[Bug 459210] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep base package
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 10 20:37:07 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210
--- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de> 2008-12-10 15:37:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ref: devel
> 1. Why is "/usr/include/gnu-gnu-gnu" used as directory for include files (in
> -devel) ? I'd say that /usr/include/gnustep would look more "normal". After a
> quick glance over http://www.gnustep.org/experience/documentation.html I have
> not found any reference for "gnu-gnu-gnu".
> 2. %{_libdir}/GNUstep/Makefiles/ and /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Makefiles/Additional/
> are unowned
I have done some rework with gnustep-make-2.0.6-14 which may effected this
review.
It may be nice if you can checked it out. The deffences are:
1.) Removing of the gnu-gnu-gnu libcombol stuff
2.) Make sure the *.so files will going into /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list