[Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 20 02:11:43 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797


D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com |
                   |)                           |




--- Comment #3 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com>  2008-12-19 21:11:41 EDT ---
I hope no-one minds, but I have taken the liberty of updating this package, as
it is blocking a package that I am keen to complete.

SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-2.spec
SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/jrosetta-1.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm 

*Sat Dec 20 2008  <mycae(a!t)yahoo.com> 1.0.1-2
- Fix build paths to prevent setup from asking for user input
  after multiple builds
- Refresh source to match MD5.
- Update patch to match path change
- Corrected licence from GPL2+ to GPL2

I agree with the symlinking, as this is done in many java packages, where the
version of interest is installed in %{name}-%{version}.jar, and then a symlink
is made to this from %{name}.jar . Unless I have mis-interpreted the intent of
the command.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list