[Bug 475777] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 10 23:06:52 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-12-10 18:06:51 EDT ---
"directrory" should be spelled "directory" in Summary: and %description.  Not a
big deal; just fix it up when you check in.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
  88788b422f9f0d6664d97ec876631309726d803abf758b903a9530746b66c8ed  
   AnyEvent-AIO-1.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
O summary is OK (spelling).
O description is OK (spelling).
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(AnyEvent::AIO) = 1.0
   perl-AnyEvent-AIO = 1.0-1.fc11
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
   perl(AnyEvent)
   perl(IO::AIO)
   perl(base)
   perl(strict)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
  All tests successful.
  Files=1, Tests=1,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr  0.00 sys +  0.01 cusr  0.00 
   csys =  0.02 CPU)

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list