[Bug 476443] Review Request: perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Parser - Complete grammar for parsing VHDL code using perl
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 14 20:38:42 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476443
Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com> 2008-12-14 15:38:41 EDT ---
[x]source files match upstream:
95aab98d316ce5289e80840301da7dea8f7fffc4931506afaf092aec1c063fe3
Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12.tar.gz
[x]package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[x]specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
[x]dist tag is present.
[x]build root is correct.
[x]license field matches the actual license.
[x]license is open source-compatible.
[x]latest version is being packaged.
[x]BuildRequires are proper.
[x]compiler flags are appropriate.
[x]%clean is present.
[x]package builds in mock.
package installs properly.
NO, you need to add
find . -type f | xargs %{__perl} -pi -e 's|#! /bin/perl|#! /usr/bin/perl|'
to your spec file, the script are looking for perl in /bin/perl and it will not
install because rpm want a package that provides /bin/perl. When I added this
to the spec file after %setup it is happy.
[x]rpmlint is silent.
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x]%check is present and all tests pass:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nopDDm
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd Hardware-Vhdl-Parser-0.12
+ unset DISPLAY
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl
1..2
ok 1
Test 2
OK
[x]no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[x]no duplicates in %files.
[x]file permissions are appropriate.
[x]no scriptlets present.
[x]documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[x]%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
Once you have made that change I will approve the package. I made it locally
and it passes tests on a vhd file I made.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list