[Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 6 22:48:35 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474812
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-12-06 17:48:33 EDT ---
rpmlint says:
perl-Class-Unload.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized unload given Class
Easy to fix.
perl-Class-Unload.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Unloads the given
class
by clearing out its symbol table and removing it from %INC.
Just needs one carriage return.
Those are really trivial, so I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix
them when you check in.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
01807226cd9a6b5b1c6a02cf8408ab09e0e76e7d70f06f6d3fe3af6e41906005
Class-Unload-0.05.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK (needs capitalization).
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
perl(Class::Unload) = 0.05
perl-Class-Unload = 0.05-1.fc11
=
perl >= 0:5.005
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Class::Inspector)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=5, Tests=21, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.02
csys = 0.13 CPU)
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED, just fix up Summary: and %description.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list