[Bug 467489] Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 06:59:26 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |orcanbahri at yahoo.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |orcanbahri at yahoo.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com>  2008-12-04 01:59:25 EDT ---
Here are the results of my review on this package:

* rpmlint says:
     nwsclient.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin
/usr/bin/PythonNWSSleighWorker.pyc 0644
     nwsclient.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin
/usr/bin/PythonNWSSleighWorker.pyo 0644
These files should be excluded. Please see:
    
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Unnecessary_Byte_compilation

* Since this package is a python module, we have to obey the python module
naming guidelines:
    
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29

? Shall we package the README* files? 

? Why is only a subset of the scripts in the scripts directory installed?

? It would be nice if you make a %check section and run as many possible tests
as possible from the test directory.

* Source0 gives 404

* Providing Eggs for non-setuptools packages is slightly different than for
setuptools packages. Please follow:
    
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list