[Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 12 11:15:54 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568
Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(ovasik at redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com> 2008-12-12 06:15:53 EDT ---
Thanks for check of spec file sanity...
(In reply to comment #3)
> About the package:
>
> - Why is xsltproc required via a path instead of using libxslt? If libxslt
> cannot be used, please explain with a comment in the spec.
Fixed, probably accidently introduced when using spec file from tarball ... up
to F-9 libxslt requirements were present, fix now...
> - It is recommended not to use %makeinstall, is there a reason to use it? It
> builds fine here with:
No reason, fixed.
> - parallel make is not used:
> make %{?_smp_mflags}
Fixed
> - Is the touch command still needed? If it is, please explain why in the spec
> file or fix it upstream:
> touch doc/xmlto.xml doc/xmlif.xml
Not sure why they were touched - introduced between 0.18-6 and 0.18.13 (FC-5
and FC-6) without explanation in ChangeLog ... will remove it
> - License Tag should be GPLv2+ according to the header in xmlto.in
Fixed
> - License is in the tarball, but not in %doc:
> COPYING
>
> - There is more documentation missing:
> README ChangeLog AUTHORS NEWS, maybe FAQ if it is planned to add more to this
> file in the future
No need for FAQ at the moment, will think about it for future releases.
> - Btw. fedorahosted provides a way to distribute releases without using the
> scm, but I do not know how to upload something there:
> https://fedorahosted.org/releases/
Ok, thanks for suggestion, I'll probably add sources under fedorahosted svn in
future and fedorahosted.org/releases for tarballs - xmlto 0.0.21 is already
there... https://fedorahosted.org/releases/x/m/xmlto/
> If you want and permissions are open in cvs, I can fix at least the issues that
> do not need a comment from you. I will then perform a full review later.
I guess just listing issues here should be enough, I'll fix it myself, thanks.
Objections so far mentioned in comment #3 fixed in rawhide build
xmlto-0.0.21-3.fc11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list