[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 3 10:34:52 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637
--- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> 2008-12-03 05:34:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The static libraries will need to go in their own -static packages; they are
> not permitted in the -devel packages alongside shared libraries. Preferably
> they aren't included at all, but that's up to you.
Removed.
> Many (all?) of the *so files are duplicated between the base and -devel
> packages. It looks like you used the usual pattern for capturing just the
> versioned .so files, but this package uses some odd library versioning so for
> some reason the library version appears before the ".so" as well as after it on
> some files. I don't pretend to understand why, but I guess you'll need to
> change the patterns used for capturing the versioned and unversioned .so files.
Fixed (I think...)
> The COPYRIGHT file mentions a gsm directory with a different copyright, but I
> don't see it in the package. I guess the package now just uses an external
> library.
I've asked upstream to update the file.
> I don't see any licensing information on the sounds. Can you verify the
> license?
Asked upstream.
new version:
http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink.spec
http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/svxlink-080730-4.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list