[Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 13 02:35:57 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247


William Jon McCann <jmccann at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(jmccann at redhat.co |
                   |m)                          |




--- Comment #5 from William Jon McCann <jmccann at redhat.com>  2008-12-12 21:35:56 EDT ---
No, my understanding is that once the snprintf code (artistic license) is used
in LGPL code the derived work is entirely LGPL.  We do this all the time with
such liberally licensed code.  So the spec file header is correct.

I also don't see a requirement in the license conditions to ship LICENSE.txt.
Since the upstream code doesn't include it, I'm not sure it is a good idea to
add it on our own.  Especially since the entire work is LGPL.

I'll fix the pkgconfig part.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list