mydns into mydns-postgresql package ? - This is not possible. For now marking as NotReady. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 15:09:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171509.mBHF9nGF015735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #29 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-17 10:09:48 EDT --- -Fixed broken path in .desktop file. -Removed Icon[en_US] and Name[en_US] lines in .desktop because they were redundant. -Added CC license to .html file as a comment. -Changed URL to peterscheie.fedorapeople.org/k12linux/quick-start-guide/. -Uploaded .tar.bz2 file to peterscheie.fedorapeople.org -Incremented revision number to 0.0.4. -Uploaded RPM and SRPM files to peterscheie.fedorapeople.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 15:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171520.mBHFK0j8017848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #30 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-17 10:19:59 EDT --- Anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 15:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171522.mBHFMX7v029178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(opensource at till.n | |ame) | --- Comment #36 from Till Maas 2008-12-17 10:22:30 EDT --- I first looked at how python packages manage to get their python(ABI) = 2.6 dependency. For this rpm has it's own automatic dependency generator. Here is one for ghc that allows to skip the Requires: ghc and Requires: ghc-prof dependencies in the spec, because they will be added automatically. http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghcdeps.sh I am not yet sure, what the impact of %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 is for ghc packages. I guess this can lead to problems in case there are also other files included that need the automatic dependency generator, e.g. python scripts. Maybe the script needs to be adjusted to also call the internal dependency generator somehow, but this should probably take care of this in the ghcdep.sh script: /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdeps --requires $REPLY For the post, postun, preun dependencies, the only way I found is this (inspired by kmodtool): http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghc-script-requires.sh Instead of the Requires(post) etc, this can be used in the spec, if Source2: points to the script: %{expand:%(/bin/bash %SOURCE2 post preun postun)} With this patch to the spec I was then able to build ghc-zlib with proper requires afaics: http://till.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-automatic-requires.patch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1003560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 15:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171549.mBHFnVgi002848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #2 from Tim Waugh 2008-12-17 10:49:31 EDT --- I am, although another reason for having a separate source package is so that bug fixes in the database engine can be distributed separately from the entire database which is quite large. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 16:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171605.mBHG5q1F006653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 16:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171644.mBHGi1w1005191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen 2008-12-17 11:44:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/linux-security-guide.spec Noted on the naming. Will change it to either fedora-security-guide or linux-security-guide (probably latter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 16:48:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171648.mBHGmIvs016115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #30 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-17 11:48:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > gtk-network.png is a link to > /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/icon-network-systems.png. I specifically > chose that icon because it looks a bit like one large computer connected to two > smaller computers, somewhat akin to an LTSP server and its clients. I rejected > other network icons because they don't convey the idea of thin clients. Ok. I have checked that only Bluecurve provides this icon: # repoquery -f '*icon-network-systems.png' bluecurve-icon-theme-0:8.0.2-2.fc10.noarch bluecurve-icon-theme-0:8.0.2-2.fc10.noarch Still a bluecurve-icon-theme requires missing. Also did you try with only Icon=icon-network-systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 17:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171713.mBHHDtR6022171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 12:13:53 EDT --- $ LANG=C rpmbuild -ts qmtest-2.4.1.tar.gz error: Failed to read spec file from qmtest-2.4.1.tar.gz ?? (anyway would you provide your srpm? It is much helpful) By the way I am sponsoring you now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 17:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171716.mBHHGUa0012798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2008-12-17 12:16:29 EDT --- I'll take this one. Stand by for a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 17:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171723.mBHHNkIA014128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-17 12:23:45 EDT --- Yes, that sounds completely reasonable. Few notes before full review: - you can drop setting the CFLAGS for the "make" commands in %build, there is no C/C++ code built, if I see it right - are the INSTALLSITELIB and INSTALLSITEARCH really required for the "make" commands in %install? They looks like some pythonic paths. - what is the upstream versioning scheme? Does the version in the included archive mean that it is a snapshot made 20081124 after the 3.0 release? Then you should apply "post-release package guideline" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages (version=3.0, release=1.20081124) - according to the README in foomatic-db, there should be files licensed under MIT too, please recheck and update the License tag to "GPLv2+ and MIT" - new snapshot was released today :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171818.mBHIIp5j025111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-17 13:18:50 EDT --- SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/lua-rex.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/lua-rex-2.4.0-2.el5.src.rpm * Wed Dec 17 2008 Lubomir Rintel - 2.4.0-2 - Add doc directory to documentation - Allow parallel make runs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:27:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171827.mBHIRLc3026794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2008-12-17 13:27:20 EDT --- Here are a few things I noticed on an initial read-through of the spec file. First, the Java packaging guidelines state that Java packages must "BuildRequires: java-devel" and "Requires: jpackage-utils" (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires), both of which are missing. Second, I don't understand why you are using a half-maven half-ant build. Shouldn't you go with one or the other? Third, the GCJ guidelines have not been followed (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines). Is there some reason for this? Fourth, the use of dos2unix is unnecessary. You can accomplish the same result as follows: sed -i -e 's/\r//g' Since sed is already in the default set of packages, this does not lead to any BuildRequires. There is no point in fixing the line endings of javadoc files since you are regenerating those files in the %build section anyway. Also, the list of files is too inclusive: dos2unix is being invoked on .pdf, .jpg, .png, .gif, and Thumbs.db files. Those are binary formats, so dos2unix is very probably corrupting them. Also, since the PDF files are just simple transformations of the HTML files, I doubt they add any value. They're extremely short and not linked to one another, so I don't see the point in including them. Fifth, changing the encodings of the XML files in docs/skin is not sufficient, since they use XML encoding declarations at the top: which means that we are now messing up any XML processors because they are really getting UTF-8 encoded files. This won't matter for the English file, because it uses only ASCII, which is a subset of both UTF-8 and ISO-8859-1. However, the German, Spanish, and French versions all use non-ASCII characters, so it will matter for them. If you really need to change the encoding, I recommend making a patch that both changes the encoding and changes the XML encoding declaration. MUST items: - Output of rpmlint: 2 packages and 1 specfile checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - Package name: OK - Spec file name: OK X Packaging guidelines: see the list of items above - Licensing guidelines: OK - License field matches: OK - Text license file in %doc: OK - Spec file in American English: OK - Spec file is legible: OK - Sources match upstream: OK (checked with md5sum) - Compiles into binary RPMs on at least one platform: OK (checked on x86_64) - Use of ExcludeArch: OK (I did not check other arches, but this is noarch) X All build dependencies in BuildRequires: need to add java-devel; see above - Proper locale handling: OK - ldconfig: OK - Relocatable package: OK - Own all created directories: OK - No duplicate entries in %files: OK - Proper file permissions: OK - %clean section: OK - Consistent use of macros: OK - Code or permissible content: OK - Large documentation: OK (total documentation size is 424K) - Nothing in %doc affects runtime: OK - Header files in -devel: OK - Static libraries in -static: OK - Pkgconfig files: OK - .so files in -devel: OK - -devel package requires main package: OK - No libtool archives: OK - Desktop file: OK - Don't own files/directories owned by other packages: OK - Clean buildroot in %install: OK - Filenames are UTF-8: OK SHOULD items: - Query upstream for missing license file: OK - Description and summary translations: OK - Package builds in mock: OK (checked for F-10 x86_64 only) - Builds on all supported architectures: did not check - Package functions as described: did not check - Sane scriptlets: see comments about maven & ant above X Subpackages require the base package: NO, the javadoc package does not require the main package - Placement of pkgconfig files: OK - File dependencies: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171842.mBHIgfEN007780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-17 13:42:38 EDT --- Some notes for 0.12.5-2: * License - As I said above, the license tag should be "GPLv2+ and GFDL" * About Patch1 - I guess the size of Patch1 is unneededly large. Would you - simply remove unneeded files - and create a patch for the rest part? (It seems actually only setup.py is patched?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171848.mBHImilX030448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-17 13:48:40 EDT --- Looks like Kevin now owns this package; updating the CC. I never found the time to get back to this, but I should be able to do so soon. The rpmlint complaint list is currently: agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64'] agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64'] agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libaggfontfreetype.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64'] These are new since my last comment, and need tto be fixed up. agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 _Z8agg_mainiPPc agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 _Z8agg_mainiPPc These are OK as discussed above. agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 These are not a big deal as discussed above, but are easy to get rid of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171855.mBHItxnt031923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-17 13:55:57 EDT --- So this was marked as being ready for review, but there's still a license concern. I'm going to mark this again as not being ready. It has also been two months since the last set of questions with no response from the submitter. Are you still working out the license issues with upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171859.mBHIxGlv032429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 13:59:14 EDT --- fontpackages-1.11-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.11-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 19:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171900.mBHJ0PkB000494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #25 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-17 14:00:25 EDT --- I have uploaded an srpm and a spec file to http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/. By the way, is there any reason why the source package name includes the build platform ('fc9') ? This isn't actually a platform-specific file, or is it ? If not, shall I rename such files in the future before uploading (or importing into CVS) ? Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 18:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171858.mBHIwlPx032364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) | --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-17 13:58:46 EDT --- Not sure why you set the needinfo flag; I don't believe I've been slow in responding to you. Normally I wouldn't ask for an updated package for the yelp dependency, but there's still the issue of the dependencies necessary to run the scriptlets which needs to be addressed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 19:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171900.mBHJ0HjR011319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 14:00:16 EDT --- fontpackages-1.11-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.11-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 19:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171933.mBHJXxst017321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-17 14:33:58 EDT --- Thank you, I will update it before committing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vhd2vl Short Description: VHDL to Verilog translator Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 19:48:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812171948.mBHJmJDT008533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag|needinfo+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #26 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-17 14:48:17 EDT --- taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 20:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172015.mBHKFbbB013774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-17 15:15:34 EDT --- Spec updated to latest guidelines as part of the F11 fonts packaging guidelines change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 20:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172016.mBHKGSBs025121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mefoster at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster 2008-12-17 15:16:27 EDT --- [ NB: Borrowing the review format from Jerry James ... ] It's just recently been pointed out to me that there are specific GCJ guidelines for Java packages at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines that should probably be followed here unless there's a good reason not to. MUST items: - Output of rpmlint: jcodings.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --- Is there any documentation at all to be had from upstream? - Package name: OK - Spec file name: OK - Packaging guidelines: note the GCJ thing above - Licensing guidelines: OK X License field matches: What is the license of this? JRuby as a whole is tri-licensed as CPL/GPL/LGPL, so I'm not sure that "MIT" is the right content here - Text license file in %doc: no, but it's not shipped with the source - Spec file in American English: OK - Spec file is legible: OK - Sources match upstream: OK (checked with sha1sum) - Compiles into binary RPMs on at least one platform: OK (checked on i386) - Use of ExcludeArch: OK (I did not check other arches, but this is noarch) - All build dependencies in BuildRequires: OK - Proper locale handling: OK - ldconfig: OK - Relocatable package: OK - Own all created directories: OK - No duplicate entries in %files: OK - Proper file permissions: OK - %clean section: OK - Consistent use of macros: OK - Code or permissible content: OK - Large documentation: OK (*no* documentation actually!) - Nothing in %doc affects runtime: OK - Header files in -devel: OK - Static libraries in -static: OK - Pkgconfig files: OK - .so files in -devel: OK - -devel package requires main package: OK - No libtool archives: OK - Desktop file: OK - Don't own files/directories owned by other packages: OK - Clean buildroot in %install: OK - Filenames are UTF-8: OK SHOULD items: X Query upstream for missing license file: see the note at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text It's probably asking if they could put the license(s) into the tarball - Description and summary translations: OK - Package builds in mock: OK (checked for F-10 i386 only) - Builds on all supported architectures: did not check - Package functions as described: did not check - Sane scriptlets: OK - Subpackages require the base package: OK (n/a) - Placement of pkgconfig files: OK - File dependencies: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 20:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172042.mBHKgVin019497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2008-12-17 15:42:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > So do you suggest to have License: GPLv2+ and GPL+ ? Yes, please also add a comment above the License tag saying that xmlto is GPLv2+ and xmlif is GPL+. Regards, Till -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172117.mBHLHbw9025582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #25 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-17 16:17:36 EDT --- Hello, Mamoru, The patch 3 performs tasks in BKChem: * Remove the piddle plugin (excluding the folder, the files related and the entry in setup.py). Piddle is a plugin that is obsolete and will be removed from BKChem in the future because its functions are performed by pycairo today. Moreover, he had several problems of license that the upstream will not be able to solve). * Remove OASA's folder and removes the entries in setup.py. * Exclude Pmw*.py files that are redundant in fedora, since we have a python-pmw package already. Beda was creating a tarball especially for Fedora untill now, but applying patches to the official tarball seemed a better approach to the upstream and save its time. Is there any other alternative that I can take, Mamoru? Sorry if this is taking longer than necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:33:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172133.mBHLXM1o028817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #26 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-17 16:33:21 EDT --- ***The patch performs 3 tasks*** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172141.mBHLfRri008437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:41:25 EDT --- >* rpmlint says: > libspiro-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation >At the least the license file can go in the %doc of this subpackage. I also >think that the README* files would suit the devel subpackage better. ok. I can put them in both... not a big deal. >* I suggest you to make use of the %{name} and %{version} macros. Sure. Good idea. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libspiro Short Description: Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves Owners: kevin Branches: devel InitialCC: Lubomir: If you would like to co-maintain this as your inkscape can use it, feel free to request in pkgdb and I will be happy to approve you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172146.mBHLkbND031327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:46:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172151.mBHLpmOA010285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:51:46 EDT --- I don't see Abhijith in the packager group. Is this your first fedora package? You will need a sponsor... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172148.mBHLmZKV009533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |walters at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:48:33 EDT --- Please use Fedora account names in requests. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172147.mBHLlvmc009470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-17 16:47:56 EDT --- Looks great now, approving. At some point you should probably bring a lua packaging guideline suggestion to the FPC since there are a few lua packages in now, and could be more coming. It'd speed up reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:56:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172156.mBHLuHVW000581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:56:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172152.mBHLqxCo032346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:52:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172152.mBHLqxts010621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 --- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-17 16:52:58 EDT --- About the rpaths: ugh, darn autocrap. I'll use the sed hack from the guidelines to get rid of those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 21:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172154.mBHLs6v3010716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:54:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172200.mBHM00O2001065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 16:59:59 EDT --- Except not. This package is already in fedora. Owned by lmacken. See bug 468222 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172201.mBHM131P012136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:01:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:06:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172206.mBHM6AJN013266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:06:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:04:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172204.mBHM4DFJ012692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:04:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172210.mBHMAiPR014131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:10:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172207.mBHM7XDE013479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:07:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172213.mBHMDlHZ003720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:13:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172212.mBHMCkrS014675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 17:12:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:32:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172232.mBHMWa3u018190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-17 17:32:35 EDT --- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172243.mBHMhuIW019695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-17 17:43:55 EDT --- - Patch should have a comment, and info about upstream status - Mixed use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - Builds OK in mock - rpmlint output: python-shove.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Common object storage frontend. python-shove.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Common object storage frontend that supports dictionary-style access, object serialization and compression, and multiple storage and caching backends. python-shove.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Library - upstream source matches - All things in store/tests/ are unlicensed. -- Summary -- Fix up the rpmlint stuff ask upstream about license on tests/ Fix macro usage to be consistant Add comment on the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:45:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172245.mBHMjcDh020104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-17 17:45:37 EDT --- Jan, are you taking the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:50:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172250.mBHMoNbo009962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-12-17 17:50:21 EDT --- Too bad upstream rpmlint refuses to accept patches for MinGW support. Maybe it is an idea to create a list of rpmlint failures which can be ignored for MinGW and put it on the MinGW guidelines page? Anyway, this package looks good enough for inclusion in Fedora: ==================================================== The package mingw32-sqlite is APPROVED by epienbro ==================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172248.mBHMmR7K009440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 17:48:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It's just recently been pointed out to me that there are specific GCJ > guidelines for Java > packages at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines that should > probably be > followed here unless there's a good reason not to. Right, the big deal especially was that there was *no* non-gcj jdk/jre on F-7 PPC/PPC64. Now that F-7 is dead it's been pushed less, but IMO still important because openjdk doesn't JIT on PPC and thus GCJ is *much* faster. WILLDO. > ... > --- Is there any documentation at all to be had from upstream? Not really -- this is mostly a new subproject of JRuby. > ... > X License field matches: What is the license of this? JRuby as a whole is > tri-licensed as > CPL/GPL/LGPL, so I'm not sure that "MIT" is the right content here This particular subpackage is MIT-licensed. They like to abuse SVN and put a bunch of projects on the same server, even with different licenses. Note the header at e.g. http://svn.jruby.codehaus.org/browse/~raw,r=7964/jruby/jcodings/trunk/src/org/jcodings/unicode/UnicodeCodeRanges.java > ... > SHOULD items: > X Query upstream for missing license file: see the note at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > It's probably asking if they could put the license(s) into the tarball Actually the tarball is automatically generated from SVN, so they need to put the license there. I'll ask. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jcodings.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jcodings-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm In koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1004755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172250.mBHMobJl020821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 17:50:35 EDT --- *** Bug 476599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476599] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172250.mBHMoaoL020792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 17:50:35 EDT --- Yeah, oops. Closing. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 468222 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172250.mBHMocwH020838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Bug 476600 depends on bug 476599, which changed state. Bug 476599 Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction Management for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476599 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 22:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172254.mBHMs083010253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 17:54:00 EDT --- Btw, License tag is still not fixed in CVS. Also, no updates for F-10 and F-9 yet (not sure if it's even been built in rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:03:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:03:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172303.mBHN3n3e022850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172320.mBHNK51l015095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-17 18:20:04 EDT --- On non-lib64 platforms, I get "file listed twice" warnings, because python_sitelib is the same as python_sitearch. I think this should be something like: # For noarch packages: sitelib %{python_sitelib}/zope %if "%{python_sitearch}" != "%{python_sitelib}" # For arch-specific packages: sitearch %{python_sitearch}/zope %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:18:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172318.mBHNIk9r025530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |konrad at tylerc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172323.mBHNNspH026493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-17 18:23:53 EDT --- (rpmlint on the SRPM comes up empty, that's good.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172323.mBHNNBZn026412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-17 18:23:10 EDT --- Next up: rpmlint output: > python-zope-filesystem.i386: W: no-documentation Harmless, it's a trivial package. If you're pedantic, you can add a %doc COPYING with the GPL in it, but I guess we can do without. > python-zope-filesystem.i386: E: no-binary Harmless, see comment #1. I'll run it through my checklist next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172342.mBHNg106029587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-17 18:42:00 EDT --- cp %{SOURCE0} __init__.py clobbers timestamp, should be cp -p. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:43:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172343.mBHNhKlG019150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 18:43:20 EDT --- Still have to wait :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172342.mBHNgIVQ019026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Bug 466717 depends on bug 475411, which changed state. Bug 475411 Summary: suitesparse is incorrectly linked and has undefined symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:45:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172345.mBHNj1oM029844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-17 18:45:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java-1.26.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the help :) Works perfectly :D Everything you mentioned should be addressed now. rpmlint is still clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:54:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172354.mBHNsM07031669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-17 18:54:21 EDT --- Reviewing the updated specfile (same URL): MUST Items: + rpmlint output OK (see comment #3) + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License ZPLv2.1 OK + No patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS (uses proper Python directories) + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires (none needed, python(abi) dependency autodetected), BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + no relevant documentation which would need to be included + nothing to compile, so RPM_OPT_FLAGS, debuginfo, static libraries, .la files, duplicated system libraries, rpaths, _smp_mflags don't apply + debuginfo package is properly disabled (package is only arch-specific because of python_sitearch) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no executables, so no .desktop file present or needed + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts (assuming python-zope-interface gets changed to use this, otherwise we have a file conflict, but that's planned already) + complies with all the legal guidelines + no license which would need including as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + no upstream to compare source against ("source" is only a trivial __init__.py file) + builds on at least one arch (F9 i386 live system) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + all build dependencies listed as BuildRequires + no translations, so locale guidelines don't apply + no shared libraries, so need to call ldconfig + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly (defattr used correctly) + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + no %doc files, so no possible issues with %doc files required at runtime + no header files or .so symlinks which would need a -devel package + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no .la files + no GUI programs (in fact, no executables at all), so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: ? maybe we want to include a copy of the ZPLv2.1? But is it worth it for this trivial package? Not a blocker in any case. + no translations for description and summary provided (no upstream) * mock build not tested * all architectures not tested, there's not much potentially arch-specific in the package anyway * no functionality test needed + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies Nitpick: %if "%{python_sitearch}" != "%{python_sitelib}" could also be used in %install to avoid redundantly installing the file twice. But it doesn't really matter. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172359.mBHNxM9c022004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 18:59:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-zope-filesystem Short Description: Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:09:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180009.mBI09pJc024113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 19:09:49 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1004878 Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:12:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180012.mBI0CwhE024854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:12:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475410] Review Request: symmetrica - A Collection of Routines for Solving Symmetric Groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180013.mBI0D3IG024893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180014.mBI0EWnO025021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:14:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:15:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180015.mBI0FrsU025544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:15:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474982] Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180016.mBI0GrSE025734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:16:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444792] Review Request: augeas - library for changing configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180024.mBI0OvdN026784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444792 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:24:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:22:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:22:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180022.mBI0Mm0R004390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:22:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:31:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180031.mBI0V3s8028196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:31:01 EDT --- deco-1.5.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:31:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180031.mBI0V6Bw028231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475082] Review Request: guiloader - GuiXml Loader Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180030.mBI0UZCL005966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475082 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:30:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180033.mBI0XSqF029029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:33:27 EDT --- perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:36:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180036.mBI0aHZm030394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:36:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:32:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180032.mBI0WLlg028742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:32:20 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vbindiff'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180033.mBI0XVXj006881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445601] Review Request: ruby-augeas - Ruby bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180035.mBI0ZavV007644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445601 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:35:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:32:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180032.mBI0WZT7006657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:32:34 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update vbindiff'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180036.mBI0aLsm008010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:36:20 EDT --- libgdbus-0.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libgdbus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:40:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180040.mBI0ejot032647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:40:44 EDT --- perl-Test-Signature-1.10-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:41:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180041.mBI0f54F032724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:41:04 EDT --- We can't do arbitrary email addresses in InitialCC... they will need to get a FAS account to be added there. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180036.mBI0agMQ030917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:36:40 EDT --- skinlf-6.7-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update skinlf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:36:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180036.mBI0ajBd031033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:36:44 EDT --- bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bandwidthd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180037.mBI0btCM008743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:37:53 EDT --- gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180040.mBI0eSfk009852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:40:27 EDT --- deco-archive-1.2-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180038.mBI0crc4009033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:38:52 EDT --- deco-archive-1.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:38:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180038.mBI0cuNn009058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180038.mBI0cnAv009010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 19:38:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180042.mBI0gFUM010384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:42:14 EDT --- skinlf-6.7-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update skinlf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180040.mBI0eLcS009815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:40:20 EDT --- bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update bandwidthd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11370 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180039.mBI0dYmR009215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:39:34 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pytagger'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:43:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180043.mBI0h8FH001939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Bug 444366 depends on bug 469134, which changed state. Bug 469134 Summary: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:43:07 EDT --- deco-1.5.7-2.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180043.mBI0hUb4011019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:43:29 EDT --- gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471335] Review Request: libgdbus - Library for simple D-Bus integration with GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180043.mBI0h57a010909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471335 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:43:04 EDT --- libgdbus-0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libgdbus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:42:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180042.mBI0gXZg010790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:42:32 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pytagger'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:49:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180049.mBI0nd7Z003310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 19:49:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327293) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327293) [Review] Attached is my initial review. General thoughts: - Why have a separate -utils package? Generally we put libs and binaries in the same package. (I could see the main package Provides:-ing a -utils subpackage.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 01:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180103.mBI13KNa005699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 20:03:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review! Built in rawhide...closing this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 01:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180108.mBI18tYn006555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-17 20:08:53 EDT --- Confirmed issues are fixed. Thanks. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 01:27:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] New: Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Summary: Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tcl-tclxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tcl-tclxml-3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package is a version bump, rename (to conform with Tcl packaging guidelines), and reorganization of the existing tclxml and tcldom packages. With this new upstream release, tclxml, tcldom, and tclxslt have all been merged into a single tclxml tarball. The shared libraries have also been merged, so it is no longer possible to keep the tclxml and tcldom packages separate. This update will be for F11 only. As far as I can tell, nothing depends on the Obsolete *-libxml and *-expat packages, so they should not need to be listed in a separate Provides: Since this involves some major changes to the spec file, I am requesting a new package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 01:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180133.mBI1XRck010486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 01:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476475] Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180146.mBI1kUrE021376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-17 20:46:29 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 01:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476524] Review Request: python-zope-testing - Zope Testing Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180146.mBI1kVBF021402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476524 Bug 476524 depends on bug 476475, which changed state. Bug 476475 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-filesystem - Python-Zope Libraries Base Filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 02:10:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180210.mBI2ALaN025910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 21:10:20 EDT --- terminator-0.11-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/terminator-0.11-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 02:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180212.mBI2CuKE026352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 21:12:55 EDT --- terminator-0.11-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/terminator-0.11-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 02:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180235.mBI2Z82H030107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #9 from Tim Fenn 2008-12-17 21:35:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > The above srpm URL is invalid, but I poked around in the directory and found > it. Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. > Oops, sorry! > Note that the leading blank line in your %description makes it into the final > output, which probably isn't what you want. That's really minor, and I can > find nothing worth complaining about. > I fixed it anyway: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.04-2.fc10.src.rpm > > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. I'll try - now that I'm more familiar with the process, I'm a little more confident in knowing what to look for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 02:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180240.mBI2eSq2022495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 02:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180240.mBI2eCUi031018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2008-12-17 21:40:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: refmac-dictionary Short Description: chemical ligand dictionary Owners: timfenn Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 03:30:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476936] New: Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476936 Summary: Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hello.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hello-2.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Hello prints a friendly greeting. It also serves as a sample GNU package, showing practices that may be useful for GNU projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:09:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180409.mBI49KDr005690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-17 23:09:20 EDT --- I don't see it in CVS yet? hiccup? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180419.mBI4Jvbb015963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-17 23:19:57 EDT --- Hum. Try now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475035] Review Request: metapost-metauml - UML in LaTeX/MetaPost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180434.mBI4Y9qr009109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475035 --- Comment #12 from Ben Boeckel 2008-12-17 23:34:09 EDT --- Ah, I see it now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 06:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180618.mBI6I0Wp024613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #34 from Dan Dennedy 2008-12-18 01:17:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #14) > > I have built mlt Fedora 8 x86_64 with --disable-qimage --disable-mmx and it > > worked also for rawhide.(0) But in this last case, i also need to disable see > > in %prep section: > > ---------- > > #disable sse unless x86_64 > > %ifnarch x86_64 > > sed -i.checksse -e 's|ifndef __DARWIN__|ifdef __DARWIN__|' > > src/modules/motion_est/filter_motion_est.c > > #Note that this conditional is wrong > > %endif > > SSE detection should be moved to ./configure and the code containing SSE > instructions should be wrapped in #ifdef HAVE_SSE ... #endif. Please ask > upstream to do that. I am upstream, and I have done this. I also checked other code assumed to be MMX to make sure it was not using SSE, and it is not. > > -------------- > > I haven't checked that, but if mmx is used on ppc, then is will certainly > > fails. > > What i expect is mmx should be disabled in all cases unless i686: The configure script checks /proc/cpuinfo on Linux to see if "mmx: 1" and "sse: 1" to automatically disable the respective options. However, you are probably cross-compiling to ppc? > > %configure \ > > ... > > %ifnarch i686 > > --disable-mmx \ > > %endif > > So anyone that want to rebuild mlt with theses options can do so with using > > --target=i686 for the package. > > Actually, there are i686 class CPUs without MMX, for example Pentium Pro and > there are i586 class CPUs with MMX (Pentium MMX, AMD K6 and K6-2/3). I'd > suggest a --with mmx conditional instead. You cannot rely on --target here. Of > course, it'd be best handled upstream in a fashion similar to what I've > suggested for SSE above. There is still a --disable-mmx. It implies --disable-sse. Do you want to test this from a svn snapshot prior to my next release - planned before end-of-year? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 06:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180625.mBI6P2EV002713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-18 01:25:00 EDT --- Two comments (I'll do a full review today or tomorrow): * The nautilus extension dependency pulls almost the entire gnome suite. The KDE (or other DE) user don't need that. I think it should go into a subpackage. * Please preserve the timestamp of the sed'ed file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 06:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180659.mBI6xq6B007847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #4 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-18 01:59:50 EDT --- I don't know, if I will have enough time after Luke's reply. I will make a decision later. It's the purpose, why this package was not assigned to me. If Luke fixes doc issue, I will approve this package, but if you want, you can take this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:11:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:11:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180711.mBI7BuZi010289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-18 02:11:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-rex Short Description: Regular expression handling library for Lua Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:45:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180745.mBI7jGLG006399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-18 02:45:14 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field BSD matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. tcl-tclxml.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency tcllib tcl-tclxml.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tclxml-libxml2 tcl-tclxml.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tclxml-expat tcl-tclxml.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tcldom-expat tcl-tclxml.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tcldom-libxml2 devel: tcl-tclxml-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation tcl-tclxml-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/tcl8.5/tclxml-3.2/libTclxmlstub3.2.a gui: tcl-tclxml-gui.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:49:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:49:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180749.mBI7ncsQ016250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-18 02:49:36 EDT --- OK, here is the full review. In addition to the above two things: - rpmlint errors can be ignored. * I don't think you need to BR: wxPython-devel . The package builds fine without it. * Source0 link is broken. Does this change frequently? If yes, I guess you should just put the filename, not the full URL (but in this case, make a comment in the SPEC file). * Any reason why you skipped packaging docs/phatch_dev.txt in %doc ? * Please follow the desktop-database and mimeinfo sections (4.6 and 4.7) at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * The python egg shouldn't be excluded, but it should be built in a proper way. This is a non-setuptools package. So follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180755.mBI7tkJ3017558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 02:55:44 EDT --- for rawhide build, rpmlint on binary RPM gave system-config-language.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/firstboot/modules/language.py /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/yumhelpers.glade system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/language_backend.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/system-config-language.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided locale_config ===> Looks Ok Rest looks as per packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180754.mBI7s82X017086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #35 from Dan Dennedy 2008-12-18 02:54:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > I don't want this project to be a nuisance with too many configurations. First > of all, I think I should split up my ffmpeg module because there are some > elements for deinterlace and color space conversion that are unencumbered and > then encumbered format/codec-oriented elements. That would let you or someone > else just make a separate package with the encumbered elements similar to > gstreamer-ffmpeg. MLT has libdv and libvorbis modules that still make it usable > without the encumbered ffmpeg elements. I do not yet think it is necessary to In MLT SVN trunk, I have added a configure option --avformat-no-codecs. This will build the MLT avformat plugin without exposing *any* of the codecs or muxers. This does make a plugin that contains the deinterlace, resampling, and color space converter. The color space converter is required at the moment to make this usable. The --avformat-svn configure option will checkout a specific revision of FFmpeg and then statically link the MLT plugin against it if that makes it any easier (no shared ffmpeg libs to link against). Someone can then make a mlt-ffmpeg package for rpmfusion.org that does something along the lines of: ./configure ... make -C src/framework make -C src/modules/avformat all install This would put only that plugin into the package, but at this point it is a replacement for the one from the main mlt package. IOW, it shares the same file path/name. Is that a problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 08:07:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180807.mBI87kLW009953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-18 03:07:45 EDT --- assogiate has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc11.ppc requires hicolor-icon-theme On x86_64: assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc11.x86_64 requires hicolor-icon-theme On i386: assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc11.i386 requires hicolor-icon-theme On ppc64: assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc11.ppc64 requires hicolor-icon-theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 08:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180816.mBI8GmQs011314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 08:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180821.mBI8Ll4n012356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 03:21:46 EDT --- check https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg01962.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 08:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180834.mBI8YmDr024135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-18 03:34:47 EDT --- The provides probably won't be needed as you said. I run: repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps tclxml-expat and no other dependencies were found. What about the permission in devel package? Also is it the dependency on tcllib necessary? Here is build in mock without tcllib http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1005993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180905.mBI955In019903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-18 04:05:00 EDT --- No, looks fine now. APPROVED. Also, removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as you are sponsored already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:23:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180923.mBI9NP0E023602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 04:23:24 EDT --- I am not able to verify upstream source as source URL is not working. Not sure what we can do where upstream is no longer available for older packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180926.mBI9QNL1024232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327310|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180925.mBI9PhQR001272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 04:25:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327310) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327310) This is modified spec file for fonts-ISO8859-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180926.mBI9Q99k001405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #16 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 04:26:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Not sure why you set the needinfo flag; I don't believe I've been slow in > responding to you. I wasn't trying to imply that, I always set needinfo flags when asking people questions in Bugzilla. I don't think the needinfo flag is intended to nag slow responders ;-), it's rather a process tool, i.e. using it I can simply check on my Bugzilla frontpage whether there are bugs where I should respond, or where I'm waiting on information by others. > Normally I wouldn't ask for an updated package for the yelp dependency, but > there's still the issue of the dependencies necessary to run the scriptlets > which needs to be addressed as well. Missed that one, my fault. I'm pretty sure a simple "Requires: rarian-compat" should suffice, as rarian-compat will register all available documentation in its own %post script, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180927.mBI9RC7w024365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 04:27:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327312) This is modified spec file for fonts-ISO8859-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180928.mBI9Sb1J001681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #17 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 04:28:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I'm pretty sure a simple "Requires: rarian-compat" > should suffice, as rarian-compat will register all available documentation in > its own %post script, though. I just checked and found that the other -docs packages have Requires(post)/(postun). I'll fix these accordingly as this will make dep-solving easier for RPM/YUM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180944.mBI9ifT7004482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #13 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-12-18 04:44:40 EDT --- Ok, I already commited and built License: GPLv2+ and GPL+ to rawhide, I do plan next xmlto release in January (hopefully) - will add the comment about licenses in next rawhide build later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476952] New: Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476952 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-bg.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-bg-4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bulgarian hyphenation rules As used by openoffice.org to find best place to break over-long words -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476952] Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181000.mBIA0n8S031117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476952 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 05:00:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock(rawhide i386). Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1006068 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. e2d3a423c90aba9c1e2776fc60030fc3 OOo-hyph-bg-4.1.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions:- License from COPYING looks like GPLv2 not GPL+. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:11:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476952] Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181011.mBIABSQP010360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476952 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-18 05:11:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-bg Short Description: Bulgarian hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181016.mBIAGoio011214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 05:16:49 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. There are several build failures which I've been tracking with upstream. (The one you found is a missing BR, but there are real build failures later on - for some reason they only affect Koji builds, not 'rpmbuild' on the command line). So best to leave this bug alone until they have had a chance to fix the build problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:19:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181019.mBIAJikV002017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 05:19:43 EDT --- Just a quick note that libz.dll.a isn't a static library, in the sense meant by the guidelines. Under Windows, DLLs are split into two parts: The foo-1.dll which is the shared library needed at runtime. But if you want to link with the shared library, you need a library of stub routines, called foo.dll.a (for cross-compilation) or more normally foo.lib if this was a real Windows machine. We actually remove the real static libraries from all of the mingw32-* packages. I'll take a look at the rest in an hour or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181034.mBIAYjfF004926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 05:34:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-sqlite Short Description: MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181033.mBIAX6Bc004760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 05:33:05 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. These are the bugs related to the rpmlint issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fedora&component=rpmlint&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=mingw&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=FAILS_QA&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&bug_status=CLOSED We're waiting for rpmlint upstream to add a feature which will allow us to mask off certain bugs for certain groups of packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181038.mBIAcph9007056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-18 05:38:50 EDT --- nekovm-1.8.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nekovm-1.8.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181042.mBIAgAgc015751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #14 from David Woodhouse 2008-12-18 05:42:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: NetworkManager-openconnect Short Description: NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect Owners: dwmw2 dcbw Branches: F-9 F-10 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181044.mBIAiAGH016048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 05:44:09 EDT --- I've created a new bug for multilib support: bug 476962 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:43:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181043.mBIAhFWo015904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 10:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181057.mBIAvYMb012192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-18 05:57:33 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181114.mBIBElq3015637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-18 06:14:46 EDT --- > - [ ??? ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > Why -utils subpackage? Well, the library can be used without the utilities - therefore the split. The utilities are end user utilities that use this library to convert icns to png and vice versa. > - [ BAD ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the > upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use > md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this > package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. > > md5sum = f6ab74c2cfd4ab5b11d1cb9114743c90 > > I can't actually download this from the given URL -- sourceforge gives > me a bunch of redirects and then a 404. I just followed the packaging guideline to provide a source URL that is on Sourceforge: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net To check the md5, you can use a mirror. > - [ BAD ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must > 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). I'll fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181128.mBIBSYJT024422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 06:28:33 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this package. Here is an updated package that sets CFLAGS correctly (and I've verified that they are passed to gcc). Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/zlib/mingw32-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-11.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Dec 18 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.2.3-11 - Pass correct CFLAGS to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:35:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:35:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181135.mBIBZloo025810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-18 06:35:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > - [ ??? ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > > Why -utils subpackage? > > Well, the library can be used without the utilities - therefore the split. The > utilities are end user utilities that use this library to convert icns to png > and vice versa. OK. > > - [ BAD ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the > > upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use > > md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this > > package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. > > > > md5sum = f6ab74c2cfd4ab5b11d1cb9114743c90 > > > > I can't actually download this from the given URL -- sourceforge gives > > me a bunch of redirects and then a 404. > > I just followed the packaging guideline to provide a source URL that is on > Sourceforge: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net > > To check the md5, you can use a mirror. The download.sf.net* urls just redirect to mirrors. The problem is none of the mirrors have the file. > > - [ BAD ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must > > 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). > > I'll fix this. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181143.mBIBhp0O021011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181145.mBIBjkQ1021617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-18 06:45:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The download.sf.net* urls just redirect to mirrors. The problem is none of the > mirrors have the file. Sorry. Thought of a different problems (sometimes the mirrors fail). The URL is not correct. I'll fix it. It must be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/icns/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181143.mBIBhb4q027189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181144.mBIBiFU2027290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #11 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-18 06:44:14 EDT --- Hi, I fix all the littles issue you said and add some changes. - Fix initscripts which not working before - Fixing permissions on certificate - Fixing a BuildRequires on nuauth-utils about perl-LDAP - Splitting in two file the config in sysconfig dir for startup I test on a rawhide box and all work fine now :-) The exact interaction between packages are good because you can have nufw and nuauth on a separate server, nutcpc is the client and don't need nufw and nuauth on the same machine, just libnuclient and nufw-utils must be or not on nufw server. And all the files are separated properly ;-) You can find the new version at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-4.fc11.src.rpm Thks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181202.mBIC296k031203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Adam Tkac 2008-12-18 07:02:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Just a quick note that libz.dll.a isn't a static library, in > the sense meant by the guidelines. > > Under Windows, DLLs are split into two parts: The foo-1.dll > which is the shared library needed at runtime. But if you > want to link with the shared library, you need a library of > stub routines, called foo.dll.a (for cross-compilation) > or more normally foo.lib if this was a real Windows machine. Ah, I didn't know how things work. Thanks for your explanation. With correct CFLAGS package is OK => reviewed (formal review is in comment #5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:58:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:58:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181158.mBIBwT0P030258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-18 06:58:28 EDT --- All looks OK, I just have a query about including the license file. I understand not including man/info pages but I believe there's still a requirement to include a license? I couldn't see anything in the mingw packaging docs that would exclude it. + rpmlint output $ rpmlint -i mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license ? %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 3c15a0c8d1d3ee1c46a1634d00617b1a bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji on rawhide + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:06:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476973] New: Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-rpmstubby.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-rpmstubby-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: RPM Stubby Plug-in is a plugin aiming to auto-generate RPM specfile from feature.xml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:07:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181207.mBIC7WeH032338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 07:07:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-zlib Short Description: MinGW Windows zlib compression library Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:09:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181209.mBIC9ahv032531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-18 07:09:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > The download.sf.net* urls just redirect to mirrors. The problem is none of the > > mirrors have the file. > > Sorry. Thought of a different problems (sometimes the mirrors fail). The URL is > not correct. I'll fix it. It must be: > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/icns/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz This is just further evidence that using %{name} can be dangerous :D. The md5sum of the file at that URL matches. I'm APPROVING this; you can fix the pkgconfig and Source0 stuff before you import it. And please, *before* :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181217.mBICHbmA027657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 07:17:35 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. This updated version just adds the LICENSE file to the %doc section. Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/bzip2/mingw32-bzip2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-5.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Dec 18 2008 Richard Jones - 1.0.5-5 - Include the LICENSE file in doc section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181225.mBICPsCK029281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 --- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 07:25:53 EDT --- New files with fixed rarian-compat dependencies at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-nfs-docs-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:26:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181226.mBICQ3wo029319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 --- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 07:26:02 EDT --- New files with fixed rarian-compat dependencies at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-users-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-users-docs-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181226.mBICQHO1029374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #18 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 07:26:16 EDT --- New files with fixed rarian-compat dependencies at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-services-docs-1.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181224.mBICOEYK028701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-18 07:24:13 EDT --- APPROVED! Thanks. Not sure if the license file will affect any of the other packages but its on your list now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181226.mBICQTnJ003650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 --- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 07:26:28 EDT --- New files with fixed rarian-compat dependencies at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-samba-docs-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:25:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181225.mBICPgER003427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 --- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-18 07:25:41 EDT --- New files with fixed rarian-compat dependencies at: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-date-docs.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/system-config-date-docs-1.0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:30:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181230.mBICUBZ5030267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 07:30:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-bzip2 Short Description: MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:35:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435661] Review Request: midori - A lightweight GTK+ web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181235.mBICZXJe005668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435661 Joachim Frieben changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfrieben at hotmail.com --- Comment #15 from Joachim Frieben 2008-12-18 07:35:30 EDT --- midori-0.1.1 has been released as of 2008-12-01. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] New: Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Summary: Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-libasyncns.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-libasyncns-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Python binding for the libasyncns asynchronous name service query library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181249.mBICn4CR001285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181250.mBICotVI008816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-18 07:50:53 EDT --- APPROVED + rpmlint output This is OK due to legal ACK above (might be nice to file a bug against rpmlint to get it added) rpmlint -i hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10.src.rpm hydrogen-drumkits.src: W: invalid-license Green OpenMusic The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AAL", "Adobe", "ADSL", "AFL", "AGPLv1", "AGPLv3", "AMPAS BSD", "ARL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CATOSL", "CeCILL", "CeCILL-B", "CeCILL-C", "CDDL", "CNRI", "CPAL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Crystal Stacker", "DOC", "ECL 1.0", "ECL 2.0", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "Entessa", "EPL", "ERPL", "EU Datagrid", "Fair", "FTL", "Giftware", "GL2PS", "Glide", "gnuplot", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv1", "GPLv2 or Artistic", "GPLv2+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv2+ with exceptions", "GPLv3", "GPLv3 with exceptions", "GPLv3+", "GPLv3+ with exceptions", "IBM", "IJG", "ImageMagick", "iMatix", "Imlib2", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LBNL BSD", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv2+ or Artistic", "LGPLv2+ with exceptions", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3 with exceptions", "LGPLv3+", "LGPLv3+ with exceptions", "libtiff", "LLGPL", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MIT with advertising", "Motosoto", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NetCDF", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Naumen", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OpenPBS", "OReilly", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 1.1", "OSL 1.1+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 2.1", "OSL 2.1+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "OReilly", "Phorum", "PHP", "psutils", "Public Domain", "Python", "Qhull", "QPL", "RiceBSD", "RPSL", "Ruby", "SCRIP", "Sendmail", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SLIB", "SPL", "TCL", "Teeworlds", "TMate", "UCD", "VOSTROM", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWidgets", "Xerox", "xinetd", "YPLv1.1", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "ZPLv2.1", "ZPLv2.1+", "zlib", "zlib with acknowledgement", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "IEEE", "OFSFDL", "Open Publication", "Public Use", "CC-BY", "CC-BY- SA", "CC-BY-ND", "DSL", "EFML", "Free Art", "GeoGratis", "OAL", "Arphic", "Baekmuk", "Bitstream Vera", "Hershey", "Liberation", "Lucida", "mplus", "OFL", "STIX", "Utopia", "XANO", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines lots of different drumkits but naming matches dependent package + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora Green OpenMusic ACKed by legal + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 86dbdb8d2f9b12690e92211d36c6fe7d Classic-626.h2drumkit c08d5093fc28a30a7542f0c89493e807 Classic-808.h2drumkit cb11827e185ab5a6906967901495884b ColomboAcousticDrumkit.h2drumkit df1bd778148cc25d8f63a8cc7aa91fcb ElectricEmpireKit.h2drumkit f953edf3f4227d786df59b544370e379 HardElectro1.h2drumkit f445c60d4625a6bfe6bb9dbac1ac0aa7 K-27_Trash_Kit.h2drumkit 4c895d59c3bc5f3322d14789de345be2 Millo-Drums_v.1.h2drumkit 2da5b8ee87bce3e67464c61ba0b722dd Millo_MultiLayered2.h2drumkit 79ca7360784ec72959aa07c3c584d76c Millo_MultiLayered3.h2drumkit a9c305829cd23c28ffd1647cb5c0bdfd VariBreaks.h2drumkit 88196a71b20a656e97e70071569dd82f asma_davul.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181255.mBICtnbE003144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |needinfo?(debarshi.ray at gmai | |l.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181255.mBICtUb3009734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-18 07:55:29 EDT --- Debarshi, wouldn't you make a review of this package? It will be used by the next version of gajim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181258.mBICwRdw010165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #27 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-18 07:58:25 EDT --- Here are the changes: * The name of the patch was changed to something more self explanatory "bkchem-exclude-oasa-piddle-pmw.patch"; * The license was added as GPLv2+ and GFDL; * The changelog explains about the adoption of the patch and what the patch does; * Rpmlint is not showing errors. In fact, the patch is absurdly large, 1.3 MB. Is it better to simply change the patch to rm commands directly into the file .spec and apply the patch only in the file setup.py? SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/bkchem.spec PATCH: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/bkchem-exclude-oasa-piddle-pmw.patch SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/bkchem-0.12.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 13:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181312.mBIDCJEd013485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #5 from Lev Shamardin 2008-12-18 08:12:18 EDT --- I've updated the .spec file and rpms: Spec URL: http://abbot.fedorapeople.org/mitter.spec SRPM URL: http://abbot.fedorapeople.org/mitter-0.4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Changed the license to GPLv3+ and changed the desktop-file-install command to desktop-file-install --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications %{name}.desktop (removed --vendor "" option) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 13:30:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181330.mBIDUI5c010639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-18 08:30:17 EDT --- Ok, looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 13:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435661] Review Request: midori - A lightweight GTK+ web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181352.mBIDq4FQ021811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435661 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-18 08:52:03 EDT --- Please don't write such RFEs on already closed review requests. Please open a new bug report against the right component instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 13:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181350.mBIDojcO021531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #28 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-18 08:50:44 EDT --- Here we go with a new proposed .spec[1] and a patch[2] much smaller. Also, of course, the SRPM[3]. [1] - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/proposed/bkchem.spec [2] - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/proposed/bkchem-setup.patch [3] - http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/2/proposed/bkchem-0.12.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 14:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470325] Review Request: qd - Double-Double and Quad-Double Arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181421.mBIELSQQ021414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470325 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-18 09:21:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Er, the spec/%{name} should be qd.spec, not qd-devel.spec. You should however > omit the %files section for the main package and only have one for the devel > subpackage. Right, since we want to be prepared for having a shared library. Otherwise the base name would have been qd-devel (as pstreams-devel and a bunch of other packages). http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/qd-2.3.7-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 14:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181422.mBIEMlNH021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-18 09:22:46 EDT --- Mostly good. Just need a clarification of the license. + rpmlint output rpmlint -i mingw32-portablexdr-4.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ? license matches the actual package license The website specified in the spec file mentions the original code is BSD derived - %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm a6805f06bbb200d32197845ba723521b portablexdr-4.0.11.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 14:40:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181440.mBIEet4K025835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #20 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-18 09:40:53 EDT --- Confirmed, contacted upstream on this, will be properly resolved until this hits fedora-X-testing. Temporary fix in place now. * Thu Dec 18 2008 Michal Nowak - 0.3.2-1 - 0.3.2 - remove rpath (x86-64) - xcb_keysyms: remove xcb_lookup_t - Revert "keysyms: use xcb_key_lookup_t type for col paramter" - temporary disabled %%check due to RPATH regression Soon in rawhide. Thanks for report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 14:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181451.mBIEpF56001733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-18 09:51:14 EDT --- Please change the release number every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 14:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181452.mBIEqD1q001837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 09:52:11 EDT --- Raised to fedora-legal-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-December/msg00022.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 15:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181521.mBIFLvdL008237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #28 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-18 10:21:54 EDT --- Update. Found another file conflict with Samba3 (/usr/bin/smbstatus). http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-0.8.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 15:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181524.mBIFOuJj002274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #30 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-18 10:24:55 EDT --- Done. Please, excuse me. SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/3/bkchem.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/3/bkchem-0.12.5-3.fc10.src.rpm PATCH: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/3/bkchem-setup.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 15:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181544.mBIFik14006384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pm at datasphere.ch --- Comment #1 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-12-18 10:44:45 EDT --- Some remarks: rpmlint devtodo.spec: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint devtodo-0.1.20-1.src.rpm: devtodo.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. devtodo.src: E: summary-too-long Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. devtodo.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. --> Please shorten the summary and suppressed the final "." --> You also have to version changelog comments. --> Release should end with "%{?dist}" rpmlint devtodo-0.1.20-1.i386.rpm devtodo.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/scripts.tcsh devtodo.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /etc/profile.d devtodo.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/scripts.sh devtodo.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. devtodo.i386: E: summary-too-long Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. devtodo.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog devtodo.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/todorc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. --> /etc/profile.d is owned by package setup, so you should not mention "%dir %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d" in you package files list. --> Please use "%config(noreplace) for file %{_sysconfdir}/todorc, or explain why you don't use it. --> The name "scripts.sh" and "scripts.tcsh" are too "impersonal" in system-wide directory %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d: i.e. change them to "devtodo.sh" and "devtodo.csh". Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1006248 --> %doc: _ INSTALL should not be packaged. _ %{_mandir}/... should be outside of %doc _ %{_mandir}/... explicit names should be avoided since compression (thus name extension) is achieved by the rpmbuild macros. Use "%{_mandir}/man1/*". License: Should probably be GPLv2, not GPLv2+: GPL v2 license is contained in the tarball, but no source file (except those generated by the autotools) menti on it. I cannot find any note saying "GPL2 or later"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 15:50:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181550.mBIFo3xr007664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-12-18 10:50:03 EDT --- New version of the GEM was released today, so the SRPM and spec are updated now: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-rufus-scheduler.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-rufus-scheduler-1.0.12-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181620.mBIGKl2V019551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-18 11:20:46 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hydrogen-drumkits Short Description: Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: lkundrak green -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:24:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181624.mBIGOYYj013647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #31 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-18 11:24:33 EDT --- Tried Icon=icon-network-systems, but it doesn't work, I just get a generic document icon (looks like a piece of paper). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181626.mBIGQagK020676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-18 11:26:35 EDT --- perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181626.mBIGQWXg014256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-18 11:26:31 EDT --- perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-B-Utils-0.07-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181631.mBIGVtoa015313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #32 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-18 11:31:53 EDT --- All the points I raised are fixed, except for the missing bluecurve-icon-theme requires. Please post a link to your srpm during review, it is easier, for example to start wget from a cut and paste in a mail or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466331] Review Request: rcov - ruby code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181651.mBIGpDr8018262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcarter at entertain-me.com --- Comment #1 from David Carter 2008-12-18 11:51:12 EDT --- This is a practice review, so don't treat as final or authoritative. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. >From the source RPM: rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/rcov-0.8.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm rcov.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov.rb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. rcov.src:42: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov/lowlevel.rb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. rcov.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov/rant.rb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. rcov.src:44: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov/rcovtask.rb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. rcov.src:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov/report.rb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. rcov.src:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov/version.rb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. These should be fixed. >From the executables: rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/rcov-* rcov.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rcovrt.so 0555 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. rcov.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rcov/rcovtask.rb 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. The first error puzzles me, as it looks like standard permissions for a .so file. You may want to verify that the shebang is required for rcovtask.rb. It looks like it should be removed. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . It seems to be OK as is, but one comment: packages for languages such as ph or python start with the php- and python- prefix. There's no requirement for this for ruby packages in the current naming guidelines, but it seems to me there should be. That would make your packages ruby-rcov-*. Other reviewers may want to comment on this. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK on x86_64 F-9. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 NA. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK. The only .so isn't in the standard path, and I assume is loaded dynamically by Ruby. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. See rpmlint comments above. Otherwise OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . There's a mix of the two styles. For example: %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT This should be fixed. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Technically, this violates the rules, but the standard ruby libraries also do this. Other reviewers may want to comment. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181651.mBIGpN3T024742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 --- Comment #16 from Jorge Bras 2008-12-18 11:51:22 EDT --- rpms here: http://neo.konnekt.org/files/ thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 16:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181649.mBIGnx6f024167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 Jorge Bras changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org | |) | --- Comment #10 from Jorge Bras 2008-12-18 11:49:58 EDT --- Yes, it's my first packagem and No I havent been sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181701.mBIH1td6026572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #33 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-18 12:01:54 EDT --- License is not right, should be CC-BY-SA. Minor remarks: I think that changelog is more readable with one empty line between each date, like * Thu Nov 13 2008 Peter Scheie - 0.0.2 - Updated screencapture image for step 8 to one in which the interface in question is highlighted. * Sun Oct 12 2008 Warren Togami - 0.0.1 - initial package Also you can use %{version} in the Source url to avoid changing it each release, like Source0: http://peterscheie.fedorapeople.org/k12linux/quick-start-guide/k12linux-quick-start-guide-%{version}.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:10:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181710.mBIHAttn021667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #26 from David Carter 2008-12-18 12:10:52 EDT --- New practice review completed (#466331). I'll do one or two more this week now that exams are over. Also, the folks at HP are in discussions about relaxing the license restrictions on the code that got removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181711.mBIHBDFU028686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-18 12:11:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jeuclid Short Description: MathML rendering solution Owners: bashton Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:15:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:15:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181715.mBIHFivQ022717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-18 12:15:41 EDT --- Sounds great. I'll be AFK all next week, so I'll go over the whole bundle Monday the 28th. Or so. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181720.mBIHK63N030356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-18 12:20:05 EDT --- For package renames, we don't have a hard policy yet, but I would like to suggest the following: - Can you create the new packages with the new names and the needed provides/obsoletes. - Post a link to them on fedora-devel list and/or here. - Once they check out on provides/obsoletes, I can make the new package names in cvs for you, and you can mark the old one as dead.package and import the new one. Does that sound reasonable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181736.mBIHaKbd026019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 Bug 454668 depends on bug 454664, which changed state. Bug 454664 Summary: Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:36:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181736.mBIHa2Tp025915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-18 12:36:02 EDT --- Committed to cvs, build and landed in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454664] Review Request: gupnp-ui - UPnP-UI is a collection of helpers for building user interfaces for gupnp apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181736.mBIHaJXK025995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454664 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-18 12:36:18 EDT --- Committed to cvs, build and landed in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:44:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181744.mBIHiJUF001136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181756.mBIHuMT7029610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-18 12:56:21 EDT --- Looks good, however I suggest that one line in %changelog must be shorter than now (note that on %description rpmlint will complain if one line exceeds 79 characters) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 17:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452354] Review Request: entertrack - Web-based artifact tracking/management system written in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181759.mBIHxua5003746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452354 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-18 12:59:55 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181807.mBII77gq031719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #32 from Terje R??sten 2008-12-18 13:07:06 EDT --- Yeah, I suggest the following: rm -> %{__rm} or %{__rm} -> rm. It's normal to have Patch1 line right below SourceX line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181816.mBIIGAgT001322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-18 13:16:09 EDT --- Indeed, the license is good now and the tests pass: skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=29, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.27 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.36 CPU) I don't think there's much point in running the skipped test; if you did want to run it, you'd just need a build depencency on perl(Test::Pod). Anyway, everything looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181812.mBIICo6h000718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-18 13:12:49 EDT --- Well, 18 hours ago new version seems released... Would you upgrade? Also, please put one line between each %changelog entry like below? ---------------------------------------------------------- * Thu Dec 18 2008 Sandro Mathys - 1.26.0-2 - The changes to the build.properties file are now applied with a for loop and sed instead of a patch - The paths to the 3rd-party libraries (i.e. currently only javamail.jar) for the javadoc generation are now looked up with build-classpath instead of being hardcoded * Tue Dec 16 2008 Sandro Mathys - 1.26.0-1 - initial build (thanks Rudolf 'che' Kastl for the help) ---------------------------------------------------------- This is useful on Fedora CVS system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181812.mBIICnU0006107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-18 13:12:48 EDT --- I'm not completely sure why this was submitted for review when you know it doesn't build, but I'll indicate that it can't be reviewed. Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:22:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:22:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181822.mBIIMmI0002325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #29 from Jerry Amundson 2008-12-18 13:22:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Update. Found another file conflict with Samba3 (/usr/bin/smbstatus). > > http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec > http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-0.8.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc10.src.rpm Processing files: samba4-devel-4.0.0-0.8.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11 error: File not found: /home/jerry/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/samba4-4.0.0-0.8.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386/usr/lib/libldb.so RPM build errors: File not found: /home/jerry/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/samba4-4.0.0-0.8.alpha6.GIT.3508a66.fc11.i386/usr/lib/libldb.so Just me? I haven't had a chance to research why yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181823.mBIINacr007919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-18 13:23:35 EDT --- Wow, that took over half a year. Unfortunately you didn't initially indicate that you needed a sponsor, so this review was done in error. I guess it should be returned to the review queue, but I'm not really sure that any of the sponsors are going to want to work with someone who takes seven months to respond. Do you perhaps have an explanation or something which might assuage their concerns? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181834.mBIIY4Ik004215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #33 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-18 13:34:03 EDT --- Thanks, Mamoru and Terje, Here are the changes. :) spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/4/bkchem.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/4/bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181850.mBIIowjU012920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-18 13:50:57 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 19:01:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181901.mBIJ1Om9009686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #34 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-18 14:01:23 EDT --- Tried Icon=icon-network-systems, but it doesn't work, I just get a generic document icon (looks like a piece of paper). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 18:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181858.mBIIweGW014030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-18 13:58:39 EDT --- Well, - I just noticed that many HTML files have "Generated by Epydoc 3.0.1" comments. Does this mean that document HTML files in qmtest can be regenerated by using epydoc (this is available in Fedora)? - By the way would you preserve the old %changelog entry? ("initial package" for 2.4.1 don't seem proper) (In reply to comment #25) > By the way, is there any reason why the source package name includes the build > platform ('fc9') ? - Because rpmbuild -bs just expands %{?dist} value. > This isn't actually a platform-specific file, or is it ? - In short, you need not take care of this. If your srpm is rebuild on a platform where dist is defined as ".fc11", the rebuilt binary rpms will have ".fc11" in their names. i.e. %{?dist} value is re-valuated when rebuilding binary rpms and the binary rpms are "renamed" properly. Also Fedora CVS system can treat this correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 19:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform9 - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181906.mBIJ6iL9011157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Lillian Angel 2008-12-18 14:06:43 EDT --- Is it possible to remove the version number from the name, and then package updates can be smoother? We would not require a new package and a review. It would not make much sense to have 2 versions of one package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 19:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181913.mBIJDY7d017046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #27 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-18 14:13:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Well, > - I just noticed that many HTML files have "Generated by Epydoc 3.0.1" > comments. Does this mean that document HTML files in qmtest can be > regenerated > by using epydoc (this is available in Fedora)? Yes. Our released source tarballs already ship with them, though, so there is no need to regenerate anything. (And, we have used different tools to generate those docs in the past (such as HappyDoc or Synopsis), so I wouldn't want to hardcode the use of epydoc into the spec file or the build system, for example. > - By the way would you preserve the old %changelog entry? > ("initial package" for 2.4.1 don't seem proper) Well, 2.4.1 is the first QMTest release for which I build rpm packages. > (In reply to comment #25) > > By the way, is there any reason why the source package name includes the build > > platform ('fc9') ? > - Because rpmbuild -bs just expands %{?dist} value. OK, I understand where the name is coming from. I don't understand whether changing the name of the source rpm (removing the {?dist} tag) would be wrong. But that was just out of interest. There is no need to rename anything. Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 19:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181916.mBIJGjXF013289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #35 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-18 14:16:44 EDT --- http://peterscheie.fedorapeople.org/k12linux/quick-start-guide/k12linux-quick-start-guide-0.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm I fixed the missing Requires; added a blank space between revisions in the changelog; removed a superfluous GenericName[en_US]= in .desktop file. Why should the license by CC-BY-SA instead of CC-BY-SA-AT? Will add %{version} for URL in next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 19:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181929.mBIJT6pj019443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-18 14:29:04 EDT --- Thanks. Note that we do generally only use needinfo in package reviews as a prod in the case one of the parties is not responsive. In the days before needinfo was a flag, at least, setting it was the best way of making sure that it dropped off of the bugzilla front page, thus ensuring that a response would not be received. I'll go along with your idea that a simple Requires: rarian-compap should take care of the scrollkeeper-update bit. If it isn't installed when the scriptlet runs then things are OK (the scriptlet will succeed, doing nothing), and if it's installed later then it will fix up the index. I note now that 1.1.4 is not available from fedorahosted, and thus I can't fetch the source. I'm not going to block the review over that as I'm guessing it just hasn't shown up there yet. There was no problem with 1.1.3 and the sources compared fine. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK. * acceptable content. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 19:46:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181946.mBIJkESM018341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-18 14:46:13 EDT --- Jason, this was just an oversight. It does build if you use 'rpmbuild'. It was when I was trying to make a scratch-build in Koji that I discovered first the missing BR, then much more serious problems which I've been trying since then to resolve with upstream. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1001758 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/10583 I will clear the whiteboard when this is really ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182012.mBIKCY0H027787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #36 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-18 15:12:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > http://peterscheie.fedorapeople.org/k12linux/quick-start-guide/k12linux-quick-start-guide-0.0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm > > I fixed the missing Requires; added a blank space between revisions in the > changelog; removed a superfluous GenericName[en_US]= in .desktop file. Why a specific version for the bluecurve-icon-theme requires? > Why should the license by CC-BY-SA instead of CC-BY-SA-AT? I said that based on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_3 But I may be wrong Rpmlint says: k12linux-quick-start-guide.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) k12linux-quick-start-guide.noarch: W: no-documentation k12linux-quick-start-guide.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/skel/Desktop/K12Linux Quick Start Guide.desktop k12linux-quick-start-guide.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.5 ['0.0.5-1.fc10', '0.0.5-1'] You can fix the first of you want. You have to fix the 4rth item, version in changelog must be 0.0.5-1. The 2 other items are not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182038.mBIKcNwT027954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|475593 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:38:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182038.mBIKcMXn027930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|475661 |477044 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182039.mBIKdlBh028079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-18 15:39:46 EDT --- > Some remarks: > > - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} fixed -%{__chmod} 0644 $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}/penstats +%{__chmod} 0644 %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/penstats > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS > > - You should report upstream about the missing pen.conf in the release tarball. the pen.conf file in /etc/httpd/conf.d/ is inside .spec file in pen tarball, but I have put it ouside spec file to make it more compatible with fedora and make this spec file clean. > - What's about a restart of apache after the installation? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript the penctl.cgi cgi is basically for statistics, I will let it without restarting apache for the moment. here are the lasted version.. http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pen/pen-0.18.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182038.mBIKcY4q000605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182038.mBIKcYHN000580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |475661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182042.mBIKgCKH028847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 --- Comment #12 from Jorge Bras 2008-12-18 15:42:10 EDT --- You are right. just to give some explanation: 1) In May I have change job, so I was a bit busy 2) the server I used to build my packages, and other stuff, the disk just died. I had no backups, now I have a RAID5. But it seems I haven't learned enough, right now I'm trying to recover some files from my laptop, the disk isn't that healty 3) I was feeling a bit lost, with all of this process of submitting a package, getting a sponser.. I had read the documentation from the fedoraproject site, but even so that's it, I have no more arguments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 20:57:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:57:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182057.mBIKvH12003913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #30 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-18 15:57:16 EDT --- See comment #26. You have to uninstall samba4 before rebuilding it, otherwise it just links to the already-installed libldb.so and doesn't build it itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182109.mBIL92sc001366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #21 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-18 16:09:00 EDT --- xcb-util-0.3.2-1.fc11 successfully built in Koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182113.mBILDnYi007102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #31 from Jerry Amundson 2008-12-18 16:13:46 EDT --- /me smacks hand on forehead, I knew libldb.so sounded familiar! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182112.mBILCevi006943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 Sayamindu Dasgupta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sayamindu at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Sayamindu Dasgupta 2008-12-18 16:12:37 EDT --- I would like to build scim for OLPC-4 (without the requires imchooser, im-settings part Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: sayamind This is as per the discussion at http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8934#comment:6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182135.mBILZKOc006369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2008-12-18 16:35:18 EDT --- License tag fixed. Building F-9 F-10 updates now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182139.mBILd8Xr006968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 16:39:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt with the latest release. And a empty line between the %changelog entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182151.mBILpsnH014290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 16:51:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd-2.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd.spec Actually, I don't think the pre-release/snapshot guidelines or the ones for using revision control apply here. 2.0.1 is an official release (actually the same as 2.0(.0) but with additional license text in the lib part as I requested from upstream). Because of only this little change no tarball was created by upstream. But the used tarball is generated by upstream's system and consists of the release tag (not a certain revision or trunk or something). The license was changed. Yes, it could be built with maven. Actually, maven needs artifacts that are not provided in Fedora. And packaging other java software that could be built using maven also shows that maven is Fedora lacks lots of important artifacts and that maven is really outdated. And I really don't understand maven enough to change any of this. Yes, I could modify the tarball but isn't it part of the guidelines that the upstream's distribution shouldn't be modified unless there's some problems with the contents? Well, xtvd-lib and xtvd-gui are upstream's naming, which should be preserved according to the guidelines. The common name (and the name of upstream's distribution) is xtvd. That's why. build-classpath is now being used. Correct me if I'm wrong in any point :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182156.mBILunO7015031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 16:56:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 21:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182159.mBILx4nX010224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 16:59:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 22:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182200.mBIM00FS010313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 17:00:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 22:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182201.mBIM10pP015687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 17:01:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. Now using build-classpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 22:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182202.mBIM2ucx016090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 17:02:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. Now using build-jar-repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 23:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182346.mBINkGmY027331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-18 18:46:15 EDT --- Curious though - how do you start scim in olpc? You might want to do some changes too related to the langbar and notification icon perhaps, dunno, if it is only for Indic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 23:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226395] Merge Review: scim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182342.mBINgfkc031984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226395 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-18 18:42:40 EDT --- Okay sounds reasonable: cvs admin done. But please try to keep the olpc branch in sync with fedora afap. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 00:04:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190004.mBJ04hsa029969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 --- Comment #3 from Wart 2008-12-18 19:04:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > What about the permission in devel package? Also is it the dependency on tcllib > necessary? Here is build in mock without tcllib > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1005993 tcllib is a runtime dependency, not a buildtime dependency (hence the use of Requires: as opposed to BuildRequires:). From the tclxml readme file: "In order for the Tcl-only parser to resolve external entities, the tcllib package must be installed." Updated package that fixes the stub library permissions: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tcl-tclxml.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tcl-tclxml-3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 00:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190040.mBJ0expU008276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 00:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190041.mBJ0f0ks008305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Bug 452427 depends on bug 458784, which changed state. Bug 458784 Summary: Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 00:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190043.mBJ0hPwM002791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Milos Jakubicek 2008-12-18 19:43:24 EDT --- Ops, sorry for noise, NEXTRELEASE is proper resolution of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 01:30:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190130.mBJ1Us94015593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-18 20:30:53 EDT --- Hi, --with-expat is pointless without --with-included-neon, because it will use whatever neon uses: configure: Configured to build litmus 0.12: Install prefix: /usr Compiler: gcc neon library: library in /usr (0.28.3) XML parser: using whatever neon uses SSL library: SSL is supported by neon Therefore, you have to choose, either use external neon or external ssl and expat. Also, you can use a %bcond_without exernal_neon, and choose the configuration options based on this. Finally, the link with the .src.rpm for F10 is dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 01:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190135.mBJ1ZjJN016325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #46 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-12-18 20:35:43 EDT --- For me, you can review the export CFLAGS, and build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 03:10:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190310.mBJ3AaSh026035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 03:56:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190356.mBJ3ummY001760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhlavink at redhat.com, | |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-18 22:56:43 EDT --- Looks like mhlavink at redhat.com owns this package now, so I'll update the CC. I've been staring at this, the very first merge review, for nearly two years now and would love to see it go away. I'm not sure if I have what it takes to do a proper review of it, but I can at least look at the current packaging and make some comments. First off, I wonder how much of the above discussion about Fedora's version being heavily patched is currently true. I see only four patches applied; one is a one-liner, one is a set of translation changes for, I believe, Turkish, and the other two don't really patch in all that much (under fifteen lines each). It would indeed be nice to include the upstream status of those patches in accordance with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment but I'm just not seeing how our current version is significantly patched. Maybe someone did some significant work on things in the last 18 months. Or maybe the problem is with some of the locale tweaks that happen directly in the specfile. It would also be nice to clean the patches up a bit, remove the unapplied patches from CVS and get rid of the commented-out bits of the spec where those patches used to be applied. Here's what current rpmlint has to say about the src.rpm: 37: E: prereq-use httpd, perl Prereq: shouldn't be used; something is needed for a scriptlet, it should be reflected in a fine-grained dependency like Requires(pre). There are no scriptlets here, so I think those should be regular runtime dependencies, specified with Requires:. Those happen to already be there, so I don't really see the point in the Prereq: line. 38: W: unversioned-explicit-provides squirrelmail-i18n We always want to provide something with a version, because without one it becomes impossible to ever provide a separate squirrelmail-i18n package. However, is there anything which might actually depend on squirrelmail-i18n? Why does it need to be provided by this package? 217: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR Shouldn't this just refer to %{SOURCE1} instead? W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 76, tab: line 76) Nobody cares about this. Fix it if you like. and about the built noarch.rpm: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs apache W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs apache E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/squirrelmail/prefs 0700 W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/squirrelmail/attach apache W: non-standard-gid /var/spool/squirrelmail/attach apache E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/squirrelmail/attach 0700 W: non-standard-gid /etc/squirrelmail/config.php apache E: non-readable /etc/squirrelmail/config.php 0640 W: non-standard-gid /etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php apache E: non-readable /etc/squirrelmail/config_local.php 0640 W: non-standard-gid /etc/squirrelmail/default_pref apache E: non-readable /etc/squirrelmail/default_pref 0640 W: non-standard-gid /etc/squirrelmail/sqspell_config.php apache E: non-readable /etc/squirrelmail/sqspell_config.php 0640 These are all perfectly OK. E: htaccess-file /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/squirrelspell/modules/.htaccess Generally it's a bad idea to use a .htaccess file in a package; better to put such things in /etc/httpd/conf.d/squirrelmail.conf so the admin can see all of the access restrictions in one place. It's also common to disable htaccess checks for reasons of speed. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ChangeLog It would be significantly better if anyone who gets this package would be able to actually read the names in the ChangeLog, but such things tend to get messy and bits in various different character sets are often added at different times. Fixing it is generally a manual procedure and needs to be coordinated with upstream (because generally iconv can't fix these problems and carrying a patch to the ChangeLog is pointless). I don't think the package review is the appropriate place to force that to happen. W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.12.txt W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.13.txt These, however, should be fixed with a couple of quick calls to tr. E: zero-length /usr/share/squirrelmail/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/serversidefilter.po.new Why do we ship this? W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/filters/bulkquery/bulkquery.c E: non-executable-script /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/demo/getpot 0644 What are these for? If they're not usable as is, perhaps they should be removed from the actual squirrelmail installation and packaged as documentation. That's it for rpmlint. I'll look at the spec later if anyone is listening on the other end of this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 04:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190433.mBJ4XELu012892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(debarshi.ray at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-18 23:33:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Debarshi, wouldn't you make a review of this package? It will be used by the > next version of gajim. I can surely review this package, but which version of Gajim are you referring to? I could not find Gajim 0.12 using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 04:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:41:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477106] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190441.mBJ4f9tH014206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477106 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 04:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477106] New: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477106 Summary: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz-0.62-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unalz is a utility to decompress .alz files. It supports bzip2/raw format transformation, splitting the compressed file into smaller chunks (alz, a00, a01, ...), extract password protected .alz files, and CRC checks. rpmlint is silent. Alzip is a commercial software: http://www.altools.com/ unalz is a free decompressor for alzip (Korean): http://www.kipple.pe.kr/win/unalz/ I'm not sure if this software can be shipped with Fedora, hence I'm blocking FE-Legal. This software normally comes with its own zlip and bzip2. I managed to patch it to use the system's zlib. But it uses a private header file of bzip2 (which is not in bzip2-devel package) and thus (part of) bzip2 has to be built in unalz. This is the way it is in Ubuntu too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190505.mBJ55c6M018230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #15 from Tomas 2008-12-19 00:05:37 EDT --- plugins/filters/bulkquery/bulkquery.c can be used to compile program, which used in non-default filters plugin configuration. In current stable it is not useful for packaged SquirrelMail versions, because people have to modify files in /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/filters/ in order to enable it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:13:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477106] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190513.mBJ5Def1012819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477106 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #1 from Warren Togami 2008-12-19 00:13:39 EDT --- http://www.kipple.pe.kr/etc/freeware_license/ This is clearly not FOSS. It contains commercial distribution prohibitions, it allows distribution only unmodified, and says patches must be distributed separately. It even explicitly mentions "free software" and the GPL and says that it is different from that. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190519.mBJ5JJZv020028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 00:19:18 EDT --- Just fixing up the review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190529.mBJ5T6t6015070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-19 00:29:05 EDT --- Rahul, Can you apply new spec in rawhide with excluding -f to fc-cache as its not needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190540.mBJ5eRmT023260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |470913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190540.mBJ5eS1g023299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470914 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226323] Merge Review: pstack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190555.mBJ5tneW019071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226323 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 00:55:48 EDT --- pstack does seem to be dead in F-9 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226362] Merge Review: redhat-artwork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190615.mBJ6Fcrp028347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226362 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:15:37 EDT --- I'm pretty sure this package is dead now, as it hasn't been in the distro since F-8. The package should still be cleaned up in CVS, though (files deleted and dead.package added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:21:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225303] Merge Review: autorun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190621.mBJ6L04f022893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225303 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:20:59 EDT --- Yes, this was obsolete as of F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226371] Merge Review: rhgb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190617.mBJ6HmaZ028679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226371 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:17:47 EDT --- This package is dead as of F-10, it seems, although the devel branch still has files. They should probably be deleted and dead.package added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:23:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225651] Merge Review: compat-slang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190623.mBJ6NqV5023151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225651 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:23:52 EDT --- This has been dead since F-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225650] Merge Review: compat-readline43 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190622.mBJ6MehT029467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225650 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:22:39 EDT --- This has been dead since F-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225657] Merge Review: cpufrequtils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190627.mBJ6RB6Y023824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225657 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: cpufreq-utils |Merge Review: cpufrequtils --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:27:10 EDT --- I'm pretty sure this still needs a merge review under the new name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225772] Merge Review: frysk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190630.mBJ6UFHl030593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225772 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:30:14 EDT --- This is dead now, so there's no point in a merge review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225775] Merge Review: gail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190631.mBJ6Vfrm024571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225775 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:31:40 EDT --- This sees to be dead now, although it still has a live devel branch. The files should probably be deleted in CVS and a dead.package file added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190635.mBJ6ZgfS031407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:35:40 EDT --- I'm a bit confused; is this a review ticket for bringing gimp-data-extras back into the distro? It's lost in the sea of merge reviews so nobody has looked at it in ages. Koji says that gimp-data-extras has been blocked from the distro since F-7. If this really does need a review, please let me know. But I also note that the links in comment 8 above are invalid (which isn't surprising, 13 months later). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225844] Merge Review: gnome-volume-manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190638.mBJ6cAot031677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225844 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:38:09 EDT --- This seems to be dead now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225917] Merge Review: isicom In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190641.mBJ6fufY025864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225917 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:41:56 EDT --- This package is dead now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225975] Merge Review: krbafs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190644.mBJ6iKk1026023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225975 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:44:19 EDT --- This package is dead now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226300] Merge Review: pkinit-nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190656.mBJ6uKAC001987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:56:19 EDT --- I can find no package in the distro with this name, nor any record that there has ever been a package in Fedora with this name. Any idea what might be going on? The ticket which was closed as a dup looks like a regular package submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:59:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226340] Merge Review: pyspi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190659.mBJ6xva1028264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226340 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:59:56 EDT --- This package has been blocked from the distro since F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226306] Merge Review: portmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190657.mBJ6vjgA002159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226306 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:57:44 EDT --- This package doesn't actually seem to have existed in post-merge Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:03:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226369] Merge Review: rgmanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190703.mBJ73CMi029047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226369 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 02:03:11 EDT --- This is no longer present in the distro as a separate source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226408] Merge Review: setarch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190704.mBJ74vrb003193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226408 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 02:04:57 EDT --- This no longer exists as a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225621] Merge Review: bluez-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190712.mBJ7ClGa004467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225621 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 02:12:47 EDT --- This package is dead now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-exchange In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190726.mBJ7QpuM006486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: |Merge Review: |evolution-connector (not |evolution-exchange |started) | --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 02:26:50 EDT --- evolution-connector was renamed to evolution-exchange, but I can find no review ticket for evolution-exchange so I suppose it still needs one. I'll repurpose this ticket. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-exchange/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225741] Merge Review: evolution-webcal (not started) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190727.mBJ7RmoJ032415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 02:27:47 EDT --- This package is dead now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190738.mBJ7cTWP001306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Flag|needinfo?(rmccabe at redhat.co |needinfo?(jparsons at redhat.c |m) |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190737.mBJ7b9MA001219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreznik at redhat.com, | |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-19 02:37:08 EDT --- cc'ing current owner of this package jreznik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190750.mBJ7oQEA009629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:51:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190751.mBJ7pV7s009846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:02:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473215] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu - HTML Form Creation, Rendering and Validation Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190802.mBJ82xNL005226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473215 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 03:02:57 EDT --- perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:26:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225246] Merge Review: anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190826.mBJ8QGux008485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246 David Cantrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:25:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190825.mBJ8P4VR008250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-19 03:25:03 EDT --- I'm sorry I read libtcl instead of libtcl. In this case everything is ok. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:26:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225246] Merge Review: anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190826.mBJ8Q38X014911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246 David Cantrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dcantrell at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190827.mBJ8R66r008590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-19 03:27:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-CheckOS Short Description: Check what OS we're running on Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225246] Merge Review: anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190843.mBJ8hS05011246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246 David Cantrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dcantrell at redhat.com |hdegoede at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 08:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Role based access control is very simple: every user has a list of roles, which that user is allowed to assume, and every restricted part of the app makes an assertion about the necessary roles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:21:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190921.mBJ9LPsE018161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-19 04:21:24 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers are in -devel OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - add "touch -r $f $f.new" between the iconv and mv calls in the charset conversion to keep the timestamps on modified files - rpmlint complains about non-standard uid/gid and some non-readable files, but that's OK due the kind of package so this package is APPROVED when you add the missing "touch" call before importing the spec to the CVS Now I need to see (and review) another your package(s) and/or some pre-reviews of other packages done by you, before I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:28:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190928.mBJ9Swuc025552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-19 04:28:57 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1009025 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url afef214de7c8084c59fad8a07a640059 Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=45, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.41 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.50 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::Roles) = 0.07 Requires: perl(Catalyst::Exception) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Set::Object) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions:- 1) Not needed following in SPEC file BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.8.0 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:36:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190936.mBJ9arKs026991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #38 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-19 04:36:51 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Just an update for 3.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190937.mBJ9bQSH020577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:38:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190938.mBJ9cZff027165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-19 04:38:34 EDT --- Only issue is the license isn't included. + rpmlint output rpmlint -i mingw32-iconv-1.12-5.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license - %doc includes license file no license file included + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm c2be282595751535a618ae0edeb8f648 libiconv-1.12.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190942.mBJ9gjYT027941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190952.mBJ9qFHt029628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-19 04:52:13 EDT --- The same issue with the license + rpmlint output rpmlint -i mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license - %doc includes license file license file not included in rpm + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm ffe6f86e63a3a29fa53ac645faaabdfa termcap-1.3.1.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191016.mBJAGf1V001318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 --- Comment #20 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 05:16:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Thanks. Note that we do generally only use needinfo in package reviews as a > prod in the case one of the parties is not responsive. I didn't know that, and will try to remember that for future reviews. > I note now that 1.1.4 is not available from fedorahosted, and thus I can't > fetch the source. I'm not going to block the review over that as I'm guessing > it just hasn't shown up there yet. There was no problem with 1.1.3 and the > sources compared fine. Oops, my bad: I forgot to "make upload". Fixed here and for the other -docs packages. Thanks for doing the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:23:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191023.mBJANXG3028475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-19 05:23:32 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. BAD? license field matches the actual license. OK* license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. BAD latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. BAD %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK allowed content OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - see comment #3 for more detailed description of the issues - versioning is wrong for a post-release snapshop - AFAICT unused variable are passed in the make calls - recheck the licenses for the files - include the license(s) as %doc - new snapshot is available - using only "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is sufficient for the %clean section - is the database useful for other purpose then for cups? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191027.mBJAR9ao029307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-19 05:27:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/termcap/mingw32-termcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-5.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Dec 19 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.3.1-5 - Added license file to doc section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191026.mBJAQuKm029255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-19 05:26:55 EDT --- Thanks for looking at all these. Here's an updated version with the license files included: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/iconv/mingw32-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-iconv-1.12-7.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Dec 19 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.12-7 - Include the license files in doc section. - Fix the changelog entry numbering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191029.mBJATZbc003474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 05:29:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-services-docs Short Description: Documentation for configuring system services Owners: nphilipp Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:38:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191038.mBJAcfan031389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-19 05:38:39 EDT --- APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191038.mBJAcJlL005371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-19 05:38:18 EDT --- APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191042.mBJAgnD0032173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #11 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 05:42:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I'm a bit confused; is this a review ticket for bringing gimp-data-extras back > into the distro? Yes. Originally it was a merge review ticket, but as of the unclear ownership of some of the files contained in the old versions, the package was dropped. When upstream published a fixed version, I reopened the ticket to get the package get back in. > It's lost in the sea of merge reviews so nobody has looked at > it in ages. Koji says that gimp-data-extras has been blocked from the distro > since F-7. Due to legal reasons, but these have been resolved in the meantime. > If this really does need a review, please let me know. I'd appreciate a review ;-). > But I also note that > the links in comment 8 above are invalid (which isn't surprising, 13 months > later). I've rebuilt the source RPM and uploaded the files to: Spec: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras.spec SRPM: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras-2.0.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:48:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191048.mBJAm5Hx000677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-19 05:48:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-termcap Short Description: MinGW terminal feature database Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 10:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191047.mBJAlvJ0007126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-19 05:47:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-iconv Short Description: GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 11:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191104.mBJB4H3A003549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #13 from Jerome Soyer 2008-12-19 06:04:16 EDT --- ok, done for the "touch" Latest version can be found at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-5.fc11.src.rpm Thanks. You can find another review request i made at : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Have a nice day! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 11:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] New: Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cmakeed.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-cmakeed-1.1.0-0.1.rc5.fc10.src.rpm Description: The CMakeEd plug-in provides an editor for CMake files. The plug-in registers an editor for files named CMakeLists.txt and *.cmake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 11:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191144.mBJBi05X010519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-19 06:43:59 EDT --- Thank you for cc'ing me here, issues are fixed now in devel. I'm only not sure if we really need smp_flags - it's noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 11:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191156.mBJBuPAL019543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 11:55:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191155.mBJBt8nt019255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-19 06:55:07 EDT --- Just got a semi-official answer from Tom?? Trnka : -- [... Matthias ...] > IANAL, which is why I'm asking here, but it seems quite strange to not > be able to distribute the root certificates if the goal is to some day > have them distributed with major web browsers... Hello! Yes, this is correct. The current NRPDaL doesn't permit redistribution. This is because CAcert is currently undergoing an audit and the NRPDaL is supposed to pass this audit too. Non-related parties are really not supposed to distribute anything, but Fedora is not a "non-related party" - third-party software vendors are to be covered (and permitted cert redistribution) in the 3PVDaL, which is currently work-in-progress. As soon as the policy group finishes the work and the 3PVDaL passes to DRAFT (active) status, the problem mentioned by you will be solved. -- So I'm unsure what to do about this... leave this review open until things change? Close it then reopen it once it can move forward again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473926] Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191221.mBJCLvOx025718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-19 07:21:55 EDT --- I've submitted the F9 and F10 builds to be pushed at last, closing. Thanks Dan and Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477152] New: Review Request: devtodo - Dev Todo is a program to display and manage a hierarchical tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: devtodo - Dev Todo is a program to display and manage a hierarchical tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477152 Summary: Review Request: devtodo - Dev Todo is a program to display and manage a hierarchical tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/devtodo/devtodo.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/devtodo/devtodo-0.1.20-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Dev Todo is small command line application for maintaining lists of tasks. It stores tasks hierarchically, with each task given one of five priority levels. Data is stored as XML, so various XSLT templates can be executed on the XML to convert it into different formats (eg. HTML). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477152] Review Request: devtodo - Dev Todo is a program to display and manage a hierarchical tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191231.mBJCVxBp021212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477152 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-19 07:31:58 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475755 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191232.mBJCW0Z2021246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-19 07:31:58 EDT --- *** Bug 477152 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191237.mBJCb3Oe029198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 07:37:01 EDT --- tcping-1.3.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcping-1.3.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191234.mBJCYIGY028452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-19 07:34:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > - You should report upstream about the missing pen.conf in the release tarball. > > the pen.conf file in /etc/httpd/conf.d/ is inside .spec file in pen tarball, > but I have put it ouside spec file to make it more compatible with fedora and > make this spec file clean. OK > > - What's about a restart of apache after the installation? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript > > the penctl.cgi cgi is basically for statistics, I will let it without > restarting apache for the moment. OK I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191240.mBJCekp6030080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-19 07:40:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I can surely review this package, but which version of Gajim are you referring > to? I could not find Gajim 0.12 using it. Current post-0.12 SVN version uses it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191238.mBJCcAVl029453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-19 07:38:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdnet Short Description: Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191259.mBJCxewY026702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 12:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191258.mBJCw070026439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-19 07:57:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pen Short Description: Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 13:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191311.mBJDBU1R004510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #3 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-19 08:11:29 EDT --- Sorry for the low quality, it's an old spec file, and I also ignored that running rpmlint on the spec file produces fewer warnings. All points have been addressed in this new release: Spec URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo.spec SRPM URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo-0.1.20-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 13:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191312.mBJDCQqO004688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2008-12-19 08:12:25 EDT --- How is the legal question going? I would like to review this but I have no idea what to do with this FE-legal thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 13:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191327.mBJDRf32000896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-19 08:27:39 EDT --- Your spec file and your Source RPM are not accessible. Why aren't you using your hosting space at Fedorapeople.org? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 13:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191343.mBJDhACK003958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-19 08:43:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-speak Short Description: Speak for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 13:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191344.mBJDiN3F004115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Andrew Cress changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew.r.cress at intel.com --- Comment #6 from Andrew Cress 2008-12-19 08:44:21 EDT --- Dan, SPEC URL: http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec?view=markup SRC RPM URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.3.2-1.src.rpm RE Fedora-only spec files: I think there are lots of counter-examples of projects in Fedora that have support for other distros (net-snmp for one), which certainly makes sense for the project maintainers. Certainly we both want to make the spec file as simple as possible. I could move the MIB and cron files from %post into the %files section, and that would probably work for the init.d scripts as well. I'll move the two binaries in question to /usr/sbin like the others, but I'll have to change 'events' to 'ievents'. And if I change some command names, this will have an impact on some legacy users, so the version will have to bump to 2.4.0 or 3.0.0 when these changes are made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 13:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191348.mBJDmwRx012188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 14:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225775] Merge Review: gail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191416.mBJEGlJw019144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225775 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-19 09:16:46 EDT --- Done, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:28:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] New: Review Request: cas - core analysis system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cas - core analysis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Summary: Review Request: cas - core analysis system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: astokes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/cas.spec SRPM URL: http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/cas-0.13-112.src.rpm Description: CAS provides a support engineer the ability to configure an environment for core analysis quickly. All the hassles of configuring architecture specific boxes, finding machines suitable for a particular core is now taken care of. -- This is my first package submission and need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191530.mBJFUFu1000645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Adam Stokes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191533.mBJFXdXp027524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #10 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-19 10:33:37 EDT --- Thank you for taking this review. Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/phatch.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/phatch-0.1.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog : - subpckage created for nautilus extension - timestamp preserved for sed'ed file - wxPython-devel removed from BuildRequires - Source0 updated - whole documentation included - update-desktop-database and update-mime-database added - egg-info properly builded - python-devel buildrequries changed to python (whithout that, build uner mock/koji failed) Source0 is a "stable" URL. The url changed from far but I didn't have update it in my SPEC. I tried to use scrollkeeper but no additionnal documentation was generated, so I removed it. I also contacted upstream about the software version (egg file generated contains "0.1.5" instead of "0.1.6" and the "about" dialog display also "0.1.5" instead of "0.1.6"). Package build on koji : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 repmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX ~]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/phatch-0.1.6-2.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/phatch-0.1.6-2.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/phatch-nautilus-extension-0.1.6-2.fc10.i386.rpm phatch.i386: E: no-binary phatch-nautilus-extension.i386: W: no-documentation phatch-nautilus-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:36:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191536.mBJFa0rw001887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #11 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-19 10:35:59 EDT --- oops, here is the good URL for koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1009427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191541.mBJFfwEY029821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-19 10:41:57 EDT --- Okay, a few things to start with: * Please don't use a source file for Version/Release. That's what the spec file is for. * You can't use "GPL" as a license tag, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL * Please put the full upstream path to your sources in your Source definitions. * Run rpmlint on the packages (both SRPM and noarch RPM) and make sure you've silenced the output. When you've made these changes, be sure to increment Release and add a new changelog entry describing the changes that you've made. Once that's done, post a new SRPM and spec file and I'll pick up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:45:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191545.mBJFjWxN004345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 --- Comment #8 from Fabrice Bellet 2008-12-19 10:45:30 EDT --- Sure. The concerned packages are here : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/ .fgfs-base is renamed to FlightGear-data .fgfs-Atlas is renamed to FlightGear-Atlas SimGear, FlightGear and FlightGear-data new versions are currently released upstream synchronously, with the same version numbers. FlighGear-Atlas and FlightGear are the only two packages that depend on FlightGear-data, so I updated their Requires accordingly. And no other package depends on FlightGear-Atlas. So I see no use in this case, to continue to provide the old names of these two renamed packages. (I'm maintainer for all the FlightGear-* packages, and comaintainer for SimGear, so I expect to update all these packages in rawhide at the same time) Does it looks good ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directory I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191554.mBJFsqjq000366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191554.mBJFsQNo006173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:55:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475775] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous Berkeley DB access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191555.mBJFt56x006555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191601.mBJG1GFd002157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 11:01:14 EDT --- To Henrique: By the way, would you write CVS request? (Please follow Join wiki) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191559.mBJFxcpO007380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191559.mBJFxfPr007463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 469471, which changed state. Bug 469471 Summary: Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 15:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191559.mBJFxegB007435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Bug 464781 depends on bug 469471, which changed state. Bug 469471 Summary: Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:08:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226300] Merge Review: pkinit-nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191608.mBJG8kgu003514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226300 --- Comment #4 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2008-12-19 11:08:45 EDT --- I should also note that the SCM for the package has moved to: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pkinit-nss.git -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191607.mBJG7nRd003401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Wart changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Wart 2008-12-19 11:07:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-tclxml Short Description: XML parsing utilities for Tcl Owners: wart Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:07:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226300] Merge Review: pkinit-nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191607.mBJG7mVu009324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226300 --- Comment #3 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2008-12-19 11:07:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I can find no package in the distro with this name, nor any record that there > has ever been a package in Fedora with this name. Any idea what might be going > on? The ticket which was closed as a dup looks like a regular package > submission. Yes, it was. When I realized I'd filed a duplicate of this request, I closed the one I'd filed as a duplicate. This one... I guess it's still pending. Note that in the meantime we've updated to 1.6.3, which includes a different implementation, and ATM I'm not sure what to expect if you manage to install both at once (though I suspect the first one which loads will be used, since as far as libkrb5 is concerned they're equivalent). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:14:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191614.mBJGEELX004575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #2 from Adam Stokes 2008-12-19 11:14:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Okay, a few things to start with: > > * Please don't use a source file for Version/Release. That's what the spec file > is for. > * You can't use "GPL" as a license tag, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL Thanks, set to GPLv3 > * Please put the full upstream path to your sources in your Source definitions. Fixed > * Run rpmlint on the packages (both SRPM and noarch RPM) and make sure you've > silenced the output. [adam at conans cas]$ rpmlint -i ~/redhat/cas/noarch/cas-0.13-113.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [adam at conans cas]$ rpmlint -i ~/redhat/cas/cas-0.13-113.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > When you've made these changes, be sure to increment Release and add a new > changelog entry describing the changes that you've made. Once that's done, post > a new SRPM and spec file and I'll pick up the review. Done SRPM: http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/cas-0.13-113.src.rpm SPEC: http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/cas.spec thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191634.mBJGYSJF008346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 --- Comment #9 from Fabrice Bellet 2008-12-19 11:34:27 EDT --- ah typo in fgfs-Atlas.spec. please grab again from the previous url, if you already have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191640.mBJGeht5009951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pm at datasphere.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191641.mBJGflJV016698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] New: Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Summary: Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: than at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/PolicyKit-kde.spec SRPM URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/PolicyKit-kde-0.20081219svn-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides a PolicyKit Authentication Frontend for KDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191637.mBJGbhIx015847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-12-19 11:37:41 EDT --- SRPM link above is lame. You probably meant http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo-0.1.20-2.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint devtodo.spec: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint devtodo-0.1.20-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint devtodo-0.1.20-2.fc11.i386.rpm devtodo.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/devtodo.sh devtodo.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/devtodo.tcsh devtodo.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.20-1 ['0.1.20-2.fc11', '0.1.20-2'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. --> Consider %config(noreplace) for %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d scripts. This will allow customization and make rpmlint silent. --> %changelog comment versioning still not OK ! %{buildroot}/etc/profile.d --> %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/profile.d (3 times) Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1009624 _ Please comment your "buildfixes" patch. _ Consider also using option -p when installing scripts to preserve their mtime. OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK source files match upstream: sha1: 003067a12139d712dbb3706069e0950a93ecaaf4 devtodo-0.1.20.tar.gz md5: 4a6241437cb56f237f850bcd2233c3c4 devtodo-0.1.20.tar.gz OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is OK. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate (unchanged). OK %clean is present. -- The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines (changelog version) OK package builds in Koji (rawhide). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. -- rpmlint is not silent (see above). OK final provides and requires are sane: devtodo = 0.1.20-2.fc11 devtodo(x86-32) = 0.1.20-2.fc11 = libc.so.6() libgcc_s.so.1() libm.so.6 libncurses.so.5 libreadline.so.5 libstdc++.so.6() libtinfo.so.5 OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I was able to run programs from the command line and manage todo lists. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. This is my first review !!! I hope I've seen everything and I'm not too severe :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191650.mBJGou5x011810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 11:50:54 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (gdata-java) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:51:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191651.mBJGptqK011976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-19 11:51:54 EDT --- Looking at the code, it looks like it is GPLv3+. Why are the man pages separate from the upstream source? Seems like they'd be a logical fit to go inside the tarball, or at the very least, uploaded to the fedorahosted site. If you opt for the latter route, please provide full upstream URLs. Do you still need Source1? It doesn't seem to be used anymore. You also don't need the Requires: python >= 2.4 Fedora's RPM will detect the python bits in the package and add a proper versioned Requires on python(abi). For example, in rawhide, we get: [spot at velociraptor ~]$ rpm -qp /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/cas-0.13-113.fc11.noarch.rpm --requires /usr/bin/python config(cas) = 0.13-113.fc11 crash python >= 2.4 python(abi) = 2.6 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Thus, your manual python Requires is unnecessary. Also, the last sentence of the description doesn't make much sense. Can you fix that up a bit? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191707.mBJH7lTK015082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 12:07:46 EDT --- Okay, then this package can be approved. Now please follow "Join" wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join (By the way would you also update Synopsis?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226300] Review Request: pkinit-nss - PKINIT for MIT Kerberos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191711.mBJHB0El021937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: pkinit-nss |Review Request: pkinit-nss | |- PKINIT for MIT Kerberos --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 12:11:00 EDT --- Thanks for responding! When you say "updated to 1.6.3" above I'm guessing you mean MIT Kerberos 1.6.3. Does its inclusion of pkinit functionality imply that this package isn't needed any longer? Or would you still like to have it in the distro? If the latter, I'll be happy to take a look although my kerberos knowledge isn't advanced enough to understand the pkinit stuff. All I really need is a link to a current src.rpm and spec file. I'll update this so that it looks less like a merge review and hopefully won't get lost again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191712.mBJHCHBw016295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 12:12:14 EDT --- Well, what I wanted to say is that long lines in %changelog should be divided into more than 2 lines, not saying that the contents of %changelog should be smaller... But all other things seems good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191715.mBJHFCIU016989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-19 12:15:10 EDT --- I would like to suggest to remove 'Linksys' from the summary since this is probably a trademark. The same for the %description. Just my thought on the legal stuff... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191715.mBJHF0ZW016612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-19 12:14:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thank you for taking this review. You're welcome > Changelog : > - subpckage created for nautilus extension I am a gnome-ignorant. How do I test this extension? I couldn't find anything in nautilus related to phatch. But it's probably me. I always find gnome too confusing. Requires: %{name} = %{version} should be Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Also, please add the license file at the least as a %doc to this package. > - whole documentation included Thanks. But now there is a docs subdirectory in a directory which is already for docs. I don't think this is elegant. Try using "docs/*" in %doc instead of just "docs" > I tried to use scrollkeeper but no additionnal documentation was generated, so > I removed it. Sorry I meant sections 4.7 or 4.8 (or they just added another section between my review and you seeing it) > I also contacted upstream about the software version (egg file generated > contains "0.1.5" instead of "0.1.6" and the "about" dialog display also "0.1.5" > instead of "0.1.6"). > Until they fix it (possibly until next version), you can use: sed -e 's|0\.1\.5|0\.1\.6|' -e 's|20080606224435|200811091037|' \ phatch/data/version.py > phatch/data/version.py.16 touch -c -r phatch/data/version.py phatch/data/version.py.16 mv phatch/data/version.py.16 phatch/data/version.py This will fix both the python egg and the about dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191721.mBJHLHWs024120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 12:21:16 EDT --- python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:21:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:21:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191721.mBJHLEQ2024088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 12:21:13 EDT --- python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191744.mBJHiqar022709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 12:44:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 2.0.1 is an official release (actually the same as 2.0(.0) but with additional > license text in the lib part as I requested from upstream). Because of only > this little change no tarball was created by upstream. But the used tarball is > generated by upstream's system and consists of the release tag (not a certain > revision or trunk or something). - But as the tarball is created from svn system, please follow revision control tarball creation method (Using "Download GNU tarball" on SCM viewvc is not preferred) If this is after 2.0.1 release, you can follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages > Yes, I could modify the tarball but isn't it part of the guidelines that the > upstream's distribution shouldn't be modified unless there's some problems with > the contents? - Please see above (i.e. please create tarball by using "svn co") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:47:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:47:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191747.mBJHlJ6d023476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 12:47:17 EDT --- Cool; I can grab the sources now, so nothing stops me from finishing this up. This is essentially identical to the other system-config-*-docs packages, so I'll be brief. rpmlint: system-config-date-docs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided system-config-date not a problem. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: f04d7d7abf4aa8259a3a2b0ac789445621c363a40aadfbf76ad53285d7f18d92 system-config-date-docs-1.0.5.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK. * acceptable content APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191750.mBJHoT1w029662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 12:50:27 EDT --- This is essentially identical to the other system-config-*-docs packages, so I'll be brief. rpmlint: system-config-nfs-docs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided system-config-nfs not a problem. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 29ad78d3a42ba2f0590a482054ac7a337f09dff5b0a408d9e56ab3db37df7447 system-config-nfs-docs-1.0.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK. * acceptable content APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:59:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191759.mBJHxIfD025528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 12:59:17 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:59:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191759.mBJHxmN2025600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2008-12-19 12:59:47 EDT --- http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/jpilot-backup-0.53-5.fc10.src.rpm looks good; the rpmlint warning seems to be a false positive APPROVED I'll sponsor you once you apply for the packager group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191758.mBJHwlRA031109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 12:58:44 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 17:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191757.mBJHvO1q030984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 12:57:21 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:05:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226300] Review Request: pkinit-nss - PKINIT for MIT Kerberos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191805.mBJI5ax2027362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226300 --- Comment #6 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2008-12-19 13:05:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for responding! When you say "updated to 1.6.3" above I'm guessing you > mean MIT Kerberos 1.6.3. That's right. > Does its inclusion of pkinit functionality imply that > this package isn't needed any longer? Or would you still like to have it in > the distro? Its main goal was to be ready in time for the EL5 release, as the upstream 1.6.3 release and module it includes weren't available yet. Going forward, I'd rather reuse more of the upstream module and integrate NSS at its internal crypto abstraction points. Beyond curiosity and compatibility with EL5 (I'm hoping to have the time to get the other work done in the F11/F12 timeframe, and switch to that), there's not much to be gained by moving this particular module forward any more. Thanks for following up on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226300] Review Request: pkinit-nss - PKINIT for MIT Kerberos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191808.mBJI8qPg000626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 13:08:52 EDT --- No problem. I guess I'll go ahead and close this. Sorry it got lost in the noise originally. If you do change your mind, just reopen or go ahead and open a new review ticket and I'll try to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191811.mBJIBwth001302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de --- Comment #5 from Thomas Moschny 2008-12-19 13:11:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec > SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm The src.rpm doesn't exist - I guess you mean: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:23:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225246] Merge Review: anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191823.mBJINwvf030607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225246 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|hdegoede at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 13:23:56 EDT --- Here are some comments copied from my mailing list post: No %{?dist} tag, but I understand why you folks have no need of that. Is the source available for download anywhere? The Source0: URL should be downloadable if at all possible. The spec should at minimum include some instructions for checking out of an SCM. As of FC-5, it is not actually necessary to have: Requires(post): desktop-file-utils >= %{desktopfileutilsver} Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils >= %{desktopfileutilsver} as long as you use the recommended update-desktop-database scriptlets. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database %post /usr/bin/update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications &> /dev/null || : %postun /usr/bin/update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications &> /dev/null || : Is there any reason to keep this bit: %triggerun -- anaconda < 8.0-1 /sbin/chkconfig --del reconfig >/dev/null 2>&1 || : Anaconda < 8.0 was, what, pre-RHL-8? There's some minor permission weirdness, like /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/boot/syslinux.cfg and /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/pyrc.py are executable, and also some shell scripts that don't have a shebang line like /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/mk-images.s390. I'll spare everyone here the full listing; just run rpmlint and look at the script-without-shebang errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:22:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] New: Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 Summary: Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john5342 at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qzion.spec SRPM URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qzion-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje. This package is a requirement of qedje which will be submitted shortly. rpmlint output is: qzion-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation appropriate docs are provided in main package which is required by qzion-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191828.mBJISmJ2004223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191828.mBJISnOM004250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] New: Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 Summary: Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john5342 at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qedje.spec SRPM URL: http://john5342.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qedje-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The main purpose of the QEdje project is to build a bridge among components that proved to have great value for open source developers: Edje and Qt. This will extend the Qt toolkit with the flexibility of a declarative language, such as Edje, and also enable Qt widgets to be embedded into Edje UI design. This package requires qzion which is also in review. rpmlint output is: qedje-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation appropriate docs are provided in main package which is required by qedje-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:34:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191834.mBJIY110032417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Moschny 2008-12-19 13:34:00 EDT --- Some remarks: - Source0 should read http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-src-with-libs.tar.gz. - there's no 'build' directory to be removed. - you could move the 'example' sources to %doc. - in %{_javadocdir} move the docs to %{name}-%{version} and make a symlink %{name} pointing to that dir. - feature lists in the %description are considered deprecated by some people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191836.mBJIaej8006045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 13:36:39 EDT --- This is essentially identical to the other system-config-*-docs packages, so I'll be brief. rpmlint: system-config-users-docs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided system-config-users not a problem. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 13007e26fca8cb3a6dbb6fbd65dca092ad187761b96f79caa1d792726fce55e9 system-config-users-docs-1.0.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK. * acceptable content APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191842.mBJIg2ee007400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191839.mBJIdZej006558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 13:39:34 EDT --- This is essentially identical to the other system-config-*-docs packages, so I'll be brief. rpmlint: system-config-samba-docs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided system-config-samba not a problem. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 00c7bc20f0734286a5ab16392fa5bd7072aeb2f75ec8239c75e31cdecc1aaf33 system-config-samba-docs-1.0.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK. * acceptable content APPROVED All done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:45:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191845.mBJIj2Sf008271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #13 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-19 13:45:00 EDT --- Update : Thank you for taking this review. Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/phatch.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog : - Fix requires for nautilus-extension - Licence file added to nautilus-extension - No more docs subdirectory in documentation folder - Fix version > I am a gnome-ignorant. How do I test this extension? I couldn't find anything > in nautilus related to phatch. But it's probably me. I always find gnome too > confusing. To test the extension : right-clicking must display 2 entries related to phatch in the context-menu. Uninstalling phatch-nautilus-extension will make those entries disapears (You have to log{on/off} when you (un)install the extension to see differencies). Package still build on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010031 Rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/phatch-nautilus-extension-0.1.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm phatch.i386: E: no-binary phatch-nautilus-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191847.mBJIlXla003432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp | |, tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-19 13:47:32 EDT --- Well, Many files under xml/ directory has the statement: --------------------------------------------------------------- Use of this BBC data for non-TV-Anytime purposes is strictly forbidden --------------------------------------------------------------- I guess this statement renders this software non-free. spot, how do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 18:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191855.mBJIt6qQ005175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-19 13:55:04 EDT --- At the very least, the xml data is non-free and not permissable in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 19:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191905.mBJJ5X9h007376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-19 14:05:32 EDT --- I'll take a gander -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 19:40:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191940.mBJJeINx014129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-19 14:40:17 EDT --- First thing I found (while building this so I have binary packages to run rpmlint on): > BuildRequires: PolicyKit-devel >= 0.9 This should be >= 0.8, as it's all the package needs and all we have in F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 19:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191949.mBJJnb40015259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-19 14:49:36 EDT --- rpmlint output: > PolicyKit-kde.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libpolkitkdeprivate.so This library calls itself "private", is it really? If nothing should link against it, we should not ship this symlink at all. But if it is getting linked against, it should be in a -devel package (even if that's the only file in -devel). The strange thing is: shouldn't there be some public API for the client library? Why is the only library in this package called "private"? > PolicyKit-kde.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libpolkitkdeprivate.so.4.1.0 Missing "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig". > PolicyKit-kde.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libpolkitkdeprivate.so.4.1.0 Missing "%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig". > PolicyKit-kde.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.-0.20081219svn-1 ['0.20081219svn-1.fc9', '0.20081219svn-1'] I already mentioned this one in IRC, you said you uploaded a fixed specfile, but it's still broken in both the specfile and the SRPM which are now up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 19:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191958.mBJJwpTC022237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 14:58:50 EDT --- I'm not really the best person to do this because I know zilch about gimp, but the package seems simple enough. Unfortunately, it doesn't build for me in mock, nor in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010055 The problem is that gimptool isn't available when the srpm is first evaluated to extract the build dependencies, so the call fails (which is OK) but then that leaves the macro empty and the resulting spec is not syntactically correct. What we usually do is tack on || echo blah so that the result has something in it, the resulting spec has correct syntax, and the final package, which is built with all of the build dependencies installed, has the correct value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 20:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192019.mBJKJWEV026206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #5 from Till Bubeck 2008-12-19 15:19:31 EDT --- Could you please help me to get any further? Please review. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 20:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192044.mBJKiNQW030907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #12 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-19 15:44:22 EDT --- Huzaifa, ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 20:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192043.mBJKhqHu030862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #5 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-19 15:43:51 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 20:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192053.mBJKr8ac032488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-19 15:53:07 EDT --- > License: Should probably be GPLv2, not GPLv2+: GPL v2 license is contained in > the tarball, but no source file (except those generated by the autotools) > mention it. I cannot find any note saying "GPL2 or later"... I believe the License field should state "GPLv2", but from different reason :). W.r.t the text from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses "" A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. """ The content of the COPYING file is not that important compared to what is stated in src files and docs. And frankly the only statement of exact license is in doc/devtodo.1.in .\" todo is licensed under the GPL, version 2. A copy of the GPL should have been distributed with the source in the file COPYING The pkg looks good to me, it's pretty similar to the one I did in now closed bug 477152. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 20:57:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192057.mBJKv1tk026693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 15:57:00 EDT --- How about this. You can close it if you like, but if you'd like a reviewer to look at this ticket, just clear the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:11:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192111.mBJLBJ1L003139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-19 16:11:18 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010198 $ rpmlint *.rpm qzion-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Simple library-only package, so only a few minor comments: 1. BR: qt4-devel is preferable 2. BR: pkgconfig (so F11+'s rpm can do automatic pkgconfig-related deps). 3. License: GPLv3+ files all contain the "or (at your option) any later version." clause sources: ok patches: ok scriptlets: ok macros: ok I'll leave the minor items 1-3 to you to fix prior to building. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192118.mBJLIKhr030298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-19 16:18:19 EDT --- Oh, and let me suggest a shorter summary, something like: A canvas abstraction (including the pkg's name and the phrase "used by and made for..." is superfluous imo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192120.mBJLKEbV030863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from John5342 2008-12-19 16:20:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qzion Short Description: A canvas abstraction Owners: john5342 Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192119.mBJLJts9030435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-19 16:19:54 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192127.mBJLR0O3031983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-19 16:26:59 EDT --- guess the scratch build won't get for without qzion, which is: missing BR: qzion-devel :) Otherwise, same general comments as per qzion review: BR: qt4-devel BR: pkgconfig License: GPLv3+ sources: ok patches: ok scriptlets: ok macros: ok I'll leave these minor items to you to fix prior to building. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192135.mBJLZfPC007046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 16:35:37 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and mark this as not being ready for review; please clear the whiteboard if the situation improves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal - generates static web-pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192136.mBJLabPn007232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(richard at nerux.org | |) | --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 16:36:35 EDT --- Still no response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192143.mBJLhpiZ008383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-12-19 16:43:50 EDT --- Updated release is available: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 21:54:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192154.mBJLsFNf003773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-19 16:54:14 EDT --- Everything is good, but running a quick search I found: $ yum search nautilus |grep extension nautilus-actions.x86_64 : Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu nautilus-extensions.i386 : Nautilus extensions library nautilus-extensions.x86_64 : Nautilus extensions library nautilus-image-converter.x86_64 : Nautilus extension to mass resize images nautilus-open-terminal.x86_64 : Nautilus extension for an open terminal shortcut nautilus-search-tool.x86_64 : A Nautilus extension to put "Search for Files" on nautilus-sound-converter.x86_64 : Nautilus extension to convert audio files So, I guess renaming the subpackage as nautilus-%{name} would be more appropriate. What do you think? You can do this before you commit. ----------------------------------------- This package (phatch) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192200.mBJM0Mv9005203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 John5342 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from John5342 2008-12-19 17:00:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qedje Short Description: A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt Owners: john5342 Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192201.mBJM1GEv011750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 17:01:14 EDT --- I can verify that this does indeed build fine with the first line changed to %define gimpdatadir %(%{_bindir}/gimptool --gimpdatadir || echo blah) Everything that follows assumes that a similar change has been made. However, I guess it's worth asking what that dependency does that the regular dependency on gimp doesn't do. We really try to avoid file dependencies out of a few specific directories because they require the users to download additional large hunks of metadata. Why is the release < 1? It doesn't seem to me that the 2.0.2 tarball upstream is any kind of prerelease. Unfortunately I can't find any statement of the license version in use. COPYING is simply v2 of the GPL, which has the usual language about being able to use any version if the program itself doesn't specify one. That would indicate that GPL+ is the appropriate license tag, but it would be a good idea to clarify with upstream because I don't think that's what they intend. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 31f9b40822646729be9ff50856e803a59290c119c600a8fdab4b669c4ccf2c1f gimp-data-extras-2.0.2.tar.bz2 X does not meet versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires: gimp-data-extras = 2.0.2-0.1.fc11 = ? /usr/share/gimp/2.0 gimp * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * acceptable content -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192210.mBJMA5Ua006820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-19 17:10:04 EDT --- Thank you very much for this review. I'll change subpackage name to nautilus-%{name} before I commit. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phatch Short Description: Photo batch processor Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192236.mBJMa5Um018166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 17:36:04 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-samba-docs Short Description: Documentation for configuring a Samba server Owners: nphilipp Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192235.mBJMZG4U017981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 17:35:14 EDT --- Actually you most certainly can remove the conditional for %fedora >= 8; you will need a different conditional for EPEL, since %fedora isn't even defined there. (Unless you're assuming for some reason that anything not Fedora behaves a certain way, in which case RHEL6 will definitely surprise you.) Of course, you also always have the option of just not using the same spec in EPEL. Since this is a prerelease, the Release: tag must be less than 1. Should be 0.3.20081202cvs%{?dist} The %description doesn't seem to talk about this package at all; it just talks about what a B2BUA does. If it had a sentence such as "This module provides a B2BUA (bullhorn to beef unstructured accountancy)" at the beginning, it would make more sense. Also, you probably want to use the correct definition for "B2BUA", as I have no idea what it is. * source files match upstream (manually verified) X package does not meet versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description needs a bit of work. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: sippy = 0-3.20081202cvs.fc11 python-sippy = 0-3.20081202cvs.fc11 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 python-twisted-core * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192237.mBJMbbMR011813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 17:37:36 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-nfs-docs Short Description: Documentation for configuring an NFS server Owners: nphilipp Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192236.mBJMab8v011726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 17:36:36 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-users-docs Short Description: Documentation for administering users and groups Owners: nphilipp Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192237.mBJMbl4V011841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen 2008-12-19 17:37:46 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-date-docs Short Description: Documentation for setting the system date and time Owners: nphilipp Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192246.mBJMkcsK019970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mathys 2008-12-19 17:46:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdata-java Short Description: Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192250.mBJMoZhs014467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 --- Comment #5 from Anthony Green 2008-12-19 17:50:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lv2core Short Description: Audio Plugin Standard Owners: green Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:51:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:51:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192251.mBJMpJcr014547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Anthony Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 22:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192249.mBJMn9Lh020194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #16 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-19 17:49:08 EDT --- PS : after a test, nautilus-%{name} will, in fact, generate phatch-nautilus-phatch, so I think I must only keep "nautilus" to have "phatch-nautilus". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 23:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192302.mBJN22Gv016234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-19 18:02:01 EDT --- For that, you'll need to use the "-n" switch For instance %package -n nautilus-%{name} %description -n nautilus-%{name} %files -n nautilus-%{name} (Doesn't apply to this package but you can use "-n" switch on %pre(un) %post(un) too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 23:10:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192310.mBJNAN0U017826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Mohak Vyas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mohakvyas at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Mohak Vyas 2008-12-19 18:10:21 EDT --- FAS ID: Vyas IRC Nick: Vyas Yes I need a sponsor. Here are the new .src.rpm and .spec file. Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~mdvyas/ExtJS/extjs.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~mdvyas/ExtJS/extjs-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm I am watching the packaging guidelines for JavaScript packages page so I can edit my package accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 23:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192308.mBJN8tVF023465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-19 18:08:54 EDT --- lordsawar-0.1.4-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lordsawar-0.1.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 23:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812192343.mBJNhPaY023817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-19 18:43:24 EDT --- Can I co-maintain it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 00:10:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200010.mBK0ASaW029008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2008-12-19 19:10:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-7.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-7.fc9.src.rpm *Sat Dec 20 2008 0.5.1-7 - Re-enable system skinlf link & jar check. spec file, SRPM and RPM give empty rpmlint output This was updated as skinlf has now been fixed & flexdock now builds correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 02:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200211.mBK2Bh6D020406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-12-19 21:11:41 EDT --- I hope no-one minds, but I have taken the liberty of updating this package, as it is blocking a package that I am keen to complete. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-1.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm *Sat Dec 20 2008 1.0.1-2 - Fix build paths to prevent setup from asking for user input after multiple builds - Refresh source to match MD5. - Update patch to match path change - Corrected licence from GPL2+ to GPL2 I agree with the symlinking, as this is done in many java packages, where the version of interest is installed in %{name}-%{version}.jar, and then a symlink is made to this from %{name}.jar . Unless I have mis-interpreted the intent of the command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 03:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200304.mBK34bQ0022339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-19 22:04:36 EDT --- I somehow happened to submit old package named as new. Corrected now. The links, hopefully correct this time, still apply: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/nightview.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/nightview-0.3.1-2.el5.src.rpm Built fine in fedora-development-i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 03:58:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:58:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200358.mBK3wM9i032527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-12-19 22:58:21 EDT --- The doctest failure in apigen.txt seems to be a genuine failure in py that the compat-doctest module is somehow mishandling. If you run the commands in apigen.txt in a python interactive shell, you get the traceback that doctest from python-2.5 yields. I've been looking at this more but haven't gotten to the bottom of it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 04:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200409.mBK49YuO007543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-12-19 23:09:34 EDT --- The example fails in a python-2.5 and python-2.4.3 shell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 04:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200412.mBK4CrpE008276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #37 from Warren Togami 2008-12-19 23:12:52 EDT --- > Requires: bluecurve-icon-theme = 8.0.2 Yes, please remove the version. Package name alone is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 04:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200418.mBK4IqZ3002959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #12 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-12-19 23:18:51 EDT --- Here's a session you can feed back to the upstream bug report. If the opportunity arises, you can also mention that this is a reason not to include copies of system libraries in something they ship ;-) Python 2.4.3 (#1, Jan 14 2008, 18:32:40) [GCC 4.1.2 20070626 (Red Hat 4.1.2-14)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import py >>> p = py.path.local('.') >>> p.check(dir=True) True >>> from py.__.apigen.tracer.docstorage import DocStorage, DocStorageAccessor >>> from py.__.apigen.tracer.tracer import Tracer >>> toregister = {'py.path.local': py.path.local, 'py.path.svnwc': py.path.svnwc} >>> ds = DocStorage().from_dict(toregister) >>> t = Tracer(ds) >>> t.start_tracing() >>> p = py.path.local('.') >>> p.check(dir=True) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? File "/home/fedora/toshio/py-0.9.2/py/path/common.py", line 95, in check def check(self, **kw): File "/home/fedora/toshio/py-0.9.2/py/apigen/tracer/tracer.py", line 38, in _tracer self.docstorage.consider_call(frame, None, self.frame) File "/home/fedora/toshio/py-0.9.2/py/apigen/tracer/docstorage.py", line 80, in consider_call desc.consider_call_site(caller_frame, upward_cut_frame) File "/home/fedora/toshio/py-0.9.2/py/apigen/tracer/description.py", line 170, in consider_call_site cs = cut_stack(stack, frame, cut_frame) File "/home/fedora/toshio/py-0.9.2/py/apigen/tracer/description.py", line 81, in cut_stack lst = [py.code.Frame(i) for i in stack[stack.index(frame):\ ValueError: list.index(x): x not in list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 04:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200440.mBK4eAIf012513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-12-19 23:40:09 EDT --- Good: * rpmlint is now silent * optparse, textwrap, and subprocess have been switched to system libraries. Still Needswork: * doctest is still using the compat module due to: https://codespeak.net/issue/py-dev/issue67 Note that this is either a problem in the tracer module or the way we're being told to use the tracer module in apigen.txt, not in the py.test or doctest module as the current upstream bug seems to think. Where does that leave us? I think removing the doctest module in favor of system libs is the first step. Then it would be very nice to run the tests with just the apigen.txt test disabled until upstream fixes the bug. (This could be done by creative moving of the apigen.txt doc file before and after the test run although that's not pretty. If there's a command line option to py.test that excludes the one failing test, that would be better.) Once that's done, I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 05:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200523.mBK5Nn6Q018572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2008-12-20 00:23:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles Short Description: Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 05:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200528.mBK5S4Ve013117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #26 from D Haley 2008-12-20 00:28:02 EDT --- https://jogl.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=300 may be of use. A gentoo maintainer has patched their build process. Its quite old, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 05:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200527.mBK5RGkN013040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #13 from D Haley 2008-12-20 00:27:14 EDT --- For general information: N.B. This is not recommended for the feint of heart, I have done a bit of a one-two skip a few with these instructions. At this stage, in order to build the JOGL and gluegen deps for scilab, you need 1) An RPM build environemnt (F9+) 2) Latest JOGL and gluegen SRPMs (for details, see bug 439630) Steps (i386): 1) Save spec and extract sources (see comment 19 in bug 439630) 2) comment out kwizart's patch0. from jogl spec file -- also comment out %patch0 from prep section (you can use my patch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324396) 3) rpmbuild -ba gluegen.spec 4) rpmbuild -ba jogl.spec 5) install gluegen using rpm -i PATH_TO_RPM 6) install jogl using rpm -i PATH_TO_RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 07:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200705.mBK75US4026126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #5 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-20 02:05:29 EDT --- New release available: repoze.what 1.0rc2 / XML plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 08:21:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812200821.mBK8LApV003467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Bug 459989 depends on bug 473814, which changed state. Bug 473814 Summary: rpm's pkgconfig auto provides is broken (fix included) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473814 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 09:52:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477307] New: Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477307 Summary: Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/netcat.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/netcat-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://netcat.sourceforge.net/ Description: Netcat is a featured networking utility which reads and writes data across network connections, using the TCP/IP protocol. It is designed to be a reliable "back-end" tool that can be used directly or easily driven by other programs and scripts. At the same time, it is a feature rich network debugging and exploration tool, since it can create almost any kind of connection you would need and has several interesting built in capabilities. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010021 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint netcat* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint netcat* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 10:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201049.mBKAnDqc026889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2008-12-20 05:49:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Ok, I already commited and built License: GPLv2+ and GPL+ to rawhide, I do plan > next xmlto release in January (hopefully) - will add the comment about licenses > in next rawhide build later. It is ok to add the comment without creating a new rawhide in build. It will make it easier to not forget about it. :-) Btw. did you write Eric an e-mail? If you did not, I can do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 12:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 07:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] New: Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.1.20080922.fc11.src.rpm Description: Prelude.ml is a collection of utility functions for OCaml programs. Of particular interest are high level parallel combinators, which make multicore parallelization of OCaml programs easy. (Note that despite the "0.1" version number, this package is very mature - it just doesn't have any upstream releases). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1011869 rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 12:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 07:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201258.mBKCwRCA014988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 07:58:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.src.rpm Just a tiny change to the META file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 13:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:09:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201309.mBKD989r017314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 08:09:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327532) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327532) Parallel mandlebrot set An auto-parallelizing mandlebrot set program, which uses this library. Adapted from: http://fhtr.blogspot.com/2008/08/preludeml-some-parallel-combinators.html Compile using: ocamlfind opt -package preludeml -linkpkg mandlebrot.ml -o mandlebrot Run using: ./mandlebrot 5000 test.pgm eog test.pgm (It will auto-detect the number of cores in your system and spread the work across them.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 13:11:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201311.mBKDBaUh018051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327532|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 13:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201313.mBKDDTse024841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-20 08:13:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm APPROVING this; you can fix the pkgconfig and Source0 stuff before you > import it. And please, *before* :). Here they are: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns.spec http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Fixed Source0 URL - Added missing 'Requires: pkgconfig' to devel package Now I'll ask for CVS :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 13:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201320.mBKDKiug026432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-20 08:20:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libicns Short Description: Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files Owners: musuruan Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 13:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477307] Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201347.mBKDlu9V024450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477307 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-20 08:47:55 EDT --- this package already exists in fedora ? please check if is the same. yum search netcat nc.i386 : Reads and writes data across network connections using TCP or UDP nc6.i386 : Netcat with IPv6 Support socat.i386 : Bidirectional data relay between two data channels ('netcat++') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201408.mBKE8NGR028617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #8 from Florent le Coz 2008-12-20 09:08:22 EDT --- Oh, really sorry :( Here are the files : http://louizatakk.fedorapeople.org/bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://louizatakk.fedorapeople.org/bluemindo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477307] Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201408.mBKE8N1C002578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477307 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-20 09:08:22 EDT --- I guess it's the same tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:12:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201412.mBKECNjG003341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Comment #24 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:12:20 EDT --- Joe, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:15:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201415.mBKEFKN7003896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #32 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:15:17 EDT --- Ivana, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201420.mBKEKIQV030739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-20 09:20:16 EDT --- Should be fixed. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eboard/eboard.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eboard/eboard-1.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477320] New: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-p3l.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-p3l-2.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OCamlP3l is a compiler for Caml parallel programs. The OCamlP3l programming paradigm is skeleton programming. The skeletons encapsulate basic parallel programming patterns in a well understood and structured approach. Based on P3L, the Pisa Parallel Programming Language, OCamlP3l skeleton algebra is embedded in a full-fledged functional programming language, namely Objective Caml. The skeleton programming approach used in OCamlP3l allows three different operational interpretations of the same source program: * the sequential interpretation which is deterministic, hence easy to understand and debug, * the parallel interpretation using a network of computing nodes run in parallel to speed up the computation, * the graphical interpretation, which is run to obtain a drawing of the parallel computing network deployed at run-time by the parallel interpretation. ------------ rpmlint is clean. The documentation is rather large (7MB), so I tried to "even things up" by putting the documentation into a -doc subpackage. However that leaves a rather small -devel package. Does this matter? Koji scratch build coming up shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477320] Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201424.mBKEOkPL005121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:24:45 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1012139 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477320] Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201428.mBKESAfH031837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:28:09 EDT --- In case you're wondering about the difference between this package and bug 477313 (ocaml-preludeml), they are aimed at two different areas. That package, prelude.ml, is for parallelizing across multicores on the same system. This package can parallelize across a cluster of machines, and also has a more theoretically sound basis in that you can prove various sequential properties of the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:36:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226542] Merge Review: words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201436.mBKEa1it000885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kzak at redhat.com |redhat at linuxnetz.de Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(kzak at redhat.com) --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:36:00 EDT --- As Roozbeh did not continue the review for more than 1.5 years now, I'm now and hereby just silently overtaking the review. Re-assinging the bug report to me first, as it is usual for a Package Review. So rpmlint is completely silent, good job until now. Rest of the package is sane according to my knowledge of being a packager. Some suggestions, I really would like to see, but no must: - Remove "BuildRequires: coreutils", something else anyway pulls that in - Replace "Source: mwords.tar.Z" by "Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20060527013227/http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/ilash/Moby/mwords.tar.Z" as it is a valid source URL and everybody can verify it Karel, olease close the bug report once you've applied the changes or let me know why you won't do this and close this bug report therewith. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:40:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201440.mBKEeUh3001627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:40:29 EDT --- I don't know why, but this has been resolved upstream with their latest version. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1012164 Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm * Sat Dec 20 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.8.1-1 - New upstream release 0.8.1. - Run omake with the --verbose option to try to debug Koji failures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201442.mBKEg34l008253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #32 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:41:59 EDT --- Jakub, Roland - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201438.mBKEcxd5007602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:38:56 EDT --- Jason, Miloslav - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:45:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:45:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201445.mBKEjTsj002388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:45:28 EDT --- rpmlint says: ocaml-pa-do.x86_64: E: no-binary which we think is OK for OCaml packages (bug 433783). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:45:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201445.mBKEjwBd002459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #22 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:45:54 EDT --- Patrice, Hans, Jason - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 14:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201459.mBKEx0hL004106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #19 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:58:59 EDT --- For gmp-4.2.4-3, rpmlint doesn't seem to be silent (or is my rpmlint just broken?): gmp-devel.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog gmp-static.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog Ivana, can you explain why a separate %configure is defined, rather using the default configure from redhat-rpm-config? So if there still is a valid reason for this own define, please add an explaining comment to the spec file, otherwise use %configure (the config.* is no longer copied since F-10 or so, if that was the reason for the own %configure). Please use "if [ $1 = 0 ]; then" in %preun, currently you're comparing something quoted. Please only use "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %clean rather the current. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 15:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201500.mBKF07UN004543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #20 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 10:00:06 EDT --- Ah... + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-mpbsd --enable-cxx configure: error: --target is not appropriate for GMP Use --build=CPU-VENDOR-OS if you need to specify your CPU and/or system explicitly. Use --host if cross-compiling (see "Installing GMP" in the manual for more on this). ...looks like a broken configure? Ivana, can you a bit investigate, whether there is really no fix for this and/or explain the %define in the spec file how it should be? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 15:02:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201502.mBKF2NL2005036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-20 10:02:22 EDT --- All should be fixed. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 15:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201547.mBKFlqZQ011869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-20 10:47:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > All should be fixed. Seems fine now. I have a strong feeling you mistyped the SRPM URL though :) > SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec Doesn't matter much since all changes were in SPEC file only. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 16:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201610.mBKGA9lF021755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-20 11:10:08 EDT --- Seems fine now, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 16:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201650.mBKGok4I026988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-20 11:50:45 EDT --- This is the rpmlint output after the rebuild [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm bluemindo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 36, tab: line 4) bluemindo.src: W: strange-permission 77133a-bluemindo-0.2.1.tar.gz 0755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is easy to fix. [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc9.noarch.rpm bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/modules/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/media/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/libs/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/gui/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/common/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/plugins/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bluemindo/src/handlers/__init__.py bluemindo.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/bluemindo.mo bluemindo.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/bluemindo.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. About the shebang stuff, perhaps it is easier to report upstream that they fix the files. Or separate those files. Some comment after a quick look at your new spec file - %{__install} -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} is twice listed - Where is %{menudir} and %{icondir} defined? Remains from the old spec file? - 'Keep in mind that usage of %find_lang in packages containing locales is a MUST.' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files - Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files for the handling of the .desktop file - You should preserve the timestamps https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 16:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201656.mBKGu8WJ027777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 17:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201726.mBKHQEER025427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 17:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201723.mBKHNOXA024899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-20 12:23:23 EDT --- rpmlint output [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint cmconvert-1.9.5-3.fc10.src.rpm cmconvert.src:38: E: files-attr-not-set 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - Is 'mkdir -p -m 0755 %{buildroot}/usr' really needed? - Use make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" to preserve the timestamps instead of make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} - There is no need to pack the file 'INSTALL' because it contains only generic information which are not useful when installed from RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 17:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201730.mBKHUjH2026112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-20 12:30:44 EDT --- Kashif, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 17:48:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] New: Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.spb.su QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-imagick/php-pecl-imagick.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-imagick/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: php-pecl-imagick is a native php extension to create and modify images using the ImageMagick API. Rpmlint produces only this errors: php-pecl-imagick.athlon: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/INSTALL php-pecl-imagick.athlon: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/TODO But this files has zero length in upstream, so I thought this may be safely ignored. Koji build are successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1012208 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 18:24:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201824.mBKIOnYb000610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-20 13:24:49 EDT --- vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 18:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201824.mBKIOlux007453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-20 13:24:46 EDT --- vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 19:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201939.mBKJdqCb011792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 19:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201940.mBKJe2rg012119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 19:49:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201949.mBKJndr9020053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 14:49:37 EDT --- Sorry for not getting back to this earlier; there are so many packages to look at. You linked to the wrong srpm above; I've found the right one. I guess when following those packaging guidelines you didn't look at the whole set of examples. Unless you have some specific reason for using the most verbose and complicated means of constructing your %files list, why not just use the simple one? I mean, you entire %files list could be the following: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README LICENSE NAME.txt NEWS.txt %{python_sitelib}/* rpmlint says: python-epsilon.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 16) I don't think this is a particularly big issue; fix it if you like. Not that it matters much, but you can do without dos2unix by simply calling sed: sed -i 's/\r//' NAME.txt Where did the %{?!python:%define python python} along with all of the %{python} macro usage come from? I'm having a tough time understanding why you would want that. I guess it would be useful if we had multiple python versions in the distro at once and you want to build python3-epsilon, except that everyone's been adamant that will not happen. Given that, it just seems like noise. I note that several of the source files carry no licensing information. Upstream should be prodded to put that information on every source file. I note that the tarball downloaded from the Source0: URL does not match what you have in this package. Any reason why there's a difference? Only the last issue is an absolute blocker, but the specfile cleanliness stuff (needlessly complex %files list, pointless %{python} macro) are things that someone else might approve, but because I'm a fan of using the minimum amount of spec file to do the job, I won't personally accept them. There's a really nice python package template in /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-python.spec which, once it's adapted, makes a nice minimal python spec file, and that's the kind of spec file that I personally like to see. So I'm going to leave this review for someone else to look at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 19:57:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:57:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201957.mBKJvLXU021520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 14:57:19 EDT --- That makes a pretty good case that the bulkquery and demo plugins should not be packaged where they are. I don't see a problem with moving them to live with the documentation, or with just not packaging them at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 19:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812201958.mBKJwRBr014664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-20 14:58:26 EDT --- I've pushed this filename issue to upstream http://www.veripool.org/boards/28/topics/show/53 I'll update the package once upstream notifies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 20:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202001.mBKK1M0X022254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 15:01:22 EDT --- Were you going to address those rpmlint complaints? The first does seem to be bogus, the second should be fixed, shouldn't it? I mean, it's nice that you post the rpmlint output, but that only means that you know there are issues to be addressed, and I'd have to bring them up at review anyway. By the way, if you pass -i to sed it will edit the file in place or make a backup for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 20:07:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202007.mBKK7VFS016126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Kashif Ahmad Khan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(thedangercobra at ya | |hoo.com) | --- Comment #5 from Kashif Ahmad Khan 2008-12-20 15:07:31 EDT --- hey guys!!! sorry for late reply,,, Actually my semester exams are going on so i am stuck in that. So i can't remove the mplayer dependency now. can't you guys do that ? Is there anything else i could do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 20:36:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202036.mBKKaH45027108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 15:36:15 EDT --- Indeed, builds fine and rpmlint is silent. However, this package is GPLv2 (only) and it needs libpcap which is BSD with advertising. I don't believe this is permitted, but then snort does it so I'm a bit confused. Blocking the legal tracker so someone who knows can check. The compiler flags are not correct. They do include -g, though, so the debuginfo package comes out OK. I'm concerned that /usr/bin/genkeys is a bit generic. It conflicts with at least some installs of ntp, although not Fedora's. and liblogtrend has /usr/bin/genkeys.pl (although, again, not in Fedora). dkim-milter has dkim-genkey and asterisk has astgenkey. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 92beb6495a856884ca343787ab2f7c9d4b9d3aba21526c2e1f6ba38736c67a23 asleap-2.2.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not.correct * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: asleap = 2.2-1.fc11 asleap(x86-64) = 2.2-1.fc11 = libcrypto.so.7()(64bit) libpcap.so.0.9()(64bit) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X generically named /usr/bin/genkeys. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 20:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202040.mBKKeCsA020634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #17 from Tomas 2008-12-20 15:40:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > That makes a pretty good case that the bulkquery and demo plugins should not be > packaged where they are. You missed test plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 21:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202113.mBKLDBxU025061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 16:13:10 EDT --- Any update? It's been over a month since the last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 21:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202120.mBKLKl37001080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 22:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202210.mBKMAlZI001136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-20 17:10:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Were you going to address those rpmlint complaints? > > The first does seem to be bogus, the second should be fixed, shouldn't it? I > mean, it's nice that you post the rpmlint output, but that only means that you > know there are issues to be addressed, and I'd have to bring them up at review > anyway. No, I'm not going to address them: the second one is bogus, too, since it's a config file, not a script that causes the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 22:19:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202219.mBKMJpZ1009112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 17:19:49 EDT --- Sorry nobody's looked at this in a while, but I just tried to build on current rawhide (x86_64) and got: notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::class_init_function(void*, void*)': notification.cc:192: error: invalid conversion from 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*, gint)' to 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*)' notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::closed_callback(NotifyNotification*, gint)': notification.cc:238: error: too many arguments to function notification.cc: In member function 'virtual void Notify::Notification::on_closed(gint)': notification.cc:501: error: too many arguments to function It does build fine on F-10, though, and there's no requirement for a package to build on rawhide in order to be reviewed, although of course you'll want to get it building relatively soon. There are a pile of rpmlint unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints, against things like libgtk-x11 and libatk. I don't think these are especially problematic as those libraries will be in memory anyway, but they're trivially fixed with the usual one-liner: sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool after the %configure call. With that, rpmlint is silent. Note that the examples are GPL, not LGPL, but they aren't installed so there's no issue. Really I don't see anything which should block approval of this package. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: fea7f6f7e436d343a14ceed749b5e9ad78e34c0a62c7790520710de5236c402f libnotifymm-0.6.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F-10, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. O rpmlint has some fixable complaints which aren't blockers. * final provides and requires are sane: libnotifymm-0.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) libnotifymm = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm(x86-64) = 0.6.1-2.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libnotifymm-devel-0.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libnotifymm-1.0) = 0.6.1 libnotifymm-devel = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm-devel(x86-64) = 0.6.1-2.fc10 = gtkmm24-devel libnotify-devel libnotifymm = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) pkgconfig * shared libraries installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig are in the -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is present. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 22:27:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202227.mBKMRgwj010482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 17:27:41 EDT --- I do understand that it's a config file; the problem is that it's executable. Is there some reason that someone might ever want to execute it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 22:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202236.mBKMaEnS004585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-20 17:36:14 EDT --- Yeah, right. I don't think so; I removed the exec bit for now. Rpmlint output is now clean. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/latex2rtf.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/latex2rtf-1.9.19-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 22:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202242.mBKMgajf012681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-20 17:42:35 EDT --- I think it would be better to use the pre-release notation (see kismet in [1]). By the way, your SRPM link is broken. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 23:26:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812202326.mBKNQR73018865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 18:26:26 EDT --- The tarball in this package doesn't match the one I get from https://forge.ocamlcore.org/frs/download.php/101/pa_do-0.8.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210009.mBL09EcT024497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 19:09:13 EDT --- Oh, that's really strange. What happens here, as far as I can tell is the .../101/... in the URI is significant. The purported filename doesn't matter: wget --no-check-certificate 'https://forge.ocamlcore.org/frs/download.php/101/furbie' ==> furbie size 99353, same as ocaml-pa-do 0.8 wget --no-check-certificate 'https://forge.ocamlcore.org/frs/download.php/102/fooble' ==> fooble size 102485, same as ocaml-pa-do 0.8.1 What I did was to just update the %{version} tag without bumping this implicit "release number" in the Source URL. The following SRPM should fix this, by correcting the source URL: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:36:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210036.mBL0aRbV022229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |slony -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 01:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210137.mBL1bdXC012905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-20 20:37:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > can't you > guys do that ? I don't know. > Is there anything else i could do ? I recommend that this package should be moved to rpmfusion if mplayer dependency cannot be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 03:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210318.mBL3IJro027262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-20 22:18:17 EDT --- New Package Request ===================== Name: gnome-applet-grandr Short Description: Gnome interface to Subversion Owners: laxathom Branch: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 03:27:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210327.mBL3RS1v028499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-20 22:27:24 EDT --- Well, Everything looks good. Kbuild flags are properly set and built on all expected arches. According to packaging guideline, this package can be added. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 03:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210354.mBL3sJjY018295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 03:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210351.mBL3pWl1018118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 22:51:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 03:56:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210356.mBL3uFIV032432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 22:56:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 03:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210353.mBL3rSGo031858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 22:53:26 EDT --- That description doesn't look right... Can you check it and reset the cvs flag when you are ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:00:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210400.mBL40F2E019627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-20 23:00:14 EDT --- ha! thanks Kevin. New Package Request ===================== Name: gnome-applet-grandr Short Description: GNOME panel applet for XrandR Owners: laxathom Branch: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210400.mBL403SJ019484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:00:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:01:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210401.mBL41dHN019851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210404.mBL44kxr000966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:04:45 EDT --- much better! ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:06:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210406.mBL46ekf001515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:06:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210410.mBL4A3YR002031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:10:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:09:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210409.mBL49BoV001696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:09:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210407.mBL47sEs001625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:07:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210416.mBL4GVxn021739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:16:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476952] Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210418.mBL4IhiZ002977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476952 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:18:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210421.mBL4L9oi003569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:21:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210420.mBL4K0kW003040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:19:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210421.mBL4Lxod022432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:21:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210426.mBL4Q8L5004381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:26:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:25:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210425.mBL4PQXC004206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:25:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210429.mBL4TYEQ023311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:29:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210427.mBL4RPVG004561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:27:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210428.mBL4Sd69004648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:28:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210434.mBL4YwxC024045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:34:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210433.mBL4XgMH005401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:33:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210437.mBL4b3El006027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:37:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210436.mBL4aCU1005959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:36:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210441.mBL4fcct006836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:41:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:39:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210439.mBL4dvQ8006280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:39:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:37:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210437.mBL4biWn006128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:37:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210440.mBL4eesm006650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:40:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210443.mBL4hRQ8025372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:43:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210442.mBL4gVYu025292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:42:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 04:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210445.mBL4jjm9025906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:45:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 05:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210500.mBL50eVT027792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-21 00:00:39 EDT --- Yep. That looks good to me from what I can see. I would of course still push to rawhide and confirm it obsoletes as you expect before pushing for f10/f9. So, would you like to just put all the requests here and I can do them at once? Once the new packages are setup, you can dead.package the old ones. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 05:02:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210502.mBL52hBs028100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #17 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-21 00:02:41 EDT --- yeah. http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm-2.1.9-4.el5.src.rpm http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 06:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210635.mBL6ZfwA009424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 01:35:41 EDT --- hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 06:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210634.mBL6YIDd008886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 01:34:17 EDT --- hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 07:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210725.mBL7PIeb017011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk --- Comment #12 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-21 02:25:16 EDT --- Please, fix URL tag in package. There is an typo in current URL tag and this URL does not work. Thank you. URL: http://www.gnome.org/parojects/hotssh ^ remove "a" here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 07:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210731.mBL7VtP5017904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rpm at greysector.ne | |t) --- Comment #20 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-21 02:31:52 EDT --- Dominik, I think we're waiting for you to bless this new version of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210820.mBL8K57r025929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:20:04 EDT --- bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bindfs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:17:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:17:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210817.mBL8Ht5j025001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:17:54 EDT --- ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ebook-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11429 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210820.mBL8KERD006993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:20:12 EDT --- fontpackages-1.11-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210821.mBL8LF7n007455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:21:14 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210821.mBL8LH1b007487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:20:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210820.mBL8KGLS007034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210818.mBL8IBDE006318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:18:10 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.3.beta1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmsn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11570 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460779] Review Request: nekovm - Neko embedded scripting language and virtual machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210821.mBL8Ltbb007642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460779 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:21:53 EDT --- nekovm-1.8.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nekovm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:24:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210824.mBL8OIex027504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Bug 449869 depends on bug 468055, which changed state. Bug 468055 Summary: broken dependency on F-9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:24:15 EDT --- tasque-0.1.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210826.mBL8Q6FA009524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:26:05 EDT --- bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210826.mBL8Q9kA009567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210825.mBL8PpRA009399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:25:50 EDT --- assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update assogiate'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476414] Review Request: assogiate - Editor for the file types database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210822.mBL8MZSI008190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476414 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:22:34 EDT --- assogiate-0.2.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update assogiate'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210828.mBL8Sffe010931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:28:40 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210831.mBL8VVkR011876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:31:29 EDT --- lordsawar-0.1.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lordsawar'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11488 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476474] Review Request: ebook-tools - Tools for accessing and converting various ebook file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210833.mBL8X0nP031097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476474 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:32:59 EDT --- ebook-tools-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update ebook-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:35:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210835.mBL8ZFlL032071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:35:14 EDT --- onboard-0.91.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update onboard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11426 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210835.mBL8ZIuF032108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:35:17 EDT --- pdfbook-20070930-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pdfbook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210832.mBL8WvCZ012499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:32:55 EDT --- python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-transaction'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11428 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210839.mBL8d4Vq000880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:39:03 EDT --- terminator-0.11-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:39:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210839.mBL8d7NK000932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210841.mBL8fRAv001719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:41:27 EDT --- pdfbook-20070930-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfbook'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11569 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:40:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210840.mBL8eo6L001611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:40:49 EDT --- bindfs-1.8.2-1.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update bindfs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210839.mBL8dj1X014527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:39:45 EDT --- onboard-0.91.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update onboard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:39:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210839.mBL8dn92014560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:39:48 EDT --- python-transaction-1.0-0.2.a1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-transaction'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469527] Review Request: tcping - Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210838.mBL8cpG0014374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:38:50 EDT --- tcping-1.3.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update tcping'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210844.mBL8ieG8002582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:44:37 EDT --- rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210843.mBL8hnFk002376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:43:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210843.mBL8hlWC016143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:43:45 EDT --- terminator-0.11-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474984] Review Request: bandwidthd - Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210845.mBL8jlVS016833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474984 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:45:46 EDT --- bandwidthd-2.0.1-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:46:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210846.mBL8kMdn017088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:46:21 EDT --- fontpackages-1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475860] Review Request: libmsn - Library for connecting to the MSN Messenger service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210846.mBL8kh3k003957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475860 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:46:42 EDT --- libmsn-4.0-0.3.beta1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libmsn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11505 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 10:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226235] Merge Review: pax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211011.mBLABWDs002051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226235 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-21 05:11:31 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 10:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: python-hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211008.mBLA8g9l001370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-21 05:08:41 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 10:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211013.mBLADTan021343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-21 05:13:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211102.mBLB2Ah4030885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(rpm at greysector.ne | |t) | --- Comment #21 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-21 06:02:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Some further comments. [...] > > sed -i 's|\r||g' distrib/ed2k_submit/README.MLdonkeySubmit > > sed -i 's|\r||g' docs/slavanap.txt > > > > iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 docs/gnutella.txt > docs/gnutella.utf8 && mv > > docs/gnutella.{utf8,txt} > > iconv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 distrib/Authors.txt > distrib/Authors.utf8 && mv > > distrib/Authors.{utf8,txt} > > > > This doesn't preserve original file timestamps. Please use touch -r to do that. > > There are a lot of similar issues in this spec-file. Actually, I don't think > that we need to preserve timestamps in that case, because we do change file > contents. I still think we should keep the timestamps, but I won't block on this. > > %files > > ... > > %{_bindir}/copysources > > %{_bindir}/get_range > > %{_bindir}/make_torrent > > ... > > %{_bindir}/subconv > > %{_bindir}/svg_converter > > > > These filenames seem a little too generic. Are they supposed to be run by the > > user? Could you add a "ml" prefix to them? > > Yes. Some of them (exept another one leftover - 'copysources' utility) You said copysources was a leftover, yet I still see it in the current spec. Others that could be problematic in the future are: %{_bindir}/get_range %{_bindir}/make_torrent %{_bindir}/subconv %{_bindir}/svg_converter I assume you will handle any file conflicts with other packages that may occur in the future. > may be > used even by user. For example, make_torrent can be used even w/o main mldonkey > package. Maybe we should package them in their own sub-packages? mldonkey-tools/utils? Why not. If they're useful independent of mldonkey then it's possible. Not really important though. Alright. There are no major issues left, so this package is APPROVED. Thank you for the enormous effort to bring this package in line with Fedora Packaging Guidelines. Great job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211103.mBLB3UMX012213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #22 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-21 06:03:29 EDT --- Well, APPROVED, pending the resolution of the issue raised in Comment #13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBTuL5003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Bug 467414 depends on bug 454416, which changed state. Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBTnNo003471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 06:29:48 EDT --- Thanks Adam and Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBTqbu003553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Bug 467397 depends on bug 454416, which changed state. Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBTrcL003582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Bug 467401 depends on bug 454416, which changed state. Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBTp5Y003527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Bug 467396 depends on bug 454416, which changed state. Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBToGg003501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Bug 467395 depends on bug 454416, which changed state. Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211129.mBLBTssY003611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Bug 467405 depends on bug 454416, which changed state. Bug 454416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211130.mBLBU5m5017459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 06:30:04 EDT --- Thanks Peter and Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:28:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:28:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211128.mBLBSjNO017031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 06:28:42 EDT --- Thanks Erik and Kevin for this. I've done the import, but I won't be able to build it until the two dependencies get imported. So I'll leave this bug open for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211132.mBLBW907017783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 06:32:07 EDT --- Thanks Peter and Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211132.mBLBWBXW017846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Bug 467399 depends on bug 467329, which changed state. Bug 467329 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211132.mBLBWAxH017820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Bug 467398 depends on bug 467329, which changed state. Bug 467329 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211133.mBLBX6Kh004478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-21 06:33:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eboard Short Description: Chess board interface for ICS Owners: mmahut Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211132.mBLBWHmP004384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-21 06:32:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_scgi Short Description: Python implementation of the SCGI protocol Owners: mmahut Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211133.mBLBXc56018054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 06:33:37 EDT --- Thanks Peter and Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:34:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211134.mBLBYtjs018178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211134.mBLBYwee018291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Bug 467414 depends on bug 467325, which changed state. Bug 467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:34:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211134.mBLBYtXq018207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Bug 467398 depends on bug 467325, which changed state. Bug 467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:34:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211134.mBLBYvT6018265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Bug 467409 depends on bug 467325, which changed state. Bug 467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211135.mBLBZ0ac018349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 467325, which changed state. Bug 467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211134.mBLBYuiB018236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Bug 467402 depends on bug 467325, which changed state. Bug 467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 11:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211134.mBLBYx39018316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Bug 467419 depends on bug 467325, which changed state. Bug 467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 12:07:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211207.mBLC73PZ024697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #15 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-21 07:07:01 EDT --- All comments from Felix hopefully addressed in this new release: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/source/dansguardian-2.9.9.5-2.src.rpm http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/specs/dansguardian.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 12:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211232.mBLCWqLc029002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #6 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-21 07:32:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Here's an updated spec with all the comments addressed: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/specs/devtodo.spec http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/source/devtodo-0.1.20-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 13:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211355.mBLDtGMf012019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-21 08:55:15 EDT --- Pong. Looks like I missed the fact that you have assigned yourself as the reviewer. The spec needs a little polishing, so please stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 13:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211355.mBLDtaRW012070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 08:55:36 EDT --- Additional info: scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1013492/logs/noarch/ Workaround bugfix was reported : Bug 477516 - perl and dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 13:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] New: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Hardware::Vhdl::Lexer splits VHDL code into lexical tokens. To use it, you need to first create a lexer object, passing in something which will supply chunks of VHDL code to the lexer. Repeated calls to the get_next_token method of the lexer will then return VHDL tokens (in scalar context) or a token type code and the token (in list context). get_next_token returns undef when there are no more tokens to be read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211415.mBLEFTKA015793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #19 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-21 09:15:28 EDT --- As I'm on hoolydays, I'll import phatch next week :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] New: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module auto-indents VHDL source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211434.mBLEY4oX018727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211434.mBLEY37S018702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477520 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211448.mBLEmltL007485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 09:48:46 EDT --- libicns-0.6.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libicns-0.6.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211452.mBLEq5AA021853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 --- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo 2008-12-21 09:52:04 EDT --- I am working to get the autotools patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211455.mBLEtnAG022422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 09:55:49 EDT --- libicns-0.6.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libicns-0.6.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 14:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211457.mBLEvTgJ022672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-21 09:57:29 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 15:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211521.mBLFL9Jw013416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #23 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-21 10:21:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Well, APPROVED, pending the resolution of the issue raised in Comment #13. Sent message upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 15:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211526.mBLFQufn027922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 15:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211526.mBLFQ7bN027819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-21 10:26:06 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1ad7245b666ce8fa87966b3a1565393d70380e13 Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. Notes ====== 1. It seems that the test phase would be happier if Test::Pod was available: t/pod.............skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD The package is available for all versions of Fedora and EPEL, so I see no reason to not BR it. 2. Requires: perl(Class::Std) is not needed, rpmbuild peeks it automatically 3. Are you sure that perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) are needed as Requires? At a quick glance I did not see them being "Use"d. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 15:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211533.mBLFX475028867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 10:33:03 EDT --- Hello Manuel, are there any other issues except the BR and Rs ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 15:44:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:44:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211544.mBLFiEY5016858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-21 10:44:14 EDT --- None that I can see. APPROVED (I'll trust you to fix those before commit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 15:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211548.mBLFmwPx031224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-21 10:48:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1e4b347153a66d7b13296872723f2d9338046bc8 Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English lan guages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. ====== 1. It seems that the test phase would be happier if Test::Pod was available: t/pod.............skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD The package is available for all versions of Fedora and EPEL, so I see no reason to not BR it. 2. I see that t/tidy gives lots of errors: t/tidy................# test line 3: expected 4 indent spaces before 'END COmpONenT;', got 10 # test line 4: expected ' \n', got ' comPonEnT tIMer\n' # test line 5: expected ' comPonEnT tIMer\n', got ' poRT (CLk\t:in stD_LogiC;\n' # ... further errors suppressed # test line 5: expected '#DEFINE uaRtio_sPEC \\n', got '#DEFINE uaRtio_sPEC \\n SIGnAl ReSET : oUT STd_logiC ; \\n SIgnAl SeluaRT : OuT inTEGER rANGE nUArTs-1 doWnTo 0; \\n sIgNAl host_c : Out t_Wb_MASteR_CoNTROl; \ \n signal hOst_s : iN t_Wb_MAsTER_sTAtUS; \\n SoUrcelINe : In NAtuRaL; \\n siGNaL LinEnO : OUT natUrAL\n' # test line 6: expected ' SIGnAl ReSET : oUT STd_logiC; \\n', got ' q <= T + baR * x;\n' # test line 7: expected ' SIgnAl SeluaRT : OuT inTEGER rANGE nUArTs-1 doWnTo 0; \\n', got 'eNd\n' # ... further errors suppressed # # test line 5: expected '##if simulatING==1\n', got ' ##if simulatING==1\n' # test line 6: expected 4 indent spaces before 't <= AL-foo*5;', got 6 # test line 7: expected '##eLSe\n', got ' ##eLSe\n' # ... further errors suppressed # # test line 5: expected '-- PRaGMa PREPROC if sImULatiNG==1\n', got ' -- PRaGMa PREPROC if sImULatiNG==1\n' # test line 7: expected '-- pRAGMA PrepRoC eLse\n', got ' -- pRAGMA PrepRoC eLse\n' # test line 9: expected '-- PRAGMa PREpROc ENDif\n', got ' -- PRAGMa PREpROc ENDif\n' The test passes, so I assume this is the very module in action, right ? 3. Require: perl(Hardware::Vhdl::Lexer) is a bit over pedantic, rpmbuild brings it in automatically so there is no need to explicitly require it: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Hardware::Vhdl::Lexer) <--------1st occurrence from the spec perl(Hardware::Vhdl::Lexer) <--------2nd occurrence from rpmbuild perl(Test::More) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 4. Is Test::More really needed or is it just a leftover from an over-zealous rpmbuild ? There are no real issues which cannot be fixed before commit so the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211601.mBLG1JLo000603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-21 11:01:18 EDT --- [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081209 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] New: Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-1.fc.src.rpm Koji scratch build: - For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1013751 - For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1013750 Description: Hpricot is a very flexible HTML parser, based on Tanaka Akira's HTree and John Resig's JQuery, but with the scanner recoded in C (using Ragel for scanning.) Note1: This RubyGem based rpm creates arch-dependent binary rpms. The following guideline [1] was approved by FPC/FESCo [2][3] and should be applied to this package. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RubyGem_with_C_code_spot [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg02221.html [3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg02221.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476952] Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211610.mBLGA3tk020728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476952 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477528] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - Error-tolerant HTML/XML parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211641.mBLGfRTK006051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477528 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |475141 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211641.mBLGfSg2006080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477528] New: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - Error-tolerant HTML/XML parser for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - Error-tolerant HTML/XML parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477528 Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - Error-tolerant HTML/XML parser for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-BeautifulSoup.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-BeautifulSoup-3.0.7a-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Beautiful Soup is a Python HTML/XML parser designed for quick turnaround projects like screen-scraping. rpmlint not silent due to missing documentation, no documentation available in upstream tarball. Licensing info in sourcefile BeautifulSoup.py. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 16:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211648.mBLGm2oJ006893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 --- Comment #3 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-12-21 11:48:01 EDT --- Updated pacakge. - Add patch to use system BeautifulSoup - Add beautifulsoup requires - Fix build/install commands. - Fix bogus permission on cutils file Package now requires BeautifulSoup which is not in Fedora. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477528 for review-request, which has been added as a dependency for this review. Updated srpm and spec: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-imdb.spec http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-imdb-3.8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 17:16:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] New: Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mechanize/rubygem-mechanize.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mechanize/rubygem-mechanize-0.8.5-2.fc.src.rpm Koji scratch build: For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1014077 For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1014079 Description: The Mechanize library is used for automating interaction with websites. Mechanize automatically stores and sends cookies, follows redirects, can follow links, and submit forms. Form fields can be populated and submitted. Mechanize also keeps track of the sites that you have visited as a history. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 17:29:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:29:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211729.mBLHTwPd031348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-21 12:29:57 EDT --- updated spec: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/mtx/devel/mtx.spec?revision=1.27 koji build including source and binary rpms: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1014121 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 17:48:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:48:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211748.mBLHmF3Q001613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #9 from John Anderson 2008-12-21 12:48:13 EDT --- Thanks for the help with the patch line, Chris. Here it is with the fix. Builds in Koji now. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1014172 http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles-0.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 18:09:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211809.mBLI9pFR004732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-21 13:09:50 EDT --- Thanks. It looks better. But I still don't think the contrib directory belongs to %doc. I think it should go directly to %{datadir}/%{name} and the tarballs inside the contrib/ should be extracted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 18:30:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211830.mBLIUgu0008153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 18:30:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211830.mBLIU4hB021776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-21 13:30:02 EDT --- Michel, please comment on the above or I am going to close this bug and review the one submitted by Jochen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 18:51:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211851.mBLIphl2025408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #24 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-21 13:51:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > Well, APPROVED, pending the resolution of the issue raised in Comment #13. > > Sent message upstream. One more small detail I forgot (not a blocker): you are passing --disable-gd to ./configure. Is there any reason why it's disabled? A user on rpmfusion-users list mentioned that they'd like it enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211908.mBLJ8Vxv028075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 14:08:30 EDT --- How does this interact with the existing ruby-hpricot package? Will it be removed from the distribution? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211914.mBLJEXP8029176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #25 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-12-21 14:14:32 EDT --- Dependency on gd adds libX11 as a dependency too. I, personally, don't think that these fancy graphs worths it, but if people will insist, then I'll add support for gd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211919.mBLJJ6fe015813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:19:05 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer Short Description: Split VHDL code into lexical tokens Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211924.mBLJOfRS016633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:24:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy-0.8-2.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy Short Description: VHDL code prettifier Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211931.mBLJVpig017898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:31:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgeda Short Description: Libraries for the gEDA project Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:33:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211933.mBLJX5qE018030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:33:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libstroke Short Description: A stroke interface library Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:39:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211939.mBLJdIxV018990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Bug 437626 depends on bug 465897, which changed state. Bug 465897 Summary: Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:39:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211939.mBLJdHWA018949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-12-21 14:39:15 EDT --- imported and built. thanks guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211939.mBLJdfP6019034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:39:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-gschem Short Description: Electronics schematics editor Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211940.mBLJesa8019535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:40:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-symbols Short Description: Electronic symbols for gEDA Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211941.mBLJfrcm001121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:41:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-examples Short Description: Circuit examples for gEDA Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] New: Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Summary: Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jaroslaw.gorny at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://strony.aster.pl/muranow/fedora/mpdscribble.spec SRPM URL: http://strony.aster.pl/muranow/fedora/mpdscribble-0.13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: mpdscribble is a music player daemon (mpd) client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm (formerly audioscrobbler). This is my first package, I'll need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211942.mBLJgaBQ019771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #26 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 14:42:35 EDT --- As an aside, if you want me to co-maintain, then feel free to add my nick (rjones) to the CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211942.mBLJgSrW001209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Jaroslaw Gorny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:49:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211949.mBLJnXDc020661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:49:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-gnetlist Short Description: Netlister for the gEDA project Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211951.mBLJpmau002810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:51:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-gattrib Short Description: Attribute editor for gEDA Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211948.mBLJmsqN002084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:48:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-utils Short Description: Several utilities for the gEDA project Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211950.mBLJorm3002620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:50:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-gsymcheck Short Description: Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 19:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812211953.mBLJrxSB021427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-21 14:53:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-docs Short Description: Documentation for gEDA Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:09:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] New: Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 Summary: Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libpcapnav/libpcapnav.spec SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libpcapnav/libpcapnav-0.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Libpcapnav is a libpcap wrapper library that allows navigation to arbitrary packets in a tcpdump trace file between reads, using timestamps or percentage offsets. It was originally based on Vern Paxson's tcpslice tool. [athienem at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm libpcapnav-debuginfo.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/src/debug/libpcapnav-0.8/src 02755 libpcapnav-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/src/debug/libpcapnav-0.8/src 02755 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. [athienem at localhost ~]$ Autogenerated packages, setgid error is ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212014.mBLKES7b006241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #27 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-21 15:14:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Dependency on gd adds libX11 as a dependency too. I, personally, don't think > that these fancy graphs worths it, but if people will insist, then I'll add > support for gd. I agree with you, let's drop the gd dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] New: Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Summary: Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libnetdude/libnetdude.spec SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libnetdude/libnetdude-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm libnetdude allows to implement trace file manipulations at a much higher level of abstraction than code written directly on top of the pcap library. It also provides a command-line interface that directly lets you script all packet- mangling capabilities provided by the set of plugins you have installed. [athienem at localhost libnetdude]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [athienem at localhost libnetdude]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:21:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] New: Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 Summary: Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/netdude.spec SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/netdude-0.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Files: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/ The Network Dump data Displayer and Editor is a framework for inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files. It addresses the need for a toolset that allows easy inspection, modification, and creation of pcap/tcpdump trace files. [root at localhost ~]# rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at localhost ~]# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:26:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212026.mBLKQRIk026466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212026.mBLKQSQg026492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212022.mBLKMdsU007662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212022.mBLKMbh2007617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477544, 477545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:22:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212022.mBLKMcsE007641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:26:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212026.mBLKQFvS008341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 15:26:13 EDT --- pen-0.18.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pen-0.18.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212035.mBLKZU6b027998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christian at whoop.org --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:35:28 EDT --- *** Bug 460886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212034.mBLKYx87027480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christian at whoop.org --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:34:57 EDT --- *** Bug 460885 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212035.mBLKZTcl027969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:35:28 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477545 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460885] Review Request: netdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212034.mBLKYw7I027455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460885 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:34:56 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477546 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:45:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212045.mBLKj6ju029450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #38 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-21 15:45:04 EDT --- http://peterscheie.fedorapeople.org/k12linux/quick-start-guide/k12linux-quick-start-guide-0.0.6.tar.bz2 - Version number for bludecurve-icon-theme removed in spec. - The license in the html is already correct. CC-BY-SA is just the short version of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike. - Changed the version number in the changelog to 0.0.6-1. - In the html file changed step #10 and corresponding screenshot. - Changed tab(s) in spec to spaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:47:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212047.mBLKlE0q011280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:47:12 EDT --- You should prod upstream to get licensing information into all of the source files, not just the top level one. There is no need to extract the license text like that. In fact, my understanding is that you shouldn't do so, especially since you insist on needlessly duplicating this generated license file between the two subpackages. I'll ask the licensing experts for clarification. * source files match upstream (compared manually). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.x86_64.rpm ocaml(Prelude) = bc560abdad61c8ad43c135a42a46cab8 ocaml-preludeml = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 ocaml-preludeml(x86-64) = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 = ocaml(Array) = 9c9fa5f11e2d6992c427dde4d1168489 ocaml(Bigarray) = fc2b6c88ffd318b9f111abe46ba99902 ocaml(Buffer) = 23af67395823b652b807c4ae0b581211 ocaml(Complex) = 73899d718b62e5534e8737bb363dbf71 ocaml(Filename) = 7cd172f02b7ee9b8d7bda3bb92144951 ocaml(Hashtbl) = ee2a3220e38a4350c5bc131ce9f3f6ce ocaml(Int32) = b2545c419b6b6a173cac4c0a3e7e0277 ocaml(Int64) = d501d6e89fdce41c79f274fb464995d5 ocaml(Lexing) = 4d17267334f1a6c75730dc3fae21fb9b ocaml(List) = a0e2e49d266ff302f8667651a43f71ba ocaml(Map) = d6ea0139afe59a16df7b23d35e571de7 ocaml(Marshal) = 02be0525cda0ca38ef8d49584e7769d6 ocaml(Nativeint) = 7233ce5207a538fea4f0c61ed411ea2c ocaml(Netbuffer) = b2846209efee896cd2574779d0d1d42d ocaml(Netchannels) = b370fbc569ce2ec79307482cf4263a41 ocaml(Netdate) = 30913487673f7f8869f808f49a7fcadd ocaml(Obj) = c827f726ce05da709cf7de58fc15e324 ocaml(Pcre) = 4fd7bbc136a5cb4f7df9321ec6092b80 ocaml(Pervasives) = 88cb1505c8bdf9a4dcd2cdf3452732b4 ocaml(Printf) = 807ecd3a1538992580464c03462c9964 ocaml(Random) = 462fc826fd1ae9df8d15e3cb798cba9d ocaml(String) = ecc403546c1c50056801131811c39017 ocaml(Sys) = 21bf525b2b3f3a46a54b96163adfe387 ocaml(Unix) = 0596a58544f8cd88fed5bf5432a53d43 ocaml(runtime) = 3.11.0 ocaml-preludeml-devel-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.x86_64.rpm ocaml-preludeml-devel = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 ocaml-preludeml-devel(x86-64) = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 = ocaml-preludeml = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. O license file is duplicated; it should not be, but this is not a blocker. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. * .cmo and .ml files not included * this is a syntax extension, so the .o file os OK in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212050.mBLKowRi011900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:50:56 EDT --- Actually, I don't see you in the account system at all. Are you sure you have already been sponsored? What's your account ID in the Fedora system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212048.mBLKmr0N011452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:48:52 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when you believe this is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212053.mBLKrtiV030575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212052.mBLKq4Hs030386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:52:03 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212052.mBLKqJP0030440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:52:17 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 20:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212053.mBLKr3H9012144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:53:02 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212112.mBLLCs9d015184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 16:12:53 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when this is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212120.mBLLKCcN002217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Stefan Seefeld changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-21 16:20:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qmtest Short Description: an automated software test execution tool. Owners: stefan Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212120.mBLLKNpe016436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #32 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-21 16:20:19 EDT --- my apologies, my time/interest has waned, so I'll withdraw to let someone else jump in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:21:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212121.mBLLL3Fl016573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-21 16:21:00 EDT --- my apologies, my time/interest has waned, so I'll withdraw to let someone else jump in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212128.mBLLSsQm017580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #96 from Lee Howard 2008-12-21 16:28:52 EDT --- SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.8-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212134.mBLLYKPU018889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #4 from Dan Kenigsberg 2008-12-21 16:34:19 EDT --- That's fine by me http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff-0-0.1.20071020snap.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:39:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212139.mBLLdTOP005174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #8 from Chris St. Pierre 2008-12-21 16:39:28 EDT --- To the best of my knowledge, I'm not in the Fedora account system; I haven't been sponsored, nor, as far as I can tell, did I claim to be. The process document at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process doesn't seem to suggest that I need to be sponsored. If that document is out of date, and I need to obtain the account and/or sponsorship of which you speak, I'd appreciate it if you could point me to more up-to-date documentation on the process. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:39:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212139.mBLLd7mk019810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #39 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-21 16:39:06 EDT --- The license in the spec file is incorrect, it should be License: CC-BY-SA it is License: GPLv2+ If you change that t is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhxbF020764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:59 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhrjT020629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:51 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhowd020585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:48 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhu9M020703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:55 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhmcj020552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:46 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhkc8020519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:44 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhtGf020666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:53 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhwSe020739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:57 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:53:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:53:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212153.mBLLr0tX022218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 --- Comment #16 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-21 16:52:59 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 22:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212208.mBLM8CEn009337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 17:08:11 EDT --- Do you think I should just not add the src/* files to the package? They are not (currently) necessary to build anyway. In fact my personal opinion is that the split is ill-advised. I'll raise the issue of licensing upstream now anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:37:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212337.mBLNb0Rs005236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:36:58 EDT --- pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:36:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212336.mBLNatCM005203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212339.mBLNdVhF023119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #23 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-12-21 18:39:29 EDT --- I have some problems with a /home partition corrupted currently. I will try to review this this week. It seems that we are near to the end of the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:41:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212341.mBLNfTSi024041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:41:28 EDT --- pystatgrab-0.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:36:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:36:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212336.mBLNaqm3022400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:36:50 EDT --- hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNe8mu023632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:40:07 EDT --- hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNeOJO023787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:40:22 EDT --- python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212341.mBLNf8DN023954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:41:06 EDT --- perl-Crypt-DSA-0.14-7.fc9, perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-9.fc9, perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNeWrg006887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:40:32 EDT --- vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNeFww006810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:40:14 EDT --- vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:42:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212342.mBLNgKJK007406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:42:19 EDT --- examiner-0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212339.mBLNdNB6006288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:39:22 EDT --- examiner-0.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:39:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212339.mBLNdxJc006466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:39:58 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469892] Review Request: examiner - Utility to disassemble and comment foreign executable binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212339.mBLNdQRE006322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469892 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNehrc006962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:40:43 EDT --- python-wikimarkup-1.01-3.005svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNeqfl007009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:40:51 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:40:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:40:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212340.mBLNeHfb006841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212341.mBLNfBJf007180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:41:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469814] Review Request: fuse-zip - Fuse-zip is a fs to navigate, extract, create and modify ZIP archives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212341.mBLNfjbr024431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469814 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 18:41:45 EDT --- fuse-zip-0.2.6-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 23:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212350.mBLNoRin009644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-21 18:50:26 EDT --- This package (rubygem-hpricot) has ruby-hpricot in its subpackage, which will replace the current ruby-hpricot (binary rpm). After this package is approved, ruby-hpricot "srpm" will be removed from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 00:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220005.mBM05wl5011906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Tim Niemueller 2008-12-21 19:05:57 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lua-posix New Branches: F-9 Owners: timn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 00:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220052.mBM0q8GM018484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #40 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-21 19:52:06 EDT --- http://peterscheie.fedorapeople.org/k12linux/quick-start-guide/k12linux-quick-start-guide-0.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Fixed license in spec. Changed one of the screenshot files in docs/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 01:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] New: Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Summary: Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/nload/nload.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/nload/nload-0.7.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: nload is a console application which monitors network traffic and bandwidth usage in real time. It visualizes the in and outgoing traffic using two graphs and provides additional info like total amount of transfered data and min/max network usage. koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1015021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 01:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220142.mBM1gPjJ025485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |nload -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 02:44:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220244.mBM2ihYg018213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen 2008-12-21 21:44:42 EDT --- An update: Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/linux-security-guide.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 03:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220311.mBM3Bb84006061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2008-12-21 22:11:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327603) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327603) rpmlint non-weak-symbol messages posted for my own reference - need to sort these out and submit patches upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 03:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220312.mBM3CsK2022761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327603|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 03:36:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220336.mBM3aOqT009620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Bug 475141 depends on bug 477528, which changed state. Bug 477528 Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - Error-tolerant HTML/XML parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477528 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 03:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477528] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - Error-tolerant HTML/XML parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220336.mBM3aMSW009587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477528 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-21 22:36:21 EDT --- BeautifulSoup is already in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 03:44:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] New: Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 Summary: Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Apache CouchDB is a distributed, fault-tolerant and schema-free document-oriented database accessible via a RESTful HTTP/JSON API. Among other features, it provides robust, incremental replication with bi-directional conflict detection and resolution, and is queryable and indexable using a table-oriented view engine with JavaScript acting as the default view definition language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 04:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220431.mBM4V21a017534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #36 from Dan Dennedy 2008-12-21 23:30:57 EDT --- I added a new configure option --avformat-no-filters to facilitate a codecs and muxers only plugin whose name will not conflict with a "stock" --avformat-no-codecs plugin. Of course, that is for rpmfusion.org or other non-fedora, but just to let you know that this will prevent a plugin filename clash on a mlt-ffmpeg package and relieve any concerns in that regard. Finally, I have also made changes to mlt and patch to kdenlive to remove all ffmpeg library dependencies from kdenlive to make that easier for acceptance. All of these changes should be in mlt 0.3.4 and kdenlive 0.7.1 due out by the end of the year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220505.mBM55pns007309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(mcepl at redhat.com) --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-22 00:05:49 EDT --- Taking review. - Only define one of python_sitelib or python_sitearch. - 'the' in Summary seems unnecessary - Does not currently build in rawhide, requires libasyncns >=0.4 Add BuildRequires: libasyncns-devel - rpmlint output: python-libasyncns.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/libasyncns.so 0775 - None of the files in test/ are licensed Otherwise OK, so please fix the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220508.mBM58j3a023061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:16:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:16:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476936] Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220516.mBM5GhQ6024392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476936 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-22 00:16:42 EDT --- Pretty simple package. Builds fine, rpmlint is happy Some licensing issues, Some files under GFDL Some under BSD I think Some under "public domain" Upstream url matches spec is clean. Please verify the licensing of this, but otherwise OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:22:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220522.mBM5MvQ5025226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 00:22:54 EDT --- Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will give us a bit more time to test and play with them. Presumbly ghc should own those scripts? > I am not yet sure, what the impact of > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > is for ghc packages. Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on? Turning off also disables all C library dependency checking? Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts to do the write thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220538.mBM5cneO011893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 00:38:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review. :) I will improvement the description of the package when importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-paths Short Description: Interface to ghc's install directories Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220604.mBM64Qxu015663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-22 01:04:25 EDT --- python-cvxopt works after the latest atlas & suitesparse builds in rawhide. There is one little missing thing I noticed: * You should BR: python-setuptools-devel otherwise the package will not build on mock. Please do this before you commit. Until the correctly linked versions of atlas and suitesparse are pushed to the F-9/F-10 branches, you will need to reside python-cvxopt in rawhide only. ------------------------------------------------ This package (python-cvxopt) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220613.mBM6DDOh032381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 01:13:12 EDT --- Will review later today. Mind that there is a small cosmetic problem: libpcapnav.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.8-2 ['0.8-1.fc11', '0.8-1'] And.. why the comment about rpmfusion ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 07:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220731.mBM7VVUF011277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-22 02:31:30 EDT --- * On the website http://tug.ctan.org/cgi-bin/ctanPackageInformation.py?id=latexdiff I see that version is 0.5 As you said there are different version references within the source. I would try to get in touch with the author to ask about the correct version. I think it should be OK to go with the version of the latexdiff script for the whole package, because the whole package is named after that script. * It looks like this package must be noarch. * rpmlint gives bunch of errors of these types: W: summary-ended-with-dot E: description-line-too-long W: spurious-executable-perm W: incoherent-version-in-changelog E: no-binary E: empty-debuginfo-package They are all easy to fix. ? Why don't you use the existing Makefile facility? * I think all of doc/support/latexdiff/* files should go to %doc ? The source/latexdiff/example/ can go to %doc too. What do you think? ? Is the wrapper script source/latexdiff/contrib/latexdiff-wrap useful? Should we package it? * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * I don't think Requires: perl is necessary. rpmbuild itself picks up the perl dependencies. (check with "rpm -qpR ") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220821.mBM8LW38019183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #41 from Patrice Dumas 2008-12-22 03:21:30 EDT --- Right. Still approved. In the %changelog, the % in %{version} should be escaped like %%{version} The spec file is used for changelog entries that are in fact for upstream, like: - Used a different screenshot for step #10 in html which more clearly shows the device names. Deleted the sentence that said to close the window because it was replaced by the File-Save verbage added in - Changed Step 10 in html doc to use File-Save rather quit, save; replaced corresponding screenshot. - Reworked opening section to cover running from LiveUSB and from hard disk, since document is mostly about network config to enable LTSP support. - Added link to Fedora Installation Guide in reference to adding user IDs. - Changed name and all allusions from README and ltsp-server-livesetupdocs to k12linux-quick-start-guide. - Changed screenshots so they show 'K12Linux Quick Start Guide' on desktop instead of 'README LTSP Server Setup'. They should be in a NEWS file or Changelog or the like. Not a big deal since the separation between the spec file and the tarball is quite artificial anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:23:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220823.mBM8NIOV019324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-22 03:23:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327623) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327623) patch to silent rpmlint output on srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:30:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220830.mBM8UG8B005438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-22 03:30:15 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220829.mBM8TqFm020154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-22 03:29:50 EDT --- Still there are rpmlint output not silent on rpms system-config-netboot.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxeosdialog.py 0644 system-config-netboot.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/netboot_gtk.py 0750 system-config-netboot.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/netboot_gtk.py 0750 system-config-netboot.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-netboot/netboot_gtk.py system-config-netboot.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/system-config-netboot.py 0750 system-config-netboot.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/system-config-netboot.py 0750 system-config-netboot.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode system-config-netboot.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-netboot AND system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxeos.py 0750 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxeos.py 0750 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxeboot.py 0750 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/pxeboot.py 0750 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-netboot/firsttime.py 0644 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/updateDiskless 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/updateDiskless 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/syncfiles 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/syncfiles 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/diskless.init 0644 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/disklessrc 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/disklessrc 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/mkdiskless 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless/mkdiskless 0700 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-netboot/diskless.py 0644 system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/boot.msg system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/expert.msg system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/general.msg system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/param.msg system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/rescue.msg system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/msgs/snake.msg system-config-netboot-cmd.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /tftpboot/linux-install/pxelinux.0 Suggestions:- 1) why some of above mentioned files are non-readable? you can make them readable. 2) For config files guidelines says http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Configuration_files 3) Desktop files must be installed as per given http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop-file-install_usage 4) Use following scriptlet for icon files https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220843.mBM8hRoe007085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220843.mBM8hSg1007106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 Bug 476632 depends on bug 476633, which changed state. Bug 476633 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 09:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220908.mBM981Nm011348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 04:08:00 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join should answer your questions. More precisely, see 1.1.9 (Get a Fedora Account ) and 1.1.11 (Get Sponsored) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 08:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220858.mBM8wAwT024258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-22 03:58:09 EDT --- - The spec file name and the SRPM name are different. - Changelog entries are still missing. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs - URL should be https://fedorahosted.org/securityguide/ - Source0 should be point to the upstream source location, to the source tarball to be more precise. Please refer to https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq, Section 'How can I publish archive releases (tgz, zip, etc) for my project?' - If there are no 'BuildRequires:' or 'Requires:' leave those entries away. - Isn't this package 'BuildArch: noarch' ? - The license should be only 'Open Publication' See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_2 - Your %file section seems to be unfinished I'm not able to rebuild your package on Fedora 9. *ERROR: Brand fedora is not installed* Either install fedora or change to a valid Brand. Installed Brands: echo common make: *** [pre] Error 1 The rpmlint output of the SRPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-3.src.rpm fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 2) fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.src: E: no-changelogname-tag fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.src: W: invalid-license Open Publication License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. For translations, take a look at https://translate.fedoraproject.org/submit/maintainers/info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 09:14:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220914.mBM9EVvn012382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #9 from Harald Hoyer 2008-12-22 04:14:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > rpmlint with udev-135-3 of rawhide: > > udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-pnp > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here bogus > > udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm bogus > udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. bogus > > udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. bogus > > udev.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name udev-post > The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or > one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. bogus > > libudev-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libudev/libudev-libs/liblibudev > 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. bogus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 09:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220913.mBM9DBUY027322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #8 from Harald Hoyer 2008-12-22 04:13:09 EDT --- rpmlint with udev-135-3 of rawhide: udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-pnp A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. udev.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name udev-post The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. libudev-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libudev/libudev-libs/liblibudev 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 10:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221033.mBMAXW3i023610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-22 05:33:31 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nload-0.7.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint nload* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [1] [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 5b851ecf898edcd1f465946745e95eb6 Build source: 5b851ecf898edcd1f465946745e95eb6 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1015818 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format [1] Source header says GPLv2+ [2] Using make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" instead of %{__make} install DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" preserve the timestamps Just some cosmetic stuff: - Every BR on one line looks neat - a dash between '...om.br> - 0.7.2-1' would be nice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 10:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221042.mBMAgJxG025212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-12-22 05:42:17 EDT --- Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1015833 rpmlint silent Review accepted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 10:50:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221050.mBMAo1jF026459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Comment #28 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-22 05:49:59 EDT --- btw, do you mind to add me as co-owner ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 10:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221057.mBMAvrLK028311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #42 from Warren Togami 2008-12-22 05:57:51 EDT --- > They should be in a NEWS file or Changelog or the like. Not a big deal since > the separation between the spec file and the tarball is quite artificial > anyway. I think it is entirely unimportant to do this... but Peter's decision as maintainer. I plan on importing the tarball into a bzr repo soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221111.mBMBBw08013654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 06:11:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: b31de0c2dfcc363cae702f5e218493fb027f5f84 Test-Compile-0.08.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidel ines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if availabl e. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. [!] Final provides and requires are sane. ==> Duplicate Requires for perl(UNIVERSAL::require) ================ *** APPROVED *** but please remove perl(UNIVERSAL::require) from Requires ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221118.mBMBIdhX032604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:18:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221118.mBMBICTk014728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-22 06:18:11 EDT --- I'll remove it. Thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221118.mBMBISMr014766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-22 06:18:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Compile Short Description: Check whether Perl module files compile correctly Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:32:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459281] Review Request: corosync - The Corosync Cluster Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221132.mBMBWmkW017920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459281 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |allisson at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Allisson Azevedo 2008-12-22 06:32:45 EDT --- Hi Steve, if builds fine in koji, close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221151.mBMBpY9K006399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #38 from Till Maas 2008-12-22 06:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our > packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for > the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will > give us a bit more time to test and play with them. Sure. > Presumbly ghc should own those scripts? Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make it easier to update them. > > I am not yet sure, what the impact of > > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > > is for ghc packages. > > Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving > _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on? Turning off also disables all C > library dependency checking? Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts > to do the write thing. If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used. According to this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask about this on fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 12:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221207.mBMC7aTm009173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-22 07:07:35 EDT --- > [1] Source header says GPLv2+ > [2] Using make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" instead of > %{__make} install DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" preserve the timestamps > > Just some cosmetic stuff: > - Every BR on one line looks neat > - a dash between '...om.br> - 0.7.2-1' would be nice fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/nload/nload.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/nload/nload-0.7.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 13:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221344.mBMDiRvb026969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-22 08:44:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > btw, do you mind to add me as co-owner ? I'd be glad to. By the way, I noticed that you're planning to add VirtualBox into RPM Fusion, which I'm happy to hear, and which was the reason I added this review as well. I don't know whether you package is finished, or whether you based your package on Till's one as well, but you may want to have a short look at my package, just to cross-check [1]. [1] http://elvn.getrpm.net/rpm/el5/src/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 13:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221346.mBMDkW1F009358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 08:46:31 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: libpcapnav.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.8-2 ['0.8-1.fc11', '0.8-1'] => either the newest changelog should be dropped or release tag should be increased [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT (with advertisement) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9f585e8589f289d157732b040f2a213e8b6b239b libpcapnav-0.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Release tag for the package does not coincide with the changelog ================ *** APPROVED *** but please fix the release tag before commit ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 13:52:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221352.mBMDqmC5010356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221404.mBME49wU012485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-12-22 09:04:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libpcapnav Short Description: Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile Owners: ixs Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221407.mBME7nst031478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-22 09:07:49 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc10,qzion-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qedje-0.3.0-2.fc10,qzion-0.3.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221407.mBME7lZR031450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-22 09:07:46 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc10,qzion-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qedje-0.3.0-2.fc10,qzion-0.3.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221413.mBMED7lo032519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|libpcapnav | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:16:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221416.mBMEGIWA000840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |netdude -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221413.mBMEDKh6032566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libpcapnav -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460885] Review Request: netdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221416.mBMEG0Pb014910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460885 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|netdude | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221417.mBMEHZhA015265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|libnetdude | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:17:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221417.mBMEHqSk015315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libnetdude -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221433.mBMEX0rY018121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 09:32:59 EDT --- Note that the Package Review Process document does explicitly link to the Join document; see the second paragraph in the Contributor section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221455.mBMEtiUv008194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-22 09:55:43 EDT --- Upstream have added a LICENSE file and also added licensing info to all of the src/* files. I'm just starting a 2 week vacation, so I will have only irregular contact until the beginning of January. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221456.mBMEuPhM022851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-22 09:56:24 EDT --- Set to NEEDINFO of me, to look at when I get back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221457.mBMEvDpL008500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 14:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221458.mBMEwqWE023233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 09:58:51 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT (with advertisement) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 04be6bd30f854ad790ebc0e4082a664c12521ba7 libnetdude-0.11.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. ==> see also note 1 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Notes === 1. The documentation from the devel package includes: /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libnetdude /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libnetdude/libnetdude /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libnetdude/libnetdude/* I suggest to preserve to shorten the tree and relocate the content from /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libnetdude/libnetdude to /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libnetdude. It's not technically incorrect but it is a bit odd to have a folder containg nothing else but one folder with the same name. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221508.mBMF88fA010683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464013] Review Request: findbugs-bcel - Byte Code Engineering Library with findbugs extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221508.mBMF8mPq010748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464013 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221508.mBMF80al025279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221512.mBMFCYp5011575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-12-22 10:12:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnetdude Short Description: Management framework for pcap packet traces Owners: ixs Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221514.mBMFEit5011721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |netbeans-platform9 - |netbeans-platform - |NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 |NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 --- Comment #2 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-12-22 10:14:43 EDT --- Lillian, I agree that the updates will be more smooth if the version number will be removed from the package names. Hence: 1. This Review Request is renamed (natbeans-platform9 -> netbeans-platform) 2. A new release is prepared: Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform-6.5-2.fc11.src.rpm Changes: - The platform version number is removed from the package names - "Obsoletes" are added for the netbeans-platform8* packages There are two rpmlint warnings additionally to the mentioned above: netbeans-platform.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netbeans-platform8 netbeans-platform-javadoc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netbeans-platform8-javadoc due to I've decided that the obsoleting packages are not a compatible replacements for the old ones. Successful scratch koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1016108 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221530.mBMFUbpj014980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 10:30:36 EDT --- mock build failed here, more precisely during the autogen sequence: Netdude Build Tools Setup ==================================================== Checking whether we have all tools available ... All necessary tools found. running libtoolize ---------------------------------------------------- libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/compile' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/config.guess' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/config.sub' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/depcomp' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/install-sh' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/missing' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/config/ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting macros in `libltdl/m4'. libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/argz.m4' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/libtool.m4' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/ltsugar.m4' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/ltversion.m4' libtoolize: copying file `libltdl/m4/lt~obsolete.m4' libtoolize: putting libltdl files in `libltdl'. libtoolize: `COPYING.LIB' not found in `/usr/share/libtool/libltdl' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9T8tG4 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9T8tG4 (%build) EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/netdude.spec' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 15:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221535.mBMFZVDx030175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-12-22 10:35:30 EDT --- Interesting. Let me find out what exactly changed in rawhide to make it fail now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221601.mBMG1THk001959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #48 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-22 11:01:24 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:06:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221606.mBMG6hUM021280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-22 11:06:40 EDT --- Please also submit a push request for F-10 on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:10:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221610.mBMGADxe003672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Wart changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Wart 2008-12-22 11:10:12 EDT --- Imported and built. Many thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221635.mBMGZTUV026435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221644.mBMGi3WL027701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-22 11:44:02 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221644.mBMGi6hL009672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-22 11:44:05 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles-0.07-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:54:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221654.mBMGsA0o029649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-22 11:54:09 EDT --- In my opinion using %doc for the content of the contrib directory is appropriate. Here is my reasoning: - %{datadir}/%{name} is being used for data (pictures, ui definition, ...) of the applications in the package (utils from contrib are not "data", but executables), FHS defines /usr/share as "architecture-independent data" - both we and upstream don't provide any support for the utils, using %{datadir}/%{name} can imply that support is provided - there are other packages that store "contrib" as %doc exactly in this sense -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:53:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221653.mBMGrcl9011465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #11 from Chris St. Pierre 2008-12-22 11:53:36 EDT --- The text was: A Contributor is defined as someone who wants to submit (and maintain) a package in Fedora. As a Contributor, you should have already made a package which adheres to the Package Naming Guidelines and Packaging Guidelines. You should also be aware of ForbiddenItems. If you are unsure how to become a contributor, or if you need more detailed instructions on this process, you should read PackageMaintainers/Join. The link is now unburied: A Contributor is defined as someone who wants to submit (and maintain) a package in Fedora. To become a contributor, you must follow the detailed instructions on this process at PackageMaintainers/Join. As a Contributor, you should have already made a package which adheres to the Package Naming Guidelines and Packaging Guidelines. You should also be aware of ForbiddenItems. Additionally, the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored mentions "the proper procedure when submitting your first review request," which I evidently didn't follow, since my bug didn't block FE-NEEDSPONSOR until you added that for me (thanks!). I can't seem to find that procedure anywhere, though; if there's more to it than using the form at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review, could you point me to that documentation, too, so I can a) make sure I didn't miss anything; and b) edit the wiki accordingly to make that more clear. Thanks again. FAS username is 'cstpierre'. Sponsorship will be found eventually, I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 17:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221746.mBMHkslM020645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-22 12:46:53 EDT --- * License issue Almost all files are under ASL 2.0, however - The following file is under GPLv3 src/resources/scratchpad/org/apache/poi/hdgf/chunks_parse_cmds.tbl Would you check how this file is used? - The following files have some questionable (?) license terms: src/documentation/content/xdocs/entity/* Would you check how these files are used? * Preshipped binaries - The source zip file contains many preshipped binary files such as .xlsx files. Would you remove these files? * koji build - By the way rebuild failed on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1016360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 17:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221751.mBMHp0jv006496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(adam at antistof.dk) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-22 12:50:59 EDT --- Adam, would you address the issue commented by wolfy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 17:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221758.mBMHwl5C008769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-22 12:58:46 EDT --- I respect your decision. We disagree at this point but this can't be regarded as a blocker. ------------------------------------------- This Merge Review (mtx) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- Closing the bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 18:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221829.mBMITOSP028258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 18:41:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221841.mBMIfnCX016007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-22 13:41:48 EDT --- I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 18:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221842.mBMIgT5U030624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-22 13:42:28 EDT --- Just more comments: * export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" should not be needed. Please check what %configure actually does by $ rpm --eval %configure * Please avoid to use %makeinstall unless impossible https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 18:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221851.mBMIp1Ea017824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-22 13:51:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nload Short Description: Console Ncurses Network Monitoring Tool Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 18:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221858.mBMIwfig019014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-22 13:58:40 EDT --- For 3.9.0-1 * License - The license tag for this package should be "MPLv1.1 or LGPLv2+". * Macros - Use macros consistently (for cosmetic issue). Please use %{name} or %name, not both. Other issues are okay. Please modify the issue above when importing into Fedora CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (javassist) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 19:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221952.mBMJq3hO028086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #14 from Chris Feist 2008-12-22 14:52:01 EDT --- Kevin, Can you make me the owner (at least for now until Abhi gets a sponsor)? Thanks, Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:04:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222004.mBMK4tQi029967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-12-22 15:04:54 EDT --- Ok, so it looks it needs more love, I'll take a deeper look to fix it. Sorry I didn't checked rpmlint, hoping package is in better condition... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222007.mBMK7nri030715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-22 15:07:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Just more comments: > > * export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" should not be needed. > Please check what %configure actually does by > $ rpm --eval %configure the "export" line will be removed in next release > > * Please avoid to use %makeinstall unless impossible > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used the hand-written Makefiles doesn't support DESTDIR, so use of %makeinstall is needed, patch to correct the situation has been already submitted upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222020.mBMKKCc4000437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #3 from Luis Nabais 2008-12-22 15:20:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327687) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327687) Spec file builddeps fixed Updated giver spec file to fix missing perl-XML-Parser build dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222037.mBMKbDnc003851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #49 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 15:37:10 EDT --- So what's up with this ticket? The last comment from the submitter was a comple of months ago. As for the emacs stuff, I would suggest that you follow the emacs packaging guidleines if you intend to package the emacs stuff, but other packages have simply taken the step of packaging a lone .el file as documentation and leaving it to the end user to set that up if they want it. Also, the package in comment #30, which seems to be the most recent one, fails to build for me in rawhide: Running aclocal Running autoconf configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-rpath configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222044.mBMKiig3004905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge | |.net) | --- Comment #14 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-22 15:44:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Were you going to move the clamd socket and pidfile to /var/run, and the > logfile to /var/log? I've updated to 1.10 and made those two changes, but during some testing on a system with selinux enabled, I now get this : ERROR: LOCAL: Socket file /var/run/clamsmtp/clamd.smtp.sock could not be bound: Permission denied With these selinux log entry : type=1400 audit(0.000:35061): avc: denied { create } for pid=24756 comm="clamd.smtp" name="clamd.smtp.sock" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:clamd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file For this to work, should I try to include something in the package or ask to get the default policy updated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222052.mBMKqgQY006565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 15:52:41 EDT --- I've found the selinux folks easy enough to work with; it's worth at least asking them for help with a policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 20:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222056.mBMKuQ3M007257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 15:56:24 EDT --- Any response from the original submitter? It's been 2.5 months now, and if there's no further response soon, I'm going to close this ticket and ask Charles to submit his own review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222101.mBML1FlY024076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #28 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-12-22 16:01:11 EDT --- I guess I shouldn't have set review flag to + before the legal issues are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222105.mBML5Q1p024757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-22 16:05:25 EDT --- sugar-speak-9-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-speak-9-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222113.mBMLDDlJ026153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 --- Comment #6 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-12-22 16:13:12 EDT --- I have been in contact with Stjepan and he agreed that I could take over the submission of this package. I was waiting for Judy to be done, which it now is. Yesterday I was going to mention that I was ready to continue working on this now, but I need to spend more time investigating the various components (miredo, miredo-server, isatapd) to figure out how to best split this package. It seems that kernels >= 2.6.24 already have built-in ISATAP support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:28:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222128.mBMLSXmq028459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 --- Comment #7 from Anthony Green 2008-12-22 16:28:32 EDT --- Closed - thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222129.mBMLT35W028510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Anthony Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:29:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222129.mBMLT4RX028534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Bug 470914 depends on bug 470913, which changed state. Bug 470913 Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222133.mBMLXjPR013077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 --- Comment #3 from Ngo Than 2008-12-22 16:33:44 EDT --- http://than.fedorapeople.org/PolicyKit-kde-0.0-0.20081219svn.fc10.src.rpm http://than.fedorapeople.org/PolicyKit-kde.spec >This library calls itself "private", is it really? If nothing should link >against it, we should not ship this symlink at all. But if it is getting linked >against, it should be in a -devel package (even if that's the only file in >-devel). >The strange thing is: shouldn't there be some public API for the client >library? Why is the only library in this package called "private"? yes, it's private. There is no public API at the moment, but it will follow later as Dario even told me. >Missing "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig >Missing "%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig it's fixed >I already mentioned this one in IRC, you said you uploaded a fixed specfile, >but it's still broken in both the specfile and the SRPM which are now it's fixed. PS: Dario will move it to extragear soon and it will follow the KDE version scheme in the future. our package will use 0.0 as version temporary, we will fix it later when PolicyKit-kde official released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222135.mBMLZvvJ030040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 16:35:56 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and close this, since Stjepan won't be the submitter and he probably doesn't want to be spammed with the review commentary from here on out. Please go ahead and open your own review ticket when you have a package ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222142.mBMLgCbo031126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-22 16:42:11 EDT --- CC'ing ajax, since he seems to have updated the package quite a bit lately. I've updated the cleaned up spec file found here : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/cdparanoia/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222143.mBMLhkpr014955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-22 16:43:45 EDT --- CVS now contains an empty "dead.package" file, so closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222150.mBMLoDhE032540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 Jaroslaw Gorny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jaroslaw.gorny at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 21:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] New: Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Summary: Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.src.rpm Description: FLTK is a cross-platform C++ GUI toolkit for UNIX?/Linux? (X11), Microsoft? Windows?, and MacOS? X. FLTK provides modern GUI functionality without the bloat and supports 3D graphics via OpenGL? and its built-in GLUT emulation. FLTK is designed to be small and modular enough to be statically linked, but works fine as a shared library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222205.mBMM5tXr019444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222202.mBMM2Jtd018579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-22 17:02:18 EDT --- > PS: Dario will move it to extragear soon and it will follow the KDE version > scheme in the future. our package will use 0.0 as version temporary, we will > fix it later when PolicyKit-kde official released. Makes sense. rpmlint now comes up with only this harmless warning: PolicyKit-kde-devel.i386: W: no-documentation I'm going to go through the checklist ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222204.mBMM4W9X002263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 Jaroslaw Gorny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222205.mBMM53eU002695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Bug 474909 depends on bug 474908, which changed state. Bug 474908 Summary: Review Request: xmms2 - A modular audio framework and plugin architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474908 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222214.mBMMEusE021174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222211.mBMMBssg020861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-22 17:11:53 EDT --- Known problems http://fltk.org/str.php?L2109 W: no-soname /usr/lib/libfltk2* -- provide SONAME for FLTK2 libs http://fltk.org/str.php?L2111 W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libfltk2.so.2.0 and perhaps http://fltk.org/str.php?L2110 E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libfltk2* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222213.mBMMDxNv004380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tgl at redhat.com) --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-22 17:13:57 EDT --- I've updated the modified spec file and patch against the latest libjpeg from CVS, still found here : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/libjpeg/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222215.mBMMFfhx004880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ajax at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222224.mBMMOkFb022734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-22 17:24:45 EDT --- That looks like the SONAME problem :( fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386 from /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libfltk2.so is needed by package fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386 (/home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386.rpm) fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386 from /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386.rpm has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libfltk2_images.so is needed by package fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386 (/home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libfltk2.so is needed by package fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386 (/home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: libfltk2_images.so is needed by package fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386 (/home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.1.r6525.fc10.i386.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222255.mBMMtwvw028971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-22 17:55:57 EDT --- Review for 46209efc4032e5c76ef176de60dc3bd6 gxmms2-0.7.0-1.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint silent on all packages. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. FIX - MUST: The License field in the package spec file does not the actual license: License field is GPLv2#, but I can't find the "or any later version" anywhere in the headers of the source. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 5419a977d75e33f201fa63f5c5d196a6 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The Package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: The package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer has tested that the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: Both packages function as described. Notes: 1. I wonder if gxmms2 should have "Requires: xmms2." 2. The "BuildRequires: gkrellm-devel" could be moved to the gkrellxmms2 subpackage 3. If you fix the license tag this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 23:03:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477698] New: Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477698 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-sk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-sk-0.20031227-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Slovak hyphenation rules as used by openoffice.org to determine the best place to automatically hyphenation Slovakian text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 23:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222359.mBMNxsib005920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 18:59:52 EDT --- Sadly no, unless you get someone else to review this package. You can't both be reviewer and maintainer of a new package. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 00:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230017.mBN0Hwvv024378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-22 19:17:56 EDT --- Does not build in rawhide, because rawhide has python-2.6, but your spec file hardcodes the python version in the %files section: %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info ^^^ To make this more flexible replace with %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py%{python_version}.egg-info and add %{!?python_version: %define python_version %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_version; print get_python_version()")} at the beginning of your spec. Another small fix: desktop-file-install will complain that the icon in the specfile is specified with file extension although it does not have an absolute path. A little sed fix for the %prep section: # small fix to avoid warning from desktop-file-install sed -i 's!mumbles.png!mumbles!' bin/mumbles.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 00:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230032.mBN0WF4E011004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-22 19:32:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maatkit Short Description: Essential command-line utilities for MySQL Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-10 My sincere apologies to Sven Lankes for not acting on this for so long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230103.mBN13EqP032354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #44 from David Kaylor 2008-12-22 20:03:10 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tasque New Branches: f-10 Owners: dkaylor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230104.mBN141m6032442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 David Kaylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:16:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:16:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230116.mBN1Gh5Y018492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 20:16:41 EDT --- Well, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored says it all in the first 2 paragraphs. Quoting from over there: - it is necessary for you to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines. - The best ways for you to illustrate your understanding of the packaging guidelines are to submit quality packages and to assist with package reviews. Prospective sponsors will want to see what reviews you have done, so go ahead and tell them when you submit your first package review request and add comments to your open review ticket with information about your activities. To cut it short: the current procedure asks for you to prove your packaging skills (in the context of Fedora rules). You can do that either by doing pre-reviews[*] of existing bugs ( http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html is a cached list of open tickets) and/or by submitting several [ new ] packages. [*]Comment #1 is an example of such a pre-review. Only sponsored people may perform formal reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230125.mBN1PUPT003146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-12-22 20:25:29 EDT --- New SRPM at . * Tue Dec 23 2008 Andreas Thienemann - 0.5.0-2 - Added explicit libtool-ltdl-devel dependency - Changed lt_ptr_t to lt_ptr in order to work around deprecated ltdl apis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230127.mBN1Rltc020083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-12-22 20:27:46 EDT --- FYI libtool changed from 1.5 to 2.0 needing mentioned changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230133.mBN1Xgos020946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 20:33:40 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:35:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:35:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230135.mBN1ZHMP004711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #50 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-12-22 20:35:15 EDT --- > Also, the package in comment #30, which seems to be the most recent one, The package may be the most recent one but the current _releases_ are librep 0.17.2: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=580 rep-gtk 0.18.3: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=581 and sawfish 1.3.5: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=32 The first two were released 2008-10-22 and sawfish on 2008-12-20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230145.mBN1jCCL006065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-22 20:45:12 EDT --- Is there any explanation of why the existing fltk package can't just be updated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 01:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230155.mBN1tIrb024192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 20:55:17 EDT --- Package imported and built ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:04:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230204.mBN24o8V025520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-22 21:04:49 EDT --- It builds fine now, but I have a couple of questions: 1. what is the purpose of : lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Dec 23 03:33 /usr/bin/netdude -> netdude0.5 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 371952 Dec 23 03:33 /usr/bin/netdude0.5 instead of simply having /usr/bin/netdude as a plain binary ? 2. Why did you choose to package the header files in the -lib rpm? Am I mistaken when I think that they should go into a separate -devel package, maybe together with the content of /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/netdude ? I think that, if you want to separate the libs in their own package (BTW, is it worth the effort/ is it needed ?), a 3 package approach similar to glibc-common/glibc/glibc-devel is more appropriate. 3. rpmlint has complains about the debuginfo package: [wolfy at wolfy ~]$ rpmlint /home/wolfy/reports/netdude/netdude-debuginfo-0.5.0-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm netdude-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/netdude-0.5.0/libltdl/.libs netdude-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/netdude-0.5.0/libltdl/.libs Should't you delete that directory as part of the cleanup process (together with the removal of static and libtool files) ? 4. "Application" is no longer a valid category according to the latest standard for desktop files. Both http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html and Packaging/Guidelines#desktop agree on that. Could you please keep in mind to fix that, please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:41:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230241.mBN2f9Cr031983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:41:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230239.mBN2dDL6031425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:39:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:40:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230240.mBN2eFQQ014998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:40:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:44:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230244.mBN2iPa1015642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:44:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:50:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477520] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Tidy - VHDL code prettifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230250.mBN2oFxB001512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:50:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230249.mBN2nWnL001045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:49:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230246.mBN2kiRk000682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:46:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230254.mBN2sVi7017676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:54:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230302.mBN326VY019534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:02:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 02:58:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230258.mBN2wGbD018539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 21:58:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Sim?= =?utf-8?q?ple_GUI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LX?= =?utf-8?q?DE?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxsession-edit - Simple GUI to configure what?s automatically started in LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Summary: Review Request: lxsession-edit - Simple GUI to configure what?s automatically started in LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-edit.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LXSession-edit is a tool to manage freedesktop.org compliant desktop session autostarts. Currently adding and removing applications from the startup list is not yet available, but it will be support in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:07:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230307.mBN37WiE020728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:07:30 EDT --- Go ahead and add the requests here (use Fedora account system accounts) and reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:15:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230315.mBN3FFqO006770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #13 from Chris St. Pierre 2008-12-22 22:15:13 EDT --- Yep, already read that, thanks. As I mentioned, I'll be working on finding sponsorship eventually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204168] Review Request: libgeda - the library needed by gEDA applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230314.mBN3EG3W021953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204168 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:14:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:19:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230319.mBN3JxcI007437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:19:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:17:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230317.mBN3HgMx022895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:17:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230323.mBN3N7TV008409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:23:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230323.mBN3Na87008514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:23:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:24:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230324.mBN3O3Ab008625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:24:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230324.mBN3OTKm024331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:24:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230326.mBN3QNOq024995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:26:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230326.mBN3QpPA009612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:26:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230328.mBN3SScj009877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:28:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230327.mBN3RI2i009714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:27:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:29:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230329.mBN3Ttp9010145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #45 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 22:29:52 EDT --- There is already a f10 branch here. Make sure you are doing 'cvs update -d' to pick up the new directory from the mass branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:40:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230340.mBN3elFF027900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-22 22:40:47 EDT --- ahem, yes, this looks pretty familiar alright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 03:47:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230347.mBN3lTNw014617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-22 22:47:28 EDT --- ok, double checked, hopefully these fltk v1 and fltk2 can be installed in parallel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 04:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230410.mBN4AiQC018873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #5 from Eric Christensen 2008-12-22 23:10:42 EDT --- - The spec file name and the SRPM name are different. FIXED - Changelog entries are still missing. IN PROGRESS (PUBLICAN BROKEN) - URL should be https://fedorahosted.org/securityguide/ FIXED - Source0 WE ARE DEVELOPING THIS DOCUMENT. - If there are no 'BuildRequires:' or 'Requires:' FIXED - Isn't this package 'BuildArch: noarch' ? YES - The license should be only 'Open Publication' FIXED (PUBLICAN BROKEN) - Your %file section seems to be unfinished ??? Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 04:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230420.mBN4K743020580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477728 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 04:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230432.mBN4WFEE022708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 23:32:14 EDT --- Thanks Jason - sorry was too busy last week to update. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Dec 23 2008 Jens Petersen - 3001.1.5-1 - update to 3001.1.5 - use bcond for doc and prof - minor tweaks for latest packaging guidelines (A little comment: this package is no longer the latest version, but 4000.0.0 seems to be too new for the current release of cabal-install - I am not quite sure how we can deal with multiple library versions inside Fedora, but it may be a problem we have to face at some point. Though hopefully the coming Haskell (library) Platform will help with this kind for basic packages like this one.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 05:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477698] Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230500.mBN50bRV010817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477698 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-23 00:00:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1017625 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 89ad655afadb78f6ceb87d9e1e3a675f hyph_sk_SK.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 05:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230518.mBN5IQbR031562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 Chris St. Pierre changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stpierre at nebrwesleyan.edu --- Comment #1 from Chris St. Pierre 2008-12-23 00:18:25 EDT --- This is not an official review. 1. When applying patch #2, patch returns: patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line While this doesn't abort the build, the patch file should be fixed to not generate this error. 2. This would fail to run with SELinux activated. You should fix the context of the CGI script, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux. Creating a drraw-selinux subpackage would probably be ideal in this case. 3. Patch #2 appears to be a bug fix. If you have filed a bug with the upstream source, you should reference this in your spec file; if not, you should file one and reference it. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 05:29:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] New: Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Summary: Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/xfconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/xfconf-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xfconf is a hierarchical (tree-like) configuration system where the immediate child nodes of the root are called "channels". All settings beneath the channel nodes are called "properties." Several things of note: This package requires libxfce4util-4.5.92 to build. There is a copy of this src.rpm in: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/libxfce4util-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint has some nasty things to say about the perl subpackage: xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod xfconf-perl.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/Xfconf.bs xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/.packlist xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/.packlist xfconf-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/Xfconf.so 0555 xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl-autogen.h xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl.h I am open to suggestion on how to clean those up. Are the .packlist files needed? Is mode 555 really bad for a perl shared module? Should I really make a perl-devel subpackage for 2 files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 06:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230604.mBN64KiX021187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Denis Leroy 2008-12-23 01:04:18 EDT --- Tibbs, thanks for the review. I'll fix the rpmlint warning and devel build issue. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnotifymm Short Description: C++ interface for libnotify Owners: denis Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 06:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230630.mBN6Uegi025221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-23 01:30:39 EDT --- Oops. I forgot to include gettext. Updated spec and src.rpm: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/xfconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/xfconf-4.5.92-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 07:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476632] Review Request: perl-Test-Compile - Check whether Perl module files compile correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230702.mBN72Yfe015386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476632 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 09:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477698] Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230915.mBN9F7C4018301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477698 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-23 04:15:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-sk Short Description: Slovak hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 09:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230946.mBN9kiYC009547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #21 from Ivana Varekova 2008-12-23 04:46:42 EDT --- Thanks. * my rpmlint was silent - so I don't fix the first point, * %preun script changed * %clean part changed * configure definition removed (can't find any reason to have it there) (gmp-4.2.4-4.fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 09:48:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230948.mBN9mqUS009713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #49 from Adam Huffman 2008-12-23 04:48:48 EDT --- Nearly there on the new XML format - should have time to finish it over the holidays. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 10:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231004.mBNA4VOW012584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 10:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231024.mBNAOONl030448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-23 05:24:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I separated the desktop and mime xml files off into their own files. I'm not > sure why, it just makes them harder to review. Because all changes should go upstream... http://code.google.com/p/clamz/issues/detail?id=5 http://code.google.com/p/clamz/issues/detail?id=6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 10:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] New: Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Summary: Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/ogmtools.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/ogmtools-1.5-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: These tools allow information about (ogminfo) or extraction from (ogmdemux) or creation of (ogmmerge) OGG media streams. Note that OGM is used for "OGG media streams". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 10:26:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231026.mBNAQr4Y016722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-12-23 05:26:51 EDT --- New SRPM at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/netdude-0.5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm 1. Fixed 2. From memory now: The header files as well as the .so shared objects are plugins into the netdude editor. IIRC the netdude editor is using the .h files during runtime. Packaging them into a -devel package did therefore not make much sense to me. 3. Fixed 4. Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 10:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231054.mBNAsUgs003272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2008-12-23 05:54:29 EDT --- Please note this used to be out of Fedora due to its libdvdread dependency. Spec tool adapted from freshrpms one; rpmlint is silent, apart from: ogmtools.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ogmtools-1.5/ChangeLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 12:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231201.mBNC113Y014820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-23 07:01:00 EDT --- nload-0.7.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nload-0.7.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 11:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231159.mBNBxsVR014374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-23 06:59:53 EDT --- nload-0.7.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nload-0.7.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 12:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231223.mBNCNg4I004212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #6 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-23 07:23:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Is there any explanation of why the existing fltk package can't just be > updated? * FLTK2 - is unstable, fast moving target - long way to stabilization - come concerns on its future, because of FLTK1.3 line now having some FLTK2 features and is considered being merge of FLTK1+2 * FLTK1 - only bug-fixes - stable API Upgrading FLTK to version 2 means breakage of API/ABI and also regressions: """ However, the momentum of the FLTK-1.1.x development meant that there are many bug-fixes in 1.1.x that are not available in 2.0. """ see: http://fltk.org/articles.php?L825+I0+TFAQ+P1+Q -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 12:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231234.mBNCY3PR006053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-23 07:34:02 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 1ca682571554c7704f4c09398b74529d OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field GPLv2 matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is ok: xfconf-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets ok. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod I'm not sure what to do with this file. I have on my computer in perllocal.pod only log from modules installed in /usr/local. So probably you should remove this file from your package. xfconf-perl.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/Xfconf.bs If it's config file, you should mark it like config. xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/.packlist xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/.packlist You should add into spec the same line as Perl packages have: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; xfconf-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/Xfconf.so 0555 The other perl *.so have permission 0755. xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl-autogen.h xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl.h In guidelines are no exception. You should create devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 12:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231256.mBNCu6gu024856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-23 07:56:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl-autogen.h > xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl.h > In guidelines are no exception. You should create devel package. perl has this exception: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#.h_files_in_module_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 13:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231320.mBNDK8uI030433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-12-23 08:20:07 EDT --- I forgot mention that you need review for libxfce4util-4.5.92 first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 13:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231358.mBNDwFrb005282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #35 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-23 08:58:12 EDT --- Hello, sorry for the delay in responding, but I was working in another city these days and am still without access to a PC. Day 24 I will be back. I've made some changes in the .spec file according to your suggestions and rebuild the SRPM. spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/4/bkchem.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.5/4/bkchem-0.12.5-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 14:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] New: Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Summary: Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/wordxtr/wordxtr.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/wordxtr/wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package will help you to create hunspell dictionary for given input language and plain text unicode data files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 15:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231505.mBNF5WGa017710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-23 10:05:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327755) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327755) failed build in F-10 for netdude-0.5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 15:02:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231502.mBNF2nVH017127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-23 10:02:48 EDT --- Houston, we've got a problem. When I tried to create a filter, netdude crashed with: [root at pc37 ~]# netdude reading from file -, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet) netdude: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/netdude/0.5/plugins/nd_bpf.so: undefined symbol: libnd_bpf_new [root at pc37 ~]# ls /usr/lib/netdude/0.5/plugins/ nd_bpf.so nd_cksumfix.so [root at pc37 ~]# rpm -qa libpca\* \*netd\* libnetdude-0.11-1.fc11.i386 libpcap-0.9.8-3.fc10.i386 libpcapnav-0.8-1.fc11.i386 netdude-0.5.0-2.fc11.i386 netdude-libs-0.5.0-2.fc11.i386 [root at pc37 ~]# uname -a Linux pc37 2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Nov 10 15:51:55 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux OTOH, your latest src.rpm cannot be built for F-10. I am attaching the failed build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 15:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231526.mBNFQxq0021858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-23 10:26:58 EDT --- I: Testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 15:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231527.mBNFRfPK006804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-12-23 10:27:40 EDT --- Ignore this comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 15:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231530.mBNFUKAe007506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-23 10:30:19 EDT --- Well, given that, surely you anticipated the followup question: If there's concern for its future, and it's that unstable and buggy, why do we want it in Fedora in the first place? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231632.mBNGWFol000474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #7 from Kashif Ahmad Khan 2008-12-23 11:32:14 EDT --- Well i just moved this package to rpmfusion.. Now let's see what they have got to say about it .... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:30:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:30:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231630.mBNGUpee032696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-23 11:30:50 EDT --- Thanks, I'll have a look and merge if so. Good to know you're involve in. Package Request ================== Package names: kBuild Description: A cross-platform build environment Owners: lkundrak, laxathom Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:35:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231635.mBNGZD5X001085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 --- Comment #11 from John Anderson 2008-12-23 11:35:12 EDT --- Thanks again for your help, Chris. Here it is with your fixes from #10. It builds in mock against rawhide for me. http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/mumbles-0.4-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231643.mBNGhtni002505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-23 11:43:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qlandkarte New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:53:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231653.mBNGrZ4I020676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231653.mBNGrAK1020602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231657.mBNGvpJ1021476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 16:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231657.mBNGvQdp004976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 17:03:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231703.mBNH3ZQ6005905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-23 12:03:34 EDT --- Hey Marcela. Thank you for the quick review! >I forgot mention that you need review for libxfce4util-4.5.92 first. libxfce4util is already in fedora, it's just that this package needs the version from the Xfce 4.6 beta2 release. I am planning on updating it in rawhide, but wanted to get the new packages reviewed first so I can push all of 4.6b2 out the same day to avoid broken deps. >xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file >/usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod >I'm not sure what to do with this file. I have on my computer in perllocal.pod >only log from modules installed in /usr/local. So probably you should remove >this file from your package. Yes, I will remove it. >xfconf-perl.x86_64: E: zero-length >/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/Xfconf.bs >If it's config file, you should mark it like config. Some more digging around and it seems this is a dynloader bootstrap file. It's not needed if it's 0 length. http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=728926 I will remove it. >xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir >/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/.packlist >xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file >/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/.packlist >You should add into spec the same line as Perl packages have: >find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; Done. >xfconf-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm >/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Xfce4/Xfconf/Xfconf.so >0555 >The other perl *.so have permission 0755. ok. Changed to 0755. >xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package >/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl-autogen.h >xfconf-perl.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package >/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Xfce4/Xfconf/Install/xfconfperl.h >In guidelines are no exception. You should create devel package. >perl has this exception: >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#.h_files_in_module_packages Thanks for spotting that Mamoru. So, I will leave these .h files and not make a devel subpackage here. new spec and src.rpm: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/xfconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/xfconf-4.5.92-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 18:10:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:10:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231810.mBNIApsX001627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #16 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-12-23 13:10:49 EDT --- Are there any progress in clarifying legal status of this package? May be need to ask at fedora-legal list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 18:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231847.mBNIlCfm008392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Jan Kratochvil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.kratochvil at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil 2008-12-23 13:47:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This is my first package, and so I need a sponsor :-) Please check the list of sponsors as described on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored You may also want to mail . With the .spec file I find there these issues: # Don't want the source rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/src (1) It has no effect as /usr/src/debug is created _after_ all the %install commands. (2) /usr/src/debug should be present for valid debuginfo package, I do not know why you would like to delete it at all. This argument has any effect? Could you make a comment there, please? MAKEINFO=`which makeinfo` IMO this your change was unnecessary, the single line does the some: -%{_prefix}/%{target} +%dir %{_prefix}/%{target} +%dir %{_prefix}/%{target}/lib +%dir %{_prefix}/%{target}/lib/ldscripts +%dir %{_prefix}/%{target}/bin + +%{_prefix}/%{target}/lib/ldscripts/* +%{_prefix}/%{target}/bin/* This is missing there: # these are for win targets only rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/%{target}-{dlltool,nlmconv,windres}.1 `rm' commands there miss `-f' which is IMO recommended in general. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 18:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231853.mBNIrgZk009560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-23 13:53:41 EDT --- My advice would be to simply not attempt multiple library versions. If you find yourself in a case where you have to maintain something backrevved, you're already lost to a certain degree. This package looks fine to me. rpmlint says: ghc-HTTP.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/HTTP-3001.1.5/libHSHTTP-3001.1.5.a ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/HTTP-3001.1.5/libHSHTTP-3001.1.5_p.a which are all normal for Haskell packages. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e34d9f979bafbbf2e45bf90a9ee9bfd291f3c67c291a250cc0a6378431578aeb HTTP-3001.1.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-HTTP-devel = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.10.1 ghc-HTTP-prof-3001.1.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-HTTP-prof = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP-prof(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 = ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-prof = 6.10.1 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 19:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231913.mBNJDQqe029298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #57 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-23 14:13:21 EDT --- Please find a new srpm here: http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/synopsis-0.11-3.fc9.src.rpm and the associated spec file: http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/synopsis.spec Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 19:30:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812231930.mBNJUYb5000324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 20:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232018.mBNKIV1Q009958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #39 from Till Maas 2008-12-23 15:18:26 EDT --- %preun and %post use undefined macros: %ghc_postinst_script instead of %ghc_register_pkg %ghc_preun_script instead of if [ "$1" -eq 0 ] ; then %ghc_unregister_pkg fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 20:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232018.mBNKIbgC010003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-23 15:18:34 EDT --- Whoops, forgot this one. Package change Request ======================= Package Name: maatkit Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 20:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232022.mBNKMeAc027682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #40 from Till Maas 2008-12-23 15:22:39 EDT --- Also there is a changelog entry missing for 1.4.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 20:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232049.mBNKn66L016079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Comment #31 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-23 15:49:05 EDT --- Package Request ================== Package names: kBuild Description: A cross-platform build environment Owners: lkundrak, laxathom Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 (Removing EOL-ed F-8, adding EPEL-5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 21:26:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232126.mBNLQhOt010075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |needinfo?(edouard.bourguign | |on at oxalya.com) --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-12-23 16:26:41 EDT --- Edouard, I've seen you still haven't created an account in the Fedora Account System yet. Without it, nobody is going to review this package for you and approve sponsorship. Instructions to create an account can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account If you don't want to be a package maintainer in Fedora any more, please let us know. I'm interested in maintaining this package if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 22:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462311] Review Request: raidutils - Utilities to manage Adaptec I2O compliant RAID controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232204.mBNM4WLN017630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462311 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslaw Gorny 2008-12-23 17:04:31 EDT --- I've reviewed requested package although I'm not a member of 'packager' group. It builds correctly and does all the items market as 'MUST' on Review Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 22:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232214.mBNMEu9Z019628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Shevchuk 2008-12-23 17:14:55 EDT --- RPMs built for Fedora 9 and 10, i386 and x86_64, with yum repodata: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 22:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] New: Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Summary: Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/gsql.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/gsql/10/x86_64/gsql-0.2.1-1.fc10/gsql-0.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The mission of GSQL opensource project is to supply database developers with an universal tool platform tailored against market leading DBMS by providing: * native DBMS access (not via ODBC layer) * databased objects organised into a tree * intuitive and easy database objects handling * syntax highlighting * query plan builder * query constructor * query result export (in XML, CSV, HTML) * debugger (depending on RDBMS) * query planner control (depending on RDBMS) * database administration functions * database system monitoring * GNOME integration (via gconf and gnome-keyring) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 22:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469265] Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232224.mBNMOMUt003786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Rafa? Psota changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rafa? Psota 2008-12-23 17:24:21 EDT --- - package builds in mock on all supported architectures (scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1019252 ) - rpmlint is silent - source file match upstream - package meets naming and packaging guidelines - not a GUI app - no headers/pkgconfig files/libtool archives - no duplicates in %files - etc. ;) Looks fine so this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 22:29:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232229.mBNMT0Mp004476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-23 17:28:57 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-twisted-words New Branches: EL-5 Owners: thomasvs The EL-5 branch has been requested in bug #454919 because not having it is blocking bug #454920. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 22:45:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232245.mBNMj05U007122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-23 17:44:57 EDT --- Since we're still early in the Fedora 11 release cycle, and since I think the impact will be minor (and even possibly positive), I've pushed twisted 8 packages to devel (see bug #450227). I've also slightly updated my web2 package, which can be found at the same location. So it should now be possible to fully test things on devel. Michal : Could you have another look at my latest package? http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/python-twisted-web2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 23:29:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232329.mBNNTHrm015198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-23 18:29:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > If there's concern for its future, and it's that unstable and buggy, why do we > want it in Fedora in the first place? There's a concern from my POV on FLTK2's *short*-term future w.r.t. its API/ABI stability, because it's released thru snapshots only but that's something we don't care much, OpenSSL used to break ABI every its second release. Rapidly changing library might be a problem for Fedora in case we have a lot of FLTK2-dependent apps, which we don't have; Dillo2 should be the first and most demanded one. >From my experience with Dillo2, FLTK2 behaves quite nice, I wouldn't say it's unstable w.r.t core library (on API/ABI I have elaborated already) & buggy -- it's supported upstream (read its "FLTK 2.0.x Weekly Snapshot" reports). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 23:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812232354.mBNNsSE5019324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 Andrea Francia changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) --- Comment #29 from Andrea Francia 2008-12-23 18:54:24 EDT --- I prepared the next release, you can see it at: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/trash-cli/0.2.1.dev-r82 Instruction for building the rpm: $ wget http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/trash-cli/trash-cli-0.2.1.dev-r82.tar.gz $ tar xvfz trash-cli-0.2.1.dev-r82.tar.gz $ cd trash-cli-0.2.1.dev-r82/ $ python setup.py bdist_rpm $ ls dist/trash-cli-0.2.1.dev*.rpm dist/trash-cli-0.2.1.dev_r82-1.noarch.rpm dist/trash-cli-0.2.1.dev_r82-1.src.rpm Running unit test: $ nosetests ...................................................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 54 tests in 1.250s OK Running command test: WARNING: these test will wipe-out your trashcan $ cd command-test $ bash mount-test-volume.sh [sudo] password for andrea: $ bash trash-file-test.bash # # Test report # tests passed: 132 tests failed: 0 tests total: 132 success rate: 100% $ sudo umount test-volume [sudo] password for andrea: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 00:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240018.mBO0I8pY023227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2008-12-23 19:18:07 EDT --- MUST Items: + rpmlint output OK (see comment #4) + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: ! License is listed as GPLv2+, should list "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" because the client library is LGPLv2+, otherwise OK + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + the only relevant documentation is COPYING, included as %doc + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used (%cmake_kde4 macro) + debuginfo package is valid + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no .desktop files needed: the only executable is polkit-kde-authorization and its functionality is available through systemsettings + ... and thus no desktop-file-install needed either + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + COPYING packaged as %doc + source compares identical to export of revision 898968 from upstream SVN + builds on at least one arch (F9 i386 mock) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BuildRequires (builds in mock) + no translations, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + ldconfig correctly called in %post and %postun + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions correct, defattr used correctly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + no %doc files required at runtime + no header files which would need to be in the -devel subpackage + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + devel symlinks correctly in the -devel subpackage + plugin (KCM) in %{_kde4_libdir}/kde4/ is correctly NOT in a -devel subpackage + -devel package has "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" + no .la files + no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream + package builds in mock (F9 i386) + passes basic functionality test (polkit-kde-authorization resp. the KCM look OK, service not tested yet) + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies Questions (non-blockers): * Should polkit-kde-authorization appear in the menu as a standalone app or is it enough to have it in systemsettings? (IMHO the latter, but there _is_ a standalone executable provided by upstream.) * Do we really want to ship a -devel package right now when there are no installed headers yet? (Not that it will matter in the long term as a public API is planned.) This package is APPROVED. Please clarify the License tag from "GPLv2+" to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" before, during or after import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 01:35:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240135.mBO1ZbBm020752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #6 from Eric Christensen 2008-12-23 20:35:36 EDT --- Latest version... Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 02:23:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240223.mBO2NFdc028105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2008-12-23 21:23:13 EDT --- commits/tags/builds done, submitted to bodhi as newpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 03:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477839] New: Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Summary: Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libxfce4menu/libxfce4menu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libxfce4menu/libxfce4menu-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: libxfce4menu is a freedesktop.org compliant menu library written for Xfce. It implements the Desktop Menu Specification version 1.0 NOTE: This package is part of the upcoming Xfce 4.6. It needs the 4.5.92 version of libxfce4util, a src.rpm of which can be found at: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/libxfce4menu/libxfce4util-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint has no output for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 04:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240427.mBO4RrYk018223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-23 23:27:51 EDT --- 1)I see latest upstream release is 3.0.1 you can build new package in rawhide. 2) you can include ChangeLog and COPYING by adding mv COPYING ChangeLog doc/ to %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 05:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240538.mBO5c9gv013011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 00:38:08 EDT --- rpmlint on binary rpm gave mlocate.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/mlocate slocate A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users. mlocate.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mlocate 0750 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. mlocate.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/bin/locate slocate A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users. mlocate.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/locate slocate 02711 The file is setgid. Usually this is a packaging bug. If this is a game, then, you should use the proper rpm group, or location. mlocate.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/locate 02711 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. mlocate.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/locate 02711 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. ==> I guess above are ok for this package. mlocate.i386: W: spurious-bracket-in-%post The %post scriptlet contains an "if []" construct without a space before the "]". == > Not sure if this fix is really required here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 05:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240546.mBO5k1h8030779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 05:45:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240545.mBO5jMmq014183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 00:45:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327789) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327789) Cleanup suggested following packaging guidelines Following changes are done in patch 1)For group creation here is guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups 2)Added macros as per given at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros#Macros_mimicking_autoconf_variables 3) preserve timestamp http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 06:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225894] Merge Review: icon-naming-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240608.mBO689hp001612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225894 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 01:08:08 EDT --- 1) rpmlint output on SRPM and RPM icon-naming-utils.src: I: checking icon-naming-utils.src: W: no-%prep-section icon-naming-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 4) icon-naming-utils.noarch: I: checking icon-naming-utils.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/icon-naming-utils.pc ==> All Looks Ok Though it looks bit odd to see icon-naming-utils.pc installed by this package. 2) License looks GPLv2 not GPL+ 3) you can preserve timestamps using make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 06:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240615.mBO6FcWj002979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-24 01:15:37 EDT --- Er, sorry, I guess the setuptools line is only if it's an egg. If that's the case, keep it and add a BR on python-setuptools. If not, get rid of it. Other than that, looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 06:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240616.mBO6GSWv019211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 06:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240627.mBO6RUX6020770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Lev Shamardin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lev Shamardin 2008-12-24 01:27:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mitter Short Description: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter Owners: abbot Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 07:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240725.mBO7PfOq029631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Edouard Bourguignon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(edouard.bourguign | |on at oxalya.com) | --- Comment #5 from Edouard Bourguignon 2008-12-24 02:25:40 EDT --- I already do have an account, my login is "madko". I'm just trying to log in but it says that my password has expired so i'm waiting for the reset password email... I guess you don't find my account because i haven't filled any details on it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 07:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225896] Merge Review: icu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812240733.mBO7XDFX014394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225896 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 02:33:12 EDT --- 1)rpmlint on SRPM gave icu.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: icu-config icu.src: W: strange-permission icu-config 0775 2) rpmlint on binary rpm is NOT silent libicu.i386: W: no-documentation libicu.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libicutu.so.40.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 libicu.i386: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40.0 libicu-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Also, after installing libicu rpmlint output changes to libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicule.so.40.0 /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicule.so.40.0 /lib/libpthread.so.0 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicule.so.40.0 /lib/libm.so.6 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicuio.so.40.0 /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicuio.so.40.0 /lib/libpthread.so.0 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicuio.so.40.0 /lib/libm.so.6 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libiculx.so.40.0 /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libiculx.so.40.0 /lib/libpthread.so.0 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libiculx.so.40.0 /lib/libm.so.6 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicui18n.so.40.0 /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicui18n.so.40.0 /lib/libpthread.so.0 libicu.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libicutu.so.40.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicutu.so.40.0 /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40 libicu.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libicutu.so.40.0 /lib/libm.so.6 libicu.i386: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/libicudata.so.40.0 ==> Can this be fixed?? 3) What is use of following directory? /usr/lib/icu/4.0/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 09:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 04:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] New: Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 Summary: Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yersinia.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yersinia-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: ttp://www.yersinia.net/ Description: Yersinia is a network tool designed to take advantage of some weakeness in different network protocols. It pretends to be a solid framework for analyzing and testing the deployed networks and systems. Currently, there are some network protocols implemented, but others are coming (tell us which one is your preferred). Attacks for the following network protocols are implemented (but of course you are free for implementing new ones): * Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) * Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) * Dynamic Trunking Protocol (DTP) * Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) * Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) * IEEE 802.1Q and IEEE 802.1X * Inter-Switch Link Protocol (ISL) * VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020348 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint yersinia* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint yersinia* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 10:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241015.mBOAFvWO010290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-24 05:15:56 EDT --- Nice to see yersinia in Fedora. Please make sure that the mandatory compiler flags are used, for the moment the following set is used: gcc `/usr/bin/libnet-config --defines` -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\""/usr/share"\" -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr//locale"\" -I. -I. - I. -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/ glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -O3 -Wall -g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 10:59:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241059.mBOAxnnC002205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #6 from Edouard Bourguignon 2008-12-24 05:59:47 EDT --- I can't change my password: ---------------------------- 500 Internal error The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. ---------------------------- from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/setnewpass/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 12:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241259.mBOCx1oA007453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 07:58:59 EDT --- grib_api-1.6.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 14:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477867] New: Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Perlilog.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perlilog is a command-line tool which generates Verilog modules from a set of files, which come in several other formats. It was originally designed to integrate Verilog IP cores. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 14:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] New: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module defines the complete grammar needed to parse any Verilog code. By overloading this grammar, it is possible to easily create perl scripts which run through Verilog code and perform specific functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241501.mBOF1wrt016637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 10:01:57 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241502.mBOF22gL031743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 10:02:02 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241502.mBOF2lg8016835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-12-24 10:02:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-imdb Short Description: Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database Owners: sindrepb Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:19:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241519.mBOFJo9n002201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.eclipse.org/mode | |ling/emf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] New: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I want to un-retire then Eclipse EMF package so we can get webtools and datatools and other nice goodies into Fedora. It's effectively a new package though since the eclipse-emf directory in CVS is empty and it hasn't been in the last few releases of Fedora. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-2.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) allows developers to build tools and other applications based on a structured data model. From a model specification described in XMI, EMF provides tools and runtime support to produce a set of Java classes for the model, along with a set of adapter classes that enable viewing and command-based editing of the model, and a basic editor. Notes: - Because of changes to Eclipse between F9 and F10, this package will probably only build on F10+. - AOT compilation is disabled due to bug #477707. - The patches included in this package are to get it to build in our environment (mostly to do with javadoc generation), no actual code has been changed from upstream. - It's probably also worth discussing the fact that the SDO sub-packages will disappear in the next major release, which will be for the Eclipse 3.5 coordinated release. I thought about maybe bundling SDO into the main EMF packages so that no-one ends up depending on a package that will be retired next year. (Or perhaps not packaging it at all for this release.) I'd be grateful for thoughts and opinions on this. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] New: Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Summary: Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-ModelSim-List.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides a class named ModelSim::List with which the EDA tester can easily check in the signals contained in the files generated by ModelSim's "write list" command in a programming manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241533.mBOFXAPd004768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-24 10:33:07 EDT --- Sorry Kevin you haven't created the EL-5 branch for geda-gattrib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 15:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241546.mBOFkdx0007183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |445149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 16:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241604.mBOG4Is2010221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 16:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241604.mBOG43sa010174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 16:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241619.mBOGJ8oh012831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 11:19:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020618 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0b77b008d2cd6df14d5486289f28ab80 ModelSim-List-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=287, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.26 CPU) + Package perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(ModelSim::List) = 0.06 Requires: perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions:- 1) Following is not needed in spec BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.004 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 16:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241628.mBOGSNhA031538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-24 11:28:22 EDT --- There is no need for Requires: xmms2, it pulls in dependencies on the xmms2 libraries. I moved the BR (although, it really makes no difference) and fixed the license tag in -2. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gxmms2 Short Description: A graphical audio player Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and the cvs is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 16:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241648.mBOGmL5X002301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 11:48:20 EDT --- + Ok - Need Work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020601 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4bdf2c5636bdc217428398eea68e44bc Perlilog-0.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. - duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs ok 1 It looks like everything is working fine! + Package perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(PL_const) perl(PL_hardroot) perl(PL_settable) perl(Perlilog) = 0.3 perl(Perlilog::PLerror) perl(UNIVERSAL) Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(Exporter) perl(Perlilog::PLerror) perl(strict) Suggestions: 1) remove following line from %files in spec %{perl_vendorlib}/* This will make sure to avoid duplicate files installation APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 16:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:49:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241649.mBOGnZkM002392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-24 11:49:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build= >http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020609 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 13e484832847e133675160862b43d933 Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs 1..1 ok 1 + Package perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(Hardware::Verilog::Hierarchy) = 0.03 perl(Hardware::Verilog::Parser) = 0.13 perl(Hardware::Verilog::StdLogic) = 0.03 perl(Parse::RecDescent::PrecompiledParser) perl(PrecompiledParser) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl >= 1:5 perl(Benchmark) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Hardware::Verilog::Hierarchy) perl(Hardware::Verilog::Parser) perl(Hardware::Verilog::StdLogic) perl(Parse::RecDescent) perl(PrecompiledParser) perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestions:- 1) I think this package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/Hardware/ also. ==> Can be fixed by mkdir in %install as mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_vendorlib}/Hardware APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:06:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475032] Review Request: gnaural - A multi-platform programmable binaural-beat generator. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241806.mBOI6Q0A028727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475032 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-24 13:06:24 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean xx - does not follow Naming Guidelines + Looking at the upstream release announcement, it looks like 1.0.20080808 should be the value of the version tag, although they say that the 1.0 release is "a stable snapshot of the beta Gnaural2". Ubuntu has also chosen to include the date in the version tag and not in the release tag. OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package meets Packaging Guidelines + The description is too verbose. Apart from the first sentence, the content mainly describes the surrounding research and not Gnaural itself. + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 'install -p' should be used to preserve timestamps. + Instead of putting gnaural-icon.png in /usr/share/pixmaps you could consider putting it in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps and add 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme'. If you do so, then you should use the necessary post and postun scriptlets from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache gnaural-icon.xpm is a better candidate for /usr/share/pixmaps. OK - Fedora approved license and meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed xx - redundant and extra build dependencies listed + pkgconfig is brought in by all the -devel packages providing *.pc files OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives xx - %{name}.desktop file is not properly installed + If the package installs a .desktop file, then desktop-file-install must be run. In this case mv can not be used. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Icon_tag_in_Desktop_Files it is better to use only 'gnaural-icon' as the value for the Icon tag in order to support theming. OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] New: Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-nokogiri/rubygem-nokogiri.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-nokogiri/rubygem-nokogiri-1.1.0-1.fc.src.rpm Koji scratch build - For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020864 - For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020868 Description: Nokogiri parses and searches XML/HTML very quickly, and also has correctly implemented CSS3 selector support as well as XPath support. Nokogiri also features an Hpricot compatibility layer to help ease the change to using correct CSS and XPath. Note: This RubyGem based rpm creates arch-dependent binary rpms. The following guideline [1] was approved by FPC/FESCo [2][3] and should be applied to this package. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RubyGem_with_C_code_spot [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081209 [3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg02221.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241841.mBOIfQoP001836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:41:26 EDT --- grib_api-1.6.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241839.mBOIdVkt001021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:39:30 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc10, qzion-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:39:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241839.mBOIdaaZ001055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 477223 depends on bug 477221, which changed state. Bug 477221 Summary: Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:38:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477883] Review Request: rubygem-nokogiri - An HTML, XML, SAX, and Reader parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241838.mBOIcaM7017834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477883 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477533 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241839.mBOIdSq9018011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:39:27 EDT --- qedje-0.3.0-2.fc10, qzion-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241839.mBOIdY2F018045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:38:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241838.mBOIcZRm017808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477883 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-24 13:38:34 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mechanize/rubygem-mechanize.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mechanize/rubygem-mechanize-0.9.0-1.fc.src.rpm * Thu Dec 25 2008 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.9.0-1 - 0.9.0 - Dependency changed: hpricot -> nokogiri -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241840.mBOIeB4j018425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:40:09 EDT --- sugar-speak-9-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-speak'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11788 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241842.mBOIgWxt002300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-24 13:42:31 EDT --- koji scratch build: - For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020855 - For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1020856 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:45:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241845.mBOIju6E003445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:45:55 EDT --- pen-0.18.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241845.mBOIjmQP003400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:45:47 EDT --- nload-0.7.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update nload'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241845.mBOIjxIM020509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241843.mBOIhxO7019729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-24 13:43:57 EDT --- I've updated the spec and package available at the above address to include a quick patch and requirements in order to avoid using the internal forked python code/projects and use the code already available in Fedora packages instead. Luke : If you could review those changes if you are still interested in being the package maintainer, that would be great (I haven't tested more than a rebuild). Note also that while looking into this, I've seen that the "mechanize" available in Fedora also/already includes a fork of BeautifulSoup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:50:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241850.mBOIogF5004895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241848.mBOImH7i004288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:48:16 EDT --- nload-0.7.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nload'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477885] New: Package Request for eperiodic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Request for eperiodic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477885 Summary: Package Request for eperiodic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-en/PeriodicTableForEmac s OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jens.uwe at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Please provide a package for the eperiodic emacs table of elements for those who are affiliated with emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477886] New: Gwyddion package request Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Gwyddion package request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477886 Summary: Gwyddion package request Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://gwyddion.net/download.php OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jens.uwe at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Please provide a gwyddion package with Fedora. The RPMs can easily build from the sources as provided on the URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 19:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225772] Merge Review: frysk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241912.mBOJCa7R008264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225772 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew.cagney at gmail.com Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-24 14:12:34 EDT --- And now it's back in the distro. I can find no other review information, so it will need to be reviewed (and probably should have been reviewed before being readded). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 19:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241956.mBOJuQL0031565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 14:56:24 EDT --- stun-0.96-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stun-0.96-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 19:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241957.mBOJvSJm031688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 14:57:28 EDT --- stun-0.96-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stun-0.96-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 22:45:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812242245.mBOMj2MZ004835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #39 from Michal Nowak 2008-12-24 17:44:57 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm * Wed Dec 24 2008 Michal Nowak 3.1-2 - minor SPEC-file changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 22:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812242247.mBOMl1pD005260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 23:46:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:46:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812242346.mBONkH9t013584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 23:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812242346.mBONkGvW013552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on| |250533 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-24 18:46:14 EDT --- Hmmm, I think python-olpcgames is needed for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475141] Review Request: python-imdb - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250030.mBP0UxrM019499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475141 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:30:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477698] Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250036.mBP0aTVI005326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477698 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:36:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:32:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250032.mBP0WQN9004597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:32:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250035.mBP0Zer6005147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:35:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250037.mBP0bTmb020312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:37:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250042.mBP0gNIu021050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:42:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250044.mBP0i83U021179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:44:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250043.mBP0hHu3006230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:43:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 00:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250044.mBP0ivDn006354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-24 19:44:55 EDT --- Sorry, it was done in pkgdb, but for some reason didn't setup right on cvs. Try now? I think I have it fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 03:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250314.mBP3ESDq010306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 22:14:27 EDT --- gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 03:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250314.mBP3EPGS010277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 22:14:25 EDT --- gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 09:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476936] Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250936.mBP9a5IO019801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476936 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-25 04:36:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hello Short Description: Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 09:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250935.mBP9ZW33019645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-25 04:35:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-cvxopt Short Description: A Python Package for Convex Optimization Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 09:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476936] Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250937.mBP9bWow002671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476936 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 11:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 06:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251132.mBPBWJpO006882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-25 06:32:18 EDT --- thanks it's fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 13:05:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251305.mBPD5Lwg006179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-25 08:05:20 EDT --- mitter-0.4.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mitter-0.4.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 13:03:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 08:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251303.mBPD3ooF005583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-25 08:03:49 EDT --- mitter-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mitter-0.4.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 14:39:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251439.mBPEdBrB007684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedoration at kayari.org --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely 2008-12-25 09:39:06 EDT --- Isn't there also a naming conflict with https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ace ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 14:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 09:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251459.mBPExpWT025991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #33 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-25 09:59:48 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks to Parag, Till, Xavier and Kevin. Xavier: Please add me to Cc when you'll add a review request for VirtualBox in RPM Fusion. I'd eventually gladly review it, so you can assign it to me right away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 15:17:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251517.mBPFHHLX014196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-25 10:17:16 EDT --- ace maintainer seems happy with renaming ace: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg00039.html By the way the current blocker for this review request is about licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 17:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 12:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477886] Gwyddion package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251746.mBPHkgsn003361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477886 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-25 12:46:41 EDT --- I don't see a package for review here, so this should not be in the package review queue. We don't accept package requests without someone actually stepping up to maintain the package. You are welcome to add your request to the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 18:07:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 13:07:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477885] Package Request for eperiodic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812251807.mBPI7EkK006678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477885 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-25 13:07:13 EDT --- Please add your package requests to the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList. This is not the appropriate place to submit requests which are not accompanied by both a working package and a willing package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 21:51:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812252151.mBPLpV6F007445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-12-25 16:51:29 EDT --- Blocking against FE-Legal on advice from Red Hat Legal counsel. I'll get more information after the holiday break. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 23:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477698] Review Request: hyphen-sk - Slovak hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812252316.mBPNGaGE020577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477698 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 23:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812252355.mBPNtZmA026006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-25 18:55:33 EDT --- Why is %_fontconfig_templatedir changed from %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.avail to %{_datadir}/fontconfig/conf.avail ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 04:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225908] Merge Review: iptstate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260429.mBQ4T3On014872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225908 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-25 23:29:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327852) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327852) spec cleanup for merge-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 04:26:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225908] Merge Review: iptstate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260426.mBQ4Qiko014739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225908 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 07:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260700.mBQ703KX003373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 07:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260749.mBQ7nGSU009647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #58 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 02:49:13 EDT --- Almost godd, however the newest rpms shows one rpmlint: synopsis.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libSynopsis.so.0.11 exit at GLIBC_2.0 Usually a shared library should not call exit() in the library ($ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit for details). Would you check this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 07:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260752.mBQ7qOSv027288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 02:52:20 EDT --- To Terje: Would you check the latest srpm by Henrique? It looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 07:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:52:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260752.mBQ7qnwP010281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: BkChem - |Review Request: bkchem - |Chemical drawing program |Chemical drawing program -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 07:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260756.mBQ7uN2q010948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 02:56:22 EDT --- I will review this. Instead I would appreciate it if you would review my review request for rubygem-nokogiri (bug 477883) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 08:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260808.mBQ88C1h012879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 03:08:11 EDT --- I will review this. Instead I would appreciate it if you would review my review request for rubygem-hpricot (bug 477526) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 08:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477948] New: Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Summary: Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kagesenshi.87 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/simple-ccsm/simple-ccsm.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/simple-ccsm/simple-ccsm-0.7.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains a simplified gui configuration tool to configure Compiz plugins and the composite window manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 08:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477949] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexey.radkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hlterm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/hlterm/perl-Term-Highlight.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hlterm/perl-Term-Highlight-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror= Description: Term::Highlight is a Perl module which can be used to highlight unlimited number of specified patterns with different colors using terminal color escape sequences. Term::Highlight supports 256 and 8 colors capable terminals. The package is shipped with full-featured script 'hl' which can also be used as grep-like engine. You can use hl just to learn perl regular expressions! This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260902.mBQ92ODq020383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Alexey Radkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260907.mBQ977Xp021527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Bug 459989 depends on bug 473814, which changed state. Bug 473814 Summary: rpm's pkgconfig auto provides is broken (fix included) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473814 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260923.mBQ9NTEI024229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-26 04:23:28 EDT --- This package was reviewed during an active conversion via IRC, so I must mention that the problems mentioned inside were fixed in real time Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: wordxtr.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Create hunspell dictionary from given plain text input data files. wordxtr.src: E: description-line-too-long This package will help you to create hunspell dictionary for given input language => fixed in next release binary RPM: wordxtr.noarch: E: devel-dependency hunspell-devel => this is needed as such (for the wordlist2hunspell provided by hunspell-devel) wordxtr.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Create hunspell dictionary from given plain text input data files. wordxtr.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This package will help you to create hunspell dictionary for given input language => fixed in next release [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: ce5a9692f6357648a1de6856d34edb21ad77d168 wordxtr-0.0.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [!] Final provides and requires are sane. * Duplicate BuildRequires: python-devel (by python-setuptools) => also fixed in next release === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested but as it is a simple python script, it should work on all arch [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === All issues were fixed during the interactive conversation via IRC ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260933.mBQ9XimU025820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-26 04:33:44 EDT --- Thanks for quick review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordxtr Short Description: hunspell dictionary creator Owners: pnemade Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260943.mBQ9hpnH027307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-12-26 04:43:50 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260944.mBQ9i2ti027352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 09:52:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 04:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260952.mBQ9qpxk028833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #37 from Terje R??sten 2008-12-26 04:52:50 EDT --- Yes, this is package is in excellent shape. Please make CVS request after #476374 is closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 10:50:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261050.mBQAoEs0006240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-26 05:50:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bkchem Short Description: Chemicaldrawing tool Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: jkeating mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 11:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261101.mBQB1oeu026197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #38 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-26 06:01:48 EDT --- Thank you, guys. I've made a CVS request for python-oasa following the instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure (I hope this is the right procedure). I'll be waiting for your ok (or not) to bkchem too. Happy new year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 11:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] New: Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Summary: Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/podcatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/podcatcher-3.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Armangil's podcatcher is a podcast client for the command line. It provides several download strategies (new shows only, back-catalog allowed, etc), offers cache management, supports BitTorrent, and generates playlists for media player applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 13:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261319.mBQDJJUr016856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Radkov 2008-12-26 08:19:18 EDT --- See some doc with screenshots at http://hlterm.wiki.sourceforge.net/General+Info+and+Usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 13:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477958] New: Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Summary: Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: avi at unix.sh QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, herrold at owlriver.com, cweyl at alumni.drew.edu, fabian at bernewireless.net, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, felix at fetzig.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/id3mtag/ SRPM URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/id3mtag/ Description: ID3 mass tagger is a tool for manipulating id3 and id3v2 tags in multiple files. It can generate tag fields from the filename and other variables, and/or rename files, using an intuitive syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 13:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261332.mBQDWcU8019645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Avi Alkalay changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261406.mBQE6i98007560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #16 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:06:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327854) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327854) gdb-session trying to know where does it crash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261407.mBQE7hHA025439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #17 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:07:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327855) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327855) backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261411.mBQEBfG4026217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Muayyad Alsadi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alsadi at ojuba.org --- Comment #18 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:11:40 EDT --- I have a problem with it in i386 (some people in IRC told be they don't have it in 64) the problem goes like this it render the .sif file successfully (any .sif file .eg for the examples) and after it finish it SIGFAULT and that happens even after leaving } of main I attached a gdb session and gdb backtrace the problem seems to be while calling the destructor of some class here or there or in gnu c libs #0 0x02081504 in fini_context_translations () at setrans_client.c:217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:13:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261413.mBQED1Om026439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #19 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:13:00 EDT --- BTW: there are .src.rpm in http://zelgadis.profusehost.net/files/rpms/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261416.mBQEGHrX027137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 09:16:16 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-2.fc.src.rpm * Fri Dec 26 2008 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.6.164-2 - Kill unneeded files more Koji build - For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022283 - For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261443.mBQEhPtR013262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #59 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-26 09:43:20 EDT --- I'm not sure why this only shows up now, but you are certainly right. I removed some long obsolete code and those exit() calls are now gone. Please find the latest spec / srpm at: http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/synopsis-0.11-4.fc9.src.rpm http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/synopsis.spec Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:53:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261453.mBQEr26q014864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 09:53:01 EDT --- By the way for CVS request you don't have to wait for python-oasa review requst to completely be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 14:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261455.mBQEtCxS015363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 09:55:11 EDT --- For 0.0.1-1: * Documents - Would you check if Rakefile or Manifest.txt really needed? - README.txt should be marked as %doc. * Possibly duplicate/conflicting files with system ones - This rpm contains net/pop.rb, net/smtp.rb. These are already included in ruby-libs rpm (however the files in ruby-libs seems older than those in this rpm). Can these files safely installed in parallel? * CRLF line terminators - Some ruby scripts in this rpm have CRLF line terminators (although my rpmlint could not detect them...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 15:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261502.mBQF2Eds016596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 10:02:13 EDT --- Oops.. * ruby abi requirement - Also ruby(abi) requirement is needed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 15:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261540.mBQFewcH008738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 10:40:57 EDT --- For 1.1-1: * License - License tag must be "LGPLv2+" * Documents - Please check if Rakefile is really needed. - README, LICENSE should be marked as %doc. * %geminstdir --------------------------------------------------------- %files %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ --------------------------------------------------------- - can be replaced by %{geminstdir}/ because you defined this macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 15:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261543.mBQFhwDF009103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #60 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 10:43:57 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (synopsis) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ Please release new version when ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 15:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261558.mBQFwP5V025626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 16:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261606.mBQG6a33013126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Stefan Seefeld changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #61 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-26 11:06:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synopsis Short Description: source-code introspection tool Owners: stefan Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 16:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261654.mBQGsS1x019241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-26 11:54:27 EDT --- Added CFLAGS Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yersinia.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261711.mBQHBv3R003671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #40 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-26 12:11:55 EDT --- I've started a CVS request for bkchem too. Am I doing this ahead of time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:16:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261716.mBQHGEeW004381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 12:16:13 EDT --- Some notes: * License - The license tag should be "GPL+" as no version is specified - However LICENSE (and also README) file also says that files under doc/ are non-free. Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code and remove all files under doc/ from the source tarball completely. - Include LICENSE file as %doc as this is important. * CFLAGS - I guess ------------------------------------------------------------- export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" export CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" ------------------------------------------------------------- is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261714.mBQHEWRm003838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-26 12:14:31 EDT --- This is only an informal review because I can't sponsor you. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nopaste-2835-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [1] [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint nopaste* nopaste.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [-] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: Build source: [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022395 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format [1] Remove the %doc in the %file section [2] The header of the script says '# Released under the GNU General Public License v2'. For me this is not looking like GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:14:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261714.mBQHEr4C022003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-26 12:14:52 EDT --- [x] Package functions as described. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261720.mBQHK5Mk023101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #41 from Terje R??sten 2008-12-26 12:20:04 EDT --- It's ok, continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261723.mBQHNV4V005382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 12:23:30 EDT --- Please fill in CVS request template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:40:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] New: Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Summary: Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/arping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/arping-2.08-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.habets.pp.se/synscan/programs.php?prog=arping Description: Arping is a util to find out it a specific IP address on the LAN is 'taken' and what MAC address owns it. Sure, you could just use 'ping' to find out if it's taken and even if the computer blocks ping (and everything else) you still get an entry in your ARP cache. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022402 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint arping* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint arping* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261746.mBQHkIIm026746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #16 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-26 12:46:17 EDT --- Please, forget the anterior form. I am very busy here and made a mistake in sending. The python-oasa is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261743.mBQHh66J026187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #15 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-26 12:43:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-oasa Short Description: Python library that handles chemical formats Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: jkeating mtasaka (In reply to comment #14) > New Package CVS Request > ======================= > Package Name: bkchem > Short Description: Chemicaldrawing tool > Owners: lspooky > Branches: F-9 F-10 > InitialCC: jkeating mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261750.mBQHo0br026920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 12:49:59 EDT --- How do you think about the previous discussion for this package (on bug 467157)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261750.mBQHoHfc027276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 12:50:16 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477971 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261750.mBQHoIXh027300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-26 12:50:16 EDT --- *** Bug 467157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261752.mBQHqHwO009496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #43 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-12-26 12:52:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bkchem Short Description: Chemical drawing tool Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: terjeros mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 20:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812262015.mBQKFH3Z014683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Pete Zaitcev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Pete Zaitcev 2008-12-26 15:15:16 EDT --- "yum install usbmon" works in Rawhide (10.90), closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 21:27:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812262127.mBQLRoqA006479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ripmime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 21:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 16:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477979] New: Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Summary: Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime-1.4.0.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages koji scratch build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 00:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477990] New: Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package includes the settings manager applications for the Xfce desktop. Note: this package is part of the upcoming Xfce 4.6. You will need: libxfce4util-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm libxfcegui4-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm libxfce4menu-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm exo-0.3.92-1.fc11.src.rpm (In that order) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 00:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477990] Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270054.mBR0s93C001751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 00:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477839] Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270054.mBR0sNwR019681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 01:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270100.mBR10PNR002969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-26 20:00:23 EDT --- I can take a look at reviewing this... look for a full review in a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 00:56:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455164] Review-Request: NaturalDocs - Documentation generator for multiple programming languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270056.mBR0ubE9002319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455164 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-26 19:56:35 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review this... look for a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 01:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270105.mBR15Fe1003854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Bug 468467 depends on bug 468466, which changed state. Bug 468466 Summary: Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 01:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270105.mBR15ExC003825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2008-12-26 20:05:12 EDT --- close bug, because there is no benefit for fedora if you`re not agree and think this would be a good package you can reopen it. the spec and srpm will be preserved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 01:05:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:05:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270105.mBR15MjV021462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-12-26 20:05:20 EDT --- close bug, because there is no benefit for fedora if you`re not agree and think this would be a good package you can reopen it. the spec and srpm will be preserved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 05:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270527.mBR5RC0O009799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-27 00:27:11 EDT --- There already exists an utility named arping packaged for fedora (it's in the iputils rpm), so for sure you cannot use %{_mandir}/man*/%{name}*.* %{_bindir}/arping As of comments, I still stand behind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157#c7 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239470#c5 (and the next ones from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239470) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 06:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270602.mBR624l7014399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-27 01:02:03 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: cacb446548d076149de0a71a6c03cd2edaa14660 yersinia-0.7.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 + koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 06:35:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] New: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Summary: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dtimms at iinet.net.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. rpmlint is not clean: vmware-requirements.src:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:47: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel vmware-requirements-server-console.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. Notes: 1. Is there a way in an x86_64 .spec require an eg gtk2.i386 package, without resorting to named file path Requires ? 2. I can make some small readme files to satisfy the no-documentation warnings 3. No binary is correct. The top level package pulls in the 2x sub packages, for the case where you want to run the vmware-server-console on the same machine as the vmware-server. 4. This does not require the VMware's non-open source vmware-server rpms. It only provides an easy way to get prerequisite packages installed so that vmware-server package can run, which saves a lot of messing around. 5. Is it worth changing the name to vmware-prerequisites: $ su -c 'yum install vmware-prerequisites' might be clearer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 07:14:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270714.mBR7EQgY023622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-27 02:14:26 EDT --- wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 08:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270850.mBR8okx0030690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 03:50:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yersinia Short Description: Network protocols tester and attacker Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 10:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 05:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] New: Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 Summary: Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/screenie.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/screenie-1.30.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Screenie is a small and lightweight screen wrapper that is designed to be a session handler that simplifies the process of administrating detached jobs by providing an interactive menu. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022715 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint screenie-1.30.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint screenie-1.30.0-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 10:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 05:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271039.mBRAdMxN016001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-27 05:39:20 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for review and CVS! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 10:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 05:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478291] New: Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478291 Summary: Review Request: shtool - Portable shell tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/shtool.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/shtool-2.0.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/shtool/ Description: GNU shtool is a compilation of small but very stable and portable shell scripts into a single shell tool. All ingredients were in successful use over many years in various free software projects. The compiled shtool program is intended to be used inside the source tree of other free software packages. There it can overtake various (usually non-portable) tasks related to the building and installation of such a package. It especially can replace the old mkdir.sh, install.sh and related scripts. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022748 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint shtool-2.0.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint shtool-2.0.8-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 11:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 06:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271132.mBRBW9C5008559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 06:32:08 EDT --- Michael, thanks for your inputs. (In reply to comment #3) > > g++ -O0 -g3 --pipe -Wall -lncurses procinfo.cpp -o procinfo > > It ignores our global %{optflags}, also influenced by switching on > --enable-maintainer-mode. You want to make it accept $CFLAGS (as it doesn't use > $CXXFLAGS for C++) and make sure that $LDFLAGS does not include -s (to avoid > stripping the binaries as that would make the debuginfo pkg useless). fixed > > /usr/bin/procinfo-ng > > It builds just this executable (renamed from "procinfo") and therefore is not > suitable as a direct replacement of the procinfo package, which includes > "lsdev" and "socklist". > > It is NOT options-compatible with the "procinfo" pkg either. > > It conflicts with package "procinfo" in the manual page file, which you forgot > to rename to procinfo-ng.8 I renamed the man page now. It's the same man page as in procinfo as far as I can see. lsdev and socklist are missing in procinfo-ng. (In reply to comment #4) > > Summary: System monitoring application > > It's text-based (ncurses), which is special enough to mention that. Else a > summary like this is misleading, since most users will expect a modern desktop > GUI application that adds a menu entry, too. Changed Here are the new files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/procinfo-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/procinfo-ng-2.0.217-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 11:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 06:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271155.mBRBt9kZ028954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #18 from Michal Hlavinka 2008-12-27 06:55:08 EDT --- I'll look at this soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 11:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 06:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271157.mBRBvvfo012464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 06:57:56 EDT --- The rpmlint output... [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint id3mtag* id3mtag.i386: W: invalid-license Two-clause BSD id3mtag-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package id3mtag-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Two-clause BSD 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint id3mtag-0.78-1.fc9.src.rpm id3mtag.src: W: invalid-license Two-clause BSD 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. For more details check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Some comments on your spec file - CHANGES, COPYING, and so on should be placed in the %files section %doc CHANGES COPYING %doc %{_docdir}/%{name} looks a bit unusual - Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Is 'Prefix: %{_usr}' really needed? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages - Remove the 'fc9' in the changelog entry '...com> - 0.78-1' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs - %{?_smp_mflags} and %{optflags} are not honored in the %build section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 12:22:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 07:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] New: Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fswebcam.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.firestorm.cx/fswebcam/ Description: A tiny and flexible webcam program for capturing images from a V4L1/V4L2 device, and overlaying a caption or image. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022775 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint fswebcam* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This review request based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 12:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 07:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271229.mBRCTTfM002031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil at sanslogic.co.uk --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 07:29:27 EDT --- *** Bug 222009 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 12:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 07:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271229.mBRCTSnU002007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 07:29:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 478294 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 13:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 08:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271312.mBRDCPFP025409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 --- Comment #12 from Terje R??sten 2008-12-27 08:12:22 EDT --- Please make a cvs request: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 13:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 08:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477839] Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271315.mBRDFGpK010879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-27 08:15:15 EDT --- Good work, this package is simply perfect: * Spec file sane and legible * Compiler flags used appropriately * RPMlint silent * Builds in mock fine (fedora-devel-i386 with recent libxfce4util) * Requires/provides are sane * Filelists for main package and -devel sane * License correct APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 13:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 08:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271328.mBRDSdfF028658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-27 08:28:38 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 69df690a91dd5902b5fe3d6b5c6a140fe242f002 fswebcam-20070108.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 + koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 14:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477990] Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271404.mBRE4bUs019735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-27 09:04:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Note: this package is part of the upcoming Xfce 4.6. > You will need: Apart from the packages you enumerated that were found in xfce4-settings [1] directory, I've also grabbed xfconf [2], since a couple of packages demanded it. [1] http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/ [2] http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfconf/ * RPMlint is silent and happy * Spec file is mostly sane and legible * Compiler flags are used appropriately * Builds find in mock, with additional repository of xfce packages * Requires, provides and filelists are sane * License is correct A few notes: 1.) Please don't do --vendor ""; in case upstream specifies vendor field, do not reset it, otherwise set it to "fedora" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation 2.) Please ensure the following is correct: Build Configuration: * Installation prefix: /usr * Debug Support: minimum * Libnotify support: no * Xcursor support: yes * Sounds settings support no * Libxklavier support: no Did you really mean to build w/o support for the above? 3.) The following line seems useless: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.desktop' -ls I guest it was forgotten there. Please remove it. I don't think any of the above would warrant a review blocker: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 14:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271423.mBRENb7d023345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2008-12-27 09:23:36 EDT --- Koji scratch build result (success): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022934 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 14:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271443.mBREhISn026474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-12-27 09:43:17 EDT --- Updated release is available: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 14:47:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271447.mBREltLl009831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 09:47:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fswebcam Short Description: Tiny and flexible webcam program Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 16:29:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 11:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] New: Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Summary: Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-wifi.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-wifi-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: https://developer.berlios.de/projects/pythonwifi/ Description: Python-Wifi is a Python library that provides access to information about a W-LAN card's capabilities, like the wireless extensions written in C. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1023011 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint python-wifi-0.3.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-wifi-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 18:28:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:28:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271828.mBRIS8Ef010109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2008-12-27 13:28:05 EDT --- Still waiting for a new upstream release. http://code.google.com/p/pathfinder-pki/issues/detail?id=16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 19:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271910.mBRJAx8H001535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-27 14:10:58 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: d33bfe05f18259a3f7fd17ae256c5644 xteddy-2.0.1.tar.gz d33bfe05f18259a3f7fd17ae256c5644 xteddy-2.0.1.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Might include: xteddy.README xtuxxy.credit as doc files? 2. Agreed on your reasoning for no desktop file... older x apps like xeyes are in the same boat I think. Perhaps if upstream is still alive you could suggest them making a launcher that comes up and lets people choose options? I don't see any further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 19:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812271928.mBRJS4iA018966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-27 14:28:03 EDT --- Vmware should supply this, not Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 20:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455164] Review-Request: NaturalDocs - Documentation generator for multiple programming languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272018.mBRKIcdS025784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455164 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-27 15:18:37 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 05a9a2a392bd3d6d44d1576e624ba74a NaturalDocs-1.4.zip 05a9a2a392bd3d6d44d1576e624ba74a NaturalDocs-1.4.zip.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. It looks pretty clear that the package is GPLv2+, but some of the files just say "the GPL". You might ping upstream about that and suggest they mention that it's v2 or later. 2. Might use 'install -p' to preserve the timestamp on the script. 3. SourceUrl is not right... looks like they use naturaldocs instead of NaturalDocs in there. Ie: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/naturaldocs/%{name}-%{version}.zip None of those are blockers, so this package is APPROVED, provided you fix those up on import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 21:19:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272119.mBRLJAhd019872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #6 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-27 16:19:08 EDT --- [x]source files match upstream: b7942cb1b57897119062f6ff7a30c970b754e7d2728297a32228b02272785695 virtaal-0.2.tar.bz2 [x]package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [FAIL]specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. The spec file should not have the version or at least not the revision number as part of its name, it should be virtaal.spec [x]dist tag is present. [x]build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x]license field matches the actual license. [x]license is open source-compatible. GPLv2+ [x]license text included in package. [x]latest version is being packaged. [FAIL]BuildRequires are proper. You should not have desktop-file-utils see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewMIMESystem [x]compiler flags are appropriate. [x]%clean is present. [x]package builds in mock. package installs properly. [FAIL]rpmlint is silent. rpmlint virtaal-0.2-2.spec ../SRPMS/virtaal-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/virtaal-0.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm virtaal.src: E: invalid-spec-name Rename Spec file virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/recent.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/about.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/__init__.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/label_expander.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/markup.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/document.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/formats.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/simplegeneric.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/tips.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/undo_buffer.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/unit_editor.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/store_grid.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/search_mode.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/unit_renderer.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/bijection.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/__init__.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/__init__.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/partial.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/openmailto.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/autocorrector.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/unit_layout.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/terminology.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/memoize.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/main_window.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/sorted_set.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/entry_dialog.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/pan_app.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/mode_selector.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/util.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/autocompletor.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/store_model.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/modes.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/set_enumerator.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/__version__.py 0644 virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/rendering.py 0644 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 36 errors, 0 warnings. [x]final provides and requires are sane: (paste in the rpm -qp --provides and --requires output) [x]owns the directories it creates. [x]doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [x]no duplicates in %files. [x]file permissions are appropriate. [x]no scriptlets present. [x]code, not content. [x]documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [x]%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [x]no libtool .la droppings. [?]desktop files valid and installed properly. The version in the desktop file is 1.0 but 0.2 for the package is that correct? There are a few things that need to be fixed before I will sign this package off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 21:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272123.mBRLNbDi002454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 16:23:36 EDT --- Just some comments on your spec file - 'Source0:' should point to the upstream tarball if possible. - Please preserve the time stamp in the %install section - Shouldn't '%doc demo' be '%doc demo/' ? - Replace '/usr/bin/' with a macro https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros rpmlint is not quite... [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint podcatcher-3.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm podcatcher.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install podcatcher.src: W: more-than-one-%changelog-section podcatcher.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 16) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 21:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478316] New: Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316 Summary: Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/farsight2.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/farsight2-0.0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Farsight2 is a collection of GStreamer modules and libraries for videoconferencing. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1023264 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 21:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477953] Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272158.mBRLwfpl025818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian 2008-12-27 16:58:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just some comments on your spec file > > - 'Source0:' should point to the upstream tarball if possible. fixed, though the URL has to be looked up again on every release because it contains some release id > - Please preserve the time stamp in the %install section fixed > - Shouldn't '%doc demo' be '%doc demo/' ? I changed it. I didn't realize that it makes a difference, but it is easier readable. > - Replace '/usr/bin/' with a macro > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros OK. > rpmlint is not quite... > > [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint podcatcher-3.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm > podcatcher.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > podcatcher.src: W: more-than-one-%changelog-section > podcatcher.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 16) > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. those are now fixed too. I have uploaded the new files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 22:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272204.mBRM4vf7008548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #11 from Tim Fenn 2008-12-27 17:04:55 EDT --- update to 0.5.2, fixed most rpmlint errors (most of the rest require significant changes to upstream package, will discuss with upstream): Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm need some info re. if its OK to progress with the existing rpmlint issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 22:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272227.mBRMRlaB029900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-27 17:27:46 EDT --- Just some comments on your spec file - The echo call in the %prep section is a bit unusual - The license is not GPLv2, it's GPLv2+ according to the header in the source file - One line per BR would be nice - There is no need for '\' in the description - From my point of view, there is no need for 'chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}' The guidelines says that the BuildRequires for python packages should be 'BuildRequires: python' and the egg stuff 'BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 22:32:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:32:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272232.mBRMWbVs012431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #3 from David Timms 2008-12-27 17:32:36 EDT --- Agreed, but I think they never will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 22:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] New: Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Summary: Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.1.svn5068.el5.src.rpm Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-privateticketsplugin.spec Description: A trac plugin to allow users to see only tickets that they are involved with. [jstanley at rugrat SPECS]$ rpmlint trac-privateticketsplugin.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jstanley at rugrat SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.1.svn5068.el5.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jstanley at rugrat SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.1.svn5068.el5.noarch.rpm trac-privateticketsplugin.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [jstanley at rugrat SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 22:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272245.mBRMjn0s014301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-27 17:45:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #6) > Issues: > > 1. Might include: > xteddy.README > xtuxxy.credit > as doc files? Yup, will do on import. > 2. Agreed on your reasoning for no desktop file... older x apps like xeyes are > in the same boat I think. Perhaps if upstream is still alive you could suggest > them making a launcher that comes up and lets people choose options? Upstream is still alive, but I guess it will oppose the idea of launcher, since it would at least double the complexity of the package, and at least I strongly oppose it, for the reasons described above. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xteddy Short Description: Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 22:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455164] Review-Request: NaturalDocs - Documentation generator for multiple programming languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272246.mBRMkZd0032512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455164 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-27 17:46:34 EDT --- > Issues: > > 1. It looks pretty clear that the package is GPLv2+, but some of the files just > say > "the GPL". You might ping upstream about that and suggest they mention that > it's v2 or > later. > > 2. Might use 'install -p' to preserve the timestamp on the script. > > 3. SourceUrl is not right... looks like they use naturaldocs instead of > NaturalDocs > in there. > Ie: > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/naturaldocs/%{name}-%{version}.zip > > None of those are blockers, so this package is APPROVED, provided you > fix those up on import. All three are reasonable and I will surely address them. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: NaturalDocs Short Description: Documentation generator for multiple programming languages Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 23:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812272308.mBRN8CUh017485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herlo1 at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |herlo1 at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Clint Savage 2008-12-27 18:08:11 EDT --- reviewing this package at Jon's request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 00:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: libmapi - OpenChange: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280010.mBS0AEjh026641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #13 from Matthew Barnes 2008-12-27 19:10:12 EDT --- Updated to a more recent SVN revision. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-0.6.svn949.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 00:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280051.mBS0p6cl017609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #17 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-27 19:51:05 EDT --- Please don't add me to initial CC. I'm not interested in getting bugzilla mail for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 01:16:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477839] Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280116.mBS1G1i1003136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-27 20:16:00 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libxfce4menu Short Description: A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce Owners: kevin Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 01:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280137.mBS1bl6T005940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-27 20:37:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) why you don't fire your efforts in direction of open source programs, like KVM, xen or QEMU ? vmware is not opensource and your contribution can't be accepted. please take a look. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#VMware I am also agree with Jason Tibbitts "Vmware should supply this, not Fedora." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 01:47:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477990] Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280147.mBS1lc2g007199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-27 20:47:37 EDT --- >1.) Please don't do --vendor ""; in case upstream specifies vendor field, do >not reset it, otherwise set it to "fedora" >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation Good catch. Fixed to use fedora as vendor (upstream doesn't have one by default) >2.) Please ensure the following is correct: >Build Configuration: >* Installation prefix: /usr >* Debug Support: minimum >* Libnotify support: no >* Xcursor support: yes >* Sounds settings support no >* Libxklavier support: no >Did you really mean to build w/o support for the above? Nope. Thanks for spotting those. Added some buildrequires to pick them up. >3.) The following line seems useless: >find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.desktop' -ls >I guest it was forgotten there. Please remove it. Well, it's needed because the make install installs the desktop files, and I then install them again with desktop-file-install. I can just use --delete-original instead. I will switch to that. >I don't think any of the above would warrant a review blocker: > >APPROVED Thanks! FYI, new package: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings-4.5.92-2.fc11.src.rpm CVS request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-settings Short Description: Settings Manager for Xfce Owners: kevin Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:26:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280226.mBS2QLvV012749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #5 from David Timms 2008-12-27 21:26:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > why you don't fire your efforts in direction of open source programs, like KVM, > xen or QEMU ? USing Fedora gives users like me the advantages of Fedora and the capability to contribute to the Fedora Project, but virtualization gives me what they may require for the machine to be a useful (winxp) in the real employment world. > vmware is not opensource Correct. > and your contribution can't be accepted. I believe this to be incorrect. Please point to the section of the guidelines that would exclude this meta package. > please take a look. I have. Did you notice that this request for review is a meta-package only. It does not require any non-open source packages, nor any packages outside of the Fedora world. At all. I understand that there will be many who don't support the out of Fedora applications, that this this will make easier to use, but I am yet to see anything that would stop this package actually being acceptable to Fedora, and am hence re-opening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:27:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280227.mBS2RLX9012842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280230.mBS2UHZJ031086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:30:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser Short Description: Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl Owner: chitlesh Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280234.mBS2Ywjw013731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:32:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280232.mBS2WQ9a013597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:32:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Perlilog Short Description: Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl Owner: chitlesh Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280234.mBS2Yf6D031502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:34:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ModelSim-List - Short Description: Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator Owner: chitlesh Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223591] Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280254.mBS2sSZZ016471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223591 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:54:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: magic Short Description: A very capable VLSI layout tool Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280252.mBS2qk2r016383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #51 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:52:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: netgen Short Description: LVS netlist comparison tool Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280253.mBS2rw2X001807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 02:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280253.mBS2rPPo001771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-27 21:53:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: irsim Short Description: Switch-level simulator Owners: chitlesh Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 03:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 22:06:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280306.mBS36oT5004014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-27 22:06:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > USing Fedora gives users like me the advantages of Fedora and the capability to > contribute to the Fedora Project, but virtualization gives me what they may > require for the machine to be a useful (winxp) in the real employment world. I am using kvm to virtualize window$ at the ratio of 20:1, with extreme performance. in real employment world we use xen/kvm/qemu, have you tried one of these ? If you want to leave this ticket open then go ahead, I am curious to see what other developers think about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 06:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280618.mBS6IRYX030197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2008-12-28 01:18:26 EDT --- Fabian - I believe I have addressed all of your comments you can find the new spec and srpm files here: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zapplet-0.1-2.src.rpm http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zapplet.spec Thanks for taking the time to review the package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 06:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280624.mBS6OHPk013727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Clint Savage 2008-12-28 01:24:16 EDT --- Grammar on the %description is odd, should be improved. Apparently, that's the way the authors wrote the description. Builds fine. rpmlint trac-privateticketsplugin.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Looks good to me, other than my caveat of poor grammar by the creator. I say it's a go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 06:30:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280630.mBS6UYcl014957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley 2008-12-28 01:30:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-privateticketsplugin Short Description: Trac extension to allow users to view only related tickets Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 09:33:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812280933.mBS9X3Yc010539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #43 from Warren Togami 2008-12-28 04:33:00 EDT --- One important correction to make. The text still says rpm -e of the old package name. I think we can release after the docs are reviewed one more time and corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 11:09:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 06:09:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281109.mBSB9SkA026629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2008-12-28 06:09:26 EDT --- 3 week ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 13:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472794] Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281304.mBSD44PO013409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472794 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2008-12-28 08:04:02 EDT --- Please excuse any really dumb questions, I am somewhat new at this process myself. Not a formal review: >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Is there a preference for %{buildroot} for newer packages? ># This was obtained on 2008/11/24 using the following commands: ># cvs -d :pserver:anonymous at onemind-commons.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/onemind-commons login ># cvs -d :pserver:anonymous at onemind-commons.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/onemind-commons co commons-java/docs >Source1: %{name}-docs-20081124.tbz Can you check out a particular CVS version, rather than HEAD -- that way the md5sum can be verified as being consistent during review. I know the upstream is dormant, so this is probably a bit picky. >BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) I am unclear -- what is the reason for changing the BuildRoot? ("Fix BuildRoot to follow the latest guidelines") Can you point to a page (in your reply) for the less up-to-date of us? >%description >This is a common library used to support other onemind libraries. Is it possible to expand on this at all? Its identical to the summary -- doesn't really provide extra information to users. That said, I am not sure what one would write here as an alternative. >%{_javadir}/*.jar I think I would prefer %{name}.jar and {name}-%{version}.jar to be explicit. This prevents any later inadvertant jar copying (another picky comment.) Other than that, it seems OK to me. There are no jars, licence seems OK and GPL header present in all java files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 13:28:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281328.mBSDS7bL018431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-12-28 08:28:06 EDT --- XMP is adobe's new proprietary format that implements metadata in files, kinda like exif, but supposedly somehow better. It is a patented "technology", however Adobe have provided a "public patent licence" http://www.adobe.com/devnet/xmp/pdfs/xmp_public_patent_license.pdf It seems OK to me, but IANAL -- are there any legal issues to consider? The clause "A claim is necessarily infringed only when there is no reasonable way to avoid infringement of that claim when defining, creating or processing metadata." seems a bit nebulous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 13:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472794] Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281332.mBSDWnsZ019361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472794 --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-12-28 08:32:48 EDT --- Oh, and you are missing the deps in the -javadoc package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 14:07:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478344] New: Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478344 Summary: Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: luca at foppiano.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lfoppiano.fedorapeople.org/f-spot.spec SRPM URL: http://lfoppiano.fedorapeople.org/f-spot-0.5.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: I don't know if this package is already submutted, but I asked more time to update it, and I didn't receive any answer. I tried to extract a new spec file from the older one. The reason of my hurry is that the actual fedora 10 f-spot version is *not* usable and *not* stable. Thanks Luca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 14:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] New: Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Summary: Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mr.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mr-0.35-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/mr/ Description: The mr command can checkout, update, or perform other actions on a set of repositories as if they were one combined respository. It supports any combination of subversion, git, cvs, mecurial, bzr and darcs repositories, and support for other revision control systems can easily be added. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1023509 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint mr-0.35-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint mr-0.35-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 14:32:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281432.mBSEWNox013912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-28 09:32:19 EDT --- ping, how's the package coming along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 14:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281434.mBSEY35W014094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-28 09:34:02 EDT --- I agree, we shouldn't include support metapackages for proprietary software in Fedora. If you want to do something for virtualization in Fedora, there's plenty of work to do e.g. with VirtualBox which is GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 15:07:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281507.mBSF7B4u002715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #18 from Justin Zygmont 2008-12-28 10:07:10 EDT --- hi, just getting back to it now that I have my Fedora10 test system built, I definitely want to get this going -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 16:46:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281646.mBSGkMID017020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2008-12-28 11:46:21 EDT --- A few notes : - License is PHP, not BSD (according to pecl.php.net) - must use %setup -q -c (to not have package.xml outside the build tree) - missing require for ABI check : php(zend-abi) - should use %{pecl_install} and %{pecl_uninstall} when exists - why PEAR in sumnary ? - should add example directory in %doc (rather than each files) Read : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 16:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281653.mBSGrsaR002219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2008-12-28 11:53:53 EDT --- Also - use %{php_extdir} instead of %{_libdir}/php/modules - use %{pecl_xmldir} instead of your %{xmldir} As the package is available in my little testing repo, you can have a look to http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SPEC/php-pecl-imagick.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:05:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281705.mBSH5lNt004155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-28 12:05:45 EDT --- MUST Items: xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM + [rishi at freebook devel]$ rpmlint gok gok.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gok-1.3.7/NEWS gok.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gok.schemas gok.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Desktop/Accessibility 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [rishi at freebook devel]$ + rpmlint is unclean on SRPM [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint /devel/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gok-2.25.2-1.fc9.src.rpm gok.src:251: W: macro-in-%changelog _lib gok.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 14, tab: line 19) gok.src: W: non-standard-group Desktop/Accessibility 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Please consider fixing the mixed use of tabs and spaces in the BuildRequires and Requires tags. + Even though Fedora does not use the Group tag, please consider using one from /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.4.2.3/GROUPS. "User Interface/Desktops" is a probable choice. Orca also uses it. + 'Requires: htmlview' is needed because of Patch0. + Can gok-1.2.1-fixlogin.patch be removed from CVS? + Please convert /usr/share/doc/gok-1.3.7/NEWS from ISO-8859 to UTF-8. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#file-not-utf8 + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make you should use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' whenever possible. In this case since upstream supports parallel builds you should use it. + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT + 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/scrollkeeper' is not needed on recent distributions. + Replace %{_lib} with %%{_lib} in the %changelog. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - license field meets actual license + gok/keysym2ucs.c is in the public domain. OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources xx - package does not build successfully + Fails to build due to missing BuildRequires: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1023579 OK - ExcludeArch not needed xx - build dependencies incorrectly listed + 'BuildRequires: esound-devel' is missing. + 'BuildRequires: m4 perl(XML::Parser)' is redundant. OK - locales handled properly OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable xx - file and directory ownership + Since an icon has been installed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor there should be a runtime dependency on hicolor-icon-theme. However, is this icon really needed as there is no .desktop file? + The -devel sub-package should have 'Requires: gtk-doc' as it needs /usr/share/gtk-doc. OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently + Both gok and %{name} used. OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - -devel has *.pc file and requires pkgconfig OK - no library files OK - -devel requires base package OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not provided + Changelog contains rationale for excluding it. OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary xx - package fails to build in mock + 'BuildRequires: esound-devel' is missing. OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected xx - scriptlets are not sane + There does not seem to be any .omf files provided by the package, yet the scrollkeeper scriptlets are being used. Why? It looks like gok-1.3.7-3.fc9.x86_64 had them. OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed OK - pkgconfig files in -devel OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281710.mBSHAbvT004870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281716.mBSHG7dU005707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281717.mBSHHEXh005823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) --- Comment #14 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-28 12:17:12 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:17:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281717.mBSHHkGT005903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-28 12:17:43 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:18:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281718.mBSHI4LQ005969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) --- Comment #38 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-28 12:17:59 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:30:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478344] Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281730.mBSHUdTY008266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478344 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-28 12:30:38 EDT --- f-spot is already in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 17:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281741.mBSHfLgw009663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2008-12-28 12:41:20 EDT --- BTW: Please remove the "ZYpp is a" from the summary tag, just "Linux software management engine" or "A Linux software management engine" is fine too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 18:07:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:07:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281807.mBSI7EbF028363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-28 13:07:13 EDT --- There are several issues here: It's a metapackage. We don't really want those in the distro. Yes, there are existing examples, but that doesn't make them good examples. The proper solution for this kind of thing would be to use a comps group instead. Of course, I'm sure that if you did commit a comps group for this, a line would form to revert it. Are there plans to do this for whatever other commercial software someone might install? Why not have -requirements metapackages for every other piece of software that nobody can bother to properly package for the distribution? We didn't even do this for flash (after having a similar discussion, mind you). Why would we do it for vmware? Honestly, it is the responsibility of the software vendor to do integration like this. I'm sure there are many in the community who would be willing to assist them in setting up a proper repository for Fedora users, with real packages that have proper dependencies. This half-way solution just doesn't do the job on many levels, and entangles the distribution with semi-official support for some random vendor's software. No, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 18:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281854.mBSIsakt001978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 13:54:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 18:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478344] Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281853.mBSIrJrZ019522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478344 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zdzichu at irc.pl --- Comment #2 from Tomasz Torcz 2008-12-28 13:53:18 EDT --- Jesse f-spot is in Fedora, but old version. This review request is for update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:06:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281906.mBSJ6Y7e004214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:06:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477839] Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281903.mBSJ3MgZ003567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:03:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476936] Review Request: hello - Prints a Familiar, Friendly Greeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281902.mBSJ2W3T021068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476936 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:02:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:05:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:05:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477990] Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281905.mBSJ5TGD021604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:05:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281908.mBSJ89n6004506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 14:08:06 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:09:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281909.mBSJ9O8T004631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:09:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:08:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:08:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281908.mBSJ8PMv004554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:08:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:10:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:10:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281910.mBSJAj9R005154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #7 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-28 14:10:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > [FAIL]specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros > consistently. > The spec file should not have the version or at least not the revision number > as part of its name, it should be virtaal.spec The name of the .spec file at the download link is just for tracking purposes, my local copy is named virtaal.spec. > [FAIL]BuildRequires are proper. > > You should not have desktop-file-utils see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewMIMESystem Fixed > [FAIL]rpmlint is silent. > > rpmlint virtaal-0.2-2.spec ../SRPMS/virtaal-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm > ../RPMS/noarch/virtaal-0.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm > virtaal.src: E: invalid-spec-name > > Rename Spec file See comment above > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/recent.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/about.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/__init__.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/label_expander.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/markup.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/document.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/formats.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/simplegeneric.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/tips.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/undo_buffer.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/unit_editor.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/store_grid.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/search_mode.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/unit_renderer.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/bijection.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/__init__.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/__init__.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/partial.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/openmailto.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/autocorrector.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/unit_layout.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/terminology.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/memoize.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/main_window.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/sorted_set.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/entry_dialog.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/pan_app.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/mode_selector.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/widgets/util.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/autocompletor.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/store_model.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/modes.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/support/set_enumerator.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/__version__.py 0644 > virtaal.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtaal/rendering.py 0644 > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 36 errors, 0 warnings. Should I fix these? These shouldn't be executable but they all have #! headers. > [?]desktop files valid and installed properly. > The version in the desktop file is 1.0 but 0.2 for the package is that correct? This is correct, it refers to the standard version, not the application version number, See: http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s05.html > There are a few things that need to be fixed before I will sign this package > off. Thanks for the review. The only outstanding issue is the 'non-executable script' error, your feedback on that would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:10:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281910.mBSJAfAU022468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 14:10:40 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281910.mBSJATHG022410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:10:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:12:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:12:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281912.mBSJCGIr005441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:12:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:15:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281915.mBSJFoaE006107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:15:48 EDT --- cvs done. (without jkeating in initialcc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455164] Review-Request: NaturalDocs - Documentation generator for multiple programming languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281916.mBSJGlIR023483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455164 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:16:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:13:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281913.mBSJD5Cb022820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:13:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:17:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478344] Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281917.mBSJHAgq006327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478344 --- Comment #3 from Jesse Keating 2008-12-28 14:17:09 EDT --- That's not how we do things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281918.mBSJI0XO006405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:17:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281920.mBSJKgXE024082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #62 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:20:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:23:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226715] Review Request: irsim - Switch-level simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281923.mBSJNEb6007258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226715 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:23:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:22:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281922.mBSJM2cE007191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:22:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281923.mBSJNfrM007293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #52 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:23:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:24:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:24:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223591] Review Request: Magic - A very capable VLSI layout tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281924.mBSJOC3n024381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-28 14:24:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 19:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:40:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478344] Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812281940.mBSJejhY009641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478344 --- Comment #4 from Luca Foppiano 2008-12-28 14:40:43 EDT --- right. but... I opened bug asking to update on Dicember 14th (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476412). I also contact the mantainer directly via IRC, and I gave him my collaboration...but...no replies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478344] Review Request: f-spot 0.5.0.3 - Image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282100.mBSL0mgp005152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478344 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha |nigjones at redhat.com |t.com | Component|Package Review |f-spot AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nigjones at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-28 16:00:47 EDT --- So just filing random bugs under the wrong component is supposed to help matters? Package reviews are for new packages entering the distribution. F-spot is already in the distribution, so it is not appropriate to file a package review ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:04:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225613] Merge Review: beecrypt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282104.mBSL4c2I005729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225613 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:04:37 EDT --- Package already got successfully reviewed with bug #438262 - closing hereby with the same state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282111.mBSLBTfW022567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 16:11:29 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:09:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282109.mBSL9R8u021952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 16:09:27 EDT --- trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225749] Merge Review: fetchmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282108.mBSL8InP021863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225749 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:08:17 EDT --- The fetchmail initscript for daemon functionality needs to get installed that users can use it more easily in the future. Maybe the initscript itself needs some love before, possible (currently somewhere in contrib inside of tarball). Adding current fetchmail maintainer on Cc, that he gets aware about this bug report... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282110.mBSLAd11006909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-28 16:10:38 EDT --- Thank you guys for the review and the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282111.mBSLBWZt007134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 16:11:32 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:11:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282111.mBSLB2H0006970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 16:11:02 EDT --- trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282112.mBSLCYiA007294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-28 16:12:32 EDT --- Thanks guys for the cvs and the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282114.mBSLEBtn007446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 16:14:11 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:14:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282114.mBSLE8xJ007415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-28 16:14:08 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fswebcam-20070108-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282120.mBSLKhTp024149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel-list at redh | |at.com Flag| |needinfo?(fedora-perl-devel | |-list at redhat.com) --- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:20:40 EDT --- The guys from the Perl SIG or similar shall explain and decide whether it is needed here, adding hereby and requesting info regarding 444 vs. 644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:26:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282126.mBSLQKox025066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjanouse at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:26:19 EDT --- Adding Tomas Janousek on Cc because of being the current maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282122.mBSLMI6V024322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #24 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-12-28 16:22:16 EDT --- * I don't understand the following code, eventually, it should be serif, no ? sans-serif * Put the following codes in section %prep after %setup (and not in %build or in %install): -------- for txt in OFL* ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} . -------- * Do the %post and the %postun are useful ? I just find them in some fonts and no wiki page about it. Nicolas, an explanation ? * Now, the change needed by the new guideline: - Add the following in the right place : BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem - Remove "%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}" and replace all the "%{fontdir}" by "%{_fontdir}" (it's now an official macro) - Replace "%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/60-%{fontname}.conf" and "%{fontdir}/*.ttf" by "%_font_pkg -f 60-%{fontname}.conf *.ttf" (- There is something else with templatedir macro, but i don't understand how it work, i'll see) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455164] Review-Request: NaturalDocs - Documentation generator for multiple programming languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282142.mBSLgH13011521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455164 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-28 16:42:16 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282151.mBSLpC4B028607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ssorce at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:51:10 EDT --- Looks like Simo Sorce is the current rsync maintainer; adding hereby to Cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282152.mBSLqgIr028727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #305156|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:52:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327903) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327903) Patch for rsync.spec to make rpmlint silent Simo, can you please apply this patch to rsync? It will solve the most review issues so that we maybe can finish this soon. One rpmlint "issue" seems to be left, that can be ignored, %config() is not worse in %changelog, it is not expanded anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 21:57:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282157.mBSLvcBS029429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ed at eh3.com |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |needinfo?(ssorce at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 16:57:37 EDT --- As Ed made no review noise for nearly two years, I'm now and hereby silently overtaking the review. I think, the patch #327903 should bring us to the way of succeeding the review hopefully very soon. Simo, please take action... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282209.mBSM9CIU031027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226319, which changed state. Bug 226319 Summary: Merge Review: procps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:09:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226319] Merge Review: procps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282209.mBSM9BIB030999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226319 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.2.7-22 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 17:09:09 EDT --- The MUST changes have been applied to CVS some time ago already. The license stuff has been clarified by Tom some time ago and is in CVS acceptable, too. Thanks to Michael, Jason, Tom and Tomas for their work: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226542] Merge Review: words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282211.mBSMBwRn015628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|redhat at linuxnetz.de |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] New: Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Summary: Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ethstatus.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: EthStatus is a simple, easy to use program for displaying commonly needed / wanted statistics in real time about ingoing and outgoing traffic that is usually hard to find, with a simple, efficient interface. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024042 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint ethstatus* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282231.mBSMVxkP018368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-28 17:31:58 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:36:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282236.mBSMapHM002371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple 2008-12-28 17:36:50 EDT --- Couple of quick items: 1. The requires on python is unnecessary. The requires: python(abi) = 2.6 in the build log does this for you. 2. Likewise the BR on python-setuptools is also unnecessary. The -devel package will pull this in for you. 3. I haven't had a chance to look at the source closely yet, but I'm thinking the requires should be pygtk2, not gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 22:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282257.mBSMvJ4i021619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2008-12-28 17:57:18 EDT --- Brian: I believe I have addressed all of the above items, and you are correct about pygtk2. New spec file: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zapplet.spec New SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zapplet-0.1-3.src.rpm [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/zapplet-0.1-3.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/zapplet-0.1-3.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./zapplet.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings Thanks for taking the time to review this package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 23:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:20:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478362] New: Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478362 Summary: Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fmirror.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/fmirror-0.8.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: fmirror is a C program to mirror a directory tree from a remote ftp server. It allows regexp (regular expression) pattern matching to help target files that are to be included and excluded. It uses a combination of timestamp, file size and file permissions to decide what files to transfer from the ftp server. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024075 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint fmirror* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint fmirror-0.8.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 23:31:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282331.mBSNV9Uj026979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-28 18:31:09 EDT --- ClamTk 4.08 released -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 23:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226511] Merge Review: unifdef In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282334.mBSNY8hs010473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226511 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-28 18:34:07 EDT --- David, if you don't care about this package, please orphan it according to the Fedora Guidelines. Anyway, the package already got reviewed when reading bug #190362 and bug #189937. Warren set the flag for this review request, too - closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 23:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282348.mBSNmKN7012379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es --- Comment #8 from Sven Lankes 2008-12-28 18:48:18 EDT --- I'm going to review this. As far as I can see the only hint as to under which license the code is seems to be the included copy of the GPLv2 - not enough to be sure IMO. I have opened a bug on the drupal-site requesting 'proper' license-information being added: http://drupal.org/node/351895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 28 23:58:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812282358.mBSNw4Je013801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #6 from Dan Kenigsberg 2008-12-28 18:58:03 EDT --- Ok, let's use version 0.5. I hope I got all your (*)s sorted. rpm passes rpmlint cleanly now. I did not see how the supplied Makefile could work. It relates to non-existing filenames and ignores the tarball directpry structure. avoiding seemed simpler than fixing it. using latexdiff is so simple that I don't think the example is really useful. I have never used latexdiff-wrap, and not anxious to try. http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/latexdiff-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290018.mBT0IxVr000587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-28 19:18:58 EDT --- The non-executable is not and issue. Thanks for the pointer on the version number on the desktop file, I have not seen that variable used before. I did a test on it and is seems to work correctly. It is now: APPROVED. Apply for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:33:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478364] New: Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Verilog code generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Verilog code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 Summary: Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Verilog code generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Provides an object-oriented environment to generate Verilog code for modules and testbenches. The Verilog::CodeGen module provides two functions, one to create a code template and another to create a Perl module which contains the device library. This module , DeviceLibs::YourDesign, provides the class methods and contains the objects for every Verilog module; the objects are created based on a fixed template. The purpose of this module is to allow the generation of customized Verilog modules. A Verilog module can have a large number of parameters like input and output bus width, buffer depth, signal delay etc. The code generator allows to create an object that will generate the Verilog module code for arbitraty values of the parameters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478365] New: Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478365 Summary: Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-CodeGen.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Provides an object-oriented environment to generate Verilog code for modules and testbenches. The Verilog::CodeGen module provides two functions, one to create a code template and another to create a Perl module which contains the device library. This module , DeviceLibs::YourDesign, provides the class methods and contains the objects for every Verilog module; the objects are created based on a fixed template. The purpose of this module is to allow the generation of customized Verilog modules. A Verilog module can have a large number of parameters like input and output bus width, buffer depth, signal delay etc. The code generator allows to create an object that will generate the Verilog module code for arbitraty values of the parameters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290040.mBT0enCO003870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-Verilog-Readmem - |perl-Verilog-Readmem - |Verilog code generator |Parse Verilog $readmemh or | |$readmemb text file --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-28 19:40:48 EDT --- sorry description is: %description The Verilog Hardware Description Language (HDL) provides a convenient way to load a memory during logic simulation. The $readmemh() and $readmemb() system tasks are used in the HDL source code to import the contents of a text file into a memory variable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478345] Review Request: mr - A multiple repository management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290042.mBT0gvFm020096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478345 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2008-12-28 19:42:56 EDT --- mr help doesn't work - it tries to call man -l which doesn't exist in the current fedora man-command. It's probably easiest to just patch out the output of "use mr help for man page" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290050.mBT0oHOE021249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) | --- Comment #39 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-12-28 19:50:15 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Dec 28 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.9.6-1 - 0.9.6 - sat-solver-perl -> perl-sat-solver - sat-solver-python -> python-sat-solver - fix weird .spec file permissions - fix mixed use of spaces and tabs - depend on rpm 4.6.0 (ie: build on Fedora 10 only) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 00:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290054.mBT0sV1w005431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) | --- Comment #16 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-12-28 19:54:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > > Any response? > They applied my patches to sat-solver (in SVN trunk/ - not in stable releases, yet) but still working on libzypp and zypper, we'll have to wait more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 01:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290100.mBT10xCP006481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-28 20:00:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.460-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 01:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290111.mBT1B0Ql008045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Comment #17 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-12-28 20:10:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > BTW: Please remove the "ZYpp is a" from the summary tag, just "Linux software > management engine" or "A Linux software management engine" is fine too. SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob;f=libs/libzypp/libzypp.spec;hb=HEAD SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/libzypp-4.28.24.1-1.fc10.src.rpm * Mon Dec 29 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 4.28.24.1-1 - 4.28.24.1 - trivial fix to Summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 01:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] New: Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 Summary: Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/linsmith.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/linsmith-0.99.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: linSmith is a Smith Charting program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 01:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290137.mBT1b4PW027471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-28 20:37:03 EDT --- Scratch build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024118 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 02:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290206.mBT26nPm015920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Brennan Ashton 2008-12-28 21:06:48 EDT --- I have started the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 03:18:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] New: Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Summary: Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Mathgl is a cross-platform library for making high-quality scientific graphics. It provides fast data plotting and handling of large data arrays, as well as window and console modes and for easy embedding into other programs. Mathgl integrates into fltk, wxWidgets, qt and opengl applications Rpmlint: Empty for spec file and SRPM. RPM returns one warning, notification has been sent upstream. mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. koji scratch: All arches appear to build succesfully. URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024210 Project page: http://mathgl.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 03:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225852] Merge Review: gok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290322.mBT3MXUa010166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225852 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-28 22:22:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > xx - file and directory ownership > + Since an icon has been installed under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor there > should be a runtime dependency on hicolor-icon-theme. However, is this > icon really needed as there is no .desktop file? Ofcourse it is needed for the icons in the window titles. So please add the dependency on hicolor-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 03:49:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290349.mBT3n0jj030321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-28 22:48:59 EDT --- Just a few drive-by review recommendations: 1. drop hard-coded Requires: freeglut hdf5 fltk qt these should all get picked up automatically 2. use BuildRequires: qt4-devel (it's unambiguous which version of qt you're using) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 03:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290354.mBT3sQVF031143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-12-28 22:54:25 EDT --- OK, a few other areas that NEEDSWORK: 3. static libs are preferably omitted. But if included at all (with justification), must be packaged separately, into something like %{name}-devel-static. .la files should go with the statics libs (omitted, or packaged along with the static libs) 4. %_includedir/ltdl.h conflicts with system libtool-ltdl-devel. Omit from packaging 5. replace %{_includedir}/mgl/*.h with (something like) %{_includedir}/mgl/ so parent dir is owned too. 6. Why does -devel have a separate (and invalid) License: GPL ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 04:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290417.mBT4HvOD017853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-28 23:17:55 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 05:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478365] Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290509.mBT59IWC009252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478365 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-29 00:09:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024296 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6f036f2906bd0993b02792cacb09f309 Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 + Package perl-Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(DeviceLibs::DesignName) perl(Verilog::CodeGen) perl(Verilog::CodeGen::Gui) Requires: perl(Cwd) perl(DeviceLibs::DesignName) perl(Verilog::CodeGen) perl(lib) perl(sigtrap) perl(strict) perl(vars) As this package don't have any BR on perl-verilog and perl-Verilog-Readmem, I reviewed this package easily. But I prefer to wait to approve this till reviews 476386 and 476364 will get finished and built in rawhide at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 05:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290541.mBT5f1NJ029689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-29 00:41:00 EDT --- 33256af1c310309da6f03f2a2fe8a869 linsmith-0.99.11.tar.gz http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024295 1) 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor 2) install command should be %{__make} install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" 3)gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet not needed as no icons installed in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor 4) Also, I see its not needed to have update-desktop-database scriptlet. from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database ==> Use this when a desktop entry has a 'MimeType key. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 05:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290552.mBT5qPwa015820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-29 00:52:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024302 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 088412ddff67f50e32bc9d45e56b2658 ethstatus_0.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 05:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290554.mBT5s1NT015998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-29 00:54:00 EDT --- Add some more description also in %description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 07:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290737.mBT7b1nk030780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-29 02:37:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: virtaal Short Description: Localization and translation editor Owners: dwayne Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2 OLPC-3 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 07:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290738.mBT7cLmg013316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2008-12-29 02:38:21 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8-2.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output (spec, SRPM and RPM): mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 1. drop hard-coded Requires: freeglut hdf5 fltk qt these should all get picked up automatically >Done. Might be a stupid lack of understanding on my part, but I do not understand how these can be picked up automatically if the only Requires is gsl. Normally rpmlint warns if you have redundant requires. I.e if A depends on C, and you "Requires: A, C" then rpmlint says that "Requires: C" is not needed. Where is it obtaining the automatic Requires from? 2. use BuildRequires: qt4-devel (it's unambiguous which version of qt you're using) > Done. 3. static libs are preferably omitted. But if included at all (with justification), must be packaged separately, into something like %{name}-devel-static. .la files should go with the statics libs (omitted, or packaged along with the static libs) >configure now has --disable-static --enable-shared passed as a flag. 4. %_includedir/ltdl.h conflicts with system libtool-ltdl-devel. Omit from packaging >I would have found that out if i had tried to install the RPM, wouldn't I? I will add this to my pre-request checks for next time around. >Building libtool-ltdl that accompanies this package has been disabled. 5. replace %{_includedir}/mgl/*.h with (something like) %{_includedir}/mgl/ so parent dir is owned too. > Done. 6. Why does -devel have a separate (and invalid) License: GPL ? >Because I stuffed up :). Removed. Latest koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024362 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 07:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] New: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alsroot at member.fsf.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SPECS/sugar-tamtam-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-common-52-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm Description: TamTam is a suite of four music and sound related activities for theSugar. TamTam is written in python with some C functions for speed-critical services.The audio engine for TamTam is Csound. rpmlint claims for right group, but other sugar activities also use Sugar/Activities group COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, so I use GPLv2+ in spec package demands sugar* and olpcsound packages from updates-testing repo but current olpcsound has unmets, thus I built sugar*.src.rpm from updates-testing and used them from local repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 07:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290757.mBT7vNo3016059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 Aleksey Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290801.mBT81ITN016818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Aleksey Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] New: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alsroot at member.fsf.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SPECS/sugar-tamtam-edit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-edit-51-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm Description: TamTam is a suite of four music and sound related activities for theSugar. TamTam is written in python with some C functions for speed-critical services.The audio engine for TamTam is Csound. rpmlint claims for right group, but other sugar activities also use Sugar/Activities group COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, so I use GPLv2+ in spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478384] New: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alsroot at member.fsf.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SPECS/sugar-tamtam-mini.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-mini-50-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm Description: TamTam is a suite of four music and sound related activities for theSugar. TamTam is written in python with some C functions for speed-critical services.The audio engine for TamTam is Csound. rpmlint claims for right group, but other sugar activities also use Sugar/Activities group COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, so I use GPLv2+ in spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:03:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290803.mBT83ldG002349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Aleksey Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:06:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290806.mBT86EAj003003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 Aleksey Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:03:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478383] New: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alsroot at member.fsf.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SPECS/sugar-tamtam-jam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-edit-52-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm Description: TamTam is a suite of four music and sound related activities for theSugar. TamTam is written in python with some C functions for speed-critical services.The audio engine for TamTam is Csound. rpmlint claims for right group, but other sugar activities also use Sugar/Activities group COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, so I use GPLv2+ in spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290807.mBT87sUt017918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Aleksey Lim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478385] New: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 Summary: Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alsroot at member.fsf.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SPECS/sugar-tamtam-synthlab.spec SRPM URL: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-synthlab-52-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm Description: TamTam is a suite of four music and sound related activities for theSugar. TamTam is written in python with some C functions for speed-critical services.The audio engine for TamTam is Csound. rpmlint claims for right group, but other sugar activities also use Sugar/Activities group COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, so I use GPLv2+ in spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290810.mBT8ARhH003585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 --- Comment #1 from Aleksey Lim 2008-12-29 03:10:27 EDT --- package demands sugar* packages from updates-testing repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478383] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-jam - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290812.mBT8C0Rg018561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478383 --- Comment #1 from Aleksey Lim 2008-12-29 03:12:00 EDT --- package demands sugar* packages from updates-testing repo sorry - copy&paste problem, right srpm url is: http://people.sugarlabs.org/~alsroot/RPM/SRPMS/sugar-tamtam-jam-52-1.20081229.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478385] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-synthlab - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290813.mBT8DJwv018627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478385 --- Comment #1 from Aleksey Lim 2008-12-29 03:13:18 EDT --- package demands sugar* packages from updates-testing repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478384] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-mini - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290812.mBT8CdQK003854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478384 --- Comment #1 from Aleksey Lim 2008-12-29 03:12:38 EDT --- package demands sugar* packages from updates-testing repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:19:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290819.mBT8JbRK019320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #14 from D Haley 2008-12-29 03:19:34 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.3-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm * Mon Dec 29 2008 5.0.3-1 - Update to new scilab release (5.0.3) - Add devel section for .h files - Disable static libs - Fix documentation build (added jeuclid-core) - Fix many rpmlint warnings (devel mainly.) There are still issues with this, the non-showing graphs still seem to elude me, even after setting (I believe) the claspath correctly in scilabs classpath.xml. Nor is the documentation being created correctly (no /usr/share/scilab/modules/helptools/jar/scilab_en_US_help.jar). However, thanks to the work of others on the deps for scilab, the help dependencies are now building appropriately (eg. jeuclid-core). >Those are debuginfo extracted by rpm. If you have a problem with them , then I >would suggest that you review how your builsystem is done... thoses are >expected to build fine and ends in %{name}-debuginfo rpm package. My understanding of the debug build process is that scilab is meant to be building all components with debugging symbols enabled. rpmbuild will subsequently generate a subset of files which have the debugging symbols and set them aside. These are then stripped using "strip" and reinstated back into the main package. AFAIK there should not be a separate folder for files with debugging information as this will distrupt the way that rpmlint operates, as it will not correctly place the files (say /usr/lib/libscilab.so) with the version that has debugging symbols, as it will simply insert /usr/lib/debug/libscilab.so, not replacing as it should. That said I am certainly not an expert in how rpmbuild operates -- I am learning as I need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 08:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290844.mBT8iiwr008162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-29 03:44:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ethstatus Short Description: Console-based ethernet statistics monitor Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 09:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290935.mBT9ZV17032269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-29 04:35:28 EDT --- Because those are not user-modifiable config file but static system templates (ie, data). So according to the FHS they should be somewhere else. See the first FPC meeting minutes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 09:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812290955.mBT9tqKh020669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 09:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] New: Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 Summary: Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 478372 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: UDAV is program for data array visualization and is based on the MathGL library. It supports a wide range of graphical plots, provides a simple scripting language and allows for visual data manipulation and editing via a WYSIWYG interface. rpmlint (spec, RPM and SRPM): empty. koji scratch: No, waiting for dependancy bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 11:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291103.mBTB38h2032566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-29 06:03:04 EDT --- The new official templates have removed explicit post and postun in font specs because packagers were messing it up, review couldn't catch all the problems, and the fontconfig maintainer was unhappy at font packagers. Conversion of existing packages to new templates is ongoing and some still use the old conventions. Please make this new package conformant to the new packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 11:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429435] Review Request: gnubversion - Gnome interface to Subversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291115.mBTBFGPa002444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429435 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #17 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-12-29 06:15:14 EDT --- This package doesn't work in Rawhide (possibly also other Fedora versions). $ ldd /usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-gnubversion.so linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff861fe000) libgnubversion.so.0 => not found libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000000000315000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000363ce00000) $ locate libgnubversion.so.0 /usr/lib64/gnubversion/libgnubversion.so.0 /usr/lib64/gnubversion/libgnubversion.so.0.0.0 I think this is caused by the rpath hack which is performed in the .spec file. Without using the rpath, the dynamic linker doesn't know where to find the library libgnubversion.so.0 (as it is in a non-standard path). To work around this, users have to add '/usr/lib64/gnubversion' to /etc/ld.so.conf and re-run /sbin/ldconfig, but such a thing shouldn't be necessary for regular users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 11:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] New: Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Summary: Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-imageviewer.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Image_Viewer Description: The Image Viewer activity is a simple and fast image viewer tool for Sugar. It has features one would expect of a standard image viewer, like zoom, rotate, etc. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024626 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-imageviewer.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-imageviewer.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 11:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291134.mBTBYSU4020408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #4 from Adam Stokes 2008-12-29 06:34:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Looking at the code, it looks like it is GPLv3+. Thanks for the catch, this makes sense as I am not committed to v3 only > > Why are the man pages separate from the upstream source? Seems like they'd be a > logical fit to go inside the tarball, or at the very least, uploaded to the > fedorahosted site. If you opt for the latter route, please provide full > upstream URLs. Fixed > > Do you still need Source1? It doesn't seem to be used anymore. Fixed > > You also don't need the Requires: python >= 2.4 > > Fedora's RPM will detect the python bits in the package and add a proper > versioned Requires on python(abi). For example, in rawhide, we get: > > [spot at velociraptor ~]$ rpm -qp > /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/cas-0.13-113.fc11.noarch.rpm --requires > /usr/bin/python > config(cas) = 0.13-113.fc11 > crash > python >= 2.4 > python(abi) = 2.6 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > Thus, your manual python Requires is unnecessary. Fixed > > Also, the last sentence of the description doesn't make much sense. Can you fix > that up a bit? :) Hopefully I cleared up the description, my writing skills are subpar :( Thanks http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/cas-0.13-114.src.rpm http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/cas.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429435] Review Request: gnubversion - Gnome interface to Subversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291223.mBTCN7ZC013976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429435 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-29 07:23:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > /usr/lib64/gnubversion/libgnubversion.so.0 > /usr/lib64/gnubversion/libgnubversion.so.0.0.0 Whoops, this is something I probably overlooked. (In reply to comment #9) > > gvn-checkout: error while loading shared libraries: libgnubversion.so.0: cannot > > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > Hm...you no need to move them to _libdir. > once this package is installed, you have to restart your X environment to > update > nautilus. perhaps your ldconfig needs to be update as well. > Currently works fine on mine without move any lib to _lidir. I'll chroot > another > one to check closer this issue. You're wrong here. The libgnubversion.so.0 really needs to go to _libdir, unlike libnautilus-gnubversion.so, which should stay in nautilus extension directory. Please move it. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] New: Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Summary: Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/httping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/httping-1.2.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.vanheusden.com/httping/ Description: Httping is like 'ping' but for http-requests. Give it an url, and it'll show you how long it takes to connect, send a request and retrieve the reply (only the headers). Be aware that the transmission across the network also takes time. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024702 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint httping* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint httping-1.2.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291237.mBTCbTLR016520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #15 from Michal Schmidt 2008-12-29 07:37:26 EDT --- Matthias, excellent, now that you updated Twisted to 8.1.0 in Rawhide, we can hopefully get web2 in too. I'll re-review your latest package today. There's one thing I noticed immediately on the first line of the spec file: %{?!python:%define python python} Looks like switched order: ?! -> !? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] New: Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Summary: Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/ircp-tray.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/ircp-tray-0.7.3-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Ircp-Tray is am infrared file transfer program. It stays inside your system tray, listening for incoming OBEX file transfer request, as well as sending file out to remote devices via IrDA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291256.mBTCupoF002490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-29 07:56:50 EDT --- Oh, yes, I should probably depend on glib-devel > 2.14, since this uses the new -fashioned timeouts; I'll fix that on next spin. RHEL 5 has older glib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291259.mBTCxegh002971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 12:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291257.mBTCvjGq020024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 13:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291321.mBTDL4g8007833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-29 08:21:03 EDT --- Good Work. * filelists fine * provides/requires sane * rpmlint silent * builds in mock * license ok, text included in %doc * seems to run fine Just a few notes, definitely not blockers: 1.) Please set vendor to "fedora" in the desktop entry https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation 2.) The description seems completely irrelevant to me I'd expect it to tell me what's in the package (the client), not the description of framework architecture. Please reconsider it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 14:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291401.mBTE1rhi015532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-29 09:01:52 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: ed6b34290c06150f168a31f5e137dbfbf7fcfa94 ircp-tray-0.7.3.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. BAD no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. BAD GUI app with desktop file. - no need to have pkgconfig as BR: , it is resolved from all used -devel BRs, gtk2-devel is a dependency of libnotify-devel, so the BRs should be only "intltool gettext libnotify-devel openobex-devel" - what is the reason for using a file as Requires? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies) - the desktop file is listed twice in %files - upstream desktop file installed, but not validated (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 14:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291422.mBTEMwwt019311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-29 09:22:53 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 14:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291454.mBTEsQb8009273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah 2008-12-29 09:54:24 EDT --- REVIEW: [+] = OK [-] = NOT OK [1] = SEE COMMENTS [?] = WTF? =========================== [+] source files match upstream: sha1: 90bad27d62e4ab5813a200feec2c5ae34e615813 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [1] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. GPLv2 with exceptions or CDDL [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. 6.5-200811100001-ml [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024679 [+] package installs properly. [2] rpmlint is silent. [3] final provides and requires are sane. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [3] scriptlets are sane [+] code, not content. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. ================== COMMENTS: [1] Do we really need the "Distrubution" tag? AFAIK nothing in Fedora makes use of it. Package groups are handled via comps. Changelog: Please remove the "6.1" references because they are not really related to this package. (changelog entries from the former "platform8" package) [2] Its not see comments above. The only thing that can/should be fixed are the "W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm" warnings, see [4] [3] rpm -qp netbeans-platform-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides libnb-platform9 = 6.5 netbeans-platform = 6.5-2.fc11 rpm -qp netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides libnb-platform9-devel = 6.5 netbeans-platform-harness = 6.5-2.fc11 Any reason why they are called "libnb-platform9" and "libnb-platform9-devel" ? Those should be renamed to libnb-plaform/-devel (other packages can use the version to require it). [4] Whats the purpose of the noautoupdate scriptlets? Wouldn't it be better to just package those files (generate them in %install section and add entries in %files). This way rpm will handle the deletion/creation of this files and there would be no need for the scriptlets. Besides those the package/spec looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 14:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291459.mBTEx1vI010111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-29 09:59:00 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/tryton.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/tryton-1.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm * Mon Dec 29 2008 Dan Hor?k 1.0.1-2 - set vendor for the desktop file - improve Description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 15:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291500.mBTF0LWT010568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-29 10:00:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tryton Short Description: Client for the Tryton application framework Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 15:15:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291515.mBTFFaOx013434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-29 10:15:35 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/linsmith.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/linsmith-0.99.11-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 15:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429435] Review Request: gnubversion - Gnome interface to Subversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291521.mBTFLXwd029739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429435 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-29 10:21:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > gvn-checkout: error while loading shared libraries: libgnubversion.so.0: cannot > > > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > > > Hm...you no need to move them to _libdir. > > once this package is installed, you have to restart your X environment to > > update > > nautilus. perhaps your ldconfig needs to be update as well. > > Currently works fine on mine without move any lib to _lidir. I'll chroot > > another > > one to check closer this issue. > > You're wrong here. The libgnubversion.so.0 really needs to go to _libdir, > unlike > libnautilus-gnubversion.so, which should stay in nautilus extension directory. > > Please move it. Thanks! Well, no. It can be guessed that the fact that this software (or the upstream) tries to install libgnubversion.so.0 under %_libdir/%name means that this software should work (at least for the upstream) without moving the library into %_libdir (well, there are not a few cases in which upstream make mistakes, however this is not the case). The culprit is the following lines. ---------------------------------------------------------- #Remove Rpath sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec="\\${wl}--rpath \\${wl}\\$libdir"|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool ----------------------------------------------------------- Well, I see these lines in many spec files, however this method removes _all_ rpaths, which sometimes makes the software unusable like this case and bug 432468. The unneeded rpath _only_ should be removed (on x86_64 it is /usr/lib64, on i386 there is nothing on this package) and %_libdir/%name rpath should be preserved, and libgnubversion.so.0 should not be moved to %_libdir. Refer to anjuta spec file about how to deal with this for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 15:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291518.mBTFIwlZ029096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #16 from Michal Schmidt 2008-12-29 10:18:55 EDT --- Please fix the !?/?! confusion. I suggest adjusting Summary and %description. Upstream no longer calls Web2 the "next generation" framework, they now call it "experimental". According to http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedWeb2 they are merging its functionality into Twisted-Web. When they're done, Web2 will be obsoleted. Everything else looks OK. Details: # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. python-twisted-web2.src: I: checking python-twisted-web2.x86_64: I: checking python-twisted-web2.x86_64: E: no-binary 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. OK. This error is expected here and should be ignored. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. Checked: Naming, Legal, No pre-built binaries, Spec legibility, Arch support, Filesystem layout, Rpmlint, Changelogs, BuildRoot (it's not the most preferred form, but it's one of the allowed ones, and RPM 4.6 ignores it anyway), Requires, BuildRequires, Summary and description, Encoding, Documentation, Debuginfo packages, Duplication of system libraries, Macros, Timestamps, Scriptlets requirements, File and Directory Ownership, Conflicts, No External Kernel Modules, No Files or Directories under /srv, Bundling of multiple projects N/A: Compiler flags, Shared Libraries, Exclusion of Static Libraries, Beware of Rpath, Configuration files, Initscripts, Desktop files, Handling Locale Files, Parallel make, Conditional dependencies, Relocatable packages, Code Vs Content, Users and Groups, Web Applications, # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. MIT license. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. 4a03e62453037b009ee5f0e1396be792249b9e2f TwistedWeb2-8.1.0.tar.bz2 # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK. Builds in Koji on all archs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1024731 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK. # MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. # MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. The main package includes documentation files, the documentation is not too large, split is not necessary. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 15:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291529.mBTFTgqg030796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-29 10:29:40 EDT --- Can you comment in the spec, or even here, on why these are bogus? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 15:30:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291530.mBTFUucU031347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-29 10:30:55 EDT --- Thanks, post back with developments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 16:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429435] Review Request: gnubversion - Gnome interface to Subversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291650.mBTGoffY027912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429435 --- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-29 11:50:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > > You're wrong here. The libgnubversion.so.0 really needs to go to _libdir, > > unlike > > libnautilus-gnubversion.so, which should stay in nautilus extension directory. > > > > Please move it. Thanks! > > Well, no. It can be guessed that the fact that this software > (or the upstream) tries to install libgnubversion.so.0 under %_libdir/%name > means that this software should work (at least for the upstream) > without moving the library into %_libdir (well, there are not a few > cases in which upstream make mistakes, however this is not > the case). > > The culprit is the following lines. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > #Remove Rpath > sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec="\\${wl}--rpath > \\${wl}\\$libdir"|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool > sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Well, I see these lines in many spec files, however this method > removes _all_ rpaths, which sometimes makes the software > unusable like this case and bug 432468. > > The unneeded rpath _only_ should be removed > (on x86_64 it is /usr/lib64, on i386 there is nothing on this package) and > %_libdir/%name rpath should be preserved, and libgnubversion.so.0 > should not be moved to %_libdir. Refer to anjuta spec file about > how to deal with this for example. I still tend to disagree. There's really no good reason for that library not being in libdir. Well, upstream does that, but that's a pretty bad excuse for using RPATH, though a good reason for a bug report upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 17:06:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225896] Merge Review: icu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291706.mBTH63DL013680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225896 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-29 12:06:02 EDT --- Give 4.0-6 a whirl. Moving icu-config into sources rather than a patch should sort out those warnings, and tweaking the linker link should fix up the shared-lib-without-dependency-information "Error" and related unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings, along with most of the other warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 18:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291824.mBTIOPZY024706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-29 13:24:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > formal review is here, see the notes below: > BAD BuildRequires are proper. > BAD final provides and requires look sane. > BAD no duplicates in %files. > BAD GUI app with desktop file. > - no need to have pkgconfig as BR: , it is resolved from all used -devel BRs, Well, did not use to be the case; but this won't go to EPEL anyway since RHEL lacks IrDA stack, so I removed the explicit pkgconfig dependency in the new package. > gtk2-devel is a dependency of libnotify-devel, so the BRs should be only > "intltool gettext libnotify-devel openobex-devel" Again -- it did not used to be. Also, I'm wondering if the redundant buildrequires are forbidden? It makes a lot more sense to me to depend on libnotify explicitly no matter if gtk does, since it's not guaranteed for non-essential dependencies to go away (though it is not likely in this case). > - what is the reason for using a file as Requires? > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies) Well, the original reasoning behind that was that I though openobex-apps package is mis-named (it's far more common to either call it -utils, or place executables in the main package and put the libraries into -libs package), and I was afraid it can change. I did not file a bug report for that, and I don't really care, so I changed the require to openobex-apps. > - the desktop file is listed twice in %files Oops, must have been a typo. > - upstream desktop file installed, but not validated > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage) Good catch. Thanks! SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/ircp-tray.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/ircp-tray-0.7.3-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 18:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291825.mBTIPone009923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #11 from Stjepan Gros 2008-12-29 13:25:49 EDT --- I'm here, but I was busy doing my PhD and then came Christmas. I'll look into packages that need review to see if there are related ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 18:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478412] New: Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478412 Summary: Review Request: mpop - POP3 client for recieving mail from POP3 mailboxes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mpop.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mpop-1.0.16-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: ttp://mpop.sourceforge.net/ Description: mpop is a small and fast POP3 client. Features include mail filtering, delivery to mbox files, maildir folders or a mail delivery agent, a very fast POP3 implementation, many authentication methods, good TLS/SSL support, IPv6 support, and more. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025081 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint mpop* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint mpop-1.0.16-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 18:33:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291833.mBTIXkUY010964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-29 13:33:45 EDT --- I suppose that's a pretty good excuse. :) Hope it went well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 18:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291858.mBTIwdCv029936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Felipe Contreras changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felipe.contreras at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Felipe Contreras 2008-12-29 13:58:37 EDT --- I'm the main author and I'm interested in this. If you need anything just let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 19:07:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:07:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291907.mBTJ7EoQ031502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-29 14:07:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm the main author and I'm interested in this. > > If you need anything just let me know. Do you already have a fedora account ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 19:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471145] Review Request: procinfo-ng - System monitoring application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812291926.mBTJQ7Ka019294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471145 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2008-12-29 14:26:06 EDT --- Packaging-wise: APPROVED [...] * The manual page could/should be patched to remove references to the old hidden option -f (full screen), which has been removed. * procinfo-ng -n1 mode gives strange/unexpected results here. Except for the first second it shows bad values "inf%" and "nan%" for the CPU usage percentage numbers and vmm stats. (usually "inf = infinite" and "nan = not a number") It seems it somehow switches into diff-mode automatically and calculates values it cannot display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 20:02:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292002.mBTK2gD6007242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 --- Comment #17 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-29 15:02:40 EDT --- Thanks for the review! The switched !? comes from a copy/paste from the other twisted packages, where it was reversed. I had fixed them, but missed web2. I've now fixed it and updated the description and summary. I didn't bother bumping the release for such minor changes, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 20:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292006.mBTK6qsF008045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-12-29 15:06:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > formal review is here, see the notes below: > > BAD BuildRequires are proper. > > BAD final provides and requires look sane. > > BAD no duplicates in %files. > > BAD GUI app with desktop file. > > > - no need to have pkgconfig as BR: , it is resolved from all used -devel BRs, > > Well, did not use to be the case; but this won't go to EPEL anyway since RHEL > lacks IrDA stack, so I removed the explicit pkgconfig dependency in the new > package. > > > gtk2-devel is a dependency of libnotify-devel, so the BRs should be only > > "intltool gettext libnotify-devel openobex-devel" > > Again -- it did not used to be. Also, I'm wondering if the redundant > buildrequires are forbidden? It makes a lot more sense to me to depend on > libnotify explicitly no matter if gtk does, since it's not guaranteed for > non-essential dependencies to go away (though it is not likely in this case). No, redundant BRs are not forbidden and this is the case when it makes sense to use them. All issues are fixed now, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 20:32:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:32:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429435] Review Request: gnubversion - Gnome interface to Subversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292032.mBTKWbip011918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429435 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-29 15:32:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > I still tend to disagree. There's really no good reason for that library not > being in libdir. Well, upstream does that, but that's a pretty bad excuse for > using RPATH, though a good reason for a bug report upstream. There is no need to install libraries only used by the software to system-wide library directory. Such files should be installed under its software specific directory (usually %_libdir/%name) to avoid name space pollution as much as possible. If upstream intends to make the library also used by other applications (with providing header files for API, for example), such file must be installed to system wide library directory. Otherwise it is better to hide files into software specific directories if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 20:54:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292054.mBTKsOSF015072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-29 15:54:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ircp-tray Short Description: Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 21:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292113.mBTLDAv3018616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Michal Schmidt 2008-12-29 16:13:07 EDT --- OK, the latest spec file is fine. Setting flag fedora-review+. You can request CVS branches for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 21:25:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292125.mBTLPeUe005474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098 --- Comment #5 from Mathieu OUDART 2008-12-29 16:25:38 EDT --- Here is an update including the latest bits : Spec URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki-8.08.12159-1.1.src.rpm I also had to remove the %elseif statements because they're not supported on all platforms. Please let me know if there's still some work to do on this package. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 21:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478429] New: Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Summary: Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tinc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tinc-1.0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/ Description: tinc is a Virtual Private Network (VPN) daemon that uses tunnelling and encryption to create a secure private network between hosts on the Internet. Because the tunnel appears to the IP level network code as a normal network device, there is no need to adapt any existing software. This tunnelling allows VPN sites to share information with each other over the Internet without exposing any information to others. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025251 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint tinc* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint tinc-1.0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This package fails at the moment on ppc. -> configure: error: OpenSSL libraries not found. All other archs all ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 22:07:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292207.mBTM7fHG011977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #13 from Stjepan Gros 2008-12-29 17:07:40 EDT --- Ok, I fixed the omission in the changelog section. The new spec and src.rpm files are available on the following URLs: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/ndisc6/ndisc6.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/ndisc6/ndisc6-0.9.8-2.fc8.src.rpm As for review of some packages, I will be hard to find one that's not already reviewed. :) Do you maybe have some suggestion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 22:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455925] Review Request: htop - interactive process viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292215.mBTMFDlr028446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455925 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-29 17:15:11 EDT --- lost bug, closing it. htop seems to be ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 22:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292220.mBTMKB0Q029318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-29 17:20:10 EDT --- Great, thanks! I'm being optimistic by requesting extra branches, but I really hope we get Twisted updated on them at some point. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-twisted-web2 Short Description: Experimental Twisted Web Server Framework Owners: thias Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 23:01:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:01:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478432] New: Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 Summary: Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/dwscan/ Description: Dwscan displays access point information in a useful manner. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025373 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint dwscan-0.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint dwscan-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 23:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292301.mBTN1r5P002924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478300 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 23:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812292301.mBTN1sOg002951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 29 23:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478434] New: Review Request: FSMDesigner4 - A Finite State Machine design tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: FSMDesigner4 - A Finite State Machine design tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478434 Summary: Review Request: FSMDesigner4 - A Finite State Machine design tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FSMdesigner/FSMDesigner4.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FSMdesigner/FSMDesigner4-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: FSMDesigner4 is a C++ based implementation for a Finite State Machine (FSM) design tool with integrated Hardware Description Language (HDL) generation. FSMDesigner4 uses the Simple-Moore FSM model guaranteeing efficient fast complex control circuits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 01:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300125.mBU1PGE4024868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-29 20:25:15 EDT --- tasque-0.1.8-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tasque-0.1.8-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 01:24:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300124.mBU1OevQ009179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-29 20:24:37 EDT --- tasque-0.1.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tasque-0.1.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 01:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300132.mBU1W01p010453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #44 from Peter Scheie 2008-12-29 20:31:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: k12linux-quick-start-guide Short Description: Document on how to enable ltsp services on k12linux. Owners: peterscheie Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: wtogami -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 02:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300242.mBU2gkDu021940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 04:13:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225894] Merge Review: icon-naming-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300413.mBU4DHGF020323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225894 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-29 23:13:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 08:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300802.mBU82lnQ024500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-30 03:02:42 EDT --- There are still several issues: SHOULD: - In dkg's %files, you are inconsistently using %name and dpkg. Please only use one of them. I recommend to use dpkg, only. - You are still using %packagename. Please stop it. - The latin1->utf8 transformation of the man-pages should be performed in %build. MUSTFIX: - There is a circular dependency between the dpkg and dpkg-dev, introduced by the perl modules (dpkg can not be installed without dpkg-dev). I see 3 alternatives to work around this issue: a) package the perl modules as separate package (e.g. perl-Dpkg) b) move all perl modules into dpkg c) try to sort out the details of the perl module deps. I for one would choose alternative a). b) is almost equivalent to a), while c) is likely difficult to implement, if possible at all. - Several directories are unowned, e.g. /etc/dpkg/origins /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Source /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Shlibs - Files below %{_mandir} automatically receive %doc => the %doc inside of your %lang(xx) %doc %{_mandir} ... lists are superfluous. Please remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 09:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300901.mBU91UZv002262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #27 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-30 04:01:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > MUSTFIX: > - There is a circular dependency between the dpkg and dpkg-dev, introduced by > the perl modules (dpkg can not be installed without dpkg-dev). > > I see 3 alternatives to work around this issue: I missed something: The cause of this issue is you incorrectly packaging the applications in %{_bindir}/. Correctly stuffing those applications into dpkg rsp. dpkg-dev, like debian does, automatically resolves this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 09:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812300923.mBU9NfjB006418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-12-30 04:23:40 EDT --- Some remarks: - Your patch is superfluous. Overriding at make-time: make install bindir=%{_bindir} has the same effect without hacking the code. - The Makefile doesn't honor INSTALL => make INSTALL="install -p" is non-functional Furthermore: - I am having strong doubts if installing this tool to %{_bindir} is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 09:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] New: Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Summary: Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/qtgpsc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/qtgpsc-0.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.navlost.eu/survey/gpsd/ Description: qtGPSc connects to a GPS receiver via gpsd and displays position, speed, and time, as well as various precision indicators and satellite configuration. It can also show the raw GPS data in GPSD or NMEA format. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025837 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint qtgpsc* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint qtgpsc-0.2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 10:13:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301013.mBUAD0LU015386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-30 05:12:59 EDT --- Thanks Ralf for your inputs. (In reply to comment #1) > - Your patch is superfluous. > Overriding at make-time: > make install bindir=%{_bindir} > has the same effect without hacking the code. It's much smarter. Changed > - The Makefile doesn't honor INSTALL > => make INSTALL="install -p" > is non-functional fixed > Furthermore: > - I am having strong doubts if installing this tool to %{_bindir} is a good > idea. What location do you have in mind? Here are the updated files. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 11:56:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] New: Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Summary: Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libxnm.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libxnm-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://xnm.sourceforge.net/ Description: XNM is a simple recursively defined serialization syntax for storing and communicating of complex data structure Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1025884 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libxnm* libxnm.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libxnm-1.0.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint libxnm-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I reported to upstream about the rpmlint warning. But so far I have no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 13:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301319.mBUDJPit015524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 08:19:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327960) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327960) log of build failure when using Fedora's CFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 13:18:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301318.mBUDITbe031785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 08:18:28 EDT --- Unfortunately your attempt to override the default CFLAGS fails, in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1024704&name=build.log you can see the following fragment: + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/kerberos/include' + DEBUG= + make -j4 cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o mem.o mem.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o http.o http.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o io.o io.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o str.o str.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o error.o error.c str.c:22: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strndup' cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o utils.o utils.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o main.o main.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o tcp.o tcp.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o mssl.o mssl.c cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g -c -o res.o res.c In file included from http.c:28: The real fix is to use: make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" DEBUG="" Only that in this case the build fails due to something looking like a small programming error (see the attached log).The presence or absence of /usr/include/kerberos made no difference in my local build and I do not have right now the time to dig further. I also suggest to contact the author and ask for a clarification of the license. Strictly speaking, everywhere in the source files he speaks about what we call "GPL+", only the reference on his website is GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 14:05:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:05:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301405.mBUE5ukp008367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2008-12-30 09:05:51 EDT --- Who says it can't already be in the process of being reviewed? Just mention that it's practice and not binding. Pick something you feel somewhat confident in, maybe in a language you have some experience with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 14:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301444.mBUEiK62031595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #16 from Gratien D'haese 2008-12-30 09:44:17 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm We're finally getting there! # rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.13 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(/home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot INFO: enabled root cache INFO: root cache aged out! cache will be rebuilt INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: creating cache State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(/home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(default) 10 minutes 21 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-i386/result I think the time has arrived to find a sponsor for this project. Best wishes and a fruitful open source 2009 !! Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 14:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301454.mBUEs14W016922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 09:54:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327964) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327964) new spec, fixes all issues that I am aware of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 14:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301455.mBUEtpQd017459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 09:55:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327965) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327965) disables the usage of the bundled strndup and teaches Makefile to use install with the new spec and the attached patch, everything seems fine. let me know if you are comfortable with the modifications that I suggest and I will do a full review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 16:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301652.mBUGqhjd020942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-30 11:52:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 17:39:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301739.mBUHd5Lx011952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-30 12:39:02 EDT --- ok. Happy for any input on the 444 vs 644 issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 18:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301822.mBUIM1DS018684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #4 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2008-12-30 13:21:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Adel, thanks for review. The next release is prepared. Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform-6.5-3.fc11.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026772 Changes and comments: --------------------- > [1] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > Do we really need the "Distrubution" tag? AFAIK nothing in Fedora makes use of > it. Package groups are handled via comps. I absolutely agree. It is my fault. - The "Distrubution" tag is deleted > Changelog: > Please remove the "6.1" references because they are not really related to this > package.(changelog entries from the former "platform8" package) - The "6.1" references are removed from the changelog > [3] final provides and requires are sane. OK. No any changes. > [3] scriptlets are sane > rpm -qp netbeans-platform-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides > libnb-platform9 = 6.5 > netbeans-platform = 6.5-2.fc11 > rpm -qp netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides > libnb-platform9-devel = 6.5 > netbeans-platform-harness = 6.5-2.fc11 > > Any reason why they are called "libnb-platform9" and "libnb-platform9-devel" ? > Those should be renamed to libnb-plaform/-devel (other packages can use the > version to require it). An idea was to support a relation between packages across various Linux distributions. I agree it has not much sense for the Fedora packages. So, to make the package spec more clear for Fedora I've removed it at all. - Specifications of providing non-Fedora packages are removed > [2] rpmlint is silent. > Its not see comments above. The only thing that can/should be fixed are the > "W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm" warnings, see [4] > ... > [4] > Whats the purpose of the noautoupdate scriptlets? > Wouldn't it be better to just package those files (generate them in %install > section and add entries in %files). This way rpm will handle the > deletion/creation of this files and there would be no need for the scriptlets. By default all the NetBeans packages rely on the RPM facilities to complete updating. Nevertheless, the NetBeans has own update subsystem called as "update center". A .noautoupdate file disables auto update of a NetBeans cluster via update center. An idea to create/delete the .noautoupdate files in %post/%preun scriptlets is giving a chance for a user with the root rights to choose an alternative way for updating of the NetBeans clusters. It may be reached if the user will use the RPM option --noscripts for installation of a package (i.e. cluster). Note, this feature won't be used by default. If you agree to save this feature of the netbeans-platform package then I won't change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 18:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301829.mBUIT8sI003280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #1 from Jose Luis 2008-12-30 13:29:07 EDT --- This is my first package, so I'm seeking a sponsor. Any feedback will be appreciated! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 18:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] New: Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Summary: Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joseluisblancoc at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.5svn714-1.src.rpm Description: The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) is an extensive, cross-platform, and open source C++ library aimed to help robotics researchers to design and implement algorithms in the fields of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM), computer vision, and motion planning (obstacle avoidance). The libraries include classes for easily managing 3D(6D) geometry, probability density functions (pdfs) over many predefined variables (points and poses, landmarks, maps), Bayesian inference (Kalman filters, particle filters), image processing, path planning and obstacle avoidance, 3D visualization of all kind of maps (points, occupancy grids, landmarks,...), etc. Gathering, manipulating and inspecting very large robotic datasets (Rawlogs) efficiently is another goal of MRPT, supported by several classes and applications. The MRPT is free software and is released under the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 18:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301831.mBUIVAiR020468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Jose Luis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 19:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301959.mBUJxoZd016989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #8 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-30 14:59:48 EDT --- Update for new release (1.8.3.0) : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm I'll open a specific bug for the -spec option needed. Builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026840 Rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/monkeystudio-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/monkeystudio-debuginfo-1.8.3.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Plugin/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Gui/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Dll/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Main File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Console/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Main/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/QWidget Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Console/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/C++ Hello World/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/Qt Form/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Static Lib/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Dll/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/XUP Project/$Project Name$.xup monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Gui/$Project Name$.xphpqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Application/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Solution/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Static Lib/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake C-C++ Dll/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/PHP/PHP-Qt Console/$Project Name$.xphpqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QMake Qt Gui/$Project Name$.pro monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/template.ini 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 29 errors, 14 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX SPECS]$ Only template files are concerned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478316] Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302008.mBUK802x018638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 15:07:59 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: farsight2.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 15) => not a big deal, but would be nice to have this fixed before commit binary RPM: farsight2-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation => not a problem, docs are in -devel farsight2-devel: empty farsight2:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: a031937091ab40be75d8a154f01de081c9fc8615 farsight2-0.0.6.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. cosmetic problems with the source rpm: - Duplicate BuildRequires: glib2-devel (by gstreamer-devel) - farsight2.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 15) 2. adding INSTALL="install -p" to the make install line will preserve the timestamps of the docs; I've verified that in a local mock build, you get for instance: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2320 Dec 12 00:35 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/pt02.html -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 472 Dec 12 00:35 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/right.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2331 Dec 12 00:35 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/style.css -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Dec 12 00:35 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/up.png instead of: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2320 Dec 30 20:26 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/pt02.html -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 472 Dec 30 20:26 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/right.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2331 Dec 30 20:26 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/style.css -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Dec 30 20:26 /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/farsight2-plugins-0.10/up.png ================ *** APPROVED *** but please take care of the above ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302034.mBUKYIE0006697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 15:34:16 EDT --- Source 0 is not available (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rear/rear-1.7.11.tar.gz). According to http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835 the latest stable version is 1.6 and the latest devel is 1.7.9. Time to update the SF page (and maybe freshmeat, too) ? Source RPM: rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 => please chmod 644 the file before doing rpmbuild -bs The following directories are left unowned: /etc/rear/ /etc/rear/templates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:38:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302038.mBUKc0J7007349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 15:37:59 EDT --- Uhm, I see that both /bin/sh and /bin/bash are needed: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires rear-1.7.11-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /bin/bash /bin/sh binutils config(rear) = 1.7.11-1.fc11 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 It's a bit unusual, since /bin/bash is a superset of /bin/sh. Is it really intended to bring in botth or you have just not been constant in using either one or the other in the scripts that you have packaged ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302046.mBUKkUn1008709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Bug 457219 depends on bug 450227, which changed state. Bug 450227 Summary: Updated Twisted packages please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450227 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302047.mBUKlXb7008845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #28 from leigh scott 2008-12-30 15:47:31 EDT --- Spec: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg.spec SRPM: http://www.linux-ati-drivers.homecall.co.uk/dpkg-1.14.23-3.fc10.src.rpm > - Several directories are unowned, e.g. > /etc/dpkg/origins > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Source > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Shlibs dpkg does own these files %dir %{_sysconfdir}/dpkg %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Dpkg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302052.mBUKqg2K009548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #21 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-30 15:52:39 EDT --- Michel : Could you please check the latest package and resume the review? Now that web2 has been approved, the new plugins packages should be able to go in easily. http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-good/elisa-plugins-good.spec http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-good/elisa-plugins-good-0.5.22-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 20:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302056.mBUKu6YT010282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Saou 2008-12-30 15:56:04 EDT --- All requirements are now in devel (python-twisted-web2 has not been rebuilt yet, but it will be as soon as its CVS request is taken care of), so the review can be picked up by anyone wanting to see elisa get into at least devel, and hopefully backported to stable Fedora : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-bad/elisa-plugins-bad.spec http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/elisa-plugins-bad/elisa-plugins-bad-0.5.22-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 22:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478316] Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302234.mBUMYh4F024684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2008-12-30 17:34:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: farsight2 Short Description: Libraries for videoconferencing Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 22:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302246.mBUMkeWY026537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Ville Skytt? 2008-12-30 17:46:39 EDT --- BTW we already have http_ping [0] in Fedora which seems very similar - I don't think that's a problem but I thought I'd mention it in case someone wants to compare features. And http_ping's maintainership is up for grabs in any case if someone wants it... [0] http://www.acme.com/software/http_ping/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 22:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478290] Review Request: screenie - A small and lightweight screen wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302254.mBUMsURt010721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478290 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 17:54:29 EDT --- You must add awk and screen as Requires, rpmbuild does not pick them and without them screenie bails out. sort is also a required program, but it is provided by coreutils and I guess it's safe enough to assume that coreutils is installed on any system where screenie would be used Everything else seems fine, package is too simple (it's just a shell script) to include a full review. - RPM name is OK - rpmlint is empty - license is OK (GPLv2+) - source screenie_1.30.0.orig.tar.gz is the same as upstream 1f04b055c30f5f8e4f35160bf50cfa060472a61a screenie_1.30.0.orig.tar.gz - builds fine in mock (devel/x86_64)) and being a simple shell script it's safe to assume it will work on any arch - file list is OK, even timestamps are preserved - works OK (when awk and screen are installed!) ====== Package APPROVED but please add manual requires for awk and screen ====== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302314.mBUNEiXl030761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 18:14:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327981) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327981) failed build log when using the spec file from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327687 I've given a try with the new spec. On PPC it fails due to some missing BR: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1027119&name=root.log On my local system, mock build for devel/x86_64 failed as in the attached log. as a sidenote, the presence of the po directory make me think that gettext is also a BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302341.mBUNf1pH018251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302340.mBUNewaC002739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:40:56 EDT --- stun-0.96-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNgDe5003129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNg8bj003096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477866] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing Verilog code using perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNg6Vu003064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477866 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:42:05 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10, perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10, perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302344.mBUNi1hN018858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:44:00 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNgfr2018667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:42:40 EDT --- gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302345.mBUNj56Z019326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:45:01 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477867] Review Request: perl-Perlilog - Verilog environment and IP core handling in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNg0FP018533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477867 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:41:59 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10, perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10, perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNgAVL018614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477871] Review Request: perl-ModelSim-List - Analyse the 'list' output of the ModelSim simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNg3GG018561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477871 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:42:02 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser-0.13-1.fc10, perl-ModelSim-List-0.06-1.fc10, perl-Perlilog-0.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302344.mBUNiN0Q018910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:44:22 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fswebcam'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302343.mBUNh5lq003547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:43:04 EDT --- stun-0.96-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNgp1k003489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:42:50 EDT --- ssbd-0.10-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302346.mBUNkXec004677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:46:33 EDT --- gxmms2-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302343.mBUNhZgc003710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:43:33 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302347.mBUNlNEo004821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474909] Review Request: gxmms2 - A graphical audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNghvF003450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474909 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302343.mBUNhVoP003666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:43:28 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update phatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11859 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:42:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302342.mBUNgc0U003413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:42:37 EDT --- fswebcam-20070108-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update fswebcam'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11852 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302347.mBUNl9UB004777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:47:08 EDT --- trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update trac-privateticketsplugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11881 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302347.mBUNlKxe020017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:47:20 EDT --- wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302350.mBUNo4BZ020876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:50:03 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:51:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302351.mBUNpS9L021299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302350.mBUNoJ17021055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:50:18 EDT --- phatch-0.1.6-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update phatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302348.mBUNmSlp020264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 18:48:26 EDT --- BuildRoot ( %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root ) is not one of the values accepted in the packaging guidelines. License seems to be GPLv2+ (not GPLv2) and the file COPYING should be included in %docs. I suggest to also add AUTHORS. Source0 should be http://xdelta.googlecode.com/files/xdelta-1.1.4.tar.gz Latest version is xdelta3.0u (http://xdelta.googlecode.com/files/xdelta3.0u.tar.gz), I had to dig below "deprecated" to locate the source0 URL for 1.1.4. Current URL is http://xdelta.org/. There are duplicate BRs: pkgconfig (by glib2-devel), automake (by libtool), autoconf (by libtool). however this is mostly cosmetic . rpmlint is unhappy, most notably is the rpath signaled in the binary rpm: Source RPM: xdelta.src:223: W: macro-in-%changelog doc xdelta.src:225: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr xdelta.src:235: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr xdelta.src:240: W: macro-in-%changelog setup xdelta.src:250: W: macro-in-%changelog doc xdelta.src:251: W: macro-in-%changelog post xdelta.src:254: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr xdelta.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A binary file delta generator and an RCS replacement library. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. rpmlint of xdelta-debuginfo: xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/generic.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/getopt.h xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/sha.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdeltapriv.h xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/md5c.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/library.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/simple.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio_edsio.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio_edsio.h xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/default.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdmain.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/partime.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/base64.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/partime.h xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio.h xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdapply.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/maketime.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/edsio.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/libedsio/fh.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xd_edsio.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdelta.c xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xdelta.h xdelta-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xdelta-1.1.4/xd_edsio.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings. rpmlint of xdelta: xdelta.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xdelta-1.1.4/xdelta.magic xdelta.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xdelta-1.1.4/NEWS xdelta.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/xdelta-1.1.4/README xdelta.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A binary file delta generator and an RCS replacement library. xdelta.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/xdelta ['/usr/lib64'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. rpmlint of xdelta-devel: xdelta-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation xdelta-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Static library and header files for Xdelta development. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I also notice that the devel package includes two static libs (/usr/lib64/libedsio.a, /usr/lib64/libxdelta.a). If including them is really intended, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries a separate xdelta-static package should be created for them. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines, the xdelta-devel package should require pkgconfig, although I guess that the /usr/bin/pkg-config included automatically by rpmbuild is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302349.mBUNnETP005605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:49:11 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302352.mBUNqPCA006686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:52:24 EDT --- vbindiff-3.0-0.2.beta4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302351.mBUNpPqw006430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:51:24 EDT --- mitter-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475962] Review Request: mitter - A maemo/GTK+ client for twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302351.mBUNpbSs006476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475962 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:51:36 EDT --- mitter-0.4.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:50:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302350.mBUNoSlW006206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:50:26 EDT --- remoot-0.9-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302349.mBUNn4io005537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:49:03 EDT --- pytagger-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:52:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:52:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302352.mBUNqC53006583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:52:12 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:49:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454482] Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302349.mBUNnHhu005636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472842] Review Request: pytagger - ID3 Tag Reader and Writer Library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302349.mBUNn7Tl005571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472842 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302352.mBUNqFL1006614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:48:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478318] Review Request: trac-privateticketsplugin - allow users to see only tickets they are involved with In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302348.mBUNmIGl005370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478318 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:48:17 EDT --- trac-privateticketsplugin-1.1.1-0.2.svn5068.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update trac-privateticketsplugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:47:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302347.mBUNlmcu005228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:47:47 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yersinia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11889 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:51:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302351.mBUNphWh021533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:51:42 EDT --- remoot-0.9-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302354.mBUNs91W022012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:54:08 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302354.mBUNsqNr022103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:54:50 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477515] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer - Split VHDL code into lexical tokens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302355.mBUNtewf022664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477515 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:55:40 EDT --- perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer-1.00-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:53:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302353.mBUNrDrr021866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:53:12 EDT --- yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update yersinia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302353.mBUNrlBx007318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:53:45 EDT --- glog-0.1.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461899] Review Request: thebridge - ILink/EchoLink compatible conference bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302353.mBUNrMH1007226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:53:21 EDT --- thebridge-1.06-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 01:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310110.mBV1AF5V001043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327984|application/text |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 01:08:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310108.mBV18wnw000567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327984|application/octet-stream |application/text mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 01:08:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310108.mBV18QLQ018526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 20:08:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327984) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327984) fixed spec, silences rpmlint (modulo "xdelta-devel: W: no-documentation ") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 01:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310113.mBV1DKdJ019255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327984|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-30 20:13:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327985) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327985) fixed my mail address in changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 01:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310147.mBV1lIDf006584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #15 from Warren Togami 2008-12-30 20:47:16 EDT --- Why did 444 happen? It seems completely unimportant? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 01:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478294] Review Request: fswebcam - Tiny and flexible webcam program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310158.mBV1wCMh025934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478294 --- Comment #10 from Philip Heron 2008-12-30 20:58:11 EDT --- I've tested the x86_64 and ppc packages, both work as expected. I'm getting a "500 Internal error" on the fedoraproject.org site when I try to submit feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 02:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475055] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfan_-_Software_for_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?ting_Gr=C3=B6bner_Fans_and_Tropical_Varieties?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310238.mBV2cNn3032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-12-30 21:38:22 EDT --- Fixed; see: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/gfan.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/gfan-0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. However, LICENSE only says this: """ The manual for Gfan is NOT distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. The manual may be freely redistributed but is not allowed to be changed. The manual may be removed from the software package. """ Does that violate Fedora guidelines? I don't think so. (But I have removed doc/ from the srpm as per your advice anyways.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 03:25:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478502] New: Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478502 Summary: Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xdotool.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xdotool-20080720-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: xdotool lets you programatically (or manually) simulate keyboard input and mouse activity, move and resize windows, etc. It does this using X11's XTEST extension and other Xlib functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 04:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445455] Review Request: xdotool - Fake keyboard/mouse input In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310400.mBV40S8m014372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445455 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-30 23:00:26 EDT --- *** Bug 478502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 04:00:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478502] Review Request: xdotool - Fake input from the mouse and keyboard very easily In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310400.mBV40RdK014338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478502 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-30 23:00:26 EDT --- already in Fedora. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6258 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 445455 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 04:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310415.mBV4FS0L031563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 04:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] New: Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Summary: Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anthonybryan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1296899 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GGet is a Download Manager for the GNOME desktop, developed during Google Summer of Code 2008. http://live.gnome.org/GGet This, along with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 are my first packages and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 04:51:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] New: Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Summary: Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-customfieldsadminplugin.spec SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin-0.1-0.1.svn5073.el5.src.rpm Description: Trac plugin to expose custom fields via web admin interface rather than directly editing trac.ini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:00:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476623] Review Request: perl-Test-NeedsDisplay - Ensure that tests needing a display have one In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310500.mBV50wx1023433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476623 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-31 00:00:57 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310527.mBV5R2YQ027623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 --- Comment #6 from Jeremy Hinegardner 2008-12-31 00:27:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: beanstalkd New Branches: EL-5 Owners: jjh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310527.mBV5RJ04027654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Jeremy Hinegardner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310531.mBV5VvKi028412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-31 00:31:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026687 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ef6155cc8a9723e0e9614508aa1c592d Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=18, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.50 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.56 CPU) + Package perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured-0.04-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Directory::Scratch::Structured) = 0.04 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Directory::Scratch) perl(English) perl(Readonly) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Install) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:46:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310546.mBV5kERF031227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:46:13 EDT --- Does this really need a OLPC-2 and OLPC-3 branch? Is OLPC-2 accepting new builds? And is this package going to be different in the OLPC-3 branch from F-9 (which OLPC uses unless there are differences). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310546.mBV5krB7013557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:46:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473477] Review Request: tryton - Client for the Tryton application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310548.mBV5mrUq013712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473477 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:48:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457219] Review Request: python-twisted-web2 - Next generation Twisted Web Server Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310550.mBV5oqgO032213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457219 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:50:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:51:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310551.mBV5phwG014397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:51:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478316] Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310555.mBV5trsv015095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:55:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: k12linux-quick-start-guide - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310554.mBV5soUU014607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #45 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:54:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310557.mBV5v6Sg015237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-31 00:57:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472662] Review Request: beanstalkd - fast, distributed, in-memory workqueue service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310558.mBV5wIFH015316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472662 Jeremy Hinegardner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Jeremy Hinegardner 2008-12-31 00:58:17 EDT --- builds and updates submitted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 06:02:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478368] Review Request: linsmith - a Smith Charting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310602.mBV62xL6001697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478368 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-31 01:02:58 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1027261 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 33256af1c310309da6f03f2a2fe8a869 linsmith-0.99.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop files installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 06:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310620.mBV6KqoO004546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 06:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473718] Review Request: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured - Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310620.mBV6KovT004522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473718 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-12-31 01:20:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Directory-Scratch-Structured Short Description: Creates temporary files and directories from a structured description Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 07:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225896] Merge Review: icu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310710.mBV7AdvA027217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225896 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-31 02:10:38 EDT --- I looked into 4.0-6 release. rpmlint is silent on SRPM but on RPMs libicu.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libicutu.so.40.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 ==> I think if this needs to be really fixed then it needs to open another bug. also after installing libicu rpm in rawhide, I see rpmlint complained same as reported in comment#1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 07:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310748.mBV7mstX032429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #9 from David Timms 2008-12-31 02:48:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > existing examples, but that doesn't make them good examples. The proper > solution for this kind of thing would be to use a comps group instead. Is it possible in the comps group definition to require 32 bit libraries when installing / running a 64bit kernel system ? (there is no evidence of such in the eg Fedora-10-comps.xml). Are comps groups made visible outside of during the anaconda installation (eg like pup used to) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 08:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478399] Review Request: ircp-tray - Infrared file transfer applet for GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310839.mBV8dFx5025683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478399 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-31 03:39:14 EDT --- Thanks Dan & Kevin! Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 09:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310906.mBV96P3U030955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-31 04:06:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327999) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327999) separate static libs into their own package I am pretty sure the static libs are not needed (repoquery --repoid=development --whatrequires "/usr/lib*/libxdelta.a" returns only xdelta-devel), but the attached spec will provide them, in a separate package. Most probably the files should be nuked together with the libtool files, but I am not in position to evaluate that, I've never developed anything based on xdelta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 09:07:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310907.mBV975N2013125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327985|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 10:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311025.mBVAPAn3026230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-31 05:25:09 EDT --- Thank you guys for your work and a happy new year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 10:31:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471754] Review Request: virtaal - Localization and translation editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311031.mBVAVbvp027324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471754 --- Comment #11 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-31 05:31:36 EDT --- There have been discussions around building activities for localisation, this would require the future adaptation of the application. I'm happy to drop the OLPC branches and request them later if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 10:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311043.mBVAh07m029285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-31 05:42:59 EDT --- ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 10:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478359] Review Request: ethstatus - Console-based ethernet statistics monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311042.mBVAguur029255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478359 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-31 05:42:56 EDT --- ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ethstatus-0.4.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 13:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475058] Review Request: netbeans-platform - NetBeans 6.5 Platform 9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311300.mBVD0PEd022172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475058 --- Comment #5 from Adel Gadllah 2008-12-31 08:00:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > Adel, thanks for review. The next release is prepared. > > Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform.spec > SRPM URL: > http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/netbeans-platform-6.5-3.fc11.src.rpm > Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1026772 > > Changes and comments: > --------------------- > > > [1] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > > Do we really need the "Distrubution" tag? AFAIK nothing in Fedora makes use of > > it. Package groups are handled via comps. > I absolutely agree. It is my fault. > - The "Distrubution" tag is deleted OK > > Changelog: > > Please remove the "6.1" references because they are not really related to this > > package.(changelog entries from the former "platform8" package) > - The "6.1" references are removed from the changelog OK > > [3] final provides and requires are sane. > OK. No any changes. > > [3] scriptlets are sane > > rpm -qp netbeans-platform-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides > > libnb-platform9 = 6.5 > > netbeans-platform = 6.5-2.fc11 > > rpm -qp netbeans-platform-harness-6.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm --provides > > libnb-platform9-devel = 6.5 > > netbeans-platform-harness = 6.5-2.fc11 > > > > Any reason why they are called "libnb-platform9" and "libnb-platform9-devel" ? > > Those should be renamed to libnb-plaform/-devel (other packages can use the > > version to require it). > An idea was to support a relation between packages across various Linux > distributions. I agree it has not much sense for the Fedora packages. > So, to make the package spec more clear for Fedora I've removed it at all. > - Specifications of providing non-Fedora packages are removed OK > > [2] rpmlint is silent. > > Its not see comments above. The only thing that can/should be fixed are the > > "W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm" warnings, see [4] > > ... > > [4] > > Whats the purpose of the noautoupdate scriptlets? > > Wouldn't it be better to just package those files (generate them in %install > > section and add entries in %files). This way rpm will handle the > > deletion/creation of this files and there would be no need for the scriptlets. > By default all the NetBeans packages rely on the RPM facilities to complete > updating. Nevertheless, the NetBeans has own update subsystem called as "update > center". A .noautoupdate file disables auto update of a NetBeans cluster via > update center. > An idea to create/delete the .noautoupdate files in %post/%preun scriptlets is > giving a chance for a user with the root rights to choose an alternative way > for updating of the NetBeans clusters. It may be reached if the user will use > the RPM option --noscripts for installation of a package (i.e. cluster). Note, > this feature won't be used by default. > If you agree to save this feature of the netbeans-platform package then I won't > change it. Well I am not sure why anyone would want to mess with an rpm installed package this way. If someone does not want to use rpms to update, he should just install the upstream tarball. Also updating this way breaks tracking via rpm and rpm -V will no longer be able to verify the installation. Other packages (ex: firefox) disable this option for the same reason. The update center should only update plugins a user has installed in his home directory, so I think we should just remove the scriptlets and package those files as part of the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 13:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225896] Merge Review: icu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311309.mBVD9IkM009325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225896 --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-31 08:09:17 EDT --- libicu.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libicutu.so.40.0 I don't really think it need to be fixed, especially as a warning vs an error, but I guess we *could* submit a patch upstream to e.g. convert all those exits to some sort of throwing of an exception instead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 13:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225896] Merge Review: icu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311332.mBVDW6eL014314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225896 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-31 08:32:05 EDT --- Thanks for your comment. Definitely this is not packaging issue but upstream source code issue. This package is now APPROVED. You can CLOSE this review as reviewed package is already in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 13:41:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311341.mBVDfmt5030623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Depends on| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(cagney at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #19 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-31 08:41:46 EDT --- Closing this now as submitter is not responding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 13:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311359.mBVDxMww001031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-31 08:59:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328009) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328009) Sample Spec file fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 13:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311357.mBVDvSXo000832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-31 08:57:26 EDT --- MUST Items: xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM + [rishi at ginger ~]$ rpmlint gmime gmime.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgmime-2.0.so.2.2.21 /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 gmime.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgmime-2.0.so.2.2.21 /lib64/libdl.so.2 gmime.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgmime-2.0.so.2.2.21 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0 gmime.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgmime-2.0.so.2.2.21 /lib64/librt.so.1 gmime.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgmime-2.0.so.2.2.21 /lib64/libnsl.so.1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. [rishi at ginger ~]$ rpmlint gmime-sharp gmime-sharp.x86_64: W: no-documentation gmime-sharp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/gmime-sharp-2.4.pc gmime-sharp.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized mono bindings for gmime gmime-sharp.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. [rishi at ginger ~]$ OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + The '%ifarch s390 s390x ppc64' condition looks wrong because devel/mono.spec has 'ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha s390 s390x ppc'. Since Mono is unavailable in ppc64 causing gmime-sharp to be excluded for that architecture, a bug should be filed blocking the ExcludeArch tracker for PPC64 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/238953). The bug number should be documented in the Spec file as a comment. + The -sharp sub-package's summary should start with a capital letter. + Invoking autoreconf and friends from the Spec file has evoked strong reactions in the past. In this case it would be easy to rework Patch2 to apply against mono/Makefile.in instead of mono/Makefile.am and then use chrpath to remove the rpaths. Remember to replace 'BuildRequires: automake libtool' with 'BuildRequires: chrpath'. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath It looks like the --disable-rpath switch does not work, neither could I manage to get rid of the rpaths by modifying libtool. But chrpath is better than using autoreconf. + Here is how the unused-direct-shlib-dependency can be removed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency + Instead of using mv to rename the files in the %install stanza, would it not be better to pass '--program-prefix=%{name}-' to %configure? It is there for this purpose only. If you choose to use this switch, please don't pass transform='s,x,x' to 'make install' in the %install stanza. + gmime-sharp-2.4.pc should be packaged in a separate -sharp-devel sub-package. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#-devel_packages + Can gmime-2.2.3-use-pkg-config.patch be removed from CVS? OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines xx - License field does not meet actual license + While most of the source code is under LGPLv2+, the gmime-uudecode and gmime-uuencode binaries are obtained from GPLv2+ sources -- src/*.[ch]. This is a multiple licensing scenario. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Please change the value of the License field to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" and document it in the Spec or the package. + examples/*-example.c are under GPLv2+. It appears to be a simple mistake and would be good to request upstream to put them at par with the rest of the files. + util/md5-utils.[ch] are in the public domain. xx - upstream license file not included in %doc + Please include src/COPYING, containing the GPLv2 text, also. OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - %post and %postun invoke ldconfig OK - package is not relocatable xx - file and directory ownership + The -devel sub-package should have 'Requires: gtk-doc' because it installs files in /usr/share/gtk-doc. + Although 'Requires: gtk-sharp2' will pull in mono-core, it is better to have an explicit 'Requires: mono-core' since the -sharp sub-package installs files in /usr/lib/mono. OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - no static libraries OK - -devel has *.pc file and requires pkgconfig + Although 'Requires: glib2-devel' will pull in pkgconfig, it is better to have an explicit 'Requires: pkgconfig' for the sake of readability. OK - library files without suffix in -devel OK - -devel requires base package OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are sane OK - subpackages other than -devel requires base package xx - pkgconfig files in -devel + gmime-sharp-2.4.pc should be packaged in a separate -sharp-devel sub-package. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#-devel_packages OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 14:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311400.mBVE0nQr019193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-12-31 09:00:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328010) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328010) Updated Patch2 to apply against mono/Makefile.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 14:22:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311422.mBVEMvgd005870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #8 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2008-12-31 09:22:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/jpilot-backup-0.53-5.fc10.src.rpm looks good; Thank you both for the review and the comments. > the rpmlint warning seems to be a false positive ah good. > APPROVED > > I'll sponsor you once you apply for the packager group A request to join the 'Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group' is pending approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 14:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311445.mBVEjvZT009922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #6 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2008-12-31 09:45:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint output apologies for forgetting to run that. It now reports 0 errors, 0 warnings after the changes below. > cmconvert.src:38: E: files-attr-not-set [...] fixed. > - Is 'mkdir -p -m 0755 %{buildroot}/usr' really needed? You're right. It is not needed. Removed. > - Use make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" to preserve the > timestamps instead of make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} done > - There is no need to pack the file 'INSTALL' because it contains only generic > information which are not useful when installed from RPM agreed, removed. cmconvert-1.9.5-4.fc10.src.rpm and revised spec file uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 14:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 236488] Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311453.mBVErTKP028395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236488 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(livinded at deadbyte | |s.net) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 15:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478531] New: Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478531 Summary: Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/tuxmeteor/tuxmeteor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/tuxmeteor/tuxmeteor-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1027833 Description: Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program. The idea is, while you're lounging on a lawn chair watching the show with a nice warm blanket over you, you put your laptop in your lap (thus helping to warm your lap, under the blanket so the bright CRT doesn't destroy everyone's night vision) and click mouse buttons or keys on the keyboard every time you see a meteor. These events all get logged to a file, so you can take the data later and make a graph of meteor frequency vs. time, or whatever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 15:47:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225896] Merge Review: icu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311547.mBVFloJZ020707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225896 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 15:50:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478531] Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311550.mBVFoNxN006219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478531 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-31 10:50:22 EDT --- No toto! Tak tomuto sa pozriem na zubok! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 16:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478533] New: Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478533 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-fr-0.20080318-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: French hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 16:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478534] New: Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478534 Summary: Review Request: gnome-mastermind - Mastermind-like game for linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/gnome-mastermind.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/gnome-mastermind-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GNOME Mastermind is a little Mastermind game for linux. The goal of this game is to break a hidden color code following the hints that the game gives us. Check the game manual for a better explanation about how the game works and is played. Rebuild under mock is OK. SRPM builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1027898 rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX ~]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gnome-mastermind-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/gnome-mastermind-0.3.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/gnome-mastermind-debuginfo-0.3.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 16:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311659.mBVGxhVe016602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #31 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-31 11:59:40 EDT --- I have imported qmtest into cvs, and built it: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7353 Is there anything else for me to do at this point ? Will the package eventually show up via yum ? (The same questions apply to the Synopsis package.) Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 17:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478533] Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311714.mBVHEq2F001480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478533 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-12-31 12:14:50 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: cbb6e17ec4143ddfd484f7d8c3ec71ba11f2f627 hyph_fr_FR_2-0.zip [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English la nguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested, but it is so simple that it cannot fail :) [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 17:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311727.mBVHR4pr021242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-31 12:27:03 EDT --- By the way a Happy New Year! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 17:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311726.mBVHQakR021195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-31 12:26:35 EDT --- For F-10/9: - Please visit bodhi web interface: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and submit requests to push the rebuilt packages to repositories. For 11: - The rebuilt packages will be (or maybe already have been) pushed into repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 18:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311803.mBVI3mJI026546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-31 13:03:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > would you patch out the internal libs/applications/dependencies? > > i can?t do that, because > 1.) i can?t patch them out or/and > 2.) i patch it out and the build or the application run failed, because the > internals are modified or not compatible to the fedora supplied. So, in fact they did no local modifications (well, some windows-specific fixes to glfw, but they are of no interest to us). Please look into these: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/teeworlds/ I added a patch for the external dependencies (it may have broken sound, but I can not verify that now :), and a line that patches the bamfile into using our compiler flags. I also made packages for pnglite and glfw. Unfortunately I had to make up sonames for both -- it can't be done right unless upstream does that. I'm wondering if you could take at least one of the two packages and submit them for review and maintain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 18:19:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311819.mBVIJpT3028898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 Milan Zazrivec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Milan Zazrivec 2008-12-31 13:19:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xqilla New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mzazrive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 20:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812312025.mBVKPMar015042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #34 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-12-31 15:25:21 EDT --- OK, I requested updates for QMTest and Synopsis for both F9 and F10. I guess this issue (as well as #438543) can now be closed. Thanks for all your help ! And a Happy New Year to you, too ! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 20:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:54:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/perl-WWW-Curl.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: WWW::Curl is a Perl extension interface for libcurl. Package build on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1028096 Rebuild under mock is OK. Local build with all tests is OK rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/perl-WWW-Curl-4.05-1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/perl-WWW-Curl-debuginfo-4.05-1.fc10.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 21:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812312101.mBVL11Xn002489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 --- Comment #1 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-12-31 16:01:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328022) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328022) Build output for local build Build output for local build : rpmbuild -ba perl-WWW-Curl.spec --with network_tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 22:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812312227.mBVMR4dX032208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2008-12-31 17:27:03 EDT --- yeah, that rocks glfw is not relevant, its already in rawhide, but there are still some problems with this package and the maintainer won't include it in f-10. please don't ask me why! the pnglite is the one that is missing. please open a review for pnglite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 23:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812312315.mBVNFTW8006438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2008-12-31 18:15:28 EDT --- New upstream release that fixes build issues. SPEC is same location. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 23:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812312334.mBVNY0dp009184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Nick Boldt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nickboldt+redhat at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nick Boldt 2008-12-31 18:33:58 EDT --- +1. I might be able to help w/ this. Andrew Overholt's already spoken to me about helping out on this, as I'm an EMF committer and newly minted JBoss employee. Note that getting EMF, XSD, WebTools (and optionally, BIRT, DTP and TPTP) into Fedora would also enable JBoss Tools' deployment via .rpm in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 23:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478316] Review Request: Farsight2 - GStreamer libraries for videoconferencing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812312357.mBVNvvRK012283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478316 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2008-12-31 18:57:56 EDT --- thanks for the review. Imported & built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.