[Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568





--- Comment #7 from Till Maas <opensource at till.name>  2008-12-16 09:38:17 EDT ---
rpmlint output:
xmlto.spec:61: E: files-attr-not-set
- The %doc has to be below the %defattr

xmlto.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt

- OK

xmlto-tex.i686: W: no-documentation
- OK
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.

License is still not ok:

xmlto.in contains a GPLv2+ header, butxmlif.l and xmlif.c do not contain any
license information
Are they really GPLv2+, too? They seem to be individual programs to me. Can you
get the original author to verify the license and add license headers then?
Here is a howto for GPL licensing:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.