[Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839





--- Comment #13 from Nicoleau Fabien <nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com>  2008-12-19 13:45:00 EDT ---
Update :
Thank you for taking this review.
Update :
Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/phatch.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10.src.rpm

Changelog :
- Fix requires for nautilus-extension
- Licence file added to nautilus-extension
- No more docs subdirectory in documentation folder
- Fix version

> I am a gnome-ignorant. How do I test this extension? I couldn't find anything
> in nautilus related to phatch. But it's probably me. I always find gnome too
> confusing.

To test the extension : right-clicking must display 2 entries related to phatch
in the context-menu. Uninstalling phatch-nautilus-extension will make those
entries disapears (You have to log{on/off} when you (un)install the extension
to see differencies).

Package still build on koji :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010031

Rpmlint output :
[builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
/home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10.src.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/phatch-0.1.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/phatch-nautilus-extension-0.1.6-3.fc10.i386.rpm
phatch.i386: E: no-binary
phatch-nautilus-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
[builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.