[Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 10 20:27:27 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979





--- Comment #31 from Dan Dennedy <dan at dennedy.org>  2008-12-10 15:27:25 EDT ---
> we need to be sure nothing will hardcode the libraries pathes
...
> > MLT already attempts to dlopen all so in lib/mlt.
> That's really bad. We are in $prefix/lib64/mlt on x86_64 ppc64 sparc64

Sorry for my miscommunication. I did not mean literally "lib/mlt." It is
actually *defaulted* to $(libdir)/mlt, where there is a ./configure option
--libdir. The application can override this via API, and there is an
environment variable as well.

> Once that said, I'm not sure I can support one more split between mlt
> non-ffmpeg enabled and mlt-freeworld ffmpeg enabled.

I don't want this project to be a nuisance with too many configurations. First
of all, I think I should split up my ffmpeg module because there are some
elements for deinterlace and color space conversion that are unencumbered and
then  encumbered format/codec-oriented elements. That would let you or someone
else just make a separate package with the encumbered elements similar to
gstreamer-ffmpeg. MLT has libdv and libvorbis modules that still make it usable
without the encumbered ffmpeg elements. I do not yet think it is necessary to
have good, bad, and ugly packages separate from the framework lib, do you? I
think the framework and majority of plugin modules can be in one package. In
that case, I need to make it easier/possible to separately build the encumbered
ffmpeg module. Feedback welcome.

> Is there any package using mlt that can be in Fedora once mlt is in?

kdenlive, which was rewritten for KDE4 and proving to be fairly usable and
stable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list