[Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199





--- Comment #3 from Ngo Than <than at redhat.com>  2008-12-22 16:33:44 EDT ---
http://than.fedorapeople.org/PolicyKit-kde-0.0-0.20081219svn.fc10.src.rpm
http://than.fedorapeople.org/PolicyKit-kde.spec

>This library calls itself "private", is it really? If nothing should link
>against it, we should not ship this symlink at all. But if it is getting linked
>against, it should be in a -devel package (even if that's the only file in
>-devel).
>The strange thing is: shouldn't there be some public API for the client
>library? Why is the only library in this package called "private"?

yes, it's private. There is no public API at the moment, but it will follow
later as Dario even told me.

>Missing "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
>Missing "%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

it's fixed


>I already mentioned this one in IRC, you said you uploaded a fixed specfile,
>but it's still broken in both the specfile and the SRPM which are now

it's fixed.

PS: Dario will move it to extragear soon and it will follow the KDE version
scheme in the future. our package will use 0.0 as version temporary, we will
fix it later when PolicyKit-kde official released.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.