[Bug 475593] New: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 9 18:22:13 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593
Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and
macro definitions used by font packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros
and other materials used to create font packages.
This package will serve as base for fonts packaging starting with Fedora 11
It has been approved by FPC today (2008-12-09).
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_%282008-11-18%29
(18:51:15) Rathann: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation
(18:51:17) ubertibbs: It makes the packages reasonable instead of having 50
lines of identical shell code pasted into them.
(18:51:21) spot: +1 from me
(18:51:24) hansg: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation
(18:51:28) ubertibbs: +1 from me.
(18:51:37) racor: -1 from me
(18:51:52) rdieter: +1 (there's good and bad uses of macros, this is an example
of the good kind, imo)
(18:52:00) ubertibbs: racor: If you want the reference where we asked the Java
folks to add the macros, I will dig it out for you.
(18:52:02) spot: abadger1999: would you like to vote?
(18:52:10) abadger1999: +1
(18:52:21) spot: okay, thats 6 for and 1 against, it passes
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081209 (minutes not posted
yet)
There is currently no hosting source for this project, a demand will be made
fedorahosted side but that's no reason not to push the package in rawhide now
so packagers can start adapting their packages to the new template(s)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list