[Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Dec 8 11:57:47 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537





--- Comment #22 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com>  2008-12-08 06:57:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Is it possible to build this package in F-10 branch without "Obsoletes"
> attribute?
> Or is there a problem with that?
> I think an empty folder is not a good idea. Also there is an problem, that this
> package is included in pkgdb:
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tightvnc#Fedora10
> 
> I like tightvnc and real-vnc is not what I want.
> 

Well, I can build tightvnc for F10 but I don't see reason for it. Current trunk
tightvnc is forked RealVNC source - it is completely different from "old"
tightvnc 1.2.9 & 1.3.9.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list