[Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 12 14:54:13 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-12-12 09:54:12 EDT ---
For 2.14.16-2:
* Licensing
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
- Please write in the spec file what files are actually
licensed under GPLv2+.
As far as I checked the source codes, the codes
under GPLv2+ are:
------------------------------------------------------
src/idl-compiler/orbit-idl-driver.c
src/idl-compiler/orbit-idl-main.c
src/services/name/name-client.c
test/*.c
test/everything/*.c
test/poa/*.c
------------------------------------------------------
and these affects files under %_bindir in ORBit2-devel.
So the license of ORBit2 (main package) should be only
"LGPLv2+" and only -devel package should have "LGPLv2+
and GPLv2+" license tag.
! Timestamps
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
is preferrred to keep timestamps on installed files.
* Requires
- Would you explain why -devel subpackage should have
"Requires: indent"?
* Documents
- Please add the following file(s) into main package
------------------------------------------------------
COPYING.LIB
------------------------------------------------------
- Maybe the following file(s) can be added in -devel subpackage
------------------------------------------------------
ChangeLog
MAINTAINERS
HACKING
------------------------------------------------------
* Shipping static archive
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
- Split static archives into -static subpackge so that
we can keep track of packages really needing the archive.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list