[Bug 468003] Review Request: qmtest - an automated software test execution tool.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003





--- Comment #27 from Stefan Seefeld <seefeld at sympatico.ca>  2008-12-18 14:13:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Well, 
> - I just noticed that many HTML files have "Generated by Epydoc 3.0.1"
>   comments. Does this mean that document HTML files in qmtest can be
> regenerated
>   by using epydoc (this is available in Fedora)?

Yes. Our released source tarballs already ship with them, though, so there is
no need to regenerate anything. (And, we have used different tools to generate
those docs in the past (such as HappyDoc or Synopsis), so I wouldn't want to
hardcode the use of epydoc into the spec file or the build system, for example.

> - By the way would you preserve the old %changelog entry?
>   ("initial package" for 2.4.1 don't seem proper)

Well, 2.4.1 is the first QMTest release for which I build rpm packages.

> (In reply to comment #25)
> > By the way, is there any reason why the source package name includes the build
> > platform ('fc9') ? 
> - Because rpmbuild -bs just expands %{?dist} value.

OK, I understand where the name is coming from. I don't understand whether
changing the name of the source rpm (removing the {?dist} tag) would be wrong.

But that was just out of interest. There is no need to rename anything.

Thanks,
          Stefan

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.