[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 10 19:00:23 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874
--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-12-10 14:00:22 EDT ---
OK, this does indeed build, even on rawhide. (The package in comment #12
failed there due to a libtool issue, but built fine on F10.)
Since the license changed, I have re-checked it. The source in the "examples"
directory is GPLv3+, not LGPLv3+, but the examples aren't built and so aren't
present in the final package. All of the other source is indeed LGPLv3+, but I
note a bug that needs to be reported upstream: In libpyzmq/pyzmq.cpp, you see
"static const char* pyZMQ_doc" which has, at the end:
"0MQ is distributed under GNU General Public License v3\n";
which seems to conflict with reality. I don't think this is a problem for this
pachage, however.
It seems to me that the issues I had are fixed; there are two new thing that I
need to look at:
zeromq-python.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libpyzmq.so
zeromq-java.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libjzmq.so
Both of these have regular versioned .so* files alongside unversioned ones, and
I don't know all of the rules for these so I will ask. Hopefully this will be
done soon.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list