[Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 11 17:40:22 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568
Till Maas <opensource at till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |opensource at till.name
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Till Maas <opensource at till.name> 2008-12-11 12:40:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Can it be possible to ask "fedora-cvs?" without formal review?
This is possible for packages that are under "Merge Review", because they are
already included in Fedora.
About the package:
- Why is xsltproc required via a path instead of using libxslt? If libxslt
cannot be used, please explain with a comment in the spec.
- It is recommended not to use %makeinstall, is there a reason to use it? It
builds fine here with:
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- parallel make is not used:
make %{?_smp_mflags}
- Is the touch command still needed? If it is, please explain why in the spec
file or fix it upstream:
touch doc/xmlto.xml doc/xmlif.xml
- License Tag should be GPLv2+ according to the header in xmlto.in
- License is in the tarball, but not in %doc:
COPYING
- There is more documentation missing:
README ChangeLog AUTHORS NEWS, maybe FAQ if it is planned to add more to this
file in the future
- Btw. fedorahosted provides a way to distribute releases without using the
scm, but I do not know how to upload something there:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/
If you want and permissions are open in cvs, I can fix at least the issues that
do not need a comment from you. I will then perform a full review later.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list